Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Compare and Contrast OSPF and EIGRP in Terms of Where Summarization Takes Place?

    Uploaded by

    Mayu Kanes
    The document discusses filtering updates on router interfaces, passive interfaces in routing protocols, and summarization in OSPF and EIGRP. It then asks how the default keyword changes the operation of a set statement in a route map. Specifically, it discusses that RIP, OSPF, and EGRP can suppress outgoing updates on passive interfaces, while only OSPF suppresses incoming updates. It also notes that OSPF summarizes between areas at ABRs, while EIGRP can summarize internally or externally on any bit boundary using manual summarization. Finally, it asks how the default keyword affects the set statement in a route map.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Compare and Contrast OSPF and EIGRP in Terms of Where Summarization Takes Place?

    Uploaded by

    Mayu Kanes
    8 views1 page
    The document discusses filtering updates on router interfaces, passive interfaces in routing protocols, and summarization in OSPF and EIGRP. It then asks how the default keyword changes the operation of a set statement in a route map. Specifically, it discusses that RIP, OSPF, and EGRP can suppress outgoing updates on passive interfaces, while only OSPF suppresses incoming updates. It also notes that OSPF summarizes between areas at ABRs, while EIGRP can summarize internally or externally on any bit boundary using manual summarization. Finally, it asks how the default keyword affects the set statement in a route map.

    Original Description:

    ciso

    Original Title

    Rip Routinginf

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses filtering updates on router interfaces, passive interfaces in routing protocols, and summarization in OSPF and EIGRP. It then asks how the default keyword changes the operation of a set statement in a route map. Specifically, it discusses that RIP, OSPF, and EGRP can suppress outgoing updates on passive interfaces, while only OSPF suppresses incoming updates. It also notes that OSPF summarizes between areas at ABRs, while EIGRP can summarize internally or externally on any bit boundary using manual summarization. Finally, it asks how the default keyword affects the set statement in a route map.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    8 views1 page

    Compare and Contrast OSPF and EIGRP in Terms of Where Summarization Takes Place?

    Uploaded by

    Mayu Kanes
    The document discusses filtering updates on router interfaces, passive interfaces in routing protocols, and summarization in OSPF and EIGRP. It then asks how the default keyword changes the operation of a set statement in a route map. Specifically, it discusses that RIP, OSPF, and EGRP can suppress outgoing updates on passive interfaces, while only OSPF suppresses incoming updates. It also notes that OSPF summarizes between areas at ABRs, while EIGRP can summarize internally or externally on any bit boundary using manual summarization. Finally, it asks how the default keyword affects the set statement in a route map.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Why would you want to filter updates being sent out or coming in on a router interface?

    How is use of passive interface similar and different between RIPv2, O P! and "I#RP? Rip "I#RP O P! uppresses Outgoing updates uppresses Outgoing updates uppresses Outgoing updates $O% uppresses incoming updates uppresses incoming updates uppresses incoming updates $eighbors $O% $eighbors $O% $eighbors

    Compare and contrast OSPF and EIGRP in terms of where summarization takes place?

    "I#RP allows summari&ation at any "I#RP router interface in the domain' "I#RP performs an auto(summari&ation each time it crosses a border between two different ma)or networ*s' Or "I#RP allows you to summari&e internal and e+ternal routes on virtually any bit boundary using manual summari&ation' O P! can summari&e only at the ,-R and the , -R' Inter(area summary . ,s created at the ,-R are embedded in %ype / . ,s' "+ternal summary . ,s created at the , -R are embedded in %ype 0 . ,s'

    How does the default *eyword in a set statement in a route map change the operation of the set statement?

    You might also like