Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 191

SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION

IN

POLITICAL LAW
ARRANGED BY TOPIC

(1987 2006)
Edited and Arranged by:

Atty. Janette Laggui-Icao and Atty. Alex Andrew P. Icao


(Silliman University College of Law) J ly 26! 200" U#$ate$ %y&

Romualdo L. Seeris II, LLB.


'#ril 19! 2007

(rom t)e '*S+,-S ./ 0'- ,1'23*'.3/* 4U,S.3/*S in 5/L3.3C'L L'+ %y t)e


UP LAW COMPLEX an$ PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION O LAW SCHOOLS

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

(/-+'-6
T is wor! is not intended "or sale or commerce. T is wor! is "reeware. It may #e "reely co$ied and distri#uted. It is $rimarily intended "or all t ose w o desire to a%e a dee$er understanding o" t e issues touc ed #y t e P ili$$ine Bar &xaminations and its trend. It is s$ecially intended "or law students "rom t e $ro%inces w o, %ery o"ten, are reci$ients o" deli#erately distorted notes "rom ot er unscru$ulous law

sc ools and students. S are to ot ers t is wor! and you will #e ric ly rewarded #y 'od in ea%en. It is also %ery good !arma.

(e would li!e to see! t e indulgence o" t e reader "or some Bar )uestions w ic im$ro$erly classi"ied under a to$ic and "or some to$ics w ic

are

are im$ro$erly or a%e $re$ared

ignorantly $ rased, "or t e aut ors are *ust Bar Re%iewees w o

t is wor! w ile re%iewing "or t e Bar &xams under time constraints and wit in t eir limited !nowledge o" t e law. (e would li!e to see! t e reader+s indulgence "or a lot o" ty$ogra$ ical errors in t is wor!.

T e Aut ors

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"

.'0L, /( C/*.,*.S
!#$% CONSTITUTION O THE PHILIPPINES.................................................................,Phil Con 87; New Features (1991)...................................................................................,Phil Con 87; People Power (1987)...................................................................................,Phil Con 87; People Power (2000)...................................................................................,. Phil Con 87; People Power (2003)...................................................................................,. Nature of the Constitution: Constitutional Supre a!" (200#).....................................,. $o%ern ent Presi&ential For %s' Parlia entar" For (()*200))...........................,. ARTICLE I Nati&na' Territ&ry.........................................................................................,/ +r!hipela,i! -o!trine (1989).............................................................................................,/ Conti,uous .one %s' /0!lusi%e /!ono i! .one (200#)...............................................,/ /0!lusi%e /!ono i! .one; 1i,hts of the Coastal State (199#)...................................,/ /0!lusi%e /!ono i! .one; 1i,hts of the Coastal State ((1*2002)............................,0 Fla, State %s' Fla, of Con%enien!e (200#)....................................................................,0 3erritor" 4 $o%ern ent (199)).........................................................................................,0 3erritorial Sea %s' 5nternal 6aters (200#).......................................................................,0 ARTICLE II De('arati&n &) Prin(i*'e+ and State P&'i(ie+........................................,1 +r e& For!es; Ser%ant of the People (2003).................................................................,1 -o!trine of 5n!orporation; Constitutional 7aw (1997)....................................................,1 -o!trine of 5n!orporation; Pa!ta Sunt Ser%an&a (2000)...............................................,1 Free&o fro Nu!lear 6eapons; Forei,n 8ilitar" 9ases (1988)...............................,1 Philippine Fla, ((#*200))..................................................................................................,2 Prin!iple of Ci%ilian Supre a!" (()*200)).....................................................................,2 State 5 unit" fro Suit (1991).......................................................................................,2 State 5 unit" fro Suit (199)).......................................................................................34 State 5 unit" fro Suit (1989)......................................................................................34 State 5 unit" fro Suit (199#).......................................................................................3, State 5 unit" fro Suit (1992).......................................................................................3, State 5 unit" fro Suit (1999).......................................................................................33 State 5 unit" fro Suit (1999).......................................................................................33 State 5 unit" fro Suit (1987).......................................................................................33 State 5 unit" %s' 6ai%er of 5 unit" (1997)..............................................................33 State 5 unit" fro Suit (1993).......................................................................................35 State Prin!iples 4 Poli!ies (199#)....................................................................................35 3ransparen!"; 8atters of Pu:li! 5nterest (1989)............................................................33ransparen!"; 8atters of Pu:li! 5nterest (2000)............................................................3. ARTICLE III Bi'' &) Rig,t+.................................................................................................3. 9ill of +ttain&er (1987)........................................................................................................3. 9ill of +ttain&er (1990)........................................................................................................3/ Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; /0tra;u&i!ial Confession (2001).............................................3/ Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; /0tra;u&i!ial Confession; Poli!e 7ine*<p (199#).................3/ Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; Poli!e 7ine*<p (1997)..............................................................30 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,ht to Counsel (1988)...........................................................30 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,ht to Counsel (1993)...........................................................30 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,ht to Counsel (2000)...........................................................31 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,ht to Counsel; 1e!eipt of Propert" Sei=e& (2002).........31 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,hts (1990).............................................................................32 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,hts (1993).............................................................................32 Custo&ial 5n%esti,ation; 1i,hts (199)).............................................................................54
BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-ou:le >eopar&" (1988)....................................................................................................54 -ou:le >eopar&" (1993)....................................................................................................5, -ou:le >eopar&" (1997)....................................................................................................5, -ou:le >eopar&" (1999)....................................................................................................53 -ou:le >eopar&" (1999)....................................................................................................53 -ou:le >eopar&" (2000)....................................................................................................53 -ou:le >eopar&" (2001)....................................................................................................53 -ou:le >eopar&" (2002)....................................................................................................55 -ou:le >eopar&"; 1e?uisites (1999)...............................................................................55 -ue Pro!ess; +:sen!e of -enial (1999).........................................................................55 -ue Pro!ess; -eportation (199#).....................................................................................5-ue Pro!ess; Forfeiture Pro!ee&in,s (1993).................................................................5. -ue Pro!ess; 8e&ia Co%era,e &urin, @earin, (199)).................................................5. -ue Pro!ess; 8eetin, %s' @earin, (1999)......................................................................5. -ue Pro!ess; Noti!e :" Pu:li!ation (1988)....................................................................5. -ue Pro!ess; Per it to Carr" Firear Autsi&e 1esi&en!e (()*200))......................5/ -ue Pro!ess; PP+*Pilots (2001)......................................................................................5/ -ue Pro!ess; Pro!e&ural %s' Su:stanti%e (1999)..........................................................50 -ue Pro!ess; Pro%isional Ar&er (1991)...........................................................................50 -ue Pro!ess; Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hers (2002)...............................................................50 -ue Pro!ess; 1a&io Station (1987).................................................................................51 -ue Pro!ess; 1epresente& :" a Non*7aw"er (1988)...................................................51 -ue Pro!ess; Su:stanti%e (2003).....................................................................................51 -ue Pro!ess; Suspension of -ri%erBs 7i!ense (1992)...................................................51 -ue Pro!ess; <r,ent Pu:li! Nee& (1987).......................................................................52 / inent -o ain; $arnish ent (199#)............................................................................52 / inent -o ain; $arnish ent (1998)............................................................................-4 / inent -o ain; i unit" fro suit (2001)..................................................................-4 / inent -o ain; 5n&ire!t Pu:li! 9enefit (1990)............................................................-4 / inent -o ain; >ust Co pensation (1988).................................................................-4 / inent -o ain; >ust Co pensation (1989).................................................................-, / inent -o ain; >ust Co pensation (1998).................................................................-, / inent -o ain; 7e,al 5nterest (1993)...........................................................................-, / inent -o ain; Non*o:ser%an!e of the poli!" of Call or noneC (2000)....................-3 / inent -o ain; Power to /0er!ise (2002)...................................................................-3 / inent -o ain; Pu:li! <se (1987)................................................................................-3 / inent -o ain; So!iali=e& @ousin, (199)).................................................................-5 / inent -o ain; 6rit of Possession (1993)..................................................................-5 /?ual Prote!tion; +lien / plo" ent (1989)...................................................................-/?ual Prote!tion; 5n%i&ious -is!ri ination (1987).........................................................-/?ual Prote!tion; 5n%i&ious -is!ri ination (1987).........................................................-. /?ual Prote!tion; Poli!e Power (2000)............................................................................-. /?ual Prote!tion; 1i,ht to /&u!ation (199#)..................................................................-. /?ual Prote!tion; Su:si&iar" 5 prison ent (1989).......................................................-. Free&o of /0pression; Censorship (2003)...................................................................-/ Free&o of /0pression; Prior 1estraint (1988).............................................................-/ Free&o of 1eli,ion; Con%i!te& Prisoners (1989).........................................................-/ Free&o of 1eli,ion; Fla, Salute (1997)........................................................................-0 Free&o of 1eli,ion; Fla, Salute (2003)........................................................................-1 Free&o of 1eli,ion; Non*/sta:lish ent Clause (1988).............................................-1 Free&o of 1eli,ion; Non*/sta:lish ent Clause (1992).............................................-1 BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%) 7

Free&o of 1eli,ion; Non*/sta:lish ent Clause (1997) Free&o of Spee!h; 9an on 3o:a!!o +- (1992) Free&o of the Press; +!tual 8ali!e (200#) Free&o of the Press; 6arti e Censorship (1987) 5 pair ent Clause; 9asi! @u an 1i,hts (1992) 5n%oluntar" Ser%itu&e (1993) 7i:ert" of +:o&e; 7i itations (1998) 7i:ert" of +:o&e; 3e porar" (199)) Non*5 prison ent for Non*Pa" ent of -e:t (1993) Poli!e Power; +:ate ent of Nuisan!e (200#) Poli!e Power; 9an on 3o:a!!o +- (1992) Poli!e Power; .onin, Ar&inan!e %s' Non*5 pair ent of Contra!ts (1989) Poli!e Power; .onin, Ar&inan!e %s' Non*5 pair ent of Contra!ts (2001) Pri%a!" of Co uni!ation (2001) Pri%a!" of Correspon&en!e (1998) Pri%a!" of Correspon&en!e; >ail (1989) 1i,ht to +sse :l"; Per it +ppli!ation; Free&o ParDs ((2*200)) 1i,ht to +sse :l"; Per it 1e?uire ents (1992) 1i,ht to +sse :l"; Pu:li! 3ea!hers (2000) 1i,ht to +sse :l"; Pu:li! 3ea!hers (2002) 1i,ht to 3ra%el; Ar&er of +rrest (1991) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Counsel of his Choi!e ((8*2002) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Presu ption of 5nno!en!e %s' Presu ption of 3heft (200#) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; 1i,ht to 9ail (1993) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; 1i,ht to 9ail; Capital Affense ((#*200)) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; 1i,ht to 9ail; -eportation Case (1989) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; 1i,ht to 9ail; 8atter of 1i,ht or a 8atter of -is!retion ((7* 2002) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; 1i,ht to Spee&" 3rial (2000) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Self*5n!ri ination (1988) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Self*5n!ri ination (1990) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Self*5n!ri ination (1992) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Self*5n!ri ination (2000) 1i,hts of the +!!use&; Self*5n!ri ination ((7*200)) Sear!hes an& Sei=ure; Pri%ate 5n&i%i&uals ((8*2002) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; +liens (2001) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 9reathal"=er 3est (1992) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 5 e&iate Control (1987) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 5n!i&ental to Eali& Sear!h (1990) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; Pla!e of Sear!h (2001) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; sear!h a&e :" a pri%ate !iti=en (1993) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; sear!h a&e :" a pri%ate !iti=en (2002) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; Eali& 6arrantless Sear!h (2000) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; Eisual Sear!h (1992) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 6ai%er of Consent (1989) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 6arrantless +rrests (1993) Sear!hes an& Sei=ures; 6arrants of +rrest (1991) ARTICLE I. Citi/en+,i* +!tion for Can!ellation; Pres!ription 4 /ffe!t of -eath (199#) Citi=enship; /le!te& Affi!ial (1993) -ual +lle,ian!e %s' -ual Citi=enship (1987) BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-2 -2 .4 .4 ., ., ., .3 .3 .3 .3 .5 .5 .5 ..... .. ./ ./ ./ .0 .0 .1 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 /4 /4 /, /, /, /3 /3 /3 /5 /5 ///. /. // // // // /0 /0 "

-ual +lle,ian!e %s' -ual Citi=enship (1988) -ual Citi=enship (199#) /ffe!t of 8arria,e; Filipino (1989) /ffe!t of Aath of +lle,ian!e (200#) /ffe!t of 1epatriation (1999) /ffe!t of 1epatriation (2002) /ffe!t of 1epatriation (2003) /ffe!ts of 8arria,es (1999) /ffe!ts of Philippine 9ill of 1902 (2001) /le!te& Affi!ial (1992) /le!tin, Philippine Citi=enship ((8*200)) /le!tin, Philippine Citi=enship; 6hen Proper ((8*200)) Natural 9orn Filipino (1989) Natural 9orn Filipino (1998) Natural*9orn Filipino(1993) Naturali=ation; Can!ellation of Citi=enship (1998) 1esi&en!" 1e?uire ents; /le!ti%e Affi!ial ((9*2002) Status; 5lle,iti ate Chil& (1990) Status; 5lle,iti ate Chil&; -ual Citi=enship (199)) Status; 7e,iti ate Chil& (2003) 6a"s of 1ea!?uirin, Citi=enship (2000) ARTICLE .I Legi+'ati0e De*art1ent +ppropriation of Pu:li! Fun&s (1988) +ppropriation of Pu:li! Fun&s; -e:t Ser%i!in, (1992) +ppropriation of Pu:li! Fun&s; Pu:li! Purposes (1988) Co ission on +ppoint ents (2002) -ele,ation of Powers (2002) -ele,ation of Powers; (()*2002) -ele,ation of Powers; Co pleteness 3est; Suffi!ient Stan&ar& 3est (()*2002) -is!ipline; 8o&es of 1e o%al (1993) -is!ipline; Suspension of a 8e :er of the Con,ress (2002) /le!te& Affi!ial; -e Fa!to Affi!er (200#) /le!toral 3ri:unal; @1/3 8e :ersF 1i,ht 4 1esponsi:ilities (2002) /le!toral 3ri:unal; Senate; >uris&i!tion (1990) Forei,n +ffairs; 1ole of @ouse of 1ep (199)) Forei,n +ffairs; 1ole of Senate (199#) 5n%esti,ations in +i& of 7e,islation (1992) 7aw 8aDin,; Pro!ess 4 Pu:li!ation (1993) 7aw*8aDin,; +ppropriation 9ill (199)) 7aw*8aDin,; +ppropriation 7aw; +uto ati! 1enewal 4 Power of +u, entation (1998) 7aw*8aDin,; +ppropriation 7aw; 1i&er Pro%ision (2001) 7aw*8aDin,; Forei,n +ffairs; 3reaties (199)) 7aw*8aDin,; A%erri&in, the Presi&ential Eeto (1991) 7aw*8aDin,; Passa,e of a 7aw (1988) 7e,islati%e Power; Pres' +?uinoFs 3i e (1990) 7e,islati%e Powers (1989) 7oans /0ten&e& to 8e :ers of Con,ress (1991) 8ulti*Part" S"ste (1999) Non*7e,islati%e Powers (1988) Non*7e,islati%e Powers; / er,en!" Powers; 1e?uisites (1997) BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

/1 /1 /2 /2 04 04 04 04 0, 0, 0, 03 03 03 05 05 05 0000. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0/ 0/ 0/ 00 00 00 01 01 02 02 02 02 14 14 14 1, 1, 1, 13 13 13 13 15 15 15 6

Prohi:itions an& 5nhi:itions of Pu:li! Affi!e (200#) (ualifi!ations; Con,ress en (1988) (ualifi!ations; Con,ress en; (1993) (ualifi!ations; Con,ress en; (1999) Separation of Powers (1988) Separation of Powers (2003) 3hree*3er 7i it: Con,ress en (199)) 3hree*3er 7i it; Con,ress en (2001) ARTICLE .II E2e(3ti0e De*art1ent +ppointin, Power; +!tin, %s' Per anent +ppoint ent (2003) +ppointin, Power; a& interi appoint ents (1991) +ppointin, Power; +& 5nteri +ppoint ents (199#) +ppointin, Power; +ppoint ents 1e?uirin, Confir ation; 1+ )972*<n!onstitutional (2002) +ppointin, Power; Cate,ories of Affi!ials (1999) +ppointin, Power; Gin&s of +ppoint ents (199#) +ppointin, Power; 7i itations on Presi&ential +ppoint ents (1997) +ppointin, Powers; +& 5nteri +ppoint ents ((#*2002) Ca:inet 8e :ers; li itation on a!!eptin, a&&itional &uties (199)) Callin,*out Power; Presi&ent ((1*200)) -e!laration; State of Cala it"; 7e,al /ffe!ts ((1*2002) -e!laration; State of National / er,en!" ((1*200)) /nter into Contra!t or $uarantee Forei,n 7oans (199#) /nter into Contra!t or $uarantee Forei,n 7oans (1999) /nter into /0e!uti%e +,ree ents (2003) 5 pose 3ariff 1atesH 5 port an& /0port (uotas (1999) 8artial 7aw 4 Suspension of 6rit of @a:eas Corpus (1987) 8artial 7aw; 7i itations (2000) 8artial 7aw; Suffi!ien!" of the Fa!tual 9asis ((3*200)) Par&onin, Power; + nest" (1993) Par&onin, Power; + nest" (1992) Par&onin, Power; 9rea!h of Con&ition; 1e%o!ation ((2*2002) Par&onin, Power; /0e! Cle en!"; Par&on (1992) Par&onin, Power; /0e!uti%e Cle en!" (1997) Par&onin, Power; /0e!uti%e Cle en!" (1999) Par&onin, Power; Gin&s (1988) Par&onin, Power; Par&onH Con&itional (1997) Presi&ent; Parti!ipation; 7e,islati%e Pro!ess (199)) Presi&ential 5 unit" fro Suit (1997) Prohi:ition +,ainst 8ultiple Positions 4 +&&itional Co pensation (2002) Prohi:ition a,ainst 8ultiple Positions :" $o%Ft Affi!ials (1987) Suspension of 6rit of @a:eas Corpus (1997) ARTICLE .III 43di(ia' De*art1ent Cases to :e @ear& /n 9an!; Supre e Court (1999) Conte pt Powers (199)) Finalit" of Eoi& >u&, ents (1993) Fis!al +utono " (1999) Fun!tion; Continuin, Constitutional Con%ention (2000) 5ssuan!e of 1estrainin, Ar&ers an& 5n;un!tions (1992) >u&i!ial 4 9ar Coun!il (1988) >u&i!ial 4 9ar Coun!il (1999)
BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

15 111. 1. 1. 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/ 10 10 11 11 12 24 24 2, 2, 2, 2, 23 23 23 23 25 22. 2. 2. 2. 2/ 2/ 2/ 20 20 20 20 21 22 22 22 22 22 ,44 ,44 ,44 ,4, ,4,


%

>u&i!ial -epart ent; 6rit of + paro (1991)......................................................................,4, >u&i!ial 5n&epen&en!e; Safe,uar& (2000)......................................................................,4, >u&i!ial Power (1989).........................................................................................................,43 >u&i!ial Power (1992).........................................................................................................,43 >u&i!ial Power (1998).........................................................................................................,45 >u&i!ial Power; S!ope (199#)..............................................................................................,45 >u&i!ial 1e%iew; 7o!us Stan&i (1992).................................................................................,4>u&i!ial 1e%iew; 1e?uisites (199#)..................................................................................,4>uris&i!tion of @7<19 (1993)............................................................................................,48an&ator" Perio& For -e!i&in, Cases (1989)...............................................................,4. Politi!al (uestion (1992)....................................................................................................,4. Politi!al (uestion -o!trine (1997)......................................................................................,4. Politi!al (uestion: Separation of Powers (200#)...............................................................,4/ Politi!al (uestion; 3o Settle +!tual Contro%ersies (200#)............................................,4/ Politi!al (uestions (1988)..................................................................................................,4/ Pro @a! Ei!e Cases (1999)...............................................................................................,40 1e o%al of 7ower Court >u&,es (1993)..........................................................................,40 1e%iew /0e!uti%e +!ts (199))..........................................................................................,40 Super%ision; Courts 4 its Personnel ((2*2002).................................................................,41 3a0pa"erBs Suit; 7o!us Stan&i (1992)..............................................................................,41 3er of Affi!e; >usti!es (199))...........................................................................................,41 Eotes re?uire& for &e!larin, a law un!onstitutional (199)) ..........................................,42 ARTICLE IX C&n+tit3ti&na' C&11i++i&n+...................................................................,42 1otational S!he e (1999)...................................................................................................,42 Constitutional Co issions 4 Coun!il ((7*200))............................................................,42 ARTICLE IX Ci0i' Ser0i(e C&11i++i&n........................................................................,42 Career Ser%i!e; Chara!teristi!s (1999)..............................................................................,42 Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission %s' CA+ (200#)......................................................................,42 Fun!tion of CSC (199#).......................................................................................................,,4 $ACCs 6ithout Ari,inal Charter %s' $ACCs 6ith Ari,inal Charter (1998).............,,4 >uris&i!tion o%er the $ACCs (1999)...................................................................................,,, >uris&i!tion o%er the $ACCs (2003)...................................................................................,,, 8o&es of 1e o%al fro Affi!e (1993)................................................................................,,, 1e!ei%in, of 5n&ire!t Co pensation (1997)....................................................................,,, Se!urit" of 3enure (1988)....................................................................................................,,3 Se!urit" of 3enure ((2*2002)..............................................................................................,,3 Se!urit" of 3enure; 8eanin, (1999)...................................................................................,,5 ARTICLE IX COMELEC.......................................................................................................,,5 /le!toral 3ri:unal; Fun!tions 4 Co position ((2*200))..............................................,,5 Fair /le!tion; /?ual Spa!e 4 3i e in 8e&ia (1989)......................................................,,5 $rant of Par&on in /le!tion Affenses (1991)..................................................................,,>u&i!ial 1e%iew of -e!isions (2001)................................................................................,,1e o%al fro Affi!e; Co issioners (1998).................................................................,,1i,ht to Eote; >uris&i!tion (2001)........................................................................................,,E'e(ti&n La5+..........................................................................................................................,,2n& Pla!er 1ule (2003).....................................................................................................,,2n& Pla!er 1ule (1990)......................................................................................................,,. 2n& Pla!er 1ule; in (uo 6arranto Cases (1992)..........................................................,,. 2n& Pla!er 1ule; 1ule of Su!!ession (199))....................................................................,,. +ppre!iation of 9allots (199#)...........................................................................................,,/ -is?ualifi!ation; $roun&s (1991)......................................................................................,,/ BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%) 8

-isualifi!ations (1999) /ffe!t of Filin, of Certifi!ate of Can&i&a!"; +ppointi%e Affi!er %s /le!ti%e Affi!er (2002) /ffe!t of Filin, of Certifi!ate of Can&i&a!"; Fair /le!tion +!t (2003) /le!tion Affenses; Conspira!" to 9ri:e Eoters (1991) /le!tion Protest (1990) /le!tion Protest %s' (uo 6arranto (2001) /le!tion Protest %s' (uo 6arranto ((2*200)) /le!tion Protest; >uris&i!tion (199)) /0piration of ter :ars ser%i!e thereof (2000) Petition to -e!lare Failure of /le!tions; 1e?uisites 4 /ffe!ts (1992) Pre*Pro!la ation Contest (1987) Pre*Pro!la ation Contest (1988) Pre*Pro!la ation Contest %s' /le!tion Contests (1997) Pre*Pro!la ation Contest; Proper 5ssues (199)) Pro!ess; 5lliterate Eoters (1987) Pro!ess; Prin!iple of 5&e Sonans (199#) Pro!ess; Stra" 9allot (199#) 1e!all (2002) 3hree*3er 7i it 1ule (2001) 3hree*3er 7i it; fro 8uni!ipalit" to Newl"*Create& Cit" ((9*2002) Ea!an!"; /ffe!t of Ei!e*8a"or +!tin, +s 8a"or (2002) Ea!an!"; 1ule of Su!!ession (1992) Ea!an!"; S9; 1ule on Su!!ession (2002) ARTICLE IX C&11i++i&n &n A3dit CA+; >uris&i!tion (2001) CA+; 8one" Clai s (1998) ARTICLE X L&(a' G&0ern1ent +ppoint ent of 9u&,et Affi!er; !ontrol %s super%ision (1999) 9oun&ar" -ispute 1esolution; 7$<; 13CFs >uris&i!tion ((10*2002) 9oun&ar" -ispute Settle ent; +uthorit"; >uris&i!tion (1999) Creation of New 7o!al $o%ern ent <nits; Ple:is!ite 1e?uire ent (200#) -e Fa!to Pu:li! Corporations; /ffe!t (200#) -e%olution of Power (1999) Fran!hise; prior appro%al of 7$< ne!essar" (1988) 7aw fi0in, the ter s of lo!al ele!ti%e offi!ials ((#*200)) Ar&inan!e; <se 4 7ease of Properties; Pu:li! <se (1997) Ar&inan!e; Eali&it"; Closure or 7ease of Properties for Pu:li! <se (2003) Ar&inan!e; Eali&it"; Co pensation; 3ortuous +!t of an / plo"ee (199#) Ar&inan!e; Eali&it"; 7o!al 3a0ation %s' Spe!ial +ssess ent (1987) Ar&inan!e; Eali&it"; Pre%entin, 5 oralit" (1987) Ar&inan!e; Eali&it"; <tili=ation 4 -e%elop ent; National 6ealth (1991) Ar&inan!es; Eali&it"; + en&in, NatFl 7aws (1988) Ar&inan!es; Eali&it"; $a :lin, Prohi:ition (1992) Ar&inan!es; Eali&it"; 7i itation of Penalties (1991) Ar&inan!es; Eeto Power (199)) Poli!e Power; 77-+ (1992) Power to 5ssue Su:poena 4 Cite For Conte pt (1993) Power; / inent -o ain; 7$<; 1i,ht to /0er!ise ((10*2002) Powers of 9aran,a" +sse :l" (2003) Powers; 7i,a n, ,a 9aran,a" (2003)
BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

,,/ ,,/ ,,0 ,,0 ,,0 ,,1 ,,1 ,,1 ,,1 ,,1 ,,2 ,,2 ,34 ,3, ,3, ,3, ,3, ,33 ,33 ,33 ,35 ,35 ,3,3,3,3,3. ,3. ,3/ ,3/ ,3/ ,3/ ,3/ ,3/ ,30 ,30 ,30 ,30 ,31 ,31 ,31 ,31 ,32 ,32 ,32 ,54 ,54 ,5, ,5, ,5,
#

1e?uisites; Contra!ts 5n%ol%in, 7$< (1991)......................................................................,5, 1e?uisites; Contra!ts in%ol%in, 7$< (1992)......................................................................,53 3a0ation; $ACC 7ia:ilit" For 1eal /state 3a0 (1999)......................................................,53 3a0ation; Sour!es of 1e%enue (1999).............................................................................,53 6ith&rawal of Pu:li! Propert" fro Pu:li! <se (1990).................................................,53 ARTICLE XI A((&3ntabi'ity &) P3b'i( O))i(er+...........................................................,55 +:an&on ent of Affi!e (2000)............................................................................................,55 -is!ipline; Cle en!"; -o!trine of Con&onation (2000)................................................,55 -is!ipline; /ffe!t of Par&on $rante& in Fa%or of Pu:li! Affi!ers (1999) ....................,5-is!ipline; Pre%enti%e Suspension 4 +ppeal; entitle ent to salar" pen&ente (2001) ,5 -is!ipline; Pre%enti%e Suspension (1990)..........................................................................,5-is!ipline; Pre%enti%e Suspension (2002)..........................................................................,5. /le!ti%e an& +ppointi%e Affi!ials: &is!iplinar" authorit" (200#)........................................,5. /le!ti%e Pu:li! Affi!er; -e Fa!to Affi!er (2000)................................................................,5. /le!ti%e Pu:li! Affi!ers; -e Fa!to Affi!er; effe!ts (200#) .................................................,5/ $raft an& Corruption; Pres!ription of Cri e (2002)...........................................................,5/ 5 pea!h ent; Cron"is (2000)..........................................................................................,50 5 pea!h ent; $roun&s (1999).........................................................................................,50 5 pea!h ent; Nature; $roun&s; P- 1)0) (1988).........................................................,50 7aw of Pu:li! Affi!ers; Ne0t*in*1anD 1ule (199#).............................................................,50 7ia:ilit" For -a a,es in Perfor an!e of Affi!ial Fun!tions (1990) ............................,51 7o!al /le!ti%e Affi!ials; 7i itations An +&&itional -uties (1992) .....................................,52 A :u&s an: Power to Suspen&; Pre%enti%e Suspension (200#)...................................,52 A :u&s an; Power to 5n%esti,ate (2003).........................................................................,52 A :u&s an; Power to Suspen&; Pre%enti%e Suspension (199))...................................,-4 Power to 5ssue Su:poena; %ali&it" of &ele,ation (1989)...................................................,-4 Prohi:ition An /le!ti%e Affi!er to @ol& Pu:li! Affi!e (2002)............................................,-4 Pu:li! Affi!e; Pu:li! 3rust (1998).....................................................................................,-4 1etire ent 9enefits (199))................................................................................................,-, ARTICLE XII Nati&na' E(&n&1y and Patri1&ny.........................................................,-3 +!?uisition an& 7ease of Pu:li! 7an&s (1998)...................................................................,-3 +!?uisition of 7an&s (1987)...............................................................................................,-3 +!?uisition of 7an&s (2000)...............................................................................................,-5 +!?uisition of 7an&s :" @ere&itar" Su!!ession (2002).....................................................,-5 +!?uisition of 7an&s; Citi=enship issue (1989)..................................................................,-5 +!?uisition of 7an&s; Citi=enship issue (199#)..................................................................,-+!?uisition of 7an&s; Citi=enship issue (1992)..................................................................,-+!?uisition of 7an&s; Prohi:ition; a!?uisition of pri%ate lan&s :" aliens (199#) ........,-. Citi=enship 1e?uire ent in 8ana,e ent of +&%ertisin, 5n&ustr" (1989) .......................,-. /n,a,e ent in 9usiness 4 /0er!ise of Profession (1987) ..............................................,-. /0ploration an& -e%elop ent of 8inerals (199#)..........................................................,-/ /0propriation of Pu:li! <tilities (1992)................................................................................,-/ 7ease of Pri%ate +,ri!ultural 7an&s (2001)........................................................................,-/ National /!ono " 4 Patri on"; Constitutional Prohi:ition (200#) .............................,-0 National Patri on"; &efinition (1999)..................................................................................,-0 Nationali=e& +!ti%ities (199#)............................................................................................,-0 Awnership 1e?uire ent of 8ass 8e&ia (1989)................................................................,-1 Chinese !iti=ens; en,a,in, in retail tra&e ((#*200)) ........................................................,-1 /0plorationH &e%elop entH an& utili=ation of natural resour!es ((#*200)) .....................,-1 ARTICLE XIII S&(ia' 43+ti(e and H31an Rig,t+..........................................................,-1

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6

+,rarian 1efor 7aw; Co%era,e (1992)............................................................................,-1 Co ission on @u an 1i,hts; Power to in%esti,ate (1992)...........................................,-2 Co ission on @u an 1i,hts; Power to issue 31A (1997)...........................................,-2 Co ission on @u an 1i,hts; Power to issue 31A (2001)...........................................,-2 Co ission on @u an 1i,hts; Power; 7i itations ((#*2002)........................................,.4 7a:or; 1i,ht to Self*Ar,ani=ation (1988)............................................................................,., 7a:or; 1i,ht to StriDe (1988).............................................................................................,., 7a:or; 1i,ht to StriDe (1993).............................................................................................,., So!ial >usti!e un&er the Present Constitution (1992).......................................................,.3 6o en (2000)......................................................................................................................,.3 ARTICLE XI. Ed3(ati&n7 S(ien(e and Te(,n&'&gy7 Art+ ..........................................,.5 /&u!ation; +!a&e i! Free&o (1987)...............................................................................,.5 /&u!ation; +!a&e i! Free&o (1989)...............................................................................,.5 /&u!ation; +!a&e i! Free&o (1993)...............................................................................,.5 /&u!ation; +!a&e i! Free&o ; /0tent (1999)..................................................................,./&u!ation; +lien /nrollees 4 -onors (1999)..................................................................,./&u!ation; -uties of State in 1e /&u!ation (1999)...........................................................,./&u!ation; Fla, Salute (1987).............................................................................................,.. /&u!ation; 1i,ht to Choose Profession (2000)..................................................................,.. /&u!ation; 1i,ht to (ualit" /&u!ation (2003)....................................................................,./ /&u!ation; 3ea!hin, of 1eli,ion (1999)..........................................................................,./ /&u!ation; Eali&it" of +!a&e i! 1e?uire ents (199#).....................................................,./ ARTICLE X.I Genera' Pr&0i+i&n+......................................................................................,./ $eneral Pro%isions; 7o!al -iale!t (1987)...........................................................................,./ +FP; li itation on a!!eptin, a&&itional &uties (199)).......................................................,.0 ARTICLE X.II A1end1ent+ &r Re0i+i&n+........................................................................,.0 PeopleFs 5nitiati%e (200#)....................................................................................................,.0 + en& ents an& 1e%isions; 8o&es (1997)......................................................................,.0 1/F/1/N-<8 %s' 5N535+35E/ ((1*2002)....................................................................,.0 ARTICLE X.III Tran+it&ry Pr&0i+i&n+.................................................................................,.1 3ransitor" Pro%isions; Forei,n 8ilitar" 9ases (199))....................................................,.1 3ransitor" Pro%isions; Forei,n 8ilitar" 9ases (1988)....................................................,.1 PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW .........................................................................................,.1 9asi! Prin!iples in Pu:li! 5ntFl 7aw (1991)..........................................................................,.1 Constituti%e 3heor" %s' -e!larator" 3heor" (200#).......................................................,/4 Conti,uous .one %s' /0!lusi%e /!ono i! .one (200#)..................................................,/4 -iplo ati! 5 unit" (2000).................................................................................................,/4 -iplo ati! 5 unit" (2001).................................................................................................,/4 -iplo ati! 5 unit" (2003).................................................................................................,/, -iplo ati! 5 unit" (200#).................................................................................................,/, -iplo ati! 5 unit"; + :assa&or ((3*2002)...................................................................,/3 -iplo ati! 5 unit"; + :assa&ors (1990).......................................................................,/3 -iplo ati! 5 unit"; Co%era,e ((3*2002).....................................................................,/5 -iplo ati! 5 unit"; -iplo ati! /n%o" an& Consular Affi!ers (1992) ...........................,/-iplo ati! 5 unit"; -iplo ati! /n%o" an& Consular Affi!ers (1997) ...........................,/. /0!lusi%e /!ono i! .one (2000).....................................................................................,/. /0e!uti%e +,ree ents; 9in&in, /ffe!t (2003)...................................................................,/. /0tra&ition %s' -eportation (1993)......................................................................................,// /0tra&ition; -o!trine of Spe!ialt" (1993).........................................................................,// /0tra&ition; /ffe!ti%it" of treat" (199)).............................................................................,// /0tra&ition; $roun&s (2002)..............................................................................................,/0 BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%) 11

,/0 /0tra&ition; 1etroa!ti%e +ppli!ation ((2*2002) ,/1 Fla, State %s' Fla, of Con%enien!e (200#) ,/1 $eno!i&e (1988) ,/1 @u an 1i,hts (1999) ,/1 @u an 1i,hts; Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,hts (1992) ,/2 @u an 1i,hts; Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,hts (199)) ,04 5ntFl Court of >usti!e; >uris&i!tion A%er States ,04 5ntFl Court of >usti!e; >uris&i!tion A%er States (199#) ,04 5ntFl Court of >usti!e; 7i itations An >uris&i!tion (1999) 5ntFl Court of >usti!e; Parties; Plea&in,s an& Aral +r,u ent (199#) ,04 ,0, 5nternational Con%ention; 7aw of the Sea (200#) ,0, 5nternational Court of >usti!e ((9*200)) 5nternational 7aw %s' 8uni!ipal 7aw; 3erritorial Prin!iple; 5nternational Cri es ((2* 2002) ,0, ,03 8an&ates an& 3rust 3erritories (2003) 8uni!ipal 7aw %s' 5nternational 7aw (2003) ,05 ,05 Neutralit" of States (1988) ,0Auter Spa!e; >uris&i!tion (2003) Prin!iple of +uto*7i itation ((10*200)) ,0,01e!ipro!it" %' Prin!iple of +uto*7i itation ((10*200)) ,01e!o,nition of States; -e Fa!to %s' -e >ure 1e!o,nition (1998) ,0. 1eparations +,ree ent; Eali&it" (1992) ,0. 1i,ht to 5nno!ent Passa,e (1999) ,0/ 1i,ht to 3ransit an& 5nno!ent Passa,e (200#) ,0/ 1i,hts an& A:li,ation un&er <N Charter (1991) ,00 Sour!es of 5nternational 7aw; Pri ar" 4 Su:si&iar" Sour!es (2003) ,00 So%erei,n 5 unit" of States; +:solute %s' 1estri!ti%e (1998) So%erei,nt" of States; Natural <se of 3erritor" (1989) ,01 ,01 So%erei,nt"; -efinition; Nature ((10*200)) State 7ia:ilities (1992) ,02 ,02 State So%erei,nt"; /ffe!ti%e A!!upation; 3erra Nullius (2000) Stateless Persons; /ffe!ts; Status; 1i,hts (1992) ,02 3erritorial Sea %s' 5nternal 6aters (200#) ,14 ,14 <se of For!e; /0!eptions (2003) ,1, <se of For!e; Prin!iple of Non*5nter%ention (199#) ,13 <se of For!e; 1i,ht of Self*&efense (2002) <se of For!e; Self*-efense; 6a,in, 6ar (1998) ,13 ,15 <se of For!e; 6hen allowe& (1988) 6ar; Co :atantsI Prisoners of 6ar %s' 8er!enaries (1993) ,15 6ilson &o!trine %s' /stra&a &o!trine (200#) ,1,1ADMINISTRATI.E LAW ,1+& in 7aw; /0haustion of +& inistrati%e 1e e&ies (1991) ,1+& in 7aw; /0haustion of +& inistrati%e 1e e&ies (2000) +& in 7aw; /0haustion of +& inistrati%e 1e e&ies %s -o!trine of Pri ar" ,1. >uris&i!tion (199)) ,1. +& in 7aw; /0haustion of +& inistrati%e 1e e&ies; /0!eptions (1991) +& in 7aw; >u&i!ial 1e%iew of +& inistrati%e +!tion (2001) ,1/ ,1/ +& in 7aw; >u&i!ial 1e%iew of +& inistrati%e -e!isions (1988) ,10 +& in 7aw; 8eanin, of J$o%ern ent of the PhilippinesK (1997) +& in 7aw; Power of the Presi&ent to 1eor,ani=e +& inistrati%e Stru!ture (2003) ............................................................................................................................................... ,10 BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%) !"

+& in 7aw; 1ules an& 1e,ulations; -ue Pro!ess (2000)................................................,10 $o%ern ent +,en!" %s' $o%ern ent 5nstru entalit" ((7*2002)....................................,11 (uasi*>u&i!ial 9o&" or +,en!" ((2*200))......................................................................,11

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-

!#$% CONSTITUTION O THE PHILIPPINES


P,i' C&n $%8 Ne5 eat3re+ 9!##!: N& 1: @ow is the 9ill of 1i,hts stren,thene& in the 1987 ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3here are se%eral wa"s in whi!h the 9ill of 1i,hts is stren,thene& in the 1987 Constitution'
1' New ri,hts are ,i%en e0pli!it re!o,nition su!h asH the prohi:ition a,ainst &etention :" reason of politi!al :eliefs an& aspirations' 3he wai%er of 8iran&a ri,hts is now re?uire& to :e a&e in writin, with the assistan!e of !ounsel' 3he use of solitar"H in!o uni!a&o an& se!ret &etention pla!es is prohi:ite&H while the e0isten!e of su:stan&ar& an& ina&e?uate penal fa!ilities is a&e the !on!ern of le,islation' 3here is also re!o,nition of the ri,ht of e0pressionH an e0press prohi:ition a,ainst the use of tortureH a an&ate to the State to pro%i&e !o pensation an& reha:ilitation for %i!ti s of torture an& their fa ilies'

7' 3he Supre e Court is e powere& to a&opt rules for the prote!tion an& enfor!e ent of !onstitutional ri,hts' 8' +rt' 55' Se!' 11 !o its the State to a poli!" whi!h pla!es %alue on the &i,nit" of e%er" hu an person an& ,uarantees full respe!t for hu an ri,hts' 9' + Co ission on @u an 1i,hts is !reate&'
10' <n&er +rti!le ME5' Se!' 2(2) the State is an&ate& to pro ote respe!t for the peopleBs ri,hts a on, the e :ers of the ilitar" in the perfor an!e of their &ut"'

P,i' C&n $%8 Pe&*'e P&5er 9!#$%: N&' ME555: 3he fra ers of the 1987 Constitution an& the people who ratifie& it a&e sure that pro%isions institutionali=in, people power were in!orporate& in the fun&a ental lawH 9riefl" &is!uss at least two su!h pro%isions' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+rt' E5H Se!' 1H while %estin, in Con,ress the le,islati%e powerH nonetheless states that su!h !onfer ent of power shall :e su:;e!t to the reser%ation a&e in fa%or of the people :" pro%isions on initiati%es an& referen&u ' For this purposeH Con,ress is re?uire&H as earl" as possi:leH to pro%i&e for a s"ste of initiati%e of referen&u where:" the people !an &ire!tl" propose an& ena!t laws or appro%e or re;e!t an a!t or law or part thereof passe& :" the Con,ress or the le,islati%e :o&ies after the re,istration of a petition thereforH si,ne& :" at least 10N of the total nu :er of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least 3N of the re,istere& %oters' (5&'H se!' 32) 3he Constitution also pro%i&es that throu,h initiati%eH upon a petition of at least 12N of the total nu :ers of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least 3N of the re,istere& %oters thereinH a en& ents to the Constitution a" :e &ire!tl" propose& :" the people' +rtH M555H se!' 12 states that the state shall respe!t the role of in&epen&ent peopleBs or,ani=ation to ena:le the to pursue an& prote!tH within the &e o!rati! fra eworDH their le,iti ate an& !olle!ti%e interests an& aspirations throu,h pea!eful lawful eans' For this purposeH the Constitution ,uarantees to su!h or,ani=ations the ri,ht to parti!ipate at all le%els of so!ialH politi!al an& e!ono i! &e!ision* aDin, an& the state is re?uire& to %ali&ate the

2'

3' So e ri,hts ha%e :een e0pan&e&' For instan!eH free a!!ess to !ourts now in!lu&es a!!ess to ?uasi*;u&i!ial :o&ies an& to a&e?uate le,al assistan!e'
#' 3he re?uire ents for interferin, with so e ri,hts ha%e :een a&e ore stri!t' For instan!eH onl" ;u&,es !an now issue sear!h warrants or warrants of arrest' 3here ust :e a law authori=in, the /0e!uti%e -epart ent to interfere with the pri%a!" of !o uni!ationH the li:ert" of a:o&eH an& the ri,ht to tra%el :efore these ri,hts a" :e i paire& or !urtaile&'

2' 3he Constitution now pro%i&es that the suspension of the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus &oes not suspen& the ri,ht to :ailH thus resol%in, a &o!trinal &ispute of lon, stan&in,'
)' 3he suspension of the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus an& the pro!la ation of artial law ha%e :een li ite& to si0t" ()0) &a"s an& are now su:;e!t to the power of Con,ress to re%oDe' 5n a&&itionH the Supre e Court is ,i%en the ;uris&i!tionH upon the petition of an" !iti=en to &eter ine the suffi!ien!" of the fa!tual :asis of the suspension of the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus an& the pro!la ation of artial law'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;

esta:lish ent of a&e?uate this purpose' (5&'H se!H 1))

e!hanis

for

P,i' C&n $%8 Pe&*'e P&5er 9"666: N& 5M' 5s the !on!ept of People Power re!o,ni=e& in the ConstitutionL -is!uss :riefl"' (3N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: OesH the !on!ept of People Power is re!o,ni=e& in the Constitution'
<n&er Se!tion 32' +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH throu,h initiati%e an& referen&u H the people !an &ire!tl" propose an& ena!t laws or appro%e or re;e!t an" a!t or law or part thereof passe& :" the Con,ress or lo!al le,islati%e :o&" after the re,istration of a petition therefor si,ne& :" at least ten per !entu of the total nu :er of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least three per !entu of the re,istere& %oters thereof' <n&er Se!tion 1)H +rti!le M555 of the ConstitutionH the ri,ht of the people an& their or,ani=ations to effe!ti%e an& reasona:le parti!ipation at all le%els of so!ialH politi!al an& e!ono i! &e!ision* aDin, shall not :e a:ri&,e&' 3he State shallH :" law fa!ilitate the esta:lish ent of a&e?uate !onsultation e!hanis s'

+rti!le M555H Se!tion 1) of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that the ri,ht of the people an& their or,ani=ations to parti!ipate at all le%els of so!ialH politi!alH an& e!ono i! &e!ision* aDin, shall not :e a:ri&,e& an& that the State shallH :" lawH fa!ilitate the esta:lish ent of a&e?uate !onsultation e!hanis s'

+rti!le ME55H Se!tion 2 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that su:;e!t to the ena!t ent of an i ple entin, lawH the people a" &ire!tl" propose a en& ents to the Constitution throu,h initiati%e' Nat3re &) t,e C&n+tit3ti&n: C&n+tit3ti&na' S3*re1a(y 9"66;:
9!6<a: 9NN 1epu:li! has a &efense treat" with /E+ Fe&eration' +!!or&in, to the 1epu:li!Bs Se!retar" of -efenseH the treat" allows te porar" :asin, of frien&l" forei,n troops in !ase of trainin, e0er!ises for the war on terroris ' 3he 8a;orit" 7ea&er of the Senate !onten&s that whether te porar" or notH the :asin, of forei,n troops howe%er frien&l" is prohi:ite& :" the Constitution of 9NN whi!h pro%i&es thatH CNo forei,n ilitar" :ases shall :e allowe& in 9NN territor"'C

<n&er Se!tion 2' +rti!le ME55 of the ConstitutionH the people a" &ire!tl" propose a en& ents to the Constitution throu,h initiati%e upon a petition of at least twel%e per !entu of the total nu :er of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least three per !entu of the re,istere& %oters therein' P,i' C&n $%8 Pe&*'e P&5er 9"66-:
N& 5 * 5s Cpeople powerC re!o,ni=e& :" the

5n !ase there is in&ee& an irre!on!ila:le !onfli!t :etween a pro%ision of the treat" an& a pro%ision of the ConstitutionH in a ;uris&i!tion an& le,al s"ste liDe oursH whi!h shoul& pre%ail: the pro%ision of the treat" or of the ConstitutionL 6h"L /0plain with reasonsH :riefl"' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5n !ase of !onfli!t :etween a pro%ision of a treat" an& a pro%ision of the ConstitutionH the pro%ision of the Constitution shoul& pre%ail' Se!tion 2(2)(a)H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 Constitution authori=es the nullifi!ation of a treat" when it !onfli!ts with the Constitution' ($on=ales %' @e!hano%aH 9 SC1+ 230 P19)3Q)'

1987 ConstitutionL /0plain full"' SUGGESTED ANSWER: CPeople powerC the Constitution' is re!o,ni=e& in

+rti!le 555H Se!tion # of the 1987 Constitution ,uarantees the ri,ht of the people pea!ea:le to asse :le an& petition the ,o%ern ent for re&ress of ,rie%an!es'
+rti!le E5H Se!tion 32 of the 1987 Constitution re?uires Con,ress to pass a law allowin, the people to &ire!tl" propose an& ena!t laws throu,h initiati%e an& to appro%e or re;e!t an" a!t or law or part of it passe& :" Con,ress or a lo!al le,islati%e :o&"'

G&0ern1ent Pre+identia' &r1 0+= Par'ia< 1entary &r1 9>?<"66?: 1' a) 6hat is the prin!ipal i&entif"in, feature of a presi&ential for of ,o%ern entL /0plain' (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he prin!ipal i&entif"in, feature of a presi&ential for of ,o%ern ent is e :o&ie& in the separation of powers &o!trine' /a!h &epart ent of ,o%ern ent e0er!ises powers ,rante& to it :" the Constitution an& a" not !ontrolH interfere with or en!roa!h upon the a!ts &one within the !onstitutional !o peten!e of the others' @owe%erH the Constitution also ,i%es ea!h &epart ent !ertain powers :" whi!h it

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@

a" &efinitel" restrain the i pro%i&ent a!tionH there:" s"ste of !he!Ds an& :alan!es thusH preser%in, the will of e0presse& in the Constitution'

others fro aintainin, a a on, the H the so%erei,n

pre%ent infrin,e ent of its !usto sH fis!alH i i,ration or sanitar" laws an& re,ulations within its territor" or territorial sea' (+rti!le 33 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') 3he /MC7<S5E/ /CANA85C .AN/ is a =one e0ten&in, up to 200 nauti!al iles fro the :aselines of a state o%er whi!h the !oastal state has so%erei,n ri,hts for the purpose of e0plorin, an& e0ploitin,H !onser%in, an& ana,in, the natural resour!esH whether li%in, or nonli%in,H of the waters super;a!ent to the sea:e& an& of the sea:e& an& su:soilH an& with re,ar& to other a!ti%ities for the e!ono i! e0ploitation an& e0ploration of the =one' (+rti!les 2) an& 27 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea')

:) 6hat are the essential !hara!teristi!s of a parlia entar" for of ,o%ern entL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he essential !hara!teristi!s of a parlia entar" for of ,o%ern ent are: the fusion of the le,islati%e an& e0e!uti%e :ran!hes in parlia ent; the pri e inisterH who is the hea& of ,o%ern entH an& the e :ers of the !a:inetH are !hosen fro a on, the e :ers of parlia ent an& as su!h are a!!ounta:le to the latter; an& the pri e inister a" :e re o%e& fro offi!e :" a %ote of loss of !onfi&en!e of parlia ent' 3here a" :e a hea& of state who a" or a" not :e ele!te&'

E2('3+i0e E(&n&1i( A&ne8 Rig,t+ &) t,e C&a+ta' State 9!##;:


N&' 11: 5n the &esire to i pro%e the fishin, etho&s of the fisher enH the 9ureau of FisheriesH with the appro%al of the Presi&entH entere& into a e oran&u of a,ree ent to allow 3hai fisher en to fish within 200 iles fro the Philippine sea !oasts on the !on&ition that Filipino fisher en :e allowe& to use 3hai fishin, e?uip ent an& %esselsH an& to learn o&ern te!hnolo," in fishin, an& !annin,'

ARTICLE I

Nati&na' Territ&ry

Ar(,i*e'agi( D&(trine 9!#$#: No' 20: 6hat &o "ou un&erstan& :" the ar!hipela,i! &o!trineL 5s this refle!te& in the 1987 ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he +1C@5P/7+$5C -AC315N/ e phasi=es the unit" of lan& an& waters :" &efinin, an ar!hipela,o either as a ,roup of islan&s surroun&e& :" waters or a :o&" of waters stu&&e& with islan&s' For this purposeH it re?uires that :aselines :e &rawn :" !onne!tin, the appropriate points of the Couter ost islan&s to en!ir!le the islan&s within the ar!hipela,o' 3he waters on the lan&war& si&e of the :aselines re,ar&less of :rea&th or &i ensions are erel" internal waters' OesH the ar!hipela,i! &o!trine is refle!te& in the 1987 Constitution' +rti!le 5H Se!tion 1 pro%i&es that the national territor" of the Philippines in!lu&es the Philippine ar!hipela,oH with all the islan&s an& waters e :ra!e& therein; an& the waters aroun&H :etweenH an& !onne!tin, the islan&s of the ar!hipela,oH re,ar&less of their :rea&th an& &i ensionsH for part of the internal waters of the Philippines'

1) 5s the a,ree ent %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:


1) No' the Presi&ent !annot authori=e the 9ureau of Fisheries to enter into a e oran&u of a,ree ent allowin, 3hai fisher en to fish within the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one of the PhilippinesH :e!ause the Constitution reser%es to Filipino !iti=ens the use an& en;o" ent of the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one of the Philippines' Se!tion 2' +rti!le M55 of the Constitution pro%i&es: J3he State shall prote!t the nationBs arine part in its ar!hipela,i! watersH territorial seaH an& e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =oneH an& reser%e its use an& en;o" ent to Filipino !iti=ens'C Se!tion 7H +rti!le M555 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he State shall prote!t the ri,hts of su:sisten!e fisher enH espe!iall" of lo!al !o unitiesH to the preferential use of the !o unal arine an& fishin, resour!esH :oth inlan& an& offshore' 5t shall pro%i&e support to su!h fisher en throu,h appropriate te!hnolo," an& resear!hH a&e?uate finan!ialH pro&u!tionH an& arDetin, assistan!eH an& other ser%i!es' 3he State shall also prote!tH &e%elopH an& !onser%e su!h resour!es' 3he prote!tion shall e0ten& to offshore fishin, ,roun&s of

C&ntig3&3+ A&ne 0+= E2('3+i0e E(&n&1i( A&ne 9"66;: (2*a*2) -istin,uish: 3he !onti,uous =one an& the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
CAN35$<A<S .AN/ is a =one !onti,uous to the territorial sea an& e0ten&s up to 12 nauti!al iles fro the territorial sea an& o%er whi!h the !oastal state a" e0er!ise !ontrol ne!essar" to

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?

su:sisten!e fisher en a,ainst forei,n intrusion' FishworDers shall re!ei%e a ;ust share fro their la:or in the utili=ation of arine an& fishin, resour!es' E2('3+i0e E(&n&1i( A&ne8 Rig,t+ &) t,e C&a+ta' State 9>!<"66@: (!) /nu erate the ri,hts of the !oastal state in the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one' (3N) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
5n the /MC7<S5E/ /CANA85C .AN/H the !oastal State has so%erei,n ri,hts for the purpose of e0plorin, an& e0ploitin,H !onser%in, an& ana,in, the natural resour!esH whether li%in, or non*li%in,H of the waters super;a!ent to the sea:e& an& of the sea:e& an& its su:soilH an& with re,ar& to other a!ti%ities for the e!ono i! e0ploitation an& e0ploration of the =oneH su!h as the pro&u!tion of ener," fro the waterH !urrents an& win&s in an area not e0ten&in, ore than 200 nauti!al iles :e"on& the :aseline fro whi!h the territorial sea is easure&' Ather ri,hts in!lu&e the pro&u!tion of ener," fro the waterH !urrents an& win&sH the esta:lish ent an& use of artifi!ial islan&sH installations an& stru!turesH arine s!ientifi! resear!h an& the prote!tion an& preser%ation of the arine en%iron ent' (+rt' 2)H <'N' Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea)

su!h as low or non*e0istent ta0ation or low operatin, !osts althou,h the ship has no ,enuine linD with that state' (@arrisH Cases an&
8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'H 1998H p' #22')

Territ&ry B G&0ern1ent 9!##?:


No' 8: + law was passe& &i%i&in, the Philippines into three re,ions (7u=onH Eisa"asH an& 8in&anao)H ea!h !onstitutin, an in&epen&ent state e0!ept on atters of forei,n relationsH national &efense an& national ta0ationH whi!h are %este& in the Central ,o%ern ent' 5s the law %ali&L /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he law &i%i&in, the Philippines into three re,ionsH ea!h !onstitutin, an in&epen&ent state an& %estin, in a !entral ,o%ern ent atters of forei,n relationsH national &efenseH an& national ta0ationH is un!onstitutional'

FirstH it %iolates +rti!le 5H whi!h ,uarantees the inte,rit" of the national territor" of the Philippines :e!ause it &i%i&e& the Philippines into three states' Se!on&H it %iolates Se!tion 1H +rti!le 55 of the ConstitutionH whi!h pro%i&es for the esta:lish ent of &e o!rati! an& repu:li! States :" repla!in, it with three States or,ani=e& as a !onfe&eration' 3hir&H it %iolates Se!tion 22H +rti!le 55 of the ConstitutionH whi!hH while re!o,ni=in, an& pro otin, the ri,hts of in&i,enous !ultural !o unitiesH pro%i&es for national unit" an& &e%elop ent'
FourthH it %iolates Se!tion 12H +rti!le M of the ConstitutionH whi!hH pro%i&es for autono ous re,ions in 8usli 8in&anao an& in the Cor&illeras within the fra eworD of national so%erei,nt" as well as territorial inte,rit" of the 1epu:li! of the Philippines'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
SAE/1/5$N 15$@3S R for the purpose of e0plorin, an& e0ploitin,H !onser%in, an& ana,in, the natural resour!esH whether li%in, or non*li%in,H of the sea:e& an& su:soil an& the super;a!ent watersH an& with re,ar& to other a!ti%ities su!h as the pro&u!tion of ener," fro the waterH !urrents an& win&s in an area not e0ten&in, ore than 200 nauti!al iles :e"on& the :aseline fro whi!h the territorial sea is easure&' (See +rt' 2)H <NC7AS)

>uris&i!tionH inter aliaH with re,ar& to:


(1) the esta:lish ent an& use of islan&sH installations an& stru!tures; artifi!ial

(2) arine s!ientifi! resear!h; an& (3) the prote!tion an& preser%ation the arine en%iron ent'

of

FifthH it %iolates the so%erei,nt" of the 1epu:li! of the Philippines' Territ&ria' Sea 0+= Interna' Water+ 9"66;: (2*a*1) -istin,uish: 3he territorial sea an& the internal waters of the Philippines' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3/1153A15+7 S/+ is an a&;a!ent :elt of sea with a :rea&th of 12 nauti!al iles easure& fro the :aselines of a state an& o%er whi!h the state has so%erei,nt"' (+rti!les 2 an& 3 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') Ship of all states en;o" the ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e

'ag State 0+= 'ag &) C&n0enien(e 9"66;: (2*a*3) -istin,uish: 3he fla, state an& the fla, of !on%enien!e' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
F7+$ S3+3/ eans a ship has the nationalit" of the fla, of the state it fliesH :ut there ust :e a ,enuine linD :etween the state an& the ship'
(+rti!le 91 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea')

F7+$ AF CANE/N5/NC/ refers to a state with whi!h a %essel is re,istere& for %arious reasons

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%

throu,h the territorial sea' (+rti!le 1# of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea')
<n&er Se!tion 1H +rti!le 5 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the 5N3/1N+7 6+3/1S of the Philippines !onsist of the waters aroun&H :etween an& !onne!tin, the islan&s of the Philippine +r!hipela,oH re,ar&less of their :rea&th an& &i ensionsH in!lu&in, the waters in :a"sH ri%ers an& laDes' No ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e for forei,n %essels e0ists in the !ase of internal waters' (@arrisH Cases an& 8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'H 1998H p' #07') 5nternal waters are the waters on the lan&war& si&e of :aselines fro whi!h the :rea&th of the territorial sea is !al!ulate&' (Bro&n'ie( Princip'es o) P*b'ic In+erna+iona' La&( ,+- ed.( 199$( p. 1#$.)

No' 1; 6hat &o "ou un&erstan& :" the C-o!trine of 5n!orporationC in Constitutional 7awL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he -AC315N/ AF 5NCA1PA1+35AN eans that the rules of 5nternational law for part of the law of the lan& an& no le,islati%e a!tion is re?uire& to aDe the appli!a:le to a !ountr"' 3he Philippines follows this &o!trineH :e!ause Se!tion 2' +rti!le 55 of the Constitution states that the Philippines a&opts the ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international law as part of the law of the lan&'

D&(trine &) In(&r*&rati&n8 Ser0anda 9"666:

Pa(ta

S3nt

ARTICLE II De('arati&n &) Prin(i*'e+ and State P&'i(ie+


Ar1ed &r(e+8 Ser0ant &) t,e Pe&*'e 9"66-:
No 5 * +rti!le 55' Se!tion 3H of the 1987 Constitution e0pressesH in partH that the C+r e& For!es of the Philippines is the prote!tor of the people an& (of) the State'C -es!ri:e :riefl" what this pro%ision eans' 5s the Philippine National Poli!e !o%ere& :" the sa e an&ateL

No M' 3he Philippines has :e!o e a e :er of the 6orl& 3ra&e Ar,ani=ation (63A) an& resultantl" a,ree& that it Cshall ensure the !onfor it" of its lawsH re,ulations an& a& inistrati%e pro!e&ures with its o:li,ations as pro%i&e& in the anne0e& +,ree ents'C 3his is assaile& as un!onstitutional :e!ause this un&ertaDin, un&ul" li itsH restri!ts an& i pairs Philippine so%erei,nt" an& eans a on, others that Con,ress !oul& not pass le,islation that will :e ,oo& for our national interest an& ,eneral welfare if su!h le,islation will not !onfor with the 63A +,ree ents' 1efute this ar,u ent' (2N)

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


+rti!le 55H Se!tion 3 of the 1987 Constitution eans that the +r e& For!es of the Philippines shoul& not ser%e the interest of the Presi&ent :ut of the people an& shoul& not !o it a:uses a,ainst the people' (1e!or& of the Constitutional Co issionH Eol' EH p' 133') 3his pro%ision is spe!ifi!all" a&&resse& to the +r e& For!es of the Philippines an& not to the Philippine National Poli!eH :e!ause the latter is separate an& &istin!t fro the for er' (1e!or& of the Constitutional Co issionH Eol' EH p' 29); 8analo %' Sisto=a' 312 SC1 + 239 P1999Q')

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to 3ana&a %' +n,araH 272 SC1+ 18 (1997)H the so%erei,nt" of the Philippines is su:;e!t to restri!tion :" its e :ership in the fa il" of nations an& the li itations i pose& of treat" li itations' Se!tion 2' +rti!le 55 of the Constitution a&opts the ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international law as part of the law of the lan&' Ane of su!h prin!iples is pa!ta sunt ser%an&a' 3he Constitution &i& not en%ision a her it*liDe isolation of the !ountr" fro the rest of the worl&'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


+rti!le 55H Se!tion 3 of the 1987 Constitution !an :e interprete& to ean that the +r e& For!es of the Philippines !an :e a le,iti ate instru ent for the o%erthrow of the !i%ilian ,o%ern ent if it has !ease& to :e the ser%ant of the people' (9ernasH 3he 1987 Constitution of the Philippines: + Co entar"H 2003 e&'H p' ))') 3his pro%ision

reed&1 )r&1 N3('ear Wea*&n+8 Mi'itary Ba+e+ 9!#$$:

&reign

&oes not appl" to the Philippine National Poli!eH :e!ause it is separate an& &istin!t fro the +r e& For!es of the Philippines' (1e!or& of the
Constitutional Co issionH Eol' EH p' 29)H 8analo %' Sisto=a' 312 SC1+ 239 P1999Q')

D&(trine &) In(&r*&rati&n8 C&n+tit3ti&na' La5 9!##%:

No' 22: 3he Se!retar" of >usti!e ha& re!entl" rule& that the Presi&ent a" ne,otiate for a o&ifi!ation or e0tension of ilitar" :ases a,ree ent with the <nite& States re,ar&less of the Cno nuDesC pro%isions in the 1987 Constitution' 3he Presi&ent forthwith announ!e& that she fin&s the sa e opinion Ca!!epta:leC an& will a&opt it' 3he Senators on the other han&H le& :" the Senate Presi&entH are sDepti!alH an& ha& e%en warne& that no treat" or international a,ree ent a" ,o into effe!t without the !on!urren!e of two*thir&s of all e :ers of the Senate'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$

+ for er senator ha& sai&H Cit is !o pletel" wron,H if not erroneousHC an& Cis an a en& ent of the Constitution :" isinterpretation'C So e e :ers of the 7ower @ouse a,ree with Se!retar" Ar&one=H while others la ent the latterBs opinion as C?uestiona:leH unfortunateH an& without an" :asis at all'C

the fla, ust :e re!o,ni=e& :" lawH it i plies that !ertain aspe!ts of the fla, are su:;e!t to !han,e throu,h le,islati%e a!tion' Prin(i*'e &) Ci0i'ian S3*re1a(y 9>?<"66?: 2' 6hat Constitutional pro%isions institutionali=e the prin!iple of !i%ilian supre a!"L (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, !onstitutional pro%isions institutionali=e the prin!iple of !i%ilian supre a!":
a' Ci%ilian authorit" is at all ti es supre e o%er the ilitar"' P+rti!le 55H Se!tion 3Q

-o "ou or &o "ou not the afore entione& rulin, -epart ent of >usti!eL 6h"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:

a,ree of

with the

No' 3he Constitution pro%i&es that if forei,n ilitar" :asesH troops or fa!ilities are to :e allowe& after the e0piration of the present Philippine*+ eri!an 8ilitar" 9ases +,ree ent in 1991H it ust :e Cun&er a treat" &ul" !on!urre& in :" the Senate an&H when the Con,ress so re?uiresH ratifie& :" a a;orit" of the %otes !ast :" the people in a national referen&u 'C (+rt' ME555H se!' 22) + ere a,ree entH thereforeH not a treat"H without the !on!urren!e of at least 2I3 of all the e :ers of the Senate will not :e %ali& (+rt' E55H se!' 21H +rt' ME555H se!' #)' 6ith respe!t to the pro%ision allowin, nu!lear weapons within the :asesH the Constitution appears to :an su!h weapons fro the Philippine territor"' 5t &e!lares as a state poli!" that Cthe PhilippinesH !onsistent with the national interestH a&opts an& pursues a poli!" of free&o fro nu!lear weapons in its territor"'C (+rtH 55H se!' 8) @owe%erH the &eli:erations of the Constitutional Co ission woul& see to in&i!ate that this pro%ision of the Constitution is Cnot so ethin, a:solute nor 100 per!ent without e0!eption'C 5t a" therefore :e that !ir!u stan!es a" ;ustif" a pro%ision on nu!lear weapons'

:'

!'

&'

e'
f' ,'

3he installation of the Presi&entH the hi,hest !i%ilian authorit"H as the Co an&er*in*Chief of the ilitar"' P+r* ti!le E55H Se!tion 18Q 3he re?uire ent that e :ers of the +FP swear to uphol& an& &efen& the ConstitutionH whi!h is the fun&a ental law of the !i%il ,o%ern ent' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(1)Q 3he re?uire ent that e :ers of the +FP shall ha%e respe!t for peopleBs ri,hts in the perfor an!e of their &ut"' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(2)Q Professionalis in the ar e& for!es' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(3)Q
5nsulation of the +FP fro partisan politi!s' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(3)Q Prohi:ition a,ainst the appoint ent of an +FP e :er in the a!ti%e ser%i!e to a !i%ilian position' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(#)Q

h' i'

P,i'i**ine 'ag 9>;<"66?: State whether or not the law is !onstitutional' /0plain :riefl"' 1' + law !han,in, the &esi,n of the Philippine fla,' (2N) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 3he law is in%ali& !onsi&erin, that un&er +rti!le ME5H Se!tion 1 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the fla, of the Philippines shall :e re&H whiteH an& :lueH with a sun an& three starsH as !onse!rate& an& honore& :" the people an& re!o,ni=e& :" law' Sin!e the Constitution itself pres!ri:es the &esi,nH it !an onl" :e !han,e& :" !onstitutional a en& ent' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he law is %ali&H pro%i&e& that the new &esi,n &oes not !han,e the ele ents an& !olor s!he e of the fla, as state& in the ConstitutionH an& the fla, is !onse!rate& an& honore& :" the people' Sin!e the Constitution itself states that

Co pulsor" retire ent of offi!ers without e0tension of ser%i!e' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(2)Q 1e?uire ent of proportional re!ruit ent fro all pro%in!es an& !itiesH so as to a%oi& an" re,ional !li?ue fro for in, within the +FP' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(7)Q
+ 3*"ear li itation on the tour of &ut" of the Chief of StaffH whi!h althou,h e0ten&i:le in !ase of e er,en!" :" the Presi&entH &epen&s on Con,ressional &e!laration of e er,en!"' P+rti!le ME5H

;'

Se!tion 2())Q 3he esta:lish ent of a poli!e for!e that is not onl" !i%ilian in !hara!ter :ut also un&er the lo!al e0e!uti%es' P+rti!le ME5H Se!tion 2(7)Q State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##!:
No' 13; 5n Fe:ruar" 1990H the 8inistr" of the +r "' 1epu:li! of 5n&onesiaH in%ite& :i&s for the suppl" of 200H000 pairs of !o :at :oots for the use of the 5n&onesian +r "' 3he 8ariDina Shoe CorporationH a Philippine !orporationH whi!h has no :ran!h offi!e an& no assets in 5n&onesiaH su: itte& a :i& to suppl" 200H000 pairs of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!#

!o :at :oots at <'S' S30 per pair &eli%ere& in >aDarta on or :efore 30 A!to:er 1990' 3he !ontra!t was awar&e& :" the 8inistr" of the +r " to 8ariDina Shoe Corporation an& was si,ne& :" the parties in >aDarta' 8ariDina Shoe Corporation was a:le to &eli%er onl" 200H000 pairs of !o :at :oots in >aDarta :" 30 A!to:er 1990 an& it re!ei%e& pa" ent for 100H000 pairs or a total of <'S' S3H000H000'00' 3he 8inistr" of the +r " pro ise& to pa" for the other 100H000 pairs alrea&" &eli%ere& as soon as the re ainin, 300H000 pairs of !o :at :oots are &eli%ere&H at whi!h ti e the sai& 300H000 pairs will also :e pai& for' 8ariDina Shoe Corporation faile& to &eli%er an" ore !o :at :oots' An 1 >une 1991H the 1epu:li! of 5n&onesia file& an a!tion :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court of Pasi,' 1i=alH to !o pel 8ariDina Shoe Corporation to perfor the :alan!e of its o:li,ations un&er the !ontra!t an& for &a a,es' 5n its +nswerH 8ariDina Shoe Corporation sets up a !ounter!lai for <'S' S3H000H000'00 representin, the pa" ent for the 100H000 pairs of !o :at :oots alrea&" &eli%ere& :ut unpai&' 5n&onesia o%e& to &is iss the !ounter!lai H assertin, that it is entitle& to so%erei,n 5 unit" fro suit' 3he trial !ourt &enie& the otion to &is iss an& issue& two writs of ,arnish ent upon 5n&onesian $o%ern ent fun&s &eposite& in the Philippine National 9anD an& Far /ast 9anD' 5n&onesia went to the Court of +ppeals on a petition for !ertiorari un&er 1ule )2 of the 1ules of Court'

Consent to the e0er!ise of ;uris&i!tion of a forei,n !ourt &oes not in!lu&e wai%er of the separate i unit" fro e0e!ution' (9rownlieH Prin!iples of Pu:li! 5nternational 7awH #th e&'H p' 3##') 3husH in -e0ter %s' Carpenter %s' Gun,li, >arn%a,sst"relsenH #3 Fe& 702H it was hel& the !onsent to :e sue& &oes not ,i%e !onsent to the atta!h ent of the propert" of a so%erei,n ,o%ern ent' State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##?:
No' ); 3he 1epu:li! of the 9alau (for erl" Palau 5slan&s) opene& an& operate& in 8anila an offi!e en,a,e& in tra&in, 9alau pro&u!ts with Philippine pro&u!ts' 5n one transa!tionH the lo!al :u"er !o plaine& that the 9alau ,oo&s &eli%ere& to hi were su:stan&ar& an& he sue& the 1epu:li! of 9alauH :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court of Pasi,H for &a a,es'

a) @ow !an the 1epu:li! of 9alau in%oDe its so%erei,n i unit"L /0plain' :) 6ill su!h &efense of so%erei,n i unit" prosperL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: +) 3he 1epu:li! of 9alau !an in%oDe its so%erei,n 5 unit" :" filin, a otion to &is iss in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion l(a)H 1ule 1) of the 1ules of Court on the ,roun& that the !ourt has no ;uris&i!tion o%er its person'
+!!or&in, to the @ol" See %s' 1osarioH 238 SC1+ 22#H in Pu:li! 5nternational 7awH when a State wishes to plea& so%erei,n i unit" in a forei,n !ourtH it re?uests the Forei,n Affi!e of the State where it is :ein, sue& to !on%e" to the !ourt that it is entitle& to i unit"' 5n the PhilippinesH the pra!ti!e is for the forei,n ,o%ern ent to first se!ure an e0e!uti%e en&orse ent of its !lai of so%erei,n i unit"' 5n so e !asesH the &efense of so%erei,n i unit" is su: itte& &ire!tl" to the lo!al !ourt :" the forei,n ,o%ern ent throu,h !ounsel :" filin, a otion to &is iss on the ,roun& that the !ourt has no >uris&i!tion o%er its person' :) NoH the &efense of so%erei,n 5 unit" will not prosper' 3he sale of 9alau pro&u!ts is a !ontra!t in%ol%in, a !o er!ial a!ti%it"' 5n <nite& States %s' 1ui=H 13)SC1+#87 an& <nite& States %s' $uintoH 182 SC1+ )##H it was state& that a forei,n State !annot in%oDe 5 unit" fro suit if it enters into a !o er!ial !ontra!t' 3he Philippines a&heres to 1/S315C35E/ SAE/1/5$N 588<N53O'

@ow woul& the Court of +ppeals &e!i&e the !aseL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he Court of +ppeals shoul& &is iss the petition insofar as it seeDs to annul the or&er &en"in, the otion of the $o%ern ent of 5n&onesia to &is iss the !ounter!lai ' 3he !ounter!lai in this !ase is a !o pulsor" !ounter!lai sin!e it arises fro the sa e !ontra!t in%ol%e& in the !o plaint' +s su!h it ust :e set up otherwise it will :e :arre&' +:o%e allH as hel& in Froilan %s' Pan Ariental Shippin, Co'H 92 Phil' 902H :" filin, a !o plaintH the state of 5n&onesia wai%e& its i unit" fro suit' 5t is not ri,ht that it !an sue in the !ourts :ut it !annot :e sue&' 3he &efen&ant therefore a!?uires the ri,ht to set up a !o pulsor" !ounter!lai a,ainst it' @owe%erH the Court of +ppeals shoul& ,rant the petition of the 5n&onesian ,o%ern ent insofar as it sou,ht to annul the ,arnish ent of the fun&s of 5n&onesia whi!h were &eposite& in the Philippine National 9anD an& Far /ast 9anD'

State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!#$#: No' 13: + propert" owner file& an a!tion &ire!tl" in !ourt a,ainst the 1epu:li! of the Philippines

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"6

seeDin, pa" ent for a par!el of lan& whi!h the national ,o%ern ent utili=e& for a roa& wi&enin, pro;e!t' (1) Can the ,o%ern ent in%oDe the &o!trine of non*suita:ilit" of the stateL
(2) 5n !onne!tion with the pre!e&in, ?uestionH !an the propert" owner ,arnish pu:li!

fun&s to satisf" his !lai for pa" entL /0plain "our answers' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) NoH the ,o%ern ent !annot in%oDe the &o!trine of state of i unit" fro suit' +s hel& in 8inisterio %s' Court of First 5nstan!e of Ce:uH #0 SC1+ #)#H when the ,o%ern ent e0propriates propert" for pu:li! use without pa"in, ;ust !o pensationH it !annot in%oDe its i unit" fro the suit' AtherwiseH the ri,ht ,uarantee& in Se!tion 9H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution that pri%ate propert" shall not :e taDen for pu:li! use without ;ust !o pensation will :e ren&ere& nu,ator"' (2) NoH the owner !annot ,arnish pu:li! fun&s to satisf" his !lai for pa" entH Se!tion 7 of +!t No' 3083 prohi:its e0e!ution upon an" ;u&, ent a,ainst the ,o%ern ent' +s hel& in 1epu:li! %s' Pala!ioH 23 SC1+ 899H e%en if the ,o%ern ent a" :e sue&H it &oes not follow that its properties a" :e sei=e& un&er e0e!ution'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) OesH the 8uni!ipalit" of Calu pit is lia:le for the ne,li,en!e of its &ri%er >ohnn"' <n&er Se!tion 2# of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH lo!al ,o%ern ent units are not e0e pt fro lia:ilit" for &eath or in;ur" to persons or &a a,e to propert"' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: NoH the uni!ipalit" is not lia:le for the ne,li,en!e of >ohnn"H the pre%ailin, rule in the law of uni!ipal !orporations is that a uni!ipalit" is not lia:le for the torts !o itte& :" its re,ular e plo"ees in the &is!har,e of ,o%ern ental fun!tions' 3he uni!ipalit" is answera:le onl" when it is a!tin, in a proprietar" !apa!it"'
5n the !ase at :arH >ohnn" was a re,ular e plo"ee of the 8uni!ipalit" of Calu pit as &ri%er of its &u p tru!D; he !o itte& a tortious a!t while &is!har,in, a ,o%ern ental fun!tion for the uni!ipalit"H ie'H &ri%in, re!Dlessl" the sai& tru!D loa&e& with san& for the repair of uni!ipal streets' <n&ou:te&l" thenH >ohnn" as &ri%er of the &u p tru!D was perfor in, a &ut" or tasD pertainin, to his offi!e' 3he !onstru!tion or aintenan!e of pu:li! streets are a& itte&l" ,o%ern ental a!ti%ities' +t the ti e of the a!!i&entH >ohnn" was en,a,e& in the &is!har,e of ,o%ern ental fun!tions' @en!eH the &eath of the two passen,ers of the ;eepne" *tra,i! an& &eplora:le thou,h it a" :e * i pose& on the uni!ipalit" no &ut" to pa" onetar" !o pensationH as hel& in 8uni!ipalit" of San' Fernan&o %' Fir eH 192 SC1+ )92'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
(2) NoH fun&s of the ,o%ern ent on &eposit in the :anD !annot :e ,arnishe& for two reasons: 1' <n&er +rt' 55H Se!' 29 (1) pu:li! fun&s

2'

!annot :e spent e0!ept in pursuan!e of an appropriation a&e :" lawH an& essential pu:li! ser%i!es will :e i paire& if fun&s of the ,o%ern ent were su:;e!t to e0e!utionH (Co issioner of Pu:li! @i,hwa"s %s' San -ie,oH 31 SC1+ )1) (1970))' 3he re e&" of the pre%ailin, part" is to ha%e the ;u&, ent !re&it in his fa%or in!lu&e& in the ,eneral appropriations law for the ne0t "ear'

State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##":


No' 9: 3he Northern 7u=on 5rri,ation +uthorit" (N75+) was esta:lishe& :" a le,islati%e !harter to stren,then the irri,ation s"ste s that suppl" water to far s an& !o er!ial ,rowers in the area' 6hile the N75+ is a:le to ,enerate re%enues throu,h its operationsH it re!ei%es an annual appropriation fro Con,ress' 3he N75+ is authori=e& to Ce0er!ise all the powers of a !orporation un&er the Corporation Co&e'C -ue to a is!al!ulation :" so e of its e plo"eesH there was a assi%e irri,ation o%erflow !ausin, a flash floo& in 9arrio .an;era' + !hil& &rowne& in the in!i&ent an& his parents now file suit a,ainst 3he N75+ for &a a,es'

State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##;: No' ); >ohnn" was e plo"e& as a &ri%er :" the 8uni!ipalit" of Calu pitH 9ula!an' 6hile &ri%in, re!Dlessl" a uni!ipal &u p tru!D with its loa& of san& for the repair of uni!ipal streetsH >ohnn" hit a ;eepne"' 3wo passen,ers of the ;eepne" were Dille&' 3he San,,unian, 9a"an passe& an or&inan!e appropriatin, P300H000 as !o pensation for the heirs of the %i!ti s' 1) 5s the uni!ipalit" lia:le for the ne,li,en!e of >ohnn"L 2) 5s the uni!ipal or&inan!e %ali&L

8a" the N75+ %ali&l" in%oDe the i unit" of the State fro suitL -is!uss thorou,hl"' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"!

NoH the Northern 7u=on 5rri,ation +uthorit" a" not in%oDe the i unit" of the State fro suitH :e!auseH as hel& in Fontanilla %s' 8alia anH 179 SC1+ )82 an& 19# SC1+ #8)H irri,ation is a proprietar" fun!tion' 9esi&esH the Northern 7u=on 5rri,ation +uthorit" has a ;uri&i!al personalit" separate an& &istin!t fro the ,o%ern entH a suit a,ainst it is not a suit a,ainst the State' Sin!e the wai%er of the i unit" fro suit is without ?ualifi!ationH as hel& in 1a"o %s' Court of First 5nstan!e of 9ula!anH 110 SC1+ #2)H the wai%er in!lu&es an a!tion :ase& on a ?uasi*&eli!t'

State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!###:


No E5 * 9' 3he e plo"ees of the Philippine 3o:a!!o +& inistration (P3+) sue& to re!o%er o%erti e pa"' 5n resistin, su!h !lai H the P3+ theori=e& that it is perfor in, ,o%ern ental fun!tions' -e!i&e an& e0plain' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s hel& in Philippine Eir,inia 3o:a!!o +& inistration %' Court of 5n&ustrial 1elationsH )2 SC1+ #1)H the Philippine 3o:a!!o +& inistration is not lia:le for o%erti e pa"H sin!e it is perfor in, ,o%ern ental fun!tions' + on, its purposes are to pro ote the effe!ti%e er!han&isin, of to:a!!o so that those en,a,e& in the to:a!!o in&ustr" will ha%e e!ono i! se!urit"H to sta:ili=e the pri!e of to:a!!oH an& to i pro%e the li%in, an&

(e',' C'+'

%' 1ui=H <'S' %' $uinto)

State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!###: +' 1') 6hat &o "ou un&erstan& :" state i unit" fro suitL /0plain' (2N) 2') @ow a" !onsent of the state to :e sue& :e ,i%enL /0plain' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1') S3+3/ 588<N53O F1A8 S<53 eans that the State !annot :e sue& without its !onsent' + !orollar" of su!h prin!iple is that properties use& :" the State in the perfor an!e of its ,o%ern ental fun!tions !annot :e su:;e!t to ;u&i!ial e0e!ution' 2') Consent of the State to :e sue& a" :e a&e e0pressl" as in the !ase of a spe!ifi!H e0press pro%ision of law as wai%er of State

unit" fro

suit is not inferre& li,htl"


or when it files a suit in

327 as a en&e& :" P- 1##2T or i plie&l" as when the State en,a,es in proprietar" fun!tions (<'S'

whi!h !ase the a&%erse part" a" file a !ounter!lai (Froilan %' Pan Ariental Shippin,) or when the &o!trine woul& in effe!t :e use& to perpetuate an in;usti!e (+ i,a:le %'
Cuen!aH #3 SC1+ 3)0)'

e!ono i! !on&itions of those en,a,e& in the to:a!!o in&ustr"' State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!#$%:
(a) CMC file& a !ase a,ainst the 1epu:li! of the Philippines for &a a,es !ause& his "a!htH whi!h was ra e& :" a na%" %essel' (:) CMC also sue& in another !ase the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs an& the 1epu:li! of the Philippines for pa" ent of the !o pensation of the %alue of his lan&H whi!h was use& as part of the tar a! of the Ce:u 5nternational +irportH without prior e0propriation pro!ee&in,s'

stateBs i unit" fro suit' +s hel& in 8inisterio %' Court of First 5nstan!e' #0 SC1+ #)# (1971)H whi!h also in%ol%e& the taDin, of pri%ate propert" without the :enefit of e0propriation pro!ee&in,H C3he &o!trine of ,o%ern ental i unit" fro suit !annot ser%e as an instru ent for perpetratin, an in;usti!e on a !iti=en' ' ' ' 6hen the ,o%ern ent taDes an" propert" for pu:li! useH whi!h is !on&itional upon the pa" ent of ;ust !o pensationH to :e ;u&i!iall" as!ertaine&H it aDes anifest that it su: its to the ;uris&i!tion of the !ourt'C 3he Soli!itor $eneralBs otion to &is iss shoul&H thereforeH :e &enie&'

3he Soli!itor $eneral o%e& to &is iss the two !ases in%oDin, state i unit" fro suit -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he ,o%ern ent !annot :e sue& for &a a,es !onsi&erin, that the a,en!" whi!h !ause& the &a a,es was the Philippine Na%"' <n&er +rt' 2180 of the Ci%il Co&eH the state !onsents to :e sue& for a ?uasi*&eli!t onl" when the &a a,e is !ause& :" its spe!ial a,ents' @en!eH the Soli!itor $eneralBs otion shoul& :e ,rante& an& the suit :rou,ht :" CMC :e &is isse&' (:) 9ut the ,o%ern ent C+NNA3 5NEAG/ the

State I113nity 0+= Wai0er &) I113nity 9!##%: NoH ): 5t is sai& that Cwai%er of i unit" :" the State &oes not ean a !on!ession of its lia:ilit"C' 6hat are the i pli!ations of this phraseL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he phrase that wai%er of i unit" :" the State &oes not ean a !on!ession of lia:ilit" eans that :" !onsentin, to :e sue&H the State &oes not ne!essaril" a& it it is lia:le' +s state& in Philippine 1o!D 5n&ustriesH 5n!' %s' 9oar& of 7i?ui&atorsH 180 SC1+ 171H in su!h a !ase the State is erel" ,i%in, the plaintiff a !han!e to

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

""

pro%e that the State is lia:le :ut the State retains the ri,ht to raise all lawful &efenses' State I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##-:
No 19: -e%i is the owner of a pie!e of lan&' 6ithout prior e0propriation or ne,otiate& saleH the national ,o%ern ent use& a portion thereof for the wi&enin, of the national hi,hwa"' -e%i file& a one" !lai with the Co ission on +u&it whi!h was &enie&' 7eft with no other re!ourseH -e%i file& a !o plaint for re!o%er" of propert" an&Ior &a a,es a,ainst the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s an& the 1epu:li! of the PhilippinesH 3he &efen&ant o%e& for &is issal of the !o plaint !onten&in, that the ,o%ern ent !annot :e sue& without its !onsent' 3he 13C &is isse& the !o plaint' An appealH how woul& "ou &e!i&e the !ase'

!) Se!tion 1H +rti!le ME55 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he LAG O THE PHILIPPINES shall :e re&H whiteH an& :lueH with a sun an& three starsH as !onse!rate& an& honore& :" the people an& re!o,ni=e& :" law'C

Se!tion 2H +rti!le ME5 of the Constitution states: 3he Con,ress a" :" lawH a&opt a new na e for the !ountr"H a national anthe H or a national sealH whi!h shall all :e trul" refle!ti%e an& s" :oli! of the i&ealsH histor"H an& tra&itions of the people' Su!h law shall taDe effe!t onl" upon its ratifi!ation :" the people in a national referen&u 'C
&) Se!tion 22H +rti!le 55 of the Constitution pro%i&es: 3he State re!o,ni=es an& pro otes the ri,hts of INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES within the fra eworD of national unit" an& &e%elop ent'C Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution rea&s: 3he StateH su:;e!t to the pro%isions of this Constitution an& national &e%elop ent poli!ies an& pro,ra sH shall prote!t the ri,hts of in&i,enous !ultural !o unities to their an!estral lan&s to ensure their e!ono i!H so!ial an& !ultural well*:ein,' 3he Con,ress a" pro%i&e for the appli!a:ilit" of !usto ar" laws ,o%ernin, propert" ri,hts or relations in &eter inin, the ownership an& e0tent of the an!estral &o ains'C Se!tion )H +rt' M555 of the Constitution pro%i&es: 3he State shall appl" the prin!iples of AGRARIAN RE ORM or stewar&shipH whene%er appli!a:le in a!!or&an!e with lawH in the &isposition or utili=ation of other natural resour!esH in!lu&in, lan&s of the pu:li! &o ain un&er lease or !on!ession suita:le to a,ri!ultureH su:;e!t to prior ri,htsH ho estea& ri,hts of s all settlersH an& the ri,hts of in&i,enous !o unities to their an!estral lan&s'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&er &is issin, the !o plaint shoul& :e re%erse&' 5n 8inisterio %' Court of First 5nstan!e of Ce:uH #0 SC1+ #)#H it was hel& that when the ,o%ern ent taDes propert" fro a pri%ate lan&owner without prior e0propriation or ne,otiate& saleH the lan&owner a" aintain a suit a,ainst the ,o%ern ent without %iolatin, the &o!trine of ,o%ern ent 5 unit" fro suit' 3he ,o%ern ent shoul& :e &ee e& to ha%e wai%e& i plie&l" its i unit" fro suit' AtherwiseH the !onstitutional ,uarantee that pri%ate propert" shall not :e taDen for pu:li! use without ;ust !o pensation will :e ren&ere& nu,ator"'

State Prin(i*'e+ B P&'i(ie+ 9!##;: No' 1; 6hat is the state poli!" on: a) worDin, wo enL :) e!olo,"L !) the s" :ols of statehoo&L &) !ultural inoritiesL e) s!ien!e an& te!hnolo,"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a) Se!tion 1#H +rti!le M555 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he State shall prote!t WORCING WOMEN :" pro%i&in, safe an& healthful worDin, !on&itionsH taDin, into a!!ount their aternal fun!tionsH an& su!h fa!ilities an& opportunities that will enhan!e their welfare an& ena:le the to reali=e their full potential in the ser%i!e of the nation'C :) Se!tion 1)H +rti!le 55 of the Constitution pro%i&es: 3he State shall prote!t an& a&%an!e the ri,ht of the people an& their posterit" to a :alan!e& an& healthful ECOLOGD in a!!or& with the rh"th an& har on" of nature'C

3he State a" resettle lan&less far ers an& far worDers in its own a,ri!ultural estates whi!h shall :e &istri:ute& to the in the anner pro%i&e& :" law'C
Se!tion 17' +rti!le M5E of the Constitution states: C3he State shall re!o,ni=eH respe!t an& prote!t the ri,hts of in&i,enous !ultural !o unities to preser%e an& &e%elop their !ulturesH tra&itionsH an& institutions' 5t shall

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"-

!onsi&er these ri,hts in the for ulation of national plans an& poli!ies'C
e) Se!tion 17H +rti!le 55 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he State shall ,i%e priorit" to EDUCATION7 SCIENCE an& TECHNOLOGD7 ARTS7 CULTURE7 an& SPORTS to foster patriotis an& nationalis H a!!elerate so!ial pro,ressH an& pro ote total hu an li:eration an& &e%elop ent'C Se!tion 1#H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution rea&s in part: C3he sustaine& &e%elop ent of a reser%oir of NATIONAL TALENTS !onsistin, of Filipino s!ientistsH entrepreneursH professionalsH ana,ersH hi,h*le%el te!hni!al anpower an& sDille& worDers an& !rafts en shall :e pro ote& :" the StateH 3he State shall en!oura,e appropriate te!hnolo," an& re,ulate 5ts transfer for the national :enefit' Su:*se!tion 2H Se!tion 3' +rti!le M5E of the Constitution states: C3he" ( EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS) shall in!ul!ate patriotis an& nationalis H foster lo%e of hu anit"H respe!t for hu an ri,htsH appre!iation of the role of national heroes in the histori!al &e%elop ent of the !ountr"H tea!h the ri,hts an& &uties of !iti=enshipH stren,then ethi!al an& spiritual %aluesH &e%elop oral !hara!ter an& personal &is!iplineH en!oura,e !riti!al an& !reati%e thinDin,H :roa&en s!ientifi! an& te!hnolo,i!al Dnowle&,eH an& pro ote %o!ational effi!ien!"'C Se!tion 10' +rti!le M5E of the Constitution &e!lares: CSCIENCE an& TECHNOLOGD are essential for national &e%elop ent an& pro,ress' 3he State shall ,i%e priorit" to resear!h an& &e%elop entH in%entionH inno%ationH an& their utili=ation; an& to s!ien!e an& te!hnolo," e&u!ationH trainin,H ser%i!es' 5t shall support in&i,enousH appropriateH an& self* reliant s!ientifi! an& !ultural !apa:ilitiesH an& their appli!ation to the !ountr"Bs pro&u!ti%e s"ste s an& national life'C Se!tion 11H +rti!le M5E of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he Con,ress a" pro%i&e for in!enti%esH in!lu&in, TAX DEDUCTIONSH to en!oura,e pri%ate parti!ipation in pro,ra s of :asi! an& applie& s!ientifi! resear!h' S!holarshipsH ,rants*in*ai& or other for s of 5n!enti%es shall :e pro%i&e& to &eser%in, s!ien!e stu&entsH resear!hersH s!ientistsH in%estorsH te!hnolo,istsH an& spe!iall" ,ifte& !iti=ens'C

Se!tion 12H +rti!le M5E of the Constitution rea&s: 3he State shall re,ulate the transfer an& pro ote the a&aptation of te!hnolo," fro all sour!es for the national :enefit' 5t shall en!oura,e wi&est parti!ipation of pri%ate ,roupsH lo!al ,o%ern entsH an& !o unit"* :ase& or,ani=ations in the ,eneration an& utili=ation of s!ien!e an& te!hnolo,"'C
NOTE: 5t is su,,este& that if an e0a inee ,a%e a su:stanti%e answer without ,i%in, the e0a!t pro%isions of the ConstitutionH then he shoul& :e ,i%en full !re&it' FurtherH one pro%ision ?uote&I&is!usse& :" the e0a inee shoul& :e suffi!ient for hi to :e ,i%en full !re&it'

Tran+*aren(y8 Matter+ &) P3b'i( Intere+t 9!#$#: No' 3: -oes the 1987 Constitution pro%i&e for a poli!" of transparen!" in atters of pu:li! interestL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: OesH the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es for a poli!" of transparen!" in atters of pu:li! interest' Se!tion 28H +rti!le 55 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es:
1' CSu:;e!t to reasona:le !on&itions pres!ri:e& :" lawH the State a&opts an& i ple ents a poli!" of full &is!losure of all its transa!tions in%ol%in, pu:li! interestHC

2' Se!tion 7H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution states: C3he ri,ht of the people to infor ation on atters of pu:li! !on!ern shall :e re!o,ni=e&H +!!ess to offi!ial re!or&sH an& to &o!u entsH an& papers pertainin, to offi!ial a!tsH transa!tionsH or &e!isionsH as well as to ,o%ern ent resear!h &ata use& as :asis for poli!" &e%elop entH shall :e affor&e& the !iti=enH su:;e!t to su!h li itations as a" :e pro%i&e& :" law'C
3' Se!tion 20H +rti!le E5 of the 1987 Constitution rea&s: C3he re!or&s an& :ooDs of a!!ount of the Con,ress shall :e preser%e& an& :e open to the pu:li! in a!!or&an!e with lawH an& su!h :ooDs shall :e au&ite& :" the Co ission on +u&it whi!h shall pu:lish annuall" an ite i=e& list of a ounts pai& to an& e0penses in!urre& for ea!h e :er'C <n&er Se!tion 17H +rti!le M5 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the sworn state ent of assetsH lia:ilities an& net worth of the Presi&entH the Ei!e*Presi&entH the 8e :ers of the Ca:inetH the Con,ressH the Supre e CourtH the Constitutional Co ission an& other !onstitutional offi!esH an& offi!ers of the

#'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

";

ar e& for!es with ,eneral or fla, ranD file& upon their assu ption of offi!e shall :e &is!lose& to the pu:li! in the anner pro%i&e& :" law'
2' Se!tion 21H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution &e!lares: C5nfor ation on forei,n loans o:taine& or ,uarantee& :" the ,o%ern ent shall :e a&e a%aila:le to the pu:li!'C

)' +s hel& in Eal onte %s' 9el onteH $'1' No' 7#930H Fe:' 13H 1989H these pro%isions on pu:li! &is!losures are inten&e& to enhan!e the role of the !iti=enr" in ,o%ern ental &e!ision* aDin, as well as in !he!Din, a:use in ,o%ern ent' Tran+*aren(y8 Matter+ &) P3b'i( Intere+t 9"666:
No E' State at least three !onstitutional pro%isions refle!tin, the State poli!" on transparen!" in atters of pu:li! interest' 6hat is the purpose of sai& poli!"L (2N)

2' C+ pu:li! offi!er or e plo"ee shallH upon assu ption of offi!eH an& as often as thereafter a" :e re?uire& :" lawH su: it a &e!laration un&er oath of his assetsH lia:ilitiesH an& net worth' 5n the !ase of the Presi&entH the Ei!e Presi&entH the 8e :ers of the Ca:inetH the Con,ressH the Supre e CourtH the Constitutional Co issions an& other !onstitutional offi!esH an& offi!ers of the ar e& for!es with ,eneral or fla, ranDH the &e!laration shall :e &is!lose& to the pu:li! in the anner pro%i&e& :" law'C (Se!tion 17H +rti!le M5) )' C5nfor ation on forei,n loans o:taine& or ,uarantee& :" the $o%ern ent shall :e a&e a%aila:le to the pu:li!'C (Se!tion 21 +rti!le M55) +s e0plaine& 5n Eal onte %' 9el onteH 170 SC1+ 22) (1989)H the purpose of the poli!" is to prote!t the people fro a:use of ,o%ern ental power' 5f a!!ess to infor ation of pu:li! !on!ern is &enie&H the postulate Cpu:li! offi!e is a pu:li! trustC woul& :e ere e pt" wor&s' UNote: 3he e0a inee shoul& :e ,i%en full !re&it if he ,i%es an" three of the a:o%e* entione& pro%isions'T

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the !onstitutional pro%isions refle!tin, the State poli!" on transparen!" in atters of pu:li! interest:
1' CSu:;e!t to reasona:le !on&itions pres!ri:e& :" lawH the State a&opts an& 5 ple ents a poli!" of full pu:li! &is!losure of all its transa!tions in%ol%in, pu:li! interest'C (Se!tion 28H +rti!le 55) 2' 3he ri,ht of the people to infor ation on atters of pu:li! !on!ern shall :e re!o,ni=e&' +!!ess to offi!ial re!or&sH an& to &o!u entsH an& papers pertainin, to offi!ial a!tsH transa!tionsH or &e!isionsH as well as to ,o%ern ent resear!h &ata use& as :asis for poli!" &e%elop entH shall :e affor&e& to !iti=enH su:;e!t to su!h li itations as a" :e pro%i&e& :" law'C (Se!tion 7H +rti!le 555) 3' 3he re!or&s an& :ooDs of a!!ounts of the Con,ress shall :e preser%e& an& :e open to the pu:li! in a!!or&an!e with lawH an& su!h :ooDs shall :e au&ite& :" the Co ission on +u&it whi!h shall pu:lish annuall" an ite i=e& list of a ounts pai& to an& e0penses in!urre& for ea!h 8e :er'C (Se!tion 20' +rti!le E5)

ARTICLE III Bi'' &) Rig,t+


Bi'' &) Attainder 9!#$%: No' M5: Con,ress passe& a law relatin, to offi!ials an& e plo"ees who ha& ser%e& in the $o%ern ent for the perio& fro Septe :er 21H 1972 up to Fe:ruar" 22H 198)'
(a) Ane pro%ision of the law &e!lare& all offi!ials fro the ranD of assistant hea& of a &epart entH :ureauH offi!e or a,en!" C<nfitC for !ontinue& ser%i!e in the ,o%ern ent an& &e!lare& their respe!ti%e positions %a!ant' +nother pro%ision re?uire& all the other offi!ials an& e plo"ees to taDe an oath of lo"alt" to the fla, an& ,o%ern ent as a !on&ition for their !ontinue& e plo" ent'

(:)

#' 3he Affi!e of the A :u&s an shall ha%e the followin, powersH fun!tionsH an& &uties:
MMM MMM ()) Pu:li!i=e atters !o%ere& :" its in%esti,ation when !ir!u stan!es so

+re the two pro%isions %ali&L 6h"L SUGGESTED ANSWER: (a) 3he law is a :ill of attain&er :" whi!h Con,ressH :" assu in, ;u&i!ial a,istra!"H in effe!t &e!lares all offi!ials an& e plo"ees &urin, artial law (Septe :er 21H 1972* Fe:ruar" 22H 198)) as &islo"al an&H on this :asisH re o%es so e while su:;e!tin, others to a lo"alt" test'
6ith respe!t to the pro%ision &e!larin, positions %a!antH e%en the power to reor,ani=e !an not

warrant an& with &ue (Se!tion 12H +rti!le M5)

pru&en!eHC

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"@

:e in%oDe& :e!ause un&er the Free&o Constitution su!h power !an :e e0er!ise& onl" :" the Presi&ent an& onl" up to Fe:ruar" 22H 1987' Sin!e the law un&er ?uestion was presu a:l" passe& after Fe:ruar" 22H 1987 an& :" Con,ressH it is un!onstitutional'

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 E2traE3di(ia' C&n)e++i&n 9"66!:


No 5M * 1afaelH Carlos an& >oseph were a!!use& of ur&er :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court of 8anila' +!!use& >oseph turne& state witness a,ainst his !o*a!!use& 1afael an& CarlosH an& was a!!or&in,l" &is!har,e& fro the infor ation' + on, the e%i&en!e presente& :" the prose!ution was an e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession a&e :" >oseph &urin, the !usto&ial 5n%esti,ationH i pli!atin, 1afael an& Carlos whoH he sai&H to,ether with hi (>oseph)H !o itte& the !ri e' 3he e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession was e0e!ute& without the assistan!e of !ounsel'

(:) 6ith respe!t to the pro%ision re?uirin, the lo"alt" testH lo"alt" as a ,eneral rule is a rele%ant !onsi&eration in assessin, e plo"eesB fitness' @owe%erH the re?uire ent in this !ase is not a ,eneral re?uire ent :ut sin,les out C artial lawC e plo"ees an& therefore is a& inistere& in a &is!ri inator" anner' 7o"alt"H thereforeH while a rele%ant !onsi&eration in other !ir!u stan!esH is :ein, e plo"e& in this !ase for an un!onstitutional purpose' Bi'' &) Attainder 9!##6:
No' 1; /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1 an& 2 issue& :" Presi&ent Cora=on C' +?uino !reate& the Presi&ential Co ission on $oo& $o%ern ent (PC$$) an& e powere& it to se?uester an" propert" shown pri a fa!ie to :e ill*,otten wealth of the late Presi&ent 8ar!osH his relati%es an& !ronies' /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 1# %ests on the San&i,an:a"an ;uris&i!tion to tr" hi&&en wealth !ases' An +pril 1#H 198)H after an in%esti,ationH the PC$$ se?uestere& the assets of M CorporationH 5n!'

+!!use& 1afael an& Carlos %ehe entl" o:;e!te& on the ,roun& that sai& e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession was ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e a,ainst the ' 1ule on whether the sai& e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession is a& issi:le in e%i&en!e or not' (2N) IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to People %s' 9alisterosH 237 SC1+ #99 (199#)H the !onfession is a& issi:le' <n&er Se!tion 12H +rti!le 555 of the ConstitutionH the !onfession is ina& issi:le onl" a,ainst the one who !onfesse&' Anl" the one whose ri,hts were %iolate& !an raise the o:;e!tion as his ri,ht is personal'

(1) M CorporationH 5n!' !lai e& that Presi&ent +?uinoH as Presi&entH !oul& not lawfull" issue /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1#H whi!h ha%e the for!e of lawH on the ,roun& that le,islation is a fun!tion of Con,ress' -e!i&e'
(2) Sai& !orporation also ?uestione& the %ali&it" of the three e0e!uti%e or&ers on the ,roun& that the" are :ills of attain&er an&H thereforeH un!onstitutional' -e!i&e'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8 +!!or&in, to People us' >araH 1## SC1+ 21)(198))H the !onfession is ina& issi:le' 5f it is ina& issi:le a,ainst the one who !onfesse&H with ore reason it shoul& :e ina& issi:le a,ainst others'
C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 E2traE3di(ia' C&n)e++i&n8 P&'i(e Line<U* 9!##;: No' 10: +n infor ation for parri!i&e was file& a,ainst -ann"' +fter the N95 foun& an e"ewitness to the !o ission of the !ri e' -ann" was pla!e& in a poli!e line*up where he was i&entifie& as the one who shot the %i!ti ' +fter the line*upH -ann" a&e a !onfession to a newspaper reporter who inter%iewe& hi '

SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1# were issue& in 198)' +t that ti e Presi&ent Cora=on +?uino e0er!ise& le,islati%e power ''''
(2) /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1# are not :ills of attain&er' A bi'' o) a++ainder is a 'egis'a+i/e ac+ &-ic- in)'ic+s p*nis-0en+ &i+-o*+ 1*dicia' +ria'. +!!or&in,l"H it was hel& in 9ataan Ship"ar&s an& /n,ineerin, !o pan"' 5n!' %' Presi&ential Co ission on $oo& $o%ern entH that /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1# are not :ills of attain&erH :e!ause the" &o not infli!t an" punish ent' An the !ontrar"H the" e0pressl" pro%i&e that an" ;u&, ent that the propert" se?uestere& is ill*,otten wealth is to :e a&e :" a !ourt (the San&i,an:a"an) onl" after trial'

1)

Can -ann" !lai that his i&entifi!ation :" the e"ewitness :e e0!lu&e& on the ,roun& that the line*up was a&e without :enefit of his !ounselL
Can -ann" !lai that his !onfession :e

2)

e0!lu&e& on the ,roun& that he was not affor&e& his C8iran&aC ri,htsL SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"?

1) NoH the i&entifi!ation of -ann"H a pri%ate personH :" an e"ewitness &urin, the line*up !annot :e e0!lu&e& in e%i&en!e' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in People %s' @attonH 210 SC1+ 1H the a!!use& is not entitle& to :e assiste& :" !ounsel &urin, a poli!e line*upH :e!ause it is not part of !usto&ial in%esti,ation'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8
OesH in <nite& States %' 6a&eH 338 <'S' 218 (19)7) an& $il:ert %' CaliforniaH 338 <'S' 2)3 (19)7)' it was hel& that on the :asis of the Si0thH rather than the Fifth + en& ent (e?ui%alent to +rt' 555H Se!' 1# (2) rather than Se!' 12(1))H the poli!e line*up is su!h a !riti!al sta,e that it !arries Cpotential su:stantial pre;u&i!eC for whi!h reason the a!!use& is entitle& to the assistan!e of Counsel'

%ali& un&er Se!tion 2(:)'1ule 113 of the 1ules on Cri inal Pro!e&ure' +!!or&in, to People %s' 7a sin,H 2#8 SC1+ #71H the ri,ht to !ounsel &oes not e0ten& to poli!e line*upsH :e!ause the" are not part of !usto&ial in%esti,ations' @owe%erH a!!or&in, to People %s' 8a!an 238 SC1+ 30)H after the start of !usto&ial in%esti,ationH if the a!!use& was not assiste& :" !ounselH an" i&entifi!ation of the a!!use& in a poli!e line*up is ina& issi:le'

2) No' -ann" !annot asD that his !onfession to a newspaper reporter shoul& :e e0!lu&e& in e%i&en!e' +s hel& in People %s' 9ernar&oH 220 SC1+ 31H su!h an a& ission was not a&e &urin, a !usto&ial interro,ation :ut a %oluntar" state ent a&e to the e&ia' C3+t&dia' 9!##%: In0e+tigati&n8 P&'i(e Line<U*

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t t& C&3n+e' 9!#$$: No' 12: +r an&o Sala an!aH a notorious poli!e !hara!terH !a e un&er !usto&ial in%esti,ation for a ro::er" in Caloo!an Cit"' Fro the outsetH the poli!e offi!ers infor e& hi of his ri,ht to re ain silentH an& also his ri,ht to ha%e a !ounsel of his !hoi!eH if he !oul& affor& one or if notH the ,o%ern ent woul& pro%i&e hi with su!h !ounsel'
@e thanDe& the poli!e in%esti,atorsH an& &e!lare& that he full" un&erstan&s the ri,hts enu erate& to hi H :ut thatH he is %oluntaril" wai%in, the ' Clai in, that he sin!erel" &esires to atone for his is&ee&sH he ,a%e a written state ent on his parti!ipation in the !ri e un&er in%esti,ation' 5n the !ourse of the trial of the !ri inal !ase for the sa e ro::er"H the written a& ission of Sala an!a whi!h he ,a%e &urin, the !usto&ial in%esti,ationH was presente& as the onl" e%i&en!e of his ,uilt' 5f "ou were his !ounselH what woul& "ou &oL /0plain "our answer'

No' 10: +H while on :oar& a passen,er ;eep one ni,htH was hel& up :" a ,roup of three teena,ers who for!i:l" &i%este& her of her wat!hH ne!Dla!e an& wallet !ontainin, P100'00' 3hat &oneH the trio ;u pe& off the passen,er ;eep an& fle&' 9H the ;eep &ri%erH an& + !o plaine& to the poli!e to who the" ,a%e &es!ription of the !ulprits' +!!or&in, to the ;eep &ri%erH he woul& :e a:le to i&entif" the !ulprits if presente& to hi ' Ne0t ornin, + an& 9 were su one& to the poli!e station where fi%e persons were line& up :efore the for i&entifi!ation' + an& 9 positi%el" i&entifie& C an& as the !ulprits' +fter preli inar" in%esti,ation' C an& - an& one >ohn -oe were !har,e& with ro::er" in an infor ation file& a,ainst the in !ourt' C an& - set upH in &efenseH the ille,alit" of their apprehensionH arrest an& !onfine ent :ase& on the i&entifi!ation a&e of the :" + an& 9 at a poli!e line*up at whi!h the" were not assiste& :" !ounsel' @ow woul& "ou resol%e the issues raise& :" C an& -L

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 woul& o:;e!t to it on the ,roun& that the wai%er of the ri,hts to silen!e an& to !ounsel is %oi&H ha%in, :een a&e without the presen!e of !ounsel' (+rt' 555H se!' 12(1); People %' $alitH 132 SC1+ #)2 (1980)' 3he wai%er ust also :e in writin,H althou,h this re?uire ent i,ht possi:l" ha%e :een !o plie& with in this !ase :" e :o&"in, the wai%er in the written !onfession' 5t shoul& also :e note& that un&er 1ule 13#H se!' 3H e%en if the e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession is %ali&H it is not a suffi!ient ,roun& for !on%i!tion if it is not !orro:orate& :" e%i&en!e of !orpus &eli!ti'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he ar,u ents of the a!!use& are untena:le' +s hel& in People %s' +!otH 232 SC1+ #0)H the warrantless arrest of a!!use& ro::ers 5 e&iatel" after their !o ission of the !ri e :" poli!e offi!ers sent to looD for the on the :asis of the infor ation relate& :" the %i!ti s is

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t t& C&3n+e' 9!##-: No' 17; 5n his e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession e0e!ute& :efore the poli!e authoritiesH >ose 6alan,taDot a& itte& Dillin, his ,irlfrien& in a fit of ;ealous"' 3his a& ission was a&e after the followin, answer an& ?uestion to wit:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"%

3 * 5Daw a" a" Darapatan pa rin Du uha n, ser:is"o n, isan, a:o,a&o para aDatulon, o sa i :esti,as"on, ito at Dun, wala Dan, aDuhaH iDaw a" a in, :i:i,"an n, li:ren, a:o,a&oH ano n,a"on an, i"on, asasa:iLC

CS * Nan&i"an na an po si Fis!al (point to +ssistant Fis!al +ni!eto 8alaputo) Da"a hin&i Do na DinaDailan,anan, a:o,a&o'C

-urin, the trial' >ose 6alan,taDot repu&iate& his !onfession !onten&in, that it was a&e without the assistan!e of !ounsel an& therefore 5na& issi:le in e%i&en!e' -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he !onfession of 1a os is not a& issi:leH sin!e the !ounsel assi,ne& to hi &i& not a&%ise hi of his ri,hts' 3he fa!t that his !onfession was taDen :efore the effe!ti%it" of the 1987 Constitution is of no o ent' /%en prior to the effe!ti%it" of the 1987 ConstitutionH the Supre e Court alrea&" lai& &own stri!t rules on wai%er of the ri,hts &urin, in%esti,ation in the !ase of People %' $alitH 132 SC1+ #)2 (1982)' C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t t& C&3n+e'8 Re(ei*t &) Pr&*erty Sei/ed 9"66":
No E555' Ane &a" a passen,er :us !on&u!tor foun& a anBs han&:a, left in the :us' 6hen the !on&u!tor opene& the :a,H he foun& insi&e a !atlin, !ar& with the ownerBs na e (-ante $alan,) an& a&&ressH a few hun&re& peso :illsH an& a s all plasti! :a, !ontainin, a white pow&er" su:stan!e' @e :rou,ht the pow&er" su:stan!e to the National 9ureau of 5n%esti,ation for la:orator" e0a ination an& it was &eter ine& to :e etha pheta ine h"&ro!hlori&e or sha:uH a prohi:ite& &ru,' -ante $alan, was su:se?uentl" tra!e& an& foun& an& :rou,ht to the N95 Affi!e where he a& itte& ownership of the han&:a, an& its !ontents' 5n the !ourse of the interro,ation :" N95 a,entsH an& without the presen!e an& assistan!e of !ounselH $alan, was a&e to si,n a re!eipt for the plasti! :a, an& its sha:u !ontents' $alan, was !har,e& with ille,al possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s an& was !on%i!te&'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !onfession of >ose 6alan,taDot is ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e' 3he warnin, ,i%en to hi is insuffi!ient in a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in People %' -ueroH 10# SC1+ 379H he shoul& ha%e :een warne& also that he has the ri,ht to re ain silent an& that an" state ent he aDes a" :e use& as e%i&en!e a,ainst hi ' 9esi&esH un&er +rt' 555H Se!' 12(1) of the ConstitutionH the !ounsel assistin, a person :ein, in%esti,ate& ust :e in&epen&ent' +ssistant Fis!al +ni!eto 8alaputo !oul& not assist >ose 6alan,taDot' +s hel& in People %' Ei&u"aH 189 SC1+ #03H his fun!tion is to prose!ute !ri inal !ases' 3o allow hi to a!t as &efense !ounsel &urin, !usto&ial in%esti,ations woul& ren&er nu,ator" the !onstitutional ri,hts of the a!!use& &urin, !usto&ial in%esti,ation' 6hat the Constitution re?uires is a !ounsel who will effe!ti%el" un&ertaDe the &efense of his !lient without an" !onfli!t of interest' 3he answer of >ose 6alan,taDot in&i!ates that he &i& not full" un&erstan& his ri,hts' @en!eH it !annot :e sai& that he Dnowin,l" an& intelli,entl" wai%e& those ri,hts'

An appeal he !onten&s that *


+' 3he plasti! :a, an& its !ontents are ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e :ein, the pro&u!t of an ille,al sear!h an& sei=ure; (3N) an& 9' 3he re!eipt he si,ne& is also ina& issi:le as his ri,hts un&er !usto&ial in%esti,ation were not o:ser%e&' (2N) -e!i&e the !ase with reasons'

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t t& C&3n+e' 9"666:


No M5' An A!to:er 1H 1982H 1a os was arreste& :" a se!urit" ,uar& :e!ause he appeare& to :e Csuspi!iousC an& :rou,ht to a poli!e pre!in!t where in the !ourse of the in%esti,ation he a& itte& he was the Diller in an unsol%e& ho i!i&e !o itte& a weeD earlier' 3he pro!ee&in,s of his in%esti,ation were put in writin, an& &ate& A!to:er 1H 1982H an& the onl" parti!ipation of !ounsel assi,ne& to hi was his ere presen!e an& si,nature on the state ent' 3he a& issi:ilit" of the state ent of 1a os was pla!e& in issue :ut the prose!ution !lai s that the !onfession was taDen on A!to:er 1H 1982 an& the 1987 Constitution pro%i&in, for the ri,ht to !ounsel of !hoi!e an& opportunit" to retainH tooD effe!t onl" on Fe:ruar" 2H 1987 an& !annot :e ,i%en retroa!ti%e effe!t' 1ule on this' (3N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: +' 5t is a& issi:le''' 9' 3he re!eipt whi!h $alan, si,ne& without the assistan!e of !ounsel is not a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' +s hel& in People %' CastroH 27# SC1+ 112 U1997)H sin!e the re!eipt is a &o!u ent a& ittin, the offense !har,e&H $alan, shoul& ha%e :een assiste& :" !ounsel as re?uire& :" +rti!le 555H Se!tion 11 of the Constitution' C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 P&'i(e Line<3* 9!##-: No' 9: >ohann learne& that the poli!e were looDin, for hi in !onne!tion with the rape of an

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"$

18*"ear ol& ,irlH a nei,h:or' @e went to the poli!e station a weeD later an& presente& hi self to the &esD ser,eant' Coin!i&entall"H the rape %i!ti was in the pre ises e0e!utin, an e0tra;u&i!ial state ent' >ohannH alon, with si0 ()) other suspe!tsH were pla!e& in a poli!e line* up an& the ,irl pointe& to hi as the rapist' >ohann was arreste& an& lo!De& up in a !ell' >ohann was !har,e& with rape in !ourt :ut prior to arrai,n ent in%oDe& his ri,ht to preli inar" in%esti,ation' 3his was &enie& :" the ;u&,eH an& thusH trial pro!ee&e&' +fter the prose!ution presente& se%eral witnessesH >ohann throu,h !ounselH in%oDe& the ri,ht to :ail an& file& a otion thereforH whi!h was &enie& outri,ht :" the >u&,e' >ohann now files a petition for !ertiorari :efore the Court of +ppeals ar,uin, that:

9oule%ar&H whi!h is also owne& :" M' 8a" the" lawfull" sei=e the sai& unli!ense& firear sL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) OesH the poli!e operati%es a" lawfull" sei=e the !o!aineH '''' (2) NoH M !annot su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of the sear!h si pl" :e!ause the pea!e offi!ers &i& not infor hi a:out his ri,ht to re ain silent an& his ri,ht to !ounsel' Se!tion 12(1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es: C+n" person un&er in%esti,ation for the !o ission of an offense shall ha%e the ri,ht to :e infor e& of his ri,ht to re ain silent an& to ha%e !o petent an& in&epen&ent !ounsel prefera:l" of his own !hoi!e'C +s hel& in People %' -"H 128 SC1+ 111' for this pro%ision to appl"H a suspe!t ust :e un&er in%esti,ation' 3here was no in%esti,ation in%ol%e& in this !ase' (3) 3he unli!ense& firear s store& at 12 Shaw 9oule%ar& a" lawfull" :e sei=e& ''' C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t+ 9!##-:
No' #: 7arr" was an o%erni,ht ,uest in a otel' +fter he !he!De& out the followin, &a"H the !ha :er ai& foun& an atta!he !ase whi!h she sur ise& was left :ehin& :" 7arr"' She turne& it o%er to the ana,er whoH to &eter ine the na e an& a&&ress of the ownerH opene& the atta!he !ase an& saw pa!Da,es whi!h ha& a pe!uliar s ell an& upon s?uee=in, felt liDe &rie& lea%es' @is !uriosit" arouse&H the ana,er a&e an openin, on one of the pa!Da,es an& tooD se%eral ,ra s of the !ontents thereof' @e tooD the pa!Da,es to the N95H an& in the presen!e of a,entsH opene& the pa!Da,esH the !ontents of whi!h upon la:orator" e0a inationH turne& out to :e ari;uana flowerin, topsH 7arr" was su:se?uentl" foun&H :rou,ht to the N95 Affi!e where he a& itte& ownership of the atta!he !ase an& the pa!Da,es' @e was a&e to si,n a re!eipt for the pa!Da,es' 7arr" was !har,e& in !ourt for possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s' @e was !on%i!te&' An appealH he now poses the followin, issues:

2) @e shoul& ha%e :een infor e& of his ri,ht to :e represente& :" !ounsel prior to his i&entifi!ation %ia the poli!e line up' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2T Pursuant to the &e!ision in People us' Cast illo' 213' SC1+ 777H >ohann nee& not :e infor e& of his ri,ht to !ounsel prior to his i&entifi!ation &urin, the poli!e line*up' 3he poli!e line*up is not part of !usto&ial in%esti,ationH sin!e >ohann was not :ein, ?uestione& :ut was erel" :ein, asDe& to e0hi:it his :o&" for i&entifi!ation :" a witness'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER
5t a" :e ar,ue& that in <nite& States %s' 6a&e' 388 <'S' 218 (19)7) an& $il:ert %s' California' 388 <'S' 2)3 (19)7) 5t was hel& that on the :asis of the Si0thH rather than the Fifth + en& ent (e?ui%alent to +rt' 555' se!' 1# (2) rather than se!' 12 (1))H the poli!e lineup is su!h a C!riti!al sta,eC that it !arries Cpotential su:stantial pre;u&i!eC for whi!h reason the a!!use& is entitle& to the assistan!e of !ounsel'

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t+ 9!##6: No' 9; So e poli!e operati%esH a!tin, un&er a lawfull" issue& warrant for the purpose of sear!hin, for firear s in the @ouse of M lo!ate& at No' 10 Shaw 9oule%ar&H Pasi,H 8etro 8anilaH foun&H instea& of firear sH ten Dilo,ra s of !o!aine'
(1) 8a" the sai& poli!e operati%es lawfull" sei=e the !o!aineL /0plain "our answer'

(2)

8a" M su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of the sear!h on the ,roun& that the pea!e offi!ers &i& not infor hi a:out his ri,ht to re ain silent an& his ri,ht to !ounselL /0plain "our answer'
Suppose the pea!e offi!ers were a:le to fin& unli!ense& firear s in the house in an a&;a!ent lotH that is' NoH 12 Shaw

(3)

1) 3he pa!Da,es are ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e :ein, the pro&u!t of an ille,al sear!h an& sei=ure;

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

"#

2) Neither is the re!eipt he si,ne& a& issi:leH his ri,hts un&er !usto&ial in%esti,ation not ha%in, :een o:ser%e&' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER: An the assu ption that the issues were ti el" raise& the answers are as follows: 1) 3he pa!Da,es are a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' '''
2) 3he re!eipt is not a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' +!!or&in, to the rulin, in People %s' 8irantesH 209 SC1+ 179H su!h re!eipt is in effe!t an e0tra;u&i!ial !onfession of the !o ission of an offense' @en!eH if it was si,ne& without the assistan!e of !ounselH in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 12(3)H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH it is ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e' PPeople %' -uhanH 1#2 SC1+ 100 (198))Q'

passin, otor %ehi!les' + 19*"ear ol& :o"H who finishe& fifth ,ra&eH while &ri%in,H was stoppe& :" the authorities at the !he!Dpoint' 6ithout an" o:;e!tion fro hi H his !ar was inspe!te&H an& the sear!h "iel&e& ari;uana lea%es hi&&en in the trunD !o part ent of the !ar' 3he prohi:ite& &ru, was pro ptl" sei=e&H an& the :o" was :rou,ht to the poli!e station for ?uestionin,'

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t+ 9!##?:


No' 3: 1) +H who was arreste& as a suspe!t in a ur&er !ase was not represente& :" !ounsel &urin, the C?uestion an& answerC sta,e' @owe%erH :efore he was asDe& to si,n his state ents to the poli!e in%esti,atorH the latter pro%i&e& + with a !ounselH who happene& to :e at the poli!e station' +fter !onferrin, with +H the !ounsel tol& the poli!e in%esti,ator that + was rea&" to si,n the state ents'

(1) 6as the sear!h without warrant le,alL (2) 9efore interro,ationH the poli!e an on &ut" infor e& the :o" in /n,lish that he &oes Cha%e a ri,ht to re ain silent an& the ri,ht to !ounsel'C @owe%erH there was no !ounsel a%aila:le as it was i&ni,ht' @e &e!lare& orall" that he &i& not nee& an" law"er as he was inno!entH sin!e he was onl" :rin,in, the ari;uana lea%es to his e plo"er in (ue=on Cit" an& was not a &ru, user' @e was !har,e& with ille,al possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s' 5s his wai%er of the ri,ht to !ounsel %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) NoH the sear!h was not %ali&H :e!ause there was no pro:a:le !ause '''' (2) NoH the wai%er of the ri,ht to !ounsel is not %ali&H sin!e it was not re&u!e& in writin, an& a&e in the presen!e of !ounsel' <n&er Se!tion 12(1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution to :e %ali&H the wai%er ust :e a&e in writin, an& in the presen!e of !ounsel' D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9!#$$:
No' 21: 3he Filipino sea en &etaine& at Gota Gina:aluH alle,e&l" fishin, in 8ala"sian territorial watersH ha& :een a!?uitte&H after trialH :" the sessions !ourt in the sa e !it"' 3he" !oul& not :e release& an& returne& to the PhilippinesH :e!ause the prose!ution ha& appeale& the ;u&, ent of a!?uittal to the Supre e Court of 8ala"sia' +ssu e the situations ha& :een re%erse& an& a 8ala"sian ha& :een apprehen&e& in ShasiH SuluH for an alle,e& offenseH !har,e& :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court an& after trial a!?uitte&'

Can the state ents of + :e presente& in !ourt as his !onfessionL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) NoH the state ents of + !annot :e presente& in !ourt as his !onfession' @e was not assiste& :" !ounsel &urin, the a!tual ?uestionin,' 3here is no showin, that the law"er who :elate&l" !onferre& with hi full" e0plaine& to hi the nature an& !onse?uen!es of his !onfession' 5n People %s' Co pil 2## SC1+ 132H the Supre e Court hel& that the a!!use& ust :e assiste& :" !ounsel &urin, the a!tual ?uestionin, an& the :elate& assistan!e of !ounsel :efore he si,ne& the !onfession &oes not !ure the &efe!t'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
OesH the state ents of + !an :e presente& in !ourt as his !onfession' +s hel& in People %s' 1ousH 2#2 SC1+ 732H e%en if the a!!use& was not assiste& :" !ounsel &urin, the ?uestionin,H his !onfession is a& issi:le if he was a:le to !onsult a law"er :efore he si,ne&'

C3+t&dia' In0e+tigati&n8 Rig,t+ 9!#$#:


No' 7: Pursuin, reports that ,reat ?uantities of prohi:ite& &ru,s are :ein, s u,,le& at ni,htti e throu,h the shores of Ca%iteH the Southern 7u=on Co an& set up !he!Dpoints at the en& of the Ca%ite !oastal roa& to sear!h

8a" the Pro%in!ial Fis!al of Sulu appeal su!h ;u&, ent of a!?uittal to the Supre e CourtH liDe what the 8ala"sians &i& in the !ase of the Filipino fisher en at Gota Gina:aluL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH :e!ause it woul& pla!e the a!!use& in &ou:le ;eopar&"H !ontrar" to +rt' 555H se!' 21 of our Constitution' P- No' 1299 prohi:its an" person not a !iti=en to e0plore or e0ploit an" of the resour!es of the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-6

an& aDes %iolation of the prohi:ition a !ri e punisha:le :" a fine of P2H000'00 to P100H000'00 an&Ior i prison ent of not less than ) onths nor ore than 10 "ears' 5f aliens are arreste& for fishin, within this =one :ut for so e reason are a!?uitte&H the &e!ision a,ainst the !annot :e appeale& to the Court of +ppeals :e!ause that woul& pla!e the in &ou:le ;eopar&"' 3his is so well esta:lishe& that the Supre e Court turne& &own an" pleas for re* e0a ination of the &o!trine first announ!e& in Gepner %' <nite& States' 11 Phil' ))9 (190#)' 3he &o!trine is sai& to :e part an& par!el not onl" of settle& ;urispru&en!e :ut also of !onstitutional law' Nor &oes it atter that the a!!use& are aliens' 3his ,uarantee has :een applie& e%en to aliens without thou,ht of their

!ri e fallin, un&er the !hapter on !ri inal ne,li,en!eH while a:an&on ent of oneBs %i!ti is a !ri e fallin, un&er the !hapter on !ri es a,ainst se!urit"' 3he for er is !o itte& :" eans of !ulpaH while the latter is !o itte& :" eans of &olo' Failure to help oneBs %i!ti is not an offense :" itself nor an ele ent of re!Dless i pru&en!e' 5t erel" 5n!reases the penalt" :" one &e,ree'

D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9!##%:


No' 2: 3he San,,unian, Panlun,so& of 8anila appro%e& an or&inan!e (No' 1000) prohi:itin, the operation in the streets within the !it" li its of ta0i!a: units o%er ei,ht "ears ol& (fro "ear of anufa!ture)' 3he i posa:le penalt" for %iolation thereof is a fine of P#H000'00 or i prison ent for one "ear upon the errin, operator' 3hereafter an& while the !it" or&inan!e was alrea&" in effe!t' Con,ress ena!te& a law (1epu:li! +!t No' 200) prohi:itin, the operation in the streets of !ities throu,hout the !ountr" of ta0i!a: units :e"on& ten "ears ol&' 3he i posa:le penalt" for %iolation thereof is the sa e as in Ar&inan!e No' 1000' +H an ownerIoperator of a ta0i!a: unit operatin, in the Cit" of 8anilaH was !har,e& with %iolation of the !it" or&inan!e' <pon arrai,n entH he plea&e& not ,uilt"; whereuponH trial was set fi%e &a"s thereafter' For failure of the witnesses to appear at the trialH the Cit" Court &is isse& the !ase a,ainst +' 3he Cit" Prose!utor of 8anila forthwith file& another infor ation in the sa e !ourt !har,in, + with %iolation of 1epu:li! +!t No' 200 for operatin, the ta0i!a: unit su:;e!t of the infor ation in the first !ase' 3he a!!use& o%e& to &is iss the se!on& !ase a,ainst hi in%oDin, &ou:le >eopar&"'

!iti=enship'

(See e','H People %' +n, Chio GioH 92 Phil' #72 (192#) (Chinese pre%iousl" !on%i!te& of ur&er); People %' Po ero"H 97 Phil 927 (1922) ( + eri!an pre%iousl" !on%i!te& of re:ellion with ur&erH arson an& ro::er")'

D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9!##-:


No' 13: + Pa;ero &ri%en :" >oe si&eswipe& a otor!"!le &ri%en :" Nelson resultin, in &a a,e to the otor!"!le an& in;uries to Nelson' >oe spe& on without ,i%in, assistan!e to Nelson' 3he Fis!al file& two infor ations a,ainst >oeH to wit: (1) re!Dless i pru&en!e resultin, in &a a,e to propert" with ph"si!al in;uries un&er +rt' 3)2H 1PCH :efore the 13C; an& (2) a:an&on ent of oneBs %i!ti un&er par' 2 +rt 272H :efore the 83C'

>oe was arrai,ne&H trie& an& !on%i!te& for a:an&on ent of oneBs %i!ti in the 83C' @e appeale& to the 13C' 5t was onl" a "ear later that he was arrai,ne& in the re!Dless i pru&en!e !har,e :efore the 13C' @e plea&e& not ,uilt"'
Su:se?uentl"H the 13C affir e& the &e!ision of the 83C relati%e to the a:an&on ent of oneBs %i!ti !har,e' >oe file& a petition for re%iew :efore the Court of +ppealsH in%oDin, his ri,ht to &ou:le >eopar&"H !onten&in, that the prose!ution for a:an&on ent un&er +rt' 272 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e is a :ar to the prose!ution for ne,li,en!e un&er +rti!le 3)2 of the sa e Co&e' -e!i&e'

@ow woul& "ou rule on +Bs were the >u&,eL SUGGESTED ANSWER:

otion if "ou

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

>oe !annot !lai that his !on%i!tion for a:an&onin, his %i!ti in %iolation of +rti!le 272 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e is a :ar to his prose!ution for ne,li,en!e un&er +rti!le 3)2 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e' +s hel& in 7a era %' Court of +ppealsH 198 SC1+ 18)H there is no &ou:le ;eopar&"H :e!ause these two offenses are not ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: i&enti!al' 1e!Dless i pru&en!e is a BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

5f 5 were the ;u&,eH 5 woul& ,rant the otion' 3he &is issal of the first !ase for failure of the witnesses to appear ter inate& the first ;eopar&"' +s hel& in Caes %s' 5nter e&iate +ppellate CourtH 179 SC1+ 2#H the &is issal of a !ase for failure of the witnesses for the prose!ution to appear !onstitutes an a!?uittal' 3he a!?uittal of + for %iolation of Ar&inan!e No' 1000 :ars his prose!ution for %iolation of 1epu:li! +!t No' 200' <n&er Se!tion 21H +rti!le in of the ConstitutionH if an a!t is punishe& :" a law an& an or&inan!eH !on%i!tion or a!?uittal un&er either :ars another prose!ution for the sa e a!t'

-!

5f 5 were the ;u&,eH 5 woul& &en" the otion' 3he &is issal of the first !ase is %oi& an& &oes not ,i%e rise to &ou:le ;eopar&"' 3he &is issal of the first !ase is ar:itrar" an& &enie& the prose!ution &ue pro!ess of law' 3he trial was set fi%e &a"s after the arrai,n ent' 3here was no suffi!ient ti e to su:poena the witnesses an& this was the first ti e the witnesses faile& to appear' +s hel& in People %s' -e!laro 170 SC1+ 1#2H the &is issal of a !ase for failure of the witnesses to appear at the initial hearin, is ar:itrar" an& %oi& an& &oes not ,i%e rise to &ou:le ;eopar&"'

the offen&e& part"' @ow woul& "ou resol%e $eral&Bs !ontentionsL /0plain' (#N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
$eral&e !annot in%oDe &ou:le ;eopar&"' +!!or&in, to Pere= %' Court of +ppealsH 1)8 SC1+ 23)H there is no i&entit" :etween !onsente& a:&u!tion an& ?ualifie& se&u!tion'

D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9!###: +' -is!uss the ri,ht of e%er" a!!use& a,ainst &ou:le ;eopar&"L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +!!or&in, to 8elo %' PeopleH 82 Phil' 7))H the rule of &ou:le ;eopar&" eans that when a person was !har,e& with an offense an& the !ase was ter inate& :" a!?uittal or !on%i!tion or in an" other anner without his !onsentH he !annot a,ain :e !har,e& with the sa e or i&enti!al offense' D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9!###:
C' An A!to:er 21H 198)H 17 "ear ol& Eir,inia Sa,ra&o :rou,ht a !o plaint a,ainst 8artin $eral&e for !onsente& a:&u!tion' 6ith the a!!use& plea&in, not ,uilt" upon arrai,n entH trial ensue&' +fter trialH a ;u&, ent of !on%i!tion was ren&ere& a,ainst $eral&e' 6hen the !ase was appeale& to itH the Court of +ppeals re%erse& the ;u&, ent of the 3rial CourtH ratio!inatin, an& rulin, as follows: C3his is not to sa" that the appellant &i& nothin, wron,'''she was se&u!e& :" the appellant with pro ises (of arria,e) ;ust to a!!o plish his lew& &esi,ns'C Oears laterH Eir,inia :rou,ht another !o plaint for (ualifie& Se&u!tion' $eral&e presente& a 8otion to (uash on the ,roun& of &ou:le ;eopar&"H whi!h otion an& his su:se?uent otion for re!onsi&eration were &enie&: (uestion: 8a" $eral&e %ali&l" in%oDe &ou:le ;eopar&" in ?uestionin, the institution of the !ase for (ualifie& Se&u!tionL @e pla!e& relian!e prin!ipall" on the Csa e e%i&en!eC test to support his stan!e' @e asserte& that the offenses with whi!h he was !har,e& arose fro the sa e set of fa!ts' Further oreH he a%erte& that the !o plaint for (ualifie& Se&u!tion is :arre& :" wai%er an& estoppel on the part of the !o plainantH she ha%in, opte& to !onsi&er the !ase as !onsente& a:&u!tion' Finall"H he ar,ue& that her &ela" of ore than ei,ht (8) "ears :efore filin, the se!on& !ase a,ainst hi !onstitute& par&on on the part of

CANS/N3/- +9-<C35AN re?uires that the taDin, awa" of the offen&e& part" ust :e with her !onsentH after soli!itation or !a;oler" fro the offen&erH an& the taDin, awa" of the offen&e& part" ust :e with lew& &esi,ns' An the other han&H (<+75F5/S/-<C35AN re?uires that the !ri e :e !o itte& :" a:use of authorit"H !onfi&en!e or relationship an& the offen&er ha& se0ual inter!ourse with the wo an' 3he &ela" in filin, the se!on& !ase &oes not !onstitute par&onH a!!or&in, to +rti!le 3## of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&eH to :e %ali& the par&on of the offen&er :" the offen&e& part" ust :e e0pressl" ,i%en' D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9"666:
No ME' Char,e& :" Fran!is!o with li:elH Pa:lo was arrai,ne& on >anuar" 3H 2000H Pre*trial was &ispense& with an& !ontinuous trial was set for 8ar!h 7H 8 an& 9H 2000' An the first settin,H the prose!ution o%e& for its postpone ent an& !an!ellation of the other settin,s :e!ause its prin!ipal an& pro:a:l" onl" witnessH the pri%ate !o plainant Fran!is!oH su&&enl" ha& to ,o a:roa& to fulfill a professional !o it ent' 3he ;u&,e instea& &is isse& the !ase for failure to prose!ute'

:) 6oul& the re%ersal of the trial !ourtBs assaile& &is issal of the !ase pla!e the a!!use& in &ou:le ;eopar&"L (3N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
:) Sin!e the postpone ent of the !ase woul& not %iolate the ri,ht of the a!!use& to spee&" trialH the pre!ipitate &is issal of the !ase is %oi&' 3he re%ersal of the &is issal will not pla!e the a!!use& in &ou:le >eopar&"'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: :) Sin!e the &is issal of the !ase is %ali&H its re%ersal will pla!e the a!!use& in &ou:le ;eopar&"' D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9"66!:
No M * For the &eath of >oe"H /rnin, was !har,e& with the !ri e of ho i!i&e :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court of Ealen=uela' @e was arrai,ne&' -ue to nu erous postpone ents of the s!he&ule& hearin,s at the instan!e of the prose!utionH parti!ularl" :ase& on the ,roun& of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-"

una%aila:ilit" of prose!ution witnesses who !oul& not :e foun& or lo!ate&H the !ri inal !ase was pen&in, trial for a perio& of se%en "ears' <pon otion of a!!use& /rnin, who in%oDe& his ri,ht to spee&" trialH the !ourt &is isse& the !ase'
/%entuall"H the prose!ution witnesses surfa!e&H an& a !ri inal !ase for ho i!i&eH in%ol%in, the sa e in!i&ent was file& anew a,ainst /rnin,' +!!use& /rnin, o%e& for &is issal of the !ase on the ,roun& of &ou:le ;eopar&"' 3he prose!ution o:;e!te&H su: ittin, the reason that it was not a:le to present the sai& witnesses earlier :e!ause the latter went into hi&in, out of fear' 1esol%e the otion' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he otion shoul& :e ,rante&' +s hel& in Caes us' 5nter e&iate +ppellate CourtH 179 SC1+ 2# (1989)H the &is issal of a !ri inal !ase pre&i!ate& on the ri,ht of the a!!use& to a spee&" trial a ounts to an a!?uittal for failure of the prose!ution to pro%e his ,uilt an& :ars his su:se?uent prose!ution for the sa e offense'

an or&inan!eH !on%i!tion or a!?uittal un&er either shall !onstitute a :ar to another prose!ution for the sa e a!t' 5n this !aseH the sa e a!t is in%ol%e& in the two !ases' 3he re!Dless i pru&en!e whi!h resulte& in ph"si!al in;uries arose fro the sa e a!t of &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of li?uor' 5n Oap %' 7uteroH $'1' No' 7*12))9H +pril 30H 1929H the Supre e Court hel& that an a!!use& who was a!?uitte& of &ri%in, re!Dlessl" in %iolation of an or&inan!e !oul& not :e prose!ute& for &a a,e to propert" throu,h re!Dless i pru&en!e :e!ause the two !har,es were :ase& on the sa e a!t' 5n People %H 1elo%aH 1#8 SC1+ 292 (1987)H it was hel& that when there is i&entit" in the a!t punishe& :" a law an& an or&inan!eH !on%i!tion or a!?uittal un&er either shall :ar prose!ution un&er the other'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


3here is no &ou:le ;eopar&" :e!ause the a!t penali=e& un&er the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e is &ifferent fro the a!t penali=e& :" the or&inan!e of 8aDati Cit"' 3he 1e%ise& Penal Co&e penali=es re!Dless i pru&en!e resultin, in ph"si!al in;uriesH while the or&inan!e of 8aDati Cit" penali=es &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of li?uor'

D&3b'e 4e&*ardy 9"66":


No 5M' + 3a araw FM &ri%en :" +sion, Cas!aseroH who was &runDH si&eswipe& a pe&estrian alon, /-S+ in 8aDati Cit"H resultin, in ph"si!al in;uries to the latter' 3he pu:li! prose!utor file& two separate infor ations a,ainst Cas!aseroH the first for re!Dless i pru&en!e resultin, in ph"si!al in;uries un&er the 1e%ise& Penal Co&eH an& the se!on& for %iolation of an or&inan!e of 8aDati Cit" prohi:itin, an& penali=in, &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of li?uor' Cas!asero was arrai,ne&H trie& an& !on%i!te& for re!Dless i pru&en!e resultin, in ph"si!al in;uries un&er the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e' 6ith re,ar& to the se!on& !ase (i'e'H %iolation of the !it" or&inan!e)H upon :ein, arrai,ne&H he file& a otion to ?uash the infor ation in%oDin, his ri,ht a,ainst &ou:le ;eopar&"' @e !onten&e& thatH un&er +rt' 555H Se!tion 21 of the ConstitutionH if an a!t is punishe& :" a law an& an or&inan!eH !on%i!tion or a!?uittal un&er either shall !onstitute a :ar to another prose!ution for the sa e a!t @e ar,ue& that the two !ri inal !har,es a,ainst hi ste e& fro the sa e a!t of &ri%in, alle,e&l" un&er the influen!e of li?uor whi!h !ause& the a!!i&ent'

D&3b'e 4e&*ardy8 ReF3i+ite+ 9!###: 9' 6hat are the re?uisites of &ou:le ;eopar&"L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s hel& in Cuison %' Court of +ppealsH 289 SC1+ 129H for a !lai of &ou:le ;eopar&" to prosperH the followin, re?uisites ust !on!ur:

(1) a first ;eopar&" has atta!he&;


(2) the first ;eopar&" was %ali&l" ter inate&; an&

(3) the se!on& is for the sa e offense' + first ;eopar&" atta!hes: 1' upon a %ali& !o plaint or infor ation; 2' :efore a !o petent !ourt; 3' after arrai,n ent; #' a %ali& entr" of plea; an& 2' the &is issal or ter ination of the !ase without the e0press !onsent of the a!!use&' D3e Pr&(e++8 Ab+en(e &) Denia' 9!###:
No E555 * 9' An +pril )H 19)3H Poli!e Affi!er 8ario $at&ula was !har,e& :" the 8a"or with $ra%e 8is!on&u!t an& Eiolation of 7aw :efore the 8uni!ipal 9oar&' 3he 9oar& in%esti,ate& $at&ula :ut :efore the !ase !oul& :e &e!i&e&H the Cit" !harter was appro%e&' 3he Cit" Fis!alH !itin, Se!tion 30 of the !it" !harterH asserte& that he was authori=e& thereun&er to in%esti,ate !it" offi!ers an& e plo"ees' 3he !ase a,ainst $at&ula was then forwar&e& to

6as there &ou:le ;eopar&"L /0plain "our answer (2N) IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
OesH there is &ou:le ;eopar&"' <n&er the se!on& senten!e of +rti!le 555H Se!tion 21 of the ConstitutionH if an a!t is punishe& :" a law an&

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

--

hi H an& a re*in%esti,ation was !on&u!te&' 3he offi!e of the Fis!al su:se?uentl" re!o en&e& &is issal' An >anuar" 11H 19))H the Cit" 8a"or returne& the re!or&s of the !ase to the Cit" Fis!al for the su: ission of an appropriate resolution :ut no resolution was su: itte&' An 8ar!h 3H 19)8H the Cit" Fis!al trans itte& the re!or&s to the Cit" 8a"or re!o en&in, that final a!tion thereon :e a&e :" the Cit" 9oar& of 5n%esti,ators (C95)' +lthou,h the C95 &i& not !on&u!t an in%esti,ationH the re!or&s show that :oth the 8uni!ipal 9oar& an& the Fis!alBs Affi!e e0hausti%el" hear& the !ase with :oth parties affor&e& a ple opportunit" to a&&u!e their e%i&en!e an& ar,ue their !ause' 3he Poli!e Co ission foun& $at&ula ,uilt" on the :asis of the re!or&s forwar&e& :" the C95' $at&ula !hallen,e& the a&%erse &e!ision of the Poli!e Co ission theori=in, that he was &epri%e& of &ue pro!ess' (uestions: 5s the Poli!e Co ission :oun& :" the fin&in,s of the Cit" Fis!alL 5s $at&ulaBs protestation of la!D or non* o:ser%an!e of &ue pro!ess well*,roun&e&L /0plain "our answers' (#N)

re!ei%e& the e%i&en!eH in %iolation of the C@e who &e!i&es ust hearC rule' 5s he !orre!tL 2) An the ,roun& that there was a %iolation of &ue pro!ess :e!ause the !o plainantsH the prose!utor an& the hearin, offi!ers were all su:or&inates of the 95- Co issioners who ren&ere& the &eportation &e!ision' 5s he !orre!tL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) NoH Ste%ie is not !orre!t' +s hel& in +&a son + +&a sonH 5n!' %s' + oresH 122 SC1+ 237H a& inistrati%e &ue pro!ess &oes not re?uire that the a!tual taDin, of testi on" or the presentation of e%i&en!e :efore the sa e offi!er who will &e!i&e the !ase' 5n + eri!an 3o:a!!o Co' %' -ire!tor of PatentsH )7 SC1+ 287H the Supre e Court has rule& that so lon, as the a!tual &e!ision on the erits of the !ases is a&e :" the offi!er authori=e& :" law to &e!i&eH the power to hol& a hearin, on the :asis of whi!h his &e!ision will :e a&e !an :e &ele,ate& an& is not offensi%e to &ue pro!ess' 3he Court note& that: C+s lon, as a part" is not &epri%e& of his ri,ht to present his own !ase an& su: it e%i&en!e in support thereofH an& the &e!ision is supporte& :" the e%i&en!e in the re!or&H there is no ?uestion that the re?uire ents of &ue pro!ess an& fair trial are full" et' 5n shortH there is no a:ro,ation of responsi:ilit" on the part of the offi!er !on!erne& as the a!tual &e!ision re ains with an& is a&e :" sai& offi!er' 5t isH howe%erH re?uire& that to ,i%e the su:stan!e of a hearin,H whi!h is for the purpose of aDin, &eter inations upon e%i&en!e the offi!er who aDes the &eter inations ust !onsi&er an& appraise the e%i&en!e whi!h ;ustifies the ' 2) NoH Ste%ie was not &enie& &ue pro!ess si pl" :e!ause the !o plainantsH the prose!utorH an& the hearin, offi!ers were all su:or&inates of the Co issioner of the 9ureau of 5 i,ration an& -eportation' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in /rian,er 4 $alin,erH 5n!' %s' Court of 5n&ustrial 1elationsH 110 Phil' #70H the fin&in,s of the su:or&inates are not !on!lusi%e upon the Co issionersH who ha%e the &is!retion to a!!ept or re;e!t the ' 6hat is i portant is that Ste%ie was not &epri%e& of his ri,ht to present his own !ase an& su: it e%i&en!e in support thereofH the &e!ision is supporte& :" su:stantial e%i&en!eH an& the !o issioners a!te& on their own in&epen&ent !onsi&eration of the law an& fa!ts of the !aseH an& &i& not si pl" a!!ept the %iews of their su:or&inates in arri%in, at a &e!ision'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he Poli!e Co ission is not :oun& :" the fin&in,s of the Cit" Fis!al' 5n 8an,u:at %' &e CastroH 1)3 SC1+ )08H it was hel& that the Poli!e Co ission is not prohi:ite& fro aDin, its own fin&in,s on the :asis of its own e%aluation of the re!or&s' 7iDewiseH the protestation of la!D of &ue pro!ess is not well* ,roun&e&H sin!e the hearin,s :efore the 8uni!ipal 9oar& an& the Cit" Fis!al offere& $at&ula the !han!e to :e hear&' 3here is no &enial of &ue pro!ess if the &e!ision was ren&ere& on the :asis of e%i&en!e !ontaine& in the re!or& an& &is!lose& to the parties affe!te&'

D3e Pr&(e++8 De*&rtati&n 9!##;:


No' 9: + !o plaint was file& :" 5ntelli,en!e a,ents of the 9ureau of 5 i,ration an& -eportation (95-) a,ainst Ste%ieH a $er an nationalH for his &eportation as an un&esira:le alien' 3he 5 i,ration Co issioner &ire!te& the Spe!ial 9oar& of 5n?uir" to !on&u!t an 5n%esti,ation' +t the sai& 5n%esti,ationH a law"er fro the 7e,al -epart ent of the 95presente& as witnesses the three 5ntelli,en!e a,ents who file& the !o plaint' An the :asis of the fin&in,sH report an& re!o en&ation of the 9oar& of Spe!ial 5n?uir"H the 95Co issioners unani ousl" %ote& for Ste%ieBs &eportation' Ste%ieBs law"er ?uestione& the &eportation or&er 1) An the ,roun& that Ste%ie was &enie& &ue pro!ess :e!ause the 95- Co issioners who ren&ere& the &e!ision were not the ones who

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-;

D3e Pr&(e++8 &r)eit3re Pr&(eeding+ 9!##-:


No' 1#: 3he SIS C8aso"C of Pana anian re,istr"H while oore& at the South @ar:orH was foun& to ha%e !ontra:an& ,oo&s on :oar&' 3he Custo s 3ea foun& out that the %essel &i& not ha%e the re?uire& shipBs per it an& shippin, &o!u ents' 3he %essel an& its !ar,o were hel& an& a warrant of Sei=ure an& -etention was issue& after &ue in%esti,ation' 5n the !ourse of the forfeiture pro!ee&in,sH the ship !aptain an& the shipBs resi&ent a,ent e0e!ute& sworn state ents :efore the Custo le,al offi!er a& ittin, that !ontra:an& !ar,o were foun& a:oar& the %essel' 3he shippin, lines o:;e!t to the a& ission of the state ents as e%i&en!e !onten&in, that &urin, their e0e!utionH the !aptain an& the shippin, a,ent were not assiste& :" !ounselH in %iolation of &ue pro!ess' -e!i&e'

the pro!ee&in,sH an& in the last anal"sis to a%oi& a is!arria,e of ;usti!e' D3e Pr&(e++8 Meeting 0+= Hearing 9!###:
No E555 * C' An No%e :er 7H 1990H nine law"ers of the 7e,al -epart ent of O 9anD who were all un&er Fre& 3orreH sent a !o plaint to ana,e ent a!!usin, 3orre of a:usi%e !on&u!t an& is ana,e ent' Furnishe& with a !op" of the !o plaintH 3orre &enie& the !har,es' 3wo &a"s laterH the law"ers an& 3orre were !alle& to a !onferen!e in the offi!e of the 9oar& Chair an to ,i%e their respe!ti%e si&es of the !ontro%ers"' @owe%erH no a,ree ent was rea!he& thereat' 9anD -ire!tor 1o ulo 8oret was tasDe& to looD further into the atter' @e et with the law"ers to,ether with 3orre se%eral ti es :ut to no a%ail' 8oret then su: itte& a report sustainin, the !har,es of the law"ers' 3he 9oar& Chair an wrote 3orre to infor hi that the :anD ha& !hosen the !o passionate option of Cwaitin,C for 3orreBs resi,nation' 3orre was asDe&H without :ein, &is isse&H to turn o%er the &o!u ents of all !ases han&le& :" hi to another offi!ial of the :anD :ut 3orre refuse& to resi,n an& re?ueste& for a Cfull hearin,C' -a"s laterH he reiterate& his re?uest for a Cfull hearin,CH !lai in, that he ha& :een C!onstru!ti%el" &is isse&C' 8oret assure& 3orre that he is Cfree to re ain in the e plo" of the :anDC e%en if he has no parti!ular worD assi,n ent' +fter another re?uest for a Cfull hearin,C was i,nore&H 3orre file& a !o plaint with the ar:itration :ran!h of N71C for ille,al &is issal' 1ea!tin, theretoH the :anD ter inate& the ser%i!es of 3orre' (uestions: (a) 6as 3orre C!onstru!ti%el" &is isse&C :efore he file& his !o plaintL (:) $i%en the ultiple eetin,s hel& a on, the :anD offi!ialsH the law"ers an& 3orreH is it !orre!t for hi to sa" that he was not ,i%en an opportunit" to :e hear&L /0plain "our answers' (#N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he a& ission of the state ents of the !aptain an& the shippin, a,ent as e%i&en!e &i& not %iolate &ue pro!ess e%en if the" were not assiste& :" !ounsel' 5n Fee&er 5nternational 7ineH Pts' 7t&' %' Court of +ppealsH 197 SC1+ 8#2H 5t was hel& that the assistan!e of !ounsel is not in&ispensa:le to &ue pro!ess in forfeiture pro!ee&in,s sin!e su!h pro!ee&in,s are not !ri inal in nature'
8oreo%erH the stri!t rules of e%i&en!e an& pro!e&ure will not appl" in a& inistrati%e pro!ee&in,s liDe sei=ure an& forfeiture pro!ee&in,s' 6hat is i portant is that the parties are affor&e& the opportunit" to :e hear& an& the &e!ision of the a& inistrati%e authorit" is :ase& on su:stantial e%i&en!e'

D3e Pr&(e++8 Hearing 9!##?:

Media

C&0erage

d3ring

No 2: +t the trial of a rape !ase where the %i!ti *!o plainant was a well Dnown personalit" while the a!!use& was a popular o%ie starH a 3E station was allowe& :" the trial ;u&,e to tele%ise the entire pro!ee&in,s liDe the A'>' Si pson trial' 3he a!!use& o:;e!te& to the 3E !o%era,e an& petitione& the Supre e Court to prohi:it the sai& !o%era,e'

+s the Supre e CourtH how woul& "ou rule on the petitionL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he Supre e Court shoul& ,rant the petition' 5n its 1esolution &ate& A!to:er 22H 1991H the Supre e Court prohi:ite& li%e ra&io an& tele%ision !o%era,e of !ourt pro!ee&in,s to prote!t the ri,ht of the parties to &ue pro!essH to pre%ent the &istra!tion of the parti!ipants in

SUGGESTED ANSWER: a) 3orre was !onstru!ti%el" &is isse&H as hel& in /?uita:le 9anDin, Corporation %' National 7a:or 1elations Co issionH 273 SC1+ 322' +llowin, an e plo"ee to report for worD without :ein, assi,ne& an" worD !onstitutes !onstru!ti%e &is issal'
:) 3orre is !orre!t in sa"in, that he was not ,i%en the !han!e to :e hear&' 3he eetin,s in the nature of !onsultations an& !onferen!es !annot :e !onsi&ere& as %ali& su:stitutes for the proper o:ser%an!e of noti!e an& hearin,'

D3e Pr&(e++8 N&ti(e by P3b'i(ati&n 9!#$$:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-@

No' 9: 8a!a:e:eH Pa pan,a has se%eral :arrios alon, the Pa pan,a ri%er' 3o ser%i!e the nee&s of their resi&entst the uni!ipalit" has :een operatin, a ferr" ser%i!e at the sa e ri%erH for a nu :er of "ears alrea&"' So eti e in 1987H the uni!ipalit" was ser%e& a !op" of an or&er fro the 7an& 3ansportation Fran!hisin, an& 1e,ulator" 9oar& (73F19)H ,rantin, a !ertifi!ate of pu:li! !on%enien!e to 8r' 1i!ar&o 8a!apinla!H a resi&ent of 8a!a:e:eH to operate ferr" ser%i!e a!ross the sa e ri%er an& :etween the sa e :arrios :ein, ser%i!e& presentl" :" the uni!ipalit"Bs ferr" :oats' + !he!D of the re!or&s of the appli!ation of 8a!apinla! shows that the appli!ation was file& so e onths :eforeH set for hearin,H an& noti!es of su!h hearin, were pu:lishe& in two newspapers of ,eneral !ir!ulation in the town of 8a!a:e:eH an& in the pro%in!e of Pa pan,a' 3he uni!ipalit" ha& ne%er :een &ire!tl" ser%e& a !op" of that noti!e of hearin, nor ha& the San,,unian, 9a"an :een re?ueste& :" 8a!apinla! for an" operate' 3he uni!ipalit" i e&iatel" file& a otion for re!onsi&eration with the 73F19 whi!h was &enie&' 5t went to the Supre e Court on a petition for !ertiorari to nullif" the or&er ,rantin, a !ertifi!ate of pu:li! !on%enien!e to 8a!apinla! on two ,roun&s:

NoH it is not a propert" ri,ht un&er the &ue pro!ess !lause of the Constitution' >ust liDe or&inar" li!enses in other re,ulate& fiel&sH it a" :e re%oDe& an" ti e' 5t &oes not !onfer an a:solute ri,htH :ut onl" a personal pri%ile,eH su:;e!t to restri!tions' + li!ensee taDes his li!ense su:;e!t to su!h !on&itions as the 7e,islature sees fit to i poseH an& a" :e re%oDe& at its pleasure without &epri%in, the li!ensee of an" propert" (Cha%e= %' 1o uloH $'1' No' 12703)H >une 9H 200#)' D3e Pr&(e++8 PPA<Pi'&t+ 9"66!:
No M555 * 3he Philippine Ports +uthorit" (PP+) $eneral 8ana,er issue& an a& inistrati%e or&er to the effe!t that all e0istin, re,ular appoint ents to har:or pilot positions shall re ain %ali& onl" up to -e!e :er 31 of the !urrent "ear an& that hen!eforth all appoint ents to har:or pilot positions shall :e onl" for a ter of one "ear fro &ate of effe!ti%it"H su:;e!t to "earl" renewal or !an!ellation :" the PP+ after !on&u!t of a ri,i& e%aluation of perfor an!e' Pilota,e as a profession a" :e pra!ti!e& onl" :" &ul" li!ense& in&i%i&ualsH who ha%e to pass fi%e ,o%ern ent professional e0a inations' 3he @ar:or Pilot +sso!iation !hallen,e& the %ali&it" of sai& a& inistrati%e or&er ar,uin, that it %iolate& the har:or pilotsB ri,ht to e0er!ise their profession an& their ri,ht to &ue pro!ess of law an& that the sai& a& inistrati%e or&er was issue& without prior noti!e an& hearin,' 3he PP+ !ountere& that the a& inistrati%e or&er was %ali& as it was issue& in the e0er!ise of its a& inistrati%e !ontrol an& super%ision o%er har:or pilots un&er PP+Bs le,islati%e !harterH an& that in issuin, the or&er as a rule or re,ulationH it was perfor in, its e0e!uti%e or le,islati%eH an& not a ?uasi*>u&i!ial fun!tion'

1' -enial of &ue pro!ess to the uni!ipalit"; 2' For failure of 8a!apinla! to se!ure appro%al of the San,,unian, 9a"an for hi to operate a ferr" ser%i!e in 8a!a:e:eH 1esol%e the two points in the petition with reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he petition for !ertiorari shoul& :e ,rante&H
1' +s a part" &ire!tl" affe!te& :" the operation of the ferr" ser%i!eH the 8uni!ipalit" of 8a!a:e:eH Pa pan,a was entitle& to :e &ire!tl" notifie& :" the 73F19 of its pro!ee&in,s relati%e to 8a!apinla!Bs appli!ationH e%en if the 8uni!ipalit" ha& not notifie& the 73F19 of the e0isten!e of the uni!ipal ferr" ser%i!e' Noti!e :" pu:li!ation was not enou,h' (8uni!ipalit" of /!ha,ue %' +:elleraH 1#) SC1+ 180 (198)))'

2' 6here a ferr" operation lies entirel" within the uni!ipalit"H the prior appro%al of the 8uni!ipal ,o%ern ent is ne!essar"' '''' D3e Pr&(e++8 Per1it t& Carry O3t+ide Re+iden(e 9>?<"66?:
3' -oes a Per it to Carr" Firear 1esi&en!e (P3CFA1) !onstitute a ri,ht prote!te& :" the ConstitutionL (2'2N)

-ue pro!ess of law is !lassifie& into two Din&sH na el"H pro!e&ural &ue pro!ess an& su:stanti%e &ue pro!ess of law' 6as thereH orH was there no %iolation of the har:or pilotsB ri,ht to e0er!ise their profession an& their ri,ht to &ue pro!ess of lawL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he ri,ht of the har:or pilots to &ue pro!ess was %iolate&' + hel& in Corona %s' <nite& @ar:or Pilots +sso!iation of the PhilippinesH 283 SC1+ 31 (1997) pilota,e as a profession is a propert" ri,ht prote!te& :" the ,uarantee of &ue pro!ess' 3he pre*e%aluation !an!ellation of the li!enses of the har:or pilots e%er" "ear is unreasona:le an& %iolate& their ri,ht to su:stanti%e &ue pro!ess' 3he renewal is

irear1
Autsi&e propert"

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-?

&epen&ent on the e%aluation after the li!enses ha%e :een !an!elle&' 3he issuan!e of the a& inistrati%e or&er also %iolate& pro!e&ural &ue pro!essH sin!e no prior pu:li! hearin, was !on&u!te&' +s hol& in Co issioner of 5nternal 1e%enue %s' Court of +ppealsH 2)1 SC1+ 237 (1998)H &-en a reg*'a+ion is being iss*ed *nder +-e 2*asi"'egis'a+i/e a*+-ori+y o) an ad0inis+ra+i/e agency( +-e re2*ire0en+s o) no+ice( -earing and p*b'ica+ion 0*s+ be obser/ed.

issue& after appropriate noti!e an& hearin, to affe!te& parties' 3he rulin, in Philippine Co uni!ations Satellite Corporation %s' +l!ua=H 180 SC1+ 218H to the effe!t that an or&er pro%isionall" re&u!in, the rates whi!h a pu:li! utilit" !oul& !har,eH !oul& :e issue& without pre%ious noti!e an& hearin,H !annot appl"'

D3e Pr&(e++8 Pr&(ed3ra' 0+= S3b+tanti0e 9!###: No E555 * +' $i%e e0a ples of a!ts of the state whi!h infrin,e the &ue pro!ess !lause: 1' in its su:stanti%e aspe!t an& (1N) 2' in its pro!e&ural aspe!tL (1N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1') + law %iolates su:stanti%e &ue pro!ess when it is unreasona:le or un&ul" oppressi%e' For e0a pleH Presi&ential -e!ree No' 1717H whi!h !an!elle& all the ort,a,es an& liens of a &e:torH was !onsi&ere& un!onstitutional for :ein, oppressi%e' 7iDewiseH as state& in /r ita*8alate @otel an& 8otel Aperators +sso!iationH 5n!' %' Cit" 8a"or of 8anilaH 20 SC1+ 8#9H a law whi!h is %a,ue so that en of !o on intelli,en!e ust ,uess at its eanin, an& &iffer as to its appli!ation %iolates su:stanti%e &ue pro!ess' +s hel& in 3ana&a %' 3u%eraH 1#) SC1+ ##)H &ue pro!ess re?uires that the law :e pu:lishe&' 2') 5n State Prose!utors %' 8uroH 23) SC1+ 202H it was hel& that the &is issal of a !ase without the :enefit of a hearin, an& without an" noti!e to the prose!ution %iolate& &ue pro!ess' 7iDewiseH as hel& in People %' Court of +ppealsH 2)2 SC1+ #22H the la!D of i partialit" of the ;u&,e who will &e!i&e a !ase %iolates pro!e&ural &ue pro!ess'

D3e Pr&(e++8 P3b'i( S(,&&' Tea(,er+ 9"66": No M * 3en pu:li! s!hool tea!hers of Caloo!an Cit" left their !lassroo s to ;oin a striDeH whi!h laste& for one onthH to asD for tea!hersB :enefits'
3he -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports !har,e& the a& inistrati%el"H for whi!h reason the" were re?uire& to answer an& for all" in%esti,ate& :" a !o ittee !o pose& of the -i%ision Superinten&ent of S!hools as Chair anH the -i%ision Super%isor as e :er an& a tea!herH as another e :er' An the :asis of the e%i&en!e a&&u!e& at the for al in%esti,ation whi!h a pl" esta:lishe& their ,uiltH the -ire!tor ren&ere& a &e!ision etin, out to the the penalt" of re o%al fro offi!e' 3he &e!ision was affir e& :" the -/CS Se!retar" an& the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission' An appealH the" reiterate& the ar,u ents the" raise& :efore the a& inistrati%e :o&iesH na el": (:) 3he" were &epri%e& of &ue pro!ess of law as the 5n%esti,atin, Co ittee was i properl" !onstitute& :e!ause it &i& not in!lu&e a tea!her in representation of the tea!hersB or,ani=ation as re?uire& :" the 8a,na Carta for Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hers (1'+' No' #)70H Se!' 9)'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he tea!hers were &epri%e& of &ue pro!ess of law' <n&er Se!tion 9 of the 8a,na Carta for Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hersH one of the e :ers of the !o ittee ust :e a tea!her who is a representati%e of the lo!alH or in its a:sen!eH an" e0istin, pro%in!ial or national or,ani=ation of tea!hers' +!!or&in, to Fa:ella %' Court of +ppealsH 283 SC1+ 22) (1997)H to :e !onsi&ere& the authori=e& representati%e of su!h or,ani=ationH the tea!her ust :e !hosen :" the or,ani=ation itself an& not :" the Se!retar" of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports' Sin!e in a& inistrati%e pro!ee&in,sH &ue pro!ess re?uires that the tri:unal :e %este& with ;uris&i!tion an& :e so !onstitute& as to affor& a person !har,e& a& inistrati%el" a reasona:le ,uarantee of i partialit"H if the tea!her who is a e :er of the !o ittee was not appointe& in a!!or&an!e with the lawH an" pro!ee&in, :efore

D3e Pr&(e++8 Pr&0i+i&na' Order 9!##!:


No 7 * An 29 >ul" 1991' the /ner," 1e,ulator" 9oar& (/19)H in response to pu:li! !la orH issue& a resolution appro%in, an& a&optin, a s!he&ule for :rin,in, &own the pri!es of petroleu pro&u!ts o%er a perio& of one (1) "ear startin, 12 +u,ust 1991H o%er the o:;e!tion of the oil !o panies whi!h !lai that the perio& !o%ere& is too lon, to pre;u&,e an& foresee' 5s the resolution %ali&L

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the resolution is in%ali&H sin!e the /ner," 1e,ulator" 9oar& issue& the resolution without a hearin,' 3he resolution here is not a pro%isional or&er an& therefore it !an onl" :e

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-%

it is tainte& with &epri%ation of pro!e&ural &ue pro!ess' D3e Pr&(e++8 Radi& Stati&n 9!#$%:
No' M5E: 5n the ornin, of +u,ust 28H 1987H &urin, the hei,ht of the fi,htin, at Channel # an& Ca elot @otelH the ilitar" !lose& 1a&io Station MMH whi!h was e0!ite&l" reportin, the su!!esses of the re:els an& o%e ents towar&s 8anila an& troops frien&l" to the re:els' 3he reports were !orre!t an& fa!tual' An A!to:er )H 1987H after nor al!" ha& returne& an& the $o%ern ent ha& full !ontrol of the situationH the National 3ele!o uni!ations Co issionH without noti!e an& hearin,H :ut erel" on the :asis of the report of the ilitar"H !an!elle& the fran!hise of station MM'

&efense presente& in his :ehalf will :e ina&e?uate !onsi&erin, the le,al re?uisite an& sDill nee&e& in !ourt pro!ee&in,s' 3here woul& !ertainl" :e a &enial of &ue pro!ess' (-el,a&o %' Court of +ppealsH 1#2 SC1+ 327 (198)))'

-is!uss the le,alit" of: (:) 3he !an!ellation of the fran!hise of the station on A!to:er )H 1987' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !an!ellation of the fran!hise of the station on A!to:er )H 1987H without prior noti!e an& hearin,H is %oi&' +s hel& in /astern 9roa&!astin, Corp' (-O1/) %' -ansH 137 SC1+ )#7 (1982)H the !ar&inal pri ar" re?uire ents in a& inistrati%e pro!ee&in,s (one of whi!h is that the parties ust first :e hear&) as lai& &own in +n, 3i:a" %' C51H )9 Phil' )32 (19#0) ust :e o:ser%e& in !losin, a ra&io station :e!ause ra&io :roa&!asts are a for of !onstitutionall"*prote!te& e0pression'

D3e Pr&(e++8 S3b+tanti0e 9"66-: 2003 No M55 * 3he uni!ipal !oun!il of the uni!ipalit" of $ua,uaH Pa pan,aH passe& an or&inan!e penali=in, an" person or entit" en,a,e& in the :usiness of sellin, ti!Dets to o%ies or other pu:li! e0hi:itionsH ,a es or perfor an!es whi!h woul& !har,e !hil&ren :etween 7 an& 12 "ears of a,e the full pri!e of a& ission ti!Dets instea& of onl" one* half of the a ount thereof' 6oul& "ou hol& the or&inan!e a %ali& e0er!ise of le,islati%e power :" the uni!ipalit"L 6h"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&inan!e is %oi&' +s hel& in 9ala!uit %' Court of First 5nstan!e of +,usan &el Norte' 1)3 SC1+ 182 P1988QH the or&inan!e is unreasona:le' 5t &epri%es the sellers of the ti!Dets of their propert" without &ue pro!ess' + ti!Det is a propert" ri,ht an& a" :e sol& for su!h pri!e as the owner of it !an o:tain' 3here is nothin, perni!ious in !har,in, !hil&ren the sa e pri!e as a&ults'

D3e Pr&(e++8 Li(en+e 9!##":

S3+*en+i&n

&)

Dri0erG+

D3e Pr&(e++8 Re*re+ented by a N&n<La5yer 9!#$$:


No' 2: Nor:erto 8alas as was a!!use& of estafa :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court of 8anila' +fter the trialH he was foun& ,uilt"' An appealH his !on%i!tion was affir e& :" the Court of +ppeals' +fter the re!or&s of his !ase ha& :een re an&e& to the 1e,ional 3rial Court for e0e!utionH an& after the latter Court ha& set the &ate for the pro ul,ation of ;u&, entH the a!!use& file& a otion with the Court of +ppeals to set asi&e the entr" of ;u&, entH an& to re an& the !ase to the 1e,ional 3rial Court for new trial on the ,roun& that he ha& ;ust &is!o%ere& that C+tt"' 7eonilo 8apor aC who he ha& !hosen an& who ha& a!te& as his !ounsel :efore the trial !ourt an& the Court of +ppealsH is not a law"er' 1esol%e& the otion of the a!!use& with reasons'

NoH 3; Con,ress is !onsi&erin, a law a,ainst &runDen &ri%in,' <n&er the le,islationH poli!e authorities a" asD an" &ri%er to taDe a C:reathal"=er testCH wherein the &ri%er e0hales se%eral ti es into a &e%i!e whi!h !an &eter ine whether he has :een &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of al!ohol' 3he results of the test !an :e use&H in an" le,al pro!ee&in, a,ainst hi ' Further oreH &e!larin, that the issuan!e of a &ri%erBs li!ense ,i%es rise onl" to a pri%ile,e to &ri%e otor %ehi!les on pu:li! roa&sH the law pro%i&es that a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the test shall :e auto ati!all" su:;e!t to a 90*&a" suspension of his &ri%erBs li!enseH

Cite two P2Q possi:le !onstitutional o:;e!tions to this law' 1esol%e the o:;e!tions an& e0plain whether an" su!h infir ities !an :e !ure&' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Possi:le o:;e!tions to the law are that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe the :reathal"=er test will %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri inationH that pro%i&in, for the suspension of his &ri%erBs li!ense without an" hearin, %iolates &ue pro!essH an& that the propose& law will %iolate the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=uresH :e!ause it allows poli!e authorities to

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he otion shoul& :e ,rante& an& the entr" ;u&, ent shoul& :e set asi&e' +n a!!use& entitle& to :e hear& :" hi self or !ounsel' (+rt' se!' 1#(2))' <nless he is represente& :" attorne"H there is a ,reat &an,er that an" of is 555H an

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-$

re?uire a &ri%e to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en if there is no pro:a:le !ause ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
1e?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a :reathal"=er test &oes not %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri inationH :e!ause he is not :ein, !o pelle& to ,i%e testi onial e%i&en!e' @e is erel" :ein, asDe& to su: it to a ph"si!al test' 3his is not !o%ere& :" the !onstitutional ,uarantee a,ainst self*in!ri ination' 3husH in South -aDota %s' Ne%illeH #29 <'S' 223H it was hel& for this reason that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a :loo&*al!ohol test is %ali&' +s hel& in 8a!De" %s' +fontr"a ##3 <'S' 1H :e!ause of !o pellin, ,o%ern ent interest in safet" alon, the streetsH the li!ense of a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the :reathal"=er test a" :e suspen&e& i e&iatel" pen&in, a post* suspension hearin,H :ut there ust :e a pro%ision for a post*suspension hearin,' 3husH to sa%e the propose& law fro un!onstitutionall" on the ,roun& of &enial of &ue pro!essH it shoul& pro%i&e for an i e&iate hearin, upon suspension of the &ri%erBs li!ense' 3he propose& law %iolates the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=ures' 5t will authori=e poli!e authorities to stop an" &ri%er an& asD hi to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en in the a:sen!e of a pro:a:le !ause'

/le!tri! 7i,ht CoH %' PSCH 10 SC1+ #) (19)#) it was hel& that a rate or&erH whi!h applies e0!lusi%el" to a parti!ular part" an& is pre&i!ate& on a fin&in, of fa!tH partaDes of the nature of a ?uasi ;u&i!ialH rather than le,islati%eH fun!tion'
3he first or&erH ,rantin, a pro%isional rate in!rease without hearin,H is %ali& if ;ustifie& :" <1$/N3 P<975C N//-H su!h as in!rease in the !ost of fuel' 3he power of the Pu:li! Ser%i!e Co ission to ,rant su!h in!rease was uphel& in se%eral !ases' (Sil%a %' A!a poH 90 Phil' 777 (1922); @alili %' PSCH 92 Phil' 103)(1923))

3he se!on& or&er re?uirin, the !o pan" to pa" unpai& super%isor" fees un&er the Pu:li! Ser%i!e +!t !annot :e sustaine&' 3he !o pan" has a ri,ht to :e hear&H :efore it a" :e or&ere& to pa"' (+n, 3i:a" %' C51H )9 Phil' )32 (19#0)) 3he thir& or&er !an :e ;ustifie&' 3he fa!t that the 319 has allowe& a pro%isional rate in!rease &oes not :in& it to aDe the or&er per anent if the e%i&en!e later su: itte& &oes not ;ustif" in!rease :utH on the !ontrar"H warrants the re&u!tion of rates' E1inent D&1ain8 Garni+,1ent 9!##;:
No' 1#: 3he 8uni!ipalit" of +ntipoloH 1i=alH e0propriate& the propert" of >uan 1e"es for use as a pu:li! arDet' 3he 8uni!ipal Coun!il appropriate& PlH000H000'00 for the pur!hase of the lot :ut the 1e,ional 3rial CourtH on the :asis of the e%i&en!eH fi0e& the %alue at P2H000H000'00'

D3e Pr&(e++8 Urgent P3b'i( Need 9!#$%:


No' 55: 3he 8anila 3ransportation Co pan" applie& for upwar& a&;ust ent of its rates :efore the 3ransportation 1e,ulator" 9oar&' Pen&in, the petitionH the 319H without pre%ious hearin,H ,rante& a ,eneral nationwi&e pro%isional in!rease of rates' 5n another Ar&erH 319 re?uire& the !o pan" to pa" the unpai& super%isor" fees !olle!ti:le un&er the Pu:li! Ser%i!e 7aw' +fter &ue noti!e an& hearin,H on the :asis of the e%i&en!e presente& :" 8anila 3ransportation Co pan" an& the AppositorsH 319 issue& an Ar&er re&u!in, the rates applie& for :" one*fourth'

6hat le,al a!tion !an >uan 1e"es taDe to !olle!t the :alan!eL 2) Can >uan 1e"es asD the 1e,ional 3rial Court to ,arnish the 8uni!ipalit"Bs a!!ount with the 7an& 9anDL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) 3o !olle!t the :alan!e of >u&, entH as state& in 3an 3o!o %s' 8uni!ipal Counsel of 5loiloH #9 Phil' 22H >uan 1e"es a" le%" on patri onial properties of the 8uni!ipalit" of +ntipolo' 5f it has no patri onial propertiesH in a!!or&an!e with the 8uni!ipalit" of 8aDati %s' Court of +ppealsH 190 SC1+ 20)H the re e&" of >uan 1e"es is to file a petition for an&a us to !o pel the 8uni!ipalit" of +ntipolo to appropriate the ne!essar" fun&s to satisf" the ;u&, ent' 2) Pursuant to the rulin, in Pasa" Cit" $o%ern ent %s' Court of First 5nstan!e of 8anilaH 132 SC1+ 12)H sin!e the 8uni!ipalit" of +ntipolo has appropriate& P1H000H000 to pa"

1)

Chara!teri=e the powers e0er!ise& :" the 319 in this !ase an& &eter ine whether un&er the present !onstitutional s"ste the 3ransportation 1e,ulator" 9oar& !an :e %ali&l" !onferre& the powers e0er!ise& :" it in issuin, the Ar&ers ,i%en a:o%e' /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&ers in this !ase in%ol%e the e0er!ise of ;u&i!ial fun!tion :" an a& inistrati%e a,en!"H an& thereforeH as a ,eneral ruleH the !ar&inal pri ar" ri,hts enu erate& in +n, 3i:a" %' C51H )9 Phil' )32 (19#0) ust :e o:ser%e&' 5n Ei,art

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

-#

for the lotH its :anD a!!ount a" :e ,arnishe& :ut up to this a ount onl"' E1inent D&1ain8 Garni+,1ent 9!##$: No E5 * 2H 5f the Cit" of Ce:u has one" in :anDH !an it :e ,arnishe&L P2NQ SUGGESTED ANSWER: 2' NoH the one" of the Cit" of Ce:u in the :anD !annot :e ,arnishe& if it !a e fro pu:li! fun&s' +s hel& in 8uni!ipalit" of 8aDati %s' Court of +ppealsH 190 SC1+ 20)H 212H pu:li! fun&s are e0e pte& fro ,arnish ent' E1inent D&1ain8 i113nity )r&1 +3it 9"66!:
No 555 * 3he 1epu:li! of the PhilippinesH throu,h the -epart ent of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s (-P6@)H !onstru!te& a new hi,hwa" linDin, 8etro 8anila an& (ue=on pro%in!eH an& whi!h a;or thorou,hfare tra%erse& the lan& owne& :" 8an, Pan&o"' 3he ,o%ern ent neither file& an" e0propriation pro!ee&in,s nor pai& an" !o pensation to 8an, Pan&o" for the lan& thus taDen an& use& as a pu:li! roa&'

(2) +s the ;u&,eH rule on the sai& o:;e!tions' SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) +s !ounsel for C Co pan"H 5 will ar,ue that the taDin, of the propert" is not for a pu:li! use an& that the or&inan!e !annot fi0 the !o pensation to :e pai& C Co pan"H :e!ause this is a ;u&i!ial ?uestion that is for the !ourts to &e!i&e'
(2) +s ;u&,eH 5 will sustain the !ontention that the taDin, of the propert" of C Co pan" to operate the !o er!ial !enter esta:lishe& within it to finan!e a housin, pro;e!t for !it" e plo"ees is not for a pu:li! use :ut for a pri%ate purpose' +s the Court in&i!ate& in a &i!tu in 8anotoD' %' National @ousin, +uthorit"H 120 SC1+ 89H that the e0propriation of a !o er!ial !enter so that the profits &eri%e& fro its operation !an :e use& for housin, pro;e!ts is a taDin, for a pri%ate purpose' 5 will also sustain the !ontention that the or&inan!eH e%en thou,h it fi0es the !o pensation for the lan& on the :asis of the pre%ailin, lan& %alue !annot reall" &ispla!e ;u&i!ial &eter ination of the pri!e for the si ple reason that an" fa!torsH so e of the super%enin,H !annot possi:l" :e !onsi&ere& :" the le,islature at the ti e of ena!tin, the or&inan!e' 3here is ,reater reason for nullif"in, the use of the !ost of !onstru!tion in the or&inan!e as :asis for !o pensation for the i pro%e ents' 3he fair arDet %alue of the i pro%e ents a" not :e e?ual to the !ost of !onstru!tion' 3he ori,inal !ost of !onstru!tion a" :e lower than the fair arDet %alueH sin!e the !ost of !onstru!tion at the ti e of e0propriation a" ha%e in!rease&'

8an, Pan&o" file& a suit a,ainst the ,o%ern ent to !o pel pa" ent for the %alue of his lan&' 3he -P6@ file& a otion to &is iss the !ase on the ,roun& that the State is i une fro suit' 8an, Pan&o" file& an opposition' 1esol%e the otion' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he otion to &is iss shoul& :e &enie&' +s hel& in + i,a:le %' Cuen!aH #3 SC1+ 300 (1972)H when the $o%ern ent e0propriates pri%ate propert" without pa"in, !o pensationH it is &ee e& to ha%e wai%e& its i unit" fro suit' AtherwiseH the !onstitutional ,uarantee that pri%ate propert" shall not :e taDen for pu:li! use without pa" ent of ;ust !o pensation will :e ren&ere& nu,ator"'

E1inent D&1ain8 Indire(t P3b'i( Bene)it 9!##6:


No' 2: 3he Cit" of Ce:u passe& an or&inan!e pro!lai in, the e0propriation of a ten (10) he!tare propert" of C Co pan"H whi!h propert" is alrea&" a &e%elope& !o er!ial !enter' 3he Cit" propose& to operate the !o er!ial !enter in or&er to finan!e a housin, pro;e!t for !it" e plo"ees in the %a!ant portion of the sai& propert"' 3he or&inan!e fi0e& the pri!e of the lan& an& the %alue of the i pro%e ents to :e pai& C Co pan" on the :asis of the pre%ailin, lan& %alue an& !ost of !onstru!tion'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 3he taDin, of the !o er!ial !enter is ;ustifie& :" the !on!ept of in&ire!t pu:li! :enefit sin!e its operation is inten&e& for the &e%elop ent of the %a!ant portion for so!iali=e& housin,H whi!h is !learl" a pu:li! purpose' E1inent D&1ain8 43+t C&1*en+ati&n 9!#$$:
No' 8: 8r' 1olan& 1i%era is the owner of four lots sou,ht to :e e0propriate& :" the /0port Pro!essin, .one +uthorit" for the e0pansion of the e0port pro!essin, =one at 9a,uio Cit"' 3he sa e par!els of lan& ha& :een %alue& :" the +ssessor at P120'00 per s?uare eterH while 8r' 1i%era ha& pre%iousl" fi0e& the arDet %alue of the sa e at P100 per s?uare eter' 3he 1e,ional 3rial Court &e!i&e& for e0propriation an& or&ere& the pa" ent to 8r' 1i%era at the rate of P100 a s?uare eter

(1)

+s !ounsel for C Co pan"H ,i%e two !onstitutional o:;e!tions to the %ali&it" of the or&inan!e'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;6

pursuant to Presi&ential -e!ree No' 1233H pro%i&in, that in &eter inin, ;ust !o pensation for pri%ate propert" a!?uire& throu,h e inent &o ain pro!ee&in,sH the !o pensation to :e pai& shall not e0!ee& the %alue &e!lare& :" the owner or &eter ine& :" the +ssessorH pursuant to the 1eal Propert" 3a0 Co&eH whi!he%er %alue is lowerH prior to the re!o en&ation or &e!ision of the appropriate ,o%ern ent offi!e to a!?uire the propert"' 8r' 1i%era appeale&H insistin, that ;ust !o pensation for his propert" shoul& :e &eter ine& :" Co issioners who !oul& e%aluate all e%i&en!e on the real %alue of the propert"H at the ti e of its taDin, :" the ,o%ern ent' @e aintains that the lower !ourt erre& in rel"in, on Presi&ential -e!ree NoH 1233H whi!h he !lai s is un!onstitutional'

wron,' Se!on&l"H the &eter ination of ;ust !o pensation in e0propriation !ases is a ;u&i!ial fun!tion' Sin!e un&er Se!tion 9H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution pri%ate propert" shall not :e taDen for pu:li! use without ;ust !o pensationH no law !an an&ate that its &eter ination as to the ;ust !o pensation shall pre%ail o%er the fin&in,s of the !ourt'

E1inent D&1ain8 43+t C&1*en+ati&n 9!##$:


No E5' 3he Cit" of Ce:u e0propriate& the propert" of Carlos 3opi!o for use as a uni!ipal parDin, lot' 3he San,,unian, Panlun,so& appropriate& P10 illion for this purpose :ut the 1e,ional 3rial Court fi0e& the !o pensation for the taDin, of the lan& at P12 illion' 1' 6hat le,al re e&"H if an"H &oes Carlos 3opi!o ha%e to re!o%er the :alan!e of P2

@ow woul& "ou &e!i&e the appealL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he &e!ision of the lower !ourt shoul& :e re%erse&' 5n /P.+ %H -ula"H 1#9 SC1+ 302 (1987) the Supre e Court &e!lare& P- No' 1233 to :e an un!onstitutional en!roa!h ent on the prero,ati%es of the ;u&i!iar"' 5t was e0plaine& that althou,h a !ourt woul& te!hni!all" ha%e the power to &eter ine the ;ust !o pensation for propert" un&er the -e!reeH the !ourtBs tasD woul& :e rele,ate& to si pl" statin, the lower %alue of the propert" as &e!lare& either :" the owner or :" the assessor' >ust !o pensation eans the %alue of the propert" at the ti e of the taDin,' 5t eans a fair an& full e?ui%alent for the loss sustaine&' 3o &eter ine it re?uires !onsi&eration of the !on&ition of the propert" an& its surroun&in,H its i pro%e ents an& !apa:ilities'

illion for the taDin, of his lan&L P3NQ S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 1' 3he re e&" of Carlos 3opl!o is to le%" on the patri onial properties of the Cit" of Ce:u' 5n 8uni!ipalit" of Paoa" %s 8anaoisH 8) Phil )29' )32H the Supre e Court hel&:
CPropert"H howe%erH whi!h is patri onial an& whi!h is hel& :" a uni!ipalit" in its proprietar" !apa!it" as treate& :" the ,reat wei,ht of authorit" as the pri%ate asset of the town an& a" :e le%ie& upon an& sol& un&er an or&inar" e0e!ution'C

E1inent D&1ain8 43+t C&1*en+ati&n 9!#$#:


NoH ): + law pro%i&es that in the e%ent of e0propriationH the a ount to :e pai& to a lan&owner as !o pensation shall :e either the sworn %aluation a&e :" the owner or the offi!ial assess ent thereofH whi!he%er is lower' Can the lan&owner su!!essfull" !hallen,e the law in !ourtL -is!uss :riefl" "our answer'

5f the Cit" of Ce:u &oes not ha%e patri onial propertiesH the re e&" of Carlos 3opi!o is to file a petition for an&a us to !o pel it to appropriate one" to satisf" the >u&, ent' 5n 8uni!ipalit" 8aDati %s' Court of +ppealsH 190 SC1+ 20)H 213' the Supre e Court sai&: C6here a uni!ipalit" falls or refusesH without ;ustifia:le reasonH to effe!t pa" ent of a final one" ;u&, ent ren&ere& a,ainst itH the !lai ant a" a%ail of the re e&" of an&a us in or&er to !o pel the ena!t ent an& appro%al of the ne!essar" appropriation or&inan!eH an& the !orrespon&in, &is:urse ent of uni!ipal fun&s therefor'C

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 1' @e !an file the one" !lai the Co ission on +u&it'

with

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the lan&owner !an su!!essfull" !hallen,e the law in !ourt' +!!or&in, to the &e!ision in /0port Pro!essin, .one +uthorit" %s' -ula"H 1#9 SC1+ 302H su!h a law is un!onstitutional' First of allH it %iolates &ue pro!essH :e!ause it &enies to the lan&owner the opportunit" to pro%e that the %aluation in the ta0 &e!laration is

E1inent D&1ain8 Lega' Intere+t 9!##-: NoH 2: 5n e0propriation pro!ee&in,s:


1) 6hat le,al interest shoul& :e use& in the !o putation of interest on ;ust !o pensationL

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s hel& in National Power Corporation %s' +n,as' 208 SC1+ 2#2H in a!!or&an!e with +rti!le 2209 of the Ci%il Co&eH the le,al interest

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;!

shoul& :e S5M per !ent ()N) a "ear' Central 9anD Cir!ular No' #1)H whi!h in!rease& the le,al interest to twel%e per!ent (12N) a "ear is not appli!a:le to the e0propriation of propert" an& is li ite& to loansH sin!e its issuan!e is :ase& on Presi&ential -e!ree NoH 11)H whi!h a en&e& the <sur" 7aw'

:e other a%aila:le lots in Santa for a sports !enter' NonethelessH the 8uni!ipalit" of SantaH throu,h its 8a"orH file& a !o plaint for e inent &o ain' Christina oppose& this on the followin, ,roun&s: 1' the 8uni!ipalit" of Santa has no power to e0propriate; 2' 1esolution No' 1 has :een %oi&e& sin!e the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an &isappro%e& it for :ein, ar:itrar"; an& 3' the 8uni!ipalit" of Santa has other an& :etter lots for that purpose' 1esol%e the !ase with reasons' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWERS: a) <n&er Se!tion 19 of 1'+' No' 71)0H the power of e inent &o ain is e0pli!itl" ,rante& to the uni!ipalit"H :ut ust :e e0er!ise& throu,h an or&inan!e rather than throu,h a resolution' (8uni!ipalit" ofParana?ue %' E'8' 1ealt" Corp'H $'1' No' 127820H >ul" 20H 1998)
:) 3he San,,unian, Panlalawi,an of 5lo!os Sur was without the authorit" to &isappro%e 1esolution No' 1 as the uni!ipalit" !learl" has the power to e0er!ise the ri,ht of e inent &o ain an& its San,,unian, 9a"an the !apa!it" to pro ul,ate sai& resolution' 3he onl" ,roun& upon whi!h a pro%in!ial :oar& a" &e!lare an" uni!ipal resolutionH or&inan!e or or&er in%ali& is when su!h resolutionH or&inan!e or or&er is :e"on& the powers !onferre& upon the !oun!il or presi&ent aDin, the sa e' Su!h is not the situation in this !ase' (8o&a" %' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No' 10791)H Fe:ruar" 20H 1997) !) 3he ?uestion of whether there is ,enuine ne!essit" for the e0propriation of ChristinaBs lot or whether the uni!ipalit" has other an& :etter lots for the purpose is a atter that will ha%e to :e resol%e& :" the Court upon presentation of e%i&en!e :" the parties to the !ase'

E1inent D&1ain8 N&n<&b+er0an(e &) t,e *&'i(y &) Ha'' &r n&neH 9"666:
No E555' 8a&lan,:a"an is the owner of a 200 s?uare eter lot whi!h was the :irthpla!e of the foun&er of a reli,ious se!t who a& itte&l" pla"e& an i portant role in Philippine histor" an& !ulture' 3he National @istori!al Co ission (N@C) passe& a resolution &e!larin, it a national lan& arD an& on its re!o en&ation the lot was su:;e!te& to e0propriation pro!ee&in,s' 3his was oppose& :" 8a&lan,:a"an on the followin, ,roun&s: a) that the lot is not a %ast tra!t; :) that those to :e :enefite& :" the e0propriation woul& onl" :e the e :ers of the reli,ious se!t of its foun&erH an& !) that the N@C has not initiate& the e0propriation of :irthpla!es of other ore &eser%in, histori!al personalities' 1esol%e the opposition raise& :" 8a&lan,:a"an' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he ar,u ents of 8a&lan,:a"an are not eritorious' +!!or&in, to 8anos!a %' Court of +ppealsH 222 SC1+ #12 (199))H the power of e inent &o ain is not !onfine& to e0propriation of %ast tra!ts of the lan&' 3he e0propriation of the lot to preser%e it as the :irthpla!e of the foun&er of the reli,ious se!t :e!ause of his role in Philippine histor" an& !ulture is for a pu:li! purposeH :e!ause pu:li! use is no lon,er restri!te& to the tra&itional !on!ept' 3he fa!t that the e0propriation will :enefit the e :ers of the reli,ious se!t is erel" in!i&ental' 3he fa!t that other :irthpla!es ha%e not :een e0propriate& is liDewise not a %ali& :asis for opposin, the e0propriation' +s hel& in >'8' 3uason an& Co pan"H 5n!' %' 7an& 3enure +& inistrationH 31 SC1+ #13 (1970)H the e0propriatin, authorit" is not re?uire& to a&here to the poli!" of Call or noneC'

E1inent D&1ain8 P&5er t& E2er(i+e 9"66@:


(10*2) 3he San,,unian, 9a"an of the 8uni!ipalit" of SantaH 5lo!os Sur passe& 1esolution No' 1 authori=in, its 8a"or to initiate a petition for the e0propriation of a lot owne& :" Christina as site for its uni!ipal sports !enter' 3his was appro%e& :" the 8a"or' @owe%erH the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an of 5lo!os Sur &isappro%e& the 1esolution as there i,ht still

E1inent D&1ain8 P3b'i( U+e 9!#$%: No' ME5: 5n >anuar" 198#H Pasa" Cit" file& e0propriation pro!ee&in,s a,ainst se%eral lan&owners for the !onstru!tion of an a?ue&u!t for floo& !ontrol in a :aran,a"' Clearl"H onl" the resi&ents of that :aran,a" woul& :e :enefite& :" the pro;e!t'
+s !o pensationH the !it" offere& to pa" onl" the a ount &e!lare& :" the owners in their ta0

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;"

&e!larationsH whi!h a ount was lower than the assesse& %alue as &eter ine& :" the assessor' 3he lan&owners oppose the e0propriation on the ,roun&s that: (a) the sa e is not for pu:li! use; an&
(:) assu in, it is for pu:li! useH the !o pensation ust :e :ase& on the e%i&en!e presente& in !ourt an& notH as pro%i&e& in presi&ential &e!rees pres!ri:in, pa" ent of the %alue state& in the ownerBs ta0 &e!larations or the %alue &eter ine& :" the assessorH whi!he%er is lower'

e0propriation is to use the lan& as a relo!ation site for 200 fa ilies s?uattin, alon, the Pasi, ri%er'
a) Can the owner of the propert" oppose the e0propriation on the ,roun& that onl" 200 out of the ore than 10H000 s?uatter fa ilies in Pasi, Cit" will :enefit fro the e0propriationL /0plain'

5f "ou were ;u&,eH how woul& "ou rule on the issueL 6h"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he !ontention that the taDin, of pri%ate propert" for the purpose of !onstru!tin, an a?ue&u!t for floo& !ontrol is not for pu:li! useC is untena:le* 3he i&ea that CP<975C <S/C eans e0!lusi%el" use :" the pu:li! has :een &is!ar&e&' +s lon, as the purpose of the taDin, is pu:li!H the e0er!ise of power of e inent &o ain is ;ustifia:le' 6hate%er a" :e :enefi!iall" e plo"e& for the ,eneral welfare satisfies the re?uire ent of pu:li! use' (@eirs of
>uan!ho +r&ona %' 1e"esH 123 SC1 + 220 (1983))

Can the -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor re?uire the Cit" of Pasi, to first se!ure authorit" fro sai& -epart ent :efore !on%ertin, the use of the lan& fro a,ri!ultural to housin,L /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a) NoH the owner of the propert" !annot oppose the e0propriation on the ,roun& that onl" 200 out of ore than 10H000 s?uatter fa ilies in Pasi, Cit" will :enefit fro the e0propriation' +s hel& in Philippine Colu :ian +sso!iation %s' PantsH 228 SC1+ ))8H the a!?uisition of pri%ate propert" for so!iali=e& housin, is for pu:li! use an& the fa!t that onl" a few an& not e%er"one will :enefit fro the e0propriation &oes not &etra!t fro the nature of the pu:li! use' :) NoH the -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor !annot re?uire Pasi, Cit" to first se!ure authorit" fro it :efore !on%ertin, the use of the lan& fro a,ri!ultural to resi&ential' +!!or&in, to Pro%in!e of Ca arines Sur %s' Court of +ppealsH 222 SC1+ 173H there is no pro%ision in the Co prehensi%e +,rarian 1efor 7aw whi!h su:;e!ts the e0propriation of a,ri!ultural lan&s :" lo!al ,o%ern ent units to the !ontrol of the -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor an& to re?uire appro%al fro the -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor will ean that it is not the lo!al ,o%ern ent unit :ut the -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor who will &eter ine whether or not the e0propriation is for a pu:li! use'

:)

(:) 9ut the !ontention that the Presi&ential -e!rees pro%i&in, that in &eter inin, ;ust !o pensation the %alue state& :" the owner in his ta0 &e!laration or that &eter ine& :" the assessorH whi!he%er is lowerH in un!onstitutional is !orre!t' 5n /P.+ %' -ula"' $'1' No' 29)03H +pril 29H 1987H it was hel& that this etho& pres!ri:e& for as!ertainin, ;ust !o pensation !onstitutes an i per issi:le en!roa!h ent on the prero,ati%es of !ourts' 5t ten&s to ren&er !ourts inutile in a atter whi!hH un&er the ConstitutionH is reser%e& to the for final &eter ination' For althou,h un&er the &e!rees the !ourts still ha%e the power to &eter ine ;ust !o pensationH their tasD is re&u!e& to si pl" &eter inin, the lower %alue of the propert" as &e!lare& either :" the owner or :" the assessor' C><S3 CA8P/NS+35ANC eans the %alue of the propert" at the ti e of the taDin,' 5ts &eter ination re?uires that all fa!ts as to the !on&ition of the propert" an& its surroun&in,s an& its i pro%e ents an& !apa:ilities ust :e !onsi&ere&H an& this !an onl" :e &one in a ;u&i!ial pro!ee&in,'

E1inent D&1ain8 Writ &) P&++e++i&n 9!##-: NoH 2: 5n e0propriation pro!ee&in,s: Can the ;u&,e %ali&l" withhol& issuan!e of the writ of possession until full pa" ent of the final %alue of the e0propriate& propert"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the ;u&,e !annot %ali&l" withhol& the issuan!e of the writ of possession until full pa" ent of the final %alue of the e0propriate& propert"' +s hel& in National Power Corporation %s' >o!sonH 20) SC1+ 220' it is the rninisterial &ut" of the >u&,e to issue the writ of possession upon &eposit of the pro%isional %alue of the e0propriate& propert" with the National or Pro%in!ial 3reasurer'

E1inent D&1ain8 S&(ia'i/ed H&3+ing 9!##?:


No' # * 3he Cit" of Pasi, initiate& e0propriation pro!ee&in,s on a one*he!tare lot whi!h is part of a ten*he!tare par!el of lan& &e%ote& to the ,rowin, of %e,eta:les' 3he purpose of the

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;-

(per -on&ee) in Republic vs. GingoyonH $1 no' 1))#29H -e!' 19H 2002H the SC hel& that 1+ 897# now re?uires full pa" ent :efore the State a" e0er!ise proprietar" ri,hts in an e0propriation pro!ee&in, an& aDin, the pre%ious rulin, o:iter &i!tu ' EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 A'ien E1*'&y1ent 9!#$#: No 18: +n or&inan!e of the Cit" of 8anila re?uires e%er" alien &esirin, to o:tain e plo" ent of whate%er Din&H in!lu&in, !asual an& part*ti e e plo" entH in the !it" to se!ure an e plo" ent per it fro the Cit" 8a"or an& to pa" a worD per it fee of P200' 5s the or&inan!e %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the or&inan!e is not %ali&' 5n Eille,as %s' @iu Chion, 3sai Pao @oH 8) SC1+ 270H it was hel& that su!h an or&inan!e %iolates e?ual prote!tion' 5t faile& to !onsi&er the %ali& su:stantial &ifferen!es a on, the aliens re?uire& to pa" the fee' 3he sa e a on, it :ein, !olle!te& fro e%er" e plo"e& alienH whether he is !asual or per anentH part*ti e or full* ti e' 3he or&inan!e also %iolates &ue pro!essH :e!ause it &oes not !ontain an" stan&ar& to ,ui&e the a"or in the e0er!ise of the power ,rante& to hi :" the or&inan!e' 3husH it !onfers upon hi unrestri!te& power to allow or pre%ent an a!ti%it" whi!h is lawful per se'

8arina feels %er" a,,rie%e& o%er the &enial an& has !o e to "ou for a&%i!e' She wants to Dnow:
(1) 6hether the 9oar& of /0a iners ha& an" plausi:le or le,al :asis for re;e!tin, her appli!ation in 198)' /0plain :riefl"' 6hether the 1987 Constitution ,uarantees her the ri,ht to a& ission to taDe the !o in, >anuar" 1988 arine offi!ers

(2)

e0a inations' /0plain an& !ite rele%ant pro%isions' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


(a) 3he &is?ualifi!ation of fe ales fro the pra!ti!e of arine profession !onstitutes as in%i&ious &is!ri ination !on&e ne& :" the /?ual Prote!tion Clause of that Constitution (+rt' 5EH Se!' 1) 5n the <nite& StatesH un&er a si ilar pro%isionH while earlier &e!isions of the Supre e Court uphel& the %ali&it" of a statute prohi:itin, wo en fro :arten&in, unless she was the wife or &au,hter of a ale owner
(3oesar+ /. C'eary( 445 6.7. ,%, (19, ) an& &en"in, (Brad&e'' /.

EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 In0idi&3+ Di+(ri1inati&n 9!#$%:


No' E5: 8arina NeptuniaH &au,hter of a sea !aptain an& sister to four arine offi!ers &e!i&e& as a !hil& to follow in her fatherBs footsteps' 5n her ,rowin, up "ears she was as u!h at ho e on :oar& a :oat as she was in the fa il" ho e :" the sea' 5n ti e she earne& a 9a!helor of S!ien!e &e,ree in 8arine 3ransportationH a;or in Na%i,ation an& Sea anship' She ser%e& her apprenti!eship for a "ear in a er!hant arine %essel re,istere& for forei,n tra&e an& another "ear on a er!hant arine %essel re,istere& for !oastwise tra&e' 9ut to :e!o e a full*fle&,e& arine offi!er she ha& to pass the appropriate :oar& e0a inations :efore she !oul& ,et her professional li!ense an& re,istration' She applie& in >anuar" 198) to taDe e0a ination for arine offi!ers :ut her appli!ation was re;e!te& for the reason that the law 1e,ulatin, the Pra!ti!e of 8arine Profession in the Philippines (Pres' -e!' No' 97 (1973) ) spe!ifi!all" pres!ri:es that CNo person shall :e ?ualifie& for e0a ination as arine offi!er unless he is:

to wo en the ri,ht to pra!ti!e law 7+a+e( 4 6.7. (1% Wa'') 14$ (1 !4) H re!ent &e!isions ha%e in%ali&ate& statutes or re,ulations pro%i&in, for &ifferential treat ent of fe ales :ase& on nothin, stereot"pi!al an& ina!!urate ,enerali=ations' 3he Court hel& that C!lassifi!ation :ase& on se0H liDe !lassifi!ations :ase& upon ra!eH aliena,eH or national ori,inH are inherentl" suspe!tH an& ust therefore :e su:;e!te& to stri!t ;u&i!ial s!rutin"'C +!!or&in,l"H the Court in%ali&ate& a statute per ittin, a ale ser%i!e an to !lai his spouse as a &epen&ent to o:tain in!rease& ?uarter allowan!eH re,ar&less of whether the wife is a!tuall" &epen&ent on hi H while &en"in, the sa e ri,ht to a ser%i!ewo an unless her hus:an& was in fa!t &epen&ent on her for o%er one half of his support' (8ron+ierro / Ric-ardson( ,11 6.7. % !
(19!4)9 Accord Craig( /. Boren( ,#9 6.7. 19$ (19!%)

(pro%i&in, for sale of :eer to ales un&er 21 an& to fe ales un&er 18); 1ee& %' 1ee&' #0# <'S' 71 (1971) (preferen!e ,i%en to en o%er wo en for appoint ent as a& inistrators of estates in%ali&)'
(:) 5n a&&ition to the /?ual Prote!tion ClauseH the 1987 Constitution now re?uires the State to Censure the fun&a ental e?ualit" :efore the law of wo en an& enC (+rt 55H Se!' 1#) an& to pro%i&e the with Csu!h fa!ilities an& opportunities that will enhan!e their welfare an& ena:le the to reali=e their full potential in the ser%i!e of the nation'C (+rt' M555H Se!' 1#)' 3hese pro%isions put in serious &ou:t the %ali&it" of P- 97 li itin, the pra!ti!e of arine profession to ales'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;;

EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 In0idi&3+ Di+(ri1inati&n 9!#$%:


No' 10: CMCH a son of a ri!h fa il"H applie& for enrol ent with the San Carlos Se inar" in 8an&alu"on,H 8etro 8anila' 9e!ause he ha& :een pre%iousl" e0pelle& fro another se inar" for s!holasti! &efi!ien!"H the 1e!tor of San Carlos Se inar" &enie& the appli!ation without ,i%in, an" ,roun&s for the &enial' +fter CMC was refuse& a& issionH the 1e!tor a& itte& another appli!antH who is the son of a poor far er who was also a!a&e i!all" &efi!ient'

professionsH the e&i!al profession &ire!tl" affe!ts the li%es of the people' EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 Rig,t t& Ed3(ati&n 9!##;: No' 12; 3he -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports 5ssue& a !ir!ular &is?ualif"in, an"one who fails for the fourth ti e in the National /ntran!e 3ests fro a& ission to a Colle,e of -entistr"' M who was thus &is?ualifie&H ?uestions the !onstitutionalit" of the !ir!ular' 1) -i& the !ir!ular &epri%e her of her !onstitutional ri,ht to e&u!ationL 2) -i& the !ir!ular %iolate the e?ual prote!tion !lause of the ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) NoH :e!ause it is a per issi%e li itation to ri,ht to e&u!ationH as it is inten&e& to ensure that onl" those who are ?ualifie& to :e &entists are a& itte& for enroll ent''''
2) NoH the !ir!ular &i& not %iolate the e?ual prote!tion !lause of the Constitution' 3here is a su:stantial &istin!tion :etween &entistr" stu&ents an& other stu&ents' 3he &ental profession &ire!tl" affe!ts the li%es an& health of people' Ather professions &o not in%ol%e the sa e &eli!ate responsi:ilit" an& nee& not :e si ilarl" treate&' 3his is in a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports %s' San -ie,oH 180 SC1+ 233'

(a) Prepare a short ar,u ent !itin, rulesH lawsH or !onstitutional pro%isions in support of CMBsC otion for re!onsi&eration of the &enial of his appli!ation' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he refusal of the se inar" to a& it CMC !onstitutes in%i&ious &is!ri inationH %iolati%e of the /?ual Prote!tion Clause (+rt' 555H Se!' 1) of the Constitution' 3he fa!tH that the other appli!ant is the son of a poor far er &oes not aDe the &is!ri ination an" less in%i&ious sin!e the other appli!ant is also a!a&e i!all" &efi!ient' 3he re%erse &is!ri ination pra!ti!e& :" the se inar" !annot :e ;ustifie& :e!ause unliDe the ra!e pro:le in + eri!aH po%ert" is not a !on&ition of inferiorit" nee&in, re&ress'

EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 P&'i(e P&5er 9"666:


No 5E' <n&aunte& :" his three failures in the National 8e&i!al +& ission 3est (N8+3)H Cru= applie& to taDe it a,ain :ut he was refuse& :e!ause of an or&er of the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports (-/CS) &isallowin, flunDers fro taDin, the test a fourth ti e' Cru= file& suit assailin, this rule raisin, the !onstitutional ,roun&s of a!!essi:le ?ualit" e&u!ationH a!a&e i! free&o an& e?ual prote!tion' 3he ,o%ern ent opposes thisH uphol&in, the !onstitutionalit" of the rule on the ,roun& of e0er!ise of poli!e power' -e!i&e the !ase &is!ussin, the ,roun&s raise&' (2N)

EF3a' Pr&te(ti&n8 S3b+idiary I1*ri+&n1ent 9!#$#:


No' #: CMC was senten!e& to a penalt" of 1 "ear an& 2 onths of prision !orre!tional an& to pa" a fine of P8H000'00H with su:si&iar" i prison ent in !ase of sol%en!"' +fter ser%in, his prison ter H CMC asDe& the -ire!tor of Prisons whether he !oul& alrea&" :e release&' CMC was asDe& to pa" the fine of P2H000'00 an& he sai& he !oul& not affor& itH :ein, an in&i,ent' 3he -ire!tor infor e& hi he has to ser%e an a&&itional prison ter at the rate of one &a" per ei,ht pesos in a!!or&an!e with +rti!le 39 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&eH 3he law"er of CMC file& a petition for ha:eas !orpus !onten&in, that the further in!ar!eration of his !lient for unpai& fines %iolates the e?ual prote!tion !lause of the Constitution' -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s hel& in -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports %' San -ie,oH180 SC1+ 233 (1989)H the rule is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power to ensure that those a& itte& to the e&i!al profession are ?ualifie&' 3he ar,u ents of Cru= are not eritorious' 3he ri,ht to ?ualit" e&u!ation an& a!a&e i! free&o are not a:solute' <n&er Se!tion 2(3)H +rti!le M5E of the ConstitutionH the ri,ht to !hoose a profession is su:;e!t to fairH reasona:le an& e?uita:le a& ission an& a!a&e i! re?uire ents' 3he rule &oes not %iolate e?ual prote!tion' 3here is a su:stantial &istin!tion :etween e&i!al stu&ents an& other stu&ents' <nliDe other

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) 3he petition shoul& :e ,rante&H :e!ause +rti!le 39 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e is un!onstitutional' 5n 3ate %s' ShortH #01 <'S' 392H the <nite& States Supre e Court hel& that i position of su:si&iar" i prison ent upon a !on%i!t who is too poor to pa" a fine %iolates e?ual prote!tionH :e!ause e!ono i! status

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;@

!annot ser%e as a %ali& :asis for &istin,uishin, the &uration of the i prison ent :etween a !on%i!t who is a:le to pa" the fine an& a !on%i!t who is una:le to pa" it'
(2) An the other han&H in <nite& States e0 rel' Pri%itera %s' GrossH 239 F Supp 118H it was hel& that the i position of su:si&iar" i prison ent for ina:ilit" to pa" a fine &oes not %iolate e?ual prote!tionH :e!ause the punish ent shoul& :e tailore& to fit the in&i%i&ualH an& e?ual prote!tion &oes not !o pel the era&i!ation of e%er" &isa&%anta,e !ause& :" in&i,en!e' 3he &e!ision was affir e& :" the <nite& States Cir!uit Court of +ppeals in 3#2 F2& 233H an& the <nite& States Supre e Court &enie& the petition for !ertiorari in 382 <'S' 911' 3his rulin, was a&opte& :" the 5llinois Supre e Court in People %s' 6illia sH 31 +713& 920'

Co uni!ations' 6hat woul& "ou &o re,ar&in, that :an on the sale of :lo!De& ti eL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 woul& !hallen,e its %ali&it" in !ourt on the ,roun& that it !onstitutes a prior restraint on free&o of e0pression' Su!h a li itation is %ali& onl" in e0!eptional !asesH su!h as where the purpose is to pre%ent a!tual o:stru!tion to re!ruit ent of ser%i!e or the sailin, &ates of transports or the nu :er an& lo!ation of troopsH or for the purpose of enfor!in, the pri ar" re?uire ents of &e!en!" or the se!urit" of !o unit" life' (Near %' 8innesotaH 283 <'SH )97 (1931))' +tta!Ds on the ,o%ern entH on the other han&H !annot ;ustif" prior restraints' For as has :een pointe& outH Cthe interest of so!iet" an& the aintenan!e of ,oo& ,o%ern ent &e an& a full &is!ussion of pu:li! affairs' Co plete li:ert" to !o ent on the !on&u!t of pu:li! en is a s!alpel in the !ase of free spee!h' 3he sharp in!ision of its pro:e relie%es the a:s!esses of offi!ial&o ' 8en in pu:li! life a" suffer un&er a hostile an& an un;ust a!!usation; the woun& !an :e assua,e& with the :al of a !lear !ons!ien!eHC (<nite& States % 9ustosH 37 Phil' 7#1 (1918))' 3he parties a&%ersel" affe!te& a" also &isre,ar& the re,ulation as :ein, on its fa!e %oi&' +s has :een hel&H Can" s"ste of prior restraints of e0pression !o es to the !ourt :earin, a hea%" presu ption a,ainst its !onstitutional %ali&it"HC an& the ,o%ern ent Cthus !arries a hea%" :ur&en of showin, ;ustifi!ation for the i position of su!h a restraint'C (New OorD 3i es Co' %' <nite& StatesH #03 <'S' 713 (1971))'

reed&1 &) E2*re++i&n8 Cen+&r+,i* 9"66-:


No 5M * 8a" the CA8/7/C (CA8/7/C) prohi:it the postin, of &e!als an& sti!Ders on C o:ileC pla!esH pu:li! or pri%ateH su!h as on a pri%ate %ehi!leH an& li it their lo!ation onl" to the authori=e& postin, areas that the CA8/7/C itself fi0esL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to +&ion, %' CA8/7/C' 207 SC1+ 712 P1992QH the prohi:ition is un!onstitutional' 5t !urtails the free&o of e0pression of in&i%i&uals who wish to e0press their preferen!e for a !an&i&ate :" postin, &e!als an& sti!Ders on their !ars an& to !on%in!e others to a,ree with the ' 5t is also o%er:roa&H :e!ause it en!o passes pri%ate propert" an& !onstitutes &epri%ation of propert" without &ue pro!ess of law' Awnership of propert" in!lu&es the ri,ht to use' 3he prohi:ition is !ensorshipH whi!h !annot :e ;ustifie&'

reed&1 &) E2*re++i&n8 Pri&r Re+traint 9!#$$:


No' 1): 3he Se!retar" of 3ransportation an& Co uni!ations has warne& ra&io station operators a,ainst sellin, :lo!De& ti eH on the !lai that the ti e !o%ere& there:" are often use& :" those :u"in, the to atta!D the present a& inistration' +ssu e that the &epart ent i ple ents this warnin, an& or&ers owners an& operators of ra&io stations not to sell :lo!De& ti e to intereste& parties without prior !learan!e fro the -epart ent of 3ransportation an& Co uni!ations' Oou are approa!he& :" an intereste& part" affe!te& a&%ersel" :" that or&er of the Se!retar" of 3ransportation an&

3he usual presu ption of %ali&it" that inheres in le,islation is re%erse& in the !ase of laws i posin, prior restraint on free&o of e0pression' reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 C&n0i(ted Pri+&ner+ 9!#$#:
No' 2: CMC is ser%in, his prison senten!e in 8untinlupa' @e :elon,s to a reli,ious se!t that prohi:its the eatin, of eat' @e asDe& the -ire!tor of Prisons that he :e ser%e& with eatless &iet' 3he -ire!tor refuse& an& CMC sue& the -ire!tor for &a a,es for %iolatin, his reli,ious free&o ' -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the -ire!tor of Prison is lia:le un&er +rti!le 32 of the Ci%il Co&e for %iolatin, the reli,ious free&o of CMC' +!!or&in, to the &e!ision of the <nite& States Supre e Court in the !ase of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;?

AB7one %s' /state of Sha:a==H 107 S' Ct' 2#00H !on%i!te& prisoners retain their ri,ht to free e0er!ise of reli,ion' +t the sa e ti eH lawful in!ar!eration :rin,s a:out ne!essar" li itations of an" pri%ile,es an& ri,hts ;ustifie& :" the !onsi&erations un&erl"in, the penal s"ste ' 5n !onsi&erin, the appropriate :alan!e :etween these two fa!torsH reasona:leness shoul& :e the test' +!!o o&ation to reli,ious free&o !an :e a&e if it will not in%ol%e sa!rifi!in, the interests of se!urit" an& it will ha%e no i pa!t on the allo!ation of the resour!es of the penitentiar"' 5n this !aseH pro%i&in, CMC with a eatless &iet will not !reate a se!urit" pro:le or un&ul" in!rease the !ost of foo& :ein, ser%e& to the prisoners' 5n fa!tH in the !ase of AB 7one %s' /state of Sha:a==H it was note& that the 8osle prisoners were :ein, ,i%en a &ifferent eal whene%er porD woul& :e ser%e&'

of a!tion' 3he ri,ht to a!t on oneBs reli,ious :elief is not a:solute an& is su:;e!t to poli!e power for the prote!tion of the ,eneral welfare' @en!e the tapes a" :e re?uire& to :e re%iewe& prior to airin,' 5n 5,lesia ni Cristo %s' Court of +ppealsH 229 SC1+ 229H 2##H the Supre e Court hel&:
C6e thus re;e!t petitionerBs postulate that 5ts reli,ious pro,ra is per se :e"on& re%iew :" the respon&ent 9oar&' 5ts pu:li! :roa&!ast on 3E of its reli,ious pro,ra :rin,s it out of the :oso of internal :elief' 3ele%ision is a e&iu that rea!hes e%en the e"es an& ears of !hil&ren' 3he Court reiterates the rule that the e0er!ise of reli,ions free&o !an :e re,ulate& :" the State when it will :rin, a:out the C7/+1 +N- P1/S/N3 -+N$/1 of so e su:stanti%e e%il whi!h the State is &ut" :oun& to pre%entH i'e'H serious &etri ent to the ere o%erri&in, 5nterest of pu:li! healthH pu:li! oralsH or pu:li! welfare'C @owe%erH the 8o%ie an& 3ele%ision 1e%iew an& Classifi!ation 9oar& !annot :an the tapes on the ,roun& that the" atta!De& other reli,ions' 5n 5,lesia ni Cristo %s' Court of +ppealsH' 229 SC1+ 229H 2#7H the Supre e Court hel&: C/%en a si&e ,lan!e at Se!tion 3 of P- No' 198) will re%eal that it is not a on, the ,roun&s to ;ustif" an or&er prohi:itin, the :roa&!ast of petitionerBs tele%ision pro,ra 'C 8oreo%erH the :roa&!asts &o not ,i%e rise to a !lear an& present &an,er of a su:stanti%e e%il' 5n the !ase of 5,lesia ni Cristo %s' Court of +ppealsH 229 SC1+ 229H 2#9: CPrior restraint on spee!hH in!lu&in, the reli,ious spee!hH !annot :e ;ustifie& :" h"potheti!al fears :ut onl" :" the showin, of a su:stanti%e an& i inent e%il whi!h has taDen the realit" alrea&" on the ,roun&'C

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he suit shoul& :e &is isse&' 3he Free /0er!ise Clause of the Constitution is essentiall" a restraint on ,o%ern ental interferen!e with the ri,ht of in&i%i&uals to worship as the" please' 5t is not a an&ate to the state to taDe positi%eH affir ati%e a!tion to ena:le the in&i%i&ual to en;o" his free&o ' 5t woul& ha%e :een &ifferent ha& the -ire!tor of Prisons prohi:ite& eatless &iets in the penal institution'

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 Li1itati&n+ 9!##$: No ME' * + reli,ious or,ani=ation has a weeDl" tele%ision pro,ra ' 3he pro,ra presents an& propa,ates its reli,iousH &o!trinesH an& !o pares their pra!ti!es with those of other reli,ions'
+s the 8o%ie an& 3ele%ision 1e%iew an& Classifi!ation 9oar& (831C9) foun& as offensi%e se%eral episo&es of the pro,ra whi!h atta!De& other reli,ionsH the 831C9 re?uire& the or,ani=ation to su: it its tapes for re%iew prior to airin,'

3he reli,ious or,ani=ation :rou,ht the !ase to !ourt on the ,roun& that the a!tion of the 831C9 suppresses its free&o of spee!h an& interferes with its ri,ht to free e0er!ise of reli,ion' -e!i&e' P2NQ SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he reli,ious or,ani=ation !annot in%oDe free&o of spee!h an& free&o of reli,ion as ,roun&s for refusin, to su: it the tapes to the 8o%ie an& 3ele%ision 1e%iew an& Classifi!ation 9oar& for re%iew prior to airin,' 6hen the reli,ious or,ani=ation starte& presentin, its pro,ra o%er tele%isionH it went into the real

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 'ag Sa'3te 9!##%:


No' 12: Se!tion 28' 3itle E5H Chapter 9H of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987 re?uires all e&u!ational institutions to o:ser%e a si ple an& &i,nifie& fla, !ere on"H in!lu&in, the pla"in, or sin,in, of the Philippine National +nthe H pursuant to rules to :e pro ul,ate& :" the Se!retar" of /&u!ation' Culture an& SportsH 3he refusal of a tea!herH stu&ent or pupil to atten& or parti!ipate in the fla, !ere on" is a ,roun& for &is issal after &ue in%esti,ation' 3he Se!retar" of /&u!ation Culture an& Sports issue& a e oran&u i ple entin, sai& pro%ision of law' +s or&ere&H the fla, !ere on"

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;%

woul& :e hel& on 8on&a"s at 7:30 a' ' &urin, !lass &a"s' + ,roup of tea!hersH stu&ents an& pupils re?ueste& the Se!retar" that the" :e e0e pte& fro atten&in, the fla, !ere on" on the ,roun& that atten&an!e thereto was a,ainst their reli,ious :elief' 3he Se!retar" &enie& the re?uest' 3he tea!hersH stu&ents an& pupils !on!erne& went to Court to ha%e the e oran&u !ir!ular &e!lare& null an& %oi&'

&is!retionar" fun&s' 1e!entl"H howe%erH the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an passe& a resolution appropriatin, P100H000 as a spe!ial &is!retionar" fun& of the $o%ernor to :e spent :" hi in lea&in, a pil,ri a,e of his pro%in!e ates to 8e!!aH Sau&i +ra:iaH 5sla Bs holiest !it"' Phil!onsaH on !onstitutional ,roun&sH has file& suit to nullif" the resolution of the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an ,i%in, the spe!ial &is!retionar" fun& to the $o%ernor for the state& purpose' @ow woul& "ou &e!i&e the !aseL $i%e "our reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he resolution is un!onstitutional FirstH it %iolates art' E5H se!' 29(2) of the Constitution whi!h prohi:its the appropriation of pu:li! one" or propert"H &ire!tl" or in&ire!tl"H for the useH :enefit or support of an" s"ste of reli,ionH an&H se!on&H it !ontra%enes art' E5H se!H 22()) whi!h li its the appropriation of &is!retionar" fun&s onl" for pu:li! purposes' 3he use of &is!retionar" fun&s for purel" reli,ious purpose is thus un!onstitutionalH an& the fa!t that the &is:urse ent is a&e :" resolution of a lo!al le,islati%e :o&" an& not :" Con,ress &oes not aDe it an" less offensi%e to the Constitution' +:o%e allH the resolution !onstitutes a !lear %iolation of the Non* esta:lish ent Clause (art' 555H se!' 2) of the Constitution'

-e!i&e the !ase' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he tea!hers an& the stu&ents shoul& :e e0e pte& fro the fla, !ere on"' +s hel& in /:ralina, %s' -i%ision Superinten&ent of S!hools of Ce:uH 221 SC1+ 2)9' to !o pel the to parti!ipate in the fla, !ere on" will %iolate their free&o of reli,ion' Free&o of reli,ion !annot :e i paire& e0!ept upon the showin, of a !lear an& present &an,er of a su:stanti%e e%il whi!h the State has a ri,ht to pre%ent' 3he refusal of the tea!hers an& the stu&ents to parti!ipate in the fla, !ere on" &oes not pose a !lear an& present &an,er'

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 'ag Sa'3te 9"66-:


No 555 * Chil&ren who are e :ers of a reli,ious se!t ha%e :een e0pelle& fro their respe!ti%e pu:li! s!hools for refusin,H on a!!ount of their reli,ious :eliefsH to taDe part in the fla, !ere on" whi!h in!lu&es pla"in, :" a :an& or sin,in, the national anthe H salutin, the Philippine fla, an& re!itin, the patrioti! ple&,e' 3he stu&ents an& their parents assail the e0pulsion on the ,roun& that the s!hool authorities ha%e a!te& in %iolation of their ri,ht to free pu:li! e&u!ationH free&o of spee!hH an& reli,ious free&o an& worship' -e!i&e the !ase'

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 N&n<E+tab'i+,1ent C'a3+e 9!##":


No' 10: 1e!o,ni=in, the %alue of e&u!ation in aDin, the Philippine la:or arDet attra!ti%e to forei,n in%est entH the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports offers su:si&ies to a!!re&ite& !olle,es an& uni%ersities in or&er to pro ote ?ualit" tertiar" e&u!ation' 3he -/CS ,rants a su:si&" to a Catholi! s!hool whi!h re?uires its stu&ents to taDe at least 3 hours a weeD of reli,ious instru!tion'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he stu&ents !annot :e e0pelle& fro s!hool' +s hel& in /:ralina, %' 3he -i%ision Superinten&ent of S!hools of Ce:u' 219 SC1+ 22) P1993QH to !o pel stu&ents to taDe part in the fla, !ere on" when it is a,ainst their reli,ious :eliefs will %iolate their reli,ious free&o ' 3heir e0pulsion also %iolates the &ut" of the State un&er +rti!le M5EH Se!tion 1 of the Constitution to prote!t an& pro ote the ri,ht of all !iti=ens to ?ualit" e&u!ation an& aDe su!h e&u!ation a!!essi:le to all'

a)
:)

5s the su:si&" per issi:leL /0plainH


Presu in, that "ou answer in the ne,ati%eH woul& it aDe a &ifferen!e if the su:si&" were ,i%en solel" in the for of la:orator" e?uip ent in !he istr" an& ph"si!sL Presu eH on the other han&H that the su:si&" is ,i%en in the for of s!holarship %ou!hers ,i%en &ire!tl" to the stu&ent an& whi!h the stu&ent !an use for pa"in, tuition in an" a!!re&ite& s!hool of his !hoi!eH

!)

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 N&n<E+tab'i+,1ent C'a3+e 9!#$$:


No' 7: * 3awi*3awi is a pre&o inantl" 8osle pro%in!e' 3he $o%ernorH the Ei!e*$o%ernorH an& e :ers of its San,*,unian, Panlalawi,an are all 8osle s' 5ts :u&,et pro%i&es the $o%ernor with a !ertain a ount as his

whether reli,ious or non*se!tarian' 6ill "our answer :e &ifferentL SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;$

a) NoH the su:si&" is not per issi:le' 5t will foster reli,ionH sin!e the s!hool ,i%es reli,ious instru!tions to its stu&ents' 9esi&esH it will %iolate the prohi:ition in Se!tion 29P2>H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution a,ainst the use of pu:li! fun&s to ai& reli,ion' 5n 7e on %s Gurt= an' #03 <'S' )02H it was hel& that finan!ial assistan!e to a se!tarian s!hool %iolates the prohi:ition a,ainst the esta:lish ent of reli,ion if it fosters an e0!essi%e ,o%ern ent entan,le ent with reli,ion' Sin!e the s!hool re?uires its stu&ents to taDe at least three hours a weeD of reli,ious instru!tionsH to ensure that the finan!ial assistan!e will not :e use& for reli,ious purposesH the ,o%ern ent will ha%e to !on&u!t a !ontinuin, sur%eillan!e' 3his in%ol%es e0!essi%e entan,le ent with reli,ion' :) 5f the assistan!e woul& :e in the for of la:orator" e?uip ent in !he istr" an& ph"si!sH it will :e %ali&' 3he purpose of the assistan!e is se!ularH i'e'H the i pro%e ent of the ?ualit" of tertiar" e&u!ation' +n" :enefit to reli,ion is erel" in!i&ental' Sin!e the e?uip ent !an onl" :e use& for a se!ular purposeH it is reli,iousl" neutral' +s hel& in 3ilton %s' 1i!har&sonH #03 <'S' )72H it will not in%ol%e e0!essi%e ,o%ern ent entan,le ent with reli,ionH for the use of the e?uip ent will not re?uire sur%eillan!e' !) 5n ,eneralH the ,i%in, of s!holarship %ou!hers to stu&ents is %ali&' Se!tion 2(3)H +rti!le M5E of the Constitution re?uires the State to esta:lish a s"ste of su:si&ies to &eser%in, stu&ents in :oth pu:li! an& pri%ate s!hools' @owe%erH the law is %a,ue an& o%er*:roa&' <n&er itH a stu&ent who wants to stu&" for the priesthoo& !an appl" for the su:si&" an& use it for his stu&ies' 3his will in%ol%e usin, pu:li! fun&s to ai& reli,ion'

6as the Co ission on +u&it !orre!t in &isallowin, the %ou!hers in ?uestionL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the Co ission on +u&it was !orre!t in &isallowin, the e0pen&itures' Se!tion 29(2)H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution prohi:its the e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s for the useH :enefitH or support of an" priest' 3he onl" e0!eption is when the priest is assi,ne& to the ar e& for!esH or to an" penal institution or ,o%ern ent orphana,e or leprosariu ' 3he sen&in, of a priest to inister to the spiritual nee&s of o%erseas !ontra!t worDers &oes not fall within the s!ope of an" of the e0!eptions'

reed&1 &) S*ee(,8 Ban &n T&ba((& AD 9!##": No' 1: Con,ress passes a law prohi:itin, tele%ision stations fro airin, an" !o er!ial a&%ertise ent whi!h pro otes to:a!!o or in an" wa" ,la ori=es the !onsu ption of to:a!!o pro&u!ts' 3his le,islation was passe& in response to fin&in,s :" the -epart ent of @ealth a:out the alar in, rise in lun, &iseases in the !ountr"' 3he 6orl& @ealth Ar,ani=ation has also reporte& that <'S' to:a!!o !o panies ha%e* shifte& arDetin, efforts to the 3hir& 6orl& &ue to &win&lin, sales in the health*!ons!ious + eri!an arDet' Cow:o" 7e%"BsH a >eans !o pan"H re!entl" release& an a&%ertise ent featurin, o&el 1i!har& 9ur,os wearin, 7e%"Bs ;a!Dets an& ;eans an& hol&in, a pa!D of 8arl:oro !i,arettes'
3he +sian 9roa&!astin, NetworD (+9N)H a pri%atel" owne& tele%ision stationH refuses to air the a&%ertise ent in !o plian!e with the law' a) +ssu e that su!h refusal a:ri&,es the free&o of spee!h' -oes the !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst the a:ri&,e ent of the free&o of spee!h appl" to a!ts &one :" +9NH a pri%ate !orporationL /0plain'

reed&1 &) Re'igi&n8 N&n<E+tab'i+,1ent C'a3+e 9!##%:


No' #: <pon re?uest of a ,roup of o%erseas !ontra!t worDers in 9runeiH 1e%' Father >uan &e la Cru=H a 1o an Catholi! priestH was sent to that !ountr" :" the Presi&ent of the Philippines to inister to their spiritual nee&s' 3he tra%el e0pensesH per &ie sH !lothin, allowan!e an& onthl" stipen& of P2H000 were or&ere& !har,e& a,ainst the Presi&entBs &is!retionar" fun&' <pon post au&it of the %ou!hers thereforH the Co ission on +u&it refuse& appro%al thereof !lai in, that the e0pen&itures were in %iolation of the Constitution'

:) 8a" Cow:o" 7e%"BsH a !orporationH in%oDe the free ,uarantee in its fa%orL /0plain'
!)

pri%ate spee!h

1e,ar&less of "our answers a:o%eH &e!i&e

the !onstitutionalit" of the law in ?uestion' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


a) 3he !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst the free&o of spee!h &oes not appl" to +9NH a pri%ate !orporation' +s state& in @u&,ens %s' National 7a:or 1elations 9oar&H #2# <'S' 207H the !onstitutional ,uarantee of free&o of spee!h is a ,uarantee onl" a,ainst

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

;#

a:ri&,e ent :" the ,o%ern ent' 5t &oes not therefore appl" a,ainst pri%ate parties' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
Sin!e +9N has a fran!hiseH it a" :e !onsi&ere& an a,ent of the ,o%ern ent :" !o pl"in, with the law an& refusin, to air the a&%ertise entH it ali,ne& itself with the ,o%ern ent' 3hus it ren&ere& itself lia:le for a lawsuit whi!h is :ase& on a:ri&,e ent of the free&o of spee!h' <n&er +rti!le 32 of the Ci%il Co&eH e%en pri%ate parties a" :e lia:le for &a a,es for i pair ent of the free&o of spee!h'

Dnowle&,e that it was false or with re!Dless &isre,ar& of whether it was false or not (9or;a %' Court of +ppealsH 301 SC1+ 1 I1999)' Sin!e there is no proof that the report was pu:lishe& with Dnowle&,e that it is false or with re!Dless &isre,ar& of whether it was false or notH the &efen&ants are not lia:le for &a a,e'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


Sin!e Senator MM is a pu:li! person an& the ?uestione& i putation is &ire!te& a,ainst hi in his pu:li! !apa!it"H in this !ase a!tual ali!e eans the state ent was a&e with Dnowle&,e that it was false or with re!Dless &isre,ar& of whether it was false or not (9or;al %' Court of +ppealsH 301 SC1+ 1 I1999Q)' Sin!e it is a atter of pu:li! Dnowle&,e that there is no OO Street in 8aDatiH the pu:li!ation was a&e with re!Dless &isre,ar& of whether or not it is false' 3he &efen&ants a" :e hel& lia:le for &a a,es'

:) Cow:o" 7e%"Bs a" in%oDe the !onstitutional ,uarantee of free&o of spee!h in its fa%or' 5n First National 9anD of 9oston %s' 9ellottiH #32 <'S' 7)2H it was rule& that this ,uarantee e0ten&s to !orporations' 5n Eir,inia
State 9oar& of Phar a!" %s' Eir,inia Citi=ens Consu er Coun!il 5n!'H #22 <'S' 7#8 H it was hel&

that this ri,ht a&%ertise ents'

e0ten&s to !o er!ial 5n +"er Pro&u!tions Pt"H 7t&' %s' Capulon,H 1)0 SC1+ 8)1H the Supre e Court hel& that e%en if the pro&u!tion of a fil is a !o er!ial a!ti%it" that is e0pe!te& to "iel& profitsH it is !o%ere& :" the ,uarantee of free&o of spee!h'

reed&1 &) t,e Pre++8 Warti1e Cen+&r+,i* 9!#$%:


No' M5E: 5n the ornin, of +u,ust 28H 1987H &urin, the hei,ht of *the fi,htin, at Channel # an& Ca elot @otelH the ilitar" !lose& 1a&io Station MMH whi!h was e0!ite&l" reportin, the su!!esses of the re:els an& o%e ents towar&s 8anila an& troops frien&l" to the re:els' 3he reports were !orre!t an& fa!tual' An A!to:er )H 1987H after nor al!" ha& returne& an& the $o%ern ent ha& full !ontrol of the situationH the National 3ele!o uni!ations Co issionH without noti!e an& hearin,H :ut erel" on the :asis of the report of the ilitar"H !an!elle& the fran!hise of station MM'

!) 3he law is !onstitutional' e0er!ise of poli!e powerH ''''

5t is a %ali&

reed&1 &) t,e Pre++8 A(t3a' Ma'i(e 9"66;:


(2*a) 3he S3+1H a national &ail" newspaperH !arrie& an e0!lusi%e report statin, that Senator MM re!ei%e& a house an& lot lo!ate& at OO StreetH 8aDatiH in !onsi&eration for his %ote !uttin, !i,arette ta0es :" 20N' 3he Senator sue& the S3+1H its reporterH e&itor an& pu:lisher for li:elH !lai in, the report was !o pletel" false an& ali!ious' +!!or&in, to the SenatorH there is no OO Street in 8aDatiH an& the ta0 !ut was onl" 20N' @e !lai e& one illion pesos in &a a,es' 3he &efen&ants &enie& Ca!tual ali!eHC !lai in, pri%ile,e& !o uni!ation an& a:solute free&o of the press to report on pu:li! offi!ials an& atters of pu:li! !on!ern' 5f there was an" errorH the S3+1 sai& it woul& pu:lish the !orre!tion pro ptl"' 5s there Ca!tual ali!eC in S3+1BS reporta,eL @ow is Ca!tual ali!eC &efine&L +re the &efen&ants lia:le for &a a,esL (2N)

-is!uss the le,alit" of: (a) 3he a!tion taDen a,ainst the station on +u,ust 28H 1987; (:) 3he !an!ellation of the fran!hise of the station on A!to:er )H 1987' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he !losin, &own of 1a&io Station MM &urin, the fi,htin, is per issi:le' 6ith respe!t news e&iaH warti e !ensorship has :een uphel& on the ,roun& that Cwhen a nation is at war an" thin,s that i,ht :e sai& in ti e of pea!e are su!h a hin&ran!e to its efforts that their utteran!e will not :e en&ure& so lon, as en fi,ht an& that no Court !oul& re,ar& the as prote!te& :" an" !onstitutional ri,ht'C 3he se!urit" of !o unit" life a" :e prote!te& a,ainst in!ite ents to a!ts of %iolen!e an& the o%erthrow :" for!e of or&erl" ,o%ern ent' (Near %' 8innesotaH 283 <'S' )97 (1931)H ?uotin, >usti!e @ol eBs opinion in S!hen!D %' <nite& StatesH 2#9 <'S' #7 (1919); New OorD

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


Sin!e Senator MM is a pu:li! person an& the ?uestione& i putation is &ire!te& a,ainst hi in his pu:li! !apa!it"H in this !ase a!tual ali!e eans the state ent was a&e with

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@6

3i es %' <nite& StatesH #03 <'S' 713 (1971) ) 6ith ,reater reason then a" !ensorship in ti es of e er,en!" :e ;ustifie& in the !ase of :roa&!ast e&ia sin!e their free&o is so ewhat lesser in s!ope' 3he i pa!t of the %i:rant spee!hH as >usti!e $utierre= sai&H is for!eful an& i e&iate' <nliDe rea&ers of the printe& worDH a ra&io au&ien!e has lesser opportunit" to !o,itateH anal"=e an& re;e!t the utteran!e' (/astern 9roa&!astin, Corp (-O1/) %H -ansH 137 SC1+ )#7 (1982) )' 5n FCC %' Pa!ifi!a Foun&ationH #38 <'S' 72) (1978)H it was hel& that Cof all for s of !o uni!ationH it is :roa&!astin, whi!h has re!ei%e& the ost li ite& First + en& ent Prote!tion'C

&oes not entail enfor!e ent of the stipulation not to arr" an& not to ha%e a :a:"' 5t is li ite& to a refun& of a portion of the pro otion e0penses in!urre& :" Soli&ari&a& Fil s'

In0&'3ntary Ser0it3de 9!##-:


No' 1); * >o"H an 13C steno,rapherH retire& at the a,e of )2' She left unfinishe& the trans!ription of her notes in a !ri inal !ase whi!h was on appeal' 3he Court of +ppeals or&ere& >o" to trans!ri:e her notes' She refuse& to !o pl" with the or&er reasonin, that she was no lon,er in the ,o%ern ent ser%i!e' 3he C+ &e!lare& >o" in !onte pt of !ourt an& she was in!ar!erate&' >o" file& a petition for ha:eas !orpus ar,uin, that her in!ar!eration is tanta ount to ille,al &etention an& to re?uire her to worD sans !o pensation woul& :e in%oluntar" ser%itu&e' -e!i&e'

I1*air1ent C'a3+e8 Ba+i( H31an Rig,t+ 9!##":


No' 2: SheilaH an a!tressH si,ne& a two*"ear !ontra!t with Soli&ari&a& Fil sH 3he fil !o pan" un&ertooD to pro ote her !areer an& to feature her as the lea&in, la&" in at least four o%ies' 5n turnH Sheila pro ise& thatH for the &uration of the !ontra!tH she shall not ,et arrie& or ha%e a :a:"; otherwiseH she shall :e lia:le to refun& to the fil !o pan" a portion of its pro otion e0penses'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
>o" !an :e in!ar!erate& for !onte pt of !ourt for refusin, to trans!ri:e her steno,raphi! notes' +s hel& 5n +&ora!ion %' $at aitanH )# SC1+ 132H her in!ar!eration &oes not !onstitute ille,al &etention' 5t is lawfulH :e!ause it is the !onse?uen!e of her &iso:e&ien!e of the !ourt or&er' Neither !an she !lai that to re?uire her to worD without !o pensation is tanta ount to in%oluntar" ser%itu&e' Sin!e !ourts ha%e the 5nherent power to 5ssue su!h or&ers as are ne!essar" for the a& inistration of >usti!eH the Court of +ppeals a" or&er her to trans!ri:e her steno,raphi! notes e%en if she is no lon,er 5n the ,o%ern ent ser%i!e'

a) -oes this !ontra!t i pairH or i pin,e uponH an" !onstitutionall" prote!te& li:ert" of SheilaL /0plain'
:) 5f Soli&ari&a& Fil s tries to enfor!e this !ontra!t ;u&i!iall"H will this !onstitutionall" prote!te& li:ert" pre%ailL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a) OesH the !ontra!t i pairs the ri,ht of Sheila to arr" an& to pro!reate' 3he !ase of 7o%in, %s' Eir,iniaH 388 <'S' 1 an& .a:lo!Di %s' 1e&hail #3# <'S' 37# re!o,ni=e& the ri,ht to arr" is a :asi! !i%il ri,ht' 7iDewiseH the !ase of SDinner %s ADlaho aH 31) <'S' 232 re!o,ni=e& that the ri,ht to pro!reate is a :asi! !i%il ri,ht' 3hese ri,hts are part of the li:ert" prote!te& :" the &ue pro!ess !lause in Se!tion 1' +rti!le 1 of the Constitution' :) OesH the !onstitutionall" prote!te& li:ert" of Sheila will pre%ailH :e!ause it in%ol%es :asi! hu an ri,hts' 3he wai%er of these :asi! hu an ri,hts is %oi&' 6hat Soli&ari&a& Fil s is seeDin, to re!o%er are pro otion e0penses' 3hese in%ol%e propert" ri,hts' +s hel& in Philippine 9loo in, 8ills / plo"ees Ar,ani=ation %s' Philippine 9loo in, 8illsH 5n!'H 21 SC1+ 189H !i%il ri,hts are superior to propert" ri,hts'

Liberty &) Ab&de8 Li1itati&n+ 9!##$:


No E555 * >uan Casano%a !ontra!te& @ansenBs &isease (lepros") with open lesions' + law re?uires that lepers :e isolate& upon petition of the Cit" @ealth Affi!er' 3he wife of >uan Casano%a wrote a letter to the Cit" @ealth Affi!er to ha%e her for erl" philan&erin, hus:an& !onfine& in so e isolate& leprosariu ' >uan Casano%a !hallen,e& the !onstitutionalit" of the law as %iolatin, his li:ert" of a:o&e' 6ill the suit prosperL P2NQ

SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the suit will not prosper' Se!tion )H +rti!le 555 of the Constitution pro%i&es:
C3he li:ert" of a:o&e an& of !han,in, the sa e within the li its pres!ri:e& :" law shall not :e i paire& e0!ept upon lawful or&er of the !ourt'C 3he li:ert" of a:o&e is su:;e!t to the poli!e power of the State' 1e?uirin, the se,re,ation of lepers is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power' 5n

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8
3he wai%er of the ri,ht to arr" an& the ri,ht to pro!reate is %ali&' /nfor!e ent of the !ontra!t

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@!

7oren=o us' -ire!tor of @ealth' 20 Phil 292H 298H the Supre e Court hel&:
C>u&i!ial noti!e will :e taDen of the fa!t that lepros" is !o onl" :elie%e& to :e an infe!tious &isease ten&in, to !ause one affli!te& with it to :e shunne& an& e0!lu&e& fro so!iet"H an& that !o pulsor" se,re,ation of lepers as a eans of pre%entin, the sprea& of the &isease is supporte& :" hi,h s!ientifi! authorit"'C

a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power' (See also People %s' NitafanH 207 SC1+ 730) P&'i(e P&5er8 Abate1ent &) N3i+an(e 9"66;:
(9*:) 3he Cit" of San 1afael passe& an or&inan!e authori=in, the Cit" 8a"orH assiste& :" the poli!eH to re o%e all a&%ertisin, si,ns &ispla"e& or e0pose& to pu:li! %iew in the ain !it" streetH for :ein, offensi%e to si,ht or otherwise a nuisan!e' +8H whose a&%ertisin, a,en!" owns an& rents out an" of the :ill:oar&s or&ere& re o%e& :" the Cit" 8a"orH !lai s that the Cit" shoul& pa" for the &estro"e& :ill:oar&s at their !urrent arDet %alue sin!e the Cit" has appropriate& the for the pu:li! purpose of !it" :eautifi!ation' 3he 8a"or refuses to pa"H so +8 is suin, the Cit" an& the 8a"or for &a a,es arisin, fro the taDin, of his propert" without &ue pro!ess nor ;ust !o pensation' 6ill +8 prosperL 1eason :riefl"' (2N)

Liberty &) Ab&de8 Te1*&rary 9!##?: No 2: 3he ilitar" !o an&er*in !har,e of the operation a,ainst re:el ,roups &ire!te& the inha:itants of the islan& whi!h woul& :e the tar,et of atta!D :" ,o%ern ent for!es to e%a!uate the area an& offere& the resi&ents te porar" ilitar" ha let' Can the ilitar" !o an&er for!e the resi&ents to transfer their pla!es of a:o&e without a !ourt or&erL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the ilitar" !o an&er !annot !o pel the resi&ents to transfer their pla!es of a:o&e without a !ourt or&er' <n&er Se!tion )H +rti!le 555 of the ConstitutionH a lawful or&er of the !ourt is re?uire& :efore the li:ert" of a:o&e an& of !han,in, the sa e !an :e i paire&'

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


3he suit of +8 will not prosper' 3he re o%al of the :ill:oar&s is not an e0er!ise of the power of e inent &o ain :ut of poli!e power (Chur!hill %' 1affert"H 32 Phil' 280 P19120* 3he a:ate ent of a nuisan!e in the e0er!ise of poli!e power &oes not !onstitute taDin, of propert" an& &oes not entitle the owner of the propert" in%ol%e& to !o pensation' (+sso!iation of S all 7an&owners in the PhilippinesH 5n!' %' Se!retar" of +,rarian 1efor H 172 SC1+ 3#3 P1989Q)'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8 OesH the ilitar" !o an&er !an !o pel the resi&ents to transfer their pla!es of a:o&e without a !ourt or&er' 5f there is no reasona:le ti e to ,et a !ourt or&er an& the !han,e of a:o&e is erel" te porar"H :e!ause of the e0i,en!"H this e0er!ise of poli!e power a" :e ;ustifie&' N&n<I1*ri+&n1ent )&r N&n<Pay1ent &) Debt 9!##-: No 12: Se!' 13 of P- 112 (3rust 1e!eipts 7aw) pro%i&es that when the entrustee in a trust re!eipt a,ree ent fails to &eli%er the pro!ee&s of the sale or to return the ,oo&s if not sol& to the entrustee*:anDH the entrustee is lia:le for estafa un&er the 1PC' -oes this pro%ision not %iolate the !onstitutional ri,ht a,ainst i prison ent for non*pa" ent of a &e:tL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH Se!tion 13 of Presi&ential -e!ree No' 112 &oes not %iolate the !onstitutional ri,ht a,ainst i prison ent for non*pa" ent of a &e:t' +s hel& in 7ee %s' 1o&ilH 172 SC1+ 100H the !ri inal lia:ilit" arises fro the %iolation of the trust re!eiptH whi!h is separate an& &istin!t fro the loan se!ure& :" it' Penali=in, su!h an a!t is

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 3he re o%al of the :ill:oar&s for the purpose of :eautifi!ation per anentl" &epri%e& +8 of the ri,ht to use his propert" an& a ounts to its taDin,' Conse?uentl"H he shoul& :e pai& ;ust !o pensation' (People %' Fa;ar&oH 10# Phil' ##3 11928Q)' P&'i(e P&5er8 Ban &n T&ba((& AD 9!##": No' 1: Con,ress passes a law prohi:itin, tele%ision stations fro airin, an" !o er!ial a&%ertise ent whi!h pro otes to:a!!o or in an" wa" ,la ori=es the !onsu ption of to:a!!o pro&u!ts' 3his le,islation was passe& in response to fin&in,s :" the -epart ent of @ealth a:out the alar in, rise in lun, &iseases in the !ountr"' 3he 6orl& @ealth Ar,ani=ation has also reporte& that <'S' to:a!!o !o panies ha%e* shifte& arDetin, efforts to the 3hir& 6orl& &ue to &win&lin, sales in the health*!ons!ious + eri!an arDetH

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@"

Cow:o" 7e%"BsH a >eans !o pan"H re!entl" release& an a&%ertise ent featurin, o&el 1i!har& 9ur,os wearin, 7e%"Bs ;a!Dets an& ;eans an& hol&in, a pa!D of 8arl:oro !i,arettes'
3he +sian 9roa&!astin, NetworD (+9N)H a pri%atel" owne& tele%ision stationH refuses to air the a&%ertise ent in !o plian!e with the law'

of the or&inan!e is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power' 5t is ha=ar&ous to health an& !o fort to use the lot for resi&ential purposesH sin!e a hi,hwa" !rosses the su:&i%ision an& the area has :e!o e !o er!ial'

P&'i(e P&5er8 A&ning Ordinan(e 0+= N&n< I1*air1ent &) C&ntra(t+ 9"66!:
No ME555 5n the &ee&s of sale toH an& in the lan& titles of ho eowners of a resi&ential su:&i%ision in Pasi, Cit"H there are restri!tions annotate& therein to the effe!t that onl" resi&ential houses or stru!tures a" :e :uilt or !onstru!te& on the lots' @owe%erH the Cit" Coun!il of Pasi, ena!te& an or&inan!e a en&in, the e0istin, =onin, or&inan!e :" !han,in, the =one !lassifi!ation in that pla!e fro purel" resi&ential to !o er!ial' C+CH a lot ownerH sol& his lot to a :anDin, fir an& the latter starte& !onstru!tin, a !o er!ial :uil&in, on the lot to house a :anD insi&e the su:&i%ision' 3he su:&i%ision owner an& the ho eownersB asso!iation file& a !ase in !ourt to stop the !onstru!tion of the :uil&in, for :anDin, :usiness purposes an& to respe!t the restri!tions e :o&ie& in the &ee& of sale :" the su:&i%ision &e%eloper to the lot ownersH as well as the annotation in the titles'

-e!i&e the !onstitutionalit" of the law in ?uestion' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he law is !onstitutional' 5t is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e powerH :e!ause s oDin, is har ful to health' 5n Posa&as &e Puerto 1i!o +sso!iates %s' 3ouris Co pan" of Puerto 1i!oH #78 <'S' 328H it was rule& that a law prohi:itin, !ertain t"pes of a&%ertise ents is %ali& if it was a&opte& in the interest of the healthH safet"H an& welfare of the people' 5n Capital 9roa&!astin, Co pan" us' 8it!hell 333 F Supp 282H a law aDin, it unlawful to a&%ertise !i,arettes on an" e&iu of ele!troni! !o uni!ation was uphel&' 3he <nite& States Supre e Court su aril" sustaine& this rulin, in CapitaV 9roa&!astin, Co pan" usH +!tin, +ttorne" $eneral #02 <'S' 1000' 3he law in ?uestion was ena!te& on the :asis of the le,islati%e fin&in, that there is a nee& to prote!t pu:li! healthH :e!ause s oDin, !auses lun, &iseases' Cow:o" 7e%"Bs has not o%erthrown this fin&in,'

P&'i(e P&5er8 A&ning Ordinan(e 0+= N&n< I1*air1ent &) C&ntra(t+ 9!#$#:
No' 12: Pe&ro :ou,ht a par!el of lan& fro S art CorporationH a realt" fir en,a,e& in &e%elopin, an& sellin, lots to the pu:li!' Ane of the restri!tions in the &ee& of sale whi!h was annotate& in the title is that the lot shall :e use& :" the :u"er e0!lusi%el" for resi&ential purposes' + ain hi,hwa" ha%in, :een !onstru!te& a!ross the su:&i%isionH the area :e!a e !o er!ial in nature' 3he uni!ipalit" later passe& a =onin, or&inan!e &e!larin, the area as a !o er!ial :anD :uil&in, on his lot' S art Corporation went to !ourt to stop the !onstru!tion as %iolati%e of the :uil&in, restri!tions i pose& :" it' 3he !orporation !onten&s that the =onin, or&inan!e !annot nullif" the !ontra!tual o:li,ation assu e& :" the :u"er' -e!i&e the !ase'

5f "ou were the >u&,eH how woul& "ou resol%e the !aseL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 5f 5 were the ;u&,eH 5 woul& &is iss the !ase' +s hel& in Arti,as an& Co pan" 7i ite& Partnership %s' F/+35 9anD an& 3rust Co pan"' 9# SC1+ )33 (1979)H the =onin, or&inan!e is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power an& pre%ails o%er the !ontra!tual stipulation restri!tin, the use of the lot to resi&ential purposes' Pri0a(y &) C&113ni(ati&n 9"66!: No M55 * C+C has a telephone line with an e0tension' Ane &a"H C+C was talDin, to C9C o%er the telephone' C+C !onspire& with his frien& CCCH who was at the en& of the e0tension line listenin, to C+BsC telephone !on%ersation with C9C in or&er to o%erhear an& tape*re!or& the !on%ersation wherein C9C !onfi&entiall" a& itte& that with e%i&ent pre e&itationH he (9) Dille& C-C for ha%in, !heate& hi in their :usiness partnership' C9C was not aware that the telephone !on%ersation was :ein, tape* re!or&e&'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ase ust :e &is isse&' +s hel& in Arti,as an& Co pan"H 7i ite& Partnership %s' F/+35i 9anD an& 3rust Co pan"H 9# SC1+ 233H su!h a restri!tion in the !ontra!t !annot pre%ail o%er the =onin, or&inan!eH :e!ause the ena!t ent

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@-

5n the !ri inal !ase a,ainst C9C for ur&erH is the tape*re!or&e& !on%ersation !ontainin, his a& ission a& issi:le in e%i&en!eL 6h"L (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he tape*re!or&e& !on%ersation is not a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' +s hel& in Sal!e&o* Artane= %s' Court of +ppealsH 232 SC1+ 111 (199#)' 1epu:li! +!t No' #200 aDes the tape* re!or&in, of a telephone !on%ersation &one without the authori=ation of all the parties to the !on%ersationH ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e' 5n a&&itionH the tapin, of the !on%ersation %iolate& the ,uarantee of pri%a!" of !o uni!ations enun!iate& in Se!tion 3H +rti!le 555 of the Constitution'

o%e& for its return on the ,roun& that it %iolates the ri,ht of CMC a,ainst unlawful sear!h an& sei=ure' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he o:;e!tion of the law"er ust :e sustaine&H Se!tion 3(1)H +rti!le 5E of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es: C3he pri%a!" of !o uni!ation an& !orrespon&en!e shall :e in%iola:le e0!ept upon lawful or&er of the !ourtH or when pu:li! safet" or or&er re?uires otherwise as pres!ri:e& :" law'C 3here was no !ourt or&er whi!h authori=e& the war&en to rea& the letter of CMC' Neither is there an" law spe!ifi!all" authori=in, the 9ureau of Prisons to rea& the letter of CMCH <n&er Se!tion 3(1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH to interfere with an" !orrespon&en!e when there is no !ourt or&erH there ust :e a law authori=in, it in the interest of pu:li! safet" or or&er'
3he rulin, of the <nite& States Supre e Court in the !ase of Strou& %s' <nite& StatesH 221 <'S' 12 is not appli!a:le hereH :e!ause Se!tion 3(1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution has no !ounterpart in the + eri!an Constitution' @en!eH in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 3(2)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the letter is ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e'

Pri0a(y &) C&rre+*&nden(e 9!##$:


No E55' * 3he poli!e ha& suspi!ions that >uan Sa sonH e :er of the su:%ersi%e New Proletarian +r "H was usin, the ail for propa,an&a purposes in ,ainin, new a&herents to its !ause' 3he Chief of Poli!e of 9antolanH 7anao &el Sur or&ere& the Post aster of the town to inter!ept an& open all ail a&&resse& to an& !o in, fro >uan Sa son in the interest of the national se!urit"' 6as the or&er of the Chief of Poli!e %ali&L (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the or&er of the Chief of Poli!e is not %ali&H :e!ause there is no law whi!h authori=es hi to or&er the Post aster to open the letters a&&resse& to an& !o in, fro >uan Sa son' +n offi!ial in the /0e!uti%e -epart ent !annot interfere with the pri%a!" of !orrespon&en!e an& !o uni!ation in the a:sen!e of a law authori=in, hi to &o so or a lawful or&er of the !ourt' Se!tion 3(1)H +rti!le 555 of the Constitution pro%i&es:
C3he pri%a!" of !o uni!ation an& !orrespon&en!e shall :e in%iola:le e0!ept upon lawful or&er of the !ourtH or when pu:li! safet" or or&er re?uires otherwise as pres!ri:e& :" law'C

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he o:;e!tion of the law"er ust :e o%errule&' 5n @u&son %s' Pal erH #)8 <'S' 217H it was hel& that the !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst ille,al sear!hes an& sei=ures &oes not e0ten& to the !onfines of the prison' 5n Strou& %s' <nite& StatesH 221 <'S' 12H the <nite& States Supre e Court hel& that letters %oluntaril" written :" a prisoner an& e0a ine& :" the war&en whi!h !ontaine& in!ri inator" state ents were a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' 3heir inspe!tion :" the prison authorities &i& not %iolate the !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst ille,al sear!hes an& sei=ures' 3his is an esta:lishe& pra!ti!e reasona:l" &esi,ne& to pro ote &is!ipline within the penitentiar"'

Pri0a(y &) C&rre+*&nden(e8 4ai' 9!#$#:


No' 8: 6hile ser%in, senten!e in 8untinlupa for the !ri e of theftH CMC sta::e& &ea& one of his ,uar&sH CMC was !har,e& with ur&er' -urin, his trialH the prose!ution intro&u!e& as e%i&en!e a letter written in prison :" CMC to his wife ten&in, to esta:lish that the !ri e of ur&er was the result of pre e&itation' 3he letter was written %oluntaril"' 5n the !ourse of inspe!tionH it was opene& an& rea& :" a war&en pursuant to the rules of &is!ipline of the 9ureau of Prisons an& !onsi&erin, its !ontentsH the letter was turne& o%er to the prose!utor' 3he law"er of CMC o:;e!te& to the presentation of the letter an&

Rig,t t& A++e1b'y8 Per1it A**'i(ati&n8 reed&1 ParI+ 9>"<"66?:


3he Sa ahan n, ,a 8ahihirap (S8) file& with the Affi!e of the Cit" 8a"or of 8anila an appli!ation for per it to hol& a rall" on 8en&iola Street on Septe :er 2H 200) fro 10:00 a' ' to 3:00 p' ' to protest the politi!al Dillin,s of ;ournalists' @owe%erH the Cit" 8a"or &enie& their appli!ation on the ,roun& that a rall" at the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@;

ti e an& pla!e applie& for will :lo!D the traffi! in the San 8i,uel an& (uiapo -istri!ts' @e su,,este& the 7iwasan, 9onifa!ioH whi!h has :een &esi,nate& a Free&o ParDH as %enue for the rall"' -oes the S8 ha%e a re e&" to !ontest the &enial of its appli!ation for a per itL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH S8 has a re e&"' <n&er 9'P' 9i,' 880 (3he Pu:li! +sse :l" +!t of 1982)H in the e%ent of &enial of the appli!ation for a per itH the appli!ant a" !ontest the &e!ision in an appropriate !ourt of law' 3he !ourt ust &e!i&e within twent"*four (2#) hours fro the &ate of filin, of the !ase' Sai& &e!ision a" :e appeale& to the appropriate !ourt within fort"* ei,ht (#8) hours after re!eipt of the sa e' 5n all !asesH an" &e!ision a" :e appeale& to the Supre e Court (9a"an 8una %' /r itaH $'1' No' 1)9838H +pril 22H 200))'

1'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he arrests are unlawful' 6hat is prohi:ite& an& penali=e& un&er Se!' 13 (a) an& 1# (a) of 9'P' 9i, 880 is Cthe hol&in, of an" pu:li! asse :l" as &efine& in this +!t :" an" lea&er or or,ani=er without ha%in, first se!ure& that written per it where a per it is re?uire& fro the offi!e !on!erne& 0 0 0 Pro%i&e&H howe%erH that no person !an :e punishe& or hel& !ri inall" lia:le for parti!ipatin, in or atten&in, an otherwise pea!eful asse :l"'C
3husH onl" the lea&er or or,ani=er of the rall" without a per it a" :e arreste& without a warrant while the e :ers a" not :e arreste&H as the" !an not :e punishe& or hel& !ri inall" lia:le for atten&in, the rall"' @owe%erH un&er Se!tion 12 thereofH when the pu:li! asse :l" is hel& without a per it where a per it is re?uire&H the sai& pu:li! asse :l" a" :e pea!efull" &isperse&'

-oes the a%aila:ilit" of a Free&o ParD ;ustif" the &enial of S8Bs appli!ation for a per itL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the a%aila:ilit" of a free&o parD &oes not ;ustif" the &enial of the per it' 5t &oes i pl" that no per its are re?uire& for a!ti%ities in free&o parDs' <n&er 9'P' 9i,' 880H the &enial a" :e ;ustifie& onl" if there is !lear an& !on%in!in, e%i&en!e that the pu:li! asse :l" will !reate a !lear an& present &an,er to pu:li! or&erH pu:li! safet"H pu:li! !on%enien!eH pu:li! orals or pu:li! health (9a"an 8una %' /r itaH $'1' No' 1)9838H +pril 22H 200))'

2'

Rig,t t& A++e1b'y8 Per1it ReF3ire1ent+ 9!##": No' #: Al" pia +!a&e "H a pri%ate uni%ersit"H issue& a stu&ent re,ulation for aintainin, or&er in the s!hool !a pus an& to ensure that a!a&e i! a!ti%ities shall :e !on&u!te& effe!ti%el"'
@en!eforthH e%er" stu&ent or,ani=ation inten&in, to hol& an" s" posiu H !on%o!ationH rall" or an" asse :l" within s!hool propert" an& in%ol%in, at least 20 people ust fileH for the prior appro%al of the -ean of Stu&entsH an +ppli!ation settin, forth the ti eH pla!eH e0pe!te& si=e of the ,roupH an& the su:;e!t* atter an& purpose of the asse :l"' 3he 7ea,ue of Nationalist Stu&ents ?uestions the %ali&it" of the new re,ulation' 1esol%e'

5s the re?uire ent to appl" for a per it to hol& a rall" a prior restraint on free&o of spee!h an& asse :l"L (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the re?uire ent for a per it to hol& a rall" is not a prior restraint on free&o of spee!h an& asse :l"' 3he Supre e Court has hel& that the per it re?uire ent is %ali&H referrin, to it as re,ulation of the ti eH pla!eH an& anner of hol&in, pu:li! asse :liesH :ut not the !ontent of the spee!h itself' 3husH there is no prior restraintH sin!e the !ontent of the spee!h is not rele%ant to the re,ulation (9a"an 8una %' /r itaH $'1' No' 1)9838H +pril 22H 200))'

3'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he re,ulation is %ali&' +s hel& 5n 1arnento us' 8al* a:ananH 129 SC1+ 329H if an asse :l" will :e hel& :" stu&ents in s!hool pre isesH per it ust :e sou,ht fro the s!hool authoritiesH who are &e%oi& of the power to &en" su!h re?uest ar:itraril" or unreasona:l"' 5n ,rantin, su!h per itH there a" :e !on&itions as to the ti e an& pla!e of the asse :l" to a%oi& &isruption of !lasses or stoppa,e of worD of the non* a!a&e i! personnel'

#'

+ssu in, that &espite the &enial of S8Bs appli!ation for a per itH its e :ers hol& a rall"H pro ptin, the poli!e to arrest the ' +re the arrests without ;u&i!ial warrants lawfulL (2'2N)

Rig,t t& A++e1b'y8 P3b'i( Tea(,er+ 9"666:


No M55 * Pu:li! s!hool tea!hers sta,e& for &a"s ass a!tions at the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports to press for the i e&iate ,rant of their &e an& for a&&itional pa"' 3he

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@@

-/CS Se!retar" issue& to the a noti!e of the ille,alit" of their unauthori=e& a!tionH or&ere& the to i e&iatel" return to worDH an& warne& the of i posa:le san!tions' 3he" i,nore& this an& !ontinue& with their ass a!tion' 3he -/CS Se!retar" issue& or&ers for their pre%enti%e suspension without pa" an& !har,e& the tea!hers with ,ross is!on&u!t an& ,ross ne,le!t of &ut" for unauthori=e& a:an&on ent of tea!hin, posts an& a:sen!es without lea%e'

(a) 3heir striDe was an e0er!ise of their !onstitutional ri,ht to pea!eful asse :l" an& to petition the ,o%ern ent for re&ress of ,rie%an!es' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) +!!or&in, to -e la Cru= %' Court of +ppealsH 302 SC1+ 303 (1999)H the ar,u ent of the tea!hers that the" were erel" e0er!isin, their !onstitutional ri,ht to pea!eful asse :l" an& to petition the ,o%ern ent for re&ress of ,rie%an!e !annot :e sustaine&H :e!ause su!h ri,hts ust :e e0er!ise& within reasona:le li its' 6hen su!h ri,hts were e0er!ise& on re,ular s!hool &a"s instea& of &urin, the free ti e of the tea!hersH the tea!hers !o itte& a!ts pre;u&i!ial to the :est interests of the ser%i!e'

a) +re e plo"ees in the pu:li! se!tor allowe& to for unionsL 3o striDeL 6h"L (3N)
:) 3he tea!hers !lai that their ri,ht to pea!ea:l" asse :le an& petition the ,o%ern ent for re&ress of ,rie%an!es has :een !urtaile&' +re the" !orre!tL 6h"L

(2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


a) Se!tion 8H +rti!le 555 of the Constitution allows e plo"ees in the pu:li! se!tor to for unions' @owe%erH the" !annot ,o on striDe' +s e0plaine& in So!ial Se!urit" S"ste / plo"ees +sso!iation %' Court of +ppeals' 172 SC1+ )8) P1989QH the ter s an& !on&itions of their e plo" ent are fi0e& :" law' / plo"ees in the pu:li! se!tor !annot striDe to se!ure !on!essions fro their e plo"er' :' 3he tea!hers !annot !lai that their ri,ht to pea!ea:l" asse :le an& petition for the re&ress of ,rie%an!es has :een !urtaile&' +!!or&in, to 9an,alisan %' Court of +ppeals' 27) SC1+ )19 (1997)H the" !an e0er!ise this ri,ht without stoppa,e of !lasses'

Rig,t t& Tra0e'8 Order &) Arre+t 9!##!:


No' ): 8r' /ste:an Gron"H a Filipino !iti=enH is arreste& for the !ri e of s u,,lin,' @e posts :ail for his release' Su:se?uentl"H he ;u ps :ail an& is a:out to lea%e the !ountr" when the -epart ent of Forei,n +ffairs (-F+) !an!els his passport' @e sues the -F+H !lai in, %iolation of his free&o to tra%elH !itin, the new pro%ision in the 9ill of 1i,hts of the 1987 ConstitutionH to wit: CNeither shall the ri,ht to tra%el :e i paire& e0!ept in the interest of national se!urit"H pu:li! safet"H or pu:li! healthH as a" :e pro%i&e& :" law' -e!i&e the !ase'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ase shoul& :e &is isse&' +n" person un&er an or&er of arrest is un&er restraint an& therefore he !an not !lai the ri,ht to tra%el' 5f he is a& itte& to :ail his free&o of o%e ent is !onfine& within the !ountr"' 3hereforeH if he su:se?uentl" ;u ps :ailH he !annot &e an& passport whi!h in effe!t will fa!ilitate his es!ape fro the !ountr"; he is in fa!t lia:le to :e arreste& an"ti e' 5n&ee&H the ri,ht to tra%el un&er the Constitution presupposes that the in&i%i&ual is un&er no restraint su!h as that whi!h woul& follow fro the fa!t that one has a pen&in, !ri inal !ase an& has :een pla!e& un&er arrest'

Rig,t t& A++e1b'y8 P3b'i( Tea(,er+ 9"66": No M * 3en pu:li! s!hool tea!hers of Caloo!an Cit" left their !lassroo s to ;oin a striDeH whi!h laste& for one onthH to asD for tea!hersB :enefits'
3he -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports !har,e& the a& inistrati%el"H for whi!h reason the" were re?uire& to answer an& for all" in%esti,ate& :" a !o ittee !o pose& of the -i%ision Superinten&ent of S!hools as Chair anH the -i%ision Super%isor as e :er an& a tea!herH as another e :er' An the :asis of the e%i&en!e a&&u!e& at the for al in%esti,ation whi!h a pl" esta:lishe& their ,uiltH the -ire!tor ren&ere& a &e!ision etin, out to the the penalt" of re o%al fro offi!e' 3he &e!ision was affir e& :" the -/CS Se!retar" an& the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission' An appealH the" reiterate& the ar,u ents the" raise& :efore the a& inistrati%e :o&iesH na el":

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 C&3n+e' &) ,i+ C,&i(e 9>$<"66@:


(1) 8ariano was arreste& :" the N95 as a suspe!t in the shoppin, all :o :in,s' +&%ise& of his ri,htsH 8ariano asDe& for the assistan!e of his relati%eH +tt"' Santos' 3he N95 noti!e& that +tt"' Santos was ine0perien!e&H in!o petent an& inattenti%e' -ee in, hi unsuite& to prote!t the ri,hts of 8arianoH the N95 &is isse& +tt"' Santos' +ppointe& in his pla!e was +tt"' 9arrosoH a

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@?

:ar topnot!her who was in the pre ises %isitin, a relati%e' +tt"' 9arroso a:l" assiste& 8ariano when the latter ,a%e a state ent' @owe%erH 8ariano assaile& the in%esti,ation !lai in, that he was &epri%e& of !ounsel of his !hoi!e'
6as the N95 !orre!t in &is issin, +tt"' Santos an& appointin, +tt"' 9arroso in his stea&L 5s 8arianoBs state entH a&e with the assistan!e of +tt"' 9arrosoH a& issi:le in e%i&en!eL (2N)

on!e the prose!ution shows there was !o plian!e with the !onstitutional re?uire ent on pre*interro,ation a&%isoriesH a !onfession is presu e& to :e %oluntar" an& the &e!larant :ears the :ur&en of pro%in, that his !onfession is in%oluntar" an& untrue' + !onfession is a& issi:le until the a!!use& su!!essfull" pro%es that it was ,i%en as a result of %iolen!eH inti i&ationH threat or pro ise of rewar& or lenien!" whi!h are not present in this !ase' +!!or&in,l"H the state ent is a& issi:le'
(People %' >ere=H $'1' No' 11#382H >anuar" 29H 1998)

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he N95 was not !orre!t in &is issin, +tt"' Santos an& appointin, +tt"' 9arroso in his stea&' +rti!le 555H Se!tion 12(1) of the 1987 Constitution re?uires that a person un&er in%esti,ation for the !o ission of an offense shall ha%e no less than C!o petent an& in&epen&ent !ounsel prefera:l" of his own !hoi!e C 3his is eant to stress the pri a!" a!!or&e& to the %oluntariness of the !hoi!e un&er the uni?uel" stressful !on&itions of a !usto&ial in%esti,ationB 3husH the law"er !alle& to :e present &urin, su!h in%esti,ation shoul& :e as far as reasona:l" possi:leH the !hoi!e of the in&i%i&ual un&er,oin, ?uestionin,' 3he appoint ent of +tt"' 9arroso is ?uestiona:le :e!ause he was %isitin, a relati%e worDin, in the N95 an& thus his in&epen&en!e is &ou:tful' 7aw"ers en,a,e& :" the poli!eH whate%er testi onials are ,i%en as proof of their pro:it" an& suppose& in&epen&en!eH are ,enerall" suspe!tH as in an" areasH the relationship :etween law"ers an& law enfor!e ent authorities !an :e s" :ioti!' Consi&erin, that 8ariano was &epri%e& of !ounsel of his own !hoi!eH the state ent is ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e' (People %' >anuarioH $'1' No' 98222H Fe:ruar" 7H 1997)

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Pre+31*ti&n &) Inn&(en(e 0+= Pre+31*ti&n &) T,e)t 9"66;: (2*:) A. lost fi%e hea& of !attle whi!h he reporte& to the poli!e as stolen fro his :arn' @e re?ueste& se%eral nei,h:orsH in!lu&in, 11H for help in looDin, for the issin, ani als' +fter an e0tensi%e sear!hH the poli!e foun& two hea& in 11Bs far ' 11 !oul& not e0plain to the poli!e how the" ,ot hi&&en in a re ote area of his far ' 5nsistin, on his inno!en!eH 11 !onsulte& a law"er who tol& hi he has a ri,ht to :e presu e& inno!ent un&er the 9ill of 1i,hts' 9ut there is another presu ption of theft arisin, fro his une0plaine& possession of stolen !attleR un&er the penal law'

+re the two presu ptions !apa:le of re!on!iliation 5n this !aseL 5f soH how !an the" :e re!on!ile&L 5f notH whi!h shoul& pre%ailL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he two presu ptions !an :e re!on!ile&' 3he presu ption of inno!en!e stan&s until the !ontrar" is pro%e&' 5t a" :e o%er!o e :" a !ontrar" presu ption foun&e& upon hu an e0perien!e' 3he presu ption that 11 is the one who stole the !attle of A. is lo,i!alH sin!e he was foun& in possession of the stolen !attle' 11 !an pro%e his inno!en!e :" presentin, e%i&en!e to re:ut the presu ption' 3he :ur&en of e%i&en!e is shifte& to 11H :e!ause how he !a e into possession of the !attle is pe!uliarl" within his Dnowle&,e' (-i=on*Pa intuan %' PeopleH 23# SC1+ )3 (199#))'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he N95 was !orre!t in &is issin, +tt"' Santos as he was in!o petent' 3he 1987 Constitution re?uires !ounsel to :e !o petent an& in&epen&ent' +tt"' 9arrosoH :ein, a :ar topnot!her a:l" assiste& 8ariano an& there is no showin, that his ha%in, a relati%e in the N95 affe!te& his in&epen&en!e' 8oreo%erH the a!!use& has the final !hoi!e of !ounsel as he a" re;e!t the one !hosen for hi an& asD for another' + law"er pro%i&e& :" the in%esti,ators is &ee e& en,a,e& :" the a!!use& where he raises no o:;e!tion a,ainst the law"er &urin, the !ourse of the in%esti,ationH an& the a!!use& thereafter su:s!ri:es to the truth of his state ent :efore the swearin, offi!er' 3husH

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Rig,t t& Bai' 9!##-:


No' 9: >ohann learne& that the poli!e were looDin, for hi in !onne!tion with the rape of an 18* "ear ol& ,irlH a nei,h:or' @e went to the poli!e station a weeD later an& presente& hi self to the &esD ser,eant' Coin!i&entall"' the rape %i!ti was in the pre ises e0e!utin, an e0tra;u&i!ial state ent' >ohannH alon, with si0 ()) other suspe!tsH were pla!e& in a poli!e line* up an& the ,irl pointe& to hi as the rapist' >ohann was arreste& an& lo!De& up in a !ell'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@%

>ohann was !har,e& with rape in !ourt :ut prior to arrai,n ent in%oDe& his ri,ht to preli inar" in%esti,ation' 3his was &enie& :" the ;u&,eH an& thusH trial pro!ee&e&' +fter the prose!ution presente& se%eral witnessesH >ohann throu,h !ounselH in%oDe& the ri,ht to :all an& file& a otion thereforH whi!h was &enie& outri,ht :" the >u&,e' >ohann now files a petition for !ertiorari :efore the Court of +ppeals ar,uin, that: 3) @e is entitle& to :ail as a atter of ri,htH thus the >u&,e shoul& not ha%e &enie& his otion to fi0 :all outri,ht' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3) 5n a!!or&an!e with +rt' 555' se!' 13 of the ConstitutionH >ohann a" :e &enie& :ail if the e%i&en!e of his ,uilt is stron, !onsi&erin, that the !ri e with whi!h he is !har,e& is punisha:le :" re!lusion perpetua' 5t is thus not a atter of ri,ht for hi to :e release& on :ail in su!h !ase' 3he !ourt ust first aDe a &eter ination of the stren,th of the e%i&en!e on the :asis of e%i&en!e alrea&" presente& :" the prose!utionH unless it &esires to present so e oreH an& ,i%e the a!!use& the opportunit" to present !ounter%ailin, e%i&en!e' 5f ha%in, &one this the !ourt fin&s the e%i&en!e not to :e stron,H then it :e!o es the ri,ht of >ohann to :e a& itte& to :ail' 3he error of the trial !ourt lies in outri,htl" &en"in, the otion for :ail of >ohann'

No' 12: 8a" an alien in%oDe the !onstitutional ri,ht to :ail &urin, the pen&en!" of &eportation pro!ee&in,sL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No' an alien a" not in%oDe the !onstitutional ri,ht to :ail &urin, the pen&en!" of &eportation pro!ee&in,s' 5n @ar%e" %s Santia,oH 1)2 SC1+ 8#0H it was hel& that the !onstitutional ,uarantee to :ail a" not :e in%oDe& in &eportation pro!ee&in,sH :e!ause the" &o not partaDe of the nature of a !ri inal a!tion'

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Rig,t t& Bai'8 Matter &) Rig,t &r a Matter &) Di+(reti&n 9>%<"66@:
a) State with reason(s) whether :ail is a atter of ri,ht or a atter of &is!retion in the

followin, !ases: (#N) a) 3he i posa:le penalt" for the !ri e !har,e& is rec'*sion perpe+*a an& the a!!use& is a inor; SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5f the a!!use& is a inor where the i posa:le penalt" for the !ri e !har,e& is re!lusion perpetuaH :ail woul& :e a atter of ri,ht' <n&er +rti!le )8 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&eH when the offen&er is a inor un&er ei,hteen "ears of a,eH he is entitle& to a penalt"H &epen&in, on his a,eH lower :" one or two &e,rees than that pres!ri:e& :" law for the !ri e !o itte&' 3he Constitution withhol&s the ,uarant" of :ail fro one who is a!!use& of a !apital offense where the e%i&en!e of ,uilt is stron,' 3he o:%ious reason is that one who fa!es a pro:a:le &eath senten!e has a parti!ularl" stron, te ptation to flee' 3his reason &oes not hol& where the a!!use& has :een esta:lishe& without o:;e!tion to :e a inor who :" law !annot :e senten!e& to &eath' (9ra%o %' 9or;aH $'1' No' 7*)2228H Fe:ruar" 18H 1982)

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Rig,t t& Bai'8 Ca*ita' O))en+e 9>;<"66?: State whether or not the law is !onstitutional' /0plain :riefl"' 2' + law &en"in, persons !har,e& with !ri es punisha:le :" re!lusion perpetua or &eath the ri,ht to :ail' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he law is in%ali& as it !ontra%enes Se!tion 13H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution whi!h pro%i&es that Call personsH e0!ept those !har,e& with offenses punisha:le :" re!lusion perpetua when e%i&en!e of ,uilt is stron,H shallH :efore !on%i!tionH :e :aila:le :" suffi!ient suretiesH or :e release& on re!o,ni=an!e as a" :e pro%i&e& :" law'C 3he a!!use& a" not :e &epri%e& of his !onstitutional ri,ht to :ail e%en if !har,e& with a !apital offense where the e%i&en!e of ,uilt is not stron,'

:) 3he i posa:le penalt" for the !ri e !har,e& is life i prison ent an& the a!!use& is a inor; ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
5f the a!!use& is a inor an& the i posa:le penalt" for the !ri e !har,e& is life i prison entH :ail woul& not :e a atter of ri,ht' 5n the instant !aseH assu in, that e%i&en!e of ,uilt stron,H :ail shall :e &enie& as the pri%ile,e& iti,atin, !ir!u stan!e of inorit" is not a%aila:le for %iolation of spe!ial laws penali=e& :" life i prison ent'

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Rig,t t& Bai'8 De*&rtati&n Ca+e 9!#$#:

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
+lthou,h the Constitution entions onl" re!lusion perpetuaH 1ule 11# of the 1ules of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@$

Court a&&s life i prison entH an& thereforeH appl"in, the PRO R:O ;OCTRI<:H :ail woul& still :e a atter of ri,htH sin!e it is fa%ora:le to the a!!use&'
!) 3he a!!use& has :een !on%i!te& of ho i!i&e on a !har,e of ur&er an& senten!e& to suffer an in&eter inate penalt" of fro ei,ht (8) "ears an& one (1) &a" of prision a"orH as ini u H to twel%e

pri%ate

!o plainantH

the

;u&,e

properl"

&is isse& the !ase for failure to prose!ute'

(12) "ears an& four (#) te poralH as a0i u ' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

onths of re!lusion

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Se')<In(ri1inati&n 9!#$$: No' 3: -r' >uan Sto' 3o as is a pra!ti!in, &entist in 8ariDinaH 8etro 8anila' @e was !har,e& with i oralit" :efore the 9oar& of -entistr" :" a la&" patientH who !lai s that -r' Sto' 3o as tooD li:erties with her person an& Disse& her while she was un&er the treat ent at the latterBs !lini!'
+t the initial hearin, of the a& inistrati%e !o plaintH the !o plainantBs !ounsel !alle& the respon&ent as his first witness' 3he respon&ent throu,h !ounselH o:;e!te& %i,orousl"H !lai in, his !onstitutional ri,ht to :e e0e pt fro :ein, a witness a,ainst hi self' 3he 9oar& note& the o:;e!tionH :ut rule& that in the ne0t s!he&ule& hearin,H a onth an& a half laterH the respon&ent woul& :e !alle& to testif" as a witnessH as the ri,ht he !lai s is not a%aila:le in a& inistrati%e in%esti,ationsH :ut onl" in !ri inal prose!utions'

5f the a!!use& has :een !on%i!te& of ho i!i&e on a !har,e of ur&er an& senten!e& to suffer i prison ent of fro 8 to 12 "earsH :ail is a atter of &is!retion' <n&er 1ule 11#H Se!' 2H par' 1 of the 1ules of CourtH if the &e!ision of the trial !ourt !on%i!tin, the a!!use& !han,e& the nature of the offense fro non*:aila:le to :aila:leH the appli!ation for :ail a" :e file& an& a!te& upon :" the appellate !ourt' +& ission to :ail is &is!retionar"'

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Rig,t t& S*eedy Tria' 9"666:


No ME' Char,e& :" Fran!is!o with li:elH Pa:lo was arrai,ne& on >anuar" 3H 2000H Pre*trial was &ispense& with an& !ontinuous trial was set for 8ar!h 7H 8 an& 9H 2000' An the first settin,H the prose!ution o%e& for its postpone ent an& !an!ellation of the other settin,s :e!ause its prin!ipal an& pro:a:l" onl" witnessH the pri%ate !o plainant Fran!is!oH su&&enl" ha& to ,o a:roa& to fulfill a professional !o it ent' 3he ;u&,e instea& &is isse& the !ase for failure to prose!ute'

-r' Sto' 3o as is &e!i&e& not to testif"' +s his law"erH what woul& "ou &oL 6h"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 will file a petition for prohi:ition with pra"er for preli inar" in;un!tion with the 1e,ional 3rial Court' 3he pri%ile,e a,ainst self in!ri ination is a%aila:le not onl" in ;u&i!ial pro!ee&in,s :ut also in a& inistrati%e in%esti,ations' 5n Pas!ual %' 9oar& of 8e&i!al /0a inersH 28 SC1+ 3## (19)9)H it was hel& that the re%o!ation of a li!ense as a e&i!al pra!titioner !an :e an e%en ,reater &epri%ation than ere forfeiture of propert"' 5n so e aspe!ts it is si ilar to !ri inal pro!ee&in,s an&H thereforeH the respon&ent !an not :e a&e to testif" as a witness for the !o plainant'

a) 6oul& the ,rant of the otion for postpone ent ha%e %iolate& the a!!use&Bs ri,ht to spee&" trialL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he ,rant of the otion for postpone ent woul& not ha%e %iolate& the ri,ht of the a!!use& to spee&" trial' +s hel& 5n People %' 7e%isteH 222 SC1+ 238 (199))' sin!e the otion for postpone ent was the first one re?ueste&H the nee& for the offen&e& part" to atten& to a professional !o it ent is a %ali& reasonH no su:stantial ri,ht of the a!!use& woul& :e pre;u&i!e&H an& the prose!ution shoul& :e affor&e& a fair opportunit" to prose!ute its !aseH the otion shoul& :e ,rante&'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
Sin!e !ontinuous trial of !ases is re?uire& an& sin!e the &ate of the initial hearin, was set upon a,ree ent of all partiesH in!lu&in, the

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Se')<In(ri1inati&n 9!##6: No' #: 3he pri%ile,e of self*in!ri ination ust :e ti el" in%oDe&H otherwise it is &ee e& wai%e&' 1' 5n a C5E57 C+S/H the plaintiff !alle& the &efen&ant a hostile witness an& announ!e& that the &efen&ant woul& :e asDe& in!ri inatin, ?uestions in the &ire!t e0a ination' 6hen shoul& the &efen&ant in%oDe the pri%ile,e a,ainst self* in!ri inationL
2' 5n a C1585N+7 C+S/H the prose!ution !alle& the a!!use& to the witness stan& as the first witness in %iew of !ertain fa!ts

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

@#

3'

a& itte& :" the a!!use& at the pre*trial' 6hen shoul& the a!!use& in%oDe the pri%ile,e a,ainst self*in!ri inationL 5n an a& inistrati%e !ase for alpra!ti!e an& the !an!ellation of li!ense to pra!ti!e e&i!ine file& a,ainst CH the !o plainant !alle& C to the witness stan&' 6hen

Cite two P2Q possi:le !onstitutional o:;e!tions to this law' 1esol%e the o:;e!tions an& e0plain whether an" su!h infir ities !an :e !ure&' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Possi:le o:;e!tions to the law are that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe the :reathal"=er test will %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri inationH that pro%i&in, for the suspension of his &ri%erBs li!ense without an" hearin, %iolates &ue pro!essH an& that the propose& law will %iolate the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=uresH :e!ause it allows poli!e authorities to re?uire a &ri%e to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en if there is no pro:a:le !ause' 1e?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a 91/+3@+7O./1 3/S3 &oes not %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri inationH :e!ause he is not :ein, !o pelle& to ,i%e testi onial e%i&en!e' @e is erel" :ein, asDe& to su: it to a ph"si!al test' 3his is not !o%ere& :" the !onstitutional ,uarantee a,ainst self*in!ri ination' 3husH in South -aDota %s' Ne%illeH #29 <'S' 223H it was hel& for this reason that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a :loo&*al!ohol test is %ali&' +s hel& in 8a!De" %s' +fontr"a ##3 <'S' 1H :e!ause of !o pellin, ,o%ern ent interest in safet" alon, the streetsH the li!ense of a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the :reathal"=er test a" :e suspen&e& i e&iatel" pen&in, a post* suspension hearin,H :ut there ust :e a pro%ision for a post*suspension hearin,' 3husH to sa%e the propose& law fro un!onstitutionall" on the ,roun& of &enial of &ue pro!essH it shoul& pro%i&e for an i e&iate hearin, upon suspension of the &ri%erBs li!ense' 3he propose& law %iolates the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=ures' 5t will authori=e poli!e authorities to stop an" &ri%er an& asD hi to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en in the a:sen!e of a pro:a:le !ause'

shoul& C in%oDe the pri%ile,e a,ainst self* in!ri inationL /0plain "our answers to the three ?uestions' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) +s hel& in 9a,a&ion, %H -e $u= anH 9# SC1+ 90)H the &efen&ant shoul& taDe the witness stan& an& o:;e!t when a ?uestion !allin, for an in!ri inatin, ?uestion is propoun&e&' <nliDe in pro!ee&in,s whi!h are !ri inal in !hara!ter in whi!h the a!!use& !an refuse to testif"H the &efen&ant ust wait until a ?uestion !allin, for an in!ri inator" answer is a!tuall" asDe&' (Suare= %' 3on,!oH 2 SC1+ 71) (2) +s hel& in Cha%e= %' Court of +ppealsH 2# SC1+ ))3H in a !ri inal !ase the a!!use& a" alto,ether refuse to taDe the witness an& refuse to answer an" ?uestionH :e!ause the purpose of !allin, hi as a witness for the prose!ution has no other purpose :ut to in!ri inate hi '

(3) +s in a !ri inal !aseH C !an refuse to taDe the witness stan& an& refuse to answer an" ?uestion' 5n Pas!ual %' 9oar& of 8e&i!al /0a inersH 28 SC1+ 3##H it was hel& that an a& inistrati%e !ase for alpra!ti!e an& !an!ellation of the li!ense to pra!ti!e e&i!ine is penal in !hara!terH :e!ause an unfa%ora:le &e!ision woul& result in the re%o!ation of the li!ense of the respon&ent to pra!ti!e e&i!ine' Conse?uentl"H he !an refuse to taDe the witness stan&' Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Se')<In(ri1inati&n 9!##":
NoH 3; Con,ress is !onsi&erin, a law a,ainst &runDen &ri%in,' <n&er the le,islationH poli!e authorities a" asD an" &ri%er to taDe a C:reathal"=er testCH wherein the &ri%er e0hales se%eral ti es into a &e%i!e whi!h !an &eter ine whether he has :een &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of al!ohol' 3he results of the test !an :e use&H in an" le,al pro!ee&in, a,ainst hi ' Further oreH &e!larin, that the issuan!e of a &ri%erBs li!ense ,i%es rise onl" to a pri%ile,e to &ri%e otor %ehi!les on pu:li! roa&sH the law pro%i&es that a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the test shall :e auto ati!all" su:;e!t to a 90*&a" suspension of his &ri%erBs li!enseH

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Se')<In(ri1inati&n 9"666: No M5' :) + an was shot an& Dille& an& his
Diller fle&' 8o ents after the shootin,H an e"ewitness &es!ri:e& to the poli!e that the sla"er wore white pantsH a shirt with floral &esi,nH ha& :oots an& was a:out 70 Dilos an& 1')2 eters' 9or;aH who fit the &es!ription ,i%enH was seen near:"' @e was taDen into !usto&" an& :rou,ht to the poli!e pre!in!t where his pantsH shirt an& :oots were for!i:l" taDen an& he was wei,he&H easure&H photo,raphe&H fin,erprinte& an& su:;e!te& to paraffin testin,' +t his trialH 9or;a o:;e!te& to the a& ission in e%i&en!e of the apparelH his

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?6

hei,ht an& wei,htH his photo,raphsH fin,erprints !o parison an& the results of the paraffin testH assertin, that these were taDen in %iolation of his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri ination' 1ule on the o:;e!tion' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
:) 3he o:;e!tion of 9or;a is not tena:le' +s hel& in People %' Pa"norH 2)1 SC1+ )12 (199))H the ri,hts ,uarantee& :" Se!tion 12H +rti!le in of the Constitution applies onl" a,ainst testi onial e%i&en!e' +n a!!use& a" :e !o pelle& to :e photo,raphe& or easure&H his ,ar ents a" :e re o%e&H an& his :o&" a" :e e0a ine&'

proof' Ane &a"H / ilio :roDe open the &esD of +l%in an& &is!o%ere& a letter wherein 1an&" thanDe& +l%in for ha%in, passe& on to hi %ital tra&e se!rets of / ilio' /n!lose& in the letter was a !he!D for P20H000'00 &rawn a,ainst the a!!ount of 1an&" an& pa"a:le to +l%in' / ilio then &is isse& +l%in fro his e plo" ent' / ilioBs proof of +l%inBs perfi&" are the sai& letter an& !he!D whi!h are o:;e!te& to as ina& issi:le for ha%in, :een o:taine& throu,h an ille,al sear!h' +l%in file& a suit assailin, his &is issal'

Rig,t+ &) t,e A((3+ed8 Se')<In(ri1inati&n 9>%<"66?: Sele!t the :est answer an& e0plain'
1' +n a!!use&Bs ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri ination is %iolate& in the followin, !ases: (2N)

1ule on the a& issi:ilit" of the letter an& !he!D' (2N) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
+s hel& in People %' 8arti ($'1' No' 812)1H >anuar" 18H 1991)H the !onstitutionH in la"in, &own the prin!iples of the ,o%ern ent an& fun&a ental li:erties of the peopleH &oes not ,o%ern relationships :etween in&i%i&uals' 3husH if the sear!h is a&e at the :ehest or initiati%e of the proprietor of a pri%ate esta:lish ent for its own an& pri%ate purposes an& without the inter%ention of poli!e authoritiesH the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!h an& sei=ure !annot :e in%oDe& for onl" the a!t of pri%ate in&i%i&ualsH not the law enfor!ersH is in%ol%e&' 5n su H +-e pro+ec+ion agains+ *nreasonab'e searc-es and sei=*res canno+ be e>+ended +o ac+s co00i++ed by PRI?AT: I<;I?I;6AL7 so as +o bring i+ &i+-in +-e a0bi+ o) a''eged *n'a&)*' in+r*sion by +-e go/ern0en+. +!!or&in,l"H the letter an& !he!D are a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' (6aterous -ru, Corp' %' N71CH $'1' No' 113271H A!to:er 1)H 1997)

a' 6hen he is or&ere& :" the trial !ourt to un&er,o a paraffin test to pro%e he is ,uilt" of ur&er; :' 6hen he is !o pelle& to pro&u!e his :anD:ooDs to :e use& as e%i&en!e a,ainst his father !har,e& with plun&er; !' 6hen he is or&ere& to pro&u!e a sa ple of his han&writin, to :e use& as e%i&en!e that he is the author of a letter wherein he a,ree& to Dill the %i!ti ; &' 6hen the presi&ent of a !orporation is su:* poenae& to pro&u!e !ertain &o!u ents as proofs he is ,uilt" of ille,al re!ruit ent' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he :est answer is !) when he is or&ere& to pro&u!e a sa ple of his han&writin, to :e use& as e%i&en!e that he is the author of a letter wherein he a,ree& to Dill the %i!ti ' <n&er +rti!le @5H Se!tion 17 of the 1987 ConstitutionH Cno person shall :e !o pelle& to :e a witness a,ainst hi self'C Sin!e the pro%ision prohi:its !o pulsor" testi onial in!ri inationH it &oes not atter whether the testi on" is taDen :" oral or written eans as either wa" it in%ol%es the <S/ AF 5N3/77/C3<+7 F+C<735/S' 3he purpose of the pri%ile,e is to a%oi& an& prohi:it there:" the repetition an& re!urren!e of !o pellin, a personH in a !ri inal or an" other !aseH to furnish the issin, e%i&en!e ne!essar" for his !on%i!tion (9er u&e= %' CastilloH Per 1e!' No' 71#*+H >ul" 2)H 1937; 9eltran %' Sa sonH $'1' No' 32022H Septe :er 23H1929)'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he letter is ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e' 3he !onstitutional in;un!tion &e!larin, the pri%a!" of !o uni!ation an& !orrespon&en!e to :e in%iola:le is no less appli!a:le si pl" :e!ause it is the e plo"er who is the part" a,ainst who the !onstitutional pro%ision is to :e enfor!e&' 3he onl" e0!eption to the prohi:ition in the Constitution is if there is a lawful or&er fro the !ourt or when pu:li! safet" or or&er re?uires otherwiseH as pres!ri:e& :" law' +n" %iolation of this pro%ision ren&ers the e%i&en!e o:taine& ina& issi:le for an" purpose in an" pro!ee&in,' (.ulueta %' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No' 107383H Fe:ruar" 20H 199))

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re8 Pri0ate Indi0id3a'+ 9>$<"66@:


(2) / ilio ha& lon, suspe!te& that +l%inH his e plo"eeH ha& :een passin, tra&e se!rets to his !o petitorH 1an&"H :ut he ha& no

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 A'ien+ 9"66!:


No 5E * + is an alien' State whetherH in the PhilippinesH he: 5s entitle& to the ri,ht a,ainst

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?!

ille,al sear!hes an& sei=ures an& a,ainst ille,al arrests' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +liens are entitle& to the ri,ht a,ainst ille,al sear!hes an& sei=ures an& ille,al arrests' +s applie& in People %' Chua @o SanH 307 SC1+ #32 (1999)H these ri,hts are a%aila:le to all personsH in!lu&in, aliens' Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 Breat,a'y/er Te+t 9!##":
NoH 3; Con,ress is !onsi&erin, a law a,ainst &runDen &ri%in,' <n&er the le,islationH poli!e authorities a" asD an" &ri%er to taDe a C:reathal"=er testCH wherein the &ri%er e0hales se%eral ti es into a &e%i!e whi!h !an &eter ine whether he has :een &ri%in, un&er the influen!e of al!ohol' 3he results of the test !an :e use&H in an" le,al pro!ee&in, a,ainst hi ' Further oreH &e!larin, that the issuan!e of a &ri%erBs li!ense ,i%es rise onl" to a pri%ile,e to &ri%e otor %ehi!les on pu:li! roa&sH the law pro%i&es that a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the test shall :e auto ati!all" su:;e!t to a 90*&a" suspension of his &ri%erBs li!enseH

to sa%e the propose& law fro un!onstitutionall" on the ,roun& of &enial of &ue pro!essH it shoul& pro%i&e for an i e&iate hearin, upon suspension of the &ri%erBs li!ense' 3he propose& law %iolates the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=ures' 5t will authori=e poli!e authorities to stop an" &ri%er an& asD hi to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en in the a:sen!e of a pro:a:le !ause'

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 I11ediate C&ntr&' 9!#$%:


No' 555: CMC a Consta:ular" Affi!erH was arreste& pursuant to a lawful !ourt or&er in 9a,uio Cit" for ur&er' @e was :rou,ht to 8anila where a warrantless sear!h was !on&u!te& in his offi!ial ?uarters at Ca p Cra eH 3he sear!h tea foun& an& sei=e& the ur&er weapon in a &rawer of CMC' Can CMC !lai that the sear!h an& sei=ure were ille,al an& o%e for e0!lusion fro e%i&en!e of the weapon sei=e&L /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH CMC !an &o so' 3he warrantless sear!h !annot :e ;ustifie& as an in!i&ent of a %ali& arrestH :e!ause !onsi&era:le ti e ha& elapse& after his arrest in 9a,uio :efore the sear!h of his ?uarters in Ca p Cra eH (ue=on Cit" was a&eH an& :e!ause the &istan!e :etween the pla!e of arrest an& the pla!e of sear!h ne,ates an" !lai that the pla!e sear!he& is within his Ci e&iate !ontrolC so as to ;ustif" the apprehension that he i,ht &estro" or !on!eal e%i&en!e of !ri e :efore a warrant !an :e o:taine&' (Chi el %' CaliforniaH 392 <'S' 722 (19)9) ) in Nolas!o %' Cru= PanoH 1#7 SC1+ 209 (1987)H the Supre e Court re!onsi&ere& its pre%ious &e!ision hol&in, that a warrantless sear!hH a&e after 30 inutes fro the ti e of arrestH an&H in a pla!e se%eral :lo!Ds awa" fro the pla!e of arrestH was %ali&' 5t hel& that a warrantless sear!h is li ite& to the sear!h of the person of the arrestee at the ti e an& in!i&ent to his arrest an& for &an,erous weapons or an"thin, whi!h a" :e use& as proof of the offense' + !ontrar" rule woul& ;ustif" the poli!e in pro!urin, a warrant of arrest an&H :" %irtue thereofH not onl" arrest the person :ut also sear!h his &wellin,' + warrant re?uires that all fa!ts as to the !on&ition of the propert" an& its surroun&in,s an& its i pro%e ents an& !apa:ilities ust :e !onsi&ere&H an& this !an onl" :e &one in a ;u&i!ial pro!ee&in,'

Cite two P2Q possi:le !onstitutional o:;e!tions to this law' 1esol%e the o:;e!tions an& e0plain whether an" su!h infir ities !an :e !ure&' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Possi:le o:;e!tions to the law are that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe the :reathal"=er test will %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri inationH that pro%i&in, for the suspension of his &ri%erBs li!ense without an" hearin, %iolates &ue pro!essH an& that the propose& law will %iolate the ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=uresH :e!ause it allows poli!e authorities to re?uire a &ri%e to taDe the :reathal"=er test e%en if there is no pro:a:le !ause 1e?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a :reathal"=er test &oes not %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri inationH :e!ause he is not :ein, !o pelle& to ,i%e testi onial e%i&en!e' @e is erel" :ein, asDe& to su: it to a ph"si!al test' 3his is not !o%ere& :" the !onstitutional ,uarantee a,ainst self*in!ri ination' 3husH in South -aDota %s' Ne%illeH #29 <'S' 223H it was hel& for this reason that re?uirin, a &ri%er to taDe a :loo&*al!ohol test is %ali&' +s hel& in 8a!De" %s' +fontr"a ##3 <'S' 1H :e!ause of !o pellin, ,o%ern ent interest in safet" alon, the streetsH the li!ense of a &ri%er who refuses to taDe the :reathal"=er test a" :e suspen&e& i e&iatel" pen&in, a post* suspension hearin,H :ut there ust :e a pro%ision for a post*suspension hearin,' 3husH

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 In(identa' t& .a'id Sear(, 9!##6:


No' 9; So e poli!e operati%esH a!tin, un&er a lawfull" issue& warrant for the purpose of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?"

sear!hin, for firear s in the @ouse of M lo!ate& at No' 10 Shaw 9oule%ar&H Pasi,H 8etro 8anilaH foun&H instea& of firear sH ten Dilo,ra s of !o!aine'
(1) 8a" the sai& poli!e operati%es lawfull" sei=e the !o!aineL /0plain "our answer'

(2)

8a" M su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of the sear!h on the ,roun& that the pea!e offi!ers &i& not infor hi a:out his ri,ht to re ain silent an& his ri,ht to !ounselL /0plain "our answer'
Suppose the pea!e offi!ers were a:le to fin& unli!ense& firear s in the house in an a&;a!ent lotH that is' NoH 12 Shaw 9oule%ar&H whi!h is also owne& :" M' 8a" the" lawfull" sei=e the sai&

(3)

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin,s in <" Ge"tin %H EillarealH #2 Phil' 88) an& People %' S" >u!oH )# Phil' ))7H the unli!ense& firear s foun& in the house at 12 Shaw 9oule%ar& a" not :e lawfull" sei=e&H sin!e the" were not in!lu&e& in the &es!ription of the arti!les to :e sei=e& :" %irtue of the sear!h warrant' 3he sear!h warrant &es!ri:e& the arti!les to :e sei=e& as firear s in the house of M lo!ate& at 10 Shaw 9oule%ar&' Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 P'a(e &) Sear(, 9"66!: No M5 * +r e& with a sear!h an& sei=ure warrantH a tea of poli!e en le& :" 5nspe!tor 3rias entere& a !o poun& an& sear!he& the house &es!ri:e& therein as No' 17 SpeaDer Pere= St'H Sta' 8esa @ei,htsH (ue=on Cit"H owne& :" 8r' /rnani PeletsH for a reporte& !a!he of firear s an& a unition' @owe%erH upon thorou,h sear!h of the houseH the poli!e foun& nothin,'
3henH a!tin, on a hun!hH the poli!e en pro!ee&e& to a s aller house insi&e the sa e !o poun& with a&&ress at No' 17*+ SpeaDer Pere= St'H entere& itH an& !on&u!te& a sear!h therein o%er the o:;e!tion of 8r' Pelets who happene& to :e the sa e owner of the first house' 3hereH the poli!e foun& the unli!ense& firear s an& a unition the" were looDin, for' +s a result' 8r' /rnani Pelets was !ri inall" !har,e& in !ourt with 5lle,al possession of firear s an& a unition as penali=e& un&er P'-' 18))H as a en&e& :" 1+' 829#' +t the trialH he %ehe entl" o:;e!te& to the presentation of the e%i&en!e a,ainst hi for :ein, ina& issi:le' 5s 8r' / ani PeletBs !ontention %ali& or notL 6h"L (2N)

unli!ense& firear sL "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

/0plain

(1) OesH the poli!e operati%es a" lawfull" sei=e the !o!aineH :e!ause it is an ite whose possession is prohi:ite& :" lawH it was in plain %iew an& it was onl" ina&%ertentl" &is!o%ere& in the !ourse of a lawful sear!h' 3he possession of !o!aine is prohi:ite& :" Se!tion 8 of the -an,erous -ru,s +!t' +s hel& in 8a,on!ia %' Pala!ioH 80 Phil' 770H an arti!le whose possession is prohi:ite& :" law a" :e sei=e& without the nee& of an" sear!h warrant if it was &is!o%ere& &urin, a lawful sear!h' 3he a&&itional re?uire ent lai& &own in 1oan %' $on=alesH 1#2 SC1+ )87 that the &is!o%er" of the arti!le ust ha%e :een a&e ina&%ertentl" was also satisfie& in this !ase' (2) NoH M !annot su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of the sear!h si pl" :e!ause the pea!e offi!ers &i& not infor hi a:out his ri,ht to re ain silent an& his ri,ht to !ounsel' Se!tion 12(1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es: C+n" person un&er in%esti,ation for the !o ission of an offense shall ha%e the ri,ht to :e infor e& of his ri,ht to re ain silent an& to ha%e !o petent an& in&epen&ent !ounsel prefera:l" of his own !hoi!e'C

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ontention of /rnani Pelet is %ali&' +s hel& in People %s' Court of +ppealsH 291SC1+ #00 (1993)H if the pla!e sear!he& is &ifferent fro that state& in the sear!h warrantH the e%i&en!e sei=e& is ina& issi:le' 3he poli!e an !annot o&if" the pla!e to :e sear!he& as set out in the sear!h warrant'

+s hel& in People %' -"H 128 SC1+ 111' for this pro%ision to appl"H a suspe!t ust :e un&er in%esti,ation' 3here was no in%esti,ation in%ol%e& in this !ase'
(3) 3he unli!ense& firear s store& at 12 Shaw 9oule%ar& a" lawfull" :e sei=e& sin!e their possession is ille,al' +s hel& in 8a,on!ia a Pala!ioH 80 Phil' 770H when an in&i%i&ual possesses !ontra:an& (unli!ense& firear s :elon, to this !ate,or")H he is !o ittin, a !ri e an& he !an :e arreste& without a warrant an& the !ontra:an& !an :e sei=e&'

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 +ear(, 1ade by a *ri0ate (iti/en 9!##-:


No' #: 7arr" was an o%erni,ht ,uest in a otel' +fter he !he!De& out the followin, &a"H the !ha :er ai& foun& an atta!he !ase whi!h she sur ise& was left :ehin& :" 7arr"' She turne& it o%er to the ana,er whoH to &eter ine the na e an& a&&ress of the ownerH opene& the atta!he !ase an& saw pa!Da,es whi!h ha& a

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?-

pe!uliar s ell an& upon s?uee=in, felt liDe &rie& lea%es' @is !uriosit" arouse&H the ana,er a&e an openin, on one of the pa!Da,es an& tooD se%eral ,ra s of the !ontents thereof' @e tooD the pa!Da,es to the N95H an& in the presen!e of a,entsH opene& the pa!Da,esH the !ontents of whi!h upon la:orator" e0a inationH turne& out to :e ari;uana flowerin, topsH 7arr" was su:se?uentl" foun&H :rou,ht to the N95 Affi!e where he a& itte& ownership of the atta!he !ase an& the pa!Da,es' @e was a&e to si,n a re!eipt for the pa!Da,es' 7arr" was !har,e& in !ourt for possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s' @e was !on%i!te&' An appealH he now poses the followin, issues:

possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s was !on%i!te&' An appeal he !onten&s that *

an&

(1) 3he plasti! :a, an& its !ontents are ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e :ein, the pro&u!t of an ille,al sear!h an& sei=ure; (3N) an& (2) 3he re!eipt he si,ne& is also ina& issi:le as his ri,hts un&er !usto&ial in%esti,ation were not o:ser%e&' (2N) -e!i&e the !ase with reasons'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+' 3he plasti! :a, an& its !ontents are a& issi:le in e%i&en!eH sin!e it was not the National 9ureau of 5n%esti,ation :ut the :us !on&u!tor who opene& the :a, an& :rou,ht it to the National 9ureau of 5n%esti,ation' +s hel& 5n People %' 8artiH 193 SC1+ 27 (1991)H the !onstitutional ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!h an& sei=ure is a restraint upon the ,o%ern ent' 5t &oes not appl" so as to re?uire e0!lusion of e%i&en!e whi!h !a e into the possession of the $o%ern ent throu,h a sear!h a&e :" a pri%ate !iti=en'

3he pa!Da,es are ina& issi:le in e%i&en!e :ein, the pro&u!t of an ille,al sear!h an& sei=ure; ' 2) Neither is the re!eipt he si,ne& a& issi:leH his ri,hts un&er !usto&ial in%esti,ation not ha%in, :een o:ser%e&' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER: An the assu ption that the issues were ti el" raise& the answers are as follows:
1) 3he pa!Da,es are a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' 3he one who opene& the pa!Da,es was the ana,er of the otel without an" interferen!e of the a,ents of the National 9ureau of 5n%esti,ation' +s hel& in People %s' 8artiH 193 SC1+ 27H the !onstitutional ri,ht a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=ures refers to unwarrante& intrusion :" the ,o%ern ent an& &oes not operate as a restraint upon pri%ate in&i%i&uals'

1)

9'

5t is ina& issi:le''''

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 .a'id Warrant'e++ Sear(, 9"666:


a) Cra!D offi!ers of the +nti*Nar!oti!s <nit were assi,ne& on sur%eillan!e of the en%irons of a !e eter" where the sale an& use of &an,erous &ru,s are ra pant' + an with re&&ish an& ,lass" e"es was walDin, unstea&il" o%in, towar&s the :ut %eere& awa" when he sense& the presen!e of poli!e en' 3he" approa!he& hi H intro&u!e& the sel%es as poli!e offi!ers an& asDe& hi what he ha& !len!he& in his han&' +s he Dept u H the poli!e en prie& his han& open an& foun& a sa!het of sha:uH a &an,erous &ru,' +!!or&in,l" !har,e& in !ourtH the a!!use& o:;e!te& to the a& ission in e%i&en!e of the &an,erous &ru, :e!ause it was the result of an ille,al sear!h an& sei=ure' 1ule on the o:;e!tion' (3N)

2) 3he re!eipt is not a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' ''' Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 +ear(, 1ade by a *ri0ate (iti/en 9"66":
No E555' Ane &a" a passen,er :us !on&u!tor foun& a anBs han&:a, left in the :us' 6hen the !on&u!tor opene& the :a,H he foun& insi&e a !atlin, !ar& with the ownerBs na e (-ante $alan,) an& a&&ressH a few hun&re& peso :illsH an& a s all plasti! :a, !ontainin, a white pow&er" su:stan!e' @e :rou,ht the pow&er" su:stan!e to the National 9ureau of 5n%esti,ation for la:orator" e0a ination an& it was &eter ine& to :e etha pheta ine h"&ro!hlori&e or sha:uH a prohi:ite& &ru,' -ante $alan, was su:se?uentl" tra!e& an& foun& an& :rou,ht to the N95 Affi!e where he a& itte& ownership of the han&:a, an& its !ontents' 5n the !ourse of the interro,ation :" N95 a,entsH an& without the presen!e an& assistan!e of !ounselH $alan, was a&e to si,n a re!eipt for the plasti! :a, an& its sha:u !ontents' $alan, was !har,e& with ille,al

:) 6hat are the instan!es when warrantless sear!hes a" :e effe!te&L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: a) 3he o:;e!tion is not tena:le' 5n a!!or&an!e with 8analili %' Court of +ppealsH 280 SC1+ #00 (1997)' sin!e the a!!use& ha& re& e"es an& was walDin, unstea&il" an& the pla!e is a Dnown han,*out of &ru, a&&i!tsH the poli!e offi!ers ha& suffi!ient reason to stop the a!!use& an& to frisD hi ' Sin!e sha:u was a!tuall" foun& &urin, the in%esti,ationH it !oul& :e sei=e& without the nee& for a sear!h warrant'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?;

:) + warrantless sear!h a" :e effe!te& in the followin, !ases: a) Sear!hes in!i&ental to a lawful arrest: :) Sear!hes of o%in, %ehi!les; !) Sear!hes of prohi:ite& arti!les in plain %iew: &) /nfor!e ent of !usto s law; e) Consente& sear!hes; f) Stop an& frisD (People %' 8ona!oH 282 SC1+ 703 P1998Q);
,) 1outine sear!hes at :or&ers an& ports of entr" (<nite& States %' 1a se"H #31 <'S'

were foun& after a ore e0tensi%e sear!h of the %arious !o part ents of the !ar' +s hel& in Eal onte %s' -e EillaH 182 SC1+ ))2H for su!h a sear!h to :e %ali&H there ust :e a pro:a:le !ause' 5n this !aseH there was no pro:a:le !auseH as there was nothin, to in&i!ate that +ntonio ha& prohi:ite& &ru,s insi&e the !o part ents of his !ar' Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 Wai0er &) C&n+ent 9!#$#:
No' 7: Pursuin, reports that ,reat ?uantities of prohi:ite& &ru,s are :ein, s u,,le& at ni,htti e throu,h the shores of Ca%iteH the Southern 7u=on Co an& set up !he!Dpoints at the en& of the Ca%ite !oastal roa& to sear!h passin, otor %ehi!les' + 19*"ear ol& :o"H who finishe& fifth ,ra&eH while &ri%in,H was stoppe& :" the authorities at the !he!Dpoint' 6ithout an" o:;e!tion fro hi H his !ar was inspe!te&H an& the sear!h "iel&e& ari;uana lea%es hi&&en in the trunD !o part ent of the !ar' 3he prohi:ite& &ru, was pro ptl" sei=e&H an& the :o" was :rou,ht to the poli!e station for ?uestionin,' 6as the sear!h without warrant le,alL

)0) P1977Q); an&


h) Sear!hes of :usinesses in the e0er!ise of %isitorial powers to enfor!e poli!e re,ulations (New OorD %' 9ur,erH #82 <'S'

)91 (1987Q)'
Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 .i+3a' Sear(, 9!##":

No' 2: -urin, the re!ent ele!tionsH !he!Dpoints were set up to enfor!e the ele!tion perio& :an on firear s' -urin, one su!h routine sear!h one ni,htH while looDin, throu,h an open win&ow with a flashli,htH the poli!e saw firear s at the :a!Dseat of a !ar partiall" !o%ere& :" papers an& !lothes'
+ntonioH owner an& &ri%er of the !ar in ?uestionH was !har,e& for %iolation of the firear s :an' +re the firear s a& issi:le in e%i&en!e a,ainst hi L /0plain' 5fH upon further inspe!tion :" the poli!eH prohi:ite& &ru,s were foun& insi&e the %arious !o part ents of +ntonioBs !arH !an the &ru,s :e use& in e%i&en!e a,ainst +ntonio if he is prose!ute& for possession of prohi:ite& &ru,sL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the sear!h was not %ali&H :e!ause there was no pro:a:le !ause for !on&u!tin, the sear!h' +s hel& in +l e&a San!he= %s' <nite& StatesH #13 <'S' 2))H while a o%in, %ehi!le !an :e sear!he& without a warrantH there ust still :e pro:a:le !ause' 5n the !ase in ?uestionH there was nothin, to in&i!ate that ari;uana lea%es were hi&&en in the trunD of the !ar' 3he ere fa!t that the :o" &i& not o:;e!t to the inspe!tion of the !ar &oes not !onstitute !onsent to the sear!h' +s rule& in People %s' 9ur,osH 1## SC1+ 1H the failure to o:;e!t to a warrantless sear!h &oes not !onstitute !onsentH espe!iall" in the li,ht of the fa!t'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a) OesH the firear s are a& issi:le in e%i&en!eH :e!ause the" were %ali&l" sei=e&' 5n Eal onte %s' -e EillaH 178 SC1+ 211 an& 182 SC1+ ))2H the Supre e Court hel& that !he!Dpoints a" :e set up to aintain pea!e an& or&er for the :enefit of the pu:li! an& !he!Dpoints are a se!urit" easure a,ainst unauthori=e& firear s' Sin!e the sear!h whi!h resulte& in the &is!o%er" of the firear s was li ite& to a %isual sear!h of the !arH it was reasona:le' 9e!ause of the :an on firear sH the possession of the firear s was prohi:ite&' Sin!e the" were foun& in plain %iew in the !ourse of a lawful sear!hH in a!!or&an!e with the &e!ision in 8a,an!ia %s' Pala!ioH 80 Phil' 770H the" are a& issi:le in e%i&en!e' :) NoH the &ru,s !annot :e use& in e%i&en!e a,ainst +ntonio if he is prose!ute& for possession of prohi:ite& &ru,s' 3he &ru,s

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
Oes' 3he re?uire ent of pro:a:le !ause &iffers fro !ase to !ase' 5n this oneH sin!e the poli!e a,ents are !onfronte& with lar,e*s!ale s u,,lin, of prohi:ite& &ru,sH e0isten!e of whi!h is of pu:li! Dnowle&,eH the" !an set up !he!Dpoints at strate,i! pla!esH in the sa e wa" that of in a nei,h:orhoo& a !hil& is Di&nappe&H it is lawful to sear!h !ars an& %ehi!les lea%in, the nei,h:orhoo& or %illa,e: 3his situation is also si ilar to warrantless sear!hes of o%in, %ehi!les in !usto s areaH whi!h sear!hes ha%e :een uphel&' (Papa %s' 8a,oH 22 SC1+ 827 (19)8)' 3he rule is :ase& on pra!ti!al ne!essit"'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?@

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 Warrant'e++ Arre+t+ 9!##-:


No' 9: >ohann learne& that the poli!e were looDin, for hi in !onne!tion with the rape of an 18* "ear ol& ,irlH a nei,h:or' @e went to the poli!e station a weeD later an& presente& hi self to the &esD ser,eant' Coin!i&entall"' the rape %i!ti was in the pre ises e0e!utin, an e0tra;u&i!ial state ent' >ohannH alon, with si0 ()) other suspe!tsH were pla!e& in a poli!e line* up an& the ,irl pointe& to hi as the rapist' >ohann was arreste& an& lo!De& up in a !ell' >ohann was !har,e& with rape in !ourt :ut prior to arrai,n ent in%oDe& his ri,ht to preli inar" in%esti,ation' 3his was &enie& :" the ;u&,eH an& thusH trial pro!ee&e&' +fter the prose!ution presente& se%eral witnessesH >ohann throu,h !ounselH in%oDe& the ri,ht to :ail an& file& a otion thereforH whi!h was &enie& outri,ht :" the >u&,e' >ohann now files a petition for !ertiorari :efore the Court of +ppeals ar,uin, that: @is arrest was not in a!!or&an!e with law' -e!i&e'

e?uip ent' 3he warrant parti!ularl" &es!ri:es the ele!troni! e?uip ent an& spe!ifies the pro%isions of the 3ariff an& Custo s Co&e whi!h were %iolate& :" the i portation'

3he warrant was ser%e& an& i ple ente& in the afternoon of 2 >anuar" 1988 :" Custo s poli!e en who then sei=e& the &es!ri:e& e?uip ent' 3he in%entor" of the sei=e& arti!les was si,ne& :" the Se!retar" of the 3iDasan Corporation' 3he followin, &a"H a hearin, offi!er in the Affi!e of the Colle!tor of Custo s !on&u!te& a hearin, on the !onfis!ation of the e?uip ent'
3wo &a"s thereafterH the !orporation file& with the Supre e Court a petition for !ertiorariH prohi:ition an& an&a us to set asi&e the warrantH en;oin the Colle!tor an& his a,ents fro further pro!ee&in, with the forfeiture hearin, an& to se!ure the return of the !onfis!ate& e?uip entH alle,in, therein that the warrant issue& is null an& %oi& for the reason thatH pursuant to Se!tion 2 of +rti!le 555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH onl" a ;u&,e a" issue a sear!h warrant' 5n his !o ent to the petitionH the Colle!tor of Custo sH throu,h the Affi!e of the Soli!itor $eneralH !onten&s that he is authori=e& un&er the 3ariff an& Custo Co&e to or&er the sei=ure of the e?uip ent whose &uties an& ta0es were not pai& an& that the !orporation &i& not e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies' Shoul& the petition :e ,rante&L -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the warrantless arrest of >ohann was not in a!!or&an!e with law' +s hel& in $o %' Court of +ppealsH 20) SC1+ 138H his !ase &oes not fall un&er the 5nstan!es in 1ule 113H se!' 2 (a) of the 1982 1ules of Cri inal Pro!e&ure authori=in, warrantless arrests' 5t !annot :e !onsi&ere& a %ali& warrantless arrest :e!ause >ohann &i& not !o it a !ri e in the presen!e of the poli!e offi!ersH sin!e the" were not present when >ohann ha& alle,e&l" rape& his nei,h:or' Neither !an 5t :e !onsi&ere& an arrest un&er 1ule 113 se!' 2 (:) whi!h allows an arrest without a warrant to :e a&e when a !ri e has in fa!t ;ust :een !o itte& an& the person aDin, the arrest has personal Dnowle&,e offsets in&i!atin, that the person to :e arreste& !o itte& it' Sin!e >ohann was arreste& a weeD after the alle,e& rapeH it !annot :e &ee e& to :e a !ri e whi!h Chas ;ust :een !o itte&C' Nor &i& the poli!e offi!ers who arreste& hi ha%e personal Dnowle&,e of fa!ts in&i!atin, that >ohann rape& his nei,h:or'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he petition shoul& not :e ,rante&' <n&er Se!s' 2202 an& 2208 of the 3ariff an& Custo s Co&eH !usto s offi!ials are authori=e& to enter an" warehouseH not use& as &wellin,H for the purpose of sei=in, an" arti!le whi!h is su:;e!t to forfeiture' For this purpose the" nee& no warrant issue& :" a !ourt' +s state& in Ei&u"a %s' 9er&ia,oH 73 SC1+ 223' for !enturies the sei=ure of ,oo&s :" !usto s offi!ials to enfor!e the !usto s laws without nee& of a sear!h warrant has :een re!o,ni=e&'

Sear(,e+ and Sei/3re+8 Warrant+ &) Arre+t 9!##!:


No' 8: An the :asis of a %erifie& report an& !onfi&ential infor ation that %arious ele!troni! e?uip entH whi!h were ille,all" i porte& into the PhilippinesH were foun& in the :o&e,a of the 3iDasan Corporation lo!ate& at 1002 9inaDa"an St'H Ce:u Cit"H the Colle!tor of Custo s of Ce:u issue&H in the ornin, of 2 >anuar" 1988H a 6arrant of Sei=ure an& -etention a,ainst the !orporation for the sei=ure of the ele!troni!

ARTICLE I.

Citi/en+,i*
Pre+(ri*ti&n

A(ti&n )&r Can(e''ati&n8 B E))e(t &) Deat, 9!##;:

No' 7: * /n=oH a Chinese nationalH was ,rante& Philippine !iti=enship in a &e!ision ren&ere& :" the Court of First 5nstan!e of Pa pan,a on >anuar" 10H 192)' @e tooD his oath of offi!e on >une 2H 1929' 5n 1970H the Soli!itor $eneral file& a petition to !an!el his !iti=enship on the ,roun& that in >ul" 19)9 the Court of 3a0 +ppeals foun& that /n=o ha& !heate& the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

??

,o%ern ent of in!o e ta0es for the "ears 192) to 1929' Sai& &e!ision of the 3a0 Court was affir e& :" the Supre e Court in 19)9' 9etween 19)0 an& 1970H /n=o ha& a!?uire& su:stantial real propert" 5n the PhilippinesH

(2) 6hether or not Fer&ieBs a!t of filin, his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" !onstitutes wai%er of his status as a per anent resi&ent of the

(1) @as the a!tion for !an!ellation of /n=oBs !iti=enship pres!ri:e&L


(2) Can /n=o asD for the &enial of the petition on the ,roun& that he ha& a%aile& of the 3a0 + nest" for his ta0 lia:ilitiesL (3) 6hat is the effe!t on the petition for

!an!ellation of /n=oBs !iti=enship if /n=o &ie& &urin, the pen&en!" of the hearin, on sai& petitionL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) NoH the a!tion has not pres!ri:e&' +s hel& in 1epu:li! %s' 7i OaoH 21# SC1+ 7#8H a !ertifi!ate of naturali=alion a" :e !an!elle& at an" ti e if it was frau&ulentl" o:taine& :" islea&in, the !ourt re,ar&in, the oral !hara!ter of the petitioner'
2) NoH /n=o !annot asD for the &enial of the petition for the !an!ellation of his !ertifi!ate of naturali=ation on the ,roun& that he ha& a%aile& of the ta0 a nest"' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in 1epu:li! %s' 7i OaoH 22# SC1+ 7#8H the ta0 a nest" erel" re o%e& all the !i%ilH !ri inal an& a& inistrati%e lia:ilities of /n=o' 5t &i& not o:literate his la!D of ,oo& oral !hara!ter an& irreproa!ha:le !on&u!t' 3) An the assu ption that he left a fa il"H the &eath of /n=o &oes not ren&er the petition for the !an!ellation of his !ertifi!ate of naturali=ation oot' +s hel& in 1epu:li! %s' 7i OaoH 22# SC1+ 7#8H the out!o e of the !ase will affe!t his wife an& !hil&ren'

<nite& States' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) +!!or&in, to the rulin, in Coast %s' Court of +ppealsH 191 SC1+ 229H a ,reen !ar& is proof that the hol&er is a per anent resi&ent of the <nite& StatesH for it i&entifies the hol&er as a resi&ent of the <nite& States an& states that the hol&er is entitle& to resi&e per anentl" an& worD in the <nite& States'
2) 3he filin, of a !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" &oes not !onstitute a wai%er of the status of the hol&er of a ,reen !ar& as a per anent resi&ent of the <nite& States' +s hel& in Coast %s' Court of +ppealsH 191 SC1+229H the wai%er shoul& :e anifeste& :" an a!t in&epen&ent of an& prior to the filin, of his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"'

D3a' A''egian(e 0+= D3a' Citi/en+,i* 9!#$%: No' E555: C+C was :orn in 1921 in the <nite& States of a Chinese father an& a Filipina other' <n&er Chinese lawsH C+BsC other auto ati!all" :e!a e a Chinese national :" her arria,e'
5n 1973H upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"H C+C ele!te& to a!?uire Philippine !iti=enship' @owe%erH C+C !ontinue& to resi&e in California an& to !arr" an + eri!an passport' @e also pai& alle,ian!e to the 3aipei ,o%ern ent' 5n the 1987 Philippine National ele!tionsH he was ele!te& Senator' @is opponent o%e& to &is?ualif" hi on the ,roun&s:

a) 3hat he was not a natural :orn !iti=en; an&


:) 3hat he ha& C&ual alle,ian!eC not onl" to

Citi/en+,i*8 E'e(ted O))i(ia' 9!##-:


No' 7: Fer&ie i i,rate& to the <nite& States in the 1980s' 3hereafterH he %isite& his ho etownH 8aDaho"H e%er" other "ear &urin, town fiestas' 5n >anuar" 1993' Fer&ie !a e ho e an& file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for 8a"or of 8aDaho"' @e won in the ele!tions' >oeH the &efeate& !an&i&ateH learne& that Fer&ie is a ,reen!ar& hol&er whi!h on its fa!e i&entifies Fer&ie as a Cresi&ent alienC an& on the :a!D thereof is !learl" printe&: CPerson i&entifie& :" this !ar& is entitle& to resi&e per anentl" an& worD in the <nite& States'C >oe file& a !ase to &is?ualif" Fer&ie fro assu in, the a"orship of 8aDa*ho"'

the <nite& States :ut also to the 1epu:li! of China' -e!i&e' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he ele!toral !ontest ust :e &is isse&'
(a) C+C is a natural :orn !iti=en' +rt' 5EH Se!' 2 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that Cthose who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship in a!!or&an!e with para,raph (3)H Se!' 1 hereof shall :e &ee e& natural :orn !iti=ens'C 3he purpose of this pro%ision is to e?uali=e the status of those who ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship :efore an& those who &i& so after >anuar" 17H 1973 when the pre%ious Constitution tooD effe!t' (:) 3he C-<+7 +77/$5+NC/C &e!lare& ini i!al to national interest in +rt' 5EH Se!' 2 refers to the &ual alle,ian!e of so e su!h as naturali=e& Filipino !iti=ens ( ostl" Chinese) who aintain alle,ian!e to Nationalist China as

(uestions: (1) 6hether or not a ,reen !ar& is proof that the hol&er is a per anent resi&ent of the <nite& States'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?%

shown in so e !ases :" their e :ership in the le,islati%e Ouan after their naturali=ation as !iti=ens of the Philippines' 3he prohi:ition &oes not appl" in situations :rou,ht a:out :" &ual !iti=enshipH su!h as the one in%ol%e& in the pro:le ' 5n&ee&H a Filipino wo an !an ha%e &ual alle,ian!e resultin, fro her arria,e to a forei,ner un&er Se!' #H so lon, as she &oes not &o or o it to &o an a!t a ountin, to renun!iation un&er Co onwealth +!t' No' )3H Se!' 1(2)' <n&er this lawH e0press renun!iation is &ifferent fro an a!t of alle,ian!e to a forei,n power as a ,roun& for loss of Philippine !iti=enship' 8oreo%erH what !onstitutes C&ual alle,ian!eC ini i!al to national interest is an& what the san!tions for su!h &ual alle,ian!e will :eH will still ha%e to :e &efine& :" law pen&in, a&option of su!h le,islationH o:;e!tion :ase& on &ual alle,ian!e will :e pre ature'

of the Philippines (+rt' 5EH se!' 1(3))' <n&er +rt' 5EH se!H 2 he is also &ee e& a natural* :orn !iti=en'
2' 3he Constitution re?uiresH a on, other thin,sH that a !an&i&ate for e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es ust :e at least 22 "ears of a,e Con the &a" of the ele!tion'C (+rt' E5H se!' ))' +s 9rown was :orn on 8a" 12H 19)2H he &i& not :e!o e 22 "ears ol& until 8a" 12H 1987' @en!e on 8a" 11H 1987H when the ele!tion was hel&H he was # &a"s short of the re?uire& a,e' 3' 3he Constitution pro%i&es that those who seeD either to !han,e their !iti=enship or to a!?uire the status of an i i,rant of another !ountr" C&urin, their tenureC shall :e &ealt with :" law (+rt' M5H se!' 17)' 3he pro%ision !annot appl" to 9rown for the followin, reasons: FirstH 9rown is in a&&ition an + eri!an !iti=en an& thus has a &ual !iti=enship whi!h is allowe& :" the Constitution' (Cf' +rt' 5EH se!' #)H Se!on&H 9rown &i& not seeD to a!?uire the status of an i i,rantH :ut is an + eri!an :" :irth un&er the prin!iple of ;us soli o:tainin, in the <nite& States' 3hir&H he &i& not seeD to !han,e his status &urin, his tenure as a pu:li! offi!er' FourthH the pro%ision of +rt' M5H se!' 17 is not self*e0e!utin, :ut re?uires an i ple entin, law' FifthH :ut a:o%e allH the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal has no ;uris&i!tion to &e!i&e this ?uestion sin!e it &oes not !on!ern the ?ualifi!ation of a e :er*ele!t'

D3a' A''egian(e 0+= D3a' Citi/en+,i* 9!#$$:


No' 13: 1o:ert 9rown was :orn in @awaii on 8a" 12H 19)2H of an + eri!an father an& a Filipina other' An 8a" 1)H 1983 while hol&in, an + eri!an passportH he re,istere& as a Filipino with the Philippine Consulate at @onoluluH @awaii' 5n Septe :erH 1983 he returne& to the PhilippinesH an& tooD up resi&en!e at 9oa!H 8arin&u?ueH ho etown of his other' @e re,istere& as a %oterH %ote&H an& e%en parti!ipate& as a lea&er of one of the !an&i&ates in that &istri!t in the 198# 9atasan ele!tions' 5n the ele!tions of 1987H he ran for Con,ress anH an& won' @is sole opponent is now ?uestionin, his ?ualifi!ations an& is tr"in, to oust hi on two :asi! !lai s:

D3a' Citi/en+,i* 9!##;:


No' 8: 5n 1989H .en" 1e"es arrie& 9en 3ulo,H a national of the State of Gon,o' <n&er the laws of Gon,oH an alien wo an arr"in, a Gon,o national auto ati!all" a!?uires Gon,o !iti=enship' +fter her arria,eH .en" resi&e& in Gon,o an& a!?uire& a Gon,o passport' 5n 1991H .en" returne& to the Philippines to run for $o%ernor of Sorso,on'

(1) @e is not a natural :orn Filipino !iti=enH :ut is in fa!tH an + eri!anH :orn in @awaiiH an inte,ral portion of the <'S'+'H who hol&s an + eri!an passport; (2) @e &i& not eet the a,e re?uire ent; an& (3) @e has a C,reen !ar&C fro the <'S' $o%ern ent' +ssu e that "ou are a e :er of the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal where the petition for 9rownBs ouster is pen&in,' @ow woul& "ou &e!i&e the three issues raise& a,ainst hi L SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he first an& thir& ,roun&s ha%e no erit' 9ut the se!on& is well taDen an&H thereforeH 9rown shoul& :e &is?ualifie&'
1' 1o:ert 9rown is a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines' + person :orn of a Filipino other an& an alien father :efore >anuar" 17H 1973H who thereafter upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" ele!t Philippine !iti=enshipH is a !iti=en

(1) 6as .en" ?ualifie& to run for $o%ernorL


(2) Suppose instea& of enterin, politi!s' .en" ;ust ,ot herself ele!te& as %i!e*presi&ent of the Philippine 9ulletinH a lo!al newspaper' 6as she ?ualifie& to hol& that positionL

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) <n&er Se!tion #H +rti!le 5E of the Constitution' .en" retaine& her Filipino !iti=enship' Sin!e she also :e!a e a !iti=en of Gon,oH she possesses &ual !iti=enship' Pursuant to Se!tion #0 (&) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH she is &is?ualifie& to run for ,o%ernor' 5n a&&itionH if .en" returne& to the PhilippinesH less than a "ear i e&iatel" :efore

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?$

the &a" of the ele!tionH .en" is not ?ualifie& to run for $o%ernor of Sorso,on' <n&er Se!tion 39(a) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH a !an&i&ate for ,o%ernor ust :e a resi&ent in the pro%in!e where he inten&s to run at least one (1) "ear i e&iatel" pre!e&in, the &a" of the ele!tion' 9" resi&in, in Gon,o upon her arria,e in 1989H .en" a:an&one& her resi&en!e in the Philippines'

not ?ualif" to parti!ipate in the ana,e ent of the 9ulletin as Ei!e*Presi&ent thereof' E))e(t &) Marriage8 i'i*in& 9!#$#:
NoH 2: (1) 7il" 3eh arri%e& in 8anila on one of her re,ular tours to the Philippines fro 3aipeh' She et Peter $oH a naturali=e& Filipino !iti=en' +fter a whirlwin& !ourtshipH 7il" an& Peter were arrie& at the San +,ustin Chur!h' + weeD after the we&&in,H 7il" 3eh petitione& in a& inistrati%e pro!ee&in,s :efore i i,ration authorities to &e!lare her a Filipino !iti=en statin, that she ha& none of the &is?ualifi!ations pro%i&e& in the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation 7aw' 3he ;ilte& Filipino ,irlfrien& of Peter $o oppose& the petition !lai in, that 7il" 3eh was still a inor who ha& not e%en !ele:rate& her 21st :irth&a"H who ne%er resi&e& in the Philippines e0!ept &urin, her one*weeD %isit as tourist fro 3aipeh &urin, the Chinese New OearH who spoDe onl" ChineseH an& who ha& ra&i!al i&eas liDe& a&%o!atin, unifi!ation of 3aiwan with ainlan& China' 7il" 3ehH howe%erH swore that she was renoun!in, her Chinese alle,ian!e an& while she Dnew no Filipino !usto s an& tra&itions as "etH she e%in!e& a sin!ere &esire to learn an& e :ra!e the ' 6oul& 7il" 3eh su!!ee& in :e!o in, a Filipino !iti=en throu,h her arria,e to Peter $oL /0plain'

3his is in a!!or&an!e with the &e!ision in Caasi %s' Court of +ppealsH 191 SC1+ 229' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
No' .en" was not ?ualifie& to run for $o%ernor' <n&er the ConstitutionH C!iti=ens of the Philippines who arr" aliens shall retain their !iti=enshipH unless :" their a!t or o ission the" are &ee e&H un&er the law to ha%e renoun!e& it'C (Se!' #H +rt' 5EH Constitution)' @er resi&in, in Gon,o an& a!?uirin, a Gon,o passport are in&i!ati%e of her renun!iation of Philippine !iti=enshipH whi!h is a ,roun& for loss of her !iti=enship whi!h she was suppose& to ha%e retaine&' 6hen she ran for $o%ernor of Sorso,onH .en" was no lon,er a Philippine !iti=en an&H hen!eH was &is?ualifie& for sai& position' 2) +lthou,h un&er Se!tion 11(1)H +rti!le ME5 of the ConstitutionH ass e&ia ust :e wholl" owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens an& un&er Se!tion 2 of the +nti*-u " 7aw aliens a" not inter%ene in the ana,e ent of an" nationali=e& :usiness a!ti%it"' .en" a" :e ele!te& %i!e presi&ent of the Philippine 9ulletinH :e!ause she has re aine& a Filipino !iti=en' <n&er Se!tion #H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH Filipino !iti=ens who arr" aliens retains their !iti=enship unless :" their a!t or o ission the" are &ee e&H un&er the lawH to ha%e renoun!e& it' 3he a!ts or o ission whi!h will result in loss of !iti=enship are enu erate& in Co onwealth +!t NoH )3' .en" is not ,uilt" of an" of the ' +s hel& in GawaDita %s' <nite& StatesH 3#3 <'S' 717H a person who possesses &ual !iti=enship liDe .en" a" e0er!ise ri,hts of !iti=enship in :oth !ountries an& the use of a passport pertainin, to one !ountr" &oes not result in loss of !iti=enship in the other !ountr"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH 7il" 3eh ipso fa!to :e!a e a Philippine !iti=en upon her arria,e to Peter $oH who is a Philippine !iti=enH pro%i&e& she possesses none of the &is?ualifi!ations lai& &own in Se!tion # of the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation 7aw' +!!or&in, to to the rulin, in 8o" Oa 7i Oao %s' Co issioner of 5 i,rationH #1 SC1+ 292H an alien wo an who arries a Filipino hus:an& ipso fa!to :e!o es a Filipino !iti=en without ha%in, to possess an" of the ?ualifi!ations pres!ri:e& in Se!tion 2 of the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation 7aw pro%i&e& she possesses none of the &is?ualifi!ations set forth in Se!tion # of the sa e law' +ll of the ,roun&s in%oDe& :" the for er ,irlfrien& of Peter $o for opposin, the petition of 7il" 3ehH e0!ept for the last oneH are ?ualifi!ationsH whi!h 7il" 3eh nee& not possess' 3he fa!t that 7il" 3eh is a&%o!atin, the unifi!ation of 3aiwan with ainlan& China is not a ,roun& for &is?ualifi!ation un&er Se!tion # of the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation 7aw'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
NeitherH was .en" ?ualifie& to hol& the position of %i!e*presi&ent of Philippine 9ulletin' <n&er the ConstitutionH Cthe ownership an& ana,e ent of ass e&ia shall :e li ite& to !iti=ensH of the PhilippinesH or to !orporationH !ooperati%es or asso!iations wholl" owne& an& ana,e& :" su!h !iti=ensC (Se!tion M5 P1QH +rt' ME5)H 9ein, a non*Philippine !iti=enH .en" !an

E))e(t &) Oat, &) A''egian(e 9"66;: (#*a) 3C+H a Filipina e&i!al te!hnolo,istH left in 1972 to worD in .A. State' 5n 1988 she arrie& A-@H a !iti=en of .A.' Pursuant to .A.Bs lawH :" taDin, an oath of alle,ian!eH she

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

?#

a!?uire& her hus:an&Bs !iti=enship' A-@ &ie& in 2001H lea%in, her finan!iall" se!ure&' She returne& ho e in 2002H an& sou,ht ele!ti%e offi!e in 200# :" runnin, for 8a"or of +PPH her ho etown' @er opponent sou,ht to ha%e her &is?ualifie& :e!ause of her .A. !iti=enship' She replie& that althou,h she a!?uire& .A.Bs !iti=enship :e!ause of arria,eH she &i& not lose her Filipino !iti=enship' 9oth her parentsH she sai&H are Filipino !iti=ens' 5s 3C+ ?ualifie& to run for 8a"orL (2N)

E))e(t &) Re*atriati&n 9"66":


No 5 * + was :orn in the Philippines of Filipino parents' 6hen artial law was &e!lare& in the Philippines on Septe :er 21H 1972H he went to the <nite& States an& was naturali=e& as an + eri!an !iti=en' +fter the /-S+ 1e%olutionH he !a e ho e to the Philippines an& later on rea!?uire& Philippine !iti=enship :" repatriation' Suppose in the 8a" 200# ele!tions he is ele!te& 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& a !ase is file& seeDin, his &is?ualifi!ation on the ,roun& that he is not a natural*:orn !iti=en of the PhilippinesH how shoul& the !ase a,ainst hi :e &e!i&e&L /0plain "our answer' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
An the assu ption that 3C+ tooD an oath of alle,ian!e to .A. to a!?uire the !iti=enship of her hus:an&H she is not ?ualifie& to run for a"or' She &i& not :e!o e a !iti=en of .A. erel" :" %irtue of her arria,eH she also tooD an oath of alle,ian!e to .A.' 9" this a!tH she lost her Philippine !iti=enship' (Se!tion 1 P3QH Co onwealth +!t No' )3')

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ase shoul& :e &e!i&e& in fa%or of +' +s hel& 5n Bengson /. @o*se o) Represen+a+i/es :'ec+ora' Trib*na'H 327 SC1+ 2#2 (2001)H repatriation results in the re!o%er" of the ori,inal nationalit"' Sin!e + was a natural*:orn Filipino !iti=en :efore he :e!a e a naturali=e& + eri!an !iti=enH he was restore& to his for er status as a natural*:orn Filipino when he repatriate&'

E))e(t &) Re*atriati&n 9!###:


No 555 * 9' >ulio @ortal was :orn of Filipino parents' <pon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"H he :e!a e a naturali=e& !iti=en in another !ountr"' 7aterH he rea!?uire& Philippine !iti=enship' Coul& @ortal re,ain his status as natural :orn Filipino !iti=enL 6oul& "our answer :e the sa e whether he rea!?uires his Filipino* !iti=enship :" repatriation or :" a!t of Con,ressL /0plain' (3N)

E))e(t &) Re*atriati&n 9"66-:


No 5E * >uan Cru= was :orn of Filipino parents in 19)0 in Pa pan,a' 5n 1982H he enliste& in the <'S' 8arine Corps an& tooD an oath of alle,ian!e to the <nite& States of + eri!a' 5n 1990H he was naturali=e& as an + eri!an !iti=en' 5n 199#H he was repatriate& un&er 1epu:li! +!t No' 2#30' -urin, the 1998 National /le!tionsH he ran for an& was ele!te& representati%e of the First -istri!t of Pa pan,a where he resi&e& sin!e his repatriation' 6as he ?ualifie& to run for the positionL /0plain'

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


>ulian 8ortal !an re,ain his status as a natural :orn !iti=en :" repatriatin,' Sin!e repatriation in%ol%es restoration of a person to !iti=enship pre%iousl" lost :" e0patriation an& >ulian 8ortal was pre%iousl" a natural :orn !iti=enH in !ase he repatriates he will :e restore& to his status as a natural :orn !iti=en' 5f he rea!?uire& his !iti=enship :" an a!t of Con,ressH >ulian @ortal will not :e a natural :orn !iti=enH sin!e he rea!?uire& his !iti=enship :" le,islati%e naturali=ation'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Cru= was ?ualifie& to run as representati%e of the First -istri!t of Pa pan,a' Sin!e his parents were Filipino !iti=ensH he was a natural* :orn !iti=en' +lthou,h he :e!a e a naturali=e& + eri!an !iti=enH un&er the rulin, in 9en,son %' @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal' 327 SC1+ 2#2 P2001QH :" %irtue of his repatriationH Cru= was restore& to his ori,inal status as a natural*:orn Filipino !iti=en'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


>ulian @ortal !annot re,ain his status as a natural :orn !iti=en :" repatriatin,' @e ha& to perfor an a!t to a!?uire his !iti=enshipH i'e'H repatriation' <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH natural :orn !iti=ens are those who are !iti=ens fro :irth without ha%in, to perfor an a!t to a!?uire or perfe!t their !iti=enship' 5f he rea!?uire& his !iti=enship :" an a!t of Con,ressH >ulian @ortal will not :e a natural :orn !iti=en sin!e he rea!?uire& his !iti=enship :" le,islati%e naturali=ation'

E))e(t+ &) Marriage+ 9!###: No 555* 6hat are the effe!ts of arria,es of: 1' a !iti=en to an alien; (1N) 2' an alien to a !iti=en; on their spouses an& !hil&renL -is!uss' (1N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1') +!!or&in, to Se!tion #H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH Filipino !iti=ens who arr" aliens retain their !iti=enshipH unless :" their a!t or

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%6

o ission the" are &ee e&H un&er the lawH to ha%e renoun!e& it'
2) +!!or&in, to 8o Oa 7i Oao %' Co issioner of 5 i,rationH #1 SC1+ 292H un&er Se!tion 12 of the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation 7awH a forei,n wo an who arries a Filipino !iti=en :e!o es a Filipino !iti=en pro%i&e& she possesses none of the &is?ualifi!ations for naturali=ation' + forei,n an who arries a Filipino !iti=en &oes not a!?uire Philippine !iti=enship' @owe%erH un&er Se!tion 3 of the 1e%ise& Naturali=ation +!tH in su!h a !ase the resi&en!e re?uire ent for naturali=ation will :e re&u!e& fro ten (10) to fi%e (2) "ears' <n&er Se!tion 1(2)H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH the !hil&ren of an alien an& a Filipino !iti=en are !iti=ens of the Philippines'

E'e(ted O))i(ia' 9!##": No' 1): /&win Ni!asioH :orn in the Philippines of Filipino parents an& raise& in the pro%in!e of Nue%a /!i;aH ran for $o%ernor of his ho e pro%in!e' @e won an& he was sworn into offi!e' 5t was re!entl" re%eale&H howe%erH that Ni!asio is a naturali=e& + eri!an !iti=en'
a) -oes he still possess Philippine !iti=enshipL :) 5f the se!on&*pla!er in the ,u:ernatorial ele!tions files a ?uo warranto suit a,ainst Ni!asio an& he is foun& to :e &is?ualifie& fro offi!eH !an the se!on&*pla!er :e sworn into offi!e as ,o%ernorL !) 5fH instea&H Ni!asio ha& :een :orn (of the sa e set of parents) in the <nite& States an& he there:" a!?uire& + eri!an !iti=enship :" :irthH woul& "our answer :e

E))e(t+ &) P,i'i**ine Bi'' &) !#6" 9"66!:


No 5 * Fro ainlan& China where he was :orn of Chinese parentsH 8r N"a 3sa Chan i,rate& to the Philippines in 189#' +s of +pril 11H 1899H he was alrea&" a per anent resi&ent of the Philippine 5slan&s an& !ontinue& to resi&e in this !ountr" until his &eath' -urin, his lifeti e an& when he was alrea&" in the PhilippinesH 8r' N"a 3sa Chan arrie& Charin,H a FilipinaH with who he :e,ot one sonH @ap ChanH who was :orn on A!to:er 18' 1897' @ap Chan ,ot arrie& also to Ni faH a FilipinaH an& one of their !hil&ren was 7a!?ui Chan who was :orn on Septe :er 27H 193)' 7a!?ui Chan finishe& the !ourse 9a!helor of S!ien!e in Co er!e an& e%entuall" en,a,e& in :usiness' 5n the 8a" 1989 ele!tionH 7a!?ui Chan ran for an& was ele!te& 1epresentati%e (Con,ress an)' @is ri%al !an&i&ateH 1a on -eloriaH file& a ?uo warranto or &is?ualifi!ation !ase a,ainst hi on the ,roun& that he was not a Filipino !iti=en' 5t was pointe& out in parti!ularH that 7a!?ui Chan &i& not ele!t Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of 21'

&ifferentL SUGGESTED ANSWER: a) NoH Ni!asio no lon,er possesses Philippine !iti=enship' +s hel& in Fri%al&o %s' CA8/7/CH 17# SC1+ 2#2H :" :e!o in, a naturali=e& + eri!an !iti=enH Ni!asio lost his Philippine !iti=enship' <n&er Se!tion 1(1) of Co onwealth +!t No' )3H Philippine !iti=enship is lost :" naturali=ation in a forei,n !ountr"H :) 2n& pla!er !anFt :e sworn to offi!e'''

!) 5f Ni!asio was :orn in the <nite& StatesH he woul& still :e a !iti=en of the PhilippinesH sin!e his parents are Filipinos' <n&er Se!tion 1(2)H those whose fathers or others are !iti=ens of the Philippines are !iti=ens of the Philippines' Ni!asio woul& possess &ual !iti=enshipH sin!e un&er + eri!an 7aw persons :orn in the <nite& States are + eri!an !iti=ens' +s hel& in +=nor %s' CA8/7/C' 182 SC1+ 703H a person who possesses :oth Philippine an& + eri!an !iti=enship is still a Filipino an& &oes not lose his Philippine !iti=enship unless he renoun!es it'

-e!i&e whether 8r' 7a!?ui Chan suffers fro &is?ualifi!ation or not' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:

E'e(ting P,i'i**ine Citi/en+,i* 9>$<"66?:


1' +tt"' / il" $oH a le,iti ate &au,hter of a Chinese father an& a Filipino otherH was :orn in 19#2' +t 21H she ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship an& stu&ie& law' She passe& the :ar e0a inations an& en,a,e& in pri%ate pra!ti!e for an" "ears' 3he >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il no inate& her as a !an&i&ate for the position of +sso!iate >usti!e of the Supre e Court' 9ut her no ination is :ein, !onteste& :" +tt"' >uris CastilloH also an aspirant to the position' She

7a!?ui Chan is a Filipino !iti=en an& nee& not ele!t Philippine !iti=enship' @is fatherH @ap ChanH was a Spanish su:;e!tH was resi&in, in the Philippines on +pril 11H 1899H an& !ontinue& to resi&e in the Philippines' 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!tion # of the Philippine 9ill of 1902H he was a Filipino !iti=en' @en!eH in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 1(3T of the 1932 ConstitutionH 7a!?ui Chan is a natural :orn Filipino !iti=enH sin!e his father was a Filipino !iti=en'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%!

!lai s that +tt"' / il" $o is not a natural* :orn !iti=enH hen!eH not ?ualifie& to :e appointe& to the Supre e Court' 5s this !ontention !orre!tL (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ontention is not !orre!t' <n&er +rti!le 5EH Se!tion 1(3) of the 1987 ConstitutionH it is pro%i&e& that those :orn :efore >anuar" 17H 1973 of Filipino othersH who ele!t Philippine Citi=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" are Filipino !iti=ens' +tt"' / il" $o was :orn of a Filipino other in 19#2 an& ele!te& !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of 21' She is a natural :orn Filipino !iti=en as pro%i&e& :" +rti!le 5EH Se!tion 2 of the Constitution R C0 0 0 those who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship in a!!or&an!e with para,raph (3)H Se!tion 1 hereof shall :e &ee e& natural*:orn !iti=ens'C @en!e she is ?ualifie& to :e appointe& to the Supre e Court' E'e(ting 2' P,i'i**ine Citi/en+,i*8 W,en

NoH 2: (2) + !hil& was :orn to a >apanese father an& a Filipina other' 6oul& he :e eli,i:le to run for the position of 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es upon rea!hin, twent"*fi%e "ears of a,eL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !hil& !an run for the @ouse of 1epresentati%es pro%i&e& upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" he ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship' <n&er Se!tion )H +rti!le E5 of the 1987 ConstitutionH to ?ualif" to :e a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH one ust :e a natural*:orn Philippine !iti=en' +!!or&in, to Se!tion 1 (3)H +rti!le 5E of the 1987 ConstitutionH !hil&ren :orn :efore >anuar" 17H 1973 of Filipino othersH who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" are Philippine !iti=ens' Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5E of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es: C3hose who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship in a!!or&an!e with para,raph (3)H Se!tion 1 hereof shall :e &ee e& natural*:orn !iti=ens'C An the other han&H if the !hil& was :orn after >anuar" 17H 1973H he woul& :e !onsi&ere& a natural :orn !iti=en without nee& of ele!tion pursuant to +rt' 5EH Se!' 1(2)'

Pr&*er 9>$<"66?:
+tt"' 1i!har& Chua was :orn in 19)#' @e is a le,iti ate son of a Chinese father an& a Filipino other' @is father :e!a e a naturali=e& Filipino !iti=en when +tt"' Chua was still a inor' /%entuall"H he stu&ie& law an& was allowe& :" the Supre e Court to taDe the :ar e0a inationsH su:;e!t to his su: ission to the Supre e Court proof of his Philippine !iti=enship' +lthou,h he ne%er !o plie& with su!h re?uire entH +tt"' Chua pra!ti!e& law for an" "ears until one Noel /u,enio file& with the Supre e Court a !o plaint for &is:ar ent a,ainst hi on the ,roun& that he is not a Filipino !iti=en' @e then file& with the 9ureau of 5 i,ration an affi&a%it ele!tin, Philippine !iti=enship' Noel !onteste& it

Nat3ra' B&rn i'i*in& 9!##$:


No 5E * +n&res +n, was :orn of a Chinese father an& a Filipino other in Sorso,onH Sorso,on' An >anuar" 20H 1973H in 1988H his father was naturali=e& as a Filipino !iti=en' An 8a" 11H 1998H +n&res +n, was ele!te& 1epresentati%e of the First -istri!t of Sorso,on' >uan 9onto who re!ei%e& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otesH file& a petition for (uo 6arranto a,ainst +n,' 3he petition was file& with the @ouse of 1epresentati%e /le!toral 3ri:unal (@1/3)' 9onto !onten&s that +n, is not a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines an& therefore is &is?ualifie& to :e a e :er of the @ouse'

!lai in, it was file& an" "ears after +tt"' Chua rea!he& the a,e of a;orit"' 6ill +tt"' Chua :e &is:arre&L /0plain' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH +tt"' Chua will not :e &is:arre&' +tt"' Chua is alrea&" a Filipino !iti=en an& there was no nee& for hi to file the affi&a%it ele!tin, Filipino !iti=enship' +n ele!tion of Philippine !iti=enship presupposes that the person ele!tin, is an alien' @is fatherH howe%erH alrea&" :e!a e a Filipino !iti=en when +tt"' Chua was still a inor an& thusH he was alrea&" a Filipino :e* fore the a,e of a;orit" (Co %' @1/3H $'1' Nos' 92191*92H >ul" 30H1991)'

3he @1/3 rule& in fa%or of +n,' 9onto file& a petition for !ertiorari in the Supre e Court' 3he followin, issues are raise&: (1) 6hether the !ase is ;usti!ia:le !onsi&erin, that +rti!le E5' Se!tion 17 of the Constitution &e!lares the @1/3 to :e the Csole >u&,eC of all !ontests relatin, to the ele!tion returns an& &is?ualifi!ations of e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' P2NQ (2) 6hether +n, is a natural :o !iti=en of the Philippines' W2NQ
@ow shoul& this !ase :e &e!i&e&L

Nat3ra' B&rn i'i*in& 9!#$#:

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%"

1' 3he !ase is ;usti!ia:le' (,ra%e a:use of &is!retion)'''


2' +n&res +n, shoul& :e !onsi&ere& a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines' @e was :orn of a Filipino other on >anuar" 20H 1973' 3his was after the effe!ti%it" of the 1973 Constitution on >anuar" 17H 1973' <n&er Se!tion (1)H +rti!le 555 of the 1973 ConstitutionH those whose fathers or others are !iti=ens of the Philippines are !iti=ens of the Philippines' +n&res +n, re aine& a !iti=en of the Philippines after the effe!ti%it" of the 1987 Constitution' Se!tion 1H +rti!le 5E of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es:

with Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH whi!h rea&s:


3hose who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship in a!!or&an!e with para,raph (3)H Se!tion 1 hereof shall :e &ee e& natural :orn !iti=ens'C 2) /rnest is not un&er*a,e&' ( ini u 22 "rs

ol&)'''' Nat3ra'i/ati&n8 Can(e''ati&n &) Citi/en+,i* 9!##$:


No M' * 7i 3on, 9iaoH a Chinese !iti=en applie& for an& was ,rante& Philippine !iti=enship :" the !ourt' @e tooD his oath as !iti=en of the Philippines to >ul" 19)3H in 1972H the Affi!e of the Soli!itor $eneral file& a petition to !an!el his Philippine !iti=enship for the reason that in +u,ust 19)3H the Court of 3a0 +ppeals foun& hi ,uilt" of ta0 e%asion for &eli:eratel" un&erstatin, his in!o e ta0es for the "ears 1929*19)1'

C3he followin, are !iti=ens of the Philippines: C(l) 3hose who are !iti=ens of the Philippines at the ti e of the a&option of this Constitution;C Nat3ra'<B&rn i'i*in&9!##-:
No' 1: 5n 19)#H 1uffaH a Filipina &o esti! helper worDin, in @on,Don,H went to 3aipei for a %a!ationH where she et Chen, Sio PaoH who she arrie&' <n&er Chinese 7awH 1uffa auto ati!all" :e!a e a Chinese !iti=en' 3he !ouple resi&e& in @on,Don,H where on 8a" 9H 19)2H 1uffa ,a%e :irth to a :o" na e& /rnest' <pon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"H /rnest ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship' +fter the /-S+ 1e%olutionH /rnest &e!i&e& to li%e per anentl" in the PhilippinesH where he prospere& as a :usiness an' -urin, the 8a" 11H 1993 ele!tionH /rnest ran an& won as a !on,ress an' @is opponentH notin, /rnestBs Chinese an!estr"H file& a petition to &is?ualif" the latter on the followin, ,roun&s; (1) /rnest Chen, is not a natural :orn Filipino; an& (2) he is un&er*a,e&' -e!i&e'

(1) Coul& 7i 3on, 9iao raise the &efense of pres!ription of the a!tion for !an!ellation of his Filipino !iti=enshipL P3NQ
(2) Supposin, the 3a0 + lia:ilitiesH &efense to 7i 3on, 9iao ha& a%aile& of nest" of the ,o%ern ent for his ta0 woul& this !onstitute a %ali& the !an!ellation of his Filipino

!iti=enshipL P2NQ SUGGESTED ANSWER:


1' NoH 7i 3on, 9iao !annot raise the &efense of pres!ription' +s hel& in 1epu:li! us' $o 9on 7eeH 1 SC1+ 11))H 1170H a &e!ision ,rantin, !iti=enship is not res ;u&i!ata an& the ri,ht of the ,o%ern ent to asD for the !an!ellation of a !ertifi!ate !an!ellation is not :arre& :" the lapse of ti e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) /rnest !annot :e &is?ualifie&' Se!tion 1H +rti!le 5E of the Constitution pro%i&es: C3he followin, are !iti=ens of the Philippines; MMM MMM MMM C(3) 3hose :orn :efore >anuar" 17H 1973H of Filipino othersH who ele!t Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit";C /rnest !oul& ele!t Philippine !iti=enship sin!e he was :orn :efore >anuar" 17H 1973 an& his other is a Filipino' +s state& in the !ases of 3orres %s' 3an Chi H )9 Phil' 218 an& Cu %s' 1epu:li!H 83 Phil' #73H for this pro%ision to appl"H the other nee& not :e a Filipino !iti=en at the ti e she ,a%e :irth to the !hil& in ?uestion' 5t is suffi!ient that she was a Filipino !iti=en at the ti e of her arria,e' AtherwiseH the nu :er of persons who woul& :e :enefite& :" the fore,oin, pro%ision woul& :e li ite&' @a%in, ele!te& Philippine !iti=enshipH /rnest is a natural*:orn Filipino !iti=en in a!!or&an!e

2' 3he fa!t that 7i 3on, 9iao a%aile& of the ta0 a nest" is not a %ali& &efense to the !an!ellation of his Filipino !iti=enship' 5n 1epu:li! %s' 7i OaoH 21# SC1+ 7#8H 72#H the Supre e Court hel&:
C5n other wor&sH the ta0 a nest" &oes not ha%e the effe!t of o:literatin, his la!D of ,oo& oral !hara!ter an& irreproa!ha:le !on&u!t whi!h are ,roun&s for &enaturali=ationHC

Re+iden(y ReF3ire1ent+8 E'e(ti0e O))i(ia' 9>#<"66@:


(1) 5n the 8a" 8H1992 ele!tions for lo!al offi!ials whose ter s were to !o en!e on >une 30H 1992H 1i!D" file& on 8ar!h 20H 1992 his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the Affi!e of $o%ernor of 7a,una' @e wonH :ut his ?ualifi!ations as an ele!te& offi!ial was ?uestione&' 5t is a& itte& that

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%-

he is a repatriate& Filipino !iti=en an& a resi&ent of the Pro%in!e of 7a,una' 3o :e ?ualifie& for the offi!e to whi!h a lo!al offi!ial has :een ele!te&H when at the latest shoul& he :e: (2N) (a) + Filipino Citi=enL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !iti=enship re?uire ent is to :e possesse& :" an ele!ti%e offi!ial at the latest as of the ti e he is pro!lai e& an& at the start of the ter of offi!e to whi!h he has :een ele!te&' Se!tion 39 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH whi!h enu erates the ?ualifi!ations of ele!ti%e lo!al ,o%ern ent offi!ialsH &oes not spe!if" an" parti!ular &ate or ti e when the !an&i&ate ust possess !iti=enship' (Fri%al&o %' CA8/7/CH $'1' No' 120292H >une 28H199))

Stat3+8 I''egiti1ate C,i'd8 D3a' Citi/en+,i* 9!##?: No' 8: 2) M was :orn in the <nite& States of a Filipino father an& a 8e0i!an other' @e returne& to the Philippines when he was twent"* si0 "ears of a,eH !arr"in, an + eri!an passport an& he was re,istere& as an alien with the 9ureau of 5 i,ration' 6as M ?ualifie& to run for e :ership in the @ouse of 1epresentati%es in the 1992 ele!tionsL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 6hether or not M was ?ualifie& to run for e :ership in the @ouse of 1epresentati%es in the 1992 ele!tion &epen&s on the !ir!u stan!es'
5f M was an 5lle,iti ate !hil&H he is not ?ualifie& to run for the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' +!!or&in, to the !ase of in re 8allareH 29 SC1+ #2H an ille,iti ate !hil& follows the !iti=enship of the other' Sin!e the other of M is a 8e0i!anH he will :e a 8e0i!an !iti=en if he is an ille,iti ate !hil&H e%en if his father is a Filipino' 5f M is a le,iti ate !hil&H he is a Filipino !iti=en' <n&er Se!tion 2(2)H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH those whose fathers are !iti=ens of the Philippines are Filipino !iti=ens' Sin!e M was :orn in the <nite& StatesH whi!h follows ;us soliH M is also an + eri!an !iti=en' 5n a!!or&an!e with +=nar %s' Co issionH on /le!tionsH 182 SC1+ 703H the ere fa!t a person with &ual !iti=enship re,istere& as an alien with the Co ission on 5 i,ration an& -eportation &oes not ne!essaril" ean that he is renoun!in, his Philippine !iti=enship' 7iDewiseH the ere fa!t that M use& an + eri!an passport &i& not result in the loss of his Philippine !iti=enship' +s hel& in GawaDita %s' <ntie& StatesH 3#3 <'S' 717H sin!e a person with &ual !iti=enship has the ri,hts of !iti=enship in :oth !ountriesH the use of a passport issue& :" one !ountr" is not in!onsistent with his !iti=enship in the other !ountr"'

(:) + resi&ent of the lo!alit"L /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er Se!tion 39 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH an in&i%i&ual ust possess the resi&en!" re?uire ent in the lo!alit" where he inten&s to run at least one "ear i e&iatel" pre!e&in, the &a" of ele!tion' Stat3+8 I''egiti1ate C,i'd 9!##6:
No' 3: O was ele!te& Senator in the 8a" 1987 national ele!tions' @e was :orn out of we&lo!D in 19#9 of an + eri!an father an& a naturali=e& Filipina other' O ne%er ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"'

9efore what :o&" shoul& 3H the losin, !an&i&ateH ?uestion the ele!tion of OL State the reasons for "our answer' (2) 5s O a Filipino !iti=enL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) 3H the losin, !an&i&ateH shoul& ?uestion the ele!tion of O :efore the Senate /le!toral 3ri:unalH ''''
(2) OesH O is a Filipino !iti=en' 8ore than that he is a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines ?ualifie& to :e!o e a Senator' Sin!e O is an ille,iti ate !hil& of a Filipino otherH he follows the !iti=enship of his other' @e nee& not ele!t Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" as hel& 5n re 8allare' 29 SC1+ #2' 5n Asias %' +ntoninoH /le!toral Case No' 11H +u,ust )H 1971H the Senate /le!toral 3ri:unal hel& that the ille,iti ate !hil& of an alien father an& a Filipino other is a Filipino !iti=en an& is ?ualifie& to :e a Senator'

(1)

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 5f M has taDen an oath of alle,ian!e to the <'S' he will :e &ee e& to ha%e renoun!e& his Philippine !iti=enship' Conse?uentl"H he is &is?ualifie& to run for the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' Stat3+8 Legiti1ate C,i'd 9"66-:
No 5E * 8i,uel Sin was :orn a "ear a,o in China to a Chinese father an& a Filipino other @is parents et in Shan,hai where the" were

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%;

lawfull" arrie& ;ust two "ears a,o' 5s 8i,uel Sin a Filipino !iti=enL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
8i,uel Sin is a Filipino !iti=en :e!ause he is the le,iti ate !hil& of a Filipino other' <n&er +rti!le 5EH Se!tion # of the 1987 ConstitutionH his other retaine& her Philippine !iti=enship &espite her arria,e to an alien hus:an&H an& a!!or&in, to +rti!le 5EH Se!tion 1(2) of the 1987 ConstitutionH !hil&ren :orn of a Filipino other are Filipino !iti=ens'

of pu:li! fun&s :" P+$CA1H not :ein, a&e pursuant to an appropriation a&e :" lawH %iolates the Constitution' A**r&*riati&n &) P3b'i( Debt Ser0i(ing 9!##": 3nd+8

Way+ &) Rea(F3iring Citi/en+,i* 9"666:


No ME555' * Cru=H a Filipino :" :irthH :e!a e an + eri!an !iti=en' 5n his ol& a,e he has returne& to the !ountr" an& wants to :e!o e a Filipino a,ain' +s his law"erH enu erate the wa"s :" whi!h !iti=enship a" :e rea!?uire&' (2N)

No 13: /0plain how the auto ati! appropriation of pu:li! fun&s for &e:t ser%i!in, !an :e re!on!ile& with +rti!le E5H Se!tion 29(1) of the Constitution' Sai& pro%ision sa"s that Cno one" shall :e pai& out of the 3reasur" e0!ept in pursuan!e of an appropriation a&e :" lawC'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s state& in $uin,ona %s' Cara,ueH 19) SC1+ 221H the presi&ential &e!rees pro%i&in, for the appropriation of fun&s to pa" the pu:li! &e:t &o not %iolate Se!tion 29(1)H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution' 3he" pro%i&e for a !ontinuin, appropriationH there is no !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst this' 3he presi&ential &e!rees appropriate as u!h one" as is nee&e& to pa" the prin!ipalH interestH ta0es an& other nor al :anDin, !har,es on the loan' +lthou,h no spe!ifi! a ounts are entione&H the a ounts are !ertain :e!ause the" !an :e !o pute& fro the :ooDs of the National 3reasur"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: Cru= a" rea!?uire Philippine !iti=enship in the followin, wa"s: 1' 9" naturali=ation; 2' 9" repatriation pursuant to 1epu:li! +!t No' 8171; an& 3' 9" &ire!t a!t of Con,ress (Se!tion 2 of Co onwealth +!t No' )3)'

ARTICLE .I De*art1ent

Legi+'ati0e

A**r&*riati&n &) P3b'i( P3b'i( P3r*&+e+ 9!#$$:

3nd+8

A**r&*riati&n &) P3b'i( 3nd+ 9!#$$:


No' ): * 8etropolitan newspapers ha%e reporte& that the Philippine $a es an& + use ent Corporation (P+$CA1) ,i%es heft" !ontri:utions to 8ala!anan,H to fun& Cso!io* e!ono i! an& !i%i! pro;e!tsC of the Presi&entH 3he reports a&& that for 1988 aloneH so e si0 hun&re& illion (P)008) pesos ha%e alrea&" :een ear arDe& for re ittan!e to the Affi!e of the Presi&ent' P+$CA1 ha& also :een reporte& to ha%e fun&e&H as !oor&inate& :" a Con,ress an fro 8in&anaoH spe!ial pro;e!ts of ?uite a nu :er of e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' +ssu in, that one" earne& :" P+$CA1 fro its operations are pu:li! fun&sH are su!h !ontri:utions to 8ala!aXan, an& to !ertain Con,ress en an& their e0pen&iture as reporte&H le,alL Cite !onstitutional or &e!isional rules in support of "our answer'

No' 7: * 3awi*3awi is a pre&o inantl" 8osle pro%in!e' 3he $o%ernorH the Ei!e*$o%ernorH an& e :ers of its San,,unian, Panlalawi,an are all 8osle s' 5ts :u&,et pro%i&es the $o%ernor with a !ertain a ount as his &is!retionar" fun&s' 1e!entl"H howe%erH the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an passe& a resolution appropriatin, P100H000 as a spe!ial &is!retionar" fun& of the $o%ernorH to' :e spent :" hi in lea&in, a pil,ri a,e of his pro%in!e ates to 8e!!aH Sau&i +ra:iaH 5sla Bs holiest !it"' Phil!onsaH on !onstitutional ,roun&sH has file& suit to nullif" the resolution of the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an ,i%in, the spe!ial &is!retionar" fun& to the $o%ernor for the state& purpose'

@ow woul& "ou &e!i&e the !aseL $i%e "our reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he resolution is un!onstitutional FirstH it %iolates art' E5H se!' 29(2) of the Constitution whi!h prohi:its the appropriation of pu:li! one" or propert"H &ire!tl" or in&ire!tl"H for the useH :enefit or support of an" s"ste of reli,ionH an&H se!on&H it !ontra%enes art' E5H se!H 22()) whi!h li its the appropriation of &is!retionar" fun&s onl" for pu:li! purposes'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ontri:utions a&e to 8ala!aXan, an& to !ertain !on,ress en are 5lle,al' <n&er art' E5H se!' 29(1) no one" !an :e pai& out of the 3reasur" e0!ept in pursuan!e of an appropriation a&e :" law' 3he &is:urse ent

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%@

3he use of &is!retionar" fun&s for purel" reli,ious purpose is thus un!onstitutionalH an& the fa!t that the &is:urse ent is a&e :" resolution of a lo!al le,islati%e :o&" an& not :" Con,ress &oes not aDe it an" less offensi%e to the Constitution' +:o%e allH the resolution !onstitutes a !lear %iolation of the Non* esta:lish ent Clause (art' 555H se!' 2) of the Constitution' C&11i++i&n &n A**&int1ent+ 9"66": No 555 * Suppose there are 202 e :ers in the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' Af this nu :erH 182 :elon, to the Pro,ressi%e Part" of the Philippines or PPPH while 17 :elon, to the Citi=ens Part" or CP' @ow woul& "ou answer the followin, ?uestions re,ar&in, the representation of the @ouse in the Co ission on +ppoint entsL +' + @ow an" seats woul& the PPP :e entitle& to ha%e in the Co ission on +ppoint entsL /0plain "our answer full"' (2N)
9' Suppose 12 of the CP representati%esH while aintainin, their part" affiliationH entere& into a politi!al allian!e with the PPP in or&er to for the C1ain:ow CoalitionBB in the @ouse' 6hat effe!tH if an"H woul& this ha%e on the ri,ht of the CP to ha%e a seat or seats in the Co ission on +ppoint entsL /0plain "our answer full"' (2N)

Co ission on +ppoint entsH AtherwiseH the Co ission on +ppoint ents will ha%e to :e reor,ani=e& as often as %otes shift fro one si&e to another in the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' De'egati&n &) P&5er+ 9"66":
No ME55' * Suppose that Con,ress passe& a law !reatin, a -epart ent of @u an @a:itat an& authori=in, the -epart ent Se!retar" to pro ul,ate i ple entin, rules an& re,ulations' Suppose further that the law &e!lare& that %iolation of the i ple entin, rules an& re,ulations so issue& woul& :e punisha:le as a !ri e an& authori=e& the -epart ent Se!retar" to pres!ri:e the penalt" for su!h %iolation' 5f the law &efines !ertain a!ts as %iolations of the law an& aDes the punisha:leH for e0a pleH with i prison ent of three (3) "ears or a fine in the a ount of P10H000'00H or :oth su!h i prison ent an& fineH in the &is!retion of the !ourtH !an it :e pro%i&e& in the i ple entin, rules an& re,ulations pro ul,ate& :" the -epart ent Se!retar" that their %iolation will also :e su:;e!t to the sa e penalties as those pro%i&e& in the law itselfL /0plain "our answer full"' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he rules an& re,ulations pro ul,ate& :" the Se!retar" of @u an @a:itat !annot pro%i&e that the penalties for their %iolation will :e the sa e as the penalties for the %iolation of the law' +s hel& in <nite& States %' 9arriasH 11 Phil' 327 (1908)H the fi0in, of the penalt" for !ri inal offenses in%ol%es the e0er!ise of le,islati%e power an& !annot :e &ele,ate&' 3he law itself ust pres!ri:e the penalt"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+' 3he 182 e :ers of the Pro,ressi%e Part" of the Philippines represent 91'28 per !ent of the 202 e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' 5n a!!or&an!e with +rti!le E5H Se!tion 18 of the ConstitutionH it is entitle& to ha%e ten of the twel%e seats in the Co ission on +ppoint ents' +lthou,h the 182 e :ers of Pro,ressi%e Part" of the Philippines represent 10'98 seats in the Co ission on +ppoint entsH un&er the rulin, in $uin,ona %' $on=alesH 21# SC1+ 789 (1992)H a fra!tional e :ership !annot :e roun&e& off to full e :ership :e!ause it will result in o%er* representation of that politi!al part" an& un&er* representation of the other politi!al parties' 9' 3he politi!al allian!e for e& :" the 12 e :ers of the Citi=ens Part" with the Pro,ressi%e Part" of the Philippines will not result in the &i inution of the nu :er of seats in the Co ission on +ppoint ents to whi!h the Citi=ens Part" is entitle&' +s hel& in Cunanan %' 3anH 2 SC1+ 1 (19)2)H a te porar" allian!e :etween the e :ers of one politi!al part" an& another politi!al part" &oes not authori=e a !han,e in the e :ership of the

De'egati&n &) P&5er+8 9>?<"66@: (2) Se!tion 32 of 1epu:li! +!t No' #)70 (3he 8a,na Carta for Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hers) rea&s:
Se!' 32' Penal Pro%ision' R + person who shall willfull" interfere withH restrain or !oer!e an" tea!her in the e0er!ise of his ri,hts ,uarantee& :" this +!t or who shall in an" other anner !o it an" a!t to &efeat an" of the pro%isions of this +!t shallH upon !on%i!tionH :e punishe& :" a fine of not less than one hun&re& pesos nor ore than one thousan& pesosH or :" i prison entH in the &is!retion of the !ourt' 5s the pro%iso ,rantin, the !ourt the authorit" to i pose a penalt" or i prison ent in its &is!retion !onstitutionalL /0plain :riefl"' (#N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%?

3he pro%iso is un!onstitutional' Se!tion 32 of 1'+' No' #)70 pro%i&es for an in&eter ina:le perio& of i prison entH with neither a ini u nor a a0i u &uration ha%in, :een set :" the le,islati%e authorit"' 3he !ourts are thus ,i%en wi&e latitu&e of &is!retion to fi0 the ter of i prison entH without e%en the :enefit of an" suffi!ient stan&ar&H su!h that the &uration thereof a" ran,eH in the wor&s of respon&ent ;u&,eH fro one inute to the life span of the a!!use&' 3his !annot :e allowe&' 5t %ests in the !ourts a power an& a &ut" essentiall" le,islati%e in nature an& whi!hH as applie& to this !aseH &oes %iolen!e to the rules on separation of powers as well as the non*&ele,a:ilit" of le,islati%e powers' (People %' >u&,e -a!u"!u"H $'1' No' 7* #2127H 8a" 2H 1989)

when it rea!hes hi e0!ept to enfor!e it' (See 53S %' +n, 3an, @oH $'1' No' 7* 17122H Fe:ruar" 27H 1922) S<FF5C5/N3 S3+N-+1- 3/S3' + suffi!ient stan&ar& is inten&e& to ap out the :oun&aries of the &ele,ateBs authorit" :" &efinin, the le,islati%e poli!" an& in&i!atin, the !ir!u stan!es un&er whi!h it is to :e pursue& an& effe!te&; inten&e& to pre%ent a total transferen!e of le,islati%e power fro the le,islature to the &ele,ate' 3he stan&ar& is usuall" in&i!ate& in the law &ele,atin, le,islati%e power' (See Onot u' 5nter e&iate +ppellate CourtH $'1' No' 7##27H 8ar!h 20H 1987) Di+(i*'ine8 M&de+ &) Re1&0a' 9!##-: No' 11: * @ow a" the followin, :e re o%e& fro offi!e: 1) Senators 4 Con,ress en 2) >u&,es of lower !ourts 3) Affi!ers an& e plo"ees in the Ci%il Ser%i!e SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) 5n a!!or&an!e with +rt' 555H se!tion 1)(3)H of the ConstitutionH Senators an& Con,ress en a" :e re o%e& :" their /MP<7S5AN for &isor&erl" :eha%iorH with the !on!urren!e of at least two*thir&s of all the e :ers of the @ouse to whi!h the" :elon,' 5n a&&itionH the" a" also :e re o%e& in !onse?uen!e of an ele!tion !ontest file& with the Senate or @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal'

De'egati&n &) P&5er+8 C&1*'etene++ Te+t8 S3))i(ient Standard Te+t 9>?<"66@: (1) 3he two a!!epte& tests to &eter ine whether or not there is a %ali& &ele,ation of le,islati%e power are the Co pleteness 3est an& the Suffi!ient Stan&ar& 3est' /0plain ea!h' (#N) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
<n&er the CA8P7/3/N/SS 3/S3H a law ust :e !o plete in all its ter s an& pro%isions when it lea%es the le,islature that nothin, is left to the ;u&, ent of the &ele,ate' 3he le,islature &oes not a:&i!ate its fun!tions when it &es!ri:es what ;o: ust :e &oneH who is to &o itH an& what is the s!ope of his authorit"' @owe%erH a &ele,ation of power to aDe the laws whi!h ne!essaril" in%ol%es a &is!retion as to what it shall :e a" not !onstitutionall" :e &one' (/&u %' /ri!taH $'1' No' 7*3209)H A!to:er 2#H 1970) <n&er the S<FF5C5/NCO AF S3+N-+1-S 3/S3H the statute ust not onl" &efine a fun&a ental le,islati%e poli!"H arD its li its an& :oun&ariesH an& spe!if" the pu:li! a,en!" to e0er!ise the le,islati%e power' 5t ust also in&i!ate the !ir!u stan!es un&er whi!h the le,islati%e !o an& is to :e effe!te&' 3o a%oi& the taint of unlawful &ele,ationH there ust :e a stan&ar&H whi!h i plies at the %er" least that the le,islature itself &eter ines atters of prin!iple an& la"s &own fun&a ental poli!"' (Free 3elephone 6orDers <nion %' 8inister of 7a:orH $'1' No' 7*2818#H A!to:er 30H 1981)

2) +s to >u&,esH +rt' E555H se!' 11 of the ConstitutionH '''' 3) +s to Ci%il Ser%i!e / plo"eesH +rt' 5M* 9' Se!' 2(3) of the Constitution'''' Di+(i*'ine8 S3+*en+i&n &) a Me1ber &) t,e C&ngre++ 9"66":
No 55' * Si eon Ealera was for erl" a Pro%in!ial $o%ernor who ran an& won as a 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es for the Se!on& Con,ressional -istri!t of lloilo' For %iolation of Se!tion 3 of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t (1'+' No'3019)H as a en&e&H alle,e&l" !o itte& when he was still a Pro%in!ial $o%ernorH a !ri inal !o plaint was file& a,ainst hi :efore the Affi!e of the A :u&s an for whi!hH upon a fin&in, of pro:a:le !auseH a !ri inal !ase was file& with the San&i,an:a"an' -urin, the !ourse of trialH the San&i,an:a"an issue& an or&er of pre%enti%e suspension for 90 &a"s a,ainst hi '

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
CA8P7/3/N/SS 3/S3' 3he law ust :e !o plete in all its essential ter s an& !on&itions when it lea%es the le,islature so that there will :e nothin, left for the &ele,ate to &o

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%%

1epresentati%e Ealera ?uestione& the %ali&it" of the San&i,an:a"an or&er on the ,roun& thatH un&er +rti!le E5H Se!tion 1)(3) of the ConstitutionH he !an :e suspen&e& onl" :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& that the !ri inal !ase a,ainst hi &i& not arise fro his a!tuations as a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' 5s 1epresentati%e EaleraBs !ontention !orre!tL 6h"L (2N)

was a &e fa!to offi!er while he was in possession of the offi!e' 3o allow +E/ to !olle!t the salaries an& allowan!es will result in aDin, the ,o%ern ent pa" a se!on& ti e' (8e!he H + 3reatise on the 7aw of Pu:li! Affi!es an& Pu:li! Affi!ersH P1890Q pp' 222*223') 9+13 is not re?uire& to refun& to the ,o%ern ent the salaries an& allowan!es he re!ei%e&' +s a &e fa!to offi!erH he is entitle& to the salaries an& allowan!es :e!ause he ren&ere& ser%i!es &urin, his in!u :en!"' (1o&ri,ue= %' 3anH 91 Phil' 72# P1922Q) 3he :ills whi!h 9+13 alone authore& an& were appro%e& :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es are %ali& :e!ause he was a &e fa!to offi!er &urin, his in!u :en!"' 3he a!ts of a &e fa!to offi!er are %ali& insofar as the pu:li! is !on!erne&' (People %' $ar!iaH 313 SC1+ 279 P1999Q)'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !ontention of 1epresentati%e Ealera is not !orre!t +s hel& in Santia,o %' San&i,an:a"anH 32) SC1+ )3)H the suspension !onte plate& in +rti!le E5H Se!tion 1)(3) of the Constitution is a punish ent that is i pose& :" the Senate or @ouse of 1epresentati%es upon an errin, e :erH it is &istin!t fro the suspension un&er Se!tion 13 of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!tH whi!h is not a penalt" :ut a pre%enti%e easure' Sin!e Se!tion 13 of the +nti*$raft an& Corruption Pra!ti!es +!t &oes not state that the pu:li! offi!er ust :e suspen&e& onl" in the offi!e where he is alle,e& to ha%e !o itte& the a!ts whi!h he has :een !har,e&H it applies to an" offi!e whi!h he a" :e hol&in,' E'e(ted O))i(ia'8 De a(t& O))i(er 9"66;: 9!6<b: +E/ ran for Con,ress an of (< pro%in!e' @owe%erH his opponentH 9+13H was the one pro!lai e& an& seate& as the winner of the ele!tion :" the CA8/7/C' +E/ file& seasona:l" a protest :efore @1/3 (@ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal)' +fter two "earsH @1/3 re%erse& the CA8/7/CBs &e!ision an& +E/ was pro!lai e& finall" as the &ul" ele!te& Con,ress an' 3husH he ha& onl" one "ear to ser%e in Con,ress'

E'e(t&ra' Trib3na'8 HRET Me1ber+J Rig,t B Re+*&n+ibi'itie+ 9"66": No 5E' 5n an ele!tion !aseH the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal ren&ere& a &e!ision uphol&in, the ele!tion protest of protestant +H a e :er of the Free&o Part"H a,ainst protestee 9H a e :er of the Fe&eral Part"' 3he &e!i&in, %ote in fa%or of + was !ast :" 1epresentati%e MH a e :er of the Fe&eral Part" '
For ha%in, %ote& a,ainst his part" ateH 1epresentati%e M was re o%e& :" 1esolution of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH at the instan!e of his part" (the Fe&eral Part")H fro e :ership in the @1/3' 1epresentati%e M proteste& his re o%al on the ,roun& that he %ote& on the :asis of the e%i&en!e presente& an& !onten&e& that he ha& se!urit" of tenure as a @1/3 8e :er an& that he !annot :e re o%e& e0!ept for a %ali& !ause'

Can +E/ !olle!t salaries an& allowan!es fro the ,o%ern ent for the first two "ears of his ter as Con,ress anL Shoul& 9+13 refun& to the ,o%ern ent the salaries an& allowan!es he ha& re!ei%e& as Con,ress anL 6hat will happen to the :ills that 9+13 alone authore& an& were appro%e& :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es while he was seate& as Con,ress anL 1eason an& e0plain :riefl"' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+E/ !annot !olle!t salaries an& allowan!es fro the ,o%ern ent for the first two "ears of his ter H :e!ause in the eanwhile 9+13 !olle!te& the salaries an& allowan!es' 9+13

6ith whose !ontention &o "ou a,reeH that of the Fe&eral Part" or that of 1epresentati%e ML 6h"L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 a,ree with the !ontention of 1epresentati%e M' +s hel& 5n 9on&o! %' Pine&aH 201 SC1+ 792 (1991)H the e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal are entitle& to se!urit" of tenure liDe e :ers of the ;u&i!iar"' 8e :ership in it a" not :e ter inate& e0!ept for a ;ust !ause' -islo"alt" to part" is not a %ali& ,roun& for the e0pulsion of a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal' 5ts e :ers ust &is!har,e their fun!tions with i partialit" an&

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%$

in&epen&en!e fro the politi!al part" to whi!h the" :elon,' E'e(t&ra' 9!##6: Trib3na'8 Senate8 43ri+di(ti&n

a,ree ent ust :e !on!urre& in :" at least two*thir&s of all the 8e :ers of the Senate'
Se!tion #H +rti!le ME555 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C+ll e0istin, treaties or international a,ree ents whi!h ha%e not :een ratifie& shall not :e renewe& or e0ten&e& without the !on!urren!e of at least two*thir&s of all the 8e :ers of the Senate'K

No' 3: O was ele!te& Senator in the 8a" 1987 national ele!tions' @e was :orn out of we&lo!D in 19#9 of an + eri!an father an& a naturali=e& Filipina other' O ne%er ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"' 9efore what :o&" shoul& 3H the losin, !an&i&ateH ?uestion the ele!tion of OL State the reasons for "our answer'

In0e+tigati&n+ in Aid &) Legi+'ati&n 9!##":


No' 8: + !ase was file& :efore the San&i,an:a"an re,ar&in, a ?uestiona:le ,o%ern ent transa!tion' 5n the !ourse of the pro!ee&in,sH newspapers linDe& the na e of Senator >' &e 7eon to the s!an&al' Senator &e 7eon tooD the floor of the Senate to speaD on a C atter of personal pri%ile,eC to %in&i!ate his honor a,ainst those C:aseless an& ali!iousC alle,ations' 3he atter was referre& to the Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ersH whi!h pro!ee&e& to !on&u!t a le,islati%e in?uir"' 3he Co ittee asDe& 8r' Ein!e 7e&es aH a :usiness an linDe& to the transa!tion an& now a respon&ent :efore the San&i,an:a"anH to appear an& to testif" :efore the Co ittee'

5s O a Filipino !iti=enL /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


(1) 3H the losin, !an&i&ateH shoul& ?uestion the ele!tion of O :efore the Senate /le!toral 3ri:unalH :e!ause the issue in%ol%e& is the ?ualifi!ation of O to :e a Senator' Se!tion 17H +rti!le E5 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that' 3he Senate an& the @ouse of 1epresentati%es shall ea!h*ha%e an /le!toral 3ri:unal whi!h shall :e the sole ;u&,e of all !ontests relatin, to the ele!tionH returnsH an& ?ualifi!ations of their respe!ti%e 8e :ers'C

(2) OesH O is a natural :orn Filipino !iti=en' '''' &reign A))air+8 R&'e &) H&3+e &) Re* 9!##?:
No' 7: 2) Can the @ouse of 1epresentati%es taDe a!ti%e part in the !on&u!t of forei,n relationsH parti!ularl" in enterin, into treaties an& international a,ree entsL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the @ouse of 1epresentati%es !annot taDe a!ti%e part in the !on&u!t of forei,n relationsH parti!ularl" in enterin, into treaties an& international a,ree ents' +s hel& in <nite& States %s' Curtiss*6ri,ht /0port CorporationH 299 <'S' 30#H the Presi&ent alone is the representati%e of the nation in the !on&u!t of forei,n affairs' +lthou,h the Senate has the power to !on!ur in treatiesH the Presi&ent alone ne,otiates treaties an& Con,ress is powerless to intru&e into this' @owe%erH if the atter in%ol%es a treat" or an e0e!uti%e a,ree entH the @ouse of 1epresentati%es a" pass a resolution e0pressin, its %iews on the atter'

8r 7e&es a refuses to appear an& file suit :efore the Supre e Court to !hallen,e the le,alit" of the pro!ee&in,s :efore the Co ittee' @e also asDs whether the Co ittee ha& the power to re?uire hi to testif"' 5&entif" the issues 5n%ol%e& an& resol%e the ' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he issues in%ol%e& in this !ase are the followin,: 1' 6hether or not the Supre e Court has ;uris&i!tion to entertain the !ase;
2' 6hether or not the Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ers has the power to in%esti,ate a atter whi!h is in%ol%e& in a !ase pen&in, in !ourt; an&

3' 6hether or not the petitioner !an in%oDe his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri ination' +ll these 5ssues were resol%e& in the !ase of 9en,=on %s' Senate 9lue 1i::on Co itteeH 203 SC1+ 7)7' 3he Supre e Court has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !ase (&eter ination of ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion)''''

&reign A))air+8 R&'e &) Senate 9!##;: No' 13: 1) <n&er the ConstitutionH what is the role of the Senate in the !on&u!t of forei,n affairsL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he Senate pla"s a role in the !on&u!t of forei,n affairsH :e!ause of the re?uire ent in Se!tion 21H +rti!le E55 of the Constitution that to :e %ali& an& effe!ti%e a treat" or international

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

%#

3he Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ers has no power to in%esti,ate the s!an&al' (no ;u&i!ial fun!tions)'''

easure if the appropriation of pu:li! fun&s is not its prin!ipal purpose an& the appropriation is onl" in!i&ental to so e other o:;e!ti%e' La5<MaIing8 A**r&*riati&n La58 A3t&1ati( Rene5a' B P&5er &) A3g1entati&n 9!##$:

3he petitioner !an in%oDe his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri inationH :e!ause this ri,ht is a%aila:le in all pro!ee&in,s' Sin!e the petitioner is a respon&ent in the !ase pen&in, :efore the San&i,an:a"anH he a" refuse to testif"' La5 MaIing8 Pr&(e++ B P3b'i(ati&n 9!##-:
No' 2; /rnest Chen,H a :usiness anH has no Dnowle&,e of le,islati%e pro!e&ure' Chen, retains "ou as his le,al a&%iser an& asDs enli,hten ent on the followin, atters: (1) 6hen &oes a :ill :e!o e a law e%en without the si,nature of the Presi&entL

No M5' * Suppose the Presi&ent su: its a :u&,et whi!h &oes not !ontain pro%isions for C-F (Countr"wi&e -e%elop ent Fun&s)H popularl" Dnown as the porD :arrelH an& :e!ause of this Con,ress &oes not pass the :u&,et' 1' 6ill that ean parali=ation of ,o%ern ent operations in the ne0t fis!al "ear for la!D of an appropriation lawL (2N)
2' Suppose in the sa e :u&,etH there is a spe!ial pro%ision in the appropriations for the +r e& For!es authori=in, the Chief of StaffH +FPH su:;e!t to the appro%al of the Se!retar" of National -efenseH to use sa%in,s in the appropriations pro%i&e& thereto to !o%er up whate%er finan!ial losses suffere& :" the +FP 1etire ent an& Separation 9enefits S"ste (1S9S) in the last fi%e (2) "ears &ue to alle,e& :a& :usiness ;u&, ent' 6oul& "ou ?uestion the !onstitutionalit" %ali&it" of the spe!ial pro%isionL P3NQ

(2) 6hen &oes the law taDe effe!tL SUGGESTED ANSWER:


1) <n&er Se!tion 27(1)H +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH a :ill :e!o es a law e%en without the si,nature of the Presi&ent if he %etoe& it :ut his %eto was o%erri&en :" two*thir&s %ote of all the e :ers of :oth the Senate an& the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& 5f the Presi&ent faile& to !o uni!ate his %eto to the @ouse fro whi!h the :ill ori,inate&H within thirt" &a"s after the &ate of re!eipt of the :ill :" the Presi&ent' 2) +s hel& in 3ana&a %s' 3u%eraH 1#) SC1+ ##)H a law ust :e pu:lishe& as a !on&ition for its effe!ti%it" an& in a!!or&an!e with +rti!le 2 of the Ci%il Co&eH it shall taDe effe!t fifteen &a"s followin, the !o pletion of its pu:li!ation in the Affi!ial $a=ette or in a newspaper of ,eneral !ir!ulation unless it is otherwise pro%i&e&' (/0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 292H 1e%ise& +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1989)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1' NoH the failure of Con,ress to pass the :u&,et will not paral"=e the operations of the $o%ern ent'
Se!tion 22(7)H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution pro%i&es: C5fH :" the en& of an" fis!al "earH the Con,ress shall ha%e faile& to pass the ,eneral appropriations :ill for the ensuin, fis!al "earH the ,eneral appropriations law for the pre!e&in, fis!al "ear shall :e &ee e& reena!te& an& shall re ain in for!e an& effe!t until the ,eneral appropriations :ill is passe& :" the Con,ress'

La5<MaIing8 A**r&*riati&n Bi'' 9!##?: No 2: +re the followin, :ills file& in Con,ress !onstitutionalL
+ :ill ori,inatin, fro the Senate whi!h pro%i&es for the !reation of the Pu:li! <tilit" Co ission to re,ulate pu:li! ser%i!e !o panies an& appropriatin, the initial fun&s nee&e& to esta:lish the sa e' /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2' OesH the pro%ision authori=in, the Chief of StaffH with the appro%al of the Se!retar" of National -efenseH to use sa%in,s to !o%er the losses suffere& :" the +FP 1etire ent an& Separation 9enefits S"ste is un!onstitutional'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+ :ill pro%i&in, for the !reation of the Pu:li! <tilit" Co ission to re,ulate pu:li! ser%i!e !o panies an& appropriatin, fun&s nee&e& to esta:lish it a" ori,inate fro the Senate' 5t is not an appropriation :illH :e!ause the appropriation of pu:li! fun&s is not the prin!ipal purpose of the :ill' 5n +sso!iation of S all 7an&owners of the PhilippinesH 5n!' %s' Se!retar" of +,rarian 1efor 172 SC1+ 3#3H it was hel& that a law is not an appropriate

Se!tion 22(2QH +rti!le E5 of the Constitution pro%i&es:


CNo law shall :e passe& authori=in, an" transfer of appropriations; howe%erH the Presi&entH the Presi&ent of the SenateH the SpeaDer of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH the Chief >usti!e of the Supre e CourtH an& the hea&s of Constitutional Co issions a"H :" lawH :e authori=e& to au, ent an" ite in the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$6

,eneral appropriation law for their respe!ti%e offi!es fro sa%in,s in other 5te s of their respe!ti%e appropriations'C
5n Philippine Constitution %s /nri?ue=H 232 SC1+ 20)H 2##H the Supre e Court hel& that a pro%ision in the $eneral +ppropriation +!t authori=in, the Chief of Staff to use sa%in,s to au, ent the fun&s of the +FP 1etire ent an& Separation 9enefits S"ste s was un!onstitutional' C6hile Se!tion 22(2) allows as an e0!eption the reali,n ent of sa%in,s to au, ent ite s in the ,eneral appropriations law for the e0e!uti%e :ran!hH su!h ri,ht ust an& !an :e e0er!ise& onl" :" the Presi&ent pursuant to a spe!ifi! law'C

entere& into :" the Presi&ent' 3he :ill !ontains the ,ui&elines to :e followe& :" the !o ission 5n the &is!har,e of its fun!tions' /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+ :ill !reatin, a ;oint le,islati%e*e0e!uti%e !o ission to ,i%eH on :ehalf of the SenateH its a&%i!eH !onsent an& !on!urren!e to treaties entere& into :" the Presi&ent' 3he Senate !annot &ele,ate this fun!tion to su!h a !o issionH :e!ause un&er Se!tion 21H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the !on!urren!e of at least two*thir&s of the Senate itself is re?uire& for the ratifi!ation of treaties'

La5<MaIing8 A**r&*riati&n Pr&0i+i&n 9"66!:

La58

Rider

No E55 * Suppose that the forth!o in, $eneral +ppropriations 7aw for Oear 2002H in the portion pertainin, to the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& SportsH will !ontain a pro%ision to the effe!t that the 1eser%e Affi!ers 3rainin, Course (1A3C) in all !olle,es an& uni%ersities is here:" a:olishe&H an& in lieu thereof all ale !olle,e stu&ents shall :e re?uire& to plant ten (10) trees e%er" "ear for two (2) "ears in areas to :e &esi,nate& :" the -epart ent of /n%iron ent an& Natural 1esour!es in !oor&ination with the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports an& the lo!al ,o%ern ent unit !on!erne&' 5t further pro%i&es that the sa e pro%ision shall :e in!orporate& 5n future $eneral appropriations +!ts' 3here is no spe!ifi! ite of appropriation of fun&s for the purpose'Co ent on the !onstitutionalit" of sai& pro%ision' (2N)

La5<MaIing8 O0erriding t,e Pre+identia' .et& 9!##!: No' 2: 3he Presi&ent si,ns into law the +ppropriations +!t passe& :" Con,ress :ut she %etoes separate ite s thereinH a on, whi!h is a pro%ision statin, that the Presi&ent a" not in!rease an ite of appropriation :" transfer of sa%in,s fro other ite s' 3he @ouse of 1epresentati%es !hooses not to o%erri&e this %eto' 3he SenateH howe%erH pro!ee&s to !onsi&er two options: (1) to o%erri&e the %eto an& (2) to !hallen,e the !onstitutionalit" of the %eto :efore the Supre e Court' a) 5s option (1) %ia:leL 5f so' what is the %ote re?uire& to o%erri&e the %etoL :) 5s option (2) %ia:leL 5f not' wh" notL 5f %ia:leH how shoul& the Court &e!i&e the !aseL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) Aption 1 is not %ia:le in as u!h as the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH fro whi!h the +ppropriations +!t ori,inate& an& to whi!h the Presi&ent ust ha%e returne& the lawH is unwillin, to o%erri&e the presi&ential %eto' 3here isH thereforeH no :asis for the Senate to e%en !onsi&er the possi:ilit" of o%erri&in, the Presi&entBs %eto' <n&er the Constitution the %ote of two*thir& of all the e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& the SenateH %otin, separatel"H will :e nee&e& to o%erri&e the presi&ential %eto' (:) 5t is not feasi:le to ?uestion the !onstitutionalit" of the %eto :efore the Supre e Court' 5n $on=ales %s' 8a!arai,H 191 SC1+ 122H the Supre e Court uphel& the !onstitutionalit" of a si ilar %eto' <n&er +rti!le E5H Se!' 27(2) of the ConstitutionH a &istin!t an& se%era:le part of the $eneral +ppropriations a!t a" :e the su:;e!t of a separate %eto' 8oreo%erH the %etoe& pro%ision &oes not relate to an" parti!ular appropriation an& is ore an

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he pro%ision is un!onstitutionalH :e!ause it is a ri&er' Se!tion 22(2)H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution pro%i&esH CNo pro%ision or ena!t ent shall :e e :ra!e& in the ,eneral appropriations :ill unless it relates spe!ifi!all" to so e parti!ular appropriation therein'C 3he a:olition of the 1eser%e Affi!ers 3rainin, Course in%ol%es a poli!" atter' +s hel& in Philippine Constitution +sso!iation %s' /nri?ue=H 232 SC1+ 20) (199#)H this !annot :e in!orporate& in the $eneral +ppropriations +!t :ut ust :e e :o&ie& in a separate law'

La5<MaIing8 &reign A))air+8 Treatie+ 9!##?: No 2: +re the followin, :ills file& in Con,ress !onstitutionalL
2) + :ill !reatin, a ;oint le,islati%e*e0e!uti%e !o ission to ,i%eH on :ehalf of the SenateH its a&%i!eH !onsent an& !on!urren!e to treaties

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$!

e0pression of a !on,ressional poli!" in respe!t of au, entation fro sa%in,s than a :u&,etar" pro%ision' 5t is therefore an inappropriate pro%ision an& it shoul& :e treate& as an ite for purposes of the %eto power of the Presi&ent'

3he Supre e Court shoul& uphol& the %ali&it" of the %eto in the e%ent the ?uestion is :rou,ht :efore it' La5<MaIing8 Pa++age &) a La5 9!#$$: No' 12: * 2' + :ill upon filin, :" a Senator or a 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es ,oes throu,h spe!ifie& steps :efore it lea%es the @ouse of 1epresentati%es or the SenateH as the !ase a" :e' +fter lea%in, the le,islatureH please na e the three etho&s :" whi!h sai& :ill a" :e!o e a law' SUGGESTED ANSWER: + :ill passe& :" Con,ress a" :e!o e a law in an" of the followin, !ases: 5f it is si,ne& into law :" the Presi&ent' (+rt' E5H se!' 27(1))' 5f it is re*passe& o%er the Presi&entBs %eto :" the %ote of two thir&s of all the e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& of the Senate' (5&') 5f the Presi&ent fails to %eto it within thirt" &a"s after re!eipt thereof an& !o uni!ate the %eto to the @ouse fro whi!h it ori,inate&H (5&') Legi+'ati0e P&5er8 Pre+= AF3in&J+ Ti1e 9!##6:
No' 1; * /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1 an& 2 issue& :" Presi&ent Cora=on C' +?uino !reate& the Presi&ential Co ission on $oo& $o%ern ent (PC$$) an& e powere& it to se?uester an" propert" shown pri a fa!ie to :e ill*,otten wealth of the late Presi&ent 8ar!osH his relati%es an& !ronies' /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 1# %ests on the San&i,an:a"an ;uris&i!tion to tr" hi&&en wealth !ases' An +pril 1#H 198)H after an in%esti,ationH the PC$$ se?uestere& the assets of M CorporationH 5n!'

(1) 3he !ontention of M Corporation shoul& :e re;e!te&' /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1# were issue& in 198)' +t that ti e Presi&ent Cora=on +?uino e0er!ise& le,islati%e power Se!tion 1H +rti!le 55 of the Pro%isional Constitution esta:lishe& :" Pro!la ation NoH 3H pro%i&e&:
C<ntil a le,islature is ele!te& an& !on%ene& un&er a new !onstitutionH the Presi&ent shall !ontinue to e0er!ise le,islati%e power'C

7iDewiseH Se!tion )H +rti!le ME555 of the 1987 Constitution rea&s: 3he in!u :ent Presi&ent shall !ontinue to e0er!ise le,islati%e power until the first Con,ress is !on%ene&'C
5n the !ase of Gapatiran n, ,a Na,lilin,Do& sa Pa a*halaan n, Pilipinas' 5n!' %' 3anH 1)3 SC1+ 371' the Supre e Court rule& that the Pro%isional Constitution an& the 1987 ConstitutionH :oth re!o,ni=e& the power of the presi&ent to e0er!ise le,islati%e powers until the first Con,ress !reate& un&er the 1987 Constitution was !on%ene& on >ul" 27H 1987'

(2) /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1# are not :ills of attain&er' '''' Legi+'ati0e P&5er+ 9!#$#:
No' 1#: +n e0istin, law ,rants ,o%ern ent e plo"ees the option to retire upon rea!hin, the a,e of 27 "ears an& !o pletion of at least 30 "ears of total ,o%ern ent ser%i!e' +s a fis!al retren!h ent easureH the Affi!e of the Presi&ent later issue& a 8e oran&u Cir!ular re?uirin, ph"si!al in!apa!it" as an a&&itional !on&ition for optional retire ent a,e of )2 "ears' + ,o%ern ent e plo"eeH whose appli!ation for optional retire ent was &enie& :e!ause he was :elow )2 "ears of a,e an& was not ph"si!all" in!apa!itate&H file& an a!tion in !ourt ?uestionin, the &isappro%al of his appli!ation !lai in, that the 8e oran&u Cir!ular is %oi&' 5s the !ontention of the e plo"ee !orre!tL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the !ontention of the e plo"ee is !orre!t' 5n 8arasi,an %s' Cru=H 120 SC1 + 1H it was hel& that su!h a e oran&u !ir!ular is %oi&' 9" intro&u!in, ph"si!al !apa!it" as an a&&itional !on&ition for optional retire entH the e oran&u !ir!ular trie& to a en& the law' Su!h a power is lo&,e& with the le,islati%e :ran!h an& not with the e0e!uti%e :ran!h'

CorporationH 5n!' !lai e& that Presi&ent +?uinoH as Presi&entH !oul& not lawfull" issue /0e!uti%e Ar&ers Nos' 1H 2 an& 1#H whi!h ha%e the for!e of lawH on the ,roun& that le,islation is a fun!tion of Con,ress' -e!i&e'

Sai& !orporation also ?uestione& the %ali&it" of the three e0e!uti%e or&ers on the ,roun& that the" are :ills of attain&er an&H thereforeH un!onstitutional' -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

L&an+ E2tended t& Me1ber+ &) C&ngre++ 9!##!:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$"

No' 9: +' +fter 2 Fe:ruar" 1987H the Philippine National 9anD (PN9) ,rants a loan to Con,ress an M' 5s the loan %iolati%e of the ConstitutionL
Suppose the loan ha& instea& :een ,rante& :efore 2 Fe:ruar" 1987H :ut was outstan&in, on that &ate with a re ainin, :alan!e on the prin!ipal in the a ount of P20H000'00H !an the PN9 %ali&l" ,i%e Con,ress an M an e0tension of ti e after sai& &ate to settle the o:li,ationL

(1) 3o a!t as national :oar& of !an%assers for


Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&ent' (+rt' E55H se!' #)'

(2) 3o

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+' 6hether or not the loan is %iolati%e of the 1987 Constitution &epen&s upon its purpose' 5f it was o:taine& for a :usiness purposeH it is %iolati%e of the Constitution' 5f it was o:taine& for so e other purposeH e','H for housin,' 5t is not %iolati%e of the Constitution :e!ause un&er Se!tion 1)H +rti!le M5' 8e :ers of Con,ress are prohi:ite& fro o:tainin, loans fro ,o%ern ent*owne& :anDs onl" if it is for a :usiness purpose' 5f the loan was ,rante& :efore the effe!ti%it" of the Constitution on Fe:ruar" 2H 1987H the Philippine National 9anD !annot e0ten& its aturit" after Fe:ruar" 2H 1987H if the loan was o:taine& for a :usiness purpose' 5n su!h a !ase the e0tension is a finan!ial a!!o o&ation whi!h is also prohi:ite& :" the Constitution'

&e!i&e whether the Presi&ent is te poraril" &isa:le& in the e%ent he reassu es his offi!e after the Ca:inetH :" a a;orit" of %ote of its e :ersH &e!lare& that he is una:le to &is!har,e the powers an& &uties of his offi!e an& now within fi%e &a"s insists that the Presi&ent is reall" una:le to &is!har,e the powers an& &uties of the presi&en!"' (+rt' E55H se!' 11)

(3) 3o !on!ur in the ,rant of a nest" :" the Presi&ent' (+rt' E55H se!' 19)H
(#) 3o initiate throu,h the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an&H throu,h the SenateH to tr" all !ases of i pea!h ent a,ainst the Presi&entH Ei!e Presi&entH the 8e :ers of the Supre e CourtH the 8e :ers of the Constitutional Co issions an& the A :u&s anH for !ulpa:le %iolation of the ConstitutionH treasonH :ri:er"H ,raft an& !orruptionH other hi,h !ri esH or :etra"al of pu:li! trust' (+rt' M5H se!s' 2*3)' (2) 3o a!t as a !onstituent asse :l" for the re%ision or a en& ent of the Constitution'

(+rt' ME55)'

M3'ti<Party Sy+te1 9!###: No M5E * -is!uss the erits an& &e erits of the ulti*part" s"ste ' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+ ulti*part" s"ste pro%i&es %oters with a ,reater !hoi!e of !an&i&atesH i&easH an& platfor s instea& of li itin, their !hoi!e to two partiesH whose i&eas a" :e sterile' 5t also lea%es roo for &eser%in, !an&i&ates who are not a!!epta:le to those who !ontrol the two &o inant parties to seeD pu:li! offi!e' An the other han&H a ulti*part" s"ste a" aDe it &iffi!ult to o:tain a sta:le an& worDa:le a;orit"H sin!e pro:a:l" no part" will ,et a a;orit"' 7iDewiseH the opposition will :e weaDene& if there are se%eral inorit" parties'

N&n<Legi+'ati0e P&5er+8 E1ergen(y P&5er+8 ReF3i+ite+ 9!##%: No' 11: -urin, a perio& of national e er,en!"' Con,ress a" ,rant e er,en!" powers to the Presi&entH State the !on&itions un&er whi!h su!h %esture is allowe&' SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er Se!tion 23(2)H +rti!le E5 of the Constitution' Con,ress a" ,rant the Presi&ent e er,en!" powers su:;e!t to the followin, !on&itions: (1) 3here is a war or other national e er,en!": (2) 3he ,rant of e er,en!" powers ust :e for a li ite& perio&; (3) 3he ,rant of e er,en!" powers is su:;e!t to su!h restri!tions as Con,ress a" pres!ri:e; an&
(#) 3he e er,en!" powers ust :e e0er!ise& to !arr" out a &e!lare& national poli!"'

N&n<Legi+'ati0e P&5er+ 9!#$$:


No' 12: 7e,islati%e powers ha& :een %este& :" the Constitution in the Con,ress of the Philippines' 5n a&&itionH the Constitution also ,rante& the law aDin, :o&"H non*le,islati%e powers' Gin&l" na e fi%e of the latter'

Pr&,ibiti&n+ and In,ibiti&n+ &) P3b'i( O))i(e 9"66;:


9-<a: >+1 fa!es a &ile a: shoul& he a!!ept a Ca:inet appoint ent now or run later for SenatorL @a%in, su!!ee&e& in law pra!ti!e as well as prospere& in pri%ate :usiness where he an& his wife ha%e su:stantial in%est entsH he

SUGGESTED ANSWER: Con,ress has the followin, le,islati%e powers:

non*

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$-

now !onte plates pu:li! ser%i!e :ut without losin, the fle0i:ilit" to en,a,e in !orporate affairs or parti!ipate in professional a!ti%ities within ethi!al :oun&s' 3aDin, into a!!ount the prohi:itions an& inhi:itions of pu:li! offi!e whether as Senator or Se!retar"H he turns to "ou for a&%i!e to resol%e his &ile a' 6hat is "our a&%i!eL /0plain :riefl"' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 shall a&%ise >+1 to run for S/N+3A1' +s a SenatorH he !an retain his in%est ents in his :usinessH althou,h he ust aDe a full &is!losure of his :usiness an& finan!ial interests an& notif" the Senate of a potential !onfli!t of interest if he authors a :ill' (Se!tion 12H +rti!le E5 of the 1987 Constitution') @e !an !ontinue pra!ti!in, lawH :ut he !annot personall" appear as !ounsel :efore an" !ourt of ;usti!eH the /le!toral 3ri:unalsH or ?uasi* ;u&i!ial an& other a& inistrati%e :o&ies' (Se!tion 1#H +rti!le E5 of the 1987 Constitution') +s a e :er of the Ca:inetH >+1 !annot &ire!tl" or in&ire!tl" pra!ti!e law or parti!ipate in an" :usiness' @e will ha%e to &i%est hi self of his in%est ents in his :usiness' (Se!tion 13H +rti!le E55 of the 1987 Constitution') 5n fa!tH the Constitutional prohi:ition i pose& on e :ers of the Ca:inet !o%ers :oth pu:li! an& pri%ate offi!e or e plo" ent' (Ci%il 7i:erties <nion %' /0e!uti%e Se!retar"H 19# SC1+ 317)

+ssu e that "ou are a e :er of the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal where the petition for 9rownBs ouster is pen&in,' @ow woul& "ou &e!i&e the three issues raise& a,ainst hi L SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he first an& thir& ,roun&s ha%e no erit' 9ut the se!on& is well taDen an&H thereforeH 9rown shoul& :e &is?ualifie&' 1' 1o:ert 9rown is a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines' + person :orn of a Filipino other an& an alien father :efore >anuar" 17H 1973H who thereafter upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" ele!t Philippine !iti=enshipH is a !iti=en of the Philippines (+rt' 5EH se!' 1(3))' <n&er +rt' 5EH se!H 2 he is also &ee e& a natural*:orn !iti=en'
2' 3he Constitution re?uiresH a on, other thin,sH that a !an&i&ate for e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es ust :e at least 22 "ears of a,e Con the &a" of the ele!tion'C (+rt' E5H se!' ))' +s 9rown was :orn on 8a" 12H 19)2H he &i& not :e!o e 22 "ears ol& until 8a" 12H 1987' @en!e on 8a" 11H 1987H when the ele!tion was hel&H he was # &a"s short of the re?uire& a,e' 3' 3he Constitution pro%i&es that those who seeD either to !han,e their !iti=enship or to a!?uire the status of an i i,rant of another !ountr" C&urin, their tenureC shall :e &ealt with :" law (+rt' M5H se!' 17)' 3he pro%ision !annot appl" to 9rown for the followin, reasons: FirstH 9rown is in a&&ition an + eri!an !iti=en an& thus has a &ual !iti=enship whi!h is allowe& :" the Constitution' (Cf' +rt' 5EH se!' #)H Se!on&H 9rown &i& not seeD to a!?uire the status of an i i,rantH :ut is an + eri!an :" :irth un&er the prin!iple of ;us soli o:tainin, in the <nite& States' 3hir&H he &i& not seeD to !han,e his status &urin, his tenure as a pu:li! offi!er' FourthH the pro%ision of +rt' M5H se!' 17 is not self*e0e!utin, :ut re?uires an i ple entin, law' FifthH :ut a:o%e allH the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal has no ;uris&i!tion to &e!i&e this ?uestion sin!e it &oes not !on!ern the ?ualifi!ation of a e :er*ele!t'

>3a'i)i(ati&n+8 C&ngre++1en 9!#$$:


No' 13: * 1o:ert 9rown was :orn in @awaii on 8a" 12H 19)2H of an + eri!an father an& a Filipina other' An 8a" 1)H 1983 while hol&in, an + eri!an passportH he re,istere& as a Filipino with the Philippine Consulate at @onoluluH @awaii' 5n Septe :erH 1983 he returne& to the PhilippinesH an& tooD up resi&en!e at 9oa!H 8arin&u?ueH ho etown of his other' @e re,istere& as a %oterH %ote&H an& e%en parti!ipate& as a lea&er of one of the !an&i&ates in that &istri!t in the 198# 9atasan ele!tions' 5n the ele!tions of 1987H he ran for Con,ress anH an& won' @is sole opponent is now ?uestionin, his ?ualifi!ations an& is tr"in, to oust hi on two :asi! !lai s:

>3a'i)i(ati&n+8 C&ngre++1en8 9!##-:


No' 1: 5n 19)#' 1uffaH a Filipina &o esti! helper worDin, in @on,Don,H went to 3aipei for a %a!ationH where she et Chen, Sio Pao' who she arrie&' <n&er Chinese 7awH 1uffa auto ati!all" :e!a e a Chinese !iti=en' 3he !ouple resi&e& in @on,Don,H where on 8a" 9H 19)2H 1uffa ,a%e :irth to a :o" na e& /rnest' <pon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"H /rnest ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship' +fter the /-S+

@e is not a natural :orn Filipino !iti=enH :ut is in fa!tH an + eri!anH :orn in @awaiiH an inte,ral portion of the <'S'+'H who hol&s an + eri!an passport; @e &i& not eet the a,e re?uire ent; an& @e has a C,reen !ar&C fro the <'S' $o%ern ent'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$;

1e%olutionH /rnest &e!i&e& to li%e per anentl" in the PhilippinesH where he prospere& as a :usiness an' -urin, the 8a" 11H 1993 ele!tionH /rnest ran an& won as a !on,ress an' @is opponentH notin, /rnestBs Chinese an!estr"H file& a petition to &is?ualif" the latter on the followin, ,roun&s; (1) /rnest Chen, is not a natural :o Filipino; an& (2) he is un&era,e&' -e!i&e'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) /rnest !annot :e &is?ualifie&'''''


2) /rnest is not un&er*a,e&' @a%in, :een :orn on 8a" 9H 19)2H he was o%er twent"*fi%e "ears ol& on the &ate of the 8a" 11H 1993 ele!tion' (/le!tion was hel& on 8a" 11H 1992)' Se!tion )H +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH re?uires !on,ress en to :e at least twent"*fi%e "ears of a,e on the &a" of the ele!tion'

Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" to :e !onsi&ere& a natural :orn !iti=en an& ?ualifie& to run for Con,ress' 1epu:li! +!t No' )809 re&u!e& the a;orit" a,e to ei,hteen (18) "ears' Cuen!o %' Se!retar" of >usti!eH 2 SC1+ 108 re!o,ni=e& three (3) "ears fro rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit" as the reasona:le perio& for ele!tin, Philippine !iti=enship' Sin!e 1epu:li! +!t No' )809 tooD effe!t in 1989 an& there is no showin, that Ei!tor +h a& ele!te& Philippine !iti=enship within three (3) "ears fro the ti e he rea!he& the a,e of a;orit" on -e!e :er 1)H 199CH he is not ?ualifie& to run for Con,ress'

5f he !onsulte& e on -e!e :er 1)H 1991H 5 woul& infor hi that he shoul& ele!t Philippine !iti=enship so that he !an :e !onsi&ere& a natural :orn !iti=en' Se*arati&n &) P&5er+ 9!#$$: No' 22: Can an" other &epart ent or a,en!" of the $o%ern ent re%iew a &e!ision of the Supre e CourtL 6h" or wh" notL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No' 3he Supre e Court is the hi,hest ar:iter of le,al ?uestions' (>a%ier %' Co ele!H 1## SC1+ 19# (198))) 3o allow re%iew of its &e!ision :" the other &epart ents of ,o%ern ent woul& upset the !lassi! pattern of separation of powers an& &estro" the :alan!e :etween the ;u&i!iar" an& the other &epart ents of ,o%ern ent' +s the >usti!es sai& in their answer to the !o plaint for i pea!h ent in the Co ittee on >usti!e of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH C>ust as it is !o pletel" una!!epta:le to file !har,es a,ainst the in&i%i&ual e :ers of Con,ress for the laws ena!te& :" the upon the ar,u ent that these laws are %iolati%e of the ConstitutionH or are a :etra"al of pu:li! trustH or are un;ust' So tooH shoul& it :e e?uall" i per issi:le to aDe the in&i%i&ual e :ers of the Supre e Court a!!ounta:le for the !ourtBs &e!isions or rulin,s'

>3a'i)i(ati&n+8 C&ngre++1en8 9!###: No 555 * C' Ei!tor +h a& was :orn on -e!e :er 1)H 1972 of a Filipino other an& an alien father' <n&er the law of his fatherBs !ountr"H his other &i& not a!?uire his fatherBs !iti=enship' Ei!tor !onsults "ou on -e!e :er 21H 1993 an& infor s "ou of his intention to run for Con,ress in the 1992 ele!tions' 5s he ?ualifie& to runL 6hat a&%i!e woul& "ou ,i%e hi L 6oul& "our answer :e the sa e if he ha& seen an& !onsulte& "ou on -e!e :er 1)H 1991 an& infor e& "ou of his &esire to run for Con,ress in the 1992 ele!tionsL -is!uss "our answer' (3N) IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
C' NoH Ei!tor +h a& is not ?ualifie& to run for Con,ress in the 1992 ele!tions' <n&er Se!tion )H +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es ust :e at least twent"*fi%e (22) "ears of a,e on the &a" of the ele!tion' Sin!e he will :e less than twent"*fi%e (22) "ears of a,e in 1992H Ei!tor +h a& is not ?ualifie& to run' <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH to :e &ee e& a natural*:orn !iti=enH Ei!tor +h a& ust ele!t Philippine !iti=enship upon rea!hin, the a,e of a;orit"' 5 shall a&%ise hi to ele!t Philippine !iti=enshipH if he has not "et &one soH an& to wait until the 1998 ele!tions'

Se*arati&n &) P&5er+ 9"66-:


No 55 * + ,roup of losin, liti,ants in a !ase &e!i&e& :" the Supre e Court file& a !o plaint :efore the A :u&s an !har,in, the >usti!es with Dnowin,l" an& &eli:eratel" ren&erin, an un;ust &e!ision in utter %iolation of the penal laws of the lan&' Can the A :u&s an %ali&l" taDe !o,ni=an!e of the !aseL /0plain'

8" answer will :e the sa e if he !onsulte& e in 1991 an& infor e& e of his &esire to run in the 1992 ele!tions' SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
C' <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5E of the ConstitutionH Ei!tor +h a& ust ha%e ele!te&

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the A :u&s an !annot entertain the !o plaint' +s state& in the !ase of 5n re: 7aureta' 1#8 SC1+ 382 P1987QH pursuant to the prin!iple of separation of powersH the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$@

!orre!tness of the &e!isions of the Supre e Court as final ar:iter of all ;usti!ia:le &isputes is !on!lusi%e upon all other &epart ents of the ,o%ern ent; the A :u&s an has no power to re%iew the &e!isions of the Supre e Court :" entertainin, a !o plaint a,ainst the >usti!es of the Supre e Court for Dnowin,l" ren&erin, an un;ust &e!ision' SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
+rti!le M5H Se!tion 1 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that pu:li! offi!ers ust at all ti es :e a!!ounta:le to the people' Se!tion 22 of the A :u&s an +!t pro%i&es that the Affi!e of the A :u&s an has the power to in%esti,ate an" serious is!on&u!t alle,e&l" !o itte& :" offi!ials re o%a:le :" i pea!h ent for the purpose of filin, a %erifie& !o plaint for i pea!h ent if warrante&' 3he A :u&s an !an entertain the !o plaint for this purpose'

1epresentati%es for a thir& ter ' 3his ter shoul& :e in!lu&e& in the !o putation of the ter li itsH e%en if C+C &i& not ser%e for a full ter ' (1e!or& of the Constitutional Co issionH Eol' nH p' 292') @e re aine& a 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es e%en if he was suspen&e&'

ARTICLE .II E2e(3ti0e De*art1ent


A**&inting P&5er8 A(ting 0+= Per1anent A**&int1ent 9"66-:
No E * 6hat is the nature of an Ca!tin, appoint entC to a ,o%ern ent offi!eL -oes su!h an appoint ent ,i%e the appointee the ri,ht to !lai that the appoint ent willH in ti eH ripen into a per anent oneL /0plain'

T,ree<Ter1 Li1it: C&ngre++1en 9!##?: No' 13: * MH a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH was ser%in, his thir& !onse!uti%e ter in the @ouse' 5n >une 199) he was appointe& Se!retar" of National -efense' Can he run for ele!tion to the Senate in the 1998 ele!tionsL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: OesH M !an run for the Senate in the 1988 ele!tion' <n&er Se!tion 7H +rti!le M of the ConstitutionH ha%in, ser%e& for three !onse!uti%e ter s as 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' M is onl" prohi:ite& fro runnin, for the sa e position' T,ree<Ter1 Li1it8 C&ngre++1en 9"66!:
No E * -urin, his thir& ter H C+CH a 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH was suspen&e& fro offi!e for a perio& of )0 &a"s :" his !ollea,ues upon a %ote of two*thir&s of all the 8e :ers of the @ouse' 5n the ne0t su!!ee&in, ele!tionH he file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the sa e position' C9CH the opposin, !an&i&ateH file& an a!tion for &is?ualifi!ation of C+C on the ,roun& that the latterBsH !an&i&a!" %iolate& Se!tion 7' +rti!le E5 of the Constitution whi!h pro%i&es that no 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es shall ser%e for ore than three !onse!uti%e ter s' C+C answere& that he was not :arre& fro runnin, a,ain for that position :e!ause his ser%i!e was interrupte& :" his )0* &a" suspension whi!h was in%oluntar"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to Se%illa %' Court of +ppeals' 209 SC1+ )37 P1992QH an a!tin, appoint ent is erel" te porar"' +s hel& in 8aroho :sar %' +lontoH 19# SC1+ 390 P1991QH a te porar" appoint ent !annot :e!o e a per anent appoint entH unless a new appoint ent whi!h is per anent is a&e' 3his hol&s true unless the a!tin, appoint ent was a&e :e!ause of a te porar" %a!an!"' 5n su!h a !aseH the te porar" appointee hol&s offi!e until the assu ption of offi!e :" the per anent appointee'

A**&inting P&5er8 ad interi1 a**&int1ent+ 9!##!: No' 3: * An 3 8a" 1992H while Con,ress is on a short re!ess for the ele!tionsH the presi&ent appoints 1enato &e Sil%a to the ranD of $eneral (#*star) in the +r e& For!es' She also &esi,nates hi as Chief of Staff of the +FP' @e i e&iatel" taDes his oath an& assu es that offi!eH with the ranD of #*star $eneral of the +FP'
6hen Con,ress resu es its session on 17 8a" 1992H the Co ission on +ppoint ents infor s the Affi!e of the Presi&ent that it has re!ei%e& fro her offi!e onl" the appoint ent of -e Sil%a to the ranD of #*star $eneral an& that unless his appoint ent to the Affi!e of the Chief of Staff of the +FP is also su: itte&H the Co ission will not a!t on the atter'

Can B+BH le,all" !ontinue with his !an&i&a!" or is he alrea&" :arre&L 6h"L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
C+C !annot le,all" !ontinue with his !an&i&a!"' @e was ele!te& as 8e :er of the @ouse of

3he Presi&ent aintains that she has su: itte& to the Co ission all that the Constitution !alls for' (a) 6ho is !orre!tL

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$?

(:) -i& $en' &e Sil%a %iolate the Constitution in i e&iatel" assu in, offi!e prior to a !onfir ation of his appoint entL
(!) +re the appoint ent an& &esi,nation %ali&L

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) + is senior to 9' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in Su ers %s' A=aeta' 81 Phil' 72#H the a& interi appoint ent e0ten&e& to + is per anent an& is effe!ti%e upon his a!!eptan!e althou,h it is su:;e!t to !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he Presi&ent is !orre!t' <n&er Presi&ential -e!ree No' 3)0H the ,ra&e of four*star ,eneral is !onferre& onl" upon the Chief of Staff' @en!eH the appoint ent of 1enato &e Sil%a as a four*star ,eneral ust :e &ee e& to !arr" with it his appoint ent as Chief of Staff of the +FPH (:) $en' 1enato &e Sil%a &i& not %iolate the Constitution when he i e&iatel" assu e& offi!e :efore the !onfir ation of his appoint entH sin!e his appoint ent was an a& interi appoint ent' <n&er +rti!le E5 5H Se!' 1) of the ConstitutionH su!h appoint ent is i e&iatel" effe!ti%e an& is su:;e!t onl" to &isappro%al :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents or as a result of the ne0t a&;ourn ent of the Con,ress' (!) 3he appoint ent an& &esi,nation of $en' &e Sil%a are %ali& for reasons ,i%en a:o%e' @owe%erH fro another point of %iew the" are not %ali& :e!ause the" were a&e within the perio& of the :an for aDin, appoint ents' <n&er +rti!le E55H Se!' 12 the Presi&ent is prohi:ite& fro aDin, appoint ents within the perio& of two (2) onths pre!e&in, the ele!tion for Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&ent' 3he appoint ent in this !ase will :e a&e on 8a" 3H 1992 whi!h is ;ust 8 &a"s awa" fro the ele!tion for Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&ent on 8a" 11H 1992' For this reason the appoint ent an& &esi,nation of $en' &e Sil%a are after all

2) 5f Con,ress a&;ourne& without the appoint ents of + an& 9 ha%in, :een !onfir e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsH + !annot return to his ol& position' +s hel& in Su ers %s' (=aetaH 81 Phil' 72#H :" a!!eptin, an a& interi appoint ent to a new positionH + wai%e& his ri,ht to hol& his ol& position' An the other han&H sin!e 9 &i& not assu e the new positionH he retaine& his ol& position' A**&inting P&5er8 A**&int1ent+ ReF3iring C&n)ir1ati&n8 RA ?#%@< Un(&n+tit3ti&na' 9"66":
No E * An -e!e :er 13H 1990H the Presi&ent si,ne& into law 1epu:li! +!t No' )972 (su:se?uentl" a en&e& :" 1+ No' 8221) !reatin, the -epart ent of 5nterior an& 7o!al $o%ern ent' Se!tions 2) an& 31 of the law pro%i&e that senior offi!ers of the Philippine National Poli!e (PNP)H fro Senior Superinten&entH Chief Superinten&entH -eput" -ire!tor $eneral to -ire!tor $eneral or Chief of PNP shallH a on, othersH :e appointe& :" the Presi&ent su:;e!t to !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents' 5n 1991 the Presi&ent pro ote& Chief Superinten&ent 1o:erto 8atapan, an& Senior Superinten&ent Conra&o 8ahi,pit to the positions of -ire!tor an& Chief Superinten&ent of the PNPH respe!ti%el"' 3heir appoint ents were in a per anent !apa!it"' 6ithout un&er,oin, !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsH 8atapan, an& 8ahi,pit tooD their oath of offi!e an& assu e& their respe!ti%e positions' 3hereafterH the -epart ent of 9u&,et an& 8ana,e ent authori=e& &is:urse ents for their salaries an& other e olu ents' >uan 9anta" file& a ta0pa"erBs suit ?uestionin, the le,alit" of the appoint ents an& &is:urse ents a&e' 9anta" ar,ues that the appoint ents are in%ali& inas u!h as the sa e ha%e not :een !onfir e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsH as re?uire& un&er Se!tions 2) an& 31 of 1'+' No' )972'

in%ali&'

PNote: 8a" 3H 1991 an& 8a" 17H 1992 are Sun&a"s' @owe%er the Co ittee fin&s no rele%an!e in the fa!t that these are holi&a"s an& therefore &e!i&e& to i,nore this fa!t'Q

A**&inting P&5er8 Ad Interi1 A**&int1ent+ 9!##;:


No' 1); 5n -e!e :er 1988H while Con,ress was in re!essH + was e0ten&e& an a& interi appoint ent as 9ri,a&ier $eneral of the Philippine +r "H in Fe:ruar" 1989' 6hen Con,ress was in sessionH 9 was no inate& as 9ri,a&ier $eneral of the Philippine +r "' 9Bs no ination was !onfir e& on +u,ust 2H 1989 while +Bs appoint ent was !onfir e& on Septe :er 2H 1989'

6ho is &ee e& ore senior of the twoH + or 9L Suppose Con,ress a&;ourne& without the Co ission on +ppoint ents a!tin, on :oth appoint entsH !an + an& 9 retain their ori,inal ranDs of !olonelL

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$%

-eter ine with reasons the le,alit" of the appoint ents an& the &is:urse ents for salaries :" &is!ussin, the !onstitutional %ali&it" of Se!tions 2) an& 31 of 1'+' No' )972' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he appoint ents of 8atapan, an& 8ahi,pit are %ali& e%en if the" were not !onfir e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsH :e!ause the" are not a on, the pu:li! offi!ials whose appoint ents are re?uire& to :e !onfir e& :" the first senten!e of +rti!le E55H Se!tion 1) of the Constitution' +!!or&in, to 8analo %' Sisto=aH 312 SC1+ 239 (1999)H Se!tions 2) an& 31 of 1epu:li! +!t )972 are un!onstitutionalH :e!ause Con,ress !annot :" law e0pan& the list of pu:li! offi!ials re?uire& to :e !onfir e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents' Sin!e the appoint ents of 8atapan, an& 8ahi,pit are %ali&H the &is:urse ents of their salaries an& e olu ents are %ali&'

!onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents are the hea& of e0e!uti%e &epart entsH a :assa&orsH other pu:li! inisters an& !onsulsH offi!ers of the ar e& for!es fro the ranD of !olonel or na%al !aptainH
an& other offi!ials whose appoint ents are %este& in the Presi&ent :" the Constitution'

A**&inting P&5er8 Cind+ &) A**&int1ent+ 9!##;: 6hen is an appoint ent in the !i%il ser%i!e per anentL
-istin,uish :etween an Cappoint ent in an a!tin, !apa!it"C e0ten&e& :" a -epart ent Se!retar" fro an a& interi appoint ent e0ten&e& :" the Presi&ent'

-istin,uish :etween a pro%isional a te porar" appoint ent' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

an&

A**&inting P&5er8 Categ&rie+ &) O))i(ia'+ 9!###: +' 1') 6hat are the si0 !ate,ories of offi!ials who are su:;e!t to the appointin, power of the Presi&entL (2N)
2') Na e the !ate,or" or !ate,ories of offi!ials whose appoint ents nee& !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsL (2N)

1) <n&er Se!tion 22(a) of the Ci%il Ser%i!e -e!reeH an appoint ent in the !i%il ser%i!e is P/18+N/N3 when issue& to a person who eets all the re?uire ents for the position to whi!h he is :ein, appointe&H in!lu&in, the appropriate eli,i:ilit" pres!ri:e&H in a!!or&an!e with the pro%isions of lawH rules an& stan&ar&s pro ul,ate& in pursuan!e thereof' 2) +n appoint ent in an +C35N$ C+P+C53O e0ten&e& :" a -epart ent Se!retar" is not per anent :ut te porar"' @en!eH the -epart ent Se!retar" a" ter inate the ser%i!es of the appointee at an" ti e' An the other han&H an +- 5N3/158 +PPA5N38/N3 e0ten&e& :" the Presi&ent is an appoint ent whi!h is su:;e!t to !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents an& was a&e &urin, the re!ess of Con,ress' +s hel& in Su ers %s' (=aetaH 81 Phil' 72#H an a& interi appoint ent is per anent' 3) 5n Se!tion 2# (&) of the Ci%il Ser%i!e +!t of 1929H a 3/8PA1+1O +PPA5N38/N3 is one issue& to a person to a position nee&e& onl" for a li ite& perio& not e0!ee&in, si0 onths' <n&er Se!tion 22(:) of the Ci%il Ser%i!e -e!reeH a te porar" appoint ent is one issue& to a person who eets all the re?uire ents for the position to whi!h he is :ein, appointe& e0!ept the appropriate !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:ilit" :e!ause of the a:sen!e of appropriate eli,i:les an& it is ne!essar" in the pu:li! 5nterest to fill the %a!an!"' An the other han&' Se!tion 2#(e) of the Ci%il Ser%i!e +!t of 1929 &efine& a P1AE5S5AN+7

SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er Se!tion 1)H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the si0 !ate,ories of offi!ials who are su:;e!t to the appointin, power of the Presi&ent are the followin,: 1' @ea& of e0e!uti%e &epart ents; 2' + :assa&orsH other pu:li! inisters an& !onsuls; 3' Affi!ers of the ar e& for!es fro the ranD of !olonel or na%al !aptain; #' Ather offi!ers whose appoint ents are %este& in hi :" the Constitution; 2' +ll other offi!ers of the ,o%ern ent whose appoint ents are not otherwise pro%i&e& :" law; an&
)' 3hose who he a" :e authori=e& :" law to appoint' (Cru=H Philippine Politi!al 7awH

1998 e&'H pp' 20#*202)

(I+ is s*gges+ed +-a+ i) +-e e>a0inee )o''o&ed +-e c'assi)ica+ion in 7ar0ien+o /. Aison( 15% 7CRA 5,9 and na0ed on'y )o*r ca+egories( beca*se -e co0bined +-e )irs+ +-ree ca+egories in+o one( -e be gi/en )*'' credi+.)

2') +!!or&in, to Sar iento %' 8isonH 12) SC1+ 2#9H the onl" offi!ers whose appoint ents nee&

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$$

+PPA5N38/N3 as one 5ssue& upon the prior authori=ation of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission in a!!or&an!e with its pro%isions an& the rules an& stan&ar&s pro ul,ate& in pursuan!e thereto to a person who has not ?ualifie& in an appropriate e0a ination :ut who otherwise eets the re?uire ents for appoint ent to a re,ular position in the !o petiti%e ser%i!eH whene%er a %a!an!" o!!urs an& the fillin, thereof is ne!essar" in the interest of the ser%i!e an& there is no appropriate re,ister of eli,i:les at the ti e of appoint ent'

to :e finishe& in not ore than si0 onths :ut :e!ause the interest of the ser%i!e re?uires that !ertain worD :e &one :" a re,ular e plo"eeH onl" that no one with appropriate eli,i:ilit" !an :e appointe& to it' @en!eH an" other eli,i:le a" :e appointe& to &o su!h worD in the eanti e that a suita:le eli,i:le &oes not ?ualif" for the position' 3o :e ore pre!iseH a pro%isional appoint ent a" :e e0ten&e& onl" to a person who has not ?ualifie& in an appropriate e0a ination :ut who otherwise eets the re?uire ents for appoint ent to a re,ular position in the !o petiti%e ser%i!eH eanin, one who ust an" wa" :e a !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:le' 5n the !ase of a te porar" appoint entH all that the law en;oins is that Cpreferen!e in fillin, su!h position :e ,i%en to persons on appropriate eli,i:le lists'C 8erel" ,i%in, preferen!e presupposes that e%en a non*eli,i:le a" :e appointe&' <n&er the lawH e%en if the appointee has the re?uire& !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:ilit"H his appoint ent is still te porar" si pl" :e!ause su!h is the nature of the worD to :e &one'
NA3/: Sin!e pro%isional appoint ents ha%e alrea&" :een a:olishe& e0a inees shoul& :e ,i%en full !re&it for whate%er answer the" a" or a" not ,i%e'

Pro%isional appoint ents in ,eneral ha%e alrea&" :een a:olishe& :" 1epu:li! +!t )0#0' @owe%erH it still applies with re,ar& to tea!hers un&er the 8a,na Carta for Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hers' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 3he !ase of 1e,is %s' As enaH 197 SC1+ 308H lai& &own the &istin!tion :etween a pro%isional an& a te porar" appoint ent'
+ P1AE5S5AN+7 +PPA5N38/N3 is e0ten&e& to a person who has not ?ualifie& in an appropriate e0a ination :ut who otherwise eets the re?uire ents for appoint ent to a re,ular position in the !o petiti%e ser%i!e whene%er a %a!an!" o!!urs an& the fillin, thereof is ne!essar" in the interest of the ser%i!e an& there is no appropriate re,ister of eli,i:le at the ti e of the appoint ent' An the other han&H a 3/8PA1+1O +PPA5N38/N3 ,i%en to a non*!i%il ser%i!e eli,i:le is without a &efinite tenure an& is &epen&ent on the pleasure of the appointin, power'

A**&inting P&5er8 Li1itati&n+ Pre+identia' A**&int1ent+ 9!##%:

&n

+ pro%isional appoint ent is ,oo& onl" until repla!e ent :" a !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:le an& in no !ase :e"on& 30 &a"s fro &ate of re!eipt :" the appointin, offi!er of the !ertifi!ate of eli,i:ilit"' (Se!' 2# P!W' 1epu:li! +!t 22)0)'
+ pro%isional appoint ent !onte plates a &ifferent situation fro that of a te porar" appoint ent' 6hereas a te porar" appoint ent is &esi,ne& to fill a position nee&e& onl" for a li ite& perio& not e0!ee&in, si0 ()) onthsH a pro%isional appoint entH on the other han&H is inten&e& for the !ontin,en!" that Ca %a!an!" o!!urs an& the fillin, thereof is ne!essar" in the interest of the ser%i!e an& there is no appropriate re,ister of eli,i:les at the ti e of the appoint ent'C 5n other wor&sH the reason for e0ten&in, a pro%isional appoint ent is not :e!ause there is an o!!asional worD to :e &one an& is e0pe!te&

No' 7: + onth :efore a forth!o in, ele!tionH C+C one of the in!u :ent Co issioners of the CA8/7/CH &ie& while in offi!e an& C9CH another Co issionerH suffere& a se%ere stroDe' 5n %iew of the pro0i it" of the ele!tions an& to a%oi& paral"=ation in the CA8/7/CH the Presi&ent who was not runnin, for an" offi!eH appointe& Co issioner C of the Co ission on +u&itH who was not a law"er :ut a !ertifie& pu:li! a!!ountant :" professionH a& interi Co issioner to su!!ee& Co issioner + an& &esi,nate& :" wa" of a te porar" easure' +sso!iate >usti!e - of the Court of +ppeals as a!tin, +sso!iate Co issioner &urin, the a:sen!e of Co issioner 9' -i& the Presi&ent &o the ri,ht thin, in e0ten&in, su!h a& interi appoint ent in fa%or of Co issioner C an& &esi,natin, >usti!e a!tin, Co issioner of the CA8/7/CL

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No' 3he Presi&ent was wron, a& interi appoint ent Co issioner C' 5n Su ers Phil' 72#H it was hel& that appoint ent is a per anent in e0ten&in, an in fa%or of %s' A=aetaH 81 an a& interi appoint ent'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

$#

<n&er Se!tion 12H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH within two onths i e&iatel" :efore the ne0t presi&ential ele!tions an& up to the en& of his ter H the Presi&ent !annot aDe per anent appoint ents'
3he &esi,nation of >usti!e - as a!tin, +sso!iate Co issioner is also in%ali&' Se!tion 1(2)' +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution prohi:its the &esi,nation of an" Co issioner of the CA8/7/C in a te porar" or a!tin, !apa!it"' Se!tion 12H +rti!le E555 of the Constitution prohi:its the &esi,nation of an" e :er of the >u&i!iar" to an" a,en!" perfor in, ?uasi* ;u&i!ial or a& inistrati%e fun!tions'

a&;ourn ent of Con,ress' + te porar" or a!tin, appointee &oes not en;o" an" se!urit" of tenureH no atter how :riefl"' (8ati:a, %' 9enipa"oH $'1' No' 1#903)H +pril 2H 2002) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: +n a& interi appoint ent is a per anent appoint ent an& &oes not %iolate Se!tion 1(2)H +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution' (Pa antasan n, 7un,so& n, 8a"nila %' 5+CH $'1' No' 7* )2#39H No%e :er 13H1982)
(:) +ssu in, the le,alit" of the first a& interi appoint ent an& assu ption of offi!e :" SantosH were his se!on& a& interi appoint ent an& su:se?uent assu ption of offi!e to the sa e position %iolations of the prohi:ition on reappoint ent un&er Se!tion 1(2)H

A**&inting P&5er+8 A**&int1ent+ 9>;<"66@:

Ad

Interi1

(1) 5n 8ar!h 2001H while Con,ress was a&;ourne&H the Presi&ent appointe& Santos as Chair an of the CA8/7/C' Santos i e&iatel" tooD his oath an& assu e& offi!e' 6hile his appoint ent was pro ptl" su: itte& to the Co ission on +ppoint ents for !onfir ationH it was not a!te& upon an& Con,ress a,ain a&;ourne&' 5n >une 2001H the Presi&ent e0ten&e& a se!on& a& interi appoint ent to Santos for the sa e position with the sa e ter H an& this appoint ent was a,ain su: itte& to the Co ission on +ppoint ents for !onfir ation' Santos tooD his oath anew an& perfor e& the fun!tions of his offi!e'

+rti!le 5M*C of the ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER:


NoH the se!on& a& interi appoint ent an& su:se?uent assu ption of offi!e &oes not %iolate the Constitution' 3he prohi:ition on reappoint ent in Se!tion 1(2)H +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution &oes not appl" to :"*passe& a& interi appoint ents' 5t !an :e re%i%e& :" a new a& interi appoint ent :e!ause there is no final &isappro%al un&er Se!tion 1)H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH an& su!h new appoint ent will not result in the appointee ser%in, :e"on& the fi0e& ter of se%en "ears' 3he phrase Cwithout reappoint entC applies onl" to one who has :een appointe& :" the Presi&ent an& !onfir e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint entsH whether or not su!h person !o pletes his ter of offi!e' 3o hol& otherwise will lea& to a:sur&ities an& ne,ate the Presi&entBs power to aDe a& interi appoint ents' (8ati:a, %' 9enipa"oH $'1' No' 1#903)H +pril 2H 2002)

1e"esH a politi!al ri%alH file& a suit assailin, !ertain or&ers issue& :" Santos' @e also ?uestione& the %ali&it" of SantosB appoint ent' 1esol%e the followin, issues: (2N)
(a) -oes SantosB assu ption of offi!e on the :asis of the a& interi appoint ents

issue& :" the Presi&ent a ount to a te porar" appoint ent whi!h is prohi:ite& :" Se!tion 1(2)H +rti!le 5M*C of the ConstitutionL ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
NoH SantosB appoint ent &oes not a ount to a te porar" appoint ent' +n a& interi appoint ent is a per anent appoint ent :e!ause it taDes effe!t i e&iatel" an& !an no lon,er :e with&rawn :" the Presi&ent on!e the appointee has ?ualifie& into offi!e' 3he fa!t that it is su:;e!t to !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents &oes not alter its per anent !hara!ter' 3he Constitution itself aDes an a& interi appoint ent per anent in !hara!ter :" aDin, it effe!ti%e until &isappro%e& :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents or until the ne0t

Cabinet Me1ber+8 'i1itati&n &n a((e*ting additi&na' d3tie+ 9!##?:


199) No' 7: Can the Se!retar" of Finan!e :e ele!te& Chair an of the 9oar& of -ire!tors of the San 8i,uel CorporationL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the Se!retar" of Finan!e !annot :e ele!te& Chair an of the 9oar& of -ire!tors of the San 8i,uel Corporation' <n&er Se!tion 13H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH e :ers of the Ca:inet !annot hol& an" other offi!e or e plo" ent &urin, their tenure unless it is otherwise pro%i&e& in the Constitution' 3he" shall not also &urin, sai& tenure parti!ipate in an" :usiness or :e finan!iall" intereste& in an" !ontra!t withH or in an" fran!hiseH or spe!ial pri%ile,e ,rante& :" the $o%ern ent or an"

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#6

su:&i%isionH a,en!" or instru entalit" thereofH in!lu&in, ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations or their su:si&iaries' 3he" shall stri!tl" a%oi& !onfli!t of interest in the !on&u!t of their offi!e' Ca''ing<&3t P&5er8 Pre+ident 9>!<"66?: 1' 6hat &o "ou ean :" the CCallin,*out PowerC of the Presi&ent un&er Se!tion 18H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er +rti!le E55H Se!' 18 of the 1987 ConstitutionH whene%er it :e!o es ne!essar"H the Presi&entH as Co an&er* in*ChiefH a" !all out the ar e& for!es to ai& hi in pre%entin, or suppressin, lawless %iolen!eH in%asion or re:ellion (-a%i& %' +rro"oH $'1' No' 17139)H 8a" 3H 200))' De('arati&n8 State &) Ca'a1ity8 Lega' E))e(t+ 9>!<"66@:
(:) 3o ,i%e the u!h nee&e& help to the Pro%in!e of +urora whi!h was &e%astate& :" t"phoons an& torrential rainsH the Presi&ent &e!lare& it in a Cstate of !ala it"'C $i%e at least four (#) le,al effe!ts of su!h &e!laration' (#N)

7' + !ri e !o itte& &urin, the state of !ala it" will :e !onsi&ere& a,,ra%ate& un&er +rt' 1#H par' 7 of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e' De('arati&n8 State &) Nati&na' E1ergen(y 9>!<"66?:
2' An Fe:ruar" 2#H 200)H Presi&ent $loria 8a!apa,al*+rro"o issue& Pro!la ation No' 1017 &e!larin, a state of national e er,en!"' 5s this Pro!la ation !onstitu*

tionalL /0plain' (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he pro!la ation is !onstitutional insofar as it !onstitutes a !all :" the Presi&ent for the +FP to pre%ent or suppress lawless %iolen!e as this is sustaine& :" Se!tion 18H +rti!le E55 of the Constitution'
@owe%erH PP 1017Bs pro%isions ,i%in, the Presi&ent e0press or i plie& power (1) to issue &e!rees; (2) to &ire!t the +FP to enfor!e o:e&ien!e to all laws e%en those not relate& to lawless %iolen!e as well as &e!rees pro ul,ate& :" the Presi&ent; an& (3) to i pose stan&ar&s on e&ia or an" for of prior restraint on the pressH are ultra %ires an& un!onstitutional' 7iDewiseH un&er Se!tion 17H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH the Presi&entH in the a:sen!e of le,islationH !annot taDe o%er pri%atel"*owne& pu:li! utilities an& :usinesses affe!te& with the pu:li! interest (-a%i& %' +rro"oH $'1' No' 17139)H 8a" 3H 200))' 3' -urin, the effe!ti%it" of this Pro!la ationH $enerH 7ito an& 9on, were arreste& :" the poli!e for a!ts of terroris ' 5s the

SUGGESTED ANSWER: -e!laration of a state of !ala it" pro&u!esH inter aliaH these le,al effe!ts within the Pro%in!e of +urora R 1' +uto ati! Pri!e Control R un&er 1'+' No' 7281H 3he Pri!e +!t; 2' +uthori=ation for the i portation of ri!e un&er 1'+' No' 8178H 3he +,ri!ultural 3arrifi!ation +!t; 3' +uto ati! appropriation un&er 1'+' No' 71)0 is a%aila:le for unforeseen e0pen&itures arisin, fro the o!!urren!e of !ala ities in areas &e!lare& to :e in a state of !ala it"; #' 7o!al ,o%ern ent units a" ena!t a supple ental :u&,et for supplies an& aterials or pa" ent of ser%i!es to pre%ent &an,er to or loss of life or propert"H un&er 1'+' No' 71)0;
2' /ntitle ent to ha=ar& allowan!e for Pu:li! @ealth 6orDers (un&er 1'+' No' 7302H 8a,na Carta for Pu:li! @ealth 6orDers)H who shall :e !o pensate& ha=ar& allowan!es e?ui%alent to at least twent"*fi%e per!ent (22N) of the onthl" :asi! salar" of health worDers re!ei%in, salar" ,ra&e 19 an& :elowH an& fi%e per!ent (2N) for health worDers with salar" ,ra&e 20 an& a:o%e;

arrest le,alL /0plain' (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he arrestH apparentl" &one without a %ali& warrantH is ille,al' @owe%erH a warrantless arrest woul& :e %ali& if those a!!use& are !au,ht !o ittin, !ri es en fla,rante &eli!to' An the other han&H if the arrest is a&e pursuant to a %ali& warrantH then it is lawful' 3he ter Ca!ts of terroris C has not :een le,all" &efine& an& a&e punisha:le :" Con,ress' No law has :een ena!te& to ,ui&e the law enfor!e ent a,entsH an& e%entuall" the !ourtsH to &eter ine the li its in aDin, arrests for the !o ission of sai& a!ts of terroris (-a%i& %' +rro"oH $'1' No' 17139)H 8a" 3H 200))'

Enter int& C&ntra(t &r G3arantee L&an+ 9!##;:


No' 13: authori=e& @i,hwa"s a,ree ent

&reign

)' /ntitle ent to ha=ar& allowan!e for s!ien!e an& te!hnolo,i!al personnel of the ,o%ern ent un&er 1'+' No' 8#39; an&

3he Presi&ent of the Philippines the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs an& to ne,otiate an& si,n a loan with the $er an $o%ern ent for

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#!

the !onstru!tion of a &a ' 3he SenateH :" a resolutionH asDe& that the a,ree ent :e su: itte& to it for ratifi!ation' 3he Se!retar" of Forei,n +ffairs a&%ise& the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s not to !o pl" with the re?uest of the Senate' 2) 5s the Presi&ent :oun& to su: it the a,ree ent to the Senate for ratifi!ationL SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the Presi&ent is not :oun& to su: it the a,ree ent to the Senate for ratifi!ation' <n&er Se!tion 20H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH onl" the prior !on!urren!e of the 8onetar" 9oar& is re?uire& for the Presi&ent to !ontra!t forei,n loans on :ehalf of the 1epu:li! of the Philippines' Enter int& C&ntra(t &r G3arantee &reign L&an+ 9!###: No 5 * 6hat are the restri!tions pres!ri:e& :" the Constitution on the power of the Presi&ent to !ontra!t or ,uarantee forei,n loans on :ehalf of the 1epu:li! of the PhilippinesL /0plain' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
<n&er Se!tion 20H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the power of the Presi&ent to !ontra!t or ,uarantee loans on :ehalf of the 1epu:li! of the Philippines is su:;e!t to the prior !on!urren!e of the 8onetar" 9oar& an& su:;e!t to su!h li itations as a" :e pres!ri:e& :" law'

No 5 * 6hat are the li itationsIrestri!tions pro%i&e& :" the Constitution on the power of Con,ress to authori=e the Presi&ent to fi0 tariff ratesH i port an& e0port ?uotasH tonna,e an& wharfa,e &ues' /0plain' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to Se!tion 28(2)H +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH Con,ress a"H :" lawH authori=e the Presi&ent to fi0 within spe!ifie& li itsH an& su:;e!t to su!h li itations an& restri!tions it a" i poseH tariff ratesH i port an& e0port ?uotasH tonna,e an& wharfa,e &ues an& other &uties or i posts within the fra eworD of the national &e%elop ent pro,ra of the $o%ern ent'

Martia' La5 B S3+*en+i&n &) Writ &) Habea+ C&r*3+ 9!#$%:


No' ME55: Ane of the features of the ,o%ern ent esta:lishe& un&er the 1987 Constitution is the restoration of the prin!iple of !he!Ds an& :alan!es' 3his is espe!iall" noteworth" in the Co an&er*in*Chief powers of the Presi&ent whi!h su:stantiall" affe!ts what was st"le& un&er the past &ispensation as the C!ali:rate& responseC to national e er,en!iesH (a) -is!uss full" the pro%isions of the 1987 ConstitutionH ,i%in, the s!opeH li its an& the role of the prin!iple of !he!Ds an& :alan!es on the Presi&entBs e0er!ise of the power:

Enter int& E2e(3ti0e Agree1ent+ 9"66-:


No MM * +n /0e!uti%e +,ree ent was e0e!ute& :etween the Philippines an& a nei,h:orin, State' 3he Senate of the Philippines tooD it upon itself to pro!ure a !ertifie& true !op" of the /0e!uti%e +,ree ent an&H after &eli:eratin, on itH &e!lare&H :" a unani ous %oteH that the a,ree ent was :oth unwise an& a,ainst the :est interest of the !ountr"' 5s the /0e!uti%e +,ree ent :in&in, (a) fro the stan&point of Philippine law an& (:) fro the stan&point of international lawL /0plain

3o suspen& the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus Pro!la ation of artial law'
(:) Consi&erin, the pressin, pro:le s of insur,en!"H re:el a!ti%itiesH li:eration o%e ents an& terrorist %iolen!eH whi!h in "our !onsi&ere& opinion a on, the options a%aila:le to the Presi&ent as Co an&er*in*Chief woul& :e the ost effe!ti%e in eetin, the e er,en!ies :" the nationL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he Presi&entBs power to suspen& the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus an& to pro!lai artial law is su:;e!t to se%eral !he!Ds :" Con,ress an& :" the Supre e Court' 3he Presi&ent is re?uire& to report to Con,ress within #8 hours his a!tion in &e!larin, artial law or suspen&in, the pri%ile,e of the writH an& Con,ress is in turn re?uire& to !on%eneH if it is not in sessionH within 2# hours followin, the pro!la ation of artial law or the suspension of the pri%ile,e without nee& of an" !allH in a!!or&an!e with its rules' 3he pro!la ation of artial law or suspension of the writ is effe!ti%e for )0 &a"s onl"H :ut Con,ress !an !ut short its effe!ti%it" :" re%oDin, the pro!la ation :" the %ote of at least a a;orit" of

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) Fro the stan&point of Philippine lawH the /0e!uti%e +,ree ent is :in&in,' +!!or&in, to Co issioner of Custo s %' /astern Sea 3ra&in,' 3 SC1+ 321 P19)1QH the Presi&ent !an enter into an /0e!uti%e +,ree ent without the ne!essit" of !on!urren!e :" the Senate'

(:) fro

3he /0e!uti%e +,ree ent is also :in&in, the stan&point of international law'''

I1*&+e Tari)) Rate+7 I1*&rt and E2*&rt >3&ta+ 9!###:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#"

all its e :ersH %otin,H ;ointl"' +n" e0tension of the pro!la ation of artial law or suspension of the writ !an onl" :e ,rante& :" Con,ress whi!h will &eter ine also the perio& of su!h e0tension'
An the other han&H the Supre e Court e0er!ises a !he!D on /0e!uti%e a!tion in the for of ;u&i!ial re%iew at the instan!e of an" !iti=en' 3he Constitution e :o&ies in this respe!t the rulin, in $ar!ia %' 7ansan,H #2 SC1+ ##8 (1971) that the Court !an &eter ine the suffi!ien!" of the fa!tual :asis of the pro!la ation of artial law or the suspension of the pri%ile,e or the e0tension thereof not for the purpose of supplantin, the ;u&, ent of the Presi&ent :ut to &eter ine whether the latter &i& not a!t ar:itraril"' 5n&ee&H +rt' E555H Se!' 1 i poses upon the !ourts the &ut" of &eter inin, whether or not there has :een ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of the other :ran!hes of the ,o%ern entH in this !aseH the Presi&ent' 3he Presi&ent !annotH :" eans of the pro!la ation of artial lawH suspen& the Constitution or supplant the !ourts an& the le,islature' Neither !an he authori=e the trial of !i%ilians :" ilitar" tri:unals so lon, as !ourts are open an& fun!tionin,H thus o%errulin, the !ase of +?uino %' 8ilitar" Co ission No' 2H )3 SC1+ 2#) (1972)' @is pro!la ation of artial law &oes not !arr" with it the suspension of the writ of ha:eas !orpusH so that the &e!ision on +?uino %' Pon!e /nrileH 29 SC1+ 183 (1973) is now o%errule&' Nor &oes the suspension of the writ &epri%e !ourts of their power to a& it persons to :ailH where proper' 3he Constitution thus o%errules the !ases of $ar!ia*Pa&illa %' Pon!e /nrileH 121 SC1+ #72 (1983) an& 8orales %' Pon!e /nrile' 121 SC1+ 238 (1983)'

o%e entsH an& terroris is to si pl" !all out the ar e& for!es for the followin, reasons: 1) the e0i,en!ies to :e et are not solel" those !ause& :" in%asion or re:ellion :ut terroris an& other !ri es' 2) Suspension of the pri%ile,e will onl" :e for a li ite& perio& an& then the perio& of retention is li ite& to 3 &a"s whi!h a" not reall" :e effe!ti%e' An the other han&H pu:li! !riti!is of the a!tion a" onl" ero&e the Presi&entBs authorit"'
3) 3here is pra!ti!all" little &ifferen!eH as far as the a:ilit" of the Presi&ent to eet an e er,en!" is !on!erne&H :etween option 1H on the other han&H the options 2 an& 3'

3he Presi&ent a" well taDe !o fort in the followin, thou,ht: C$o%ern ent of li ite& power nee& not :e ane i! ,o%ern ent' +ssuran!e that ri,hts are se!ure ten&s to &i inish fear an& ;ealous" of stron, ,o%ern entH an&H :" aDin, us feel safe to li%e un&er it aDes for its :etter support'C (6est Es' State 9r&' of /&u!' %' 9arnetteH 319 <'S' )2# (19#3)) Martia' La58 Li1itati&n+ 9"666: No ME55' -e!larin, a re:ellionH hostile ,roups ha%e opene& an& aintaine& ar e& !onfli!ts on the 5slan&s of Sulu an& 9asilan' a) 3o ?uell thisH !an the Presi&ent pla!e un&er artial law the islan&s of Sulu an& 9asilanL $i%e "our reasonsL (3N)
:) 6hat are the !onstitutional safe,uar&s on the e0er!ise of the Presi&entBs power to

pro!lai artial lawL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


a) 5f pu:li! safet" re?uires itH the Presi&ent !an pla!e Sulu an& 9asilan un&er artial law sin!e there is an a!tual re:ellion' <n&er Se!tion 18H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the Presi&ent !an pla!e an" part of the Philippines un&er artial law in !ase of re:ellionH when pu:li! safet" re?uires it'

(:) 3he Presi&ent has three options: (1) 3A C+77 A<3 the ar e& for!es to pre%ent or suppress lawless %iolen!eH in%asion or re:ellion; (2) 3A S<SP/N- the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus or (3) 3A P1AC7+58 artial law' 3he last two options !an :e resorte& to onl" in !ases of in%asion or re:ellion when pu:li! safet" re?uires either the supension of the pri%ile,e or the pro!la ation of artial law'
5t is su: itte& that the ost effe!ti%e eans of eetin, the !urrent e er,en!" whi!h is :rou,ht a:out :" re:ellionH li:eration

:) 3he followin, are the !onstitutional safe,uar&s on the e0er!ise of the power of the Presi&ent to pro!lai artial law: a) 3here ust :e a!tual in%asion or re:ellion;
:) 3he &uration of the pro!la ation shall not

e0!ee& si0t" &a"s: !) 6ithin fort"*ei,ht hoursH the Presi&ent shall report his a!tion to Con,ress' 5f Con,ress is not in sessionH it ust !on%ene within twent"*four hours; &) Con,ress a" :" a;orit" %ote of all its e :ers %otin, >ointl" re%oDe the pro!la ationH an& the Presi&ent !annot set asi&e the re%o!ation;

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#-

e) 9" the sa e %ote an& in the sa e annerH upon 5nitiati%e of the Presi&entH Con,ress a" e0ten& the pro!la ation 5f the in%asion or re:ellion !ontinues an& pu:li! safet" re?uires the e0tension; f) 3he Supre e Court a" re%iew the fa!tual suffi!ien!" of the pro!la ationH an& the Supre e Court ust &e!i&e the !ase within thirt" &a"s fro the ti e it was file&; ,) 8artial law &oes not auto ati!all" suspen& the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus or the operation of the Constitution' h) 5t &oes not supplant the fun!tionin, of the !i%il !ourts an& of Con,ress' 8ilitar" !ourts ha%e no >uris&i!tion o%er !i%ilians where !i%il !ourts are a:le to fun!tion' (Cru=H Philippine Politi!al 7awH 1992 e&'H pp' 213* 21#') Martia' La58 S3))i(ien(y &) t,e a(t3a' Ba+i+ 9>-<"66?:
3he Presi&ent issue& a Pro!la ation No' 1018 pla!in, the Philippines un&er 8artial 7aw on the ,roun& that a re:ellion sta,e& :" lawless ele ents is en&an,erin, the pu:li! safet"' Pursuant to the Pro!la ationH suspe!te& re:els were arreste& an& &etaine& an& ilitar" tri:unals were set up to tr" the ' 1o:ert &ela Cru=H a !iti=enH file& with the Supre e Court a petition ?uestionin, the %ali&it" of Pro!la ation No' 1018'

suspen& the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus an& the power to i pose artial law in%ol%e the !urtail ent an& suppression of !ertain :asi! !i%il ri,hts an& in&i%i&ual free&o sH an& thus ne!essitate safe,uar&s :" Con,ress an& re%iew :" the Supre e Court (59P %' .a oraH $'1' No' 1#128#H +u,ust 12H 2000)' 3' 3he Soli!itor $eneral ar,ues thatH in an" e%entH the &eter ination of whether the re:ellion poses &an,er to pu:li! safet" in%ol%es a ?uestion of fa!t an& the

Supre e Court is not a trier of fa!ts' 6hat shoul& :e the rulin, of the CourtL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
>u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" of the !ourts of ;usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies in%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent (+rt' EinH Se!' 1H par' 2H1987 Constitution)' 6hen the ,rant of power is ?ualifie&H !on&itional or su:;e!t to li itationsH the issue of whether the pres!ri:e& ?ualifi!ations or !on&itions ha%e :een et or the li itations respe!te&H is ;usti!ia:le R the pro:le :ein, one of le,alit" or %ali&it"H not its wis&o ' +rti!le E55H Se!tion 18 of the 1987 Constitution spe!ifi!all" ,rants the Supre e Court the power to re%iewH in an appropriate pro!ee&in, file& :" an" !iti=enH the suffi!ien!" of the fa!tual :asis of the pro!la ation of artial law' 3husH in the atter of su!h &e!larationH two !on&itions ust !on!ur: (1) there ust :e an a!tual in%asion or re:ellion; an& (2) pu:li! safet" ust re?uire it' 3he Supre e Court !annot rene,e on its !onstitutional &ut" to &eter ine whether or not the sai& fa!tual !on&itions e0ist (59P %' .a oraH $'1' No' 1#128#H +u,ust 12H 2000)' #' Finall"H the Soli!itor $eneral aintains that the Presi&ent reporte& to Con,ress su!h pro!la ation of 8artial 7awH :ut Con,ress &i& not re%oDe the pro!la ation' 6hat is the effe!t of the ina!tion of Con,ress on the suit :rou,ht :" 1o:ert to

-oes 1o:ert ha%e a stan&in, to !hallen,e Pro!la ation No' 1018L /0plain' (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH 1o:ert has stan&in,' <n&er +rti!le E555H Se!tion 17 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the Supre e Court a" re%iewH in an appropriate pro!ee&in, file& :" an" !iti=enH the suffi!ien!" of the fa!tual :asis of the pro!la ation of artial law' +s !iti=en thereforeH 1o:ert a" file the petition ?uestionin, Pro!la ation No' 1018' 2' 5n the sa e suitH the Soli!itor $eneral !onten&s that un&er the ConstitutionH the Presi&ent as Co an&er*in*ChiefH &eter ines whether the e0i,en!" has arisen re?uirin, the e0er!ise of his power to &e!lare 8artial 7aw an& that his &eter ination is !on!lusi%e upon the !ourts' @ow shoul& the Supre e Court

1'

ruleL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he Supre e Court shoul& rule that his &eter* ination is not !on!lusi%e upon the !ourts' 3he 1987 Constitution allows a !iti=enH in an appropriate pro!ee&in,H to file a petition ?uestionin, the suffi!ien!" of the fa!tual :asis of sai& pro!la ation' 8oreo%erH the power to

the Supre e CourtL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he ina!tion of Con,ress has no effe!t on the suit :rou,ht :" 1o:ert to the Supre e Court as +rti!le E555H Se!tion 18 pro%i&es for !he!Ds on the Presi&entBs power to &e!lare artial law to :e e0er!ise& separatel" :" Con,ress an& the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#;

Supre e Court' <n&er sai& pro%isionH the &uration of artial law shall not e0!ee& si0t" &a"s :ut Con,ress has the power to re%oDe the pro!la ation or e0ten& the perio&' An the other han&H the Supre e Court has the power to re%iew the sai& pro!la ation an& pro ul,ate its &e!ision thereon within thirt" &a"s fro its filin, (+rti!le E555H Se!tion 18)'

#' NoH the a!!use& !annot a%ail of the :enefits of a nest" if he !ontinues to profess his inno!en!e' 5n Eera %s' PeopleH 7 SC1+ 122' sin!e a nest" presupposes the !o ission of a !ri e' 5t is in!onsistent for an a!!use& to seeD for,i%eness for so ethin, whi!h he !lai s he has not !o itte&' Pard&ning P&5er8 Brea(, &) C&nditi&n8 Re0&(ati&n 9>@<"66@:
(1) 9runo still ha& se%eral "ears to ser%e on his senten!e when he was !on&itionall" par&one& :" the Presi&ent' + on, the !on&itions i pose& was that he woul& Cnot a,ain %iolate an" of the penal laws of the Philippines'C 9runo a!!epte& all of the !on&itions an& was release&' Shortl" thereafterH 9runo was !har,e& with 2 !ounts of estafa' @e was then in!ar!erate& to ser%e the i e0pire& portion of his senten!e followin, the re%o!ation :" the Presi&ent of the par&on' 9runoBs fa il" file& a petition for ha:eas !orpusH alle,in, that it was error to ha%e hi re!o itte& as the !har,es were falseH in fa!tH half of the were alrea&" &is isse&'

Pard&ning P&5er8 A1ne+ty 9!##-:


No 20: * 3he National <nifi!ation Co ission has re!o en&e& the ,rant of a:solute an& un!on&itional a nest" to all re:els' 3here is the %iew that it is not ne!essar" for the re:els to a& it the !o ission of the !ri e !har,e&H it :ein, enou,h that the offense falls within the s!ope of the a nest" pro!la ation followin, the &o!trine lai& &own in 9arrio?uinto %s' Fernan&e=H 82 Phil' )#2' 5n other wor&sH a& ission of ,uilt is not a !on&ition sine ?ua non for the a%ail ent of a nest"' 5s this !orre!tL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he %iew that it is not ne!essar" for re:els to a& it the !o ission of the !ri e !har,e& in or&er to a%ail the sel%es of the :enefits of a nest" is not !orre!t' +s state& in Eera %' PeopleH 7 SC1+ 12)H the &o!trine lai& &own in 9orrio?uinto %s' Fernan&e=H 82 Phil' )#2 has :een o%erturne&' + nest" presupposes the !o ission of a !ri e' 5t is in!onsistent for so eone to seeD for for,i%eness for a !ri e whi!h he &enies ha%in, !o itte&' (People %s' PasilanH 1# SC1+ )9#)'

1esol%e the petition with reasons' (#N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he petition shoul& not :e ,i%en &ue !ourse' 3he ,rant of par&on an& the &eter ination of the ter s an& !on&itions of a !on&itional par&on are P<1/7O /M/C<35E/ +C3S whi!h are not su:;e!t to ;u&i!ial s!rutin"' 3he a!!eptan!e thereof :" the !on%i!t or prisoner !arrie& with it the authorit" or power of the /0e!uti%e to &eter ine whether a !on&ition or !on&itions of the par&on has or ha%e :een %iolate&' 6here the Presi&ent opts to re%oDe the !on&itional par&on ,i%enH no ;u&i!ial pronoun!e ent of ,uilt of a su:se?uent !ri e is ne!essar"H u!h less !on%i!tion therefor :" final ;u&, ent of a !ourtH in or&er that a !on%i!t a" :e re!o en&e& for the %iolation of his !on&itional par&on' 3he &eter ination of the o!!urren!e of a :rea!h of a !on&ition of a par&onH an& the proper !onse?uen!es of su!h :rea!hH is a purel" e0e!uti%e a!tH not su:;e!t to ;u&i!ial s!rutin"' (3orres %' $on=alesH $'1' No' 7)872H >ul" 23H 1987)

Pard&ning P&5er8 A1ne+ty 9!##@:


No' 2: 7u!asH a ranDin, e :er of the N-FH was !apture& :" poli!e en while a:out to :oar& a passen,er :us :oun& for Sorso,on' Char,e& with re:ellion he plea&e& not ,uilt" when arrai,ne&' 9efore trial he was ,rante& a:solute par&on :" the Presi&ent to allow hi to parti!ipate in the pea!e talDs :etween the ,o%ern ent an& the !o unist re:els' 3' 5nstea& of a par&onH a" the Presi&ent ,rant the a!!use& a nest" if fa%ora:l" re!o en&e& :" the National + nest" Co issionL /0plain'

#' 8a" the a!!use& a%ail of the :enefits of a nest" &espite the fa!t the he !ontinue& to profess inno!en!eL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3' 3he Presi&ent a" ,rant the a!!use& a nest"' +!!or&in, to 9arrio?uinto %s' Fernan&e=H 82 Phil' )#2H + nest" a" :e ,rante& :efore or after the institution of the !ri inal prose!ution'

Pard&ning P&5er8 E2e( C'e1en(y8 Pard&n 9!##@:


No' 2: 7u!asH a ranDin, e :er of was !apture& :" poli!e en while :oar& a passen,er :us :oun& for Char,e& with re:ellion he plea&e& not the N-FH a:out to Sorso,on' ,uilt"

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#@

when arrai,ne&' 9efore trial he was ,rante& a:solute par&on :" the Presi&ent to allow hi to parti!ipate in the pea!e talDs :etween the ,o%ern ent an& the !o unist re:els'

(1) 5s the par&on of the Presi&ent %ali&L /0plain'


(2) +ssu in, that the par&on is %ali&H !an

in !ri inal !asesH it woul& ha%e :een unne!essar" to e0!lu&e i pea!h ent !ases fro this s!ope' 5f the Presi&ent !an ,rant par&ons in !ri inal !asesH with ore reason he !an ,rant e0e!uti%e !le en!" in a& inistrati%e !asesH whi!h are less serious'

7u!as re;e!t itL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1' 3he par&on is not %ali&' <n&er Se!tion 19H +rti!le E55 of the 1987 ConstitutionH par&on a" :e ,rante& onl" after !on%i!tion :" final >u&, ent'
2' OesH 7u!as !an re;e!t the par&on +s hel& in <nite& States %s' 6ilsonH 7 Pet' 120 an& 9ur&i!D %s' <nite& StatesH 27# <'S' #80' a!!eptan!e is essential to !o plete the par&on an& the par&on a" :e re;e!te& :" the person to who it is ten&ere&H for it a" infli!t !onse?uen!es of ,reater &is,ra!e than those fro whi!h it purports to relie%e'

Pard&ning P&5er8 E2e(3ti0e C'e1en(y 9!###: +' 6hat are the !onstitutional li itations on the par&onin, power of the Presi&entL (2N) 9' -istin,uish :etween par&on an& a nest"' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +' 3he followin, are the li itations on the par&onin, power of the Presi&ent'
1) 5t !annot :e ,rante& in !ases of

2)

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: NoH 7u!as !annot re;e!t the par&on' +!!or&in, to 9i&&le %s' Pero%i!hH 27# <'S' #80H a!!eptan!e is not ne!essar"H for the ,rant of par&on in%ol%es a &eter ination :" the Presi&ent that pu:li! welfare will :e :etter ser%e& :" infli!tin, less than what the ;u&, ent fi0e&' Pard&ning 9!##%: P&5er8 E2e(3ti0e C'e1en(y

i pea!h ent; 1eprie%esH !o utationsH par&onH an& re ission of fines an& forfeitures !an :e ,rante& onl" after !on%i!tion :" final ;u&, ent'
3he fa%ora:le re!o en&ation of the CA8/7/C is re?uire& for %iolation of ele!tion lawsH rules an& re,ulations'

3)

9' +!!or&in, to 9arrio?uinto %' Fernan&e=H 82 Phil' )#2H the followin, are the &istin!tions :etween par&on an& a nest"'
1' Par&on is a pri%ate a!t an& ust :e plea&e& an& pro%e& :" the person par&one&; while a nest" is a pu:li! a!t of whi!h !ourts taDe ;u&i!ial noti!e;

No' 12; $o%ernor + was !har,e& a& inistrati%el" with oppression an& was pla!e& un&er pre%enti%e suspension fro offi!e &urin, the pen&en!" of his !ase' Foun& ,uilt" of the !har,eH the Presi&ent suspen&e& hi fro offi!e for ninet" &a"s' 7aterH the Presi&ent ,rante& hi !le en!" :" re&u!in, the perio& of his suspension to the perio& he has alrea&" ser%e&' 3he Ei!e $o%ernor ?uestione& the %ali&it" of the e0er!ise of e0e!uti%e !le en!" on the ,roun& that it !oul& :e ,rante& onl" in !ri inalH not a& inistrati%eH !ases'

@ow shoul& the ?uestion :e resol%e&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he ar,u ent of the Ei!e $o%ernor shoul& :e re;e!te&' +s hel& in 7la as %s' Ar:osH 202 SC1+ 8##' the power of e0e!uti%e !le en!" e0ten&s to a& inistrati%e !ases' 5n ,rantin, the power of e0e!uti%e !le en!" upon the Presi&entH Se!tion 19H +rti!le E55 of the Constitution &oes not &istin,uish :etween !ri inal an& a& inistrati%e !ases' Se!tion 19H +rti!le E55 of the Constitution e0!lu&es i pea!h ent !asesH whi!h are not !ri inal !asesH fro the s!ope of the power of e0e!uti%e !le en!"' 5f this power a" :e e0er!ise& onl"

2' Par&on &oes not re?uire the !on!urren!e of Con,ressH while a nest" re?uires the !on!urren!e of Con,ress; 3' Par&on is ,rante& to in&i%i&ualsH while a nest" is ,rante& to !lasses of persons or !o unities; #' Par&on a" :e ,rante& for an" offenseH while a nest" is ,rante& for politi!al offenses; 2' Par&on is ,rante& after final !on%i!tionH while a nest" a" :e ,rante& at an" ti e; an&
)' Par&on looDs forwar& an& relie%es offen&er fro the !onse?uen!es of offenseH while a nest" looDs :a!Dwar& an& person ,rante& it stan&s :efore the law thou,h he ha& !o itte& no offense' the his the as

Pard&ning P&5er8 Cind+ 9!#$$:


No' 2#: 3he first para,raph of Se!tion 19 of +rti!le E55 of the Constitution pro%i&in, for the par&onin, power of the Presi&entH entions reprie%eH !o utationH an& par&on' Please

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#?

&efine the three of the H an& &ifferentiate one fro the others' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he ter s were &efine& an& &istin,uishe& fro one another in People %' EeraH )2 Phil' 2)H 111* 112 (1930)H as follows:
(1) 1/P15/E/ is a postpone ent of e0e!ution of a senten!e to a &a" !ertainH the

No' 7: Can the Presi&ent taDe a!ti%e part in the le,islati%e pro!essL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH 3he Presi&ent !an taDe a!ti%e part in the le,islati%e pro!ess to the e0tent allowe& :" the Constitution' @e !an a&&ress Con,ress at an" ti e to propose the ena!t ent of !ertain laws' @e re!o en&s the ,eneral appropriations :ill' @e !an !all a spe!ial session of Con,ress at an" ti e' @e !an !ertif" to the ne!essit" of the i e&iate ena!t ent of a :ill to eet a pu:li! !ala it" or e er,en!"' @e !an %eto a :ill'

(2) CA88<3+35AN is a re ission of a part of the punish entH a su:stitution of less penalt" for the one ori,inall" i pose&' (3) + P+1-ANH on the other han&H is an a!t of ,ra!eH pro!ee&in, fro the power entruste& with the e0e!ution of the laws whi!h e0e pts the in&i%i&ual on who it is :estowe& fro the punish ent the law infli!ts for a !ri e he has !o itte&' Pard&ning 9!##%: P&5er8 Pard&n7 C&nditi&na'

Pre+identia' I113nity )r&1 S3it 9!##%:


No' 13: <pon !o plaint of the in!u :ent Presi&ent of the 1epu:li!H C+C was !har,e& with li:el :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court' C+C o%e& to &is iss the infor ation on the ,roun& that the Court ha& no ;uris&i!tion o%er the offense !har,e& :e!ause the Presi&entH :ein, i une fro suitH shoul& also :e &is?ualifie& fro filin, a !ase a,ainst C+C in !ourt'

No' 1); + while ser%in, i prison ent for estafa' upon re!o en&ation of the 9oar& of Par&ons an& ParoleH was ,rante& par&on :" the Presi&ent on !on&ition that he shoul& not a,ain %iolate an" penal law of the lan&' 7aterH the 9oar& of Par&ons an& Parole re!o en&e& to the Presi&ent the !an!ellation of the par&on ,rante& hi :e!ause + ha& :een !har,e& with estafa on 20 !ounts an& was !on%i!te& of the offense !har,e& althou,h he tooD an appeal therefro whi!h was still pen&in,' +s re!o en&e&H the Presi&ent !an!ele& the par&on he ha& ,rante& to +' + was thus arreste& an& i prisone& to ser%e the :alan!e of his senten!e in the first !ase' + !lai e& in his petition for ha:eas !orpus file& in !ourt that his &etention was ille,al :e!ause he ha& not "et :een !on%i!te& :" final ;u&, ent an& was not ,i%en a !han!e to :e hear& :efore he was re!o itte& to prison'

1esol%e the otion' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he otion shoul& :e &enie& a!!or&in, Soli%en us' 8aDasiarH 1)7 SC1+ 393H i unit" of the Presi&ent fro suit is personal the Presi&ent' 5t a" :e in%oDe& :" Presi&ent onl" an& not :" an" other person' to the to the

Pr&,ibiti&n Again+t M3'ti*'e P&+iti&n+ B Additi&na' C&1*en+ati&n 9"66": No E5' 8 is the Se!retar" of the -epart ent of Finan!e' @e is also an e0*offi!io e :er of the 8onetar" 9oar& of the 9an,Do Sentral n, Pilipinas fro whi!h he re!ei%es an a&&itional !o pensation for e%er" 9oar& eetin, atten&e&'
NH a ta0pa"erH file& a suit in !ourt to &e!lare Se!retar" 8Bs e :ership in the 8onetar" 9oar& an& his re!eipt of a&&itional !o pensation ille,al an& in %iolation of the Constitution' N in%oDe& +rti!le E55H Se!tion 13 of the Constitution whi!h pro%i&es that the Presi&entH Ei!e*Presi&entH the 8e :ers of the Ca:inetH an& their &eputies or assistants shall notH unless otherwise pro%i&e& in the ConstitutionH hol& an" other offi!e or e plo" ent &urin, their tenure' N also !ite& +rti!le 5M*9H Se!tion 8 of the ConstitutionH whi!h pro%i&es that no ele!ti%e or appointi%e pu:li! offi!er or e plo"ee shall re!ei%e a&&itionalH &ou:leH or in&ire!t !o pensationH unless spe!ifi!all" authori=e& :" law'

5s +Bs ar,u ent %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he ar,u ent of + is not %ali&' +s hel& in 3orres %s' $on=ales' 122 SC1+ 272 a ;u&i!ial pronoun!e ent that a !on%i!t who was ,rante& a par&on su:;e!t to the !on&ition that he shoul& not a,ain %iolate an" penal law is not ne!essar" :efore he !an :e &e!lare& to ha%e %iolate& the !on&ition of his par&on' 8oreo%erH a hearin, is not ne!essar" :efore + !an :e re!o itte& to prison' 9" a!!eptin, the !on&itional par&onH +H a,ree& that the &eter ination :" the Presi&ent that he %iolate& the !on&ition of his par&on shall :e !on!lusi%e upon hi an& an or&er for his arrest shoul& at on!e issue'

Pre+ident8 Parti(i*ati&n8 Legi+'ati0e Pr&(e++ 9!##?:

5f "ou were the ;u&,eH how woul& "ou &e!i&e the followin,:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#%

a) the issue re,ar&in, the ultiple positionsL (3N)

hol&in,

of

:) the issue on the pa" ent of a&&itional or &ou:le !o pensationL(2N) /0plain "our answers full"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 5f 5 were the ;u&,eH 5 woul& uphol& the %ali&it" of the &esi,nation of Se!retar" 8 as e0 offi!io e :er of the 8onetar" 9oar&H +s state& in Ci%il 7i:erties <nion %' /0e!uti%e Se!retar"H 19# SC1+ 317 (1991)H the prohi:ition a,ainst the hol&in, of ultiple positions :" Ca:inet 8e :ers in +rti!le E55H Se!tion 13 of the Constitution &oes not appl" to positions o!!upie& in an e0 offi!io !apa!it" as pro%i&e& :" law an& as re?uire& :" the pri ar" fun!tions of their offi!e' (:) 5f 5 were the >u&,eH 5 woul& rule that Se!retar" 8 !annot re!ei%e an" a&&itional !o pensation' +s state& in Ci%il 7i:erties <nion %' /0e!uti%e Se!retar"H 19# SC1+ 317 (1991)H a Ca:inet 8e :er hol&in, an e0*offi!io position has no ri,ht to re!ei%e a&&itional !o pensationH for his ser%i!es in that position are alrea&" pai& for :" the !o pensation atta!he& to his prin!ipal offi!e'

as Se!retar" of 3ra&e an& pro%ision of +rtH E55H Se!H Ca:inet e :ers fro hol&in, or e plo" entH is su:;e!t to in +rt' 5MH 9H Se!' 7'

5n&ustr"' 3he 13H prohi:itin, an" other offi!e the e0!eptions

:' -ean Sin!o :elie%es that e :ers of Con,ress !annot :e e :ers of the 9oar& of 1e,ents of the <ni%ersit" of the Philippines un&er the 5n!o pati:ilit" Clause of the 1932 Constitution whi!h is si ilar to the pro%ision of +rt' E5H Se!' 13 of the present Constitution' <n&er this %iewH the e :ership of the Chair an of the Senate Co ittee on 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr" in the /0port Control 9oar& !annot :e sustaine&' (Sin!oH Philippine Politi!al 7aw 13) (llth /&' 19)2)'

8oreo%erH sin!e the apparent ;ustifi!ation for the e :ership of the Chair an of the Senate Co ittee is to ai& hi in his le,islati%e fun!tionsH this purpose !an easil" :e a!hie%e& throu,h le,islati%e in%esti,ations un&er +rt' E5H Se!'21'
An the other han&H -ean Cortes appears to su,,est a !ontrar" %iewH notin, that after the &e!ision in $o%ern ent of the Philippine 5slan&s %' Sprin,er 20 Phil' 229 (1927)H in %ali&atin, the law &esi,natin, the Senate Presi&ent an& SpeaDer as e :ers of the 9oar& of Control of ,o%ern ent !orporationsH no other &e!ision has :een ren&ere&' An the !ontrar"H laws ha%e :een ena!te&H aDin, e :ers of Con,ress e :ers of %arious :oar&s'

Pr&,ibiti&n again+t M3'ti*'e P&+iti&n+ by G&0Jt O))i(ia'+ 9!#$%: No' 5: +ssu e that a law has :een passe& !reatin, the /0port Control 9oar& !o pose& of: a' 3he Se!retar" of 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr" as Chair an an& as 8e :ers: :' 3he Chair an of the Senate Co ittee on 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr" !' +n +sso!iate >usti!e of the Supre e Court &esi,nate& :" the Chief >usti!e &' 3he Co issioner of Custo sH an& e' 3he Presi&ent of the Philippine Cha :er of Co er!e an& 5n&ustr"H 3he National Constitutional +sso!iation of the Philippines has file& suit to !hallen,e the !onstitutionalit" of the law' -eter ine whether the e :ership of ea!h of the a:o%e in the 9oar& !an :e uphel&' Cite rele%ant !onstitutional pro%isions' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a' 3he !hair anship of the Se!retar" of 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr" in the 9oar& !an :e uphel& on the :asis of +rt' 5MH 9H Se!' 7H whi!h allows appointi%e offi!ials to hol& other offi!es if allowe& :" law (su!h as the law in this !ase !reatin, the /0port Control 9oar&) or ;ustifie& :" the pri ar" fun!tions of their offi!es' 3he fun!tions of the 9oar& is relate& to his fun!tions

5n&ee&H the e :ership of the Chair an of the Senate Co ittee on 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr" a" :e uphel& as :ein, in ai& of his le,islati%e fun!tions sin!e what is prohi:ite& :" +rt' E5H Se!' 13 is the a!!eptan!e of an in!o pati:le offi!e or e plo" ent in the ,o%ern ent' (CortesH Philippine Presi&en!"H pp' 111* 112(19)))) (!) 3he &esi,nation of an +sso!iate >usti!e of the Supre e Court !annot :e sustaine& :ein, the i position on the e :ers of the CourtH of non*;u&i!ial &utiesH !ontrar" to the prin!iple of separation of powers' 5t is ;u&i!ial power an& ;u&i!ial power onl" whi!h the Supre e Court an& its e :ers a" e0er!ise' (+rt E555' Se!' 1; 8anila /le!tri! Co' %' Pasa" 3rans' Co'H 27 Phil' )00 (1932))
(&) a&e 3he Co issioner of Custo s a" :e e :er of the 9oar& for the sa e

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

#$

reason in the !ase of the Se!retar" of 3ra&e an& 5n&ustr"H un&er +rt' 5MH 9H Se!' 7'
(e) 3he e :ership of the Presi&ent of the Philippine Cha :er of Co er!e a" also :e uphel& on the ,roun& that Con,ress has the power to pres!ri:e ?ualifi!ations for the offi!e'

(#) (2)

Cases hear& :" a &i%ision when the re?uire& a;orit" is not o:taine&; Cases where a &o!trine or prin!iple of law pre%iousl" lai& &own will :e o&ifie& or re%erse&;
+& inistrati%e !ases a,ainst ;u&,es when the penalt" is &is issal; an&

())

S3+*en+i&n &) Writ &) Habea+ C&r*3+ 9!##%: (a) 6hen a" the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus :e suspen&e&L (:) 5f %ali&l" &e!lare&H what woul& :e the full !onse?uen!es of su!h suspensionL SUGGESTED ANSWER: (a) <n&er Se!tion 1)H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus a" :e suspen&e& when there is an in%asion or re:ellion an& pu:li! safet" re?uires it'
(:) +!!or&in, to Se!tion 18H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH the suspension of the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus shall appl" onl" to persons ;u&i!iall" !har,e& with re:ellion or offenses 5nherent to or &ire!tl" !onne!te& with in%asion' +n" person arreste& or &etaine& shoul& :e ;u&i!iall" !har,e& within three &a"s' AtherwiseH he shoul& :e release&' 8oreo%erH un&er Se!tion 13' +rti!le 555 of the ConstitutionH the ri,ht to :ail shall not :e i paire& e%en when the pri%ile,e of the writ of ha:eas !orpus is suspen&e&'

(7)

/le!tion !ontests Ei!e* Presi&ent'

for

Presi&ent

or

C&nte1*t P&5er+ 9!##?:


No' 3: 2) An the first &a" of the trial of a rape* ur&er !ase where the %i!ti was a popular 3E starH o%er a hun&re& of her fans rallie& at the entran!e of the !ourthouseH ea!h !arr"in, a pla!ar& &e an&in, the !on%i!tion of the a!!use& an& the i position of the &eath penalt" on hi ' 3he rall" was pea!eful an& &i& not &istur: the pro!ee&in,s of the !ase' a) Can the trial !ourt or&er the &ispersal of the rall"ists un&er pain of :ein, punishe& for !onte pt of !ourtH if the" fail to &o soL /0plain'

:) 5f instea& of a rall"H the fans of the %i!ti wrote letters to the newspaper e&itors &e an&in, the !on%i!tion of the a!!use&H !an the trial !ourt punish the for !onte ptL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2' a) OesH the trial !ourt !an or&er the &ispersal of the rall" un&er pain of :ein, !ite& for !onte pt' 3he purpose of the rall" is to atte pt to influen!e the a& inistration of >usti!e' +s state& in People %s' FloresH 239 SC1+ 83H an" !on&u!t :" an" part" whi!h ten&s to &ire!tl" or in&ire!tl" 5 pe&eH o:stru!t or &e,ra&e the a& inistration of ;usti!e is su:;e!t to the !onte pt powers of the !ourt' :) NoH the trial !ourt !annot punish for !onte pt the fans of the %i!ti who wrote letters to the newspaper e&itors asDin, for the !on%i!tion of the a!!use&' Sin!e the letters were not a&&resse& to the >u&,e an& the pu:li!ation of the letters o!!urre& outsi&e the !ourtH the fans !annot :e punishe& in the a:sen!e of a !lear an& present &an,er to the a& inistration of >usti!e' 5n Ca:ansa, %s' Fernan&e=H 102 Phil 122H it was hel& that a part" who wrote to the Presi&ential Co plaints an& +!tion Co ittee to !o plain a:out the &ela" in the &isposition of his !ase !oul& not :e punishe& for !onte pt in the a:sen!e of a !lear an& present &an,er to the fair a& inistration of >usti!e'

ARTICLE .III 43di(ia' De*art1ent


Ca+e+ t& be Heard En Ban(8 S3*re1e C&3rt 9!###: No M5 * /nu erate the !ases re?uire& :" the Constitution to :e hear& en :an! :" the Supre e CourtL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the !ases re?uire& :" the Constitution to :e hear& en :an! :" the Supre e Court: (1) Cases in%ol%in, the !onstitutionalit" of a treat"H international or e0e!uti%e a,ree entH or law;
Cases whi!h un&er the 1ules of Court are re?uire& to :e hear& en :an!'

(2)

(3)

Cases in%ol%in, the !onstitutionalit"H appli!ationH or operation of presi&ential &e!reesH pro!la ationsH or&ersH instru!tionsH or&inan!esH an& other re,ulations;

ina'ity &) .&id 43dg1ent+ 9!##-:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

##

No' 8; 3he +9C 1ealt"H 5n!H file& a !o plaint a,ainst 1i!o for the !olle!tion of unpai& install ents on a su:&i%ision lot pur!hase& :" the latterH 1i!o faile& to file an answerH was &e!lare& in &efault; an& after re!eption of plaintiffs e%i&en!e e0 parteH ;u&, ent was ren&ere& a,ainst hi ' 3he &e!ision :e!a e finalH an& upon otion :" +9C 1ealt"H the ;u&,e issue& a writ of e0e!ution' 1i!o now files a otion to ?uash the writ an& to %a!ate the >u&, ent !onten&in, that it is the @ousin, an& 7an& <se 1e,ulator" 9oar& (@7<19) whi!h is %este& with ori,inal an& e0!lusi%e >uris&i!tion o%er !ases in%ol%in, the real estate :usiness' 1i!o pra"s for the &is issal of the !o plaint an& for the nullit" of the &e!ision' 3he realt" fir opposes the otion ar,uin, that un&er 9P 129H 13Cs ha%e e0!lusi%e an& ori,inal ;uris&i!tion o%er !ases in whi!h the a ount of !ontro%ers" e0!ee&s P20H000'00' +nswer the followin, ?ueries:

plans of the ,o%ern ent an& allo!ate an& &is:urse su!h su s as a" :e pro%i&e& :" law or pres!ri:e& :" it in the !ourse of the &is!har,e of its fun!tions' 3n(ti&n8 C&ntin3ing C&n0enti&n 9"666: C&n+tit3ti&na'

No 5' * * Ane Senator re arDe& that the Supre e Court is a !ontinuin, Constitutional Con%ention' -o "ou a,reeL /0plain' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5 &o not a,ree that the Supre e Court is a !ontinuin, Constitutional Con%ention' 3he !riti!is is :ase& on the assu ption that in e0er!isin, its power of ;u&i!ial re%iew the Supre e Court 5s not erel" interpretin, the Constitution :ut is tr"in, to re aDe the $o%ern ent on the :asis of the personal pre&ile!tions of the 8e :ers of the Supre e CourtH this is a power that properl" :elon,s to the people an& their ele!te& representati%es' 3he Supre e Court !annot &e!i&e !ases erel" on the :asis of the letter of the Constitution' 5t has to interpret the Constitution to ,i%e effe!t to the intent of its fra ers an& of the people a&optin, it' 5n 5nterpretin, the ConstitutionH the Supre e Court has to a&opt it to the e%er*!han,in, !ir!u stan!es of so!iet"' 6hen the Supre e Court striDes &own an a!t of the 7e,islati%e or the /0e!uti%e -epart entH it is erel" &is!har,in, its &ut" un&er the Constitution to &eter ine !onfli!tin, !lai s of authorit"'

1) 6ho has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !olle!tion suitL 2) 3he 13C &e!isionH ha%in, :e!o e final an& e0e!utor"H !an it still :e %a!ate&L SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1T 3he @7<19 2) OesH the &e!ision of the 1e,ional 3rial Court !an still :e %a!ate&H e%en if it has :e!o e final an& e0e!utor"' Sin!e the 1e,ional 3rial Court ha& no ;uris&i!tion o%er the !aseH the &e!ision is %oi&' i+(a' A3t&n&1y 9!###: No M5 * 6hat &o "ou un&erstan& :" the an&ate of the Constitution that the ;u&i!iar" shall en;o" fis!al autono "L Cite the !onstitutional pro%isions !al!ulate& to :rin, a:out the reali=ation of the sai& !onstitutional an&ate' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er Se!tion 3H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH the fis!al autono " of the >u&i!iar" eans that appropriations for the >u&i!iar" a" not :e re&u!e& :" the le,islature :elow the a ount appropriate& for the pre%ious "ear an&H after appro%alH shall :e auto ati!all" an& re,ularl" release&'
5n 9en,=on %' -rilonH 208 SC1+ 133H the Supre e Court e0plaine& that fis!al autono " !onte plates a ,uarantee of full fle0i:ilit" to allo!ate an& utili=e resour!es with the wis&o an& &ispat!h that the nee&s re?uire' 5t re!o,ni=es the power an& authorit" to &en"H assess an& !olle!t feesH fi0 rates of !o pensation not e0!ee&in, the hi,hest rates authori=e& :" law for !o pensation an& pa" BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%) !66

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3o a !ertain e0tentH the Supre e Court is a !ontinuin, Constitutional Con%ention' 6hen a !ase is :rou,ht in !ourt in%ol%in, a !onstitutional issue' 5t :e!o es ne!essar" to interpret the ConstitutionH Sin!e the Supre e Court is supre e within its own sphereH its interpretation of the Constitution will for part of the law of the lan&'

I++3an(e &) Re+training and InE3n(ti&n+ 9!##":

Order+

No' 7: Con,ress is !onsi&erin, new easures to en!oura,e forei,n !orporations to :rin, their in%est ents to the Philippines' Con,ress has foun& that forei,n in%est ents are &eterre& :" the un!ertain in%est ent !li ate in the Philippines' Ane sour!e of su!h un!ertaint" is the hei,htene& ;u&i!ial inter%ention in in%est ent atters' Ane su!h easure pro%i&es that Cno !ourt or a& inistrati%e a,en!" shall issue an" restrainin, or&er or in;un!tion a,ainst the

!66

Central 9anDC in the 9anDBs e0er!ise of its re,ulator" power o%er spe!ifi! forei,n e0!han,e transa!tions' 6oul& this :e a %ali& easureL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the easure is %ali&' 5n 8antruste S"ste sH 5n!' %s' Court of +ppealsH 179 SC1+ 13)H the Supre e Court hel& that a law prohi:itin, the issuan!e of an in;un!tion is %ali&H :e!ause un&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH the ;uris&i!tion of the !ourts a" :e &efine& :" law'

(#) 3he Se!retar" of >usti!e as e0 offi!io e :er; (2) + representati%e of Con,ress as e0 offi!io e :er; ()) + representati%e of the 5nte,rate& 9ar; (7) + professor of law; (8) + retire& >usti!e of the Supre e Court; an& (9) + representati%e of the pri%ate se!tor' (Se!tion 8 (1)H +rti!le E555 of the Constitution) 3he ter of offi!e of the re,ular e :ers is four (#) "ears' (Se!tion 8(2)H +rti!le E555 of the Constitution) 43di(ia' De*art1ent8 Writ &) A1*ar& 9!##!: No 1: 6hat is a Constitutional writ of + paro an& what is the :asis for su!h a re e&" un&er the ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he writ of + paro in 8e0i!an law is an e0traor&inar" re e&" where:" an intereste& part" a" seeD the in%ali&ation of an" e0e!uti%eH le,islati%e or ;u&i!ial a!t &ee e& in %iolation of a fun&a ental ri,ht' 3he a&option of su!h a re e&" in the Philippines a" :e :ase& on +rti!le E555H Se!' 2(2) of the ConstitutionH whi!h e powers the Supre e Court to pro ul,ate rules !on!ernin, the prote!tion an& enfor!e ent of !onstitutional ri,hts'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: Sin!e un&er Se!tions 1 an& 2(2)H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH the !ourts are ,i%en the power of >u&i!ial re%iewH the easure is %oi&H Su!h power ust :e preser%e&' 3he issuan!e of restrainin, or&ers an& 5n;un!tions is in ai& of the power of ;u&i!ial re%iew' 43di(ia' B Bar C&3n(i' 9!#$$: No' 11: + no%el feature of the present Constitution is the >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il' Please state: 7' 5ts prin!ipal fun!tion; 8' 5ts !o position; an& 9' 6ho super%ises itH an& taDes !are of its appropriationsL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
11' 3he >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il has the prin!ipal fun!tion of re!o en&in, appointees to the >u&i!iar"' 5t a" e0er!ise su!h other fun!tions an& &uties as the Supre e Court a" assi,n to it' (+rt' E555H se!' 8(2))'

2' 3he >9C is !o pose& of the Chief >usti!e as e0 offi!io Chair anH the Se!retar" of >usti!e an& a representati%e of the Con,ress as e0 offi!io 8e :ersH a representati%e of the 5nte,rate& 9arH a professor of lawH a retire& 8e :er of the Supre e CourtH an& a representati%e of the pri%ate se!tor' (+rt' E555H se!' 8(1))'
3H 3he Supre e Court super%ises the >9C an& pro%i&es in the annual :u&,et of the Court the appropriations of the >9C' (+rt' E555H se!' 8(#))'

43di(ia' Inde*enden(e8 Sa)eg3ard 9"666: No 5' Na e at least three !onstitutional safe,uar&s to aintain ;u&i!ial in&epen&en!e' (3N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the !onstitutional safe,uar&s to aintain ;u&i!ial in&epen&en!e: D' 3he Supre e Court is a !onstitutional :o&" an& !annot :e a:olishe& :" ere le,islation' 3he e :ers of the Supre e Court !annot :e re o%e& e0!ept :" i pea!h ent' 3he Supre e Court !annot :e &epri%e& of its ini u ;uris&i!tion pres!ri:e& in Se!tion 2H +rti!le M of the Constitution'
3he appellate ;uris&i!tion of the Supre e Court !annot :e in!rease& :" law without its a&%i!e an& !on!urren!e'

l'

'

n'

43di(ia' B Bar C&3n(i' 9!###: No M5 * 6hat is the !o position of the >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il an& the ter of offi!e of its re,ular e :ersL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il is !o pose& of the followin,: 1' 3he Chief >usti!e as e0 offi!io !hair an;

o'

+ppointees to the >u&i!iar" are no inate& :" the >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il an& are not su:;e!t to !onfir ation :" the Co ission on +ppoint ents'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6!

!)

&)

e)

3he Supre e Court has a& inistrati%e super%ision o%er all lower !ourts an& their personnel' 3he Supre e Court has e0!lusi%e power to &is!ipline >u&,es of lower !ourts' 3he 8e :ers of the >u&i!iar" ha%e se!urit" of tenureH whi!h !annot :e un&er ine& :" a law reor,ani=in, the >u&i!iar"'
8e :ers of the >u&i!iar" !annot :e

Senator &e 7eon tooD the floor of the Senate to speaD on a C atter of personal pri%ile,eC to %in&i!ate his honor a,ainst those C:aseless an& ali!iousC alle,ations' 3he atter was referre& to the Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ersH whi!h pro!ee&e& to !on&u!t a le,islati%e in?uir"' 3he Co ittee asDe& 8r' Ein!e 7e&es aH a :usiness an linDe& to the transa!tion an& now a respon&ent :efore the San&i,an:a"anH to appear an& to testif" :efore the Co ittee'

f)

&esi,nate& to an" perfor in, ?uasi*>u&i!ial a& inistrati%e fun!tions' (3)

a,en!" or

(#) (2)

3he salaries of 8e :ers of the >u&i!iar" !annot :e &e!rease& &urin, their !ontinuan!e in offi!e' 3he >u&i!iar" has fis!al autono "' 3he Supre e Court has e0!lusi%e power to pro ul,ate rules of plea&in,H pra!ti!e an& pro!e&ure' Anl" the Supre e Court !an te poraril" assi,n ;u&,es to other stations' 5t is the Supre e Court who appoints all offi!ials an& e plo"ees of the >u&i!iar"' (Cru=H Philippine Politi!al 7awH 1992 e&' (pp' 229*31')

8r 7e&es a refuses to appear an& file suit :efore the Supre e Court to !hallen,e the le,alit" of the pro!ee&in,s :efore the Co ittee' @e also asDs whether the Co ittee ha& the power to re?uire hi to testif"' 5&entif" the issues 5n%ol%e& an& resol%e the ' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he issues in%ol%e& in this !ase are the followin,: (3) 6hether or not the Supre e Court has ;uris&i!tion to entertain the !ase;
(#) 6hether or not the Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ers has the power to in%esti,ate a atter whi!h is in%ol%e& in a !ase pen&in, in !ourt; an&

())

(7)

(2)

6hether or not the petitioner !an in%oDe his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri ination'

43di(ia' P&5er 9!#$#: No' 10: 6here is ;u&i!ial power %este&L 6hat are in!lu&e& in su!h powerL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH ;u&i!ial power is %este& in one Supre e Court an& in su!h lower !ourts as a" :e esta:lishe& :" law' 5t in!lu&es the &ut" of the !ourts of ;usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies in%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent'

+ll these 5ssues were resol%e& in the !ase of 9en,=on %s' Senate 9lue 1i::on Co itteeH 203 SC1+ 7)7'
3he Supre e Court has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !aseH :e!ause it in%ol%es the ?uestion of whether or not the Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ers has the power to !on&u!t the in%esti,ation' <n&er Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH ;u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" of the !ourts to &eter ine whether or not an" :ran!h of the ,o%ern ent is a!tin, with ,ra%e of a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D of ;uris&i!tion' 3he Co ittee on +!!ounta:ilit" of Pu:li! Affi!ers has no power to in%esti,ate the s!an&al' Sin!e the s!an&al is in%ol%e& in a !ase pen&in, in !ourtH the in%esti,ation will en!roa!h upon the e0!lusi%e &o ain of the !ourt' 3o allow the in%esti,ation will !reate the possi:ilit" of !onfli!tin, ;u&, ents :etween the !o ittee an& the !ourt' 5f the &e!ision of the !o ittee were rea!he& :efore that of the !ourtH it i,ht influen!e the ;u&, ent of the !ourt'

43di(ia' P&5er 9!##":


No' 8: + !ase was file& :efore the San&i,an:a"an re,ar&in, a ?uestiona:le ,o%ern ent transa!tion' 5n the !ourse of the pro!ee&in,sH newspapers linDe& the na e of Senator >' &e 7eon to the s!an&al'

3he petitioner !an in%oDe his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri inationH '''

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6"

43di(ia' P&5er 9!##$:


5E' +n&res +n, was :orn of a Chinese father an& a Filipino other in Sorso,onH Sorso,on' on >anuar" 20H 1973' 5n 1988' his father was naturali=e&as a Filipino !iti=en' An 8a" 11H1998' +n&res +n, was ele!te& 1epresentati%e of the First -istri!t of Sorso,on' >uan 9onto who re!ei%e& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otesH file& a petition for (uo 6arranto a,ainst +n,' 3he petition was file& with the @ouse of 1epresentati%e /le!toral 3ri:unal (@1/3)' 9onto !onten&s that +n, is not a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines an& therefore is &is?ualifie& to :e a e :er of the @ouse'

a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent' +s hel& in 8ar!os us' 8an,lapusH 177 SC1+ ))8' this pro%ision li its resort to the politi!al ?uestion &o!trine an& :roa&ens the s!ope of ;uri&i!al in?uir" into areas whi!h the !ourts un&er the 1932 an& the 1973 Constitutions woul& nor all" ha%e left to the politi!al &epart ents to &e!i&e'

3he @1/3 rule& in fa%or of +n,' 9onto file& a petition for !ertiorari in the Supre e Court' 3he followin, issues are raise&:
(3) 6hether the !ase is ;usti!ia:le !onsi&erin, that +rti!le E5' Se!tion 17 of the Constitution &e!lares the @1/3 to :e the Csole >u&,eC of all !ontests relatin, to the ele!tion returns an& &is?ualifi!ations of e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' P2NQ 6hether +n, is a natural :o !iti=en of

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: <n&er the 1932 an& 1973 ConstitutionsH there was no pro%ision &efinin, the s!ope of ;u&i!ial power as %este& in the ;u&i!iar"' 6hile these ConstitutionsH :oth pro%i&e& for %esture of ;u&i!ial power Cin one Supre e Court an& in su!h inferior !ourts as a" :e esta:lishe& :" lawHC the" were silent as to the s!ope of su!h power' 3he 1987 ConstitutionH on the other han&H re* wrote the pro%isions on the %esture of ;u&i!ial power ori,inall" appearin, in the 1932 an& 1973 ConstitutionsH as follows: C3he ;u&i!ial power shall :e %este& in one Supre e Court an& in su!h lower !ourts as a" :e esta:lishe& :" law'
C>u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" of the !ourts of ;usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies 5n%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of >uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent'C (Se!' 1' +rt' E555) 3he se!on& para,raph of the !ite& pro%ision was not foun& in the 1932 an& 1973 ConstitutionH it !ontains a new &efinition of ;u&i!ial power parti!ularl" the s!ope thereof' 3he first portion thereof represents the tra&itional !on!ept of >u&i!ial powerH in%ol%in, the settle ent of !onfli!tin, ri,hts as :" lawH whi!h presu a:l" was i pli!it in the 1932 an& 1973 Constitutions' 3he se!on& (latter) portion of the &efinition represents a :roa&enin, of the s!ope of ;u&i!ial power orH in the lan,ua,e of the Supre e CourtH !onfer ent of Ce0pan&e& >uris&i!tionC on the >u&i!iar" (-a=a %' Sin,sonH 180 SC1+ #9)) to ena:le the !ourts to re%iew the e0er!ise of &is!retion :" the politi!al &epart ents of ,o%ern ent' 3his new prero,ati%e of the ;u&i!iar" as now re!o,ni=e& un&er the 1987 Constitution was not !onstitutionall" per issi:le un&er the 1932 an& 1973 Charters'

(#) @ow

the Philippines' W2NQ


shoul& this !ase :e &e!i&e&L

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3' 3he !ase is ;usti!ia:le' +s state& 5n 7a=atin %s' @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal 1)8 SC1+ 391H #0#H sin!e ;u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern entH the Supre e Court has the power to re%iew the &e!isions of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal in !ase of ,ra%e +:use of &is!retion on its part'

#' +n&res +n, shoul& :e !onsi&ere& a natural :orn !iti=en of the Philippines' '''' 43di(ia' P&5er8 S(&*e 9!##;: No' 2: 1T 6hat is the &ifferen!eH if an"' :etween the s!ope of >u&i!ial power un&er the 1987 Constitution on one han&H an& the 1932 an& 1973 Constitutions on the otherL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he s!ope of ;u&i!ial power un&er the 1987 Constitution is :roa&er than its s!ope un&er the 1932 an& 1973 Constitution :e!ause of the se!on& para,raph of Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH whi!h states that it in!lu&es the &ut" to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6-

43di(ia' Re0ie58 L&(3+ Standi 9!##":


No' ): 3he Philippine /n%iron entalistsB Ar,ani=ation for NatureH a &ul" re!o,ni=e& non* ,o%ern ental or,ani=ationH inten&s to file suit to en;oin the Philippine $o%ern ent fro allo!atin, fun&s to operate a power plant at 8ount 3u:a 5n a southern islan&' 3he" !lai that there was no !onsultation with the 5n&i,enous !ultural !o unit" whi!h will :e &ispla!e& fro an!estral lan&s essential to their li%elihoo& an& in&ispensa:le to their reli,ious pra!ti!es' 3) 3he or,ani=ation is :ase& in 8aDati' +ll its offi!ers li%e an& worD in 8aDati' Not one of its offi!ers or e :ers :elon, to the affe!te& in&i,enous !ultural !o unit"' -o the" ha%e the stan&in, in this &isputeL /0plain' #) 6oul& "our answer :e &ifferent if the Philippine Power CorporationH a pri%ate !o pan"H were to operate the plantL /0plain'

the power plantH :e!ause no pu:li! fun&s will :e spent for its operation' +s hel& in $on=ales %s' 8ar!osH )2 SC1+ )2#H a ta0pa"er has no stan&in, to file a !ase if no e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s is in%ol%e&'
Sin!e no e :er or offi!er of the Philippine /n%iron entalistsB Ar,ani=ation :elon,s to the affe!te& in&i,enous !o unit"H none of the ri,hts of the Philippine /n%iron entalistsB Ar,ani=ation an& of its offi!ers an& e :ers are affe!te&' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in National /!ono i! Prote!tionis +sso!iation %s' An,pinH 171 SC1+ )27H the or,ani=ation has no stan&in, to file the !ase'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
a) <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH the State shoul& prote!t the ri,hts of !ultural 5n&i,enous !o unities to their an!estral lan&s to ensure their well*:ein,' <n&er Se!tion 17H +rti!le M5E of the ConstitutionH the State shoul& prote!t the ri,hts of in&i,enous !ultural !o unities to preser%e an& &e%elop this !ulturesH tra&itionsH an& institutions an& shoul& !onsi&er these ri,hts in the for ulation of national plans an& poli!ies' 3he ,o%ern ent %iolate& these pro%isionsH :e!ause it &e!i&e& to operate the power plant without !onsultin, the in&i,enous !ultural !o unit" an& the operation of the power plant will result in its &ispla!e ent' 5f the pro;e!te& lawsuit will :e :ase& on %iolation of the ri,hts of the in&i,enous !ultural !o unitiesH the Philippine /n%iron entalists Ar,ani=ation will ha%e no stan&in, to file the !ase' None of its offi!ers an& e :ers :elon, to the in&i,enous !ultural !o unit"' None of their ri,hts are affe!te&'

43di(ia' Re0ie58 ReF3i+ite+ 9!##;: No' 2: 2) +ssu e that the !onstitutional ?uestion raise& in a petition :efore the Supre e Court is the 5is ota of the !aseH ,i%e at least two other re?uire ents :efore the Court will e0er!ise its power of ;u&i!ial re%iewL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2) +!!or&in, to 8a!asiano %s' National @ousin, +uthorit"H 22# SC1+ 23)H in a&&ition to the re?uire ent that the !onstitutional ?uestion raise& :e the lis ota of the !aseH the followin, re?uisites ust :e present for the e0er!ise of the power of ;u&i!ial re%iew: (!) 3here ust :e an a!tual !ase or !ontro%ers" in%ol%in, a !onfli!t of le,al ri,hts sus!epti:le of >u&i!ial &eter ination;

(&) 3he !onstitutional ?uestion raise& :" the proper part"; an& (e) 3he !onstitutional ?uestion raise& at the earliest opportunit"' 43ri+di(ti&n &) HLURB 9!##-:

ust ust

:e :e

5f the lawsuit will seeD to en;oin the use of pu:li! fun&s to operate the power plantH the Philippine /n%iron entalistsB Ar,ani=ation !an file a ta0pa"erBs suit' +s hel& in 8a!e&a us' 8a!arai,H 197 SC1+ 771H a ta0pa"er has stan&in, to ?uestion the ille,al e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s'
:) 3he Philippine /n%iron entalists Ar,ani=ation will ha%e no stan&in, to file the !ase if it is a pri%ate !o pan" that will operate

No' 8; 3he +9C 1ealt"H 5n!H file& a !o plaint a,ainst 1i!o for the !olle!tion of unpai& install ents on a su:&i%ision lot pur!hase& :" the latterH 1i!o faile& to file an answerH was &e!lare& in &efault; an& after re!eption of plaintiffs e%i&en!e e0 parteH ;u&, ent was ren&ere& a,ainst hi ' 3he &e!ision :e!a e finalH an& upon otion :" +9C 1ealt"H the ;u&,e issue& a writ of e0e!ution' 1i!o now files a otion to ?uash the writ an& to %a!ate the >u&, ent !onten&in, that it is the @ousin, an& 7an& <se 1e,ulator" 9oar& (@7<19) whi!h is %este& with ori,inal an& e0!lusi%e >uris&i!tion o%er !ases in%ol%in, the real estate :usiness' 1i!o pra"s for the &is issal of the !o plaint an& for the nullit" of the &e!ision' 3he realt" fir opposes the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6;

otion ar,uin, that un&er 9P 129H 13Cs ha%e e0!lusi%e an& ori,inal ;uris&i!tion o%er !ases in whi!h the a ount of !ontro%ers" e0!ee&s P20H000'00' +nswer the followin, ?ueries: (!) 6ho has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !olle!tion suitL (&) 3he 13C &e!isionH ha%in, :e!o e final an& e0e!utor"H !an it still :e %a!ate&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1T +s hel& in /state -e%elopers an& 5n%estors Corporation %s' Court of +ppealsH 213 SC1+ 323H pursuant to Presi&ential -e!ree No' 13##H it is the @ousin, an& 7an& <se 1e,ulator" 9oar& whi!h has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !lai of a &e%eloper a,ainst a :u"er for the pa" ent of the :alan!e of the pur!hase pri!e of a lot' 3he ;uris&i!tion of the 1e,ional 3rial Court o%er !ases in whi!h the a ount of !ontro%ers" e0!ee&s P20H000'00 e0ists onl" in all !ases where the !ase &oes not otherwise fall within the e0!lusi%e ;uris&i!tion of an" other !ourtH tri:unalH person or :o&" e0er!isin, >u&i!ial or ?uasi*;u&i!ial fun!tionsH

within three onths (+rt' MH Se!' 11)' 5n 8ar!elino %s' Cru=H 121 SC1+ 21 (1983) it was hel& that the perio&s pres!ri:e& are onl" &ire!tor"H not an&ator"' P&'iti(a' >3e+ti&n 9!##@:
No' 13: >u&i!ial power as &efine& in Se!' 1H 2n& par'H +rt' E555H 1987 ConstitutionH now Cin!lu&es the &ut" of the Courts of >usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies in%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D of e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent' C3his &efinition is sai& to ha%e e0pan&e& the power of the ;u&i!iar" to in!lu&e politi!al ?uestions for erl" :e"on& its ;uris&i!tion' f) -o "ou a,ree with su!h as interpretation of the !onstitutional &efinition of ;u&i!ial power that woul& authori=e the !ourts to re%iew an&H if warrante&H re%erse the e0er!ise of &is!retion :" the politi!al &epart ents (e0e!uti%e an& le,islati%e) of the ,o%ern entH in!lu&in, the Constitutional Co issionsL -is!uss full"H ,) 5n "our opinionH how shoul& su!h &efinition :e !onstrue& so as not to ero&e !onsi&era:l" or &isre,ar& entirel" the

2) OesH :e!ause it is %oi&''''


Mandat&ry Peri&d &r De(iding Ca+e+ 9!#$#:

No' 10: (2) -espite the lapse of # onths fro the ti e that the trial was ter inate& an& the !ase su: itte& for &e!isionH the trial !ourt faile& to &e!i&e the !ase' 3he &efense !ounsel o%e& to &is iss the !ase on the ,roun& that after the lapse of 90 &a"sH the !ourt ha& lost ;uris&i!tion to &e!i&e the !ase' Shoul& the otion :e ,rante&L SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the otion shoul& not :e ,rante&' Se!tion 12 (#)H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es: C-espite the e0piration of the appli!a:le an&ator" perio&H the !ourtH without pre;u&i!e to su!h responsi:ilit" as a" ha%e :een in!urre& in !onse?uen!e thereofH shall &e!i&e or resol%e the !ase or atter su: itte& thereto for &eter inationH without further &ela"'C 3husH the failure of the trial !ourt to &e!i&e the !ase within ninet" &a"s &i& not oust it of ;uris&i!tion to &e!i&e the !ase' ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
3he 1973 Constitution pro%i&e& for !ertain !onse?uen!es on the &e!isions of !ourts in !ase of the failure of the Supre e Court an& other inferior !olle,iate !ourts to &e!i&e !ases within pres!ri:e& perio&s' 9ut it &i& not pro%i&e for !onse?uen!es on the &e!isions of trial !ourts as a result of their failure to &e!i&e !ases

e0istin, Cpoliti!al ?uestionC -is!uss full"' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

&o!trineL

!) OesH the se!on& para,raph of Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 Constitution has e0pan&e& the power of the >u&i!iar" to in!lu&e politi!al ?uestions' 3his was not foun& in the 1932 an& the 1973 ConstitutionH Pre!isel"H the fra ers of the 1987 !onstitution inten&e& to wi&en the s!ope of ;u&i!ial re%iew' &) +s pointe& out in 8ar!os %s' 8an,lapusH 177 SC1+ ))8H so as not to &isre,ar& entirel" the politi!al ?uestion &o!trineH the e0tent of ;u&i!ial re%iew when politi!al ?uestions are in%ol%e& shoul& :e li ite& to a &eter ination of whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of the offi!ial whose a!t is :ein, ?uestione&' 5f ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion is not shownH the !ourts shoul& not su:stitute their ;u&, ent for that of the offi!ial !on!erne& an& &e!i&e a atter whi!h :" its nature or :" law is for the latter alone to &e!i&e'

P&'iti(a' >3e+ti&n D&(trine 9!##%: No' 2; 3o what e0tentH if at allH has the 1987 Constitution affe!te& the Cpoliti!al ?uestion &o!trineCL

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6@

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the Constitution has e0pan&e& the s!ope of ;u&i!ial power :" in!lu&in, the &ut" of the !ourts of >usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies in%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the $o%ern ent' 5n 8ar!os %s' 8an,lapusH 177 SC1+ ))8H the Supre e Court state& that :e!ause of this !ourts of ;usti!e a" &e!i&e politi!al ?uestions if there was ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of the offi!ial whose a!tion is :ein, ?uestione&'

3he assault of a fellow Senator !onstitutes &isor&erl" :eha%ior' P&'iti(a' >3e+ti&n8 T& Sett'e A(t3a' C&ntr&0er+ie+ 9"66;: (a) 3he 1932H 1973 an& 1987 Constitutions !o onl" pro%i&e that C>u&i!ial power shall :e %este& in one Supre e Court an& in su!h lower !ourts as a" :e esta:lishe& :" law'C
6hat is the effe!t of the a&&ition in the 1987 Constitution of the followin, pro%ision: C>u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" of the !ourts of ;usti!e to settle a!tual !ontro%ersies in%ol%in, ri,hts whi!h are le,all" &e an&a:le an& enfor!ea:leH an& to &eter ine whether or not there has :een ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the ,o%ern entCL -is!uss :riefl"H !itin, at least one illustrati%e !ase' (2N)

P&'iti(a' >3e+ti&n: Se*arati&n &) P&5er+ 9"66;:


(:) S-A was ele!te& Con,ress an' 9efore the en& of his first "ear in offi!eH he infli!te& ph"si!al in;uries on a !ollea,ueH /3H in the !ourse of a heate& &e:ate' Char,es were file& in !ourt a,ainst hi as well as in the @ouse /thi!s Co ittee' 7aterH the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH &i%i&in, alon, part" linesH %ote& to e0pel hi ' Clai in, that his e0pulsion was railroa&e& an& tainte& :" :ri:er"H he file& a petition seeDin, a &e!laration :" the Supre e Court that the @ouse ,ra%el" a:use& its &is!retion an& %iolate& the Constitution' @e pra"e& that his e0pulsion :e annulle& an& that he shoul& :e restore& :" the SpeaDer to his position as Con,ress an' 5s S-ABs petition :efore the Supre e Court ;usti!ia:leL Cite pertinent issues for !onsi&eration' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he effe!t of the se!on& para,raph of Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 Constitution is to li it resort to the politi!al ?uestion &o!trine an& to :roa&en the s!ope of ;u&i!ial in?uir" into areas whi!h the >u&i!iar"H un&er the pre%ious ConstitutionsH woul& ha%e left to the politi!al &epart ents to &e!i&e' 5f a politi!al ?uestion is in%ol%e&H the >u&i!iar" !an &eter ine whether or not the offi!ial whose a!tion is :ein, ?uestione& a!te& with ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion (8ar!os %' 8an,lapusH 177 SC1+ ))8 P1989Q); (-a=a %' Sin,sonH 180 SC1+ #9) P1989Q)' 3husH althou,h the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal has e0!lusi%e ;uris&i!tion to &e!i&e ele!tion !ontests in%ol%in, e :ers of the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH the Supre e Court nullifie& the re o%al of one of its e :ers for %otin, in fa%or of the protestantH who :elon,e& to a &ifferent part"' (9on&o! %' Pine&aH 201 SC1+ 792 P1991Q)'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
6hile un&er Se!tion 1H +rti!le E555 of the 1987 Constitution the Supre e Court a" in?uire whether or not the &e!ision to e0pel S-A is tainte& with ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tionH the petition shoul& :e &is isse&' 5n +le;an&rino %' (ue=on (#) Phil' 83 P192#Q)H the Supre e Court hel& that it !oul& not !o pel the Senate to reinstate a Senator who assaulte& another Senator an& was suspen&e& for &isor&erl" :eha%iorH :e!ause it !oul& not !o pel a separate an& !o*e?ual &epart ent to taDe an" parti!ular a!tion' 5n As eXa %' Pen&atun (109 Phil' 8)3 P19)0Q)H it was hel& that the Supre e Court !oul& not interfere with the suspension of a Con,ress an for &isor&erl" :eha%iorH :e!ause the @ouse of 1epresentati%es is the ;u&,e of what !onstitutes &isor&erl" :eha%ior'

P&'iti(a' >3e+ti&n+ 9!#$$: No' 23: 5n a!!or&an!e with the opinion of the Se!retar" of >usti!eH an& :elie%in, that it woul& :e ,oo& for the !ountr"H the Presi&ent enters into an a,ree ent with the + eri!ans for an e0tension for another fi%e (2) "ears of their sta" at their ilitar" :ases in the PhilippinesH in !onsi&eration of: 2' + "earl" rental of one :illion <'S' &ollarsH pa"a:le to the Philippine ,o%ern ent in a&%an!e;
)' +n un&ertaDin, on the part of the + eri!an ,o%ern ent to i ple ent i e&iatel" the ini*8arshall plan for the !ountr" in%ol%in,

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6?

ten :illion <'S' &ollars in ai&s an& !on!essional loans; an& 7' +n un&ertaDin, to help persua&e + eri!an :anDs to !on&one interests an& other !har,es on the !ountr"Bs out*stan&in, loans'
5n returnH the Presi&ent a,ree& to allow + eri!an nu!lear %essels to sta" for short %isits at Su:i!H an& in !ase of %ital ilitar" nee&H to store nu!lear weapons at Su:i! an& at ClarD Fiel&' + %ital ilitar" nee& !o esH un&er the a,ree entH when the sealanes fro the Persian $ulf to the Pa!ifi!H are threatene& :" hostile ilitar" for!es' 3he Nu!lear Free Philippine Coalition !o es to "ou for a&%i!e on how the" !oul& le,all" pre%ent the sa e a,ree ent entere& into :" the Presi&ent with the <S ,o%ern ent fro ,oin, into effe!t' 6hat woul& "ou a&%ise the to &oL $i%e "our reasons'

No' 11: @ow a" the followin, :e re o%e& fro offi!e: 2' Senators 4 Con,ress en )' >u&,es of lower !ourts 7' Affi!ers an& e plo"ees in the Ci%il Ser%i!e SUGGESTED ANSWER: (!) +s to Sen 4 Con,H +rt' 555H se!tion 1)(3)H of the ConstitutionH ''' (&) <n&er +rt' E555H se!' 11 of the ConstitutionH >u&,es of lower !ourts a" :e re o%e& :" &is issal :" the Supre e :" a %ote of a a;orit" of the 8e :ers who a!tuall" tooD part in the &eli:eration on the issues in the !ase an& %ote& thereon' (e) +s to Ci% Ser%i!e / plH +rt' 5M*9' Se!' 2(3) of the ConstitutionH ''' Re0ie5 E2e(3ti0e A(t+ 9!##?: No' 10: 1) MH a !lerD of !ourt of the 1e,ional 3rial Court of 8anilaH was foun& ,uilt" of :ein, a:sent without offi!ial lea%e for 90 &a"s an& !onsi&ere& &is isse& fro ser%i!e :" the Supre e Court' @e appeale& to the Presi&ent for e0e!uti%e !le en!"' +!tin, on the appealH the /0e!uti%e Se!retar"H :" or&er of the Presi&ent !o ute& the penalt" to a suspension of si0 onths' (3) Can the Supre e Court re%iew the !orre!tness of the a!tion of the Presi&ent in !o utin, the penalt" i pose& on ML /0plain' (#) 6as the a!tion of the Presi&ent !onstitutional an& %ali&L /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1' a) OesH the Supre e Court !an re%iew the !orre!tness of the a!tion of the Presi&ent 5n !o utin, the penalt" i pose& on M' 9" &oin, soH the Supre e Court is not &e!i&in, a politi!al ?uestion' 3he Supre e Court is not re%iewin, the wis&o of the !o utation of the penalt"' 6hat it is &e!i&in, is whether or not the Presi&ent has the power to !o ute the penalt" of MH +s state& in -a=a %s' Sin,son' 180 SC1+ #9)H it is within the s!ope of >u&i!ial power to pass upon the %ali&it" of the a!tions of the other &epart ents of the $o%ern ent' :) 3he !o utation :" the Presi&ent of the penalt" i pose& :" the Supre e Court upon M is un!onstitutional' Se!tion )' +rti!le E555 of the Constitution %ests the Supre e Court with the power of a& inistrati%e super%ision o%er all !ourts an& their personnel' 5n $ar!ia %s' -e la PenaH 229 SC1+ 7))H it was hel& that no other :ran!h of the $o%ern ent a" intru&e into this e0!lusi%e power of the Supre e Court'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5f the +,ree ent is not in the for of a treat"H it is not liDel" to :e su: itte& to the Senate for ratifi!ation as re?uire& in +rt' E55H se!' 21' 5t a" notH thereforeH :e oppose& in that :ran!h of the ,o%ern ent' Nor is ;u&i!ial re%iew feasi:le at this sta,e :e!ause there is no ;usti!ia:le !ontro%ers"' 6hile +rt' E555H se!' 1H par' 2 states that ;u&i!ial power in!lu&es the &ut" of !ourt of ;usti!e to C&eter ine whether or not there has :een a ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion a ountin, to la!D or e0!ess of ;uris&i!tion on the part of an" :ran!h or instru entalit" of the ,o%ern entHC it is !lear that this pro%ision &oes not &o awa" with the politi!al ?uestion &o!trine' 5t was inserte& in the Constitution to pre%ent !ourts fro aDin, use of the &o!trine to a%oi& what otherwise are ;usti!ia:le !ontro%ersiesH al:eit in%ol%in, the /0e!uti%e 9ran!h of the ,o%ern ent &urin, the artial law perio&' An the other han&H at this sta,eH no ;usti!ia:le !ontro%ers" !an :e fra e& to ;ustif" ;u&i!ial re%iewH 5 woul&H thereforeH a&%i!e the Nu!lear Free Philippine Coalition to resort to the e&ia to laun!h a !a pai,n a,ainst the +,ree ent'

Pr& Ha( .i(e Ca+e+ 9!###: No M5 6hat &oes if ean when a Supre e Court >usti!e !on!urs in a &e!ision pro ha! %i!eL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 6hen a &e!ision is pro ha! %i!eH it eans the rulin, will appl" to this parti!ular !ase onl"' Re1&0a' &) L&5er C&3rt 43dge+ 9!##-:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6%

S3*er0i+i&n8 C&3rt+ B it+ Per+&nne' 9>@< "66@:


(3) Pe&ro 8asipa, file& with the A :u&s an a !o plaint a,ainst 13C >u&,e >ose Pala!pa! with %iolation of +rti!le 20# of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e for Dnowin,l" ren&erin, an un;ust ;u&, ent in Cri inal Case No' )17' >u&,e Pala!pa! file& a otion with the A :u&s an to refer the !o plaint to the Supre e Court to &eter ine whether an a& inistrati%e aspe!t was in%ol%e& in the sai& !ase' 3he A :u&s an &enie& the otion on the ,roun& that no a& inistrati%e !ase a,ainst >u&,e Pala!pa! relati%e to the &e!ision in Cri inal Case No' )17 was file& an& pen&in, in his offi!e'

C' NoH the !ourt !annot taDe !o,ni=an!e of the !ase' +s hel& in >o"a %s' Presi&ential Co ission on $oo& $o%ern entH 222 SC1+ 2)9H sin!e the petitioners were not the le,al owners of paintin,s an& anti?ue sil%erwareH the" ha& no stan&in, to ?uestion their &isposition' 9esi&esH the paintin,s an& the anti?ue sil%erware &i& not !onstitute i portant !ultural properties or national !ultural treasuresH as the" ha& no e0!eptional histori!al an& !ultural si,nifi!an!e to the Philippines' -' Co +!!or&in, to >o"a us' Presi&ential ission on $oo& $o%ern entH 222 SC1+

C' for a ta0pa"erBs suit to four re?uisites ust :e !onsi&ere&:


(1) the ?uestion

prosperH

ust :e raise& :" the proper

State with reasons whether the A :u&s anBs rulin, is !orre!t' (#N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he A :u&s anBs rulin, is not !orre!t' <n&er Se!tion )H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH it is the Supre e Court whi!h is %este& with e0!lusi%e a& inistrati%e super%ision o%er all !ourts an& its personnel' Pres!in&in, fro this pre iseH the A :u&s an !annot &eter ine for itself an& :" itself whether a !ri inal !o plaint a,ainst a ;u&,eH or !ourt e plo"eeH in%ol%es an a& inistrati%e atter' 3he A :u&s an is &ut" :oun& to ha%e all !ases a,ainst ;u&,es an& !ourt personnel file& :efore itH referre& to the Supre e Court for &eter ination as to whether an a& inistrati%e aspe!t is in%ol%e& therein' (>u&,e >ose Caoi:es %' A :u&s anH $'1' No' 132177H >ul" 19H 2001)

part"; (#) there ust :e an a!tual !ontro%ers"; (2) the ?uestion ust :e raise& at the earliest possi:le opportunit"; an& ()) the &e!ision on the !onstitutional or le,al ?uestion ust :e ne!essar" to the &eter ination of the !ase' 5n or&er that a ta0pa"er a" ha%e stan&in, to !hallen,e the le,alit" of an offi!ial a!t of the ,o%ern entH the a!t :ein, ?uestione& ust in%ol%e a &is:urse ent of pu:li! fun&s upon the theor" that the e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s for an un!onstitutional a!t is a isappli!ation of su!h fun&sH whi!h a" :e en;oine& at the instan!e of a ta0pa"er' Ter1 &) O))i(e8 43+ti(e+ 9!##?:
No' 9: +H an asso!iate ;usti!e of the Supre e Court rea!he& the a,e of se%ent" on >ul" 1H 199)' 3here was a !ase !alen&are& for &eli:eration on that &a" where the %ote of + was !ru!ial' Can + hol& o%er the position an& parti!ipate in the &eli:eration of the !ase on >ul" 1H 199)L /0plain'

Ta2*ayerG+ S3it8 L&(3+ Standi 9!##@:


No' 12: 6hen the 8ar!os a& inistration was topple& :" the re%olutionar" ,o%ern entH the 8ar!oses left :ehin& se%eral Al& 8astersB paintin,s an& anti?ue sil%erware sai& to ha%e :een a!?uire& :" the as personal ,ifts' Ne,otiations were then a&e with /llen 7a"ne of 7on&on for their &isposition an& sale at pu:li! au!tion' 7aterH the ,o%ern ent entere& into a CConsi,n ent +,ree entC allowin, /llen 7a"ne of 7on&on to au!tion off the su:;e!t art pie!es' <pon learnin, of the inten&e& saleH well*Dnown artistsH patrons an& ,uar&ians of the arts of the Philippines file& a petition in !ourt to en;oin the sale an& &isposition of the %alue& ite s assertin, that their !ultural si,nifi!an!e ust :e preser%e& for the :enefit of the Filipino people'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No' + !annot hol& o%er his position as +sso!iate >usti!e of the Supre e Court an& parti!ipate in the &eli:erations of the !ase on >ul" 1H 199)' <n&er Se!tion 11H +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH 8e :ers of the Supre e Court hol& offi!e until the" rea!h the a,e of se%ent" "ears or :e!o e in!apa!itate& to &is!har,e their &uties' Constitutional offi!ers whose ter s are fi0e& :" the Constitution ha%e no ri,ht to hol& o%er their positions until their su!!essors shall ha%e :een appointe& an& ?ualifie& unless otherwise pro%i&e& in the Constitution' (8e!he H + 3reaties on the 7aw of Pu:li! Affi!es an& Affi!ersH p' 228')

3) Can the !ourt taDe !o,ni=an!e of the !aseL /0plain' #) 6hat are the re?uisites for a ta0pa"erBs suit to prosperL SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6$

.&te+ reF3ired )&r de('aring a 'a5 3n(&n+tit3ti&na' 9!##?: No' 7: Can fi%e e :ers of the Supre e Court &e!lare a uni!ipal or&inan!e un!onstitutionalL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
Oes' fi%e 8e :ers of the Supre e Court sittin, en* :an! !an &e!lare a uni!ipal or&inan!e un!onstitutional' <n&er Se!tion #(2)' +rti!le E555 of the ConstitutionH a uni!ipal or&inan!e !an :e &e!lare& un!onstitutional with the !on!urren!e of a a;orit" of the 8e :ers of the Supre e Court who a!tuall" tooD part in the &eli:eration on the issues in the !ase an& %ote& thereon' 5f onl" ei,ht 8e :ers of the Supre e Court a!tuall" tooD part in &e!i&in, the !aseH there will still :e a ?uoru ' Fi%e 8e :ers will !onstitute a a;orit" of those who a!tuall" tooD part in &e!i&in, the !ase'

ARTICLE IX Ci0i' Ser0i(e C&11i++i&n


Career Ser0i(e8 C,ara(teri+ti(+ 9!###: No 5M * 6hat !hara!teri=es the !areer ser%i!e an& what are in!lu&e& in the !areer ser%i!eL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +!!or&in, to Se!tion 7H Chapter 2H 3itle 5H 9ooD E of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987H the !areer ser%i!e is !hara!teri=e& :" (1) /ntran!e :ase& on erit an& fitness to :e &eter ine& as far as pra!ti!a:le :" !o petiti%e e0a ination or :ase& on hi,hl" te!hni!al ?ualifi!ations; (2) opportunit" for a&%an!e ent to hi,her !areer positions; an& (3) se!urit" of tenure' 3he !areer ser%i!e in!lu&es:
(1) AP/N C+1//1 PAS535ANS for appoint ent to whi!h prior ?ualifi!ations in an appropriate e0a ination is re?uire&;

ARTICLE IX C&n+tit3ti&na' C&11i++i&n+


R&tati&na' S(,e1e 9!###: No M555 * 6hat are the re?uisites for the effe!ti%e operation of the so*!alle& C1otational S!he eC for Constitutional Co issionsL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +s hel& in 1epu:li! %' 5 perialH 9) Phil' 770H for the effe!ti%e operation of the rotational s!he e of the Constitutional Co issionH the first Co issioner shoul& start on a !o on &ate an& an" %a!an!" :efore the e0piration of the ter shoul& :e fille& onl" for the une0pire& :alan!e of the ter ' C&n+tit3ti&na' C&11i++i&n+ B C&3n(i' 9>%< "66?: (3) 3he le,islature a" a:olish this :o&": (2N) 0 Co ission on +ppoint ents 1 A :u&s an 2 >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il 3 Court of 3a0 +ppeals # Co ission on +u&it SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he le,islature a" a:olish the &) CA<13 AF 3+M +PP/+7S sin!e it is erel" a !reation of law unliDe the Co ission on +ppoint entsH A :u&s anH >u&i!ial an& 9ar Coun!il an& Co ission on +u&it whi!h are all !onstitu* tional !reations' 3husH the latter a,en!ies a" onl" :e a:olishe& :" wa" of an a en& ent or re%ision of the Constitution'

(2) C7AS/- C+1//1 PAS535ANS whi!h are s!ientifi! or hi,hl" te!hni!al in nature; (3) Positions in the C+1//1 /M/C<35E/ S/1E5C/; (#) Career offi!ers other than those in the !areer e0e!uti%e ser%i!eH who are appointe& :" the Presi&ent; (2) Co issione& offi!ers an& enliste& en of the +r e& For!es; ()) Personnel of ,o%ern ent * owne& or !ontrolle& !orporationsH whether perfor in, ,o%ern ental or proprietar" fun!tionsH who &o not fall un&er the non*!areer ser%i!e; an& (7) Per anent la:orersH whether sDille&H se isDille&H or unsDille&'
Ci0i' Ser0i(e C&11i++i&n 0+= COA 9"66;: 9#<a: For er $o%ernor PP of +-S Pro%in!e ha& &is isse& se%eral e plo"ees to s!ale &own the operations of his Affi!e' 3he e plo"ees !o plaine& to the 8erit S"ste s Prote!tion 9oar&H whi!h rule& that the Ci%il Ser%i!e rules were %iolate& when the e plo"ees were &is isse&' 3he Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission (CSC) affir e& the 8SP9 &e!isionH an& or&ere& +-S to reinstate the e plo"ees with full :a!Dwa,es' +-S &i& not appeal an& the or&er :e!a e final' 5nstea& of !o pl"in, i e&iatel"H 9APH the in!u :ent $o%ernor of +-SH referre& the atter to the Co ission on +u&it (CA+)H

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!6#

whi!h rule& that the a ounts &ue are the personal lia:ilities of the for er $o%ernor who &is isse& the e plo"ees in :a& faith' 3husH +-S refuse& to pa"' 3he final CSC &e!isionH howe%erH &i& not fin& the for er $o%ernor in :a& faith' 3he for er $o%ernor was liDewise not hear& on the ?uestion of his lia:ilit"'

1'

3he rule prohi:itin, the appoint ent to !ertain ,o%ern ent positionsH of the spouse an& relati%es of the Presi&ent within the fourth &e,ree of !onsan,uinit" or affinit"' P2NQ
3he rule aDin, it in!o pati:le for e :ers of Con,ress to hol& offi!es or e plo" ent in the ,o%ern ent' P2NQ

2'

5s +-SB refusal ;ustifie&L Can CA+ &isallow the pa" ent of :a!Dwa,es :" +-S to the &is isse& e plo"ees &ue un&er a final CSC &e!isionL -e!i&e an& reason :riefl"' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+' 3he refusal of +-S is not ;ustifie&H an& the Co ission on +u&it !annot &isallow the pa" ent of :a!Dwa,es :" +-S to the &is isse& e plo"ee' 3he Co ission on +u&it !annot aDe a rulin, that it is the for er ,o%ernor who shoul& :e personall" lia:leH sin!e the for er ,o%ernor was not ,i%en the opportunit" to :e hear&' 5n a&&itionH the Co ission on +u&it !annot set asi&e a final &e!ision of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission' 3he pa" ent of :a!Dwa,es to ille,all" &is isse& ,o%ern ent e plo"ee is not an irre,ularH unne!essar"H e0!essi%eH e0tra%a,ant or un!ons!iona:le e0pen&iture' (<" %' Co ission on +u&itH 328 SC1+ )07 P2000Q)'

3'

#'
2'

3he rule prohi:itin, e :ers of the Constitutional Co issionsH &urin, their tenureH to :e finan!iall" intereste& in an" !ontra!t with or an" fran!hise or pri%ile,e ,rante& :" the ,o%ern entH P2NQ 3he rule pro%i&in, for post au&it :" the CA+ of !ertain ,o%ern ent a,en!ies' P2NQ
3he rule re?uirin, Con,ress to pro%i&e for the stan&ar&i=ation of !o pensation of ,o%ern ent offi!ials an& e plo"ees' P2NQ Se!tion 13' +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH whi!h prohi:its the Presi&ent fro appointin, his spouse an& relati%es within the fourth &e,ree of !onsan,uinit" or affinit" &oes not &istin,uish :etween ,o%ern ent !orporations with ori,inal !harters an& their su:si&iariesH :e!ause the prohi:ition applies to :oth'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1'

3n(ti&n &) CSC 9!##;: No' 12 * 2) Can the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission re%oDe an appoint ent :" the appointin, power an& &ire!t the appoint ent of an in&i%i&ual of its !hoi!eL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to the rulin, in 8e&alla %s' Sto' 3o asH 208 SC1+ 321H the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission !annot &i!tate to the appointin, power who to appoint' 5ts fun!tion is li ite& to &eter inin, whether or not the appointee eets the ini u ?ualifi!ation re?uire ents pres!ri:e& for the position' AtherwiseH it woul& :e en!roa!hin, upon the &is!retion of the appointin, power'

2' Se!tion 13H +rti!le E55 of the ConstitutionH whi!h prohi:its 8e :ers of Con,ress fro hol&in, an" other offi!e &urin, their ter without forfeitin, their seatH does no+ dis+ing*is:etween ,o%ern ent !orporations with ori,inal !harters an& their su:si&iariesH :e!ause the prohi:ition applies to :oth'
3' Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5M*+ of the ConstitutionH whi!h prohi:its 8e :ers of the Constitutional Co issions fro :ein, finan!iall" intereste& in an" !ontra!t with or an" fran!hise or pri%ile,e ,rante& :" the $o%ern entH does no+ dis+ing*is- :etween ,o%ern ent !orporations with ori,inal !harters an& their su:si&iariesH :e!ause the prohi:ition applies to :oth' #' Se!tion 2(1)H +rti!le 5M*- of the Constitution whi!h pro%i&es for post au&it :" the Co ission on au&it of ,o%ern ent !orporationsH does no+ dis+ing*is- :etween ,o%ern ent !orporations with ori,inal !harters an& their su:si&iariesH :e!ause the pro%ision applies to :oth' 2' Se!tion 2H +rti!le 5M*9 of the ConstitutionH whi!h pro%i&es for the stan&ar&i=ation of the

GOCC+ Wit,&3t Origina' C,arter 0+= GOCC+ Wit, Origina' C,arter 9!##$:
No 55'* * 3he Constitution &istin,uishes :etween two t"pes of owne& an&Ior !ontrolle& !orporations: those with ori,inal !harters an& those whi!h are su:si&iaries of su!h !orporations' 5n whi!h of the followin, ruleIrules is su!h a &istin!tion a&eL Consi&er ea!h of the followin, ite s an& e0plain :riefl" "our answerH !itin, pertinent pro%isions of the Constitution'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!6

!o pensation of ,o%ern ent e plo"eesH :etween ,o%ern ent an& their su:si&iariesH for applies onl" to ,o%ern ent with ori,inal !harters'

offi!ials an& dis+ing*is-es !orporations the pro%ision !orporations

43ri+di(ti&n &0er t,e GOCC+ 9!###:


No 5M * 7u=%i in&a 8arfelH ;oine& :" ele%en other retren!he& e plo"eesH file& a !o plaint with the -epart ent of 7a:or an& / plo" ent (-A7/) for unpai& retren!h ent or separation pa"H un&erpa" ent of wa,es an& non*pa" ent of e er,en!" !ost of li%in, allowan!e' 3he !o plaint was file& a,ainst Foo& 3er inalH 5n!' Foo& 3er inal 5n!' o%e& to &is iss on the ,roun& of la!D of ;uris&i!tionH theori=in, that it is a ,o%ern ent*owne& an& !ontrolle& !orporation an& its e plo"ees are ,o%erne& :" the Ci%il Ser%i!e 7aw an& not :" the 7a:or Co&e' 8arfel oppose& the otion to &is issH !onten&in, that althou,h Foo& 3er inalH 5n!' is a !orporation owne& an& !ontrolle& :" the ,o%ern ent earlier !reate& an& or,ani=e& un&er the ,eneral !orporation law as C3he $reater 8anila Foo& 3er inalH 5n!'CH it has still the arDs of a pri%ate !orporation: it &ire!tl" hires its e plo"ees without seeDin, appro%al fro the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission an& its personnel are !o%ere& :" the So!ial Se!urit" S"ste an& not the $o%ern ent Ser%i!e 5nsuran!e S"ste H 3he ?uestion pose& in the petition for !ertiorari at :ar is whether or not a la:or law !lai a,ainst a ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporation liDe the Foo& 3er inalH 5n!' falls within the ;uris&i!tion of the -epart ent of 7a:or an& / plo" ent or the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionL -e!i&e an& ratio!inate' (#N)

e oran&u *or&erH &ire!ts the !orporation to !o pl" with Ci%il Ser%i!e 1ules in the appoint ent of all of its offi!ers an& e plo"ees' 3he e oran&u *or&er of the CSC is assaile& :" the !orporationH as well as :" its offi!ers an& e plo"eesH :efore the !ourt' @ow shoul& the !ase :e resol%e&L SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he e oran&u *or&er of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission shoul& :e &e!lare& %oi&' +s hel& in $a o,a o %' PNAC Shippin, an& 3ransit Corporation' 381 SC1+ 7#2 (2002)' un&er +rti!le 5M*9H Se!tion 2(1) of the 1987 Constitution ,o%ern ent* owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations or,ani=e& un&er the Corporation Co&e are not !o%ere& :" the Ci%il Ser%i!e 7aw :ut :" the 7a:or Co&eH :e!ause onl" ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations with ori,inal !harters are !o%ere& :" the Ci%il Ser%i!e' M&de+ &) Re1&0a' )r&1 O))i(e 9!##-: No' 11: @ow a" the followin, :e re o%e& fro offi!e: 1) Senators 4 Con,ress en 2) >u&,es of lower !ourts 3) Affi!ers an& e plo"ees in the Ci%il Ser%i!e SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1) SenatorsH Con,'H +rt' 555H se!tion 1)(3)H of the ConstitutionH ''' 2) >u&,esH +rt' E555H se!' 11 of the ConstitutionH 3) <n&er +rt' 5M*9' Se!' 2(3) of the ConstitutionH offi!ers an& e plo"ees in the Ci%il Ser%i!e a" onl" :e re o%e& for !ause as pro%i&e& :" law an& after o:ser%an!e of &ue pro!ess'
3heir re o%al ust :e effe!te& :" the appropriate &is!iplinar" authorit" in a!!or&an!e with Ch' 7 se!s' #7*#8 of 9ooD E of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987 an& the Ci%il Ser%i!e 1ules an& 1e,ulations'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he !lai of the retren!he& e plo"ees falls un&er the ;uris&i!tion of the National 7a:or 1elations Co ission an& not un&er the ;uris&i!tion of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission' +s hel& in 7u anta %' National 7a:or 1elations Co issionH 170 SC1+ 79H sin!e Foo& 3er inalH 5n!' was or,ani=e& un&er the Corporation 7aw an& was not !reate& :" a spe!ial law in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 2(1)H +rti!le 5M*9 of the ConstitutionH it is not !o%ere& :" the !i%il ser%i!e'

Re(ei0ing &) Indire(t C&1*en+ati&n 9!##%: No' 18; +H while an in!u :ent $o%ernor of his pro%in!eH was in%ite& :" the $o%ern ent of Ca :o&ia as its offi!ial ,uest' 6hile thereH the so%erei,n Din, awar&e& $o%ernor + with a &e!oration of honor an& ,ifte& hi with a ,ol& rin, of insi,nifi!ant onetar" %alueH :oth of whi!h he a!!epte&' 6as $o%ernor +Bs a!!eptan!e of the &e!oration an& ,ift %iolati%e of the ConstitutionL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH it %iolate& Se!tion 8H +rti!le 5M*9 of the Constitution' For his a!!eptan!e of the

43ri+di(ti&n &0er t,e GOCC+ 9"66-:


No E55 * + !orporationH a hol&er of a !ertifi!ate of re,istration issue& :" the Se!urities an& /0!han,e Co issionH is owne& an& !ontrolle& :" the 1epu:li! of the Philippines' 3he Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission (CSC)H in a

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!!

&e!oration of honor an& the ,ol& rin, fro the $o%ern ent of Ca :o&ia to :e %ali&H $o%ernor + shoul& first o:tain the !onsent of Con,ress'

Se(3rity &) Ten3re 9!#$$:


No' 10: /0er!isin, power he !lai s ha& :een ,rante& hi :" the /0e!uti%e Ar&er on the reor,ani=ation of the ,o%ern entH the Co issioner of Custo s su aril" &is isse& two hun&re& si0t"*fi%e offi!ials an& e plo"ees of the 9ureau of Custo s' 8ost of the ouste& e plo"ees appeale& to the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission !lai in, their ouster ille,al' 3he Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH after hearin,H later or&ere& the Co issioner of Custo s to reinstate ost of those &is isse&' 5nstea& of followin, the or&er of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH Co issioner 8ison inten&s to :rin, for re%iew :efore the Supre e CourtH the sa e &e!ision of the Co ission'

1' 5f "ou were the !ounsel for the Co issioner of Custo sH how woul& "ou ;ustif" his &is issal of !usto s offi!ials an& e plo"eesL 2' 5f on the other han&H "ou were a !ounsel for the &is isse& offi!ials an& e plo"eesH how woul& "ou sustain the or&er of the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission reinstatin, ost of the L State "our reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1' 5 woul& in%oDe the resolution in >ose %' +rro"oH $'1' No' 78#32H +u,' 11H 1987H in whi!h the Supre e Court hel& that un&er +rt' ME555H se!H 1) of the ConstitutionH !areer ser%i!e e plo"ees a" :e re o%e& Cnot for !ause :ut as a result of the reor,ani=ation pursuant to Pro!la ation No' 3 &ate& 8ar!h 22H 198) an& the reor,ani=ation followin, the ratifi!ation of this Constitution'C 9" %irtue of this pro%isionH it was hel& that the reor,ani=ation of the 9ureau of Custo s un&er /0e!uti%e Ar&er NoH 127 a" !ontinue e%en after the ratifi!ation of the ConstitutionH an& !areer ser%i!e e plo"ees a" :e separate& fro the ser%i!e without !ause as a result of su!h reor,ani=ation' 2' 5 woul& ar,ue that art' ME555H se!' 1) &oes not reall" authori=e the re o%al of !areer ser%i!e e plo"ees :ut si pl" pro%i&es for the pa" ent of separationH retire entH an& other :enefits a!!ruin, to the un&er the appli!a:le laws' 3he referen!e to !areer ser%i!e e plo"ees separate& Cas a result of the reor,ani=ation followin, the ratifi!ation of this ConstitutionC is onl" to those separate& as a result of reor,ani=ation of the stru!ture an& fun!tions of ,o%ern ent (e','H as a result of

a:olition of offi!es) as &istin,uishe& fro the reor,ani=ation of personnel whi!h is what is referre& to therein as Cthe reor,ani=ation pursuant to Pro!la ation No' 3 &ate& 8ar!h 22H 198)'C For the power of the ,o%ern ent to ter inate the e plo" ent of ele!ti%e an& appointi%e offi!ials pursuant to +rt' 555H se!' 2 of Pro!la ation No' 3 (otherwise Dnown as the Pro%isional Constitution)H throu,h the appoint ent or &esi,nation of their su!!essors has :een repeate&l" hel& to ha%e en&e& on Fe:ruar" 2H 1987H when the new Constitution tooD effe!t' (-e 7eon %' /s,uerraH 123 SC1+ )02 (1987); 1e"es %' Ferrer $'1' No' 77801H -e!' 11H 1987; Asias %' FerrerH $'1H No' 770#9H 8ar!h 28H 1988)H 8oreo%erH su!h repla!e ent of in!u :ents !an onl" :e for !ause as pres!ri:e& :" /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 17H &ate& 8a" 28H 198)' Sin!e the su ar" &is issals in ?uestion are not for !auseH the re o%al of the 9ureau of Custo s offi!ials %iolates art' 5MH 9H se!H 2(3) of the Constitution'

Se(3rity &) Ten3re 9>@<"66@:


(3) 1i!ar&o was ele!te& -ean of the Colle,e of /&u!ation in a State <ni%ersit" for a ter of fi%e (2) "ears unless sooner ter inate&' 8an" were not please& with his perfor an!e' 3o appease those !riti!al of hi H the Presi&ent !reate& a new positionH that of Spe!ial +ssistant to the Presi&ent with the ranD of -eanH without re&u!tion in salar"H an& appointe& 1i!ar&o to sai& position in the interest of the ser%i!e' Conte poraneousl"H the <ni%ersit" Presi&ent appointe& Santos as +!tin, -ean in pla!e of 1i!ar&o' (2N) (a) -oes the phrase Cunless sooner ter inate&C ean that the position of 1i!ar&o is ter ina:le at willL

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: NoH the ter Cunless sooner ter inate&C !oul& not ean that his position is ter ina:le at will' Se!urit" of tenure eans that &is issal shoul& onl" :e for !auseH as pro%i&e& :" law an& not otherwise' (Pal era %' CSCH $'1' No' 1101)8H +u,ust #H 199#) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
NoH his position is not ter ina:le at will' 1i!ar&oBs !ontra!t of e plo" ent has a fi0e& ter of fi%e "ears' 5t is not an appoint ent in an a!tin, !apa!it" or as offi!er*in*!har,e' + !olle,e &ean appointe& with a ter !annot :e separate& without !ause' 1i!ar&oH with a &efinite ter of e plo" entH a" not thus :e

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!"

re o%e& e0!ept for !ause' (Sta' 8aria %' 7ope=H $'1' No' 7*30773H Fe:ruar" 18H1970) (:) 6as 1i!ar&o re o%e& fro his position as -ean of the Colle,e of /&u!ation or erel" transferre& to the position of Spe!ial +ssistant to the

Presi&entL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


1i!ar&o was re o%e& fro his position as &ean' @a%in, an appoint ent with a fi0e& ter H he !annotH without his !onsentH :e transferre& :efore the en& of his ter ' @e !annot :e asDe& to ,i%e up his post nor appointe& as &ean of another !olle,eH u!h less transferre& to another position e%en if it :e &i,nifie& with a &eanBs ranD' 8ore than thisH the transfer was a &e otion :e!ause &eanship in a uni%ersit"H :ein, an a!a&e i! position whi!h re?uires learnin,H a:ilit" an& s!holarshipH is ore e0alte& than that of a spe!ial assistant who erel" assists the Presi&entH as the title in&i!ates' 3he spe!ial assistant &oes not aDe authoritati%e &e!isions unliDe the &ean who &oes so in his own na e an& responsi:ilit"' 3he position of &ean is !reate& :" lawH while the spe!ial assistant is not so pro%i&e& :" law; it was a !reation of the uni%ersit" presi&ent' (Sta' 8aria %' 7ope=H $'1' No' 7*30773H Fe:ruar" 18H 1970)

/a!h /le!toral 3ri:unal shall :e !o pose& of N5N/ 8e :ersH three of who shall :e >usti!es of the Supre e Court to :e &esi,nate& :" the Chief >usti!eH an& the re ainin, si0 shall :e 8e :ers of the Senate or the @ouse of 1epresentati%esH as the !ase a" :eH who shall :e !hosen on the :asis of proportional representation fro the politi!al parties an& the parties or or,ani=ations re,istere& un&er the part"*list s"ste represente& therein' 3he senior >usti!e in the /le!toral 3ri:unal shall :e its Chair an (+rti!le E5H Se!tion 17H1987 Constitution)'

air E'e(ti&n8 EF3a' S*a(e B Ti1e in Media 9!#$#:


No' 1): + CA8/7/C (CA8/7/C) resolution pro%i&es that politi!al parties supportin, a !o on set of !an&i&ates shall :e allowe& to pur!hase ;ointl" air ti e an& the a,,re,ate a ount of a&%ertisin, spa!e pur!hase& for !a pai,n purposes shall not e0!ee& that allotte& to other politi!al parties or ,roups that no inate& onl" one set of !an&i&ates' 3he resolution is !hallen,e& as a %iolation of the free&o of spee!h an& of the press' 5s the resolution !onstitutionall" &efensi:leL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
OesH the resolution is !onstitutionall" &efensi:le' <n&er Se!tion #H +rti!le 5M*C of the 1987 ConstitutionH &urin, the ele!tion perio& the CA8/7/C a" super%ise or re,ulate the e&ia of !o uni!ation or infor ation to ensure e?ual opportunit"H ti eH an& spa!e a on, !an&i&ates with the o:;e!ti%e of hol&in, freeH or&erl"H honestH pea!efulH an& !re&i:le ele!tions' 3o allow !an&i&ates whi!h are supporte& :" ore than one politi!al part" to pur!hase ore air ti e an& a&%ertisin, spa!e than !an&i&ates supporte& :" one politi!al part" onl" will &epri%e the latter of e?ual ti e an& spa!e in the e&ia'

Se(3rity &) Ten3re8 Meaning 9!###: No 5M * *6hat is the eanin, an& ,uarantee of se!urit" of tenureL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to Pal era %' Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH 232 SC1+ 87H S/C<153O AF 3/N<1/ eans that no offi!er or e plo"ee in the Ci%il Ser%i!e shall :e suspen&e& or &is isse& e0!ept for !ause as pro%i&e& :" law an& after &ue pro!ess'

ARTICLE IX

COMELEC

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
No' +lthou,h the e0pen&iture li itation applies onl" to the pur!hase of air ti eH thus lea%in, politi!al parties free to spen& for other for s of !a pai,nH the li itation nonetheless results in a &ire!t an& su:stantial re&u!tion of the ?uantit" of politi!al spee!h :" restri!tin, the nu :er of issues that !an :e &is!usse&H the &epth of their &is!ussion an& the si=e of the au&ien!e that !an :e rea!he&H throu,h the :roa&!ast e&ia' Sin!e the purpose of the Free Spee!h Clause is to pro ote the wi&est possi:le &isse ination of infor ationH an& the realit" is that to &o this re?uires the e0pen&iture of one"H a li itation on e0pen&iture for this purpose !annot :e ;ustifie&H not e%en for the purpose of e?uali=in,

E'e(t&ra' Trib3na'8 3n(ti&n+ B C&1*&+iti&n 9>@<"66?: 1' 6hat is the fun!tion of the Senate /le!toral 3ri:unal an& the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unalL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er +rti!le E5H Se!tion 17 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the Senate an& @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unals shall :e the sole ;u&,e of all !ontests relatin, to the ele!tionH returnsH an& ?ualifi!ations of their respe!ti%e 8e :ers' 2' 6hat is the !o position of ea!hL (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!-

the opportunit" of politi!al !an&i&ates' 3his is the rulin, in 9u!Dle" %s' EaleoH #2# <'S' 1 (197))H whi!h in%ali&ate& a law li itin, the e0pen&itures of !an&i&ates for !a pai,nin, in the <nite& States' 5n the PhilippinesH a pro%ision of the 3aXa&a*Sin,son 7awH li itin, the perio& for !a pai,nin,H was nearl" in%ali&ate& on this sa e prin!ipleH e0!ept that the a;orit" of !ourt la!De& one ore %ote to aDe their &e!ision effe!ti%e' (See $on=ale= %s' Co ele!H 27 SC1+ 832 (19)9)'

CourtH fro the &e!ision of the CA8/7/C First -i%isionL 5f "es' 6h"L 5f not what pro!e&ural step ust he un&ertaDe firstL ( 2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
C+C !annot file a petition for !ertiorari with the Supre e Court' +s hel& in 8astura %s' CA8/7/CH 282 SC1+ #93 (1998)H the Supre e Court !annot re%iew the &e!isions or resolutions of a &i%ision of the CA8/7/C' C+C shoul& first file a otion for re!onsi&eration with the CA8/7/C en :an!'

Grant &) Pard&n in E'e(ti&n O))en+e+ 9!##!:


No' 11 * 5n !onne!tion with the 8a" 1987 Con,ressional ele!tionsH 7uis 8illanes was prose!ute& for an& !on%i!te& of an ele!tion offense an& was senten!e& to suffer i prison ent for si0 "ears' 3he !ourt &i& not i pose the a&&itional penalt" of &is?ualifi!ation to hol& pu:li! offi!e an& of &epri%ation of the ri,ht of suffra,e as pro%i&e& for in Se!tion 1)# of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e of the Philippines (9'P' 9l,' 881)'

Re1&0a' )r&1 O))i(e8 C&11i++i&ner+ 9!##$:


No 5M' * Suppose a Co issioner of the CA8/7/C is !har,e& :efore the San&i,an:a"an for alle,e&l" toleratin, %iolation of the ele!tion laws a,ainst proliferation of prohi:ite& :ill:oar&s an& ele!tion propa,an&a with the en& in %iew of re o%in, hi fro offi!e' 6ill the a!tion prosperL P2NQ

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the a!tion will not prosper' <n&er Se!tion 8H +rti!le M5 of the ConstitutionH the Co issioners of the CA8/7/C are re o%a:le :" 58P/+C@8/N3' +s hel& in the !ase of 5n re $on=ales' 1)0 SC1+ 771H 77#* 772H a pu:li! offi!er who is re o%a:le :" i pea!h ent !annot :e !har,e& :efore the San&i,an:a"an with an offense whi!h !arries with it the penalt" of re o%al fro offi!e unless he is first i pea!he&' AtherwiseH he will :e re o%e& fro offi!e :" a etho& other than 5 pea!h ent'

5n +pril 1991H the Presi&ent ,rante& hi a:solute par&on on the :asis of a stron, re!o en&ation of the 9oar& of Par&ons an& Parole' 3hen for the ele!tion in 8a" 1992H 7uis 8illanes files his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the offi!e of 8a"or in his uni!ipalit"' (a) 6hat is the effe!t of the failure of the !ourt to i pose the a&&itional penalt"L (:) 5s the par&on %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER: (a) No nee& to e0pressl" i pose Y the" are a!!essor" penalties' (:) 3he par&on is %oi&H sin!e 7uis 8illanes was !on%i!te& for the !o ission of an ele!tion offense an& his par&on was not a&e upon the re!o en&ation of the CA8/7/C' <n&er +rti!le 5MH CH Se!' 2 of the ConstitutionH no par&on for %iolation of an ele!tion law a" :e ,rante& without the fa%ora:le re!o en&ation of the CA8/7/C 43di(ia' Re0ie5 &) De(i+i&n+ 9"66!:
No ME5 * 5n an ele!tion protest in%ol%in, the position of $o%ernor of the Pro%in!e of 7a,una :etween C+CH the protesteeH an& C9CH the protestantH the First -i%ision of the CA8/7/C ren&ere& a &e!ision uphol&in, 9Bs protest Can C+C file a petition for !ertiorari with the Supre e Court un&er 1ule )2 of the 1ules of

Rig,t t& .&te8 43ri+di(ti&n 9"66!:


No 55 * 7et us suppose that Con,ress ena!te& a law whi!h a en&e& the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e (parti!ularl" Se!tions 138H 139H 1#2H 1#3) :" %estin, H in the CA8/7/C the ;uris&i!tion o%er in!lusion an& e0!lusion !ases file& :" %otersH instea& of in the !ourts (83CH then 13C)'

5s the law %ali& or notH an& wh"L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he law ,rantin, the CA8/7/C ;uris&i!tion o%er in!lusion an& e0!lusion !ases is un!onstitutional' <n&er Se!tion 2(3)H +rti!le 5M* C of the ConstitutionH the CA8/7/C !annot &e!i&e the ri,ht to %oteH whi!h refers to the in!lusion an& e0!lusion of %oters' <n&er Se!tion 2())H +rti!le 5M*C of the ConstitutionH it !an onl" file petitions in !ourt for in!lusion or e0!lusion of %oters'

E'e(ti&n La5+
"nd P'a(er R3'e 9"66-:
No E555 * 5n the uni!ipal a"oralt" ele!tions in 1980H the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes was su:se?uentl" &e!lare& to

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!;

:e &is?ualifie& as a !an&i&ate an& so ineli,i:le for the offi!e to whi!h he was ele!te&' 6oul& this fa!t entitle a !o petin, !an&i&ate who o:taine& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes to asD an& to :e pro!lai e& the winner of the ele!ti%e offi!eL 1easons' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+!!or&in, to 3rini&a& %' CA8/7/C' 312 SC1+ 172 P1999QH if the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes is &is?ualifie&H the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes !annot :e pro!lai e& the winner' Sin!e he was not the !hoi!e of the peopleH he !annot !lai an" ri,ht to the offi!e'

:) 5f the se!on&*pla!er in the ,u:e atorial ele!tions files a ?uo warranto suit a,ainst Ni!asio an& he is foun& to :e &is?ualifie& fro offi!eH !an the se!on&*pla!er :e sworn into offi!e as ,o%ernorL !) 5fH instea&H Ni!asio ha& :een :orn (of the sa e set of parents) in the <nite& States an& he there:" a!?uire& + eri!an

!iti=enship :" :irthH woul& "our answer :e &ifferentL SUGGESTED ANSWER: a) NoH Ni!asio no lon,er possesses Philippine !iti=enship' ''' :) 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in +:ella us' CA8/7/CH 201 SC1+ 223H the se!on& pla!er !annot :e sworn to offi!eH :e!ause he lost the ele!tion' 3o :e entitle& to the offi!eH he ust ha%e ,arnere& the a;orit" or pluralit" of the %otes' !) Oes :e!ause he will :e a &ual !iti=en '''

"nd P'a(er R3'e 9!##6:


No' 7: + file& a protest with the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal ?uestionin, the ele!tion of 9 as 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es in the 1987 national ele!tions on the ,roun& that 9 is not a resi&ent of the &istri!t the latter is representin,' 6hile the !ase was pen&in,' 9 a!!epte& an a&*interi appoint ent as Se!retar" of the -epart ent of >usti!e'

(1) 8a" + !ontinue with his ele!tion protest in or&er to &eter ine the real winner in the sai& ele!tionsL State "our reason' (2) Can +H who ,ot the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes in the ele!tionsH asD that he :e pro!lai e& ele!te& in pla!e of 9L /0plain "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER: (1) NoH + a" not !ontinue with his protest' ''''
(2) NoH + !annot asD that he :e pro!lai e& ele!te& in pla!e of 9' 3he %otes !ast for 9 were not in%ali& %otes' @en!eH + ,arnere& onl" the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes' Anl" the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the a;orit" or pluralit" of the %otes is entitle& to :e pro!lai e& ele!te&' An this ,roun&H it was hel& in 7a:o %' CA8/7/CH 17) SC1+ 1H that the fa!t that the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes is not eli,i:le &oes not entitle the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes to :e pro!lai e& the winner'

"nd P'a(er R3'e8 R3'e &) S3((e++i&n 9!##?: No' 13: 1) + an& 9 were the onl" !an&i&ates for a"or of 9i,aaH 9ula!an in the 8a" 1992 lo!al ele!tions' + o:taine& 10H000 %otes as a,ainst 3H000 %otes for 9' 5n the sa e ele!tionsH M ,ot the hi,hest nu :er of %otes a on, the !an&i&ates for the San,,unian, 9a"an of the sa e town' + &ie& the &a" :efore his pro!la ation' a) 6ho shoul& the 9oar& of Can%assers pro!lai as ele!te& a"orH +H 9 or ML /0plainH :) 6ho is entitle& to &is!har,e the fun!tions of the offi!e of the a"orH 9 or ML /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5n a!!or&an!e with 9enito %s' CA8/7/CH 232 SC1+ #3)H it is + who shoul& :e pro!lai e& as winnerH :e!ause he was the one who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes for the position of a"orH :ut a notation shoul& :e a&e that he &ie& for the purpose of appl"in, the rule on su!!ession to offi!e' 9 !annot :e pro!lai e&H :e!ause the &eath of the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes &oes not entitle the !an&i&ate who o:taine& the ne0t hi,hest nu :er of %otes to :e pro!lai e& the winnerH sin!e he was not the !hoi!e of the ele!torate' M is not entitle& to :e pro!lai e& ele!te& as a"orH :e!ause he ran for the San,,unian, 9a"an' Neither 9 nor M is entitle& to &is!har,e the fun!tions of the offi!e of a"or' 9 is not entitle& to &is!har,e the offi!e of a"orH sin!e he was &efeate& in the ele!tion' M is not entitle& to

"nd P'a(er R3'e8 in >3& Warrant& Ca+e+ 9!##": No' 1): /&win Ni!asioH :orn in the Philippines of Filipino parents an& raise& in the pro%in!e of Nue%a /!i;aH ran for $o%ernor of his ho e pro%in!e' @e won an& he was sworn into offi!e' 5t was re!entl" re%eale&H howe%erH that Ni!asio is a naturali=e& + eri!an !iti=en'
a) -oes he still possess Philippine !iti=enshipL

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!@

&is!har,e the offi!e of a"or' <n&er Se!tion ## of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH it is the %i!e a"or who shoul& su!!ee& in !ase of per anent %a!an!" in the offi!e of the a"or' 5t is onl" when the position of the %i!e a"or is also %a!ant that the e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an who o:taine& the hi,hest nu :er of %otes will su!!ee& to the offi!e of a"or' A**re(iati&n &) Ba''&t+ 9!##;: No' 3; 5f a !an&i&ate for town a"or is an en,ineer :" professionH shoul& %otes for hi with the prefi0 C/n,ineerC :e in%ali&ate& as C arDe& :allotsCL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3) NoH a :allot in whi!h the na e of a !an&i&ate for town a"or who is an en,ineer whi!h is prefi0e& with Cen,ineerC shoul& not :e in%ali&ate& as a arDe& :allot' <n&er 1ule No' 12 of the rules for the appre!iation of :allotsH :allots whi!h !ontain su!h prefi0es are %ali&'

an& he re!ei%es the winnin, nu :er of %otesH the hearin, on the ?uestion of &is?ualifi!ation shoul& !ontinue' <pon otion of the !o plainant or an" inter%enorH the !ourt or the CA8/7/C a" or&er the suspension of the pro!la ation of the winnin, !an&i&ate if the e%i&en!e of his ,uilt is stron,'

Di+3a'i)i(ati&n+ 9!###:
No E * +'2' <n&er the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH na e four persons who are &is?ualifie& fro runnin, for an" ele!ti%e position' (2N)

Di+F3a'i)i(ati&n8 Gr&3nd+ 9!##!:


No' 11 * 5n !onne!tion with the 8a" 1987 Con,ressional ele!tionsH 7uis 8illanes was prose!ute& for an& !on%i!te& of an ele!tion offense an& was senten!e& to suffer i prison ent for si0 "ears' 3he !ourt &i& not i pose the a&&itional penalt" of &is?ualifi!ation to hol& pu:li! offi!e an& of &epri%ation of the ri,ht of suffra,e as pro%i&e& for in Se!tion 1)# of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e of the Philippines (9'P' 9l,' 881)'

5n +pril 1991H the Presi&ent ,rante& hi a:solute par&on on the :asis of a stron, re!o en&ation of the 9oar& of Par&ons an& Parole' 3hen for the ele!tion in 8a" 1992H 7uis 8illanes files his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the offi!e of 8a"or in his uni!ipalit"' (!) 5s a petition to &is?ualif" 8illanes %ia:leL (&) 6hat are the effe!ts of a petition to &is?ualif"L SUGGESTED ANSWER: (!) 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!' )8 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH 7uis 8illanes a" :e &is?ualifie& fro runnin, for a"or as he was !on%i!te& of an ele!tion offense'
(&) <n&er Se!' ) of the /le!toral 1efor s 7awH an" !an&i&ate who has :een &e!lare& :" final ;u&, ent to :e &is?ualifie& shall not :e %ote& forH an& %otes !ast for hi shall not :e !ounte&'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +2') <n&er Se!tion #0 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the followin, are &is?ualifie& fro runnin, for an" lo!al ele!ti%e position: 1) 3hose senten!e& :" final ;u&, ent for an offense in%ol%in, oral turpitu&e or for an offense punisha:le :" one (1) "ear or ore of i prison entH within two (2) "ears after ser%in, senten!e; 2) 3hose re o%e& fro offi!e as a result of an a& inistrati%e !ase; 3) 3hose !on%i!te& :" final ;u&, ent for %iolatin, the oath of alle,ian!e to the 1epu:li! of the Philippines; #) 3hose with &ual !iti=enship; 2) Fu,iti%es fro ;usti!e in !ri inal or non* politi!al !ases here or a:roa&; )) Per anent resi&ents in a forei,n !ountr" or those who ha%e a!?uire& the ri,ht to resi&e a:roa& an& !ontinue to a%ail of the sa e ri,ht after the effe!ti%it" of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e; an& 7) 3he insane or fee:le* in&e&'
E))e(t &) i'ing &) Certi)i(ate &) Candida(y8 A**&inti0e O))i(er 0+ E'e(ti0e O))i(er 9"66":

5f :efore the ele!tion he is not &e!lare& :" final ;u&, ent to :e &is?ualifie& an& he is %ote& for

No M555' +H a Cit" 7e,al Affi!erH an& 9H a Cit" Ei!e*8a"orH file& !ertifi!ates of !an&i&a!" for the position of Cit" 8a"or in the 8a" 1#H 2001 ele!tions' a) 6as + ipso fa!to !onsi&ere& resi,ne& an&H if soH effe!ti%e on what &ateL (2N) :) 6as 9 ipso fa!to !onsi&ere& resi,ne& an&H if soH effe!ti%e on what &ateL (3N) 5n :oth !asesH state the reason or reasons for "our answer' SUGGESTED ANSWER: +) + was !onsi&ere& ipso fa!to resi,ne& upon the filin, of his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"H :e!ause :ein, a Cit" 7e,al Affi!erH he is an appointi%e offi!ial' Se!tion )) of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e pro%i&es that an" person hol&in, a pu:li! appointi%e offi!e shall :e !onsi&ere& ipso fa!to resi,ne& upon the filin, of his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!?

9) 9 is not !onsi&ere& ipso fa!to resi,ne&' Se!tion )7 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e !onsi&ers an" ele!ti%e offi!ial ipso fa!to resi,ne& fro offi!e upon his filin, of a !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for an" offi!e other than the one he is hol&in, e0!ept for Presi&ent an& Ei!e*Presi&entH was repeale& :" the Fair /le!tion +!t E))e(t &) i'ing &) Certi)i(ate &) Candida(y8 air E'e(ti&n A(t 9"66-:
No M * (a) Pe&ro 1e"es is an in!u :ent Ei!e* 8a"or of (ue=on Cit"' @e inten&s to run in the re,ular ele!tions for the position of Cit" 8a"or of (ue=on Cit" whose in!u :ent a"or woul& ha%e full" ser%e& three !onse!uti%e ter s :" 200#' 6oul& Pe&ro 1e"es ha%e to ,i%e up his position as Ei!e*8a"or*

(:) 3he answer is the sa e if Pe&ro 1e"es is a Con,ress an of (ue=on Cit"H :e!ause the repeal of Se!tion )7 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e !o%ers :oth ele!ti%e national an& lo!al offi!ials' E'e(ti&n O))en+e+8 C&n+*ira(y t& Bribe .&ter+ 9!##!: No' 12: -is!uss the &isputa:le presu ptions
(a) of !onspira!" to :ri:e %oters an& (:) of the in%ol%e ent of a !an&i&ate an& of his prin!ipal !a pai,n ana,ers in su!h !onspira!"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) <n&er Se!H 28 of the /le!toral 1efor s 7aw proof that at least one %oter in &ifferent pre!in!ts representin, at least twent" per !ent of the total pre!in!ts in an" uni!ipalit"H !it" or pro%in!e was offere&H pro ise& or ,i%en one"H %alua:le !onsi&eration or other e0pen&iture :" the relati%esH lea&er or s" pathi=er of a !an&i&ate for the purpose of pro otin, the !an&i&a!" of su!h !an&i&ateH ,i%es rise to a &isputa:le presu ption of !onspira!" to :ri:e %oters' (:) <n&er Se!' 28 if the proof affe!ts at least 20N of the pre!in!ts of the uni!ipalit"H !it" or pro%in!e to whi!h the pu:li! offi!e aspire& for :" the fa%ore& !an&i&ate relatesH this shall !onstitute a &isputa:le presu ption of the in%ol%e ent of the !an&i&ate an& of his prin!ipal !a pai,n ana,ers in ea!h of the uni!ipalities !on!erne&H in the !onspira!"'

(1) An!e he files his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"; or (2) 6hen the !a pai,n perio& starts; or (3) An!e an& if he is pro!lai e& winner in the ele!tion; or (#) <pon his assu ption to the ele!ti%e offi!e; or (2) None of the a:o%e' Choose the !orre!t answer
(:) 5f Pe&ro 1e"es wereH instea&H an in!u :ent Con,ress an of (ue=on Cit"H who inten&s to seeD the a"oralt" post in (ue=on Cit"H woul& "our !hoi!e of answer in no'(1) a:o%e :e the sa eL 5f notH whi!h woul& :e "our !hoi!eL

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(a) 3he !orre!t answer is (2)' Se!tion 1# of the Fair /le!tion +!t repeale& Se!tion )7 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH whi!h pro%i&e& that an" ele!te& offi!ialH whether national or lo!alH who runs for an" offi!e other than the one he is hol&in, in a per anent !apa!it"H e0!ept for Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&entH shall :e !onsi&ere& ipso fa!to resi,ne& fro his offi!e upon the filin, of his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"' Se!tion 1# of the Fair /le!tion +!t liDewise ren&ere& ineffe!ti%e the first pro%iso in the thir& para,raph of Se!tion 11 of 1epu:li! +!t No' 8#3)'

E'e(ti&n Pr&te+t 9!##6:


No' 7: + file& a protest with the @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unal ?uestionin, the ele!tion of 9 as 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es in the 1987 national ele!tions on the ,roun& that 9 is not a resi&ent of the &istri!t the latter is representin,' 6hile the !ase was pen&in,' 9 a!!epte& an a&*interi appoint ent as Se!retar" of the -epart ent of >usti!e'

(1) 8a" + !ontinue with his ele!tion protest in or&er to &eter ine the real winner in the sai& ele!tionsL State "our reason' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) NoH + a" not !ontinue with his protest' 3here is no &ispute as to who was the winner in the ele!tionH as it is not &ispute& that it was 9 who o:taine& the a;orit"' 3he purpose of the protest is si pl" to seeD the re o%al of 9 fro offi!e on the ,roun& that he is ineli,i:le' @owe%erH 9 forfeite& his !lai to the position of !on,ress an :" a!!eptin, an a& interi appoint ent as Se!retar" of >usti!eH the protest a,ainst hi has :e!o e oot' Nothin, will :e ,aine& :" resol%in, it' 5n the !ase of Purisi a %'

Conse?uentl"H Pe&ro 1e"es !an run for 8a"or without ,i%in, up his position as Ei!e* 8a"or' @e will ha%e to ,i%e up his position as Ei!e*8a"or upon e0piration of his ter as Ei!e*8a"or on >une 30H 200#'
(<o+eB T-e 2*es+ion did no+ asC +-e e>a0inee +o e>p'ain +-e reason )or -is c-oice and +-e genera' ins+r*c+ions re2*ires s*cdisc*ssion on'y +o a DyesD or DnoD ans&er.)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!%

SolisH #3 SC1+ 123H it was hel& that where a protestant in an ele!tion !ase a!!epte& his appoint ent as ;u&,eH he a:an&one& his !lai to the pu:li! offi!e in%ol%e& in the protest' @en!eH the protest ust :e &is isse& for ha%in, :e!o e oot' Si ilarl"H in Pere= % Pro%in!ial 9oar& of Nue%a /!i;aH 113 SC1+ 187H it was hel& that the !lai of a petitioner to an appointi%e offi!e ha& :e!o e ootH :e!ause the petitioner ha& forfeite& his !lai to the offi!e :" filin, a !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for a"or'

a) the :aran,a"L :) the uni!ipalit"L !) the pro%in!eL &) the !it"L e) the @ouse of 1epresentati%esL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 2(2)H +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution an ele!tion protest in%ol%in, the ele!ti%e position enu erate& :elow shoul& :e file& in the followin, !ourts or tri:unals:

E'e(ti&n Pr&te+t 0+= >3& Warrant& 9"66!: No ME55 * <n&er the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e (9'P' 881H as a en&e&)H :riefl" &ifferentiate an ele!tion protest fro a ?uo warranto !aseH as to who !an file the !ase an& the respe!ti%e ,roun&s therefor' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER8
+n /7/C35AN P1A3/S3 a":e file& :" a losin, !an&i&ate for the sa e offi!e for whi!h the winner file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"' + (<A 6+11+N3A C+S/ a" :e file& :" an" %oter who is a re,istere& %oter in the !onstituen!" where the winnin, !an&i&ate sou,ht to :e &is?ualifie& ran for offi!e' 5n an ele!tion !ontestH the issues are: (a) who re!ei%e& the a;orit" or pluralit" of the %otes whi!h were le,all" !ast an& (:) whether there were irre,ularities in the !on&u!t of the ele!tion whi!h affe!te& its results'

a) 9aran,a" * 8etropolitan 3rial CourtH 8uni!ipal Cir!uit 3rial CourtH or 8uni!ipal 3rial Court :) 8uni!ipalit" * 1e,ional 3rial Court !) Pro%in!e * CA8/7/C &) Cit" * CA8/7/C
e) <n&er Se!tion 17' +rti!le E5 of the ConstitutionH an ele!tion protest in%ol%in, the position of 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es shall :e file& in the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal'

E2*irati&n &) ter1 bar+ +er0i(e t,ere&) 9"666:


No ME5' 5n the ele!tions of 8a" 1992H Cru= an& Santos were the !an&i&ates for the offi!e of 8uni!ipal 8a"orH the ter of whi!h was to e0pire on >une 30H 1992' Fin&in, that he won :" a ar,in of 20 %otesH the 8uni!ipal 9oar& of Can%assers pro!lai e& Cru= as the &ul" ele!te& 8a"or' Santos file& an ele!tion protest :efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court (13C) whi!h &e!i&e& that it was Santos who ha& the pluralit" of 30 %otes an& pro!lai e& hi the winner' An otion a&eH the 13C ,rante& e0e!ution pen&in, the appeal of Cru= to the CA8/7/C (Co ele!) an& on this :asis' Santos assu e& offi!e an& ser%e& as 8uni!ipal 8a"or' 5n ti eH the Co ele! re%erse& the rulin, of the 13C an& instea& rule& that Cru= won :" a ar,in of #0 %otes an& pro!lai e& hi the &ul" ele!te& 8uni!ipal 8a"or'

5n a ?uo warranto !aseH the issue is whether the !an&i&ate who was pro!lai e& ele!te& shoul& :e &is?ualifie& :e!ause of ineli,i:ilit" or &islo"alt" to the Philippines' E'e(ti&n Pr&te+t 0+= >3& Warrant& 9>@<"66?: -ifferentiate an ele!tion protest fro an a!tion for ?uo warranto' (2'2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+n /7/C35AN P1A3/S3 is a pro!ee&in, where:" a losin, !an&i&ate for a parti!ular position !ontests the results of the ele!tion on ,roun&s of frau&H terroris H irre,ularities or ille,al a!ts !o itte& :eforeH &urin, or after the !astin, an& !ountin, of %otes' An the other han&H a P/3535AN FA1 (<A 6+11+N3A is file& :" an" re,istere& %oter to !ontest the ele!tion of an" !an&i&ate on ,roun&s of ineli,i:ilit" or &islo"alt" to the 1epu:li! of the Philippines'

a) 5t is now :e"on& >une 30H 1992' Can Cru= still hol& offi!e for the portion of the ter he has faile& to ser%eL 6h"L (3N) SUGGESTED ANSWER8 a) +s hel& in 8alaluan %' CA8/7/CH 22# SC1+ 397 (199))' Cru= !an no lon,er hol& offi!e for the portion of the ter he faile& to ser%e sin!e his ter has e0pire&' Petiti&n t& De('are ai'3re &) E'e(ti&n+8 ReF3i+ite+ B E))e(t+ 9!##@:
No' ): -ue to %iolen!e an& terroris atten&in, the !astin, of %otes in a uni!ipalit" in 7anao &el Sur &urin, the last 8 8a" 1992 ele!tionsH it :e!a e i possi:le to hol& therein freeH or&erl"

E'e(ti&n Pr&te+t8 43ri+di(ti&n 9!##?: NoH 1#: 1) +s !ounsel for the protestantH where will "ou file an ele!tion protest in%ol%in, a !onteste& ele!ti%e position in:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!$

an& honest ele!tions' Se%eral !an&i&ates for uni!ipal positions with&rew fro the ra!e' Ane !an&i&ate for 8a"or petitione& the CA8/7/C for the postpone ent of the ele!tions an& the hol&in, of spe!ial ele!tions after the !auses of su!h postpone ent or failure of ele!tions shall ha%e !ease&'

pre%ente& fro !astin, their %otes' 3he CA8/7/C &is isse& the pre*pro!la ation !ontest on the ,roun& that all the returns appear !o plete an& unta pere&'

1' @ow an" %otes of CA8/7/C Co issioners a" :e to ,rant the petitionL /0plain'

the !ast

-eter ine if the CA8/7/C &e!i&e& !orre!tl" an& if C9C has an" re!ourse for !ontestin, C+BsC ele!tion' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he CA8/7/C !orre!tl" &is isse& C9BsC P1/* P1AC7+8+35AN CAN3/S3' Su!h a !ontest is li ite& to !lai s that the ele!tion returns are in!o plete or that the" !ontain aterial &efe!ts or that the" ha%e :een ta pere& withH falsifie& or prepare& un&er &uress or that the" !ontain &is!repan!ies in the %otes !re&ite& to the !an&i&atesH the &ifferen!e of whi!h affe!ts the result of the ele!tion' (A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH sees' 2#3H 23#*23)) An the other han&H the ?uestion whether or not there was terroris H %ote :u"in, an& other irre,ularities in the ele!tions !annot :e the su:;e!t of a pre*pro!la ation !ontest :ut ust :e raise& in a re,ular ele!tion protest' (San!he= %' CA8/7/CH $1' No' 78#)1; Pon!e /nrile %' CA8/7/CH $'1' Nos' 791#) 4 79212H +u,' 12H 1987; +:es %' CA8/7/CH 21 SC1+ 1222 (19)7) ) Sin!e the :asis of C9BsC petition is that his followers ha& :een :ou,ht while others ha& :een pre%ente& fro !astin, their :allotsH his re e&" is to file an ele!tion !ontest an& this shoul& :e :rou,ht in the @ouse or Senate /le!toral 3ri:unal whi!hH un&er +rt' E5H Se!' 17H is the sole ;u&,e of the ele!tionH returns an& ?ualifi!ations of e :ers of ea!h @ouse of Con,ress'

2' + person who was not a !an&i&ate at the ti e of the postpone ent of the ele!tions &e!i&e& to run for an ele!ti%e position an& file& a !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" prior to the spe!ial ele!tions' 8a" his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" :e a!!epte&L /0plain' 3' Suppose he ran as a su:stitute for a !an&i&ate who pre%iousl" with&rew his !an&i&a!"H will "our answer :e the sa eL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1' +!!or&in, to Se!tion 7H +rti!le 5M*+ of the 1987 ConstitutionH the CA8/7/C shall &e!i&e :" a 8+>A153O EA3/ of all its e :ers an" !ase or atter :rou,ht :efore it 5n Cua %s' CA8/7/CH 12) SC1+282H the Supre e Court state& that a two*to*one &e!ision ren&ere& :" a -i%ision of the CA8/7/C an& a three*to*two &e!ision ren&ere& :" the CA8/7/C en :an! was %ali& where onl" fi%e e :ers tooD part in &e!i&in, the !ase'

2' NoH his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" !annot :e a!!epte&' <n&er Se!tion 72 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH as a rule in !ases of postpone ent or failure of ele!tion no a&&itional !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" shall :e a!!epte&'
3' NoH the answer will :e &ifferent' <n&er Se!tion 72 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH an a&&itional !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" a" :e a!!epte& in !ases of postpone ent or failure of ele!tion if there was a su:stitution of !an&i&ates; :ut the su:stitute ust :elon, to an& ust :e en&orse& :" the sa e part"'

Pre<Pr&('a1ati&n C&nte+t 9!#$$: No' 18: 5n ele!tion lawH what is a pre* pro!la ation !ontro%ers"L 6here a" it :e liti,ate& with finalit"L +fter the ulti ate winner has :een &ul" pro!lai e&H &oes the loser still ha%e an" re e&" to the en& than he a" finall" o:tain the position he aspire& for in the ele!tionL /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+ P1/*P1AC7+8+35AN CAN31AE/1SO refers to an" ?uestion pertainin, to or affe!tin, the pro!ee&in,s of the :oar& of !an%assers whi!h a" :e raise& :" an" !an&i&ate or :" an" re,istere& politi!al part" or !oalition of politi!al parties :efore the :oar& or &ire!tl" with the CA8/7/CH or an" atter raise& un&er se!s' 233*23) of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e in relation to the preparationH trans issionH re!eiptH !usto&" or appre!iation of the ele!tion returns' (A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH se!H 2#1)'

Pre<Pr&('a1ati&n C&nte+t 9!#$%:


No' E55: C+C an& C9C were !an&i&ates for representati%es in the 1987 National /le!tionsH C9C file& a pre*pro!la ation !ontest with the CA8/7/C on the ,roun& that ra pant %ote :u"in, an& terroris a!!o panie& the ele!tions' Parti!ulars were supplie& of C9BsC followers :ou,ht*off an& other followers

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!!#

3he CA8/7/C has e0!lusi%e ;uris&i!tion of all pre*pro!la ation !ontro%ersies' (5&'H se!' 2#1) 5ts &e!isions :e!o e e0e!utor" after the lapse of 2 &a"s fro re!eipt :" the losin, part" of the &e!isionH unless restraine& :" the Supre e Court' (5&'H se!' 2#))
+ loser a" still :rin, an ele!tion !ontest !on!ernin, the ele!tionH returnsH an& ?ualifi!ations of the !an&i&ate pro!lai e&' 5n the !ase of ele!ti%e :aran,a" offi!ialsH the !ontest a" :e file& with the uni!ipal trial !ourts; in the !ase of ele!ti%e uni!ipal offi!ialsH in the 1e,ional 3rial Court; in the !ase of ele!ti%e pro%in!ial an& !it" offi!ialsH in the CA8/7/C (+rt' 5MH CH se!' 2(2)); in the !ase of Senators or Con,ress enH in the Senate or @ouse /le!toral 3ri:unals (+rt' E5H se!' 17); an& in the !ase of the Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&entH in the Presi&ential /le!toral 3ri:unal' (+rt' E55H se!' #)'

pre;u&i!e to the filin, of an ele!tion protest' @owe%erH the pro!ee&in,s a" !ontinue when on the :asis of the e%i&en!e presente& so farH the CA8/7/C or the Supre e Court &eter ines that the petition appears to :e eritorious' (Se!tion 1)H 1epu:li! +!t No' 71))) (9) /7/C35AN CAN3/S3S +n ele!tion protest is initiate& :" filin, a protest !ontainin, the followin, alle,ations: 1' 3he protestant is a !an&i&ate who &ul" file& a !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" an& was %ote& for in the ele!tion: 2' 3he protestee has :een pro!lai e&; an& 3' 3he &ate of the pro!la ationH (8iro %s' CA8/7/CH 121 SC1+ #))) 3he followin, ha%e ;uris&i!tion o%er ele!tion !ontests: a) 9aran,a" offi!ials * 5nferior Court; :) 8uni!ipal offi!ials * 1e,ional 3rial Court; !) 1e,ionalH pro%in!ialH an& !it" offi!ials * CA8/7/C (Se!tion 2(2)H +rt' 5M*C of the Constitution); &) Con,ress an * @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal' e) Senators * Senate /le!toral 3ri:unal' (Se!tion 1' +rti!le E5 of the Constitution); f) Presi&ent an& Ei!e Presi&ent * Supre e Court (Se!tion #H +rti!le E55 of the Constitution)'
3he &e!ision of the inferior !ourt in ele!tion !ontests in%ol%in, :aran,a" offi!ials an& of the 1e,ional 3rial Court in ele!tion !ontests in%ol%in, uni!ipal offi!ials are appeala:le to the CA8/7/C' (Se!tion 2(2)' +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution') 3he &e!ision of the CA8/7/C a" :e :rou,ht to the Supre e Court on !ertiorari on ?uestions of law' (1i%era %s' CA8/7/CH 199 SC1+ 178) 3he &e!ision of the CA8/7/C in ele!tion !ontests in%ol%in, re,ionalH pro%in!ial an& !it" offi!ials a" :e :rou,ht to the Supre e Court on !ertiorari (Se!tion 7H +rti!le 5M*+ an& Se!tion 2(2)H +rti!le 5M*C of the Constitution')

Pre<Pr&('a1ati&n C&nte+t 0+= E'e(ti&n C&nte+t+ 9!##%: NoH 17: State how (a) pre* pro!la ation !ontro%ersiesH on the one han&H an& (:) ele!tion protestsH on the otherH are initiate&H hear& an& finall" resol%e&' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(+) P1/*P1AC7+8+35AN CAN31AE/1S5/S

a) (uestions affe!tin, the !o position or pro!ee&in,s of the :oar& of !an%assers a" :e initiate& in the :oar& of !an%assers or &ire!tl" with the CA8/7/C' :) (uestions in%ol%in, the ele!tion returns an& the !ertifi!ates of !an%ass shall :e :rou,ht in the first instan!e :efore the :oar& of !an%assers onl"H (Se!tion 17H 1epu:li! +!t NoH 21))') !) 3he :oar& of !an%assers shoul& rule on the o:;e!tions su aril"' (Se!tion 20H 1epu:li! +!t No' 71))') &) +n" part" a&%ersel" affe!te& a" appeal to the CA8/7/C' (Se!tion 20' 1epu:li! +!t No' 71))') e) 3he &e!ision of the Co ission on /le!tion a" :e :rou,ht to the Supre e Court on !ertiorari :" the a,,rie%e& part"H (Se!tion 7H +rti!le 5M*+ of the Constitution')
+ll pre*pro!la ation !ontro%ersies pen&in, :efore the CA8/7/C shall :e &ee e& ter inate& at the :e,innin, of the ter of the offi!e in%ol%e& an& the rulin,s of the :oar& of !an%assers shall :e &ee e& affir e&H without

3he &e!isions of the Senate /le!toral 3ri:unal an& of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal a" :e ele%ate& to the Supre e Court on !ertiorari if there was ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion' (7a=atin %s CA8/7/C 1)8 SC1+ 391)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"6

Pre<Pr&('a1ati&n C&nte+t8 Pr&*er I++3e+ 9!##?: NoH 1#: 2) $i%e three issues that !an :e properl" raise& an& :rou,ht in a pre* pro!la ation !ontest' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 2) +!!or&in, to Se!tion 2#3 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH the followin, issues !an :e properl" raise&' 1' 3he !o position or pro!ee&in,s of the :oar& of !an%assers are ille,al; 2' 3he !an%asse& ele!tion returns are in!o pleteH !ontain aterial &efe!tsH appro%e& to :e ta pere& withH or !ontain &is!repan!" in the sa e returns or in other authenti!ate& !opies; 3' 3he ele!tion returns were prepare& un&er &uressH threatsH !oer!ionH or inti i&ationH or the" are o:%iousl" anufa!ture& or not authenti!; an& #' Su:stitute or frau&ulent returns in !ontro%erte& pollin, pla!es were !an%asse&H the results of whi!h ateriall" affe!te& the stan&in, of the a,,rie%e& !an&i&ate or !an&i&ates'
@owe%erH a!!or&in, to Se!tion 12 of the S"n!hroni=e& /le!tion 7aw no pre*pro!la ation !ases shall :e allowe& on atters relatin, to the preparationH trans issionH re!eiptH !usto&" an& appre!iation of the ele!tion returns or the !ertifi!ates of !an%ass with respe!t to the positions of Presi&entH Ei!e*Presi&entH Senator an& 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es' No pre*pro!la ation !ase are allowe& in the !ase of :aran,a" ele!tions'

prepare the affi&a%it in a!!or&an!e with the &ata supplie& :" the appli!ant' (5&'H se!' 127) Pr&(e++8 Prin(i*'e &) Ide1 S&nan+ 9!##;: No' 3; 1) 6hat is "our un&erstan&in, of the prin!iple of i&e sonans as applie& in the /le!tion 7awL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
1) <n&er 1ule No' 7 of the rules for the appre!iation of :allots in Se!tion 211 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH the i&e sonans rule eans that a na e or surna e in!orre!tl" written whi!hH when rea&H has a soun& si ilar to the na e or surna e of a !an&i&ate when !orre!tl" written shall :e !ounte& in his fa%or'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWERS:
a) 5&e sonans literall" eans the sa e or si ilar soun&' 3his prin!iple is a&e anifest in one of the rules for the appre!iation of :allots e :o&ie& in the A ni:us /le!tion Co&e (Se!' 211H 9P 881) statin, that C+ na e or surna e in!orre!tl" written whi!h when rea&H has a soun& si ilar to the na e or surna e of a !an&i&ate when !orre!tl" written shall :e !ounte& in his fa%or' 3husH if the na e as spelle& in the :allotH thou,h &ifferent fro the !orre!t spellin, thereofH !on%e"s to the ears when pronoun!e& a!!or&in, to the !o onl" a!!epte& etho&sH a soun& pra!ti!all" 5&enti!al with the soun& of the !orre!t na e as !o onl" pronoun!e&H the na e thus ,i%en is a suffi!ient &esi,nation of the person referre& to' 3he ?uestion whether one na e is i&e sonans with another is not a ?uestion of spellin, :ut of pronun!iation' (8an&a! %' Sa onteH #9 Phil' 28#)' 5ts appli!ation is ai e& at reali=in, the o:;e!ti%e of e%er" ele!tion whi!h is to o:tain the e0pression of the %oters will'

Pr&(e++8 I''iterate .&ter+ 9!#$%:


No' M55: C+CH while of le,al a,e an& of soun& in&H is illiterate' @e has asDe& "our a&%i!e on how he !an %ote in the !o in, ele!tion for his :rotherH who is runnin, for a"or' 3his will :e the first ti e C+C will %ote an& he has ne%er re,istere& as a %oter :efore' 6hat a&%i!e will "ou ,i%e hi on the pro!e&ure he nee&s to follow in or&er to :e a:le to %oteL

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he Constitution pro%i&es that until Con,ress shall ha%e pro%i&e& otherwiseH illiterate an& &isa:le& %oters shall :e allowe& to %ote un&er e0istin, laws an& re,ulations (+rtH EH Se!' 2)' 5t is ne!essar" for an" ?ualifie& %oter to re,ister in or&er to %ote' (A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH Se!' 112) 5n the !ase of illiterate an& &isa:le& %otersH their %oterBs affi&a%it a" :e prepare& :" an" relati%e within the fourth !i%il &e,ree of !onsan,uinit" or affinit" or :" an" e :er of the :oar& of ele!tion inspe!tors who shall

:) 3he ter eans soun&in, the sa e or nearl" aliDe' 3he rule is :ase& on the 5&ea that the isspellin, of a na e or la!D of sDill in writin, shoul& not :e taDen as a ,roun& for re;e!tin, the %otes apparentl" inten&e& for a !an&i&ateH so lon, as the intention of the %oter appears to :e !lear' 3he Supre e Court has rule& that the prin!iple of i&e sonans is li:erall" !onstrue&' Corpu= %' 5:a"H 8# Phil' 18# (19#9)' Pr&(e++8 Stray Ba''&t 9!##;: No' 3; 2) 6hat is a Cstra" :allotCL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2) <n&er 1ule No' 19 of the rules appre!iation of :allots in Se!tion 211 A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH stra" :allot is one fa%or of a person who has not file& for the of the !ast in a

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"!

!ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" or in fa%or of a !an&i&ate for an offi!e for whi!h he &i& not present hi self' +lthou,h the Co&e &oes not pro%i&e for stra" :allotH it is presu e& that stra" :allot refers to stra" %ote' Re(a'' 9"66": No ME5' Suppose the people of a pro%in!e want to re!all the pro%in!ial ,o%ernor :efore the en& of his three*"ear ter of offi!eH +' An what ,roun& or ,roun&s !an the pro%in!ial ,o%ernor :e re!alle&L (1N) 9' @ow will the re!all :e initiate&L (2N) C' 6hen will the re!all of an ele!ti%e lo!al offi!ial :e !onsi&ere& effe!ti%eL U2NT SUGGESTED ANSWER: 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!tion )9 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the $o%ernor !an :e re!alle& for 7ASS AF CANF5-/NC/'
<n&er Se!tion 70 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the re!all a" :e initiate& :" a resolution a&opte& :" a a;orit" of all the e :ers of the preparator" re!all asse :l"H whi!h !onsists of all the a"orsH the %i!e* a"orsH an& the san,,unian, e :ers of the uni!ipalities an& !o ponent !itiesH or :" a written petition si,ne& :" at least twent"*fi%e per !ent (22N) of the total nu :er of re,istere& %oters in the pro%in!e' +!!or&in, to Se!tion 72 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the re!all of an ele!ti%e lo!al offi!ial shall taDe effe!t upon the ele!tion an& pro!la ation of a su!!essor in the person of the !an&i&ate re!ei%in, the hi,hest nu :er of %otes !ast &urin, the ele!tion on re!all'

-e!i&e whether the &is?ualifi!ation !ase will prosper or not' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he &is?ualifi!ation !ase shoul& :e &is isse&' +s hel& in 9or;a %s' CA8/7/CH 292 SC1+127 (199))H in !o putin, the three*ter li itation i pose& upon ele!ti%e lo!al offi!ialsH onl" the ter for whi!h he was ele!te& to shoul& :e !onsi&ere&' 3he ter whi!h he ser%e& as a result of su!!ession shoul& not :e in!lu&e&' 5t is not enou,h that the offi!ial has ser%e& three !onse!uti%e ter s' @e ust ha%e :een ele!te& to the sa e position three !onse!uti%e ti es'

T,ree<Ter1 Li1it8 )r&1 M3ni(i*a'ity t& Ne5'y<Created City 9>#<"66@:


2' 8anuel was ele!te& 8a"or of the 8uni!ipalit" of 3u:a in the ele!tions of 1992H 1992 an& 1998' @e full" ser%e& his first two ter sH an& &urin, his thir& ter H the uni* !ipalit" was !on%erte& into the !o ponent Cit" of 3u:a' 3he sai& !harter pro%i&e& for a hol&* o%er an& so without interre,nu 8anuel went on to ser%e as the 8a"or of the Cit" of 3u:a' 5n the 2001 ele!tionsH 8anuel file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for Cit" 8a"or' @e &is!lose&H thou,hH that he ha& alrea&" ser%e& for three !onse!uti%e ter s as ele!te& 8a"or when 3u:a was still a uni!ipalit"' @e also state& in his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" that he is runnin, for the position of 8a"or for the first ti e now that 3u:a is a !it"' 1e"esH an a&%ersar"H ran a,ainst 8anuel an& petitione& that he :e &is?ualifie& :e!ause he ha& alrea&" ser%e& for three !onse!uti%e ter s as 8a"or' 3he petition was not ti el" a!te& uponH an& 8anuel was pro!lai e& the winner with 20H000 %otes o%er the 10H000 %otes re!ei%e& :" 1e"es as the onl" other !an&i&ate' 5t was onl" after 8anuel tooD his oath an& assu e& offi!e that the CA8/7/C rule& that he was &is?ualifie& for ha%in, ran an& ser%e& for three !onse!uti%e ter s' (2N)

T,ree<Ter1 Li1it R3'e 9"66!:


No M5M * 5n the 8a" 1992 ele!tionsH 8anuel 8analo an& Se,un&o Parate were ele!te& as 8a"or an& Ei!e 8a"orH respe!ti%el"' <pon the &eath of 8analo as in!u :ent uni!ipal a"orH Ei!e 8a"or Se,un&o Parate su!!ee&e& as a"or an& ser%e& for the re ainin, portion of the ter of offi!e' 5n the 8a" 1992 ele!tionH Se,un&o Parate ran for an& won as a"or an& then ser%e& for the full ter ' 5n the 8a" 1998 ele!tionsH Parate ran for reele!tion as 8a"or an& won a,ain' 5n the 8a" 2001 ele!tionH Se,un&o Parate file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the sa e position of a"orH :ut his ri%al a"oralt" !an&i&ate sou,ht his &is?ualifi!ation alle,in, %iolation of the three* ter li it for lo!al ele!ti%e offi!ials pro%i&e& for in the Constitution an& in the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e'

(a) +s law"er of 8anuelH present the possi:le ar,u ents to pre%ent his &is?ualifi!ation an& re o%al' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s law"er of 8anuelH 5 woul& ar,ue that he shoul& not :e &is?ualifie& an& re o%e& :e!ause he was a three*ter a"or of the uni!ipalit" of 3u:aH an&H with its !on%ersion to a !o ponent !it"H the latter has a totall" separate an& &ifferent !orporate personalit" fro that of the uni!ipalit"' 8oreo%erH as a

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!""

ruleH in a representati%e &e o!ra!"H the people shoul& :e allowe& freel" to !hoose those who will ,o%ern the ' @a%in, won the ele!tionsH the !hoi!e of the people shoul& :e respe!te&' (:) @ow woul& "ou rule on whether or not 8anuel is eli,i:le to run as 8a"or of the newl"*!reate& Cit" of 3u:a i e&iatel" after ha%in, alrea&" ser%e& for three (3) !onse!uti%e ter s as 8a"or of the 8uni!ipalit" of 3u:aL

parti!ular ele!tion' 3he per anent %a!an!" in the !onteste& offi!e shoul& :e fille& :" su!!ession' (7a:o %' CA8/7/CH $'1' No' 102111H >ul" 3H1992) ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
1e"es !oul& not :e pro!lai e& as winner :e!ause he &i& not win the ele!tion' 3o allow the &efeate& !an&i&ate to taDe o%er the 8a"oralt" &espite his re;e!tion :" the ele!torate is to &isenfran!hise the ele!torate without an" fault on their part an& to un&er ine the i portan!e an& eanin, of &e o!ra!" an& the peopleBs ri,ht to ele!t offi!ials of their !hoi!e' (9enito %' CA8/7/CH $'1' No' 10)023H +u,ust 17H 199#)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
8anuel is not eli,i:le to run as a"or of the !it" of 3u:a' 3he 1987 Constitution spe!ifi!all" in!lu&e& an e0!eption to the peopleBs free&o to !hoose those who will ,o%ern the in or&er to a%oi& the e%il of a sin,le person a!!u ulatin, e0!essi%e power o%er a parti!ular territorial ;uris&i!tion as a result of a prolon,e& sta" in the sa e offi!e' 3o allow 8anuel to %ie for the position of !it" a"or after ha%in, ser%e& for three !onse!uti%e ter s as a uni!ipal a"or woul& o:%iousl" &efeat the %er" intent of the fra ers when the" wrote this e0!eption' Shoul& he :e allowe& another three !onse!uti%e ter s as a"or of the Cit" of 3u:aH 8anuel woul& then :e possi:l" hol&in, offi!e as !hief e0e!uti%e o%er the sa e territorial ;uris&i!tion an& inha:itants for a total of ei,hteen !onse!uti%e "ears' 3his is the %er" s!enario sou,ht to :e a%oi&e& :" the ConstitutionH if not a:horre& :" it' (7atasa %' CA8/7/CH $'1' No' 12#829H -e!e :er 10H 2003) (!) +ssu in, that 8anuel is not an eli,i:le !an&i&ateH re:ut 1e"esB !lai that he shoul& :e pro!lai e& as winner ha%in, re!ei%e& the ne0t hi,her nu :er of %otes'

.a(an(y8 E))e(t &) .i(e<May&r A(ting A+ May&r 9"66":


No M5E' Suppose +H a 8uni!ipal 8a"orH went on a si!D lea%e to un&er,o e&i!al treat ent for a perio& of four (#) onths' -urin, that ti e +' 6ill 9H the 8uni!ipal Ei!e*8a"orH :e perfor in, e0e!uti%e fun!tionsL 6h"L (2N)

9' 6ill 9 at the sa e ti e :e also perfor in, le,islati%e fun!tions as presi&in, offi!er of the San,,unian, 9a"anL 6h"L (3N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: +' Sin!e the 8uni!ipal 8a"or is te poraril" in!apa!itate& to perfor his &utiesH in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion #)(a) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the 8uni!ipal Ei!e*8a"or shall e0er!ise his powers an& perfor his &uties an& fun!tions' 3he 8uni!ipal Ei!e*8a"or will :e perfor in, e0e!uti%e fun!tionsH :e!ause the fun!tions of the 8uni!ipal 8a"or are e0e!uti%e'
9' 3he 8uni!ipal Ei!e*8a"or !annot !ontinue as presi&in, offi!er of the San,,unian, 9a"an while he is a!tin, 8uni!ipal 8a"or' 5n a!!or&an!e with $a :oa %' +,uirreH 310 SC1+ 8)7 (1999)H un&er the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the Ei!e*8uni!ipal 8a"or was &epri%e& of the power to presi&e o%er the San,,unian, 9a"an an& is no lon,er a e :er of it' 3he te porar" %a!an!" in the offi!e of the 8uni!ipal 8a"or !reates a !orrespon&in, te porar" %a!an!" in the Affi!e of the 8uni!ipal Ei!e*8a"or when he a!ts as 8uni!ipal 8a"or' 3his !onstitutes ina:ilit" on his part to presi&e o%er the sessions of the San,,unian, 9a"an'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
1e"es !annot :e pro!lai e& winner for re!ei%in, the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes' 3he Supre e Court has !onsistentl" rule& that the fa!t that a pluralit" or a a;orit" of the %otes are !ast for an ineli,i:le !an&i&ate at a popular ele!tionH or that a !an&i&ate is later &e!lare& to :e &is?ualifie& to hol& offi!eH &oes not entitle the !an&i&ate who ,arnere& the se!on& hi,hest nu :er of %otes to :e &e!lare& ele!te&' 3he sa e erel" results in aDin, the winnin, !an&i&ateBs ele!tion a nullit"' 5n the present !aseH 10H000 %otes were !ast for pri%ate respon&ent 1e"es as a,ainst the 20H000 %otes !ast for petitioner 8anuel' 3he se!on& pla!er is o:%iousl" not the !hoi!e of the people in this

.a(an(y8 R3'e &) S3((e++i&n 9!##@:


No' 7: 3he Ei!e 8a"or of a uni!ipalit" file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the sa e offi!e in the last ele!tions' 3he 8uni!ipal 8a"or was

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"-

also runnin, for re*ele!tion' 9oth were offi!ial !an&i&ates of the sa e politi!al part"' +fter the last &a" for the filin, of !ertifi!ates of !an&i&a!"H the 8a"or &ie&' <n&er these fa!ts * a) Can the Ei!e 8a"or su!!ee& to the offi!e of 8a"or pursuant to the pro%isions of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eL /0plain' :) +ssu in, that the Ei!e 8a"or su!!ee&s to the position of 8a"or after the in!u :ent &ie&H whi!h position is now &ifferent fro the one for whi!h he has file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"H !an he still !ontinue to run as Ei!e 8a"orL /0plain' !) 5s there an" le,al i pe&i ent to the Ei!e 8a"or to repla!e the re*ele!tionist 8a"or who &ie&L /0plainH SUGGESTED ANSWER: OesH the %i!e a"or !an su!!ee& to the offi!e of a"or' <n&er Se!tion ## of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH he stan&s ne0t in line to the offi!e of a"or in !ase of a per anent %a!an!" in it' @is filin, of a Certifi!ate of Can&i&a!" for 8a"or &i& not auto ati!all" result to his :ein, !onsi&ere& resi,ne& (Se!' )7H A ni:us /le!tion Co&e)'
OesH the %i!e a"or !an !ontinue to run as %i!e a"or' +t the ti e that he file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!"H the %i!e a"or ran for the sa e offi!e he was hol&in,' 5n &eter inin, whether a !an&i&ate is runnin, for a position other than the one he is hol&in, in a per anent !apa!it" an& shoul& :e !onsi&ere& resi,ne&H it is the offi!e he was hol&in, at the ti e he file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" shoul& :e !onsi&ere&' 3here is no le,al i pe&i ent to the %i!e a"or runnin, as a"or to repla!e the %i!e a"or who &ie& un&er Se!tion 77 of the A ni:us /le!tion Co&eH if a !an&i&ate &ies after the last &a" for filin, !ertifi!ates of !an&i&a!"H he a" :e repla!e& :" a person :elon,in, to his politi!al part"' @owe%erH it is re?uire& that he shoul& first with&raw his Certifi!ate of Can&i&a!" for Ei!e*8a"or an& file a new Certifi!ate of Can&i&a!" for 8a"or'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+s hel& in Farinas %' 9ar:aH 22) SC1+ 39) (199))H neither of the appoint ents is %ali&' <n&er Se!tion #2 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH in !ase of a per anent %a!an!" in the San,,unian, 9a"an !reate& :" the !essation in offi!e of a e :er who &oes not :elon, to an" politi!al part"H the $o%ernor shall appoint a ?ualifie& person re!o en&e& :" the San,,unian, 9a"an' Sin!e + was not re!o en&e& :" the San,,unian, 9a"anH his appoint ent :" the $o%ernor is not %ali&' Sin!e 9 was not appointe& :" the $o%ernor :ut :" the 8uni!ipal 8a"orH his appoint ent is also not %ali&'

ARTICLE IX A3dit

C&11i++i&n &n

COA8 43ri+di(ti&n 9"66!: No E555 * 3he Philippine National 9anD was then one of the lea&in, ,o%ern ent*owne& :anDs an& it was un&er the au&it ;uris&i!tion of the Co ission on +u&it (CA+)' + few "ears a,oH it was pri%ati=e&' 6hat is the effe!tH if an"H of the pri%ati=ation of PN9 on the au&it >uris&i!tion of the CA+L (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in Philippine +irlines %s' Co ission on +u&itH 2#2 SC1+ 39H(1992)H sin!e the Philippine National 9anD is no lon,er owne& :" the $o%ern entH the Co ission on +u&it no lon,er has ;uris&i!tion to au&it it as an institution' <n&er Se!tion 2(2)H +rti!le 5M*of the ConstitutionH it is ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations an& their su:si&iaries whi!h are su:;e!t to au&it :" the Co ission on +u&it' @owe%erH in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion 2(1)H +rti!le 5M*- of the ConstitutionH the Co ission on +u&it !an au&it the Philippine National 9anD with respe!t to its a!!ounts :e!ause the $o%ern ent still has e?uit" in it'

COA8 M&ney C'ai1+ 9!##$:


No 5' * 3he -epart ent of National -efense entere& into a !ontra!t with 1aintree Corporation for the suppl" of pon!hos to the +r e& For!es of the Philippines (+FP)H stipulatin, thatH in the e%ent of :rea!hH a!tion a" :e file& in the proper !ourts in 8anila'

.a(an(y8 SB8 R3'e &n S3((e++i&n 9"66": No ME' + %a!an!" o!!urre& in the san,,unian, :a"an of a uni!ipalit" when MH a e :erH &ie&' M &i& not :elon, to an" politi!al part"'
3o fill up the %a!an!"H the pro%in!ial ,o%ernor appointe& + upon the re!o en&ation of the san,,unian, panlalawi,an' An the other han&H for the sa e %a!an!"H the uni!ipal a"or appointe& 9 upon the re!o en&ation of the san,,unian, :a"an'

6hi!h of these appoint ents is %ali&L (2N)

Suppose the +FP fails to pa" for &eli%ere& pon!hosH where ust 1aintree Corporation file its !lai L 6h"L P 10NQ SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1aintree Corporation ust file its !lai with the Co ission on +u&itH <n&er Se!tion 2(1) 5M*-

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!";

of the ConstitutionH the Co ission on +u&it has the authorit" to settle all a!!ounts pertainin, to e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s' 1aintree Corporation !annot file a !ase in !ourt' 3he 1epu:li! of the Philippines &i& not wai%e its i unit" fro suit when it entere& into the !ontra!t with 1aintree Corporation for the suppl" of pon!hos for the use of the +r e& For!es of the Philippines' 3he !ontra!t in%ol%es the &efense of the Philippines an& therefore relates to a so%erei,n fun!tion' 5n <nite& States %s' 1ui=H 13) SC1+ #87H #92H the Supre e Court hel&; C3he restri!ti%e appli!ation of State i unit" is proper onl" when the pro!ee&in,s arise out of !o er!ial transa!tions of the forei,n so%erei,n' 5ts !o er!ial a!ti%ities or e!ono i! affairs' State& &ifferentl"H a State a" :e sai& to ha%e &es!en&e& to the le%el of an in&i%i&ual an& !an thus :e &ee e& to ha%e ta!itl" ,i%en its !onsent to :e sue& onl" when it enters into :usiness !ontra!ts' 5t &oes not appl" where the !ontra!t relates to the e0er!ise of its so%erei,n fun!tions' 5n this !ase the pro;e!ts are an inte,ral part of the na%al :ase whi!h is &e%ote& to the &efense of :oth the <nite& States an& the PhilippinesH in&isputa:l" a fun!tion of the ,o%ern ent of the hi,hest or&er; the" are not utili=e& for nor &e&i!ate& to !o er!ial or :usiness purposes'C

ARTICLE X

L&(a' G&0ern1ent

A**&int1ent &) B3dget O))i(er8 (&ntr&' 0+ +3*er0i+i&n 9!###:


No E * -' An 8a" 17H 1988H the position of Pro%in!ial 9u&,et Affi!er of Pro%in!e M :e!a e %a!ant' Pe&ro CastahonH ,o%ernor of the pro%in!eH pursuant to Se!' 1 of /'A' No' 112H su: itte& the na es of three no inees for the aforesai& position to the -epart ent of 9u&,et 8ana,e ent (-98)H one of who was that of 8arta 8ahonhon' + onth laterH Castahon infor e& the -98 that 8ahonhon ha& assu e& the offi!e of P9A an& re?ueste& that she :e e0ten&e& the appropriate appoint ent' 3he -98 Se!retar" appointe& >osefa Gala"on instea&' Castahon proteste& the appoint ent of Gala"on insistin, that it is he who ha& the ri,ht to !hoose the P9A :" su: ittin, the na es of his three no inees an& Gala"on was not one of the ' 3he -98 !ountere& that none of the ,o%ernorBs no inees ha%e the ne!essar" ?ualifi!ations for the position' Spe!ifi!all"H 8ahonhon la!De& the fi%e*"ear e0perien!e in :u&,etin,' @en!eH the -98 was left with no alternati%e :ut to na e one who possesses all the re?uisite ?ualifi!ations in the person of Gala"on' 5t !ite& Se!tion )'0 of the -98 7o!al 9u&,et Cir!ular No' 31 whi!h statesH C3he -98 reser%es the ri,ht to fill up an" e0istin, %a!an!" where none of the no inees of the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e eet the pres!ri:e& re?uire ents'C

3he pro%ision for %enue in the !ontra!t &oes not !onstitute a wai%er of the State 5 unit" fro suitH :e!ause the e0press wai%er of this i unit" !an onl" :e a&e :" a statute'
5n 1epu:li! us' Purisi a 78 SC1+ #70H #7#H the Supre e Court rule&: C+pparentl" respon&ent >u&,e was isle& :" the ter s of the !ontra!t :etween the pri%ate respon&entH plaintiff in his sala an& &efen&ant 1i!e an& Corn +& inistration whi!hH a!!or&in, to hi H anti!ipate& the !ase of a :rea!h of !ontra!t :etween the parties an& the suits that a" thereafter arise' 3he !onsentH to :e effe!ti%e thou,hH ust !o e fro the State a!tin, throu,h a &ul" ena!te& statute as pointe& out :" >usti!e 9en,=on in 8o:il'C

(a)

6as the -98Bs appoint ent %ali&L (2N)

(:) 6hat !an "ou sa" re,ar&in, the a:o%e* ?uote& Se!tion )'0 of -98Bs 7o!al 9u&,et Cir!ular No' 31L /0plain "our answers' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
-' (a) <n&er Se!tion 1 of /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 112H the Pro%in!ial 9u&,et Affi!er ust :e re!o en&e& :" the $o%ernor' Sin!e >osefa Gala"on was not re!o en&e& :" the $o%ernorH her appoint ent is not %ali&' +s hel& in San >uan %' Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH 19) SC1+ )9H if the person re!o en&e& :" the $o%ernor is not ?ualifie&H what the Se!retar" of 9u&,et an& 8ana,e ent shoul& &o is to asD hi to re!o en& so eone who is eli,i:le' (:) -98 7o!al 9u&,et Cir!ular No' 31 is not %ali&H sin!e it is in!onsistent with /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 112H whi!h re?uires that the appointee for Pro%in!ial 9u&,et Affi!er :e re!o en&e& :" the $o%ernor' (<n&er the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH it is now the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e who is e powere& to appoint the :u&,et offi!er)'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
5n a!!or&an!e with the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&iesH 1aintree Corporation shoul& first file a !lai with the Co ission on +u&it' 5f the !lai is &enie&H it shoul& file a petition for !ertiorari with the Supre e Court'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"@

B&3ndary Di+*3te Re+&'3ti&n8 LGU8 RTCJ+ 43ri+di(ti&n 9>!6<"66@:


1 * 3here was a :oun&ar" &ispute :etween -uenasH a uni!ipalit"H an& PassiH an in&epen&ent !o ponent !it"H :oth of the sa e pro%in!e' State how the two lo!al ,o%ern ent units shoul& settle their :oun&ar" &ispute' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
9oun&ar" &isputes :etween lo!al ,o%ern ent units shoul&H as u!h as possi:leH :e settle& a i!a:l"' +fter efforts at settle ent failH then the &ispute a" :e :rou,ht to the appropriate 1e,ional 3rial Court in the sai& pro%in!e' Sin!e the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e is silent as to what :o&" has e0!lusi%e ;uris&i!tion o%er the settle ent of :oun&ar" &isputes :etween a uni!ipalit" an& an in&epen&ent !o ponent !it" of the sa e pro%in!eH the 1e,ional 3rial Courts ha%e ,eneral ;uris&i!tion to a&;u&i!ate the sai& !ontro%ers"' (8un' of Ganan,a %' 8a&ronaH $'1' No' 1#1372H +pril 30H 2003)

+ ple:is!ite is ne!essar"H :e!ause this is re?uire& for the !reation of a new uni!ipalit"' (Se!tion 10H +rti!le M of the 1987 Constitution') 3he %oters of :oth 8a&aDo an& 8asi,la shoul& parti!ipate in the ple:is!iteH :e!ause :oth are &ire!tl" affe!te& :" the !reation of 8asi,la' 3he territor" of 8a&aDo will :e re&u!e&' (3an %' CA8/7/CH 1#2 SC1+ 727 P198))'

De a(t& P3b'i( C&r*&rati&n+8 E))e(t 9"66;: NA' E55 * 8+-+GA is a uni!ipalit" !o pose& of 80 :aran,a"sH 30 west of 8a&aDo 1i%er an& 20 east thereof' 3he 30 western :aran,a"sH feelin, left out of e!ono i! initiati%esH wish to !onstitute the sel%es into a new an& separate town to :e !alle& 8asi,la' + law is passe& !reatin, 8asi,la an& a ple:is!ite is a&e in fa%or of the law'
9' Suppose that one "ear after 8asi,la was !onstitute& as a uni!ipalit"H the law !reatin, it is %oi&e& :e!ause of &efe!ts' 6oul& that in%ali&ate the a!ts of the uni!ipalit" an&Ior its uni!ipal offi!ersL /0plain :riefl"' (2N)

B&3ndary Di+*3te Sett'e1ent8 A3t,&rity8 43ri+di(ti&n 9!###: No E * C' 6hat :o&" or :o&ies are %este& :" law with the authorit" to settle &isputes in%ol%in,: (1) two or ore towns within the sa e pro%in!e; (1N) (2) two or ore hi,hl" ur:ani=e& !ities' (1N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 1') <n&er Se!tion 118(:) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH :oun&ar" &isputes in%ol%in, two or ore uni!ipalities within the sa e pro%in!e shall :e settle& :" the san,,unian, panlalawi,an !on!erne&' 2') <n&er Se!tion 118(&) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH :oun&ar" &isputes in%ol%in, two or ore hi,hl" ur:ani=e& !ities shall :e settle& :" the san,,unian, panlun,so& of the parties' Creati&n &) Ne5 L&(a' G&0ern1ent Unit+8 P'ebi+(ite ReF3ire1ent 9"66;:
NA' E55 * 8+-+GA is a uni!ipalit" !o pose& of 80 :aran,a"sH 30 west of 8a&aDo 1i%er an& 20 east thereof' 3he 30 western :aran,a"sH feelin, left out of e!ono i! initiati%esH wish to !onstitute the sel%es into a new an& separate town to :e !alle& 8asi,la' +' $rantin, that 8asi,laFs proponents su!!ee& to se!ure a law in their fa%orH woul& a ple:is!ite :e ne!essar" or notL 5f it is ne!essar"H who shoul& %ote or parti!ipate in the ple:is!iteL -is!uss :riefl"' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
+lthou,h the uni!ipalit" !annot :e !onsi&ere& as a &e fa!to !orporationH :e!ause there is no %ali& law un&er whi!h it was !reate&H the a!ts of the uni!ipalit" an& of its offi!ers will not :e in%ali&ate&H :e!ause the e0isten!e of the law !reatin, it is an operati%e fa!t :efore it was &e!lare& un!onstitutional' @en!eH the pre%ious a!ts of the uni!ipalit" an& its offi!ers shoul& :e ,i%en effe!t as a atter of fairness an& ;usti!e' (8uni!ipalit" of8ala:an, %' 9enitoH 27 SC1+ 233 P19)9Q

De0&'3ti&n &) P&5er 9!###: -efine &e%olution with respe!t to lo!al ,o%ern ent units' SUGGESTED ANSWER: Se!tion 17(e) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e &efines &e%olution as the a!t :" whi!h the National $o%ern ent !onfers power an& authorit" upon the %arious lo!al ,o%ern ent units to perfor spe!ifi! fun!tions an& responsi:ilities' ran(,i+e8 *ri&r a**r&0a' &) LGU ne(e++ary 9!#$$:
No' 9: 8a!a:e:eH Pa pan,a has se%eral :arrios alon, the Pa pan,a ri%er' 3o ser%i!e the nee&s of their resi&ents the uni!ipalit" has :een operatin, a ferr" ser%i!e at the sa e ri%erH for a nu :er of "ears alrea&"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

So eti e in 1987H the uni!ipalit" was ser%e& a !op" of an or&er fro the 7an& 3ansportation

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"?

Fran!hisin, an& 1e,ulator" 9oar& (73F19)H ,rantin, a !ertifi!ate of pu:li! !on%enien!e to 8r' 1i!ar&o 8a!apinla!H a resi&ent of 8a!a:e:eH to operate ferr" ser%i!e a!ross the sa e ri%er an& :etween the sa e :arrios :ein, ser%i!e& presentl" :" the uni!ipalit"Bs ferr" :oats' + !he!D of the re!or&s of the appli!ation of 8a!apinla! shows that the appli!ation was file& so e onths :eforeH set for hearin,H an& noti!es of su!h hearin, were pu:lishe& in two newspapers of ,eneral !ir!ulation in the town of 8a!a:e:eH an& in the pro%in!e of Pa pan,a' 3he uni!ipalit" ha& ne%er :een &ire!tl" ser%e& a !op" of that noti!e of hearin, nor ha& the San,,unian, 9a"an :een re?ueste& :" 8a!apinla! for an" operate' 3he uni!ipalit" i e&iatel" file& a otion for re!onsi&eration with the 73F19 whi!h was &enie&' 5t the went to the Supre e Court on a petition for !ertiorari to nullif" the or&er ,rantin, a !ertifi!ate of pu:li! !on%enien!e to 8a!apinla! on two ,roun&s:

,oes a,ainst the aforesai& !onstitutional re?uire ent of three "ear ter s for lo!al offi!ials e0!ept for :aran,a" offi!ials' Ordinan(e8 U+e B Lea+e &) Pr&*ertie+8 P3b'i( U+e 9!##%:
No' 9: -ue to o%er*!row&in, in the pu:li! arDet in Pa!oH 8anilaH the Cit" Coun!il passe& an or&inan!e allowin, the lease to %en&ors of parts of the streets where the pu:li! arDet is lo!ate&H pro%i&e& that the lessees pa" to the !it" ,o%ern ent a fee of P20 per s?uare eter of the area o!!upie& :" the lessees' 3he resi&ents in the area !o plaine& to the 8a"or that the lease of the pu:li! streets woul& !ause serious traffi! pro:le s to the ' 3he 8a"or !an!elle& the lease an& or&ere& the re o%al of the stalls !onstru!te& on the streets'

(1) -enial of &ue pro!ess to the uni!ipalit"; an& (2) For failure of 8a!apinla! to se!ure appro%al of the San,,unian, 9a"an for hi to operate a ferr" ser%i!e in 8a!a:e:eH 1esol%e the two points in the petition with reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he petition for !ertiorari shoul& :e ,rante&H 1' +s a part" &ire!tl" affe!te& :" the operation of the ferr" ser%i!eH the 8uni!ipalit" of 8a!a:e:eH Pa pan,a was entitle& to :e &ire!tl" notifie& :" the 73F19 '''' 2' 5t has :een hel& that where a ferr" operation lies entirel" within the uni!ipalit"H the prior appro%al of the 8uni!ipal ,o%ern ent is ne!essar"' An!e appro%e&H the operator ust then appl" with the 73F19 for a !ertifi!ate of pu:li! !on%enien!e an& shall :e su:;e!t to 73F19 super%isionH (8uni!ipalit" of /!ha,ue %' +:elleraH supra)' La5 )i2ing t,e ter1+ &) '&(a' e'e(ti0e &))i(ia'+ 9>;<"66?: State whether or not the law is !onstitutional' /0plain :riefl"' 3' + law fi0in, the ter s of lo!al ele!ti%e offi!ialsH other than :aran,a" offi!ialsH to ) "ears' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he law is in%ali&' <n&er +rti!le MH Se!tion 8 of the 1987 ConstitutionH Cthe ter of offi!e of ele!ti%e lo!al offi!ialsH e0!ept :aran,a" offi!ialsH whi!h shall :e &eter ine& :" lawH shall :e three "ears an& no su!h offi!ial shall ser%e for ore than three !onse!uti%e ter s'C 3he law !learl"

6as the a!t of the 8a"or le,alL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he !an!ellation of the lease an& the re o%al of the stalls are %ali&' +s hel& in 8a!asiano %s' -ioDnoH 212 SC1+ #)#H the lease of pu:li! streets is %oi&H sin!e the" are reser%e& for pu:li! use an& are outsi&e the !o er!e of an' Ordinan(e8 .a'idity8 C'&+3re &r Lea+e &) Pr&*ertie+ )&r P3b'i( U+e 9"66-:
No M5 * +n a,,rie%e& resi&ent of the Cit" of 8anila file& an&a us pro!ee&in,s a,ainst the !it" a"or an& the !it" en,ineer to !o pel these offi!ials to re o%e the arDet stalls fro !ertain !it" streets whi!h the" ha& &esi,nate& as flea arDets' Portions of the sai& !it" streets were lease& or li!ense& :" the respon&ent offi!ials to arDet stallhol&ers :" %irtue of a !it" or&inan!e' -e!i&e the &ispute'

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


3he petition shoul& :e ,rante&' 5n a!!or&an!e with 8a!asiano %' -ioDno' 212 SC1+ #)# P1992QH sin!e pu:li! streets are properties for pu:li! use an& are outsi&e the !o er!e of anH the Cit" 8a"or an& the Cit" /n,ineer !annot lease or li!ense portions of the !it" streets to arDet stallhol&ers'

SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


3he petition shoul& :e &enie&' <n&er Se!tion 21(&)of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH a !it" a" :" or&inan!e te poraril" !lose a street so that a flea arDet a" :e esta:lishe&' Ordinan(e8 .a'idity8 C&1*en+ati&n8 T&rt3&3+ A(t &) an E1*'&yee 9!##;: No' ); >ohnn" was e plo"e& as a &ri%er :" the 8uni!ipalit" of Calu pitH 9ula!an' 6hile &ri%in, re!Dlessl" a uni!ipal &u p tru!D with its loa& of san& for the repair of uni!ipal streetsH

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"%

>ohnn" hit a ;eepne"' 3wo passen,ers of the ;eepne" were Dille&' 3he San,,unian, 9a"an passe& an or&inan!e appropriatin, P300H000 as !o pensation for the heirs of the %i!ti s' 1) 5s the uni!ipalit" lia:le for the ne,li,en!e of >ohnn"L 2) 5s the uni!ipal or&inan!e %ali&L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
2) 3he or&inan!e appropriatin, P300H000'00 for the heirs of the %i!ti s of >ohnn" is %oi&' 3his a ounts to appropriatin, pu:li! fun&s for a pri%ate purpose' <n&er Se!tion 332 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH no pu:li! one" shall :e appropriate& for pri%ate purposes'

:e !har,e& to propert" owners :enefite& :" pu:li! worDsH :e!ause the essential &ifferen!e :etween a ta0 an& su!h assess ent is pre!isel" that the latter is :ase& wholl" on :enefits re!ei%e&' @owe%erH if the or&inan!e le%ies a ta0 on all :usiness esta:lish ents lo!ate& outsi&e the pri%ate su:&i%isionH then it is o:;e!tiona:le on the ,roun& that it appropriate pri%ate fun&s for a pu:li! purpose' (Pas!ual %' Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDsH supra) Ordinan(e8 .a'idity8 Pre0enting I11&ra'ity 9!#$%:
(!) +n or&inan!e prohi:itin, :ar:ershop operators fro ren&erin, assa,e ser%i!e to their !usto ers in a separate roo '

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8
<pon the fore,oin, !onsi&erationsH the uni!ipal or&inan!e is null an& %oi& for :ein, ultra %ires' 3he uni!ipalit" not :ein, lia:le to pa" !o pensation to the heirs of the %i!ti sH the or&inan!e is utterl" &e%oi& of le,al :asis' 5t woul& in fa!t !onstitute an ille,al use or e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s whi!h is a !ri inal offense' 6hat is oreH the or&inan!e &oes not eet one of the re?uisites for %ali&it" of uni!ipal or&inan!esH ie'H that it ust :e in !onsonan!e with !ertain well*esta:lishe& an& :asi! prin!iples of a su:stanti%e natureH to wit: it &oes not !ontra%ene the Constitution or the lawH it is not unfair or oppressi%e' 5t is not partial or &is!ri inator"' 5t is !onsistent with pu:li! poli!"H an& it is not unreasona:le'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: (!) 3he or&inan!e is %ali&' 5n Eelas!o %H Eille,asH 120 SC1+ )28 (1983) su!h or&inan!e was uphel& on the ,roun& that it is a eans of ena:lin, the Cit" of 8anila to !olle!t a fee for operatin, assa,e !lini!s an& of pre%entin, i oralit" whi!h i,ht :e !o itte& :" allowin, the !onstru!tion of separate roo s in :ar:er shops' Ordinan(e8 .a'idity8 Uti'i/ati&n B De0e'&*1ent8 Nati&na' Wea't, 9!##!: No' 2; 3he pro%in!e of Palawan passes an or&inan!e re?uirin, all ownersIoperators of fishin, %essels that fish in waters surroun&in, the pro%in!e to in%est ten per!ent (10N) of their net profits fro operations therein in an" enterprise lo!ate& in Palawan' N+1CA Fishin, Corp'H a Filipino !orporation with hea& offi!e in Na%otasH 8etro 8anilaH !hallen,es the or&inan!e as un!onstitutional' -e!i&e the !ase' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&inan!e is in%ali&' 3he or&inan!e was apparentl" ena!te& pursuant to +rti!le MH Se!' 7 of the ConstitutionH whi!h entitles lo!al ,o%ern ents to an e?uita:le share in the pro!ee&s of the utili=ation an& &e%elop ent of the national wealth within their respe!ti%e areas' @owe%erH this shoul& :e a&e pursuant to law' + law is nee&e& to i ple ent this pro%ision an& a lo!al ,o%ern ent !annot !onstitute itself unto a law' 5n the a:sen!e of a law the or&inan!e in ?uestion is in%ali&'

Ordinan(e8 .a'idity8 L&(a' Ta2ati&n 0+= S*e(ia' A++e++1ent 9!#$%: 1987 No' E: State whether or not the followin, !it" or&inan!es are %ali& an& ,i%e reasons in support of "our answers: (:) +n or&inan!e on :usiness esta:lish ents to raise fun&s for the !onstru!tion an& aintenan!e of roa&s in pri%ate su:&i%isionsH whi!h roa&s are open for use :" se, ents of the pu:li! who a" ha%e :usiness insi&e the su:&i%ision' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(:) 3he or&inan!e is %ali&' 3he !har,e on the :usiness esta:lish ents is not a ta0 :ut a SP/C5+7 +SS/SS8/N3' @en!eH the hol&in, in Pas!ual %' Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDsH 110 Phil' 331 (19)0)H that pu:li! fun&s !annot :e appropriate& for the !onstru!tion of roa&s in a pri%ate su:&i%isionH &oes not appl"' +s hel& in +postoli! Prefe!t %' Cit" 3reasurer of 9a,uioH 71 Phil' 2#7 (19#1)H spe!ial assess ents a"

Ordinan(e+8 .a'idity8 A1ending NatJ' La5+ 9!#$$:


No' #: >ose O' Sa:ater is a real estate &e%eloper' @e a!?uires raw lan&s an& !on%erts

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"$

the into su:&i%isions' +fter a!?uirin, a lot of aroun& 12 he!tares in Ca:anatuan Cit"H he !ause& the preparation of a su:&i%ision plan for the propert"' 9efore he was a:le to su: it the su:&i%ision plan to the 9ureau of 7an&s an&Ior 7an& 1e,istration Co ission for %erifi!ation an&Ior appro%alH he was infor e& that he ust first present the plan to the Cit" /n,ineer who woul& &eter ine whether the =onin, or&inan!e of the Ca:anatuan Cit" ha& :een o:ser%e&' @e was surprise& when he was asDe& to pa" the !it" ,o%ern ent a ser%i!e fee of P0'30 per s?uare eter of lan&H !o%ere& :" his su:&i%ision plan' @e was e%en ore surprise& when infor e& that a fine of P200'00 an&Ior i prison ent for not e0!ee&in, si0 onths or :othH ha%e :een fi0e& in the or&inan!e as penalt" for %iolation thereof' 9elie%in, that the !it" or&inan!e is ille,alH he file& suit to nullif" the sa e'

power of 3a!lo:an Cit" to suppress ,a :lin, an& prohi:ite& ,a es of !han!e e0!lu&es of !han!e per itte& :" law' 5 plie& repeals are not fa%ore&' (9as!o %' P+$CA1)

Ordinan(e+8 .a'idity8 Li1itati&n &) Pena'tie+ 9!##!:


No' 10: 3he uni!ipalit" of +l!o"H Ce:uH passe& Ar&inan!e No' 10H series of 1991H re?uirin, ownersH a& inistratorsH or tenants of :uil&in,s an& pre ises to Deep an& aintain the in sanitar" !on&itionH an& shoul& the" fail to &o soH !ause the to :e !leare& an& Dept in sanitar" !on&ition an& the !ost thereof to :e assesse& a,ainst the ownerH a& inistrator or tenantH as the !ase a" :eH whi!h !ost shall !onstitute a lien a,ainst the propert"' 5t further penali=es %iolation thereof with a fine not e0!ee&in, Ane 3housan& Pesos (P1H000'00) or i prison ent for one (1) "ear at the &is!retion of the !ourt' 5s the or&inan!e %ali&L

-e!i&e the !ase with reasons' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


3he or&inan!e is null an& %oi&' 5n Eilla!orta %' 9ernar&oH 1#3 SC1+ #80 (198)) the Supre e Court hel& that a uni!ipal or&inan!e !annot a en& a national law in the ,uise of i ple entin, it' 5n this !aseH the re?uire ent a!tuall" !onfli!ts with se!' ## of +!t No' #9) :e!ause the latter &oes not re?uire su:&i%ision plans to :e su: itte& to the Cit" /n,ineer :efore the" !an :e su: itte& for appro%al toH an& %erifi!ation :"H the 7an& 1e,istration Co ission an&Ior the 9ureau of 7an&s'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&inan!e is %ali& insofar as it re?uires ownersH a& inistratorsH or tenants of :uil&in,s an& pre ises to Deep an& aintain the in sanitar" !on&ition an& pro%i&es that shoul& the" fail to &o soH the uni!ipalit" shall !ause the to :e !leane& an& the !ost shall :e assesse& a,ainst the ownerH a& inistratorH or tenant an& shall :e a lien a,ainst the propert"' 3his is e0pressl" authori=e& :" Se!' 1#9(DD) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e' @owe%erH the penalt" for the %iolation of the or&inan!e is in%ali&H :e!ause it is e0!essi%e' 3he penalt" in this !ase is a fine not e0!ee&in, P1H000 or i prison ent for one "earH in the &is!retion of the !ourt' <n&er Se!' 1#9 (!) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH howe%erH the penalt" for the %iolation of a uni!ipal or&inan!e !an not e0!ee& a fine of P1H000'00 or 5 prison ent for si0 onthsH or :oth at the &is!retion of the !ourt'

Ordinan(e+8 .a'idity8 Ga1b'ing Pr&,ibiti&n 9!##@:


No' #: 2' P+$CA1 &e!i&e& to operate a !asino in 3a!lo:an Cit" un&er authorit" of P'-' No' 18)9' 5t lease& a portion of a :uil&in, :elon,in, to /llen 8!$uire reno%ate& an& e?uippe& it in preparation for its inau,uration' 3he San,,unian, Panlun,so& of 3a!lo:an Cit" ena!te& an or&inan!e prohi:itin, the operation of !asinos in the Cit" an& pro%i&in, penalt" for its %iolation' /llen 8!$uire an& P+$CA1 assaile& the %ali&it" of the or&inan!e in !ourt' @ow woul& "ou resol%e the issueL -is!uss full"'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he or&inan!e shoul& :e &e!lare& in%ali&' +s hel& in 8a,ta;as %s' Pr"!e Properties Corporation' 5n!'H 23# SC1+ 222' su!h an or&inan!e !ontra%enes Presi&ential -e!ree No' 18)9H whi!h authori=es the Philippine + use ent an& $a in, Corporation to operate !asinos within the territorial >uris&i!tion of the PhilippinesH :e!ause it pre%ents the sai& !orporation fro e0er!isin, the power !onferre& on it to operate a !asino in 3a!lo:an Cit"' 3he

Ordinan(e+8 .et& P&5er 9!##?: (1) @ow &oes the lo!al le,islati%e asse :l" o%erri&e the %eto :" the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e of an or&inan!eL (2) An what ,roun&s !an a lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e %eto an or&inan!eL (3) @ow !an an or&inan!e %etoe& :" a lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e :e!o e a law without it :ein, o%erri&&en :" the lo!al le,islati%e asse :l"L SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) <n&er Se!tions 2# (a) an& 22 (!) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the lo!al le,islati%e asse :l" !an o%erri&e the %eto

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!"#

of the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e :" two*thir&s %ote of all its e :ers'
(2) <n&er Se!tion 22PaQ of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e a" %eto an or&inan!e on the ,roun& that it is 6LTRA ?IR:7 or PR:E6;ICIAL TO T@: P6BLIC W:L8AR:. (3) Pursuant to Se!tion 2#(:) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH an or&inan!e %etoe& :" the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e shall :e &ee e& appro%e& if he &oes not !o uni!ate his %eto to the lo!al le,islati%e asse :l" within 12 &a"s in the !ase of a pro%in!e an& 10 &a"s in the !ase of a !it" or a uni!ipalit"' 7iDewiseH if the %eto :" the lo!al e0e!uti%e has :een o%erri&&en :" the lo!al le,islati%e asse :l"H a se!on& %eto will :e %oi&' <n&er Se!tion 22(!) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the lo!al !hief e0e!uti%e a" %eto an or&inan!e onl" on!e'

7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" %s' Court of +ppealsH 231 SC1+ 292H un&er 1epu:li! +!t NoH #820H the 7a,una 7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" is an&ate& to pro ote the &e%elop ent of the 7a,una 7aDe areaH in!lu&in, the surroun&in, Pro%in!e of 1i=alH with &ue re,ar& to the pre%ention of pollution' 3he 7a,una 7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" is an&ate& to pass upon an& appro%e or &isappro%e all pro;e!ts propose& :" lo!al ,o%ern ent offi!es within the re,ion' 2' OesH the 7a,una 7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" !an ;ustif" its or&er' Sin!e it has :een authori=e& :" /0e!uti%e Ar&er No' 927 to aDe or&ers re?uirin, the &is!ontinuan!e of pollutionH its power to issue the or&er !an :e inferre& fro this' AtherwiseH it will :e a toothless a,en!"' 8oreo%erH the 7a,una 7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" is spe!ifi!all" authori=e& un&er its Charter to issue !ease an& &esist or&ers'

P&'i(e P&5er8 LLDA 9!##@:


No' 9: 3he 8uni!ipalit" of 9inan,onanH 1i=alH passe& a resolution authori=in, the operation of an open ,ar:a,e &u psite in a 9* he!tare lan& in the 1e"es /state within the 8uni!ipalit"Bs territorial li its' So e !on!erne& resi&ents of 9inan,onan file& a !o plaint with the 7a,una 7aDe -e%elop ent +uthorit" (77-+) to stop the operation of the &u psite &ue to its har ful effe!ts on the health of the resi&ents' 3he 77-+ !on&u!te& an on*site in%esti,ationH onitorin,H testin, an& water sa plin, an& foun& that the &u psite woul& !onta inate 7a,una &e 9a" an& the surroun&in, areas of the 8uni!ipalit"' 3he 77-+ also &is!o%ere& that no en%iron ental !learan!e was se!ure& :" the 8uni!ipalit" fro the -epart ent of /n%iron ent an& Natural 1esour!es (-/N1) an& the 77-+ as re?uire& :" law' 3he 77-+ therefore issue& to the 9inan,onan uni!ipal ,o%ern ent a !ease an& &esist or&er to stop the operation of the &u psite' 3he 8uni!ipalit" of 9inan,onan file& a !ase to annul the or&er issue& :" the 77-+'

P&5er t& I++3e S3b*&ena B Cite C&nte1*t 9!##-:

&r

No ): 8a"or +lfre&o 7i !lose& the funhouses in the /r ita &istri!t suspe!te& of :ein, fronts for prostitution' 3o &eter ine the feasi:ilit" of puttin, up a le,ali=e& re& li,ht &istri!tH the !it" !oun!il !on&u!te& an in?uir" an& in%ite& operators of the !lose& funhouses to ,et their %iews' No one honore& the 5n%itation' 3he !it" !oun!il issue& su:poenas to !o pel the atten&an!e of the operators :ut whi!h were !o pletel" &isre,ar&e&' 3he !oun!il &e!lare& the operators ,uilt" of !onte pt an& issue& warrants for their arrest'

3he operators !o e to "ou for le,al a&%i!eH asDin, the followin, ?uestions: (1) 5s the !oun!il e powere& to issue su:poenas to !o pel their atten&an!eL (2) -oes the !oun!il ha%e the power to !ite for !onte ptL SUGGESTED ANSWER:
i) 3he !it" !oun!il is not e powere& to issue su:poenas to !o pel the atten&an!e of the operators of the fun*houses 5n the /r ita &istri!t' 3here is no pro%ision in the ConstitutionH the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH or an" law e0pressl" ,rantin, lo!al le,islati%e :o&ies the power to su:poena witnesses' +s hel& in Ne,ros Ariental 55 /le!tri! Cooperati%eH 5n!' %s' San,,unian, Panlun,so& of -u a,ueteH 122 SC1+ #21H su!h power !annot :e i plie& fro the ,rant of &ele,ate& le,islate& power' Su!h power is >u&i!ial' 3o allow lo!al le,islati%e :o&ies to e0er!ise su!h power without

(1) Can the 8uni!ipalit" of 9inan,onan in%oDe poli!e power to pre%ent its resi&ents an& the 77-+ fro interferin, with the operation of the &u psite :" the 8uni!ipalit"L /0plain'
(2) Can the 77-+ ;ustif" its or&er :" assertin, that the health of the resi&ents will :e

a&%ersel" affe!te&' /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:


1' NoH the 8uni!ipalit" of 9inan,onan !annot in%oDe its poli!e power' +!!or&in, to 7a,una

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-6

e0press statutor" :asis woul& %iolate the &o!trine of separation of powers'


(2) 3he !it" !oun!il &oes not ha%e the power to !ite for !onte pt' 3here is liDewise no pro%ision in the ConstitutionH the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH or an" other laws ,rantin, lo!al le,islati%e :o&ies the power to !ite for !onte pt' Su!h power !annot :e &ee e& i plie& in the &ele,ation of le,islati%e power to lo!al le,islati%e :o&iesH for the e0isten!e of su!h power poses a potential &ero,ation of in&i%i&ual ri,hts'

of +ppealsH $'1' No' 10791)H Fe:ruar" 20H 1997)


3he ?uestion of whether there is ,enuine ne!essit" for the e0propriation of ChristinaBs lot or whether the uni!ipalit" has other an& :etter lots for the purpose is a atter that will ha%e to :e resol%e& :" the Court upon presentation of e%i&en!e :" the parties to the !ase'

P&5er8 E1inent D&1ain8 LGU8 Rig,t t& E2er(i+e 9>!6<"66@: 3he San,,unian, 9a"an of the 8uni!ipalit" of SantaH 5lo!os Sur passe& 1esolution No' 1 authori=in, its 8a"or to initiate a petition for the e0propriation of a lot owne& :" Christina as site for its uni!ipal sports !enter' 3his was appro%e& :" the 8a"or' @owe%erH the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an of 5lo!os Sur &isappro%e& the 1esolution as there i,ht still :e other a%aila:le lots in Santa for a sports !enter'
NonethelessH the 8uni!ipalit" of SantaH throu,h its 8a"orH file& a !o plaint for e inent &o ain' Christina oppose& this on the followin, ,roun&s: (a) the 8uni!ipalit" of Santa has no power to e0propriate; (:) 1esolution No' 1 has :een %oi&e& sin!e the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an &isappro%e& it for :ein, ar:itrar"; an& (!) the 8uni!ipalit" of Santa has other an& :etter lots for that purpose'

P&5er+ &) Barangay A++e1b'y 9"66-: Can a 9aran,a" +sse :l" e0er!ise an" poli!e powerL SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the 9aran,a" +sse :l" !annot e0er!ise an" poli!e power' <n&er Se!tion 398 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH it !an onl" re!o en& to the San,,unian, 9aran,a" the a&option of easures for the welfare of the :aran,a" an& &e!i&e on the a&option of an initiati%e' P&5er+8 Liga ng 1ga Barangay 9"66-: Can the 7i,a n, ,a 9aran,a" e0er!ise le,islati%e powersL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he 7i,a n, 8,a 9aran,a" !annot e0er!ise le,islati%e powers' +s state& in 9ito*Anon %' Fernan&e=' 320 SC1+ 732 P2001QH it is not a lo!al ,o%ern ent unit an& its pri ar" purpose is to &eter ine representation of the ,a in the san,,unians; to %entilateH arti!ulateH an& !r"stalli=e issues affe!tin, :aran,a" ,o%ern ent a& inistration; an& to se!ure solutions for the throu,h proper an& le,al eans' ReF3i+ite+8 C&ntra(t+ In0&'0ing LGU 9!##!: 3he 8uni!ipalit" of Si:on,aH Ce:uH wishes to enter into a !ontra!t in%ol%in, e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s' 6hat are the le,al re?uisites thereforL SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the le,al re?uisites for the %ali&it" of a !ontra!t to :e entere& into :" the 8uni!ipalit" of Si:on,aH whi!h in%ol%es the e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&s: (1) 3he !ontra!t ust :e within the power of the uni!ipalit"; (2) 3he !ontra!t ust :e entere& into :" the proper offi!erH i'e'H the a"orH upon resolution of the San,,unian, 9a"an pursuant to Se!tion 1#2 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e;
(3) 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!' )0) of the 1e%ise& +& inistrati%e Co&eH there ust :e an appropriation of the pu:li! fun&s; an& in a!!or&an!e with Se!' )07H there ust :e a

1esol%e the !ase with reasons' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:


<n&er Se!tion 19 of 1'+' No' 71)0H the power of e inent &o ain is e0pli!itl" ,rante& to the uni!ipalit"H :ut ust :e e0er!ise& throu,h an or&inan!e rather than throu,h a resolution' (8uni!ipalit" ofParana?ue %' E'8' 1ealt" Corp'H $'1' No' 127820H >ul" 20H 1998) 3he San,,unian, Panlalawi,an of 5lo!os Sur was without the authorit" to &isappro%e 1esolution No' 1 as the uni!ipalit" !learl" has the power to e0er!ise the ri,ht of e inent &o ain an& its San,,unian, 9a"an the !apa!it" to pro ul,ate sai& resolution' 3he onl" ,roun& upon whi!h a pro%in!ial :oar& a" &e!lare an" uni!ipal resolutionH or&inan!e or or&er in%ali& is when su!h resolutionH or&inan!e or or&er is :e"on& the powers !onferre& upon the !oun!il or presi&ent aDin, the sa e' Su!h is not the situation in this !ase' (8o&a" %' Court

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-!

!ertifi!ate of a%aila:ilit" of fun&s issue& :" the uni!ipal treasurer; an& (#) 3he !ontra!t ust !onfor with the for al re?uisites of written !ontra!ts pres!ri:e& :" law' ReF3i+ite+8 C&ntra(t+ in0&'0ing LGU 9!##@: No' #: 1' 6hat are the !on&itions un&er whi!h a lo!al e0e!uti%e a" enter into a !ontra!t in :ehalf of his ,o%ern ent unitL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 1' 3he followin, are the !on&itions un&er whi!h a lo!al e0e!uti%e a" enter into a !ontra!t in :ehalf of the ,o%ern ent until:
(1) 3he lo!al ,o%ern ent unit ust ha%e the power to enter into the parti!ular !ontra!t; (2) Pursuant to Se!tion 22(!) of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH there ust :e a prior authori=ation :" the san,,unian, !on!erne&H an& a le,i:le !op" of the !ontra!t shall :e poste& at a !onspi!uous pla!e in the pro%in!ial !apitol or the !it"H uni!ipal or :aran,a" hall' (3) 5n a!!or&an!e with Se!tions #) an& #7H Chapter 8H Su:title 9' 9ooD E of the 1987 +& inistrati%e Co&eH if the !ontra!t 5n%ol%es the e0pen&iture of pu:li! fun&sH there ust :e an appropriation therefore an& a !ertifi!ate of a%aila:ilit" of fun&s :" the treasurer of the lo!al ,o%ern ent unit'

not lia:le for real estate ta0 on the propert" :elon,in, to the ,o%ern ent whi!h it o!!up"' @owe%erH Se!tion 23# of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e su:se?uentl" with&rew the e0e ption fro real propert" ta0es of ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations' 5f 5 were the >u&,eH 5 woul& hol& the National -e%elop ent Co pan" lia:le for real estate ta0es'

Ta2ati&n8 S&3r(e+ &) Re0en3e 9!###: No E * <n&er the ConstitutionH what are the three ain sour!es of re%enues of lo!al ,o%ern ent unitsL (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the ain sour!es of re%enues of lo!al ,o%ern ent units un&er the Constitution: 1' 3a0esH feesH an& !har,es' (Se!tion 2H +rti!le M) 2' Share in the national ta0es' (Se!tion )H +rti!le M) 3' Share in the pro!ee&s of the utili=ations an& &e%elop ent of the national wealth within their areas' (Se!tion 7H +rti!le MT Wit,dra5a' &) P3b'i( Pr&*erty )r&1 P3b'i( U+e 9!##6: No' 8: MO.H a !orporation or,ani=e& un&er the laws of @on,Don,H with 100N forei,n e?uit"H o:taine& fro the Se!urities an& /0!han,e Co ission a li!ense to operate a prawn hat!her" pro;e!t on a pie!e of lan& lease& fro the Cit" of -a,upan' 3he lan& was for erl" a parD an& pla=a :elon,in, to the Cit" an& was !on%erte& :" the Cit" to &eri%e u!h nee&e& fun&s' (1) 8a" the Cit" of -a,upan lawfull" !on%ert the parD to prawn pon&s an& lease the sa eL /0plain "our answer'
(2) 8a" the Cit" of -a,upan an& MO. !orporation %ali&l" enter into the lease !ontra!t for the prawn pon&sL +nswer with reasons'

(#) 3he !ontra!t ust !onfor with the for al re?uisites of written !ontra!ts pres!ri:e& :" law'
(2) Pursuant to Se!tion 20)8 of the 1e%ise& +& inistrati%e Co&eH if a pro%in!e is a part" to a !ontra!t !on%e"in, title to real propert"H the !ontra!t ust :e appro%e& :" the Presi&ent' <n&er Se!tion 219) of the 1e%ise& +& inistrati%e Co&eH if a uni!ipalit" is a part" to a !ontra!t !on%e"in, real propert" or an" 5nterest in it or !reatin, a lien upon itH the !ontra!t ust :e appro%e& :" the pro%in!ial ,o%ernor'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
(1) OesH the Cit" of -a,upan a" lawfull" !on%ert the parD into prawn pon&s an& lease the ' + !it" a" !lose a parD an& pla=a an& on!e the propert" has :een with&rawn fro pu:li! useH it falls within the !o er!e of an an& a" :e lease&' Se!tion 10 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e pro%i&es: C+ lo!al ,o%ern ent unit a" liDewiseH throu,h its hea& a!tin, pursuant to a resolution of its san,,unian an& in a!!or&an!e with e0istin, law an& the pro%isions of this Co&eH !lose an" :aran,a"H uni!ipalH !it" or pro%in!ial roa&H streetH alle" parD or s?uare' No su!h wa" or pla!e or an" part thereof

Ta2ati&n8 GOCC Liabi'ity &r Rea' E+tate Ta2 9!###: No E5 * C' 3he Pro%in!e of M re?uire& the National -e%elop ent Co pan" to pa" real estate ta0es on the lan& :ein, o!!upie& :" N-C an& the latter ar,ue& that sin!e it is a ,o%ern ent*owne& !orporationH its properties are e0e pt fro real estate ta0es' 5f "ou were the >u&,eH how woul& "ou &e!i&e the !aseL 1eason out' (2N) SUGGESTED ANSWER:
5n National -e%elop ent Co pan" %' Ce:u Cit"H 212 SC1+ 382H the Supre e Court hel& that the National -e%elop ent Co pan" was

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-"

shall :e !lose& without in&e nif"in, an" person pre;u&i!e& there:"' + propert" thus with&rawn fro pu:li! use a" :e use& or !on%e"e& for an" purpose for whi!h other real propert" :elon,in, to the lo!al unit !on!erne& i,ht :e lawfull" use& or !on%e"e&'C 5n Fa%is %' Cit" 9a,uioH 27 SC1+ 10)0H it was hel& that the Cit" of 9a,uio !oul& !lose a street an& lease it sin!e it ha& :e!o e patri onial propert"' 7iDewiseH in Ce:u A0",en an& +!et"lene Co pan"H 5n!' a 9er!elesH )) SC1+ #81H it was hel& that the Cit" of Ce:u !oul& !lose a street an& sell it thereafter' (2) Sin!e the Cit" of -a,upan has the power to !on%ert the parD into prawn pon&s it !an also lease it to MO. e%en thou,h MO. is a 100N* forei,n !orporation' 3he operation of a prawn hat!her" &oes not in%ol%e e0ploitation of natural resour!es within the eanin, of Se!tions 2 an& 3H +rti!le M55 of the 1987 Constitution' (Se!retar" of >usti!eH Ap' No' 3H s' 1988) Sin!e the portion of the parD ha& :een with&rawn fro pu:li! useH it !oul& :e &ispose& for an" lawful purpose in!lu&in, leasin, it to a forei,n !orporation'

+l!antara !annot reassu e offi!e as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an' +s hel& in San,,unian, 9a"an of San +n&res %' Court of +ppealsH 28# SC1+ 27) (1998)H +l!antara shoul& :e &ee e& to ha%e a:an&one& his position as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an' @is intention to a:an&on his position is shown :" his failure to perfor his fun!tion as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"anH his failure to !olle!t the salar" for the positionH his failure to o:;e!t to the appoint ent of his repla!e entH an& his failure to initiate an" a!t to reassu e his post after the reor,ani=ation of the San,,unian, 9a"an was %oi&e&' +l!antara effe!te& his intention :" his letter of resi,nationH his assu ption of offi!e as e :er of the San,,unian, Panlalawi,anH his &is!har,e of his &uties as its e :erH an& his re!eipt of the salar" for su!h post' +l!antara !annot :e &ee e& to ha%e lost his offi!e as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an :" resi,nation' <n&er Se!tion 82 of the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&eH the resi,nation shoul& :e su: itte& to the San,,unian, 9a"an' @e su: itte& it to the 8a"or instea&H an& the resi,nation was not a!!epte&'

ARTICLE XI A((&3ntabi'ity &) P3b'i( O))i(er+


Aband&n1ent &) O))i(e 9"666:
No E55' +l!antara was ele!te& :aran,a" !hair an an& later presi&ent of the +sso!iation of 9aran,a" Coun!ils in his uni!ipalit"' 5n that !apa!it"H he was appointe& :" the Presi&ent as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an of his uni!ipalit"' 7aterH the Se!retar" of 5nterior an& 7o!al $o%ern ents appointe& +l!antara as e :er of the San,,unlan, Panlalawi,an of their pro%in!e to eet a reor,ani=ational !ontin,en!"H an& 8en&o=a tooD his pla!e in the San,,unian, 9a"an' +l!antara then wrote a letter of resi,nation fro the San,,unian, 9a"an a&&resse& to the 8a"or of the uni!ipalit"H !ease& fun!tionin, as e :er thereof an& assu e& offi!e an& perfor e& his fun!tions as e :er of the San,,unlan, Panlalawi,an' 7aterH the reor,ani=ation of the San,,unian, Panlalawi,an an& the appoint ent of 8en&o=a were %oi&e&' Can +l!antara reassu e offi!e as e :er of the San,,unian, 9a"an or has he lost it :e!ause of resi,nationL a:an&on entL /0plain' (2N)

Di+(i*'ine8 C'e1en(y8 C&nd&nati&n 9"666:

D&(trine

&)

No E5' + pro%in!ial ,o%ernor &ul" ele!te& to offi!e was !har,e& with &islo"alt" an& suspen&e& fro offi!e pen&in, the out!o e of the for al in%esti,ation of the !har,es a,ainst hi ' 3he Se!retar" of 5nterior an& 7o!al $o%ern ents foun& hi ,uilt" as !har,e& an& re o%e& hi fro offi!e' @e file& a petition :efore the Supre e Court ?uestionin, his re o%al' 6hile the !ase was pen&in, :efore the Supre e CourtH he file& his !ertifi!ate of !an&i&a!" for the position of $o%ernor an& wonH an& was pro!lai e& $o%ernor' @e !lai s his reele!tion to the position of $o%ernor has ren&ere& the pen&in, a& inistrati%e !ase a,ainst hi oot an& a!a&e i!' 5s he !orre!tL /0plain' (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:

SUGGESTED ANSWER: OesH the re*ele!tion of the ,o%ernor has ren&ere& the pen&in, a& inistrati%e !ase a,ainst hi oot' +s e0plaine& in +,uinal&o %' SantosH 212 SC1+ 7)8 (1992)H a lo!al ele!ti%e offi!ial !annot :e re o%e& fro offi!e for is!on&u!t !o itte& &urin, his pre%ious ter H :e!ause ea!h ter is separate an& the people :" re*ele!tin, hi are &ee e& to ha%e for,i%en his is!on&u!t'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!--

Di+(i*'ine8 E))e(t &) Pard&n Granted in a0&r &) P3b'i( O))i(er+ 9!###:
N& 5E * C' + Cit" +ssistant 3reasurer was !on%i!te& of /stafa throu,h falsifi!ation of pu:li! &o!u ent' 6hile ser%in, senten!eH he was ,rante& a:solute par&on :" the Presi&ent' 1' +ssu in, that the position of +ssistant Cit" 3reasurer has re aine& %a!antH woul& he :e entitle& to a reinstate ent without the nee& of a new appoint entL /0plain' (2N)

:) Can he !lai salar" for the perio& that his !ase was pen&in, appealL 6h"L (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;
a) +lfonso 9eit !annot !lai an" salar" for the perio& of his pre%enti%e suspension &urin, the pen&en!" of the in%esti,ation' +s hel& in $loria %s' Court of +ppealsH 30) SC1+ 287 (1997)H un&er Se!tion

2' 5f later the sa e position :e!o es %a!antH !oul& he reappl" an& :e reappointe&L /0plain' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: C' 1') +s hel& in 8onsanto %' Fa!toranH
(!) SC1+ 190H par&on erel" frees the in&i%i&ual fro all the penalties an& le,al &isa:ilities i pose& upon hi :e!ause of his !on%i!tion' 5t &oes not restore hi to the pu:li! offi!e relin?uishe& :" reason of the !on%i!tion'

22 of the Ci%il Ser%i!e 7awH the pro%ision for pa" ent of salaries &urin, the perio& of pre%enti%e suspension &urin, the pen&en!" of the in%esti,ation has :een &elete&' 3he pre%enti%e suspension was not a penalt"' 5ts i position was lawfulH sin!e it was authori=e& :" law'
:) 5f the penalt" was o&ifie& :e!ause +lfonso 9eit was e0onerate& of the !har,e that was the :asis for the &e!ision or&erin, his &is issalH he is entitle& to :a!D wa,esH otherwiseH this woul& :e tanta ount to punishin, hi after e0oneration fro the !har,e whi!h !ause& his &is issal' P$loria %s' Court of +ppealsH 3A) SC1+ 287 (1997)Q' 5f he was repri an&e& for the sa e !har,e whi!h was the :asis of the &e!ision or&erin, his &is issalH +lfonso 9elt is not entitle& to :a!D wa,esH :e!ause he was foun& ,uilt"H an& the penalt" was erel" !o ute&' (-ela Cru= %s' Court of +ppealsH 302 SC1+ 303 (1998)Q'

F51S3 +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: 2') 3he +ssistant Cit" 3reasurer !an reappl" an& :e appointe& to the positionH sin!e the par&on re o%e& the &is?ualifi!ation to hol& pu:li! offi!e' S/CAN- +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: 2') 3he +ssistant Cit" 3reasurer !annot reappl" an& :e appointe& to the positionH <n&er +rti!le 3) of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&eH a par&on &oes not restore the ri,ht to hol& pu:li! offi!e unless su!h ri,ht :e e0pressl" restore& :" the par&on; Di+(i*'ine8 Pre0enti0e B A**ea'8 entit'e1ent *endente 9"66!: S3+*en+i&n t& +a'ary

Di+(i*'ine8 Pre0enti0e S3+*en+i&n 9!##6:


N&' ): 5n 198)H FH then the offi!er*in*!har,e of 9otolanH .a :alesH was a!!use& of ha%in, %iolate& the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t :efore the San&i,an:a"an' 9efore he !oul& :e arrain,e&H he was ele!te& $o%ernor of .a :alesH +fter his arrai,n entH he was put un&er pre%enti%e suspension :" the San&i,an:a"an Cfor the &uration of the trialC'

N& ME * +lfonso 9eitH a suppl" offi!er in the -epart ent of S!ien!e an& 3e!hnolo," (-AS3)H was !har,e& a& inistrati%el"' Pen&in, in%esti,ationH he was pre%enti%el" suspen&e& for 90 &a"s' 3he -AS3 Se!retar" foun& hi ,uilt" an& ete& hi the penalt" of re o%al fro offi!e' @e appeale& to the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission (CSC)' 5n the eanti eH the &e!ision was e0e!ute& pen&in, appeal' 3he CSC ren&ere& a &e!ision whi!h o&ifie& the appeale& &e!ision :" i posin, onl" a penalt" of repri an&H an& whi!h &e!ision :e!a e final'

3' Can F su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of his pre%enti%e suspension on the ,roun& that the !ri inal !ase a,ainst hi in%ol%e& a!ts !o itte& &urin, his ter as offi!er*in*!har,e an& not &urin, his ter as $o%ernorL #' Can F %ali&l" o:;e!t to the aforestate& &uration of his suspensionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
(1) NoH F !annot su!!essfull" !hallen,e the le,alit" of his pre%enti%e suspension on the ,roun& that the !ri inal !ase a,ainst hi in%ol%e a!ts !o itte& &urin, his ter as A5C an& not &urin, his ter as ,o%ernor :e!ause

a) Can +lfonso 9elt !lai salar" for the perio& that his !ase was pen&in, in%esti,ationL 6h"L (3N)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-;

suspension fro offi!e un&er 1epu:li! +!t 3019 refers to an" offi!e that the respon&ent is presentl" hol&in, an& not ne!essaril" to the one whi!h he hol& when he !o itte& the !ri e with whi!h he is !har,e&' 3his was the rulin, in -eloso %' San&i,an:a"an 173 SC1+ #09' (2) OesH F !an %ali&l" o:;e!t to the &uration of the suspension' 5n -eloso u' San&i,an:a"anH 173 SC1+ #09H it was hel& that the i position of pre%enti%e suspension for an in&efinite perio& of ti e is unreasona:le an& %iolates the ri,ht of the a!!use& to &ue pro!ess' 3he people who ele!te& the ,o%ernor to offi!e woul& :e &epri%e& of his ser%i!es for an in&efinite perio&H an& his ri,ht to hol& offi!e woul& :e nullifie&' 8oreo%erH sin!e un&er Se!tion #2 of the Ci%il Ser%i!e -e!ree the &uration of pre%enti%e suspension shoul& :e li ite& to ninet" (90) &a"sH e?ual prote!tion &e an&s that the &uration of pre%enti%e suspension un&er the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t he also li ite& to ninet" (90) &a"s'

Se!tion 13 of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!tH whi!h is not a penalt" :ut a pre%enti%e easure' Sin!e Se!tion 13 of the +nti*$raft an& Corruption Pra!ti!es +!t &oes not state that the pu:li! offi!er ust :e suspen&e& onl" in the offi!e where he is alle,e& to ha%e !o itte& the a!ts whi!h he has :een !har,e&H it applies to an" offi!e whi!h he a" :e hol&in,' E'e(ti0e A**&inti0e O))i(ia'+: and di+(i*'inary a3t,&rity 9"66;: "66; 9-<b: C3-H a Co issioner of the
National 7a:or 1elations Co ission (N71C)H sports a No' 10 !ar plate' + &is,runtle& liti,ant file& a !o plaint a,ainst hi for %iolation of the +nti* $raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t :efore the A :u&s an' C3- now seeDs to en;oin the A :u&s an in a petition for prohi:itionH alle,in, that he !oul& :e in%esti,ate& onl" :" the Supre e Court un&er its power of super%ision ,rante& in the Constitution' @e !onten&s that un&er the law !reatin, the N71CH he has the ranD of a >usti!e of the Court of +ppealsH an& entitle& to the !orrespon&in, pri%ile,es' @en!eH the A89 has no ;uris&i!tion o%er the !o plaint a,ainst hi '

Di+(i*'ine8 Pre0enti0e S3+*en+i&n 9"66":


N& 55' Si eon Ealera was for erl" a Pro%in!ial $o%ernor who ran an& won as a 8e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es for the Se!on& Con,ressional -istri!t of lloilo' For %iolation of Se!tion 3 of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t (1'+' No'3019)H as a en&e&H alle,e&l" !o itte& when he was still a Pro%in!ial $o%ernorH a !ri inal !o plaint was file& a,ainst hi :efore the Affi!e of the A :u&s an for whi!hH upon a fin&in, of pro:a:le !auseH a !ri inal !ase was file& with the San&i,an:a"an' -urin, the !ourse of trialH the San&i,an:a"an issue& an or&er of pre%enti%e suspension for 90 &a"s a,ainst hi ' 1epresentati%e Ealera ?uestione& the %ali&it" of the San&i,an:a"an or&er on the ,roun& thatH un&er +rti!le E5 H Se!tion 1)(3) of the ConstitutionH he !an :e suspen&e& onl" :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es an& that the !ri inal !ase a,ainst hi &i& not arise fro his a!tuations as a e :er of the @ouse of 1epresentati%es'

Shoul& C3-Bs petition :e ,rante& or &is isse&L 1eason :riefl"' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he petition of C3- shoul& :e &is isse&' Se!tion 21 of the A :u&s an +!t %ests the Affi!e of the A :u&s an with &is!iplinar" authorit" o%er all ele!ti%e an& appointi%e offi!ials of the ,o%ern entH e0!ept offi!ials who a" :e re o%e& onl" :" i pea!h entH 8e :ers of Con,ressH an& the >u&i!iar"' 6hile C3- has the ranD of a >usti!e of the Court of +ppealsH he &oes not :elon, to the >u&i!iar" :ut to the /0e!uti%e -epart ent' 3his si pl" eans that he has the sa e !o pensation an& pri%ile,es as a >usti!e of the Court of +ppeals' 5f the Supre e Court were to in%esti,ate C3-H it woul& :e perfor in, a non*;u&i!ial fun!tion' 3his will %iolate the prin!iple of separation of powers' (No:le;as %' 3eehanDeeH 23 SC1+ #02 P19)8Q)

5s 1epresentati%e EaleraBs !ontention !orre!tL 6h"L (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:


3he !ontention of 1epresentati%e Ealera is not !orre!t +s hel& in Santia,o %' San&i,an:a"anH 32) SC1+ )3)H the suspension !onte plate& in +rti!le E5H Se!tion 1)(3) of the Constitution is a punish ent that is i pose& :" the Senate or @ouse of 1epresentati%es upon an errin, e :erH it is &istin!t fro the suspension un&er

E'e(ti0e P3b'i( O))i(er8 De O))i(er 9"666:

a(t&

N& ME5' 5n the ele!tions of 8a" 1992H Cru= an& Santos were the !an&i&ates for the offi!e of 8uni!ipal 8a"orH the ter of whi!h was to e0pire on >une 30H 1992' Fin&in, that he won :" a ar,in of 20 %otesH the 8uni!ipal 9oar& of Can%assers pro!lai e& Cru= as the &ul" ele!te& 8a"or' Santos file& an ele!tion protest

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-@

:efore the 1e,ional 3rial Court (13C) whi!h &e!i&e& that it was Santos who ha& the pluralit" of 30 %otes an& pro!lai e& hi the winner' An otion a&eH the 13C ,rante& e0e!ution pen&in, the appeal of Cru= to the CA8/7/C (Co ele!) an& on this :asis' Santos assu e& offi!e an& ser%e& as 8uni!ipal 8a"or' 5n ti eH the Co ele! re%erse& the rulin, of the 13C an& instea& rule& that Cru= won :" a ar,in of #0 %otes an& pro!lai e& hi the &ul" ele!te& 8uni!ipal 8a"or' &) 5t is now :e"on& >une 30H 1992' Can Cru= still hol& offi!e for the portion of the ter he has faile& to ser%eL 6h"L (3N)

9' +E/ !annot !olle!t salaries an& allowan!es fro the ,o%ern ent for the first two "ears of his ter H :e!ause in the eanwhile 9+13 !olle!te& the salaries an& allowan!es' 9+13 was a &e fa!to offi!er while he was in possession of the offi!e' 3o allow +E/ to !olle!t the salaries an& allowan!es will result in aDin, the ,o%ern ent pa" a se!on& ti e' (8e!he H + 3reatise on the 7aw of Pu:li! Affi!es an& Pu:li! Affi!ersH P1890Q pp' 222*223') 9+13 is not re?uire& to refun& to the ,o%ern ent the salaries an& allowan!es he re!ei%e&' +s a &e fa!to offi!erH he is entitle& to the salaries an& allowan!es :e!ause he ren&ere& ser%i!es &urin, his in!u :en!"' (1o&ri,ue= %' 3anH 91 Phil' 72# 119220' 3he :ills whi!h 9+13 alone authore& an& were appro%e& :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es are %ali& :e!ause he was a &e fa!to offi!er &urin, his in!u :en!"' 3he a!ts of a &e fa!to offi!er are %ali& insofar as the pu:li! is !on!erne&' (People %' $ar!iaH 313 SC1+ 279 P19990'

e) 6as Santos a usurper an& shoul& he pa" :a!D what he has re!ei%e& while hol&in, the offi!e as 8uni!ipal 8a"orL 6h"L (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1; &) Cru= !an no lon,er hol& offi!e for the portion of the ter he faile& to ser%e sin!e his ter has e0pire&' e) Santos was not a usurper' @e was a &e fa!to offi!erH sin!e he ha& a !olor of ele!tion to the offi!e of 8uni!ipal 8a"or :" %irtue of the &e!ision in the ele!tion protest' @en!eH he is entitle& to the e olu ents of the offi!e' E'e(ti0e P3b'i( O))i(er+8 De e))e(t+ 9"66;: a(t& O))i(er8

X<9' +E/ ran for Con,ress an of (< pro%in!e' @owe%erH his opponentH 9+13H was the one pro!lai e& an& seate& as the winner of the ele!tion :" the CA8/7/C' +E/ file& seasona:l" a protest :efore @1/3 (@ouse of 1epresentati%es /le!toral 3ri:unal)' +fter two "earsH @1/3 re%erse& the CA8/7/CFs &e!ision an& +E/ was pro!lai e& finall" as the &ul" ele!te& Con,ress an' 3husH he ha& onl" one "ear to ser%e in Con,ress'

Gra)t and C&rr3*ti&n8 Pre+(ri*ti&n &) Cri1e 9"66": N& M55' Suppose a pu:li! offi!er has !o itte& a %iolation of Se!tion 3 (:) an& (!) of the +nti* $raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t U1+ NoH 3019)H as a en&e&H :" re!ei%in, onetar" an& other aterial !onsi&erations for !ontra!ts entere& into :" hi in :ehalf of the ,o%ern ent an& in !onne!tion with other transa!tionsH as a result of whi!h he has a asse& ille,all" a!?uire& wealth' 2' -oes the !ri inal offense itte& pres!ri:eL (2N) 3' -oes the ri,ht of the ,o%ern ent to re!o%er the ille,all" a!?uire& wealth pres!ri:eL (3N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: !o 3' + %iolation of Se!tion 3(:) an& (!) of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t pres!ri:es' +s hel& in Presi&ential +&*@o! Fa!t* Fin&in, Co ittee on 9ehest 7oans %' -esiertoH 317 SC1+ 272 (1999)H +rti!le M5H Se!tion 12 of the Constitution &oes not appl" to !ri inal !ases for %iolation of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t
#' +rti!le M5H Se!tion 12 of the Constitution pro%i&es that the ri,ht of the State to re!o%er properties unlawfull" a!?uire& :" pu:li! offi!ials or e plo"eesH or fro the or fro their

Can +E/ !olle!t salaries an& allowan!es fro the ,o%ern ent for the first two "ears of his ter as Con,ress anL Shoul& 9+13 refun& to the ,o%ern ent the salaries an& allowan!es he ha& re!ei%e& as Con,ress anL 6hat will happen to the :ills that 9+13 alone authore& an& were appro%e& :" the @ouse of 1epresentati%es while he was seate& as Con,ress anL 1eason an& e0plain :riefl"' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-?

no inees or transfereesH shall not :e :arre& :" pres!ription' I1*ea(,1ent8 Cr&nyi+1 9"666:
N& 55' 5s !ron"is a le,al ,roun& for the i pea!h ent of the Presi&entL /0plain' (2N)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 1' 5 pea!h ent is a etho& :" whi!h persons positions of hol&in, ,o%ern ent hi,h an& &i,nit" an& with authorit"H presti,eH &efinite tenure a" :e re o%e& fro offi!e for !auses !losel" relate& to their !on&u!t as pu:li! offi!ialsH (E'$' S5NCAH P@575PP5N/ PA7535C+7 7+6 373 (llth e&' 19)2))'
3he ,roun&s for i pea!h ent are !ulpa:le %iolation of the ConstitutionH treasonH :ri:er"H ,raft an& !orruptionH other hi,h !ri es an& :etra"al of pu:li! trust' (+rt' M5H se!' 2)'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
OesH !ron"is is a le,al ,roun& for the i pea!h ent of the Presi&ent' <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le M5 of the ConstitutionH :etra"al of pu:li! trust is one of the ,roun&s for 5 pea!h ent' 3his refers to %iolation of the oath of offi!e an& in!lu&es !ron"is whi!h in%ol%es un&ul" fa%orin, a !ron" to the pre;u&i!e of pu:li! interestH (1e!or& of the Constitutional Co issionH Eol' 55H p' 272)

3he offi!ials re o%a:le :" i pea!h ent are the Presi&entH Ei!e Presi&entH the 8e :ers of the Supre e CourtH 8e :ers of the Constitutional Co issions an& the A :u&s an' (5&')
2' P- No' 1)0)H se!' 1H in so far as it pro%i&es for the re o%al of the e :ers of the San&i,an:a"an onl" :" i pea!h ent ust :e &ee e& to ha%e :een ren&ere& inoperati%e :" the new Constitution whi!h pro%i&es that with the e0!eption of the offi!ials there entione&H C+ll other pu:li! offi!ers an& e plo"ees a" :e re o%e& fro offi!e as pro%i&e& :" lawH :ut not :" i pea!h ent'C 8oreo%erH un&er +rt' E555H se!H 11H the power to re o%e lower !ourt ;u&,es is %este& in the Supre e Court en :an! whi!hH :" the %ote of a a;orit" of the e :ers who a!tuall" taDe part in the &eli:eration on the issues in the !ase an& %ote thereonH !an &is iss lower !ourt ;u&,es'

I1*ea(,1ent8 Gr&3nd+ 9!###: N& ME * 6hat are the for i pea!h ent' /0plain' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le M5 of the ConstitutionH the ,roun&s for i pea!h ent are (3) Culpa:le %iolation of the Constitution * eans intentional %iolation of the Constitution an& not %iolations !o itte& in ,oo& faith' (#) 3reason * the sa e eanin, as in the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e (2) 9ri:er" * the sa e eanin, as in the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e ()) $raft an& Corruption * refers to prohi:ite& a!ts enu erate& in the +nti* $raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t' (7) other @i,h Cri es * refer to offenses that striDe at the %er" life or or&erl" worDin, of the ,o%ern ent' (8) an& 9etra"al of Pu:li! 3rust * refers to an" %iolation of the oath of offi!e' (Cru=H Philippine Politi!al 7awH 1998 e&'H pp' 33)*337; 9ernasH 3he 1987 Constitution of the Philippines: + Co entar"H 199) e&'H pp' 991*992) I1*ea(,1ent8 Nat3re8 Gr&3nd+8 PD !?6? 9!#$$: N&' 1#: 1' 6hat is i pea!h entH what are the ,roun&s thereforH an& who are the hi,h offi!ials re o%a:le there:"L
2' Presi&ential -e!ree No' 1)0) pro%i&es that >usti!es of the San&i,an:a"an a" :e re o%e& onl" :" i pea!h ent' 5s this Presi&ential -e!ree still %ali&L 6h"L

,roun&s

La5 &) P3b'i( O))i(er+8 Ne2t<in<RanI R3'e 9!##;:


N&' 12 Pe&ro Cru=H 9a,uioH retire&' 3o fill Cit" 8a"or appointe& en,ineer who for erl" ha& :een assi,ne& to for the past fi%e "ears' the Cit" /n,ineer of the %a!ant positionH the >ose 1e"esH a !i%il worDe& un&er Cru= :ut the Affi!e of the 8a"or

Ei!ente /stra&aH the +ssistant Cit" /n,ineer file& a protest with the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission !lai in, that :ein, the offi!er ne0t in ranD he shoul& ha%e :een appointe& as Cit" /n,ineer' 1) 6ho has a :etter ri,ht to :e appointe& to the !onteste& positionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1) possesses An the assu ption that >ose 1e"es the ini u ?ualifi!ation

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-%

re?uire ents pres!ri:e& :" law for the positionH the appoint ent e0ten&e& to hi is %ali&' Conse?uentl"H he has a :etter ri,ht than Ei!ente /stra&a'
3he !lai of /stra&a that :ein, the offi!er ne0t in ranD he shoul& ha%e :een appointe& as Cit" /n,ineer is not eritorious' 5t is a settle& rule that the appointin, authorit" is not li ite& to pro otion in fillin, up %a!an!ies :ut a" !hoose to fill the :" the appoint ent of persons with !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:ilit" appropriate to the position' /%en if a %a!an!" were to :e fille& :" pro otionH the !on!ept of Cne0t in ranDC &oes not i port an" an&ator" re?uire ent that the person ne0t in ranD ust :e appointe& to the %a!an!"' 6hat the !i%il ser%i!e law pro%i&es is that if a %a!an!" is fille& :" pro otionH the person hol&in, the position ne0t in ranD thereto Cshall :e !onsi&ere& for pro otion'C /spanol %' Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission 20) SC1+ 712H

(1) NoH M !annot re!o%er &a a,es fro the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs' 3he Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs or&ere& the &e olition of the fishpon& in the perfor an!e of his offi!ial &uties' @e &i& not a!t in :a& faith or with ,ross ne,li,en!e' @e issue& the or&er onl" after &ue in%esti,ation' 5n 8a:utol %' Pas!ualH 12# SC1+ 87)H it was hel& that the e :ers of the +& @o! Co ittee !reate& to i ple ent Presi&ential -e!ree No' 29) an& 7etter of 5nstru!tion NoH 19H whi!h or&ere& the &e olition of stru!tures o:stru!tin, pu:li! waterwa"sH !oul&B not :e sue& for &a a,es althou,h the" or&ere& the &e olition of a :uil&in, that en!roa!he& upon a !reeDH :e!ause the pu:li! offi!ers !on!erne& &i& not a!t in :a& faith'

(2) NoH the li:el suit will not prosper' 3he report su: itte& :" the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs to the Presi&ent !onstitutes pri%ile,e& !o uni!ationH as it was sent in the perfor an!e of offi!ial &ut"' +rti!le 32# of the 1e%ise& Penal Co&e pro%i&es; C/%er" &efa ator" i putation is presu e& to :e ali!iousH e%en if it :e trueH if no ,oo& intention an& ;ustifia:le oti%e for aDin, it is shownH e0!ept in the followin, !ases: 1' + pri%ate !o uni!ation a&e :" an" person to another in the perfor an!e of an" le,alH oral or so!ial &ut";C 5n -eano %' $o&ine=H 12 SC1+ #83H it was hel& that a report sent :" a pu:li! offi!ial to his superior is pri%ile,e& !o uni!ationH :e!ause its su: ission is pursuant to the perfor an!e of a le,al &ut"'
9esi&esH in sen&in, his reportH the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs a!te& in the &is!har,e of his offi!ial &uties' @en!eH he was a!tin, in :ehalf of the 1epu:li! of the Philippines an& within the s!ope of his authorit" +!!or&in, to the rulin, in San&ers %' Eeri&ianoH 1)2 SC1+ 88H a suit :rou,ht a,ainst a pu:li! offi!ial for writin, a letter whi!h is alle,e& to :e li:elous :ut whi!h was written while he was a!tin, as a,ent of the ,o%ern ent an& within the s!ope of his authorit" is a!tuall" a suit a,ainst the State without its !onsent'

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1;
Neither >ose 1e"es nor Ei!ente /stra&a has a :etter ri,ht to :e appointe& Cit" /n,ineer' +s hel& in 9arro=o %s' Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH 198 SC1+ #87H the appointin, authorit" is not re?uire& to appoint the one ne0t*in*ranD to fill a %a!an!"' @e is allowe& to fill it also :" the transfer of an e plo"ee who possesses !i%il ser%i!e eli,i:ilit"'

Liabi'ity &r Da1age+ in Per)&r1an(e &) O))i(ia' 3n(ti&n+ 9!##6: N&' 10: 3he Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDsH after an in%esti,ationH or&ere& the &e olition of the fishpon& of M as a nuisan!e per se on the ,roun& that it en!roa!he& on na%i,a:le ri%ers an& i pe&e& the use of the ri%ers' 3he Se!retar" su: itte& to the Presi&ent of the Philippines a report of sai& in%esti,ationH whi!h report !ontaine& !learl" li:elous atters a&%ersel" affe!tin, the reputation of MH a well* Dnown !i%i! an& reli,ious lea&er in the !o unit"' 3he Supre e Court later foun& that the ri%ers were an* a&e an& were !onstru!te& on pri%ate propert" owne& :" M' 3' 8a" M re!o%er &a a,es fro the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs for the !ost in%ol%e& in re:uil&in, the fishpon&s an& for lost profitsL State "our reason' #' Suppose M files a li:el suit a,ainst the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs' 6ill the sai& li:el suit prosperL /0plain "our answer' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
3he ?uestion &oes not spe!if" how the li:el was !o itte&' 5f the li:elous state ent was not rele%ant to the report on the alle,e& ille,al en!roa!h ent of the ri%erH the fa!t that it was a&e in the !ourse of an offi!ial report &oes not

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-$

i uni=e the Se!retar" of Pu:li! 6orDs fro lia:ilit" for li:el' L&(a' E'e(ti0e O))i(ia'+8 Li1itati&n+ On Additi&na' D3tie+ 9!##@:
N&' 10: + Cit" 8a"or in 8etro 8anila was &esi,nate& as 8e :er of the 7o!al + nest" 9oar& (7+9) as allowe& un&er the 1ules an& 1e,ulations 5 ple entin, + nest" Pro!la ation Nos' 3#7 an& 3#8' as a en&e& :" Pro!la ation No' 377' 3he 7+9 is entruste& with the fun!tions of re!ei%in, an& pro!essin, appli!ations for a nest" an& re!o en&in, to the National + nest" Co ission appro%al or &enial of the appli!ations' 3he ter of the Co ission an&H ne!essaril"H the 7o!al + nest" 9oar&s un&er it e0pires upon the !o pletion of its assi,ne& tasDs as a" :e &eter ine& :" the Presi&ent' 8a" the Cit" 8a"or a!!ept his &esi,nation without forfeitin, his ele!ti%e position in the li,ht of the pro%ision of Se!' 7H 1st par' +rt' 5M*9 of the 1987 Constitution whi!h pertinentl" states that CPNQo ele!ti%e offi!ial shall :e eli,i:le for appoint ent or &esi,nation in an" !apa!it" to an" pu:li! offi!e or position &urin, his tenureLC -is!uss full"H

O1b3d+1an: P&5er t& S3+*end8 Pre0enti0e S3+*en+i&n 9"66;:


9?: -ire!tor 6A6 faile& the lifest"le !he!D !on&u!te& :" the A :u&s anBs Affi!e :e!ause 6A6s assets were ,rossl" &isproportionate to his salar" an& allowan!es' 8oreo%erH so e assets were not in!lu&e& in his State ent of +ssets an& 7ia:ilities' @e was !har,e& of ,raft an& !orrupt pra!ti!es an& pen&in, the !o pletion of in%esti,ationsH he was suspen&e& fro offi!e for si0 onths' (3) +,,rie%e&H 6A6 petitione& the Court of +ppeals to annul the pre%enti%e suspension or&er on the ,roun& that the A :u&s an !oul& onl" re!o en& :ut not i pose the suspension' 8oreo%erH a!!or&in, to 6A6H the suspension was i pose& without an" noti!e or hearin,H in %iolation of &ue pro!ess' 5s the petitionerBs !ontention eritoriousL -is!uss :riefl"' (2N)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he !ontention of -ire!tor 6A6 is not eritorious' 3he suspension ete& out to hi is pre%enti%e an& not puniti%e' Se!tion 2# of 1epu:li! +!t No' )770 ,rants the A :u&s an the power to i pose pre%enti%e suspension up to si0 onths' Pre%enti%e suspension a":e i pose& without an" noti!e or hearin,' 5t is erel" a preli inar" step in an a& inistrati%e in%esti,ation an& is not the final &eter ination of the ,uilt of the offi!er !on!erne&' ($ar!ia %' 8o;i!aH 31# SC1+ 207 P1999Q)' 3' For his partH the A :u&s an o%e& to &is iss 6A6s petition' +!!or&in, to the A :u&s an the e%i&en!e of ,uilt of 6A6 is stron,H an& petitioner faile& to e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies' 6A6 a& itte& he file& no otion for re!onsi&erationH :ut onl" :e!ause the or&er suspen&in, hi was i e&iatel" e0e!utor"' Shoul& the otion to &is iss :e ,rante& or notL -is!uss :riefl"' (2N)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
NoH the Cit" 8a"or a" not a!!ept his &esi,nation without forfeitin, his ele!ti%e positions' +s state& in Flores %s' -rilon 223 SC1+ 2)8H it is the intention of Se!tion 7H +rti!le M*9 of the 1987 Constitution that lo!al ele!ti%e offi!ials shoul& &e%ote their full ti e to their !onstituents' 6hile se!on& para,raph of Se!tion 7H +rti!le 5M*9 of the 1987 Constitution allows appointi%e offi!ials to hol& other offi!es when allowe& :" law or :" the pri ar" fun!tions of their positionsH no su!h e0!eption is a&e in the first para,raphH whi!h &eals with ele!ti%e offi!ials' 5t is the 5ntention of the 1987 Constitution to :e ore strin,ent with ele!ti%e lo!al offi!ials'

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
OesH he a" a!!ept su!h &esi,nation without forfeitin, his a"orship' 3he Constitutional pro%ision :ein, !ite& !onte plates a Cpu:li! offi!e or positionC' 5t is :elie%e& that the 7o!al + nest" 9oar& is not su!h an offi!e sin!e it is erel" an a& ho! :o&"' 9esi&esH it is :elie%e& that its fun!tions are not Cso%erei,nC in !hara!ter whi!h is one of the ele ents of a pu:li! offi!e'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
9' 3he otion to &is iss shoul& :e &enie&' Sin!e the suspension of -ire!tor 6A6 was i e&iatel" e0e!utor"H he woul& ha%e suffere& irrepara:le in;ur" ha& he trie& to e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies :efore filin, a petition in !ourt (<ni%ersit" of the Philippines 9oar& of 1e,ents %' 1asulH 200 SC1+ )82 P19910* 9esi&esH the ?uestion in%ol%e& is purel" le,al' (+=ar!on %' 9una,anH 399 SC1+ 3)2 P2003Q)'

O1b3d+1an8 P&5er t& In0e+tigate 9"66-:


BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!-#

N& 55 + ,roup of losin, liti,ants in a !ase &e!i&e& :" the Supre e Court file& a !o plaint :efore the A :u&s an !har,in, the >usti!es with Dnowin,l" an& &eli:eratel" ren&erin, an un;ust &e!ision in utter %iolation of the penal laws of the lan&' Can the A :u&s an %ali&l" taDe !o,ni=an!e of the !aseL /0plain'

his authorit"' Con,ress inten&e& to e power the A :u&s an to suspen& all offi!ersH e%en if the" are e plo"e& in other offi!es in the $o%ern ent' 3he wor&s Csu:or&inateC an& Cin his :ureauC &o not appear in the ,rant of su!h power to the A :u&s an'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
NoH the A :u&s an !annot entertain the !o plaint' +s state& in the !ase of 5n re: 7aureta' 1#8 SC1+ 382 P1987QH pursuant to the prin!iple of separation of powersH the !orre!tness of the &e!isions of the Supre e Court as final ar:iter of all ;usti!ia:le &isputes is !on!lusi%e upon all other &epart ents of the ,o%ern ent; the A :u&s an has no power to re%iew the &e!isions of the Supre e Court :" entertainin, a !o plaint a,ainst the >usti!es of the Supre e Court for Dnowin,l" ren&erin, an un;ust &e!ision'

P&5er t& I++3e S3b*&ena8 &) de'egati&n 9!#$#:

0a'idity

S/CAN- +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:


+rti!le M5H Se!tion 1 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es that pu:li! offi!ers ust at all ti es :e a!!ounta:le to the people' Se!tion 22 of the A :u&s an +!t pro%i&es that the Affi!e of the A :u&s an has the power to in%esti,ate an" serious is!on&u!t alle,e&l" !o itte& :" offi!ials re o%a:le :" i pea!h ent for the purpose of filin, a %erifie& !o plaint for i pea!h ent if warrante&' 3he A :u&s an !an entertain the !o plaint for this purpose'

N&' 17: +ssu e that un&er the !harter of the Cit" of 8anilaH the Cit" 8a"or has the power to in%esti,ate !it" offi!ials an& e plo"ees appointe& :" hi an& in !onne!tion therewithH a& inister oathH taDe testi on" an& issue su:poenas' 3he a"or issue& an e0e!uti%e or&er !reatin, a !o itteeH !haire& :" CMCH to in%esti,ate ano alies in%ol%in, li!ense& inspe!tors of the 7i!ense 5nspe!tion -i%ision of the Affi!e of the Cit" 3reasurerH 5n the !ourse of its in%esti,ationH CMC su:poenae& COCH a pri%ate !iti=en worDin, as :ooDDeeper of +sia @ar&ware' COC refuse& to appear !onten&in, that the Co ittee of CMC has no power to issue su:poenas' -e!i&e'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
OesH the !o ittee has no power to issue su:poenas a!!or&in, to Car elo %sH 1a osH ) SC1+ 83)' 5n !reatin, the !o itteeH the a"or &i& not ,rant it the power to issue su:poenas' 9esi&esH the a"or !annot &ele,ate his power to issue su:poenas'

O1b3d+1an8 P&5er t& S3+*end8 Pre0enti0e S3+*en+i&n 9!##?:


N&' 10: 2) +n a& inistrati%e !o plaint for %iolation of the +nti*$raft an& Corrupt Pra!ti!es +!t a,ainst M was file& with the A :u&s an' 5 e&iatel" after taDin, !o,ni=an!e of the !ase an& the affi&a%its su: itte& to hi H the A :u&s an or&ere& the pre%enti%e suspension of M pen&in, preli inar" in%esti,ation' M ?uestione& the suspension or&erH !onten&in, that the A :u&s an !an onl" suspen& pre%enti%el" su:or&inate e plo"ees in his own offi!e' 5s M !orre!tL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: NoH M is not !orre!t' +s hel& in 9uenase&a %s' Fla%ierH 22) SC1+ )#2' un&er Se!tion 2# of 1epu:li! +!t No' )770H the A :u&s an !an pla!e un&er pre%enti%e suspension an" offi!er un&er his &is!iplinar" authorit" pen&in, an in%esti,ation' 3he o ent a !o plaint is file& with the A :u&s anH the respon&ent is un&er

Pr&,ibiti&n On E'e(ti0e O))i(er t& H&'d P3b'i( O))i(e 9"66": N& E55' M was ele!te& pro%in!ial ,o%ernor for a ter of three "ears' @e was su:se?uentl" appointe& :" the Presi&ent of the Philippines ser%in, at her pleasureH as !on!urrent Presi&ential +ssistant for Politi!al +ffairs in the Affi!e of the Presi&entH without a&&itional !o pensation' 5s MBs appoint ent %ali&L (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he appoint ent of M is not %ali&H :e!ause the position of Presi&ential +ssistant for Politi!al +ffairs is a pu:li! offi!e' +rti!le 5M*9 Se!tion 7 of the Constitution pro%i&es that no ele!ti%e offi!ial shall :e eli,i:le for appoint ent or &esi,nation in an" !apa!it" to an" pu:li! offi!e or position &urin, his tenure' +s hel& in Flores %' -rilonH 223 SC1+ 2)8 (1993)H sin!e an ele!ti%e offi!ial is ineli,i:le for an appointi%e positionH his appoint ent is not %ali&'

P3b'i( O))i(e8 P3b'i( Tr3+t 9!##$:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;6

N& E' * Suppose Con,ress passe& a law to 5 ple ent the Constitutional prin!iple that a pu:li! offi!e is a pu:li! trustH :" pro%i&in, as follows:
CNo e plo"ee of the Ci%il Ser%i!e shall :e e0!use& fro atten&in, an& testif"in, or fro pro&u!in, :ooDsH re!or&sH !orrespon&en!eH &o!u ents or other e%i&en!e in an" a& inistrati%e in%esti,ation !on!ernin, the offi!e in whi!h he is e plo"e& on the ,roun& that his testi on" or the e%i&en!e re?uire& of hi a" ten& to in!ri inate hi or su:;e!t hi to a penalt" or forfeiture; :ut his testi on" or an" e%i&en!e pro&u!e& :" hi shall not :e use& a,ainst hi in !ri inal prose!ution :ase& on the transa!tionH atter or thin, !on!ernin, whi!h is !o pelle&H after in%oDin, his pri%ile,e a,ainst self*in!ri inationH to testif" or pro&u!e e%i&en!e' Pro%i&e&H howe%erH that su!h in&i%i&ual so testif"in, shall not :e e0e pt fro prose!ution an& punish ent for per;ur" !o itte& in so testif"in, nor shall he :e e0e pt fro &e otion or re o%al fro offi!e' +n" e plo"ee who refuses to testif" or pro&u!e an" &o!u ents un&er this +!t shall :e &is isse& fro the ser%i!eHC

in!ri ination seeDs to pre%ent is the !on%i!tion of the witness on the :asis of testi on" eli!ite& fro hi ' 3he rule is satisfie& when he is ,rante& i unit"' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
1' 5n a!!or&an!e with /%an,elista %s' >aren!ioH )8 SC1+ 99H 107*108H 5f An, is :ein, !ite& erel" as a witnessH he a" not refuse to answer' @owe%erH if the ?uestion ten&s to %iolate his ri,ht a,ainst self*in!ri inationH he a" o:;e!t to it' An the other han&H un&er the rulin, in Cha%e= %s' Court of +ppealsH 2# SC1+ ))3H )80H 5f he is a respon&entH An, a" refuse to answer an" ?uestion :e!ause of his ri,ht a,ainst self* in!ri ination'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 2' No An, !annot ar,ue that the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission inferre& his ,uilt fro his refusal to answer' @e was not &is isse& :e!ause of his in%ol%e ent in the leaDa,e in the e&i!al e0a ination :ut for his refusal to answer' 3his is a %iolation of the law' @e !oul& :e !o pelle& to answer the ?uestion on pain of :ein, &is isse& in !ase of his refusalH :e!ause he was ,rante& 5 unit"' 5n 7efDowit= %s' 3urle"' #1# <'S' 70H 8#H the <nite& States Supre e Court hel&:
CFurther oreH the a!!o o&ation :etween the interest of the State an& the Fifth + en& ent re?uires that the State ha%e eans at its &isposal to se!ure testi on" if i unit" is supplie& an& testi on" is still refuse&' 3his is re!o,ni=e& :" the power of !ourts to !o pel testi on"H after a ,rant of i unit"H :" use of !i%il !onte pt an& !oer!e& i prison ent' Shilitani %' <nite& StatesH 38# <S 3)#' 1) 7 /& 2& )22' 8) 2 Ct 1231 (19)))' +lsoH ,i%en a&e?uate i unit" the State a" plainl" insist that e plo"ees either answer ?uestions un&er oath a:out the perfor an!e of their ;o: or suffer the loss of e plo" ent'C

Suppose furtherH that An,H a e :er of the Professional 1e,ulator" 9oar&H is re?uire& to answer ?uestions in an in%esti,ation re,ar&in, a 7/+G+$/ in a e&i!al e0a ination' (2) Can An, refuse to answer ?uestions on the ,roun& that he woul& in!ri inate hi selfL P#NQ (3) Suppose he refuses to answerH an& for that reasonH is &is isse& fro the ser%i!eH !an he pausi:l" ar,ue that the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co ission has inferre& his ,uilt fro his refusal to answer in %iolation of the ConstitutionL W3NQ (#) SupposeH on the other han&H he answers the ?uestion an& on the :asis of his answersH he is foun& ,uilt" an& is &is isse&' Can he plausi:l" assert that his &is issal is :ase& on !oer!e& !onfessionL 53NQ S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3' >es An, !an ar,ue that his &is issal was :ase& on !oer!e& !onfession' 5n $arrit" %s' New >erse"H 382 <'S' #93H 200H the <nite& States Supre e Court hel&: C6e now hol& the prote!tion of the in&i%i&ual un&er the Fourteenth + en& ent a,ainst !oer!e& state ents prohi:its use in su:se?uent !ri inal pro!ee&in,s of state ents o:taine& un&er threat of re o%al fro offi!eH an& that it e0ten&s to allH whether the" are poli!e en or other e :ers of the :o&" politi!'C

1' NoH An, !annot refuse to answer the ?uestion on the ,roun& that he woul& in!ri inate hi selfH sin!e the law ,rants hi i unit" an& prohi:its the use a,ainst hi in a !ri inal prose!ution of the testi on" or e%i&en!e pro&u!e& :" hi ' +s state& :" the <nite& States Supre e Court in 9rown %s' 6alDer' 1)1 <'S' 291H 297H what the !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst self* Retire1ent Bene)it+ 9!##?: BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;!

N&' 9: 2) +H an e plo"ee of the National 3reasurerH retire& on >anuar" 10H 199)' 9efore she !oul& !olle!t her retire ent :enefitsH the National 3reasurer &is!o%ere& that + ha& :een ne,li,ent in the en!ash ent of falsifie& treasur" warrants' 5t appearsH howe%erH that + ha& re!ei%e& all one" an& propert" !learan!es fro the National 3reasurer :efore her retire ent' Can the National 3reasurer withhol& the retire ent of + pen&in, &eter ination of her ne,li,en!e in the en!ash ent of the falsifie& treasur" warrantsL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
2) 5n a!!or&an!e with 3antui!o %s' -o in,oH 230 SC1+ 391 an& Cru= us' 3antui!oH 1)) SC1+ )70H the National 3reasurer !annot withhol& the pa" ent of the retire ent :enefits of + pen&in, &eter ination of her lia:ilit" for ne,li,en!e in the en!ash ent of the falsifie& treasur" warrantsH :e!ause her retire ent :enefits are e0e pt fro e0e!ution'

1' 5 &isa,ree' <n&er Se!tion 7H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH a !orporation or asso!iation whi!h is si0t" per!ent owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens !an a!?uire pri%ate lan&H :e!ause it !an lease pu:li! lan& an& !an therefore hol& pu:li! lan&' @owe%erH it !annot a!?uire pu:li! lan&' <n&er Se!tion 3H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH pri%ate !orporations an& asso!iations !an onl" lease an& !annot a!?uire pu:li! lan&'

<n&er Se!tion 8H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH a natural*:orn Filipino !iti=en who lost his Philippine !iti=enship a" a!?uire pri%ate lan& onl" an& !annot a!?uire pu:li! lan&'
(3) 5 &isa,ree' 3he ere fa!t that a !orporation is reli,ious &oes not entitle it to own pu:li! lan&' +s hel& 5n 1e,ister of -ee&s %s' <n, Siu Si 3e pleH 97 Phil' 28H )1H lan& tenure is not in&ispensa:le to the free e0er!ise an& en;o" ent of reli,ious profession of worship' 3he reli,ious !orporation !an own pri%ate lan& onl" if it is at least si0t" per !ent owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens' (#) 5 &isa,ree' <n&er Se!tion 1 of Presi&ential -e!ree No' #71H !orporations an& asso!iations owne& :" aliens are allowe& to lease pri%ate lan&s up to twent"*fi%e "earsH renewa:le for another perio& of twent"*fi%e "ears upon a,ree ent of the lessor an& the lessee' @en!eH e%en if the reli,ious !orporation is owne& :" aliensH it !an lease pri%ate lan&s'

ARTICLE XII Nati&na' E(&n&1y and Patri1&ny


A(F3i+iti&n and Lea+e &) P3b'i( Land+ 9!##$:
/0press "our a,ree ent or &isa,ree ent with an" of the followin, state ents' 9e,in "our answer with the state ent: C5 +$1//C or C-5S+$1//C as the !ase a" :e' (3) +n"oneH whether 5n&i%i&ualH !orporation or asso!iationH ?ualifie& to a!?uire pri%ate lan&s is also ?ualifie& to a!?uire pu:li! lan&s in the Philippines' P2NQ (#) + reli,ious !orporation is ?ualifie& t o ha%e lan&s in the Philippines on whi!h it a" :uil& 5ts !hur!h an& aDe other i pro%e ents pro%i&e& these are a!tuall"H &ire!tl" an& e0!lusi%el" use& for reli,ious purposes' P2NQ

(2) 5 &isa,ree' For a !orporationB to ?ualif" to a!?uire pri%ate lan&s in the PhilippinesH un&er Se!tion 7H +rti!le Mn of the Constitution in relation to Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH onl" si0t" per !ent ()0N) of the !orporation is re?uire& to :e owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens for it to ?ualif" to a!?uire pri%ate lan&s'
()) 5 a,ree' + forei,n !orporation !an lease pri%ate lan&s onl" an& !annot lease pu:li! lan&' <n&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH the e0plorationH &e%elop ent an& utili=ation of pu:li! lan&s a" :e un&ertaDen throu,h !o*pro&u!tion' >oint %enture or pro&u!tion*sharin, a,ree ents onl" with Filipino !iti=en or !orporations or asso!iations whi!h are at least si0t" per !ent owne& :" Filipino !iti=en'

(2) + reli,ious !orporation !annot lease pri%ate lan&s 5n the Philippines' P2NQ
()) + reli,ious !orporation !an a!?uire pri%ate lan&s in the Philippines pro%i&e& all its e :ers are !iti=ens of the Philippines' P2NQ

(7) + forei,n !orporation !an onl" lease pri%ate lan&s in the Philippines' P2NQ S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+ 9!#$%: N&' ME: An 8ar!h 1H 1987H C+9CC CorporationH a !o pan" en,a,e& in the e0port tra&eH applie&

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;"

for ;u&i!ial !onfir ation of its title o%er ten he!tares of ti :er lan&s' 3he !o pan" :ou,ht the lan& fro CMC who in turn inherite& it fro his father COC' 3he latter ha& :een in openH notoriousH pu:li! an& !ontinue& possession of the lan& sin!e 1922' An what %ali& ,roun&s !an "ouH as Soli!itor $eneralH oppose the appli!ationL

a!!i&ent without an& testa ent'

lea%in,

last

will

ANSWER:
+s Soli!itor $eneralH 5 !an oppose the appli!ation for !onfir ation of title on the ,roun& that un&er +rt' M55H Se!' 3 ti :er lan&s !annot :e alienate&' 3he rulin, in -ire!tor of 7an&s %' 5+CH 1#) SC1+ 209 (198))H an& -ire!tor of 7an&s %H 9en,=onH No' 2#0#2H >ul" 28H 1987H reiterate& in -ire!tor of 7an&s %' 8anila /le!tri! Co'H $'1H No' 27#)1H Sept' 11H 1987H to the effe!t that a !orporation is entitle& to the !onfir ation of i perfe!t title to lan&s a!?uire& :" it fro pri%ate in&i%i&uals who ha%e possesse& the sa e for 30 "earsH un&er :ona fi&e !lai of ownershipH for the reason that su!h persons are presu e& to ha%e perfor e& all !on&itions essential to a ,o%ern ent ,rant an&H thereforeH are entitle& to the issuan!e of a !ertifi!ate of titleH applies onl" to a,ri!ultural lan&s'

NowH M :rou,ht suit to re!o%er the lan& on the ,roun& that 9H :ein, an alienH was not ?ualifie& to :u" the lan& when 9 an& + ;ointl" :ou,ht the lan& fro hi an& thatH upon the &eath of CH the lan& was inherite& :" his parents :ut 9 !annot le,all" a!?uire an&Ior inherit it'
@ow shoul& the !ase :e &e!i&e&L 5f M file& the suit a,ainst C when the latter was still ali%eH woul& "our answer :e the sa eL 6h"L (2N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
M !annot re!o%er the lan& whether fro C or + an& 9' <n&er +rti!le 5EH Se!tion 1 (2) of the ConstitutionH C is a Filipino !iti=en sin!e his father is a Filipino' 6hen + an& 9 &onate& the lan& to CH it :e!a e propert" of a Filipino !iti=en' +s hel& in @alili %' Court of +ppealsH 287 SC1+ #)2 (1998)H the sale of lan& to an alien !an no lon,er :e annulle& if it has :een !on%e"e& to a Filipino !iti=en' Sin!e C left no will an& his parents are his heirsH in a!!or&an!e with +rti!le M55H Se!tion 7 of the ConstitutionH 9 !an a!?uire the lan& :" here&itar" su!!ession'

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+ 9"666:


N& ME555' * a) +n&" 7i H an ethni! ChineseH :e!a e a naturali=e& Filipino in 1932' 9ut later he lost his Filipino !iti=enship when he :e!a e a !iti=en of Cana&a in 1971' 6antin, the :est of :oth worl&sH he :ou,htH in 1987H a resi&ential lot in For:es ParD an& a !o er!ial lot in 9inon&o' +re these sales %ali&L 6h"L (3N)

SUGGESTED ANSWER: NoH the sales are not %ali&' <n&er Se!tion 8H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH onl" a natural* :orn !iti=en of the Philippines who lost his Philippine !iti=enship a" a!?uire pri%ate lan&' Sin!e +n&" 7i was a for er naturali=e& Filipino !iti=enH he is not ?ualifie& to a!?uire pri%ate lan&s' A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+ S3((e++i&n 9"66": by Hereditary

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+8 Citi/en+,i* i++3e 9!#$#: N&' 1: 8ariaH a natural*:orn Filipino !iti=enH went to the <nite& States in 19)2 to worD as a nurse' 6ith her sa%in,sH she :ou,ht a par!el of lan& !onsistin, of 1H000 s?uare eters in a resi&ential su:&i%ision in 8etro 8anila' She ha& the sai& propert" title& in her na e in 1970' 5n >ul"H 1972H 8aria a!?uire& + eri!an !iti=enship :" naturali=ation' 3wo onths laterH she arrie& her Cana&ian :o"frien&' #' Can 8aria %ali&l" sell this par!el of lan& to the "oun,er sister of her hus:an& who is also a Cana&ian !iti=enL 2' Supposin, 8ariaBs hus:an& &ies an& she &e!i&es to resi&e in the Philippines per anentl"H !an 8aria :u" the par!el of lan& !onsistin, of #00 s?uare eters nei,h:orin, her ownL ANSWER:
(1) NoH 8aria !annot %ali&l" sell the par!el of lan& to the "oun,er sister of her hus:an& who is a Cana&ian !iti=en' <n&er Se!tion 7H +rti!le M55 of the 1987 ConstitutionH as a ,eneral ruleH aliens !annot a!?uire pri%ate lan& sin!e pursuant to Se!tion 2H in relation to Se!tion 3H +rti!le M55H of the 1987 Constitution the" are not ?ualifie& to a!?uire or hol& lan&s of the pu:li!

N& M5' * +H a Filipino !iti=enH an& his wife 9H a >apanese nationalH :ou,ht a fi%e*he!tare a,ri!ultural lan& fro MH a Filipino !iti=en' 3he !ouple later e0e!ute& a &ee& of &onation o%er the sa e lan& in fa%or of their onl" !hil& C' + "ear laterH howe%erH C &ie& in %ehi!ular

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;-

&o ain' <n&er Se!tion 7H +rti!le M55 of the 1987 ConstitutionH an alien !an a!?uire pu:li! lan& :" here&itar" su!!ession' <n&er Se!tion 8H +rti!le M55 of the 1987 ConstitutionH a natural*:orn Philippine !iti=en who lost his Philippine !iti=enship a" :e a transferee of pri%ate lan&' 3he "oun,er sister of the hus:an& of 8aria is not a!?uirin, the pri%ate lan& :" here&itar" su!!ession :ut :" sale' Neither is she a for er natural*:orn Philippine !iti=en who lost her Philippine !iti=enship' Conse?uentl"H neither of the e0!eptions foun& in the a:o%e* entione& pro%isions is appli!a:le to her'

Se!tion 7H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution a,ainst the a!?uisition of pri%ate lan&s :" aliens'
2) 9e!ause of the naturali=ation of Peter Co as a Filipino !iti=enH he !an e0er!ise the option to pur!hase the lan&' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in Oap %s' $ra,e&aH 121 SC1+ 2##' sin!e he is ?ualifie& to own lan&H the poli!" to preser%e lan&s for Filipinos will :e a!hie%e&'

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+8 Citi/en+,i* i++3e 9!##@:


N& 11; 5n >une 1978 spouses >oel an& 8i!helle pur!hase& a par!el of lan&' 7ot No' 1#3H Ca&astral Sur%e" No' 38*-H with an area of )00 s?uare eters for their resi&en!e in CaintaH 1i=alH fro Ce!ille who :" herself an& her pre&e!essor*in*interest ha& :een in openH pu:li!H pea!efulH !ontinuous an& e0!lusi%e possession of the propert" un&er a :ona fi&e !lai of ownership lon, :efore 12 >une 19#2' +t the ti e of pur!haseH the spouses >oel an& 8i!helle were then natural :orn Filipino !iti=ens' 5n Fe:ruar" 1987 the spouses file& an appli!ation for re,istration of their title :efore the proper !ourt' 3his ti e howe%er >oel an& 8i!helle were no lon,er Filipino !iti=ens' 3he ,o%ern ent oppose& their appli!ation for re,istration alle,in, that the" ha%e not a!?uire& proprietar" ri,hts o%er the su:;e!t lot :e!ause of their su:se?uent a!?uisition of Cana&ian !iti=enshipH an& that unre,istere& lan&s are presu e& to :e pu:li! lan&s un&er the prin!iple that lan&s of whate%er !lassifi!ation :elon, to the State un&er the 1e,alian &o!trineH hen!eH the" still pertain to the State'

(2) NoH 8aria !annot :u" the a&;oinin, par!el of lan&' <n&er Se!tion 2 of 9atas Pa :ansa 9l,' 182H a natural*:orn Philippine !iti=en who lost his Philippine !iti=enshipH a" a!?uire onl" up to 1H000 s?uare eters of pri%ate ur:an lan&' Sin!e 8aria has pre%iousl" a!?uire& a par!el of lan& with an area of 1H000 s?uare etersH she !an no lon,er pur!hase an" a&&itional par!el of ur:an lan&' +lternati%e +nswer:
OesH she !an a!?uire the a&;a!ent lan& whi!h has an area of #00 s?uare eters sin!e the law li its a!?uisition of lan&s to 1H000 s?uare eters after the loss of Philippine !iti=enship'

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+8 Citi/en+,i* i++3e 9!##;:


N&' 17: + an& 9 lease& their resi&ential lan& !onsistin, of one thousan& (1H000) s?uare eters to Peter CoH a Chinese !iti=enH for a perio& of fift" (20) "ears' 5n 1992H :efore the ter of the lease e0pire&' Co asDe& + an& 9 to !on%e" the lan& to hi as the !ontra!t ,a%e hi the option to pur!hase sai& lan& if he :e!a e a naturali=e& Filipino !iti=en' Co tooD his oath as a Filipino !iti=en in 1991'

@ow will "ou resol%e the issues raise& :" the appli!ants an& the oppositorL -is!uss full"' ANSWER:
3he ar,u ent of the ,o%ern ent that unre,istere& lan&s are presu e& to :e pu:li! lan&s is utterl" un eritorious' +s hel& in 1epu:li! %s' Court of +ppeals' 232 SC1+ 2)2H in a!!or&an!e with Se!tion #8 of the Pu:li! 7an& +!tH sin!e the pre&e!essors*in* interest of >oel an& 8i!helle ha& :een in openH pu:li!H pea!efulH !ontinuous an& e0!lusi%e possession of the lan& un&er a :ona fi&e !lai of ownership lon, :efore >une 12' 19#2H their pre&e!essors* in*interest ha& a!?uire& the lan&H :e!ause the" were !on!lusi%el" presu e& to ha%e perfor e& all !on&itions essential to a ,o%ern ent ,rant' 3he lan& !ease& to :e a part

C' 6as the !ontra!t of lease for a perio& of fift" (20) "ears %ali& !onsi&erin, that the lessee was an alienL -' 6hat is the effe!t of the naturali=ation of Peter Co as a Filipino !iti=en on the %ali&it" of the option to pur!hase ,i%en hi L ANSWER:
1) +s hel& in Philippine 9anDin, Corporation %s' 7ui She' 21 SC1+ 22H the lease of a par!el of lan& with an option to :u" to an alien is a %irtual transfer of ownership to the alien an& falls within the s!ope of the prohi:ition in

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;;

of the pu:li! &o ain' 5t is aliena:le an& &isposa:le lan&' >oel an& 8i!helle a!?uire& the ri,hts of their pre&e!essors*in*interest :" %irtue of the sale to the '
>oel an& 8i!helle !an ha%e the lan& re,istere& in their na es' 3he" were natural*:orn Filipino !iti=ens at the ti e of their a!?uisition of the lan&' 5n an" e%ent the" were Filipino !iti=ens at the ti e of their a!?uisition of the lan&' 3heir :e!o in, Cana&ian !iti=ens su:se?uentl" is i aterial' +rti!le M55H Se!' 8 of the 1987 Constitution presupposes that the" pur!hase& the lan& after the" lost Filipino !iti=enship' 5t &oes not appl" in this !ase at all'

2) 3he -ee& of Sale !annot :e annulle&' +s hel& in Chees an %s' 5nter e&iate +ppellate CourtH 193 SC1+ 93' to a!!or& to >ohn S ithH an alienH the ri,ht to ha%e a &e!isi%e %ote as to the &isposition of the lan& woul& per it an in&ire!t !ontro%ersion of the !onstitutional prohi:ition a,ainst the a!?uisition of pri%ate lan&s :" aliens'

Citi/en+,i* ReF3ire1ent in Manage1ent &) Ad0erti+ing Ind3+try 9!#$#:


N&' 11: (2) 8a" a forei,ner who owns su:stantial sto!Dhol&in,s in a !orporation en,a,e& in the a&%ertisin, in&ustr" sit as a treasurer of sai& !orporationL Cite the !onstitutional pro%ision in point'

A(F3i+iti&n &) Land+8 Pr&,ibiti&n8 a(F3i+iti&n &) *ri0ate 'and+ by a'ien+ 9!##;:
N&'18; >ohn S ithH a <S nationalH was arrie& to Petra &e >esusH a Filipino !iti=enH on >une 2H 1980' 3wo (2) "ears laterH Petra pur!hase& a par!el of resi&ential lan& fro >ose Cru= usin, her own fun&s' 3he -ee& of Sale states that the lan& was sol& to CPetra arrie& to >ohn S ithC an& was re,istere& as su!h' 6ith the Dnowle&,e of >ohn S ithH Petra a& inistere& the lan&H leasin, parts thereof to se%eral in&i%i&uals' 3hree (3) "ears laterH PetraH without the Dnowle&,e of >ohn S ithH sol& the lan& to -a%i& Pere=' <pon learnin, of the transa!tionH >ohn S ith file& a !ase to annul the -ee& of Sale' Citin, +rt' 1)0 of the Ci%il Co&eH he ar,ue& that sai& sale was without his !onsentH the propert" :ein, !on;u,al as it was pur!hase& at the ti e he was arrie& to Petra' @e presente& the -ee& of Sale e0e!ute& :" Petra statin, that she is arrie& to >ohn S ith' @e wants to re!o%er at least his !on;u,al share'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: Se!tion 11(1)H +rti!le ME5 1987 Constitution pro%i&es; of the

(2) NoH a forei,ner who owns shares of sto!D in a !orporation en,a,e& in the a&%ertisin, in&ustr" !annot ser%e as treasurer in the !orporationH for a treasurer is an e0e!uti%e or ana,in, offi!er' Se!tion 11(2)H +rti!le ME5 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es:
C3he parti!ipation of forei,n in%estors in the ,o%ernin, :o&" of entities in su!h in&ustr" shall :e li ite& to their proportionate share in the !apital thereofH an& all the e0e!uti%e an& ana,in, offi!ers of su!h entities ust :e !iti=ens of the Philippines'C

C' 5s >ohn S ith entitle& to his !on;u,al shareL -' 8a" the -ee& of Sale e0e!ute& :" Petra 5n fa%or of -a%i& Pere= :e annulle&L ANSWER:
1) NoH >ohn S ith is not entitle& to his !on;u,al share in the lan&' Firstl"H sin!e it was a!?uire& with the personal fun&s of Petra &e >esusH in a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in 8irasol %s' 7i H 29 Phil' 701H the presu ption that the propert" is !on;u,al has :een re:utte&' Se!on&l"H a &e!laration that >ohn S ith is entitle& to a !on;u,al share in the lan& will %iolate the prohi:ition a,ainst the !on%e"an!e of pri%ate lan&s to aliens e :o&ie& in Se!tion 7H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution'

Engage1ent in B3+ine++ B E2er(i+e &) Pr&)e++i&n 9!#$%: N&' 5M: 3he Philippine entere& into a 3reat" of Frien&shipH Co it" an& Co er!e with 5n&onesia with the followin, pro%isions:
(1 ) 3he nationals of ea!h !ontra!tin, State a& itte& to the pra!ti!e of law in sai& StateH to pra!ti!e law without taDin, the :ar e0a inations in the other !ontra!tin, State' (2) 3he nationals of ea!h !ontra!tin, State to en,a,e in retail tra&e :usiness in the territor" of the other !ontra!tin, State' 5s the treat" %ali&L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 3he treat" is %ali&' (1) +rt' M55H Se!' 1# pro%i&es that the pra!ti!e of all professions in the Philippines shall :e

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;@

li ite& to Filipino !iti=ensH sa%e in !ases pres!ri:e& :" law' @ere the treat" has the for!e of law'
(2) +rt' M55' Se!' 10 pro%i&es that Con,ress shall reser%e to !iti=ens of the Philippines or to !orporations or asso!iations at least )0N of the !apital of whi!h is owne& :" su!h !iti=ens !ertain areas of in%est ent' 3here !an :e no ?uestion then as to the %ali&it" of the Nationali=ation of 1etail 3ra&e 7awH the !onstitutionalit" of whi!h was sustaine& in 5!hon, %' @ernan&e=H 101 Phil' 1122 (1927) e%en in the a:sen!e of a si ilar e0press ,rant of power to Con,ress un&er the 1932 Constitution' +lthou,h Con,ress !an repeal or a en& su!h lawH it a" not :e a en&e& :" a treat" in %iew of +rt' M55H Se!' 22 whi!h &e!lares a!ts of !ir!u %ent or ne,ate an" pro%isions of this +rt' M55 to :e ini i!al to national interest an& su:;e!t the offen&ers to !ri inal an& !i%il san!tions' For then the 1etail 3ra&e Nationali=ation 7aw :e!o es part of +rt' M55H ha%in, :een passe& pursuant to the an&ate in Se!' 10'

!orporation in%ol%in, te!hni!al an& finan!ial assistan!e for the e0ploration an& e0ploitation of ineralsH :ut there shoul& :e no >oint %enture' Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55 of the Constitution authori=es the Presi&ent to enter into a,ree ents with forei,n*owne& !orporations in%ol%in, te!hni!al or finan!ial assistan!e for the e0plorationH &e%elop entH an& utili=ation of inerals' @owe%erH the sa e pro%ision states the ;oint %enture for the e0plorationH &e%elop ent an& utili=ation of natural resour!es a" :e un&ertaDen onl" with Filipino !iti=ensH or !orporations or asso!iations at least si0t" per !ent of whose !apital is owne& :" Filipino !iti=en'

E2*r&*riati&n &) P3b'i( Uti'itie+ 9!##":


N&' 11 * 3he Philippine Co o&ities Affi!e (PCA)H a ,o%ern ent a,en!"H wishes to esta:lish a &ire!t !o puter an& fa0 linDup with tra&in, !enters in the <nite& States' 3he a&%an!e& te!hnolo," of a pri%ate !o pan"H Philippine Pa!ifi! 3ele!o uni!ationsH is ne!essar" for that purpose :ut ne,otiations :etween the parties ha%e faile&' 3he 1epu:li!H in :ehalf of the PCAH files suit to !o pel the tele!o uni!ations !o pan" to e0e!ute a !ontra!t with PCA for PCABs a!!ess an& use of the !o pan"Bs fa!ilities' -e!i&e' 5f the !ase will not prosperH what alternati%e will "ou propose to the 1epu:li!L

@owe%erH it a" also :e plausi:l" ar,ue& that a treat" a" a en& a prior law an& treat" of frien&shipH !o it" an& !o er!e with 5n&onesia a" :e &ee e& to ha%e !reate& an e0!eption in the Nationali=ation of 1etail 3ra&e 7aw in fa%or of 5n&onesian !iti=en' E2*'&rati&n and De0e'&*1ent &) Minera'+ 9!##;:
N&' 11: 5n the &esire to i pro%e the fishin, etho&s of the fisher enH the 9ureau of FisheriesH with the appro%al of the Presi&entH entere& into a e oran&u of a,ree ent to allow 3hai fisher en to fish within 200 iles fro the Philippine sea !oasts on the !on&ition that Filipino fisher en :e allowe& to use 3hai fishin, e?uip ent an& %esselsH an& to learn o&ern te!hnolo," in fishin, an& !annin,'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he a!tion will not prosper' +s hel& in 1epu:li! of the P-i'ippines /s. P-i'ippine Long ;is+ance Te'ep-one Co0panyH 2) SC1+ )20H parties !annot :e !o pelle& to enter into a !ontra!t' @owe%erH sin!e un&er Se!tion 18H +rti!le M55 of the ConstitutionH the State a" e0propriate pu:li! utilitiesH the 1epu:li! of the Philippines a" !o pel the Philippine Pa!ifi! 3ele!o uni!ations to allow a!!ess to its fa!ilities' 5f the 1epu:li! of the Philippines !an taDe title to the fa!ilities of Philippine Pa!ifi! 3ele!o uni!ations :" its power of e0propriationH there is no reason wh" it !annot use su!h power to i pose onl" a :ur&en upon Philippine Pa!ifi! 3ele!o uni!ation without loss of title'

(2) 5s the a,ree ent %ali&L


(3) Suppose the a,ree ent is for a ;oint %enture on the sa e area with a 3hai oil !orporation for the e0ploration an& e0ploitation of inerals with the 3hai !orporation pro%i&in, te!hni!al an& finan!ial assistan!e' 5s the a,ree ent %ali&L

+NS6/1; #) No' Anl" Filipinos e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one'''


2) 3he Presi&ent !an e oran&u

Lea+e &) Pri0ate Agri(3't3ra' Land+ 9"66!: a"


enter

fish
into

in
a

N& 5E * + is an alien' State whetherH in the PhilippinesH he: a) Can :e a lessee of a pri%ate a,ri!ultural lan&H (3N)

of a,ree ent with a 3hai oil

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;?

SUGGESTED ANSWER8
OesH an alien !an :e a lessee of pri%ate a,ri!ultural lan&' +s state& in Gri%enDo %s' 1e,ister of -ee&s of 8anilaH 79 Phil' #)1 (19#7)H aliens !an lease pri%ate a,ri!ultural lan&H :e!ause the" are ,rante& te porar" ri,hts onl" an& this is not prohi:ite& :" the Constitution'

+!!or&in, to Aani'a Prince @o+e' /. 3o/ern0en+ 7er/ice Ins*rance 7ys+e0H 2)7 SC1+ #08H the national patri on" refers not onl" to our natural resour!es :ut also to our !ultural herita,e' Nati&na'i/ed A(ti0itie+ 9!##;: 2) $i%e a :usiness a!ti%it" the e?uit" of whi!h ust :e owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens: 0 at least )0N 1 2 at least 70N 100N

Nati&na'

B E(&n&1y Patri1&ny8 C&n+tit3ti&na' Pr&,ibiti&n 9"66;: 9$<b: 9' /+P is a ,o%ern ent !orporation !reate& for the purpose of re!lai in, lan&s in!lu&in, foreshore an& su: er,e& areasH as well as to &e%elopH i pro%eH a!?uireH lease an& sell an" an& all Din&s of lan&s' + law was passe& transferrin, title to /+P of lan&s alrea&" re!lai e& in the foreshore an& offshore areas of 88 9a"H parti!ularl" the so*!alle& 7i:ert" 5slan&sH as aliena:le an& &isposa:le lan&s of the pu:li! &o ain' 3itles were &ul" issue& in /+PBs na e'
Su:se?uentl"H /+P entere& into a ;oint %enture a,ree ent (>E+) with +15H a pri%ate forei,n !orporationH to &e%elop 7i:ert" 5slan&s' +&&itionall"H the >E+ pro%i&e& for the re!la ation of 220 he!tares of su: er,e& lan& in the area surroun&in, 7i:ert" 5slan&s' /+P a,ree& to sell an& transfer to +15 a portion of 7i:ert" 5slan&s an& a portion of the area to :e re!lai e& as the !onsi&eration for +15Bs role an& parti!ipation in the ;oint %entureH upon appro%al :" the Affi!e of the Presi&ent' 5s there an" !onstitutional o:sta!le to the sale an& transfer :" /+P to +15 of :oth portions as pro%i&e& for in the >E+L (2N)

3) $i%e two !ases in whi!h aliens a" :e allowe& to a!?uire e?uit" in a :usiness a!ti%it" :ut !annot parti!ipate in the ana,e ent thereofL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 1) a) +t least si0t" per !ent ()0N) of the e?uit" of the entities en,a,e& in the followin, :usiness ust :e owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens un&er the Constitution' 1' Co*pro&u!tionH >oint %entureH or pro&u!tion*sharin, a,ree ent with the State for the e0plorationH &e%elop entH an& utili=ation of natural resour!es (Se!tion 2H +rti!le M55) 2' Aperation of a pu:li! utilit" (Se!tion 11H +rti!le M55) 3' /&u!ation (Se!tion #(2)H +rti!le M5E)
:) +t least se%ent" per!ent (70N) of the e?uit" of :usiness entities en,a,e& in a&%ertisin, ust :e owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens un&er the Constitution' (Se!tion 11(2)H +rti!le ME5)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
9' +15 !annot a!?uire a portion of 7i:ert" 5slan&s :e!auseH althou,h /+P has title to 7i:ert" 5slan&s an& thus su!h lan&s are aliena:le an& &isposa:le lan&H the" !annot :e sol&H onl" lease&H to pri%ate !orporations' 3he portion of the area to :e re!lai e& !annot :e sol& an& transferre& to +15 :e!ause the sea:e& is inaliena:le lan& of the pu:li! &o ain' (Se!tion 3H +rti!le M55 of the 1987 Constitution; Cha%e= %' Pu:li! /states +uthorit"H 38# SC1+ 122 P2002Q)'

!) 8ass e&ia ust :e wholl" owne& :" Filipino !iti=ens un&er the Constitution (Se!tion 11(1)H +rti!le ME5)' 2) <n&er the ConstitutionH aliens a" a!?uire e?uit" :ut !annot parti!ipate in the ana,e ent of :usiness entities en,a,e& in the followin, a!ti%ities: (3) Pu:li! utilities (Se!tion 11H +rti!le M55)
(#) /&u!ation (Se!tion #(2) '+rti!le M5E)

Nati&na' Patri1&ny8 de)initi&n 9!###: No M55 * 6hat is eant :" National Patri on"L /0plain the !on!ept of National Patri on"L (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

(2) +&%ertisin, +rti!le ME5)

(Se!tion

11(2)H

!;%

O5ner+,i* ReF3ire1ent &) Ma++ Media 9!#$#: N&' 11: (1) + &o esti! !orporation with 30N forei,n e?uit" proposes to pu:lish a weeDl" a,a=ine for ,eneral !ir!ulation in 8etro 8anila whi!h will feature the lifest"les of the ri!h an& the fa ous' 8a" this :e &oneL Cite the !onstitutional pro%ision in point' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (1) NoH the !orporation !annot pu:lish a weeDl" a,a=ine sin!e it is en,a,e& in the operation of a ass e&ia an& is not wholl" owne& :" Philippine !iti=ens'
Se!tion 11(1)H +rti!le ME5 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es; C3he ownership an& ana,e ent of ass e&ia shall :e li ite& to !iti=ens of the PhilippinesH or to !orporationsH !ooperati%es or asso!iationsH wholl"*owne& an& ana,e& :" su!h !iti=ens'C

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he law is %ali& as un&er +rti!le M55H Se!tion 2 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the e0plorationH &e%elop entH an& utili=ation of natural resour!es shall :e un&er the full !ontrol an& super%ision of the State' 5t is also pro%i&e& that the State a" &ire!tl" un&ertaDe su!h a!ti%ities or it a" enter into !o*pro&u!tionH ;oint %enture or sharin, a,ree ents with Filipino !iti=ens or !orporations or asso!iationsH at least )0N Filipino*owne&' Further oreH the Presi&ent a" enter into a,ree ents with forei,n*owne& !orporations in%ol%in, te!hni!al or finan!ial assistan!e for lar,e*s!ale e0plorationH &e%elop entH an& utili=ation of ineralsH petroleu an& other ineral oilsH a!!or&in, to ter s an& !on&itions pro%i&e& :" law' + state !orporationH unliDe a pri%ate !orporationH a" :e !reate& :" spe!ial law an& pla!e& un&er the !ontrol of the Presi&entH su:;e!t to su!h !on&itions as the !reatin, statute a" pro%i&e'

C,ine+e (iti/en+8 engaging in retai' trade 9>;<"66?: State whether or not the followin, laws are !onstitutional' /0plain :riefl"' 3' + law prohi:itin, Chinese !iti=ens fro en,a,in, in retail tra&e' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he law is in%ali& as it sin,les out an& &epri%es Chinese !iti=ens fro en,a,in, in retail tra&e' 5n 5!hon, %' @ernan&e=H $'1' No' 7*7992H 8a" 31H1927H the !ourt hel& that the 3reat" of + it" :etween the 1epu:li! of the Philippines an& the 1epu:li! of China ,uarantees e?ualit" of treat ent to the Chinese nationals Cupon the sa e ter s as the nationals of an" other !ountr"'C 3husH the !ourt rule& therein that the nationals of China are not &is!ri inate& a,ainst :e!ause nationals of all other !ountriesH e0!ept those of the <nite& StatesH who are ,rante& spe!ial ri,hts :" the ConstitutionH are all prohi:ite& fro en,a,in, in the retail tra&e' 5n the !ase at :arH the law &is!ri inates onl" a,ainst Chinese !iti=ens an& thus %iolates the e?ual prote!tion !lause'

ARTICLE XIII S&(ia' 43+ti(e and H31an Rig,t+


Agrarian Re)&r1 La58 C&0erage 9!##": N&' 12: 3eo&oro 7u=un, is en,a,e& in the :usiness of prawn far in,H 3he prawns are nurture& in his fishpon&s in 8in&oro an&H upon har%estH are i e&iatel" fro=en for e0port'
Con,ress passe& the Co prehensi%e +,rarian 1efor 7aw of 1988 whi!h pro%i&es a on, others that all pri%ate lan&s &e%ote& to a,ri!ulture shall :e su:;e!t to a,rarian refor ' 3he law in!lu&es un&er the ter Ca,ri!ultureC the followin, a!ti%ities: !ulti%ation of the soilH plantin, of !ropsH ,rowin, of fruit treesH raisin, of li%esto!DH poultr" or fish' 3he -epart ent of +,rarian 1efor issue& an i ple entin, or&er whi!h pro%i&es that !o er!ial far s use& for a?ua*!ultureH in!lu&in, salt*:e&sH fishpon&s an& prawn far s are within the s!ope of the law'

Can the law :e &e!lare& un!onstitutionalL -e!i&e' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:


+s hel& in L*= 8ar0s /s. 7ecre+ary o) +-e ;epar+0en+ o) Agrarian Re)or0H 192 SC1+ 21H the law is un!onstitutional insofar as it in!lu&e& li%esto!DH poultr" an& swine raisin,' 5n the &efinition of the a,ri!ultural lan& whi!h the Constitutional Co ission a&opte& in

E2*'&rati&n7 de0e'&*1ent7 and 3ti'i/ati&n &) nat3ra' re+&3r(e+ 9>;<"66?: State whether or not the law is !onstitutional' /0plain :riefl"' 2' + law !reatin, a state !orporation to e0ploitH &e%elopH an& utili=e !o presse& natural ,as' (2N)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;$

!onne!tion with a,rarian refor H lan&s &e%ote& to su!h purposes were not in!lu&e&' @owe%erH :oth the law an& the i ple entin, or&er are !onstitutional insofar as the" in!lu&e& fishpon&s' 3he &efinition of a,ri!ultural lan& whi!h the Constitutional Co ission a&opte& in!lu&e& fishpon&s'

C&11i++i&n &n H31an Rig,t+8 P&5er t& in0e+tigate 9!##":


N&' 12 * 6alan, Su,atH a %i,ilante ,roup !o pose& of pri%ate :usiness en an& !i%i! lea&ers pre%iousl" %i!ti i=e& :" the Nationalist Patrioti! +r " (NP+) re:el ,roupH was i pli!ate& in the torture an& Di&nappin, of -r' 8en,eleH a Dnown NP+ s" pathi=er'

the o!!upants to %a!ate the stru!tures within fi%e &a"s fro noti!eH otherwise the" woul& :e e%i!te& an& relo!ate& an& their shanties re o%e&H in or&er that the par!el of lan& !oul& :e !on%erte& into a parD for pu:li! use an& en;o" ent' 3he inha:itants of the par!el of lan& !o plaine& to the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts ur,in, that the 8a"or of (ue=on Cit" :e stoppe& fro &oin, what he has threatene& to &o' 3he Co ission on @u an 1i,htsH after !on&u!tin, an in%esti,ation an& fin&in, that the shanties of petitioners were alrea&" :ein, &e olishe& :" thenH or&ere& the (ue=on Cit" 8a"or an& persons 5 ple entin, his or&er to !ease an& &esist fro &e olishin, petitionersB shanties un&er pain of !onte pt' 6hat ha%e "ou to sa" on the %ali&it" of the a!tuation of the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts in relation to that of the (ue=on Cit" 8a"orL

:) -oes the Co ission @u an 1i,hts ha%e the power in%esti,ate an& a&;u&i!ate the atterL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;

on to

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he a!tuation of the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts is %oi&' 5n 7i0on /s. Co00ission on @*0an Rig-+sH 229 SC1+ 117' the Court hel& that the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts has no power to issue a restrainin, or&er or a writ of in;un!tion an& has no power to !ite for !onte pt for %iolation of the restrainin, or&er or a writ of preli inar" in;un!tion' 3he !ease an& &esist or&erH a!!or&in, to the CourtH is a se anti! 5nterpla" for a restrainin, or&er' 5ts power to !ite for !onte pt shoul& :e un&erstoo& to appl" onl" to %iolations of its a&opte& operational ,ui&elines an& rules of pro!e&ure essential to !arr" out its in%esti,atorial powersH whi!h it is !onstitutionall" authori=e& to a&opt'

:) <n&er Se!tion 18H +rti!le M555 of the ConstitutionH the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts has the power to in%esti,ate all for s of hu an ri,hts %iolations in%ol%in, !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts an& to onitor the !o plian!e :" the ,o%ern ent with international treat" o:li,ations on hu an ri,hts' +s hel& in Carino %s' Co ission on @u an 1i,htsH 20# SC1+ #83H the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts has no power to &e!i&e !ases in%ol%in, %iolations of !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts' 5t !an onl" in%esti,ate the an& then refer the atter to the appropriate ,o%ern ent a,en!"'

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
5f what is referre& to in the pro:le is the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts un&er the <nite& National /!ono i! an& So!ial Coun!ilH the !ase a" :e in%esti,ate& :" the Co ission :ase& on a spe!ial pro!e&ure for fa!t*fin&in, an& in?uir" :ase& on the !onsent of the States !on!erne&' @owe%erH this &oes not !onstitute in%esti,ation in the usual sense of the ter H with no o:;e!ti%e of esta:lishin, !ulpa:ilit"' 3he Co ission on @u an 1i,hts is not e powere& to aDe a&;u&i!ations'

C&11i++i&n &n H31an Rig,t+8 P&5er t& i++3e TRO 9"66!:


N& E5 * 5n or&er to i ple ent a :i, ,o%ern ent floo& !ontrol pro;e!tH the -epart ent of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s (-P6@) an& a lo!al ,o%ern ent unit (7$<) re o%e& s?uatters fro the :anD of a ri%er an& !ertain esteros for relo!ation to another pla!e' 3heir shanties were &e olishe&' 3he Co ission on @u an 1i,hts (C@1) !on&u!te& an in%esti,ation an& issue& an or&er for the -P6@ an& the 7$< to !ease an& &esist fro effe!tin, the re o%al of the s?uatters on the ,roun& that the hu an ri,hts of the s?uatters were :ein, %iolate&' 3he -P6@ an& the 7$< o:;e!te& to the or&er of the C@1

C&11i++i&n &n H31an Rig,t+8 P&5er t& i++3e TRO 9!##%:


N&' 8 * +:out a hun&re& people o!!upie& a par!el of lan& in (ue=on Cit" :elon,in, to the !it" ,o%ern ent an& :uilt shanties thereon whi!h the" utili=e& for &wellin,H sari*sari storesH et!' 3he Cit" 8a"or issue& an or&er &ire!tin,

1esol%e whi!h position is !orre!t' 1easons (2N)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!;#

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;
3he position of the -epart ent of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s an& of the lo!al ,o%ern ent unit is !orre!t' +s hel& in /0port Pro!essin, .one +uthorit" %' Co ission on @u an 1i,htsH 208 SC1+122 (1992)H no pro%ision in the Constitution or an" law !onfers on the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts ;uris&i!tion to issue te porar" restrainin, or&ers or writs of preli inar" in;un!tion' 3he Co ission on @u an 1i,hts has no ;u&i!ial power' 5ts powers are erel" in%esti,ator"'

!onse?uent &an,er to life an& li : !annot :e i,nore&' 5t is para&o0i!al that a ri,ht whi!h is !lai e& to ha%e :een %iolate& is one that !annotH in the first pla!eH e%en :e in%oDe&H if it isH in fa!tH e0tant' 9ase& on the !ir!u stan!es o:tainin, in this instan!eH the C@1 or&er for &e olition &o not fall within the !o part ent of hu an ri,hts %iolations in%ol%in, !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts inten&e& :" the Constitution' (Si on %' Co ission on @u an 1i,htsH $'1' No' 100120H >anuar" 2H 199#)

C&11i++i&n &n H31an Rig,t+8 P&5er8 Li1itati&n+ 9>;<"66@:


!) S?uatters an& %en&ors ha%e put up stru!tures in an area inten&e& for a PeopleBs ParDH whi!h are i pe&in, the flow of traffi! in the a&;oinin, hi,hwa"' 8a"or Cru= ,a%e noti!e for the stru!tures to :e re o%e&H an& the area %a!ate& within a onthH or elseH fa!e &e olition an& e;e!t ent' 3he o!!upants file& a !ase with the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts (C@1) to stop the 8a"orBs o%e'

(:) Can the C@1 issue an Cor&er to &esistC or restrainin, or&erL S<$$/S3/+NS6/1:
3he C@1 a" not issue an Cor&er to &esistC or restrainin, or&er' 3he !onstitutional pro%ision &ire!tin, the C@1 to pro%i&e for pre%enti%e easures to those whose hu an ri,hts ha%e :een %iolate& or nee& prote!tion a" not :e !onstrue& to !onfer ;uris&i!tion on the Co ission to issue a restrainin, or&er or writ of in;un!tion forH it that were the intentionH the Constitution woul& ha%e e0pressl" sai& so' >uris&i!tion is !onferre& onl" :" the Constitution or :" law' 5t is ne%er &eri%e& :" i pli!ation' (/0port Pro!essin, .one +uthorit" %' Co ission on @u an 1i,htsH $'1' No' 101#7)H +pril 1#H 1992)

3he C@1 then issue& an Cor&er to &esistC a,ainst 8a"or Cru= with warnin, that he woul& :e hel& in !onte pt shoul& he fail to !o pl" with the &esistan!e or&er' 6hen the allotte& ti e lapse&H 8a"or Cru= !ause& the &e olition an& re o%al of the stru!tures' +!!or&in,l"H the C@1 !ite& hi for !onte pt' (2N) 0 6hat is "our !on!ept of @u an 1i,htsL -oes this !ase in%ol%e %iolations of hu an ri,hts within the s!ope of the C@1Bs ;uris&i!tionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
<n&er the <ni%ersal -e!laration of @u an 1i,htsH the 5nternational Co%enant on /!ono i!H So!ial an& Cultural 1i,hts an& 5nternational Co%enant on Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,htsH the s!ope of hu an ri,hts in!lu&es C+-ose +-a+ re'a+e +o an indi/id*a'Fs socia'( econo0ic( c*'+*ra'( po'i+ica' and ci/i' re'a+ions... a'ong &i+- &-a+ is genera''y considered +o be -is in-eren+ and ina'ienab'e rig-+s( enco0passing a'0os+ a'' aspec+s o) 'i)e'C 5n the !ase at :arH the lan& a&;oins a :us" national hi,hwa" an& the !onstru!tion of the s?uatter shanties i pe&es the flow of traffi!' 3he

(!) 5s the C@1 e powere& to &e!lare 8a"or Cru= in !onte ptL -oes it ha%e !onte pt powers at allL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he C@1 &oes not possess a&;u&i!ati%e fun!tions an& thereforeH on its ownH is not e powere& to &e!lare 8a"or Cru= in !onte pt for issuin, the Cor&er to &esist'C @owe%erH un&er the 1987 ConstitutionH the C@1 is !onstitutionall" authori=e&H in the e0er!ise of its in%esti,ati%e fun!tionsH to Ca&opt its operational ,ui&elines an& rules of pro!e&ureH an& !ite for !onte pt for %iolations thereof in a!!or&an!e with the 1ules of Court'C +!!or&in,l"H the C@1H in the !ourse of an in%esti,ationH a" onl" !ite or hol& an" person in !onte pt an& i pose the appropriate penalties in a!!or&an!e with the pro!e&ure an& san!tions pro%i&e& for in the 1ules of Court' (Carino %' Co ission on

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@6

@u an

1i,htsH

$'1'

No'

9))81H

-e!e :er 2H 1991) Lab&r8 Rig,t t& Se')<Organi/ati&n 9!#$$:


N&' 2: 9e!ause of the arDe& in!rease in the in!i&en!e of la:or striDes an& of worD stoppa,es in in&ustrial esta:lish entsH Con,ress inten&in, to help pro ote in&ustrial pea!eH passe&H o%er the o:;e!tions of ilitant la:or unionsH an a en& ent to the 7a:or Co&eH pro%i&in, that no person who is or has :een a e :er of the Co unist Part" a" ser%e as an offi!er of an" la:or or,ani=ation in the !ountr"' +n asso!iation of for er NP+s (New Peoples +r ") who ha& surren&ere&H a%aile& of a nest"H an& are presentl" lea&in, ?uiet an& pea!eful li%esH !o es to "ou asDin, what !oul& :e &one a,ainst the a en& ent' 6hat woul& "ou a&%ise the asso!iation to &oL /0plain'

For these reasonsH 5 woul& a&%ise the asso!iation to worD for the %eto of the :ill an&H if it is not %etoe& :ut :e!o es a lawH to !hallen,e it in !ourt' Lab&r8 Rig,t t& StriIe 9!#$$:
N&= !: @earin,s :efore a !on,ressional !o ittee ha%e esta:lishe& that an" fir s at the 9ataan /0port Pro!essin, .one ha& !lose& &own or pulle& out :e!ause of unsta:le la:or !on&itions resultin, in so an" striDes' 3o re e&" the situation an& in;e!t %italit" to the e0port e0pansion pro,ra H so e !on,ressional lea&ers an& :usiness e0e!uti%es propose that striDe*free e0port =ones :e esta:lishe&'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
5n PA8L6 /. 7ecre+ary o) Labor H 27 SC1+ #0 (19)9) the Supre e Court uphel& the %ali&it" of se!' 23 of the 5n&ustrial Pea!e +!t re?uirin, la:or unions to su: itH within )0 &a"s of the ele!tion of its offi!ersH affi&a%its of the latter that the" are not e :ers of the Co unist Part"H a,ainst the !lai that the re?uire ent un&ul" !urtaile& free&o of asse :l" an& asso!iation' 3he Court pointe& out that the filin, of the affi&a%its was erel" a !on&ition for the a!?uisition :" a la:or or,ani=ation of le,al personalit" an& the en;o" ent of !ertain ri,hts an& pri%ile,es whi!h the Constitution &oes not ,uarantee' An the other han&H the re?uire ent !onstitutes a %ali& e0er!ise of the StateBs poli!e power to prote!t the pu:li! a,ainst a:useH frau& an& i postors' 9ut the &is?ualifi!ation of e :ers of the CPP an& its ilitar" ar H the NP+H fro :ein, offi!ers of a la:or union woul& (1) nullif" the a nest" ,rante& :" the Presi&ent with the !on!urren!eH it a" :e assu e&H of the a;orit" of the e :ers of Con,ress an& (2) per it the !on&e nation of the for er NP+ e :ers without ;u&i!ial trial in a wa" that aDes it !ontrar" to the prohi:ition a,ainst the ena!t ent of :ill of attain&er an& e0 post fa!to law' 3he a nest" ,rante& to the for er NP+s o:literate& their offense an& relie%e& the of the punish ent i pose& :" law' (9arrio?uinto %H Fernan&e=H 82 Phil' )#2 (19#9))' 3he a en& ent woul& aDe the ,uilt" of an a!tH that of ha%in, :een for er e :ers of the NP+H for whi!h the" ha%e alrea&" :een for,i%en :" Presi&ential a nest"'

-o "ou :elie%e that un&er the present ConstitutionH it is le,all" possi:le to put up su!h a striDe*free e0port pro!essin, =one in the !ountr"L 6h" or wh" notL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
No' 3he fa!t that an" fir s at the 9ataan /P.+ ha%e :een for!e& to !lose &own :" unsta:le la:or !on&ition :rou,ht a:out :" striDe &oes not ;ustif" the :an on striDe' 3he Constitution ,uarantees the ri,hts of worDers to en,a,e in Cpea!eful !on!erte& a!ti%itiesH in!lu&in, the ri,ht to striDe in a!!or&an!e with law'C (+rt' M555H se!' 3)' 5t is ille,al striDes whi!h !an :e prohi:ite& :ut not all striDes' For striDe is la:orBs le,iti ate weapon' 5n the a:sen!e of a !o pellin, interest of the state (su!h as health an& safet"H e','H the prohi:ition of striDe in hospitals an& in&ustries in&ispensa:le to the national interest) it !annot :e prohi:ite&'

Lab&r8 Rig,t t& StriIe 9!##-:


N&' 12: Con,ress an Chen, sa"s he is one of the !o*authors of the Su:i! 9a" 8etropolitan +uthorit" Charter' @e &e!lares that the S98+ is the answer to rapi& e!ono i! ,rowth an& the attain ent of the Presi&entBs Philippine 2000C &rea ' @owe%erH Chen, is worrie& that forei,n !apital i,ht :e slow in !o in, in &ue to unsta:le worDin, !on&itions resultin, fro too an" striDes' 3o re e&" this situation' Chen, proposes an a en& ent to S98+ law &e!larin, it as a striDe*free =one or total :an on striDes' 5s this proposal le,all" &efensi:leL /0plain :riefl"'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+rt' M555' se!' 3 of the Constitution ,uarantees the ri,ht of all worDers to en,a,e in pea!eful !on!erte& a!ti%itiesH in!lu&in, the ri,ht to striDe

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@!

in a!!or&an!e with law' 3husH a law !annot totall" prohi:it the ri,ht to striDe :ut !an onl" re,ulate the e0er!ise thereof' @is proposal to :an striDes totall" in the Su:i! Spe!ial /!ono i! an& Freeport .one isH therefore un!onstitutional' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
6hile the Constitution ,uarantees to worDers the ri,ht to en,a,e in pea!eful !on!erte& a!ti%itiesH 5n!lu&in, the ri,ht to striDeH su!h ri,ht !an onl" :e e0er!ise& in a!!or&an!e with law' 3he phrase Cin a!!or&an!e with lawC was 5nserte& pre!isel" to 5n&i!ate that in so e e0!eptional !ases worDers woul& not ha%e the ri,ht to striDe if it is prohi:ite& :" law' @en!eH the proposal to :an striDes totall" in the Su:i! Spe!ial /!ono i! an& Freeport .one is !onstitutional' (So!ial Se!urit" S"ste / plo"ees +sso!iation %s' Court of +ppealsH 172 SC1+ )8)H >ul" 28' 1989; 8anila Pu:li! S!hool 3ea!hers +sso!iation %' 7a,uioH 200 SC1+ 323 (1991))'

State to alle%iate the pli,ht of the un&erpri%ile,e& :" re o%in, 5ne?uitiesH it si pl" a&e a ,eneral poli!" &e!laration an& fo!use& on so!ial an& e!ono i! ine?uitiesH

:) 5n the 1987 ConstitutionH so!ial >usti!e is !on!eptuali=e& as a set of spe!ifi! e!ono i!H so!ial an& !ultural ri,hts' !) 3he 1987 Constitutional pro%ision on so!ial ;usti!e in!lu&es all phases of national &e%elop ent' 5t in!lu&es e!ono i!H politi!alH so!ial an& !ultural ri,hts' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1
2' 5n Calalan, %' 6illia sH et' al'' 70 Phil' 72)H so!ial ;usti!e was &efine& as Cneither !o unis nor &espotis H nor ato is H nor anar!h"H :ut the hu ani=ation of laws an& the e?uali=ation of so!ial an& e!ono i! for!es :" the State so that ;usti!e in its rational an& o:;e!ti%el" se!ular !on!eption a" at least :e appro0i ate&' So!ial ;usti!e eans the pro otion of the welfare of all the peopleH the a&option :" the ,o%ern ent of easures !al!ulate& to insure e!ono i! sta:ilit" of all the !o petent ele ents of so!iet"H throu,h the aintenan!e of a proper e!ono i! an& so!ial e?uili:riu in the interrelations of the e :ers of the !o unit"HC An the other han&H Se!tion )H +rti!le 55 of the 1973 Constitution pro%i&e&' 3he State shall pro ote so!ial ;usti!e to ensure the &i,nit"H welfareH an& se!urit" of all the people' 3owar& this en&' the State shall re,ulate the a!?uisitionH ownershipH useH en;o" entH an& &isposition of pri%ate propert"H an& e?uita:l" &iffuse propert" ownership an& profits'C 3his pro%ision e0poun&e& on the !on!ept of so!ial ;usti!e :" e0pressl" entionin, the re,ulation of propert" an& the e?uita:le &iffusion of ownership' Note: 5t is su,,este& that the e0a iner shoul& !orrelate the answers to :oth ?uestions an& ,i%e !re&it to answers whi!h state that there is an e0pansion of the ran,e of so!ial >usti!e in the 1987 Constitution !o pare& to the 1932 an& the 1973 Constitution'

S&(ia' 43+ti(e 3nder t,e Pre+ent C&n+tit3ti&n 9!##@: N&' 1* 1' -is!uss the !on!ept of so!ial ;usti!e un&er the 1987 ConstitutionH 2' @ow &oes it !o pare with the ol& !on!ept of so!ial >usti!e un&er the 1973 ConstitutionL <n&er the 1932 ConstitutionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1
1' Se!tion 10H +rti!le 55 of the 1987 Constitution pro%i&es' C3he State shall pro ote so!ial ;usti!e in all phases of national &e%elop entC' +s state& in 8ar?ue= %s' Se!retar" of 7a:orH 171 SC1+ 337H so!ial ;usti!e eans that the State shoul& assist the un&erpri%ile,e&' 6ithout su!h helpH the" i,ht not :e a:le to se!ure ;usti!e for the sel%es' Sin!e the pro%ision on so!ial ;usti!e in the 1987 Constitution !o%ers all phases of national &e%elop entH it is not li ite& to the re o%al of so!io*e!ono i! ine?uities :ut also in!lu&es politi!al an& !ultural ine?uities' 3he 1987 Constitution ela:orate& on the !on!ept of so!ial ;usti!e :" &e%otin, an entire arti!leH +rti!le M555H to it'

W&1en 9"666:
N& 5M' :) 6hat are the pro%isions of the

+lternati%e +nswers:
a) Se!tion 2H +rti!le 55 of the 1932 Constitution pro%i&e&H C3he pro otion of so!ial ;usti!e to 5nsure the well*:ein, an& e!ono i! se!urit" of all the people shoul& :e the !on!ern of the State'C 6hile this pro%ision e :o&ie& the !on!ept of so!ial ;usti!e as an o:li,ation of the

Constitution on wo enL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: :) 3he followin, are the pro%isions of the Constitution on wo en:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@"

1) C5t (the State) shall e?uall" prote!t the life of the other an& the life of the un:orn fro !on!eption'C (Se!tion 12H +rti!le 55) 2) 3he State re!o,ni=es the role of wo en in nation*:uil&in,H an& shall ensure the fun&a ental e?ualit" :efore the law of wo en an& en'C (Se!tion 1#H +rti!le 55)
3) C3he State shall prote!t worDin, wo en :" pro%i&in, safe an& healthful worDin, !on&itionsH taDin, into a!!ount their aternal fun!tionsH an& su!h fa!ulties an& opportunities that will enhan!e their welfare an& ena:le the to reali=e their full potential in the ser%i!e of the nation'C (Se!tion 1#H +rti!le M555)

(!) 3he preferen!e ,i%en to the poor anBs son is ;ustifie&' Not onl" is the se inar" entitle& to !hoose who it will a& it :e!ause it en;o"s institutional autono " (+rt' M5EH Se!' 2(2) ) :ut the !hoi!e a&e in this !ase is a wise an& ;u&i!ious one' 3he ri!h anBs son ha& :een e0pelle& fro another s!hool :e!ause of a!a&e i! &elin?uen!"' -espite the e!ono i! a&%anta,e an& opportunit" he ha&H he still faile& in his s!hool worDH warrantin, a fin&in, that he !annot reall" &o s!hool worD' An the other han&H the poor anBs son a" :e a!a&e i!all" &efi!ient pre!isel" as a result of po%ert" so that if relie%e& of its effe!ts it is pro:a:le he will &o :etter in s!hool' 3he &e o!rati=ation of wealth an& powerH i pli!it in +rt' M555H Se!' 1H an& ;ustifies the &e!ision of the 1e!tor in this !ase'

ARTICLE XI. Ed3(ati&n7 S(ien(e and Te(,n&'&gy7 Art+


Ed3(ati&n8 A(ade1i( reed&1 9!#$%:
N&' M: CMCH a son of a ri!h fa il"H applie& for enrol ent with the San Carlos Se inar" in 8an&alu"on,H 8etro 8anila' 9e!ause he ha& :een pre%iousl" e0pelle& fro another se inar" for s!holasti! &efi!ien!"H the 1e!tor of San Carlos Se inar" &enie& the appli!ation without ,i%in, an" ,roun&s for the &enial' +fter CMC was refuse& a& issionH the 1e!tor a& itte& another appli!antH who is the son of a poor far er who was also a!a&e i!all" &efi!ient'

Ed3(ati&n8 A(ade1i( reed&1 9!#$#: N&' 9: 6hat &o "ou un&erstan& :" a!a&e i! free&o L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+!!or&in, to Si&ne" @ooDH a!a&e i! free&o is the free&o of professionall" ?ualifie& persons to in?uireH &is!o%erH pu:lish an& tea!h the truth as the" see it in the fiel& of their !o peten!e without :ein, su:;e!t to an" !ontrol or authorit" e0!ept the !ontrol or authorit" of the rational etho&s :" whi!h truths or !on!lusions are sou,ht an& esta:lishe& in these &is!iplines' 5n $ar!ia %s' Fa!ult" +& ission Co itteeH )8 SC1+ 277H it was hel& that the a!a&e i! free&o of institutions of hi,her learnin, in%ol%es a wi&e sphere of autono " in &e!i&in, their o:;e!ti%es an& the :est eans of attainin, the without outsi&e interferen!e e0!ept when o%erri&in, pu:li! welfare !alls for so e restraint' 3husH a s!hool !an &eter ine for itself who a" tea!hH who a" :e tau,htH how it shall :e tau,htH an& who a" :e a& itte& to stu&"' 5n 3an,onon %s' PanoH 137 SC1+ 2#2H it was hel& that the a!a&e i! free&o of an institution of hi,her learnin, in!lu&es the ri,ht to pres!ri:e a!a&e i! stan&ar&s an& to refuse re*enroll ent to stu&ents for a!a&e i! &efi!ien!ies an& %iolation of &is!iplinar" re,ulations' +!!or&in, to <ni%ersit" of San Carlos %s' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No' 79237H A!to:er 18H 1988H a!a&e i! free&o in!lu&es the ri,ht to pres!ri:e re?uire ents for the !onfer ent of honors'

000 (:) Prepare a :rief ar,u ent !itin, rulesH lawsH or Constitutional pro%isions in support of the 1e!torBs &enial of the otion for re!onsi&eration' (!) $i%e "our &e!ision on the appeal of CMC fro the 1e!torBs &enial of CMBsC appli!ationH S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
(:) 3he se inar" has institutional autono " whi!h ,i%es it the ri,htH all thin,s :ein, e?ualH to !hoose who it will a& it as stu&ent' ($ar!ia %' Fa!ult" of +& issionH 7o"ola S!hool of 3heolo,"H )8 SC1+ 277 (1972); Eillar %' 3e!hnolo,i!al 5nstitute of the PhilippinesH 132 SC1+ 70) (1982); 3an,onan %' Cru= PanoH 137 SC1+ 2#2 (1982) ) 3his autono " is suffi!ientl" lar,e to per it in this !ase the se inar" to !hoose :etween the ri!h anBs son an& the poor anBs son'

Ed3(ati&n8 A(ade1i( reed&1 9!##-:


BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@-

N&' 18: 3in,H a stu&ent of 9an,Derohan <ni%ersit"H was ,i%en a failin, ,ra&e :" Professor 8ahi,pit' 3in, !onfronte& Professor 8ahi,pit at the !orri&or after !lass an& a heate& ar,u ent ensue&' Cooler hea&s pre%ente& the %er:al war en&in, in ph"si!al !onfrontation' 8ahi,pit left the !a pus an& went shoppin, 5n a &epart ent store' 3in, saw 8ahi,pit an& without an" warnin, aule& the latter' 8ahi,pit file& an a& inistrati%e !o plaint a,ainst 3in, :efore the -ean of Stu&ents for :rea!h of uni%ersit" rules an& re,ulations' 3he -ean set the !o plaint for hearin,' @owe%erH 3in, file& a petition :efore the 13C to prohi:it the -ean an& the s!hool fro in%esti,atin, hi !onten&in, that the aulin, in!i&ent happene& outsi&e the s!hool pre ises an& thereforeH outsi&e the s!hoolBs ;uris&i!tion' 3he s!hool an& the -ean answere& that the s!hool !an in%esti,ate 3in, sin!e his !on&u!t outsi&e s!hool hours an& e%en outsi&e of s!hool pre ises affe!t the welfare of the s!hool; an& further oreH the !ase in%ol%es a stu&ent an& fa!ult" e :er' 5f "ou were the ;u&,eH how woul& "ou &e!i&e the !aseL

a!a&e i! free&o of an institution of hi,her learnin, in!lu&es the free&o to &eter ine who a" tea!hH what a" :e tau,htH how it shall :e tau,htH an& who a" :e a& itte& to stu&"' 9e!ause of a!a&e i! free&o H an institution of hi,her learnin, !an refuse to re*enroll a stu&ent who is a!a&e i!all" &efi!ient or who has %iolate& the rules of &is!ipline' +!a&e i! free&o ,rants institutions of hi,her learnin, the &is!retion to for ulate rules for the ,rantin, of honors' 7iDewiseH :e!ause of a!a&e i! free&o H an institution of hi,her learnin, !an !lose a s!hool'

Ed3(ati&n8 A'ien Enr&''ee+ B D&n&r+ 9!###: N& 55 * C' 6hat is the rule on the nu :er of aliens who a" enroll in e&u!ational institutions in the Philippines' $i%e the e0!eption to the rule' 8a" su!h institutions a!!ept &onations fro forei,n stu&ents un&er the prete0t that su!h &onations are to :e use& to :u" e?uip ent an& i pro%e s!hool fa!ilitiesL /0plain' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: C' <n&er Se!tion #(2)H +rti!le M5E of the ConstitutionH no ,roup of aliens shall !o prise ore than one*thir& of the enroll ent in an" s!hool' 3he e0!eption refers to s!hools esta:lishe& for forei,n &iplo ati! personnel an& their &epen&ents an&H unless otherwise pro%i&e& :" lawH for other forei,n te porar" resi&ents'
/&u!ational institutions a" a!!ept &onations fro forei,n stu&ents' No pro%ision in the Constitution or an" law prohi:its it'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
5f 5 were the >u&,eH 5 woul& &is iss the petition' 5n Ange'es / 7isonH 112 SC1+ 2)H it was hel& that a s!hool !an su:;e!t to &is!iplinar" a!tion a stu&ent who assaulte& a professor outsi&e the s!hool pre isesH :e!ause the is!on&u!t of the stu&ent in%ol%es his status asH a stu&ent or affe!ts the ,oo& na e or reputation of the s!hool' 3he is!on&u!t of 3in, &ire!tl" affe!ts his suita:ilit" as a stu&ent'

Ed3(ati&n8 9!###:

A(ade1i(

reed&18

E2tent

N& 55 * +' 6hat is +!a&e i! Free&o L -is!uss the e0tent of +!a&e i! Free&o en;o"e& :" institutions of hi,her learnin,' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+' +!!or&in, to Reyes /. Co*r+ o) Appea'sH 19# SC1+ #02H a!a&e i! free&o is the free&o of a fa!ult" e :er to pursue his stu&ies in his parti!ular spe!ialt" an& thereafter to aDe Dnown or pu:lish the result of his en&ea%ors without fear that retri:ution woul& :e %isite& on hi in the e%ent that his !on!lusions are foun& &istasteful or o:;e!tiona:le :" the powers that :eH whether in the politi!alH e!ono i!H or a!a&e i! esta:lish ents' 5n 3arcia /. 8ac*'+y Ad0ission Co00i++eeH )8 SC1+ 277H it was hel& that the

Ed3(ati&n8 D3tie+ &) State in Re Ed3(ati&n 9!###: N& 55 * 9' $i%e two &uties of the state an&ate& :" the Constitution re,ar&in, e&u!ation' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 9' +rti!le M5E of the Constitution i poses the followin, &uties re,ar&in, e&u!ation upon the State: 1' 3he State shall prote!t an& pro ote the ri,ht of all !iti=ens to ?ualit" e&u!ation at all le%els an& shall taDe appropriate steps to aDe su!h e&u!ation a!!essi:le to all' (Se!tion 1)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@;

2' 3he State shall esta:lishH aintain an& support a !o pleteH a&e?uateH an& inte,rate& s"ste of e&u!ation rele%ant to the nee&s of the people an& so!iet"' PSe!tion 2(1)Q

Ed3(ati&n8 'ag Sa'3te 9!#$%: N&' M555: 3he re?uire ent that s!hool !hil&ren parti!ipate in fla, !ere onies has :een the su:;e!t of !ontro%ers"' An the one han& it is the %iew that the re?uire ent %iolates reli,ious free&o ; on the other is the Supre e Court &e!ision that :e!ause of rele%ant pro%isions of the 1932 Constitution the fla, salute a" :e %ali&l" re?uire&' 6hi!h of the a:o%e fin&s support on 1987 ConstitutionH Cite at least two pro%isions to pro%e "our point' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 3he %iew that fla, salute a" %ali&l" :e re?uire& fin&s support in the followin, pro%isions of the 1987 Constitution:
(a) +rtH M5EH Se!' 3(2)H whi!h pro%i&es that all e&u!ational institutions shall in!ul!ate in stu&entsH a on, other !i%il %irtuesH patriotis an& nationalis an& tea!h the the ri,hts an& &uties of !iti=enship' 3hus !onsi&era:l" :roa&enin, the ai s of s!hools is ori,inall" state& in the 1932 Constitution whi!h the Supre e Court relie& upon for its &e!ision in $erona %' Se!retar" of /&u!ationH 10) Phil' 2 (1929)H uphol&in, the fla, salute in the Philippines' 3he 1932 Constitution si pl" entione& the &e%elop ent of !i%i! !ons!ien!e an& the tea!hin, of the &uties of !iti=enship' (:) +rt 55H Se!H 13 an&ates the State to Cin!ul!ate in the "outh patriotis an& nationalis HC while Se!' 17 re?uires the State to ,i%e priorit" to e&u!ationH a on, other !on!ernsH Cto foster patriotis an& nationalis 'C

3' 3he State shall esta:lish an& aintain a s"ste of free pu:li! e&u!ation in the ele entar" an& hi,h s!hool le%els' PSe!tion 2(2)Q
#' 3he State shall esta:lish an& aintain a s"ste of s!holarship ,rantsH stu&ent loan pro,ra sH su:si&iesH an& other in!enti%es whi!h shall :e a%aila:le to &eser%in, stu&ents in :oth pu:li! an& pri%ate s!hoolsH espe!iall" to the un&erpri%ile,e&' PSe!tion 2(3)Q 2' 3he State shall en!oura,e non* for alH infor al an& in&i,enous learnin, s"ste sH as well as self* learnin,H in&epen&ent an& out*of* s!hool stu&" pro,ra parti!ularl" those that respon& to !o unit" nee&sH PSe!tion 2W#WQ

)' 3he State shall pro%i&e a&ult !iti=ensH the &isa:le&H an& out*of*s!hool "outh with trainin, in !i%i!sH %o!ational effi!ien!" an& other sDills' PSe!tion 2(2)Q
7' 3he State shall taDe into a!!ount re,ional an& se!toral nee&s an& !on&itions an& shall en!oura,e lo!al plannin, in the &e%elop ent of e&u!ational poli!ies an& pro,ra s' PSe!tion 2(1WQ 8' 3he State shall enhan!e the ri,hts of tea!hers to professional a&%an!e ent' Non*tea!hin, a!a&e i! an& non*a!a&e i! personnel shall en;o" the prote!tion of the State' PSe!tion 2(#)Q 9' 3he State shall assi,n the hi,hest :u&,etar" priorit" to e&u!ation an& ensure that tea!hin, will attra!t an& retain its ri,htful share of the :est a%aila:le talents throu,h a&e?uate re uneration an& other eans of ;o: satisfa!tion an& fulfill ent' PSe!tion 2(2)Q

Ed3(ati&n8 Rig,t t& C,&&+e Pr&)e++i&n 9"666:


N& 5E' <n&aunte& :" his three failures in the National 8e&i!al +& ission 3est (N8+3)H Cru= applie& to taDe it a,ain :ut he was refuse& :e!ause of an or&er of the -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports (-/CS) &isallowin, flunDers fro taDin, the test a fourth ti e' Cru= file& suit assailin, this rule raisin, the !onstitutional ,roun&s of a!!essi:le ?ualit" e&u!ationH a!a&e i! free&o an& e?ual prote!tion' 3he ,o%ern ent opposes thisH uphol&in, the !onstitutionalit" of the rule on the ,roun& of e0er!ise of poli!e power' -e!i&e the !ase &is!ussin, the ,roun&s raise&' (2N)

PNote: 3he ?uestion two !onstitutional &uties of re,ar&in, e&u!ation'Q

asDs for the state

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +s hel& in -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports %' San -ie,oH180 SC1+

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@@

233 (1989)H the rule is a %ali& e0er!ise of poli!e power to ensure that those a& itte& to the e&i!al profession are ?ualifie&' 3he ar,u ents of Cru= are not eritorious' 3he ri,ht to ?ualit" e&u!ation an& a!a&e i! free&o are not a:solute' <n&er Se!tion 2(3)H +rti!le M5E of the ConstitutionH the ri,ht to !hoose a profession is su:;e!t to fairH reasona:le an& e?uita:le a& ission an& a!a&e i! re?uire ents' 3he rule &oes not %iolate e?ual prote!tion' 3here is a su:stantial &istin!tion :etween e&i!al stu&ents an& other stu&ents' <nliDe other professionsH the e&i!al profession &ire!tl" affe!ts the li%es of the people'

pu:li! ele entar" an& hi,h s!hools within the re,ular !lass hours :" instru!tors &esi,nate& or appro%e& :" the reli,ious authorities to whi!h the !hil&ren or war&s :elon,H without a&&itional !ost to the $o%ern ent'

.a'idity ReF3ire1ent+ 9!##;:


Ed3(ati&n8

&)

A(ade1i(

N&' 12; 3he -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports 5ssue& a !ir!ular &is?ualif"in, an"one who fails for the fourth ti e in the National /ntran!e 3ests fro a& ission to a Colle,e of -entistr"' M who was thus &is?ualifie&H ?uestions the !onstitutionalit" of the !ir!ular' 1) -i& the !ir!ular &epri%e her of her !onstitutional ri,ht to e&u!ationL 2) -i& the !ir!ular %iolate the e?ual prote!tion !lause of the ConstitutionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1) NoH the !ir!ular &is?ualif"in, an"one who fails for the fourth ti e in the National /ntran!e 3ests fro a& ission to the Colle,e of -entistr" &i& not &epri%e M of her !onstitutional ri,ht to e&u!ation' +s hel& in -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& Sports %s' San -ie,oH 180 SC1+ 233H this ri,ht is not a:solute' Se!tion 2(3)' +rti!le M5E of the Constitution pro%i&es that the ri,ht to !hoose a profession or !ourse of stu&" is su:;e!t to fairH reasona:le an& e?uita:le a& ission an& a!a&e i! re?uire ents' 1e?uirin, that those who will enroll in a Colle,e of -entistr" shoul& pass the National /ntran!e 3est is %ali&H :e!ause it is inten&e& to ensure that onl" those who are ?ualifie& to :e &entists are a& itte& for enroll ent'

Ed3(ati&n8 Rig,t t& >3a'ity Ed3(ati&n 9"66-:


N& 555 * Chil&ren who are e :ers of a reli,ious se!t ha%e :een e0pelle& fro their respe!ti%e pu:li! s!hools for refusin,H on a!!ount of their reli,ious :eliefsH to taDe part in the fla, !ere on" whi!h in!lu&es pla"in, :" a :an& or sin,in, the national anthe H salutin, the Philippine fla, an& re!itin, the patrioti! ple&,e' 3he stu&ents an& their parents assail the e0pulsion on the ,roun& that the s!hool authorities ha%e a!te& in %iolation of their ri,ht to free pu:li! e&u!ationH free&o of spee!hH an& reli,ious free&o an& worship' -e!i&e the !ase'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he stu&ents !annot :e e0pelle& fro s!hool' +s hel& in :bra'inag /. T-e ;i/ision 7*perin+enden+ o) 7c-oo's o) Ceb*. 219 SC1+ 22) P1993QH to !o pel stu&ents to taDe part in the fla, !ere on" when it is a,ainst their reli,ious :eliefs will %iolate their reli,ious free&o ' 3heir e0pulsion also %iolates the &ut" of the State un&er +rti!le M5EH Se!tion 1 of the Constitution to prote!t an& pro ote the ri,ht of all !iti=ens to ?ualit" e&u!ation an& aDe su!h e&u!ation a!!essi:le to all'

2) NoH the !ir!ular &i& not %iolate the e?ual prote!tion !lause of the Constitution' '''

Ed3(ati&n8 Tea(,ing &) Re'igi&n 9!###: N& 55 * -' 6hat is the !onstitutional pro%ision !on!ernin, the tea!hin, of reli,ion in the ele entar" an& hi,h s!hools in the PhilippinesL /0plain' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
-' <n&er Se!tion 3(3)H +rti!le M5E of the ConstitutionH at the option e0presse& in writin, :" the parents or ,uar&iansH reli,ion shall :e allowe& to :e tau,ht to their !hil&ren or war&s in

ARTICLE X.I Genera' Pr&0i+i&n+


Genera' Pr&0i+i&n+8 L&(a' Dia'e(t 9!#$%: No' E: State whether or not the followin, !it" or&inan!es are %ali& an& ,i%e reasons in support of "our answers: (a) +n or&inan!e pres!ri:in, the use of the lo!al &iale!t as e&iu of instru!tion in the pri ar" ,ra&es' SUGGESTED ANSWER:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@?

(a) 3he or&inan!eH whi!h pres!ri:es the use of the lo!al &iale!t as e&iu of instru!tion in the pri ar" ,ra&esH is in%ali&' 3he Constitution pro%i&es in +rt M5EH Se!' 7 for the use of re,ional &iale!t as au0iliar" e&iu of instru!tion' 5f the or&inan!e pres!ri:es the use of lo!al &iale!t not as au0iliar"H :ut as e0!lusi%e lan,ua,e of instru!tionH then it is %iolati%e of the Constitution for this a&&itional reason' 3he or&inan!e woul& thus allow ore &iale!ts to :e use& than it is &esira:le an& aDe the ?uest for national unit" ore &iffi!ult'

N&' 20: State the %arious o&es ofH an& steps inH re%isin, or a en&in, the Philippine Constitution' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 3here are three Constitution' o&es of a en&in, the

A P8 'i1itati&n &n a((e*ting additi&na' d3tie+ 9!##?: No' 7: Can the >u&,e*+&%o!ate $eneral of the +r e& For!es of the Philippines :e appointe& a 3rustee of the $o%ern ent Ser%i!e 5nsuran!e S"ste L /0plain' SUGGESTED ANSWER:
NoH the >u&,e +&%o!ate $eneral of the +r e& For!es of the Philippines !annot :e appointe& as trustee of the $o%ern ent Ser%i!e 5nsuran!e S"ste ' <n&er Se!tion 2(#)' +rti!le ME5 of the ConstitutionH no e :er of the +r e& For!es of the Philippines in the a!ti%e ser%i!e shall at an" ti e :e appointe& or &esi,nate& in an" !apa!it" to a !i%ilian position in the $o%ern entH in!lu&in, ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations'

1' <n&er Se!tion 1H +rti!le ME555 of the Constitution' Con,ress a" :" three*fourths %ote of all its 8e :ers propose an" a en& ent to or re%ision of the Constitution' 2' <n&er the sa e pro%isionH a !onstitutional !on%ention a" propose an" a en& ent to or re%ision of the Constitution' +!!or&in, to Se!tion 3H +rti!le ME55 of the Constitution' Con,ress a" :" a two*thir&s %ote of all its 8e :ers !all a !onstitutional !on%ention or :" a a;orit" %ote of all its 8e :ers su: it the ?uestion of !allin, su!h a !on%ention to the ele!torate' 3' <n&er Se!tion 2' +rti!le ME55 of the ConstitutionH the people a" &ire!tl" propose a en& ents to the Constitution throu,h initiati%e upon a petition of at least twel%e per !ent of the total nu :er of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least three per !ent of the re,istere& %oters therein' +!!or&in, to Se!tion #H +rti!le ME55 of the ConstitutionH to :e %ali& an" a en& ent to or re%ision of the Constitution ust :e ratifie& :" a a;orit" of the %otes !ast 5n a ple:is!ite'

ARTICLE X.II A1end1ent+ &r Re0i+i&n+


Pe&*'eJ+ Initiati0e 9"66;: 9;<b: +n a en& ent to or a re%ision of the present Constitution a" :e propose& :" a Constitutional Con%ention or :" the Con,ress upon a %ote of three*fourths of all its e :ers' 5s there a thir& wa" of proposin, re%isions of or a en& ents to the ConstitutionL 5f soH howL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3here is no thir& wa" of proposin, re%isions to the Constitution; howe%erH the people throu,h initiati%e upon petition of at least twel%e per !ent of the total nu :er of re,istere&H %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least three per !ent of the re,istere& %oters in itH a" &ire!tl" propose a en& ents to the Constitution' 3his ri,ht is not operati%e without an i ple entin, law' (Se!tion 2H +rti!le ME55 of the 1987 Constitution')

RE ERENDUM 0+= INITIATI.E 9>!<"66@: (a) 3he present Constitution intro&u!e& the !on!epts an& pro!esses of 5nitiati%e an& 1eferen&u ' Co pare an& &ifferentiate one fro the other' (3N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
5N535+35E/ is the power of the people to propose a en& ents to the Constitution or to propose an& ena!t le,islations throu,h an ele!tion !alle& for the purpose' <n&er the 1987 ConstitutionH the people throu,h initiati%e !an propose a en& ents to the Constitution upon a petition of at least twel%e per !entu of the total nu :er of re,istere& %otersH of whi!h e%er" le,islati%e &istri!t ust :e represente& :" at least three per !entu of the re,istere& %oters therein' 1/F/1/N-<8 is the power of the ele!torate to appro%e or re;e!t a le,islation throu,h an ele!tion !alle& for the purpose' (Se!' 3H 1'+' No' )732 P1989Q)'

A1end1ent+ and Re0i+i&n+8 M&de+ 9!##%:


BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@%

An the other han&H the 7o!al $o%ern ent Co&e (1'+' No' 71)0) &efines 7AC+7 5N535+35E/ as the le,al pro!ess where:" the re,istere& %oters of a lo!al ,o%ern ent unit a" &ire!tl" proposeH ena!tH or a en& an" or&inan!e (Se!' 120) an& 7AC+7 1/F/1/N-<8 as the le,al pro!ess where:" the re,istere& %oters of the lo!al ,o%ern ent units a" appro%eH a en& or re;e!t an" or&inan!e ena!te& :" the San,,unian' (Se!' 12))

the other han&H le& :" the Senate Presi&entH are sDepti!alH an& ha& e%en warne& that no treat" or international a,ree ent a" ,o into effe!t without the !on!urren!e of two*thir&s of all e :ers of the Senate'

ARTICLE X.III Tran+it&ry Pr&0i+i&n+


Tran+it&ry Pr&0i+i&n+8 Ba+e+ 9!##?: &reign Mi'itary
N&' # * 1) <n&er the e0e!uti%e a,ree ent entere& into :etween the Philippines an& the other e :ers of the +S/+NH the other e :ers will ea!h sen& a :attalion*si=e unit of their respe!ti%e ar e& for!es to !on&u!t a !o :ine& ilitar" e0er!ise in the Su:i! 9a" +rea' + ,roup of !on!erne& !iti=ens sou,ht to en;oin the entr" of forei,n troops as %iolati%e of the 1987 Constitution that prohi:ite& the stationin, of forei,n troops an& the use :" the H of lo!al fa!ilities'

+ for er senator ha& sai&H Cit is !o pletel" wron,H if not erroneousHC an& Cis an a en& ent of the Constitution :" isinterpretation'C So e e :ers of the 7ower @ouse a,ree with Se!retar" Ar&one=H while others la ent the latterBs opinion as C?uestiona:leH unfortunateH an& without an" :asis at all'C -o "ou or &o "ou not a,ree with the afore entione& rulin, of the -epart ent of >usti!eL 6h"L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
No' 3he Constitution pro%i&es that if forei,n ilitar" :asesH troops or fa!ilities are to :e allowe& after the e0piration of the present Philippine*+ eri!an 8ilitar" 9ases +,ree ent in 1991H it ust :e Cun&er a treat" &ul" !on!urre& in :" the Senate an&H when the Con,ress so re?uiresH ratifie& :" a a;orit" of the %otes !ast :" the people in a national referen&u 'C (+rt' ME555H se!' 22) + ere a,ree entH thereforeH not a treat"H without the !on!urren!e of at least 2I3 of all the e :ers of the Senate will not :e %ali& (+rt' E55H se!' 21H +rt' ME555H se!' #)' 6ith respe!t to the pro%ision allowin, nu!lear weapons within the :asesH the Constitution appears to :an su!h weapons fro the Philippine territor"' 5t &e!lares as a state poli!" that Cthe PhilippinesH !onsistent with the national interestH a&opts an& pursues a poli!" of free&o fro nu!lear weapons in its territor"'C (+rtH 55H se!' 8) @owe%erH the &eli:erations of the Constitutional Co ission woul& see to in&i!ate that this pro%ision of the Constitution is Cnot so ethin, a:solute nor 100 per!ent without e0!eption'C 5t a" therefore :e that !ir!u stan!es a" ;ustif" a pro%ision on nu!lear weapons'

+s the >u&,eH &e!i&e the !ase' /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:


1) +s a ;u&,eH 5 shall &is iss the !ase' 6hat Se!tion 22H +rti!le ME55 of the Constitution prohi:its in the a:sen!e of a treat" is the stationin, of troops an& fa!ilities of forei,n !ountries in the Philippines' 5t &oes not in!lu&e the te porar" presen!e in the Philippines of forei,n troops for the purpose of a !o :ine& ilitar" e0er!ise' 9esi&esH the hol&in, of the !o :ine& ilitar" e0er!ise is !onne!te& with &efenseH whi!h is a so%erei,n fun!tion' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in 9aer %s' 3i=onH 27 SC1+ 1H the filin, of an a!tion interferin, with the &efense of the State a ounts to a suit a,ainst the State without its !onsent'

Tran+it&ry Pr&0i+i&n+8 Ba+e+ 9!#$$:

&reign

Mi'itary

PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW


Ba+i( Prin(i*'e+ in P3b'i( IntJ' La5 9!##!: Sele!t an" fi%e (2) of the followin, an& e0plain ea!hH usin, e0a ples: (a) (:) 1eprisal 1etorsion

N&' 22: 3he Se!retar" of >usti!e ha& re!entl" rule& that the Presi&ent a" ne,otiate for a o&ifi!ation or e0tension of ilitar" :ases a,ree ent with the <nite& States re,ar&less of the Cno nuDesC pro%isions in the 1987 Constitution' 3he Presi&ent forthwith announ!e& that she fin&s the sa e opinion Ca!!epta:leC an& will a&opt it' 3he Senators on BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19

!"#$$%)

!@$

(!) -e!larator" 3heor" of Prin!iple (&) 1e!o,nition of 9elli,eren!" (e) (f) (,) (i) (;) Continental Shelf /0e?uatur Prin!iple of -ou:le Cri inalit" 5nno!ent Passa,e

1e!o,nition

(h) Prote!ti%e Personalit" >us !o,ens in 5nternational

(e) CAN35N/N3+7 S@/7F of a !oastal state !o prises the sea*:e& an& su:soil of the su: arine areas that e0ten& :e"on& its territorial sea throu,hout the natural prolon,ation of its lan& territor" to the outer e&,e of the !ontinental ar,inH or to a &istan!e of 200 nauti!al iles fro the C:aselines fro whi!h the :rea&th of the territorial sea is easure& where the outer e&,e of the !ontinental shelf &oes not e0ten& up to that &istan!e'
(f) /M/(<+3<1 is an authori=ation fro the re!ei%in, state a& ittin, the hea& of a !onsular post to the e0er!ise of his fun!tions' For e0a pleH if the Philippines appoints a !onsul ,eneral for New OorDH he !annot start perfor in, his fun!tions unless the Presi&ent of the <nite& States issues an e0e?uatur to hi H

7aw S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (a) 1/P15S+7 is a !oer!i%e easure short of warH &ire!te& :" a state a,ainst anotherH in retaliation for a!ts of the latter an& as eans of o:tainin, reparation or satisfa!tion for su!h a!ts' 1eprisal in%ol%es retaliator" a!ts whi!h :" the sel%es woul& :e ille,al' For e0a pleH for %iolation of a treat" :" a stateH the a,,rie%e& state sei=es on the hi,h seas the ships of the offen&in, state'
(:) 1/3A1S5AN is a le,al :ut &eli:eratel" unfrien&l" a!t &ire!te& :" a state a,ainst another in retaliation for an unfrien&l" thou,h le,al a!t to !o pel that state to alter its unfrien&l" !on&u!t' +n e0a ple of retorsion is :annin, e0ports to the offen&in, state' (!) 3he -/C7+1+3A1O 3@/A1O AF 1/CA$N535AN is a theor" a!!or&in, to whi!h re!o,nition of a state is erel" an a!Dnowle&, ent of the fa!t of its e0isten!e' 5n other wor&sH the re!o,ni=e& state alrea&" e0ists an& !an e0ist e%en without su!h re!o,nition' For e0a pleH when other !ountries re!o,ni=e& 9an,la&eshH 9an,la&esh alrea&" e0iste& as a state e%en without su!h re!o,nition' (&) 1/CA$N535AN AF 9/775$/1/NCO is the for al a!Dnowle&, ent :" a thir& part" of the e0isten!e of a state of war :etween the !entral ,o%ern ent an& a portion of that state' 9elli,eren!" e0ists when a si=ea:le portion of the territor" of a state is un&er the effe!ti%e !ontrol of an insur,ent !o unit" whi!h is seeDin, to esta:lish a separate ,o%ern ent an& the insur,ents are in &e fa!to !ontrol of a portion of the territor" an& populationH ha%e a politi!al or,ani=ationH are a:le to aintain su!h !ontrolH an& !on&u!t the sel%es a!!or&in, to the laws of war' For e0a pleH $reat 9ritain re!o,ni=e& a state of :elli,eren!" in the <nite& States &urin, the Ci%il 6arH

(,) 3he prin!iple of -A<97/ C1585N+753O is the rule in e0tra&ition whi!h states that for a re?uest to :e honore& the !ri e for whi!h e0tra&ition is re?ueste& ust :e a !ri e in :oth the re?uestin, state an& the state to whi!h the fu,iti%e has fle&' For e0a pleH sin!e ur&er is a !ri e :oth in the Philippines an& in Cana&aH un&er the 3reat" on /0tra&ition :etween the Philippines an& Cana&aH the Philippines !an re?uest Cana&a to e0tra&ite a Filipino who has fle& to Cana&a'
(h) P1A3/C35E/ P/1SAN+753O prin!iple is the prin!iple :" whi!h the state e0er!ise ;uris&i!tion o%er the a!ts of an alien e%en if !o itte& outsi&e its territor"H if su!h a!ts are a&%erse to the interest of the national state' (i) 5NNAC/N3 P+SS+$/ eans the ri,ht of !ontinuous an& e0pe&itious na%i,ation of a forei,n ship throu,h the territorial sea of a state for the purpose of tra%ersin, that sea without enterin, the internal waters or !allin, at a roa&stea& or port fa!ilit" outsi&e internal watersH or pro!ee&in, to or fro internal waters or a !all at su!h roa&stea& or port fa!ilit"' 3he passa,e

is inno!ent so lon, as it is not pre;u&i!ial to the pea!eH ,oo& or&er or se!urit" of the !oastal state'
(;) ><S CA$/NS is a pere ptor" nor of ,eneral international law a!!epte& an& re!o,ni=e& :" the international !o unit" as a whole as a nor fro whi!h no &ero,ation is per itte& an& whi!h !an :e o&ifie& onl" :" a su:se?uent nor of ,eneral international law ha%in, the sa e !hara!terH +n e0a ple is the prohi:ition a,ainst the use of for!e'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!@#

C&n+tit3ti0e T,e&ry 0+= De('arat&ry T,e&ry 9"66;: (2*a*#) -istin,uish: 3he !onstituti%e theor" an& the &e!larator" theor" !on!ernin, re!o,nition of states' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +!!or&in, to the CANS353<35E/ 3@/A1OH re!o,nition is the last in&ispensa:le ele ent that !on%erts the state :ein, re!o,ni=e& into an international person' +!!or&in, to the -/C7+1+3A1O 3@/A1OH re!o,nition is erel" an a!Dnowle&, ent of the pre*e0istin, fa!t that the state :ein, re!o,ni=e& is an international person'(Cru=H 5nternational 7awH 2003 e&') C&ntig3&3+ A&ne 0+= E2('3+i0e E(&n&1i( A&ne 9"66;: II<+' -istin,uish :riefl" :ut !learl" :etween: 2) 3he !onti,uous =one an& the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (2) CAN35$<A<S .AN/ is a =one !onti,uous to the territorial sea an& e0ten&s up to t5e'0e na3ti(a' 1i'e+ fro the territorial sea an& o%er whi!h the !oastal state a" e0er!ise !ontrol ne!essar" to pre%ent infrin,e ent of its !usto sH fis!alH i i,ration or sanitar" laws an& re,ulations within its territor" or territorial sea' (+rti!le 33 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') 3he /MC7<S5E/ /CANA85C .AN/ is a =one e0ten&in, up to 200 nauti!al iles fro the :aselines of a state o%er whi!h the !oastal state has so%erei,n ri,hts for the purpose of e0plorin, an& e0ploitin,H !onser%in, an& ana,in, the natural resour!esH whether li%in, or nonli%in,H of the waters super;a!ent to the sea:e& an& of the sea:e& an& su:soilH an& with re,ar& to other a!ti%ities for the e!ono i! e0ploitation an& e0ploration of the =one' (+rti!les 2) an& 27 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') Di*'&1ati( I113nity 9"666: N& MM * + forei,n a :assa&or to the Philippines lease& a %a!ation house in 3a,a"ta" for his personal use' For so e reasonH he faile& to pa" rentals for ore than one "ear' 3he lessor file& an a!tion for the re!o%er" of his propert" in !ourt'

a) Can the forei,n a :assa&or in%oDe his &iplo ati! i unit" to resist the lessorBs a!tionL (3N) :) 3he lessor ,ets hol& of e%i&en!e that the a :assa&or is a:out to return to his ho e !ountr"' Can the lessor asD the !ourt to stop the a :assa&orBs &eparture fro the PhilippinesL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
a) NoH the forei,n a :assa&or !annot in%oDe his &iplo ati! i unit" to resist the a!tionH sin!e he is not usin, the house in 3a,a"ta" Cit" for the purposes of his ission :ut erel" for %a!ation' <n&er +rti!le 3(l)(a) of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH a &iplo ati! a,ent has no i unit" in !ase of a real a!tion relatin, to pri%ate i o%a:le propert" situate& in the territor" of the re!ei%in, State unless he hol&s it on :ehalf of the sen&in, State for purposes of the ission' :) NoH the lessor !annot asD the !ourt to stop the &eparture of the a :assa&or fro the Philippines' <n&er +rti!le 29 of the Eienna Con%entionH a &iplo ati! a,ent shall not :e lia:le to an" for of arrest or &etention' (per -on&ee) 3he ,roun&s !ite& :" O. is tena:le on the :asis that the pre!ept that a State !annot :e sue& in the !ourts of a forei,n state is a lon,* stan&in, rule of !usto ar" international law then !losel" i&entifie& with the personal i unit" of a forei,n so%erei,n fro suit an&H with the e er,en!e of &e o!rati! statesH a&e to atta!h not ;ust to the person of the hea& of stateH or his representati%eH :ut also &istin!tl" to the state itself in its so%erei,n !apa!it"' 5f the a!ts ,i%in, rise to a suit are those of a forei,n ,o%ern ent &one :" its forei,n a,entH althou,h not ne!essaril" a &iplo ati! persona,eH :ut a!tin, in his offi!ial !apa!it"H the !o plaint !oul& :e :arre& :" the i unit" of the forei,n so%erei,n fro suit without its !onsent' Suin, a representati%e of a state is :elie%e& to :eH in effe!tH suin, the state itself' (G@AS1A6 85N<C@/1 %s' CA<13 AF +PP/+7SH $'1' No' 1#239)' Fe:ruar" 11H 2003)

Di*'&1ati( I113nity 9"66!:


N& MM * -r' EelenH an offi!ial of the 6orl& @ealth Ar,ani=ation (6@A) assi,ne& in the PhilippinesH arri%e& at the Nino" +?uino 5nternational +irport with his personal effe!ts !ontaine& in twel%e !rates as una!!o panie& :a,,a,e' +s su!hH his personal effe!ts were allowe& free entr" fro &uties an& ta0esH an& were &ire!tl" store& at +rshaine CorporationBs

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?6

warehouse at 8aDatiH pen&in, -r' EelenBs relo!ation to his per anent ?uarters'
+t the instan!e of poli!e authoritiesH the 1e,ional 3rial Court (13C) of 8aDati issue& a warrant for the sear!h an& sei=ure of -r' EelenBs personal effe!ts in %iew of an alle,e& %iolation of the 3ariff an& Custo Bs Co&e' +!!or&in, to the poli!eH the !rates !ontaine& !ontra:an& ite s' <pon protest of 6@A offi!ialsH the Se!retar" of Forei,n +ffairs for all" a&%ise& the 13C as to -r' EelenBs i unit"' 3he Soli!itor $eneral liDewise ;oine& -r' EelenBs plea of i unit" an& otion to ?uash the sear!h warrant' 3he 13C &enie& the otion'

<n&er +rti!le 37 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH e :ers of the a& inistrati%e an& te!hni!al staff of the &iplo ati! issionH shallH if the" are not nationals of or per anent resi&ents in the re!ei%in, StateH en;o" the pri%ile,es an& i unities spe!ifie& in +rti!le 29'

<n&er +rti!le 9 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH the re e&" is to &e!lare the hi,h*ranDin, offi!ials an& ranD*an&*file e plo"ees personae non ,ratae an& asD the to lea%e' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: <n&er the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH a &iplo ati! a,ent Cshall not :e lia:le to an" for of arrest or &etention (+rti!le 29) an& he en;o"s i unit" fro !ri inal ;uris&i!tion (+rti!le 31)'
3his i unit" a" !o%er the Chi,h*ranDin, offi!ialsC in ?uestionH who are assu e& to :e &iplo ati! offi!ers or a,ents' 6ith respe!t to the CranD*an&*file e plo"eesC the" are !o%ere& :" the i unit" referre& to a:o%eH pro%i&e& the" are not nationals or per anent resi&ents of the PhilippinesH pursuant to +rti!le 37(2) of the sai& Con%ention' 5f the sai& ranD*an&*file e plo"ees :elon, to the ser%i!e staff of the &iplo ati! ission (su!h as &ri%ers) the" a" :e !o%ere& :" the i unit" (e%en if the" are not Philippine nationals or resi&ents) as set out in +rti!le 37(3)H if at the ti e of the arrest the" were in Ca!ts perfor e& in the !ourse of their &uties'C 5f a &ri%er was a on, the sai& ranD*an&*file e plo"ees an& he was arreste& while &ri%in, a &iplo ati! %ehi!le or en,a,e& in relate& a!tsH still he woul& :e !o%ere& :" i unit"'

5s the &enial of the properL (2N)

otion to ?uash

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he &enial of the otion is i proper' +s hel& in 6orl& @ealth Ar,ani=ation %s' +?uinoH #8 SC1+ 2#2 (1972)' as an offi!ial of the 6orl& @ealth Ar,ani=ationH -r' Eelen en;o"e& &iplo ati! i unit" an& this in!lu&e& e0e ption fro &uties an& ta0es' Sin!e &iplo ati! i unit" in%ol%es a politi!al ?uestionH where a plea of &iplo ati! i unit" is re!o,ni=e& an& affir e& :" the /0e!uti%e -epart entH it is the &ut" of the !ourt to a!!ept the !lai of i unit"'

Di*'&1ati( I113nity 9"66-: N& ME555 * + ,roup of hi,h*ranDin, offi!ials an& ranD*an&*file e plo"ees statione& in a forei,n e :ass" in 8anila were arreste& outsi&e e :ass" ,roun&s an& &etaine& at Ca p Cra e on suspi!ion that the" were a!ti%el" !olla:oratin, with CterroristsC out to o%erthrow or &esta:ili=e the Philippine $o%ern ent' 3he Forei,n + :assa&or sou,ht their i e&iate releaseH !lai in, that the &etaine& e :ass" offi!ials an& e plo"ees en;o"e& &iplo ati! i unit"' 5f in%ite& to e0press "our le,al opinion on the atterH what a&%i!e woul& "ou ,i%eL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 5 shall a&%i!e that the hi,h*ranDin, offi!ials an& ranD*an&*file e plo"ees :e release& :e!ause of their &iplo ati! i unit"' +rti!le 29 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations pro%i&es: C3he person of a &iplo ati! a,ent shall :e in%iola:le' @e shall not :e lia:le to an" for of arrest or &etention'C

Di*'&1ati( I113nity 9"66;:


9$<a: +' 89CH an alien :usiness an &ealin, in !arpets an& !a%iarH file& a suit a,ainst poli!e en an& O.H an atta!he of MM / :ass"H for &a a,es :e!ause of ali!ious prose!ution' 89C alle,e& that O. !on!o!te& false an& ali!ious !har,es that he was en,a,e& in &ru, traffi!Din,H whereupon nar!oti!s poli!e en !on&u!te& a C:u"*:ustC operation an& without warrant arreste& hi H sear!he& his houseH an& sei=e& his one" an& ;ewelr"H then &etaine& an& torture& hi in %iolation of his !i%il an& hu an ri,hts as well as !ausin, hi H his fa il" an& :usiness serious &a a,es a ountin, to two illion pesos' 89C a&&e& that the trial !ourt a!?uitte& hi of the &ru, !har,es'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?!

+ssailin, the !ourtBs ;uris&i!tion: O. now o%es to &is iss the !o plaintH on the ,roun& that (1) he is an e :ass" offi!er entitle& to &iplo ati! i unit"; an& that (2) the suit is reall" a suit a,ainst his ho e state without its !onsent' @e presents &iplo ati! notes fro MM / :ass" !ertif"in, that he is an a!!re&ite& e :ass" offi!er re!o,ni=e& :" the Philippine ,o%ern ent' @e perfor s offi!ial &utiesH he sa"sH on a ission to !on&u!t sur%eillan!e on &ru, e0porters an& then infor lo!al poli!e offi!ers who aDe the a!tual arrest of suspe!ts' +re the two ,roun&s !ite& :" O. to &is iss the suit tena:leL (2N)

(a) +s

!ounsel of +:a&H refute the &efenses of Cso%erei,n i unit"C an& C&iplo ati! i unit"C raise& :" the State of 5tal" an& its + :assa&or'
S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +s !ounsel for +:a&H 5 will ar,ue that so%erei,n i unit" will not lie as it is an esta:lishe& rule that when a State enters into a !ontra!tH it wai%es its i unit" an& allows itself to :e sue&' 8oreo%erH there is a pro%ision in the !ontra!t that an" suit arisin, therefro shall :e file& with the proper !ourts of the Cit" of 8anila' An the issue of &iplo ati! i unit"H 5 will assert that the a!t of the + :assa&or unilaterall" ter inatin, the a,ree ent is tortuous an& &one with ali!e an& :a& faith an& not a so%erei,n or &iplo ati! fun!tion'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+' 3he !lai of &iplo ati! i unit" of O. is not tena:leH :e!ause he &oes not possess an a!Dnowle&,e& &iplo ati! title an& is not perfor in, &uties of a &iplo ati! nature' @owe%erH the suit a,ainst hi is a suit a,ainst MM without its !onsent' O. was a!tin, as an a,ent of MM an& was perfor in, his offi!ial fun!tions when he !on&u!te& sur%eillan!e on &ru, e0porters an& infor e& the lo!al poli!e offi!ers who arreste& 89C' @e was perfor in, su!h &uties with the !onsent of the Philippine ,o%ern entH thereforeH the suit a,ainst O. is a suit a,ainst MM without its !onsent' (8inu!her %' Court of +ppealsH 397 SC1+ 2## P1992Q)'

(:) +t an" rateH what shoul& :e the !ourtBs rulin, on the sai& &efensesL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he !ourt shoul& rule a,ainst sai& &efenses' 3he aintenan!e !ontra!t an& repair of the / :ass" an& + :assa&orBs 1esi&en!e is a !ontra!t in ;us i periiH :e!ause su!h repair of sai& :uil&in,s is in&ispensa:le to the perfor an!e of the offi!ial fun!tions of the $o%ern ent of 5tal"' @en!eH the !ontra!t is in pursuit of a so%erei,n a!ti%it" in whi!h !aseH it !annot :e &ee e& to ha%e wai%e& its i unit" fro suit' An the atter of whether or not the + :assa&or a" :e sue&H +rti!le 31 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations pro%i&es that a &iplo ati! a,ent en;o"s i unit" fro the !ri inalH !i%il an& a& inistrati%e ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, state e0!ept if the a!t perfor e& is outsi&e his offi!ial fun!tionsH in a!!or&an!e with the prin!iple of fun!tional ne!essit"' 5n this !aseH the a!t of enterin, into the !ontra!t :" the + :assa&or was part of his offi!ial fun!tions an& thusH he is entitle& to &iplo ati! i unit"' (1epu:li! of 5n&onesia %' Ein=onsH $'1' No' 12#702H >une 2)H 2003)

+73/1N+35E/ S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: Di*'&1ati( 9>-< "66@: I113nity8 A1ba++ad&r

(1) 5tal"H throu,h its + :assa&orH entere& into a !ontra!t with +:a& for the aintenan!e an& repair of spe!ifie& e?uip ent at its / :ass" an& + :assa&orBs 1esi&en!eH su!h as air !on&itionin, unitsH ,enerator setsH ele!tri!al fa!ilitiesH water heatersH an& water otor pu ps' 5t was stipulate& that the a,ree ent shall :e effe!ti%e for a perio& of four "ears an& auto ati!all" renewe& unless !an!elle&' FurtherH it pro%i&e& that an" suit arisin, fro the !ontra!t shall :e file& with the proper !ourts in the Cit" of 8anila' Clai in, that the 8aintenan!e Contra!t was unilaterall"H :aselessl" an& ar:itraril" ter inate&H +:a& sue& the State of 5tal" an& its + :assa&or :efore a !ourt in the Cit" of 8anila' + on, the &efensesH the" raise& were Cso%erei,n i unit"C an& C&iplo ati! i unit"'C (2N)

Di*'&1ati( I113nity8 A1ba++ad&r+ 9!##6:


BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?"

N&' 2: -H the + :assa&or of the Gin,&o Nepal to the PhilippinesH lease& a house 9a,uio Cit" as his personal %a!ation ho e' a!!ount of ilitar" &istur:an!e in NepalH not re!ei%e his salar" an& allowan!es fro ,o%ern ent an& so he faile& to pa" his rentals ore than one "ear' /H the lessorH file& a!tion for re!o%er" of his propert" with 1e,ional 3rial Court of 9a,uio Cit"'

of in An &i& his for an the

(1) Can the a!tion a,ainst - prosperL (2) Can / asD for the atta!h ent of the furniture an& other personal properties of after ,ettin, hol& of e%i&en!e that - is a:out to lea%e the !ountr"L (3T Can / asD for the !ourt to stop -Bs &eparture fro the PhilippinesL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (1) OesH the a!tion !an prosper' +rti!le 31 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations pro%i&es: C1' + &iplo ati! a,ent shall en;o" i unit" fro the !ri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, State' @e shall also en;o" i unit" fro its !i%il an& a& inistrati%e ;uris&i!tionH e0!ept in the !ase of:
(a) + real a!tion relatin, to pri%ate i o%a:le propert" situate& in the territor" of the re!ei%in, StateH unless he hol&s it on :ehalf of the sen&in, State for the purposes of the ission;C

an& 31 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations pro%i&es that the papersH !orrespon&en!e an& the propert" of &iplo at a,ents shall :e in%iola:le' 3hereforeH a writ of atta!h ent !annot :e issue& a,ainst his furniture an& an" personal properties' 8oreo%erH on the assu ption that the Gin,&o of Nepal ,rants si ilar prote!tion to Philippine &iplo ati! a,ents' Se!tion # of 1epu:li! +!t No' 72 pro%i&es that an" writ or pro!ess issue& :" an" !ourt in the Philippines for the atta!h ent of the ,oo&s or !hattels of the a :assa&or of a forei,n State to the Philippines shall :e %oi&'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
(3) NoH / !annot asD the !ourt to stop the &eparture of the + :assa&or of the Gin,&o of Nepal fro the Philippines' +rti!le 29 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations pro%i&es: C3he person of a &iplo ati! a,ent shall :e in%iola:le' @e shall not :e lia:le to an" for of arrest or &etention'C

Di*'&1ati( I113nity8 C&0erage 9>-<"66@: (2) +&a s an& 9aDer are + eri!an !iti=ens resi&in, in the Philippines' +&a s :efrien&e& 9aDer an& :e!a e a fre?uent %isitor at his house' Ane &a"H +&a s arri%e& with 30 e :ers of the Philippine National Poli!eH ar e& with a Sear!h 6arrant authori=in, the sear!h of 9aDerBs house an& its pre ises for &an,erous &ru,s :ein, traffi!De& to the <nite& States of + eri!a'
3he sear!h purporte&l" "iel&e& positi%e resultsH an& 9aDer was !har,e& with Eiolation of the -an,erous -ru,s +!t' +&a s was the prose!utionBs prin!ipal witness' @owe%erH for failure to pro%e his ,uilt :e"on& reasona:le &ou:tH 9aDer was a!?uitte&' 9aDer then sue& +&a s for &a a,es for filin, tru pe&*up !har,es a,ainst hi ' + on, the &efenses raise& :" +&a s is that he has &iplo ati! i unit"H !onfor a:l" with the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations' @e presente& -iplo ati! Notes fro the + eri!an / :ass" statin, that he is an a,ent of the <nite& States -ru, /nfor!e ent +,en!" tasDe& with C!on&u!tin, sur%eillan!e operationsC on suspe!te& &ru, &ealers in the Philippines :elie%e& to :e the sour!e of prohi:ite& &ru,s :ein, shippe& to the <'S' 5t was also state& that after ha%in, as!ertaine& the tar,etH +&a s woul& then

3he a!tion a,ainst the + :assa&or is a real a!tion in%ol%in, pri%ate i o%a:le propert" situate& within the territor" of the Philippines as the re!ei%in, state' 3he a!tion falls within the e0!eption to the ,rant of i unit" fro the !i%il an& a& inistrati%e ;uris&i!tion of the Philippines' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1;
NoH the a!tion will not prosper' +lthou,h the a!tion is a real a!tion relatin, to pri%ate i o%a:le propert" within the territor" of the PhilippinesH nonethelessH the %a!ation house a" :e !onsi&ere& propert" hel& :" the + :assa&or 5n :ehalf of his state (the Gin,&o of Nepal) for the purposes of the ission an&H thereforeH su!h is :e"on& the !i%il an& a& inistrati%e ;uris&i!tion of the PhilippinesH in!lu&in, its !ourtsH

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
(2) NoH / !annot asD for the atta!h ent of the personal properties of the + :assa&or' +rts' 30

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?-

infor the Philippine nar!oti! a,ents to aDe the a!tual arrest' (2N)
a) +s !ounsel of plaintiff 9aDerH ar,ue wh" his !o plaint shoul& not :e &is isse& on the ,roun& of &efen&ant +&a sB &iplo ati! i unit" fro suit'

3' Suppose after he was !har,e&H he was appointe& as his !ountr"Bs a :assa&or to the Philippines' Can his newl"*,aine& &iplo ati! status :e a ,roun& for &is issal of his !ri inal !aseL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1' <n&er +rti!le 32 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH a &iplo ati! a,ent shall en;o" i unit" fro the !ri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, State' @e shall also en;o" i unit" fro its !i%il an& a& inistrati%e ;uris&i!tion e0!ept in the !ase of:

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1'
+s !ounsel for 9aDerH 5 woul& ar,ue that +&a s is not a &iplo ati! a,ent !onsi&erin, that he is not a hea& of ission nor is he part of the &iplo ati! staff that is a!!or&e& &iplo ati! ranD' 3husH the suit shoul& not :e &is isse& as +&a s has no &iplo ati! i unit" un&er the 19)1 Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elations'

:) +s !ounsel of &efen&ant +&a sH ar,ue for the &is issal of the !o plaint' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1
+s !ounsel for +&a sH 5 woul& ar,ue that he worDe& for the <nite& States -ru, /nfor!e ent +,en!" an& was tasDe& to !on&u!t sur%eillan!e of suspe!te& &ru, a!ti%ities within the !ountr" with the appro%al of the Philippine ,o%ern ent' <n&er the &o!trine of State 5 unit" fro SuitH if the a!ts ,i%in, rise to a suit are those of a forei,n ,o%ern ent &one :" its forei,n a,entH althou,h not ne!essaril" a &iplo ati! persona,eH :ut a!tin, in his offi!ial !apa!it"H the !o plaint !oul& :e :arre& :" the i unit" of the forei,n so%erei,n fro suit without its !onsent' +&a s a" not :e a &iplo ati! a,ent :ut the Philippine ,o%ern ent has ,i%en its i pri aturH if not !onsentH to the a!ti%ities within Philippine territor" of +&a s an& thus he is entitle& to the &efense of state i unit" fro suit' (8inu!her %' C+H $'1' No' 1#239)H Fe:ruar" 11H 2003)

(a) + real a!tion relatin, to pri%ate i o%a:le propert" situate& in the territor" of the re!ei%in, StateH unless he hol&s it on :ehalf of the sen&in, State for the purposes of the ission; (:) +n a!tion relatin, to su!!ession in whi!h the &iplo ati! a,ent is in%oDe& as e0e!utorH a& inistratorH heir or le,atee as a pri%ate person an& not on :ehalf of the sen&in, State; (!) +n a!tion relatin, to an" professional or !o er!ial a!ti%it" e0er!ise& :" the &iplo ati! a,ent in the re!ei%in, State outsi&e his offi!ial fun!tions'
An the other han&H un&er +rti!le #1 of the Eienna Con%ention on Consular 1elationsH a !onsular offi!er &oes not en;o" 5 unit" fro the Cri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, State' <n&er +rti!le #3 of the Eienna Con%ention on Consular 1elationsH !onsular offi!ers are not a ena:le to the >uris&i!tion of the >u&i!ial or a& inistrati%e authorities of the re!ei%in, State in respe!t of a!ts perfor e& in the e0er!ise of !onsular fun!tions' @owe%erH this &oes not appl" in respe!t of a !i%il a!tion either:

Di*'&1ati( I113nity8 Di*'&1ati( En0&y and C&n+3'ar O))i(er+ 9!##@: N&' 3: 1' -is!uss the &ifferen!esH if an"H in the pri%ile,es or i unities of &iplo ati! en%o"s an& !onsular offi!ers fro the !i%il or !ri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, state'
2' + !onsul of a South + eri!an !ountr" statione& in 8anila was !har,e& with serious ph"si!al in;uries' 8a" he !lai 5 unit" fro ;uris&i!tion of the lo!al !ourtL /0plain'

(a) arisin, out of a !ontra!t !on!lu&e& :" a !onsular offi!er in whi!h he &i& not !ontra!t e0pressl" or i plie&l" as an a,ent of the sen&in, State; or (:) :" a thir& part" for &a a,e arisin, fro an a!!i&ent in the re!ei%in, State !ause& :" a %ehi!leH %esselH or air!raft' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
2' NoH he a" not !lai i unit" fro the ;uris&i!tion of the lo!al !ourt' <n&er +rti!le #1 of the Eienna Con%ention of Consular 1elationsH !onsuls &o not en;o" i unit" fro the !ri inal >uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, State' @e is not lia:le to arrest or &etention pen&in, trial unless the offense was !o itte& a,ainst his fatherH

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?;

otherH !hil&H as!en&antH &es!en&ant or spouse' Consuls are not lia:le to arrest an& &etention pen&in, trial e0!ept in the !ase of a ,ra%e !ri e an& pursuant to a &e!ision :" the !o petent ;u&i!ial authorit"' 3he !ri e of ph"si!al 5n;uries is not a ,ra%e !ri e unless it :e !o itte& a,ainst an" of the a:o%e* entione& persons' (S!hne!Den:ur,er %' 8oran )3 Phil' 2#9)'

was hel& that a !onsul is not e0e pt fro !ri inal prose!ution in the !ountr" where he is assi,ne&' @owe%erH as se!retar" in the + eri!an / :ass"H M en;o"s &iplo ati! i unit" fro !ri inal prose!ution +s se!retar"H he is a &iplo ati! a,ent' <n&er Para,raph 1 of +rti!le 31 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH a &iplo ati! a,ent en;o"s i unit" fro the !ri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, State'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 3' OesH the !ase shoul& :e &is isse&' <n&er +rti!le #0 of the Eienna Con%ention on -iplo ati! 1elationsH if a &iplo ati! a,ent is in the territor" of a thir& StateH whi!h has ,rante& hi a passport %isa if su!h %isa was ne!essar"H while pro!ee&in, to taDe up his postH the thir& State shall a!!or& hi in%iola:ilit" an& su!h other i unities as a" :e re?uire& to ensure his transit' Di*'&1ati( I113nity8 Di*'&1ati( En0&y and C&n+3'ar O))i(er+ 9!##%:
N& 19: MH a Se!retar" an& Consul in the + eri!an / :ass" in 8anilaH :ou,ht fro 9 a &ia on& rin, in the a ount of P20H000'00 whi!h he later ,a%e as a :irth&a" present to his Filipino ,irlfrien&' 3he pur!hase pri!e was pai& in !he!D &rawn upon the Citi:anD' <pon present ent for pa" entH the !he!D was &ishonore& for insuffi!ien!" of fun&s' 9e!ause of MBs failure to aDe ,oo& the &ishonore& !he!DH 9 file& a !o plaint a,ainst M in the Affi!e of the Cit" Prose!utor of 8anila for %iolation of 9atas Pa :ansa 9i,' 22' +fter preli inar" in%esti,ationH the infor ation was file& a,ainst M in the Cit" Court of 8anila' M file& a otion to &is iss the !ase a,ainst hi on the ,roun& that he is a Se!retar" an& Consul in the + eri!an / :ass" en;o"in, &iplo ati! i unit" fro !ri inal prose!ution in the Philippines'

E2('3+i0e E(&n&1i( A&ne 9"666: N& M5M' :) 6hat is the !on!ept of the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one un&er the <N Con%ention on the 7aw of the SeaL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
:) 3he e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one un&er the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea is an area :e"on& an& a&;a!ent to the territorial seaH whi!h shall not e0ten& :e"on& 200 nauti!al iles fro the :aselines fro whi!h the territorial sea is easure&' 3he !oastal State has in the e0!lusi%e e!ono i! =one:

(a) So%erei,n ri,hts for the purpose of e0plorin, an& e0ploitin,H !onser%in, an& ana,in, the natural resour!esH whether li%in, or non*li%in,H if the waters super;a!ent to the sea*:e& an& of the sea:e& an& su:soilH an& with re,ar& to other a!ti%ities for the e!ono i! e0ploitation an& e0ploration of the =oneH su!h as the pro&u!tion of ener," fro the waterH !urrents an& win&s; (:) >uris&i!tion as pro%i&e& in the rele%ant pro%isions of the Con%ention with re,ar& to: (i) the esta:lish ent an& use of artifi!ial islan&sH installations an& stru!tures; (ii) arine s!ientifi! resear!h; an&
(iii) the prote!tion arine en%iron ent; an& preser%ation of the

5f "ou were the >u&,eH how woul& "ou resol%e the otion to &is issL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 5f 5 were the >u&,eH 5 woul& ,rant the &is iss' otion to

(!) Ather ri,hts an& &uties pro%i&e& for the Con%ention' P+rti!le 2) of the Con%ention of the 7aw of the Sea') E2e(3ti0e Agree1ent+8 Binding E))e(t 9"66-:
N& MM +n /0e!uti%e +,ree ent was e0e!ute& :etween the Philippines an& a nei,h:orin, State' 3he Senate of the Philippines tooD it

+s !onsulH M is not i une fro !ri inal prose!ution' <n&er Para,raph 3 of +rti!le #1 of the Eienna Con%ention on Consular 1elationsH a !onsular offi!er is not i une fro the !ri inal ;uris&i!tion of the re!ei%in, state' 5n S!hne!Den:ur,er %s' 8oronH )3 Phil' 2#9H it

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?@

upon itself to pro!ure a !ertifie& true !op" of the /0e!uti%e +,ree ent an&H after &eli:eratin, on itH &e!lare&H :" a unani ous %oteH that the a,ree ent was :oth unwise an& a,ainst the :est interest of the !ountr"' 5s the /0e!uti%e +,ree ent :in&in, (a) fro the stan&point of Philippine law an& (:) fro the stan&point of international lawL /0plain

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (a) +s to Philippine lawH /0e!uti%e +,ree ent is :in&in,'''' the

N&' 10: 2) Patri!D is !har,e& with ille,al re!ruit ent an& estafa :efore the 13C of 8anila' @e ;u pe& :ail an& ana,e& to es!ape to + eri!a' +ssu e that there is an e0tra&ition treat" :etween the Philippines an& + eri!a an& it &oes not in!lu&e ille,al re!ruit ent as one of the e0tra&ita:le offenses' <pon surren&er of Patri!D :" the <'S' $o%ern ent to the PhilippinesH Patri!D proteste& that he !oul& not :e trie& for ille,al re!ruit ent' -e!i&e'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
2) <n&er the prin!iple of spe!ialt" in e0tra&itionH Patri!D !annot :e trie& for ille,al re!ruit entH sin!e this is not in!lu&e& in the list of e0tra&ita:le offenses in the e0tra&ition treat" :etween the Philippines an& the <nite& StatesH unless the <nite& States &oes not o:;e!t to the trial of Patri!D for 5lle,al re!ruit ent'

(:) 3he /0e!uti%e +,ree ent is also :in&in, fro the stan&point of international law' +s hel& in 9a%an %' .a ora' 3#2 SC1+ ##9 P2000QH in international law e0e!uti%e a,ree ents are e?uall" :in&in, as treaties upon the States who are parties to the ' +&&itionall"H un&er +rti!le 2U1)(a) of the Eienna Con%ention on the 7aw of 3reatiesH whate%er a" :e the &esi,nation of a written a,ree ent :etween StatesH whether it is in&i!ate& as a 3reat"H Con%ention or /0e!uti%e +,ree entH is not le,all" si,nifi!ant' Still it is !onsi&ere& a treat" an& ,o%erne& :" the international law of treaties'

E2traditi&n8 E))e(ti0ity &) treaty 9!##?: N&' ); 1) 3he /0tra&ition 3reat" :etween Fran!e an& the Philippines is silent as to its appli!a:ilit" with respe!t to !ri es !o itte& prior to its effe!ti%it"' a) Can Fran!e &e an& the e0tra&ition of +H a Fren!h national resi&in, in the PhilippinesH for an offense !o itte& in Fran!e prior to the effe!ti%it" of the treat"L /0plain' :) Can + !ontest his e0tra&ition on the ,roun& that it %iolates the e0 post fa!to pro%ision of the Philippine ConstitutionL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1' a) OesH Fran!e !an asD for the e0tra&ition of + for an offense !o itte& in Fran!e :efore the effe!ti%it" of the /0tra&ition 3reat" :etween Fran!e an& the Philippines' 5n Cleu,h %s' StraDosh' 109 F2& 330H it was hel& that an e0tra&ition treat" applies to !ri es !o itte& :efore its effe!ti%it" unless the e0tra&ition treat" e0pressl" e0e pts the ' +s 6hite an points outH e0tra&ition &oes not &efine !ri es :ut erel" pro%i&es a eans :" whi!h a State a" o:tain the return an& punish ent of persons !har,e& with or !on%i!te& of ha%in, !o itte& a !ri e who fle& the ;uris&i!tion of the State whose law has :een %iolate&' 5t is therefore i aterial whether at the ti e of the !o ission of the !ri e for whi!h e0tra&ition is sou,ht no treat" was in e0isten!e' 5f at the ti e e0tra&ition is re?ueste& there is in for!e :etween the re?uestin, an& Cthe re?ueste& States a treat" !o%erin, the offense on whi!h

E2traditi&n 0+= De*&rtati&n 9!##-: N&' 10: 1) 6hat is the &ifferen!e if an" :etween e0tra&ition an& &eportationL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 1) 3he followin, are the &ifferen!es :etween e0tra&ition an& &eportation:
a' /M31+-535AN is effe!te& for the :enefit of the state to whi!h the person :ein, e0tra&ite& will :e surren&ere& :e!ause he is a fu,iti%e !ri inal in that stateH while -/PA13+35AN is effe!te& for the prote!tion of the State e0pellin, an alien :e!ause his presen!e is not !on&u!i%e to the pu:li! ,oo&'

:' /M31+-535AN is effe!te& on the :asis of an e0tra&ition treat" or upon the re?uest of another stateH while -/PA13+35AN is the unilateral a!t of the state e0pellin, an alien' !' 5n /M31+-535ANH the alien will :e surren&ere& to the state asDin, for his e0tra&itionH while in -/PA13+35AN the un&esira:le alien a" :e sent to an" state willin, to a!!ept hi ' E2traditi&n8 D&(trine &) S*e(ia'ty 9!##-:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!??

the re?uest is :ase&H the treat" is appli!a:le' (6hite anH -i,est of 5nternational 7awH Eol' )H pp' 723*72#') :) NoH + !annot !ontest his e0tra&ition on the ,roun& that it %iolates the e0 post fa!to pro%ision of the Constitution' +s hel& in 6ri,ht %s' Court of +ppealsH 232 SC1+ 3#1H the prohi:ition a,ainst e0 post fa!to laws in Se!tion 22H +rti!le 555 of the Constitution applies to penal laws onl" an& &oes not appl" to e0tra&ition treaties' E2traditi&n8 Gr&3nd+ 9"66":
N& ME555' >ohn is a for er Presi&ent of the 1epu:li! MH :ent on re,ainin, power whi!h he lost to Presi&ent @arr" in an ele!tion' Full" !on%in!e& that he was !heate&H he set out to &esta:ili=e the ,o%ern ent of Presi&ent @arr" :" eans of a series of protest a!tions' @is plan was to weaDen the ,o%ern ent an&H when the situation :e!a e ripe for a taDe*o%erH to assassinate Presi&ent @arr"' 6illia H on the other han&H is a :elie%er in hu an ri,hts an& a for er follower of Presi&ent @arr"' Notin, the s"ste ati! a!ts of harass ent !o itte& :" ,o%ern ent a,ents a,ainst far ers protestin, the sei=ure of their lan&sH la:orers !o plainin, of low wa,esH an& stu&ents seeDin, free tuitionH 6illia or,ani=e& ,roups whi!h hel& pea!eful rallies in front of the Presi&ential Pala!e to e0press their ,rie%an!es' An the e%e of the assassination atte ptH >ohnBs en were !au,ht :" e :ers of the Presi&ential Se!urit" $roup' Presi&ent @arr" went on air threatenin, to prose!ute plotters an& &issi&ents of his a& inistration' 3he ne0t &a"H the ,o%ern ent !har,e& >ohn with assassination atte pt an& 6illia with in!itin, to se&ition'

the plan of >ohn to assassinate Presi&ent @arr" was part of su!h plan' @owe%erH if the e0tra&ition treat" !ontains an attentat !lauseH 1epu:li! + !an e0tra&ite >ohnH :e!ause un&er the attentat !lauseH the taDin, of the life or atte pt a,ainst the life of a hea& of state or that of the e :ers of his fa il" &oes not !onstitute a politi!al offense an& is therefore e0tra&ita:le'

F51S3 +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: 1epu:li! + a" or !an refuse the re?uest of e0tra&ition of 6illia :e!ause he is not in its territor" an& thus it is not in the position to &eli%er hi to 1epu:li! M'
/%en if 6illia were in the territorial ;uris&i!tion of 1epu:li! +H he a" not :e e0tra&ite& :e!ause in!itin, to se&itionH of whi!h he is !har,e&H !onstitutes a politi!al offense' 5t is a stan&ar& pro%ision of e0tra&ition treatiesH su!h as the one :etween 1epu:li! + an& 1epu:li! MH that politi!al offenses are not e0tra&ita:le'

S/CAN- +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: 1epu:li! 9 !an &en" the re?uest of 1epu:li! M to e0tra&ite 6illia H :e!ause his offense was not a politi!al offense' An the :asis of the pre&o inan!e or proportionalit" test his a!ts were not &ire!tl" !onne!te& to an" purel" politi!al offense' E2traditi&n8 Retr&a(ti0e A**'i(ati&n 9>"< "66@: (1) 3he Philippines an& +ustralia entere& into a 3reat" of /0tra&ition !on!urre& in :" the Senate of the Philippines on Septe :er 10H 1990' 9oth ,o%ern ents ha%e notifie& ea!h other that the re?uire ents for the entr" into for!e of the 3reat" ha%e :een !o plie& with' 5t tooD effe!t in 1990'
3he +ustralian ,o%ern ent is re?uestin, the Philippine ,o%ern ent to e0tra&ite its !iti=enH $i:sonH who has !o itte& in his !ountr" the in&i!ta:le offense of A:tainin, Propert" :" -e!eption in 1982' 3he sai& offense is a on, those enu erate& as e0tra&ita:le in the 3reat"' For his &efenseH $i:son asserts that the retroa!ti%e appli!ation of the e0tra&ition treat" a ounts to an e0 post fa!to law' 1ule on $i:sonBs !ontention' (2N)

>ohn fle& to 1epu:li! +' 6illia H who was in 1epu:li! 9 atten&in, a le!ture on &e o!ra!"H was a&%ise& :" his frien&s to sta" in 1epu:li! 9' 9oth 1epu:li! + an& 1epu:li! 9 ha%e !on%entional e0tra&ition treaties with 1epu:li! M' 5f 1epu:li! M re?uests the e0tra&ition of >ohn an& 6illia H !an 1epu:li! + &en" the re?uestL 6h"L State "our reason full"' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1epu:li! + !an refuse to e0tra&ite >ohnH :e!ause his offense is a politi!al offense' >ohn was plottin, to taDe o%er the ,o%ern ent an&

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
$i:son is in!orre!t' 5n 6ri,ht %' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No'113213H +u,ust 12H199#H it was hel& that the retroa!ti%e appli!ation of the 3reat" of /0tra&ition &oes not %iolate

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?%

the prohi:ition a,ainst e0 post fa!to lawsH :e!ause the 3reat" is neither a pie!e of !ri inal le,islation nor a !ri inal pro!e&ural statute' 5t erel" pro%i&e& for the e0tra&ition of persons wante& for offenses alrea&" !o itte& at the ti e the treat" was ratifie&'

/urope :efore 6orl& 6ar 55) were e0ter inate& :" the Na=is' +lon, with the >ewsH another 9 to 10 illion people ($"psies an& Sla%s) were assa!re&' (6A17- +78+N+C 120 (#0th e&'H 1987))' H31an Rig,t+ 9!###:
!### N& M * +' $i%e three ultilateral !on%entions on @u an 1i,hts a&opte& un&er the &ire!t auspi!es of the <nite& NationsL (2N)

'ag State 0+= 'ag &) C&n0enien(e 9"66;: II<+' -istin,uish :riefl" :ut !learl" :etween: (3) 3he fla, state an& the fla, of !on%enien!e' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: F7+$ S3+3/ eans a ship has the nationalit" of the fla, of the state it fliesH :ut there ust :e a ,enuine linD :etween the state an& the ship' (+rti!le 91 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') F7+$ AF CANE/N5/NC/ refers to a state with whi!h a %essel is re,istere& for %arious reasons su!h as low or non*e0istent ta0ation or low operatin, !osts althou,h the ship has no ,enuine linD with that state' (@arrisH Cases an& 8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'H 1998H p' #22') Gen&(ide 9!#$$: 6hat is C$eno!i&eHC an& what is the fore ost e0a ple thereof in re!ent histor"L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: C$eno!i&eC refers to an" of the followin, a!tsH whether !o itte& in ti e of war or pea!eH with intent to &estro" in whole or in part nationalH ethni!H ra!ial or reli,ious ,roup: (a) Gillin, e :ers of a ,roup; (:) Causin, :o&il" or ental har to its e :ers; (!) -eli:eratel" infli!tin, on the ,roup !on&itions of life !al!ulate& to :rin, a:out its ph"si!al &estru!tion in whole or in part; (&) 5 posin, easures to pre%ent :irths within the ,roup; an&
(e) For!i:l" transfor in, !hil&ren of the ,roup to another ,roup' (>' S+7AN$+ 4 P' O+PH P<975C 5N3/1N+35AN+7 7+6 399*#00 (19))))' 3he fore ost e0a ple of ,eno!i&e is the @olo!aust (1933*19#2) where a:out ) illion >ews (two thir&s of the >ewish population of

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +' 3he followin, are ultilateral !on%entions on @u an 1i,hts a&opte& un&er the &ire!t auspi!es of the <nite& Nations: 1' 5nternational Co%enant on Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,hts; 2' Con%ention on the /li ination of +ll For s of -is!ri ination a,ainst 6o en; 3' Con%ention on the 1i,hts of the Chil&; #' Con%ention a,ainst 3orture an& Ather CruelH 5nhu an or -e,ra&in, 3reat ent or Punish ent; 2' 5nternational Con%ention on the /li ination of +ll For s of 1a!ial -is!ri ination; )' Con%ention on the Pre%ention an& Punish ent of the Cri e of $eno!i&e; an& 7' 5nternational Con%ention on /!ono i!H So!ialH an& Cultural 1i,hts H31an Rig,t+8 Ci0i' and P&'iti(a' Rig,t+ 9!##":
N&' 12: 6alan, Su,atH a %i,ilante ,roup !o pose& of pri%ate :usiness en an& !i%i! lea&ers pre%iousl" %i!ti i=e& :" the Nationalist Patrioti! +r " (NP+) re:el ,roupH was i pli!ate& in the torture an& Di&nappin, of -r' 8en,eleH a Dnown NP+ s" pathi=er'

a) <n&er pu:li! international lawH what rules properl" appl"L 6hat lia:ilitiesH if an"H arise thereun&er if 6alan, Su,atBs in%ol%e ent is !onfir e&' :) -oes the Co ission on @u an 1i,hts ha%e the power to in%esti,ate an& a&;u&i!ate the atterL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
a) An the assu ption that -r' 8en,ele is a forei,nerH his torture %iolates the 5nternational Co%enant on Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,htsH to whi!h the Philippine has a!!e&e&' +rti!le 7 of the

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?$

Co%enant on Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,hts pro%i&es: CNo one shall :e su:;e!te& to torture or to !ruelH inhu an or &e,ra&in, treat ent or punish ent'C 5n a!!or&an!e with +rti!le 2 of the Co%enant on Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,htsH it is the o:li,ation of the Philippines to ensure that -r' 8en,ele has an effe!ti%e re e&"H that he shall ha%e his ri,ht to su!h a re e&" &eter ine& :" !o petent authorit"H an& to ensure the enfor!e ent of su!h re e&" when ,rante&' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: An the assu ption that -r' 8en,ele is a forei,nerH his !lai will ha%e to :e &ire!te& a,ainst the e :ers of 6alan, Su,at on the :asis of the Philippine law an& :e a&&resse& to the ;uris&i!tion of Philippine !ourts' @is !lai a" :e :ase& on the ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international lawH whi!h for part of Philippine law un&er Se!tion 2H +rti!le 55 of the Constitution' @is !lai a" :e pre ise& on rele%ant nor s of international law of hu an ri,hts'
<n&er international lawH -r' 8en,ele ust first e0haust the re e&ies un&er Philippine law :efore his in&i%i&ual !lai !an :e taDen up :" the State of whi!h he is a national unless the sai& State !an satisfa!toril" show it is its own interests that are &ire!tl" in;ure&' 5f this !on&ition is fulfille&H the sai& StateBs !lai will :e &ire!te& a,ainst the Philippines as a su:;e!t of international law' 3hus it woul& !ease to :e an in&i%i&ual !lai of -r' 8en,ele' -r' 8en,eleBs !ase a" !on!ern international law nor s on State responsi:ilit"' 9ut the appli!ation of these nor s re?uire that the :asis of responsi:ilit" is the rele%ant a!ts that !an :e attri:ute& to the Philippines as a State'

:) Can onl" a&;u&i!ation

in%esti,ateH

no

power

of

H31an Rig,t+8 Ci0i' and P&'iti(a' Rig,t+ 9!##?: !##? N&' 1: 1) -istin,uish !i%il ri,hts fro politi!al ri,hts an& ,i%e an e0a ple of ea!h ri,ht' 2) 6hat are the relations of !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts to hu an ri,htsL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1) 3he ter CC5E57 15$@3SC refers to the ri,hts se!ure& :" the !onstitution of an" state or !ountr" to all its 5nha:itants an& not !onne!te& with the or,ani=ation or a& inistration of ,o%ern entH P9la!DH @an&:ooD of + eri!an Constitutional 7awH #th e&'H 22)') PA7535C+7 15$@3S !onsist in the power to parti!ipateH &ire!tl" or in&ire!tl"H in the ana,e ent of the ,o%ern ent' 3husH !i%il ri,hts ha%e no relation to the esta:lish entH ana,e ent or support of the ,o%ern ent' (+nthon" %s' 9urrowH 129 F 783)'

C5E57 15$@3S &efines the relations of in&i%i&ual a on,st the sel%es while PA7535C+7 15$@3S &efines the relations of 5n&i%i&uals %is*a*%is the state' C5E57 15$@3S e0ten& prote!tion to all inha:itants of a stateH while PA7535C+7 15$@3S prote!t erel" its !iti=ens'
/0a ples of !i%il ri,hts are the ri,hts a,ainst in%oluntar" ser%itu&eH reli,ious free&o H the ,uarantee a,ainst unreasona:le sear!hes an& sei=uresH li:ert" of a:o&eH the prohi:ition a,ainst i prison ent for &e:tH the ri,ht to tra%elH e?ual prote!tionH &ue pro!essH the ri,ht to arr"H ri,ht to return to this !ountr" an& ri,ht to e&u!ation'

@en!eH un&er the prin!iple of attri:ution it is ne!essar" to show that the a!ts of the %i,ilante ,roup 6alan, Su,at !an :e le,all" attri:ute& to the Philippines :" the State of whi!h -r' 8en,ele is a national'
3he appli!ation of treat" nor s of international law on hu an ri,htsH su!h as the pro%ision a,ainst torture in the 5nternational Co%enants in Ci%il an& Politi!al 1i,hts pertain to States' 3he a!ts of pri%ate !iti=ens !o posin, 6alan, Su,at !annot the sel%es !onstitute a %iolation :" the Philippines as a State'

/0a ples of politi!al ri,hts are the ri,ht of suffra,eH the ri,ht of asse :l"H an& the ri,ht to petition for re&ress of ,rie%an!es'
2) @u an ri,hts are :roa&er in s!ope than !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts' 3he" also in!lu&e so!ialH e!ono i!H an& !ultural ri,hts' @u an ri,hts are inherent in persons fro the fa!t of their hu anit"' /%er" an possesses the e%er"where an& at all ti es si pl" :e!ause he is a hu an :ein,' An the other han&H so e !i%il an& politi!al ri,hts are not natural ri,hts' 3he" e0ist :e!ause the" are prote!te& :" a

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!?#

!onstitution or ,rante& :" law' For e0a pleH the li:ert" to enter into !ontra!ts is not a hu an ri,ht :ut is a !i%il ri,ht' IntJ' C&3rt &) 43+ti(e8 43ri+di(ti&n O0er State+ !##; N&' 20: 3he so%erei,nt" o%er !ertain islan&s is &ispute& :etween State + an& State 9' 3hese two states a,ree& to su: it their &isputes to the 5nternational Court of >usti!e P5C>Q' 1) -oes the 5C> ha%e ;uris&i!tion to taDe !o,ni=an!e of the !aseL 2) 6ho shall represent the parties :efore the CourtL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1) 3he 5nternational Court of >usti!e has ;uris&i!tion o%er the !aseH :e!ause the parties ha%e ;ointl" su: itte& the !ase to it an& ha%e thus in&i!ate& their !onsent to its ;uris&i!tion'

2) Parties to a !ase a" appoint a,ents to appear :efore the 5nternational Court of >usti!e in their :ehalfH an& these a,ents nee& not :e their own nationals' @owe%erH un&er +rti!le 1) of the Statutes of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eH no e :er of the !ourt a" appear as a,ent in an" !ase' IntJ' C&3rt &) 43+ti(e8 43ri+di(ti&n O0er State+ 9!##;:
N&' 19; 3he State of No%aH !ontrolle& :" an authoritarian ,o%ern entH ha& unfrien&l" relations with its nei,h:orin, stateH + eri!a' 9reslaH another nei,h:orin, stateH ha& :een shippin, ar s an& a unitions to No%a for use in atta!Din, + eria'

1) 5f No%a an& + eria are e :ers of the <nite& NationsH No%a !an pre ise its !ause of a!tion on a %iolation of +rti!le 2(#) of the <nite& Nations CharterH whi!h re?uires e :ers to refrain fro the threat or use of for!e ''' 2) 9" %irtue of the prin!iple of so%erei,n i unit"H no so%erei,n state !an :e a&e a part" to a pro!ee&in, :efore the 5nternational Court of >usti!e unless it has ,i%en its !onsent' 5f + eria has not a!!epte& the >uris&i!tion of the 5nternational Court of >usti!e' + eria !an in%oDe the &efense of la!D of ;uris&i!tion' /%en if + eria has a!!epte& the ;uris&i!tion of the !ourt :ut the a!!eptan!e is li ite& an& the li itation applies to the !aseH it a" in%oDe su!h li itation its !onsent as a :ar to the assu ption of ;uris&i!tion' 5f ;uris&i!tion has :een a!!epte&H + eria !an in%oDe the principle of anticipatory self-defenseH re!o,ni=e& un&er !usto ar" international lawH :e!ause No%a is plannin, to laun!h an atta!D a,ainst + eria :" usin, the ar s it :ou,ht fro 9resia'

3) 5f ;uris&i!tion o%er + eria is esta:lishe&H the !ase shoul& :e &e!i&e& in fa%or of No%aH '''' if ;uris&i!tion o%er + eria is not esta:lishe&H the !ase shoul& :e &e!i&e& in fa%or of + eria :e!ause of the prin!iple of so%erei,n i unit"' IntJ' C&3rt &) 43+ti(e8 Li1itati&n+ On 43ri+di(ti&n 9!###: N& M * 9' <n&er its StatuteH ,i%e two li itations on the ;uris&i!tion of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 9' 3he followin, are the li itations on the ;uris&i!tion of the 5nternational Court of >usti!e un&er its Statute: 1' Anl" states a" :e parties in !ases :efore it' (+rti!le 3#) 2' 3he !onsent of the parties is nee&e& for the !ourt to a!?uire ;uris&i!tion o%er a !ase' (+rti!le 3)) IntJ' C&3rt &) 43+ti(e8 Partie+8 P'eading+ and Ora' Arg31ent 9!##;:
N&' 20: 3he so%erei,nt" o%er !ertain islan&s is &ispute& :etween State + an& State 9' 3hese two states a,ree& to su: it their &isputes to the 5nternational Court of >usti!e P5C>Q'

3o forestall an atta!DH + eria pla!e& floatin, ines on the territorial waters surroun&in, No%a' + eria supporte& a ,roup of re:els or,ani=e& to o%erthrow the ,o%ern ent of No%a an& to repla!e it with a frien&l" ,o%ern ent'
No%a &e!i&e& to file a !ase a,ainst + eria in the 5nternational Court of >usti!e

1) An what ,roun&s a" No%aBs !auses of a!tion a,ainst + eria :e :ase&L 2) An what ,roun&s a" + eria o%e to &is iss the !ase with the 5C>L
-e!i&e the !ase' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%6

3) 6hat lan,ua,e shall :e use& in the plea&in,s an& oral ar,u entL #) 5n !ase State +H the petitionerH falls to appear at the oral ar,u entH !an State 9H the respon&entH o%e for the &is issal of the petitionL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3) <n&er +rti!le 39 of the Statutes of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eH the offi!ial lan,ua,es of the !ourt are /n,lish an& Fren!h' 5n the a:sen!e of an a,ree entH ea!h part" a" use the lan,ua,e it prefers' +t the re?uest of an" part"H the !ourt a" authori=e a part" to use a lan,ua,e other than /n,lish or Fren!h'

1'

6here is the seat of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eL 11N) 3he seat of the 5nternational Court of >usti!e is at the @a,ue or elsewhereH as it a" &e!i&eH e0!ept &urin, the ;u&i!ial %a!ations the &ates an& &uration of whi!h it shall fi0 (5'C'>' StatuteH +rt' 22)' @ow an" are its e :ersL (1N) 3he Court is !o pose& of fifteen e :ers who ust :e of hi,h oral !hara!ter an& possess the ?ualifi!ations re?uire& in their respe!ti%e !ountries for appoint ent to the hi,hest ;u&i!ial offi!e or are ;uris!onsults of re!o,ni=e& !o peten!e in international law (5'C'>' StatuteH +rt' 2)'
6hat is the ter of their offi!eL (1N) 3he" are ele!te& for a ter of nine "earsH sta,,ere& at three*"ear inter%als :" &i%i&in, the ;u&,es first ele!te& into three e?ual ,roups an& assi,nin, the :" lotter" ter s of threeH si0 an& nine "ears respe!ti%el"' 5 e&iate re*ele!tion is allowe& (5'C'>' StatuteH +rt' 13)'

2'

#) <n&er +rti!le 23 of the Statutes of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eH whene%er one of the parties &oes not appear :efore the !ourt or fails to &efen& its !aseH the other part" a" asD the !ourt to &e!i&e in fa%or of its !lai ' @owe%erH the !ourt ustH :efore &oin, soH satisf" itself it has >uris&i!tion an& that the !lai is well foun&e& in fa!t an& law' Internati&na' C&n0enti&n8 La5 &) t,e Sea 9"66;:
(2*:) /n route to the tuna fishin, ,roun&s in the Pa!ifi! A!eanH a %essel re,istere& in Countr" 36 entere& the 9alintan, Channel north of 9a:u"an 5slan& an& with spe!ial hooDs an& nets &ra,,e& up re& !orals foun& near 9atanes' 9" international !on%ention !ertain !orals are prote!te& spe!iesH ;ust :efore the %essel rea!he& the hi,h seasH the Coast $uar& patrol inter!epte& the %essel an& sei=e& its !ar,o in!lu&in, tuna' 3he aster of the %essel an& the owner of the !ar,o proteste&H !lai in, the ri,hts of transit passa,e an& inno!ent passa,eH an& sou,ht re!o%er" of the !ar,o an& the release of the ship' 5s the !lai eritorious or notL 1eason :riefl"' (2N)

3'

#'

6ho is its in!u :ent presi&entL (1N) 3he in!u :ent Presi&ent is 1osal"n @i,,ins' 6hat is hisIher nationalit"L (1 N) She is a national of the <nite& Gin,&o or a 9ritish su:;e!t' (NA3/: Sin!e ?uestions 5M(#) an& 5M(2) &o not test the e0a ineesB Dnowle&,e of the lawH it is su,,este& that the" :e &isre,ar&e&)
5n 1980H the <nite& States file& with the 5nternational Court of >usti!e a !o plaint a,ainst 5ran alle,in, that the latter is &etainin, + eri!an &iplo ats in %iolation of 5nternational 7aw' /0plain how the 5nternational Court of >usti!e !an a!?uire ;uris&i!tion o%er these !onten&in, !ountries' (2N)

2'

)'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;
3he !lai of inno!ent passa,e is not eritorious' 6hile the %essel has the ri,ht of inno!ent passa,eH it shoul& not !o it a %iolation of an" international !on%ention' 3he %essel &i& not erel" na%i,ate throu,h the territorial seaH it also &ra,,e& re& !orals in %iolation of the international !on%ention whi!h prote!te& the re& !orals' 3his is pre;u&i!ial to the ,oo& or&er of the Philippines' (+rti!le 19(2) of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea)

<n&er +rti!le 3) of the 5'C'>' StatutesH :oth parties ust a,ree to su: it the sel%es to the ;uris&i!tion of the 5nternational Court of >usti!e' Internati&na' La5 0+= La58 Territ&ria' Prin(i*'e8 Cri1e+ 9>"<"66@: M3ni(i*a' Internati&na'

Internati&na' C&3rt &) 43+ti(e 9>#<"66?:

(2) Poli!e Affi!er @enr" 8a,itin, of the Nar!oti!s Se!tion of the 6estern Poli!e -istri!t applie& for a sear!h warrant in the 1e,ional 3rial Court of 8anila for %iolation

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%!

of Se!tion 11H +rti!le 55 (Possession of Prohi:ite& -ru,s) of 1epu:li! +!t (1'+') No' 91)2 (Co prehensi%e -an,erous -ru,s +!t of 2002) for the sear!h an& sei=ure of heroin in the !a:in of the Captain of the 8SS SeastarH a forei,n*re,istere& %essel whi!h was oore& at the South @ar:orH 8anilaH its port of &estination' 9ase& on the affi&a%its of the appli!antBs witnesses who were !rew e :ers of the %esselH the" saw a :o0 !ontainin, ten (10) Dilo,ra s of heroin un&er the :e& in the CaptainBs !a:in' 3he 13C foun& pro:a:le !ause for the issuan!e of a sear!h warrant; ne%erthelessH it &enie& the appli!ation on the ,roun& that Philippine !ourts ha%e no !ri inal ;uris&i!tion o%er %iolations of 1'+' No' 91)2 !o itte& on forei,n*re,istere& %essels foun& in Philippine waters'

or&er to esta:lish pro:a:le !auseH as re?uire& :" Se!tions 3 an& # of 1ule 12)' 5n an" e%entH there is no showin, that the re?uisite ?uantu of pro:a:le !ause was esta:lishe& :" ere referen!e to the affi&a%its an& other &o!u entar" e%i&en!e presente&' Mandate+ and Tr3+t Territ&rie+ 9"66-: N& ME55 * 6hat are the so*!alle& 8an&ates an& 3rust 3erritoriesL -oes the <nite& Nations e0er!ise so%erei,nt" o%er these territoriesL 5n the affir ati%eH how is this ;uris&i!tion e0er!ise&L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he 8an&ates were the o%erseas possessions of the &efeate& states of $er an" an& 3urDe" whi!h were pla!e& :" the 7ea,ue of Nations un&er the a& inistration of an&atories to pro ote their &e%elop ent an& ulti ate in&epen&en!e' (@arrisH Cases an& 8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'H p' 131') 6hen the <nite& Nations repla!e& the 7ea,ue of NationsH the s"ste of 8an&ates was repla!e& :" the S"ste of 3rust 3erritories' 3he <nite& Nations e0er!ise& resi&uar" so%erei,nt" o%er the 3rust 3erritories throu,h the 3rustee PowersH who e0er!ise& the powers of so%erei,nt" su:;e!t to super%ision :" an& a!!ounta:ilit" to the <nite& Nations' (Appenhei * 7auterpa!htH 5nternational 7awH Eol' 5H 7th e&'H pp' 213*21#') (Sin!e there are no ore 3rust 3erritoriesH this is ;ust a atter of histori!al interest')

5s the rulin, of the !ourt !orre!tL Support "our answer with reasons' (2N) +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: 3he !ourtBs rulin, is not !orre!t' 3he forei,n*re,istere& %essel was not in transit' 5t was oore& in South @ar:orH 8anilaH its port of &estination' @en!eH an" !ri e !o itte& on :oar& sai& %esselH liDe possession of heroinH is tria:le :" our !ourts (<'S' %' +h Sin,H $'1' No' 13002H A!to:er 10H 1917)H e0!ept if the !ri e in%ol%es the internal ana,e ent of the %essel' +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
3he 13C a" assert its ;uris&i!tion o%er the !ase :" in%oDin, the territorial prin!ipleH whi!h pro%i&es that !ri es !o itte& within a stateBs territorial :oun&aries an& persons within that territor"H either per anentl" or te poraril"H are su:;e!t to the appli!ation of lo!al law' >uris&i!tion a" also :e asserte& on the :asis of the uni%ersalit" prin!ipleH whi!h !onfers upon all states the ri,ht to e0er!ise ;uris&i!tion o%er &eli!ta ;uris ,entiu or international !ri esH su!h as the international traffi! nar!oti!s' 3he possession of 10 D,s' of heroin !onstitutes !o er!ial ?uantit" an& therefore ?ualifies as traffi!Din, of nar!oti!s' Conse?uentl"H the &enial of the sear!h warrant shoul& ha%e :een an!hore& on the failure of the !ourt to !on&u!t personal e0a ination of the witnesses to the !ri e in

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
8an&ates pertains to the an&ate s"ste esta:lishe& un&er +rti!le 22 of the Co%enant of the 7ea,ue of Nations for the tutela,e an& ,uar&ianship of !olonies an& territories for erl" hel& :" $er an" an& 3urDe" :efore the First 6orl& 6arH :" a %i!torious power on :ehalf of the 7ea,ue of Nations until the" were prepare& for in&epen&en!e' 3erritories un&er an&ate were not un&er the so%erei,nt" of an" State; the" were a& inistere& :" a an&ator" power whi!h was responsi:le to the 7ea,ue of Nations for the &e%elop ent an& welfare of the &isa&%anta,e& su:;e!t peoples towar&s in&epen&en!e' 3husH an&ate& territories were un&er the ;uris&i!tion of the an&ator" powerH su:;e!t to the super%ision of the 7ea,ue of Nations' 3he ,eneral le,al fra eworD of the an&ate s"ste passe& into the trusteeship s"ste of the <nite& NationsH to,ether with

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%"

an&ate& territories whi!h &i& not attain in&epen&en!e status :" the en& of the Se!on& 6orl& 6ar' 3rust territories an& the 3rusteeship Coun!il are !reate& :" the <N Charter' 3he trusteeship s"ste un&er Chapters M55 an& M555 of the <N Charter is esta:lishe& un&er the super%ision of the <N 3rusteeship Coun!il un&er the authorit" of the $eneral +sse :l" for the pro otion of politi!al an& so!io* e!ono i! &e%elop ent of peoples in trust territories towar&s in&epen&ent status' + new feature of the <N trusteeship s"ste is the !reation of a new !ate,or" of territoriesH the strate,i! trust territoriesH whi!h is un&er the super%ision of the Se!urit" Coun!il instea& of the 3rusteeship Coun!il' <n&er the fore,oin, !on&itionsH the <nite& Nations a" not :e sai& to e0er!ise so%erei,nt" o%er trust territoriesH the fun!tions an& powers of the 3rusteeship Coun!il an& the $eneral +sse :l" :ein, li ite& to a& inistration an& super%ision un&er the prin!iple of self*&eter ination as set forth in in&i%i&ual trust a,ree ents !on!lu&e& in a!!or&an!e with the <N Charter' <N ;urisi&i!tion is e0er!ise& throu,h the 3rusteeship Coun!il un&er the authorit" of the $eneral +sse :l"H e0!ept with respe!t to strate,i! areas or territories whi!h are pla!e& un&er the ;uris&i!tion of the Se!urit" Coun!il'

it is Philippine !ourts that will &e!i&e the !aseH the" will uphol& the Constitution o%er international law' 5f it is an international tri:unal that will &e!i&e the !aseH it will uphol& international law o%er uni!ipal law' +s hel& :" the Per anent 5nternational Court of >usti!e in the !ase of the Polish Nationals in -an=i,H a State !annot in%oDe its own Constitution to e%a&e o:li,ations in!u :ent upon it un&er international law'

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1 5 woul& taDe the proposition assi,ne& to 3ea CCC as :ein, nearer to the le,al realit" in the PhilippinesH na el"H C+ !ountr"Bs Constitution pre%ails o%er international law :ut international law pre%ails o%er uni!ipal statutesC'
3his isH howe%erH su:;e!t to the pla!e of international law in the Philippine Constitutional settin, in whi!h treaties or !usto ar" nor s in international law stan& in parit" with statutes an& in !ase of irre!on!ila:le !onfli!tH this a" :e resol%e& :" Ie0 posteriori &ero,at le0 priori as the Supre e Court o:iter &i!tu in +::as %' CA8/7/C hol&s' @en!eH a statute ena!te& later than the !on!lusion or effe!ti%it" of a treat" a" pre%ail' 5n the Philippine le,al s"ste H there are no nor s hi,her than !onstitutional nor s' 3he fa!t that the Constitution aDes ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international law or !on%entional international law as part of Philippine law &oes not aDe the superior to statutor" lawH as !larifie& in Se!retar" of >usti!e %' 7antion an& Philip 8orris &e!isions'

M3ni(i*a' La5 0+= Internati&na' La5 9"66-: N& ME5* +n or,ani=ation of law stu&ents sponsore& an inter*s!hool &e:ate a on, three tea s with the followin, assi,n ents an& propositions for ea!h tea to &efen&: 3ea C+C * 5nternational law pre%ails o%er uni!ipal law' 3ea C9C * 8uni!ipal law pre%ails o%er international law' 3ea CCC * + !ountr"Bs Constitution pre%ails o%er international law :ut international law pre%ails o%er uni!ipal statutes' 5f "ou were ,i%en a !han!e to !hoose the !orre!t propositionH whi!h woul& "ou taDe an& wh"L S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
5 shall taDe the proposition for 3ea C' 5nternational 7aw an& uni!ipal law are supre e in their own respe!ti%e fiel&s' Neither has he,e on" o%er the other' (9rownlieH Prin!iples of Pu:li! 5nternational 7awH #th e&' p' 127') <n&er +rti!le 55H Se!tion 2 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international law for part of the law of the lan&' Sin!e the" erel" ha%e the for!e of lawH if

Ne3tra'ity &) State+ 9!#$$:


N&' 20: Swit=erlan& an& +ustralia are outstan&in, e0a ples of neutrali=e& statesH

1' 6hat are the !hara!teristi!s of a neutrali=e& stateL 2' 5s neutralit" s"non" ous with neutrali=ationL 5f notH &istin,uish one fro the other' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1' 6hether si ple or !o positeH a State is sai& to :e neutrali=e& where its in&epen&en!e an& inte,rit" are ,uarantee& :" an international !on%ention on the !on&ition that su!h State o:li,ates itself ne%er to taDe up ar s a,ainst an" other StateH e0!ept for self*&efenseH or enter into su!h international o:li,ations as woul& in&ire!tl" in%ol%e it in war' + State seeDs neutrali=ation where it is weaD an& &oes not

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%-

wish to taDe an a!ti%e part in international politi!s' 3he power that ,uarantee its neutrali=ation a" :e oti%ate& either :" :alan!e of power !onsi&erations or :" the &esire to aDe the weaD state a :uffer :etween the territories of the ,reat powers' (>' S+7AN$+ 4 P' O+PH P<975C 5N3/1N+35AN+7 7+6 7) (19))))' 2' Firstl"H neutralit" o:tains onl" &urin, warH whereas neutrali=ation is a !on&ition that applies in pea!e or in war' Se!on&l"H neutrali=ation is a status !reate& :" eans of treat"H whereas neutralit" is a status !reate& un&er international lawH :" eans of a stan& on the part of a state not to si&e with an" of the parties at war' 3hir&l"H neutralit" is :rou,ht a:out :" a unilateral &e!laration :" the neutral StateH while neutrali=ation !annot :e effe!te& :" unilateral a!tH :ut ust :e re!o,ni=e& :" other States' (5&')

Auter spa!e in this esti ate :e,ins fro the lowest altitu&e an artifi!ial satellite !an re ain in or:it' <n&er the 8oon 3reat" of 1979 the oon an& the other !elestial :o&ies for part of outer spa!e'
5n outer spa!eH the spa!e satellites or o:;e!ts are un&er the ;uris&i!tion of States of re,istr" whi!h !o%ers astronauts an& !os onauts' 3his atter is !o%ere& :" the 1e,istration of A:;e!ts in Spa!e Con%ention of 197# an& the 7ia:ilit" for -a a,e Cause& :" Spa!e& A:;e!ts Con%ention of 1972'

Prin(i*'e &) A3t&<Li1itati&n 9>!6<"66?: 1' 6hat is the prin!iple of auto*li itationL (2'2N) +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
<n&er the prin!iple of auto*li itationH an" state a" :" its !onsentH e0press or i plie&H su: it to a restri!tion of its so%erei,n ri,hts' 3here a" thus :e a !urtail ent of what otherwise is a plenar" power (1ea,an %' C51H $'1' 7*2)379H -e!e :er 27H 19)9)'

O3ter S*a(e8 43ri+di(ti&n 9"66-: N& M5M * 6hat is outer*spa!eL 6ho or whi!h !an e0er!ise ;uris&i!tion o%er astronauts while in outer spa!eL +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
3here are se%eral s!hools of thou,ht re,ar&in, the &eter ination of outer spa!eH su!h as the li it of air fli,htH the hei,ht of at ospheri! spa!eH infinit"H the lowest altitu&e of an artifi!ial satelliteH an& an altitu&e appro0i atin, aero&"na i! lift' +nother s!hool of thou,ht pro!ee&s :" analo," to the law of the sea' 5t proposes that a State shoul& e0er!ise full so%erei,nt" up to the hei,ht to whi!h an air!raft !an as!en&' Non* ilitant fli,ht instru entalities shoul& :e allowe& o%er a se!on& areaH a !onti,uous =one of 300 iles' A%er that shoul& :e outer spa!e' 3he :oun&ar" :etween airspa!e an& outer spa!e has not "et :een &efine&' (@arrisH Cases an& 8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'' pp' 221*223') <n&er +rti!le 8 of the 3reat" on the Prin!iples $o%ernin, the +!ti%ities of States in the /0ploration an& <se of Auter Spa!eH 5n!lu&in, the 8oon an& Ather Celestial 9o&iesH a State on whose re,istr" an o:;e!t laun!he& into outer spa!e retains ;uris&i!tion o%er the astronauts while the" are in outer spa!e'

Re(i*r&(ity 0= Prin(i*'e &) A3t&<Li1itati&n 9>!6<"66?: 2' 6hat is the relationship :etween re!ipro!it" an& the prin!iple of auto* li itationL (2'2N) +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
6hen the Philippines enters into treatiesH ne!essaril"H these international a,ree ents a" !ontain li itations on Philippine so%erei,nt"' 3he !onsi&eration in this partial surren&er of so%erei,nt" is the re!ipro!al !o it ent of other !ontra!tin, states in ,rantin, the sa e pri%ile,e an& i unities to the Philippines' For e0a pleH this Din& of re!ipro!it" in relation to the prin!iple of auto*li itation !hara!teri=es the Philippine !o it ents un&er 63A*$+33' 3his is :ase& on the !onstitutional pro%ision that the Philippines Ca&opts the ,enerall" a!!epte& prin!iples of international law as part of the law of the lan& an& a&heres to the poli!" of '''

!ooperation an& a it" with all nationsC (3ana&a %' +n,araH $'1' No' 118292H 8a" 2H 1997)'

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
Auter spa!e is the spa!e :e"on& the airspa!e surroun&in, the /arth or :e"on& the national airspa!e' 5n lawH the :oun&ar" :etween outer spa!e an& airspa!e has re aine& un&eter ine&' 9ut in theor"H this has :een esti ate& to :e :etween 80 to 90 Dilo eters'

Re(&gniti&n &) State+8 De a(t& 0+= De 43re Re(&gniti&n 9!##$: N& M55' -istin,uish :etween &e fa!to re!o,nition an& &e ;ure re!o,nition of states' P2N)

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%;

SUGGESTED ANSWER: 3he followin, are the &istin!tions :etween &e fa!to re!o,nition an& &e >ure re!o,nition of a ,o%ern ent: 1' -e fa!to re!o,nition is pro%isionalH &e >ure re!o,nition is relati%el" per anent; 2' -e fa!to re!o,nition &oes not %est title in the ,o%ern ent to its properties a:roa&; &e >ure re!o,nition &oes; 3' -e fa!to re!o,nition is li ite& to !ertain ;uri&i!al relations; &e ;ure re!o,nition :rin,s a:out full &iplo ati! relations' (Cru=' 5nternational 7aw' 199) e&'' p' 83') ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 3he &istin!tion :etween &e fa!to re!o,nition an& &e ;ure re!o,nition of a State is not !lear in international law' 5t isH howe%erH usuall" assu e& as a point of &istin!tion that while &e fa!to re!o,nition is pro%isional an& hen!e a" :e with&rawnH &e ;ure re!o,nition is final an& !annot :e with&rawn'
Confronte& with the e er,en!e of a new politi!al entit" in the international !o unit"H a State a" e0perien!e so e &iffi!ult" in respon&in, to the ?uestion whether the new politi!al or&er ?ualifies to :e re,ar&e& as a state un&er international lawH in parti!ular fro the %iewpoint of its effe!ti%eness an& in&epen&en!e on a per anent :asis' 3he re!o,ni=in, State a" !onsi&er its a!t in re,ar& to the new politi!al entit" as erel" a &e fa!to re!o,nitionH i pl"in, that it a" with&raw it if in the en& it turns out that the !on&itions of statehoo& are not fulfille& shoul& the new authorit" not re ain in power'

%arious parts of +sia' 3he >apanese $o%ern ent has a!!or&in,l" laun!he& a ,oo&will !a pai,n an& has offere& the Philippine $o%ern ent su:stantial assistan!e for a pro,ra that will pro ote R throu,h ,o%ern ent an& non*,o%ern ental or,ani=ations R wo ensB ri,htsH !hil& welfareH nutrition an& fa il" health !are' +n e0e!uti%e a,ree ent is a:out to :e si,ne& for that purpose' 3he a,ree ent in!lu&es a !lause where:" the Philippine $o%ern ent a!Dnowle&,es that an" lia:ilit" to the C!o fort wo enC or their &es!en&ants are &ee e& !o%ere& :" the reparations a,ree ents si,ne& an& i ple ente& i e&iatel" after the Se!on& 6orl& 6ar' >uliano 5,lesiasH a &es!en&ant of a now &e!ease& !o fort wo anH seeDs "our a&%i!e on the %ali&it" of the a,ree ent' +&%ise hi '

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he a,ree ent is %ali&' 3he !o fort wo en an& their &es!en&ants !annot assert in&i%i&ual !lai s a,ainst >apan' +s state& in -a%is 4 8oore %s' 1e,anH #23 <'S' )2#H the so%erei,n authorit" of a State to settle !lai s of its nationals a,ainst forei,n !ountries has repeate&l" :een re!o,ni=e&' 3his a" :e a&e without the !onsent of the nationals or e%en without !onsultation with the ' Sin!e the !ontinue& a it" :etween a State an& other !ountries a" re?uire a satisfa!tor" !o pro ise of utual !lai sH the ne!essar" power to aDe su!h !o pro ises has :een re!o,ni=e&' 3he settle ent of su!h !lai s a" :e a&e :" e0e!uti%e a,ree ent'

Rig,t t& Inn&(ent Pa++age 9!###:


N& M * C' State /psilonH &urin, pea!e ti eH has allowe& forei,n ships inno!ent passa,e throu,h 8antranas StraitH a strait within /psilonBs territorial sea whi!h has :een use& :" forei,n ships for international na%i,ation' Su!h passa,e ena:le& the sai& ships to tra%erse the strait :etween one part of the hi,h seas to another' An >une 7H 1997H a warship of State 9eta passe& throu,h the a:o%e*na e& strait' 5nstea& of passin, throu,h !ontinuousl" an& e0pe&itiousl"H the ship &ela"e& its passa,e to ren&er assistan!e to a ship of State $a a whi!h was &istresse& with no one near:" to assist' 6hen !onfronte& :" /psilon a:out the &ela"H 9eta e0plaine& that the &ela" was &ue to for!e a;eure in !onfor it" with the pro%ision of +rti!le 18(2) of the 1982 Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea (<NC7AS)' Se%en onths laterH /psilon suspen&e& the ri,ht of inno!ent

9ut e%en thenH a &e fa!to re!o,nition in this !onte0t pro&u!es le,al effe!ts in the sa e wa" as &e ;ure re!o,nition' 6hether re!o,nition is &e fa!to or &e ;ureH steps a" :e taDen to with&raw re!o,nition if the !on&itions of statehoo& in international law are not fulfille&' 3husH fro this stan&pointH the &istin!tion is not le,all" si,nifi!ant' Note: 3he ?uestion shoul& refer to re!o,nition of ,o%ern ent not re!o,nition of state :e!ause there is no su!h &istin!tion in re!o,nition of state' Re*arati&n+ Agree1ent8 .a'idity 9!##":
N&' 1#: 3he >apanese $o%ern ent !onfir e& that &urin, the Se!on& 6orl& 6arH Filipinas were a on, those !ons!ripte& as C!o fort wo enC (or prostitutes) for >apanese troops in

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%@

passa,e of warships throu,h 8antranas Strait without ,i%in, an" reason therefor' Su:se?uentl"H another warship of 9eta passe& throu,h the sai& straitH an& was fire& upon :" /psilonBs !oastal :atter"' 9eta proteste& the aforesai& a!t of /psilon &rawin, attention to the e0istin, !usto ar" international law that the re,i e of inno!ent passa,e (e%en of transit passa,e) is non*suspen&a:le' /psilon !ountere& that 8antranas Strait is not a ne!essar" routeH there :ein, another suita:le alternati%e route' 1esol%e the a:o%e* entione& !ontro%ers"H /0plain "our answer' (#N)

9atanes' 9" international !on%ention !ertain !orals are prote!te& spe!ies' >ust :efore the %essel rea!he& the hi,h seasH the Coast $uar& patrol inter!epte& the %essel an& sei=e& its !ar,o in!lu&in, tuna' 3he aster of the %essel an& the owner of the !ar,o proteste&H !lai in, the ri,hts of transit passa,e an& inno!ent passa,eH an& sou,ht re!o%er" of the !ar,o an& the release of the ship' 5s the !lai eritorious or notL 1eason :riefl"' (2N)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;
3he !lai of inno!ent passa,e is not eritorious' 6hile the %essel has the ri,ht of inno!ent passa,eH it shoul& not !o it a %iolation of an" international !on%ention' 3he %essel &i& not erel" na%i,ate throu,h the territorial seaH it also &ra,,e& re& !orals in %iolation of the international !on%ention whi!h prote!te& the re& !orals' 3his is pre;u&i!ial to the ,oo& or&er of the Philippines' (+rti!le 19(2) of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +ssu in, that /psilon an& 9eta are parties to the <NC7ASH the !ontro%ers" a":e resol%e& as follows:
<n&er the <NC7ASH warships en;o" a ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e' 5t appearin, that the portion of /psilonBs territorial sea in ?uestion is a strait use& for international na%i,ationH /psilon has no ri,ht un&er international law to suspen& the ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e' +rti!le #2(2) of the <NC7AS is !lear in pro%i&in, that there shall :e no suspension of inno!ent passa,e throu,h straits use& for international na%i,ation' An the assu ption that the straits in ?uestion is not use& for international na%i,ationH still the suspension of inno!ent passa,e :" /psilon !annot :e effe!ti%e :e!ause suspension is re?uire& un&er international law to :e &ul" pu:lishe& :efore it !an taDe effe!t' 3here :ein, no pu:li!ation prior to the suspension of inno!ent passa,e :" 9etaBs warshipH /psilonBs a!t a!?uires no %ali&it"'

Rig,t+ and Ob'igati&n 3nder UN C,arter 9!##!:


N&' 1#: State M in%a&es an& !on?uers State O' 3he <nite& Nations Se!urit" Coun!il &e!lares the in%asion an& !on?uest ille,al an& or&ers an international e :ar,o a,ainst State M' Su:se?uentl"H the sa e <'N' :o&" a&opts a resolution !allin, for an enfor!e ent a!tion a,ainst State M un&er Chapter E55 of the <'N' Charter' State .H a <'N' e :erH reli,iousl" !o plies with the e :ar,o :ut refuses to taDe part in the enfor!e ent a!tionH sen&in, a e&i!al ission instea& of fi,htin, troops to the trou:le& area'

8oreo%erH /psilonBs suspension of inno!ent passa,e a" not :e %ali& for the reason that there is no showin, that it is essential for the prote!tion of its se!urit"' 3he a!tuation of 9etaBs warship in resortin, to &ela"e& passa,e is for !ause re!o,ni=e& :" the <NC7AS as e0!usa:leH i'e'H for the purpose of ren&erin, assistan!e to persons or ship in &istressH as pro%i&e& in +rti!le 18(2) of the <NC7AS' @en!eH 9etaBs warship !o plie& with the international law nor s on ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e' Rig,t t& Tran+it and Inn&(ent Pa++age 9"66;:
II<9' :n ro*+e to the tuna fishin, ,roun&s in the Pa!ifi! A!eanH a %essel re,istere& in Countr" 36 entere& the 9alintan, Channel north of 9a:u"an 5slan& an& with spe!ial hooDs an& nets &ra,,e& up re& !orals foun& near

(a) -i& State . %iolate its o:li,ations un&er the <'N' CharterL (:) 5f soH what san!tions a" :e taDen a,ainst itL (!) 5f notH wh" notL ANSWER: (a) NoH State . &i& not %iolate its o:li,ations un&er the <nite& Nations Charter' 5t !o plie& with the resolution !allin, for enfor!e ent a!tion a,ainst State MH :e!ause it sent a e&i!al tea ' (:) No san!tions a" :e taDen a,ainst State .' :e!ause it &i& not %iolate its o:li,ation un&er the <nite& Nations Charter'
(!) Co plian!e with the resolution !allin, for enfor!e ent a!tion a,ainst Slate M &oes not ne!essaril" !all for the sen&in, of

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%?

fi,htin, troops' <n&er +rt #3 of the <nite& Nations CharterH !o plian!e with the !all for enfor!e ent a!tion a,ainst State M has to :e a&e in a!!or&an!e with a spe!ial a,ree ent with the Se!urit" Coun!il an& su!h a,ree ent shall ,o%ern the nu :ers an& t"pes of for!esH their &e,ree of rea&iness an& ,eneral lo!ationsH an& the nature of the fa!ilities an& assistan!e to :e supplie& :" e :ers of the <nite& Nations'

pro!e&ures an& a !usto ar" nor is the pro&u!t of the for ation of ,eneral pra!ti!e a!!epte& as law'
9" wa" of illustratin, 5nternational Con%ention as a sour!e of lawH we a" refer to the prin!iple e :o&ie& in +rti!le ) of the Eienna Con%ention on the 7aw of 3reaties whi!h rea&s: C/%er" State possesses !apa!it" to !on!lu&e treatiesC' 5t tells us what the law is an& the pro!ess or etho& :" whi!h it !a e into :ein,' 5nternational Custo a" :e !on!retel" illustrate& :" pa!ta sunt ser%an&aH a !usto ar" or ,eneral nor whi!h !a e a:out throu,h e0tensi%e an& !onsistent pra!ti!e :" a ,reat nu :er of states re!o,ni=in, it as o:li,ator"' 3he su:si&iar" eans ser%es as e%i&en!e of law' + &e!ision of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eH for e0a pleH a" ser%e as aterial e%i&en!e !onfir in, or showin, that the prohi:ition a,ainst the use of for!e is a !usto ar" nor H as the &e!ision of the Court has &e onstrate& in the Ni!ara,ua Case' 3he status of a prin!iple as a nor of international law a" fin& e%i&en!e in the worDs of hi,hl" ?ualifie& pu:li!ists in international lawH su!h as 8!NairH Gelsen or Appenhei '

S&3r(e+ &) Internati&na' La58 Pri1ary B S3b+idiary S&3r(e+ 9"66-:


N& ME * State "our ,eneral un&erstan&in, of the pri ar" sour!es an& su:si&iar" sour!es of international lawH ,i%in, an illustration of ea!h'

SUGGESTED ANSWER: <n&er +rti!le 38 of the Statute of the 5nternational Court of >usti!eH the P158+1O SA<1C/S of international law are the followin,: 1' 5nternational !on%entionsH e','H Eienna Con%ention on the 7aw of 3reaties' 2' 5nternational !usto sH e','H sa:ota,eH the prohi:ition a,ainst sla%er"H an& the prohi:ition a,ainst torture' 3' $eneral prin!iples of law re!o,ni=e& :" !i%ili=e& nationsH e','H pres!riptionH res ;u&i!ataH an& &ue pro!ess'
3he S<9S5-5+1O SA<1C/S of international law are ;u&i!ial &e!isionsH su:;e!t to the pro%isions of +rti!le 29H e','H the &e!ision in the +n,lo*Norwe,ian Fisheries Case an& Ni!ara,ua %' <nite& StatesH an& 3/+C@5N$S of the ost hi,hl" ?ualifie& pu:li!ists of %arious nationsH e','H @u an 1i,hts in 5nternational 7aw :" 7auterpa!ht an& 5nternational 7aw :" Appenhe i *7auterpa!ht'

S&0ereign I113nity &) State+8 Ab+&'3te 0+= Re+tri(ti0e 9!##$: N& M555' 6hat is the &o!trine of So%erei,n i unit" in international 7awL P2NQ SUGGESTED ANSWER: 9" the &o!trine of so%erei,n i unit"H a StateH its a,ents an& propert" are i une fro the ;u&i!ial pro!ess of another StateH e0!ept with its !onsent' 3husH i unit" a" :e wai%e& an& a State a" per it itself to :e sue& in the !ourts of another StateH So%erei,n i unit" has &e%elope& into two s!hools of thou,htH na el"H a:solute i unit" an& restri!ti%e i unit"' 9" a:solute i unit"H all a!ts of a State are !o%ere& or prote!te& :" i unit"' An the other han&H restri!ti%e i unit" aDes a &istin!tion :etween ,o%ern ental or so%erei,n a!ts (a!ta ;ure i perii) an& non,o%ern entalH propriet" or !o er!ial a!ts (a!ta ;ure ,estiones)' Anl" the first !ate,or" of a!ts is !o%ere& :" so%erei,n i unit"' 3he Philippine a&heres to the

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
1efle!tin, ,eneral international lawH +rti!le 38(1) of the Statute of the 5nternational Court of >usti!e is un&erstoo& as pro%i&in, for international !on%entionH international !usto H an& ,eneral prin!iples of law as pri ar" sour!es of international lawH while in&i!atin, that ;u&i!ial &e!isions an& tea!hin,s of the ost hi,hl" ?ualifie& pu:li!ists as Csu:si&iar" eans for the &eter ination of the rules of law'C

3he pri ar" sour!es a" :e !onsi&ere& as restri!ti%e i unit" s!hool of thou,ht' for al sour!es in that the" are the etho&s :" ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8 whi!h nor s of international law are !reate& an& re!o,ni=e&' + !on%entional or treat" nor !o es into :ein, :" esta:lishe& treat"* aDin, BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%%

5n <nite& States %s' 1ui=H 13) SC1+ #87' #90* #91' the Supre e Court e0plaine& the &o!trine of so%erei,n i unit" in international law;
C3he tra&itional rule of State i unit" e0e pts a State fro :ein, sue& in the !ourts of another State without its !onsent or wai%erH this rule is a ne!essar" !onse?uen!e of the prin!iples of in&epen&en!e an& e?ualit" of states' @owe%erH the rules of 5nternational 7aw are not petrifie&H the" are !onstantl" &e%elopin, an& e%ol%in,' +n& :e!ause the a!ti%ities of states ha%e ultiplie&' 5t has :een ne!essar" to &istin,uish the R :etween so%erei,n an& ,o%ern ent a!ts P1*re i0periiQ an& pri%ateH !o er!ial an& proprietar" a!ts ( 1*re ges+ionis)H 3he result is that State i unit" now e0ten&s onl" to a!ts jure imperii'C

21 of the <nite& Nations Conferen!e on the @u an /n%iron ent i poses upon states the responsi:ilit" to ensure that a!ti%ities within their ;uris&i!tion or !ontrol &o not !ause &a a,e to the en%iron ent of other States'

S&0ereignty8 De)initi&n8 Nat3re 9>!6<"66?:


3' @ow is state so%erei,nt" &efine& in 5nternational 7awL (2'2N) +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: State so%erei,nt" si,nifies in&epen&en!e in re,ar& to a portion of the ,lo:eH an& the ri,ht to e0er!ise an& enfor!e ;uris&i!tion thereinH to the e0!lusion of an" other state the fun!tions of the state PSee 5slan& of 7as Pal as Case (<S %' 3he Netherlan&s) 2 1'5++' 829Q' So%erei,nt" eans in* &epen&en!e fro outsi&e !ontrol' 3he 1933 8onte%i&eo Con%ention e0presses this in positi%e ter s as in!lu&in, Cthe !apa!it" to enter into relations with other states'C

S&0ereignty &) State+8 &) Territ&ry 9!#$#:

Nat3ra'

U+e

N&' 19: 3he 1epu:li! of China (3aiwan)H in its :i& to &e%elop a h"&ro,en :o : an& &efen& itself a,ainst threats of in%asion !o in, fro the PeopleBs 1epu:li! of ChinaH !on&u!te& a series of se!ret nu!lear weapons tests in its own at osphere' 3he tests resulte& in ra&ioa!ti%e fallouts whi!h !onta inate& the ri%ers in an& aroun& +parri an& other :o&ies of water within the territorial ;uris&i!tion of the PhilippinesH Can the Philippines !o plain a,ainst the 1epu:li! of China for %iolation of its so%erei,nt"L

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
<n&er the prin!iple of state so%erei,nt" in 5nternational 7awH all states are so%erei,n e?uals an& !annot assert ;uris&i!tion o%er one another' + !ontrar" &isposition woul& Cun&ul" %e0 the pea!e of nationsC (-a @a:er %' (ueen of Portu,alH 17 (' 9' 171)' #' 5s state so%erei,nt" a:soluteL (2'2N) +73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1: State so%erei,nt" is not a:solute' An the !ontrar"H the rule sa"s that the state a" not :e sue& without its !onsentH whi!h !learl" i ports that it a" :e sue& if it !onsents' 8oreo%erH !ertain restri!tions enter into the pi!ture: (1) li itations i pose& :" the %er" nature of e :ership in the fa il" of nations; an& (2) li itations i pose& :" treat" stipulations' 3he so%erei,nt" of a state therefore !annot in fa!t an& in realit" :e !onsi&ere& a:solute (3ana&a %' +n,araH $'1' No' 118292H 8a" 2H1997)'

ANSWER: 5n the 3rial S elter +r:itration :etween the <nite& States an& Cana&aH the +r:itral 3ri:unal hel& that air pollution fro Cana&a shoul& :e en;oine&H :e!ause so%erei,nt" in!lu&es the ri,ht a,ainst an" en!roa!h ent whi!h i,ht pre;u&i!e the natural use of the territor" an& the free o%e ent of its inha:itants' Sin!e the nu!lear tests !on&u!te& :" the 1epu:li! China resulte& in ra&ioa!ti%e fallouts whi!h !onta inate& the ri%ers an& other :o&ies of water within the PhilippinesH the 1epu:li! of China %iolate& the so%erei,nt" of the Philippines'
O/SH the Philippines !an !o plain a,ainst the 1epu:li! of China for %iolation of its so%erei,nt"' +rti!le 19# of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea re?uires States to taDe all easures ne!essar" to ensure that a!ti%ities un&er their ;uris&i!tion or !ontrol are so !on&u!te& as not to !ause &a a,e :" pollution to other States an& their en%iron ent' Prin!iple

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
So%erei,nt" is a:solute with respe!t to e0!lusi%e !o peten!e o%er internal atters PSee 5slan& of 7as Pal as Case (<S %' 3he Netherlan&s) 2 1'5++' 829QH su:;e!t onl" to su!h li itations as a" :e i pose& or re!o,ni=e& :" the state itself as part of its o:li,ations un&er international law' 5n the international plainH state so%erei,nt" is reali=e& as the !o* e0isten!e with other so%erei,nties un&er !on&itions of in&epen&en!e an& e?ualit"'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%$

State Liabi'itie+ 9!##@:


N&' 8: 5n a rai& !on&u!te& :" re:els in a Ca :o&ian townH an + eri!an :usiness an who has :een a lon,*ti e resi&ent of the pla!e was !au,ht :" the re:els an& ro::e& of his !ash an& other %alua:le personal :elon,in,s' 6ithin inutesH two tru!Dloa&s of ,o%ern ent troops arri%e& pro ptin, the re:els to with&raw' 9efore fleein, the" shot the + eri!an !ausin, hi ph"si!al in;uries' $o%ern ent troopers i e&iatel" laun!he& pursuit operations an& Dille& se%eral re:els' No !ash or other %alua:le propert" taDen fro the + eri!an :usiness an was re!o%ere&'

5n an a!tion for in&e nit" file& :" the <S $o%ern ent in :ehalf of the :usiness an for in;uries an& losses in !ash an& propert"H the Ca :o&ian ,o%ern ent !onten&e& that un&er 5nternational 7aw it was not responsi:le for the a!ts of the re:els' 1' 5s the !ontention of Ca :o&ian ,o%ern ent !orre!tL /0plain' the

3he :asis of the Philippine !lai is effe!ti%e o!!upation of a territor" not su:;e!t to the so%erei,nt" of another state' 3he >apanese for!es o!!upie& the Spratl" 5slan& ,roup &urin, the Se!on& 6orl& 6ar' @owe%erH un&er the San Fran!is!o Pea!e 3reat" of 1921 >apan for all" renoun!e& all ri,ht an& !lai to the Spratl"s' 3he San Fran!is!o 3reat" or an" other 5nternational a,ree ent howe%erH &i& not &esi,nate an" :enefi!iar" state followin, the >apanese renun!iation of ri,ht' Su:se?uentl"H the Spratl"s :e!a e terra nullius an& was o!!upie& :" the Philippines in the title of so%erei,nt"' Philippine so%erei,nt" was &ispla"e& :" open an& pu:li! o!!upation of a nu :er of islan&s :" stationin, of ilitar" for!esH :" or,ani=in, a lo!al ,o%ern ent unitH an& :" awar&in, petroleu &rillin, ri,htsH a on, other politi!al an& a& inistrati%e a!ts' 5n 1978H it !onfir e& its so%erei,n title :" the pro ul,ation of Presi&ential -e!ree No' 129)H whi!h &e!lare& the Gala"aan 5slan& $roup part of Philippine territor"'

2' Suppose the re:ellion is su!!essful an& a new ,o%ern ent ,ains !ontrol of the entire StateH repla!in, the lawful ,o%ern ent that was topple&H a" the new ,o%ern ent :e hel& responsi:le for the in;uries or losses suffere& :" the + eri!an :usiness anL /0plain'

State'e++ Per+&n+8 E))e(t+8 Stat3+8 Rig,t+ 9!##@: 1' 6ho are stateless persons un&er 5nternational 7awL 2' 6hat are the of statelessnessL !onse?uen!es

ANSWER8
1' OesH the !ontention of the Ca :o&ian $o%ern ent is !orre!t' <nless it !learl" appears that the ,o%ern ent has faile& to use pro ptl" an& with appropriate for!e its !onstitute& authorit" it !annot :e hel& responsi:le for the a!ts of re:elsH for the re:els are not its a,ents an& their a!ts were &one without its %olition' 5n this !aseH ,o%ern ent troopers i e&iatel" pursue& the re:els an& Dille& se%eral of the '

3' 5s a stateless person entirel" without ri,htH prote!tion or re!ourse un&er the 7aw of NationsL /0plain' #' 6hat easuresH if an"H has 5nternational 7aw taDen to pre%ent statelessnessL ANSWER: 1' 7TAT:L:77 P:R7O<7 are those who are not !onsi&ere& as nationals :" an" State un&er the operation of its laws' 2' 3he !onse?uen!es of statelessness are the followin,:
(a) No State !an inter%ene or !o plain in :ehalf of a stateless person for an international &elin?uen!" !o itte& :" another State in infli!tin, in;ur" upon hi '

2' 3he new ,o%ern ent a" :e hel& responsi:le if it su!!ee&s in o%erthrowin, the ,o%ern ent' Ei!torious re:el o%e ents are responsi:le for the ille,al a!ts of their for!es &urin, the !ourse of the re:ellion' 3he a!ts of the re:els are i puta:le to the when the" assu e& as &ul" !onstitute& authorities of the state' State S&0ereignty8 Terra N3''i3+ 9"666: N& M5M * a) PhilippinesB !lai Spratl" 5slan&sL
E))e(ti0e O((3*ati&n8

6hat is the :asis of the to a part of the

(:) @e !annot :e e0pelle& :" the State if he is lawfull" in its territor" e0!ept on ,roun&s of national se!urit" or pu:li! or&er'
(!) @e !annot a%ail hi self of the prote!tion an& :enefits of

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!%#

!iti=enship liDe se!urin, for hi self a passport or %isa an& personal &o!u ents'
3' No' <n&er the Con%ention in 1elation to the Status of Stateless PersonH the Contra!tin, States a,ree& to a!!or& to stateless persons within their territories treat ent at least as fa%ora:le as that a!!or&e& to their nationals with respe!t to free&o of reli,ionH a!!ess to the !ourtsH rationin, of pro&u!ts in short suppl"H ele entar" e&u!ationH pu:li! relief an& assistan!eH la:or le,islation an& so!ial se!urit"' 3he" also a,ree& to a!!or& to the treat ent not less fa%ora:le than that a!!or&e& to aliens ,enerall" in the sa e !ir!u stan!es' 3he Con%ention also pro%i&es for the issuan!e of i&entit" papers an& tra%el &o!u ents to stateless person' #' 5n the Con%ention on the Confli!t of Nationalit" 7aws of 1930H the Contra!tin, States a,ree& to a!!or& nationalit" to persons :orn in their territor" who woul& otherwise :e stateless' 3he Con%ention on the 1e&u!tion of Statelessness of 19)1 pro%i&es that if the law of the !ontra!tin, States results in the loss of nationalit" as a !onse?uen!e of arria,e or ter ination of arria,eH su!h loss ust :e !on&itional upon possession or a!?uisition of another nationalit"'

<n&er Se!tion 1H +rti!le 5 of the 1987 ConstitutionH the 5N3/1N+7 6+3/1S of the Philippines !onsist of the waters aroun&H :etween an& !onne!tin, the islan&s of the Philippine +r!hipela,oH re,ar&less of their :rea&th an& &i ensionsH in!lu&in, the waters in :a"sH ri%ers an& laDes' No ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e for forei,n %essels e0ists in the !ase of internal waters' (@arrisH Cases an& 8aterials on 5nternational 7awH 2th e&'H 1998H p' #07') 5nternal waters are the waters on the lan&war& si&e of :aselines fro whi!h the :rea&th of the territorial sea is !al!ulate&' (9rownlieH Prin!iples of Pu:li! 5nternational 7awH #th e&'H 1990H p' 120')

U+e &) &r(e8 E2(e*ti&n+ 9"66-:


N& M5E* Not too lon, a,oH Callie& for!esCH le& :" + eri!an an& 9ritish ar e& for!esH in%a&e& 5ra? to Cli:erate the 5ra?is an& &estro" suspe!te& weapons of ass &estru!tion'C 3he Se!urit" Coun!il of the <nite& Nations faile& to rea!h a !onsensus on whether to support or oppose the Cwar of li:erationC' Can the a!tion taDen :" the allie& for!es fin& ;ustifi!ation in 5nternational 7awL /0plain'

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
3he <nite& States an& its allie& for!es !annot ;ustif" their in%asion of 5ra? on the :asis of self*&efense un&er +rti!le 21 atta!D :" 5ra?H an& there was no ne!essit" for anti!ipator" self* &efense whi!h a" :e ;ustifie& un&er !usto ar" international law' Neither !an the" ;ustif" their in%asion on the ,roun& that +rti!le #2 of the Charter of the <nite& Nations per its the use for!e a,ainst a State if it is san!tione& :" the Se!urit" Coun!il' 1esolution 1##1H whi!h ,a%e 5ra? a final opportunit" to &isar or fa!e serious !onse?uen!esH &i& not authori=e the use of ar e& for!e'

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER8
<n&er the Con%ention on the 1e&u!tion of Stateless*ness of 19)1H a !ontra!tin, state shall ,rant its nationalit" to a person :orn in its territor" who woul& otherwise :e stateless an& a !ontra!tin, state a" not &epri%e a person or a ,roup of persons of their nationalit" for ra!ialH ethni!H reli,ious or politi!al ,roun&s'

Territ&ria' Sea 0+= Interna' Water+ 9"66;: II<+' -istin,uish :riefl" :ut !learl" :etween: (1) 3he territorial sea an& the internal waters of the Philippines' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+' (1) 3/1153A15+7 S/+ is an a&;a!ent :elt of sea with a :rea&th of t5e'0e na3ti(a' 1i'e+ easure& fro the :aselines of a state an& o%er whi!h the state has so%erei,nt"' (+rti!les 2 an& 3 of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea') Ship of all states en;o" the ri,ht of inno!ent passa,e throu,h the territorial sea' (+rti!le 1# of the Con%ention on the 7aw of the Sea')

ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 5n 5nternational 7awH the a!tion taDen :" the allie& for!es !annot fin& ;ustifi!ation' 5t is !o%ere& :" the prohi:ition a,ainst the use of for!e pres!ri:e& :" the <nite& Nations Charter an& it &oes not fall un&er an" of the e0!eptions to that prohi:ition'
3he <N Charter in +rti!le 2(#) prohi:its the use of for!e in the relations of states :" pro%i&in, that all e :ers of the <N Cshall refrain in their international relations fro the threat or use of for!e a,ainst the territorial inte,rit" or politi!al in&epen&en!e of an" stateH

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$6

or in an" other anner in!onsistent with the purposes of the <nite& Nations'C 3his an&ate &oes not onl" outlaw war; it en!o passes all threats of an& a!ts of for!e or %iolen!e short of war' +s thus pro%i&e&H the prohi:ition is a&&resse& to all <N e :ers' @owe%erH it is now re!o,ni=e& as a fun&a ental prin!iple in !usto ar" international law an&H as su!hH is :in&in, on all e :ers of the international !o unit"'
3he a!tion taDen :" the allie& for!es !annot :e ;ustifie& un&er an" of the three e0!eptions to the prohi:ition a,ainst the use of for!e whi!h the <N Charter allows' 3hese are:

of No%a an& to repla!e it with a frien&l" ,o%ern ent'


No%a &e!i&e& to file a !ase a,ainst + eria in the 5nternational Court of >usti!e

1) An what ,roun&s a" No%aBs !auses of a!tion a,ainst + eria :e :ase&L 2) An what ,roun&s a" + eria o%e to &is iss the !ase with the 5C>L 3) -e!i&e the !ase' ANSWER:
1) 5f No%a an& + eria are e :ers of the <nite& NationsH No%a !an pre ise its !ause of a!tion on a %iolation of +rti!le 2(#) of the <nite& Nations CharterH whi!h re?uires e :ers to refrain fro the threat or use of for!e a,ainst the territorial inte,rit" or politi!al in&epen&en!e of an" state' 5f either or :oth No%a or + eria are not e :ers of the <nite& NationsH No%a a" pre ise its !ause of a!tion on a %iolation of the non*use of for!e prin!iple in !usto ar" international law whi!h e0ists parallel to +rti!le 2(#) of the <nite& Nations Charter' 5n the Case Con!ernin, 8ilitar" an& Para ilitar" +!ti%ities in an& +,ainst Ni!ara,ua (198) 5C> 1ep' 1#)H the 5nternational Court of >usti!e !onsi&ere& the plantin, of ines :" one state within the territorial waters of another as a %iolation of +rti!le 2(#) of the <nite& Nations Charter' 5f the support pro%i&e& :" + eria to the re:els of No%a ,oes :e"on& the ere ,i%in, of onetar" or ps"!holo,i!al support :ut !onsists in the pro%ision of ar s an& trainin,H the a!ts of + eria !an :e !onsi&ere& as in&ire!t a,,ression a ountin, to another %iolation of +rti!le 2(#)' 5n a&&itionH e%en if the pro%ision support is not enou,h to !onsi&er the a!t %iolation of the non*use of for!e prin!ipleH this is %iolation of the prin!iple of non*inter%ention !usto ar" 5nternational law' of a a in

(1) inherent ri,ht of in&i%i&ual or !olle!ti%e self*&efense un&er +rti!le 21; (2) enfor!e ent easure in%ol%in, the use of ar e& for!es :" the <N Se!urit" Coun!il un&er +rti!le #2; an&
(3) enfor!e ent easure :" re,ional arran,e ent un&er +rti!le 23H as authori=e& :" the <N Se!urit" Coun!il' 3he allie& for!es &i& not laun!h ilitar" operations an& &i& not o!!up" 5ra? on the !lai that their a!tion was in response to an ar e& atta!D :" 5ra?H of whi!h there was none' 8oreo%erH the a!tion of the allie& for!es was taDen in &efian!e or &isre,ar& of the Se!urit" Coun!il 1esolution No' 1##1 whi!h set up Can enhan!e& inspe!tion re,i e with the ai of :rin,in, to full an& %erifie& !o pletion the &isar a ent pro!essCH ,i%in, 5ra? Ca final opportunit" to !o pl" with its &isar a ent o:li,ationsC' 3his resolution was in the pro!ess of i ple entation; so was 5ra?Bs !o plian!e with su!h &isar a ent o:li,ations'

U+e &) &r(e8 Prin(i*'e &) N&n< Inter0enti&n 9!##;:


N&' 19; 3he State of No%aH !ontrolle& :" an authoritarian ,o%ern entH ha& unfrien&l" relations with its nei,h:orin, stateH + eria' 9reslaH another nei,h:orin, stateH ha& :een shippin, ar s an& a unitions to No%a for use in atta!Din, +rneria' 3o forestall an atta!DH + eria pla!e& floatin, ines on the territorial waters surroun&in, No%a' + eria supporte& a ,roup of re:els or,ani=e& to o%erthrow the ,o%ern ent

+,,ression is the use of ar e& for!e :" a state a,ainst the so%erei,nt"H territorial inte,rit" or politi!al in&epen&en!e of another state or in an" other anner in!onsistent with the <nite& Nations Charter'
2) 9" %irtue of the prin!iple of so%erei,n i unit"H no so%erei,n state !an :e a&e a part" to a pro!ee&in, :efore the 5nternational Court of >usti!e unless it has ,i%en its !onsent'

'''

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$!

3) 5f ;uris&i!tion o%er + eria is esta:lishe&H the !ase shoul& :e &e!i&e& in fa%or of No%aH :e!ause + eria %iolate& the prin!iple a,ainst the use of for!e an& the prin!iple of non* 5nter%ention' 3he &efense of anti!ipator" self* &efense !annot :e sustaine&H :e!ause there is no showin, that No%a ha& o:ili=e& to su!h an e0tent that if + eria were to wait for No%a to striDe first it woul& not :e a:le to retaliate'

(2) 5t a" :rin, the atter to the Se!urit" Coun!il whi!h a" authori=e san!tions a,ainst Countr" MH in!lu&in, easure in%oDin, the use of for!e' <n&er +rti!le # of the <N CharterH Countr" O a" use for!e a,ainst Countr" M as well as a,ainst the +li 9a:a or,ani=ation :" authorit" of the <N Se!urit" Coun!il' SECOND ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:
<n&er the Se!urit" Coun!il 1esolution No' 13)8H the terrorist atta!D of +li 9a:a a" :e &efine& as a threat to pea!eH as it &i& in &efinin, the Septe :er 11H 2001 atta!Ds a,ainst the <nite& States' 3he resolution authori=es ilitar" an& other a!tions to respon& to terrorist atta!Ds' @owe%erH the use of ilitar" for!e ust :e proportionate an& inten&e& for the purpose of &etainin, the persons alle,e&l" responsi:le for the !ri es an& to &estro" ilitar" o:;e!ti%es use& :" the terrorists' 3he fun&a ental prin!iples of international hu anitarian law shoul& also :e respe!te&' Countr" O !annot :e ,rante& sweepin, &is!retionar" powers that in!lu&e the power to &e!i&e what states are :ehin& the terrorist or,ani=ations' 5t is for the Se!urit" Coun!il to &e!i&e whether for!e a" :e use& a,ainst spe!ifi! states an& un&er what !on&itions the for!e a" :e use&'

@owe%erH if ;uris&i!tion o%er + eria is not esta:lishe&H the !ase shoul& :e &e!i&e& in fa%or of + eria :e!ause of the prin!iple of so%erei,n i unit"' U+e &) &r(e8 Rig,t &) Se')<de)en+e 9"66":
N& M5M' An A!to:er 13H 2001H e :ers of +li 9a:aH a politi!al e0tre ist or,ani=ation :ase& in an& un&er the prote!tion of Countr" M an& espousin, %iolen!e worl&wi&e as a eans of a!hie%in, its o:;e!ti%esH plante& hi,h*powere& e0plosi%es an& :o :s at the 5nternational 3ra&e 3ower (533) in >ewel Cit" in Countr" OH a e :er of the <nite& Nations' +s a result of the :o :in, an& the !ollapse of the 100*stor" twin towersH a:out 2H000 peopleH in!lu&in, wo en an& !hil&renH were Dille& or in;ure&H an& :illions of &ollars in propert" were lost' 5 e&iatel" after the in!i&entH +li 9a:aH speaDin, throu,h its lea&er 9in -er&an&atH a& itte& an& owne& responsi:ilit" for the :o :in, of 533H sa"in, that it was &one to pressure Countr" O to release !apture& e :ers of the terrorist ,roup' +li 9a:a threatene& to repeat its terrorist a!ts a,ainst Countr" O if the latter an& its allies faile& to a!!e&e to +li 9a:aBs &e an&s' 5n responseH Countr" O &e an&e& that Countr" M surren&er an& &eli%er 9in -er&an&at to the ,o%ern ent authorities of Countr" O for the purpose of trial an& Cin the na e of ;usti!e'C Countr" M refuse& to a!!e&e to the &e an& of Countr" O' 6hat a!tion or a!tions !an Countr" O le,all" taDe a,ainst +li 9a:a an& Countr" M to stop the terrorist a!ti%ities of +li 9a:a an& &issua&e Countr" M fro har:orin, an& ,i%in, prote!tion to the terrorist or,ani=ationL Support "our answer with reasons' (2N)

U+e &) &r(e8 Se')<De)en+e8 Waging War 9!##$:


N& M5E' +t the Nure :er, trial of the Na=i war !ri inals at the en& of the 6orl& 6ar 55' the &efense ar,ue& on :ehalf of the $er an &efen&ants that althou,h a nation !oul& not wa,e a,,ressi%e war without trans,ressin, 5nternational lawH it !oul& use war as an 5nstru ent of self*&efenseH an& that the nation itself ust :e the sole ;u&,e of whether its a!tions were in self*&efense' @ow woul& "ou eet the ar,u ent if "ou were a e :er of the 3ri:unal tr"in, the !aseL P2NQ

SUGGESTED ANSWER:
No rule of 5nternational law ,i%es a state resortin, to war alle,e&l" in self*&efense the ri,ht to &eter ine with a le,all" !on!lusi%e effe!t the le,alit" of su!h a!tion' 3he >u&, ent of the Nure :er, 5nternational 8ilitar" 3ri:unal re;e!te& the &efense of the Na=i war !ri inals: C9ut whether a!tion taDen un&er the !lai of self*&efense was in fa!t a,,ressi%e or &efensi%e ust ulti atel" :e su:;e!t to

IRST ALTERNATI.E ANSWER:


(1) Countr" O a" e0er!ise the ri,ht of self*&efenseH as pro%i&e& un&er +rti!le 21 of the <N Charter Cuntil the Se!urit" Coun!il has taDen easure ne!essar" to aintain international pea!e an& se!urit"C' Self*&efense ena:les Countr" O to use for!e a,ainst Countr" M as well as a,ainst the +li 9a:a or,ani=ation'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$"

in%esti,ation an& a&;u&i!ation if international law is e%er to :e enfor!e&'C ALTERNATI.E ANSWER: 5nternational law on self*&efense !annot assu e the nature of war' 6ar re?uires Ca &e!laration of war ,i%in, reasonsC un&er the @a,ue Con%ention 55 of 1907' Pre!isel"H the Na=i war !ri inalwere in&i!te& :efore the Nure :er, 3ri:unal for %iolatin, this Con%ention an& were foun& ,uilt"' Sin!e the Na=i war !ri inal ar,ue& that war as self*&efense is un&erstoo& :" the as eanin, Cthat the nation itself ust :e the sole >u&,e of whether its a!tion were in self* &efenseCH it is !lear that what the" ha& in in& in fa!t is Cwar as an instru ent of national poli!"CH not self*&efense as an o:;e!ti%e ri,ht un&er 5nternational law' 6a,in, was as an instru ent of national law is prohi:ite& :" the Pa!t of Paris of 1928 (Gello, * 9rai& Part) of whi!h $er an" was alrea&" a state part" :efore the Se!on& 6orl& 6ar' Pre!isel"H the $er an 1ei!h was in&i!te& :efore the Nure :er, 3ri:unal for %iolation of the Pa!t of Paris an& the Na=i war !ri inals were foun& ,uilt" of this as a war !ri e' @en!eH the ar,u ent is itself an a& ission of %iolation of international law' U+e &) &r(e8 W,en a''&5ed 9!#$$:
1' 3he Charter of the <nite& Nations prohi:its not onl" re!ourse to war :ut also resort to the use of for!e or threat' 5n the ar&ent &esire to aintain pea!eH the Charter o:li,es e :ers to settle their international &isputes :" pea!eful eans an& to refrain in their international relations fro the threat or use of for!e' 3he sa e CharterH howe%erH re!o,ni=in, perhaps the realities of international relationsH allows the use of for!e in e0!eptional o!!asions'

operations :" airH seaH or lan& for!es of e :ers of the <N' 2' <n&er art' 21 e :er states also ha%e the inherent ri,ht of !olle!ti%e self &efense if an ar e& atta!D o!!urs a,ainst a e :er stateH until the Se!urit" Coun!il has taDen easures ne!essar" to aintain international pea!e an& se!urit"' War8 C&1batant+K Pri+&ner+ &) War 0+= Mer(enarie+ 9!##-:
N&' 3: 1e&enH >olan an& +n&"' Filipino touristsH were in 9osnia*@er=e,o%ina when hostilities erupte& :etween the Ser:s an& the 8osle s' Penniless an& !au,ht in the !rossfireH 1e&enH >olanH an& +n&"H :ein, retire& ,eneralsH offere& their ser%i!es to the 8osle s for a han&so eH salar"H whi!h offer was a!!epte&' 6hen the Ser:ian National $uar& approa!he& Sara;e%oH the 8osle !i%ilian population spontaneousl" tooD up ar s to resist the in%a&in, troops' Not fin&in, ti e to or,ani=eH the 8osle s wore ar :an&s to i&entif" the sel%esH %owin, to o:ser%e the laws an& !usto s of war' 3he three Filipinos fou,ht si&e :" si&e with the 8osle s' 3he Ser:s pre%aile& resultin, in the !apture of 1e&enH >olan an& +n&"H an& part of the !i%ilian fi,htin, for!e'

1) +re 1e&enH >olan an& +n&" !onsi&ere& !o :atants thus entitle& to treat ent as prisoners of warL 2) +re the !apture& !i%ilians liDewise prisoners of warL ANSWER: 1) 1e&enH >olan an& +n&" are not !o :atants an& are not entitle& to treat ent as prisoners of warH :e!ause the" are er!enaries' +rti!le #7 of the Proto!ol 5 to the $ene%a Con%entions of 19#9 pro%i&es: C+ 8er!enar" shall not ha%e the ri,ht to :e !o :atant or a prisoner of war'C
Pursuant to +rti!le #7 of Proto!ol 5 of the $ene%a Con%entions of 19#9H 1e&enH >olanH an& +n&" are er!enariesH :e!ause the" were re!ruite& to fi,ht in an ar e& !onfli!tH the" in fa!t tooD &ire!t part in the hostilitiesH the" were oti%ate& to taDe part in the hostilities essentiall" :" the &esire for pri%ate ,ain an& in fa!t was pro ise& a han&so e salar" :" the 8osle sH the" were neither nationals of a part" to the !onfli!t nor resi&ents of territor" !ontrolle& :" a part" to the !onfli!tH the" are not e :ers of the ar e& for!es of a part" to the

Please state two o!!asions when the use of ar e& for!es is allowe& :" the <'N' Charter' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
1' <n&er art' #2 of the <N CharterH shoul& the Se!urit" Coun!il !onsi&er that pa!ifi! etho&s of settlin, &isputes are ina&e?uateH it a" taDe su!h a!tion :" airH seaH or lan& for!es as a" :e ne!essar" to aintain or restore international pea!e an& se!urit"' Su!h a!tion a" in!lu&e &e onstrationsH :lo!Da&eH an& other

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$-

!onfli!tH an& the" were not sent :" a state whi!h is not a part" to the !onfli!t on offi!ial &ut" as e :ers of its ar e& for!es'
2) 3he !apture& !i%ilians are prisoners of war' <n&er +rti!le # of the $ene%a Con%ention relati%e to the 3reat ent of Prisoners of 6arH inha:itants of a non*o!!upie& territor"H who on the approa!h of the ene " spontaneousl" taDe up ar s to resist the in%a&in, for!esH without ha%in, ha& ti e to for the sel%es into re,ular ar e& for!esH pro%i&e& the" !arr" ar s openl" an& respe!t the laws an& !usto s of warH are !onsi&ere& prisoners of war if the" fall into the power of the ene "'

9' Se!tion #0 of the Ci%il Ser%i!e -e!ree has :een repeale& :" 1epu:li! +!t No' ))2#' +s law"er of >ose 3apulanH 5 will file a petition for an&a us to !o pel his reinstate ent' 5n a!!or&an!e with the rulin, in 8an,u:at us' As enaH $'1 No' 7*12837H +pril 30H 1929H 102 Phil' 1308H there is no nee& to e0haust all a& inistrati%e re e&ies :" appealin, to the Ci%il Ser%i!e Co issionH sin!e the a!t of the ,o%ernor is patentl" 5lle,al'

Ad1in La58 E2,a3+ti&n &) Ad1ini+trati0e Re1edie+ 9"666: N& M555' a) /0plain the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies' (2N) :) $i%e at least three (3) e0!eptions to its appli!ation' (3N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+') 3he &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies eans that when an a&e?uate re e&" is a%aila:le within the /0e!uti%e -epart entH a liti,ant ust first e0haust this re e&" :efore he !an resort to the !ourts' 3he purpose of the &o!trine is to ena:le the a& inistrati%e a,en!ies to !orre!t the sel%es if the" ha%e !o itte& an error' (1osales %' Court of +ppealsH 1)2 SC1+ 3## P19881)

Wi'+&n d&(trine 0+= E+trada d&(trine 9"66;: (2*a*2) -istin,uish: 3he 6ilson &o!trine an& the /stra&a &o!trine re,ar&in, re!o,nition of ,o%ern ents' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: <n&er the 657SAN -AC315N/H re!o,nition shall not :e e0ten&e& to an" ,o%ern ent esta:lishe& :" re%olution or internal %iolen!e until the freel" ele!te& representati%es of the people ha%e or,ani=e& a !onstitutional ,o%ern ent'
<n&er the /S31+-+ -AC315N/H the 8e0i!an ,o%ern ent &e!lare& that it woul&H as it saw fitH !ontinue or ter inate its &iplo ati! relations with an" !ountr" in whi!h a politi!al uphea%al ha& taDen pla!e an& in so &oin, it woul& not pronoun!e ;u&, ent on the ri,ht of the forei,n state to a!!eptH aintain or repla!e its ,o%ern ent' (Cru=H 5nternational 7awH 2003 e&') (5n %iew of re!ent &e%elop entsH the 6ilson &o!trine an& the /stra&a &o!trine are no lon,er in the ainstrea of pu:li! international law')

9') 3he followin, are the e0!eptions to the appli!ation of the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies: 1' 3he ?uestion in%ol%e& is purel" le,al; 2' 3he a& inistrati%e :o&" is in estoppel; 3' 3he a!t !o plaine& of is patentl" ille,al; #' 3here is an ur,ent nee& for >u&i!ial inter%ention; 2' 3he !lai in%ol%e& is s all; )' $ra%e an& irrepara:le in;ur" will :e suffere&; 7' 3here is no other plainH spee&" an& a&e?uate re e&"; 8' Stron, pu:li! interest is in%ol%e&; 9' 3he su:;e!t of the !ontro%ers" is pri%ate law;
10' 3he !ase in%ol%es a ?uo warranto pro!ee&in, (Sun%ille 3i :er Pro&u!tsH 5n!' %' +:a&' 20) SC1+ #82 U1992);

ADMINISTRATI.E LAW
Ad1in La58 E2,a3+ti&n &) Ad1ini+trati0e Re1edie+ 9!##!:
N&' 9: 9H For :ein, notoriousl" un&esira:le an& a re!i&i%istH >ose 3apulanH an e plo"ee in the first le%el of the !areer ser%i!e in the Affi!e of the Pro%in!ial $o%ernor of 8as:ateH was &is isse& :" the $o%ernor without for al in%esti,ation pursuant to Se!tion #0 of the Ci%il Ser%i!e -e!ree (P'-' No' 807T whi!h authori=es su ar" pro!ee&in,s in su!h !ases'

+s a law"er of >ose what stepsH if an"H woul& "ou taDe to prote!t his ri,htsL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$;

11' 3he part" was &enie& &ue pro!ess (Sa ahan, 8a,:u:uDi& n, Gap&ulaH 5n!' %' Court of +ppealsH 302 SC1+ 1#7 P1999Q);
12' 3he &e!ision is that of a -epart ent Se!retar"' (Na=areno %' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No' 131)#1H Fe:ruar"

23' 2000);
13' 1esort to a& inistrati%e re e&ies woul& :e futile (<ni%ersit" of the Philippines 9oar& of 1e,ents %' 1asul 200 SC1+

;uris&i!tion applies where a !ase is within the !on!urrent ;uris&i!tion of the !ourt an& an a& inistrati%e a,en!" :ut the &eter ination of the !ase re?uires the te!hni!al e0pertise of the a& inistrati%e a,en!"' 5n su!h a !aseH althou,h the atter is within the ;uris&i!tion of the !ourtH it ust "iel& to the ;uris&i!tion of the a& inistrati%e !ase' 2) NoH the failure to e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies :efore filin, a !ase in !ourt &oes not oust the !ourt of ;uris&i!tion to hear the !ase' +s hel& in 1osario %s' Court of +ppealsH 211 SC1+ 38#H the failure to e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies &oes not affe!t the ;uris&i!tion of the !ourt :ut results in the la!D of a !ause of a!tionH :e!ause a !on&ition pre!e&ent that ust :e satisfie& :efore a!tion !an :e file& was not fulfille&'

)82 P1991Q);
1#' 3here is unreasona:le &ela" (1epu:li! %H San&i,an:a"anH 301 SC1+

237 P1999Q);
12' C3he a!tion in%ol%es re!o%er" of ph"si!al possession of pu:li! lan& ($a:rito u' Court of +ppealsH 1)7 SC1+

771 U1988Q);
1)' 3he part" is poor (Sa:ello %' -epart ent of /&u!ationH Culture an& SportsH 180 SC1+ )23 P1989Q); an&

Ad1in La58 E2,a3+ti&n &) Ad1ini+trati0e Re1edie+8 E2(e*ti&n+ 9!##!:


N&' 8: An the :asis of a %erifie& report an& !onfi&ential infor ation that %arious ele!troni! e?uip entH whi!h were ille,all" i porte& into the PhilippinesH were foun& in the :o&e,a of the 3iDasan Corporation lo!ate& at 1002 9inaDa"an St'H Ce:u Cit"H the Colle!tor of Custo s of Ce:u issue&H in the ornin, of 2 >anuar" 1988H a 6arrant of Sei=ure an& -etention a,ainst the !orporation for the sei=ure of the ele!troni! e?uip ent' 3he warrant parti!ularl" &es!ri:es the ele!troni! e?uip ent an& spe!ifies the pro%isions of the 3ariff an& Custo s Co&e whi!h were %iolate& :" the i portation' 3he warrant was ser%e& an& i ple ente& in the afternoon of 2 >anuar" 1988 :" Custo s poli!e en who then sei=e& the &es!ri:e& e?uip ent' 3he in%entor" of the sei=e& arti!les was si,ne& :" the Se!retar" of the 3iDasan Corporation' 3he followin, &a"H a hearin, offi!er in the Affi!e of the Colle!tor of Custo s !on&u!te& a hearin, on the !onfis!ation of the e?uip ent' 3wo &a"s thereafterH the !orporation file& with the Supre e Court a petition for !ertiorariH prohi:ition an& an&a us to set asi&e the warrantH en;oin the Colle!tor an& his a,ents fro further pro!ee&in, with the forfeiture hearin, an& to se!ure the return of the !onfis!ate& e?uip entH alle,in, therein that the warrant issue& is null an& %oi& for the reason thatH pursuant to Se!tion 2 of +rti!le 555 of the 1987 ConstitutionH onl" a ;u&,e a" issue a sear!h warrant' 5n his !o ent to the petitionH the Colle!tor of Custo sH throu,h the Affi!e of

17' 3he law pro%i&es for i e&iate resort to the !ourt (1ulian % Eal&e=H 12 SC1+ 201 P19)#Q)' UNote: 3he e0a inee shoul& :e ,i%en full !re&it if he ,i%es three of the a:o%e* entione& e0!eptions'T Ad1in La58 E2,a3+ti&n &) Ad1ini+trati0e Re1edie+ 0+ D&(trine &) Pri1ary 43ri+di(ti&n 9!##?: N&' 11: 1) -istin,uish the &o!trine of pri ar" ;uris&i!tion fro the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies' 2) -oes the failure to e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies :efore filin, a !ase in !ourt oust sai& !ourt of ;uris&i!tion to hear the !aseL /0plain' S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1;
1) 3he &o!trine of pri ar" ;uris&i!tion an& the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies :oth &eal with the proper relationships :etween the !ourts an& a& inistrati%e a,en!ies' 3he &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies applies where a !lai is !o,ni=a:le in the first instan!e :" an a& inistrati%e a,en!" alone' >u&i!ial interferen!e is withhel& until the a& inistrati%e pro!ess has :een !o plete&' +s state& in 5n&ustrial /nterprisesH 5n!' %s' Court of +ppealsH 18# SC1+ #2)' 3he &o!trine of pri ar"

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$@

the Soli!itor $eneralH !onten&s that he is authori=e& un&er the 3ariff an& Custo Co&e to or&er the sei=ure of the e?uip ent whose &uties an& ta0es were not pai& an& that the !orporation &i& not e0haust a& inistrati%e re e&ies' (a) Shoul& the petition :e ,rante&L -e!i&e'
(:) 5f the Court woul& sustain the !ontention of the Colle!tor of Custo s on the atter of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&iesH what is the a& inistrati%e re e&" a%aila:le to the !orporationL

Ad1in La58 43di(ia' Re0ie5 &) Ad1ini+trati0e A(ti&n 9"66!: N& M5E $i%e the two (2) re?uisites for the ;u&i!ial re%iew of a& inistrati%e &e!isionIa!tionsH that isH when is an a& inistrati%e a!tion ripe for >u&i!ial re%iewL (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: 3he followin, are the !on&itions for ripeness for ;u&i!ial re%iew of an a& inistrati%e a!tion: 1' 3he a& inistrati%e a!tion has alrea&" :een full" !o plete& an&H thereforeH is a final a,en!" a!tion; an&
2' +ll a& inistrati%e re e&ies ha%e :een e0hauste&' P$on=alesH +& inistrati%e 7awH 1e0 9ooDstore: 8anilaH p' 13) (1979)Q'

(!) 6hat are the e0!eptions to the rule on e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&iesL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: (a) No' !ourt nee&e&' No sear!h warrant fro

(:) +s pointe& out in Chia us' +!tin, Colle!tor of Custo sH 177 SC1+ 723H the a& inistrati%e re e&" a%aila:le un&er Se!tion 2313 of the 3ariff an& Custo s Co&e is to appeal to the Co issioner of Custo sH fro whose &e!ision an appeal to the Court of 3a0 +ppeals lies'

Ad1in La58 43di(ia' Re0ie5 &) Ad1ini+trati0e De(i+i&n+ 9!#$$:


N&' 17: +pe0 7o,,in, Co' an& 9ati:ot 7o,,in, Co' are a&;a!ent ti :er !on!ession hol&ers in 5sa:ela' 9e!ause of :oun&ar" !onfli!tsH an& utual !har,es of in!ursions into their respe!ti%e !on!ession areasH the 9ureau of Forestr" or&ere& a sur%e" to esta:lish on the ,roun& their !o on :oun&ar"' 3he 9ureau of Forestr"Bs &e!ision in effe!t fa%ore& 9ati:ot' +pe0 appeale& to the -epart ent of Natural 1esour!es an& /n%iron ent an& this &epart ent re%erse& the &e!ision of the 9ureau of Forestr" an& sustaine& +pe0' 5t was the turn of 9ati:ot to appeal to the Affi!e of the Presi&ent' 3he Affi!e of the Presi&ent throu,h an +sst' /0e!uti%e Se!retar" sustaine& the -epart ent of Natural 1esour!es ari& /n%iron ent' An a otion for re!onsi&eration :" 9ati:otH howe%erH an +sst' /0e!uti%e Se!retar" other than the one who si,ne& the &e!ision affir in, the &e!ision of the -epart ent of Natural 1esour!es an& /n%iron ent &e!i&e& for 9ati:otH -issatisfie& with the +& inistrati%e a!tion on the !ontro%ers"' +pe0 file& an a!tion with the 1e,ional 3rial Court a,ainst 9ati:otH the -ire!tor of Forestr"H an& the +sst' /0e!uti%e Se!retaries insistin, that a ;u&i!ial re%iew of su!h &i%er,ent a& inistrati%e &e!isions is ne!essar" to &eter ine the !orre!t :oun&ar" line of the li!ense& areas in ?uestion' 9ati:ot o%e& to &is iss the a!tionH :ut the 1e,ional 3rial Court &enie& the sa e an& e%en en;oine& enfor!e ent of the &e!ision of

(!) 3he followin, are the e0!eptions to the &o!trine of e0haustion of a& inistrati%e re e&ies: 1' 3he !ase &eals with pri%ate lan&;
2' 3he ?uestion in%ol%e& is purel"

le,al; 3' 3he !ase in%ol%es a ?uo warranto pro!ee&in,; #' 3here is &enial of &ue pro!ess; 2' 3he &e!ision is patentl" ille,al; part" will )' 3he a,,rie%e& suffer irrepara:le in;ur"; 7' 3here is estoppel;

8' 1esort to a& inistrati%e re e&ies woul& :e futile; 9' 3he &e!ision is that of a &epart ent hea&; 10' 3he law e0pressl" pro%i&es for i e&iate ;u&i!ial re%iew; 11' Pu:li! interest is in%ol%e&; 12' 3here was unreasona:le &ela" in the a& inistrati%e pro!ee&in,s; an& 13' 3he a,,rie%e& part" is poor'

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$?

the Affi!e of the Presi&ent' 9ati:otBs otion for re!onsi&eration was liDewise &enie&' 9ati:ot then file& a petition for !ertiorari an& prohi:ition to re%iew an& annul the or&ers of the 1e,ional 3rial Court' -o "ou :elie%e the petition for !ertiorari an& prohi:ition is eritoriousL 6h" or wh" notL S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he petition for !ertiorari an& prohi:ition is eritoriousH 3he or&er of the trial !ourt ust a!!or&in,l" :e set asi&e' +s hel& in a si ilar !aseH 7ian,a 9a" 7o,,in, Co' %' /na,eH 122 SC1+ 80 (1987)H &e!isions of a& inistrati%e offi!ers shoul& not :e &istur:e& :" the !ourts e0!ept when the for er ha%e a!te& without or in e0!ess of their ;uris&i!tion or with ,ra%e a:use of &is!retion' 3he ere suspi!ion of +pe0 that there were ano alies in the nonrelease of the first C&e!isionC an& its su:stitution of a new one :" another +ssistant /0e!uti%e Se!retar" &oes not ;ustif" ;u&i!ial re%iew' 8ere :eliefsH suspi!ions an& !on;e!tures !annot o%er!o e the presu ption of re,ularit" of offi!ial a!tion'

Pala!e an& a lon,*stan&in, 9ureau un&er the -epart ent of 5nterior an& 7o!al $o%ern ents' 3he e plo"ees of :oth offi!es assaile& the a!tion of the Presi&ent for :ein, an en!roa!h ent of le,islati%e powers an& there:" %oi&' 6as the !ontention of the e plo"ees !orre!tL /0plain'

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he !ontention of the e plo"ees is not !orre!t' +s hel& in 9uDlo& n, Gawanin, /@9 %' .a ora' 3)0 SC1+ 718 P2001QH Se!tion 31H 9ooD 555 of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987 has &ele,ate& to the Presi&ent !ontinuin, authorit" to reor,ani=e the a& inistrati%e stru!ture of the Affi!e of the Presi&ent to a!hie%e si pli!it"H e!ono " an& effi!ien!"' Sin!e this in!lu&es the power to a:olish offi!esH the Presi&ent !an a:olish the Affi!e of the Presi&ential SpoDes anH pro%i&e& it is &one in ,oo& faith' 3he Presi&ent !an also a:olish the 9ureau in the -epart ent of 5nterior an& 7o!al $o%ern entsH pro%i&e& it is &one in ,oo& faith :e!ause the Presi&ent has :een ,rante& !ontinuin, authorit" to reor,ani=e the a& inistrati%e stru!ture of the National $o%ern ent to effe!t e!ono " an& pro ote effi!ien!"H an& the powers in!lu&e the a:olition of ,o%ern ent offi!es' (Presi&ential -e!ree No' 1#1)H as a en&e& :" Presi&ential -e!ree No' 1772; 7arin %' 3he /0e!uti%e Se!retar"' 280 SC1+ 713 P1997Q)'

Ad1in La58 Meaning &) LG&0ern1ent &) t,e P,i'i**ine+M 9!##%:


N&' 3: +re ,o%ern ent*owne& or !ontrolle& !orporations within the s!ope an& eanin, of the C$o%ern ent of the PhilippinesCL

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
Se!tion 2 of the 5ntro&u!tor" Pro%ision of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987 &efines the ,o%ern ent of the Philippines as the !orporate ,o%ern ental entit" throu,h whi!h the fun!tions of ,o%ern ent are e0er!ise& throu,hout the PhilippinesH in!lu&in,H sa e as the !ontrar" appears fro the !onte0tH the %arious ar s throu,h whi!h politi!al authorit" is a&e effe!ti%e in the PhilippinesH whether pertainin, to the autono ous re,ionsH the pro%in!ialH !it"H uni!ipal or :aran,a" su:&i%isions or other for s of lo!al ,o%ern ent' $o%ern ent owne& or !ontrolle& !orporation are within the s!ope an& eanin, of the $o%ern ent of the Philippines if the" are perfor in, ,o%ern ental or politi!al fun!tions' Ad1in La58 P&5er &) t,e Pre+ident t& Re&rgani/e Ad1ini+trati0e Str3(t3re 9"66-: N& E5 * 3he Presi&ent a:olishe& the Affi!e of the Presi&ential SpoDes an in 8ala!anan,

Ad1in La58 R3'e+ and Reg3'ati&n+8 D3e Pr&(e++ 9"666:


N& 555' * 3he 8ariti e 5n&ustr" +uthorit" (8+15N+) issue& new rules an& re,ulations ,o%ernin, pilota,e ser%i!es an& feesH an& the !on&u!t of pilots in Philippine ports' 3his it &i& without noti!eH hearin, nor !onsultation with har:or pilots or their asso!iations whose ri,hts an& a!ti%ities are to :e su:stantiall" affe!te&' 3he har:or pilots then file& suit to ha%e the new 8+15N+ rules an& re,ulations &e!lare& un!onstitutional for ha%in, :een issue& without &ue pro!ess' -e!i&e the !ase' (2N)

S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
3he issuan!e of the new rules an& re,ulations %iolate& &ue pro!ess' <n&er Se!tion 9H Chapter 55H 9ooD E55 of the +& inistrati%e Co&e of 1987H as far as pra!ti!a:leH :efore a&optin, propose& rulesH an a& inistrati%e a,en!" shoul& pu:lish or !ir!ulate noti!es of the propose& rules an& affor& intereste& parties the opportunit" to su: it their %iews; an& in the fi0in, of ratesH no rule shall :e %ali& unless the propose& rates

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$%

shall ha%e :een pu:lishe& in a newspaper of ,eneral !ir!ulation at least two weeDs :efore the first hearin, on the ' 5n a!!or&an!e with this pro%isionH in Co issioner of 5nternal 1e%enue % C+H 2)1 SC1+ 23) (199))H it was hel& that when an a& inistrati%e rule su:stantiall" in!reases the :ur&en of those &ire!tl" affe!te&H the" shoul& :e a!!or&e& the !han!e to :e hear& :efore its issuan!e'

intents an& purposes' + &istin!tionH howe%erH a" :e a&e with respe!t to those entities possessin, a separate !harter !reate& :" statute' a' -P6@ is an a,en!"' 5t &oes not possess a separate !harter'
:' 9SP is an instru entalit" :e!ause it was in!orporate& un&er the new Central 9anD 7aw (1'+' No' 7)23)

+73/1N+35E/ +NS6/1:
Su: ission of the rule to the <ni%ersit" of the Philippines 7aw Center for pu:li!ation is an&ator"' <nless this re?uire ent is !o plie& withH the rule !annot :e enfor!e&'

G&0ern1ent Agen(y 0+= G&0ern1ent In+tr31enta'ity 9>%<"66@: (3) State with reason(s) whi!h of the followin, is a ,o%ern ent a,en!" or a ,o%ern ent instru entalit": a' -epart ent of Pu:li! 6orDs an& @i,hwa"s; :' 9an,Do Sentral n, Pilipinas; !' Philippine Ports +uthorit"; &' 7an& 3ransportation Affi!e;
e' 7an& 9anD of the Philippines' (2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1: +n 5NS31<8/N3+753O refers to an" a,en!" of the national ,o%ern ent not inte,rate& within the &epart ental fra eworDH %este& with spe!ial fun!tions or ;uris&i!tion :" lawH with so e if not all !orporate powersH a& inisterin, spe!ial fun&sH an& en;o"in, operational autono "H usuall" throu,h a !harter' (5ron an& Steel +uthorit" %' Court of +ppealsH $'1' No' 10297)H A!to:er 22H 1992) +$/NCO un&er the a& inistrati%e !o&e is an" &epart entH :ureauH offi!eH !o issionH authorit" or offi!er of the national ,o%ern entH authori=e& :" law or e0e!uti%e or&er to aDe rulesH issue li!ensesH ,rant ri,hts or pri%ile,esH an& a&;u&i!ate !ases; resear!h institutions with respe!t to li!ensin, fun!tions; ,o%ern ent !orporations with respe!t to fun!tions re,ulatin, pri%ate ri,htsH pri%ile,esH o!!upation or :usinessH an& offi!ials in the e0er!ise of the &is!iplinar" powers as pro%i&e& :" law'

!' PP+ !an :e &efine& as :oth an instru entalit" an& an a,en!" :e!ause it was in!orporate& :" spe!ial law an& it has its own !harterH "et it is inte,rate& with the -A3C' &' 73A is an a,en!"' 5t is an offi!e of the -A3C'
e' 79P is an instru entalit" ha%in, a !harter un&er a spe!ial law an& is a ,o%ern ent finan!ial institution ($F5) in&epen&ent of an" &epart ent of ,o%ern ent'

>3a+i<43di(ia' B&dy &r Agen(y 9>@<"66?: 3' 6hat is a ?uasi*;u&i!ial :o&" or a,en!"L (2'2N) S<$$/S3/- +NS6/1:
+ ?uasi*;u&i!ial :o&" or a,en!" is an a& inistrati%e :o&" with the power to hearH &eter ine or as!ertain fa!ts an& &e!i&e ri,htsH &uties an& o:li,ations of the parties :" the appli!ation of rules to the as!ertaine& fa!ts' 9" this powerH ?uasi* ;u&i!ial a,en!ies are ena:le& to interpret an& appl" i ple entin, rules an& re,ulations pro ul,ate& :" the an& laws entruste& to their a& inistration'

3here

is

NA

P1+C35C+7
for an all

-5S35NC35AN

instru entalit"

:etween an& a,en!"H

BAR Q&A (as arranged by Topics) POLITICAL LAW (19 !"#$$%)

!$$

You might also like