Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 1 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

t
!--F
$?.
--y?
,u
1 RIC 1.FINE,InProPer
2 PrisonerID #1824367
c/oMen'sCenkalJail
3 441BauchetSkeet
4 LosAngeles,CA 90012
5
6 UM TED STATESCOURT OFH PEALS
7
FOR THE NG TH CIRCUIT
8
9
10 RIC 1.FINE, CaseNo.09-56073
Petitioner,
11 D.C.No.2:
09-cv-01914J'
FW (CW)
12 vs. D.C.No.2:09-cv-07943JFW (CW)
13 E> RGENCY PETITION FOR
14 SI-TEIUFFOFLOSANGELES wRIT OF A'
I'E To
15 COUNTY,eta1, IM> DIATEI.Y ORDER TRIAI,
Iuspondents cotm'
r To ENTER WRJ' I- OF
16 / e p s j,., . . HABEAS CORPUS IN USDC
j, l
Z%
v.
e7
.,
ok
n
r
;
qD
,
k,
ryr
L
,
s
'':j
.
1
;
vt
.s
o C ASE NO.CV-09-07943 OR
jssto ouosp To suow
Ig Fltt'b v(
)
-y ,f
?;y.
.
rj
y,y cxuss
19 xcgs-sn - - ..
20 Petitioner(hereinlverççFing asbeenincarceratedsinceMarch4,2009in
21
22
the Los M geles Colmty Jailtmder 'coercive incarceration'pursuantto a
23 March4,2009 contemptorderissued by LA SuperiorCourtJudgeDavid P.
24 Yaffe. Thatcontemptorderispresently on appealbeforethisCourtin the
25
26 instantcase.Theissuecertifiedforappealis'whetherthetrialcourtjudge
27 Iè
JudgeYaffe)shouldhaverecusedhimself'.Oralargumentissetfortheweek
28
ofDecember7-11,2009.

-1
-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 2 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 Dut
ing the Diskict Courtproceeding and the appealproceeding, the
2
3 RespondentSheriftltheLA SuperiorCourtandJudgeYaffe(thelattertwoof
4 whom arenotrespondents)inCV-09-1914JFW (CW)madefalsestatementsto
5
theCourt. Thesestatementsshowed thatFine's''coerciveincarceration'was
6
7 limitedto5daysunderCCPj1218,andshouldnothavebeen'lmlimited'.
8 Thiswaspm icularly tnle asFinewasrefusing to answerquestions on
9
10 'moral''groundssuchascontestingthejurisdictionofJudgeYaffetopreside
11 overthecaseanddematldinghisrecusal.TheCourtwillnotethattltisisthe
12
issueonappeal.
13
14 TheLA SuperiorCourt,JudgeYaffeandSheriffLeroyBacaknew thatthey
15 couldnotholdFineformoret11a115daystmderInReFarr,36Cal.App.
3d577(1974)
16
17 andInReï nlliam z:Farr,64Ca1.
App.3d605(1976).Tltiscreatedanindependent
ls violationofthetnkingofFine'slibertywithoutdueprocessoflaw.
19
20
Additionally,the LA SuperiorCourtand JudgeYaffe admitted in their
21 appealbrieffortheftrsttimethatthecontemptwasboth''miminal'and'civil''
22 TltisadmissionprovedthatFinewasdeniedhisSixthAmendmentrighttoajury
23
24 trialpttrsuanttotheB&PCodej6126criminalchargeofpracticing1awwithout
25 alicenseorholdinghimselfouttopracticelaw.
26
27 Finally,DiszctCourtMagiskateJudgeCarlaM.WoehrleandJudgeJolm
28 F.Walterviolated28USC j2243,therebydenyingFinedueprocessand

-2-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 3 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l causing his incarceration on Founds separate 9om those ofthe contempt

2
3 proceeding.
4 OnOctober30,2009,Finefiled aPetitionforWritofHabe% Corpusfor
5
settingforththosenew anddifferentgrounds,USDC caseno. CV-09-7943JFW
6
v (CW). ThePetitionnamedtheU.S.DistrictCourt(referringto actionsof
B MaistrateJudgeWoehrleand Judge Walter),theSheriffofLosAngeles
9
10 Cotmty,theLA SuperiorCourtand JudgeYaffe asrespondents. A trueand
11 correctcopy ofthePetition,marked asExhibitçi1'' isattached hereto and
12
incorporatedhereinbythisreferenceasifsetfort
hinfull.
13
14 The Petition was assiNed to Judge Walter and Magistrate Judge
15 Woehrle. Eachofthem shouldhaverecusedthemselves.SeeInReMurchison,
16
17 349v.U.S.135(1955)-tç
Nomancanbeajudgeinllisowncase''anditnoman
18 ispermitted to try caseswherehehasan interestin the outcome'', cited in
19
20 Capertonv.W.Z MassevCoalCo..Inc.,566US (2009)decidedJtme8,
21 2009,SlipOpinionpage10.JudgeWalterandMagistrateJudgeWoehrlewere
22
23
madeawareoftheCapertonprecedentitlcaseno.CV-09-19l4JFW (CW)but
24 iNoredit.
25 JudgeWalterandMagistrateJudgeWoehrleviolateddueprocesswhenthey
26
27 deniedthePetition as 'successive''absentawritofmandate from theNinth
28 Circuit.A mzeandcorrectcopyofJudgeWalter'sOrderdenyingthePetition

.3-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 4 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 withoutprejudiceisattachedheretoasExhibit&t2''andincorporatedhereinby
2
3
thisreferenceasifsetforthin111.
4 OnOctober6,2009,FineattemptedtofileamotiontorecuseJudgeWalter,
5
amotiontorecuseMagiskateJudgeWoehrle,anoticeofnon-consenttoany
6
7 magiskatejudgehenri
ngthec%e,andanexparteapplicationforimmediate
0 releaseandto p'antthewrit. A1lofthosedocumentswere 'received''bythe
9
10 Courtbutnot'
'
filed'.Trueandcorrectcopiesofthesedocllmentsareattached
11 hereto,marked collectively asExhibitçG3''> and incorporated herein by this
12
referenceasifsetforthin111.
13
14 Given thedirectviolationsofdueprocessofJudgeWalterandMagiskate
15 JudgeWoehrle ofdeciding theirown case, thewritofmandatemustissue.
16
17 Furt
her,sincetheFoundsofthePetition arenot'successive''butseparateand
1s distinctandtheresultofthefraudontheCourtbytheLA SuperiorCourtand
19
20
JudgeYaffe,andtheviolationsofSection2243ofJudgeWalterandMagistrate
21 JudgeWoehrle,thewritmustissueor,ataminimum,an ordertoshow cause
22
mustissuewiththeExParteApplicationsetfortinExhibit::
3,,.
23
24 Emergency action is needed as Fine is now in ltis ninth month of
25 incarceration,whenthel
imitwas5daystmderCCPj1218andtheFarrcases.
26
27 EachadditionaldaythatFineremainsinincarcerationisanew violationofhis
2: constimtionalrights.

-4-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 5 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

Datedthis% dayofMô47,2009 Respectfullysubmitted,

-N >.
BY: M
RICHARD 1.FINE,
lnProPer

7
8
9
10
1l
12
13
14
15

17
18

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 6 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

PROOFOFSERVICE

STATE OFCM IFORNIA,

COLTNTY OFLOSANGELES

1nm FredSottile.Myaddressis2601E.VictoriaStreet,# 108,Rancho

Dominguez,CA 90220.
On November.V-- ,2009,Iservedtheforegoingdoctlmentdescribedas
EG RGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE TO
IMMEDIATELY ORDER TQIAL COURT TO ENTER WRIT OFHABEAS
CORPUSIN USDC CASE NO.CV-09-7943OR ISSUE ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE oninterestedpartiesintltisactionbydepositingatruecopythereotl
whichwasenclosedinasealedenvelope,withpostagefullyprepaid,intheUnited
StatesMail,addressedasfollows:
AaronMitchellFontana KevinM.Mccormick
PaulB.Beach BENTON,ORR,DUVAL& BUCKWGHAM
LAWRENCEBEACH ALLEN&CHOI,PC 39N.CalifomiaStreet
100WestBroadway,Ste.1200 P.O.Box1178
Glendale,CA 91210-1219 Ventura,CA 93002
1certifyanddeclare,tmderpenaltyofperjurytmderthelawsoftheUnited
StatesofAmericaand the State ofCalifomiw thattheforegoing istrue and
correct.
Executedonthis ) dayofNovember,2009,atRanchoDominguez,
Califomia.

h-re.m S /znss-
FRED SOTTILE
 Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt17 ofFi
Page: led10DktEntry:
55 /30/20097128989
Page1of31
FILED
ltlcluRn1.F1NE,InProper
(?.--
,
!
Prisonerm #1824367 2119ocrzo' p. jzzj
c/oMenssCentalzail ctq#xjy:;.ajs
4
L4
o1
sBau
Angc
ehet
les,S
Ct
r
Aee
t
90012 WvTkté
0t%nlj
söyiAi
N tj
i%y
qa
xtj#
,y
.
:y r=-
UNITEDSTATESDISTRICTCOURT
CENTRALDISTRICTOFCALVORNW WESTERNDIWSION
fqo
mcuARn1.FlNE!
Petitloner,
î
cas:#t
g'
#
!
,
tè
wQ
,!
79457t
--zJc-)
E< ROENCYPETITIONFORWRITOF
VS. HABEASCORPUSBYPERSONIN
U.S.DISTRICTCOIJRTFORTHE FEDERAI,ANDSTATECUSTODY
CENTRALDISTRICTOFCALIFORNIA; (28U.S.C.jZZ4II;REQW STFOR
STAYOFEXECUTIONOFSENTENCE
SHERIFFOFLOSANGELESCOUNTY; ConvictionfromLosM gelesCounty,case
SIPERIORCOURTOFTlo STATBOF numberLASCBSl0942û
CALIFORNW COUNTYOFLOS Previous/relatedUSDCcasenumber:
ANOELES; CV-09-1914JFW (CW)
LOSANOELESCOUNTYSUPERIOR Curren#relatedNinthCircuitCourtof
COURTJUDGEDAVD P.YAFFE, Appealscasenumber:09-56073
Respondents.

PETIHOX
ThisPetitionconcernsactionswhichoccurredintheDistrictCourtincaseCV-09-1914
JFW (Cm .PedtionerdoesnotconsenttoproceedbdbreaMagis%teJudge.
Thispetition seeb PetitionerRichard1.Fine'slçç
Fine''
limmediatereleasefrom
ttcoerçiw incamervqn''on moralFoundsin O tFinewillneversucçumb dpn'ng the
pendencyoftheappeal,oranyactionsintheU.S.SupremeCourtiftheappealfails.Any
furtherincrceration beyondtheeightmonthsalready served* 1only serveto flzrtber
reinforceFine'sbdiefinthewro essnnaçrlmîardltyoft:eactionsofJudgeYGennd
Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt18 ofFi55
Page: led10/
30/2009 7128989
DktEntry: Page2of31

:tt?.
P.zr21:g9 1i
ash:e
-
$7
r;:
' l(pQE
r?l
1 ru
::i-iî
:û ct
à ï
-1
u
;iIlr.3J7'j.
N
2 1i
2é'
7 i);
1- 4)7j
:
-I2
1t
7
.l
R2)F1% ïe
c
'
'-
'p19-286!:@ kritllaà:asgu -r)u:(1)
lrmllmtI $.
5g:.
,
)
'
s.e
-m,
l :> -,.,
*-)
,tzv 5a--
l-ùt:1layaent.. * 5.:f.
 Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt19 ofFi55
Page: led10/
30/20097128989
DktEntry: Page3of31

1 thosewhotakemoneyfromLosAngelesCotmtyCYACountf'
landpresideovercaseswhere
2 1.ACo=t
yisapmyorhn:anînterot
3 ThequestiononappealiswhetherJudgeYatlbshouldhaverecusedhimself.
4 nfsPetitionalsoseeksFine'simmediatereleasefrom Gcoerciveincarceration''anda
5 stayofexecutionofsentenceandWritofHabeasCorpusonthecriminalconvictionabased
6 uponthedenialofdueprocessthathasoccurredinthisDiskid Courtbythemisleading
7 statementsandffaudupontheCourtbyRespondentSheriF ofLosM gelesCounty.theLA
s CountySuperiorCoM CtLA SuperiorCourt'),LA SuperiorCourtJudgeDavidB. Yafre
9 (t<
JHgeYee''
)aadte'
rcoue .T* madeAtetceatqendrepre= teions/n4submittu
10 dxumentsintheDiskidCourt<GWritofHabeasComus''caseofFinev.Sheriloflm Angeles
11 Countv- USDC casenoCV-09-1914J' FW (CW). Suchsotementqzrepresentnfionsand
12 documentsweremisleadingandfraudulentwhencomparedtothestatements,representaéons
13 anddocumentsmadeOctober9,2009inleappealofthecase,NinthCircuitCourtofAppeals
14 caseno.09-56073.
15 ThisPetienfurtherseeksFine'simmediatereleasefrom f%coerciveincarceraion''based
16 u>nt% violalio- of28U.S. C.92243bytH Die dCouhtho+ te aelisY ofMviM te
17 JudgeCarlaWoehrle,approvedbyJudgeWalter,andtheviolationsofRespondentSheritT,the
18 LASupeiorC'
OII
/andJuëeYee.
19
20 grmspxcelqoN
21 Jurisdictionexis'tsOder28U.S.
C.j2241asallactionsxcurredaherPetitionerwasin
22 thejurisdictionoftheFMeralCourt.Jurisdictionalsoexis.
tsunder28U.I.
C.û2055,28
23 U.S.
C.j1345and28U.S. C.!1945.
24
M Y a
26 A1lactsocçurredintheCentralDistrictofCalifomia. Peeoner,Respondenlandany
27 realpe esininterestal1resideanddobusinessintheCene DisdctofCalifornia
2g

2
 CaseCase:
2:09-cv-07943-JFW-
09-56073 CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt110 ofFile
Page: d10/3
55 0/2009 7128989
DktEntry: Page4of31

1 Responsestoguestionsf'
rom USDCtTederalCustodyForm''(CV-27):

3 1. PlaceofDetention: LACountyMen'sCenkalJail
4 441BauchetStred,LosAngeles,CA.90012
5 2. NameandLocationofCourtthatimposedoriginalsentence:
6 LosAngelesCountySumriorCourt
111NorthHi11Street,Dept.36
7' L* M mlD,CA,M 12
8 3. CasenumberOdtheoffensesforwhi chorisnalsentencewasïmposed:
9 a) BS109420
b) Refusaltoanswerquesionsatdebtorxsexamination-contemptofcourt
10 c) Practicing1aworholdingouttopractioelaw-contem#ofcourt
11 4 Dateo'' sene ceimpoM AOZItenns
12 a) March4,2009
b) 'ç
coerci
veincarceration''nobail,indeterminate
la c) $1,000or5daysconsecutivew1t11b)above
14 5 HndingmadeinoriginalStatecase
,5 b) aherpleaofnotgl
zilty
IE 6. Fie ngmnd-inoriginalStatec,sseby
17
b) Judgewithoutajury
18 7. Didyouappealorï#nalStatecaseinStateCourt?
xQ>
19
8. StateCourtapmalsnotallowed.WhtsofHabeasComustakenandsllmmarily
2:
21 dMie.Writ51* inUSY casene.CV-*-1914JFWICW).AOonsi nthatcasearebasisof
thisPetition.
22
9. StateconciselyeveryFoundonwhichyouclaim youarebeingheldunlswfully)
23
24
BASESFORAI. %.GROUNDS
nisPetîtîon addressesthe moraland due processFoundswhich surround the
26
27
underlyingcaseCV-09-1914JFWICW)tthe'xWritcasen). TheWdtcaseispresentlyon
iutheNe' fN'me-' x W.56073. neimque.ol isT'wketherZetrm'l
2:
judge(JudgeYaFe)shouldhaverecusedhimstlf''Thelmderlyingfactsareadmitfe.
dbyJudge

a
 CaseCase:
2:09-c09-56073
v-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt111 ofFil
Page: ed10/DktEntry:
55 30/2009 7128989
Page5of31

1 YGeinhistestimonyinthecontemptprxetding(USDCDkt#1,Reporter'sTranscript
2 HnlezlDvombc22.2*:))Hemcmi ve aym=tsfromM Cqxty(w&l.hewasjudgeinthe
3 caseofMar naStran-d--co-lo. 11HomeownersAzocf
-i cfftm v.Coun* ofLosWnzele,.LA
4 SuperiorCourtcaseno.BS109420,t heunderl/ngcaseofthecontemptproceeding,acdwhile
5 hepresidedoverotherLACot mtycases).HedidnotdisclosethepaymentsonhisForm700
6 StatementofFinancialInterest(ashewasrequiredtodolahedidnothaveanywritten
? agreementofemploymentoranyarrangementtoperform servîcesforLACounty. Hedidnot
# putthemoneyinhisjudicialcampaignfund-Hedidnotremembe,
ranydecisionhemade
9 a>' 1A jltv I*e#h- yem nthertbanle 'siœ v dingNil''intheMAn'>
10 strandcase.(ThatdecisionrequiredrecirculaionofpartofanEnviromnentallmpactReport
11 (çt
Em'').Itdidn0tstoptheproject)
12 (ThemtitionintheMarinaStrandcaseallegednumerousWola:ons,including0n:that
13 thepromsedprojectdidnotproddeanyfmanci albenesttoLACounty.Addi tionally,itwas
14 shownthattheLACountyBoardofSupervisors'May15,2007voteapprovingtheEm was
15 illegalastwoofthefourSumrvisorswhovotedfortheEm hadreceivedcondbutionsgreater
1E 1%p$5* f- * 1ReyShoas/BmleinH,>> tltheMari - S%M œ e,Mthipay- of
17 theirvoting,whichmadetheirvotesillegalundertheCalifomiaFairPoliticalPracticesAct.)
1â Tlw LA CountymymentstoJu+ YaFewere+ .30Gmrz- sndamounte to
19 approximately27% ofhisstatesale of$178,800,asrevealedinthecaseofSturzeonv.
20 Countvo/'zatuAnqeles,167Ca1.App.4t
h630(2008),revdenied12/23/08.TheCourtheldthat
21 thepam entsviolatedM icleW ,Section19,oftheCaliforniaConstitution.
22 InreadiontotheSturpeondecision,theJudici alCommilofCalifomia(partofthe
23 judiciaryunderM icleW,Section6,ottheCalifbrniaConsti tution)draiedSenateBillSBX
24 2-11. SenateBillSBX 2-11wasenactedonFebruary20,2009andbecameeFectiveon
M Muy2ts2QA. k > :e r- G =
' umt
'ytqie' *4* gA-meal.
al
26 employeesfrom criminalprosecufono civilliabilityanddisciplino actionbecauseofthe
27 countyp&m entstothejudges.ltacknowledgedtheoountypam entsascn'
minal.Italso
28

4
 CaseCase:
2:09-cv-07943-JFW-
09-56073 CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt112 ofFil
Page: ed10/DktEntry:
55 30/2009 7128989
Page6of31

1 allowedthecotmtiestoconénuetheNyments,Athouti mmunity,atnocosttothestate. The

2 constitutionalityofthatpartoftl lawisy-qm.wtlyinlitio '
œ.
3 Finehasbeenfightingthenow- crimînn.
lLA Colmtypaymentsmadetojudgessince
4 2000-2001whenhebecameawarethatjudgesin1999kialsbsdkkenLACountypayments.
5 HehasbroughtFederalcivilrightssuitschallengingthepaymtntsasaviolationofAïcleW
6 Section19,oftl leCalifomiaConstitufonandtheFirstandFourteenthAmendmentsasfarback,
? as2002. Heraîsedtheissuefnbriefsstartîngîn2000-
2001,haschallengedjudgesontheissue
8 s-rtingin2002,andsledwritsin2004. UntiltheSturqeoncaseFinewastheonlyattorneyin
s
9 fwllfnram
'jygjjtjng. tlseues
10 In2009,Finewmsdisbarredforhavingbroughtthe2002Federalci
vilrightscasesand
ll co> challengesevenloughhewasshowntobecorrectontilelawbytheSturqeonamision
.
12 neSturgeondecisionwasGlaw''andtheCaliforniaSupremeCourthaddenieditsreview
13 whenafew monthslatertheydeniedrevjew inFine'spetitionforreview inthedisbsnnent
14 caseandççdisbarred''him fordoingthesamethingasruledcorrectinStur%eon
. Thesameday
15 oftlésdenialofreview ofthedisblnmentcase.SenateBillSBX 2-11wasinkoduced
.ltwas
W *--''M-' dap la> . F@m ofte sixSv emeC- Jusliee whoVMM toe yreviewhad
17 takencountypaymentsandmtroactiveimmuni ty,andtheothertwowereontheJudicial
18 CouncilofCxliforniwwhiçhwroteSeMteBillSBX21-1.
19 Finehasnothingtolose. HeisouttowinintheNinthCircui tandtheU,S.Supreme
20 Courtifnecesse . TheU.S.SupremeCourtprecedentsareonhisside.
'
I'hebriefsintlle
21 NinthCircuithavebeenwrittenandsubmitted. Theoralargumentissetfortheweekof
22 December7,2009. KeepingFinei njailwillnever''coerce''him togiveinandanswer
H questionsinacasewhereheisarguingthejudgeneverAsdt herighttorule.nisisaYorar
24 battle of due process versus criminals i
n judges'robes,a clean judiciary vgrsus
'a-
qhhztlnnolv'
eM oaw
26 JudgeYee'sacionsintheMsrinaSkandcasedemonstratetheeffectofthecriminal
27 paymenl. Hetookthemoney,didnotdiscloseitmadeordersinfavœ of1-
ACountyJ'M tlwir
28 cmapplicantfortheEIR,sati
njudn entofllisownillegalactions,threwhisopponent(Fine)

a
 CaseCase:
2:09-cv-07943-JFW-
09-56073 CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt113 ofFil
Page: ed10/DktEntry:
55 Page7of31
30/2009 7128989

injailandhasnowmisle>danddeMll
dedtheDisddCourt Heistheobjedofmoral
ou- wpndri yx.ButforR.
- -BiIISBX2-1lxIwwxl4H tht@neineom- Mxnot
Fine,
SEOIJENCE01EU NTSINDIS
-TR
-I-
CTCOIIR-T
1.3/20/09-PetitionsledbyFine(USDCDkt.#1);
2.4/07/09-Magl
'strateJudgeWoehrleordersResmndentSheriFtoanswerordîsmissfor
lackof- * by491/A (Dkt.#6))
8 3.4/09/09-FineGlesexparteagplicafontobeset9eemndingdecision;Ma/state
WoehrleordemResmndentShenFtoresmndby4/21/09(DR #7))
4.4 to/2Di
1/09- NoticeofInterestedPeesflledbyRespondentSheriF(Dkt.#11);Mo*on
smissPeeoner'sPeti*onforWdtofHabeasCorpusorinthealtemaiverequest
thatthiscoM HI '
mHthereA1> ' esinl
'
nle-etorG M tomtitioer'sl>* cv s
peti*ontDkt.#12);
5.4/23/09-MeenteJudgeWoehrledirectsrealpartiesininte=ttorespondtcmtiéon
*M ex> e iOfx by5/1/*xRdFiaetefl eo- eonornon-opposïonto
RespondentSherimsmotionby5/1/09(Dkt.#13);
6.4/24/09-FineflesopposiGontomodon(Dk1.#14);
17 7.D5/1/09-LASumriorCourtandJudgeYGe5l eresponsetomeon(Dk%.#15)and
eclarationofKevlMccormickwitlfourexhibits(Dkt.#16);
1:
#.5*5t
(Dk /* - ' leJudm Woehrleei% Fe '& ''&hlomo@on- Dkt#14
19 .#2 0)strik,tsFine'ssupplementtoo- sitiontomoéonGled4/22/09(Dk.#17),
orderspetih!.
onersreply,ifany,tobesledby5/22/09andtakesmattercdersubmission
wiàoutoralargument(Dkt.#19).51W09-respoa ia ofe '
uonandrmueq.t
forlmmedlatereleasefromcustodyGledbyFine(Dkt.#22:
9.Same(Dkt#24:
10.S6/12/09-ReportandrecommendationofMagistrateJudge(Dkt#26);noticeofU.S.
upremeCourtdecisionofCapertonetalv.W.rMassevCoalCo.Inc..eta1..dated
6/8/09filedbyFine(Dkt.#28);
11.6/25/09-Objections,includingMemorandum inSupportofObjectionstoMagistrate
Judge'sReport,demandforimmediatereleasefil edbyFine(Dk1.#29)9
27
28 12.* WB9-e ' v - -Meti - e yinge ti e XnyingSerilrsmëion
todismisstDkt.#12),den/ngpetitioner'sapplicationforDlease(Dkt#30)9

é
 CaseCase:
2:09-cv-07943-JFW-
09-56073 CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt114 ofFil55
Page: ed10/DktEntry:
30/2009 7128989
Page8of31

1 13.7/17/09-OrderbyJudgeWalterdenyingCerùfkateofAppolability(Dkt#44:
2
14.*12* -A> fx *4m e .tionf- Ceelcak d'A- labilip (Dkt#49).
3 CertiscateofAppealabilityhadbeenapprovedbyNinthCircuitonissueofç'whether
4 trialcourt(
JudgeYaffe)shouldhaverecusedhimself'.
5 RELEVANTFACTSFORALLGROUNDS
6 ThispetitionconcernstheacticnsofResmndentSheriFLeroyD.Bacw Sherifofthe
1 CountyofLosAngeles,USDCMa#stmt eJudgeCarlaWoebrleaandUSDCJudgeJohnF.
B WaltersubsequenttothefilingofthePetitionforWritofHsbeasCorpussledbyFinein
9 Usœ - >.C4* .1914JFW (CW).
10 suchactionsconsistedof:
11 1 ' ateJudgefurlaWoehrleWolatmg
' 2:U.S.C.92243byr ' tol '
nmln
12 anordertoshow causetoRespondentSheriffRfolhwith''upontheGlingofthePetitionon
13 Msmh20,2009,t hedatethePetitionwassledasrequiredbyû2243,butinsteadwaitinga
14 retnrndategeaterthan20daysfromthedateoffiling(Dkt.#6)andseing18daystodoso;
15 2. RespondentSheri lviolakngû2243byrefusing$%0showcausewhythewrit
<* :M > be ''e Y* 'g*Y v'ea-' &hoe 1% meeàustofe >' '
17 (.
Dk.t.#j2);
18 3. Resme . ntSheriFviolatedtheAFil7%2* Orderbymevingtodismiuthe
19 RespondentShelilâom thecasewhilendmittingthattheResmndentSheriffwasthepromr
20 > ,showingthemotiontobeMvolous,withoutmeritandmadeonlytoharassanddelay
21 (okt.#12);
22 4. MagienteJudgeCarlaWoehrleWolatingj2243bynotç'determinling)thefacts
23 anddismsingofthemaœraslaw andjustlcerequire*oneitherApril9,2009(theXte
24 ResmndentShee refusedtoflearehlm)butinsteaddirecti
ngtheLASupedorCourtand
25 J+ YGeto- 4mk-#13:
26 5. RespondentSheri ë theLA SupehorCourtandJudgeYaffemisleadingthe
27 CourtbystatingthatNounselfortheSuperiorCourtofCaliforniaMdJudgtYG euowsof
28 thepeti
tionandintendstorespondifaskedtodosobythecoM''(DW #12,page10,lines2-

a
 CaseCase:
2:09-cv-07943-JFW-
09-56073 CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt115 ofFil
Page: ed10/DktEntry:
55 30/2009 7128989
Page9of31

1 4)whileknowingthatRespondentSheriffhadnotlistedthemasrealpe esininterestonhis
2 NoticeofIntexee'lPades51d w1t11theCourtsHowingthattheCourtdidnothavepersonal
3 jurisdic:onoverthemtos
ek''or<<
direct''themtorespond,andknowingthattheywouldnot
4 Rsbowp-.lllewhyO writshouldnot% grute''inanyrvsmnx teygave;
5 6. Magis%teJudgeCarlaWoehrleviolafngdueprocessbyrefusingtograntFine's
6 April9,2009ex> applica6ontobeDleasedfromîncarcemtionawhichwasnotopmsedby
7 ResmndentSheriF onApril21, 2009whenheSledMsModontoDismîss,oranytime
' thereacr(Dkt#13$
9 7. M>' at eJe eCarllWnm.
hrleviolat'
mg9H43byRmlAwfullyeœte tbe
10 timefortherexrn,andviolafngdueprocessbyçs
irecdng''theLA SupeHorCourtandJudge
11 Ys> terv dtothePdi:c andexM eapplie onwhileHowingthatshedidnothave
12 mmonaljurisdicionoverthem andthattheyhadnotappearedinthecisenorsoughtto
13 intervenvdespiktheiret
uowledge''oftheçase(DW #13%
14 8. TheLA SuperiorCourtandJudgeYGedeliberatdymisleadingleCourtand
15 committingfraudupontheCourtbynotGshowingcausewhythewritshoddnotbegranted''
16 ' te < tie t@@h>
-elfœ R tSe #1%11* i-*- (:jtl if
17 askedtodosobythecourt'',theirdeli/ratelysubmittingtotheCourtdxumentswhichon
i8 leirfacewerenotexhibitsatthecontempttrial.inpadculartheMaroh27.2008strikeorder
19 (Dkt#16-3,Ex.BtotheDeclmtionofKevinMccormicKwhichwasnotlistedasanexhibit
20 inN e 9.ofO Mv0114,2X9JMgment(Dkt.#1+2,Ex.AtotH Tw'lamtionofKe n
21 Mçcormick),whichthey<sosubmittedi
22 9. TheLA SumdorCourtandJudgeYafedeliberatelymisleadingtheCourtand
27 commiingâaudumntheCourtbymisse ngfnnfqandmnMngstatemenlforwhichexhibits
24 didnotexistinthecontemptZal,towit:
25
h.I,ASw .orce RdJudr Y* ssbrieftDW #15)> ''3,lines14-16-Yal
26 partiesininterest,Man'naStrandGledamotiontodismiss...
u Truth - Dkt#1(Judgment)andDkt#16-2.parae 2.showsr- f mdent
Cûuo ofTm M gqle 4.aze > ' œ 1na1ReySbomqJqintV=tureOdDd
28 ReyShoresVentureNorth)sledamotiontodismiss...

x
 Case2:09-cv09-56073
Case: -07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt116 F
Page: ofi
le55d10/3DktEntry: Page10of31
0/2009 7128989

B. Page4,line5-referencetoOctober12,2007SGteBarrecommendationat
Judgmentpage5,N pRph4(9k1.#16-2).
Truth-NoshowinginJudo entthattheStatgBarrecommendadonwasanorder
ofthefYliforniaSupremeCourt.lnfact,inDkt#16-5(Repnrter'sTonceriptof
Msreh4,2009hearing),JudgeYGestapsatN e1l.line13ytkoughpage12,
l1
'
n-Q Ot1be-w> aocoe ord- 'bn:wu brnlnnr+ % <ç
withoutalictnstorwhilebeingZactive''
> ' % kw
.
6 C. Page4,Foomote6-CalifornilStateBarwebsite
TTe - NqO wàgO t**-hw > evht '
Ntattk e .êagx4.li>
5-7andFootnote7:onOctober15,2007,Fineflledamoenforrelief9om
ismissalbaseduponthisNmdavitoffault''
Tne Finesled themotion basedumn Rexcusableneglecc hadng
mfscakulatedthenumberofcalendardays. n eLA SumdorCourtandJudge
YalewererelyingupontheMnrch17,2004strikeorder.They%ewthisorderto
be'lnfnlthful.Intheap- lofthehab- corpuszo- (NintllCircuitcaseno.09-
56073).Oyftle at' Suppl-m-.
-nl> tofRv. nrr CS& ')olOc** 9,
2009tDkt.#28). Fine'smoti onisSER nos.00001-00011,Thedxument,
received on October 10,2007 butnotsled untilOctober15, 2007,shows
''excusableneglect''
neLASuperiorCourtandludgeYGeuewaboutthemodon,butwithheldit
fromthecourt.
D. Page4,line19,throughpage6:line1-DescriptionofJanuary8,2008order,
F j9*- --='--+ Fm e u--uj:9- * ' a * byJI<&
Yafe''asdescribedinMarch27,2008strikeorder. AndFootnotes9-13,the
Janue :,2008orderisSER0023-0026.Fineasnotnoticedorpresent.
Trutk - AaAowne vw% Mam:27.200:AIn'bn4r* w notattzwhz 'bit<
theçontempttrial.NorwasiteverservedonFine. Dkt#16-3doesnotattacha
certiscateofsewice. TheOmedocumentapp-e asSER 0168-0170 also
withoutaçerv cateofsewice. TheMarch27,2098sGkeorderrefers,toa
Me 1#wl*8e' ke-' in*e ' J* Y* AH le
February19,2008motionandadmonishedFine. ThisKionw thenrepOtedat
page4,linethroughpage6,line1,oftheLA SumriorCourtandJudgeYaFe
resmnse..However,suchsectioninboththeMarcm.h7t
..
t20.0
.8eikeorderandthe
L A o- ee J+ Y* #e- %w --p- sj. s1w.
AsshownbythedocketsheetfortheMsrlnaSèandrxqe,noMsmh18!2008order
exists.LASCDkt#49insuchcaseisaMarch14,2008proofofservlceandDkt.
#
950isaMrch20.2008minuteorder. (SeeattachedrelevantpoïonofMsrina
%ndcasedocket) ludgeYGeandtheLA guperiorGurtfabricatedthe
March18.2008An'keorderanddefraudedtheCourt.
.-.
Fe er,theMarch18,2008M keorderinterpe lionthattheFebruary19,2008
=x.. %ge y*-.0% % %>. Sa% xwuww -- jcDy
#1,TrialEx.IA page22,paranph12,lines18-19.SER0062)'ç
thecourthas
notisclosedifitispresentlyreceivingmoneyfrom LA Countyorhasreceived
 2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt1 17 Fofile55
Page: d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page11of31

1 moniesduHngthetimeofthiscasea''Thereisnom yth# amotiondirectedtoLA

2 SupeorCourtjudgeswhcwerereceivingmoneyfrom LA Countycouldbe
...-
3
*V *@ Je ya& jo% jygji-wa& yy Y
m GW u. jv
statementinthemotion.NorcouldJudgeYaFehave* e11itassuch ,baS
H upon
4
thesta:amentsinthtmotioa
5 Asit:..
-.< Je Y>> bsd* ' % M 1* he> ''
thecriminalpayments.WhenhelnsllyadmittedtosuchonMarch20,2008,a
6 CCPj170. 3objecéonwasserveduponhim onMarch25,2008.Hedidnot
resmndandwasdisgualisedunderCCPû170.3(cX4).TheMarch18,2008order
*G= aN e-hdzeonbyJe eYGeOertM Yt. *
HeanflmllyattemptedtostriketheFebruary19.2008motionataCourthearing
onMarch20,2008.SteMinuteOrder(SER0077-0078).ANoticeofRulingwas
WVW .. te F 19.2cpxxxw wagpga jjggog%& yx jg&
10 0079-0082)AGnoticeofdisqualiscation''wassledonMsrch25,2008(separate
from theMarch25,2008CCPû170. 3013objxdon)amchingtheNeticeof
11 Ruling(NRR0083-0089).ThisMarch25,2008Gnoticeofdisqualifcation''isthe
Y - JG Ye - œil*eMe rt9* -'H qr4c.neCIH N/M.
12 wroteonthefaceoftheMarch25,2008notceofdisqualiscafonunotjceor:er
13
strickenmrorderdatedMarch27,2003byConnieL.Hudson,deputyclerkJohn
A.Clarke,execeveclerk''
14 Nosuchhand-wrfttennoteexistsontheCCPû 170.3objection'sfacepage
15 (SER0090).OnA#l11,2008,Fine5ledasepatenoticeofdisqualisctionfor
non-resmnsetotheCCP9170.3objeqti onp=uanttoCCPj170.3(c)(4)(Dkt.#
1,TrialBx.21).
AsofApril8,2008,JudgeYaffewasremovedfrom thecas:bylaw,inaddition
totheeffxtofhisJanual 8,2008orderbeingvoidasunconstitutionaland
18 unlawfulasbeingwithoutjnn'
gdictiœ
19 TheLA SuperiorCourtandJudgeYGeuewthesefactsfrom theoutsetand
9om thedocumentsthattheyhaveproducedintheappeal,they%ew thattheya
20 wex mislee nganddeHudingtheCOU/inthewritcase.
21 MagiseteJgdgeCarlaWoehdelîtemllyfollowedthefalsestatementsînher
Re
Wopeohrrtlatpage6,linel2,throughpage7,li
22 ealso madetheerrorofassumingneth1
a6
t.Jl
unaeddYa
dg itioFe
n,Ma
>/s
cktr
abte
otJ
hud
tg
he
e
27 W TO zsa2- ç$ e ofdise icuh' mt''* +eM* 25.M 8CCP9170.3
objecdon.(Dkt.#25-2Report,page7,lines13-16). NetevenJudgeYafe
24 dnimedtodothis.(SeeDkt#1judm ent,Dkt.#16-2,paranph9a.)
E. Page6alines2-4.referencetoApril15.2008order.
26 Truth-Ordernotanexhibitattrial
B. Page7,lines5-14,statementsaboutAugust25,2008andDecember24,2008
27 hearings.
28 Truth-Nodocumenlsupmrtingsuçh
G. Page7,lines17-19,Footote22-Czroupingofchargesin5vecategories.

K
 Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt1 18Fi
Page: ofl
e55
d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page12of31

1 Truth- Nodocumentssupportingsuch. Notest

d imony(seeReporter'sTranscri
pt
2 atedneo-mber22,2Q08).
3 H, Page8,line16,tbroughpage9,line5-Concludingw11 ttnomnalconfmement
pwa
ros
ceie
mpog
dinse
s.d,;andnoissueconcemingcriminslconlemptispresentedbythese
4
5 Q
25%i -> - 'ag- of* LASY O'C- ae J* Yafel> .#
nNinthCircuitcaseno. 9-56073)st
6 line1,inrefern'ngtothecont0
empttrial:ççta
ht
es
epatcpœd
ro age
in3
p.l
cin
ue 15
lmin,
at
th
eYu
dingh
apag
5nde1:
4,
ofb01 civilandcriminalcontemrt''Finewhschargedw1111WolaegB'linmqq&
7 FrofesslonsCodeCBAPCode;46126,acrl -mlnalenhlte.lllsconvlcdonwasfor
: <'consecuti
ve''sentences:'
%e5vedaystobeservH intlwcountyjailistobe
consecutivetothetimespentinsaidjailonthepredouscharge..,
$ % LA * C-eUWJW WW k> ***6W '''*'m#A WW %
10 bothcriminalandcivilfrom thechargeinth*November3,2008OrdertoShow
CauseofviolatingB&PCode96126,wltichisacn.ml nalsection,andthefactthat
.
11 suchcountwasnotdismissed.
1a 10. Ma#strateJudgeCarlaWoehrle,inincomoratingthefmudulentfac?intothe
la RemrtwithouthavinghadaZalasrequiredby92243. Section2243statesinrelevantpart
14 N H te e oroe le - y&e e ibeseforh-'g,notmoxlbsnfl vedaysaH
15 therehlazforgoodœuseadditionaltimeisallowed, unlesstheapplicationforwritandrefzlrn
1+ - œ y, *
0-- ofllwste- - * e * e is'' 'M*M11be ' toN duc:
17 atthehearingthebodyoftllepersonde'sined.Theapplicantortlemrsonde-inedm:y,lmder
lg oaA denyanyofthefactssetfo% intherehlrnorallegeanyothermaterialfacts-''
j: MagistrateJudgeCarlaWoehrledidnothave&hearingbuttookthefraudulentand
2: tmsubstantiatedfn+ andusedthem inherReportatDkt#25-2.pages6-10;page18,line21
zl throughpage20,line2)page21,lînes24-26;andpage22,lînes23-25.
22
23 r.- f- ,-Fme ' *&mnmfhzv lee onov-l
ffm Wu#Je eYaFeqhnxzldVve<emtqM
:4 Mmsel:baseduponhishavingv eivedcriminalpaymentsfrom LA County, prevents
z5 continuedinca erationA m servinganypurmsennd11,%1.#v= O ,
'
ec,1ec4f*isr.
n-,* ws
26 'hx/theinidalincarcerationwasmnalandnotRcoemive.''
27 The:bovef* qareincorporatedhereinasifsetfo% in111.
28

11
 Case2:
09-cv09-56073
Case: -07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt1 19 Fofile55
Page: d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page13of31

l Theirstproblem lhn'existsinthiscaseis*atoftheunerlyingcourtorder.Beforethe
2 nruromn% Tu-x--'ws''w '' ' - W1dcruelad=.ua1puishmentsthe
3 ordermustbeNalid.''
4 Inthiscaseaitisthevalidityoftke '' â.gnfh*G* *heis> '' >
5 fromtheoutsetofthecase,whet herJudgtYGeshouldbetheZaljudge.Theissuebeforethe
6 NinthCfmuitisRwhethertheZaIcourt(ludgeYaFe)shouldHverecusedhi mself''Ifthe
? answerîs'e
yese,t
hentheorderfsînvalîdNcauseJudgeY*edîdnothaveJudsdfctîontosîton
' thecaseandenteranyorderwhatsoever,inclue gthepanualy8,2008orderwhichbeganand
9 * . 'e Gt
'tnx- AM ev> 16% a werWRx''1V œ* WAillvoiddx taFineVving
10 notbeenservedw1t11priornoticeoftheJanuary8,2008hemringyth. beingpreventedfrom
ll att ' jt The.A olM Gala+aa(% Ie kR- L% .
12 Finehasademonskated, lonpheldbeliefandposifon#%n1theLA Countycriminal
13 pam entstoJudgeYGeandotherswhotakesuchmsndatehisandtheirzec'lul Thst%11f
14 issuppoledbyCaperton.supm,andcasescitedthereinforthe' Akingofthepaymtnts.InRe
15 Murchison.349v.U. S.135(1955)fortheproposidonthatamu œ notjudgehisowncases
1* > * -. (
*/e &*e.M*U.S.11,14(19M)(%*&J' M> * % aM* *@m anipt- e
17 padyoverwhiçhheisprtsiding,doesnotgi vetheap- nœofjusticee).andUnitedS-tatesv.
18 *i- *521#Qd*21M5f7 .*t'ir*lM )C*erighttoatn-bunalf- *ombiasorprejudiœis
19 based,notonsection144,butonthedueprocessc1aus:''.)
20 GroundOneisb- dumnfaAeFm' r,36 577(1974).IeF- .te C-
21 discusxdat584-585thatNtisnecessarytodeterminethepointatwhichthecommieent:in
22 jaillceasestoseweilçcoerdve'purposeandbecomespuniNveinchamcter. Whenthatmint
27 isrealizedsotlm:t:eincarcerationorthecontemnorYcomesmnal,itsdurafonbecomes
24 ljmitedbytheSve-daymaximum sentenceprovidedinCMeofCivilProcedureSecéon
25 t2t:.-.Q
26 GroundOneisalsobaseduponfaR6William T--Fa
rr,64Ca1.
App.
3d605(1976),in
27 whichthatCoM nnolrmpz'
28
uTheCodeofCivilProcedureenumemtesthecourfsmwearespectingthe
conductofconfemptproœedings(û128))defmesactsandomissionsconstituting
12
 Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt1 20Fi
Page: ofl
e55
d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page14of31

1 contempt(û1209),dirM andindirectcontemptandtheprœeuresthereforW
2 1211),
. .andprejcribespunishment(j1219).Thusu&nadjudie onofçontempt
a*- - * >> on(cxtem-)> exce .nglwhv!Mve.aojjsm
3 (
C$o5d0e0)sorhemavbeimorisonednotexr. eedinc5vedavs.orboth;...'(91218,
4
Civ.Proc.
lBecauseofthepenaltiesimposedundertYsseciomcontemptis
criminAlinnature.(
5 #la& v.Mmltl palRCaidenv.SweriorCort34t7nl24&.:6(295PW 1V1j;
orr ,144Cal.App.2d131,136(3* 7. 2*75!1.)'
*
(Emphasisadded.)
6
JudgeYaleknewlbsfe w.q ' ' r 9121:o*s,l ' % Iaw+ ' to
8 followthemœedenlofInreFarrandlnReWilliam 2:FarrwhenheorderedthatFinebe
9 heIHAm+IlkgMoxxrxu % ' e > ' . Nd % xerci bj:xdert:e
10 cizcumstances, Fine'sincarcerafon bewqme punidve on the sixth day ofincarceraéon,
11 Y Kx> . E* em#q< *gR-pnnaqatSI IWTUrw lbnlfqdgeYaJewo
12
13
breskingthelaw.
14
15 11. Finehasbeenincarceratedforalmosteightmonths. Heisn0tgoingtoGbreak.''
1* TV lwooeooe-x
'
M w > f. te > &% wjie pfJ+ YaFe*sje dickonand
17 or
derwasalwaysinquestion.
18 TheîncarcerationislongmsttheGve-daymaximumsetforthinCCPl1218.
19 JudgeYaffeknew hisactionswerepenalfrom theoutsetashewasRceivingcriminal
aû paments.JudgeYaFewantedtopunishFine*omthebe/nning.Finehasnodoubtthathe
21 Wllp* '.Onlyaco* wMthiRorestheen* mm'alN entsandiv stheU.S.Supreme
22 C00 mecedentwouldholdthatJudgeYG eshouldnotrecusehimself natisexactlywhat
23 * 1-' ' f'
zw''tii 'lxtMœero Jud&'sReportsacceptedbyt;eDfsdctCourtxdidnot
24 evenmentionCapertonoranyrelevant<wment''case.Suchomissionacommifleza%rït
w smciscally infnrmed oftl t2- z- < hnth= a eye te R> *
26 subsequentlyintheObjectionsthereto,combinedw1
t11itsntisstxlemctoffactsanditsrefusal
27 to R taCerv cate ofAppealability,demonse- why theNinth CircuitFanted the
28 CertifcateofAppealabîlftyandtookthecase.
Fine'smeralpositionissustnined- Heshouldbesetfree.

12
 Case2:09-cv09-56073
Case: -07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt121 Fofile55
Page: d10/3DktEntry: Page15of31
0/2009 7128989

1 GroundTw@-Immediattreleaseismandatedaasisastayofexecutionandwritof
2 %nG-om- . % .-*-' *= M - w o ' ' -u'''''''e *'''M G C%
3 neabovefactsareinco> ratedhereinasifsetforthinfull.
4
5 mu daA. A> @Cn- fM @f% - --*G- tlu GWG * M PCe 961:69
jed,
6
M shownhemin,theLA SumriorCoudandJudgeYafendmitkdintheirAnswering
BriefintheNinthCircuit(9thCir.Dkt#25)thatacrkninalconvicionoccured.This
8
conformsw1t11thechargeintheOrdertoShowCauseforRAPC*eû6126.Ita1s0conforms
9
withieslatementlnt:eMaglstraltJudge,sRemrt(USDCDkt#25-2,page10,llnes3-5)
10
referringtotheç'criminalcontempf',andSectionVatpages11-12.
11
. > . .. . a.xyoj.xaayjouwoy
12
e -nceonthecriminalcontempt.Finecanseekthis,asitisc1- thathewaschargedw1t11a
l3 . .
WolationofB&PCodeû6126-Suchcbnem u' ntxt3.-4*oa.a * wa:ya aawm,.x..+
14 i
ntheMarinaSkandcase,docketnumbers153-204.(Seeattached.)
15
Suchactionofsœkingastayandgx tingsuchoccurredintheGrstunconstie onal
1:
em lemptproceedingbytheLA SuperiorCo< Finev.SuneriorCorf.USDCcaseno.CV-
17
02-46470LT(SGL).Thevitofbsl-qcorpusw broughtaRersentencingandbefore
18 .
. inpœ iw... sxo c- .yix ejIw wy1% s1,e 1. a- +k- m-
19
challengestheJudo ent*111thewlit.ThesamecolmselashererepresentedtheLASumrior
20 . .
21
fw- i
a +ha
:om o
y. * -M P Ce #6 1
26 i
sa '
'- .=
. e . zF% . ausjo aja
GaI.whichhedidnotreceive.MaéstrateJudgeCarlaWoehrlewaswronginherReportat
22
Dkt.#25-2,page14.line14,whereshestales:çtthispeétionerwasnotchargedw11 astrious
crimeoraseriouscriminalcontempt...''
24
Ontheotherbnnd:FineisnotguiltyofanyWolationof96126or96127(b)l nnAmuchas
.
25
JudgeYs% ae .WatDkt.#16-5.page9,line13.tkoughpage10.line2,#hAtâerewasno
26
courtorderthatFinedolatei Givtnthatstatement,thewritmustbegrankdastothe996126
27
* 61271)--
2:

14
 Case2:
09-cv09-56073
Case: -07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt1 22Fi
Page: ofl
e55
d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page16of31

1 B. n emi,leadihgstatementsandfrauduponthee@ud mandatethatFinebe
2 :etfreeinasmuc:awsàownabovwthegpeclscstatemenlandthespecillcfrauddenled
% - - .pfe e at
3
4
GroundThree-Theviolaéonsof28U.S.
C.û2243violat
edueprocess.
TV aK-..-2--+-. * ï....,
*..o@u e lv .
5
6
Asshownabove,thespecifcviolaéonsofû2243WolatesFine'srighttodueprocess.
T
TherefusaloftheMagistrateJudgeaRespondentSherië theLA SumriorCourtandJudge
8
YGetpfollowû2243removedanypossibilityofafairtrial.
9
Hsd92243beenoayed,thewritcasewouldhavebeenoveronApdl9,2009,andthe
lg
writwouldhavebeengrantedattheoutset.HadtheMasstrateJudgefollowed92243when
11
theResmndentSheriFdisobeyedsucKthecasewouldhavebeenoveronApril21,2009.Had
12
* ' J+ #rl3ur wptw IA> * Cn''e*M JvgeYGedio yed#
2243,thecasewouldhavebeenoveronMay1,2009.
13
14
HndJu+ Wzlernuye 92243.% xxz
mxla- .%vaollnNH% ' Je o
actasshedid.Al1oftheirviolations,oranyoneofthem,deniedFinedueprocess.
15
IG
HM theResmndentSheriFobeyedû2243 andiledat'
retnrn'',hewouldhavebeen
forcedtondmitthathecouldnotç*showcausewhythewritshouldnotbegranted,''lnstead,he
17
didnotrespond.
ig
19
HnWtHeLA ' Co- e le Yee- 11-
' =dtheno> dj2243
andfiledaGreturny''theywouldhavebeenforcedto@mitthattheycouldnotNhow cause
20
wkyte -it-K-'a=G e ''
21
Instead.theydidnotinterveneandsledalimitedT'reswnse''wilhmisleadingstatements
22
andsubmi/M documenlthatwerenotpe ofthecont emptplxpczeing.
H
24
Togetherandintentionally,bytheiractions,RespondentSherië theLASuperiorCo<
JudgeYaleandtheircounselmisledtheCourtandcommittedafmudupontheCourt
26
10. PrevipusmtidonsEledunderSection2055:
27
Nm Y* %' FdM a> '' = V %> Wennmlne aiWrkafMnnaa'e
28 intheNinthCtrcuittcmseno.09-71692).

:5
 Case2Case:
:09-cv09-56073
-07943-JFW-CW Docume
11/12/2009 nt123 Fofile55
Page: d10/3DktEntry:
0/2009 7128989
Page17of31

l 11.a)1)NinthCircuit
2 2)WritofMandate-caseno.09-71692
3 3)ViclationofSœtion2243
4 4)DismissedasmootonJune30,2009bpmuseDiszctCouldeddedcaseon
5 Y A.> .
6 12. Notrepresentedbyconnqel

8
> WherefoaaPee onerpmzsthatthecourtgrantPeeonermlieftowhichhemaybe
1: enétledintheproceeding.
11
12 Ideclarelmdermnaltyofmrjurythattheforegoingistrueandcorrect.
13
14 patedYs## dayorœtoler,> R ohmi-d,
l5 -''
W BY:
RI I.FINE, .
17 lnWOPer
18
19
20
21
22
D
24
25
26
27
28

16
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 24 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

.. .. . .. :@ . @- @ @
*.@.
NOTICEOFENTRYOFORDER
C 4/21/2008 AWA
FEESRADND
INGCCOM
OSTSPE
TN
OSA
RTORY
EALPAL
RETGIA
EL
SIN 7 $7.50
INTEREST&AGAINSTRICHARDLFINE
REALPARTIESININTERESTS
C 4/15/2008 O
DB
ISJQ
EC
UF
AIL
OIN TO
FICATNOTIO
ION CEOUFDGEDAVID
FJ 1z $:.64
P.YAFFE,EK .
ORDERAWARDINGCOMPENSATORY
C 4/15/2008 LEGALFEESANDCOSTSTOREAL 5 $7.50
PARTIESININTEREST,ETC
NOTICEOFDISQUALIFICATIONOF
C 4/11/2008 J
FU
AD
ILG
UEDA
RETV
OID
COPN
.Y
SA
EF
NF
TEO(R1)
AF
NOSR
WERTHE 10 $7.50
MARCH25,2008'CCPSEGION170.3
OBIECFION' 'WITHINETC.
F- 4/11/2008 PETP
OF FE
FI
TO
ITNIERSFROR
ON EPL
YBIR
WR TI
EFI
OF NS
MANUPP
DATOERT 21 $8.27
C 4/10/2008 MinuteOrder 1 $7.50
REPLYINSUPPORTOFMOTIONTO
f- 4/7/2008 DISQ
JUD UA
GESLRIF
EYl.IAVISNUGPEMON
CE RIOR
EYCO
FRUOM
RTL.A 14 $7.78
COUNTY,ETC
REALPARTYININTEREST&COUNR
OFLOSANGELESJOINTMEMORANDUM
r- 4/1/2008 OFPOINTSANDAUTHORITIESIN 38 $9.46
OPPOSRIONTOPFFITIONFORWRIT
OFMANDATE
SUPPLEMENTALDECLARATIONOF
JOSHUALROSENINSUPPORTOFREAL
f- 4/1/2008 P
TA
ORM
TI
OETSION
INI
TNOTE
DRIE
SS
QT
US
AO
LIP
FP
YOLSAITION 7 $7.50
SUPERIORCOURTJUDGESRECEIVING
MONEYFROMLACOUNW,EK .
EVIDENTIARYOBJEWIONSOFREAL
PARTIESININTERESTINSUPPORTOF
T- 3/28/2008 o
Dp
ISpQ
oU
sA
nL
qIoNL
FYTAOSMUOPT
EI
ROIO
NRTO
COURT 6 $;.sc
JUDGESRECEIVING MONEYFROLA
COUNTY,ETC
RESPONSETOMOTIONTODISMISS
r- 3/28/2008 THEORDERTOPAYAUORNEYSFEES 7 $7.50
ANDCOSTSAND;ETE
MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSAND
AUTHORUIESOFREALPARTIESIN
r- 3/28/2008 I
TNOTE
DREQ
ISST
UAIN
LIO
FYPP
LO
ASSUI
UPO
EN
RIT
OORMOT
COUI
RON
T 35 $9.25
JUDGESRKEIVINGMONEYFROMLA
COUNR ;FFC
C 3/27/2008 MinuteOrder 2 $7.50
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 25 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

C 3/27/2008 O
DRISDQEURASLTRII
IF CKAITNI
GONNOTICEOF 3 $7.50
r- 3/25/2008 N
Z OTGICEEDOAF
SUTDRIKEwcV cI
DDISPQYUAAFUF
psEcnqoFE
ICOAR
NF
TIFOANILO
17c.3 UF
RETO 1 $7'50
OBJECFION';ETC
OBJECTIONANDVERIFIEDSTATEMENT
TODISQUALIFYJUDGEDAVIDPYAFFE
C 3/25/2008 A
WNHDoAALRLELA
PRSEUSPEENR
TIUOYRRCEO
CURTN
EM JU
GDGES 80 $12.40
MONIESORCONTRIBUTIONSFROMLA
COUNR ;ETC
r- 3/25/2008 NOTICEOFRULING 4 $7.50
r- 3/20/2008 MinuteOrder 2 $7.50
PROOFOFSERVICEOFDECLARATION
C 3/14/2008 OFQSUAENSDTMFOS
RE R.CKO
AS
NS
SII
DNER
SA
UTPI
POONRTOF
OF 2 $7.50
LATE-FILEDOBJECTIONS,ETC
NOTICEOFNOOPPOSITIONFILEDTO
V 3/13/2008 M OTI
COU ROTNZUTDOGE
DISSQ
RU ALI
ECE MFYNLGAMON
SUPEERYIOR 3 $7.50
FROMLACOUNTY,ETC
OBZECFIONSTOMOTIONTO
C 3/13/2008 D
JUISQUA
DGE SUFREY LIAWN
CE SUGPEMON
RIOREYCOFRUOM
RTL.A 3 $7.50
COUNTY,ETC
DECLARATIONOFSANDRAS.KASSIN
C 3/13/2008 S
CU PPSOIR
ON DT OFIRON
EMT EQU ESLTAF
OF TO
E-RFILED 16 $7.92
OBZECTIONS,ETC
NOTICEOFMOTJONANDMOTJONTO
DISMISSTHEORDERTOPAY
C 3/5/2008 A
TUO
AXAR NEYSNE
UOR FEYE
SSFA
EN DACNODSTCSOA
ES SN DATND
TS O 8 $7.50
MEMORANDUMOFPOINTSAND
AUTHORITIES
PFFRIONERSOPENINGBRIEFIN
T- 3/3/2008 SUPPORTOFPFFITIONFORWRITOF 25 $8.55
MANDATE
NOTICEOFMOTIONANDMOTIONTO
C 2/19/2008 DISQUALIFYLASUPERIORCOURT 38 $9.46
IUDGES,ETC
f- 2/1/2008 MEMOCOSTSSUMMARY 4 $7.50
C 1/23/2008 NOTICEOFRULING 8 $7.50
C 1/8/2008 MinuteOrder 5 $7.50
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 26 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 W ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 CENTQAT.DISTRICT OF OAT.IFORNIA
10
11
12 RICHARD I. FINE, ) No.CV 09-7943-JFW(CW)
)
13 Petitioner, ) ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
) FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
14 v. )
)
15 U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al., )
)
16 Respondents, )
)
17
18 For reasons stated below, this petition is summarily dismissed.
19 M CKGROI;ND
20 The oro .œq.petitioner, Richard I. Fine, is in the custody of the
21 Sherlff TS Los M geles Crnant'
y under a ctmter t '
jn
adgment isslned March
22 4, 2009, by the California Superior Courtr Los M geles County, in Case
23 No. 85109420. Petitioner previously sought to challenge that custody
24 in a petition for writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. $
.
î 2254, in
25 this court, in Case No. CV 09-1914-JFW(CW). That prior petition was
26 denied and dismissed with prejudice in a ludgment entered June 29,
27 2009. Petitioner's appeal of that denial is pending before the United
28 States Court or Appeals for the Ninth Circuît în Case No. 09-560V3.
l
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 27 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 The present petition is simply an attempt to re-argue issues

2 Petitioner raised in his prior petition. Furthermore, although
3 Petitioner lists this district court as a respondent in the present
4 petition, he is not in the custody of this court. On the contrary,
5 this court has simply declined to order him released rrom the custody
6 of the Sheriff of Los Angeles County.
7 Sq'âr Aon QF M VTN
8 If it appears from the face of a habeas petition and any attached
9 exhibits that a petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district
10 court the petition may be summarily dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. f 2243;
11 Rules Governing Section 2254 Casesr 28 U.S.C. foll.5 2254, Rule 1(b)
12 (rules also apply to habeas petitions not under 5 2254), Rule 4
13 (summary dismissal);Local Rules Governing Duties of Magistrate Judges
14 (C.D.Cal.)r Rule 3.2.2 4su- ary dismissal by presented order#.
15 DISCUSSION
16 Under 28 U.S.C. 5 2241 a federal district court has jurisdiction
17 to consider an application for habeas corpus relief which alleges that
18 the petitioner ''is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws
19 or treaties of the United States.'' 28 U.S.C.5 2241(c)(3). However,
20 ''the authority of the federal courts to grant habeas relief to state
21 priscmers nander : 2241 is llznited by 23 U.S.C. 5 2254.*' Greenawalt 77.
22 Stewart, 105 F.3d 1287, 1287 (9th Cir. 1997)(per curiam)(citinc Felker
23 v. Turrine 518 U.S. 651, 662, 116 S. Ct. 2333, 135 L. Ed. 2d 827
24 (1996).: Petitioner is in custody pursuant to a state court ludgment,
25 and he is seeking to challenge the legality of that custody.
26 Therefore, even if he seeks to bring his petition under 28 U.S.C.
27
28 l Petitioaer haa rkot offered any baai.s for deterraiaitlg ttkat his
petition, ostensibly under 5 2241, is not limited by 5 2254.
2
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 28 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 $ 2241, review is limited by the 1aw applying to petitions under 28

2 U.S.C. 5 2254. Felker, 518 U.S. at 662. For example, a state
3 prisoner may not use an application under 5 2241 to evade the
4 limitations on successive petitions that apply to petitions brought
5 under 5 2254. Greenawalt, 105 F.3d at 1287-88.
6 A new habeas petition which challenges the same state court
7 jtzdgmeat addraaaad ia oae or = ra prior petitiraa, i-a a secoaà or
8 successive petition under 28 U.S.C.5 2244 (a)-(b).2 A federal
9 district court may not consider a second or successive petition unless
10 the petitioner has first obtained an order from the proper federal
11 circuit court of appeals authorizing the district court to review the
12 new petition. See 28 U.S.C. 5 2244(b)(3) (A). The court of appeals
13 may only authorize review of a second or successive petition in the
14 district court if the petitioner ''makes ô prima facie showing tto the
15 court of aroealsq that the application satisfies the requirements of''
16 28 U.S.C.5 2244(b). See 28 U.S.C.5 2244(b)(3)(C); Felker v.Turrin,
17 518 U.S. 651, 657, l16 S.Ct.2333, 135 L.Ed. 2d 827 (1996).
18 The present petition is a second or successive petition under
19 5 2244(b)(3)(A)because it challenges the same state court ludgment
20 challenged in Case No. CV 09-1914, and that petition was dismissed
21 w1th pretr
nndlce. Thls ctmrtmay '
rlot revlew a snaccesslve petltirm
22 unless the petitioner has first obtained the required order from the
23 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. There is no
24
25
2 There are exceptiorjsr unde.r which a new petition is not
26 subject to dismissal as successive (for example, if a prior petition
27 was dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state
remedlesr or if a new petition challenges parole decisions that could
28 aot have been addresaed l.lla prior petitiork). but aoae of these
exceptions apply in the present ease.
3
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 29 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 indication in the record that this petitioner has obtained such

2 an order. Therefore, the present petition is subject to dismissal
3 without prejudice. Petitioner may flle a new petition in this court
4 if and only if he first obtains authorization from the Ninth Circuit
5 pursuant to 28 U.S.C.5 2244(1)(3)(A).
6 ORDERS:
7 1- It is nonRp/n that judgmant be eatered anmmarily diamiaaing
8 the petition as successive.
9 2. The clerk shall serve copies of this order and the judgment
10 herein on the parties.
11
12 DATED: November 5, 2009
13
14 > KJ.
OHN F. WM TER
15 United States District Judge
16 Presented by:
17 Dated: November 2, 2009
18
19 /s/
CARLA M. WOEHRLE
20 United States Magistrate Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 30 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

RICHARD 1.FINE
PrisfmerID #1824%7
c/oMen'sCentalJail
441BauchetStreet
LosAngeles.CA 90012
UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALWORM A,WESTERN DIH SION

RIC 1.FINE, CaseNo.CV09-07943JFW (CW)

Petitioner,
EX PARR'EAPPLICATION FOR
VS. IMMEDIATERELEASEAr FOR
U.S.DISTRICTCOURTFOR TllE IMMEDIATE GM NT OFWRIT
CENTRALDISTRICTOF OFHABEASCORPUS
CM IFORNA,etal, qjjj
..!y..i.. D
f'
.. .. nC
uC
k'
i1
g*
e'7
L 1$
Il;
u-
.
'
.)
7
u
Respondents. ':
7
.
i
;.
:-
,
.
,.(
2
'.
:;
:
. .''
'
5
k
g
:
-
.?(:
.
'
-
g.(,
ë
. 2
$
.
'1
..
:
.
,
E
1
ë
;
:
-
l
,r
k
-
l
,
i
.
'.
.-
.
,
,
'
7
j
I
'1
7
!
'i
.:
.
:
.
-
.
..
,
1
2
ki
ll
)
z
j
.
:
-
1;
.l
-i
g
:
'
7l
i1
i
;
.
,I
E!
E
T
I
E
T
I
:h
) .
.
':17 ;.
Lt
: .
...'
,'
.
jL.7.(
t....
..t
)
'
J-E;. Ngy (
.:
.
;c
su
jt
a
-g
-
CLE?A,0.2.ZtSTRICTC,')6
*q
-
t
A''
r
CEAIFALDISTRCICFCILIFORNI/
P ?C( 'SIEFC'l
)l
tlSl021CFPI JF .
NoticecannotbegivenforthisExParteAppll
'
catl
'
onduetothefactthatthe
CourthmsneitherFantedthemitttforthwith''norissuedanordertoshow cause
itforthwith''toRespondentstoGtshow causewhythemitshouldnotbegranted''
asrequiredby28U.S.C.j2243.WithouttheCourtdoingtheactsrequiredby
j2243,Petitionerdoesnothaveanypersontowhom togivethenotice,asno
respondenthasl'appeared''inthec%e.
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 31 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

TobestofPetitioner'sknowledge,thefollowingaretheaddressesofthe
Respondentsand theirattomeys,based upon information in case no.CV09-
1914JFW (CW):
Respondent Attornev
U.S.DislictCourt Unknown
3l2NorthSpringStreet
LosAngeles,CA 90012
SheriffLeroyD.Baca Lawrence,Beach,Allen& Choi,PC
c/oMen'sCentralJail 110WestBroadway,Suite1200
44lBauchd Street Glendale,CA 91210
LosM geles,CA 90012 Te1:(818)545-1925
Fax:(818)545-1937
Email:afontanalzlbaclaw.com
LA SuperiorCourtand Benton,Om Duval& Buckingham
JudgeDavidP.Yaffe 39NorthCalifomiaStreet
1llHillStreet P.O.Box1178
LosAngeles,CA 90012 Venturw CA 93002-1178
Te1:(805)648-5111
Email:O cco= ick.
l
klbel
atonorr.col
n

Petitioner(ç&Fine7')incorporatesthePetitionfiledhereinbyreferenceasif
21
setforthin111.
23 ThegroundsfortheExParteApplicationareasfollows:

25
l. ThePetitionwasfiledonOctober30,2009*
,
2. Pursuantto28U.S.
C.j2243,theCourtmusteithergrantthePetition
27 çtforthwith''orordertheRespondentstkforthwith''toshow causewhythe
28
writshouldnotbewanted,
'

-2-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 32 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

TheCourthasviolated j2243 asofthepresenttimeasithasnot

ûEforthwith''pantedthewritnororderedtherespondentsto show cause
whythewritshouldnotbegranted'
,
4. TheCourthasahistoryofviolatingj2243intheexactmnnneranddidthe
exactsamethingincaseno.CV09-1914JFW (CW), '
Theaforementionedviolationofj2243isoneofthebasesforthepresent
10 Petition;
11 6. EveniftheCourtcouldcuretheviolationofj2243,theCourtwouldhave
12
to grantthe writasthe Respondentscnnnotshow causewhy the writ
14 shouldnotbepanted;
15 ThePetitionisclearonitsfacethattheRespondentsknew thatPetitioner
16
17 couldnotbeçtcoercivelyincarcerated''formorethanfivedaysunderCCP
18 j1218(a)andthecaseoflnReFarr(citedinthePetitionl;
8. ThePetitionisclearonitsfacethatRespondentsknew thatnoMarch 18,
20
21 2008orderexisted'
,
22 9. ThePetitionisclearonitsfacethatRespondentsknew thatPetitionerwas
23
criminallychargedwithaBusiness& ProfessionsCodej6126violation
25 andthatsuchchargewasnotdismissed'
,
10. ThePetition isclearon itsfacethatRespondentsknew thatJudgeYaffe
stated thattherewasno courtorder violated relating to the
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 33 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

practicingwithoutalicenseorholdingouttopracticeorpracticingwhile
çtinvoluntarilyinactive''(B&Pcodejj6126and6127(b);and
11.ThePetitionisclearonitsfacethattheMagistrateJudgeandtheDistrict
CourtJudgeknew thattheywereviolatingj2243,amongstotherthings.

'
I'
heExParteApplication isbasedupon thisApplication,thePetition,the
MemorandtmzofPointsandAtlthorities,andtheDeclarationofRichard1.Fine.

Datedthis L dayofNovember,2009 Respectfullysubmitted,

13
BY:
RICHARD 1.FINE,
15 InProPer
16

18
19
20

22
23
24

26
27
28
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 34 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

Memorandum ofPointsandAuthorities
2
3
PetitionerseeksanordertoimmediatelyreleasePetitionerfrom çç
coercive
4 incarceration''andtoimmediatelystayexecutionofsentenceandgrantthewrit.
5
Petitionerhasbeen Llcoercively incarcerated''sinceMarch 4,2009. The
6
7 tmderlyingissueofwhethertheincarceration isproperiscurrentlybeforethe
8 NinthCircuitinthecaseofFinev.Sheriy ofCovnfpofLosAngeles,eta1,
9
10 appealno.56073,trialcourtcaseno.CV09-1914J' FWICW).Thequestionon
11 appealisTtwhethcrthutrialjudgegludgeYaffc)shouldhavcrccusedhimself''
12
'
lhatissue was litigated before Magistrate Judge Woehrle and Judge
13
14 Walter,whodenied thewritanddeniedtheCertificateofAppealability. The
15 NinthCircuitrantedtheCertificateofAppealability.Thebriefmgschedulehas
beencompletedandoralargumentissetfortheweekofDecember7-l1,2009.
lhe Petitlon addresses ttle constlmtlonal vlolations that have been
committedbyMagistrateJudgeCarlaM.Woehrle,JudgeJohnF.Walter,Sheriff
21 LeroyD.Bacw andtheLA SuperiorCourtandJudgeDavidP.Yaffe(ççludge
Yaffe'')incaseno.(7V09-1914JFWICW).
TheviolationsandgrotmdsforsucharesetforthinthePetition,whichis
incorporatedhereinasifsetforthin111.
The grounds forthe Application are setforth in the Application and
incorporatedhereinasifsetforthin111.

l
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 35 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 In additioùtotheFoundsforthisApplication,thisApplicationmustbe
2
3
grantedbaseduponthecontinuousdelaysofjusticeengagedinbyMagistrate
4 JudgeWoehrleandJudgeWalterincasesinvolvingFine.'
Fhisisthethirdcase
5
since2008whereFinehasbeenapetitionerbeforethesejudicialofficers.
6
7 A1lofthe three caseshave involved an underlying factualbaseofLA
8 Cotmtyjudgestakingcriminalpaymentsfrom LA County.Theflrstcase,Fine
9
10 v.StateBarofCalifornia,etal,CV08-2906J' FWICW)soughttodeclarethe
11 Califomia limoral turpimde'' statute and Cvvoltmtary enrollment stamte
12
13
unconstimtionalandtoenjointheStateBarfrom prosecutingFineundersuch.
14 FinehadbroughtFederalcivilrightslawsuitsagainstjudgesandchallenged
15 judicialofticerswhohadtakenpaymentsfrom LA Cotmty,whowœsaparty
16
17 beforethem.(1d.) Thesepaymentswereheldtobeunconstitutionalunder
18 ArticleV1,Section 19,oftheCalifomiaConstitutioninthecaseofSturgeonv.
19 th
20
Ctlp
zntpo.fLosAngeles,l67Cal.App.4 630(2008)rev.denied12/23/08.(1d.4
21 Thejudge'swho receivedpaymentsweregiven retroactiveimmtmity from
22 criminalprosecution,civilrightsliability anddisciplinaryaçtionbySenateBill
23
24 SBX2-l1,enacted February20,2009,effectiveMay 21,2009. Thepayments
25 violateddueprocessasshownbytherecentcaseofCaperton v.A.Z Massev
26
27 CoalCo..lnc.,etaI,566U.S. (2009),decidedJune8,2009,citingTumevv.
28 Ohio,273U.S.510(1927),.Wardv.Monro
.
eville,409U.S.57(1972).
,Gibsonv. N.

-6-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 36 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989
*
.

l Berrvhill,411U.S.564(1973),
*andAetnaLi
feIns.Co.v.Lavoie,475U.S.813
2
3 (1986).
4 MagistrateJudgeWbehrleandJudgeWaltertooktenmonthstodecidea
5 MotiontoDismissfiledbyFine.Theydislissedthecaseon YoungerAbstention
6
7 Fotmds.However,atthetimetheydismissedthecmse,theStateBarcasewas
8 OVef. Therewasnotanyreason fortheFederalCourtto abstain. Theythen
9
10 deniedaMotiontoSetAsideJudgmentofDismissalwltichwasnotopposedby
11 theStateBarrespondents,eta1.
12
Thiswastheflrstpartofapattem ofdelay and ignoringU.S.Supreme
13
14 Courtprecedent.(TheMotiontoSetAsideJudgmentofDismissalshowedthat
15 the California Supreme Courtjusticeswere biased inasmuch asthey had
16
17 receivedillegal(criminallpaymentsfrom counties.
18 Thesecondpartwascaseno.CV09-1914JFW(CW). lnthiscase,they
19
20 violated28U.S.C.j2243asshowninthePetitionherein.Theyalsorefusedto
21 follow oreven discussrelevantU.S.SupremeCourtprecedentontheissueof
22 dueprocess, even though theCaperton casewasspecitically broughttotheir
23
24 attentiononthedueprocessandrecusalissues.
25 ThethirdpartisthepresentPetition inwhichMagistrateJudgeWoehrle
26
27 andJudgeWalterviolatedj2243forthesecondtime.Theyarealsoviolating
28 theConstitutionbykeepingFineinûtcoerciveincarceration''whileknowingthat

-7
-
'
Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 37 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989
j
l suchincarcerationviolatesthelaw (CCPj1218(a)andtheFarrcase),andthat
2
3
theyshouldhaverecusedthemselvesfrom thecaseattheoutset(seeInRe
4 Murchison,349U.S.133,l36(1955)-ajudgecannotjudgehisownactions).
5 Thistypeofconductwasnotlimited to MagislateJudgeWoehzle and
6
7 JudgeWalter.ltpervadedtheU.S.DistrictCourtincmsesrelatedtoFineandhis
8 stateBardisbarment.
9
ln the case ofln ReRichard 1.Fine,caseno.09-MC-129,theDistrict
10
11 CourtissuedanOrdertoShow Cause(thetçOSC'')astowhyFineshouldnotbe
12
disbarredfrom theDistrictCourtbasedupontheCalifomiadisbarment.
13
14 District Court Presiding Judge Audrey Collins ordered disbnrment.
15 PACER showedthatFine,sresponsetotheosc wasnotlisted,eventhoughit
l6
17
wasfiled. ltsubsequently cameoutthatJudgeCollinshadconcealedthefact
18 thatherhusbandisahighlyrnnkedLA Cotmty official. (ThecriminalLA
19
20
CountypaymentstotheLA SuperiorCourtjudgesandFine'schallengingsuch
21 byFederalcivilrightslawsuitsandCCPj170.3objectionswerepartofthe
22 disbarmentcase. Finewasfotmd guilty of..moralturpimde,,f.
orjjjjyjg such
23
24 lawsuitsandchallenges).
25 FinemovedtorecuseJudgeCollinsunder28U.S.C.j4554$basedupon
26
herfamily incomecoming from LA Cotmty. Thecasewasthen assignedto
27
28 JudgeOtisWright.

-8
-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 38 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l JudgeWrightwasaformerLA CotmtySuperiorCourtjudgewhohad
2
received the criminalLA Cotmty paymentsand had received theretroactive
3
4 immunity under Senate Bill SBX2-11. He did not recuse himself and
5 .
l
mmediatelydeniedthemotiontorecuseJudgeCollins.
6
7 FinemovedtorecuseJudgeWrightassoonasFinebecameawarethatthe
8 CaseWaSaSSignedtohim.
9
10
JudgeWrightwasin evenaworsepositionth% JudgeCollinsduetothe
11 immlmityfrom criminalprosecutionunderlenateBillSBX2-11. Bygiving
12
retroactive immunity from criminal prosecution, Senate Bill SBX2-l1
13
14 acknowledgedthecriminalityoftheLA CotmtypaymentstotheLA Superior
15 Courtjudges.Suchcriminalactsincludedbribery,misappropriationofftmdsand
I6
17 destructionofjustice,amongstothers.
18 Judge Wrightwasrequired to recusehimselftmderthe dictatesofdue
19
process. TheU.S.SupremeCourthasruled andreaftirmedtheprinciplethat
20
21 tjusticemustsatisfytheappearanceofjusticeD'.Levinev.UnitedStates,366
22 U.S.610(1960),ci tingO.lfuttv.UnitedStates,348U.S.l1,14(1954)-:(A
23 '
24 judgereceivingabribefromanyinterestedpm' tyoverwhichheispresidingdoes
25 notgivetheappearanceofjustice.''UnitedStatesv.Sciuto,52lF.2d842,845
26
27 (7thCircuit,1996)-çttherighttoatribunalfreefrom biasorprejudiceisbased,
28 noton Section l44,butOnthedueprocessclause. UnitedStatesv.Bali
strieri,

-9
-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 39 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l 779F.2dl191,1202(7thCircuit,1985)-ûtwèthilkthislanguage(455(a))
2
imposesadutyonthejudgetoactsua sponte,evenifnomotionoraffidavitis
3
4 tiled-''
5 ThemotiontodisqualifyJudgeWrightwassenttoJudgeChristinaSnyder,
6
7 whodeniedit.JudgeSnyder'sdecision didnotdiscussanyofthecontrolling
8 U.S.SupremeCourtcasesregardingJudgeWright'shavingreceived criminal
9
pavmentsfrom LA County orhishavingreceivedreloactiveimmunityfrom
10 x -
11 cn'
minalprosecutitm forsuch.Shealsohadconcealedthefacthatshehadbeen
12 quoted in aLosAngelesTimesarticleaboutJudgeCollins. Sucharticlewas
13
14 favorableandJudgeSnyder'scommentswerefavorable,demonstratingabias
15 towardsJudge Collins. The article disclosed the position ofJudge Collin,s
16
17
husbandwithLA County,showingthatJudgeSnyderltnew thatJudgeCollins
18 shouldhaverecusedherself.
19
Finally,JudgeCollinsrefusedtofollow theNinthCircuit,which didnot
20
21 disbarFine,butinsteadstayedtheirdisbarmentuntiltheoutcomeofappealno.
22 09-56073,basedupont
heoverlapoftheissues-qûwhetherthetrialjudge(Judge
23
24 Yaffelshould haverecused himself.'' Judge Yaffe admitted to receiving
25 Paymentsfrom LA County.Appealno.09-56073isUSDC caseno.CV09-1914
26
27 JFW (CW).
28

-l
0-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 40 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 Inessence,likeJudgeYaffe,theDistrictCourthasviolateddueprocessby
2
3
havingtakenmoneyfrom LA CountygludgeCollinsjandcriminalpayments
4 from LA Countyandreceivingretroactiveimmunity(JudgeWrightl,andnot
5 recusingthemselves,asrequiredtmderthelaw.
6
7 BœsedupontheprecedentoftheactionoftheSupremeCourtJustice,Abe
B FO11%, whoresignedwhenitasdisclosedthathehadreceiveda$20,000-per-
9
10
yearconsultingfeewithpaymentstohiswifeafterhisdeathinthesameamotmt,
11 to attend onemeeting a year from Louis Wolfson to advise his company's
12
foundation while Fortaswassitting asaSupremeCourtJusticefrom 1965-
13
14 1968 and wasan advijorto PresidentJohnson,the refusaltorecuseJudges
15 CollinsandWrightisegregious. lnthecaseofJusticeFortas,neitherWolfson,
16
17 theWolfson Fotmdation,noranyoftheWolfson Companies,hadcaszsbefore
18 theSupremeCourt.However,thepossibilityexistedthatoneoftheWolfson's
19
casescouldbeaffectedby aSupremeCourtdecision. JusticeFortasresired
20
21 ratherth% faceimpeachment.
22 lnconlast,JudgeCollins,whosefamilyreceivesmoneyfrom LA Cotmty,
23
24 hadnotonlyrefusedtoresir,buthadbeenrequiredtorecuseherself.Judge
25 wrjght who received criminalpayments from LA County and retroactive
26
27
immlmityfrom criminalprosecutionforsuchhasnotonlyrefusedtoresir,but
28 hasnotbeenrequiredtorecusehimself.

-1
1-
:
Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 41 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l Additionally,MagistrateJudgeWoehrleandJudgeWalterhavenotfound
2 ' .
thatCaliforniaSupremeCourtJusticesChin,Conigan,Kennard,and Moreno
3
4 and ChiefJusticeGeorge,who receivedcriminalpaymentsfrom countiesand
5 rekoactiveimmtmityfrom criminalprosecution,civilliabilityand disciplinary
6
7 action,andJusticeBaxter,whowason theJudicialCouncilofCaliforniawith
8 ChiefJustïceGeorgeasitdraftedSenateBillSBX2-ll tobenotbiasedinthe
9
10
case08-2906 JFW (CW). TheJudicialCouncilispartofthe Califomia
11 JudiciarylmderArticleVl,Section6,oftheCaliforniaConstimtion.
12 UndertheFortasprecedent,neitherWolfson,theWolfsonFoundationnor
13
14 the Wolfson Companies had a case before the Supreme Court. Only the
15 possibilityexistedthataSupremeCourtdecisionmayeffectthem.Incontrast,
16
17
LA CountyhasadirectinterestinthedisbarmentofFineandadirectinterestin
18 thettYaffe''recusalsinceitmadethecri
minalpayments.
19 '
20
A11oftheDistrictCourtjudgesandJudgeWoehrleknew this. Their
21 failure and refusalto obey due processand the Fortasprecedentisbeyond
22
comprehension.
23
24 Based upon the grotmds stated in the Petition and the aforementioned
25 feaSO11S,FinewillprevailonthePetitionandthewritwillbeFanted.
26
Noticecouldnotbereasonablygivenduetothefactthàtanordertoshow
27
28 causehasnotbeenissuedtotheRespondentsbytheCourt.ThusnoRespondent

. -1
z.
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 42 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

hasappearedinthec%e,leavingnottrespondent''tobegivennoticeoftheEx
ParteApplication.
Fine respectfully requests that the Courtimmediately issue an order
immediatelyreleasingFinefrom incarceration from theLA Countyjailand
immediately pantingthewritofhabemscorpusincludingthestayofexecution
ofsentencesandwritofhabeascorpusasto theconviction ofpracticinglaw
withoutalicenseorholdingouttopractice.

oatedthis ( dayorxovember,2009 Respectfullysubmitted,

BY:
RICHARD 1.FINE,
InProPer
17
18
19
20
21
22

24
25
26
27
28
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 43 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989
C

l DeclarationofRichard1.Fine
2 STATE OFCALIFORM A
3 COUNTY OFLOSANGELES
4
5 1,Richard1.Fine,declare:
6
The following facts are within my personalknowledge and ifcalled to
7
8 testify,lcould andwouldcompetentlytestifyheretoasfollows:
9 1. 1am thePetitionerherein;
io
11
2. lhavebeenincarceratedunderççcoerciveincarceration''in LA County
12 Men'sCentalJailsinceMarch4>20097
.
13
3. ThePetition forWritofHabeasCorpusin caseno.CV-09-1914JFW
14
15 (CW)wasfiled on March 20,2009,andtheOrderfrom MagistrateJudge
16 WoehrletoRespondentSheriffofLA CountywasnotissuedtmtilApril7,2009,
.
17
lg 4. ThePetition forWritofHabeasCorpusinthiscasewastiled October
19 30,2009,
.
20
21
5. AsofthedateofftlingthisExParteApplication,PACER doesnotshow
22 thatanyordertoshow causeh% beenissuedtotheResponden? toshow cause
23
whythewritshouldnotbegranted'
,and
24
25 6. Noticecannotbere%onablygiventotheRespondentsofthisExParte
26 Applicationduetothefactthatnoordertoshow causehmsbeenissuedandthey
27 '
28 havenotappearedinthiscase.

-1
4-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 44 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

Ideclaretmderpenaltyofperjurythattheforegoingismzeandcorrectunder
thelawsoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica.
Executedthis L dayof-xovember,2009atLosAngeles,califbrnia.

CHARD 1.FINE

10

12
13

15
16
17
18

20
21
22
23
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 45 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l RICHARD 1.FINE
2 l'
Yk'
isonuk'113#l824:,
$7 If2.LI3J'l
c/oMen'sCentralJail
3 441BauchetStreet
a Inqangples,('
>A-Q()t)12
5
6 UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
7 CENTRALDISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA,WESTERN DIVISION
8
9
i
i0 RICHARD 1.FINE, j
gCaseNo.CV09-07943JFW (CW)
l1 Petitioner, i
12 l
( TO RECUSE
vs. ! MAGISTRATEJUDGEJO1-lN F.
13 U.S.DISTRICTCOURTFORTHE !
!B.;ZYLTER
14 CENTM LDISTRICT OF I
15 CALIFORNIA,eta1, L
)28U. S.C.j455(a)
Respondents. ) yt RECEIkEZ
l6 y à.y B(
J1Ngyjjjyj
l7 .
i: .. hgk 62ggg
l9 CLEIA,tI.S.Dl21fD(7CSURT
CENTFAI
-DlS1p1(7OF2ALIFOFhII
2() wEsEqi ynlylsltjN
r DEIRtJ'
J
21 ThegroundsfortheMotionare:
22
1. JudgeJohn F.V/alteristhe sameJudge who isnamed in the ilzstal-
tt
23
24 PetitionforWritofHabeasCorpus(thetû
petition'')asbeingtheJudgewho
25 deniedPetitionerdueprocessandunlawfullyincarceratedPetitionerbyviolating
26
?7 28U.S.C.j2243.amongstotherthinp,assetforthinthePetitione
'and
28 .

-l
-
l
1I 1
 4. ,
Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 46 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989
.'

I 2. ltisadenialofdueprocesstbrajudgetojudgehisownactions,which
2
JudgeWalterwillbedoingifheremainsonthecase.SeelnReMurchison,349
3
4 lJ.S.I33n136(1955),citingthecentralnllethatût
nomancanbeajudgeinhis
5 owncase,,,and addingthatttnomanjspermjttetjtotrycaseswherehehasan
6
7 interestintheoutcome.''CitedinCapertonv.A.71MassevCoalCo.,Inc.,566
8 US (2009)decidedJune8,2009,SlipOpinionpagel0.
9
10
11 Araument
12
JudgeWaltermustberecusedinthiscaseashewillbedecidinghisactions
13
14 incaseno.CV-09-1914JFW (CW)whicharethesubjectmatteroftheinstant
15 Petition.
16
17 Therequirementsofdue process assetforth in Murchison,supra and
i8 Caperton,supra,mandatehisrecusal.
19
20
///
21
///
22 iIIIl
I
23
///
24
///
25
///
26 ','7/
/
27
/'/'/'
28
1'//

-2-

II . I
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 47 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

oatedthis/.dayot-&()v ,2009 lkespectfullysubmitted,

--z
..
..
a.--e .<
6Y*
' *.
.. F'
w.'
* W'W .
RICHARD 1.FINE,
lnProPer
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 48 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989
r
x

I RICHARD 1.FINE
2 PrisonerID # 1824367
c/oMen'sCentralJail
3 441BauchetStreet
4 LosAngeles,CA 90012
5
6 UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT
7 CENTM L DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA,WESTERN DIVISION
8
9
l0 7
RICHARD1.FmE, jCaseNo.CV09-07943JFW (CW)
il Petitioner, j
lz l TO RECUSE
VS. i MAGISTRATE JUDGECARLA M.
13 lwouyllu-s
l4 U.S.DISTRICT COURTFOR THE l
'
!
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ;agu.s.c.j 5r (:y)g Rgcljygo
15 cAulyoRxlA,etal, q .)y,.
,
',;
Respondents. ; 'il
y..)è 'gt
JTNOT'Fll-ëg
l(
3 :
: .
y ,
j,y.t
-;.
17 L. .
:.,, Ngy 6gjgj
'
'
..
18
19 cEitEjw),y
j2
ysja
.
a,
n
jna
, (
)j
jr
sy
j.
rj
ja,
F
j
()
a
;
,,,
20
ThegroundsfortheMotionare: t nmgTy
21 1. MagistrateJudgeCarlaM.WoehrleisthesameMagistrateJudgewhois
22 namedintheinstantPetitionforWritofHabeasCorpusasbeingtheMagistrate
23
24 JudgewhodeniedPetitionerdueprocessandunlawfullyincarceratedPetitioner
25 byviolating28U.S.
C.j2243,amongstotherthings,assetforthinthePetition,
'
26
27 and
28

-l
-
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 49 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

Itisadenialofdueprocessforajudgetojudgeherownactions,which
MagistrateJudgeWoehrlewillbedoingifsheremainsonthecase.SeeInRe
Hurchison,349U.S.l33,l36(1955),citingthecentralrulethat'inomancanbe
ajudgeinhisowncasen''andaddingthatt'nomanispermittedtotl' ycases
wherehehasan interestin theoutcome.''Cited in Caperton v.W.ILMassçv
CoalCo.,Inc.,566U.S.- (2009),decidedJune8,2009,Sli
pOpinionpage10.

Artument
Magistrate Judge Woehrle mustbe recused in this case as she willbe
decidingheractionsincaseno.CV-09-1914JFW (CW)whicharethesubject
matteroftheinstantPetition.
The requirennentsofdue processassettbrth in Murchison,supra and
18 Caperton,supra,mandateherrecusal.
19
20

22
23
24
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 50 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

oatedthis('
,dayot-(jlov ,2009 Respectfullysubmitted,
, .....
-.
-'-'
wx..gr..:
jjY. x-*.r.. m.-..
'''
e
RICHARD 1.FINE,
InProPer

18

20
'

Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 51 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

l RICHARD 1.FINE
a PrisonerID #1824367
3
c/oMen'sCentralJail
chetStreet
4.:. .( k
L.'
t
ï.#
....;
, 2z-t
' q
W
L'
'.n
l.
i'
leles,CA 90012
t ':
= 8Z
!l t
:=
o ' g
,!
: IJNITEDSTATESDISTRICTcotTR'r
s
D.ir. HM=E TRALDISTRICTOFCALIFORNIA,WESTERNDIVISION
=%= 9 cgk
é:<
10 RICOHAk D1.FINE, i
iCaseNo.CV09-07943JFW (CW)
11 tjtïoner, j
Ic jNo-rlcEoyNox-coNsENTTo
13 vs. iMAGISTRATEJLJDGEAS
U.S.DISTRICTCOURTFORTI4E f CONSENTmG IN .4PREVIOUS
14 CENTRALDISTRICTOF l
C W IYPSTIYION RESW TED IN A
15 CALIFORNI 1 DEMAL OFDUEPROCESSANll
ResponA,et
dentsa
.
l, l
,THEFILING oFTl-
llsPETITION
16 )
1 .
17 l
18
19
20 PleasetakenoticethatPetitionerdoesnotconsenttoaMagistrateJudge.
21
22 lrrespectiveofthelocalruleofthiscotu'
trequiring a11prosecasestobe
23 heardbetbreaMagistrateJudge,such ruleresultsin adirectviolationofdue
24
25 PFOCCSS.
26
ThatviolationisoneofthebasesoftheinstantPetition forWritofHabeas
27
2: Corpus.lnthecaseofRichard1.Finev.SherilfofLosAngelesCt??
,
/rltp,caseno.

I
j
lI -l
- l
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 52 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

1 CV-09-l914JFW (CW),whichwasaPetitionforWritofHabeasCorpus,the
2
3
casewasassignedtoMagistrateJudgeCarlaWoehrle.
4
5 Sheimmediatelyviolated28U.S.C.j2243bynoteithergrantingtheWrit
6 'tforthwith''orissuing an orderto show causetotheRespondentltforthwith''
7
ordering theRespondentvutoshow causewhythewritshouldnotbegranted.,,
8
9 Shewaitedl8daysfrom March20,2009twhcnthcPditionwasfiled),until
10 April7, 2009,when sheissued herorder,which wasnotan 'torderto show
11 77 .
12 Cause.
13
14
W'hen theRespondentSheriffdidnot'tshow cause';andrefusedtoanswer
15 thePetition,shefurtherviolated 28U.S.C.j2243by ûtdirecting''theLA
l6
17
SuperiorCourtandJudgeDavidP.Yaffe(, ((
,
JudgeYaffer
j
,)toanswer.Shedjt.
j
18 nothavejtlrisdictionovertheL,
A SuperiorCourtandJudgeYaffeoandtheywere
19 notthetçltespondent.''Further,theydidnotseektointervene.ShegavetheLA
20
21 SuperiorCourtandJudgeYaffeuntilMay 1,2009toanswer.Thiswasbeyond
22 the20-daylimitationsetfort
h in Section2243forresponse,whichwouldhave
23
beenApril27,2009fortheRespondentitxhecouldhaveshown(,t
.
goodcause..
):
,
24
25
WhentheLA SuperiorCourtandJudgeYaffedidnotkkshow causewhythe
26
27 writshotlld notbe granted,''she then wrote a Reportand Recommendation
28

-2-

il I
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 53 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

baseduponnonexistentorders(Marchl8,20091andttfacts''whichsheclaimed
wereinatçrecord,''factswhichdidnotexist.

HerviolationsofSection2243form partofthebasisfortheinstantPetition.
ThoseviolationsresultedintheunlawfulincarcerationofPetitioner,Aespective
oftheotherviolationsoftheRespondentSheriff,theLA SuperiorCourtand
JudgcYaffc.

Asofthedateofthisfiling,Section 2243 hasagain been violated. The

present'tMagistrateJudge''gWoehrlelhasneitherçkgranted''thePetitionnor
issuedan'-
ordertoshow cause''totheRespondentsU.S.DistrictCourt,Sheriff
Leroy D.Baca,LA SuperiorCourtandJudgeDavidP.Yaffe''
toshow cause
whythewritshouldnotbegranted.''

ThepresentûtMagistrateJudge''hasalreadyviolateddueprocessinthiscase.
ThePetitionstatesonitsfacethatPetitionerwasnotconsentingtoaMagistrate
Judge;theCourtshouldneverhaveassignedthiscasetoat'MagistrateJudge.''

The 't
M agistrate Judge''assignmentmustnow be removed,and the writ
grantedoranordertoshow causeissuedwithathree-dayretunzassetforthin
Section2243.
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 54 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

The DistrictCourthas now unlawfully incarcerated Petitioner for eight

l
nonths.Thisunlawfulincarcerationisduetothedirectanddeliberateviolation
of1aw by MagistrateJtldgeCarlaWoehrle. Shewasnotexercisingûtiudicial
discretion''ordecidingjudicialquestions,shewasviolatingSection2243.She
6
knew thatshewasviolatingSection 2243. Sheknew thatshewasunlawfully
8 keeping Petitionerincarcerated by her deliberate violation ofSection 2243.
9
10 Thesewerenottjudicialacts''ofdecidingacase.Thesewereactsviolatingthe
law,aimedatdcprivingPetitionerofhisliberty.
12
13 Thesesameactsarenow occurringinthiscase.
14
Forthesereasons,Petitionerdoesnotconsentto MagistateJudge Carla
16 Woehrleinthiscase.

18
19
20

22

24

26

28
 Case: 09-56073 11/12/2009 Page: 55 of 55 DktEntry: 7128989

Datedthis.V dayofNJU ,2009 Respectfullysubmitted,

-R.R
û. .....--. .-.
BY: -5u ...
-.,..oo.

4 RI
InCHARD
ProPer 1.FINE,