Life-Cycle Cost Assessment of RC and Engineered Cementitous Composite Frames Using Structural Optimization

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Life-Cycle Cost Assessment of RC and Engineered Cementitous Composite Frames using Structural Optimization

Eric Liu

Objective

Objective
Investigate

use of ECC to reduce Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) of structural frames and improve the performance at different limit states.

ECC vs Typical Concrete

What is ECC?

Ultra Ductile Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Composite


ECC:

5% tensile strain capacity


Concrete: 0.01% tensile strain capacity

Typical ECC

500 times Typical Concrete

Minimum Fiber Reinforcement ~ 2% of volume


If If

less then behaves like typical Fiber-Reinforced Composite more then brittle failure

Flexural Bending

Tensile Stress Strain Graph

Shear Stress-Strain Graph

Drift Comparison

What is LCC?

Takes into account the entirety of the structures lifespan


Initial

Cost
Use (concrete, reinforcement) Cost (I.E.: Placing steel reinforcement)

Material

Construction

Future

Cost
Cost due to Seismic Damage

Retrofitting

LCC: ECC Advantages vs Disadvantages

Advantages
No/shear less

reinforcement, less construction time


cosmetic repair and structural retrofit 3x more expensive than typical concrete

Disadvantages
ECC

Methodology

Objective

Investigate use of ECC to reduce Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) of structural frames and improve the performance at different limit states.
R/C R/ECC R/C with R/ECC joint

3 Frames: 2-Story 2-Bay


Frame

Flow Chart

Design Variables

ASCE

ACI
Japan Society of Civil Engineers Building Construction Cost Data Zeus NL Earthquake Motions

Cost

Inelastic Dynamic Analysis


LCC Assessment: Repair Cost

FEMA Drift criteria (1%, 2%, 4%)

Questions

You might also like