Elizabeth Kent is accused of lying and committing perjury in federal court regarding a legal proceeding involving her late husband's estate. Court documents were filed over 60 days late, the next business day after Kent allegedly lied in court, claiming $18,000 was owed rather than the $112,000 others claimed. The documents support accusations that Kent lied in court due to greed over her husband's estate. She also refused to sign an affidavit of forgery because it would have exposed her lies.
2010-07-19 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against Judge John Segal, Clerk John Clarke, Attorney David Pasternak, Los Angeles Superior Court - in Re: Public Corruption in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) - real estate fraud by the court s
George C. Reeves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Roone Arledge, and Everett Erlick v. Joseph O. Giaimo, Counterclaim-Defendant, 719 F.2d 602, 2d Cir. (1983)
Elizabeth Kent is accused of lying and committing perjury in federal court regarding a legal proceeding involving her late husband's estate. Court documents were filed over 60 days late, the next business day after Kent allegedly lied in court, claiming $18,000 was owed rather than the $112,000 others claimed. The documents support accusations that Kent lied in court due to greed over her husband's estate. She also refused to sign an affidavit of forgery because it would have exposed her lies.
Elizabeth Kent is accused of lying and committing perjury in federal court regarding a legal proceeding involving her late husband's estate. Court documents were filed over 60 days late, the next business day after Kent allegedly lied in court, claiming $18,000 was owed rather than the $112,000 others claimed. The documents support accusations that Kent lied in court due to greed over her husband's estate. She also refused to sign an affidavit of forgery because it would have exposed her lies.
Elizabeth Kent is accused of lying and committing perjury in federal court regarding a legal proceeding involving her late husband's estate. Court documents were filed over 60 days late, the next business day after Kent allegedly lied in court, claiming $18,000 was owed rather than the $112,000 others claimed. The documents support accusations that Kent lied in court due to greed over her husband's estate. She also refused to sign an affidavit of forgery because it would have exposed her lies.
This is a part of the public record. This is a part of the
proceeding involving Elizabeth J L Kent after her husband died, including involvement of NBD, First Chicago NBD and or Chase HEREIN REFERRED TO AS CHASE. The Date of filing is significant. It was over 60 days after a suit was filed (well past the time for default) and the next business day after Elizabeth Kent, lied and committed perjury on this subject matter in Federal Court. The amount claimed was $18,000 USD, NOT the $112,000 USD some claimed. This answer was not available to the public until after Elizabeth Kent committed perjury in federal court to support her and her daughters GREED. More to be posted very soon concerning the liar Elizabeth Kent. Oh yes, this woman repeatedly refused to excute an affidavit of forgery (because NBD, First Chicago NBD, and or Chase knew she was a liar).
2010-07-19 Complaint filed with US Attorney Office against Judge John Segal, Clerk John Clarke, Attorney David Pasternak, Los Angeles Superior Court - in Re: Public Corruption in Galdjie v Darwish (SC052737) - real estate fraud by the court s
George C. Reeves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Roone Arledge, and Everett Erlick v. Joseph O. Giaimo, Counterclaim-Defendant, 719 F.2d 602, 2d Cir. (1983)