The document discusses analyzing the managerial decision by Bobby's Burgers CEO to grant 500 shares of company stock to each unit manager in order to address incentive problems among managers. It notes that owners and employees often have differing objectives, with employees preferring more leisurely work and bearing most effort costs while owners reap most gains. Granting stock could motivate managers by making them feel like owners with accountability for decisions impacting not just short-term operations but long-term company performance. While other incentive programs could also work, variable compensation tying a portion of manager pay to unit and company performance would likely push managers to work harder to earn bonuses or avoid losing them from poor results.
The document discusses analyzing the managerial decision by Bobby's Burgers CEO to grant 500 shares of company stock to each unit manager in order to address incentive problems among managers. It notes that owners and employees often have differing objectives, with employees preferring more leisurely work and bearing most effort costs while owners reap most gains. Granting stock could motivate managers by making them feel like owners with accountability for decisions impacting not just short-term operations but long-term company performance. While other incentive programs could also work, variable compensation tying a portion of manager pay to unit and company performance would likely push managers to work harder to earn bonuses or avoid losing them from poor results.
The document discusses analyzing the managerial decision by Bobby's Burgers CEO to grant 500 shares of company stock to each unit manager in order to address incentive problems among managers. It notes that owners and employees often have differing objectives, with employees preferring more leisurely work and bearing most effort costs while owners reap most gains. Granting stock could motivate managers by making them feel like owners with accountability for decisions impacting not just short-term operations but long-term company performance. While other incentive programs could also work, variable compensation tying a portion of manager pay to unit and company performance would likely push managers to work harder to earn bonuses or avoid losing them from poor results.
Analyzing Managerial Decisions: Granting Stock Options Rodolfo Handal MBA 540 June 22, 2014 Dr. Patrick Murphy
Analyzing Managerial Decisions 2
Analyzing Managerial Decisions: Granting Stock Options One of the greatest challenges that managers from different levels and different industries have is to be able to motivate people. There are many different techniques and tools that are used by managers to motivate their employees, but problems arise as not all individuals are motivated by the same things. In the case of Bobbys Burgers, the restaurant chain was experiencing incentive problems among its outlet managers (Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman, 2009, p.466). In order to resolve this issue and motivate unit managers, the CEO proposed granting 500 shares of stock of the firm to each manager (Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman, 2009).
Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman (2009), note that incentive problems exist within firms because owners and employees have fundamentally different objectives (p.453). According to Brickley, Smith & Zimmeran, employers expect employees to work diligently while employees prefer to take work at a more leisurely pace. In addition they note that the incentive problem is caused by the fact that most of the costs of exerting effort are borne by employees, while much of the gains go to the owner (p.456).
In the case of Bobbys Burgers, the firm could use a stock granting program as means of motivating employees to act in the best interests of the firm. By giving managers ownership of the firm the incentive problem is solved as employees will feel that they are not exerting efforts for the owners, but for themselves; therefore, increasing their accountability for their actions. Granting stock options is a strategic move by the management group in order to get managers to take decisions and align their actions with those of other employees, as well as the stakeholders (given that they are both).
Another reason why stock option programs are beneficial in this type of environment is because it makes employees not only think about the short-term, but also the long-term. Many times, employees are more focused on the short day-to-day operations and are not worried about how their actions can affect the firm in the future. Granting stock options can be a way to resolve this issue as they will feel that degree of accountability.
Firms have many options on how to motivate employees and managers, and certainly Bobbys Burgers may have other incentive programs that could motivate increased efforts at the units. As stated previously, not all employees are motivated by the same things, as such, it is important that the CEO considers the motivators of each of the managers; however, there are general ways in which other programs could help the firms performance.
One of the ways in which the CEO could motivate managers at local units is by establishing programs such as bonuses for good performance, prizes for winning contests, salary revisions based on performance, promotions and titles for good performance, profit sharing plans, among others (Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman, 2009). Brickley, Smith & Zimmerman (2009), also note that rewards do not have to be monetary (p.470).
One of the best ways in which the CEO could push managers at local units to exert more efforts in their units is by introducing variable compensation. For example, 30 per cent of an managers salary could be tied to variable compensation which would be dependent on the units Analyzing Managerial Decisions 3
performance. In addition, a 5 per cent could be variable based on the performance of the other units and the business as a whole. By doing this, employees will exert more effort in order to meet their utility or bare the cost of losing their bonus if performance is poor.
Analyzing Managerial Decisions 4
Reference Brickley, J., Smith, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2009). Managerial economics and organizational architecture (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.