Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Do Tuyen Tinh (Rev)
Do Tuyen Tinh (Rev)
Do Tuyen Tinh (Rev)
Approved
Appraiser Name:
Checked
Issued
Gage ID.:
Equipment Characteristic:
Equipment Resolution:
Equipment Size:
Study Date:
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
10.000
2.700
5.100
5.800
7.600
9.100
2.500
3.900
5.700
7.700
9.300
2.400
4.200
5.900
7.800
9.500
2.500
5.000
5.900
7.700
9.000
2.700
3.800
6.000
7.800
9.400
2.300
3.900
6.100
7.800
9.500
2.500
3.900
6.000
7.800
9.500
2.500
3.900
6.100
7.700
9.500
2.400
3.900
6.400
7.800
10
2.400
4.000
6.300
11
2.600
4.100
12
2.400
2.4917
Trial
Reference Value
Average
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
X
Y
0.70
1.10
-0.20
-0.40
-0.90
0.50
-0.10
-0.30
-0.30
-0.70
0.40
0.20
-0.10
-0.20
-0.50
0.50
1.00
-0.10
-0.30
-1.00
0.70
-0.20
0.00
-0.20
-0.60
0.30
-0.10
0.10
-0.20
-0.50
0.50
-0.10
0.00
-0.20
-0.50
0.50
-0.10
0.10
-0.30
-0.50
9.600
0.40
-0.10
0.40
-0.20
-0.40
7.500
9.200
10
0.40
0.00
0.30
-0.50
-0.80
6.000
7.600
9.300
11
0.60
0.10
0.00
-0.40
-0.70
3.800
6.100
7.700
9.400
12
0.40
-0.20
0.10
-0.30
-0.60
4.1250
6.0250
7.7083
9.3583
0.4917
0.1250
0.0250
-0.2917
-0.6417
Slope, a =
-0.1342
Intercept, b =
0.7467
Part Part
Y/n
X/n
Y2
Bias
Part
Bias Average
Remark :
Number of part, g =
alpha, =
Number of trails, m =
12
tgm-2,1-/2 =
gm =
60
0.05
R =
0.2451
2.0017
Upper bound
0.5881
0.2876
0.0050
-0.2491
-0.4853
Best fit
0.4783
0.2100
-0.0583
-0.3267
-0.5950
Lower bound
0.3686
0.1324
-0.1217
-0.4043
-0.7047
Linearity Plot
12.0000
ECO Co. Ltd
Syx =
1/2
Average
Bias = 0
Bias Average
Linear (Upper bound)
Linear (Best fit)
Linear (Lower bound)
0
0
Reference Value
0.8000
8.0000
Bias = 0
0.3000
6.0000
Bias
10.0000
4.0000
2.0000
-0.2000 2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
-0.7000
0.0000
2.000
4.000
6.000
8.000
Reference Value
10.000
12.000
-1.2000
Reference Value
Interpretation: When the RED center line falls entirely within the BLUE limits, Linearity is acceptable.
H0: a = 0
H0: b = 0
Acceptable
H1: b 0
Not acceptable
H1: a 0
ta =
11.991
tb =
10.060
ta tgm-2,1-/2
tb tgm-2,1-/2
ta > tgm-2,1-/2
tb > tgm-2,1-/2
Final conclusion
2/2