Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hon'ble Alok Singh, J (Oral) .: in The High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital Writ Petition No. 730 of 2014 (M/S)

    Uploaded by

    VishnuParshad
    5 views1 page
    The petitioner Sakshi Singh filed a writ petition against the State of Uttarakhand regarding her application for a caste certificate dated October 1st, 2013 that was not being decided upon by respondents 2 and 3. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State submitted that an appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for a caste certificate would be made within two weeks and communicated to both the petitioner and her counsel. In light of this statement, the petitioner's counsel agreed for the petition to be disposed of accordingly.

    Original Description:

    6

    Original Title

    6

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The petitioner Sakshi Singh filed a writ petition against the State of Uttarakhand regarding her application for a caste certificate dated October 1st, 2013 that was not being decided upon by respondents 2 and 3. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State submitted that an appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for a caste certificate would be made within two weeks and communicated to both the petitioner and her counsel. In light of this statement, the petitioner's counsel agreed for the petition to be disposed of accordingly.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    5 views1 page

    Hon'ble Alok Singh, J (Oral) .: in The High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital Writ Petition No. 730 of 2014 (M/S)

    Uploaded by

    VishnuParshad
    The petitioner Sakshi Singh filed a writ petition against the State of Uttarakhand regarding her application for a caste certificate dated October 1st, 2013 that was not being decided upon by respondents 2 and 3. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State submitted that an appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for a caste certificate would be made within two weeks and communicated to both the petitioner and her counsel. In light of this statement, the petitioner's counsel agreed for the petition to be disposed of accordingly.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.

    730 of 2014 (M/S)

    Sakshi Singh Versus State of Uttarakhand and others

    ..Petitioner ..Respondents

    Present: Mr. Pramod Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/Respondents.

    Honble Alok Singh, J (Oral). The only grievance of the petitioner is that despite moving application dated 1.10.2013 to obtain caste certificate, respondent nos. 2 & 3 are sitting over the matter and not taking decision thereon for the reasons best known to the respondents. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that an appropriate decision in accordance with law shall be taken on the application of the petitioner seeking caste certificate, preferably within two weeks from today and decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner as well as Mr. Pramod Belwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by Registered Post AD. Mr. Pramod Belwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that let present petition be disposed of in the light of the statement made by Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. Order accordingly. CLMA No. 3211 of 2014 also stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) 9.4.2014
    Avneet

    You might also like