Professional Documents
Culture Documents
17 November 2009
17 November 2009
17 November 2009
Today’s Tabbloid
PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com
Not every sector. Just ATR sent the following letter to Congressman Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) today:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform, I write to congratulate you for
• health care sponsoring H.R. 3971,...
• energy
Not everything. But more and more. So much that even the growing The Obama administration, alas, has decided to back the Senate’s bill,
opposition can’t keep up with it all. though the Justice Department also expressed “concerns” about the
handful of actually-substantive checks on government spying power, and
made clear that it intends to continue “working with the Committee” to
gut those before the bill reaches the floor. For those with a taste for the
gory details, Wired points to CDT’s handy dandy cheat sheet comparing
the main provisions of the two bills.
1
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
Year after year states build their budgets around what they expect to
KEY VOTE ALERT
raise in tax revenue for the upcoming fiscal year. This means that states “NO” to “Doc Fix” (H.R. 3961)
When you get to the top of a mountain, what do you find? Other than This bill is not offset with any spending
maybe a mountain goat, or the frozen remains of an ill-fated previous cuts so the overall tab will recklessly add
climber, snow, that’s what. That’s why it’s almost appropriate that the over $200 billion over ten years to the
Obama administration’s Race to the The Top Fund, as I have written national debt. This is also a deceptive
before and write again in this new op-ed, is essentially a snow job. And it attempt to hide the true cost of health care
seems to be a particularly blinding one. reform.
To qualify for Fund dollars, states have to make hardly any meaningful Reasonable people can argue about the merits of a
changes to their education systems. For the most part they just have to “doc fix”, but fiscal prudence demands that it not
submit plans for how they could conceivably do good stuff. Moreover, add one penny to the national debt. This bill
the same “stimulus” that furnished the $4.35 billion for Race to The Top needs to have a full offset of spending cuts to meet
supplied roughly 20 times that amount to protect the abysmal, that requirement. Also, it’s clear that Senate
obese education status quo from recessionary pressures. Nonetheless, leaders are stripping this bill out of
many conservatives, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, are comprehensive health care reform legislation in
going out of their way to lionize Obama & co. for their reform efforts. order to avoid the task of selling an expensive
proposal to the public that breaks the President’s
Why the cross-spectrum adulation? One problem is certainly that some revenue neutral pledge. When it comes to
conservatives have given up on real reform — universal school choice overhauling one-sixth of the national economy,
and getting the feds out of education — in favor of being seen as “doing the American people are entitled to honesty and
something” from Washington. Probably more important, though, is that transparency from their elected leaders in
Race to the Top is constantly being festooned in brash, combative Washington.
rhetoric about pushing what are actually relatively minor — but
still disliked by teacher union — improvements such as linking educator
pay to student performance and increasing charter schools. (For a taste
of the hyperbole, check out Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s
opening commentary from Sunday’s Meet the Press.) That Race to the
Top falls far short of actually doing even these very limited things seems
not to matter.
2
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE BLOG FEEDS relationship. Access to housing, jobs, new goods, and the possibility of
minor improvements in life, all depend on a well documented support of
Cuban Blogger Yoani Sanchez the revolution through attendance of mass meetings and membership in
the communist party, for example.
Keeps Speaking Truth to Power
Or through personal relationships with those in power. Sanchez
[Cato at Liberty] describes how young women long ago began prostituting themselves to
NOV 16, 2009 02:36P.M. high ministry or military officials in exchange for non-monetary goods or
privileges. Such “courtesans of socialism” later turned to traditional
prostitution with the arrival of currency convertibility in Cuba. Sanchez
also optimistically describes the role that technology, especially the
internet, is playing in creating spaces of liberty. In a country where
people increasingly feel the regime’s days are numbered, such exercises
of personal freedom can be powerful.
3
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
In a new Policy Analysis, Cato Research Fellow Jason Kuznicki examines • The politics behind the health care overhaul.
the ongoing threats to free speech both at home and around the world,
from hate-speech laws in the United Kingdom and Canada and • Mass corruption in Afghanistan. Malou Innocent: “Washington has
university speech codes in the United States, to the Cairo Declaration on already surged into Afghanistan once this year. The United States
Human Rights in Islam: should not spend more American blood and more of its ever-
diminishing financial resources to prop up Karzai’s ineffectual
The result is not more happiness, but a race to the regime.”
bottom, in which aggrieved groups compete
endlessly with one another for a slice of government • A government takeover of health care is not pro-choice — for
power. Philosopher Robert Nozick once observed that anyone: “Whatever your views on abortion, the fight over abortion
utilitarianism is hard-pressed to banish what he termed in the Obama health plan illustrates perfectly why government
utility monsters—that is, individuals who take inordinate should stay out of health care. When the government subsidizes
satisfaction from acts that displease others. Arguing about health care, anything you do with that money becomes the voters’
who hurt whose feelings worse, and about who needs more business. And rather than allow for choice between different ways
soothing than whom, seems designed to discover—or of doing things, the government typically imposes the preferences
create—utility monsters. We must not allow this to happen. of the majority — or sometimes, a vocal minority — on everybody.”
Instead, liberal governments have traditionally relied on a • Podcast: “A Proposed Beat Down for Banks“
particular bargain, in which freedom of expression is
maintained for all, and in which emotional satisfaction is a
private pursuit, not a public guarantee. This bargain can
extend equally to all people, and it forms the basis for an FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE BLOG FEEDS
enduring and diverse society, one in which differences may
be aired without fear of reprisal. Although world cultures ATR and CFA to House: Pass
increasingly mix with one another, and although our
powers of expression are greater than ever before, the TARP Accountability and
these are not sound reasons to abandon the liberal
bargain. Restrictions on free expression do not make Disclosure Act [Americans for
societies happier or more tolerant, but instead make
them more fractious and censorious. Tax Reform]
NOV 16, 2009 11:49A.M.
Read the whole thing.
As a possible extension of the TARP program looms, the House is set to
vote on a measure that will bring more transparency and accountability
into the program this week. An amended version of H....
4
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
Centers for Medicare and IBD Editorial: America’s corporate tax to grind.
Last Friday, the the non-partisan and independent Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, the agency in charge of running Medicare and
Medicaid, issued a report analyzing the effect of Obamacare i...
5
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
It turns out that, unlike her next most junior colleague, Justice Alito —
who hung back early in his tenure while learning the rhythms of the
Court – Justice Sotomayor has not been a shrinking violet in her
This evening at 7pm ET:
questioning of advocates. Indeed, according to a National Law Journal
tally, during the 13 November arguments that just concluded, she asked
BEN BERNANKE’S SPEECH:
146 questions (or 11.2 per case), which is even ahead of where Chief
An eye on the Fed, dollar & gold
Justice Roberts was at this point in his career. And, because Sotomayor
speaks more often than her more reserved predecessor, Justice Souter,
Panel:
she has made a “hot” bench even hotter.
6
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
Court tends to grapple with. And therefore I’ll go out on a The health-care reform proposals now before Congress could
counterintuitive limb here to predict that, as Sotomayor settles into her further strain state budgets because they would expand
new role, her questioning will become less frequent but more Medicaid, Genest said.
substantive.
Genest said Congress should overhaul Medicaid, now funded
jointly by state and federal governments but run by the states.
The federal government should cover more of the costs, give
FISCALLY CONSERVATIVE BLOG FEEDS states more flexibility or even make a drastic switch and
let federal officials take over Medicaid completely, he said.
Federal Assumption of
“If you want to imagine a crisis, as a thought experiment,
Medicaid Costs [Cato at Liberty] imagine all 50 states writing a letter to the federal
NOV 16, 2009 10:43A.M. government saying, ‘We’re no longer providing Medicaid.’
That would get Congress’ attention. And that’s about the only
From the standpoint of Americans who prefer less government, one of real leverage we have,” Genest said.
the worst developments of the 20th century was the federal subsidization
of state and local spending. The result has been bigger government at all Current health care legislation in Congress threatens to increase state
levels. Medicaid represents the largest portion of federal money to the Medicaid spending. In the House passed bill, the federal government
states. The states administer their own Medicaid programs, but the would pick up 100 percent of Medicaid’s expansion until 2015 when it
federal government picks up 50 to 83 percent of the tab depending on a would drop to 91 percent. However, the future is unpredictable and it’s
state’s income. The estimated price tag of the federal share for fiscal year not hard to imagine a future Congress keeping it at 100 percent federal
2009 is $260 billion. funding.
One result of the federal government paying for half or more is that it According to the Congressional Research Service, the House bill also
encourages the states to expand enrollment and benefits. It also makes it contains a provision that could be intended to create a justification for
politically difficult to cut state Medicaid spending because of the greater federal assumption of state Medicaid spending:
accompanying loss of federal dollars.
H.R. 3962 would require GAO to study federal matching
A 2007 analysis on the exorbitant future costs of Medicaid by Jagadeesh payments made to state Medicaid programs to make
Gokhale illustrates how the program’s price tag has skyrocketed since its recommendations on the FMAP formula to Congress. By
creation in 1965 (see chart here). Over the decades, the states expanded February 15, 2011, GAO would be required to submit a report
their programs whenever the economy was growing and the tax revenues based on this study assessing the effect on the federal
were flowing. When the economy went into recession and the revenue government, states, providers, and beneficiaries of making
dried up, the states generally didn’t scale-back benefits and sometimes the following changes to the FMAP formula: (1) removing the
they asked for bailouts from the federal government. The 2009 stimulus 50% floor or 83% ceiling, or both and (2) revising the current
package provided an estimated $87 billion in federal Medicaid money for FMAP formula to better reflect state fiscal capacity, state
the states. efforts to finance health and long-term care services, and to
better adjust for national or regional economic downturns.
If the economy remains stagnant over the next few years and state tax
revenues fail to rebound, further pressure will mount on the federal See this essay on the need for a return to fiscal federalism.
government to continue bailing out state Medicaid programs. The
nightmare scenario would be for the federal government to assume the Update: The Washington Post reports this morning that the House
full costs of Medicaid under state pressure. health care reform bill contains an additional $23.5 billion Medicaid
bailout for the states. The provision would extend by an additional six
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s budget director, Michael months (through 2011) the stimulus legislation’s “temporary” increase in
Genest, recently raised the idea: the federal government’s share of total Medicaid spending.
7
Today’s Tabbloid PERSONAL NEWS FOR lgn@limitedgovernmentnetwork.com 17 November 2009
Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani appeared on Fox News
Sunday this weekend to argue against the Obama administration’s plan
to try some alleged terrorists in New York courts. He did not acquit
himself well.
Giuliani argued, for example, that criminal defendants aren’t tried “at
the scene of the crime.” Criminal defendants are almost always tried in
the jurisdictions where their crimes took place (not at the actual crime
scene, of course). Giuliani’s insistence on misstating basic criminal
procedure showed that he was twisting to score points against the
administration. This is inappropriate political use of terrorism issues.