1) Antonio Ramon Ongsiako was prosecuted for reckless imprudence for colliding with another vehicle after losing control of his car to avoid hitting a bus. The lower courts found him guilty and sentenced him to jail time and damages.
2) Ongsiako appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that the lower courts made errors in their measurements and findings that were important to determining his negligence.
3) The Supreme Court agreed that the lower courts made mistakes. It found that the actual distance Ongsiako had to avoid the collision was 150 feet, not 150 meters as the lower courts claimed, which was not enough time. The Supreme Court reversed the criminal liability but still required Ongsi
G.R. No. L-69901 July 31, 1987 ANTONIO RAMON ONGSIAKO, Petitioner, Intermediate Appellate Court and The People of The Philippines, Respondents. CRUZ, J.
1) Antonio Ramon Ongsiako was prosecuted for reckless imprudence for colliding with another vehicle after losing control of his car to avoid hitting a bus. The lower courts found him guilty and sentenced him to jail time and damages.
2) Ongsiako appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that the lower courts made errors in their measurements and findings that were important to determining his negligence.
3) The Supreme Court agreed that the lower courts made mistakes. It found that the actual distance Ongsiako had to avoid the collision was 150 feet, not 150 meters as the lower courts claimed, which was not enough time. The Supreme Court reversed the criminal liability but still required Ongsi
1) Antonio Ramon Ongsiako was prosecuted for reckless imprudence for colliding with another vehicle after losing control of his car to avoid hitting a bus. The lower courts found him guilty and sentenced him to jail time and damages.
2) Ongsiako appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that the lower courts made errors in their measurements and findings that were important to determining his negligence.
3) The Supreme Court agreed that the lower courts made mistakes. It found that the actual distance Ongsiako had to avoid the collision was 150 feet, not 150 meters as the lower courts claimed, which was not enough time. The Supreme Court reversed the criminal liability but still required Ongsi
1) Antonio Ramon Ongsiako was prosecuted for reckless imprudence for colliding with another vehicle after losing control of his car to avoid hitting a bus. The lower courts found him guilty and sentenced him to jail time and damages.
2) Ongsiako appealed to the Supreme Court arguing that the lower courts made errors in their measurements and findings that were important to determining his negligence.
3) The Supreme Court agreed that the lower courts made mistakes. It found that the actual distance Ongsiako had to avoid the collision was 150 feet, not 150 meters as the lower courts claimed, which was not enough time. The Supreme Court reversed the criminal liability but still required Ongsi
FACTS: Antonio Ramon Ongsiako was prosecuted for reckless imprudence by the trial court for colliding with a jeep owned by Robert Ha when he lost control in avoiding a bus owned by the Philippine Rabbit Bus corporation. The Trial Court sentenced him to 2 months of arresto mayor and pay PHP 143,131.04 for damages. The petitioner appealed and the IAC decreasing the liability to PHP 61,131.04. However, Ongsiako filed to the Supreme Court claiming that the Lower courts erred in their decision since there was errors in the measurements the court recorded and such errors are important to prove that the petitioner is not negligent. Ongsiako claimed that 150 feet is the distance and not 150 meters thus the actual measurement did not give him ample time to avoid the collision.
ISSUE: Whether the lower courts have committed errors in relation to the decision they rendered.
RULING: Yes, by carefully analyzing the records, it is clear that the lower courts are wrong to prosecute the petitioner since the petitioner was not at all negligent. The lower court claims that Ongsiako has adequate time to avoid the jeep but actually that is not the case since 150 feet is not enough to avoid such collision. Also, the Supreme Court also proclaimed that the remark the lower courts said that Ongsiako was stupid for controlling the car to go back to the road was uncalled for since it was clear in the situation and in the records that the petitioner has actually no control and that if there were anyone to blame it would be the driver of the Philippine Rabbit Bus. The Supreme Court reversed and acquitted Ongsiako of his criminal liability but still the latter is compelled to pay civil liability amounting to PHP46,131.04 for the damages.
G.R. No. L-69901 July 31, 1987 ANTONIO RAMON ONGSIAKO, Petitioner, Intermediate Appellate Court and The People of The Philippines, Respondents. CRUZ, J.