Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures
Approximate Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures
! ! !
Trusses Vertical Loads on Building Frames Lateral Loads on Building Frames: Portal Method Lateral Loads on Building Frames: Cantilever Method Problems
Method 1 : If the diagonals are intentionally designed to be long and slender, it is reasonable to assume that the panel shear is resisted entirely by the tension diagonal, whereas the compressive diagonal is assumed to be a zero-force member. Method 2 : If the diagonal members are intended to be constructed from large rolled sections such as angles or channels, we will assume that the tension and compression diagonals each carry half the panel shear.
Example 1 Determine (approximately) the forces in the members of the truss shown in Figure. The diagonals are to be designed to support both tensile and compressive forces, and therefore each is assumed to carry half the panel shear. The support reactions have been computed.
F 3m A 4m 10 kN
C B 20 kN 4m
20 kN F 3m A 4m 10 kN 20 kN F C B 20 kN 4m 10 kN + !MF"= 0: FAB(3) - 8.33cos36.87o(3) = 0 FAB = 6.67 kN (T) E D + !MA"= 0: FFE(3) - 8.33cos36.87o(3) = 0 FFE = 6.67 kN (C)
#"= 36.87o
FFE V = 10 kN A FAF 8.33 # 6.67 kN 10 kN 20 - 10 - 2Fsin(36.87o) = 0 F = 8.33 kN FFB = 8.33 kN (T) FAE = 8.33 kN (C) + !Fy = 0: FAF - 10 - 8.33sin(36.87o) = 0 FAF = 15 kN (T)
#
3m A + !Fy = 0:
FFB= F F =F # AE FAB
10 kN
#"= 36.87o
V = 10 kN
D 3m C 10 kN
#"= 36.87o
6.67 kN 8.33 kN #
FDC
+ !Fy = 0:
+ !Fy = 0:
#"= 36.87o
6.67 kN 8.33 kN #
E # FEB
6.67 kN 8.33 kN
+ !MC"= 0:
+ !MD"= 0:
Example 2 Determine (approximately) the forces in the members of the truss shown in Figure. The diagonals are slender and therefore will not support a compressive force. The support reactions have been computed. 10 kN J 4m A 40 kN 4m B 4m C 4m D 4m E 40 kN 20 kN I 20 kN H 20 kN G 10 kN F
10 kN J 4m A 40 kN FAI = 0 + !Fy = 0: 40 - 10 - FJBcos 45o = 0 FJB = 42.43 kN (T) + !MA"= 0: FJI(4) - 42.43sin 45o(4) = 0 FJI = 30 kN (C) + !MJ"= 0: FAB(4) = 0 FAB = 0
45o
FJB
#
40 kN
FAI = 0 FAB
FJA = 40 kN (C)
FIC
FIH V = 10 kN
FBH = 0 FBC
10 kN J 4m A 40 kN + !MB"= 0:
20 kN I
45o
FIC
FIH V = 10 kN
42.3 kN 0 + !Fy = 0:
45o
FBI
45o 0 45o
4m B
FBH = 0 FBC
30 kN
FIH(4) - 14.14sin
45o(4)
+ 10(4) - 40(4) = 0
14.14 kN 30 kN
45o
FCH
14.14 kN
45o
30 kN
Assumptions for Approximate Analysis column w girder A L (a) w B point of zero 0.21L 0.21L moment L (b) w B L Simply supported (c) A B w assumed points of zero moment 0.1L L column
0.1L
10
Example 3 Determine (approximately) the moment at the joints E and C caused by members EF and CD of the building bent in the figure. 1 kN/m E F
1 kN/m C D
A 6m
11
1 kN/m
1 kN/m
4.8 kN
4.8 m 0.1L=0.6 m 0.6 m 0.6 kN 0.6(0.3) + 2.4(0.6) = 1.62 kNm 3 kN 0.6 m 2.4 kN
2.4 kN 2.4 kN
12
Ph/2 Ph/2
l (a) Ph/2 Ph/2 Ph/l h P/2 (d) Ph/l (c) L/2 P P/2
P/2 Ph/l
13
Frames : Fixed-Supported P h P h
$ assumed hinges
L/2 h/2
Ph/4 (d)
Ph/4
Ph/2l
14
assumed hinges
#
h/3
(b)
15
Example 4 Determine by approximate methods the forces acting in the members of the Warren portal shown in the figure. 2m 40 kN C 2m B 4m 7m H G D 4m 2m E F
A 8m
16
2m 40 kN C 2m B 3.5 m J 40/2 = 20 kN = V N N D
4m
G K
20 kN = V
V = 20 kN 3.5 m A V = 20 kN N M 20 kN = V N I
17
2m 40 kN C FCD D 2m B 3.5 m J 20 kN 27.5 kN + !Fy = 0: -27.5 + FBDcos 45o = 0 FBD = 38.9 kN (T) + !MB"= 0: FCD(2) - 40(2) - 20(3.5) = 0 FCD = 75 kN (C) + !MD"= 0: FBH(2) + 27.5(2) - 20(5.5) = 0 FBH = 27.5 kN (T) + !MG"= 0: + !Fy = 0: F 45o BD FBH E FGH
2m FEF F FEG
45o
2m 3.5 m K
20 kN = V 27.5 kN 27.5 - FEGcos 45o = 0 FEG = 38.9 kN (C) FEF(2) - 20(3.5) = 0 FEF = 35 kN (T) + !ME"= 0: FGH(2) + 27.5(2) - 20(5.5) = 0 FGH = 27.5 kN (C)
18
y 38.9 kN 75 kN
45o
y FHE
45o
FDE
45o
x FDH
27.5 kN
45o
27.5 kN
38.9 kN + !Fy = 0:
+ !Fy = 0:
+ !F = 0: x
19
(b)
20
Example 5 Determine by approximate methods the forces acting in the members of the Warren portal shown in the figure.
5 kN B
3m A 4m C 4m E 4m H
21
5 kN B
3m
I A 4m C
J E 4m
K H 4m
5 kN B 1.5 m V Iy I
2V Jy + !F = 0: x
2V Ky 5 - 6V = 0 V = 0.833 kN
L Ly
22
5 kN B 1.5 m 0.833 kN I
2m
4.167 kN 4.167 kN M
2m D
2m N 1.5 m J
2.501kN
0.625 kN
0.625 kN 1.666 kN
0.625kN
0.625 kN 1.5 m L
0.625 kN I 1.5 m 0.625 kN J 1.5 m A C 0.833 kN 1.25 kNm 0.833kN 1.666 kN K 1.5 m E 1.666 kN
L 1.5 m H 0.625 kN
23
Example 6 Determine (approximately) the reactions at the base of the columns of the frame shown in Fig. 7-14a. Use the portal method of analysis.
20 kN
I 5m
30 kN
F 6m
A 8m
B 8m
24
20 kN
G O
H P
S Q N F L C 8m
I 5m
30 kN
D J A
E K B
6m
8m
25
20 kN V
2.5 m Oy 2V Py V Py
+ !F = 0: x 20 kN G 5m 30 kN D 3m V Jy
20 - 4V = 0 H
V = 5 kN I
2V
Ky
Ly
+ !F = 0: x
20 + 30 - 4V = 0
V = 12.5 kN
26
20 kN
4m R
Ry = 3.125 kN Rx = 15 kN
R 15 kN
3.125 kN 4m H 4m
Sy = 3.125 kN Sx = 5 kN
2.5 m 10 kN
Ky = 0 kN K B Bx = 0 25 kN 3m Bx = 25 kN MB = 75 kNm
27
beam (a)
In summary, using the cantilever method, the following assumptions apply to a fixed-supported frame. 1. A hinge is place at the center of each girder, since this is assumed to be point of zero moment. 2. A hinge is placed at the center of each column, since this is assumed to be a point of zero moment. 3. The axial stress in a column is proportional to its distance from the centroid of the cross-sectional areas of the columns at a given floor level. Since stress equals force per area, then in the special case of the columns having equal cross-sectional areas, the force in a column is also proportional to its distance from the centroid of the column areas.
28
Example 7 Determine (approximately) the reactions at the base of the columns of the frame shown. The columns are assumed to have equal crossectional areas. Use the cantilever method of analysis. 30 kN C D 4m B 15 kN 4m A 6m F E
29
30 kN
C I 4m B H J G D K E L F 6m
15 kN 4m A
6m
30
30 kN
C 2m Hx Hy
3m I M
3m D Kx Ky
+ !MM"= 0:
H y % K y % 10 kN
30 kN
C I 4m B H J 3m N Gy Ly 3m Lx D K E
+ !MN"= 0:
15 kN 2m Gx
G y % L y % 35 kN
31
30 kN 2m
Iy = 10 kN 3m Ix = 15 kN
I 15 kN
10 kN 3m D 2m
Hx = 15 kN
10 kN H 2m 15 kN 2m Gx = 22.5 kN 35 kN 35 kN G A Ax = 35 kN 15 kN J 3m G
25 kN Lx = 22.5 kN
32
Example 8 Show how to determine (approximately) the reactions at the base of the columns of the frame shown. The columns have the crossectional areas show. Use the cantilever of analysis. 35 kN 4 mL 45 kN 6 mE P 6000 mm2 I Q R O 6000 mm2
F 6000 mm2 A 6m
H 6000 mm2 D
33
35 kN 4 mL 45 kN 6 mE A
P M I
Q N J
R O K
F B 6m 4m
G C 8m
H D
6000 mm2 6m
6000 mm2 8m
~ x A 6000(0) & 5000(6) & 4000(10) & 6000(18) ' % x% % 8.48 m A 6000 & 5000 & 4000 & 6000 '
34
35 kN 2m Lx Ly
P Mx My
Q Nx Ny 2.48 m 1.52 m
R Ox
Oy 9.52 m -----(1)
8.48 m + !MNA"= 0:
Since any column stress ) is proportional to its distance from the neutral axis
)M
2.48
% %
)L
8.48
; ;
)M % )N %
My 5000(10 ) Ny 4000(10 )
(6 (6
% %
( ( ( ( ( ( 2) ( ( ( ( ( (3)
)N
1.52
)L
8.48
)O
9.52
)L
8.48
)O %
9.52 )L ; 8.48
Oy 6000(10 (6 )
( ( ( ( ( ( 4)
Ly = 3.508 kN Ny = 0.419 kN
My = 0.855 kN Oy = 3.938 kN
35
Hy
Since any column stress ) is proportional to its distance from the neutral axis ; Fy Ey )F ) 2.48 2.48 % E ; )F % )E ; % ( ) ( ( ( ( ( (6) (6 (6 2.48 8.48 8.48 5000(10 ) 8.48 6000(10 )
)G
1.52
% %
)E
8.48
; ;
)G %
1.52 )E ; 8.48
Gy 4000(10 (6 ) Hy
( ( ( ( ( (7) ( ( ( ( ( (8)
)H
9.52
)E
8.48
9.52 )H % )E ; 8.48
36
35 kN 2m Lx= 5.262 kN
3m
3.508 kN 3.508 kN 2m 5.262 kN Iy= 15.536 kN I Ix= 114.702 kN 3m 19.044 kN 19.044 kN E 3m Ax = 19.044 kN Ax = 64.44 kN MA = 193.32 kNm 64.44 kN One can continue to analyze the other segments in sequence, i.e., PQM, then MJFI, then FB, and so on.
45 kN
3m Ex= 64.44 kN
37