Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RheOlogy of Bio Process Fluids
RheOlogy of Bio Process Fluids
References Doran, Chapter 7 Blanch and Clark, Chapter 5 Atkinson and Mavituna, Chapter !lsvik, ". and #ristiansen, B., $%heolo&' of (ilamentous (ermentations$, Biotechnol. Adv., ), *+, - ,,./. Inter-relations between viscosity and broth processing
Medium
Cell 3rowth
2roduct (ormation
Cell Morpholo&'
4iscosit'
Bioreactor Conditions
5eat 8ransfer
Mi1in& %e7uirments
Mass 8ransfer
Rheology of Fermentation Fluids Bioreactor performance influenced b' broth rheolo&', which is determined b'0 biomass concentration morpholo&' biomass &rowth rate e1tracellular components
As these parameters t'picall' ver' throu&hout the course of a fermentation, so too will the rheolo&'.
correlations which describe viscosit' as a function of biomass concentration onl' are of limited value pol'mer solutions, paper pulp suspensions often used to simulate flow behaviour of fermentation broths, but the' do not include effects of active biomass on s'stem performance
Correlations for broth viscosity Vand equation for a suspension of spheres -volume fraction / in a 9ewtonian li7uid of viscosit' :0
= L ( + ).5 + 7.)5 ) )
:imited applicabilit'; valid for 'east<spore suspensions = . vol> solids. dependenc' of on biomass &enerall' stron&er than predicted b' 4and "7uation
Correlations for mycelial systems based on biomass concentration uthors Correlation 8akahashi and ?amada - ,@A/ . Deindorfer and 3aden - ,55/ ' ).+*).5 6olomons and Beston - ,@ / ).@5 -cell dr' wei&ht conc./, -shear stress/, ' -'ield stress/ Correlations for !ower-"aw Broths #ystem A. ni&er 2. chr'so&enum 6. levoris -Allen and %obinson, ,,A/ but %heolo&ical parameters -k, n, ' / also influenced b' specific &rowth rate, D!, osmotic pressure of medium. Cnsert pa&esD -!lsvik and #ristiansen/ Correlation k +.+ k ).5 k A.7
-metE et al., ,7,/ #p :h&uA.@ ' :eA.F ).5 Bhere :e is the h'phal len&th, :&hu is the h'phal &rowth unit -total h'phal len&th<no. of tips/ Correlation found to be applicable for batch e1periments, but not for continuous -possibl' due to differences in cell fle1ibilit'/ !ower law $odel
(atile - ,F5/ # A.+ dpA.) n *A.A@ dp*A.AF Bhere is the biomass concentration -dr' wei&ht/ and dp is the a&&re&ate diameter (re7uentl', as , # , n , but no simple relationship e1ists between solids concentration and rheolo&'.