Julie Rollins Saint Marys University of Minnesota Schools of Graduate and rofessional rogra!s ortfolio Entry for Wisconsin Teacher Standard 9 E"UW #9$Ethics and %ssues in Education &athi Ste''ins (int) *ove!'er ++, +-./ WTS 9 page 2 of 12 Selected Wisconsin Teacher Standard Descriptors Wisconsin Teacher Standard (WTS) 9: Teachers are able to evaluate themselves and their teaching. The teacher is a reflective practitioner 0ho continually evaluates the effects of his1her choices and actions on others 2students, parents, and other professionals in the learning co!!unity3 and 0ho actively see4s out opportunities to gro0 professionally5 Knoledge5 The teacher understands !ethods of in6uiry that provide hi!1her 0ith a variety of self-assess!ent and pro'le!-solving strategies for reflecting on his1her practice, its influences on students gro0th and learning, and the co!ple7 interactions 'et0een the!5 Dispositions5 The teacher is co!!itted to reflection, assess!ent, and learning as an ongoing process5 !er"ormances5 The teacher uses classroo! o'servation, infor!ation a'out students, cultural, social, philosophical fra!e-0or4s, and research as sources for evaluating the outco!es of teaching and learning and as a 'asis for reflecting on and revising practice5 #ndividual $oal My goal is to 'e genuine and intentional a'out !y evaluation and reflection process5 % 0ill consider 'oth the conse6uentialist and the non-conse6uentialist vie0s and use current educational research to !a4e infor!ed decisions in !y classroo!5 8nce % have !ade a decision, % !ust also follo0 through 0ith i!ple!enting the decision entirely5 WTS 9 page % of 12 Sel"&'ssessment o" #nstruction (elated to WTS 9 9or Wisconsin Teacher Standard 2WTS3 9, % 0ant to focus on continued learning and use of evaluation and reflection to 'etter !yself as an educator5 :urrently, % a! a si7th grade teacher in the Marshfield School "istrict at one of the five ele!entary schools5 My ele!entary 'uilding is a four-trac4 school 0ith a'out .-- students in each grade level of 4indergarten through si7th grade5 8ur si7th grade is set up as a !iddle school !odel 0ith each of the four teachers teaching one of the core su';ect areas5 % a! the current :o!!unication <rts teacher 0here % a! teaching reading, 0riting, gra!!ar, and spelling5 =eing that % a! the reading teacher, one great concern that % have for !y students is there reading a'ility5 So!e students are in the at-ris4 range and reading at a third grade level, 0hile other students are in the advanced range and reading 0ell a'ove the si7th grade level5 <t the 'eginning of the school year, the four of us teachers get together and create our class groupings5 8ne of the :o! <rts class groups 0e create is a lo0er reading-leveled group and of s!aller class si)e5 Many ti!es throughout the school year % reflect on this decision of for!ing the lo0er reading-leveled group5 There are !any positive outco!es to this approach of grouping5 Using this strategy for creating a s!aller group, % a! a'le to spend !ore ti!e 0or4ing 0ith each student one-on-one5 This schedule also allo0s for the special education teacher to 'e in !y classroo! during that ti!e to assist students 0ho need e7tra help5 % a! a'le to go into !ore detailed e7planations of concepts and i!ple!ent re-teaching !ore often if needed5 Students do tend to have !ore confidence 0ith reading aloud, ans0ering 6uestions, and participating in class discussions 0hen there are fe0er students in the class5 Students at this level are a'le to 'e proud of their successes even if they are s!all 0hen the level of co!petition has 'een reduced in their class5 (o0ever, there are also !any negative effects to this grouping approach5 The students 0ho de!onstrate higher levels of thin4ing and good reading s4ills are not in the classroo! to 'e a'le to 'e peer role !odels for the lo0er-level WTS 9 page ) of 12 readers5 So!eti!es students are placed in the lo0er-level group 'ecause their 'ehaviors affect their school 0or4 rather than their learning a'ility> these students 'eco!e a distraction to a student 0ho is a struggling learner5 The pacing of the class tends to !ove a 'it slo0er 0hich can result in the class not covering the entire re6uired curriculu!5 These are so!e of the issues for 'oth sides of this decision5 Even after loo4ing at 'oth sides, % still 6uestion if this is the 'est strategy for grouping the students for reading5 ?oo4ing at 'oth the conse6uentialist and non- conse6uentialist vie0s is very i!portant for !a4ing the 'est decision5 The rightness or 0rongness of an action> 0hether it produces the greatest good for the greatest nu!'er> duty, o'ligation, and principle are i!portant considerations, and treating people 0ith e6ual respect are all 'eliefs that need to 'e considered 0hen !a4ing a decision5 <fter learning a'out these t0o vie0points and considering 'oth sides of this decision, % do 'elieve that for!ing the groups is a good decision and sides 0ith the conse6uentialist 'elief5 Students are !a4ing gains 0hen they have the opportunities they do in the s!aller class si)e5 The 'est decision !ade is the one that 'est !eets the needs of the students in !y classroo!5 9or the 4no0ledge descriptor, % chose, @the teacher understands !ethods of in6uiry that provide hi!1her 0ith a variety of self-assess!ent and pro'le!-solving strategies for reflecting on his1her practice, its influences on students gro0th and learning, and the co!ple7 interactions 'et0een the!5A Students co!e to school 0ith !any different 'ac4grounds and situations5 <s a teacher !y goal is to find the teaching !ethods that 0ill 'est !eet the individual needs of !y students !ost effectively5 9or the disposition descriptor, % chose, @the teacher is co!!itted to reflection, assess!ent, and learning as an ongoing process5A To 'e an effective educator, one !ust al0ays evaluate the!selves, the lesson and or unit, and the students success of !eeting the learning targets5 % spend ti!e thin4ing a'out !y lessons and units, and % analy)e students assess!ent WTS 9 page * of 12 results5 (o0ever, % do need to ta4e the ti!e to !a4e the necessary changes to the lesson or unit to !a4e it !ore effective for student success on the assess!ent5 Thin4ing that % 0ill fi7 it later or ne7t ti!e is not a productive approach5 9ollo0ing through 0ith !a4ing any changes to a lesson or unit !ust 'e done i!!ediately, and this is one s4ill that % need to i!prove5 9or the perfor!ance descriptor % chose, @the teacher uses classroo! o'servation, infor!ation a'out students, cultural, social, philosophical fra!e-0or4s, and research as sources for evaluating the outco!es of teaching and learning and as a 'asis for reflecting on and revising practice5A <ll students learn differently> it is i!portant to loo4 at all factors 0hen deciding 0hat the 'est teaching strategy is for each individual student5 Understanding a students cultural, social, and philosophical fra!e-0or4 allo0s !e to 4no0 that student and 0hat 0or4s 'est for hi! or her5 Education is constantly changing, as are the students, and 'eing a'le to learn fro! our successes and our !ista4es is a very i!portant s4ill5 (e"lection o" +ntire ,earning !rocess Ethics and %ssues in Education 0as a very interesting course5 %t 0as very interesting to participate in the discussions during class on the variety of ethical issues5 So!eti!es it 0as easy to !a4e !y decision, 0hile other ti!es it 0as 6uite difficult to decide after loo4ing carefully at 'oth sides5 ?istening to 0hat the others had to say 0as very eye opening as 0e analy)ed so!e of the cases in class5 ?oo4ing at 'oth sides of a case helped !e to reali)e ho0 i!portant it is to consider all factors 'efore !a4ing a decision5 8ne assign!ent that reinforced this thin4ing process 0as our ;ournal entries5 Reflecting on decisions that % have !ade in !y classroo! 0hile loo4ing at the! fro! a conse6uentialist and nonconse6uentialist 'elief 0as very infor!ative5 This assign!ent illustrated the i!portance of identifying all of the facts and loo4ing at 'oth sides of an issue 'efore !a4ing a decision5 8ne aspect of the course that 0as very !eaningful for !e 0as the concept of filters5 These are the life e7periences, culture, and values that influence our approach 0hen !a4ing a WTS 9 page - of 12 decision5 < persons gender, life e7periences, 0or4 ethic, values, co!!unity involve!ent, and econo!ic status are ;ust a fe0 of the factors that influence ho0 one approaches ethical issues and !a4es a decision5 %t is essential that as an educator, % recogni)e and respect these filters in order to 'e a'le to !eet the needs of others and !a4e the 'est ethical decision5 <ge is one filter that % identified as influential in !y decision !a4ing process5 <s a parent of a fourteen year old and an eleven year old, % recogni)e ho0 !y children have different 'eliefs and vie0s si!ply 'ecause of their age5 %n !y school setting, % need to 'e a0are of these differences and consider ho0 a person of a younger generation 0ould vie0 an issue co!pared to !y o0n perspective5 <ge is a factor 0ithin !y teaching tea! of four5 We have !e, one 0ho is close to retire!ent, one 0ho is 'et0een retire!ent and !e, and one 0ho is four years out of college5 Each of us has a different approach and !ethod of teaching practices that 0e use in our classroo! as 0ell as strategies of classroo! !anage!ent5 We all respect one anothers different vie0points and loo4 to one another to 'etter understand a different perspective5 This class taught !e that in order to 'e the !ost effective teacher that % can 'e> % !ust recogni)e these differences in people and respect their 'eliefs5 <nother aspect of this course that % learned a great deal fro! 0as the de'ate assign!ent5 My de'ate assign!ent 0as on the inclusive !odel in the classroo!5 My initial response to the 6uestion 0as that the inclusive !odel is 0or4a'le5 <fter researching, creating a pro and con chart, and reflecting on 'oth sides of the issue> !y response stays the sa!e5 (o0ever, % certainly do see 'oth sides of this 6uestion5 This course has definitely taught !e to loo4 at an issue fro! different perspectives5 % no0 reali)e the i!portance of loo4ing at 'oth the conse6uentialist and non-conse6uentialist vie0points5 The assign!ents and class discussions sho0ed !e that !y decision-!a4ing process needs to include all of the facts and 'oth sides 'efore % !a4e a final decision5 % do ta4e ti!e to try and consider all facts and evaluate the circu!stances carefully WTS 9 page . of 12 'efore reacting and !a4ing a decision in !y classroo!5 8verall, % feel that this class has taught !e necessary s4ills to 'e an effective educator5 WTS 9 page / of 12 'rti"act ': 0ournal +ntries <rtifact < sho0s t0o e7a!ples of ;ournal entries that deal 0ith ethical dile!!as % have faced in !y classroo!5 The entries include the facts, the ethical issue, argu!ents for 'oth sides, and !y decision along 0ith 0hether !y decision !a4ing is conse6uentialist or non-conse6uentialist5 0ournal 1 1 #ssue: %n our school district, every year the students have a district spelling list of co!!only used 0ords 0hich they are e7pected to achieve at least B-C !astery on 'y the end of the school year5 =eing the :o!!unication <rts teacher, % ad!inister that test of D$ 0ords to the entire # th
grade at !y school5 These scores are reported to the district office at the end of the school year5 < group of .+ ?" students 0ho have replace!ent reading curriculu! ta4e the spelling test 0ith the Special Education teacher that teaches the! the reading5 %t 0as near the end of the school year, and % as4ed that teacher ho0 the students in her class 0ere doing 0ith the district spelling 0ords5 She told !e to ;ust give the! an B-C for a score5 (er rationale 0as that she 0ould 0or4 0ith the! enough to get the! to the B-C !astery that is re6uired5 The students in her replace!ent reading class did ta4e the test> ho0ever, they did not achieve the B-C5 <nd no0 % have to report false scores to the district office for the # th grade students5 +thical 2uestion: "o % ;ust give those .+ ?" students a score of B-C 0hich is 0hat % 0as told to do 'y their reading teacherE 'rguments o" 3oth Sides: $ive the students the /45 Do not give the students the /45 students have replace!ent curriculu!, therefore have acade!ic needs 0hich !a4e learning D$ spelling 0ords difficult if the students did not truly pass the test, the students should not 'e given the passing score reading teacher is responsi'le for their score, and % si!ply report score given 'y a colleague % 0ould 4no0ingly 'e reporting false scores to !y district office reading teacher clai!s that she 0ill 0or4 on the spelling 0ords 0ith the students therefore it is her duty to do so and 0ho a! % to say that she didnt do that not all students are capa'le of passing a spelling test of D$ 0ords, and that should 'e accepta'le in certain circu!stances % cannot prove that the reading teacher gave false scores> % need to trust !y colleague students have replace!ent reading curriculu! and !ay'e need to have a !odified e7pectation for these district spelling 0ords sho0ing that all students achieve the B-C is the districts goal 0hich 0e are all 0or4ing to !eet it is 0rong to ;ust give the! an B-C reporting the scores of B-C, 4eeps the peace 'et0een the regular classroo! teacher and the Special Education teacher WTS 9 page 9 of 12 Decision: <fter tal4ing 0ith !y # th grade tea! of teachers and !y principal, % decided to give the students the score of B-C5 (o0ever, % !ade note on !y spreadsheet of data that those .+ ?" students 0ere given a !odified test 0ith the Special Education teacher5 % !ade this decision 'ased on t0o reasons5 8ne, % could not prove that she didnt 0or4 0ith the students on this list of 0ords in a !anner that 0ould allo0 the! to achieve !astery5 T0o, it is not appropriate for !e to ;udge the practice of !y colleague therefore % reported the infor!ation that 0as given to !e 'y the Special Education teacher5 This decision 0as a conse6uential one5 %t 0as decided 'ased on the rightness or 0rongness of an action and done so to produce the !ost good5 0ournal 1 2 #ssue: <n E=" 2E!otional =ehavior "isorder3 student of !y ho!eroo! 0as in his !ath class and 0as having a 'ad day5 <t the end of class, he !ade a co!!ent aloud to the other students, @% a! going to 'ring a gun to school and get all of you5A (e then turns to one particular student and says, @and % a! going to 'egin 0ith you5A The E=" teacher and principal 0ere called to the classroo!5 =ecause it 0as lunchti!e, all the other # th grade students follo0ed routine and left the roo! to go to lunch5 The principal tal4ed to the student5 The E=" student !ade a choice to re;oin his class!ates5 Therefore, he 0ent to lunch and out to recess, and he continued the rest of the day as if nothing happened5 The principal did tal4 to the one particular student to ensure that she felt safe at school5 That student replied, @% 4no0 that he didnt really !ean 0hat he said5A +thical 2uestion: Should there 'e !ore of a conse6uence i!ple!ented in this situationE 'rguments o" 3oth Sides: 6onse7uence should be implemented 8o conse7uence is necessar9 Threats such as this are to 'e ta4en very seriously and action is necessary Student has a 'ehavior disorder and does not understand and handle a situation the sa!e as the regular education students <ll students need to see that action is ta4en 0hen threatening co!!ents such as this are !ade 'y any student rincipal had a conversation 0ith the student and a decision 0as !ade therefore 0e are e7pected to follo0 that decision The safety of the student 'ody should 'e the nu!'er one priority rincipal ensured that the one particular student did feel safe <t the very least, the student should have 'een re!oved fro! the others for lunch and recess ti!e %t 0ould not 'e appropriate to !a4e an e7a!ple of an E=" student to all other students in this situation "ue process is essential to !aintain a free society 0hich in this situation 0ould !ean a safe environ!ent at school Reha'ilitation is very different for an E=" student in this situation "ue process needs to 'e altered in this situation 'ecause of the students disa'ility even though it is difficult for the other students to rationali)e that WTS 9 page 14 of 12 Decision: The decision !ade 'y the principal 0as carried out> no other conse6uences 0ere i!ple!ented5 <s a classroo! teacher 0ith +$ other students in !y roo!, % had a very difficult ti!e ;ustifying this decision to !yself5 % didnt agree 0ith the decision5 The threatening co!!ents should 'e ta4en seriously for the safety of all students5 The decision !a4ing 'y the principal 0as a conse6uentialist 0ay of thin4ing 0hich 0as the rightness and 0rongness of the particular action of this particular student5 My 'elief 0ith this situation is a nonconse6uentialist 0ay of thin4ing5 The rule is as it stands, and all students should face a conse6uence if they !a4e a threating co!!ent to another student5 WTS 9 page 11 of 12 'rti"act 3: Debate 'ssignment <rtifact = sho0s a chart outlining the pros and cons for the de'ate issue assign!ent5 #ssue 11) : #s the #nclusive 6lassroom ;odel Wor<able= >es 8o .99- F %ndividuals 0ith "isa'ilities Education <ct 2%"E<3 'egan an @inclusive schoolsA !ove!ent disa'led children have a right to and can 'enefit fro! inclusion in regular educational environ!ent Mara Sapon-Shevin says, @inclusion creates a society in 0hich all children and their fa!ilies feel 0elco!ed and valuedA inclusion 'enefits all students 'y helping the! understand and appreciate that the 0orld is 'ig, people are different, and that 0e can 0or4 together to find solutions that 0or4 for everyone inclusive classroo!s foster a cli!ate 0here students 4no0 they 0ill not 'e a'andoned 0hen they e7perience in;ustice 'enefits for students 0ith disa'ilitiesG friendships, greater opportunities for interactions, having peer role !odels, higher e7pectations, greater access to general curriculu!, increased achieve!ent of %E goals 'enefits for students 0ithout disa'ilitiesG friendships, increased appreciation and acceptance of diversity, respect for all people, preparation for adult life in an inclusive society, opportunities to !aster activities 'y teaching others learning to live together in a de!ocratic society is one of the !ost i!portant goals and outco!es of inclusive classroo!s students learn to support class!ates in a students are included in large classes 0ith inade6uate support !ost of the effectiveness for inclusive classroo!s has 'een 'uilt around sociali)ation Wade <5 :arpenter says, @inclusion is not li4ely to 0or4 if 0e insist on including the victi!i)ers 0ith the victi!sA 0e need to provide alternatives for those 4ids 0ho dont 0ant to 'e in schools and detract fro! the education of those 0ho do teachers need !ore support and 4ids need !ore teachers for inclusion to 'e effective Wade <5 :arpenter suggests that there 'e no !ore than .$ 4ids per class in an inclusive setting teacher attitude and training is crucial evidence suggests that general education teachers feel unprepared to serve students 0ith disa'ilities, have little ti!e availa'le to colla'orate, and !a4e fe0 acco!!odations for students 0ith special needs successful inclusion re6uires funda!ental change in the organi)ational structures of schools and in the roles and responsi'ilities of the teachers evidence suggests that 'oth general and special educators feel inade6uately prepared to serve students 0ith disa'ilities in the general education classroo! teachers report lac4 of support regarding ti!e, training, personnel, WTS 9 page 12 of 12 caring co!!unity &ids Together, %nc5 states, @there is not any research that sho0s any negative effects fro! inclusion done appropriately 0ith the necessary supports and services for students to actively participate and achieve %E goals in this age of accounta'ility and the role of testing, it is i!portant for teachers to ensure that every student is receiving the appropriate standards and o';ectives across the curriculu! inclusive education can 'e a !ore efficient use of a schools resources such as staff and !aterials> separate settings involve duplicate resources that are costly for schools <ccording to the U5S5 "ept5 of Education, researchers have found that nondisa'led students 0ho have opportunities to interact 0ith students 0ith disa'ilities hold !ore positive and accepting attitudes to0ard the! than do students 0ho have not had such opportunities interactions 'et0een disa'led and non- disa'led students can also reduce nondisa'led students fear of students 0ith a severe disa'ility students 0ith disa'ilities 0ould 'e engaged in activities that are acco!!odated to their a'ility level in the general education classroo! !aterials, class si)e, and severity of disa'ilities there is an increasing nu!'er of special education students 0hich increases the caseloads of special education teachers the needs of the students !ay not 'e !et 'ecause of large class si)es, increasing de!ands, and fe0er resources if the special education students are clustered in one class, it creates a su'co!!unity of nonlearners> ho0ever if the students are evenly distri'uted, it is difficult to schedule special education staff and support caution for i!ple!enting inclusion is suggested until acco!!odations and adaptations are in place for the students 0ith disa'ilities