I N D I C T M E N T

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F T H E S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
C O U N T Y O F Q U E E N S
-----------------------------------------
|
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK |
|
AGAINST |
|
|
IRA KURMEN | FILED:
DEFENDANT | INDICTMENT NO. 378/2014
NYSID# 05553150K |
|
ROY HOFFMAN |
DEFENDANT |
|
DANIEL LANIADO |
DEFENDANT |
|
SAMUEL HILLER |
DEFENDANT |
NYSID# 01139431N |
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
PL 155.42 GRAND LARCENY IN THE FIRST (IRA KURMEN)
DEGREE (1) (ROY HOFFMAN)
(SAMUEL HILLER)
PL 175.35 OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT (IRA KURMEN)
FOR FILING IN THE FIRST (ROY HOFFMAN)
DEGREE (2-3) (SAMUEL HILLER)
PL 155.40-1 GRAND LARCENY IN THE SECOND (IRA KURMEN)
DEGREE (4) (SAMUEL HILLER)
PL 175.10 FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS (IRA KURMEN)
IN THE FIRST DEGREE (5-16) (SAMUEL HILLER)
PL 175.35 OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT (IRA KURMEN)
FOR FILING IN THE FIRST (SAMUEL HILLER)
DEGREE (17-28)
PL 155.42 GRAND LARCENY IN THE FIRST (DANIEL LANIADO)
DEGREE (29)
PL 190.80-1 IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST (DANIEL LANIADO)
DEGREE (30,33,36)
PL 190.80-2 IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST (DANIEL LANIADO)
DEGREE (31,34,37)
PL 190.80-3 IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST (DANIEL LANIADO)
DEGREE (32,35,38)
PL 155.35-1 GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD (ROY HOFFMAN)
DEGREE (39)
PL 155.35-1 GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD (IRA KURMEN)
DEGREE (40)
PL 155.35-1 GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD (SAMUEL HILLER)
DEGREE (41)
PL 155.35-1 GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD (DANIEL LANIADO)
DEGREE (42)
A TRUE BILL
------------------------------- DISTRICT ATTORNEY
FOREMAN
FIRST COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN, ROY HOFFMAN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF
GRAND LARCENY IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHERS, ON OR ABOUT AND BETWEEN
NOVEMBER 30, 2005 AND DECEMBER 30, 2012 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE
PROPERTY HAVING AN AGGREGATE VALUE EXCEEDING ONE MILLION DOLLARS, TO
WIT: UNITED STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
SECOND COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN, ROY HOFFMAN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF
OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS
FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHERS, ON OR ABOUT MAY 17,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
THIRD COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN, ROY HOFFMAN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF
OFFERING A FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS
FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHERS, ON OR ABOUT MARCH 01,
2011 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
FOURTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF GRAND LARCENY
IN THE SECOND DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT AND BETWEEN
JULY 01, 2009 AND JUNE 30, 2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE
PROPERTY HAVING AN AGGREGATE VALUE EXCEEDING FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS,
TO WIT: UNITED STATES CURRENCY FROM THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION.
FIFTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JULY 24,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
SIXTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER
10, 2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR
CAUSED A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR
INTENT TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR
CONCEAL THE COMMISSION THEREOF.
SEVENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 07,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
EIGHTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 10,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
NINTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 01,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
TENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 07,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
ELEVENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 09,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
TWELFTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT MARCH 10, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED A
FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
THIRTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT APRIL 09, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED A
FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
FOURTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT APRIL 20, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED A
FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
FIFTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JUNE 09,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
SIXTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF FALSIFYING
BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 27,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, MADE OR CAUSED
A FALSE ENTRY IN THE BUSINESS RECORDS OF AN ENTERPRISE, AND THEIR INTENT
TO DEFRAUD INCLUDED AN INTENT TO COMMIT ANOTHER CRIME OR CONCEAL THE
COMMISSION THEREOF.
SEVENTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JULY 24,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
EIGHTEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT SEPTEMBER
10, 2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
NINETEENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 07,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTIETH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 10,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY FIRST COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 01,
2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY SECOND COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 07,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY THIRD COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 09,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY FOURTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT MARCH 10, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT CONTAINED A
FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE
STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR PRESENTED THE
SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR BELIEVING THAT IT
WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR OTHERWISE BECOME A
PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT.
TWENTY FIFTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT APRIL 09, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT CONTAINED A
FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE
STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR PRESENTED THE
SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR BELIEVING THAT IT
WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR OTHERWISE BECOME A
PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT.
TWENTY SIXTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT APRIL 20, 2010
IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT CONTAINED A
FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE
STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR PRESENTED THE
SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR BELIEVING THAT IT
WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR OTHERWISE BECOME A
PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT.
TWENTY SEVENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT JUNE 09,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY EIGHTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANTS IRA KURMEN AND SAMUEL HILLER OF OFFERING A
FALSE INSTRUMENT FOR FILING IN THE FIRST DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANTS, EACH AIDING THE OTHER, ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 27,
2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, KNOWING THAT A WRITTEN INSTRUMENT
CONTAINED A FALSE STATEMENT OR FALSE INFORMATION, AND WITH INTENT TO
DEFRAUD THE STATE OR ANY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION THEREOF, OFFERED OR
PRESENTED THE SAME TO A PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC SERVANT KNOWING OR
BELIEVING THAT IT WOULD BE FILED WITH, REGISTERED OR RECORDED IN, OR
OTHERWISE BECOME A PART OF THE RECORDS OF SUCH PUBLIC OFFICE OR PUBLIC
SERVANT.
TWENTY NINTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF GRAND LARCENY IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN MARCH 11, 2006 AND JULY 01, 2012 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, STOLE PROPERTY HAVING AN AGGREGATE VALUE EXCEEDING ONE MILLION
DOLLARS, TO WIT: UNITED STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
THIRTIETH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JULY 31, 2009 AND MAY 01, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NISELLY BONILLA BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NISELLY BONILLA OR BY ACTING AS
NISELLY BONILLA OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OF
NISELLY BONILLA AND THEREBY OBTAINED GOODS, MONEY, PROPERTY OR
SERVICES OR USED CREDIT IN THE NAME OF NISELLY BONILLA IN AN AGGREGATE
AMOUNT THAT EXCEEDED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THIRTY FIRST COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JULY 31, 2009 AND MAY 01, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NISELLY BONILLA BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NISELLY BONILLA OR BY ACTING AS
NISELLY BONILLA OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OF
NISELLY BONILLA AND THEREBY CAUSED FINANCIAL LOSS TO SUCH PERSON OR
ANOTHER PERSON OR PERSONS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT THAT EXCEEDED TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THIRTY SECOND COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JULY 31, 2009 AND MAY 01, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NISELLY BONILLA BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NISELLY BONILLA OR BY ACTING AS
NISELLY BONILLA OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION OF
NISELLY BONILLA AND THEREBY COMMITTED OR ATTEMPTED TO COMMIT A CLASS D
FELONY OR HIGHER LEVEL CRIME OR ACTED AS AN ACCESSORY IN THE
COMMISSION OF A CLASS D OR HIGHER LEVEL FELONY.
THIRTY THIRD COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN MAY 31, 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2012 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY ACTING AS DOUBLE PLAY
TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY
OBTAINED GOODS, MONEY, PROPERTY OR SERVICES OR USED CREDIT IN THE NAME
OF DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT THAT
EXCEEDED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THIRTY FOURTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN MAY 31, 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2012 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY ACTING AS DOUBLE PLAY
TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY
CAUSED FINANCIAL LOSS TO SUCH PERSON OR ANOTHER PERSON OR PERSONS IN
AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT THAT EXCEEDED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THIRTY FIFTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN MAY 31, 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2012 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS
DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY ACTING AS DOUBLE PLAY
TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF DOUBLE PLAY TOYS INC., A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY
COMMITTED OR ATTEMPTED TO COMMIT A CLASS D FELONY OR HIGHER LEVEL
CRIME OR ACTED AS AN ACCESSORY IN THE COMMISSION OF A CLASS D OR
HIGHER LEVEL FELONY.
THIRTY SIXTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JUNE 12, 2011 AND NOVEMBER 18, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY,
OR BY ACTING AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY OBTAINED GOODS,
MONEY, PROPERTY OR SERVICES OR USED CREDIT IN THE NAME OF NLM, A
BUSINESS ENTITY, IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT THAT EXCEEDED TWO THOUSAND
DOLLARS.
THIRTY SEVENTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JUNE 12, 2011 AND NOVEMBER 18, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY,
OR BY ACTING AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY CAUSED FINANCIAL LOSS
TO SUCH PERSON OR ANOTHER PERSON OR PERSONS IN AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT
THAT EXCEEDED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THIRTY EIGHTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF IDENTITY THEFT IN THE FIRST
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AND BETWEEN JUNE 12, 2011 AND NOVEMBER 18, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF
QUEENS, KNOWINGLY AND WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ASSUMED THE IDENTITY OF
NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY,
OR BY ACTING AS NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, OR BY USING PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION OF NLM, A BUSINESS ENTITY, AND THEREBY COMMITTED OR
ATTEMPTED TO COMMIT A CLASS D FELONY OR HIGHER LEVEL CRIME OR ACTED AS
AN ACCESSORY IN THE COMMISSION OF A CLASS D OR HIGHER LEVEL FELONY.
THIRTY NINTH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT ROY HOFFMAN OF GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT AUGUST 18, 2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE PROPERTY HAVING
AN AGGREGATE VALUE OF MORE THAN THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, TO WIT: UNITED
STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
FORTIETH COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT IRA KURMEN OF GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD DEGREE
COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE PROPERTY
HAVING AN AGGREGATE VALUE OF MORE THAN THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, TO WIT:
UNITED STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
FORTY FIRST COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT SAMUEL HILLER OF GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR
ABOUT JUNE 30, 2010 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE PROPERTY HAVING AN
AGGREGATE VALUE OF MORE THAN THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, TO WIT: UNITED
STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
FORTY SECOND COUNT
THE GRAND JURY OF THE COUNTY OF QUEENS BY THIS INDICTMENT,
ACCUSES THE DEFENDANT DANIEL LANIADO OF GRAND LARCENY IN THE THIRD
DEGREE COMMITTED AS FOLLOWS:
THE DEFENDANT, ACTING IN CONCERT WITH OTHER PERSONS, ON OR ABOUT
MAY 05, 2011 IN THE COUNTY OF QUEENS, STOLE PROPERTY HAVING AN
AGGREGATE VALUE OF MORE THAN THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS, TO WIT: UNITED
STATES CURRENCY FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
RICHARD A. BROWN
DISTRICT ATTORNEY