Digest Case TAX

Digests
Taxation Law I
Michael Vernon Guerrero Mendiola
2003
Shared under Creative Commons ttri!ution"
#onCommercial"Shareli$e 3%0 &hili''ines license%
Some (ights (eserved%
Ta!le o) Contents
Commissioner vs% lgue* G( L"2++,0* -. /e!ruar0 -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% -
Lu2on Stevedoring Cor'% vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"30232* 2, 3ul0 -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% -
Lut2 vs% raneta* G( L".+4,* 22 Decem!er -,44 1%%%%%%%%% 2
McCollough vs% Mar0land* -. 5S 3-6 7-+-,8 1%%%%%%%%% 2
&anhandle 9il vs% State o) Mississi''i* 2.. 5S 2-+ 7-,2+8 1%%%%%%%%% 3
Commissioner vs% Linga0en Gul) :lectric* G( L"23..-* ; ugust -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% ;
#ational Develo'ment Co% vs% Commissioner* G( L"43,6-* 30 3une -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% ;
Domingo vs% Garlitos* G( L"-+,,3* 2, 3une -,63 1%%%%%%%%% 4
Commissioner vs% Itogon"Su0oc Mines* G( L"242,,* 2, 3ul0 -,6, 1%%%%%%%%% 4
(e'u!lic vs% Mam!ulao Lum!er* G( L"-..24* 2+ /e!ruar0 -,62 1%%%%%%%%% 4
/rancia vs% Intermediate ''ellate Court* G( L"6.6;,* 2+ 3une -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% 6
Caltex &hili''ines vs% Commission on udit 7C98* G( ,24+4* + Ma0 -,,2 1%%%%%%%%% .
Cu 5n<ieng vs% &atstone* G( -624;* 2- /e!ruar0 -,22 1%%%%%%%%% .
Villegas vs* =iu Chiong Tsai &ao =o* G( L"2,6;6* -0 #ovem!er -,.+ 1%%%%%%%%%+
'ostolic &re)ect o) Mountain &rovince vs% Cit0 Treasurer o) >aguio Cit0* G( ;.242* -+ 'ril -,;- 1%%%%%%%%% +
&hili''ine irlines vs% :du* =( L";-3+3* -4 ugust -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% ,
&rogressive Develo'ment Cor'oration vs% ?ue2on Cit0* G( 360+-* 2; 'ril -,+, 1%%%%%%%%% ,
merican Mail Line vs% >asilan* G( L"-26;.* 3- Ma0 -,6- 1%%%%%%%%% -0
Saldana vs% Iloilo* G( L"-0;.0* 26 3une -,4+ 1%%%%%%%%% -0
Com'ania General de To!acos de /ili'inas vs% Manila* G( L"-66-,* 2, 3une -,63 1%%%%%%%%% --
&hili''ine cet0lene Co% Inc% vs% Commissioner* G( L"-,.0.* -. ugust -,6. 1%%%%%%%%% --
Commissioner vs% merican (u!!er* G( L"-,66.* 2, #ovem!er -,66 1%%%%%%%%% -2
Commissioner vs% Gotamco* G( L"3-0,2* 2. /e!ruar0 -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% -2
&ascual vs% Secretar0 o) &u!lic @or$s and Communications* G( L"-0;04* 2, Decem!er -,60 1%%%%%%%%% -3
(e'u!lic vs% >acolod"Murcia Milling Co%* G( L"-,+2;"26* , 3ul0 -,,, 1%%%%%%%%% -3
3-st In)antr0 &ost :xchange vs% &osadas* G( 33;03* ; Se'tem!er -,30 1%%%%%%%%% -;
@ells /argo vs% Collector o) Internal (evenue* G( ;6.20* 2+ 3une -,;0 1%%%%%%%%% -4
&hili''ine Match Co% Ltd% vs% Ce!u Cit0* G( L"30.;4* -+ 3anuar0 -,.+ 1%%%%%%%%% -4
Commissioner vs% >ritish 9verseas irwa0s Cor'%* G( L"64..3".;* 30 'ril -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% -6
Commissioner vs% ir India* G( L".2;;3* 2, 3anuar0 -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% -6
llied Thread vs% Cit0 o) Manila* G( L";02,6* 2- #ovem!er -,+; 1%%%%%%%%% -.
!ra vs% =ernando* G( L";,336* 3- ugust -,+- 1%%%%%%%%% -.
ssociation o) Custom >ro$ers vs% Manila* G( L";3.6* 22 Ma0 -,43 1%%%%%%%%% -+
Aa'atiran ng mga #agliling$od sa &amahalaan vs% Tan* G( L"+-3--* 30 3une -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% -+
Sison vs% ncheta* G( L"4,;3-* 24 3ul0 -,+; 1%%%%%%%%% -,
3uan Luna Su!division vs% Sarmiento* G( L"343+* 2+ Ma0 -,42 1%%%%%%%%% -,
Shell Co% vs% Vano* G( L"60,3* 2; /e!ruar0 -,4;1%%%%%%%%% 20
Victorias Milling Co% vs% Munici'alit0 o) Victorias* G( L"2--+3* 2. Se'tem!er -,6+ 1%%%%%%%%% 20
&unsalan vs% Manila* G( L";+-.* 26 Ma0 -,4; 1%%%%%%%%% 2-
9rmoc Sugar vs% Treasurer o) 9rmoc Cit0* G( L"23.,;* -. /e!ruar0 -,6+ 1%%%%%%%%% 2-
&e'si"Cola >ottling Co% vs% Cit0 o) >utuan* G( L"22+-;* 2+ ugust -,6+ 1%%%%%%%%% 22
Vera vs% Cuevas* G( L"336,3",;* 3- Ma0 -,., 1%%%%%%%%% 22
merican >i!le Societ0 vs% Manila* G( L",63.* 30 'ril -,4. 1%%%%%%%%% 23
Caga0an :lectric &ower B Light Co% vs% Commissioner* G( L"60-26* 24 Se'tem!er -,+4 1%%%%%%%%% 23
Casanovas vs% =ord* G( L"3;.3* 22 March -,0. 1%%%%%%%%% 2;
Churchill vs% Conce'cion* G( --4.2* 22 Se'tem!er -,-6 1%%%%%%%%% 2;
Villanueva vs% Iloilo Cit0* G( L"2642-* 2+ Decem!er -,6+ 1%%%%%%%%% 24
:astern Theatrical Co% vs% l)onso* G( L"--0;* 3- Ma0 -,;; 1%%%%%%%%% 24
(e0es vs% lman2or* G( ;,+3,";6* 26 'ril -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% 26
!ra Valle0 College vs% Cuino* G( L"3,0+6* -4 3une -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% 26
=errera vs% ?ue2on Cit0 >oard o) ssessment ''eals* G( L"-42.0* 30 Se'tem!er -,6- 1%%%%%%%%% 2.
Lladoc vs% Commissioner* G( L"-,20-* -6 3une -,64 1%%%%%%%%% 2.
>isho' o) #ueva Segovia vs% &rovincial >oard o) Ilocos #orte* G( 2.4++* 3- Decem!er -,2. 1%%%%%%%%% 2+
Commisioner vs% >isho' o) Missioner0 District o) the &hili''ine Islands* G( L"-,;;4* 3- ugust -,64 1%%%%%%%%% 2+
=odges vs% Iloilo Cit0* G( L"-+-2,* 3- 3anuar0 -,631%%%%%%%%% 2,
&rocter and Gam!le vs% 3agna* G( L"2;264* 2+ Decem!er -,., 1%%%%%%%%% 2,
Commissioner vs% Lednic$0* G( L"-+-6,* 3- 3ul0 -,6; 1%%%%%%%%% 30
Commissioner vs% 3avier* G( .+,43* 3- 3ul0 -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% 30
Meralco vs% Vera* G( L"2,,+.* 22 9cto!er -,.4 1%%%%%%%%% 3-
Commissioner vs% Manila 3oc$e0 Clu!* G( L"+.44* 23 March -,46 1%%%%%%%%% 3-
SSS vs% >acolod Cit0* G( L"34.26* 2- 3ul0 -,+2 1%%%%%%%%% 32
#ita)an vs% Commissioner* G( L".+.+0* 23 3ul0 -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% 32
Commissioner vs% (o!ertson* G( L".0--6"-,* -2 ugust -,+6 1%%%%%%%%% 32
(eagan vs% Commissioner* G( L"263.,* 2. Decem!er -,6, 1%%%%%%%%% 33
Davao Light and &ower vs% Commissioner o) Customs* G( L"2+.3, and L"2+,02 1%%%%%%%%% 33
Surigao Consolidated Mining vs% Collector* G( L"-;+.+* 26 Decem!er -,63 1%%%%%%%%% 3;
@onder Mechanical :ngineering vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"22+04 and L"2.+4+* 30 3une -,.4 1%%%%%%%%% 34
Visa0as Ce!u Terminal vs% Commissioner* G( L"-,430 and L"-,;;;* 2. /e!ruar0 -,64 1%%%%%%%%% 34
Lealda :lectric vs% Commissioner* G( L"-6;2+* 30 'ril -,63 1%%%%%%%%% 36
Misamis 9riental vs% Caga0an :lectric* G( ;4344* -2 3anuar0 -,,0 1%%%%%%%%% 36
=ilado vs% Collector* G( L",;0+* 3- 9cto!er -,46 1%%%%%%%%% 3.
Commissioner vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( ;;00.* 20 March -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% 3.
Maceda vs% Macaraig* G( ++2,-* 3- Ma0 -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% 3+
Commissioner vs% &hoenix ssurance* G( L"-,.2.* 20 Ma0 -,64 1%%%%%%%%% 3,
Commissioner vs% Connel >ros% Co%* G( L"2..42"43* 30 ugust -,.- 1%%%%%%%%% 3,
Commissioner vs% /iremanDs /und Insurance* G( L"306;;* , March -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% ;0
Commissioner vs% Ce!u &ortland Cement* G( L"2,04,* -4 Decem!er -,+. 1%%%%%%%%% ;0
(e'u!lic vs% Vda% de /ernande2* G( L",-;-* 24 Se'tem!er -,46 1%%%%%%%%% ;-
Tanada vs% Tuvera* G( L"63,-4* 2; 'ril -,+4 1%%%%%%%%% ;-
>agatsing vs% (amire2* G( L";-63-* -. Decem!er -,.6 1%%%%%%%%% ;2
Commissioner vs% >urroughs Ltd%* G( L"6643* -, 3une -,+6 1%%%%%%%%% ;2
Commissioner vs% Mega General Merchandise* G( L"6,-36* 30 Se'tem!er -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% ;3
Commissioner vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( -0+34+* 20 3anuar0 -,,4 1%%%%%%%%% ;3
Commissioner vs% Court o) ''eals* G( --,.6-* 2, ugust -,,6 1%%%%%%%%% ;;
>S"C># >roadcating vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"42306* -2 9cto!er -,+- 1%%%%%%%%% ;;
In (: Eialcita* M ,0"6"0-4"SC* -+ 9cto!er -,,0 1%%%%%%%%% ;4
Commissioner vs% Court o) ''eals* G( ,60-6* -. 9cto!er -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% ;4
>orromeo vs% Civil Service Commission* G( ,6032* 3- 3ul0 -,,- 1%%%%%%%%% ;6
:sso Standard :astern vs% Commissioner* G( 2+40+",* . 3ul0 -,+, 1%%%%%%%%% ;6
Guagua :lectric Light &lant Co% vs% Collector* G( L"236--* 2; 'ril -,6. 1%%%%%%%%% ;.
(e'u!lic vs% Limaco and De Gu2man Commercial Co%* G( L"-30+-* 3- ugust -,62 1%%%%%%%%% ;.
Inter'rovincial uto!us Co% vs% Collector o) Internal (evenue* G( L"6.;-* 3- 3anuar0 -,46 1%%%%%%%%% ;+
Tan Guan vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"236.6* 2. 'ril -,6. 1%%%%%%%%% ;,
Da0rit vs% Cru2* G( L"3,,-0* 26 Se'tem!er -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% ;,
Collector vs% >eni'a0o* G( L"-3646* 3- 3anuar0 -,62 1%%%%%%%%% 40
Meralco Securities Cor'% vs% Savellano* G( L"36-+-* 23 9cto!er -,+21%%%%%%%%% 40
Commissioner vs% !ad* G( L"-,62.* 2. 3une -,6+ 1%%%%%%%%% 4-
Commissioner vs% &rocter B Gam!le &hili''ines* G( L"66+3+* -4 'ril -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% 4-
Cit0 Lum!er vs% Domingo* G( L"-+6--* 30 3anuar0 -,6; 1%%%%%%%%% 42
Villamin vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"--436* 3- 9cto!er -,60 1%%%%%%%%% 42
S0 &o vs% Court o) Tax ''eals* G( L"+-;;6* -+ ugust -,++ 1%%%%%%%%% 43
This collection contains one hundred one (101) cases
summarized in this format by
Michael Vernon M. Guerrero (as a sophomore law student)
during the irst !emester" school year #00$%#00&
in the Ta'ation (aw ) class
under *tty. +iogenes Villarubia
at the *rellano ,ni-ersity !chool of (aw (*,!().
.ompiled as /+" 0uly #011.
1erne Guerrero entered *,!( in 0une #00#
and e-entually graduated from *,!( in #002.
3e passed the /hilippine bar e'aminations immediately after (*pril #004).
www%!erneguerrero%com
Digests (Berne Guerrero)
[1]
Commissioner vs. Algue
GRL-28890 1! "e#ru$r% 1988
First Division, Cruz (J); 4 concur
"$&ts' The Philippine Sugar Estate Development Compan (PSEDC) appointe! "lgue #nc$ as its agent,
authorizing it to sell its lan!, %actories, an! oil manu%acturing process$ The &egeta'le (il #nvestment
Corporation (&(#CP) purchase! PSEDC properties$ For the sale, "lgue receive! a commission o% P)*+,,,,
an! it -as %rom this commission that it pai! .uevara, et$ al$ organizers o% the &(#CP, P/+,,,, in promotional
%ees$ #n )01+, "lgue receive! an assessment %rom the Commissioner o% #nternal 2evenue in the amount o%
P34,)34$3+ as !elin5uenc income ta6 %or ears )0+3 am! )0+0$ "lgue %ile! a protest or re5uest %or
reconsi!eration -hich -as not acte! upon ' the 7ureau o% #nternal 2evenue (7#2)$ The counsel %or "lgue
ha! to accept the -arrant o% !istrant an! lev$ "lgue, ho-ever, %ile! a petition %or revie- -ith the Coourt o%
Ta6 "ppeals$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment -as reasona'le$
)el*' Ta6es are the li%e'loo! o% the government an! so shoul! 'e collecte! -ithout unnecessar hin!rance$
Ever person -ho is a'le to pa must contri'ute his share in the running o% the government$ The .overnment,
%or his part, is e6pecte! to respon! in the %orm o% tangi'le an! intangi'le 'ene%its inten!e! to improve the
lives o% the people an! enhance their moral an! material values$ This sm'iotic relationship is the rationale o%
ta6ation an! shoul! !ispel the erroneous notion that is an ar'itrar metho! o% e6action ' those in the seat o%
po-er$
Ta6 collection, ho-ever, shoul! 'e ma!e in accor!ance -ith la- as an ar'itrariness -ill negate the ver
reason %or government itsel%$ For all the a-esome po-er o% the ta6 collector, he ma still 'e stoppe! in his
trac9s i% the ta6paer can !emonstrate that the la- has not 'een o'serve!$ :erein, the claime! !e!uction
(pursuant to Section 4, ;a< ;)< o% the Ta6 Co!e an! Section /, ;)< o% 2evenue 2egulation *= as to
compensation %or personal services) ha! 'een legitimatel ' "lgue #nc$ #t has %urther proven that the
pament o% %ees -as reasona'le an! necessar in light o% the e%%orts e6erte! ' the paees in in!ucing
investors (in &(#CP) to involve themselves in an e6perimental enterprise or a 'usiness re5uiring millions o%
pesos$
The assessment -as not reasona'le$
[2]
Lu+on ,teve*oring Cor-. vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-10212 29 2ul% 1988
Secon! Division, Paras (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' >uzon Steve!oring Corp$ importe! various engine parts an! other e5uipment %or tug'oat repair an!
maintenance in )01) an! )01*$ #t pai! the assesse! compensation ta6 un!er protest$ ?na'le to secure a ta6
re%un! %rom the Commissioner (%or the amount o% P44,44*$)4), it %ile! a petition %or revie- -ith the Court o%
Ta6 "ppeals (CT")$ The CT" !enie! the petition, as -ell as the motion %or reconsi!eration %ile! therea%ter$
(ssue' 8hether the corporation is e6empt %rom the compensation ta6$
)el*' "s the po-er o% ta6ation is a high prerogative o% sovereignt, the relin5uishment o% such is never
presume! an! an re!uction or !imunition thereo% -ith respect to its mo!e or its rate, must 'e strictl
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 1 )
construe!, an! the same must 'e couche! in !ear an! unmista9a'le terms in or!er that it ma 'e applie!$ The
corporation@s tug'oats !o not %all un!er the categories o% passenger or cargo vessels to avail o% the e6emption
%rom compensation ta6 in Section )0, o% the Ta6 Co!e$ #t ma 'e %urther note! that the amen!ment o% Section
)0, o% 2epu'lic "ct 4)/1 -as inten!e! to provi!e incentives an! in!ucements to 'olster the shipping in!ustr
an! not the 'usiness o% steve!oring, in -hich the corporation is engage! in$
>uzon Steve!oring Corp$ is not e6empt %rom compensating ta6 un!er Section )0,, an! is thus not entitle! to
re%un!$
[1]
Lut+ vs. Ar$net$
GR L-!859 22 De&em#er 1955
First Division, 2ees J7> (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' "8alter >utz, as Ju!icial "!ministrator o% the #ntestate Estate o% "ntonio Jame >e!esma, sought to
recover the sum o% P)4,1111$4, pai! ' the estate as ta6es %rom the Commissioner un!er Section e o%
Common-ealth "ct +1/ (the Sugar "!Austment "ct), alleging that such ta6 is unconstitutional as it levie! %or
the ai! an! support o% the sugar in!ustr e6clusivel, -hich is in his opinion not a pu'lic purpose$
(ssue' 8hether the ta6 is vali! in supporting an in!ustr$
)el*' The ta6 is levie! -ith a regulator prupose, i$e$ to provi!e means %or the reha'ilitation an! sta'ilization
o% the threatene! sugar in!ustr$ The act is primaril an e6ercise o% police po-er, an! is not a pure e6ercise o%
ta6ing po-er$ "s sugar pro!uction is one o% the great in!ustries o% the Philippines; an! that its promotion,
protection an! a!vancement re!oun!s greatl to the general -el%are, the legislature %oun! that the general
-el%are !eman!e! that the in!ustr shoul! 'e sta'ilize!, an! provi!e! that the !istri'ution o% 'ene%its
there%rom 'e rea!Auste! among its component to ena'le it to resist the a!!e! strain o% the increase in ta6 that it
ha! to sustain$ Further, it cannot 'e sai! that the !evotion o% ta6 mone to e6perimental stations to see9
increase o% e%%icienc in sugar pro!uction, utilization o% 'Bpro!ucts, etc$, as -ell as to the improvement o%
living an! -or9ing con!itions in sugar mills an! plantations, -ithout an part o% such mone 'eing channele!
!iectl to private persons, constitute e6pen!iture o% ta6 mone %or private purposes$
The ta6 is vali!$
[4]
6&Colloug7 vs. 6$r%l$n*
1! 8, 119 (1819) 6$rs7$ll (C2)
"$&ts' The ?nite! States Congress incorporate! a 'an9, the 7an9 o% the ?nite! States; an! esta'lishe! a
'ranch in the State o% Carlan!$ The State o% Carlan!, in turn, through its legislature, impose! a ta6 upon
the 'an9$
(ssue' 8hether the State o% Carlan! can ta6 a %e!eral 'an9$
)el*' The .overnment o% the ?nite! States, though limite! in its po-ers, is supreme$ #ts la-s, -hen ma!e in
pursuance o% the Constitution, %orm the supreme la- o% the lan!, Danthing in the Constitution or la-s o% an
State, to the contrar, not -ithstan!ing$E "mong the enumerate! po-ers o% the government are to la an!
collect ta6es; to regulate commerce; to !eclare an! con!uct a -ar; an! to raise an! support armies an! navies$
Still, the po-er o% ta6ation is retaine! ' the States$ #t is not a'ri!ge! ' the grant o% a similar po-er to the
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 2 )
.overnment o% the ?nion$ #t is to 'e concurrentl e6ercise! ' the t-o governments$ Consistentl -ith a %air
construction o% the Constitutions= the po-er to ta6 involves the po-er to !estro; the po-er to !estro ma
!e%eat an! ren!er useless the po-er to create; an! there is a plain repugnance in con%erring on one
government a po-er to control the constitutional measures o% another, -hich other, -ith respect to those ver
measures, is !eclare! to 'e supreme over that -hcih e6erts the control$ Ta6ation !oes not necessaril an!
unavoi!a'l !estro$ To carr it to the e6cess o% !estruction -oul! 'e an a'use, an! -oul! 'anish that
con%i!ence -hich is essential to all government$ :ence, the States have no po-er to retar!, impe!e, 'ur!en,
or in an manner control, the operations o% the constitutional la-s enacte! ' Congress to carr into e6ecution
the po-ers veste! in the general government$ The la- passe! ' the legislature o% Carlan!, imposing a ta6
on the 7an9 o% the ?nite! States, is unconstitutional an! voi!$
[5]
:$n7$n*le ;il vs. ,t$te o. 6ississi--i
2!! 8, 218 (1928) Butler (2)
"$&ts' The la-s o% Cississippi provi!e! that Dan person engage! in the 'usiness o% !istri'utor o% gasoline,
or retail !ealer in gasoline, shall pa an e6cise ta6 %or the privilege o% engaging in such 'usiness,E e6cept that
sol! in interstate commerce or puchase! outsi!e the state an! 'rought in ' the consumer %or his o-n use$
Since )0*+, Panhan!le (il Co$ has 'een engage! in such 'usiness$ Su'se5uentl, the State sue! to recover
ta6es claime! on account o% sales ma!e ' the compan to the ?nite! States %or the use o% its Coast .uar!
%leet in service in the .ul% o% Ce6ico an! its &eteran@s :ospital at .ul%port$ The compan !e%en!e! on the
groun! that Cississippi statutes relevant to the case, i% construe! to impose ta6es on such sales, are repugnant
to the %e!eral constitution$
(ssue' 8hether Panhan!le (il Co$ is lia'le %or the e6cise ta6 impose! ' the State o% Cississippi$
)el*' The ?nite! States is empo-ere! ' the Constitution to maintain an! operate the %leet an! the hospital$
"uthorization an! la-s enacte! pursuant to the Constitution are supreme, an! in case o% con%lict, control state
enactments$ The States ma not 'ur!en or inter%ere -ith the e6ertion o% national po-er, or ma9e it a source o%
revenue or ta9e the %un!s raise! or ta6 the means %or %or the per%ormance o% %e!eral %unctions$ 8hile the State
o% Cississippi ma impose charges upon the compan %or the privilege o% carring tra!e that is su'Aect to the
po-er o% the State, it ma not la an ta6 upon transactions ' -hich the ?nite! States secures the things
!esire! %or its governmental purposes$ The necessar operation o% the statutes -hen so construe! is !irectl to
retar!, impe!e, an! 'ur!en the e6ertion ' the ?nite! States o% its constitutional po-ers to operate the %leet
an! the hospital$ The e6actions !eman!e! in%ringe upon the right to have the Constitutional in!epen!ence o%
the ?nite! States, in respect to such purchases, remain untrammele!$
Panhan!le (il Co$ is, thus, not lia'le %or the ta6es claime!$
; <ote= #t is not in the main 'o! or !ecision, 'ut in the !issenting opinion o% Justice :olmes that the
%ollo-ing !octrine -as enunciate!=
D$$$ (The Court), so o%ten has !e%eate! the attempt to ta6 in certain -as, can !e%eat an attempt to
!iscriminate or other-ise go too %ar -ithout -holl a'olishing the po-er to ta6$ The po-er to ta6 is
not the po-er to !estro -hile this Court sits$ The po-er to %i6 rates is the po-er to !estro i%
unlimite!, 'ut this Court -hile it en!eavors to prevent con%iscation !oes not prevent the %i6ing o%
rates$ " ta6 is not an unconstitutional regulation in ever case -here an a'solute prohi'ition o% sales
-oul! 'e one$E <
[9]
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 1 )
Commissioner vs. Ling$%en Gul. =le&tri&
GR L-21!!1 4 August 1988
En 7anc, Sarmiento (J)= )4 concur
"$&ts' >ingaen .ul% Electric Po-er operates an electric po-er plant serving the municipalities o% >ingaen
an! 7inmale, Pangaisnan, pursuant to municipal %ranchise grante! it ' the respective municipal councils$
The %ranchises provi!e! that the grantee shall pa 5uarterl to the Provincial Treasur o% Pangasinan )F o%
the gross earnings o'taine! through the privilege %or the %irst *, ears (%rom )041), an! *F !uring the
remaining )+ ears o% the li%e o% the %ranchise$ #n )043, the Philippine Presi!ent approve! the %ranchise (2"
4344)$ #n )0++, the 7#2 assesse! an! !eman!e! against the compan !e%icienc %ranchise ta6es an!
surcharges %ro the ears )041 to )0+4 appling the %ranchise ta6 rate o% +F on gross receipts %rom )043 to
)0+4$ The compan as9e! %or a reinvestigation, -hich -as !enie!$
(ssue [1]' 8hether the Court can in5uire into the -is!om o% the "ct$
)el* [1]' The Court !oes not have the authorit to in5uire into the -is!om o% the "ct$ Charters or special
la-s grante! an! enacte! ' the >egislatur are in the nature o% private contracts$ The !o not contitute a part
o% the machiner o% the general government$ The are usuall a!opte! a%ter care%ul consi!eration o% the
private rights in relation -ith the resultant 'ene%its o% the State$ #n passing a special charter, the attention o%
the >egislature is !irecte! to the %acts an! circumstances -hich the act or charter is inten!e! to meet$ The
>egislature consi!ers an! ma9es provision %or all the circumstance o% the particular case$ The Court ought not
to !istur' the ruling o% the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals on the constitutionalit o% the la- in 5uestion$
(ssue [2]' 8hether a rate 'elo- +F on gross income violate the uni%ormit o% ta6 clause in the Constitution$
)el* [2]' " ta6 is uni%orm -hen it operates -ith the same %orce an! e%%ect in ever place -here the su'Aect o%
it is %oun!$ ?ni%ormit means that all propert 'elonging to the same class shall 'e ta6e! ali9e$ The legislature
has the inherent po-er not onl to select the su'Aects o% ta6ation 'ut to grant e6emptions$ Ta6 e6emptions
have never 'een !eeme! violateve o% the e5ual protection clause$ :erein, the +F %ranchise ta6 rate provi!e!
in Section *+0 o% the Ta6 Co!e -as never inten!e! to have a universal application$ Section *+0 e6pressl
allo-s the pament o% ta6es at rates lo-er than +F -hen the charter granting the %ranchise preclu!es the
imposition o% a higher ta6$ 2" 4344 !i! not onl %i6 an! speci% a %ranchise ta6 o% *F on its gross receipts,
'ut ma!e it in lieu o% an an! all ta6es, all la-s to the contrar not-ithstan!ing$ D
The compan, hence, is not lia'le %or !e%icienc ta6es$
[!]
<$tion$l Develo-ment Co. vs. Commissioner
GR L-51991 10 2une 198!
En 7anc, Cruz (J)= )4 concur
"$&ts' The Gational Development Co$ (GDC) entere! into contracts in To9o -ith several Japanese
ship'uil!ing companies %or the construction o% )* oceanBgoing vessels$ #nitial paments -ere ma!e in cash
an! through irrevoca'le letters o% cre!it$ 8hen the vessels -ere complete! an! !elivere! to the GDC in
To9o, the latter remitte! to the ship'il!ers the amount o% ?SH 4,,11,+3,$/, as interest on the 'alance o% the
purchase price$ Go ta6 -as -ithhel!$ The Commissioner then hel! GDC lia'le on such ta6 in the total amount
o% P+,))+,*44$/4$ The 7ureau o% #nternal 2evenue serve! upon the GDC a -arrant o% !istraint an! lev a%ter
negotiations %aile!$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 4 )
(ssue' 8hether the GDC is lia'le %or !e%icienc ta6$
)el*' The Japanese ship'uil!ers -ere lia'le on the interest remitte! to them un!er Section 4/ o% the Ta6
Co!e$ The GDC is not the one ta6e!$ The imposition o% the !e%icienc ta6es on the GDS is a penalt %or its
%ailure to -ithhol! the same %rom the Japanese ship'uil!ers$ Such lia'ilit is impose! ' Section +4(c) o% the
Ta6 Co!e$ GDC -as remiss in the !ischarge o% its o'ligation o% its o'ligation as the -ithhol!ing agent o% the
government an! so shoul! 'e lia'le %or its omission$
[8]
Domingo vs. G$rlitos
GR L-18991 29 2une 1991
En 7anc, >a'ra!or (J)= 3 concur,
) concur in result, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' #nDomingo vs$ Coscoso (),1 P:#> ))43), the Supreme Court !eclare! as %inal an! e6ecutor the
or!er o% the Court o% First #nstance o% >ete %or the pament o% estate an! inheritance ta6es, charges an!
penalties amounting to P4,,,+3$++ ' the Estate o% the late 8alter Scott Price$ The petition %or e6ecution %ile!
' the %iscal, ho-ever, -as !enie! ' the lo-er court$ The Court hel! that the e6ecution is unAusti%ie! as the
.overnment itsel% is in!e'te! to the Estate %or *1*,*,,; an! or!ere! the amount o% inheritance ta6es 'e
!e!ucte! %rom the .overnment@s in!e'te!ness to the Estate$
(ssue' 8hether a ta6 an! a !e't ma 'e compensate!$
)el*' The court having Auris!iction o% the Estate ha! %oun! that the claim o% the Estate against the
.overnment has 'een recognize! an! an amount o% P*1*,*,, has alrea! 'een appropriate! ' a
correspon!ing la- (2" */,,)$ ?n!er the circumstances, 'oth the claim o% the .overnment %or inheritance
ta6es an! the claim o% the intestate %or services ren!ere! have alrea! 'ecome over!ue an! !eman!a'le as
-ell as %ull li5ui!ate!$ Compensation, there%ore, ta9es place ' operation o% la-, in accor!ance -ith "rticle
)*/0 an! )*0, o% the Civil Co!e, an! 'oth !e'ts are e6tinguishe! to the concurrent amount$
[9]
Commissioner vs. (togon-,u%o& 6ines
GR L-25299 29 2ul% 1999
En 7anc, Fernan!o (J)= 0 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' #togonBSuoc Cines %ile! its income ta6 return %or the %iscal ear )0+0 to )01,$ Four months later, it
%ile! an amen!e! income ta6 return, reporting a loss$ #t thus sought a re%un! %rom the Commissioner$ 8hen it
%ile! its income ta6 return on the ne6t ear, it !e!ucte! an amount representing allege! ta6 cre!it %or
overpament %or the prece!ing %iscal ear$ The Commissioner impose! an amount P),+)*$34 as )F monthl
interest on the amount o% P)4,)++$*, %rom Januar to Decem'er )01*$ The 'asis %or such assessment -as
allege!l the a'sence o% a legal right to !e!uct sai! amount 'e%ore the ta6 cre!it or re%un! is approve! ' the
Commissioner$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment on interest -as Austi%ie!$
)el*' The Ta6 Co!e provi!es that interest upon the amount !etermine! as a !e%icienc shall 'e assesse! an!
shall 'e pai! upon notice an! !eman! %rom the Commissioner at the rate therein speci%ie!$ #t ma!e clear,
ho-ever, in an earlier provision %oun! in the same section that i% in an prece!ing ear, the ta6paer -as
entitle! to a re%un! o% an amount !ue as ta6, such amount, i% not re%un!e!, ma 'e !e!ucte! %rom the ta6 to
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 5 )
'e pai!$ "lthough the imposition o% monthl interest !oes not constitute penalt 'ut a Aust compensation to the
State %or the !ela in paing the ta6 an! %or the concomitant use ' the ta6paer o% %un!s that right%ull
shoul! 'e in government@s han!s; in light o% the overpament %or )0+0 an! )01,, it cannot 'e sai! that the
ta6paer -as guilt o% !ela ena'ling it to utilize the mone$
The compan is entitle! to re%un!$
[10]
Re-u#li& vs. 6$m#ul$o Lum#er
GR L-1!!25 28 "e#ru$r% 1992
En 7anc, 7arrera (J)= ), concur
"$&ts' Cam'ulao >um'er Compan pai! the .overnment a total o% P0,)*/$+, as re%orestation charges$
:aving %oun! lia'le %or an aggregate amount o% P4,3,*$4/ %or %orest charges, it conten!e! that since the
2epu'lic (.overnment) has not ma!e use o% the re%orestation charges %or re%oresting the !enu!e! area o% the
lan! covere! ' the compan@s license, the 2epu'lic shoul! re%un! sai! amount or, i% it cannot 'e re%un!e!, at
least the compan shoul! 'e compensate! -ith -hat it o-e! the 2epu'lic %or re%orestation charges$
(ssue' 8hether ta6es ma 'e su'Aect o% setBo%% or compensation$
)el*' #nternal revenue ta6es, such as %orest charges, cannot 'e the su'Aect o% setBo%% or compensation$ " claim
%or ta6es is not such a !e't, !eman!, contract or Au!gment as is allo-e! to 'e setBo%% un!er the statutes o% setB
o%%, -hich are construe! uni%orml, in the light o% pu'lic polic, to e6clu!e the reme! in an action or an
in!e'te!ness o% the State or municipalit to one -ho is lia'le to the State or municipalit %or ta6es$ Geither
are the su'Aect o% recoupment since the !o not arise out o% the contract or transaction sue! on$
Ta6es are not in the nature o% contracts 'et-een the parties 'ut gro- out o% a !ut to, an! are the positive acts
o% the government, to the ma9ing an! en%orcing o% -hich, the personal consent o% in!ivi!ual ta6paers is not
re5uire!$
[11]
"r$n&i$ vs. (nterme*i$te A--ell$te Court
GR L-9!949 28 2une 1988
Thir! Division, .utierrez Jr$ (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' Engracio Francia -as the registere! o-ner o% a house an! lot locate! in Pasa Cit$ " portion o% such
propert -as e6propriate! ' the 2epu'lic o% the Philippines in )0//$ #t appeare! that Francia !i! not pa his
real estate ta6es %rom )014 to )0//$ Thus, his propert -as sol! in a pu'lic auction ' the Cit Treasurer o%
Pasa Cit$
(ssue' 8hether the e6propriation pament ma compensate %or the real estate ta6es !ue$
)el*' There can 'e no o%%Bsetting o% ta6es against the claims that the ta6paer ma have against the
government$ " person canot re%use to pa a ta6 on the groun! that the government o-es him an amount e5ual
to or greater than the ta6 'eing collecte!$ The collection o% a ta6 annot a-ait the results o% a la-suit agianst
the government$ #nternal revenue ta6es cannot 'e the su'Aect o% compensation$ The .overnment an! the
ta6paer are not mutuall cre!itors an! !e'tors o% each other un!er "rticle )*/3 o% the Civil Co!e an! a claim
o% ta6es is not such a !e't, !eman!, contract or Au!gment as is allo-e! to 'e setBo%%$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 9 )
; <ote= See 2epu'lic vs$ Cam'ulao, an! Cor!ero vs$ .on!a, as !octrine in sai! cases -ere merel
reiterate!$ <
[12]
C$lte0 :7ili--ines vs. Commission on Au*it (C;A)
GR 92585 8 6$% 1992
En 7anc, Davi!e (J)= )* concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' #n )030, C(" sent a letter to Calte6, !irecting it to remit its collection to the (il Price Sta'ilization
Fun! ((PSF), e6clu!ing that unremitte! %or )031 an! )33 o% the a!!itional ta6 on petroleum pro!ucts
authorize! un!er Section 3 o% PD )0+1; an! that pen!ing such remittance, all its claims %or reim'ursement
%rom the (PSF shall 'e hel! in a'eance$ Calte6 re5ueste! C(", not-ithstan!ing an earl release o% its
reim'ursement certi%icates %rom the (PSF, -hich C(" !enie!$ (n 4) Ca )030, Calte6 su'mitte! a proposal
to C(" %or the pament an! the recover o% claims$ C(" approve! the proposal 'ut prohi'ite! Calte6 %rom
%urther o%%seting remittances an! reim'ursements %or the current an! ensuing ears$ Calte6 move! %or
reconsi!eration$
(ssue' 8hether the amounts !ue %rom Calte6 to the (PSF ma 'e o%%sette! against Calte6@ outstan!ing claims
%rom sai! %un!s$
)el*' Ta6ation is no longer envisione! as a measure merel to raise revenue to support the e6istence o%
government; ta6es ma 'e levie! -ith a regulator purpose to provi!e means %or the reha'ilitation an!
sta'ilization o% a threatene! in!ustr -hich is a%%ecte! -ith pu'lic interest as to 'e -ithin the police po-er o%
the state$ PD )0+1, as amen!e! ' E( )4/, e6plicitl provi!es that the source o% (PSF is ta6ation$ " ta6paer
ma not o%%set ta6es !ue %rom the claims that he ma have against the government$ Ta6es cannot 'e the
su'Aect o% compensation 'ecause the government an! ta6paer are not mutuall cre!itors an! !e'tors o% each
other an! a claim %or ta6es is not such a !e't, !eman!, contract or Au!gment as is allo-e! to 'e setBo%%$
[11]
Cu 8n>ieng vs. :$tstone
GR 19254 21 "e#ru$r% 1922
First Division, (stran! (J)= 4 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' .$ "$ Cu ?nAieng !esire! to erect a -arehouse in "zcarraga street -as !enie! a 'uil!ing permit until
he shall have ma!e provision %or the construction o% an arca!e over the si!e-al9 in %ront o% the 'uil!ing, an!
until he shall have %urther complie! -ith Section ) o% (r!inance 4,) o% the Cit o% Canila, i$e$ pament o%
)I* o% the assesse! value o% the cit lan!$ CuunAieng %ile! a petition %or a -rit o% man!amus to compel the cit
engineer to issue the permit$
(ssue' 8hether the %ee -as vali!l impose!$
)el*' The allo-a'le amount o% license %ee or ta6 !epen!s so much on the special circumstances o% each
particular case$ "!Au!ications, ho-ever, appear to recognize 4 classes o% licenses (license %orregulation o%
use%ul occupations or enterprises; licenses %or the regulation o% nonBuse%ul occupations or enterprises; an!
licenses %or revenue onl), -hich shoul! 'e ta9en into consi!eration in !etermining the reasona'leness o% the
license %ee$ :erein, in imposing a %ee e5ual to )I* o% the assesse! value o% the portion o% the si!e-al9 covere!
' the arca!e, the municipal 'oar! e6cee!e! its po-ers$ The construction o% 'uil!ings is a use%ul enterprise
an! the amount o% the license %ee shoul! there%ore 'e limite! to the cost o% licensing, regulating, an!
surveillance$ "s it !oes not appear such cost -oul! materiall increase through the construction o% the arca!e,
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( ! )
the e6cess %ee is clearl impose! %or the purpose o% revenue$ There is nothing in the charter o% the Cit
in!icating legislative intent to con%er tot the municipal 'oar! to impose a license ta6 %or revenue on the
construction o% 'uil!ings$ "lthough the cit can re5uire the construction o% arca!es in certain circumstances,
the license %ee prescri'e! ' (r!inance 4,) is illegal$
[14]
?illeg$s vs )iu C7iong /s$i :$o )o
GR L-29949 10 <ovem#er 19!8
En 7anc, Fernan!ez (J)=
4 concur, 4 concur in result, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' The Cunicipal 7oar! o% Canila enacte! (r!inance 1+4/ re5uiring aliens (e6cept those emploe! in
the !iplomatic an! consular missions o% %oreign countries, in technical assistance programs o% the government
an! another countr, an! mem'ers o% religious or!ers or congregations) to procure the re5uisite maor@s
permit so as to 'e emploe! or engage in tra!e in the Cit o% Canila$ The permit %ee is P+,, an! the penalt
%or the violation o% the or!inance is 4 to 1 months imprisonment or a %ine o% P),, to P*,,, or 'oth$
(ssue' 8hether the or!inance imposes a regulator %ee or a ta6$
)el*' The or!inance@s purpose is clearl to raise mone un!er the guise o% regulation ' e6acting P+, %rom
aliens -ho have 'een cleare! %or emploment$ The amount is unreasona'le an! e6cessive 'ecause it %ails to
consi!er !i%%erence in situation among aliens re5uire! to pa it, i$e$ 'eing casual, permanent, partBtime, ran9B
an!B%ile or e6ecutive$
; The (r!inance -as !eclare! invali! as it is ar'itrar, oppressive an! unreasona'le, 'eing applie! onl to
aliens -ho are thus !eprive! o% their rights to li%e, li'ert an! propert an! there%ore violates the !ue process
an! e5ual protection clauses o% the Constitution$ Further, the or!inance !oes not la !o-n an criterion or
stan!ar! to gui!e the Caor in the e6ercise o% his !iscretion, thus con%erring upon the maor ar'itrar an!
unrestricte! po-ers$ <
[15]
A-ostoli& :re.e&t o. 6ount$in :rovin&e vs. Cit% /re$surer o. B$guio Cit%
GR 4!252 18 A-ril 1941
En 7anc, #mperial (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' The "postolic Pre%ect is a corporation sole, o% religious character, organize! un!er the Philippine la-s,
an! -ith resi!ence in 7aguio, The Cit impose! a special assessment against properties -ithin its territorial
Auris!iction, inclu!ing those o% the "postolic Pre%ect, -hich 'ene%its %rom its !rainage an! se-erage sstem$
The "postolic Pre%ect conten!s that its properties shoul! 'e %ree o% ta6$
(ssue' 8hether the "postolic Pre%ect, as a religious entit, is e6empt %rom the pament o% the special
assessment$
)el*' #n its 'roa! meaning, ta6 inclu!es 'oth general ta6es an! special assessment$ Jet actuall, there is a
recognize! !istinction 'et-een them in that assessment is con%ine! to local impositions upon propert %or the
pament o% the cost o% pu'lic improvements in its imme!iate vicinit an! levie! -ith re%erence to special
'ene%its to the propert assesse!$ " special assessment is not, strictl spea9ing, a ta6; an! neither the !ecree
nor the Constitution e6empt the "postolic Pre%ect %rom pament o% sai! special assessment$ Furthermore,
arguen!o that e6emption ma encompass such assessmen, the "postolic Pre%ect cannot claim e6emption as it
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 8 )
has not proven the propert in 5uestion is use! e6clusivel %or religious purposes; 'ut that it appearsthat the
same is 'eing use! to other nonBreligious purposes$ Thus, the "postolic Pre%ect is re5uire! to pa the special
assessment$
[19]
:7ili--ine Airlines vs. =*u
)R L-41181 15 August 1988
En 7anc, .utierrez Jr$ (J)= )4 concur
"$&ts' The Philippine "irlines (P">) is engage! in the air transportation 'usiness un!er a legislative
%ranchise, "ct 4*/), -herein it is e6empt %rom the pament o% ta6es$ (n the strength o% an opinion o% the
Secretar o% Justice ((pinion 4,/ o% )0+1),
P"> -as !etermine! to have not 'een paing motor vehicle registration %ees since )0+1$ The >an!
Transportation Commissioner re5uire! all ta6 e6empt entities, inclu!ing P">, to pa motor vehicle
registration %ees$ P"> proteste!$
(ssue' 8hether registration %ees as to motor vehicles are ta6es to -hich Philippine "irlines is e6empt$
)el*' Ta6es are %or revenue, -hereas %ees are e6actions %or purposes o% regulation an! inspection, an! are %or
that reason limite! in amount to -hat is necessar to cover the cost o% the services ren!ere! in that
connection$ #t is the o'Aect o% the charge, an! not the name, that !etermines -hether a charge is a ta6 or a %ee$
The mone collecte! un!er the Cotor &ehicle >a- is not inten!e! %or the e6pen!itures o% the Cotor &ehicle
(%%ice 'ut accrues to the %un!s %or the construction an! maintenance o% pu'lic roa!s, streets an! 'ri!ges$ "s
the %ees are not collecte! %or regulator purposes as an inci!ent to the en%orcement o% regulations governing
the operation o% motor vehicles on pu'lic high-as, 'ut to provi!e revenue -ith -hich the .overnment is to
construct an! maintain pu'lic high-as %or everone@s use, the are verita'le ta6es, not merel %ees$ P"> is,
thus, e6empt %rom paing such %ees, e6cept %or the perio! 'et-een */ June )013 to 0 "pril )0/0, -here its ta6
e6eption in the %ranchise -as repeale!$
[1!]
:rogressive Develo-ment Cor-or$tion vs. @ue+on Cit%
GR 19081 24 A-ril 1989
Thir! Division, Feliciano (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' The Cit Council o% Kuezon Cit a!opte! (r!inance /00/ ()010) -here privatel o-ne! an! operate!
pu'lic mar9ets to pa ),F o% the gross receipts %rom stall rentals to the Cit, as supervision %ee$ Such
or!inance -as amen!e! ' (r!inance 0*41 ()0/*), -hich impose! a +F ta6 on gross receipts on rentals or
lease o% space in privatelBo-ne! pu'lic mar9ets in Kuezon Cit$ Progressive Development Corp$, o-ne! an!
operator o% Farmer@s Car9et an! Shopping Center, %ile! a petition %or prohi'ition against the cit on the
groun! that the supervision %ee or license ta6 impose! is in realit a ta6 on income the cit cannot impose$
(ssue' 8hether the supervision %ee I license ta6 is a ta6 on income$
)el*' The +F ta6 impose! in (r!inance 0*41 !oes not constitute a ta6 on income, nor a cit income ta6
(!istinguishe! %rom the national income ta6 ' the Ta6 Co!e) -ithin the meaning o% Section * (g) o% the >ocal
"utonom "ct, 'ut rather a license ta6 or %ee %or the regulation o% 'usiness in -hich the compan is engage!$
To 'e consi!ere! a license %ee, the imposition must relate to an occupation or activit that so engages the
pu'lic interest in health, morals, sa%et an! !evelopment as to re5uire regulations %or the protection an!
promotion o% such pu'lic interest; the imposition must also 'ear a reasona'le relation to the pro'a'le
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 9 )
e6penses o% the regulation, ta9ing into account not onl the costs o% !irect regulation 'ut also its inci!ental
conse5uences as -ell$ The gross receipts %rom stall rentals have 'een use! onl as a 'asis %or computing the
%ees or ta6es !ue to the cit to cover the latter@s a!ministrative e6penses$ The use o% the gross amount o% stall
rentals, as 'asis %or the !etermination o% the collecti'le amount o% license ta6, !oes not ' itsel% convert or
ren!er the license ta6 into a prohi'ite! cit ta6 on income$ For or!inaril, the higher the amount o% stall
rentals, the higher the aggregate volume o% %oo!stu%%s an! relate! items sol! in the privatel o-ne! mar9et;
an! the higher the volume o% goo!s sol! in such mar9et, the greater e6tent an! %re5uenc o% inspection an!
supervision that ma 'e reasona'l re5uire! in the interest o% the 'uing pu'lic$
[18]
Ameri&$n 6$il Line vs. B$sil$n
GR L-1294! 11 6$% 1991
En 7anc, Dizon (J)= 0 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' The Cit Council o% 7asilan Cit enacte! (r!inance )3, ()0++) imposing upon a %oreign vessel
engage! in coast-ise tra!e -hich ma anchor -ithin the territorial -aters o% 7asilan Cit to pa an anchorage
%ee o% hal% centavo per registere! gross ton o% the vessle %or the %irst *4 hours, provi!e! that the ma6imum
charge shall not e6cee! P/+ per !a$ "s the cit treasurer assesse! an! attempte! to collect %rom "merican
Cail >ine the anchorage %ees, the compan %ile! an action %or !eclarator relie% to have the courts !etermine
the vali!it o% the or!inance$
(ssue' 8hether the anchorage %ees -ere %or regulator or revenue purposes$
)el*' The %ees re5uire! are inten!e! %or revenue purposes$ The %ees have no proper or reasona'le relation to
the cost o% issuing the permits an! the cost o% inspection or surveillance; 'eing 'ase! upon the tonnage o% the
vessels$ The %ees impose! on the vessels e6cee! even the har'or %ees impose! ' the Gational .overnment to
raise revenues %or the Port 8or9s Fun!$ The Cit o% 7asilan -as not grante! a 'lan9et authorit or po-er o%
ta6ation, 'ut merel given the po-ers to lev an! collect ta6es %or general an! special purposes in accor!ance
-ith or as provi!e! ' la-$ The po-er to regulate as an e6ercise o% police po-er !oes not inclu!e the po-er
to impose %ees %or revie- purposes$
The or!inance -as invali!$
[19]
,$l*$n$ vs. (loilo
GR L-104!0 29 2une 1958
En 7anc, Contemaor (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' #n )041, the Cit o% #loilo promulgate! (r!inance *3, -hich strictl prohi'its the transport o% %oo!
suppl an! la'or animals outsi!e #loilo -ithout %irst o'taining the necessar license permit %rom the maor$
?n!er the or!inance, Sera%in Sal!ana ha! 'een paing, un!er protest, soBcalle! %ees on %ish 'ought in #loilo
an! sent to Canila %rom )1 Septem'er to 1 Decem'er )041$
(ssue' 8hether the Dlicense %eeE -as vali!l impose!$
)el*' " license %ee represents the permission conce!e! to !o an act is in the main purpose o% police po-er,
an! is not suppose! to 'e impose! %or revenue$ " propert ta6, on the other han!, is a ta6 in the or!inar
sense, assessing accor!ing to the value o% propert$ Ju!ging %rom the amount o% %ees %i6e! in the or!inance,
the soBcalle! %ees -ere in realit ta6es %or cit revenue$ "s such, the are unauthorize! ' the la- or the Cit
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 10 )
Charter, an! are alson in contravention o% Sections **3/ an! *1*0 o% the 2evise! "!ministrative Co!e$ The
prohi'ition against ta9ing animals an! articles outsi!e #loilo -ithout maor@s permit is in restraint o% tra!e
an! a curtailment o% the rights o% the o-ners o% sai! animals an! articles to %reel sell an! o% prospective
purchasers to 'u an! !ispose o% them -ithout the cit limits in the or!inar course o% commerce an! tra!e$
The or!inance is ultra vires an!, thus, is null an! voi!$
[20]
Com-$ni$ Gener$l *e /o#$&os *e "ili-in$s vs. 6$nil$
GR L-19919 29 2une 1991
En 7anc, Dizon (J)= 3 concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' Compania .eneral !e Ta'acos !e Filipinas (Ta'acalera) pai! the Cit o% Canila the %i6e! license %ees
prescri'e! ' (r!inance 44+3 %or the ears )0+4 to )0+/$ #n )0+4, Cit (r!inance 4144 an! 43)1 -ere
passe!; -here the term Dgeneral merchan!iseE %oun! therein inclu!e! all articles in Sections )*4 to )43 o% the
Ta6 Co!e (thus, also li5uor un!er Se!ctions )44 to )4+)$ The Ta'acalera pai! its -holesaler@s an! retailer@s
ta6es$ #n )0+4, the Cit Treasurer a!!resse! a letter to an accounting %irm, e6pressing the vie- that li5uor
!ealers paing the annual -holesale an! retail %i6e! ta6 un!er (r!inance 44+3 are not su'Aect to the
-holesale aan! retail !ea9lers@ ta6es prescri'e! ' Cit (r!inances 4144, 44,), an! 43)1$ The Ta'acalera,
upon learning o% sai! stoppe! inclu!ing 5uarterl s-orn !eclaratons re5uire! ' the latter or!inances, an! in
)0+/, !eman!e! re%un!e o% the allege! overpament$ The claim -as !isallo-e!$
(ssue' 8hether there is a !istinction 'et-een (r!inance 44+3 an! (r!inances 4144, 44,) an! 43)1, to
prevent re%un! to the compan$
)el*' .enerall, the term Dta6E applies to all 9in!s o% e6actions -hich 'ecome pu'lic %un!s$ >egall,
ho-ever, a license %ee is a legal concept 5uite !istinct %rom ta6= the %ormer is impose! in the e6ercise o%
police po-er %or purposes o% regulation, -hile the latter is impose! un!er the ta6ing po-er %or the purpose o%
raising revenues$ (r!inance 44+3 prescri'es municipal license %ees %or the privilege to engage in the 'usiness
o% selling li5uor or alcohol 'everages; consi!ering that the sale o% into6icating li5uor is (potentiall) harm%ul
to pu'lic health an! morals, an! must 'e su'Aect to supervision or regulation ' the State an! ' cities an!
municipalities authorize! to act in the premises$ (n the other han!, (r!inances 4144 , 44,) an! 43)1
impose! ta6es on the sales o% general merchan!ise, -holesale or retail, an! are revenue measures enacte! '
the Cunicipal 7oar! o% Canila$
7oth a license %ee an! a ta6 ma 'e impose! on the same 'usiness or occupation, or %or selling the same
article, -ithout it 'eing in violation o% the rule against !ou'le ta6ation$ The contrar vie- o% the Treasurer in
its letter is o% no conse5uence as the government is not 'oun! ' the errors or mista9es committe! ' its
o%%icers, speciall on matters o% la-$
The compan, thus, is not entitle! to re%un!$
[21]
:7ili--ine A&et%lene Co. (n&. vs. Commissioner
GR L-19!0! 1! August 199!
En 7anc, Castro (J)= / concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' Philippine "cetlene Co$ #nc$ is engage! in the manu%acture an! sale o% o6gen an! acetlene gases$ #t
sol! its pro!ucts to the Gational Po-er Corporation (Gapocor), an agenc o% the Philippine .overnment, an!
the &oice o% "merica (&("), an agenc o% the ?nite! States .overnment$ The Commissioner assesse!
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 11 )
!e%icienc sales ta6 an! surcharges against the compan$ The compan !enie! lia'ilit %or the pament o% ta6
on the groun! that 'oth Gapocor an! &(" are e6empt %rom ta6es$
(ssue' 8hether Philippine "cetlene Co$ is e6empt %rom the ta6$
)el*' Sales ta6 are pai! ' the manu%acturer or pro!ucer -ho must ma9e a true an! complete return o% the
amount o% his, her or its gross monthl sales, receipts or earnings or gross value o% output actuall remove!
%rom the %actor or mill, -arehouse an! to pa the ta6 !ue thereon$ The ta6 impose! ' Section )31 o% the
Ta6 Co!e is a ta6 on the manu%acturer or pro!ucer an! not a ta6 on the purchaser e6cept pro'a'l in a ver
remote an! inconse5uential sense$ "ccor!ingl, its lev on the sales ma!e to ta6Be6empt entities li9e the
Gapocor is permissi'le$ (n the other han!, there is nothing in the language o% the Cilitar 7ases "greement
to -arrant the general e6emption grante! ' .eneral Circular &B4) ()04/)$ Thus, the e6pansive construction
o% the ta6 e6emption is voi!; an! the sales to the &(" are su'Aect to the pament o% percentage ta6es un!er
Section )31 o% the Ta6 Co!e$ There%ore, ta6 e6emption is strictl construe! an! e6emption -ill n'ot 'e hel!
to 'e con%erre! unless the terms un!er -hich it is grante! clearl an! !istinctl sho- that such -as the
intention$
[22]
Commissioner vs. Ameri&$n Ru##er
GR L-1999! 29 <ovem#er 1999
En 7anc, 2ees J7> (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' "merican 2u''er Compan sol! its ru''er pro!ucts locall an! as prescri'e! ' the Commissioner@s
regulation, the compan !eclare! the same %or ta6 purposes in -hich the Commissioner accor!ingl assesse!$
The compan pai! un!er protest the correspon!ing sales ta6es thereon, claiming e6emption un!er Section )33
(') o% the Ta6 Co!e, an! su'se5uentl claime! re%un!$ 8ith the Commissioner re%using to !o so, the case -as
'rought 'e%ore the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals, -hich uphel! the Commissioner@s stan! that the compan is not
entitle! to recover the sales ta6 that ha! 'een separatel 'ille! to its customers, an! pai! ' the latter$
(ssue' 8hether the compan can recover the sales ta6 pai!$
)el*' The sales ta6 is ' la- impose! !irectl, not on the thing sol!, 'ut on the act (sale) o% the manu%acturer,
pro!ucer, or importer, -ho is e6clusivel ma!e lia'le %or its timel pament$ 8here the ta6 mone pai! '
the compan came %rom is reall no concern o% the .overnment, 'ut solel a matter 'et-een the compan
an! its customers$ (nce recovere!, the compan must hol! the re%un!e! ta6es in trust %or hte in!ivi!ual
purchasers -ho a!vance! pament thereo%, an! -hose names must appear in compan recor!s$ :erein, the
compan sales 'et-een *4 "ugust )0+1 (approval o% 2" )1)*) to ** June )0+/ (-hen 2" )3+1 restore! the
e6emption o% agricultural pro!ucts D-hether in their original %orm or notE) -ere properl ta6e!$ Such amount
correspon!ing to the perio! are not recovera'le$
[21]
Commissioner vs. Got$m&o
GR L-11092 2! "e#ru$r% 198!
First Division, Jap (J)> 1 concur
"$&ts' The 8orl! Tra!e (rganization (8:() !eci!e! to construct a 'uil!ing to house its o%%ices, as -ell as
the other ?nite! Gations (%%ices in Canila$ #n inviting 'i!s %or the construction o% the 'uil!ing, the 8:(
in%orme! the 'i!!ers o% its ta6 e6emptions$ The contract -as a-ar!e! to John .otamco an! Sons$ The
Commissioner opine! that a 4F contractor@s ta6 shoul! 'e !ue %rom the contractor$ The 8:( issue! a
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 12 )
certi%ication that .otamco shoul! 'e e6empte!, 'ut the Commissioner insiste! on the ta6$ 2aise! in the Court
o% Ta6 "ppeals, the court rule! in %avor o% .otamco$
(ssue' 8hether .otamco is li9e-ise %rom the contractor@s ta6 in lieu o% 8:(@s e6emption %rom in!irect
ta6es$
)el*' Direct ta6es are those that are !eman!e! %rom the ver person -ho, it is inten!e! or !esire!, shoul!
pa them; -hile in!irect ta6es are those that are !eman!e! in the %irst instance %rom one person in the
e6pectation an! intention that he can shi%t the 'ur!en to someone else$ :erein, the contractor@s ta6 is paa'le
' the contractor 'ut it is the o-ner o% the 'uil!ing that shoul!ers the 'ur!en o% the ta6 'ecause the same is
shi%te! ' the contractor to the o-ner as a matter o% sel%Bpreservation$ Such ta6 is an Din!irect ta6E on the
organization, as the pament thereo% or its inclusion in the 'i! price -oul! have meant an increase in the
construction cost o% the 'uil!ing$
:ence, the Contractee@s (8:() e6emption %rom Din!irect ta6esE implies that contractor (.otamco) is e6empt
%rom contractor@s ta6$
[24]
:$s&u$l vs. ,e&ret$r% o. :u#li& AorBs $n* Communi&$tions
GR L-10405 29 De&em#er 1990
En 7anc, Concepcion (J)= ), concur
"$&ts' 2" 0*, ("ct appropriating %un!s %or pu'lic -or9s) -as enacte! in )0+4 containing an item (Section )
c;a<) %or the construction, reconstruction, repair, e6tension an! improvement o% Pasig %ee!er roa! terminals
(the proAecte! an! planne! su'!ivision roa!s, -hich -ere not et constructe!, -ithin "ntonio Su'!ivision
o-ne! ' Senator Jose C$ Lulueta)$ Lulueta D!onate!E sai! parcels o% lan! to the .overnment + months a%ter
the enactment o% 2" 0*,, on the con!ition that i% the .overnment violates such con!ition the lan!s -oul!
revert to Lulueta$ The provincial governor o% 2izal, 8enceslao Pascual, 5uestione! the vali!it o% the
!onation an! the Constitutionalit o% the item in 2" 0*,, it 'eing not %or a pu'lic purpose$
(ssue' 8hether the item in the appropriation is vali!$
)el*' The right o% the legislature to appropriate %un!s is correlative -ith its right to ta6, un!er constitutional
provisions against ta6ation e6cept %or pu'lic purposes an! prohi'iting the collection o% a ta6 %or one purpose
an! the !evotion thereo% to another purpose, no appropriation o% state %un!s can 'e ma!e %or other than a
pu'lic purpose$ The vali!it o% a statute !epen!s upon the po-ers o% Congress at the time o% its passage or
approval, not upon events occuping, or acts per%orme!, su'se5uentl thereto, unless the latter consist o% an
amen!ment o% the organic la-, removing, -ith retrospective operation, the constitutional limitation in%ringe!
' sai! statute$ :erein, inasmuch as the lan! on -hich the proAecte! %ee!er roa!s -ere to 'e constructe!
'elonge! to Senator Lulueta at the time 2" 0*, -as passe! ' Congress, or approve! ' the Presi!ent, an!
the !is'ursement o% sai! sum 'ecame e%%ective on *, June )0+4 pursuant to Section )4 o% the "ct, the result
is that the appropriating sough a private purpose an! hence, null an! voi!$
[25]
Re-u#li& vs. B$&olo*-6ur&i$ 6illing Co.
GR L-19824-29 9 2ul% 1999
En 7anc, 2egala (J)= / concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' 2" 14* create! the Philippine Sugar #nstitute, a semiBpu'lic corporation$ #n )0+), the #nstitute
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 11 )
ac5uire! the #nsular Sugar 2e%iner %or P4$,/ million paa'le in installments %rom the procee!s o% the sugar
ta6 to 'e collecte! un!er 2" 14*$ The operation o% the re%iner %or )0+4 to )0+/ -as !isastrous as the
#nstitute su%%ere! tremen!ous losses$ Conten!ing that the purchase o% the re%iner -ith mone %rom the
#nstitute@s %un! -as not authorize! un!er 2" 14*, an! that the continue! operation o% the re%iner is inimical
to their interest, 7acolo!BCurcia Cilling Co$, CaBao Sugar Central, TalisaBSila Cilling Co$ an! the Central
"zucarera !el Danao re%use! to continue -ith their contri'ution to sai! %un!$ The trial court %oun! them lia'le
un!er 2" 14*$
(ssue' 8hether the ta6paers ma re%use to pa the special assessment, allege!l !istinct %rom an or!inar ta6
-hich no one can re%use to pa$
)el*' The nature o% a Dspecial assessmentE similar to the case has 'een !iscusse! an! e6plaine! in >utz vs$
"raneta$ The special assessment or lev %or the Philippine Sugar #nstitute (Philsugin) Fun! is not so much an
e6ercise o% the po-er o% ta6ation, nor the imposition o% a special assessment, 'ut the e6ercise o% police po-er
%or the general -el%are o% the entire countr$ #t is, there%ore, an e6ercise o% a sovereign po-er -hich no private
citizen ma la-%ull resist$ Section *a o% the Charter authorizing Philsugin to Dcon!uct research -or9 %or the
sugar in!ustr in all its phases, either agricultural or in!ustrial, %or the purpose o% intro!ucing into the sugar
in!ustr such practices or processes that -ill re!uce the cost o% pro!uction an! achieve greater e%%icienc in
the in!ustr, Austi%ies the ac5uisition o% the re%iner in 5uestion$ The %inancial loss resulting %rom the operation
thereo% is no means an in!e6 that the in!ustr !i! not pro%it there%rom, as other gains o% a !i%%erent nature
(such as e6perience) ma have 'een realize!$
[29]
11st (n.$ntr% :ost =0&7$nge vs. :os$*$s
GR 11401 4 ,e-tem#er 1910
En 7anc, Calcolm (J)= + concur
"$&ts' The 4)st #n%antr Post E6change is a post e6change constitute! in accor!ance -ith "rm regulations
an! the la-s o% the ?nite! States$ in the course o% its !ul authorize! 'usiness transactions, the E6change
ma!e man purchases o% various an! !iverse commo!ities, goo!s, -ares an! merchan!ise %rom various
merchants in the Philippines$ The Commissioner collecte! a sales ta6 o% ) )I* F o%the gross value o% the
commo!ities, etc$ %rom the merchants -ho sol! sai! commo!ities to the E6change$ " %ormal protest -as
lo!ge! ' the E6change$
(ssue' 8hether the E6change is e6empt %rom the sales ta6 impose! against its suppliers$
)el*' Ta6es have 'een collecte! %rom merchants -ho ma!e sales to "rm Post E6changes since )0,4 ("ct
))30, Section )40)$ Similar ta6es are pai! ' those -ho sell merchan!ise to the Philippine .overnment, an!
' those -ho !o 'usiness -ith the ?S "rm an! Gav in the Philippines$ :erein, the merchants -ho e%%ecte!
the sales to the Post E6change are the ones -ho pai! the ta6; an! it is the o%%icers, sol!iers, an! civilian
emploees an! their %amilites -ho are 'ene%ite! ' the post e6change to -hom the ta6 is ultimatel shi%te!$
The ta6 lai! upon the merchants -ho sell to the "rm Post E6changes !oes not inter%ere -ith the supremac
o% the ?S .overnment, nor -ith the operations o% its instrumentalities, such as the ?S "rm, to such e6tent or
in such a manner as to ren!er the ta6 illegal$ The ta6 !oes not !eprive the "rm o% the po-er to serve the
.overnment as it -as inten!e! to serve it, or hin!er the e%%icient e6ercise o% its po-er$
"n "rm Post E6change, although an agenc -ithin the ?S "rm, cannot secure e6emption %rom ta6ation %or
merchants -ho ma9e sales to the Post E6change$
[2!]
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 14 )
Aells "$rgo vs. Colle&tor o. (ntern$l Revenue
GR 49!20 28 2une 1940
First Division, Coran (J)= 4 concur, ) concur in result
"$&ts' 7ir!ie >illian Ee !ie! on )1 Septem'er )04*, at >os "ngeles, Cali%ornia, the place o% her allege! last
resi!ence an! !omicile$ "mong the properties she le%t -as her )I* conAugal shares o% stoc9 in the 7enguet
Consoli!ate! Cining Co$, an anonmous partnership (socie!a! anonima), organize! un!er the la-s o% the
Philippines$ She le%t a -ill !ul a!mitte! to pro'ate in Cali%ornia -here her estate -as a!ministere! an!
settle!$ 8ells Fargo 'an9 an! ?nion Trust Co$ -as !ul appointe! trustee o% the trust ' the sai! -ill$ The
Fe!eral an! Cali%ornia State@s inheritance ta6es !ue thereon have 'een !ul pai!$ The Collector o% #nternal
2evenue in the Philippines, ho-ever, sought to su'Aect the shares o% stoc9 to inheritance ta6, to -hich 8ells
Fargo o'Aecte!$
(ssue' 8hether the shares o% stoc9 are su'Aect to Philippine inheritance ta6 consi!ering that the !ece!ent -as
!omicile! in Cali%ornia$
)el*' (riginall, the settle! la- in the ?nite! States is that intangi'les have onl one situs %or the purpose o%
inheritance ta6, an! such situs is in the !omicile o% the !ece!ent at the time o% his or her !eath$ 7ut the rule
has 'een rela6e!$ The ma6im Dmo'ila se5uuntur personam,E upon -hich the rule rests, has 'een !ecrie! as a
mere D%iction o% la- having its origin in consi!erations o% general convenience an! pu'lic polic, an! cannot
'e applie! to limit or control teh right o% the State to ta6 propert -ithin its Auris!ictionE an! must Diel! to
esta'lishe! %act o% legal o-nership, actual presence an! control else-here, an! cannot 'e applie! i% to !o so
-houl! result in inescapa'le an! patent inAustice$E The rela6ation o% the original rule rests on either o% t-o
%un!amental consi!erations= ()) upon the recognition o% the inherent po-er o% each government to ta6
persons, properties, an! rights -ithin its Auris!iction an! enAoing, thus, the protection o% its la-s; an! (*)
upon the principle that as to intangi'les, a single location in space is har!l possi'le, consi!ering the multiple,
!istinct relationships -hich ma 'e entere! into -ith respect thereto$
:erein, the actual situs o% the shares o% stoc9 is in the Philippines, the corporation 'eing !omicile! therein$
The certi%icates o% stoc9 remaine! in the Philippines up to the time -hen the !ecease! !ie! in Cali%ornia, an!
the -ere in possession o% one Srena CcMee, secretar o% the corporation, to -hom the have 'een
!elivere! an! in!orse! in 'lan9$ CcMee ha! the legal title to the certi%icates o% stoc9 hel! in trust %or the true
o-ner thereo%$ The o-ner resi!ing in Cali%ornia has e6ten!e! here her activities -ith respect to her
intangi'les so as to avail heresel% o% the protection an! 'ene%it o% Philippine la-s$ "ccor!ingl, the
Auris!iction o% the Philippine .overnment to ta6 must 'e uphel!$
[28]
:7ili--ine 6$t&7 Co. Lt*. vs. Ce#u Cit%
GR L-10!45 18 2$nu$r% 19!8
Secon! Division, "5uino (J)= 4 concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' Ce'u Cit impose! a 5uarterl ta6 (sales ta6 o% )F) on gross sales or receipts o% merchants, !ealers,
importers an! manu%acturers or an commo!it !oing 'usiness in Ce'u Cit, through (r!inance */0$ Section
0 o% the (r!inance provi!e! that, %or the purpose o% the ta6, Dall !eliveries o% goo!s or commo!ities store! in
Ce'u Cit, or i% not store! are soll! in that cit sahll 'e consi!ere! as sales in the cit an! shall 'e ta6a'le$E
Philippine Catch Co$ >t!$, -ith principal o%%ice in Canila, 5uestione! the legalit o% the ta6 collecte! ' the
Cit o% Ce'u on sales o% matches store! ' the compan in Ce'u Cit 'ut !elivere! to customers outsi!e the
cit$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 15 )
(ssue' 8hether the Cit o% Ce'u can ta6 sales o% matches -hich -ere per%ecte! an! pai! %or in Ce'u Cit 'ut
-here the matches -ere !elivere! to customers outsi!e the cit$
)el*' The cit can vali!l ta6 the sales o% matches to customers outsi!e o% the cit as long as the or!ers -ere
'oo9e! an! pai! %or in the compan@s 'ranch o%%ice in the cit$ Those matches can 'e regar!e! as sol! in the
cit, as contemplate! in the or!inance, 'ecause the matches -ere !elvere! to the carrier in Ce'u Cit$
.enerall, !eliver to the carrier is !eliver to the 'uer ("rticle )+*4, Civil Co!e)$ " !i%%erent interpretation
-oul! !e%eat the ta6 or!inance in 5uestion or encourage ta6 evasion through the simple e6pe!ient o%
arranging %or the !eliver o% the matches at the outs9irts o% the cit though the purchases -ere e%%ecte! an!
pai! %or in the compan@s 'ranch o%%ice in the cit$ The municipal 'oar! o% the cit is empo-ere! to provi!e
%or the lev an! collection o% ta6es %or general an! special purposes in accor!ance -ith la-$
[29]
Commissioner vs. Britis7 ;verse$s Air3$%s Cor-.
GR L-95!!1-!4 10 A-ril 198!
En 7anc, CelencioB:errera (J)= / concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' 7ritish (verseas "ir-as Corp$ (7("C) is a ),,F 7ritis .overnmentBo-ne! corporation engage! in
international airline 'usiness an! is a mem'er o% the #nterline "ir Transport "ssociation, an! thus, it operates
air transportation service an! sells transportation tic9ets over the routes o% the other airline mem'ers$ From
)0+0 to )0/*, 7("C ha! no lan!ing rights %or tra%%ic purposes in the Philippines an! thus !i! not carr
passengers an!Ior cargo to or %rom the Philippines 'ut maintaine! a general sales agent in the Philippines BB
8arner 7arnes N Co$ >t!$, an! later, Kantas "ir-aus BB -hich -as responsi'le %or selling 7("C tic9ets
covering passengers an! cargoes$ The Commissioner o% #nternal 2evenue assesse! !e%icienc income ta6es
against 7("C$
(ssue' 8hether the revenue !erive! ' 7("C %rom tic9et sales in the Philippines %or air transportation, -hile
having no lan!ing rights in the Philippines, constitute income o% 7("C %rom Philippine sources, an!
accor!ingl, ta6a'le$
)el*' The source o% an income is the propert, activit or service that pro!uce! the income$ For the source o%
income to 'e consi!ere! as coming %rom the Philippines, it is su%%icient that the income is !erive! %rom
activit -ithin the Philippines$ :erein, the sale o% tic9ets in the Philippines is the activit that pro!uce! the
income$ The tic9ets e6change! han!s here an! paments %or %ares -ere also ma!e here in Philippine currenc$
The situs o% the source o% paments is the Philippines$ The %lo- o% -ealth procee!e! %rom, an! occure!
-ithin, Philippine territor, enAoing the protection accor!e! ' the Philippine .overnment$ #n consi!eration
o% such protection, the %lo- o% -ealth shoul! share the 'ur!en o% supporting the government$ PD 13, in
relation to PD )4++, ensures that international airlines are ta6e! on their income %rom Philippine sources$ The
* )I* Fta6 on gross 'illings is an income ta6$ #% it ha! 'een inten!e! as an e6cise or percentage ta6, it -oul!
have 'een place! un!er Title & o% the Ta6 Co!e covering ta6es on 'usiness$
[10]
Commissioner vs. Air (n*i$
GR L-!2441 29 2$nu$r% 1988
First Division, .ancaco (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' "ir #n!ia is a %oreign corporation an! an o%%Bline international carrier not engage! in the 'usiness o% air
transporation in the Philippines$ "ir #n!ia sells airplane tic9ets in the Philippines trhough its general sales
agent, Philippine "irlines$ Sai! tic9ets are service! ' "ir #n!ia outsi!e the Philippines$ The Commissioner o%
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 19 )
#nternal 2evenue assesse! against "ir #n!ia the amount o% P)4*,4/)$13 representing *$++ income ta6 on its
gross Philippine 'illngs pursuant to Section *4 (') (*) o% the Ta6 Co!e, as amen!e!, inclusive o% th e+,F
surcharge an! interest %or -ill%ul neglect to %ile a return as provi!e! un!er Section /* o% the same Co!e$ "ir
#n!ia appeale! to the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals$
(ssue' 8hether the revenue !erive! ' an international air carrier %rom sles o% tic9ets in the Philippines %or air
transportation, -hile having no lan!ing rights in the countr, constitutes income o% sai! carrier %rom
Philippine sources, an! thus ta6a'le un!er Section *4 (') (*) o% the Ta6 Co!e$
)el*' 7ase! on the !octrine enunciate! in 7ritish (verseas "ir-as Corp$, the revenue !erive! ' "ir #n!ia
%rom the sales o% airplane tic9ets, through its agent in the Philippines, must 'e consi!ere! ta6a'le income$ "s
correctl assesse! ' the Commissioner, such income is su'Aect to a *$+F ta6 pursuant to PD )4++, amen!ing
section *4 (') (*) o% the Ta6 Co!e$
[11]
Allie* /7re$* vs. Cit% o. 6$nil$
GR L-40299 21 <ovem#er 1984
En 7anc, "'a! Santos (J)= ), concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' "llie! Threa! Co$ #nc$ is engage! in the 'usiness o% manu%acturing se-ing threa! an! arn$ #t operates
its %actor an! maintains an o%%ice in Pasig, 2izal$ #n or!er to sell its pro!ucts in Canila an! in other parts o%
the Philippines, it engage! the services o% a sales 'ro9er, Mer N Co$ >t!$, the latter !eriving commissions
%rom ever sale ma!e %or its principal$ The Cit o% Canila enacte! (r!inance /+)1 imposing 'usiness ta6es
'ase! on gross sales on a gra!uate! 'asis on manu%acturers, importers or pro!ucers !oing 'usiness in Canila$
"llie! Threa! an! Mer N Co$ allege! that sai! or!inance is invali! %or 'eing contrar to Section +4 o% PD
4*1$
(ssue' 8hether "llei! Threa! is properl ta6e! in Canila$
)el*' (r!inance /+)1, as amen!e!, imposes a 'usiness ta6 on manu%acturers, importers or pro!ucers !oing
'usiness in Canila$ The ta6 imposition is upon the per%ormance o% an act, enAoment o% a privilege, or the
engaging in an occupation, an! hence is in the nature o% an e6cise ta6$ The po-er to lev an e6cise upon the
per%orance o% an act or the engaging in an occupation !oes not !epen! upon the !omicile o% the person su'Aect
tot he e6cise, nor upon the phsical location o% the propert an! in connection -ith the act or occupation
ta6e!, 'ut !epen!s upon the place in -hich the act is per%orme! or occupation engage! in$ Thus, since "llie!
Threa! sells its pro!ucts in the Cit o% Canila through its 'ro9er, Mer N Co$, it cannot escapte the ta6 lia'ilit
impose! ' (r!inance /+)1, as amen!e!$
[12]
A#r$ vs. )ern$n*o
GR L-49119 11 August 1981
Secon! Division, Fernan!o (J)=
4 concur, ) concur in result, ) on leave
"$&ts' The provincial assessor ma!e a ta6 assessment on the properties o% the 2oman Catholic 7ishop o%
7angue!$ The 'ishop claims ta6 e6emption %rom real estate ta6, through an action %or !eclarator relie%$ "
summar Au!gment -as ma!e granting the e6emption -ithout hearing the si!e o% the Province o% "'ra$
(ssue' 8hether the properties o% the 7ishop o% 7angue! are ta6Be6empt$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 1! )
)el*' The )04+ an! the )0/4 Constitutions !i%%er in language as to the e6emption o% religious propert %rom
ta6es as teh shoul! not onl 'e De6clusivelE 'ut also DactuallE an! D!irectlE use! %or religious purposes$
:erein, the Au!ge accepte! at its %ace the allegation o% the 7ishop instea! o% !emonstrating that there is
compliance -ith the constitutional provision that allo-s an e6emption$ There -as an allegation o% lac9 o%
Auris!iction an! o% lac9 o% cause o% action, -hich shoul! have compelle! the Au!ge to accor! a hearing to the
province rather than !eci!ing the case imme!iatel in %avor o% the 7ishop$ E6emption %rom ta6ation is not
%avore! an! is never presume!, so that i% grante!, it must 'e strictl construe! against the ta6paer$ There
must 'e proo% o% the actual an! !irect use o% the lan!s, 'uil!ings, an! improvements %or religious (or
charita'le) purposes to 'e e6empte! %rom ta6ation$
The case -as reman!e! to the lo-er court %or a trial on merits$
[11]
Asso&i$tion o. Custom BroBers vs. 6$nil$
GR L-41!9 22 6$% 1951
En 7anc, 7autistaB"ngelo (J)= 4 concur, 4 concur in result
"$&ts' The "ssociation o% Customs 7ro9ers, -hich is compose! o% all 'ro9ers an! pu'lic service operators o%
motor vehicles in the Cit o% Canila, challenges the vali!it o% (r!inance 44/0 on the groun!s ()) that -hile
it levies a soBcalle! propert ta6, it is in realit a license ta6 -hich is 'eon! the po-er o% the Canila
Cunicipal 7oar!; (*) that sai! or!inance o%%en!s against the rule on uni%ormit o% ta6es; an! (4) that it
constitutes !ou'le ta6ation$
(ssue' 8hether the or!inance in%ringes on the rule on uni%ormit o% ta6es as or!aine! ' the Constitution$
)el*' 8hile the ta6 in the (r!inance re%ers to propert ta6 an! it is %i6e! a! valorem, it is merel levie! on
all motor vehicles operating -ithin Canila -ith the main purpose o% raising %un!s to 'e e6pen!e! e6clusivel
%or the repair, maintenance an! improvement o% the streets an! 'ri!ges in sai! cit$ The or!inance imposes a
license %ee although un!er the cloa9 o% an a! valorem ta6 to circumvent the prohi'ition in the Cotor &ehicle
>a-$ Further, it !oes not !istinguish 'et-een a motor vehicle %or hire an! one -hich is purel %or private use$
Geither !oes it !istinguish 'et-een a motor vehicle registere! in Canila an! one registere! in another place
'ut occasionall comes to Canila an! uses its streets an! pu'lic high-as$ The !istinction is necessar i% he
or!inance inten!s to 'ur!en -ith ta6 onl those registere! in Canila as ma 'e in%erre! %rom the -or!
DoperatingE use! therein$ There is an ine5ualit in the or!inance -hich ren!ers it o%%ensive to the
Constitution$
[14]
C$-$tir$n ng mg$ <$glilingBo* s$ :$m$7$l$$n vs. /$n
GR L-81111 10 2une 1988
En 7anc, Pa!illa (J)= )* concur, * on leave
"$&ts' E( */4 -as issue! ' the Presi!ent o% the Philippines -hich amen!e! the 2evenue Co!e, a!opting the
valueBa!!e! ta6 (&"T) e%%ective ) Januar )033$ Four petitions assaile! the vali!it o% the &"T >a- %ro 'eing
'eon! the Presi!ent to enact; %or 'eing oppressive, !iscriminator, regressive, an! violative o% the !ue
process an! e5ual protection clauses, among others, o% the Constitution$ The #ntegrate! Customs 7ro9ers
"ssociation particularl conten! that it un!ul !iscriminate against customs 'ro9ers (Section ),4 ;r<) as the
amen!e! provision o% the Ta6 Co!e provi!es that Dservice per%orme! in the e6ercise o% pro%ession or calling
(e6cept custom 'ro9ers) su'Aect to occupational ta6 un!er the >ocal Ta6 Co!e, an! pro%essional services
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 18 )
per%orme! ' registere! general pro%essional partnerships are e6empt %rom &"T$
(ssue' 8hether the EB&"T la- !iscriminates against customs 'ro9ers$
)el*' The phrase De6cept custom 'ro9ersE is not meant to !iscriminate against custom 'ro9ers 'ut to avert a
potential con%lict 'et-een Sections ),* an! ),4 o% the Ta6 Co!e, as amen!e!$ The !istinction o% the customs
'ro9ers %rom the other pro%essionals -ho are su'Aect to occupation ta6 un!er the >ocal Ta6 Co!e is 'ase!
upon material !i%%erences, in that the activities o% customs 'ro9ers parta9e more o% a 'usiness, rather than a
pro%ession an! -ere thus su'Aecte! to the percentage ta6 un!er Section )/4 o% the Ta6 Co!e prior to its
amen!ment ' E( */4$ E( */4 a'olishe! the percentage ta6 an! replace! it -ith the &"T$ #% the "ssociation
!i! not protest the classi%ication o% customs 'ro9ers then, there is no reason -h it shoul! protest no-$
[15]
,ison vs. An&7et$
GR L-59411 25 2ul% 1984
En 7anc, Fernan!o (J)= 0 concur, * concur in result, ) concur in separate opinion, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' 7atas Pam'ansa )4+ -as enacte!$ Sison, as ta6paer, allege! that its provision (Section )) un!ul
!iscriminate! against him ' the imposition o% higher rates upon his income as a pro%essional, that it amounts
to class legislation, an! that it transgresses against the e5ual protection an! !ue process clauses o% the
Constitution as -ell as the rule re5uiring uni%ormit in ta6ation$
(ssue' 8hether 7P )4+ violates the !ue process an! e5ual protection clauses, an! the rule on uni%ormit in
ta6ation$
)el*' There is a nee! %or proo% o% such persuasive character as -oul! lea! to a conclusion that there -as a
violation o% the !ue process an! e5ual protection clauses$ "'sent such sho-ing, the presumption o% vali!it
must prevail$ E5ualit an! uni%ormit in ta6ation means that all ta6a'le articles or 9in!s o% propert o% the
same class shall 'e ta6e! at the same rate$ The ta6ing po-er has the authorit to ma9e reasona'le an! natural
classi%ications %or purposes o% ta6ation$ 8here the !i%%erentitation con%orms to the practical !ictates o% Austice
an! e5uit, similar to the stan!ar!s o% e5ual protection, it is not !iscriminator -ithin the meaning o% the
clause an! is there%ore uni%orm$ Ta6paers ma 'e classi%ie! into !i%%erent categories, such as recipients o%
compensation income as against pro%essionals$ 2ecipients o% compensation income are not entitle! to ma9e
!e!uctions %or income ta6 purposes as there is no practicall no overhea! e6pense, -hile pro%essionals an!
'usinessmen have no uni%orm costs or e6penses necessarh to pro!uce their income$ There is ample
Austi%ication to a!opt the gross sstem o% income ta6ation to compensation income, -hile continuing the
sstem o% net income ta6ation as regar!s pro%essional an! 'usiness income$
[19]
2u$n Lun$ ,u#*ivision vs. ,$rmiento
GR L-1518 28 6$% 1952
En 7anc, Tuason (J)= / concur
"$&ts' Juan >una Su'!ivision is a local corporation -hich issue! a chec9 to the Cit Treasurer o% Canila %or
amount to 'e applie! to its lan! ta6 %or the secon! semester o% )04)$ The recor!s o% the Cit Treasurer !o not
sho- -hat -as !one -ith the chec9 (#t appears that it -as !eposite! -ith the Philippine Gational 7an9
;PG7<)$ "%ter li'eration (88##), the Cit Treasurer re%use! to re%un! the corporation@s !eposit or appl it to
such %uture ta6es as might 'e %oun! !ue, -hile the Philippine Trust Co (to -hich the chec9 -as presente!)
-as un-illing to reverse its !e'it entr against Juan >una Su'!$ Sai! amount is also su'Aect o% another
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 19 )
!isagreement 'et-een the corporation an! the Cit Treasure, -ith the corporation claiming that the
-holeamount o% the chec9 %or the ta6es %or the last semester o% )04) have 'een remitte! ' Common-ealth
"ct /,4 ()04+)$
(ssue' 8hether the provision allo-ing the remission covers ta6es pai! 'e%ore the enactment o%
Common-ealth "ct /,4, or ta6es -hich -ere still unpai!$
)el*' The la- is clear that it applies to Dta6es an! penalties !ue an! paa'le,E i$e$ ta6es o-e! or o-ing$ The
remission o% ta6es !ue an! paa'le to the e6clusion og ta6es alrea! collecte! !oes not constitute un%air
!iscrimination$ Each set o% ta6es is a class ' itsel%, an! the la- -oul! 'e open to attac9 as class legislation
onl i% all ta6paers 'elonging to one class -ere not treate! ali9e$ :erein, the are not$ The ta6paers -ho
pai! their ta6es 'e%ore li'eration an! those -ho ha! not -ere not on the same %ooting on the nee! o% material
relie%$ Ta6paers -ho ha! 'een in arrears in their o'ligation -houl! have to satis% their lia'ilit -ith genuine
currenc, -hile the ta6es pai! !uring the occupation ha! 'een satis%ie! in Japanese 8ar Gotes, man o% them
at a time -hen those notes -ere -ellBnigh -orthless$ To re%un! those ta6es -ith restore! currenc -oul! 'e
un!ul enrich man o% the paers at a greater e6pense to the people at large$
[1!]
,7ell Co. vs. ?$no
GR L-9091 24 "e#ru$r% 1954
En 7anc, Pa!illa (J)= ), concur
"$&ts' The municipal council o% Cor!ova, Ce'u a!opte! (r!inance ), ()041) imposing an annual ta6 o% P)+,
on occupation or the e6ercise o% the privilege o% installation manager; (r!inance 0 ()04/) imposing an annual
ta6 o% P4, %or local !eposits in !rums o% com'usti'le an! in%lamma'le materials an! an annual ta6 o% P*,,
%or tin can %actories; an! (r!inance )) ()043) imposing an annual ta6 o% P)+, on tin can %actories having a
ma6imum annual output capacit o% 4,,,,, tin cans$ Shell Co$, a %oreign corporation, %ile! suit %or the re%un!
o% the ta6es pai! ' it, on the groun! that the or!inances imposing such ta6es are ultra vires$
(ssue' 8hether (r!inance ), is !iscriminator an! hostile 'ecause there is no other person in the localit
-ho e6ercise such !esignation or occupation$
)el*' The %act that there is no other person in the localit -ho e6ercises such a D!esignationE or calling !oes
not ma9e the or!inance !iscriminator an! hostile, inasmuch as it is an! -ill 'e applica'le to an person or
%irm -ho e6ercises such calling or occupation name! or !esignate! as Dinstallation manager$E
[18]
?i&tori$s 6illing Co. vs. 6uni&i-$lit% o. ?i&tori$s
GR L-21181 2! ,e-tem#er 1998
En 7anc, Sanchez (J)= 0 concur
"$&ts' (r!inance ) ()0+1) -as approve! ' the municipal council o% &ictorias ' -a o% an amen!ment to *
municipal or!inances separatel imposing license ta6es on operators o% sugar centrals an! sugar re%ineries$
The changes -ere= ()) -ith respect to sugar centrals, ' increasing the rates o% license ta6es; an! (*) as to
sugar re%ineries, ' increasing the rates o% license ta6es as -ell as teh range o% gra!uate! sche!ule o% annual
output capacit$ &ictorias Cilling 5uestione! the vali!it o% (r!inance ) as it, among others, allege!l single!
out &ictorias Cilling Co$ since it is the onl operator o% a sugar central an! a sugar re%iner -ithin the
Auris!iction o% the municipalit$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 20 )
(ssue' 8hether (r!inance ) is !iscriminator$
)el*' The or!inance !oes not single out &ictorias as the onl o'Aect o% the or!inance 'ut is ma!e to appl to
an sugar central or sugar re%iner -hich ma happen to operate in the municipalit$ The %act that &ictorias
Cilling is actuall the sole operator o% a sugar central an! a sugar re%iner !oes not ma9e the or!inance
!iscriminator$ The or!inance is unli9e that in (rmoc Sugar Compan vs$ Cunicipal 7oar! o% (rmoc Cit,
-hich speci%icall spelle! out (rmoc Sugar as the su'Aect o% the ta6ation, the name o% the compan herein
-as never mentione! in the or!inance$
[19]
:uns$l$n vs. 6$nil$
GR L-481! 29 6$% 1954
En 7anc, 2ees (J)= / concur
"$&ts' (r!inance 4403 -as enacte! pursuant to paragraph ) o% Section )3 o%the 2evise! Charter o% the Cit
o% Canila, imposing a municipal occupation ta6 on persons e6ercising various pro%essions in the cit$ &arious
pro%essionals %ile! suit to annul the or!inance an! the provision o% la- authorizing the enactment o% the
or!inance, an! to call %or the re%un! collecte! ta6es un!er the or!inance$
(ssue' 8hether the (r!inance violates the e5ual protection clause$
)el*' The legislature ma, in its !iscretion, select -hat occupation shall 'e ta6e!, an! in the e6ercise o% that
!iscretion it ma ta6 all, or it ma select %or ta6ation certain classes an! leave the other unta6e!$ Canila, as
the seat o% the Gational .overnment an! -ith a population an! volume o% tra!e man times that o% an other
Philippine cit or municipalit, o%%ers a more lucrative %iel! %or the practice o% the pro%essions, so that it is 'ut
%air that the pro%essionals in Canila 'e ma!e to pa a higher occupation ta6 than their 'rethen in the
provinces$ The or!inance imposes the ta6 upon ever person De6ercisingE or DpursuingE an o% the occupation
name! in the or!inance, an! !oes not ma9e an !istinction 'et-een pro%essional having o%%ices in Canila an!
outsi!ers -ho practice their pro%ession therein$ 8hat constitutes e6ercise or pursuit o% a pro%ession in the cit
is a matter o% Au!icial !etermination$
The (r!inance !oes not violate the e5ual protection clause$
[40]
;rmo& ,ug$r vs. /re$surer o. ;rmo& Cit%
GR L-21!94 1! "e#ru$r% 1998
En 7anc, 7angzon JP (J)= 0 concur
"$&ts' #n )014, the Cunicipal 7oar! o% (rmoc Cit passe! (r!inance 4, imposing on an an! all pro!uctions
o% centri%uga sugar mille! at the (rmoc Sugar Co$ #nc$ in (rmoc Cit a municpal ta6 e5uivalent to )F per
e6port sale to the ?nite! States an! other %oreign countries$ The compan pai! the sai! ta6 un!er protest$ #t
su'se5uentl %ile! a case see9ing to invali!ate the or!inance %or 'eing unconstitutional$
(ssue' 8hether the or!inance violates the e5ual protection clause$
)el*' The (r!inance ta6es onl centri%ugal sugar pro!uce! an! e6porte! ' the (rmoc Sugar Co$ #nc$ an!
none other$ "t the time o% the ta6ing or!inance@s enacte!, the compan -as the onl sugar central in (rmoc
Cit$ The classi%ication, to 'e reasona'le, shoul! 'e in terms applica'le to %uture con!itions as -ell$ The
ta6ing or!inance shoul! not 'e singular an! e6clusive as to e6clu!e an su'se5uentl esta'lishe! sugar
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 21 )
central, o% the same class as the present compan, %rom the coverage o% the ta6$ "s it is no-, even i% later a
similar compan is set up, it cannot 'e su'Aect to the ta6 'ecause the or!inance e6pressl points onl to the
compan as the entit to 'e levie! upon$
[41]
:e-si-Col$ Bottling Co. vs. Cit% o. Butu$n
GR L-22814 28 August 1998
En 7anc, Concepcion (J)= + concur
"$&ts' (r!inance )), -as enacte! ' the Cit o% 7utuan imposing a ta6 o% P,$), per case o% *4 'ottles o%
so%t!rin9s or car'onate! !rin9s$ The ta6 -as impose! upon !ealers engege! in selling so%t!rin9s or
car'onate! !rin9s$ 8hen (r!inance )),, the ta6 -as impose! upon an agent or consignee o% an person,
association, partnership, compan or corporation engage! in selling so%t!rin9s or car'onate! !rin9s, -ith
Dagent or consigneeE 'eing particularl !e%ine! on the inserte! provision Section 4B"$ #n e%%ect, merchants
engage! in the sale o% so%t!rin9s, etc$ are not su'Aect to the ta6 unless the are agents or consignees o% another
!ealer -ho must 'e one engage! in 'usiness outsi!e the Cit$ PepsiBCola 7ottling Co$ %ile! suit to recover
sums pai! ' it to the cit pursuant to the (r!inance, -hich it claims to 'e null an! voi!$
(ssue' 8hether the (r!inance is !iscriminator$
)el*' The (r!inance, as amen!e!, is !iscriminator since onl sales ' Dagents or consigneesE o% outsi!e
!ealers -oul! 'e su'Aect to the ta6$ Sales ' local !ealers, not acting %or or on 'ehal% o% other merchants,
regar!less o% the volume o% their sales , an! even i% the same e6cee!e! those ma!e ' sai! agents or
consignees o% pro!ucers or merchants esta'lishe! outsi!e the cit, -oul! 'e e6empt %rom the ta6$ The
classi%ication ma!e in the e6ercise o% the authorit to ta6, to 'e vali! must 'e reasona'le, -hich -oul! 'e
satis%ie! i% the classi%ication is 'ase! upon su'stantial !istinctions -hich ma9es real !i%%erences; these are
germane to the purpose o% legislation or or!inance; the classi%ication applies not onl to present con!itions 'ut
also to %uture con!itions su'stantiall i!entical to those o% the present; an! the classi%ication applies e5uall to
all those -ho 'elong to the same class$ These con!itions are not %ull met ' the or!inance in 5uestion$
[42]
?er$ vs. Cuev$s
GR L-11991-94 11 6$% 19!9
First Division, De Castro (J)= 4 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' Consoli!ate! Philippines #nc$, .eneral Cil9 Co$ (Phil$) #nc$, an! Cil9 #n!ustries #nc$ are engage! in
the manu%acture, sale an! !istri'ution o% %ille! mil9 pro!ucts throughout the Philippines$ The #nstitute o%
Evaporate! Fulle! Cil9 Canu%acturers o% the Philippines is a corporation organize! to uphol! an! maintain
the highest stan!ar!s o% local %ille! mil9 in!ustries, o% -hich the companies are mem'ers$ The Commissioner
re5uire! the companies to -ith!ra- %rom the mar9et all o% their %ille! mil9 pro!ucts -hich !o not 'ear the
inscription re5uire! ' Section )10 (#nscription to 'e place! on s9imme! mil9) o% the Ta6 Co!e -ithin )+
!as %rom receipt o% or!er -ith e6plicit -arning o% prosection %or nonBcompliance$ The companies %ile! an
action %or prohi'ition an! inAunction$
(ssue' 8hether Section )10 o% theTa6 Co!e can 'e en%orce! against the companies$
)el*' 8ith Section )4) (speci%ic ta6 impose! on s9imme! mil9) an! Section )// (penalt on sale o%
s9imme! mil9 -ithout pament o% speci%ic ta6 an! legen! re5uire! in Section )10) repeale! ' 2" 444 an!
2" 414, respectivel; Section )10 has lost its ta6 purpose, an! thus the Commissioner necessar lost his
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 22 )
authorit to en%orce the same$ Further, Section )10 applies to s9imme! mil9, -hich is !i%%erent to %ille! mil9$
Furthermore, Section )10 is onl 'eing en%orce! against the respon!ent companies na! not against
manu%acturers, !istri'utors or sellers o% con!ense! s9imme! mil9 such as S#C#>"C, SC", 72EC#>,
EGF"C#>, an! (>"C$ Such 9in! o% en%orcement amounts to an unconstitutional !enial o% the e5ual
protection o% the la-s, %or the la-, i% not e5uall en%orce! to persons similarl situate!, -oul! o%%en! against
the Constitution$
[41]
Ameri&$n Bi#le ,o&iet% vs. 6$nil$
GR L-991! 10 A-ril 195!
Secon! Division, Feli6 (J)= / concur, ) concur in result
"$&ts' #n the course o% its ministr, the Philippine agenc o% the "merican 7i'le Societ has 'een !istri'uting
an! selling 'i'les an!Ior gospel portions thereo% throughout the Philippines an! translating the same into
several Philippine !ialets$ The acting Cit Treasurer o% Canila re5uire! the societ to secure the
correspon!ing Caor@s permit an! municipal license %ees, together -ith compromise covering the perio!
%rom the 4th 5uarter o% )04+ to the *n! 5uarter o% )0+4$ The societ pai! such un!er protest, an! %ile! suit
5uestioning the legalit o% the or!inances un!er -hich the %ees are 'eing collecte!$
(ssue' 8hether the municipal or!inances violate the %ree!om o% religious pro%ession an! -orship$
)el*' " ta6 on the income o% one -ho engages in religious activities is !i%%erent %rom a ta6 on propert use!
or emploe! in connection -ith those activities$ #t is one thing to impose a ta6 on the income or propert o% a
preacher, an! another to e6act a ta6 %or him %or the privilege o% !elivering a sermon$ The po-er to ta6 the
e6ercise o% a privilege is the po-er to control or suppress its enAoment$ Even i% religious groups an! the press
are not altogether %ree %rom the 'ur!ens o% the government, the act o% !istri'uting an! selling 'i'les is purel
religious an! !oes not %all un!er Section */ (e) o% the Ta6 Co!e (C" 411)$ The %act that the price o% 'i'les,
etc$ are a little higher than actual cost o% the same !oes not necessaril mean it is alrea! engage! in 'usiness
%or pro%it$ (r!inance *+*0 an! 4,,, are not applica'le to the Societ$
[44]
C$g$%$n =le&tri& :o3er D Lig7t Co. vs. Commissioner
GR L-90129 25 ,e-tem#er 1985
Secon! Division, "5uino (J)= + concur
"$&ts' Cagaan Electric is a hol!er o% a legislative %ranchise un!er 2epu'lic "ct 4*4/ -here pament o% 4F
ta6 on gross earnings is in lieu o% all ta6es an! assessments upon privileges, etc$ #n )013, 2" +44) amen!e!
the %ranchise ' ma9ing all corporate ta6paers lia'le %or income ta6 e6cept those in!icate! in paragraph (c)
()) o% Section *4 o% the Ta6 Co!e$ #n )010, through 2" 1,*,, its %ranchise -as e6ten!e! to t-o other to-ns
an! the ta6 e6emption -as reenacte!$ #n )0/4, the Commissioner re5uire! the compan to pa !e%icienc
income ta6es %or )013 to )0/)$
(ssue' 8hether the -ith!ra-al o% the %ranchise@s ta6 e6emption violates the nonBimpairment clause o% the
Constitution$
)el*' Congress coul! impair the compan@s legislative %ranchise ' ma9ing it lia'le %or income ta6$ The
Constitution provi!es that a %ranchise is su'Aect to amen!ment, alteration or repeal ' the Congress -hen the
pu'lic interest so re5uires$ 2" 4*4/ itsel% provi!es that the %ranchise is su'Aect to amen!ment, etc$ '
Congress$ The enactment o% 2" +44) ha! the e%%ect o% -ith!ra-ing the compan@s e6emption %rom income
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 21 )
ta6$ The e6emption -as restore! ' the enactment o% 2" 1,*,$ The compan is lia'le onl %or the income ta6
%pr the perio! o% ) Januar to 4 "ugust )010$
[45]
C$s$nov$s vs. )or*
GR L-14!1 22 6$r&7 190!
First Division, 8illar! (J)= 4 concur, ) !issents
"$&ts' #n )30/, the Spanish .overnment, in accor!ance -ith the provisions o% the roal !ecree o% )4 ma
)31/, grante! J$ Casanovas certain mines in the province o% "m'os Camarines, o% -hich mines the latter is
no- the o-ner$ That these -ere vali!l per%ecte! mining concessions grante! to prior to )) "pril )300 is
conce!e!$ The -ere so consi!ere! ' the Collector o% #nternal 2evenue an! -ere ' him sai! to %all -ithin
the provisions o% Section )44 o% "ct ))30 (#nternal 2evenue "ct)$ The Commissioner, JG( S$ :or!, impose!
upon these properties the ta6 mentione! in Section )44, -hich Casanovas pai! un!er protest$
(ssue' 8hether Section )44 o% "ct ))30 is vali!$
)el*' The !ee! constitute! a contract 'et-een the Spanish .overnment an! Casanovas$ The o'ligation in the
contract -as impaire! ' the enactment o% Section )44 o%the #nternal 2evenue >a, there' in%ringing the
provisions o% Section + o% the "ct o% Congress o% ) Jul )0,*$ Furthermore, the section con%licts -ith Section
1, o% the "ct o% Congress o% ) Jul )0,*, -hich in!icate that concessions can 'e cancelle! onl ' reason o%
illegalit in the proce!ure ' -hich the -er o'taine!, or %or %ailure to compl -ith the con!itions prescri'e!
as re5uisites %or their retention in the la-s un!er -hich the -er grante!$ The groun!s -ere not sho-n or
claime! in the case$ "s to the allegation that the section violates uni%ormit o% ta6ation, the Court %oun! it
unnecessar to consi!er the claim in vie- o% the result at -hich the Court has arrive!$
[49]
C7ur&7ill vs. Con&e-&ion
GR 115!2 22 ,e-tem#er 1919
Secon! Division, Trent (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' Section ),, o% "ct *440 (promulgate! )0)4) impose! an annual ta6 o% P4 per s5uare meter upon
electric signs, 'ill'oar!s, an! spaces use! %or posting or !isplaing temporar signs, an! all signs !isplae!
on premises not occupie! ' 'uil!ings$ The section -as amen!e! ' "ct *44*, re!ucing the ta6 to P* per
s5uare meter$ The ta6es impose! ' "ct *44* -ere rati%ie! ' the ?S Congress on 4 Carch )0)+$ Francis "$
Churchill an! Ste-art Tait, coBpartners in Cercantile "!vertising "genc, o-e! a 'ill'oar! to -hich the
-ere ta6e! at P),4$ The ta6 -as pai! un!er protest$ Churchill an! Tait institute! the action to recover the
amount$
(ssue' 8hether the statute or ta6 is voi! %or lac9 o% uni%ormit$
)el*' ?ni%ormit in ta6ation means that all ta6a'le articles or 9in!s o% propert, o% the same class, shall 'e
ta6e! at the same rate$ #t !oes not mean that lan!s, chattels, securities, incomes, occupations, %ranchises,
privileges, necessities, an! lu6uries shall all 'e assesse! at the same rate$ Di%%erent articles ma 'e ta6e! at
!i%%erent amounts provi!e! the rate is uni%orm on the same class ever-here, -ith all people, at all times$
:erein, the "ct imposes a ta6 o% P* per s5uare meter or a %raction thereo% upon ever electric sign, 'ill'oar!,
etc$, -herever %oun! in the Philippine #slan!s$ The rule o% ta6ation upon such signs is uni%orm throughout the
islan!s$ The rule !oes not re5uire ta6es to 'e gra!e! accor!ing to the value o% the su'Aect(s) upon -hich the
are impose!, especiall those levie! as privilege or occupation ta6es$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 24 )
[4!]
?ill$nuev$ vs. (loilo Cit%
GR L-29521 28 De&em#er 1998
En 7anc, Castro (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' (n 4, Septem'er )041, the Cunicipal 7oar! o% #loilo Cit enacte! (r!inance 31 imposing license ta6
%ees upon tenement house (P*+); tenemen house partl engage! or -holl engage! in an! !e!icate! to
'usiness in 7aza, #znart, an! "l!eguer Streets (P*4 per apartment); an! tenement house, pa!tl or -holl
engage! in 'usiness in other streets (P)* per apartment)$ The vali!it o% such or!inance -as challenge! '
Euse'io an! 2eme!ios &illanueva, o-ners o% %our tenement houses containing 44 apartments$ The Supreme
Court hel! the or!inance to 'e ultra vires$ (n )+ Januar )01,, ho-ever, the municipal 'oar!, 'elieving that it
ac5uire! authorit to enact an or!inance o% the same nature pursuant to the >ocal "utonom "ct, enacte!
(r!inance )) (series o% )01,), Euse'io an! 2eme!ios &illaniueva assaile! the or!inance ane-$
(ssue' 8hether (r!inance )) violate the rule o% uni%ormit o% ta6ation$
)el*' The Court has rule! that tenement houses constitute a !istinct class o% propert; an! that ta6es are
uni%orm an! e5ual -hen impose! upon all propert o% the same class or character -ithin the ta6ing authorit$
The %act that the o-ners o% the other classes o% 'uil!ings in #loilo are not impose! upon ' the or!inance, or
that tenement ta6es are impose! in other cities !o not violate the rule o% e5ualit an! uni%ormit$ The rule
!oes not re5uire that ta6es %or the same purpose shoul! 'e impose! in !i%%erent territorial su'!ivisions at the
same time$ So long as the 'ur!en o% ta6 %alls e5uall an! impartiall on all o-ners or operators o% tenement
houses similarl classi%ie! or situate!, e5ualit an! uni%ormit is accomplishe!$ The presumption that ta6
statutes are inten!e! to operate uni%orml an! e5uall -as not overthro-n herein$
[48]
=$stern /7e$tri&$l Co. vs. Al.onso
GR L-1104 11 6$% 1944
Secon! Division, Per%ecto (J)= + concur
"$&ts' The municipal 'oar! o% Canila enacte! (r!inance *0+3 (series o% )041) imposing a %ee on the price o%
ever a!mission tic9et sol! ' cinematograph theaters, vau!eville companies, theatrical sho-s an! 'o6ing
e6hi'itions, in a!!ition to %ees impose! un!er Sections 144 an! //3 o% (r!inance )1,,$ Eastern Theatrical
Co$, among others, 5uestion the vali!it o% or!inance, on the groun! that it is unconstitutional %or 'eing
contrar to the provisions on uni%ormit an! e5ualit o% ta6ation an! the e5ual protection o% the la-s
inasmuch as the or!inance !oes not ta6 other 9in!s o% amusement, such as race trac9s, coc9pits, ca'arets,
concert halls, circuses, an! other places o% amusement$
(ssue' 8hether the or!inance violates the rule on uni%ormit an! e5ualit o% ta6ation$
)el*' E5ualit an! uni%ormit in ta6ation means that all ta6a'le articles or 9in!s o% propert o% the same class
shall 'e ta6e! at the same rate$ The ta6ing po-er has the authorit to ma9e reasona'le an! natural
classi%ications %or purposes o% ta6ation; an! the theater companies cannot point out -hat places o% amusement
ta6e! ' the or!inance !o not constitute a class ' themselves an! -hich can 'e con%use! -ith those not
inclu!e! in the or!inance$ The %act that some- places o% amusement are not ta6e! -hile others, li9e the ones
herein, are ta6e! is no argument at all against the e5ualit an! uni%ormit o% the ta6 imposition$
[49]
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 25 )
Re%es vs. Alm$n+or
GR 49819-49 29 A-ril 1991
En 7anc, Paras (J)= )+ concur
"$&ts' J7>, E!mun!o an! Cilagros 2ees are o-ners o% parcels o% lan! in Canila -hich are lease! an!
occupie! as !-elling sites ' tenants$ #n )0/), 2" 14+0 -as passe! prohi'iting an increase o% monthl
rentals o% !-elling units or o% lan! on -hich another !-elling is locate! %or one ear a%ter e%%ectivit %or
rentals not e6cee!ing P4,, 'ut allo-ing an increase o% rent therea%ter ' not more than ),F$ The "ct also
suspen!e! the operation o% "rticle )1/4 o% the Civil Co!e (eAectment o% lessess)$ PD *, amen!e! 2" 14+0 '
a'solutel prohi'iting the increase an! in!e%initel suspen!ing "rticle )1/4$ The 2eeses, thus, -ere
preclu!e! %rom raising the rentals an! %rom eAecting the tenants$ #n )0/4, the Cit "ssessor o% Canila
reclassi%ie! an! reassesse! the value o% the properties 'ase! on the sche!ule o% mar9et values !ul revie-e!
' the Secretar o% Finance$ "s it entaile! an increase o% the correspon!ing ta6 rates, the 2eeses %ile! a
memoran!um o% !isagreement -ith the 7oar! o% Ta6 "ssessment "ppeals an! averring therein that the
reassessments -ere e6cessive, un-arrante!, une5uita'le, con%iscator an! unconstitutional inasmuch as the
ta6es impose! e6cee!e! the annual income !erive! %rom their properties; an! that the income approach
shoul! have 'een use! in !etermining lan! values instea! o% the comparative sales approach -hich the
assessor a!opte!$
(ssue' 8hether the reassessment is une5uita'le$
)el*' Ta6ation is e5uita'le -hen its 'ur!en %alls on those 'etter a'le to pa$ Ta6ation is progressive -hen its
rate goes up !epen%ing on the resources o% the person a%%ecte!$ Ta6es are uni%orm -hen all ta6a'le articles or
9in!s o% propert o% the same class are ta6e! at the same rate$ The ta6ing po-er has the authorit to ma9e
reasona'le an! natural classi%ication %or purposes o% ta6ation$ >a-s shoul! operate e5uall an! uni%orml,
ho-ever, on all persons un!er similar circumstances or that all persons mus t 'e treate! in the same manner,
the con!itiions not 'eing !i%%erent 'oth in the privileges con%erre! an! lia'ilities impose!$ Finall, un!er the
2eal Propert Ta6 Co!e (PD 414), propert must 'e appraise! at its cuurent an! %air mar9et value$ The mar9et
value o% the properties covere! ' PD *,, thus cannot 'e e5uate! -ith the mar9et value o% properties not so
covere!$ Shcu propert covere! ' PD *, has naturall a much lesser mar9et value in vie- o% the rental
restrictions$ "lthough ta6es are the li%e'loo! o% the government an! shoul! 'e collecte! -ithout unnecessar
hin!rance, such collection shoul! 'e ma!e in accor!ance -ith la- as an ar'itrariness -ill negate the ver
reason %or government itsel%$ "s teh 2eeses are 'ur!ene! ' the 2ent Freeze >a-s (2" 14+0 an! PD *,),
the shoul! not 'e penalize! ' the same government ' the imposition o% e6cessive ta6es the cancan ill
a%%or! an! -oul! eventuall result in the %or%eiture o% their properties, un!er the principle o% social Austice$
[50]
A#r$ ?$lle% College vs. AEuino
GR L-19089 15 2une 1988
"$&ts' "'ra &alle College rents out the groun! %loor o% its college 'uil!ing to Gorthern Car9eting
Corporation -hile the secon! %loor thereo% is use! ' the Director o% the College %or resi!ential purposes$ The
municipal an! provincial treasurers serve! upon the College a Dnotice o% seizureE an! later a Dnotice o% saleE
!ue to the allege! %ailure o% the College to pa real estate ta6es an! penalties thereon$ The school %ile! suit to
annul sai! notices, claiming that it is ta6Be6empt$
(ssue' 8hether the College is e6empt %rom ta6es$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 29 )
)el*' 8hile the Court allo-s a more li'eral an! nonBrestrictive interpretation o% the phrase De6clusivel ise!
%or e!ucational purposes,E reasona'le emphasis has al-as 'een ma!e that e6emption e6ten!s to %acilities
-hich are inci!ental to an! reasona'l necessar %or the accomplishment o% the main purposes$ 8hile the
secon! %loor@s use, as resi!ence o% the !irector, is inci!ental to e!ucation; the lease o% the %irst %loor cannot '
an stretch o% imagination 'e consi!ere! inci!ental to the purposes o% e!ucation$ The test o% e6emption %rom
ta6ation is the use o% the propert %or purposes mentione! in the Constititution$
[51]
)errer$ vs. @ue+on Cit% Bo$r* o. Assessment A--e$ls
GR L-152!0 10 ,e-tem#er 1991
First Division, Concepcion (J)= 1 concur
"$&ts' #n )0+*, the Director o% the 7ureau o% :ospitals authorize! Jose &$ :errera an! Ester (changco
:errera to esta'lish an! operate the St$ Catherine@s :ospital$ #n )0+4, the :erreras sent a letter to the Kuezon
Cit "ssessor re5uesting e6emption %rom pament o% real estate ta6 on the hospital, stating that the same -as
esta'lishe! %or charita'le an! humanitarian purposes an! not %or commercial gain$ The e6emption -as
grante! e%%ective ears )0+4 to )0++$ #n )0++, ho-ever, the "ssessor reclassi%ie! the properties %rom
De6emptE to Dta6a'leE e%%ective )0+1, as it -as ascertaine! that out 4* 'e!s in the hospital, )* o% -hich are
%or paBpatients$ " school o% mi!-i%er is also operate! -ithin the premises o% the hospital$
(ssue' 8hether St$ Catherine@s :ospital is e6empt %rom reallt ta6$
)el*' The a!mission o% paBpatients !oes not !etract %rom the charita'le character o% a hospital, i% all its
%un!s are !evote! e6clusivel to the maintenance o% the institution as a pu'lic charit$ The e6emption in
%avor o% propert use! e6clusivel %or charita'le or e!ucational purpose is not limite! to propert actuall
in!ispensa'le there%ore, 'ut e6ten!s to %acilities -hich are inci!ental to an! reasona'l necessar %or the
accomplishment o% sai! purpose, such as in the case o% hospitals BB a school %or training nurses; a nurses@
home; propert use! to provi!e housing %acilities %or interns, resi!ent !octors, superinten!ents an! otehr
mem'ers o% the hospital sta%%; an! recreational %acilities %or stu!ent nurses, interns an! resi!ents$ 8ithin the
purvie- o% the Constitution, St$ Catherine@s :ospital is a charita'le institution e6empt %rom ta6ation$
[52]
Ll$*o& vs. Commissioner
GR L-19201 19 2une 1995
En 7anc, Pare!es (J)= 0 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' #n )0+/, the C7 Estate #nc$ o% 7acolo! Cit !onate! P),,,,, in cash to the parish priest o% &ictorias,
Gegros (cci!ental; the amount spent %or the construction o% a ne- Catholic Church in the localit,m as
inten!e!$ #n)0+3, C7 Estate %ile! the !onor@s gi%t ta6 return$ #n )01,, the Commissioner issue! an assessment
%or !onee@s gi%t ta6 against the parish$ The priest lo!ge! a protest to the assessment an! re5ueste! the
-ith!ra-al thereo%$
(ssue' 8hether the Catholic Parish is ta6 e6empt$
)el*' The phrase De6empt %rom ta6ationE shoul! not 'e interprete! to mean e6emption %rom all 9in!s o%
ta6es$ The e6emption is onl %rom the pament o% ta6es assesse! on such properties as propert ta6es as
contra!istinguishe! %rom e6cise ta6es$ " !onee@s gi%t ta6 is not a propert ta6 'ut an e6cise ta6 impose! on the
trans%er o% propert ' -a o% gi%t inter vivos$ #t !oes not rest upon general o-nership, 'ut an e6cise upon the
use ma!e o% the properties, upon the e6ercise o% the privilege o% receiving the properties$ The imposition o%
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 2! )
such e6cise ta6 on propert use! %or religious purpose !o not constitute an impairment o% the Constitution$
The ta6 e6emption o% the parish, thus, !oes not e6ten! to e6cise ta6es$
[51]
Bis7o- o. <uev$ ,egovi$ vs. :rovin&i$l Bo$r* o. (lo&os <orte
GR 2!588 11 De&em#er 192!
En 7anc, "vancena (J)= + concur
"$&ts' The 2oman Catholic "postolic Church is the o-ner o% a parcel o% lan! in San Gicolas, #locos Gorte$
(n the south si!e is a part o% the Church ar!, the convent an! an a!Aacent lost use! %or a vegeta'le gar!en in
-hich there is a sta'le an! a -ell %or the use o% the convent$ #n the center is the remain!er o% the churchar!
an! the Church$ (n the north si!e is an ol! cemeter -ith its t-o -alls still stan!ing, an! a portion -here
%ormerl stoo! a to-er$ The provincial 'oar! assesse! lan! ta6 on lots comprising the north an! south si!e,
-hich the church pai! un!er protest$ #t %ile! suit to recover the amount$
(ssue' 8hether the lots are covere! ' the Church@s ta6 e6emption$
)el*' The e6emption in %avor o% the convent in the pament o% lan! ta6 re%ers to the home o% the priest -ho
presi!es over the church an! -ho has to ta9e care o% himsel% in or!er to !ischarge his !uties$ The e6emption
inclu!es not onl the lan! actuall occupie! ' the Church 'ut also the a!Aacent groun! !estine! to the
or!inar inci!ental uses o% man$ " vegeta'le gar!en, thus, -hich 'elongs to a convent, -here its use is limite!
to the necessit o% the priest, comes un!er the e6emption$ Further, lan! use! as a lo!ging house ' the people
-ho participate in religious %estivities, -hich constitutes an inci!ental use in religious %unctions, li9e-ise
comes -ithin the e6emption$ #t cannot 'e ta6e! accor!ing to its %ormer use, i$e$ a cemeter$
[54]
Commisioner vs. Bis7o- o. 6issioner% Distri&t o. t7e :7ili--ine (sl$n*s
GR L-19445 11 August 1995
En 7anc, 2egala (J)= / concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' The Cissioner District o% the Philippine #slan!s, o% the Protestant Episcopal Church in the ?nite!
States, o-ns an! operates the St$ >u9e@s :ospital in Kuezon Cit, the 7rent :ospital in Lam'oanga Cit, an!
the St$ Stephen@s :igh School in Canila$ #n )0+/ to )0+0, the Cissionar District receive! various shipments
o% materials, supplies, e5uipment an! other articles inten!e! %or use in the construction an! operation o% the
ne- St$ >u9e@s :ospital$ (n these shipments, the Commissioner collecte! compensation ta6$ The Cissionar
District %ile! claims %or re%un!, 'ut -hich -as !enie! ' the Commissioner on the groun! that St$ >u9e@s
:ospital -as not a charita'le institution an! there%ore -as not e6empt %rom ta6es$
(ssue' 8hether the shipments %or St$ >u9e@s :ospital are ta6Be6empt$
)el*' ?n!er 2" )0)1, -hich covers ta6es on !onations in an %orm an! all articles importe! into the
Philippines, re5uires that the importe! articles ush have 'een !onate!, the !onee must 'e a !ul incorporate!
or esta'lishe! international civic organization, religious or charita'le societ or institution %or civic, religious
or charita'le purposes; an! the articles must have 'een !onate! %or the use o% the organization, societ or
institution; or %or %ree !istri'ution an! not %or sale, 'arter or hire$ "s the la- !oes not !istinguish or 5uali%
the enAoment or the e6emption (as the Secretar o% Finance !i! in Departent (r!er )3, series o% )0+3), the
a!mission o% pa patients !oes not !etract %rom the charita'le character o% a hospital, i% its %un!s are !evote!
e6clusivel to the maintenance o% the institution$ Thus, the shipments are ta6 e6empt$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 28 )
[55]
)o*ges vs. (loilo Cit%
GR L-18129 11 2$nu$r% 1991
En 7anc, 7autista "ngelo (J)= / concur, * a%%irm, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' #n )01,, the Cunicipal 7oar! o% #loilo enacte! (r!inance 44 re5uiring the pament o% a sales ta6 o%
)I* o% )F o% the selling price o% an motor vehicle an! prohi'iting the registration o% the sale involving sai!
vehicle in the Cotors &ehicle (%%ice o% #loilo unless the tas has 'een pai!$ #t also e6pressl re5uire! that the
pament o% the municipal ta6 shall 'e a re5uirement %or registration an! trans%er o% o-nership$ CG :o!ges,
engage! in 'uingBan!Bselling o% secon! han! motor vehicles in the cit, assaile! the or!inance as invali! %or
'eing passe! in e6cesso% the authorit con%erre! ' la- upon the municipal 'oar!$
(ssue' 8hether the Cit o% #loilo is empo-ere! to impose the ta6$
)el*' The Cit o% #loilo is empo-ere! to impose municipal licenses, ta6es or %ees upon an person engage!
in an occupation or 'usiness, or e6ercising an privilege in the Cit; to regulate an! impose reasona'le %ees
%or services ren!ere! con!ucte! -ithin the cit, an! to lev %or pu'lic purposes Aust an! uni%orm ta6es,
licenses, or %ees$ The ta6 in 5uestion is in the %orm o% percentage ta6 on the procee!s o% the sale o% a motor
vehicle$ The prohi'ition against such ta6 re%er onl to municipalities an! municipal !istricts an! !oes not
comprehen! chartere! cities as the Cit o% #loilo$
[59]
:ro&ter $n* G$m#le vs. 2$gn$
GR L-24295 28 De&em#er 19!9
First Division, Celencio :errera (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' Procter an! .am'le Philippines Canu%acturing Corp$ is a consoli!ate! corporation o% Procter an!
.am'le Tra!ing Compan$ #t is engage! in the manu%acture o% soap, e!i'le oil, margarine an! otehr similar
pro!ucts; an! maintains a D'o!egaE in the municipalit o% Jagna, -here it stores copra purchase! in the
municipalit an! there%rom ships the same %or its manu%acturing an! other operations$ #n )0+4, the Cunicipal
Council enacte! (r!inance 4, imposing storage %ees o% all e6porta'le copra !eposite in the 'o!ega -ithin the
Auris!iction o% the municipalit o% Jagna, 7ohol$ From )0+3 to )014, the compan pai! the municipalit,
allege!l un!er protest, storage %ees$ #n )014, it %ile! suit, -herein it prae! that the (r!inance 'e !eclare!
inapplica'le to it, an! i% not, that it 'e !eclare! ultra vires an! voi!$
(ssue' 8hether the (r!inance i s voi!, as it amounts to !ou'le ta6ation$
)el*' The vali!it o% the (r!inance must 'e uphel! pursuant to the 'roa! authorit con%erre! upon
municipalites ' Common-ealth "ct 4/* (promulgate! )040), -hich -as the prevailing la- -hen the
(r!inance is actuall a municipal license ta6 or %ee on persons, %irms an! corporations e6ercising the
privilege o% storing copra -ithin the municipalit@s territorial Auris!iction$ Such %ees impose! !o not amount
to !ou'le ta6ation$ For !ou'le ta6ation to e6ist, the same propert must 'e ta6e! t-ice, -hen it shoul! 'e
ta6e! 'ut once$ " ta6 on the compan@s pro!ucs is !i%%erent %rom the ta6 on the privilege o% storing copra in a
'o!ega situate! -ithin the territorial 'oun!ar o% the municipalit$
[5!]
Commissioner vs. Le*ni&B%
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 29 )
GR L-18199 L-18289 L-21414F 11 2ul% 1994
En 7anc, 2ees J7> (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' Spouses &E an! Caria &alero >e!nic9 are "merican citizens resi!ing in the Philippines, an! have
!erive! all their income %rom Philippine sources since )04/$ #n )0++, the spouses %ile! -ith the ?S #nternal
2evenue agent in Canila their Fe!eral income ta6 return %or )04/, )0+) to )0+4 on income %rom Philippine
sources$ From )0+1 to )0+3, the %ile! their !omesic income ta6 returns in compliance -ith local la-s$ The
amen!e! their ta6 returns in )0+0 to inclu!e their ta6es pai! to the ?S Fe!eral .overnment, interests, an!
e6change an! 'an9 charges$ The %ile! their claims %or re%un!$
(ssue' 8hether income ta6 pai! to %oreign governments can 'e !e!ucte! %rom the gross income or as a ta6
cre!it$
)el*' The la-@s intent is that the right to !e!uct income ta6es pai! to %oreign government %rom the ta6paer@s
gross income is given onl as an alternative or su'stitute to his right to claim a ta6 cre!it %or sich %oreign
income ta6es; so that unless the alien resi!ent has a right to claim such ta6 cre!it i% he so chooses, he is
preclu!e! %rom !e!ucting the %oreign income ta6es %rom his gross income$ The prupose o% the la- is to
prevent the ta6paer %rom claiming t-ice the 'ene%its o% his pament o% %oreign ta6es, ' !e!uction %rom
gross income an! ' ta6 cre!it$ To allo- an alien resi!ent to !e!uct %rom his gross income -hatever ta6es he
pas to his o-n government amounts to con%er on the latter po-er to re!uce the ta6 income o% the Philippine
.overnment$ Such result is incompati'le -ith the status o% the Philippines as an in!epen!ent an! sovereign
state$ "n relie% %rom the allege! !ou'le ta6ation shoul! come %rom the ?nite! States, since its right to 'ur!en
the ta6paer is solel pre!icate! on the ta6paer@s citizenship, -ithout contri'uting to the pro!uction o% the
-ealth that is 'eing ta6e!$
[58]
Commissioner vs. 2$vier
GR !8951 11 2ul% 1991
Secon! Division, Sarmiento (J)= 4 concur, )too9 no part
"$&ts' #n )0//, &ictoria Javier (-i%e o% Celchor), receive! %rom the Pru!ential 7an9 an! Trust Co$
?SH000,0/4$/, remitte! ' her sister, Dolores &entosa, through some 'an9s in the ?nite! States, among them
Cellon 7an9 G"$ Cellon 7an9 %ile! suit to recover the e6cess amount o% ?SH0000,,,, as the remittance o%
?SH ) million -as a clerical error an! shoul! have 'een ?S H),,,, onl (Compare %acts in Cellon 7an9 vs$
Cagsino, .2 /)4/0, )3 (cto'er )00,)$ #n )0/3, Celchor Javier %ile! his income ta6 return %or )0//sho-ing
a gross income o% P+4,,+4$43 an! a net income o% P43,,+4$43 an! stating in the %ootnote o% the return that
Dta6paer -as recepient o% some mone receive! %rom a'roa! -hich he presume! to 'e a gi%t 'ut turne! out
to 'e an error an! is no- su'Aect o% litigation$ #n )03,, the Commissioner assesse! an! !eman!e! %rom Javier
!e%icienc assessment o% P0,*3/,*0/$+) %or )0//$ Javier proteste! such assessment, -here the Commissioner
in turn impose! a +,F %rau! penalt against Javier$
(ssue' 8hether Javier is lia'le %or the +,F %rau! penalt$
)el*' ?n!er the then Section /* o% the Ta6 Co!e, a ta6paer -ho %iles a %alse return is lia'le to pa the %rau!
penalt o% +,F o% the ta6 !ue %rom him or o% the !e%icienc ta6 in case pament has 'een ma!e on the 'asis
o% the return %ile! 'e%ore the !iscover o% the %alsit or %rau!$ The %rau! contemplate! ' la- is actual an! not
constructive$ #t must 'e intentional %rau!, consisting o% !eception -ill%ull an! !eli'eratel !one or resorte!
to in or!er to in!uce another to give up some legal right$ Frau! is never impute! an! the courts never sustain
%in!ings o% %rau! upon circumstances -hich, at most create! onl suspicion$ " %rau!ulent return is al-as an
attempt to eva!e a ta6, 'ut a merel %alse return ma not 'e$ :erein, there -as no actual an! intentional %rau!
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 10 )
through -ill%ul an! !eli'erate mislea!ing o% the government agenc concerne! (7#2) committe! ' Javire$
Javier !i! not conceal anthing to in!uce the government to give some legal right an! place itsel% at a
!isa!vantage$ Error or mista9e o% la- is not %rau!$ "s rule! ' the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals, the +,F surcharge
impose! as %rau! penalt in the !e%icienc assessment shoul! 'e !elete!$
[59]
6er$l&o vs. ?er$
GR L-2998! 22 ;&to#er 19!5
First Division, Cunoz Palma (J)= 4 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' Ceralco is the hol!er o% a %ranchise to construct, maintain, an! operate an electric light, heat , an!
po-er sstem in the Cit o% Canila an! its su'ur's$ #n )01* an! )014, Ceralco importe! an! receive! %rom
a'roa! copper -ires, trans%ormers, an! insulators %or use in the operation o% its 'usiness$ The Collector o%
Customs, as !eput o% the Commissioner o% #nternal 2evenue, levie! an! collecte! a compensating ta6$
Ceralco claime! %or re%un! %or the sai! eares, 'ut such claims -ere either not acte! upon or !enie! ' the
Commissioner$
(ssue' 8hether Ceralco is e6empt %rom pament o% a compensating ta6 on poles, -ires, trans%ormers an!
insulators importe! ' it %or use in the operation o% its electric light, heat, an! po-er sstem$
)el*' Ceralco is not e6empt %rom paing the compensationg ta6 provi!e! %or in Section )0, o% the Ta6 Co!e,
the prupose o% -hich is to Dplace casual importers, -ho are not merchants on e5ual %orring -ith esta'lishe!
merchants -ho pa sales ta6 on articles importe! ' them$E Ceralco@s claim %or e6emption %rom pament o%
the compensating ta6 is not clear or e6presse!, contrar to the rule that De6emptions %rom ta6ation are highl
!is%avore! in la-, an! he -ho claims e6emption must 'e a'le to Austi% his claim ' the clearest grant o%
organic or statute la-$E Ta6 e6emptiion are strictl construe! against the ta6paer, the 'eing highl
!is%avore! an! ma almost 'e sai! to 'e Do!ious to the la-$E 8hen e6emption is claime!, it must 'e sho-n
in!u'ita'l to e6ist, %or ever presumption is against it, an! a -ellB%oun!e! !ou't is %atal to the claim$
[90]
Commissioner vs. 6$nil$ 2o&Be% Clu#
GR L-8!55 21 6$r&7 1959
First Division, 7autista "ngelo (J)= 0 concur
"$&ts' The Canila Joc9e Clu' is the o-ner o% the San >azaro :ippo!rome, -hich is use! %or hol!ing horse
races either ' the clu' itsel% or ' the Philippine Charit S-eepsta9es (%%ice (PCS() or other charita'le
institutions authorize! ' la- to hol! horse races$ (n )0+) an! )0+*, the PCS( hel! 'ene%it races %or
charita'le, relie% an! civic purposes in -hich the Clu' -as pai! in the %orm o% rentals, -hich -as inclu!e! in
its !eclare! income ta6es in its return %or sai! ears$ The Clu' claime! %or re%un! o% the sum collecte! ' the
Commissioner as to the rentals, conten!ing that it is e6empt un!er Section 4 o% 2" /0$
(ssue' 8hether the Clu' is e6empt %rom income !erive! %rom the PCS( races$
)el*' The e6emption !oes not re%er to an income ta6 that ma 'e impose! on the rentals that ma 'e pai!
%or the use o% racing trac9s an! other paraphernalia$ The income earne! ' the Clu' herein !i! not come %rom
the horse races hel! ' sai! clu' 'ut it came to it as rentals pai! %or the use o% its propert$ The ta6 pai! %or
such income cannot 'e consi!ere! as one connecte! -ith those races -ithin the purvie- o% the e6emption
clause in 2" /0$ 7 its ver nature, the la- that e6empts one %rom ta6 must 'e clearl e6presse! 'ecause the
e6emption must 'e a'le to Austi% his claim ' the clearest grant o% organic or statute la-$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 11 )
[91]
,,, vs. B$&olo* Cit%
GR L-15!29 21 2ul% 1982
Secon! Division, Escolin (J)= + concur
"$&ts' The Social Securit Sstem (SSS) is a government agenc create! un!er 2" ))1)$ #n pursuance o% its
operations, SSS maintains a num'er o% regional o%%ices, one o% -hich is a +Bstore 'uil!ing occuping 4
parcels o% lan! in 7acolo! Cit$ Sai! 'uil!ing an! lan!s -ere assesse! %or ta6ation$ For %ailure to pa the
realt ta6es thereon, the cit levi! upon sai! properties$ SSS sought reconsi!eration on the groun! that SSS is
a governmentBo-ne! an! Bcontrolle! corporation an! is e6empt %rom pament o% real estate ta6es$
(ssue' 8hether SSS propert in 7acolo! Cit is ta6Be6empt$
)el*' The !istinction -hether the governmentBo-ne! or controlle! corporation e6ercises ministrant or
proprietor %unction is o% no relevance as the e6emption !oes not relate to legal %ees 'ut on realt ta6es$ The
Charter o% 7acolo! Cit !oes not contain an 5uali%ication -hatsoever in provi!ing %ro the e6emption %rom
real estate ta6es o% lan!s an! 'uil!ing o-ne! ' the .overnmentI #t is a6iomatic that -hen pu'lic propert is
involve!, e6emption is the rule an! ta6ation is the e6ception$ PD *4, amen!ing the Social Securit "ct o%
)0+4, has alrea! remove! all !ou'ts as to the e6emption o% the SS %rom ta6ation (Section )1)$
[92]
<it$.$n vs. Commissioner
GR L-!8!80 21 2ul% 198!
2esolution
En 7anc, CelencioB:errera (J)= )* concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' The Chie% Justice has previousl issue! a !irective to the Fiscal Canagement an! 7u!get (%%ice to
continue to !e!uct -ithhol!ing ta6es %rom the salaries o% the Justices o% the Supreme Court an! other
mem'ers o% the Au!iciar$ This -as a%%irme! ' the Supreme Court En 7anc on 4 Decem'er )03/$ 2TC
Au!ges see9 to prohi'it or enAoin the Commissioner o% the #nternal 2evenue an! the Financial (%%icer o% the
Supreme Court %rom ma9ing an !e!uction o% -ithhol!ing ta6es %rom their salaries$
(ssue' 8hether the salaries o% Au!ges are su'Aect to ta6$
)el*' The salaries o% mem'ers o% the Ju!iciar are su'Aect to the general income ta6 applie! to all ta6paers$
"lthough such intent -as somehoe an! ina!vertentl not clearl set %orth in the %inal te6t o% the )03/
Constitution, the !eli'erations o% the )031 Constitutional Commission negate the contention that the intent o%
the %ramers is to revert to the original concept o% DnonB!iminutionE o% salaries o% Au!icial o%%icers$ :ence, the
!octrine in Per%ecto v$ Ceere an! En!encia vs$ Davi! !o not appl anmore$ Justices an! Au!ges are not onl
the citizens -hose income have 'een re!uce! in accepting service in government an! et su'Aecte to income
ta6$ Such is true also o% Ca'inet mem'ers an! all other emploees$
[91]
Commissioner vs. Ro#ertson
GR L-!0119-19 12 August 1989
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 12 )
"$&ts' Fran9 an! James 2o'ertson, 2o'ert Cathe, an! John .arrison are citizens o% the ?nite! States,
hol!ers o% "merican passports, an! a!mitte! as Special Termporar &isitors un!er Section 0 (a) visa o% the
Philippine #mmigration "ct o% )04,, an! are civilian emploees in a ?S Cilitar 7ase in the Philippines in
connection -ith its construction, maintenance, operation an! !e%ense (The 2o'erstons an! .arrison -ere
'orn in the Philippines)$ Their incomes are solel !erive! %rom salaries %rom the ?S .overnment ' reason o%
their emploment in the ?S 7ases in the Philippines$ The Commissioner o% #nternal 2evenue assesse!
!e%icienc income ta6 against them %rom ta6a'le ears )010 to )0/*$
(ssue' 8hether 2o'ertson, et$ al$, are e6empte! %rom ta6$
)el*' #n or!er to avail onesel% o% the ta6 e6emption un!er the 2PB?S Cilitar 7ases "greement ("rticle O###,
Paragraph a), one must 'e a national o% the ?nite! States emploe! in connection -ith the construction,
maintenance, operation or !e%ense, o% the 'ases, resi!ing in the Philippines ' reason o% such emploment,
an! the income !erive! is %rom the ?S .overnment$ Sai! circumstances are all present in the present case$
The 'asic inten!ment is to e6empt all ?S citizens -or9ing in the militar 'ases %rom the 'ur!en o% paing
Philippine #ncome Ta6 -ithout !istinction as to those 'orn locall or 'orn in their countr o% origin$ 8here
the la- !oes not !istinguish, one must not !istinguish$ Ubi lex non ditinguit nec nos tinguere debemos.
[94]
Re$g$n vs. Commissioner
GR L-291!9 2! De&em#er 1999
En 7anc, Fernan!o (J)=
/ concur, ) concur in result, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' 8illiam 2eagan importe! a ta6B%ree )01, Ca!illac car -ith accessories value! at ?S H 1,444$34,
inclu!ing %reight, insurance an! other charges$ "%ter ac5uiring a permit to sell the car %rom the 'ase
comman!er o% Clar9 "ir 7ase, 2eagan sol! the car to a certain 8illie Johnson Jr$ o% the ?S Carine Corps
statione! in Sangle Point, Cavite %or ?SH 1,1,,$ Johnson sol! the same, on the same !a to Fre! Ceneses, a
Filipino$ "s a result o% the transaction, the Commissioner ren!ere! 2eagan lia'le %or income ta6 in the sum o%
P*,0/,$ 2eagan claime! that he -as e6empt as the transaction occurre! in Clar9 "ir 7ase, Da 'ase outsi!e the
Philippines$E
(ssue' 8hether 2eagan -as ta6Be6empt$
)el*' The Philippines, as an in!epen!ent an! sovereign countr, e6ercises its authorit over its entire !omain$
"n state ma, ho-ever, ' its consent, e6press or implie!, su'mit to a restriction o% its sovereign rights$ #t
ma allo- another po-er to participate in the e6ercise o% Auris!ictional right over certain portions o% its
territor$ 7 !oing so, it ' no means %ollo-s that such areas 'ecome impresse! -ith an alien character$ The
areas retain their status as native soil$ Clar9 "ir 7ase is -ithin Philippine territorial Auris!iction to ta6, an!
thus, 2eagan -as lia'le %or the income ta6 arising %rom the sale o% his automo'ile in Clar9$ The la- !oes not
loo9 -ith %avor on ta6 e6emptions an! that he -ho -oul! see9 to 'e thus privilege! must Austi% it ' -or!s
too plain to 'e mista9en an! too categorical to 'e misinterprete!$ 2eagan has not !one so, an! cannot !o so$
[95]
D$v$o Lig7t $n* :o3er vs. Commissioner o. Customs
GR L-28!19 $n* L-28902
First Division, 2ees J7> (J)= 0 concur
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 11 )
"$&ts' Davao >ight is a grantee o% a legislative %ranchise to install, operate an! maintain an electric light, heat
an! po-er plant in the cit o% Davao, %or +, ears$ (n t-o occasions, it importe! electrical supplies, materials
an! e5uipment %or installation in its po-er plant$ The importations arrive! in the port o% Ce'u Cit, -here the
Collector impose! custom !uties an! ta6es amounting to P0,0*3$ Davao >ight pai! un!er protest, claiming it
is similarl ta6Be6empte! as the Gational Po-er Corporation, -hich is allege!l posing as competition to
Davao >ight in its 'usiness$
(ssue' 8hether Davao >ight is similarl ta6Be6empt as Gapocor$
)el*' Davao >ight@s purpose in securing a %ranchise to esta'lish an! operate an electric plant an! po-er
stations -as to engage in a 'usiness or pro%itBma9ing venture, -hile Gapocor -as speci%icall create! to
un!erta9e the !evelopment o% h!raulic po-er nation-i!e an! the pro!uction o% po-er %rom other sources,
%or use o% the government an! the general pu'lic$ #n isolate! sale o% electric po-er to one governmentBo-ne!
plant (Gational Development Co$, in Davao) -oul! not 'e enough to classi% the Gapocor as a DcompetingE
concern to Davao >ight@s enterprise$ Gapocor@s ta6 e6emption (2" 4+3) -as grante! in or!er to %acilitate the
li5ui!ation ' sai! corporation o% its lia'ilities, an! the conse5uential release ' the government itsel% %ro its
o'ligation in the transactions entere! into ' the Presi!ent on 'ehal% o% Gapocor$ Davao >ight is not entitle!
to the same e6emption privileges enAoe! ' another operator -ithout an e6press provision o% the la- to that
e%%ect$ E6emption %rom ta6ation is never presume!$ For ta6 e6emption to 'e recognize!, the grant must 'e
clear an! e6press$ #t cannot 'e ma!e to rest on vague implications$
[99]
,urig$o Consoli*$te* 6ining vs. Colle&tor
GR L-148!8 29 De&em#er 1991
En 7anc, 2agala (J)= ), concur
"$&ts' 7e%ore the out'rea9 o% the 8ar, the Surigao Consoli!ate! Cining Co$ -as operating its mining
concessions in Cainit, Surigao$ Due to the interruption o% communications at the out'rea9 o% the -ar, the
compan lost contact -ith its mines an! never receive! the pro!uction reports %or the 4
th
5uarter o% )04)$ To
avoi! incurring an ta6 lia'ilit or penalt, it !eposite! o% chec9 paa'le to an! in!orse! in %avor o% the Cit
Treasurer, in pament o% a! valorem ta6es %or the sai! perio!$ "%ter the -ar, the compan %ile! its a! valorem
ta6 %or the sai! perio! pursuant to Common-ealth "ct //*$ #ts return -as revise!, until eventuall the
compan claime! a re%un! o% P)/,)+3$,)$ The collector o% #nternal 2evenue !enie! the re5uest %or re%un!$
(ssue' 8hether Surigao Consoli!ate! ma recover its ta6 pament in light o% the con!onation ma!e un!er a
su'se5uent la-, 2" 3)$
)el*' 2" 3), Section )(!) provi!e! that Dall unpai! roalties, a! valorem or speci%ic ta6es on all minerals
mine! %rom mining claims or concessions e6isting an !in %orce on ) Januar )04*, an! -hich minerals -ere
lost ' reason o% -ar, o% circumstance arising there%rom are con!one!PE The provision re%ers to the
con!onation o% unpai! ta6es onl$ The con!onation o% a ta6 lia'ilit is e5uivalent an! is in the nature o% ta6
e6emption$ 7eing so, it shoul! 'e sustaine! onl -hen e6presse! in e6plicit terms, an! it cannot 'e e6ten!e!
'eon! the plain meaning o% those terms$ :e -ho claims an e6emption %rom his share o% the common 'ur!en
o% ta6ation must Austi% his claim ' sho-ing t hat the >egislature inten!e! to e6empt him$ The compan
%aile! to sho- an portion o% the la- that e6plicitl provi!e! %or a re%un! o% those ta6paers -ho ha! pai!
their ta6es on the items$
[9!]
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 14 )
Aon*er 6e&7$ni&$l =ngineering vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-22805 $n* L-2!858 10 2une 19!5
First Division, Esguerra (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' 8on!er Cechanical Engineering Corp$ -as grante! ta6 e6emption privilege un!er 2" 4+ in respect to
the Dmanu%acture o% machines %or ma9ing cigarette papers, pails, -ashers, rivets, nails, can!ies, chairs, etc$E
The ta6 e6emption e6pire! on 4, Ca )0+)$ #n )0+4, the compan applie! -ith the secretar o% Finance %or
the reinstatement o% the e6emption privilege un!er the provisions o% 2" 0,), the reinstatement to commence
on the !ate 2" 0,) too9 e%%ect$ The compan -as given a Certi%icate o% Ta6 E6emption on / Jul )0+4,
e6emption it similarl as in 2" 4+ until 4) Decem'er )0+3, -ith !iminishing e6emption until *, June )0++$
The Commissioner assesse! sales ta6 on gross sales o% articles manu%acture! ' it, inclu!ing steel chairs$ The
compan appeale! to the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals$
(ssue' 8hether the compan is e6empte! %rom the ta6 impose! on the manu%acture an! sale o% articles, such
as steel chairs$
)el*' The compan -as grante! ta6 e6emption in the manu%acture an! sale o% Dmachines %or ma9ing
cigarette paper, pails, etc$E 'ut not %or the manu%acture an! sale o% articles pro!uce! ' those machines$ The
manu%acture o% steel chairs, Aeep parts, an! other articles not constituting machines %or ma9ing certain
pro!ucts -oul! not %all un!er the classi%ication o% Dne- an! necessarE in!ustries envisione! in 2" 4+ an!
0,) as to entitle the compan to ta6 e6emption$ E6emptions are highl !is%avore! in la- an! he -ho claims
ta6 e6emption must 'e a'le to Austi% his claim or right thereto ' the clearest grant o% organic or statute la-$
Ta6 e6emption must 'e clearl e6presse! an! cannot 'e esta'lishe! ' implication$
[98]
?is$%$s Ce#u /ermin$l vs. Commissioner
GR L-19510 $n* L-19444 2! "e#ru$r% 1995
En 7anc, Pare!es (J)= 3 concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' &isaan Ce'uTerminal Co$ -as appointe! the sole manager o% the #rrastre Service at the Port o% Ce'u,
a%ter a pu'lic 'i!!ing in )0+/, covering import cargoes, inclu!ing transit import cargoes$ #n )0+3, the 7ureau
o% #nternal 2evenue (Canila) !eman!e! the pament o% percentage ta6es an! penalties !ue to the
.overnment$ Su'se5uentl, ho-ever, 7#2 e6aminers state! that the compan -as not su'Aecte! o% the 4F
percentage ta6, it has 'een paing *3F o% the gross receipts to the 7ureau o% Customs$
(ssue' 8hether &isaas Ce'u Terminal Co$ #n c$ is e6empte! %rom the percentage ta6$
)el*' The compan is an arrastre contractor an! is covere! ' Section )0) o% the Ta6 Co!e$ Section )0) o%
the Ta6 Co!e !oes not esta'lish an !istinction 'et-een an arrastre operator -ho han!les onl importe! cargo
in its arrastre operations , pursuant to 2" )4,, an! those han!ling interislan! cargo, so as to e6empt the
compan %rom the percentage ta6$ #t is a -ell settle! rule that he -ho claim s e6emption shoul! prove '
convincing proo%s that he is e6empte!$ The compan %aile! to present such proo%s$ Further, the
recommen!ation o% the e6aminers are su'Aect to the revie- o% their superiors, -ho ma counterman! or
a%%irm them$ The government is never estoppe! to collect legitimate ta6es 'ecause o% the error committe! '
its agents$
:o-ever, as the compan pas *3F o% the total monthl gross receipts !erive! %rom the arrastre service to the
7ureau o% Customs, to hol! the compan lia'le %or the pament o% percentage ta6 is unAust an! not
contemplate! ' Section )0) o% the Ta6 Co!e$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 15 )
[99]
Le$l*$ =le&tri& vs. Commissioner
GR L-19428 10 A-ril 1991
"$&ts' #n )0)+, Julian >ocsin "nson -as grante! a %ranchise to operate an electric light an! po-er plant in
>egaspi an! Daraga, in "l'a province$ :e sol! the %ranchise, the certi%icate o% pu'lic convenience, an!
electric plant to Saturnino 7enito; -ho in turn sol! the same to >eal!a Electric (a partnership %orme! ' the
7enitos an! other parties in )0+))$ Since )0)+, the original grantee an! its successorsBinBinterest pai! a
%ranchise ta6 o% *F on the gross earnings or receipts %rom the 'usiness un!er the %ranchise, until )041 -hen
2" 40 amen!e! Section *+0 o% the Ta6 Co!e, increasingl the %ranchise ta6 to +F$ >eal!a Electric maintains
it is onl lia'le to *F %ranchise ta6, an! not +F$
(ssue' 8hether >eal!a Electric is e6empte! %rom the ta6 increase in light o% its %ranchise$
)el*' >eal!a Electric@s %ranchise !oes not speci%icall state that the rate o% the %ranchise ta6 to 'e pai! shall
'e *F o% its gross earnings or receipts$ The intent o% the legislature -as to impose upon the grantee (an! its
successors), the o'ligation to pa the same %ranchise ta6 impose! upon other grantee or %ranchise hol!ers at
the time its %ranchise ("ct*4/+) -as enacte!$ >eal!a@s charter contains an e6press provision to the e%%ect that
the same ma 'e altere! or repeale! ' Congress, an! !oes not contain an provision provi!ing that the
%ranchise ta6 -ere re5uire! to pa -as to 'e Din lieu o% all ta6es o% an 9in! levie!, esta'lishe!, or collecte!
' an authorit -hatsoever, no- or in the %utureE or in lieu o% all ta6es o% ever name an! natureQ
municipal, provincial or central,,,E Ta6 e6emptions are not to 'e presume!$
[!0]
6is$mis ;rient$l vs. C$g$%$n =le&tri&
GR 45155 12 2$nu$r% 1990
First Division, .rino "5uino (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' Cagaan Electric Po-er an! light Co, #nc$ (CEP">C() -as grante! a %ranchise in )01) un!er 2"
4*4/ to install, operate an! maintain an electric light, heat an! po-er sstem in Cagaan !e (ro an! its
su'ur's$ #n )0/4, the >ocal Ta6 Co!e (PD *4)) -as promulgate!, -here Section 0 thereo% provi!ing %or a
%ranchise ta6$ Pursuant thereto, the province o% Cisamis (riental enacte! Provincial 2evenue (r!inance )0,
-hose Section )* also provi!es %or a %ranchise ta6$ The Provincial Treasurer !eman!e! pament o% the
provincial %ranchise ta6 %rom CEP">C($ CEP">C( pai! un!er protest$
(ssue' 8hether CEP">C( is e6empt %rom the provincial %ranchise ta6$
)el*' >ocal Ta6 2egulation 4B/+ issue! ' the Secretar o% Finance in )0/1 ma!e it clear that the %ranchise
ta6 provi!e! in the >ocal Ta6 Co!e ma onl 'e impose! on companies -ith %ranchise that !o not contain the
e6empting clause, i$e$ DinBlieuBo%BallBta6esBproviso$E CEP">C(@s %ranchise i$e$ 2" 4*4/, 4+/) an! 1,*,
(Section 4 thereo%), uni%orml provi!es that Din consi!eration o% the %ranchise an! rights here' grante!, the
grantee shall pa a %ranchise ta6 e5ual to 4F o% the gross earnings %or electric current sol! un!er the
%ranchise, o% -hich *F goes to the national Treasur an! )F goes into the treasur o% the municipalities o%
Tagoloan, (pol, &illanueva, Jasaan, an! Cagaan !e (ro, as the case ma 'e= Provi!e!, that the sai! %ranchise
ta6 o% 4F o% the gross earnings shall 'e in lieu o% all ta6es an! assessments o% -hatever authorit upon
privileges, earnings, income, %ranchise an! poles, -ires, trans%ormers, an! insulators o% the grantee %rom
-hich ta6es an! assessments the grantee is here' e6pressl e6empte!$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 19 )
[!1]
)il$*o vs. Colle&tor
GR L-9408 11 ;&to#er 1959
En 7anc, 7autista "ngelo (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' "$&ts' Emilio :ila!o %ile! his income ta6 return %or )0+) -ith the treasurer o% 7acolo! Cit, claiming
a !e!ucti'le item o% P)*,34/$1+ %rom his gross income pursuant to .eneral Circular &B)*4 issue! ' the
Collector o% #nternal 2evenue$ The Secretar o% Finance, through the Collector, issue! .eneral Circular &B
)40 -hich revo9e! an! !eclare! voi! Circular &B)*4; an! lai! !o-n the rule;s< that losses o% propert -hich
occurre! in 8orl! 8ar ## %rom %ires, storms, ship-rec9 or other casualt, or %rom ro''er, the%t, or
em'ezzlement are !e!ucti'le in the ear o% actual loss or !estruction o% sai! propert$ The !e!uctions -ere
!isallo-e!$
(ssue' 8hether #nternal 2evenue >a-s -ere en%orce! !uring the -ar an! -hether :ila!o can claim
compensation %or !estruction o% his propert !uring the -ar$
)el*' Philippines #nternal 2evenue >a-s are not political in nature an! as such -ere continue! in %orce
!uring the perio! o% enem occupation an! in e%%ect -ere actuall en%orce! ' the occupation government$
Such ta6 la-s are !eeme! to 'e la-s o% the occupie! territor an! not o% the occuping enem$ "s o% the en!
o% )04+, there -as no la- -hich :ila!o coul! claim %or the !estruction o% his properties !uring the 'attle %or
the li'eration o% the Philippines$ ?n!er the Philippine 2eha'ilitation "ct o% )043, the pament o% claims '
the 8ar Damage Commission !epen!e! upon its !iscretions nonBpament o% -hich !oes not give rise to an
en%orcea'le right$ "ssuming that the loss (!e!ucti'le item) represents a portion o% the /+F o% his -ar !amage
claim, the amount -oul! 'e at most a proper !e!uction o% his )0+, gross income (not on his )0+) gross
income) as the last installment an! notice o% !iscontinuation o% pament ' the 8ar Damage Commission -as
ma!e in )0+,$
[!2]
Commissioner vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR 4400! 20 6$r&7 1991
First Division, Ce!ial!ea (J)= 4 concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' "$&ts' Eastern E6tension "ustralasia an! China Telegraph Co$ ( a %oreign corporation) -as given a
concession %or the construction, operation an! maintenance o% su'marine telegraph ca'le %rom :ong Mong to
Canila on 4, Carch )303 ' a 2oal Decree o% the Spanish .overnment$ 8hen the concession e6pire! in
)0+*, 2" 3,3 -as approve!, giving the compan a legislative %ranchise Dto lan!, construct, maintain an!
operate a su'marine telegraph ca'le connecting Canila to :ong MongE, an! a ta6 e6ception %rom the pament
o% all ta6es e6cept a %ranchise ta6 o% +F o% the gross earnings an! the ta6 on its real propert$ The
Commissioner, ho-ever, assesse! !e%icienc income ta6 (inclusive o% surcharges, interests an! penalties
thereon %or ears )01+B)0/,) against the compan on the 'elie% that the %ranchise is inoperative %or %ailure to
con%orm -ith the constitutional re5uirement that %ranchise hol!ers shoul! 'e organize! un!er Philippine >a-s
an! that 3,F o% its capital o-ne! ' Filipinos
(ssue' 8hether the %ranchise is inoperative, ren!ering the compan lia'le %or !e%icienc income ta6$
)el*' " la- is presume! constitutional as it is suppose! to have 'een care%ull stu!ie! an! !etermine! to
constitutional 'e%ore it -as %inall enacte! ' Congress an! approve! ' the Chie% E6ecutive$ Go
constitutional 5uestion -oul! 'e resolve! unless the re5uisites o% a Au!icial in5uir are present; i$e$ the
e6istence o% an appropriate case, an interest personal an! su'stantial ' the part raising the constitutional
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 1! )
5uestion, the plea that the %unction 'e e6ercise! at the earliest opportunit, an! the necessit that the
constitutional 5uestion 'e passe! in or!er to !eci!e the case$ :erein, the last criterion is missing; an!
accor!ingl, the Court gives high respect %or the acts o% the other !epartments o% the government an!, as much
as possi'le, avoi!s !eci!ing the constitutional 5uestion$
The compan !ul complie! -ith the con!itions set %orth in the legislative %ranchise$ #t has also complie!
-ith the ta6 re5uirement ' paing to the 2epu'lic a ta6 o% +F o% the gross earnings %rom Philippines
operations regularl since its creation$ "s a legislative %ranchise parta9es o% the nature o% a contract; the
%ranchise is the la- 'et-een the parties an! the are 'oun! ' the terms thereo%$ The government agenc
cannot !eclare the %ranchise as Dine%%ective an! unen%orcea'leE merel ' stating that the compan %aile! to
compl -ith the re5uirements o% the general statutes (e$g$ Pu'lic Service "ct an! the Corporation la-) -hich
are not mentione! in 2" 3,3$ Still, a reman! o% the case to the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals is necessar to
!etermine the income ta6 lia'ilit o% the compan correspon!ing to its income 'eon! the scope o% 2" 3,3$
[!1]
6$&e*$ vs. 6$&$r$ig
GR 88291 11 6$% 1991
En 7anc, .ancaco (J)= 1 concur, * too9 no part, ) !issents
"$&ts' Common-ealth "ct )*, create! G"P(C(2 as a pu'lic corporation to un!erta9e the !evelopment o%
h!raulic po-er an! the pro!uction o% po-er %rom other sources$ 2" 4+3 ()040) grante! G"P(C(2 ta6 an!
!ut e6emption privileges$ 2" 140+ ()0/)) revise! the charter o% the G"P(C(2, tas9ing it to carr out the
polic o% the national electri%ication, an! provi!e! in !etail G"P(C(2@s ta6 e6ceptions$ PD 43, ()0/4)
speci%ie! that G"P(C(2@s e6emption inclu!es all ta6es, etc$ impose! D!irectl or in!irectl$E PD 043
integrate! the e6emptions in %avor o% .(CCs inclu!ing their su'si!iaries; ho-ever, empo-ering the Presi!ent
or the Cinister o% Finance, upon recommen!ation o% the Fiscal #ncentives 2evie- 7oar! (F#27) to restore,
partiall or completel, the e6emptions -ith!ra-n or revise!$ The F#27 issue! 2esolution ),B3+ (/ Fe'ruar
)03+) restoring the !ut an! ta6 e6emptions privileges o% G"P(C(2 %or perio! )) June )034B 4, June )03+$
2esolution )B31 ()Januar )031) restore! such e6emption in!e%initel e%%ective ) Jul )03+$ E( 04 ()03/)
again -ith!re- the e6emption$ F#27 issue! 2esolution )/B3/ (*4 June )03/) restoring G"P(C(2@s
e6emption, -hich -as approve! ' the Presi!ent on + (cto'er )03/$
Since )0/1, oil %irms never pai! e6cise or speci%ic an! a! valorem ta6es %or petroleum pro!ucts sol! an!
!elivere! to G"P(C(2$ (il companies starte! to pa speci%ic an! a! valorem ta6es on their sales o% oil
pro!ucts to G"P(C(2 onl in )034$ G"P(C(2 claime! %or a re%un! (P413$+3 million)$ (nl portion
thereo%, correspon!ing to Calte6, -as approve! an! release! ' -a o% a ta6 cre!it memo$ The claim %or
re%un! o% ta6es pai! ' PetroPhil, Shell an! Calte6 amounting to P4),$+3 million -as !enie!$ G"P(C(2
move! %or reconsi!eration, starting that all !eliveries o% petroleum pro!ucts to G"P(C(2 are ta6 e6empt,
regar!less o% the perio! o% !eliver$
(ssue' 8hether G"P(C(2 cease to enAo e6emption %rom in!irect ta6 -hen PD 043 state! the e6emption in
general terms$
)el*' G"P(C(2 is a nonBpro%it pu'lic corporation create! %or the general goo! an! -el%are, an! -holl
o-ne! ' the government o% the 2epu'lic o% the Philippines$ From the ver 'eginning o% the corporation@s
e6istence, G"P(C(2 enAoe! pre%erential ta6 treatment Dto ena'le the corporation to pa the in!e'tness an!
o'ligationE an! e%%ective implementation o% the polic enunciate! in Section ) o% 2" 140+$ From the
pream'le o% PD 043, it is evi!ent that the provisions o% PD 043 -ere not inten!e! to 'e strictl construe!
against G"P(C(2$ (n the contrar, the la- man!ates that it shoul! 'e interprete! li'erall so as to enhance
the ta6 e6empt status o% G"P(C(2$ #t is recognize! principle that the rule on strict interpretation !oes not
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 18 )
appl in the case o% e6emptions in %avor o% government political su'!ivision or instrumentalit$ #n the case o%
propert o-ne! ' the state or a cit or other pu'lic corporations, the e6press e6ception shoul! not 'e
construe! -ith the same !egree o% strictness that applies to e6emptions contrar to the polic o% the state,
since as to such propert De6ception is the rule an! ta6ation the e6ception$E
[!4]
Commissioner vs. :7oeni0 Assur$n&e
GR L-19!2! 20 6$% 1995
En 7anc, 7engzon JP (J)= ), concur
"$&ts' Phoeni6 assurance is a %oreign insurance corporation organize! un!er the la-s o% .reat 7ritain,
license! to !o 'usiness in the Philippines$ Through its hea! o%%ice in >on!on, it entere! into -orl!-i!e
reinsurance treaties -ith various %oreign insurance companies$ #t agree! to ce!e a portion o% premiums
receive! on original insurances un!er-ritten ' its hea! o%%ice, su'si!iaries, an! 'ranch o%%ices aroun! the
-orl!, in consi!eration %or assumption ' the %oreign insurance companies o% n e5uivalent portion o% the
lia'ilit %orm such original insurances$ Pursuant to such treaties, the compan ce!e! portions o% its premiums
it earne! %rom its un!er-riting 'usiness in the Philippines, upon -hich assesse! -ithhol!ing ta6$ The
compan therea%ter amen!e! its ta6 returns ()0+,B)0+4) e6clu!ing reinsurance premium an! items o%
!e!uction attri'uta'le to such premium$ The Commissioner assesse! !e%icienc income ta6 against the
compan$
(ssue' 8hether the Commissioner is Austi%ie! in the assessment o% !e%icienc ta6$
)el*' The changes an! alteration em'o!ie! in the amen!e! ta6 return consiste! o% the e6clusion o%
reinsurance premium receive! %rom !omestic insurance companies ' the compan@s hea! o%%ice, reinsurance
premium ce!e! to %oreign insurers not !oing 'usiness in the Philippines an! various items o% !e!uctions
attri'uta'le to such e6clu!e! reinsurance premiums, there' su'stantiall mo!i%ing the original return$ "s
amen!e! return is su'stantiall !i%%erent %rom the original return, the perio! o% limitation o% the right to issue
the same shoul! 'e counte! %rom the %iling o% the amen!e! income ta6 return$ The right o% the Commissioner
to assess the !e%icienc ta6 on the amen!e! return has not prescri'e!$ To hol! other-ise -oul! pave the -a
%or ta6paer to eva!e the pament o% ta6es simpl reporting in their original return heav losses an!
amen!ing the same more than + ears later -hen the Commissioner has lost his authorit to assess the proper
ta6 there un!er$ The o'Aect o% the ta6 co!e is to impose ta6es %or the nee!s o% the government, not to enhance
ta6 avoi!ance to its preAu!ice$
[!5]
Commissioner vs. Connel Bros. Co.
GR L-2!!52-51 10 August 19!1F =n B$n& Re%es 2r.(2).' 10 &on&ur
"$&ts' The Commissioner !isallo-e! the !e!uctions %or 'a! !e'ts, !epreciation, an! e6cess in valuation o%
leasehol! improvements ' Connel 7ros$ Co$ in its income ta6 return %or ta6a'le ear )0+4 an! )0++$ The
Commissioner thus assesse! against the compan !e%icienc ta6es or assessments %or sai! ears$ The Court
o% Ta6 "ppeals mo!i%ie! the assessment ' inclu!ing the correspon!ing interest an! surcharges pursuant to
Section +) o% the Ta6 Co!e$
(ssue' 8hether the interest an! surcharges on !elin5uents ta6 paments are chargea'le$
)el*' Delin5uenc in!icates nonBpament o% the correct an! collecti'le ta6, an! such state o% !elin5uenc
e6ists not %rom the assessment o% the !e%icienc 'ut %rom the ver time the ta6paer %aile! to pa the correct
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 19 )
amount !ue %rom him$ :erein, the !elin5uenc ta6es 'ecame !ue an! the assessment there%ore -ere ma!e
'e%ore the amen!ment o% Section +) on * June )0+0; an! thus, the compan@s lia'ilit shoul! 'e !etermine!
pursuant to the ol! Section (e) o% the Ta6 co!e$ ?n!er the ol! Section, a !elin5uent ta6 paer -oul! have to
pa, in a!!ition to the unpai! ta6, a +F surcharge thereon compute! %rom the time the ta6 'ecame !ue, plus
interest on the -hole unpai! amount at the rate o% )F a month$ ?n!er 2" *444, the !elin5uent ta6paer shall
pa at the rate o% 1F per annum compute! %rom the !ate prescri'e! %or pament o% the income ta6 up to the
assessment o% the !elin5uenc ta6, 'ut -hich shall not e6cee! the amount correspon!ing to a perio! o% 4
ears$ Section )4 o% the amen!ator act shoes that there is no intent to ma9e 2" *444 retroactive$
[!9]
Commissioner vs. "irem$nGs "un* (nsur$n&e
GR L-10944 9 6$r&7 198!
Secon! Division, Paras (J)= + concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' Fireman@s Fun!s #nsurance is a resi!ent %oreign insurance corporation organize! un!er the la-s o% the
?nite! States, authorize! an! !ul license! to !o 'usiness in the Philippines$ From )0+*B)0+3, the compan
entere! into various insurance contracts involving causalit, %ire an! marine ris9s, %or -hich the
correspon!ing insurance policies -ere issue!$ From )0+*B)0+1, !ocumentar stamps -ere 'ought an!
a%%i6e! to the correspon!ing pages o% the polic register, instea! o% on the insurance policies issue!$ The
Commissioner assesse! an! !eman!e! %rom the compan the pament o% !ocumentar stamps %or the ears
)0+*B)0+3, plus compromise penalties$
(ssue' 8hether the a%%i6ture o% !ocumentar stamp on pages other than those authorize! ' la- is
tantamount to %ailure to pa the same$
)el*' "lthough the !ocumentar stamps -ere a%%i6e! to papers other than those authorize! ' la-, it is not
tantamount to %ailure to pa the same as the compan purchase! an! pai! the !ocumentar stamps
correspon!ing to the various insurance policies$ Sections *),, *4*, **), *4/ an! *40 o% the Ta6 Co!e have
the overri!ing purpose to collect ta6es, an! the steps involving !ocumentar ta6es (purchase, a%%i6ture, an!
cancellation) are 'ut a means to that en!$ "lthough the insurance policies -ith the correspon!ing
!ocumentar stamps a%%i6e! are the 'est evi!ence to prove pament o% sai! !ocumentar stamp ta6, it !oes
not preclu!e the a!missi'ilit o% other proo%s -hich are uncontra!icte! an! consi!era'le -eight$ Still,
-henever the interpretation o% statute leving ta6es or !uties are in !ou't, such statutes are to 'e construe!
most strongl against the government an! in %avor o% the su'Aects or citizens, 'ecause 'ur!ens are not to 'e
impose!, nor presume! to 'e impose! 'eon! -hat statutes e6pressl an! clearl import$ There is no
Austi%ication %or the government -hich has alrea! realize! the revenue, -hich is the o'Aect o% the imposition
o% the su'Aect stamp ta6, to re5uire pament o% the same ta6 %or the same !ocuments$
[!!]
Commissioner vs. Ce#u :ortl$n* Cement
GR L-29059 15 De&em#er 198!
"irst Division Cru+ (2)' 4 &on&ur
"$&ts' 7 virtue o% a !ecision o% the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals, mo!i%ie! ' the Supreme Court, the
Commissioner -as or!ere! to re%un! overpaments o% a! valorem ta6es on cement pro!uce! an! sol! ' the
compan a%ter (cto'er )0+/$ The compan move! %or a -rit o% e6ecution, -hich -as oppose! ' the
Commissioner on the groun! that the compan ha! an outstan!ing sales ta6 lia'ilit to -hich the Au!gment
!e't ha! alrea! 'een cre!ite!$ The Court o% Ta6 "ppeals hel! that the allege! sales ta6 lia'ilit -as still
'eing 5uestione! an! there%ore cannot 'e setBo%% against the re%un!$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 40 )
(ssue' 8hether the assessment o% sales ta6 lia'ilit ma 'e en%orce!, i$e$ to set o%% against the re%un!$
)el*' The argument, that the assessment cannot as et 'e en%orce! 'ecause it is still 'eing conteste!, loss
sight o% the urgenc o% the nee! to collect ta6es as Dthe li%e 'loo! o% the government$E #% the pament o% ta6es
coul! 'e postpone! ' simpl 5uestioning their vali!it, the machiner o% the state -oul! grin! to a halt an!
all government %unctions -oul! 'e paralze!$ To re5uire the Commissioner to actuall re%un! to the
compan the amount o% the Au!gment !e't$ 8hich he -ill later have the right to !istrait %or pament o% its
sales ta6 lia'ilit, is an i!le ritual$
[!8]
Re-u#li& vs. ?*$. *e "ern$n*e+
GR L-9141 25 ,e-tem#er 1959
=n B$n& L$#r$*or (2)' ! &on&ur
"$&ts' (limpio Fernan!ez an! his -i%e "ngelina (asan ha! a net -orth o% P3, ,,, on 3 Decem'er )04)$
During the Japanese occupation, the spouses ac5uire! several real properties$ "t the time o% the hus'an!@s
!eath in )04+, he ha! a net -orth o% P4),430$ The Collector o% #nternal 2evenue assesse! a -ar pro%its ta6
(2" ++) on the estate o% the !ecease! at P/, 1)4$,,, -hich -as a!ministrative re%use! to pa$ The vali!it o%
2" ++ -as 5uestione!, as -ell as the vali!it an! the legalit o% the assessment$
(ssue' 8hether the 8ar Pro%its ta6 >a- ma 'e retroactivel applie! -ithout violating the Constitution
(especiall the provision on e6Bpost %acto la-s)$
)el*' The prohi'ition against the e6 %acto la-s applies onl to criminal or penal matters, an! not to la-s
-hich concern civil matters or procee!ings generall, or -hich a%%ect or regulate civil or private right$ E6
post %acto is con%ine! to la-s respecting criminal punishments, an! ha! no relation -hatever to retrospective
legislation o% an other !escription$ 2etrospective la-s, -hen not o% a criminal nature, !o not come in
con%lict -ith the Constitution, unless o'no6ious to its provisions on other groun!s than their respective
character$ The la- ma not 'e consi!ere! harsh an! oppressive 'ecause o% the %orce o% its impact %ell on
those -ho ha! amasse! -ealth or increase! their -ealth !uring the -ar, 'ut !i! not touch the less %ortunate$
The polic %ollo-e! is the same as that -hich un!erlies the #ncome Ta6 >a-, imposing the 'ur!en upon those
-ho have an! relieving those -ho have not$
[!9]
/$n$*$ vs. /uver$
GR L-91915 24 A-ril 1985
=n B$n& =s&olin (2)' 1 &on&ur 2 &on&ur 3it7 reserv$tion 1 on le$ve 1 tooB no -$rt
"$&ts' #nvo9ing the people@s right to 'e in%orme! on matters o% pu'lic concern as -ell as the principle that
la-s to 'e vali! an! en%orcea'le must 'e pu'lishe! in the (%%icial .azette or other-ise e%%ectivel
promulgate!, TaRa!a, et$al$ see9 a -rit o% man!amus to compel pu'lic o%%icials to pu'lish presi!ential
!ecrees, letters o% instructions, general or!ers, proclamation, e6ecutive or!ers, letter o% implementation an!
a!ministrative or!ers$
(ssue' 8hether the unpu'lishe! la-s have 'in!ing %orce an! e%%ect$
)el*' The pu'lication in the (%%icial .azette is re5uire! to give the general pu'lic a!e5uate notice o% the
various la-s -hich are to regulate their actins an! con!uct as citizens$ Pu'lication is necessar to apprise the
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 41 )
pu'lic o% the contents o% regulations an! ma9e penalties 'in!ing on the person a%%ecte! there'$ The
pu'lication o% all presi!ential issuances o% a Dpu'lic natureE or Do% general applica'ilitE is a man!ate! '
la-, an! is a re5uirement o% !ue process$ Presi!ential !ecrees that provi!e %or %ines, %or%eitures or penalties
%or their violation or other-ise impose a 'ur!en on the people, such as ta6 an! revenue measures %all -ithin
this categor$ 7e%ore a person ma 'e 'oun! ' la-, he must 'e %irst 'e o%%iciall an! speci%icall in%orme!
o% its contents$ 8hen not pu'lishe!, such shall have no %orce an! e%%ect$ :o-ever, the
implementationIen%orcement o% the presi!ential !ecrees prior to their pu'lication in the .azette is an
operative %acts, -hich ma have conse5uences -hich cannot 'e Austl ignore!$
(<ote' The aspect o% Doperative %actsE -as !roppe! in su'se5uent resolution$)
[80]
B$g$tsing vs. R$mire+
GR L-41911 1! De&em#er 19!9
=n B$n& 6$rtin (2)' ! &on&ur 1 &on&ur 3it7 Eu$li.i&$tion 1 reserve* vote
"$&ts' #n )0/4, the Cunicipal 7oar! o% Canila enacte! (r!inance /+**, regulating the operation o% pu'lic
mar9ets an! prescri'ing %ees %or the rentals o% stalls an! provi!ing penalties %or violation thereo%$ The
Fe!eration o% Canila Car9et &en!ors #nc$ assaile! the vali!it o% the or!inance, alleging among others the
nonBcompliance to the pu'lication re5uirement un!er the 2evise! Charter o% the Cit o% Canila$
(ssue' 8hether the pu'lication re5uirement -as complie! -ith$
)el*' The 2evise! Charter o% the Cit o% Canila is a special act since it relates onl to the Cit o% Canila,
-hereas the >ocal Ta6 Co!e i! a general la- 'ecause it applies universall to all local governments$ Section
)/ o% the Charter spea9s o% Dor!inanceE in general$ 8hereas, Section 44 o% the >ocal Ta6 Co!e relates to
Dor!inances leving or imposing ta6es, %ees or other chargesE in particular$ 8hile the Charter re5uires
pu'lication, 'e%ore the enactment o% the or!inance an! a%ter approval thereo%, in t-o !ail ne-spapers o% the
general circulation in the cit, the >ocal Ta6 Co!e onl prescri'es %or pu'lication -i!el circulate! -ithin the
Auris!iction o% the local government or ' posting the or!inance in the local legislative hall or premises an! in
t-o other conspicuous places -ithin the territorial Auris!iction o% the local government$ 7eing a general la-
-ith a special provision applica'le in the case, the >ocal Ta6 Co!e prevails$
[81]
Commissioner vs. Burroug7s Lt*.
GR L-9951 19 2une 1989
,e&on* Division :$r$s (2)' 4 &on&ur
"$&ts' 7urroughs >t! is a %oreign corporation authorize! to engage in 'usiness in the Philippines$ #ts 'ranch
o%%ice in Ca9ati applie! -ith the Central 7an9 %or authorit to remit to its parent compan a'roa!, 'ranch
pro%its$ #t pai! )+F 'ranch pro%it remittance ta6$ The 'ranch, ho-ever, later claime! %or a re%un! or cre!it
conten!ing that the 'ranch pro%it remittance ta6 pursuant to a 7#2 ruling o% *) Januar )03,$ The Court o%
Ta6 "ppeals grante! the compan@s petition$ The Commissioner %ile! a petition %or certiorari, claiming
Cemoran!um Circular 3B3* ()/ Carch )03*) shoul! appl$
(ssue' 8hether the Cemoran!um Circular 3B3* shoul! 'e retroactivel applie!$
)el*' 2evenue 2uling o% *) Januar )03, remains to appl in the case as the compan pai! the ta6 on )4
Carch )0/0$ Cemoran!um Circular 3B3* cannot 'e given retroactive e%%ect in the light o% Section 4*/ (nonB
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 42 )
retroactivel o% rulings) o% the ta6 co!e$ The retroactive application o% the Circular -oul! !eprive the
compan the su'stantial amount o% P)/*,,+3$0,$ The misstates or omits material %acts %rom his return or #
an !ocument re5uire! o% him ' the 7#2, or -here the %acts su'se5uentl gathere! ' the 7#2 are materiall
!i%%erent %rom the %acts on -hich the ruling is 'ase!, or -here the ta6paer acte! in 'a! %aith to allo- the
retroactive application o% the circular$
[82]
Commissioner vs. 6eg$ Gener$l 6er&7$n*ise
GR L-99119 10 ,e-tem#er 1988
"$&ts' Prior to the promulgation o% PD 40*, all importations o% para%%in -a6, irrespective o% 9in! an! nature,
-ere su'Aect to /F a!vance sales ta6 on lan!e! costs plus *+F mar9up (Section )34;'< in relation to Section
)31 o% the Ta6 Co!e$ 8ith the promulgation o% PD 40*, e%%ective )3 Fe'ruar )0/4, all importation o%
para%%in -a6 -ere su'Aect to the speci%ic ta6 impose! un!er Section )4* (i) o% the Ta6 Co!e, instea! o% the
%ormer /F sales ta6$ 8hen the issue D-hether importe! cru!e para%%in -a6 -as su'Aect to the speci%ic ta6E
-as 'rought to the 7#2 %or clari%ication, then Commissioner &era rule! that onl -a6 use! as high pressure
lu'ricant an! microBcrstalline is su'Aect to speci%ic ta6, -hile the rest are su'Aect to the sales ta6$ Thus, Cega
.eneral Cerchan!ise %ile! claims %or ta6 re%un! or ta6 cre!it$ "cting Commissioner Plana !enie! the claims
in *3 Januar )0//$ (n )) Januar )0/3, ho-ever, Plana grante! the corporation@s claim %or re%un! or cre!it
pertaining to the importation ma!e )3 "pril )0/+$ The Corporation proteste! the ta6 assessment o% 3 Ca
)0/3, -hich -as !enie! ' the Commissioner$
(ssue' 8hether the )) Januar )0/3 grant (letter) revo9e! the ruling !ate! *3 Januar )0//$
)el*' The letter !ate! )) Januar )0/3 !i! not in an -a revo9e the ruling !ate! *3 Januar )0//, -hich
ruling applie! the speci%ic ta6 to -as -ithout !istinction$ The reason Plana remove! in )0/3 the compan@s
lia'ilit %or speci%ic ta6 -as 'ecause he -ante! to revo9e his ruling o% *3 Januar )0// 'ut 'ecause the ta6
re%erre! to an importation ma!e 'e%ore *3 Januar )0// (i$e$ )3 "pril )0/+), -hich -as still covere! ' the
ruling o% Commissioner &era (ruling o% )4 Ca )0/+)$
[81]
Commissioner vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR 108158 20 2$nu$r% 1995
/7ir* Division ?itug (2)' 4 &on&ur
"$&ts' (n ** "ugust )031, E6ecutive (r!er 4) -as promulgate! !eclaring a oneBtime ta6 amnest on unpai!
income ta6es, later amen!e! to inclu!e estate an! !onor@s ta6es an! ta6es on 'usiness %or the ta6a'le ears
)03) to )003+$ "vailing itsel% o% the amnest, 2(: "utoparts Philippines #nc$ %ile! its Ta6 "mnest 2eturn
an! pai! the correspon!ing amnest ta6es !ue$ The Compan re5ueste! that the !e%icienc ta6 notice ()4
"ugust )031) 'e cancelle! an! -ith!ra-n as it has availe! o% the ta6 amnest$ The Commissioner !enie! the
re5uest, construing that the amnest coverage inclu!e onl assessments issue! ' the 7#2 a%ter the
promulgation o% E(4) an! not to assessments thereto%ore ma!e$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment can -ithstan! e%%ects o% ta6 amnest$
)el*' " ta6 amnest, 'eing a general par!on or intentional overloo9ing ' the state its authorit to impose
penalties on persons other-ise guilt o% evasion or violation o% a revenue or ta6 la-, parta9es o% an a'solute
%orgiveness or -aiver ' the government itsel% o% its right to collect -hat other-ise -oul! 'e !ue it, an! in
this sense, preAu!icial thereto, to give ta6 eva!ers, -ho -ish to relent an! are -illing to re%orm a chance to %or
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 41 )
so an! there' 'ecome a part o% the ne- societ -ith a clean slate$ Section 4 o% E( 4) enumerate!, in no
uncertain terms, ta6paers -ho ma not avail to the amnest grante!$ The compan !oes not %all un!er an
o% the e6ceptions$ The a!!e! e6ception urge! ' the Commissioner 'ase! on 2evenue Cemoran!um (r!er
4B3/, %urther restricting the scope o% the amnest, -or9 against the raison !@etre o% E( 4) an! clearl amounts
to an alt o% a!ministrative legislation contrar to the man!ate o% the la- -hich the regulation ought to
implement$ The rule in the or!er that onl assessments issue! a%ter *) "ugust )031 shall 'e a'ate! is 'eon!
the contemplation o% the la-$
[84]
Commissioner vs. Court o. A--e$ls
GR 119!91 29 August 1999
"irst Division ?itug (2)' 2 &on&ur
"$&ts' Fortune To'acco is engage! in the manu%acture o% !i%%erent 'ran!s o% cigarettes, speci%icall
DChampionE, D:ope4E, an! DCoreE (-hich are %oreign 'ran!s liste! in the 8orl! To'acco Director as
'elonging to %oreign companies$ Fortune To'acco, ho-ever, change! names o% D:opeE to D>u6urE an!
DCoreE to DPremium CoreE there' removing sai! 'ran!s %rom the %oreign 'ran! categor$ Proo% -as also
ma!eI su'mitte! to the 7#2 that DChampionE -as an original Fortune To'acco Corp$ register an! thus a local
'ran!$ 2" /1+4 -as enacte! on ), June )004, leving a P+ minimum ta6 on locall manu%acture! cigarettes
ta6e! at ++F or e6portation o% -hich is not authorize! ' contract, an! P* minimum ta6 per pac9 on other
locall manu%acture! cigarette$ The 7#2 sent the Compan a month later a cop 2evenue Cemoran!um
Circular 4/B04 !eclaring D:opeE, DCoreE an! DChampionE as %oreign 'ran!s, an! thus su'Aecting them to
++F as valorem ta6, a revie- o% 2CC 4/B04 -as !enie!$
(ssue' 8hether the 'ran!s ma 'e place! -ithin the scope o% the amen!ator la- (2" /1+4) an! su'Aect then
to an increase!, through 2CC 4/B04$
)el*' Prior to the issuance o% 2CC 4/B04, the 'ran!s -ere in the categor o% locall manu%acture! cigarettes
not 'earing %oreign 'ran!s, su'Aect to 4+F a! valorem ta6$ 8ithout 2CC 4/B04, the enactment o% 2"/1+4
-oul! not have ne- ta6 rate conse5uences on the compan@s pro!ucts$ #n issuing 2CC 4/B04, the 7#2
legislate! un!er its 5uasiBlegislative authorit an! not simpl interprete! the la-$ 8hen an a!ministrative
rule goes 'eon! merel provi!ing %or the means that can %acilitate or ren!er least cum'ersome the
implementation o% the la- 'ut su'stantiall a!!s to or increases the 'ur!en o% those governe!$ #t 'ehooves
the agenc to accor! at least to those !irectl a%%ecte! a chance to 'e hear!, an! there' 'e !ul in%orme!,
'e%ore that ne- issuance is given the %orce an! e%%ect o% la-$
[85]
AB,-CB< Bro$*&$ting vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-52109 12 ;&to#er 1981
"irst Division 6elen&io )errrer$ (2)' 4 &on&ur
"$&ts' #n implementing Section 4(') o% the Ta6 Co!e, the Commissioner issue! .eneral Circular &B444$
Pursuant thereto, "7SBC7G 7roa!casting Corp$ !uti%ull -ithhel! an! turne! over to the 7#2 4,F o% S o%
the %ilm rentals pai! ' it to %oreign corporations not engage! in tra!e or 'usiness in the Philippines$ The last
ear that the compan -ithhel! ta6es pursuant to the Circular -as in )013$ (n */ June )0,3, 2" +44)
amen!e! Section *4 (') o% the Ta6 Co!e increasing the ta6 rate %rom 4,F to 4+F an! revising the ta6 'asis
%rom Dsuch amountE re%erring to rents, etc$ to Dgross income$E #n )0/), the Commissioner issue! a letter o%
assessment an! !eman! %or !e%icienc -ithhol!ing income ta6 %or ears )01+ to )013$ The compan
re5ueste! %or reconsi!eration; -here the Commissioner !i! not act upon$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 44 )
(ssue' 8hether 2evenue Cemoran!um Circular 4B/), revo9ing .eneral Circular &B444, ma 'e retroactivel
applie!$
)el*' 2ulings or circulars promulgate! ' the Commissioner have no retroactive application -here to so
appl them -oul! 'e preAu!icial to ta6paers$ :erein ,the preAu!ice the compan o% the retroactive
application o% Cemoran!um Circular 4B/) is 'eon! 5uestion$ The compan -as no longer in a position to
-ithhol! ta6es !ue %rom %oreign corporations 'ecause it ha! alrea! remitte! all %ilm rentals an! ha! no
longer control over them -hen the ne- circular -as issue!$ #nso%ar as the enumerate! e6ceptions are
concerne!, the compan !oes not %all un!er an o% them$
[89]
(n R= Hi$l&it$
A6 90-9-015-,C 18 ;&to#er 1990
En 7anc, .utierrez Jr$ (J)= )4 concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' "mounts -ere claime! ' "tt$ 7ernar!o F$ Lialcit on the occasion o% his retirement$ (n *4 "ugust
)00,, a resolution -as issue! ' the Court En 7anc stating that the terminal leave pa o% "tt$ Lialcita
receive! ' virtue o% his compulsor retirement can never 'e consi!ere! a part o% his salar su'Aect to the
pament o% income ta6 'ut %alls un!er the phrase Dother 'ene%its receive! ' retiring emploees an!
-or9ers,E -ithin the meaning o% Section ) o% PD **, an! is thus e6empt %rom the pament o% income ta6$
That the mone value o% his accrue! leave cre!its is not part o% his salar is 'uttesse! ' Section 4 o% PD 03+,
-hich it ma9es it clear that the actual service is the perio! o% time %or -hich pa has 'een receive!, e6clu!ing
the perio! covere! ' terminal leave$ The Commissioner %ile! a motion %or reconsi!eration$
(ssue' 8hether terminal leave pa is e6empt %rom ta6; as -ell as other amounts claime! herein$
)el*' "ppling Section )* (c) o% Common-ealth "ct )31, as incorporate! into 2" 11,, an! Section *3 (c) o%
the %ormer la-, the amount receive! ' "tt$ Lialcita as a result o% the converson o% unuse! leave cre!its,
commonl 9no-n as terminal leave, is applie! %or ' an o%%icer or emploee -ho retires, resigns, or is
separate! %rom the service through no %ault o% his o-n$ Since the terminal leave is applie! %or a%ter the
severance o% the emploment, terminal pa is no longer compensation %or services ren!ere!$ #t cannot 'e
vie-e! as salar$ Further, the terminal leave pa ma also 'e consi!ere! as a retirement gratuit, -hich is also
another e6clusion %rom gross income as provi!e! %or in Section *3 ('), / (%) o% the Ta6 Co!e$
The *4 "ugust 2esolution ("C 0,B1B,)+BSC), ho-ever, speci%icall applies onl to emploees o% the
Ju!iciar -ho retire, resign or are separate! through no %ault o% their o-n$ The resolution cannot 'e ma!e to
appl to otehr government emploees, a'sent an actual case or controvers, as that -oul! 'e in principle an
a!visor opinion$
[8!]
Commissioner vs. Court o. A--e$ls
GR 99019 1! ;&to#er 1991
Secon! Division, Pa!illa (J)= * concur, ) on leave
"$&ts' E%ren Castane!a retire! %rom government service as 2evenue "trtache in the Philippine Em'ass in
>on!on, Englan! on ), Decem'er )03* un!er the provisiions o% Section )* (c) o% Common-ealth "ct )31, as
amen!e!$ ?pon retirement, he receive!, among other 'ene%its, terminal leave pa %rom -hich the
Commissioner -ithhel! P)*,++/$)4, allege!l representing income ta6 thereon$ Castane!a claime! %or a
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 45 )
re%un!$
(ssue' 8hether terminal leave pa is su'Aect to -ithhol!ing income ta6$
)el*' Terminal >eave Pa receive! ' a government o%%icial or emploee is not su'Aect to -ithhol!ing
income ta6$ #n the e6ercise o% soun! personnel polic, the .overnment encourages unuse! leaves to 'e
accumulate!$ The .overnment recognizes that retirement pa %or pu'lic servants is less than generous, i% not
meager or scrimp$ Terminal leave paments are given thus not onl at the same time 'ut also %oor the same
polic consi!erations governing retirement 'ene%its$ Got 'eing part o% the gross salar or income o% a
government o%%icial or emploee 'ut a retirement 'ene%it, terminal leave pa is not su'Aect to income ta6$
[88]
Borromeo vs. Civil ,ervi&e Commission
GR 99012 11 2ul% 1991
En 7anc, .utierrez Jr$ (J)= )+ concur
"$&ts' Jesus G$ 7orromeo -as the Chairman o% the Civil Service Commission until his retirement on ) "pril
)031$ #n )033, he -rote the Commission on "u!it re5uesting an opinion -hether the mone value o% the
terminal leave o% retire! Constitutional Commission mem'ers shoul! inclu!e the allo-ances receive! at the
time o% retirement$ 7orromeo re5ueste! %or the pament o%terminal leave !i%%erential representing the unpai!
Cost o% >iving "llo-ance (C(>") an! 2epresentation an! Transportation "llo-nace (2"T") amounting to
P))),**0$,4$ The Department o% 7u!get an! Canagement !enie! the re5uest$
(ssue' 8hether the terminal leave pa o% the %ormer CSC Chairman shoul! 'e compute! on the 'asis o% the
highest monthl salar plus C(>" an! 2"T", or solel on the 'asis o% highest monthl salar -ithout sai!
allo-ances$
)el*' "n application %or terminal leave is an application %or a Dcommutation o% leave cre!itsE an! not a
Dcommutation o% salarE as the o%%icer or emploee has alrea! severe! his conncection -ith his emploer
an! is no longer -or9ing$ The cash value o% his accumulate! leave cre!its shoul! not 'e treate! as
compensation %or services ren!ere! at that time$ #nasmuch as terminal leave paments are given not onl at
teh same time 'ut also %or the same polic consi!erations governing retirement 'ene%its, the paments
there%ore shoul! inclu!e C(>" an! 2"T"$ Section *31 o% the 2evise! "!ministrative Co!e is not applica'le$
#t cannot 'e construe! as limiting the 'asis o% the computation o% terminal leave pa to monthl salar onl$
[89]
=sso ,t$n*$r* =$stern vs. Commissioner
GR 28508-9 ! 2ul% 1989
First Division, Cruz (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' ESS( !e!ucte! %rom its gross income %or )0+0, as part o% its or!inar an! necessar 'usiness
e6penses, the amount it ha! spent %or !rilling an! e6ploration o% its petroleum conscessions$ The
Commissioner !isallo-e! the claim on the groun! that the e6penses shoul! 'e capitalize! an! might 'e
-ritten o%% as a loss onl -hen a D!r holeE shoul! result$ :ence, ESS( %ile! an amen!e! return -here it
as9e! %or the re%un! o% P4*4,*/, ' reason o% its a'an!onment, as !r holes, o% several o% its oil -ells$ #t also
claime! as or!inar an! necessar e6penses in the same return amount representing margin %ees it ha! pai! to
the Central 7an9 on its pro%it remittances to its Ge- Jor9 (%%ice$
(ssue' 8hether the margin %ees ma 'e consi!ere! or!inar an! necessar e6penses -hen pai!$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 49 )
)el*' For an item to 'e !e!ucti'le as a 'usiness e6pense, the e6pense must e'e or!inar an! necessar; it
must 'e pai! or incurre! -ithin the ta6a'le ear; an! it must 'e pai! or incurre! in carring on a tra!e or
'usiness$ #n a!!ition, the ta6parer must su'stantiall prove ' evi!ence or recor!s teh !e!uctions claime!
un!er la-, other-ise, the same -ill 'e !isallo-e!$ There has 'een no attempt to !e%ine Dor!inar an!
necessarE -ith precision$ :o-ever, as gui!ing principle in the proper a!Au!ication o% con%licting claims, an
e6penses is consi!ere! necessar -here the e6pen!iture is appropriate an! help!ul in the !evelopment o% the
ta6paer@s 'usiness$ #t is or!inar -hen it connotes a pament -hich is normal in relation to the 'usiness o%
the ta6paer an! the surroun!ing circumstances$ "ssuming that the e6pen!iture is or!inar an! necessar in
the operation o% the ta6paer@s 'usiness; the e6pen!iture, to 'e an allo-a'le !e!uction as a 'usiness e6pense,
must 'e !etermine! %rom the nature o% the e6pen!iture itsel%, an! on the e6tent an! permanenc o% the -or9
accomplishe! ' the e6pen!iture$ :erein, ESS( has not sho-n that the remittance to the hea! o%%ice o% part
o% its pro%its -as ma!e in %urtherance o% its o-n tra!e or 'usiness$ The petitioner merel presume! that all
corporate e6penses are necessar an! appropriate in the a'sence o% a sho-ing that the are illegal or ultra
vires; -hich is erroneous$ Claims %or !e!uctions are a matter o% legislative grace an! !o not turn on mere
e5uita'le consi!erations$
[90]
Gu$gu$ =le&tri& Lig7t :l$nt Co. vs. Colle&tor
GR L-21911 24 A-ril 199!
En 7anc, 7engzon JP (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' .uagua Electric >ight Plant Co$ is a grantee o% municipal %ranchises ' the municpal councils o%
.uagua an! Se6moan, Pampanga$ #t reporte! a gross income o% P),)44,,,4$44 %or )04/ go )0+1 an! pai!
thereon a %ranchise ta6 o% P+1,114$0/ compute! at +F in accor!ance -ith Section *+0 o% the Ta6 Co!e$
7elieving that it shoul! pa a lo-er %ranchise ta6 as provi!e! ' its %ranchises, it %ile! a claim %or re%un! on
*+ Carch )0+/ %or overpament$ The Commissioner !enie! the re%un! o% %ranchise ta6 %or the perio! prior to
the 4th 5uarter o% )0+) on the groun! that the right to re%un! has prescri'e!$ The Commissioner allo-e! the
re%un! o% P)1,+04$3/$ >ater ho-ever, !ue to the hol!ing in :oa :in Co$ vs$ Davi!, the Commissioner
assesse! against the compan !e%icienc %ranchise ta6 su'Aect to a *+F surcharge, an! there' inclu!ing the
amount previousl allo-e! ' the Commissioner to 'e re%un!e!$
(ssue' 8hether the ta6 Dre%un!e! erroneouslE shoul! 'e impose! against the compan, or i% the right to
recover has prescri'e!$
)el*' .uagua Electric -oul! 'e paing the same !e%icienc ta6 %or the perio! o% ) Januar to 4, Govem'er
)0+1 i% it is re5uire! to pa P)1,+04$3/ in a!!ition to the sum o% P)0,043$)*, the !i%%erence 'et-een the ta6
compute! at +F pursuant to Section *+0 o% the Ta6 Co!e an! the %ranchise ta6 pai! at )F an! *F un!er the
%ranchise$ Further, ' insisting on the pament o% P)1,+04$3/ (Septem'er )0+) to Govem'er )0+1), the
Commissioner is tring to collect the same !e%icienc ta6 -here the right to assess the same, accor!ing to
him, has 'een lost ' prescription$ The !eman! on the ta6paer to pa the sum o% P)1,+04$3/ is in e%%ecct an
assessment o% !e%icienc %ranchise ta6$ The right to assess, thus, an! to collect is governe! ' Section 44) o%
the Ta6 Co!e rather than ' "rticle ))4+ o% the Civil Co!e, as a special la- prevails over a general la-$
.uagua Electric is a'solve! %rom the pament o% P)1,+04$3/$
[91]
Re-u#li& vs. Lim$&o $n* De Gu+m$n Commer&i$l Co.
GR L-11081 11 August 1992
En 7anc, Pare!es (J)= 3 concur, * too9 no part
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 4! )
"$&ts' #n )041, >imaco N De .uzman Co$ -as engage! in the importation o% cigarettes$ To guarantee
pament o% revenue ta6es, the compan an! the &isaan Suret an! #nsurance Corp$$ as suret, e6ecute! *
importer 'on!s$ (n */ June )041, the compan %ile! -ith the 7ureau o% Customs entr papers covering
shipment o% * million DSpu!E cigarettes it ha! importe! %rom Ge- Jor9$ the speci%ic ta6 !ue thereon
amounte! to P1,,,,$ The compan, through its agentI'ro9er J$ ($ :iponia, pai! the 7ureau o% Customs the
ta6 -ith P),,, in cash an! P+,,,, in a PG7 Chec9 on )+ Jul )041$ The cigarettes -ere release! to the
compan 'ut the chec9 'ounce!$ (n )/ June )043, the Collector o% #nternal 2evenue !eman!e! the pament
o% the !e%icienc speci%ic ta6$ The amount remaine! unpai!$ (n )+ "pril )0+), the compan re5ueste! that
action 'e !e%erre! as it inten!s to settle the matter amica'l -ith the 7#2$ The 2epu'lic %ile! a complaint %or
the %or%eiture o% the 'on!s, an! the pament o% the sum o% P+,,,, plus interest$ The compan invo9e! the
!e%ense o% estoppel an! prescription$
(ssue' 8hether the action has prescri'e!$
)el*' ?n!er Section 44* (c) o% the Ta6 Co!e, the collection o% the ta6 ' summar metho! or ' Au!icial
action shall 'e e%%ecte! -ithin + ears a%ter the assessment o% the ta6$ To assess means to impose a ta6; to
charge -ith a ta6; to !eclare a ta6 to 'e paa'le; to apportion a ta6 to 'e pai! or contri'ute!; to %i6 a rate, to
%i6 or settle a sum to 'e pai! ' -a o% ta6; to set, %i6 or charge a certain sum to each ta6paer; to settle,
!etermine or %i6 the amount o% ta6 to 'e pai!$ :erein, the assessment -as ma!e on )/ June )043 (-hen a
letter o% !eman! %or the amount o% the ru''er chec9 -as sent to the compan) an! not on )+ Jne )041 (the
!ate o% pament)$ Even assuming that the latter !ate is the !ate o% assessment, the action is still not 'arre! '
the statute o% limitations as teh statute -as suspen!e! -hen the compan ac9no-le!ge! the !e't in -riting in
"pril )0+), an! re5ueste! the !e%erment o% the Au!icial action to 'e ta9en ' the .overnment to-ar!s the
collection o% the o'ligation, so that the compan coul! ma9e representations -ith the C(llector to settle the
matter amica'l$ Prescription has not set in$
[92]
(nter-rovin&i$l Auto#us Co. vs. Colle&tor o. (ntern$l Revenue
GR L-9!41 11 2$nu$r% 1959
First Division, >a'ra!or (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' #nterprovincial "uto'us Co$ is a common carrier engage! in transporting passengers an! %reight '
means o% TP? 'uses in Cisamis (cci!ental an! Gorthern Lam'oanga$ The compan -as not a'le to preserve
the receipt stu's %rom )041 to )043 'ut -as a'le to preserve those %or )040 an! )04,$ The provincial revenue
agent %or Cisamis (cci!ental ascertaine! the num'er o% receipts ' re%erring to the con!uctor@s !ail report
%or the sai! perio! )041 to )043$ From there, the ta6 assesse! amounte! to P/,//1$*4, -hich -as collecte!
%rom the compan@s !eposit in Philippine Gational 7an9$ The compan !eman!e! the re%un! o% the sai!
amount, 'ut -hich -as !enie!$
(ssue' 8hether the %reight receipts -ere actuall issue! %or more than P+ each, to -arrant the assesse! ta6 o%
P/,//1$*4$
)el*' 2eceipts must have 'een issue! %or valua'le cargo to insure against the loss o% -hich, unli9e cargo
han!carrie! ' to-n%ol9s an! %armers -here the latter avoi! to secure receipts thereto$ Such %in!ing ' the
revenue agent -as not controverte!$ #n actions %ro the recover o% ta6es assesse! an! collecte!, the ta6paer
has the 'ur!en o% proving that the assessment is illegal as all presumptions are in %avor o% the correctness o%
ta6 assessments$ The goo! %aith o% ta6 assessors an! the vali!it o% their actions are presume!$ "s such rule,
on the 'ur!en o% proo%, has not 'een complie! -ith, the action %or recover must 'e !enie!$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 48 )
[91]
/$n Gu$n vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-219!9 2! A-ril 199!
En 7anc, 7engzon JP (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' #n )04/, Tan .uan an! Sia >in, Chinamen, organize! an! registere! the Philippine Surplus Compan,
a general partnership$ " general partnership is e6empt %rom income ta6 although it is re5uire! to %ile an
income ta6 return$ Pro%its, -hether !istri'ute! or not, are consi!ere! income o% the partners$ "cting upon a
con%i!ential report, ho-ever, that the compan poste! %ictitious e6pesnes in its 'oo9s to avoi! ta6es, the 7#2
investigate! in )0+4 the 'oo9s o% the partnership an! !iscovere! that the e6penses -ere not covere! '
receipts, that the names o% paees -ere erase!, an! that the paees !i! not report the sums in 5uestion in their
income ta6$ The 7#2 !isallo-e! e6pense !e!uctions %or the ear )043 amounting to P*,1,43, %or 'eing
%ictitious$ Sai! sum -as treate! as income o% the in!ivi!ual partners, an! thus, the 7#2 assesse! P+,,0+1$+/ as
!e%icienc income ta6 against Tan .uan$ Tan .uan appeale!$
(ssue' 8hether the !e!uction claime! ' the compan as 'usiness income shoul! 'e allo-e!, an! thus
a'solve Tan .uan o% the assesse! ta6 lia'ilit$
)el*' The Commissioner@s %in!ing on the %acts constituting %rau!, proven, an! %oun! esta'lishe! ' the Court
o% Ta6 "ppeals, -as not re'utte! ' the ta6paer$ Tan .uan !i! not present an evi!ence to !isprove the
%in!ings that the e6penses are %ictitious; consi!ering that the investigation on Tan .uan@s lia'ilit -as ma!e
prior to the e6piration o% the +Bear perio! to preserve an! 9eep receipts as set %gorth in Section 44/ o% the
Ta6 Co!e$ "s the !etermination o% the Commissioner is presume! correct, it 'ehooves the ta6paers to re'ut
such presumption$ For %ailure to overcome the 'ur!en, Tan .uan or the compan cannot claim the e6penses
as !e!uction %rom gross income$
[94]
D$%rit vs. Cru+
GR L-19910 29 ,e-tem#er 1988
First Division, .ancaco (J)= 4 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' Cecilia Teo!oro Darit, Tori'ia Teo!oro Castane!a, Pru!encio Teo!or, Francisco Teo!oro an! Jose%ina
Teo!oro Tiongson are legitimate chil!ren an! heirs o% the !ecease! spouses Carta an! Tori'io Teo!oro -ho
!ie! intestate on ) Jul )01+ an! 4, "ugust )01+$ The heirs separatel %ile! estate an! inheritance ta6 returns
%or the estates o% the spouses -ith the 7#2$ #n )0/*, the 7#2 issue! !e%icienc estate an! inheritance ta6
assessments %or P),11*,,/*,44 an! P),/4/,/0,$04 respectivel %or the Estate o% Dona Carta an!
P),+4*,*04$,) am! P+)3,4+3$/*, respectivel %or the Estate o% Don Tori'io$ The heirs as9e! %or
reconsi!eration as the assessment -as allege!l contrar to la- an! not supporte! ' su%%icient evi!ence$ #n a
ta6 return !ate! 4) Carch )0/4, Darit !eclare! an a!!itional amount o% P4,1++,+0+$/3 as part o% the estates
o% the Teo!oro spouses$ The 7#2 issue! ta6 pament acceptance or!ers, as the heirs an! estate have pai! a
total o% P*3+,,41$33$ #n )0/4, the Commissioner %ile! a motion %or allo-ance o% claim against the estates, an!
%or an or!er o% pament o% ta6es 'e%ore the trial court, praing that Darit 'e or!ere! to pa the 7#2 the sum
o% P1,4/,,40)$0) plus surcharges an! interest$ Darit %ile! oppositions conten!ing that the ta6es have 'een
settle! accor!ing to the provisions o% PD *4, as amen!e! ' PD 1/$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment is %inal, e6ecutor, an! !eman!a'le$
)el*' The act o% the Commissioner, in %iling an action %or allo-ance o% the claim %or estate an! inheritance
ta6es, ma 'e construe! as a !enial o% the ta6paers@ re5uest %or reconsi!eration$ From the !ate o% receipt o%
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 49 )
the cop o% the Commissioner@s letter %or collection o% ta6es, the ta6paers must contest an! !ispute the same,
an! upon !enial thereo%, the have a perio! o% 4, !as to appeal the case to the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals$ Ta6
assessment ma!e ' ta6 e6aminers are presume! correct an! ma!e in goo! %aith$ " ta6paer has to prove
other-ise$ Failure o% the ta6paers to appeal to the Court o% Ta6 "ppeals in !ue time ma!e the assessments
%ina, e6ecutor an! !eman!a'le$
[95]
Colle&tor vs. Beni-$%o
GR L-11959 11 2$nu$r% 1992
"$&ts' "l'erto 7enipao is the o-ner o% the >ucena Theater in >ucena, Kuezon$ #n )0+4, the internal revenue
agent investigate! 7enipao@s ta6 lia'ilit %or the perio! o% "ugust )0+* to Septem'er )0+4$ The e6aminer
recommen!e! a !e%icienc ta6 assessment in the sum o% P)),)04$4+ inclusive o% *+F surcharge plus a
suggeste! compromise penalt o% P0,,$,, 'ase! on the conclusion that 7enipao sol! * ta6B%ree *,c ticlets
%rau!ulentl in or!er to avoi! pament o% amusement ta6 prescri'e! ' Section *1, o% the Ta6 Co!e ('ase!
on a reverse ratio o% a!ult to chil!ren; 4=) in )040 to )0+), an! )=4 %or perio! in 5uestion; an! average
atten!ance %or the past ears)$ 7enipao proteste!, claiming that the %in!ings o% the e6aminers are mrere
presumptions an! conclusions, !evoi! o% %in!ings o% %act o% allege! %rau!ulent practices ' him$
(ssue' 8hether there is evi!ence in the recor! to sho- 7enipao committe! the allege! act to cheat or
!e%rau! the .overnment$
)el*' "n assessment %i6es an! !etermines the ta6 lia'ilit o% a ta6paer$ #n or!er to stan! the test o% Au!icial
scrutin, the assessment must 'e 'ase! on actual %acts$ The presumption o% correctness o% assessment, 'eing a
mere presumption, cannot 'e ma!e to rest on another presumption, no matter ho- reasona'le or logical such
ma 'e; i$e$ that the circumstances in )0+* an! )0+4 are presume! to 'e the same as those e6isting in )040 to
)0+), an! Jul )0++$ There are no su'stantial %acts to support the assessment in 5uestion$ Geither -as there
an proo% o% the %rau! allege!l committe!$ Frau! is a serious charge, an! to 'e sustaine!, it must also 'e
supporte! ' clear an! convincing proo%$
[99]
6er$l&o ,e&urities Cor-. vs. ,$vell$no
GR L-19181 21 ;&to#er 1982
First Division, Teehan9ee (J)= 4 concur, ) too9 no part
"$&ts' #n )01/, the late Juan .$ Caniago su'mitte! to the Commissioner con%i!ential !enunciation against
the Ceralco Securities Corp$ %or ta6 evasion %or not having pai! income ta6 on *+F o% the !ivi!en!s it
receive! %rom the Canila Electric Co$ %or ears )01* to )011$ The Commissioner cause! the investigation o%
the !enunciation an! %oun! that no !e%icienc corporate ta6 -as !ue %rom Ceralco Securities$ Caniago -as
in%orme! o% the %in!ings$ The Secretar o% Finance sustaine! the Commissioner@s action$ Caniago %ile! a
petition %or man!amus against the Commissioner so as to compel it to impose the allege! !e%icienc ta6
assessment against Ceralco Securities an! to a-ar! him the correspon!ing in%ormer@s a-ar!$
(ssue' 8hether the Commissioner ma 'e compelle! to impose the allege! !e%icienc ta6 assessment$
)el*' Can!amus onl lies to en%orce the per%ormance o% a ministerial act or !ut an! not to control the
per%ormance o% !iscretionar po-er$ Can!amus ma not 'e ma!e against teh Commissioner to compel him to
impose a ta6 assessment not %oun! ' him to 'e !ue or proper, %or that -oul! 'e tantamount to a usurpation o%
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 50 )
e6ecutive %unctions$ Purel a!ministrative an! !iscretionar %unctions ma not 'e inter%ere! -ith ' the
Courts$ The !iscretionar po-er veste! in the proper e6ecutive o%%icial, in the a'sence o% ar'itrariness or
grave a'use so as to go 'eon% the statutor authorit, is not su'Aect to the contrar Au!gment or control o%
others$
[9!]
Commissioner vs. A#$*
GR L-1992! 2! 2une 1998
En 7anc, Castro (J)= 3 concur
"$&ts' "rman!o "'a! (2epu'lic "lcohol Distiller) is a manu%acturer an! seller o% !enature! alcohol$ (n )4
"ugust )0+3, he applie! %or the !enaturation o% 44,,,, gauge liters o% recti%ie! alcohol$ (n *) "ugust )0+3, a
!enaturing committee %rom the 7#2 supervise! the !enaturation o% the alcohol in "'a!@s -arehouse in
Caloocan, 2izal $The alcohol -as certi%ie! to 'e !enature! ' the Committee$ Domestic alcohol, -hen
!enature! an! use! %or in!ustrial purposes, is e6empt %rom pament o% speci%ic ta6$ #n a surprise inspection
on *+ "ugust )0+3, ho-ever, the 7#2 inspectors %oun! that the alcohol has not 'een completel !enature!
an! still ma 'e use! %or compoun!ing li5uors$ The team also !iscovere! that onl ),,43, gauge liters -ere
le%t$ "'a! -as ma!e lia'le %or speci%ic ta6$
(ssue' 8hether the government is estoppe! ' mista9es o% its agents$
)el*' The 7#2 !enaturing committe! remisse! in its per%ormance o% its !uties as it certi%ie! the alcohol to 'e
!enature!, -here it -as %oun! in a su'se5uent e6amination that it is not completel !enature!$ #t is a settle!
rule in the per%ormance o% its governmental %unctions, the State cannot 'e estoppe! ' the neglect or omission
o% its agents$ For i% other-ise hel!, it -oul! 'e eas %or manu%acturers to eva!e lia'ilit on the prete6t that
some government o%%icial has certi%ie! to the 5ualit o% their pro!ucts (an! possi'l the ta6 e6emption
resulting there%rom) an! that the have ever right to rel on this certi%icate$ "'a! -as or!ere! to pa
P)0,4,*$*, as speci%ic ta6, -ith interest thereon %rom the !ate o% last sale$
[98]
Commissioner vs. :ro&ter D G$m#le :7ili--ines
GR L-99818 15 A-ril 1988
Secon! Division, Paras (J)
"$&ts' Procter an! .am'le Philippines is a -holl o-ne! su'si!iar o% Procter an! .am'le ?S" (PCCB
?S"), a nonBresi!ent %oreign corporation in the Philippines, not engage! in tra!e an! 'usiness therein$ PCCB
?S" is the sole sharehol!er o% PCC Philippines an! is entitle! to receive income %rom PCC Philippines in
the %orm o% !ivi!en!s, i% not rents or roalties$ For the ta6a'le ears )0/4 an! )0/+, PCC Philippines %ile! its
income ta6 return an! also !eclare! !ivi!en!s in %avor o% PCCB?S"$ #n )0//, PCC Philippines, invo9ing the
ta6Bsparing provision o% Section *4 (') as the -ithhol!ing agent o% the Philippine .overnment -ith respect to
!ivi!en! ta6es pai! ' PCCB?S", %ile! a claim %or the re%un! o% *, percentage point portion o% the 4+
percentage -hole ta6 pai! -ith the Commissioner o% #nternal 2evenue$
(ssue' 8hether PCC Philippines is entitle! to the )+F pre%erential ta6 rate on !ivi!en!s !eclare! an!
remitte! to its parent corporation$
)el*' The issue raise! is one ma!e %or the %irst time 'e%ore the Supreme Court$ ?n!er the same un!erling
principle o% prior e6haustion o% a!ministrative reme!ies, on the Au!icial level, issues not raise! in the lo-er
court cannot 'e generall raise! %or the %irst time on appeal$ Gonetheless, it is a6iomatic that the state can
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 51 )
never 'e allo-e! to Aeopar!ize the government@s %inancial position$ The su'mission o% the Commissioner that
PCC Philippines is 'ut a -ithhol!ing agent o% the government an! there%ore cannot claim reim'ursement o%
allege! overpai! ta6es, is completel meritorious$ The real part in interest is PCCB?S", -hich shoul! prove
that it is entitle! un!er the ?S Ta6 Co!e to a ?S Foreign Ta6 Cre!it e5uivalent to at least *, percentage
points spare! or -aive! as other-ise consi!ere! or !eeme! pai! ' the .overnment$ :erein, the claimant
%aile! to sho- or Austi% the ta6 return o% the !ispute! )+F as it %aile! to sho- the actual amount cre!ite! '
the ?S .overnment against the income ta6 !ue %rom PCCB?S" on the !ivi!en!s receive! %rom PCC
Philippines; to present the income ta6 return o% PCCB?S" %or )0/+ -hen the !ivi!en!s -ere receive!; an! to
su'mit !ul authenticate! !ocument sho-ing that the ?S government cre!ite! teh *,F ta6 !eeme! pai! in
the Philippines$
[99]
Cit% Lum#er vs. Domingo
GR L-18911 10 2$nu$r% 1994
En 7anc, >a'ra!or (J)= 3 concur, * too9 no part
"$&ts' The Commissioner assesse! on an a!!itional income against Cit >un'er #nc$, representing minor
!e!uctions %rom allege! e6penses on un!isclose! sales o% pl-oo!, nails, an! .# sheets amounting to
P/,0,*$,/ an! on a cash cre!it 'alance o% P/,301$3,$ The compan claims that the pl-oo! an! the .# sheets
-ere actuall lost in a %ire occuring in the cit an! thatthe cre!it cash 'alance is a loan secure! ' it$ #t
appears that the regional !irector revie-ing the case re!uce! the assessment %rom P+,,*3$,, to P)/1$ Still, the
compan allege! that the assessment is violative o% Cemoran!um (r!er &B144 (o% 4 Jul )0+1), issue! ' the
Commissioner, granting 2egional Directors authorit to close ta6 cases involving !e%icienc assessments not
e6cee!ing P),,,,, in ta6es an! penalties$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment violates Cemoran!um (r!er &B144$
)el*' The or!er in 5uestion -as applica'le onl to su'or!inace o%%icers o% the 7#2 an! coul! not 'in! the
Commissioner himsel%, -ho has 'een entruste! ' la- to ma9e %inal assessments$ The Commissioner cannot
!elegate this po-er to ma9e a %inal assessment to his su'or!inate$ Delegatus nor potest !elegare; i$e$ the
peroson to -hom an o%%ice or !ut is !elegate! cannot la-%ull !evolve the !ut on another$
[100]
?ill$min vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-11519 11 ;&to#er 1990
Secon! Division, 7autista "ngelo (J)=
/ concur, ) concur in result
"$&ts' "n assessment -as issue! ' the Provincial 2evenue agent o% (riental Cin!oro against Tomas 7$
&illamin$ #n )0++, &illamin re5ueste! reconsi!eration o% the assessment, 'ut -hich -as !enie! ' the
Collector o% #nternal 2evenue, through the "cting Chie% o% the "ssessment Department on / June )0++$
(ssue' 8hether the letter signe! ' the "cting Chie% o% the "ssessment Department is the !ecision
contemplate! ' la-$
)el*' The issue is o% no moment consi!ering that Cemoran!um (r!er &B1,4 ()+ Carch )0+1) o% the 7ureau
o% #nternal 2evenue, -hich authorizes sai! o%%icial ("cting Chie% o% "ssessment Department) to sign letters o%
!eman! involving assessment in 'ehal! o% the Collector o% #nternal 2evenue$ Coreover, the su'se5uent letters
signe! ' the Collector a%%irming an! uphol!ing the correctness o% the assessment ma!e ' his "ssessment
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 52 )
Department constitutes evi!ent proo% that the o%%icial -ho signe! the letter o% / June )0++ -as !ul
authorize! to !o so$
[101]
,% :o vs. Court o. /$0 A--e$ls
GR L-81449 18 August 1988
Secon! Division, Sarmiento (J)= 4 concur
"$&ts' 7oni%acio S Po is the -i!o- o% the late Po 7ien Sing, (-ho !ie! on / Septem'er )03,)$ #n the ta6a'le
ears )014 to )0/*, the !ecease! Po 7ien Sing -as the sole proprietor o% Silver Cup 8ine Factor (Talisa,
Ce'u), an! -as engage! in the 'usiness o% manu%acture an! sale o% compoun!e! li5uors, using alcohol an!
other ingre!ients as ra- materials$ (n the 'asis o% a !enunciation against Silver Cup, the Secretar o% Finance
!irecte! the FinanceB7#2BG7# team to investigate$ Silver Cup -as re5uire! to pro!uce accounting recor!s
an! other relate! !ocuments %or the e6amination o% the team$ Po 7ien Sing %aile! to !o so$ This prompte! the
team to enter the %actor 'o!ega o% Silver Cup an! seize !i%%erent 'ran!s, consisting o% ),+++ cases o% alcohol
pro!ucts$ (n the 'asis o% the team@s report o% investigation, the Commissioner assesse! Po 7ien Sing
!e%icienc income ta6 %or )011 to )0/, in thhe amount o% P/,)+4,13+$)1 an! %or !e%icienc speci%ic ta6 %or *
Januar )014 to )0 Januar )0/* in the amount o% P+,+0+,,,4$13$ Po 7ien Sing proteste! the assessment$
(ssue' 8hether the assessment have vali! an! legal 'ases$
)el*' Section )1 (') o% the Gational #nternal 2evenue Co!e o% )0// is speci%ic an! clear$ The rule on the
D'est evi!ence o'taina'leE applies -hen a ta6 report re5uire! ' la- %or the purpose o% assessment is not
availa'le or -hen the ta6 report is incomplete or %rau!ulent$ :erein, the persistent %ailure o% Po 7ien Sing an!
7oni%acia S Po to present their 'oo9s o% accounts %or e6amination %or the ta6a'le ears involve! le%t the
Commissioner no other legal option e6cept to resort to the po-er con%erre! upon him un!er Section )1 o% the
Ta6 Co!e$
/$0$tion L$3 ( 2004 ( 51 )

Digest Case TAX

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Digest Case TAX

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digest Case TAX

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Digests

You might also like