Members of a project team were tasked with helping a man named Don solve a dilemma. Don worked at a company and his daughter attended a daycare run by a woman named Miss Anderson. Don had concerns about Miss Anderson's mental state and behavior towards the children. The team identified Don's key criteria as his daughter's security, his job credibility, Miss Anderson's mental state, and his relationship with his wife. They developed alternatives like moving his daughter to a new daycare, discussing it with his wife, asking neighbors about Miss Anderson, or confronting her. The team analyzed the alternatives based on how well they addressed each criterion and selected moving the daughter to a new daycare as the best option. They
Members of a project team were tasked with helping a man named Don solve a dilemma. Don worked at a company and his daughter attended a daycare run by a woman named Miss Anderson. Don had concerns about Miss Anderson's mental state and behavior towards the children. The team identified Don's key criteria as his daughter's security, his job credibility, Miss Anderson's mental state, and his relationship with his wife. They developed alternatives like moving his daughter to a new daycare, discussing it with his wife, asking neighbors about Miss Anderson, or confronting her. The team analyzed the alternatives based on how well they addressed each criterion and selected moving the daughter to a new daycare as the best option. They
Members of a project team were tasked with helping a man named Don solve a dilemma. Don worked at a company and his daughter attended a daycare run by a woman named Miss Anderson. Don had concerns about Miss Anderson's mental state and behavior towards the children. The team identified Don's key criteria as his daughter's security, his job credibility, Miss Anderson's mental state, and his relationship with his wife. They developed alternatives like moving his daughter to a new daycare, discussing it with his wife, asking neighbors about Miss Anderson, or confronting her. The team analyzed the alternatives based on how well they addressed each criterion and selected moving the daughter to a new daycare as the best option. They
Mohd Nur Hanif Aiman Bin Azhari 14527 Mohd Eshar Bin Abdul Halim 15638 Mohd Faizal Bin Suhaimi 15675 Che Muhammad Aiman Syazwan 15597
Honour Who To Protect Project 1 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM Follow company policy of not disclosing information or using it for personal gain and pulling daughter from daycare. IDENTIFICATION OF DECISION CRITERIA Security of his daughter Jobs credibility Mental state of Miss Anderson Relationship with Wife Allocation of Weights to Criteria Criterion
Weightage Security of his daughter
10 Jobs credibility
8 Mental state of Miss Anderson
6 Relationship with Wife
5 Weightage is range from 1 10 DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES Tell and discuss with his wife Take out daughter to another Daycare Centre Ask miss Andersons neighbors regarding her behavior Keep Ignorant on the dilemma Consult the doctors opinion regarding her mental state Confront miss Anderson Alternative Evaluation of Alternative SUM of Weightage x Analysis Security of his daughter Jobs credibility Mental state of Miss Anderson Relationship with Wife Take out daughter to another Daycare Centre 100 44 97 34 275 Tell and discuss with his wife 51 26 67 99 243 Ask miss Andersons neighbors regarding her behavior 79 12 73 56 220
Keep Ignorant on the dilemma 3 100 34 50 187 Consult the doctors opinion regarding her mental state 78 32 87 52 249 Confront miss Anderson 50 8 99 47 204 SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVE Take out daughter to another Daycare Centre 100 24 97 34 275 IMPLEMENTATION OF ALTERNATIVE Take out Daughter from Daycare Use another reason instead of her mental state. This can avoid miss Anderson to be fired from her job
EVALUATION OF DECISION EFFECTIVENESS The decision can be evaluated at the further action of Don whether he successfully solve his dilemma.