PROV 106: Research Methods Summary Writing Assignments Evaluation Checklist Student Name: Seaeun Lee Grade: 76/100

You missed the authors main idea for this chapter. Although some of your supporting ideas were good, others were not necessary (did not add support to the main idea). Please read my comments and see me if you have any questions. Introduction: 30 points
States title and type of source Briefly provides author/source credentials States the central idea(s) Strong Evidence 30-25 pts Some Evidence 24-20 pts Little / No Evidence 19-0 pts

Comments: 22/30 Paragraph not well constructed (one very long sentence). Main idea is incomplete. Comments: 22/30 No explanation of poverty traps or nutrition poverty traps. Some information not necessary.

Body: 30 points
States supporting ideas in a logical order Defines key terms used by author (if necessary) Provides a neutral and objective tone using reporting verbs (does not give personal opinion)

Strong Evidence 30-25 pts

Some Evidence 24-20 pts

Little / No Evidence 19-0 pts

Conclusion: 20 points
Re-states authors main idea Gives specific reason for selecting this source (develop research question etc.)

Strong Evidence 20-17pts

Some Evidence 16-14 pts

Little / No Evidence 13-0 pts

Comments: 13/20

APA Citation & Copy of Source: 10 points

Provides a full reference of the source in APA format with no errors

Strong Evidence 10-9 pts Strong Evidence 10-9 pts

Some Evidence 8-6 pts

Little / No Evidence 5-0 pts

Comments: 10/10

Language and Format 10 points

Has few grammar/spelling errors that do not affect reader comprehension Follows format specified by instructor

Some Evidence 8-6 pts

Little / No Evidence 5-0 pts

Comments: 9/10 Some awkward phrases.