Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Direct Heat Transfer
Direct Heat Transfer
h
ay
y=0-
75
4. 2. 44
4. 2. 45
4. 2. 46
Subst i t ut i ng Equat i ons 4. 2. 1, 4. 2. 39, 4. 4. 42 i nt o Equat i on 4. 2. 46
and nondi mensi onal i zi ng yi el ds
d3_
dx
30 ( l + 8( 6C + 6f ) ) 8 J a B2
Pr f 5f 4 + ( 3Ref ) 2/ 3 Pr f
( 4 Sc + g6f ) 4. 2. 47
Equat i ons 4. 2. 42, 4. 2. 45 and 4. 2. 47 descr i be t he condensat i on i n
Regi on I I . The i ni t i al condi t i ons ar e e = 0 and 5C = 0 at t he begi nni ng
of Regi on I I .
Heat Tr ansf er Expr essi ons
A heat t r ansf er coef f i ci ent can be def i ned as
h( x) =
8T
ay
y=o
( Tsat " Tw)
f r omwhi ch t he l ocal Nussel t number can be def i ned as
4. 2. 48
M h( x) ( vf 2/ g)1/ 3
Nu( x) =- - - - - - - - - 1- - - - - - - - - -
K
Case A Tw < Tn < Tc;at
The heat t r ansf er coef f i ci ent f or Regi on I i s
- 2( TW - T0)k
( Tsat V 1
3Ti
b___
K
8y
y = 0
( ^sat '
Tw)
The l ocal Nussel t number i n Regi on I i s
OQ
Nuj (7) = - w
(1 - 0W) 6i
Subst i t ut i ng t he expr essi on f or 6i f r om Equat i on 4
4. 2. 48 becomes
29
Nu> w =
f r omwhi ch an aver age Nussel t number i n Regi on I can
. 3ew
NUl (1 - 0w) ai x1/ 3
Regi on I comes t o an end at X = Xq when 6]_ + 62
t he expr essi ons f or and 62 f r om Equat i on 4. 2. 21, t he
t i on i s obt ai ned whi ch def i nes t he ext ent of Regi on I .
al + a2 XD ^ = 5f *
The l ocal Nussel t number i n Regi on I I i s gi ven by
4. 2. 49
4. 2. 50
4. 2. 51
- . 2. 21, Equat i on
4. 2. 52
be evaul at ed as
4. 2. 53
= Sf . Ut i l i zi ng
f ol l owi ng equa-
4. 2. 54
76
The aver age Nussel t i n Regi on I I i s expr essed as
f * - -
Nu j i = J Nu j j (x) dx
*D
(x - x q)
The aver age Nussel t number over Regi ons I and I I i s
Nu = Nuj + Nu j j (x - xD)
x
Case B Tw < Tn = Tsa^
The l ocal heat t r ansf er coef f i ci ent i n Regi on I i s
2k
h( x) =
61
The l ocal Nussel t number i n Regi on I i s expr essed as
2
Nuj (x) =
' 61
Ut i l i zi ng t he expr essi on f or 6^ f r om Equat i on 4. 2. 37,
4. 2. 59 becomes
f r omwhi ch an aver age Nussel t number over t he l engt h of Regi on
expr essed as
4. 2. 56
gi ven by
4. 2. 57
gi ven by
4. 2. 58
4. 2. 59
Equat i on
4. 2. 60
I can be
78
Ni J j = _1/ 3 4. 2. 61
al x
Regi on I comes t o an end when = 6f . Ut i l i zi ng t he expr essi on
f or <5i f r om Equat i on 4. 2. 37 t he f ol l owi ng equat i on i s obt ai ned t o
def i ne, Xp, t he ext ent of Regi on I :
6f 3
~X[) = ( ) . 4. 2. 62
al
The l ocal Nussel t number i n Regi on I I i s gi ven by
20-j + 3 6f
Nu11 ( x) = -------------------- 4. 2. 63
6f
The aver age Nussel t number i n Regi on I I can be eval uat ed as
P -
Nuj i -J Nu j j (x) dx
*D
(x - xD)- - - - - 4- 2- 64
The aver age Nussel t number i n Regi ons I and I I i s gi ven by
_ Nui xD + Nun (x " XD)
Nu = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 4. 2. 65
4. 3 Resul t s and Di scussi on
Case A Tw < Tn < Tqat
Exami nat i on of t he gover ni ng di f f er ent i al equat i on i ndi cat es t hat
t he condensat i on i n Regi on I i s dependent on t he Reynol ds number , t he
Pr andt l number and t he J akob number . I n Regi on I f or smal l val ues of
x si mpl e expr essi ons coul d be obt ai ned f or t he coef f i ci ent s of 6^,
79
62 and 6C i ndi cat ed i n Equat i on 4. 2. 21 They ar e
' 36 ~| 1/3
(SRe^r)1/ 3 Pr j J
I" 24 ~| l / 2
L( 3Ref )2//3 Pr ^H
4. 3. 1
i f 1
a3 ~ 2 I 2 32 +
Regi on I comes t o an end when
6i + 62 = 6f 4. 3. 2
The ext ent of Regi on I , Xq, can be det er mi ned af t er sol vi ng t he
gover ni ng di f f er ent i al equat i ons. Al t er nat el y i t can be eval uat ed
ut i l i zi ng t he pr of i l es i ndi cat ed i n Equat i on 4. 2. 21. Subst i t ut i ng
t he pr of i l es f or fi j , 62 f r om Equat i on 4. 2. 21 and t he val ues of a^
and a2 f r om Equat i on 4. 3. 1 i nt o Equat i on 4. 3. 2 yi el ds
The above equat i on has t o be sol ved numer i cal l y t o obt ai n t he val ue
of X[). Mor eover i t i s cl ear t hat t he ext ent of Regi on i s onl y a f unct i on
of t he Reynol ds number and t he Pr andt l number of t he f i l m.
The aver age Nussel t number i n Regi on I i s gi ven by
- 3 0W
36 ~j l / 3_ 1/ 3
77T~ XD
1/2 1/2
4. 3. 3
4. 3. 4
I n addi t i on t o t he Reynol d, Pr andt l , J akob number s, condensat i on i n
Regi on I I i s dependent on a f our t h par amet er : t he t emper at ur e of t he
pl at e. I n Regi on I I , si mpl e expr essi ons coul d not be obt ai ned f or t he
l ocal or aver age Nussel t number ; t hus t hey had t o be eval uat ed numer i
cal l y.
I t i s i mpor t ant t o det er mi ne t he l engt h of t he pl at e over whi ch
t he aver age Nussel t number i s t o be cal cul at ed. I t has been r epor t ed
[ 27] t hat f or sur f ace condensat i on t he aver age f i l m heat t r ansf er co
ef f i ci ent on a t ube wi t h di amet er , d, has t he same magni t ude as t he
aver age f i l m heat t r ansf er coef f i ci ent on a ver t i cal pl at e wi t h hei ght
x = 2. 5 d. The t ube di amet er s of i nt er est l i e bel ow one i nch whi ch
cor r esponds t o an equi val ent nondi mensi onal hei ght of t he pl at e of
1000. Thus t he aver age Nussel t number was cal cul at ed over t he hei ght
of t he pl at e t o a maxi mum of x = 1000.
Fi gur e 4. 3. 1 pr esent s t he nondi mensi onal i nt er f aci al t emper at ur e,
9-j , as f unct i on of t he di st ance al ong t he pl at e f or di f f er ent t em
per at ur es of t he i ncomi ng f i l m. As expect ed i n Regi on I , as T0 i ncr eases
T-j i ncr eases. However , i n Regi on I I , f or a gi ven Tw, a l ar ger T0 r esul t s
i n a shar per decr ease i n 9-j . Thi s i s pr i mar i l y due t o t he l ar ger heat
f l ux at t he wal l r esul t i ng f r om a l ar ger t emper at ur e di f f er ence acr oss
t he f i l m. The f ast er depl et i on of t he heat at t he wal l l eads t o a shar p
er decr ease i n 9i .
Fi gur e 4. 3. 2 pr esent s t he nondi mensi onal i nt er f aci al t emper at ur e,
pl at e f or di f f er ent t emper at ur es of t he wal l . I n Regi on I , 9-j r emai ns
t he same f or each of t he wal l t emper at ur es. Thi s i s due t o t he f act t hat
condensat i on i n Regi on I i s dependent onl y on t he cool i ng capaci t y of
t he f i l m and i ndependent of t he wal l t emper at ur e. However i n Regi on
80
X
Fi gur e 4. 3. 1. I nt er f aci al t emper at ur e as a f unct i on of X f or di f f er ent
J a. Tsat =600R, Tw=500R.
00
X
Fi gur e 4. 3. 2. Nondi mensi onal i nt er f aci al t emper at ur e as a f unct i on of X f or
di f f er ent J a*. Tsat =600R, To=570R.
I I t he pl at e wal l mai nt ai ned at l ow t emper at ur e act s as t he heat si nk.
As a r esul t 0-j decr eases. As expect ed f or l ower wal l t emper at ur es
t her e i s a shar per decr ease i n 0-j i n Regi on I I . Fur t her mor e i t i s
not i ced t hat i n t he begi nni ng of Regi on I I f or a shor t di st ance 0-j
i ncr eases i nst ead of decr easi ng. Thi s can be at t r i but ed t o t he f act
t hat i n t he begi nni ng of t he Regi on I I , t he i nf l uence of t he wal l i s
not f el t i mmedi at el y by t he i nt er f ace. The di st ance bet ween t he poi nt s
A and B i s t he di st ance r equi r ed f or t he i nt er f ace t o f eel t he ef f ect
of t he pl at e wal l . Thi s di st ance i s st r i ct l y a f unct i on of t he hydr o
dynami cs of t he f i l m.
Fi gur e 4. 3. 3 shows t he var i at i on of 0-j wi t h X f or di f f er ent Rey
nol ds number s of t he f i l m. For l ow f i l m vel oci t i es t he i nt er f aces ar e
si gni f i cant l y af f ect ed by t he l ow wal l t emper at ur e. As a r esul t t her e
i s a shar per decr ease i n 0^. However , f or a l ar ger Reynol ds number
( >100) t her e i s l i t t l e decr ease i n 0-j i n Regi on I I . I n f act t he l ow
t emper at ur e wal l seems t o have ver y l i t t l e ef f ect on t he i nt er f aci al
t emper at ur e.
Fi gur es 4. 3. 4 t hr ough 4. 3. 6 pr esent t he i nt egr at ed aver age Nussel t
number as a f unct i on of x f or di f f er ent i ncomi ng f i l m t emper at ur es, wal l
t emper at ur es and Reynol ds number s. The r esul t s agr ee wi t h t he expect ed
t r ends. For exampl e, a l ower wal l t emper at ur e l eads t o a l ar ger t emper
at ur e di f f er ence acr oss t he f i l m l eadi ng t o a hi gher heat t r ansf er at
t he wal l . I t i s t o be not ed t hat a hi gher heat t r ansf er at t he wal l
does not necessar i l y mean a hi gher condensat i on r at e. For exampl e consi
der t he case of a hi gh Reynol ds number s. For a hi gh Reynol ds number t he
i nt er f aci al t emper at ur e r emai ns f ai r l y hi gh and does not decr ease si g
ni f i cant l y i n Regi on I I . Thi s l eads t o a hi gh t emper at ur e di f f er ence
83
X
Fi gur e 4. 3. 3. Nondi mensi onal i nt er f aci al t emper at ur e as a f unct i on of X f or
di f f er ent Reynol ds number s. Tsat =600R, To=570R, Tw=500R.
00
o 200 400 _ 600 800 1000
X
Fi gur e 4. 3. 4. I nt egr at ed aver age Nussel t number as a f unct i on of X f or
di f f er ent J a. Tsat =600R, Tw=500R.
X
Fi g u r e 4. 3. 5. I n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as f u n c t i o n o f X f or
d i f f e r e n t J a* . T $ a t =600 R, To =570 R.
CO
cr>
o 200 400 600 800 1000
X
Fi g u r e 4. 3. 6. I n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as a f u n c t i o n o f X f or
d i f f e r e n t Re y n o l d s number s . T . =600 R, T =570 R,
T =500 R. s a 0
w
0 0
I
ac r o s s t h e f i l m l e a d i n g t o a hi gh heat t r a n s f e r at t h e wa l l . Ho we v e r , a
l ar ge i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e l eads t o a l ow t e mp e r a t u r e d r i v i n g f o r c e
f or c o n d e n s a t i o n l e a d i n g t o r e d u c e d c o n d e n s a t i o n r at e. The heat t r a n s
f er at t h e wal l i s b e i n g t r e a t e d as i t i s t hi s q u a n t i t y t h a t has been
r e p o r t e d i n o t h e r t h e o r e t i c a l and e x p e r i me n t a l wor k s .
Cas e B Tw < Tn = Tq
Ex a mi n a t i o n of t he g o v e r n i n g d i f f e r e n e t i a l Eq u a t i o n 4 . 2 . 3 6 i n d i
c at es t h a t t he heat t r a n s f e r i n Re g i o n I i s d e p e n d e n t on t he Pr andt l
n u mb e r and t h e t h i c k n e s s of t h e f i l m. Eq u a t i o n 4 . 2 . 3 s t at e s t hat t h e
t h i c k n e s s of t he f i l m i s s t r i c t l y a f u n c t i o n of t he Re y n o l d s n umber .
I t has been s hown t h a t i n Re g i o n I t h e t her mal b o u n d a r y l a y e r gr o wt h
c an be e x p r e s s e d as
<$1 = a^ x * / 3 . 4 . 3 . 5
On e v a l u a t i n g t he v al ue of aj at x : 0 i t was f ound t o be
36 1/ 3
a^ = [ - - - - - - - ] . 4 . 3 . 6
* Pr f Sf
Fr o m Eq u a t i o n 4 . 2 . 3 an e x p r e s s i o n c an be o b t a i n e d f o r t h e n o n d i
me n s i o n a l t h i c k n e s s of t h e f l m.
l f = ( 3 Re f ) 1 / 3 4 . 3 . 7
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n 4 . 3 . 7 i nt o 4 . 3 . 6 y i e l d s
a x = 2 . 9 2 2 Pr f " ! / 3 Re f " I / 9 . 4 . 3 . 8
The e x t e n t of Re g i o n I i s d e t e r mi n e d as
88
89
5^ 3_ ( 3 Re f ) 4 / 3 Pr f
4. 3. 9
36
Ut i l i z i n g t h e a b o v e e x p r e s s i o n s f or aj and Xq t he a v e r a g e Nu s
s el t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I c an be o b t a i n e d as
3
No s i mp l e e x p r e s s i o n s c o u l d be o b t a i n e d f or t h e l oc al or a v e r a g e
Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I . Th u s , t h e y h ad t o be e v a l u a t e d u s i n g n u m
er i c al t e c h n i q u e s .
Fi g u r e 4 . 3 . 7 s hows t he v a r i a t i o n of t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a
c i al t e mp e r a t u r e wi t h t he d i s t a n c e a l o n g t he p l at e i n Re g i o n I I . For
l ow Re y n o l d s n umber s t h e r e i s a s i g n i f i c a n t d e c r e a s e i n 0-j as x i n
c r e a s e s . Ho we v e r , f or hi gh Re y n o l d n u mber s , wh i c h l ead t o hi gh f i l m
v e l o c i t i e s , t h e n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e d e c r e a s e s v er y
s l o wl y wi t h x. Th us , t he c o n d i t i o n s i n Re g i o n I I ar e al mo s t t he s ame
as i n Re g i o n I . I t a p p e a r s t hat t h e wal l ma i n t a i n e d at a l ow t e mp e r a
t u r e has i n s i g n i f i c a n t ef f ec t on t he i n t e r f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e i . Th e
p r e s e n t p r o b l e m was a n a l y z e d u t i l i z i n g a l i n e a r t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n
t he f i l m. For a l ar ge Re y n o l d s n u mb e r t h e f o l l o wi n g e x p r e s s i o n was o b
t a i n e d f or t he i n t e g r a t e d Nu s s e l t n umber s ov er Re g i o n s I and I I
x
Th e a b o v e e x p r e s s i o n does not c o n t a i n t h e J a k o b n u mb e r i n d i c a t i n g
t hat at h i g h e r Re y n o l d n u mb e r s t he i n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i s
i n d e p e n d e n t of t he wal l t e mp e r a t u r e .
4 . 3 . 1 0
= 0 . 0 2 8 Re f Pr f + 0 . 6 9 3 Re f " 1/ 3 ( x - x D) 4. 3. 11
X
Fi g u r e 4. 3. 7. No n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e as a f u n c t i o n o f X
f o r d i f f e r e n t Re y n o l d s number s .
Fi g u r e 4 . 3 . 8 p r e s e n t s t h e v a r i a t i o n of t h e n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a
c i al t e mp e r a t u r e wi t h t he d i s t a n c e a l o n g t h e p l a t e f or d i f f e r e n t t e mp e r
at ur es of t h e wa l l . Th e r es ul t s f o l l o w t h e e x p e c t e d t r e n d s . A l ower wal l
t e mp e r a t u r e r es ul t s i n a f a s t e r r emov al of heat at t h e wal l l e a d i n g t o
a f a s t e r d e c r e a s e i n e- j .
Fi g u r e 4 . 3 . 9 p r e s ent s t he i n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as
f u n c t i o n of x f or d i f f e r e n t Ref . As n o t e d e a r l i e r f or a l o we r Re y n o l d s
n u mb e r t he i n t e r f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e dr ops f as t e r a l o n g t he l engt h of
t h e pl at e. As a r es ul t t h e heat f l ux at t h e wal l d e c r e a s e s l e a d i n g t o
a l ower a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I . Ho we v e r , i n Re g i o n I a
h i g h e r Re y n o l d s n u mb e r l eads t o a l o we r Nu s s e l t n umber .
Fi g u r e 4 . 3 . 1 0 p r e s e n t s t h e i n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as a
f u n c t i o n of x f or d i f f e r e n t wal l t e mp e r a t u r e s . I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t at
h i g h e r Re y n o l d s n u mb e r ( =100) t h e c u r v e s f or ( Ts a^ - T w ) = 25, 50, 75 F
f al l on t h e s a me c ur v e. Th i s i s i n a g r e e me n t wi t h Eq u a t i o n 4 . 3 . 1 1 wh i c h
s t at es t hat at h i g h e r Re y n o l d s n u mb e r s t h e a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i s i n
d e p e n d e n t of t h e wal l t e mp e r a t u r e .
91
Fi g u r e 4. 3. 8. No n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e as a f u n c t i o n o f X
f o r d i f f e r e n t J a* . T s a =600 R.
Nu
X
Fi g u r e 4. 3. 9. I n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as a f u n c t i o n o f X f or
d i f f e r e n t Re y n o l d s number s . T s a ^. =600 R.
CO
X
Fi g u r e 4 . 3. 10. I n t e g r a t e d a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r as a f u n c t i o n o f of X f or
d i f f e r e n t J a* . T . =600 R.
s at
CHAPTER 5
CONDENSATI ON ON A THI N FI L M FL OWI NG OVER A
VERTI CAL I SOTHERMAL PL ATE I N PRESENCE
OF A NONCONDENSI BL E GAS
5. 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n
I t i s wel l k nown t hat t h e p r e s e n c e of a s mal l a mo u n t of n o n c o n d e n
s i b l e gas i n t h e c o n d e n s i n g v a p o r c an d r a s t i c a l l y r ed u c e t h e c o n d e n s a
t i o n heat t r a n s f e r . To u n d e r s t a n d t he a b o v e p h e n o me n o n s ev er al i n v e s t i
gat or s hav e d e al t wi t h t he p r o b l e m of l a mi n a r f i l m c o n d e n s a t i o n on an
i s o t h e r ma l v er t i c al s ur f ac e. Sp a r r o w and Li n [ 17] we r e t he f i r s t t o
f o r mu l a t e a t h e o r y t o p r e d i c t t h e ef f e c t s of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es on
l a mi n a r f i l m c o n d e n s a t i o n . Ut i l i z i n g a s i mi l a r i t y t r a n s f o r ma t i o n t hey
s o l v e d t h e c o u p l e d c o n s e r v a t i o n e q u a t i o n s of heat , mas s and mo me n t u m
t r a n s f e r . They hav e s hown t hat f or c o n d e n s a t i o n of s t eam, a ma s s
f r a c t i o n of ai r equal t o hal f a pe r c e n t c an r educ e t he c o n d e n s a t i o n
heat t r a n s f e r by ov er 50%. Mi n k o wy c z and Sp a r r o w [ 6 ] s t u d i e d t he
s ame p r o b l e m i n 1969. Ho wev er , t h e y e x a mi n e d t he e f f e c t s of i n t e r
f ac i al r es i s t a n c e , f r ee c o n v e c t i o n due t o t e mp e r a t u r e g r a d i e n t s , mas s
and t her mal d i f f u s i o n and v a r i a b l e p r o p e r t i e s . They c o n c l u d e d t h a t t he
e f f e c t s of i n t e r f a c i a l r e s i s t a n c e and t her mal d i f f u s i o n we r e n e g l i g i b l e .
They f u r t h e r poi nt out t hat t he ef f e c t s of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es ar e
a c c e n t u a t e d at l o we r p r e s s u r e s . Ro s e [ 19] d e al t wi t h t he s a me p r o b l e m
u t i l i z i n g an i nt egr al a p p r o a c h . Al - Di wa n y [ 28] p e r f o r me d e x p e r i me n t a l
s t u d i e s on l a mi n a r f i l m c o n d e n s a t i o n i n t h e p r e s e n c e of a n o n c o n d e n s i b l e
gas . I n al l of t he a b o v e s t udi es i t was c o n c l u d e d t h a t t he p r e s e n c e
of a s mal l a mo u n t of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas d r a s t i c a l l y r e d u c e d t he c o n d e n
s a t i o n heat t r a n s f e r .
Al t h o u g h s i z e a b l e wor k of e x p e r i me n t a l and a n a l y t i c a l n a t u r e has
been r e p o r t e d on t he ef f e c t s of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es on c o n d e n s a t i o n
on bar e s u r f a c e s , l i t t l e a t t e n t i o n has been f o c u s e d on t he ef f e c t s
of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es on di r ec t c ont ac t c o n d e n s a t i o n p r o c e s s e s .
Thus , i t was d e c i d e d t o a n a l y z e t he e f f ec t s of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es
on c o n d e n s a t i o n on a t hi n f i l m f l o wi n g ov er an i s ot her mal v er t i c al
s u r f a c e .
The onl y wo r k r e p o r t e d t hat i s c l os e t o t he p r o b l e m i s c o n d e n s a t i o n
on an i mmi s c i b l e f i l m f l o wi n g o v e r an a d i a b a t i c v er t i c al s u r f a c e [ 9]
wh i c h was t r e a t e d by t h e a u t h o r i n 1983. The p r e s e n t p r o b l e m i s d i f
f e r e n t as t he v er t i c al s u r f a c e i s i s ot her mal i n s t e a d of b e i n g a d i a b a t i c .
I n t h e p r e s e n t p r o b l e m t h e i s ot h e r ma l wal l ac t s as t h e heat s i nk , l e a d
i ng t o an e n t i r e l y d i f f e r e n t heat t r a n s f e r p e r f o r ma n c e . Ho we v e r , t he
b as i c me t h o d of a p p r o a c h t o t h e p r o b l e m r ema i n s t he s ame.
5. 2 Phy s i c al Model and Ma t h e ma t i c a l Fo r mu l a t i o n
Cas e A Tw < Tn < T<;at
The b a s i c model f or c o n d e n s a t i o n on a t hi n f i l m f l o wi n g o v e r an
i s o t her mal v er t i c al p l at e i n t he p r e s e n c e of a n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas i s
s hown i n Fi g u r e 5. 2. 1. The f i l m wi t h a ma s s f l o w r at e mf and a t e mp e r a
t u r e T0 f l ows down a v er t i c al i s o t her mal f l at pl a t e . I t e n t e r s a c h a mb e r
f i l l e d wi t h a v a por c o n t a i n i n g a s mal l f r a c t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas .
I t i s a s s u me d t hat t he p r e s s u r e i n t he c h a mb e r i s s u f f i c i e n t l y l ow
96
97
Regi on I
Regi on I I
Fi g u r e 5. 2. 1. Phy s i c al model f or c o n d e n s a t i o n on a t h i n f i l m
f l o wi n g o v e r an i s o t her mal p l a t e i n t he p r e s e n c e
o f a n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas wh e n T <T <T
3 w o s at
98
and t he J a k o b nu mb e r , Cp (T - T0 ) / hf g, i s s mal l . Thi s a s s u r e s t h a t t he
c o n d e n s a t e l a y e r i s t hi n. I t i s a s s u me d t hat t h e e f f e c t s of s u p e r h e a t
i ng, t her mal d i f f u s i o n and d i f f u s i o n t h e r mo ar e n e g l i g i b l e [ 6 ] . Fl u i d
p r o p e r t y v a r i a t i o n s ar e r e t a i n e d onl y i n t h o s e pl ac es wh e r e t h e y pl ay
an es s e n t i a l r ol e i n e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e t r a n s p o r t p r o c e s s e s .
Thi s p r o b l e m as s h own i n Fi g u r e 5. 2. 1 c an be d i v i d e d i nt o t wo r e
gi ons . Re g i o n I de f i n e s a r egi on wh e r e t he t her mal b o u n d a r y l ay er s
ar e d e v e l o p i n g . As T0 > Tw , a t her mal b o u n d a r y l ay er , 6j , gr ows f r om
t h e wal l t o wa r d s t he edge of t he f i l m. As T > T0 , t he v a p o r c o n d e n s e s
on t he e d g e of t he f i l m. As a r es ul t a s e c o n d t her mal b o u n d a r y l ay er
gr ows f r o m t h e e d g e of t he f i l m t o wa r d s t he wa l l . At a p oi nt a l o n g t h e
l engt h of t he pl at e, Xq, t he t wo b o u n d a r y l ay er s meet . The r egi on
0 < X < Xq i s d e f i n e d as Re g i o n I . I n Re g i o n I i n a d d i t i o n t o t he
c o n d e n s a t e l ay er , t h er e ar e mo me n t u m and s pec i es b o u n d a r y l ay er s ,
wh i c h ar e br o u g h t about t he by p r e s e n c e of t he n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas .
Re g i o n I I begi ns when t he t wo t her mal b o u n d a r y l ay er s S\ and 62
me e t s uc h t hat + 62 = 5f. Fr o m t hi s poi nt on wa r d s t he e n t i r e f i l m
c ool s down. The i s o t her mal p l at e ac t s as t he heat s i nk i n s t e a d of t he
c o o l a n t c a p a c i t y of t h e f i l m.
Re g i o n I
The ma s s f l o w r at e per uni t wi d t h f or t he f i l m i s
Pf Uf dy
5. 2. 1
0
wh e r e
99
9 r , y -i
u f = [ 6 f y - ]
Vf 2
5.2.2
Ut i l i z i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2. 1 and 5. 2. 2, t h e r e ar e o b t a i n e d
6f =
" 3 mf
- Uf
1/ 3 v 2 1/ 3
( L )
g
5 . 2. 3
The i nt egr al f o r m of e n e r g y e q u a t i o n f or b o u n d a r y l a y e r i s
- f
dx J
Pf uf Cp f (Tl - T0 ) dy = - k f
9Ti
9y
y = o
5 . 2 . 4
and f or t he b o u n d a r y l ay er S2 , t he e n e r g y e q u a t i o n i s
O f
J Pf u f Cp f ( T2 - T0 ) dy = k f
8T 2
6 f 62
9y
y = 6 f.
5 . 2. 5
As t he J a k o b n u mb e r i s s mal l , t he e n e r g y e q u a t i o n f or t h e c o n d e n s a t e
l a y e r i s
- f
dx J
5 f + 5 c
y = 5
f .
5 . 2. 6
Th e b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s g o v e r n i n g t he t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n b o u n d a r y
l ay er 6 ^ ar e
Ti = Tw at y = 0
9T
Tl = T ; i = 0 at y = Si
1 u 3y
5. 2. 7
Th e s e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
100
Tl - T 0 = ( Tw - T 0 ) ( 1 - 7 - )
1 5.2.8
The b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s f or t h e t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n b o u n d a r y l a y e r
62 ar e
3T
^7
0 at y = 5f - 62
T 2 = Ti at y = 5 f . 5 . 2 . 9
Th e s e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
5f - y
t 2 - To ' <T1 - To> I 1 - '
5 . 2 . 1 0
As t he c o n d e n s a t e l ay er i s t hi n i t i s r e a s o n a b l e t o a s s u me a l i n e a r
t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e . Th e b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s are
T c = T-j at y = Sf
Tc = T* at y = 6C + <5f
5. 2. 11
Th e s e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
y ~ ^ f
Tc = Ti + ( T - T i > < - T - f )
5. 2 . 1 2
The c o mp a t i b i l i t y of heat f l u x e s at t h e i n t e r f a c e 6f
Hi
ay
y = sf
dTr
= k f &
f ay
y = sf
5. 2. 1 3
l eads t o t he f o l l o wi n g e x p r e s s i o n f or t he i nt er f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e
101
1
2
Ti =
1 +
De f i n i n g a n o n d i me n s i o n a l t e mp e r a t u r e
T - T
0 = - - - - - Q-
Tcc . Tr
t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e c an be e x p r e s s e d as
1 5-
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2. 8 and 5. 2. 2 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i ng t he l en g t h t e r m by ( v f 2/ g ) ^ 3 l eads t o
_ 3
d 6i _ __________ 36______
dx Pr f ( f - TO ^ l )
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2. 2 and 5. 2 . 1 0 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t he l engt h t e r m by ( v ^ ^ / g ) ^ 3 y i e l d s
24 _ o ~f~2 1
- 25 ( Sf - ^ 2_) I. _ H l
d 6 2 2 _ Pr f 10 ' T T dx
d F " - 10 2 2 )
5. 2 . 1 4
5. 2 . 1 5
5 . 2 . 1 6
. 4 and
5. 2. 17
. 5 and
5 . 2 . 1 8
Th e v e l o c i t y i n t h e c o n d e n s a t e l a y e r i s equal t o t h e e d g e v e l o c i t y
of t he f i l m
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2. 1 9 and 5. 2. 12 i nt o Eq u a t i o n and non-
The c o n s e r v a t i o n e q u a t i o n s t o be s a t i s f i e d i n t h e gas v a p o r b o u n d
ar y l a y e r ar e t he c o n s e r v a t i o n of ma s s f or t h e mi x t u r e , c o n s e r v a t i o n of
s p e c i e s of one of t he c o mp o n e n t s and t h e c o n s e r v a t i o n of e n e r g y a nd mo
me n t u m. As t he e n e r g y t r a n s f e r r e d due t o c o n d u c t i o n and c o n v e c t i o n i n t h e
g a s - v a p o r r egi on i s v er y s mal l r e l a t i v e t o t hat l i b e r a t e d as l a t e n t
heat , t he v a p o r e n e r g y e q u a t i o n wi l l not be c o n s i d e r e d .
The l oc al c o n c e n t r a t i o n of gas and v apor i s e x p r e s s e d i n t e r ms
of t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e ma s s f r a c t i o n s Wg and Wv
p = p v + Pg ; Wv + Wg = 1 .
As Wv and Wg ar e d e p e n d e n t on e a c h ot he r , one of t h e m c an be e l i m
i na t e d f r o m t he p r o b l e m. I n t hi s a n a l y s i s Wg i s r e t a i n e d and i t s s u b
d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t h e l en g t h t e r ms by ( v ^ ^ / g ) ^ 3 r es ul t s i n
d ^ 2
dx
5 . 2 . 2 0
Ut i l i z i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2. 16, Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 2 0 bec o me s
dS 2 4 J a
__ c = _____ _____
9 *
5 . 2 . 2 1
c
5 . 2 . 2 2
s c r i p t i s d r o p p e d . The par t i al p r e s s u r e of t he v a p o r and t he t ot al p r e s
s ur e ar e r e l a t e d by t h e e x p r e s s i o n
PV 1 - W
103
P 1 - W ( 1 - Mv / Mg ) 5. 2. 23
As t h e J a k o b n u mb e r i s s mal l and t h e p r e s s u r e a c r o s s t h e b o u n d a r y
l a y e r i s a s s u me d t o be c o n s t a n t , t he v a r i a t i o n i n h f i s s mal l . Un d e r
9
t h e a b o v e a s s u mp t i o n s t h e Cl a u s i u s Cl a p r e y o n Eq u a t i o n c an be i n t e g r a t e d
rPv dP r s h f Q d T
J ~ = J* R ^
P * T
r v 1
5. 2. 2 4
wh e r e T and Ts ^ ar e t h e s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e s of t h e v a p o r c o r r e s
p o n d i n g t o t h e par t i al p r e s s u r e Pv * and Pv ^ , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
Upon p e r f o r mi n g t h e i n d i c a t e d i n t e g r a t i o n i n Eq u a t i o n 5. 2 . 2 4 , an
e x p r e s s i o n i s o b t a i n e d f o r t h e i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e b e t we e n t h e c o n
d e n s a t e and t h e gas v a p o r b o u n d a r y l ay er s .
T* =
Ts c
g
wh e r e u t l i z i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 2 3
, . R P\ / OQ
1+ ^ V 7 5. 2. 2 5
1 - w, ~| ] l - W* ( 1 - Mv / Mg )
P
1v
Pv* 1 1 - wM (l - - v) l - w*
1 Mg
5. 2. 2 6
I n t e r ms of t h e n o n d i me n s i o n a l t e mp e r a t u r e Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 2 5 i s gi v en as
104
- I n T
Q
R
hf ( Too - Tq )
n
P yoo
b *
r V
1 +
Tgoo R Py 00
n
P *
V
5. 2. 27
The c o n s e r v a t i o n e q u a t i o n s f or ma s s , mo me n t u m and s p e c i e s ar e
3u 3 V
- - - - - - - - - - - 1- - =
0
3x 3y
3u 3u 32u
u + V
= v ?
3x
ay ay
3w 3w 32W
u + V
= D 2
3x
ay 3y
The i nt egr al f or m of e q u a t i o n s
5 . 2 . 2 8
s pe c i e s ar e
- f
dx J
sf + 6c + s m
f + 6C
9 p d SC 3n
u^ dy + u_ - ur V* = - v
J c dx c 3y
y = Sf + 6C
5. 2. 29
d _
dx J
6f + sc + 6m
u ( W - WJ dy + u c ( W* - WJ ^
5f + s c
* 3W
ur V ( W - WJ = - D
C ' a>/ gy
y = Sf + S( 5 . 2 . 3 0
As q u a d r a t i c p r o f i l e s f or v e l o c i t y and c o n c e n t r a t i o n h a v e been r e
p o r t e d t o y i e l d good r es ul t s i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o s a t i s f y t he f o l l o wi n g
b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s :
u = u c ; W = W* at y = Sf + Sc
105
u - 0 ; = 0 at y = 6f + 6r + 6m
3y
3W 5. 2. 31
W = Woo i = 0 a t y = 6f + 6 r + 6c .
3y
3u
Thes e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o t h e f o l l o wi n g p r o f i l e s f or v e l o c i t y and c on-
c ent r at i on
u c 2
u = ~2 [ 6f + 6C + 6m - y ]
5. 2 . 3 2
W* - Woo
w - Wro = ( - - - - - ) [ 6f + 6 + 6 - y ] 2 .
6S2 5 . 2 . 3 3
The c o n s e r v a t i o n of ma s s at t h e i n t e r f a c e 6f + 6C l eads t o
Sf + 6r
d f a r d6 i
dx J P f u c dy = [ ou - - pv]
6f 6f + 6C '
5 . 2 . 3 4
The i n t e r f a c e b e t we e n t h e c o n d e n s a t e and t he gas v a p o r mi x t u r e i s
i mp e r me a b l e t o t h e n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas . Ther e f o r e ,
d 6 , 3w
^ p gu 77 p gv ) +D ^ = 0 .
dx ^ y = 6f + 6C 5. 2. 3 5
Co mb i n i n g e q u a t i o n s 5 . 2 . 3 4 and 5. 2. 3 5 and e l i mi n a t i n g v * r es ul t s i n
Pc d 6r 2ZP W* - W
u_ = - - - - - - - - - - - - 5. 2. 3 6
pi C dx W* 6S
As t h e J a k o b n u mb e r i s s mal l t h e t her mal d r i v i n g f or i s r e l a t i v e l y
s mal l . Th e r e f o r e e q u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 3 6 c an be r e d u c e d t o
106
Pc
d 5 c
dx
7T (
W
2D W
)
5. 2. 37
Thi s y i e l d s an e x p r e s s i o n f or t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t he n o n c o n d e n s i b l e
gas at t h e i n t e r f a c e Sf + 6C. No n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 3 7 y i e l d s
W* =
2/ 3 v f 5s d 5c 2
1 - Re / 7-3 Pr f - I s r = - =
8 Voo 5C dx
5 . 2 . 3 8
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2 . 3 2 and t he e x p r e s s i o n f or v f r o m Eq u a t i o n
5 . 2 . 3 4 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 2 9 y i e l d s
r 2
dS
dx"
40
m
( 3 Re f ) 2/ 3 Z I
Voo
5 f d<sc 2
Poo d *
5 . 2 . 3 9
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n 5. 2. 3 3 and t he e x p r e s s i o n f or v f r o m Eq u a
t i o n 5. 2. 3 5 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2. 3 0 and n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g y i e l d s
24 W
dS 2
dx ( 3 Re f ) 2 / 3 s r W* m
( 0 . 5 - 0 . 2 I s ) d 6 m
6m dx
J 2
s
1
1 ___
1
* s 2l ^ d w*
Woo
L 2
m
10
V J
d) T -1
5C 3 5 2
( i ~ + - r ? )
m 10 V
5. 2 . 4 0
Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2 . 1 7 , 5. 2 . 1 8 , 5. 2 . 2 1 , 5 . 2 . 3 9 and 5 . 2 . 4 0 d e f i n d t he c o n d e n s a
t i on i n Re g i o n I . They c an be s o l v e d n u me r i c a l l y a f t e r e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e
v al ues of t he f i r s t d e r i v a t i v e s at x = 0. As c an be s een f r o m t h e f i g u r e
t he i ni t i al c o n d i t i o n s ar e 6i ( x =0 ) =0 ; 52( x =0 ) =0 ; 6c ( x =0 ) =0 ; 6m( x =0 ) =0 ;
and Ss ( x =0) =0. Al t e r n a t e l y , t h e y may be s ol v ed a s s u mi n g a s er i es of
s o l u t i o n . I t ma y be s hown t h a t t he s o l u t i o n s ar e s a t i s f i e d by t he e x
p r e s s i o n s
107
51
= aj x l / 3 +
62
= a2
1( 1/ 2
+ .
C
= a 3 x l / 2 +
= a 4
T l / 2
+ .
= a5
x l / 2 + .
5. 2. 41
The s o l u t i o n s f or Re g i o n I e n d s wh e n 61 + 62 = 6f .
Re g i o n I I
Re g i o n I I begi ns wh e n 5] _ + 62 = <Sf - Fr o m t hi s poi nt o n wa r d s t he
i s o t h e r ma l p l a t e ac t s as t h e h e a t s i nk .
At t h e end of Re g i o n I l et
6i =T* i ; 62= L2
and
C1 =
Sf
. r - _C
, t o -
6f 5 . 4 . 4 2
s uc h t h a t c j + C2 = 1 .
I n t h e b e g i n n i n g of Re g i o n I I an i n f l e x i o n p oi nt o c c u r s at y = L] , ;
8T
wh e r e t h e s l o p e = 0. Th e r e f o r e t h e heat t r a n s f e r i n Re g i o n I I i s
9y
a n a l y z e d i n t wo z ones ; 0 < y < and < y < 6f .
The e n e r g y e q u a t i o n f or t he f i l m i s
d f 1 t a k f T 9T1
r j uf Ti dy =
pf Cpf L 9y |y = L
3Ti
3y
,]
5 . 2 . 4 3
108
f or 0 < y < l \
and
i f ' uf T2 d y . ^ f ^ l - >J l
dx J T 2 p _ r n . L3y
1
>f c Pf | y = 6 f
y =
5.2.44
f or Li < y <6f .
The b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s f or t h e t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n 0 < y < L\
ar e
Ti = Tw at y = 0
9T1 _ q
T1 = Tb
ay
5 . 2 . 4 5
Thes e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
i L l ) y
2 Lj
T1 T + 2 <Tb - Tw + ^ - < Tb - Tw +
5. 2 . 4 6
The b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s g o v e r n i n g t h e t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n Lj < y < <5f
ar e
T2 = Tb ( x) ; l i = - 1 = - p ( x ) at y = Li
D ay k 1
12 = T-j at y = 6f = Li + L 2
5. 2. 47
Thes e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
y - L l '
T2 = Tb - p ( y - Li ) + ( Ti - Tb + gL2 ) ( - - - )
L 2 2 5 . 2 . 4 8
The c o n d e n s a t e l a y er t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e r emai ns as
( y - <5f )
TC = T-j + ( T* - Ti ) - - - - - _
c
109
4.2.49
The c o mp a t i b i l i t y of heat f l ux es at t he i n t e r f a c e 6f l eads t o t he
f o l l o wi n g e x p r e s s i o n f or t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l i nt er f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e
01 =
0 * L 2 + 2 0 b 6C - e L 2 6c
2 5c + L 2 5.2.50
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5.2.2 and 5.2.46 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5.2.43 and
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t he l engt h t e r ms by (vf2/g)l/3 l eads t o
I - 1 c ,
3 5 ]
3 * l ,
-1 10 J
+ ci Sf
-8 jet - 0W+ ec]_ Sf J
^ ' I 3 ( 5 - u
dx dx
5.2.51
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5.2.2 and 5.2.48 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5.2.44 and
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t he l eng t h t e r ms by ( v f ^ / g ) ^ 3 l eads t o
M
d 0 i
dB
d 0.
[<-
0b + 0 L 2
1 dx - ^ 5 f dx + M3 dx Pr f ( 1_ Ci ) ^ 4
5.2.52
wh e r e
2Ci Co , c 1% c 22 (1 - c x ) c 23
= 1 2 (1 - _ i ) + L 1 -
2 4 15
5.2.53
m2
clc22 (i . fl) + cj?_ (1 " Cl) ^2
6 2 12 20
4
C1C0 . c i Cg ( 1 - c x ) c 2 '
2 4 10
M3 = H A (1 - l i
The c o n d e n s a t e l ay er e n e r g y equat i o n , t he mo me n t u m and s pec i es
e q u a t i o n i n t h e gas v a p o r r egi on r emai n t he s ame as Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2. 20,
5 . 2 . 3 9 and 5 . 2. 40, r e s p e c t i v e l y .
Thus Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2. 51, 5. 2 . 5 2 , 5 . 2. 20, 5. 2. 39 and 5. 2 . 4 0 d e f i n e
t h e c o n d e n s a t i o n i n Re g i o n I I . The i ni t i al c o n d i t i o n s ar e p and 65
= 0. The i ni t i al v al ues f or Sc , 6m, <5S ar e t h os e o b t a i n e d at t he end
of Re g i o n I .
Case B Tw < Tn = Tc;gf
Fi g u r e 5. 2. 2 s hows t h e phy s i c al model f or c o n d e n s a t i o n on a v e r t i
cal i s o t h e r ma l p l a t e i n t h e p r e s e n c e of a n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas wh e n i n c o m
i ng f i l m i s at t h e s ame t e mp e r a t u r e as t h e s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e of t he
v apr . As t h e f i l m t e mp e r a t u r e i s t h e s ame as t he s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e ,
no c o n d e n s a t i o n t a k es pl ac e. Ho we v e r , as t h e f i l m t e mp e r a t u r e i s g r e a t e r
t h a n t h e t e mp e r a t u r e of t h e pl at e, a t her mal b o u n d a r y l ay er gr ows f r om
t h e wal l t o wa r d s t he edge of t he f i l m. The r egi on wh e r e t he t her mal
b o u n d a r y l a y e r d e v e l o p s i s c a l l e d as Re g i o n I . Re g i o n I c o mes t o en d wh e n
61 = Sf . Fr om t hi s p oi nt o n wa r d t h e f i l m e d g e t e mp e r a t u r e d e c r e a s e s .
As t he f i l m e d g e t e mp e r a t u r e i s l es s t han t he s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e ,
c o n d e n s a t i o n t a k e s pl ac e. Du e t o t h e p r e s e n c e of t h e n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas ,
i n t he gas v a p o r z one, a mo me n t u m and s p e c i e s b o u n d a r y l a y e r ar e e s t a b
l i s hed. The r egi on wh e r e t he f i l m edge t e mp e r a t u r e dr ops l e a d i n g t o
c o n d e n s a t i o n i s t e r me d as Re g i o n I I .
Re g i o n I
The i nt egr al f o r m of t h e e n e r g y e q u a t i o n f or t h e b o u n d a r y l a y e r 6^
and t he v e l o c i t y p r o f i l e r ema i n t he s a me as Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2 . 2 and 5. 2. 4.
Ho we v e r , t h e b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s f or t he t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e c h a n g e t o
110
I l l
Fi g u r e 5. 2. 2. Phy s i c al model f o r c o n d e n s a t i o n on a t h i n f i l m
f l o wi n g o v e r an i s ot h e r ma l v e r t i c a l p l a t e i n
t he p r e s e n c e of a n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas wh e n
" * w<"*' o- " ' " sat .
112
Tl = Tw at y = 0
= 0 at y = l _i .
5 . 2 . 5 4
Thes e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
Tl - Ts at = ( Tw - Ts a t ) (1 - - )
61 5. 2. 55
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2 . 5 4 and 5 . 2. 2 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2. 4 and
Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 5 5 d e s c r i b e s t he heat t r a n s f e r i n Re g i o n I . I t c an
be s o l v e d n u me r i c a l l y a f t e r e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e v a l u e of t he f i r s t d e r i v a
t i v e at x = 0. Fo r e x t r e me l y s mal l v al ues of x i t c an be s hown t hat
Re g i o n I c omes t o an en d wh e n 6} = 6f .
Re g i o n I I
Re g i o n I I begi ns as t he f i l m edge t e mp e r a t u r e at y = 6f dr ops
b e l o w t he s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e of t he v apor . As a r es ul t , c o n d e n s a t i o n
b egi ns . A c o n d e n s a t e l ayer , Sc , f or ms on t h e e d g e of t h e f i l m. Du e t o t h e
p r e s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas i n t he c o n d e n s i n g v a p o r a s e p a r a t e mo me n
t u m and s p e c i e s e q u a t i o n s ar e e s t a b l i s h e d i n t he gas v apor r egi on.
The b o u n d a r y c o n d i t i o n s f or t h e t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t h e f i l m ar e
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t he l engt h t e r ms by ( v f 2/ g ) ^ 3 l eads t o
36
5 . 2 . 5 6
dx
5. 2 . 5 7
113
Tl = Tw at y = 0
3 Ti q
T x = ^ ; ! = - - = " 6 at y = 5f
Thes e c o n d i t i o n s l ead t o
T1 - Tw+ C2<Ti - V + % ] f f -td, - T ) + M f ] ^ .
The e n e r g y e q u a t i o n f or t h e f i l m i s
k f
r i i i -
! I i
-
p f c
Pf
L 9y | y =Sf
9y
y =o-
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2. 2 and 5 . 2 . 5 8 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2,
n o n d i me n s i o n a l i z i n g t h e l engt h t e r ms by ( v ^ / g ) 1^ l eads t o
d
dx
46 i + o ^ f
wh e r e
T - T,
0 =
w
Too - Tu
3 ( v f 2/ g ) 1/ 3
( Too - Ty^J
5. 2 . 5 8
5 . 2 . 5 9
5 . 2 . 6 0
59 and
5. 2. 61
5 . 2 . 6 2
The t e mp e r a t u r e i n t h e c o n d e n s a t e l a y e r r emai ns as
114
y - 6 f
Tc = T, + ( T* - T i ) ( ?) .
c 5. 2. 6 3
The c o mp a t i b i l i t y of heat f l ux es at t he i n t e r f a c e y = 6f l eads
t o t he f o l l o wi n g e x p r e s s i o n f or t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r
a t u r e 0 -j .
0-j = 0 * + g <5C . 5. 6. 6 4
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 6 4 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2. 61 y i e l d s
_ _ 30 _ _ d0 * _ dSr
dB n - ' 4 [ 0* + 0 ( 5f + 6C) ] - 4 - 4 6 S
__ = Pr f 6 f i t , j x (j x
dx
_ 7 _
4 ^ C + Q 5 f
8 5 . 2 . 6 5
Th e c o n d e n s a t e e n e r g y e q u a t i o n r e ma i n s as
d Sc _ 2 __ J a 0* ~ 0 .j
dx 3 2/ 3 Re f 2 / 3 Pr f 6 C ' 5. 2. 6 6
Su b s t i t u t i n g Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 6 4 i nt o Eq u a t i o n 5. 2 . 6 6 y i e l d s
d 5 r 2 J a _
~ - 9 / t ?/ "3 3 5. 2. 67
dx 3 2/ j Re f ' P r f '
The n o n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e , 0* , at y = 5f + 5 C r emai ns
as
115
^ V s -
s
n
Pv
- T0 hf Pv *
___________________9________
i ?T Pv
1 + __ n
5. 2. 6 8
hf
Pv *
wh e r e
Pv
00 _
" 1 - W -I
00
pi - W* ( 1 - Mv / Mq ) - |
PV* L l - (1 - Mv / Mg ) J
1 1 - w
5. 2. 6 9
Th e i n t e r f a c i a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas r e ma i n s as
Wo o
W*
1
32/ 3 2/ 3 v f p j d 6,
- - - Ref _ L 6c _1 6 S
4 v _ . dx
5 . 2 . 7 0
The g o v e r n i n g d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n s f or c o n s e r v a t i o n of mo me n t u m and
s p e c i e s i n t he gas v a p o r mi x t u r e r emai n as
d 6 2
m _
40
dx ( 3 Re f ) 273 v f
- 1 0 6- S
P o o dx
5. 2. 71
d s 2
dx
24 Wo
( 3 Re f ) 2 / 3 Sr w*
Vo,
A I ^s_ \ d 5m^
* 7 2 " 5 * m d *
2 622 1 6 C 1 S 2 dw*
( I - ^ - 9'
( w* - Woo) 2 6m 10 6m dx
3 4 4 )
^ m 10 ^ m
5. 2. 7 2
116
Heat Tr a n s f e r Ex p r e s s i o n s
A heat t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t c an be d e f i n e d as
, 9T
h ( x ) = k
y =o
5 . 2 . 7 3
( T . - T w)
The l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r c an be d e f i n e d as
h ( x ) ( v f 2 / g ) 1/ 3
Nu (T) = - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - .
k 5 . 2 . 7 4
Cas e A Tw < Tn < Tqa ^
Su b s t i t u t i n g f or h( x ) , t h e l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I b e
c omes
29, .
N. . ( x) = - - - - - W- - - .
( 1 - ew) 6i
5 . 2 . 7 5
Su b s t i t u t i n g t h e e x p r e s s i o n f or f r om Eq u a t i o n 5. 2. 41 t he l oc al
Nu s s e l t n u mb e r bec omes
5. 2 . 7 6
pa
N ( x ) = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t t t
U ( 1 - 9w) a i x 1 / 3
f r o m wh i c h an a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I c an be c a l c u l a t e d as
Nu t = - ^ - - - - - - - r n- . 5. 2. 77
1 (1 - 0w) ai x 1/ 3
The l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I i s gi v en by
117
5 . 2 . 7 8
The a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I i s e x p r e s s e d as
NUI I =J_Nu I I dx
' XD
5 . 2 . 7 9
( x - x D)
wh e r e
Xq i s t he e x t e n t of Re g i o n I .
The a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t ov er t he e n t i r e l engt h of Re g i o n s I and I I
Cas e B Tw < Tn - Ts
The l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I i s gi v en by
2 . 0
Nu ( x) 5. 2. 81
61 .
Su b s t i t u t i n g f or 6^ t he l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r c an be e x p r e s s e d as
f r o m wh i c h an a v e r a g e Nus s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I c an be c a l c u l a t e d
i s g i v en by
Nu = Nuj xD + Nu n ( x - XD)
5 . 2 . 8 0
x
Nu ( x) = _1/ 3
ai x
5. 2 . 8 2
118
as
3
5.2.83
The l oc al Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I i s gi v en by
20-j + 3 5f
Ni i j j ( x) =
5. 2. 8 4
The a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I I i s c a l c u l a t e d as
r x -
Nun - J - ^un (x) dx
5. 2 . 8 5
The ov er al l a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r o v e r Re g i o n s I and I I i s gi v en
wh e r e x q i s t h e e x t e n t of Re g i o n I .
I n t h e pr e s e n t a n a l y s i s t he ov er al l a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i s
t h e q u a n t i t y of p r i me i mp o r t a n c e .
5. 3. Re s u l t s and Di s c u s s i o n
Cas e A Tw < Tn < T<;at
Ex a mi n a t i o n of t h e g o v e r n i n g d i f f e r e n t i a l e q u a t i o n s i n d i c a t e s t hat
c o n d e n s a t i o n i n Re g i o n I i s d e p e n d e n t on e i g h t n o n d i me n s i o n p a r a me t e r s .
They ar e
Nu r xD + Nuj j ( x - x D)
Nu = - - - - - - - - - -
x
5. 2 . 8 6
119
5. 3. 1
Al t h o u g h t he e q u a t i o n s d e r i v e d ar e v a l i d f or al l f l u i d s y s t e ms of
i n t e r e s t , i t was d e c i d e d t o r e s t r i c t t he s t udy t o t hat of s t e a m c o n
d e n s i n g on a t hi n f i l m of wa t e r . The r eas on f or t hi s r e s t r i c t i o n i s
t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y of o t h e r l i t e r a t u r e s f or s t e a m- a i r s y s t ems .
I t was o b s e r v e d t h a t s i mp l e e x p r e s s i o n s c o u l d be o b t a i n e d f or t he
c o e f f i c i e n t s of 6^ and 62 as i n d i c a t e d i n Eq u a t i o n 5. 2. 41. They ar e
No s i mp l e e x p r e s s i o n s c oul d be o b t a i n e d f or t he c o e f f i c i e n t s of 6C,
Sm and 5 S . Thus t hey had t o be e v a l u a t e d n u me r i c a l l y . They we r e
d e t e r mi n e d t o a hi gh p r e c i s i o n u s i ng t he Me i n b a c k s u b r o u t i n e , Hy br d l
[ 29] , d e v e l o p e d at t h e Ar g o n n e Na t i onal L a b o r a t o r y , Ch i c a g o , I l l i n o i s
The s u b r o u t i n e f i nds t he z er os of a s y s t e m of N n o n l i n e a r f u n c t i o n s i n
n v a r i a b l e s by a mo d i f i c a t i o n of t he Powel l h y b r i d me t h o d . The u s e r
mu s t p r o v i d e a s u b r o u t i n e wh i c h c a l c u l a t e s t he f u n c t i o n s . The J a c o b i a n
i s t h e n c a l c u l a t e d by a f o r wa r d d i f f e r e n c e a p p r o x i ma t i o n .
Ut i l i z i n g t he e x p r e s s i o n s f or 61 and 62 f r om Eq u a t i o n s 5. 2. 41 and
t h e v al ues of t he c o n s t a n t s a^ and a 2 f r om Eq u a t i o n 5. 3. 2, t he f o l l o wi n g
e x p r e s s i o n i s o b t a i n e d f or Xp t h e e x t e n t of Re g i o n I .
The a b o v e e q u a t i o n has t o be s o l v e d n u me r i c a l l y t o o b t a i n t h e ex -
5 . 3 . 2
,1/2 1/2
5 . 3 . 3
120
t ent of Re g i o n I . I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t t he ex t e n t of Re g i o n I i s d e
p e n d e n t on t h e Pr andt l n u mb e r and t h e Re y n o l d s n u mb e r of t he f i l m. The
a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n u mb e r i n Re g i o n I i s g i v en by
I n a d d i t i o n t o e i g h t p a r a me t e r s n o t e d i n Eq u a t i o n 5. 3. 1, c o n d e n s a
t i o n i n Re g i o n I I i s d e p e n d e n t on t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l t e mp e r a t u r e of
t he v er t i c al pl at e. No s i mp l e e x p r e s s i o n s c o ul d be o b t a i n e d f or t he
l oc al or a v e r a g e Nu s s e l t n umber s i n Re g i o n I I ; t hus t hey had t o be
e v a l u a t e d n u me r i c a l l y . As n ot ed i n t he p r e v i ous c h a p t e r i n s e c t i o n
4. 3, t h e ma x i mu m n o n d i me n s i o n a l l e n g t h of t he p l a t e of i n t e r e s t ov er
wh i c h c o n d e n s a t i o n heat t r a n s f e r i s e x a mi n e d i s 1000.
The p r e s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e g a s es i n t h e c o n d e n s i n g v a p o r l eads
t o c o mp l e x t r a n s p o r t p r o c e s s e s . Thus t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e s e p r o c e s s e s one
has t o e x a mi n e t he b e h a v i o r of t he i n t e r f ac i al c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t he
n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas , i t s ef f e c t on t h e i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e and t he
Nu s s e l t n u mb e r .
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 1 p r e s e n t s t he c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t he n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas
at t he i n t e r f a c e Sf + Sc as a f u n c t i o n of t he d i s t a n c e al ong t he
p l a t e f or d i f f e r e n t i n c o mi n g f i l m t e mp e r a t u r e s . I t i s o b s e r v e d t hat a
l o we r T0 l eads t o a hi gh W* i n Re g i o n I . Thi s c an be e x p l a i n e d as
f ol l ows . A l o we r T0 p r o v i des a h i g h e r t e mp e r a t u r e d r i v i n g f o r c e f or c o n
d e n s a t i o n . As a r es ul t mo r e v apor and n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas ar e d r awn
t o wa r d s t he i n t e r f a c e Sf + Sc . To c o u n t e r b a l a n c e t hi s i n c r e a s e d i n f l o w
of t he n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas , a h i g h e r o u t f l o w i s r e q u i r e d wh i c h r es ul t s
- 3 e w
5 . 3. 4
X
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 1. I n t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e qas as a f u n c t i o n
of X f o r d i f f e r e n t J a. T , =600 R, T =500 R.
s at w
r o
i n a h i g h e r W* . I n Re g i o n I I t h e r e i s onl y a s l i g h t i n c r e a s e i n W* .
Thi s i s i s due t o t he s mal l d i f f e r e n c e be t we e n T0 and Tw . For a
l a r g e r T0 , t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n of t h e n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas , W* , i s s mal l
i n Re g i o n I . Ho we v e r , i n Re g i o n I I t h e r e i s a c o n s i d e r a b l e i n c r e a s e
i n W* . Thi s i s due t o t he l a r g e r d i f f e r e n c e b e t we e n T0 and Tw wh i c h
l eads t o s i g n i f i c a n t l y h i g h e r c o o l i n g of t he i n t er f ac e.
Fi g u r e 5 . 3. 2 p r e s e n t s W* as a f u n c t i o n of x f or d i f f e r e n t Tw .
I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t W* i s i n d e p e n d e n t of Tw i n Re g i o n I . Thi s i s due
t o t h a t f ac t t h a t t h e c o n d e n s a t i o n i n Re g i o n I i s d e p e n d e n t onl y on t he
c o o l i n g c a p a c i t y of t h e f i l m. But i n Re g i o n I I as t h e wal l t e mp e r a t u r e
d e c r e a s e s , W* i n c r e a s e s . A l ower Tw l eads t o a f a s t e r c o o l i n g of t he
i n t e r f a c e at 6f + 6C. Thus t he t her mal d r i v i n g f or c e i nc r eas es , l e a d
i ng t o a h i g h e r W* . Thi s p h e n o me n o n has been o b s e r v e d i n s ev er al s t u d i e s
on s u r f a c e c o n d e n s e r s [ 6 , 1 7 , 1 8 , 1 9 ] . As n ot ed i n t h e pur e v a p o r c as e,
f or a s h o r t - d i s t a n c e i n Re g i o n I I , W* d e c r e a s e s i n s t e a d of i n c r e a s i n g .
Thi s p h e n o me n o n c an be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e d e l a y e d i n f l u e n c e of t h e c ol d
wal l on t h e i n t er f ac e.
Fi g u r e 5 . 3. 3 s hows t h e v a r i a t i o n of W* wi t h x f or a d i f f e r e n t Re y
no l ds nu mb e r . I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t f or a l a r g e r Re y n o l d s n u mb e r t h e r e i s
a l e s s e r b u i l d up of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas es .
An i n c r e a s e i n t he i nt er f ac i al c o n c e n t r a t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e
gas es , W* , d e c r e a s e s t he s a t u r a t i o n t e mp e r a t u r e of t h e v apor , T* , at
t he i n t e r f a c e Sf + 6C. Thi s i n t ur n l eads t o a s ma l l e r t e mp e r a t u r e
T- j , at t he i n t e r f a c e y = <5f . Thi s p h e n o me n o n i s o b s e r v e d i n Fi g u r e
5 . 3 . 4 wh i c h p r e s ent s t he n o n d i me n s i o n a l i nt er f ac i al t e mp e r a t u r e 9j
as a f u n c t i o n of x f or d i f f e r e n t T0 . A l ower T0 l eads t o a h i g h e r W*
wh i c h i n t ur n d r a s t i c a l l y r educ es 0 -j . Thi s p h e n o me n o n i s f u r t h e r ob-
122
0 . 7
0. 6
W* 0. 5
200
400
600
X
800
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 2. I n t e r f a c i a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas a f u n c t i o n
o f X f o r d i f f e r e n t J a* . T s a t =600 R, T o =570 R.
1000
r o
co
0 200 400 600 800 1000
X
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 3. I n t e r f a c i a l c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas as a f u n c t i o n
o f X f or d i f f e r e n t Re y n o l d s number s . T . =600 R, T =570 R,
T =500 R. s a t 0
w
r o
-p*
200 400 _ 600 800 1000
X
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 4. No n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e as a f u n c t i o n o f X f o r
d i f f e r e n t J a. T s a t =600 R, Tw=500 R.
rv>
c_n
o b s e r v e d i n Fi g u r e s 5. 3. 5 and 5. 3. 6 wh i c h pr e s e n t 0-j as a f u n c t i o n
of x f o r d i f f e r e n t wal l t e mp e r a t u r e s and Re y n o l d s n u mb e r s , r e s p e c t i v e l y .
I n o r d e r t o u n d e r s t a n d c l e a r l y t he e f f e c t s of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas
on c o n d e n s a t i o n heat t r a n s f e r i t i s i mp o r t a n t t o e x a mi n e t he v a r i a t i o n
of t h e r at i o of t he Nu s s e l t nu mb e r s f or c o n d e n s a t i o n wi t h and wi t h
out n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas wi t h o t h e r p a r a me t e r s . Fi g u r e 5. 3. 7 p r e s e n t s
t he r a t i o of Nu s s e l t nu mb e r s as a f u n c t i o n of x f or = 0 . 0 1 , T0 =
570 R and Tw = 520 R. I t i s o b s e r v e d t hat f or a s hor t d i s t a n c e i n
Re g i o n I I , t h e r at i o i s g r e a t e r t han one. I n al l of t he p r e v i o u s
a n a l y t i c a l s t u d i e s on b a r e s u r f a c e , i t has been r e p o r t e d t hat t h e r at i o
of Nu s s e l t numb e r s i s l es s t h a n one. I n o r d e r t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e u n u
s ual b e h a v i o r i n t he p r e s e n t pr obl em, i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o e x a mi n e t he
t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t h e f i l m. Fi g u r e 5 . 3 . 8 and 5 . 3. 9 p r e s e n t t he
t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e s i n t he f i l m f or c o n d e n s a t i o n wi t h and wi t h o u t t he
p r e s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas r e s p e c t i v e l y , a f u n c t i o n of x. For
t h e pur e v a p o r c as e i t i s o b s e r v e d t hat i n t he b e g i n n i n g of Re g i o n I I
t h e t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e ex i s t s i n t wo s e p a r a t e s hapes . A c o n v e x p r o
f i l e i s 0 < y < Li and a c o n c a v e q u a d r a t i c p r o f i l e i s < y < Sf wi t h
t h e s l ope b e i n g z er o at Y = Lj . Thi s i s i n a g r e e me n t wi t h t he b o u n d a r y
c o n d i t i o n s i n Eq u a t i o n s 5 . 2 . 4 5 and 5 . 2 . 4 6 . Mo r e o v e r , i t i s n o t i c e d t hat
t h e c o n v e x p r o f i l e has mo r e hei g h t . Thi s i s due t o t h e c o mp a r a t i v e l y
l ar ge 0 -j ( r e s u l t i n g f r om t he a b s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas ) . Af t e r a
s h o r t d i s t a n c e i nt o Re g i o n I I t he e n t i r e p r o f i l e i n 0 < y < Sf b e c o me s
c o n c a v e . Fu r t h e r t he s l o p e of t h e p r o f i l e at y = 0 d e c r e a s e s . As we p r o
c eed f a r t h e r i nt o Re g i o n I I t he c o n c a v i t y d e c r e a s e s . The t e mp e r a t u r e
p r o f i l e g r a d u a l l y t ends t o a l i n e a r s hape. Mo r e o v e r , t he s l o p e at y =
0 s t ar t s t o i n c r e a s e . Thus , i t i s o b s e r v e d t hat as we p r o c e e d i n t o Re-
126
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 5. No n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e as a f u n c t i o n of X f or
d i f f e r e n t J a* . T s a t =600 R, To =570 R.
X
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 6. No n d i me n s i o n a l i n t e r f a c i a l t e mp e r a t u r e as a f u n c t i o n of X
f or d i f f e r e n t Re y n o l d s number s . T . =600 R, T =570 R,
T =500 R. s at 0
w
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 7. Ra t i o o f Nu s s e l t n u mb e r s f or c o n d e n s a t i o n wi t h and wi t h o u t
t h e p r e s e n c e o f n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas as a f u n c t i o n o f X.
y
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 8. Te mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t he f i l m at d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s o f X.
Pur e v a p o r c as e.
CO
o
y
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 9. Te mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t he f i l m at d i f f e r e n t v a l u e s o f X
i n t he p r e s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas .
gi on I I t h e s l o p e at y = 0 f i r s t d e c r e a s e s and t hen i n c r e a s e s . Th e s ame
b e h a v i o u r i s n o t e d i n Fi g u r e 5 . 3 . 9 f or n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas b e i n g p r e s e n t ,
wi t h one e x c e p t i o n . Th e v al ue of 9-j i s mu c h l ower . Thi s i s due t o
p r e s e n c e of t h e n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas i n t he c o n d e n s i n g v apor .
Fi g u r e 5 . 3 . 1 0 p r e s e n t s t he t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t h e b e g i n n i n g of
Re g i o n I I f or c o n d e n s a t i o n wi t h and wi t h o u t t he p r e s e n c e of t he n o n c o n
d e n s i b l e gas . I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t t he s l ope of t h e p r o f i l e at y = 0
i s t he s ame f or bot h c as es . Fi g u r e 5 . 3 . 1 0 p r e s e n t s t he t wo p r o f i l e s
at x = 122. I t i s o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e s l o p e of t he p r o f i l e wi t h n o n c o n
d e n s i b l e gas es at x = 0 i s g r e a t e r t h a n t h a t f or t h e pur e v a p o r c as e.
Th i s i s du e t o t h e l a r g e r c o n v e x i t y of t he l a t e r c ur v e. Fi g u r e s 5 . 3. 11,
5 . 3. 12, and 5 . 3 . 1 3 p r e s e n t t he t wo p r o f i l e s at x = 272, 472 and 672
r e s p e c t i v e l y . I t i s o b s e r v e d t hat at x = 272 t h e t wo s l o p e s ar e a l mo s t
t he s ame. Ho we v e r , f o r x > 272, t he s l o p e at y = 0 f o r t he pur e v apor
c a s e e x c e e d s t h a t f or t he n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas c as e. Thi s b e h a v i o u r of t he
t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e l eads t o t he r at i o of Nu s s e l t n u mb e r s i n Fi g u r e 5 . 3. 7
g r e a t e r t h a n 1 .
Fi g u r e s 5. 3 . 1 4 , 5. 3 . 1 5 , 5. 3. 16, and 5. 3 . 1 7 s h o w t h e v a r i a t i o n of
t h e r at i o of Nu s s e l t n umber s f or c o n d e n s a t i o n wi t h and wi t h o u t t he
p r e s e n c e of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas wi t h x f or d i f f e r e n t i n c o mi n g f i l m
t e mp e r a t u r e , wal l t e mp e r a t u r e s , Re y n o l d s n u mb e r and f r ee s t r e a m c o n
c e n t r a t i o n of n o n c o n d e n s i b l e s .
Cas e B Tw < T n < T s at
Wh e n t h e i n c o mi n g f i l m t e mp e r a t u r e i s t h e s ame as t h e s a t u r a t i o n
t e mp e r a t u r e of t he v apor , no c o n d e n s a t i o n t a k e s p l a c e i n Re g i o n I .
Eq u a t i o n 5 . 2 . 5 6 d e s c r i b e s t h e heat t r a n s f e r i n Re g i o n I . Th e d e v e l o p -
132
1.00
Fi g u r e 5. 3. 10. Co mp a r i s o n o f t e mp e r a t u r e p r o f i l e i n t h e f i l m f o r c o n d e n s a t i o n
wi t h and wi t h o u t t he p r e s e n c e o f n o n c o n d e n s i b l e gas at
X=7 2 . 6 4 , at t he b e g i n n i n g o f Re g i o n I I .
y
Figure 5.3.11. Comparison of temperature profile in the film for condensation
with and without the presence of noncondensible gas at
X=122.
y
Figure 5.3.12. Comparison of temperature profile in the film for condensation
with and without the presence of noncondensible gas at X=272.
CO
cn
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
y
Figure 5.3.13. Comparison of the temperature profile in the film for condensation
with and without the presence of noncondensible gas at X=472.
Co
cn
200 400
600 800 1000
X
Figure 5.3.14. Ratio of average Nusselt numbers for condensation with and
without the presence of noncondensible gas as a function
of X for different Ja. T ,=600 R, T =500 R, W =0.01,
Ref=100. sat " "
I-
CO
X
Figure 5.3.15. Ratio of average Nusselt number for condensation with and
without the presence of noncondensible gas as a function
of X for different Ja*. T t=600 R, T =570 R, W =0.01,
Ref=100.
Nu
Nu,
200 400 600 800 1000
X
Figure 5.3.16. Ratio of average Nusselt numbers for condensation with and
without the presence of noncondensible gas as a function
of X for different Reynolds numbers.
TW =500 R, To=570 R.
Ts a r 600R
CO
lO
1.10
Nu
Nu,
1.05
1.00
0.95
0.90
200 400 600 800 1000
Figure 5.3.17. Ratio of Nusselt numbers for condensation with and without
the presence of noncondensible gas as a function of X for
different W^. T sat=600 R, To=570 R, Ref=100.
O
fil = al * 5.3.5
For small values of x, a^ can be calculated from Equation 5.2.56
as
141
ment of the thermal boundary layer is described by
36 1/3 1/3
81 ' [6fPrf] C(3Ref)2/3 nf] . 5 -3 '6
The extent of Region I is evaluated by solving Equation 5.2.55.
Alternately it can be defined as
/<Sf\ 1/3 5 3 7
XD -(-1 ) 5 - 3 - 7
al
Thus the average Nusselt number in Region I can be expressed as
NuI = a A / 3 = 36 1/3 4/3 1/3
I D C , -i/o 1 t-f3Rp ^ pr 3 5.3.8
(3Ref)^/ Prf ^ Ref'36 Frf .
As Region II begins the film edge temperature drops below the sat
uration temperature of the vapor. As a result condensation begins. This
leads to a build up of noncondensible gas at the interface y = 6f + 6C.
Figure 5.3.18 presents the interfacial concentration of noncondensible
gas, W*, as a function of x for different wall temperatures. It is seen
that as the wall temperature decreases there is a sharper decrease in
k*. This phenomenon can be explained as follows. A lower wall tempera
ture leads to a faster cooling of the interface at y = 6f + 5C . This
leads to an increase in the thermal driving force (Tsato6 - T*) for
X
Figure 5.3.18. Interfacial concentration of noncondensible gas as a function
of X for different ja*. Tsat=600 R, ^=0.01.
t*
ro
condensation. As a result more vapor and noncondensible gas are drawn
towards the interface <5f + 5C. To counterbalance this increase in the
inflow of the noncondensible gases, a higher outflow is required which
results in an increase in the concentration of the noncondensible gas,
W*, at the interface 6f + <SC.
Figure 5.3.19 presents the interfacial concentration of nonconden
sible gas a function of x for different Reynolds. A low Reynolds
number indicates a lower film velo city. Thus the walls cools the
interface faster leading to an increase in W*. It is obvious that a
higher free stream concentration of noncondensible gas would lead to
a higher interfacial concentration W*. This is readily seen in Figure
5.3.20 which prsents W* as a function of x for different Wo,.
Figures 5.3.21 through 5.3.23 present the interfacial temperature
9 -j as a function of x for different wall temperatures, Reynolds num
bers and free stream concentration of noncondensible gas. For all cases
0-j is equal to one in Region I, but it decreases in Region II. For
high Reynolds numbers as seen in Figure 5.3.22 there is no appreciable
decrease in 0-j. It was observed that at high Reynolds numbers the cold
wall did not have significant effect on the interfacial temperature.
Thus it can be concluded at high Reynolds numbers that neither the
wall temperature nor the condensible gases have a significant effect on
the interfacial temperature.
Figures 5.3.24, 5.3.25, 5.3.26 present the ratio of the Nusselt
numbers for condensation with and without the presence of the noncon
densible gas as a function of x for different wall temperatures, Rey
nolds numbers and the free stream concentration of noncondensible gas
respectively.
1 143
Figure 5.3.19. Jnterfacial concentration of noncondensible gas a function of
X for different Reynolds numbers. T ,=600 R, T =550 R,
W =.0.01. sat w
-fs
0 200 400 600 800 1000
X
Figure 5.3.20. Interfacial concentration of noncondensible gas a function
of X for different W^. T sa.j.=600oR,
tn
1.0
0.8
9.
i
0.7 ~
0.6
0.5 --------------1
0
Figure 5.
200 400 600 800 1000
3.21. Nondimensional interfacial temperature as a function of X
for different Ja*. T = .=600 R, U -0.01, Re*=100.
sat oo f
4*
CT1
X
Figure 5.3.22. Nondimensional interfacial temperature as a function of X for
different Reynolds numbers. T .=600 R, T =550 R, W =0.01.
sat w oo
4a.
'vl
Figure 5.3.23. Nondimensional interfacial temperature as a function of X
for different W . T ,=600 R, T =550 R, Re,=100.
00 sat w T
o 200 400 600 800
X
Figure 5.3.24. Ratio of Nusselt numbers for condensation with and without
noncondensible gas a function of X for different Ja*.
T .=600 R, U =0.01.
sat
1000
1.2
1. 0
Nu 0.8
Nu,
0. 6
0.4
_L
200 400 _ 600
X
800 1000
Figure 5.3.25. Ratio of Nusselt numbers for condensation with and without
noncondensible gas a function of for different Reynolds
numbers. T +=600 R, T =550 R, W =0.01. ~
sat W 00 in
o
Figure 5.3.26. Ratio of Nusselt numbers for condensation with and without
noncondensible gas as a function of J for different W .
T a+=600 R, T =550 R, Re-=100. *
S a t W T
In all of the cases it is observed that in the beginning of Re
gion I the ratio of Nusselt numbers is greater than one. Far away
into Region II the ratio drops to a value less than one. In order
to understand this behavior it is necessary to examine the tempera
ture profile in the film. Figure 5.3.27 presents the temperature
profile in the film at different locations in Region II. In the be
ginning of Region II at x = 55 the temperature profile is in the form
of a quadratic. However, as x increases the profile, it tends to assume
a linear profile. However, such a behavior is not observed in the
case of condensation with noncondensible gas. At different values of
x, the profile remains quadratic, as seen in Figure 5.3.28. This is
due to the rapid decrease in e-j due to the presence of noncondensible
gas. It is observed that the profiles for condensation with and with
out the noncondensible gases will be same at the beginning of Region I.
Figure 5.3.29 presents the two profiles at x = 155. It is observed that
due to a lower 0j, the slope of the profile at y = 0 for the non
condensible gas is greater than that for the pure vapor case. Figures
5.3.30 and 5.3.31 present the two profiles at x = 255 and 755 respec
tively. At x = 255 the two slopes at y = 0 are almost equal. However,
at x = 755, the slope at y = 0 for the pure vapor case is higher than
that for the case with noncondensible gas. This is due to the rapid
suppression of the interfacial temperature. In the latter case, this
results from the presence of the noncondensible gas.
152
1.0
Figure 5.3.27. Nondimensional^ temperature in the film as a function of Y
at different X location. T sa^.=600 R, RW=550 R.
Figure 5.3.28. NondimensionaJ_ temperature in the film as a function of Y
at different X locations. T .=600 R, T =550 R, W =0.01,
Ref=50. sat w
cn
-P*
Y
Figure 5.3.29. Nondimensional temperature in the film as a function of Y
at x=155. Tsat=600 R, TW =550 R, Ref=50, W^O.Ol.
1
5
5
Y
Figure 5.3.30. Nondimensional temperature in the film as a function of Y
at x=255. Tsat=600 R, Tw=550 R, Ref=50, W^O.Ol.
CJ1
cn
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Y
Figure 5.3.31. Nondimensional temperature in the film as a function of Y
at x=455. Tsat=600 R, Tw =550 R, Ref=50, 1^=0.01.
U1
CHAPTER 6
CONDENSATION ON A THIN FILM FLOWING OVER SINGLE AND
MULTILE HORIZONTAL ISOTHERMAL TUBES
6.1 Introduction
Since the pioneering work of Nusselt (22) numerous studies have
been made of the problem of film condensation on flat plates and on
tubes. In Nusselt's original analytical work the vapor was assumed
to be quiescent, saturated, and free of noncondensibles. Further,
he assumed that the thermal capacitance of the condensate film was
negligible, the shear induced by the vapor was vanishingly small and
that the interfacial resistance was also negligible. Beginning with
Roshenow (23) the assumptions made by Nusselt were examined one at
a time. Sparrow and co-workers (6,24,30) reported the influence of
all of these assumptions for flow over a flat plate. Their results
indicated that for a pure saturated vapor at low pressure, excluding
liquid metals, the model of Nusselt was sufficient.
For a horizontal circular tube, the only analytical studies in
addition to that of Nusselt (22) for laminar film condensation were
due to Sparrow and Gregg (30) and Chen (31). The solution of Reference
(30) was obtained by utilizing the boundary layer equation and casting
the problem in terms of similarity variables. Of course, for a gra
vity driven flow of condensate a similarity solution does not exist
except near the upper stagnation point. Chen (31) used an integral
boundary layer approach in which the governing equations were used to
evaluate the temperature and velocity profiles. Chen's solution was
cast in terms of two parameters which were essentially the Jakob
number and the Jakob number divided by the Prandtl number. For these
"two" parameters becoming vanishingly small his solution resulted in
the identical results to those obtained by Nusselt (22). He showed
that the Nusselt's solution did not hold for liquid metals. However,
this fact had been previously indicated by Roshenow (23), Koh
(32) and Sparrow and co-workers (6 ) for flat plate studies.
For the case of condensation on a vertical row of tubes, Chen
(31) has been the only one to offer an improvement to Nusselt's theory,
although experimental studies have been made by several investigators.
The experimental results (33,34) have generally shown much higher
heat transfer rates than predicted by either Nusselt or Chen. The
phenomenon has been attributed to splashing and nonuniform spilling,
both of which are difficult to predict. These effects as well as
vapor velocity over the tubes and the possible effects of waves on
the condensate film could all attribute to the difference between the
experimental results and the theory for a quiescent vapor.
Chen, in developing his theoretical model for multiple tube
laminar film condensation, assumed that the Ja/Pr was vanishingly
small and that the condensate leaving the first or upper tube was
at a temperature only slightly below the saturation temperature. By
the time it reached the second tube he assumed that it would have
reached the saturation temperature. Thus, condensation on the second
tube would not start until a thermal boundary layer penetrated the
film of fluid that had dripped from the upper tube. His results
159
indicate that the average heat transfer for n tubes is higher than
that of Nusselt and is dependent on the Jakob number, but is indepen
dent of the tube spacing due to his assumptions about the temperature
of the condensate when it reaches the second and subsequent tubes.
In the present analysis we evaluate the heat transfer to the falling
sheet between the subsequent tubes as well as that for each tube and
thus are free of Chen's assumption as to the condensate temperature
as it falls onto the lower tubes. Our analysis reduces to that of
Chen's for large tube pitch where his assumption would be realistic.
6.2 Physical Model and Mathematical Formulation
Model for the Second or a Subsequent Tube
The physical model for the second or a subsequent tube is shown
in Figure 6.2.1. A liquid sheet at temperature T0 and mass flux mf im
pinges without splashing on top of the horizontal tube and flows over it
due to gravity. The Reynolds number for the sheet is such that the re
sulting film remains thin and laminar. The tube wall is held at a tem
perature Tw and the film is surrounded by a quiescent saturated vapor
at temperature Tsat . Two possible cases are encountered. If the
tube above is at a large distance above the tube being considered
it is possible that T0 = Tsat. Since Tw < Tsat a thermal boundary
layer will grow outward from the tube wall until it is of thickness
equal to that of the film. At this point the film surface temperature
Tj will drop below Tsat, and condensation will commence. It is
this situation that was analyzed by Chen (31) except that he assumed
that the distance it would take for the thermal boundary layer to
grow from the wall was negligible. A more general situation would
160
161
I
/
Region II
Figure 6.2.1. Physical model for condensation on second
or subsequent tube.
apply when the tube pitch (distance between tubes) is small. For
this case Tsat > T0 > Tw . As shown in Figure 6.2.1 condensation will
be initiated immediately (at <j>0). A thermal boundary layer, 63,
will grow into the film from the interface at the same time as a
thermal boundary layer, 5j, grows outward from the tube wall. Until
the two boundary layers meet the only condensation will be that which
occurs due to the heat capacitance of the film. The distance along
the tube at which the two boundary layers meet, + <$2 = <Sf, is called
<j>l and the region where only the film capacitance influences the
condensate layer, Sc , growth is called Region I. From the end of
Region I until the film and condensate leave the tube is referred to
as Region II. In this region the primary driving force for the con
densation is the heat sink due to the wall being held at Tw . When
the sheet is at a temperature T0, below Tsat, condensation will
occur along its entire length. However, in our model we assume per
fect mixing when it impinges on the tube under consideration; thus,
we consider the condensation to initiate at ^0 . In our analyses
we assume that the film and condensate layer are laminar and free of
surface waves. Further, we employ the remainder of the assumptions
used by Nusselt, constant properties, negligible shear induced by the
vapor, etc. These assumptions limit the analysis to low pressure
and to the Jakob number ^Pf(Tsat - being smal1.
Utilizing the above assumptions the following analyses can
be made for Regions I and II.
Region I
For the film which is due to the impinging sheet conservation of
mass gives
162
The momentum equation, using Nusselt's assumptions, yields
thus
g sin* y ,
uf = ------ [6f y - ]
vf 2
, 3mf 1/3 .vf ,1/3 . -1/3
6f = [--- 1 ( ) sin
uf 9
6 .2.2
6.2.3
The integral form of the energy equation for the thermal boundary
layer growing from the wall is
R d<t> / Pf Uf CPf ^T1 ' V dy ~ " kf
3Ti
3y
y~o
6.2.4
and for the thermal boundary layer growing from the interface it is
-6f
iij uf cpf <t2 - To ) kf
6f 52
il2
ay
6.2.5
y-fif
The energy equation for the condensate layer assuming negligible
thermal capacitance for this newly growing layer is
hfg
R d<|>
6f+6c
J P c uc dy = k f 6 .2.6
ly=5f
In the two thermal boundary layers growing in the film we assume
quadratic temperature profiles which satisfy the temperature condi
tions at the edges and the temperature gradient at 6^ or <S2 . The
164
resulting profiles are
Tl - T0 = (Tw - T0 ) (1 - y )2
6.2.7
and
6 .2.8
The assumption of negligible thermal capacitance of the condensate
layer implies a linear temperature profile
In the above equations Tj is the interfacial temperature between
the film and the condensate layer. Compatibility of heat fluxes at
the condensate layer-film interface leads to
In Region I the condensate layer will be extremely thin as compared
to 6f; thus we will assume that the velocity in this layer will be
that obtained from Equation 6.2.2 evaluated at y = 6f. This in fact
assumes that the film is negligibly accelerated or decelerated due to
the increased mass. This assumption is reasonable for Tsat > T0 > Tw
as we have previously assumed that ^pf (Tsat - Tw )/hfg < < 1 and
6.2.9
T0 + 1/2 62/6c Tgat
6.2.10
1 + 1/2 62/6C
thus, Cpf (Tsat - T0 )/hfg < Cpf (Tsat - Tw )/ hfg < < 1.
Defining a dimensionless temperature
165
e =
T - To
Tsat ~ T0
6 .2.11
the interfacial temperature becomes
0 i =
1/2 52/Sc
1 + 1 / 2 J 2/c >
6 . 2.12
where the bar indicates nondimensionalizing with respect to the char
acteristic length (vf2/g)l/3 . Substituting the appropriate tempera
ture and velocity profiles into Equations 6.2.4, 6.2.5 and 6.2.6 and
nondimensionalizing the terms yields, respectively,
d6 72 R
dcf) L-Pry sin<t> tancj) 3
3Sf3 2 8,-1
tan* 3 6f ' 5 J '
v (2 6f - 7 l)
b
6.2.13
d6:
dcf>
- 2622 (6f2 - )
LPrf sin<j> c T 10 6-j d(f>
2 S2
3 tan<j> 10
6o2 ))] * (Sf2 -
10
So2 )
6.2.14
and
dcf>
Ja R sin-1/3* 2 5,
32/3 Ref2/3 Prf (1 + 1/2 62/ 6c) 3 tan*
6.2.15
Equations 6.2.12-6.2.15 describe the condensation in Region I. The
166
necessary boundary conditions as can be seen from Figure 1 are
S l U = <t>o) = fi2U = <f>o) = 0 and 6c(')> = <t>o) = * The equations may
be solved numerically after first establishing the values of the first
derivatives of <f> = <|>0 . For very small values of - 4>0 it can be shown
that
After the two thermal boundary layers have merged, 6 ^+6 2= Sf,
the entire film heats up. An inflection point occurs in the tempera
ture profile at y/Sf = Sj / Sf . For <j> = + <t>i this inflection point
results in 9T/3y at y/6f = 6]_/6f equal to zero. The inflection persists
at larger values of <|> although the slope is no longer zero. In order
to most easily deal with this situation the integral energy equation
for the film is best solved in two parts, i.e., y/6f < 61 (<j0 + 4i)/
Sf = Cj and < y/Sf < 1 .
The energy equation for the film can be written as
s1 = a j U - 4>0 )1/3 +
2 = a2 (<j> - 4>q ) ^2 +
Sc = - <t>0 ) +
6.2.16
The solution for Region I ends when i + 62 = Sf.
Region II
6.2.17
1 d 6f k.p 3To 9To
6.2.18
The temperature profile to be used in Equation 6.2.17 must satisfy
the conditions:
167
y = 0 Ti = Tw
8Tj 9T2
y = Ci Sf Tl = Tb = t2 , --- = = - e(<J>) 6.2.19
ay 3y
These conditions lead to
PCI Sf y
Tl = Tw + 2(Tb - Tw + )
2 Ci Sf
- ( Tb - Tw + BCi 6f) ( : )2 6.2.20
Ci Sf *
For T2 the boundary conditions in y are:
3T2
y = Cl Sf T2 = Tb - - = 3 .
9y
y = Sf T2 = Ti
These lead us to
T2 = Tb - B(y - Ci Sf) + (T-j - Tb + 3Sf (1
(y - Ci Sf) 2
- Ci ) ) [ ( T T 7 7 n 7 ] 6 -2 ' 21
In addition the velocity profile in the film and condensate becomes
g sin* y2
uf = - ---- -[(Sf + Sc) y - 6 .2.22
vf 2
for 0 < y < Sf + Sc .
Utilizing the temperature and velocity profiles given in Equations
6.2.19-6.2.21, and Equations 6.2.17 and 6.2.18 yield the following
nondimensional equations respectively
168
[5/3 - 3/5 CX] db 1 Ci Sf 0 _ dg
------------- - ------------ + d Sf
[1/3 - Cj/10] dtj> 3 tan<j> dct>
8
R [0b - 9W + B C 1 5 f]
Prf q 3 Sf4 sin<|>( 1/3 - C1/10)
6.2.24
and
d9b M 3 d9-j 1 BSf dg
M2 d(j> M2 d<j> 3 tan<j> d<(>
R
Prf Sf4 (l - Cj)
i-j - 9b + p Sf(l - Cj)
6.2.25
where
Mi = (Cl - - ^ ) 2 (1 - C!) + (1 - C i ) 3 ^
M2
M3
= (C1 - - -
2 (1 - Cj)
+ (1 - Ci) ---
6 1 120
= (Cl - -ir-)
c / (1 - Cn )
11 3
+ (1 - Ci)
3 1 20
6.2.26
The compatabi1ity of heat fluxes at the condensate layer-film
interface leads to
sf(i - q ) (1 - gsc ) + 29b sc
2SC + (1 - Cl) Sf
6.2.27
The condensate energy equation is
The solution of Equations 6.2.2-6.2.28 will define the condensation
in Region II. The boundary conditions for this region are those at
the end of Region I; i.e.,
0b * 0 , 3 = 0 ,
6C = Sc , 9|_ = 9|_ _
()> = (j>o + * 1 (j) - <f>o + <|>1
Heat Transfer Coefficient
The purpose of a heat transfer coefficient is to define the
surface area needed to provide a given amount of condensation or
temperature rise in the coolant. Thus, for the current problem it is
necessary to define the heat per unit area as:
q" - h(<}>) (Tsat - Tw ) - + kc ^
3T
y=o
6.2.30
which yields
2k (T0 - Tw )
hj(c}>) = ---------- in Region I 6.2.31
51 Tsat _ Tw
and
2k(Tb - Tw + pCi <5f/2)
h tt (<{>) = ----------------------- in Region II . 6.2.32
Ci f(Tsat - Tw )
The average heat transfer coefficient is
_ J o+'tl <l>o+<t,l+<f>2
h = [J hj(<j)) d<f> +J hjj (()>) d<}> ] / (<j)i + <j>2) . 6.2.33
+ A
Condensation on the upper most tube, as shown in Figure 6.2.2, in
a vertical row of horizontal tubes can be analyzed by the theory of
Nusselt (22) or Chen (31). The condensate leaving the upper tube is
hypothesized here as falling as a continuous sheet until it impinges
on the second tube. While the condensate traverses the distance to the
second tube condensation occurs on the sheet. Jacobs and Nadig (21)
have recently solved the problem of condensation on such a sheet. If we
assume that the fluid in the sheet becomes well mixed as it impinges on
the second tube the model developed earlier in this paper is applicable
for the analysis of the heat transfer as the fluid layer flows around
the tube. If the condensate leaving the second tube again falls as
a sheet and impinges on the third tube and so on, we find that the
heat transfer for multiple tubes can be analyzed by repeatedly using
the model of Jacobs and Nadig for condensation on a falling sheet and
the present model. In the analysis the mean temperature of the fluid
leaving a tube and impinging on the next is successively changed in
the models as one works downward through the row of tubes.
Since all of the heat transfer must ultimately be absorbed by
the coolant, it is only necessary to evaluate the average heat trans
fer coefficient on the surface of each successive tube, add them
together and divide by the total number of tubes in the vertical row
in order to determine the average heat transfer coefficient for that
number of tubes. The theory of Nusselt is used for the first tube's
h and the present analysis is used for the successive tubes. The
model of Jacobs and Nadig (21) is only used to determine the value of
T0 for each tube. This value will depend on the tube spacing as
170
Condensation on a Vertical Row of Tubes
171
Figure 6.2.2. Physical model for condensation on multiple tubes.
well as the Jakob number and Prandtl number and Reynolds number of
the condensate sheet.
172
6.3. Results and Discussion
. Examination of the governing differential equations indicates
that for values of <f> approaching <j>0, simple expressions could be ob
tained for the coefficients of S2 and 6C indicated in Equation
6.2.16. They are:
ai [
36R
Prf sin<|>0 Sf
1/3
r 24R ,
ap [ . p]
d Prf sin<t>0 Sf^
1/2
1 1 / 1 16 Ja R_______
a3 [. _ a2 + _ _.a2 + _ _ _ ^
6.3.1
Thus for small values of <t - <j>0
\ = ax (<j) - <}>0 )1/3 + ...
<$2 ~ a2(<t) $o ^ ^
53 = a^C* - <t>0 ) +
6.3.2
Using these functions for starting values the governing equations
were solved numerically using a standard Runga-Kutta algorithm on a
Hewlett-Packard 3000 minicomputer. The average heat transfer coeffi
cient was then determined as indicated in Equations 6.2.31-6.2.33.
After solving the governing equations the solutions were applied
to the solution of the multiple tube problem as indicated previously.
Calculations made in this paper correspond to the experimental work
of Young (33). In these experiments the wall temperature was kept
constant, the tube pitch was two diameters and the outside tube dia
meter was 0.375 inches, - 9 5 mm. For these conditions Figure 6.3.1
shows the ratio of the presently determined average heat transfer
coefficient to that reported by Nusselt (22) for 0.04 < Ja < 0.20. It
is clear that Nusselt's solution is in increasing error as the number
of tubes in a vertical row increases. Further there is a weak depend
ence on Ja with the error increasing as Ja increases. The results
shown in Figure 6.3.1 are well correlated by the expression,
[1 + 0.103 Ja >212(n - l)1/2] . 6.3.3
^nun
Figures 6 .3.2-6.3.5 show the comparison of the present model with
the experimental results of Young (33). In addition, the results of
Chen's (31) analysis are also shown. Although the present analysis
shows a definite improvement over that of Chen the experimental data
are generally higher than we predict. The relatively close tube
spacing can lead to high vapor velocities as has been pointed out
by Fujii et al. (35). For close tube spacing they note that it is
unlikely that the falling condensate sheets will accelerate to the
degree that considerable splashing will occur as has been argued by
some investigators. However, surface waves and partially "drop-wise"
condensation as well as appreciable vapor velocity could induce higher
heat transfer rates. They argue that the latter is the primary reason
why the heat transfer is higher than would be predicted by a model
such as developed herein.
If the tube pitch is large the falling condensate sheet between
173
1.2
nun
VI
t*
1.25
Young et al.(33)
Chen (31)
Present theory
nun
1.00
0.75
0.0 0.05
1
0.10
Ja
0.15
0.20
Figure 6.3.2. Ratio of average heat transfer coefficient over two tubes to
that obtained from Nusselt1s analysis as a function of Jakob
number.
0.05 0.10 0.15
Figure 6.3.3. Ratio of average heat transfer coefficient over three tubes
to that obtained from Nusselt's analysis as a function of
Jakob number.
cn
Figure 6.3.4. Ratio of average heat transfer coefficient over four tubes
to that obtained from Nusselt's analysis as a function of
Jakob number.
Figure 6.3.5. Ratio of average heat transfer coefficient over five tubes to
that obtained from Nusselt's analysis as a function of Jakob
number.
tubes will accelerate to a high velocity and the condensate sheet will
become thinner. Both of these effects will make T0 approach Tsat- Thus,
Chen's solution should become applicable. However, Chen neglects the
distance needed to establish the thermal boundary layer moving outward
from the wall. He requires the same temperature profile as for conden
sation on a single tube. A high velocity in the film will, of course,
make it thinner and increase the heat transfer coefficient, yet the
established temperature profile reduces it. These effects together
make his heat transfer increase at a faster rate than ours as Jakob
number increases when applied to a pitch ratio of two. However, at
low values of Jakob number Chen's analysis yields significantly lower
values of hn .
179
REFERENCES
1. Rai, V.C., and Pinder, K.L., "Direct Contact Condensation of Steam
in a Packed Column with Immiscible Heat Transfer Agents,"
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 2, 1974, pp.
170-174.
2. Bokay, A. and Jaszay, T., "High Performance Jet Condensers for
Steam Turbines," Proceedings of the Sixth International Heat
Transfer Conference, Vol. 2, August 1978, pp. 61-65.
3. Joseph, K., Source Book on the Production of Electricity from
Geothermal Energy, U.S. Department of Energy Publication,
March 1980, pp. 413-417.
4. Jacobs, H.R. and Fanner, H., "Direct Contact Condensers - - A Liter
ature Survery," Energy Development Administration, Report No.
DEE/1523-3, February 1977.
5. Kudo, A.E. and Equsa, T.T.,"Basic Studies of Vapor Suppression,"
Proceedings of the Fifth International Heat Transfer Confer
ence, Vol. 3, September 1974, pp. 221-225.
6 . Minkowycz, W.J. and Sparrow, E.M., "Condensation Heat Transfer in
the Presence of Noncondensibles, Interfacial Resistance, Su
per heating, variable Properties and Diffusion," International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 9, 1966, pp. 1125-1144.
7. Jacobs, H.R. and Bogart, J.A., "Condensation on Immiscible Falling
Films," Paper No. 80-HT-110, ASME National Heat Transfer Con
ference, Orlando, Florida, July 1980.
8 . Jacobs, H.R. and Nadig, R., "Condensation on an Immiscible Falling
Film in the Presence of a Noncondensible Gas," Heat Exchangers
for Two-Phase Application, HTD - Vol 27, pp. 99-106, ASME Na
tional Heat Transfer Conference, Seattle, Washington, July
1983.
9. Nadig, R., Condensation on an Immiscible Falling Film in the Pre
sence of a Noncondensible Gas, Master's Thesis, University of
Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 1983.
10. Hausbrand, E., Evaporating, Condensing and Coolant Apparatus, D.
Van Nostrand Co., 5th ed., New York, 1933.
11. How, H., "How to Design Barometric Condensers," Chemical Engineer
ing, pp. 174-182, February 1956.
181
12. Oliker, I., "On Calculation of Heat and Mass Transfer in Jet Type
Direct Contact Heaters," Paper No. 76-HT-21, ASME National
Heat Transfer Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, August 1976.
13. Kutateladze, S.S., Heat Transfer in Condensing and Boiling, Chap
ter 7, Moscow, 1952. English Translation by U.S. Atomic Energy
Commission, AEC-TR-3770, 2nd Edition.
14. Hasson, D., Luss, D. and Peck, R., "Theoretical Analyses of Vapor
Condensation on Laminar Jets," International Journal of Heat
and Mass Transfer, Vol. 7, pp. 969-981, 1964.
15. Hasson, D., Luss, D., and Navon, V., "An Experimental Study of
Steam Condensing on a Laminar Water Sheet," International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 7, pp. 983-1001, 1964.
16. Jacobs, H.R., and Bogart, J.A., and Pensel, R.W., "Condensation on
a Thin Film Flowing Over an Adiabatic Sphere," Proceedings of
the Seventh International Heat Transfer Conference, Vol. 5,
pp. 89-94, Munich, 1982.
17. Sparrow, E.M. and Lin, S.H., "Condensation Heat Transfer in the Pre
sence of a Noncondensible Gas," ASME Journal of Heat Transfer,
August 1964, pp. 430-436.
18. Sparrow, E.M., Minkowycz, W.J. and Saddy, M., "Forced Convection
Condensation in the Presence of a Noncondensibles and Inter
facial Resistance," International Journal of Heat and Mass
Transfer, Vol. 10, 1967, pp. 1829-1845.
19. Rose, J.W., "Condensation of a Vapor in the Presence of a Nonconden
sing Gas," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
Vol. 12, 1969, pp. 233-237.
20. Taitel, Y. and Tamir, A., "Condensation in the Presence of a Noncon
densible Gas in Direct Contact," International Journal of Heat
and Mass Transfer, Vol. 12, 1969, pp. 1157-1169.
21. Jacobs, H.R. and Nadig, R. ,"Condensation on Coolant Jets and Sheet,"
ASME Paper 84-HT-28, National Heat Transfer Summer Conference
Niagara Falls, New York, August 1984.
22. Nusselt, W., "Die Oberflachen Kondensation des Wasserdaujes," Zeit-
schrijt des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, Vol. 60, 1916, pp.
541-569.
23. Roshnow, W.M., "Heat Transfer and Temperature Distribution in Lam
inar Film Condensation," Transactions of ASME, Vol. 78, 1956,
pp. 1645-1648.
24. Sparrow, E.M. and Gregg, J.L., "A Boundary-Layer Treatment of Lam
inar Film Condensation," Journal of Heat Transfer, Transac
tions of ASME, Series C, Vol. 81, 1959, pp. 13-18.
182
25. Chen, M.M., "An Analytical Study of Laminar Film Condensation:
Part 1 - Flat Plates," Journal of Heat Transfer, Transactions
of ASME, February 1961, pp. 48-54.
26. Murty, N.S., and Sastri, V.M.K., "Condensation on a Falling Liquid
Film," Heat Transfer 1974, Proceedings of the 5th Interna
tional Heat Transfer Conference, Vol. Ill, September 3-7,
1974, pp. 231-235.
27. Eckert, E.R.G. and Drake, R.M., Heat and Mass Transfer, Second Edi
tion, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1959, pp. 338.
28. Al-Diwany, H.K., Rose, J.W., "Free Convection Film Condensation of
Steam in the Presence of Non-condensing Gases," International
Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1973, Vol. 16, pp. 1359
1369.
29. More, J.J., Garbow, B.S. and Hillstrom, K.E., User Guide for Min-
pack - 1 , Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, August 1980.
30. Sparrow, E.M. and Gregg, J.L., "Laminar Condensation Heat Transfer
on a Horizontal Cylinder," Journal of Heat Transfer, Trans
actions of ASME, Series C, Vol. 81, 1959, pp. 291-296.
31. Chen, M.M., "An Analytical Study of Laminar Film Condensation:
Part 2 - Single and Multiple Horizontal Tubes," Journal of
Heat Transfer, Transaction of ASME, February 1961, pp. 55-60.
32. Koh, J.C.Y., "An Integral Treatment of Two Phase Boundary Layer
in Film Condensation," Journal of Heat Transfer, August 1961,
pp. 359-362.
33. Young, F.L., and Wohlenberg, W.J., "Condensation of Saturated
Freon - 12 on a Bank of Horizontal Tubes," Transaction of
ASME, Vol. 64, 1942, pp. 787-794.
34. Katz, D.L., and Geist, J.M., "Condensation on a Six Finned Tubes
in a Vertical Row," Transaction of ASME, Vol. 70, 1948, pp.
907-914.
35. Fujii, T., Behara, U., Hirata, K., Oda, K., "Heat Transfer and Flow
Resistance in Condenation of Low Pressure Steam Flowing Through
Tube Banks," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,
Vol. 15, No-2, February 1972, pp. 247-261.