Industry-Discount Retailing Discount retailing which came into existence in mid 1950s followed model of supermarkets and extended the concept of discounting and selling goods at very low margin to general merchandise. People were ready to try self-service , cheaper buying experience in the US. Discount retailing flourished as a result of this mindset of people. The sales saw an unprecedented growth from $2 billion in 1960 to $68 billion in 1985. This growth trend continued till 2000. But many players entered on local as well as national level to harness the opportunity of the sector and the number of stores increased by 64% with 144% sales growth of the sector. But in late 1970s and early 1980s this growth ceased to only 8% and many large retail chains failed in this period. Company-Walmart Walmart evolved in 1969 although the roots of it can be traced to 1962 when 16 variety stores were opened by Walton and his brother. Regional entry by discount stores compelled them to open 30 discount stores in rural areas of US. It had one third stores located in metropolitan areas and it also enjoyed monopoly in many places where it accounted for 10%-12% of total sales. Due to increase in sales, it gradually increased the size of its stores from 42000 sq. ft. to 100000 sq.ft. It used centralized purchasing system and used in store terminals to wire merchandise request to a central computer which in turn would send request to the distribution center. It maintained a high bargain power with its suppliers and broke their monopoly by purchasing with many. The inbound logistics brought the merchandise in the distribution center and sorting was being done to deliver to stores. In return, trucks used to carry supplies to cut costs. Each distribution center served up to 175 stores within a 150-300 mile radius. Stores ran 12 hours a day and seven days a week generally. Maximum of gross area was used for sales and there was no need to back room storage due to high inventory turns as well as quick logistics of the goods from distribution center to stores. It had all total of 70000 SKUs and it led the industry by installing computerized inventory tracking system.
2. Decision Sheet Identify key decision questions (issues which requires/required strategic intervention) 1. Whether Walmart should focus on Sams wholesale clubs in near future as it is cost cutting also (SG&A expenses reduced)? 2. Sams wholesale clubs have caused 1% decrease in gross margin, a matter of concern for walmart? 3. Discount stores have been backbone for the company in the past and in present also but Sams stores may help in clearing stock pileups, where to focus? 4. There may be Supply chain issue between two types of stores for Walmart as both may compete internally for the goods and services of the company internally? 5. Chances of channel conflict cannot be negated for both type of stores, how to resolve it? 6. Walmart has done exceptionally good in Sams stores as compared to competitors, whether it should focus on it? But it may happen that it may cannibalize its conventional discount stores business.
My decisions (its rationale, feasibility, effects, and tradeoffs): What are my decisions (qualitative and quantitative)? Rationale and feasibility of implementing my decision What is the impact of my decisions and how will it make a difference to my inheritance? What are the trade-offs in the decisions (qualitative and quantitative)?
Walmart should continue operating its discount stores as of now and should focus on Sams stores in smaller areas where customer traffic is high and customers purchasing frequency for particular type of good can be traced.
It is popular in smaller areas with high customer traffic. Can be used as the platform to clear stockpiles in the inventory. Also it will not cannibalize the discount stores operating in urban areas. Both type of stores will run parallel in different demographic areas and conflict will be minimized. Company will be able to generate cash inflows from both type of stores smoothly. Chances of Cannibalizing still exist. Also company may not focus on particular type of store which may cause lack in its effectiveness. Also it should see for viability of Sams stores in various regions as it is also causing lowering of gross margin although SG&A expenses are reduced.
Specify measures to mitigate the negative consequences The company should focus on the Sams stores in smaller areas and discount stores in metropolitans. It should devise a strategy for both type of stores to minimize the supply chain and logistical conflicts and should work on improving both on parallel basis. It should advertise and portray both in such a way that business of one may not eat business of the other type of store.