This document provides a scoring rubric for evaluating student presentations on cultural concepts related to beer. It lists 12 criteria for the presentation with point values assigned to each. The criteria include timely posting of materials, organization and structure of the presentation, equitable participation of presenters, clear explanation of the cultural concept as related to beer, inclusion of beer brands and styles, provision of relevant information, adherence to time guidelines, citation of sources, inclusion of a sources cited slide, and professional handling of questions. The maximum possible score is 60 points.
This document provides a scoring rubric for evaluating student presentations on cultural concepts related to beer. It lists 12 criteria for the presentation with point values assigned to each. The criteria include timely posting of materials, organization and structure of the presentation, equitable participation of presenters, clear explanation of the cultural concept as related to beer, inclusion of beer brands and styles, provision of relevant information, adherence to time guidelines, citation of sources, inclusion of a sources cited slide, and professional handling of questions. The maximum possible score is 60 points.
This document provides a scoring rubric for evaluating student presentations on cultural concepts related to beer. It lists 12 criteria for the presentation with point values assigned to each. The criteria include timely posting of materials, organization and structure of the presentation, equitable participation of presenters, clear explanation of the cultural concept as related to beer, inclusion of beer brands and styles, provision of relevant information, adherence to time guidelines, citation of sources, inclusion of a sources cited slide, and professional handling of questions. The maximum possible score is 60 points.
(Goal: 12 to 14 minutes) Presentation Topic: Presenters: Possible Actual 1. Posting to Blackboard was on time, complete, and formatted properly 10 On time, but incomplete (and fixed within 72 hours) 8 Late, but within 24 hours, and complete 7.5 Late, but within 72 hours, and complete 6 Late, but within 72 hours, but incomplete 4 Posted after 72 hours or not at all or late and incomplete 0 2. Presentation was well developed (format) and organized (it flowed well) 4 3. Presentation was delivered professionally (humor is fine!) 4 4. Each presenter played an equitable role in the presentation 4 5. Presentation clearly related beer to the cultural concept 4 6. Included the discussion of at least one beer brand and style 4 7. Information presented, as appropriate: 12 The global location of the country, state, city, etc. Visual aids (posters, equipment, clothing, handouts, etc.) Samples (food, beverage, coasters, etc.) Demographic information (country, target market, etc.) Historical timeline and/or facts (brewery, city, country, etc.) Brewery statistics, product lines, facts, etc. Consumer trends, preferences, and/or consumption statistics Other measures of performance Traditional food and/or food and beer pairing references Customs and/or traditions Hospitality etiquette Festivals and/or events Media and/or other marketing examples Other: 8. The presentation finished within the proper time guidelines 8 9. If PowerPoint, sources of statistical information, facts, pictures, and/or quotes cited on each slide 4 (These should be brief references to full citations on the Sources Cited slide) 10. "Sources Cited" provided at the end of the presentation 4 11. The presenters handled questions professionally 2 12. If slides, handouts, or wording on video have grammatical or typographical errors, deduct 1 point each 0.00 Total Score (60 points maximum): 0.00 Comments: