There are two kinds of novation: extinctive and modificatory. Extinctive novation extinguishes the old obligation by creating a new one that replaces it. Modificatory novation modifies elements of the existing obligation but allows the original obligation to remain to the extent it is still compatible with the changes. A new agreement intended to continue an existing agreement rather than replace it does not constitute novation under Philippine law.
There are two kinds of novation: extinctive and modificatory. Extinctive novation extinguishes the old obligation by creating a new one that replaces it. Modificatory novation modifies elements of the existing obligation but allows the original obligation to remain to the extent it is still compatible with the changes. A new agreement intended to continue an existing agreement rather than replace it does not constitute novation under Philippine law.
There are two kinds of novation: extinctive and modificatory. Extinctive novation extinguishes the old obligation by creating a new one that replaces it. Modificatory novation modifies elements of the existing obligation but allows the original obligation to remain to the extent it is still compatible with the changes. A new agreement intended to continue an existing agreement rather than replace it does not constitute novation under Philippine law.
Obligations may be altered by changing their object or principal conditions, substituting the person of the debtor, or subrogating a third person in the rights of the creditor
It is extinctive when the old obligation is extinguished by the creation of a new one that takes the place of the former
(2) Modificatory
by making any change in any of the elements of an obligation
the old obligation subsists, as amended, to the extent it remains compatible with the novatory agreement.
New agreement is intended to give life to an old agreement. Is this novation?
No novation of a contract occurs when the new agreement entered into between the parties is intended to give life to the old one (Huibonhoa vs. Court of Appeals, 117 SCAD 281, 320 SCRA 625).
People'S Trans East Asia Insurance Corporation, A.K.A. People'S General Insurance Corporation, Petitioner, vs. Doctors of New Millennium Holdings, Inc., Respondent