Framing Rubric

Non-Compliance
0 pts
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts

Job Completion
Non-Compliance

The project was not
completed or not
completed to the
specifications listed in
the blue prints.
Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

N/A
Excellent

The project was 100%
complete matching the
blue prints to exact
detail.

Demonstrate Knowledge
of Process
Non-Compliance

Student is not able to
identify and explain
necessary
procedures/concepts in
order to complete the
project.
Poor

Student is able to
identify and explain
70-79% of the
necessary
procedures/concepts in
order to complete the
project. Student relies
on text book/notes
skills to complete the
project.
Fair

Student is able to
identify and explain
80-89% of the
necessary
procedures/concepts in
order to complete the
project. Student still
relies on own memory
skills to complete the
project.
Good

Student is able to
identify and explain
90-99% of the
necessary
procedures/concepts in
order to complete the
project. Student still
relies on own memory
skills to complete the
project.
Excellent

Student is able to
identify and explain
necessary
procedures/concepts in
order to complete the
project. Student relies
on own memory skills
to complete the
project.

Ability to Follow
Directions
Non-Compliance

Student was not able/or
did not follow
directions from the
instructor and
blueprints.
Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

N/A
Excellent

Followed directions
from instructor and
blueprints with 100%
accuracy.

Student Preparedness
Non-Compliance

Student refused to
gather materials/tools
necessary in order to
complete the project
(non-compliant).
Poor

Student did not gather
the materials/tools
necessary in order to
complete the project.
Fair

Student gathered most
of the materials/tools
necessary, but required
excess time to do so.
Good

Student had/gathered
most materials/tools
necessary to complete
the project for and was
ready to work.
Excellent

Student had all
materials/tools
necessary to complete
the project and was
ready to work.

Time Management
Non-Compliance

Student refused to
work during the time
given. Project was no
completed on time.
Poor

Student did not use
given time well. Were
unable to complete the
project by the deadline
given by the
instructor.
Fair

Procrastinated at times
but was still able to
complete the project in
a timely matter (job
completed on
time/within budget).
Good

Used time fairly well
throughout the project.
Group project was still
completed in a timely
matter (job completed
on time/within
budget).
Excellent

Routinely used time
will throughout the
project to get the
job/project done in a
timely matter (job
completed on
time/within budget).

Student Attitude During
Project
Non-Compliance

Student did nor turn
in/participate during
the project.
Poor

Student turned in a
project/participated
just enough just to
receive a grade.
Fair

Student participated
and turned in a project
that is "good enough"
in order to receive a
fair grade.
Good

Student worked on the
project with good
attitude and completed
a project that they are
satisfied with.
Excellent

Student worked on the
project with a great
attitude and completed
a project that is a true
reflection of their
diligent efforts.

Application of Safety
Practices
Non-Compliance

Student blatantly failed
to follow the
established rules. Was
a danger to
himself/herself and
Poor

Student failed to
follow a significant
number of the safety
rules.
Fair

Student attempted to
follow the safety rules,
but failed to meet
several of the
established rules.
Good

Student followed most
of the safety rules, but
may have forgotten
one.
Excellent

Student followed all
safety rules established
by the Industrial
Technology Program
100% of the time.

others in the class.
Application of Math Skills
Non-Compliance

Student didn't get the
right square number,
had wrong layout, and
measurements were
wrong.
Poor

Student had the right
square number, but the
layout and
measurements were
wrong.
Fair

Student had right
square number and the
right layout, but had 8
wrong measurements.
Good

Student had right
square number and
layout, but had 4
wrong measurements.
Excellent

Student had correct
square number, layout,
and measurements
100%.