Idaho State Department of Education

Professional Development Plan Rolling Hills Public Charter School

Idaho State Department of Education
Developed by Oregon State Department of Education Professional Development Plan
Page 5 of 14
NEED ONE: STRENGTHEN COMMON CORE CURRICULUM AND STRATEGIES FOR MATH AND ELA WRITING
GOAL ONE: ALL GRADE LEVEL MATH TEACHERS WILL ATTEND MTI TRAINING COURSES
Please indicate in bold those activities addressing academic progress and/or HQT issues.
STRATEGY/ACTIVITY
What evidence based
strategy/activity will be
implemented?
EVIDENCE OF
IMPLEMENTATION
How will you
determine (know) and
monitor that the
strategy/activity was
implemented?
TIMELINE
for completing the
activity
PERSONS
RESPONSIBLE
Who will provide
oversight for
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation of
strategy?
EVALUATION
How will you
measure the
effectiveness of the
strategy to: improve
teaching, to improve
student learning,
and to narrow the
student achievement
gap?
ESTIMATED
COSTS
What are the
anticipated costs?
Provide Object
Codes as listed on
budget summary
page.
FUNDING
What is the
source? Title I, II-
A, II-D, III, IV, V,
State, Local,
Grants?
Math teachers will
attend MTI
refresher training
courses in the Fall,
Winter, and Spring.
Certificates of
successful course
completion will be
in personnel files.
End of 2014-15
School year
and end of
2015-16
school year for
new teachers
Administrator Teachers will
demonstrate
successful
implementation
of MTI strategies
in classroom
math lessons.
2014-15:
($70 fee + $70
sub) x 7 teachers
x 3 courses
= $2940

2015-16:
($70 fee + $70
sub) x 2 new
teachers x 3
courses
= $840
State HB 65
PD Grant
($3780)
Teachers will
review, recommend
adoption, and
implement CCSS
math and ELA
writing curriculum
New CCSS Math
and ELA Writing
curriculum will be
adopted and
implemented with
PD support.
End of 2014-15
school year
with ongoing
PD through
2015-16 school
year.
Administrator
and PD
Coordinator
Teachers will
demonstrate
successful
implementation
of CCSS math
and ELA writing
curriculum.
General Funds
and Title IIA


Idaho State Department of Education
Professional Development Plan Rolling Hills Public Charter School


Idaho State Department of Education
Developed by Oregon State Department of Education Professional Development Plan
Page 6 of 14


NEED TWO: STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, SKILL, AND DIFFERENTIATION USING TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION
GOAL TWO: LCD PROJECTORS IN EACH CLASSROOM FOR INTERACTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES
Please indicate in bold those activities addressing academic progress and/or HQT issues.
STRATEGY/ACTIVITY
What evidence based
strategy/activity will be
implemented?
EVIDENCE OF
IMPLEMENTATION
How will you
determine (know) and
monitor that the
strategy/activity was
implemented?
TIMELINE
for completing the
activity
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
Who will provide
oversight for
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation of
strategy?
EVALUATION
How will you
measure the
effectiveness of the
strategy to: improve
teaching, to improve
student learning,
and to narrow the
student achievement
gap?
ESTIMATED
COSTS
What are the
anticipated costs?
Provide Object
Codes as listed on
budget summary
page.
FUNDING
What is the
source? Title I, II-
A, II-D, III, IV, V,
State, Local,
Grants?
Install LCD
projectors in each
classroom for
interactive
instructional
activities.
Installation Installation by
the end of
2014-15 school
year.


Administrator Teacher/lesson
evaluation
through
observation and
student survey
LCD projectors:
$500 x 8 classes
= $4000

(PFA will fund
installation of
LCD projectors)


State HB 65
PD Grant
($4000)
Staff training for use
of LCD projectors for
interactive
instructional activities
using Discovery
Education, Khan
Academy, and multi-
media student
presentations
Lesson plans
and/or
observations
Lesson
implementation
within 30 days
after LCD
projector
installation.
Administrator
and PD
Coordinator
Teacher/lesson
evaluation
through
observation and
student survey
PD Coordinator
2014-15 stipend:
$1500
2015-16 stipend:
$1500

State HB 65
PD Grant for
2014-15 and
2015-16
($3000)
Idaho State Department of Education
Professional Development Plan Rolling Hills Public Charter School


Idaho State Department of Education
Developed by Oregon State Department of Education Professional Development Plan
Page 7 of 14


NEED THREE: PROGRESS MONITORING TOOLS FOR MEASURING ACADEMIC PROGRESS
GOAL THREE: STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE ACADEMIC PROGRESS USING EASYCBM
Please indicate in bold those activities addressing academic progress and/or HQT issues.
STRATEGY/ACTIVITY
What evidence based
strategy/activity will be
implemented?
EVIDENCE OF
IMPLEMENTATION
How will you
determine (know) and
monitor that the
strategy/activity was
implemented?
TIMELINE
for completing the
activity
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
Who will provide
oversight for
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation of
strategy?
EVALUATION
How will you
measure the
effectiveness of the
strategy to: improve
teaching, to improve
student learning,
and to narrow the
student achievement
gap?
ESTIMATED
COSTS
What are the
anticipated costs?
Provide Object
Codes as listed on
budget summary
page.
FUNDING
What is the
source? Title I, II-
A, II-D, III, IV, V,
State, Local,
Grants?
Collect benchmark
screening and
progress monitoring
data for academic
interventions using
the easyCBM
progress monitoring
tool.
Student data will
be recorded and
monitored using
the easyCBM
database.
Benchmark
screenings for
all students:
Fall, Winter,
Spring
Progress
Monitoring:
every 2-3 weeks
for students
receiving
intervention
Administrator
and Title I
Coordinator

Teachers to keep
data and report
to parents
Graphs and data
from easyCBM
will be
interpreted at
least each month
to determine
effective
interventions.
Interventions
may change
based on data
$1,200.00
(annual cost of
easyCBM) x 3
= $3600






Technology
Grant for
2013-14.

State HB 65
PD Grant for
2014-15 and
2015-16
($2400)


Idaho State Department of Education
Professional Development Plan Rolling Hills Public Charter School


Idaho State Department of Education
Developed by Oregon State Department of Education Professional Development Plan
Page 8 of 14


NEED FOUR: PD WEBSITE FOR TEACHERS AND STAFF TO SHARE AND REVIEW PD TRAINING MATERIALS
GOAL FOUR: TEACHERS WILL USE THE SCHOOL PD WEBSITE TO STRENGTHEN AND MAINTAIN SKILLS
Please indicate in bold those activities addressing academic progress and/or HQT issues.
STRATEGY/ACTIVITY
What evidence based
strategy/activity will be
implemented?
EVIDENCE OF
IMPLEMENTATION
How will you
determine (know) and
monitor that the
strategy/activity was
implemented?
TIMELINE
for completing the
activity
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
Who will provide
oversight for
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation of
strategy?
EVALUATION
How will you
measure the
effectiveness of the
strategy to: improve
teaching, to improve
student learning,
and to narrow the
student achievement
gap?
ESTIMATED
COSTS
What are the
anticipated costs?
Provide Object
Codes as listed on
budget summary
page.
FUNDING
What is the
source? Title I, II-
A, II-D, III, IV, V,
State, Local,
Grants?
Materials and links
from PD trainings
will be posted on the
school PD website
for teachers and
staff.
Teachers and staff
will receive link
and password to
the schools PD
website.
August 2014 Administrator
and PD
Coordinator
Website usage
and quarterly
staff survey
results will be
reviewed.
Annual website
fee: $50 x 3
= $150

PD Coordinator
2014-15 stipend:
$1500
2015-16 stipend:
$1500




State HB 65
PD Grant for
2014-15 and
2015-16
($3150)


Idaho State Department of Education
Professional Development Plan Rolling Hills Public Charter School


Idaho State Department of Education
Developed by Oregon State Department of Education Professional Development Plan
Page 9 of 14

HQT NEEDS: TEACHERS TO MEET FEDERAL HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER REQUIREMENTS
HQT GOAL: ALL TEACHERS WILL MEET HQT REQUIREMENTS BY FALL OF 2014 OR HAVE HQT PLAN
Please indicate in bold those activities addressing academic progress and/or HQT issues.
STRATEGY/ACTIVITY
What evidence based
strategy/activity will be
implemented?
EVIDENCE OF
IMPLEMENTATION
How will you
determine (know) and
monitor that the
strategy/activity was
implemented?
TIMELINE
for completing the
activity
PERSON
RESPONSIBLE
Who will provide
oversight for
implementation,
monitoring and
evaluation of
strategy?
EVALUATION
How will you
measure the
effectiveness of the
strategy to: improve
teaching, to improve
student learning,
and to narrow the
student achievement
gap?
ESTIMATED
COSTS
What are the
anticipated costs?
Provide Object
Codes as listed on
budget summary
page.
FUNDING
What is the
source? Title I, II-
A, II-D, III, IV, V,
State, Local,
Grants?
Teachers not
meeting HQT
requirements will be
on an individual
teacher plan for
achieving HQT
status by passing
subject area Praxis
tests.
Individual HQT
Teacher Plan will
be in their
personnel file.
File Review
within 30 days.

HQT teacher
plan competed
within 1 year.
Administrator Teacher will
take and pass
subject area
Praxis tests.
2014-15:
$185 x 4
teachers = $740



2013-14:
Title II-A

State HB 65
PD Grant
($740)