Given the economic benefits of paying the Living Wage, and increasing the minimum wage in the USA, why is Bristol's mayor shying away from seeking full accreditation as a Living Wage employer?
Given the economic benefits of paying the Living Wage, and increasing the minimum wage in the USA, why is Bristol's mayor shying away from seeking full accreditation as a Living Wage employer?
Given the economic benefits of paying the Living Wage, and increasing the minimum wage in the USA, why is Bristol's mayor shying away from seeking full accreditation as a Living Wage employer?
Questions to the Mayor from Cllr Mike Wollacott Living Wage
1) Given the growing consensus around the economic benefits of the introduction of the Living Wage in the UK, that has drawn widespread political support, and the growing evidence of the economic benefits of substantial increases in the Minimum Wage in the US, combined with the recommendations of Bristols own Fairness Commission, does the Mayor feel that the Council should be moving away from the commitment to obtain Living Wage Accreditation?
2) With widespread support in Government for the Living Wage, and the economic savings that will flow with a broader take up of the Living Wage in the public and private sectors, will the Mayor seek to enter into discussions with the appropriate central government departments to ensure that progressive local authorities capture these saving to invest in the local community, and make representations to central government that when they support a top rate of tax of 45p, it is somewhat perverse to expect the lowest paid workers to see a marginal rate of taxation of 60p+ on the benefits they receive if they are brought up to a Living Wage income?