Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Draft Directive Governing The Award of Damages To Victims of Anti-Competitive Practices: Removal From The Commission's Agenda

    Uploaded by

    jordijauma
    49 views1 page
    Draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices: removal from the Commission's agenda The draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices was due to have been approved within the Commission as a whole on 7 October 2009. Surprisingly, however, the item concerned was apparently ‘dropped’ from the Commission’s agenda. Why did this happen? For how long does the Commission intend to put off the approval of the draft directive? Commissioner Kroes regarded the matter at issue as a priority, given that the directive would establish a Europe-wide right whereby victims of a business cartel or of abuse of a dominant position would be entitled to compensation. Could the Commission explain its reasons for postponing the decision on this matter?

    Original Title

    Draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices: removal from the Commission's agenda

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices: removal from the Commission's agenda The draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices was due to have been approved within the Commission as a whole on 7 October 2009. Surprisingly, however, the item concerned was apparently ‘dropped’ from the Commission’s agenda. Why did this happen? For how long does the Commission intend to put off the approval of the draft directive? Commissioner Kroes regarded the matter at issue as a priority, given that the directive would establish a Europe-wide right whereby victims of a business cartel or of abuse of a dominant position would be entitled to compensation. Could the Commission explain its reasons for postponing the decision on this matter?

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    49 views1 page

    Draft Directive Governing The Award of Damages To Victims of Anti-Competitive Practices: Removal From The Commission's Agenda

    Uploaded by

    jordijauma
    Draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices: removal from the Commission's agenda The draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices was due to have been approved within the Commission as a whole on 7 October 2009. Surprisingly, however, the item concerned was apparently ‘dropped’ from the Commission’s agenda. Why did this happen? For how long does the Commission intend to put off the approval of the draft directive? Commissioner Kroes regarded the matter at issue as a priority, given that the directive would establish a Europe-wide right whereby victims of a business cartel or of abuse of a dominant position would be entitled to compensation. Could the Commission explain its reasons for postponing the decision on this matter?

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    WRITTEN QUESTION P-5106/09

    by Ramón Jáuregui Atondo (S-D)


    to the Commission

    Subject: Draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive


    practices: removal from the Commission's agenda

    The draft directive governing the award of damages to victims of anti-competitive practices was due
    to have been approved within the Commission as a whole on 7 October 2009. Surprisingly, however,
    the item concerned was apparently ‘dropped’ from the Commission’s agenda. Why did this happen?

    For how long does the Commission intend to put off the approval of the draft directive?

    Commissioner Kroes regarded the matter at issue as a priority, given that the directive would
    establish a Europe-wide right whereby victims of a business cartel or of abuse of a dominant position
    would be entitled to compensation.

    Could the Commission explain its reasons for postponing the decision on this matter?

    792811.EN PE 429.912

    You might also like