Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stakeholder Management
Stakeholder Management
Summary of Changes
Version 0.2 0." 0.4 '.0 Date 2 Dec 04 # Dec. 04 % Dec. 04 '0 Dec 04
Summary of Changes/Comments
Initial Draft provided to ichard !riestly for comment. $pdated version with comments from ichard. $pdated version with comments from &usan. $pdated with comments from (ichael and released for approval.
Author
David )orthington, !(* +onsultant
Page 2 of 9
Introduction
Stakeholder identification and management is a key skill for all pro ect managers! program managers and e"ec#ti$es %collecti$ely called pro ect manager for the p#rpose of this paper&. Stakeholders are indi$id#als 'ho represent specific interest gro#ps ser$ed (y the o#tcomes and performance of a pro ect or program. Pro ect managers are acco#nta(le for the end)to) end management of their pro ects! incl#ding performance and e"pectation management of indi$id#als 'ho may (e o#tside their direct control. Pro ect managers m#st gi$e d#e consideration to the people iss#es s#rro#nding pro ects and recognise that the appropriate in$ol$ement and management of stakeholders is almost al'ays a critical s#ccess factor. Pro ect managers sho#ld therefore ha$e a formal stakeholder management process that is appropriate for the circ#mstances of the pro ect.
Start
$ 2e
ie'
Monitor outcomes and take correcti!e actions Plan acti!ities that need to be performed to ensure commitment
,ltho#gh the a(o$e steps can (e initiated in a logical se-#ence! they can also occ#r conc#rrently and iterati$ely. *he same steps are then #sed to re$ie' stakeholders and ens#re ongoing alignment.
*o identify pro ect stakeholders! de$elop a list of all indi$id#als 'ho 'ill ha$e an interest in the o#tcomes of yo#r pro ect. .ays of identifying key indi$id#als incl#de3 Perform a process impact analysis %'ho is impacted (y the c#rrent system! 'ho 'ill (e impacted (y the change introd#ced (y the pro ect4&5 6onsider indi$id#als in$ol$ed in the re-#irements gathering and scope definition process5 7ndertake a (enefits analysis %'ho 'ill (enefit from the sol#tion4&5 8e$elop a list of standard stakeholders %e.g. Ser$ice 8esk! technical s#pport! (#siness testers! (#siness o'ners! Policy 8irection professionals&5 Scan local comm#nity gro#ps! employer and employee associations! informal employee gro#p leaders %Social 6l#( President& etc. 8isc#ss 'ith other pro ect managers and re$ie' doc#mentation from similar pro ects #ndertaken in the past5 8isc#ss the list 'ith the Pro ect Sponsor and other stakeholders as the list de$elops.
*here are t'o forms that can (e #sed to capt#re details regarding yo#r stakeholders! depending on the a#dience and p#rpose of the ta(le. *he first form! the Stakeholder Plan! is for p#(lic #se and 'ill often (e incl#ded in pro ect related doc#ments! s#ch as 9#siness 6ases or Pro ect Statements. *he Stakeholder Plan 'ill generally (e a s#()set of a larger 8epartment! 8i$ision or 9ranch plan.
!osition0 Title
Director
Department0 *rganisation
+entral 23&
Interests
6 *wner of the process 6 1nsure that total IT spend within area is managed effectively 6 &ponsor and champion of IT governance process 6 !rovide direction and make -usiness decisions relating to IT &pend
3elen 4urke
2D5
3ead *ffice
4ill &mith
The second form, the &takeholder (ap, is for the personal use of the pro,ect manager and the management team. The &takeholder (ap is used to identify the level of support currently -eing received -y stakeholders and to map actions to maintain or increase that support. The &takeholder (ap is shown -elow.
Page 4 of 9
Commitment <ach stakeholder 'ill display a different le$el of commitment to the pro ect! e$en thro#gho#t the life of the pro ect. *he range of commitment to a pro ect is represented (y the follo'ing $al#es3 Committed (make it happen). *he stakeholder has committed to contri(#ting to the pro ect! prefera(ly in 'riting! and is a$aila(le to do so. *he commitment may (e doc#mented in the form of an agreed plan! descri(ing 'hat 'ill (e pro$ided and (y 'hen! or other forms of 'ritten comm#nication %e)mail! memo! letter! contract! statement of intent&5 Supporti!e (help it happen). *he stakeholder is 'ell informed! sees $al#e in 'hat is (eing done! #nderstands his/her contri(#tion and is 'illing to pro$ide it! altho#gh no formal commitment has (een entered into5 &eutral (let it happen). *he stakeholder may or may not (e informed a(o#t the pro ect and 'hile they do not disagree! they are not acti$ely in$ol$ed in any capacity! or may (e indifferent a(o#t the pro ect o( ecti$es and o#tcomes5
%isagrees (stop it from happening). *he stakeholder may or may not (e informed! (#t does not see $al#e in the pro ect and the 'ork (eing performed! he/she 'o#ld rather not (e in$ol$ed and in fact 'o#ld prefer the 'ork not to (e carried o#t at all. 2e$ie' each stakeholder and determine 'hat their c#rrent le$el of contri(#tion and commitment are! and enter their name in the stakeholder map.
Page + of 9
+ritical
Helen
+ontri-ution
Desira-le
Peter
iles
7on8 essential
!yron
Disagrees 7eutral
&upportive +ommitted
+ommitment
Target >o' identify 'here each stakeholder :needs; to (e to ens#re an ade-#ate le$el of contri(#tion and commitment to'ards the pro ect. *his 'ill reflect the ideal or target scenario for the pro ect. <nter each stakeholder0s name onto the map in the target position. =f the stakeholders target is f#rther right or #p'ards dra' an arro' from c#rrent to target. =f the stakeholder is c#rrently in the ideal position! simply circle the stakeholder0s name.
Page 6 of 9
+ritical
+ontri-ution
Desira-le
Peter
iles
iles
7on8 essential
!yron
Disagrees 7eutral
&upportive +ommitted
+ommitment
Step * %e!elop an action plan
=dentifying any o(stacles to the f#ll contri(#tion and commitment of a stakeholder is the first step to'ards identifying any acti$ities that may ser$e to remo$e these o(stacles. =t is therefore a good practice to identify any s#ch o(stacles d#ring stakeholder analysis so that they can (e taken into acco#nt 'hen planning. ?(stacles co#ld incl#de items s#ch as3 @ack of kno'ledge and information5 .as not s#fficiently engaged d#ring planning and decision)making5 Aas not yet (een re-#ested to participate5 =s already committed to another pro ect or responsi(ility and is not a$aila(le5 6annot (e made a$aila(le d#e to e"pected location and d#ration5 8oes not agree 'ith the changes (eing proposed! sees the changes as a potential threat5 8oes not ha$e the re-#isite le$el of a#thority to (e a(le to contri(#te effecti$ely5 8oes not ha$e the re-#isite skills to (e a(le to contri(#te effecti$ely5 =s in conflict 'ith other stakeholders5 =s an e"ternal pro$ider and no formal agreement has yet (een p#t in place5 *here may (e do#(ts a(o#t the capa(ility! sta(ility or a$aila(ility of an e"ternal s#pplier! cons#ltant or contractor.
9ased on the positioning of stakeholders on the Stakeholder Map and on the o(stacles that ha$e (een identified! appropriate acti$ities can (e listed and incl#ded in an action plan.
Page B of 9
*he main p#rpose of these acti$ities is to remo$e the o(stacles and infl#ence stakeholders to'ards the desired state! rather than necessarily all the 'ay to the committed le$el. /or e"ample! 'hilst it is preferential to ha$e the 8irector)Ceneral! 8ep#ty 8irector)Ceneral! ,rea 6<?s and the selected soft'are $endor 6ommitted! a social! clinical or related (#siness #nit leader co#ld (e enco#raged to (e s#pporti$e %say! acti$ely promote the pro ect& rather than ignore the pro ect %ne#tral&. *he le$el of effort e"pended on each stakeholder sho#ld (e eno#gh to mo$e them to the desired state! and then maintain that state thro#gho#t the pro ect. =ncreasing and maintaining the contri(#tion of stakeholders that are already in agreement or committed also increases the likelihood of a s#ccessf#l pro ect. Special care needs to (e taken 'hen dealing 'ith critical and desira(le stakeholders that are in disagreement. =f it is not possi(le to o(tain their commitment then it (ecomes necessary to red#ce the pro ect0s dependence on their contri(#tion %mo$e them from critical or desira(le to non)essential&. *he first step in dealing 'ith disagreement sho#ld al'ays (e that of listening! #nderstanding and ackno'ledging iss#es and concerns. *he follo'ing ta(le may (e #sed to identify the actions that need to (e taken to increase stakeholders0 commitment to the pro ect Stakeholder Management Plan *arget Primary ,ctions @e$el 2elationship
6ritical 6ommitte d 9ill >iles 8esira(le S#pporti$e 8esira(le 6ommitte d >on) essential >e#tral 9ill .eekly Meeting one)on)one. =n$ite to 'eekly pro ect (riefings. ,ttends stat#s and steering committee. =an to meet monthly prior to steering comm. ,sk for commitment to fill ,cting 6hair role 'hen Aelen is a'ay. .eekly meeting one)on)one. Aold informal Phase 2 disc#ssions 'hen Pa#l is in to'n. ,rrange $endor site $isit for Dan#ary. 8isc#ss incl#sion in 'eekly stat#s meetings %confirm 'ith Aelen first&. Pro$ide ind#stry scan doc#ments to sho' reasoning for decisions to)date. =ncrease one)on)one meetings from monthly to fortnightly. /ortnightly one)on)one meetings to disc#ss pro ect stat#s. 7nderstand role and d#ration. 7nderstand po'er (ase. 8isc#ss role of 7nion 6ons#ltati$e 6ommittee in f#t#re planning sessions. =n$ite as o(ser$er. S#ggest coffee after ne"t stat#s meeting.
Stakeholder
<rnie
6#rrent @e$el
6ritical >e#tral
Aelen
9ill
Peter
=an
9yron
Pete
Page E of 9
Page 9 of 9