Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Article Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Muhamad Nazrul Boyoteen
    17 views1 page
    This document is an article review form for the URISA Journal. It asks the reviewer to answer yes or no questions about key elements of the article such as whether the title and abstract are appropriate, the purpose is clearly stated, the methods are sound, the conclusions are supported, and the writing is clear. The reviewer is also asked to provide specific comments and suggestions and to recommend whether the article should be published as is, published with changes, rejected but encouraged to be revised, or rejected without encouragement to rewrite.

    Original Description:

    RPH NEW

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an article review form for the URISA Journal. It asks the reviewer to answer yes or no questions about key elements of the article such as whether the title and abstract are appropriate, the purpose is clearly stated, the methods are sound, the conclusions are supported, and the writing is clear. The reviewer is also asked to provide specific comments and suggestions and to recommend whether the article should be published as is, published with changes, rejected but encouraged to be revised, or rejected without encouragement to rewrite.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    17 views1 page

    Article Review Form

    Uploaded by

    Muhamad Nazrul Boyoteen
    This document is an article review form for the URISA Journal. It asks the reviewer to answer yes or no questions about key elements of the article such as whether the title and abstract are appropriate, the purpose is clearly stated, the methods are sound, the conclusions are supported, and the writing is clear. The reviewer is also asked to provide specific comments and suggestions and to recommend whether the article should be published as is, published with changes, rejected but encouraged to be revised, or rejected without encouragement to rewrite.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    ARTICLE REVIEW FORM URISA JOURNAL Name of Article Reviewer: Date of Review: Title of Article: Author of Article: Please

    answer YES or NO to the following questions and add further comments as a ro riate! "! The article title is a ro riate! #! The a$stract accuratel% reflects the content! &! The ur ose or thesis of the article is stated clearl%! '! The ur orted significance of the article is e( licitl% stated! )! The article adequatel% ties to the relevant literature! *! The research stud% methods are sound and a ro riate! +! The literature review and research stud% methods are e( lained clearl%! ,! The rimar% thesis is argued ersuasivel%! -! The writing is clear concise and interesting! ".! All figures/ ta$les/ and hotos are necessar% and a ro riate! ""! The conclusions or summar% are accurate and su orted $% the content! "#! The article is of interest to man% 0R1SA mem$ers! Specific Reviewer Comments an S!""estions: 2These comments ma% $e in addition to or in lieu of reviewer comments inserted into the te(t of the article! 0se as man% lines as needed!3

    Reviewer Recommen ation: Please indicate which of the following actions %ou recommend! 2 3 "! Pu$lish/ no significant alterations suggested! 2 3 #! Pu$lish/ $ut suggest changes to the article as s ecified in this review! 2 3 &! Pu$lish/ $ut suggestions as s ecified in this review must $e addressed $% either ma4ing e( laining wh% changes would $e ina ro riate 2 3 5hec4 here if altered article should $e resu$mitted to the reviewer 2 3 '! Re6ect/ $ut encourage author to tr% a ma6or revision and a second eer review 2 3 )! Re6ect/ do not encourage a rewrite 7urther Reviewer 5omments Regarding Dis osition of the Article:

    changes or

    You might also like