This case involves a dispute over a savings account that was subject to a joint survivorship agreement between Romarico Vitug and his late wife Dolores. The executor of Dolores' estate opposed Romarico's claim for reimbursement from the savings account, arguing that it was part of the conjugal estate. The Supreme Court ruled that the survivorship agreement was valid as it did not constitute a donation or will. It allowed Romarico to claim the savings account as his separate property and claim reimbursement from the estate. A valid survivorship agreement does not have to comply with the formalities of a will but also cannot be used to circumvent the law.
This case involves a dispute over a savings account that was subject to a joint survivorship agreement between Romarico Vitug and his late wife Dolores. The executor of Dolores' estate opposed Romarico's claim for reimbursement from the savings account, arguing that it was part of the conjugal estate. The Supreme Court ruled that the survivorship agreement was valid as it did not constitute a donation or will. It allowed Romarico to claim the savings account as his separate property and claim reimbursement from the estate. A valid survivorship agreement does not have to comply with the formalities of a will but also cannot be used to circumvent the law.
This case involves a dispute over a savings account that was subject to a joint survivorship agreement between Romarico Vitug and his late wife Dolores. The executor of Dolores' estate opposed Romarico's claim for reimbursement from the savings account, arguing that it was part of the conjugal estate. The Supreme Court ruled that the survivorship agreement was valid as it did not constitute a donation or will. It allowed Romarico to claim the savings account as his separate property and claim reimbursement from the estate. A valid survivorship agreement does not have to comply with the formalities of a will but also cannot be used to circumvent the law.
FACTS: Romarico Vitug and Nenita Alonte were co-administrators of Dolores Vitugs (deceased) estate Rowena Corona was t!e e"ecutri" Romarico# t!e deceaseds !us$and# filed a motion wit! t!e %ro$ate court as&ing for aut!orit' to sell certain s!ares of stoc& and real %ro%erties $elonging to t!e estate to co(er alleged ad(ances to t!e estate# w!ic! !e claimed as %ersonal funds T!e ad(ances were used to %a' estate ta"es Corona o%%osed t!e motion on ground t!at t!e ad(ances came from a sa(ings account w!ic! formed %art of t!e con)ugal %artners!i% %ro%erties and is %art of t!e estate T!us# t!ere was no ground for reim$ursement Romarico claims t!at t!e funds are !is e"clusi(e %ro%ert'# !a(ing $een ac*uired t!roug! a sur(i(ors!i% agreement e"ecuted wit! !is late wife and t!e $an& T!e agreement stated t!at after t!e deat! of eit!er one of t!e s%ouses# t!e sa(ings account s!all $elong to and $e t!e sole %ro%ert' of t!e sur(i(or# and s!all $e %a'a$le to and collecti$le or wit!drawa$le $' suc! sur(i(or T!e lower court u%!eld t!e (alidit' of t!e agreement and granted t!e motion to sell CA re(ersed stating t!at t!e sur(i(ors!i% agreement constitutes a con(e'ance mortis causa w!ic! did not com%l' wit! t!e formalities of a (alid will Assuming t!at it was a donation inter (i(os# it is a %ro!i$ited donation (donation $etween s%ouses) +SS,-: ./N t!e sur(i(ors!i% agreement was (alid 0-1D: 2-S T!e con(e'ance is not mortis causa# w!ic! s!ould $e em$odied in a will A will is a %ersonal# solemn# re(oca$le and free act $' w!ic! a ca%acitated %erson dis%oses of !is %ro%ert' and rig!ts and declares or com%lies wit! duties to ta&e effect after !is deat! T!e $e*uest or de(ise must %ertain to t!e testator +n t!is case# t!e sa(ings account in(ol(ed was in t!e nature of con)ugal funds Since it was not s!own t!at t!e funds $elonged e"clusi(el' to one %art'# it is %resumed to $e con)ugal +t is also not a donation inter (i(os $ecause it was to ta&e effect after t!e deat! of one %art' +t is also not a donation $etween s%ouses $ecause it in(ol(ed no con(e'ance of a s%ouses own %ro%erties to t!e ot!er +t was an error to include t!e sa(ings account in t!e in(entor' of t!e deceaseds assets $ecause it is t!e se%arate %ro%ert' of Romarico T!us# Romarico !ad t!e rig!t to claim reim$ursement A will is a %ersonal# solemn# re(oca$le and free act $' w!ic! a ca%acitated %erson dis%oses of !is %ro%ert' and rig!ts and declares or com%lies wit! duties to ta&e effect after !is deat! Sur(i(ors!i% agreements are %ermitted $' t!e NCC 0owe(er# its o%eration or effect must not $e (iolati(e of t!e law (ie used as a cloa& to !ide an inofficious donation or to transfer %ro%ert' in fraud of creditors or to defeat t!e legitime of a forced !eir)