IS THE ROTATIONAL SHOT PUT

TECHNIQUE THE NEXT STEP

FORWARD FOR WOMEN IN THIS
COUNTRY? (by John Smith)
March 2, 2014 John Smith Leave a comment
In the last two years, I have been conducting a personal case study involving the glide and
rotational techniques performed in shot putting. In this personal study, I took a glider with six
years of experience that had thrown 17.23m with the technique, and started working a glide/spin
combo throwing protocol for all implements for entire practices. My findings, after thousands of
throws, showed that using the spin technique averaged 11-11.5% better than the glides taken
during the practice sessions. This led me to strongly believe that women shot putters could once
again approach the distances achieved by men in the event. The women of this country will
simply have to make the same transition the men did roughly twenty years ago.
In the early days, the spin technique emerged when gliders began experimenting with new
methods of throwing the shot put. At first, the distance between the two techniques wasnt great.
The majority of throws taken with the spin were the same or no more than two feet farther than
the glide. Yet, as testing became stronger, throwers became weaker and more guys started
playing with the spin. The result of the experimenting with the new technique was that the
distance between the two systems started to expand.
At some point, rumors of guys putting ten feet on top of their standing throw started to surface,
which was very hard to believe at the time. Then the next generation of rotational throwers
started talking about their full throw as being 12-14 feet further than their standing throws, and
ten feet on a standing throw became an accepted number. This is significant because the glide in
the past required certain qualities to throw 70-73 feet. It mainly demanded a large standing throw
because a glider could typically only add 4 to 7 feet on top of their standing throw, which
required a 72-foot glider to have at least a 65 to 68 foot standing throw to attain that distance.
Although making a standing throw that great seems hard to believe in this day and age, 65 to 68
foot standing throws were commonplace at the world class level during the 80s and early 90s. I
have not seen an american 65+ standing throw in 20 years.
The influence of steriods on this era were made clear in a report compiled in the former East
Germany. Under a state-supported drug regimine, the average male thrower was expected to
improve in a four year time period 2.5m-4m in the shot, 10m-12m in the disc and 6- 10m in the
hammer. The women were expected to improve in four years 4.5m -5m in the shot, 11-20m in
the disc, and 8 15m in the javelin.These are the former DDR numbers whos state-supported
system developed and tracked these increases to the Stasi. Therefore, men who threw 62 to 65
foot throws clean, could make the jump to 70-73 feet with the glide, and become world class
throwers within weeks. However, during the 1990s when testing became better, the big standing
throws went away and so did the big gliders in America. This is what happened, and the USA
maybe unknowingly made the adjustment to the spin.
Due to the big standing throws falling about 2-2.5m from what it used to be, the men in this
country turned to the rotational method to make up the distance lost. Because of that change,
American men broke the 22m barrier clean, which many people still refused to believe. In my
estimation, there have been six men to throw over 22m clean in this country with the rotational
method. It is safe to say that after the rotational technique evolved in this country, the glide is
not what is used to be, even on a world level. All one has to do is look at the amount of world
class gliders from the 80s and early 90s compared to today. The male 70 foot glider is definitely
an endangered speciesmuch like a high jumper still using the western roll was when the flop
took over.
Many say this is a different deal with the women, but I say it has not been explored fully enough.
The women throw a 4k. So the bodyweight to implement ratio is much different than the men.
However, the standing throw to full throw differential is about the same. Just like the men, 115%
on standing throw is considered great gliding. Still, the clean 70-foot throw for women most
likely has not been done yet. World class gliding for women takes one of two great physical
qualities. These characteristics involve a very big tall athletic woman (6.3 to 6.6 and 220 to
300lbs) or a girl with a golden arm very much like the skinny kid that throws the 95mph fastball.
I have seen a couple of golden arms in Terri Cantwell and Michelle Carter in this country. Both
these women could stand 59-61 feet without world class strength levels, but these athletes are
very rare. The only women we should consider for the glide shot technique are these two types of
women. If you do not have a big standing throw, you will have a hard time reaching world class
female levels in the shot. Now, question is what do we do with all the women that dont have
huge standing throws or huge levers and mass? Make spinners out of them. Jill Camarena made
the change from a 59-foot glider to a 66-foot spinner. Jill was the one thrower that made me take
a very serious look into women with rotational technique.
All it will take is 1000s of girls working at it from a young age, and it will happen. If guys can
go 12-15 feet on standing throw, there is no valid reason why women cant do this also. Its just
going to take one girl to break through like the men did years ago. The first step to this process is
getting high school girls throwing a 3k shot to develop the CNS pathways to throw a shot far.
Training for the 3k would require work with a 2k, which would also further teach our girls how
to throw something far. So when the young girls are ready step up to the 4k, its just a matter of
building physical and specific strength through lifting and throwing heavy implements before
they are able to match the collegiate men. We need high school girls throwing 20m with the 3k.
The more girls that can accomplish this the more likely we will produce better marks at the next
level.
The main concern with the execution of this theory would be establishing a throwing system that
teaches high school coaches how to coach and teach the rotational method before the girls reach
the college ranks. Then the cream will rise to the top and a 70-footer will emerge years later
from the system.
With the rotational shot technique, women should follow what the men have accomplished with
the spin in the last 20 years. The glide for the men in this country has became obsolete with the
explosion of male rotational throwers who reach drug era distances without using drugs. The
same will happen for the women if the necessary steps are taken. I am convinced that a 21m
throw could spring out of the hands of a female spin shot putter someday in this decade. Who
will be the first is an unknown at this point, but it can be done.
Make no mistake about it, and as much as the Europeans like to point to one or two guys
throwing far with the glide, our NCAA system produces 19m, 20m, 21m throwers like a
machine. This we are doing right; however, my next article will be on what we are not doing and
need to do in the disc. How to make up those 80s and early 90s discus differentials.
John Smit