1. The document discusses data dictionaries, which are organized listings of all pertinent data elements in a system with precise definitions so that users and analysts share a common understanding.
2. It describes the need for a standardized notation in data dictionaries to concisely define complex data elements and their composition.
3. Standard notations are presented, including using "L" to mean "is defined as" and symbols to represent composition, optional/alternative elements, comments, and other definitions.
1. The document discusses data dictionaries, which are organized listings of all pertinent data elements in a system with precise definitions so that users and analysts share a common understanding.
2. It describes the need for a standardized notation in data dictionaries to concisely define complex data elements and their composition.
3. Standard notations are presented, including using "L" to mean "is defined as" and symbols to represent composition, optional/alternative elements, comments, and other definitions.
1. The document discusses data dictionaries, which are organized listings of all pertinent data elements in a system with precise definitions so that users and analysts share a common understanding.
2. It describes the need for a standardized notation in data dictionaries to concisely define complex data elements and their composition.
3. Standard notations are presented, including using "L" to mean "is defined as" and symbols to represent composition, optional/alternative elements, comments, and other definitions.
Data Dictionaries Dictionaries are like watches; the worst is better than none, and the best cannot be expected to go quite true! "" #rs $rio%%i Anecdotes of Samuel Johnson, &'() Contents & *ntroduction + ,he need -or data dictionary notation . Data dictionary notation .& De-initions .+ /lementary Data /lements .. 0ptional Data /lements .1 *teration .2 Selection .) Aliases 1 Showing the data dictionary to the user 2 *mplementation o- the data dictionary ) Summary ' 3/F/3/45/S ( 67/S,*04S A4D /8/35*S/S 9 /4D40,/S Introduction IN THIS CHAPTER, YOU WI EARN: & Why we need a data dictionaryin a systems de;elopment pro<ect; + ,he notation -or data dictionary de-initions; . =ow a data dictionary should be presented to the user; and 1 =ow to implement a data dictionary ,he second important modeling tool that we will discuss is the data dictionary ,hough it doesn>t ha;e the glamour and graphical appeal o- data-low diagrams, entity"relationship diagrams, and state"transition diagrams, the data dictionary is crucial Without it, your model o- the user>s requirements cannot possibly be considered complete; all you will ha;e is a rough sketch, an artist>s rendering! o- the system ,he importance o- a data dictionary is o-ten lost on many adults, -or they ha;e not used a dictionary -or &? or +? years ,ry to think back to your elementary school days, when you were constantly besieged with new words in your schoolwork ,hink back also to your -oreign language courses, particularly the ones that required you to read books and maga%ines Without a dictionary, you would ha;e been lost ,he same is true o- a data dictionary in systems analysis: without it, you will be lost, and the user won>t be sure you ha;e understood the details o- the application ,he phrase data dictionary is almost sel-"de-ining ,he data dictionary is an organi%ed listing o- all the data elements that are pertinent to the system, with precise, rigorous de-initions so that both user and systems analyst will ha;e a common understanding o- all inputs, outputs, components o- stores, and intermediate calculations ,he data dictionary de-ines the data elements by doing the -ollowing: Describing the meaning o- the -lows and stores shown in the data-low diagrams Describing the composition o- aggregate packets o- data mo;ing along the -lows, that is, complex packets @such as a customer addressA that can be broken into more elementary items @such as city, state, and postal codeA Describing the composition o- packets o- data in stores Speci-ying the rele;ant values and units o- elementary chunks o- in-ormation in the data-lows and data stores Describing the details o- relationships between stores that are highlighted in an entity"relationship diagram ,his aspect o- the data dictionary will be discussed in more detail in 5hapter &+ a-ter we ha;e introduced the entity"relationship notation The need !or data dictionar" notation *n most real"world systems that you will work on, the packets, or data elements, will be su--iciently complex that you will need to describe them in terms o- other things 5omplex data elements are de-ined in terms o- simpler data elements, and simple data elements are de-ined in terms o- the legitimate units and ;alues they can take on ,hink, -or example, about the way you would respond to the -ollowing question -rom a #artian @which is the way many users think o- systems analystsBA about the meaning o- a person>s na#e: $artian: So what is this thing called a nameC! You @shrugging impatientlyA: Well, you know, it>s <ust a name * mean, like, well, it>s what we call each other! $artian @pu%%ledA: Does that mean you can call them something di--erent when you>re angry than when you>re happyC! You @slightly ama%ed at the ignorance o- this alienA: 4o, o- course not A name is the same all the time A person>s name is what we use to distinguish him or her -rom other people! $artian @suddenly understandingA: Ahh, now * understand We do the same thing on my planet #y name is .&1&29+)2.2(9'9.+.(1)+)1.! You @incredulousA: Dut that>s a number, not a name! $artian: And a ;ery good name it is, too *>m proud o- it 4obody has anything close! You: Dut what about your -irst nameC 0r is your -irst name ., and your last name &1&29+)2.2C! $artian: What>s this about -irst name and last nameC * don>t understand * ha;e only one name, and it>s always the same! You: Well, that>s not the way it works here We ha;e a -irst name, and a last name, and sometimes we ha;e a middle name too! $artian: Does that mean you could be called +. 12 99C! You: 4o, we don>t allow numbers in our names Eou can only use the alphabetic characters A through F! As you can imagine, the con;ersation could continue -or a ;ery long time Eou might think the example is contri;ed, because we rarely run into #artians who ha;e no concept o- the meaning o- a name Dut it is not too -ar -rom the discussions that take place @or should take placeA between a systems analyst and a user, in which the -ollowing questions might be raised: #ust e;eryone ha;e a -irst nameC What about the character #r ,! on the old ,G series, ,he A ,eam!C What about punctuation characters in a person>s last name; -or example, D>Arcy!C Are abbre;iated middle names allowed, -or example, Hohn 8 Hames!C *s there a minimal length required o- a person>s nameC For example, is the name 8 E! legalC @0ne could imagine that it would wreak ha;oc with many computer systems throughout the country, but is there any legalIbusiness reason why a person couldn>t gi;e himsel- a -irst name o- 8 and a last name o- ECA =ow should we treat the su--ixes that sometimes -ollow a last nameC For example, the name Hohn Hones, Hr! is presumably legitimate, but is the Hr to be considered part o- the last name or a special new categoryC And i- it is a new category, shouldn>t we allow numeric digits, too; -or example, Sam Smith .rdC 4ote, by the way, that none o- these questions has anything to do with the way we will e;entually store the in-ormation on a computer; we are simply trying to determine, as a matter o- business policy, what constitutes a ;alid nameJre-K0n the other hand, it is likely that the business policy presently in place has been strongly in-luenced by the computer systems that the organi%ation has been using -or the past .? years Fi-ty years ago, someone might ha;e been considered eccentric i- he decided to call himsel- Fre2d Smi'th! but it probably would ha;e been accepted by most organi%ations, because names were transcribed onto pieces o- paper by human hands /arly computer systems @and most o- the ones in place todayA ha;e a lot more trouble with such nonstandard namesJIre-K As you can imagine, it gets rather tedious describing the composition o- data elements in a rambling narrati;e -orm We need a concise, compact notation, <ust as a standard dictionary like Webster>s has a compact, concise notation -or de-ining the meaning o- ordinary words %ata dictionar" notation ,here are many common notational schemes used by systems analyst ,he one shown below is among the more common, and it uses a number o- simple symbols: L is composed o- M and @ A optional @may be present or absentA N O iteration P Q select one o- se;eral alternati;e choices RR comment S identi-ier @key -ieldA -or a store T @or ;A separates alternati;e choices in the P Q construct As an example, we might de-ine name -or our -riendly #artian as -ollows: na#e L courtes"&tit'e M !irst&na#e M @#idd'e&na#eA M 'ast&na#e courtes"&tit'e L P#r T #iss T #rs T #s T Dr T $ro-essorQ !irst&na#e L N'e(a'&characterO #idd'e&na#e L N'e(a'&characterO 'ast&na#e L N'e(a'&characterO 'e(a'&character L PA"FTa"%T?"9TUT"T T Q As you can see, the symbols look rather mathematical; you may be worried that it>s -ar too complicated to understand As we will soon see, though, the notation is quite easy to read ,he experience o- se;eral thousands o- *, de;elopment pro<ects and se;eral tens o- thousands o- users has shown us that the notation is also quite understandable to almost all users if it is presented properly; we will discuss this in Section &?. %e!initions A de-inition o- a data elementis introduced with the symbol L!; in this context, the L! is read as is de-ined as,! or is composed o-,! or simply means! ,hus, the notation A L ) M C could be read in any o- the -ollowing ways: Whene;er we say A, we mean a ) and a C A is composed o- ) and C A is de-ined as ) and C ,o completely de-ine a data element, our de-inition will include the -ollowing: ,he meaning o- the data element within the context o- this user>s application ,his is usually pro;ided as a comment, using the R R! notation ,he composition o- the data element, i- it is composed o- meaning-ul elementary components ,he legal values that the data element can take on, i- it is an elementary data element that cannot be decomposed any -urther ,hus, i- we were building a medical system that kept track o- patients, we might de-ine the terms *ei(ht and hei(ht in the -ollowing way: weight L R patient>s weight upon admission to the hospital RR units: kilograms; range: &"+??R height L R patient>s height upon admission to the hospital RR units: centimeters; range: +?"+??R 4ote that we ha;e described the rele;ant units and the rele;ant range within matching R! characters Again, this is a notational con;ention that many *, organi%ations -ind use-ul, but it can be changed i- necessary *n addition to the units and range, you may also need to speci-y the accuracy or precision with which the data element is measured For a data element like price, -or example, it is important to indicate whether the ;alues will be expressed in whole dollars, to the nearest penny, and so onJre-K4ot only that, we need to speci-y whether we>re dealing in 7S dollars, 5anadian dollars, Australian dollars, =ong Vong dollars, etcJIre-K And in many engineering and scienti-ic applications, it is important to indicate the number o- signi-icant digits in the ;alue o- data elements E'e#entar" %ata E'e#ents /lementary data elements are those -or which there is no meaning-ul decomposition in the context o- the user>s en;ironment ,his is o-ten a matter o- interpretation and one that you must explore care-ully with the user For example, we ha;e seen in the discussion abo;e that the term name could be decomposed into'ast&na#e, !irst&na#e, #idd'e&na#e, and courtes"&tit'e Dut perhaps in some user en;ironments no such decomposition is necessary, rele;ant, or e;en meaning-ul @ie, where the terms 'ast&na#e, etc., have no meaning to the userA When we ha;e identi-ied elementary data items, they must be entered in the data dictionary As indicated abo;e, the data dictionary should pro;ide a brie- narrati;e comment, enclosed within R! characters, describing the meaning o- the term within the user>s context 0- course, there will be some terms that are sel-"de-ining, that is, terms whose meaning is uni;ersally the same -or all in-ormation systems, or where the systems analyst might agree that no -urther elaboration is necessary For example, the -ollowing might be considered sel-"de-ining terms in a system that maintains in-ormation about people: current&hei(ht current&*ei(ht date&o!&+irth se, ho#e&phone&nu#+er *n these cases, no narrati;e comment is necessary; many systems analysts will use the notation RR! to indicate a null comment! when the data element is sel-" de-ining =owe;er, it is important to speci-y the ;alues and units o- measure that the elementary data item can take on For example: current&*ei(ht L RR Runits: pounds; range: &"1??R current&hei(ht L RR Runits: inches; range: &"9)R date&o!&+irth L RR Runits: days since Han &, &9??; range: ?".)2??R se, L R;alues: P# T FQR Optiona' %ata E'e#ents An optional data element, as the phrase implies, is one that may or may not be present as a component o- a composite data element ,here are many examples o- optional data elements in in-ormation systems: A customer>s name may or may not include a middle name A customer>s street address may or may not include such secondary in-ormation as an apartment number A customer>s order may contain a billing address, a shipping address, or possibly both Situations like the last one must be care-ully ;eri-ied with the user and must be accurately documented in the data dictionary For example, the notation custo#er&address L @shippin(&addressA M @+i''in(&addressA means, quite literally, that the customer"address might consist o-: <ust a shipping"address; or <ust a billing"address; or a shipping"address and a billing"address; or neither a shipping"address nor a billing"address ,his last possibility is rather dubious *t is -ar more likely that the user really means that the customer"address must consist o- a shipping"address or a billing"address or both ,his could be expressed in the -ollowing way: custo#er&address L Pshippin(&address T +i''in(&address T shippin(& address M +i''in(&addressQ 0ne could also argue that, in a mail"order business, one always needs a billing address to ensure that the order will be paid -or; a separate shipping address @eg, i- the customer>s accounting department is in a separate locationA is optional ,hus, it is possible that the user>s real business policy is better expressed by custo#er&address L +i''in(&address M @shippin(&addressA Dut o- course the only way to know this is to ask the user and to care-ully explain the implications o- the di--erent notations shown abo;eJre-K,here is one possibility that might explain the absence o- both shipping address and billing address in a customer order: the walk"in customer who wishes to purchase an item and carry it away with him *t is likely that we would want to explicitly identi-y such a customer @by de-ining a new data element called walk"in that could ha;e a ;alue o- true or -alseA because @&A walk"in customers may need to be treated di--erently @-or example, their orders won>t ha;e any shipping chargesA, and @+A it>s a good way to double"check and ensure that the missing shipping"address or billing"address was not a mistakeJIre-K Iteration ,he iteration notation is used to indicate the repeated occurrence o- a component o- a data element *t is read as %ero or more occurrences o-! ,hus, the notation order L custo#er&na#e M shippin(&address M N ite# O means that an order must always contain a customer"name, and must always contain a shipping"address, and will also contain zero or more occurrences o- an ite# ,hus, we may be dealing with a customer who places an order in;ol;ing only one item or two items, or someone on a shopping binge who decides to order .9' di--erent itemsJre-KVeep in mind once again that we are de-ining the intrinsic business meaning o- a data element without regard to the technology that will e;entually be used to implement it /;entually, -or example, our systems designers are likely to ask -or a reasonable upper limit on the number o- di--erent items that can be contained in a single order *n order to make things work e--iciently with our S7$/3W=*F database management system, we>ll ha;e to restrict the number o- items to )1 *t>s unlikely that anyone would want to order more than )1 di--erent items anyway, and i- they do, they can simply place multiple orders! And the user may ha;e his own limitations, based on the paper -orms or printed reports that he deals with; this is part o- the user implementation model, which we will discuss in 5hapter +&JIre-K *n many real"world situations, the user will want to speci-y upper and lower limits to the iteration For instance, in the example abo;e, the user will probably point out that it does not make sense -or a customer to place an order with %ero items; there must be at least one item in the order And the user may want to speci-y an upper limit; perhaps &? items is the most that will be allowed We can indicate upper and lower limits in the -ollowing way: order L custo#er&na#e M shippin(&address M &Nite#O&? *t>s okay to speci-y just a lower limit, or just an upper limit, or both or neither ,hus, all o- the -ollowing are allowable: a L &NbO a L NbO&? a L &NbO&? a L NbO Se'ection ,he selection notation indicates that a data element consists o- exactly one o- a set o- alternati;e choices ,he choices are enclosed by the square brackets P! and Q! and separated by the ;ertical bar T! character ,ypical examples are: se, L P#ale T FemaleQ custo#er&t"pe L PWo;ernment T *ndustry T 7ni;ersity T 0therQ *t is important to re;iew the selection choices with the user to ensure that all possibilities ha;e been identi-ied *n the last example, the user might tend to concentrate her or his attention on the go;ernment,! industry! and uni;ersity! customers, and might require some prodding to remember that some customers -all into the none o- the abo;e! category A'iases An alias, as the term implies, is an alternati;e name -or a data element *t is a common occurrence when dealing with a di;erse group o- users, o-ten in di--erent departments or di--erent geographical locations @and sometimes with di--erent nationalities and di--erent languagesA, who insist on using di--erent names to mean the same thing ,he alias is included in the data dictionary -or completeness, and it is cross"re-erenced to the primary or o--icial data name For example: client L Ralias -or customerR 4ote that the de-inition o- client does not show the composition @ie, it does not show that a client consists o- a name, address, telephone number, etcA All this detail should be pro;ided only -or the primary data name, in order to minimi%e the redundancy in the modelJre-KEou may wish to ignore this ad;ice i- you are using a computeri%ed data dictionary package that can manage and control the redundancy; howe;er, this is -airly uncommon ,he crucial thing to remember is that i- we change the de-inition o- a primary data element @eg, i- we decide that the de-inition o- a customer should no longer include the phone"numberA then the change must apply to all the aliases as wellJIre-K /;en though the data dictionary correctly cross"re-erences the aliases to the primary data name, you should a;oid using aliases whene;er possible ,his is because the data names are usually -irst seen, and are most ;isible to all users, on the data-low diagrams, where it may not be obvious that custo#er and c'ientare aliases for one another *t is -ar better, i- at all possible, to get the users to agree on one common nameJre-KAn alternati;e is to annotate the -low on the data-low diagram to indicate that it is an alias -or something else; an asterisk, -or example, could be appended to the end o- alias names For example, the notation clientR could be used to indicate that client is an alias -or something else Dut e;en this is cumbersomeJIre-K Sho*in( the data dictionar" to the user ,he data dictionary is created by the systems analyst during the de;elopment o- the system model, but the user must be capable o- reading and understanding the data dictionary in order to ;eri-y the model ,his raises some ob;ious questions: Will the users be able to understand the data dictionary notationC =ow should the users ;eri-y that the dictionary is complete and correctC =ow is the dictionary createdC ,he question o- user acceptance o- the dictionary notation is a red herring! in most cases Ees, the dictionary notation looks somewhat mathematical; but, as we ha;e seen, the number o- symbols that the user has to learn are ;ery -ew 7sers are accustomed to a ;ariety o- -ormal notations in their work and personal li-e; consider, -or example, the notation -or musical scores, which is -ar more complex Figure &?&: #usical score notation Similarly, the notation -or bridge, chess, and a ;ariety o- other acti;ities is at least as complex as that o- the data dictionary notation shown in this chapter Figure &?+: 5hess notation ,he question o- user ;eri-ication o- the data dictionary usually leads to this question: Should the users read through the entire dictionary, item by item, to ensure that it is correctC! *t is di--icult to imagine that any user would be willing to do thisB *t is more likely that the user will ;eri-y the correctness o- the data dictionary in conjunction with the dataflow diagram, entity-relationship diagram, state-transition diagram, or process specification that he or she is reading ,here are a number o- correctness! issues that the systems analyst can carry out on his own, without the assistance o- the user: he can ensure that the dictionary is complete, consistent, and non"contradictory ,hus, he can examine the dictionary on his own and ask the -ollowing questions: =as e;ery -low on the data-low diagram been de-ined in the data dictionaryC =a;e all the components o- composite data elements been de-inedC =as any data element been de-ined more than onceC =as the correct notation been used -or all data dictionary de-initionsC Are there any data elements in the data dictionary that are not re-erenced in the data-low diagrams, entity"relationship diagrams, or state"transition diagramsC I#p'e#entation o! the data dictionar" 0n a medium" or large"si%ed system, the data dictionary can represent a -ormidable amount o- work *t is not uncommon to see a data dictionary with se;eral thousand entries, and e;en a relati;ely simple system will ha;e se;eral hundred entries ,hus, some thought must be gi;en to the way the dictionary will be de;eloped, or the task is likely to o;erwhelm the systems analyst ,he easiest approach is to make use o- an automated @computeri%edA -acility to enter dictionary de-initions, check them -or completeness and consistency, and produce appropriate reports *- your organi%ation is using any modern database management system @eg, DD+, 0racle, Sybase, #icroso-t AccessA, a dictionary -acility is already a;ailable *n this case, you should take ad;antage o- the -acility and use it to build your data dictionary =owe;er, beware o- the -ollowing potential limitations: Eou may be -orced to limit your data namesto a certain length @eg, &2 or .+ charactersA ,his probably won>t be a ma<or problem, but you may -ind that your user may insist on a name such as destination&o!& custo#er&ship#ent and that your data dictionary package -orces you to abbre;iate the name to dest&o!&cust&ship 0ther arti-icial limitations may be placed on the name For example, the hyphen character "! may not be allowed, and you may be -orced to use the underscore X! character instead 0r you may be -orced to pre-ix @or su--ixA all your names with a pro<ect code indicating the name o- the systems de;elopment pro<ect, leading to such names as acct-pa"-.H/012P11-3endor4phone4nu#+er Eou may be -orced to assign physical attributes @eg, the number o- bytes, or blocks o- disk storage, or such data representations as packed decimalA to an item o- data, e;en though it is not a matter o- user policy ,he data dictionary discussed in this chapter should be an analysis dictionary and should not require unnecessary or irrele;ant implementation decisions Some systems analysts are also beginning to use automated toolkit packages that include graphic -acilities -or data-low diagrams, and the like, as well as data dictionary capabilities Again, i- such a -acility exists, you should make use o- it Automated toolkits are discussed in more detail in Appendix A *- you ha;e no automated -acility -or building the data dictionary, you should at least be able to use a con;entional word"processing system to build a text -ile o- data dictionary de-initions 0r, i- you ha;e access to a personal computer, you can use any o- the common -ile"management and database management programs @eg, #icroso-t Access -or Windows"based computers, or File#aker -or #acintosh computersA to construct and manage your data dictionary 0nly in the most extreme case should you resort to a manual data dictionary, that is, separate, ."by"2 index cards -or each dictionary entry ,his was o-ten necessary, prior to the &99?s; e;en when $5s were already widely deployed, it was discouraging to see how many organi%ations kept their programmers and systems analysts in the Dark Ages ,he cobbler>s children, as the saying goes, are usually the last to get shoes Dut today, it is un-orgi;able; i- you are working on a pro<ect where you do not ha;e access to a data dictionary package or an automated analyst>s toolkit or a personal computer or a word processing system, then you should @&A quit and -ind a better <ob, or @+A get your own personal computer, or @.A both o- the abo;e Su##ar" Duilding a data dictionary is one o- the more tedious, time"consuming aspects o- systems analysis Dut it is also one o- the more important aspects: without a -ormal dictionary that de-ines the meaning o- all the terms, there can be no hope -or precision *n the next chapter, we will see how to use the data dictionary and the data-low diagram to build process speci-ications -or each o- the bottom"le;el processes RE5ERENCES & HD Yomax, Data Dictionary Systems 3ochelle $ark, 4H: 455 $ublications, &9'' + ,om De#arco, Structured Analysis and Systems Specification 4ew Eork: E073D04 $ress, &9'9 . D Vroenke, Database rocessing 5hicago: Science 3esearch Associates, &9'' 1 Shaku Atre, Data !ase" Structured #echni$ues for Design, erformance, and %anagement 4ew Eork: Wiley, &9(? 6UESTIONS AN% E7ERCISES & Wi;e a de-inition o- data dictionary + Why is a data dictionary important in systems analysisC . What in-ormation does a data dictionary pro;ide about a data elementC 1 What is the meaning o- the L! notation in a data dictionaryC 2 What is the meaning o- the M! notation in a data dictionaryC ) What is the meaning o- the @ A! notation in a data dictionaryC ' What is the meaning o- the N O! notation in a data dictionaryC ( What is the meaning o- the P T T Q! notation in a data dictionaryC 9 Do you think the users you work with can understand the standard data dictionary notation pro;ided in this chapterC *- not, can you suggest an alternati;eC &? Wi;e an example o- an elementary data item && Wi;e three examples o- optional data elements &+ What are the possible meanings o- the -ollowing: @aA address L @cityA M @stateA @bA address L street"address M city M @stateA M @%ipcodeA &. Wi;e an example o- the use o- the iteration NO notation &1 What is the meaning o- each o- the -ollowing notations: @aA a L &NbO @bA a L NbO&? @cA a L &NbO&? @dA a L &?NbO&? &2 Does it make sense to ha;e an order de-ined in the -ollowing wayC Why or why notC order 8 custo#er&na#e 9 shippin(&address 9 :;ite#< &) Wi;e an example o- the selection @P Q !A construct &' What is the meaning o- an alias in a data dictionaryC &( Why should the use o- aliases be minimi%ed where;er possibleC &9 What kind o- annotation can be used on a DFD to indicate that a data element is an aliasC +? What are the three ma<or issues when a user looks at a data dictionaryC +& Do you think the users in your organi%ation will be able to understand data dictionary notationC ++ Do you think that the data dictionary notation shown in this chapter is more complex or less complex than musical notationC +. What are the three error"checking acti;ities that the systems analyst can carry out on a data dictionary without the userC +1 What are the likely limitations o- an automated data dictionary packageC +2 Wi;e a data dictionary de-inition o- customer"name based on the -ollowing ;erbal speci-ication -rom a user: When we record a customer>s name, we>re ;ery care-ul to include a courtesy title ,his can be either #r,! #iss,! #s,! #rs,! or Dr! @,here are lots o- other titles like $ro-essor,! Sir,! etc, but we don>t bother with themA /;ery one o- our customers has a -irst name, but we allow a single initial i- they pre-er #iddle names are optional And o- course, the last name is required; we allow a pretty broad range o- last names, including names that ha;e hyphens @Smith"Frisby,! -or exampleA and apostrophes @D>Arcy!A and so -orth We e;en allow an optional su--ix, to allow -or things like ,om Smith, Hr! or =ar;ey Shmrdlu .rd! +) What is wrong with the -ollowing data dictionary de-initions: @aA a L b c d @bA a L b M M c @cA a L Nb @dA a L 1NbO. @eA a L NxA @-A x L @@yAA @gA p L 1N)NyO(O) +' *n the hospital example o- Section 9+, what are the implications o- the de-inition o- height and weightC 5omment: *t would imply that we are only measuring in integral units and are not keeping track o- -ractional centimeters, and so on +( Write a data dictionary de-inition o- the in-ormation contained on your dri;er>s license *- you don>t ha;e a dri;er>s license, -ind a -riend who does +9 Write a data dictionary de-inition o- the in-ormation contained on a typical bank credit card @eg, #aster5ard or GisaA .? Write a data dictionary de-inition o- the in-ormation contained in a passport .& Write a data dictionary de-inition o- the in-ormation contained in a lottery ticket EN%NOTES Jre-erencesIK 3etrie;ed -rom Zhttp:IIyourdoncomIstrucanalysisIwikiIindexphpC titleL5hapterX&?[oldidL1+&.Z ,his page was last modi-ied on &) #arch +?&?, at &.:.? ,his page has been accessed 99,2(? times