The document outlines general principles of evaluation that underpin quality evaluation in schools, TAFE, and strategic evaluations by state and regional offices. The principles include validity, rigor, utility, feasibility, transparency, and integrity. Validity means comprehensively and accurately identifying needs, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives. Rigor applies appropriate data collection and analysis. Utility provides timely and practical information to stakeholders. Feasibility completes evaluations within constraints and resources. Transparency includes well-justified documentation. Integrity conducts evaluations ethically and reports results clearly. Independence also applies for major strategic evaluations.
The document outlines general principles of evaluation that underpin quality evaluation in schools, TAFE, and strategic evaluations by state and regional offices. The principles include validity, rigor, utility, feasibility, transparency, and integrity. Validity means comprehensively and accurately identifying needs, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives. Rigor applies appropriate data collection and analysis. Utility provides timely and practical information to stakeholders. Feasibility completes evaluations within constraints and resources. Transparency includes well-justified documentation. Integrity conducts evaluations ethically and reports results clearly. Independence also applies for major strategic evaluations.
The document outlines general principles of evaluation that underpin quality evaluation in schools, TAFE, and strategic evaluations by state and regional offices. The principles include validity, rigor, utility, feasibility, transparency, and integrity. Validity means comprehensively and accurately identifying needs, evidence, and stakeholder perspectives. Rigor applies appropriate data collection and analysis. Utility provides timely and practical information to stakeholders. Feasibility completes evaluations within constraints and resources. Transparency includes well-justified documentation. Integrity conducts evaluations ethically and reports results clearly. Independence also applies for major strategic evaluations.
Evaluation policy: general principles (December 2010)
General manager, planning and innovation, (02) 9561 8099.
EVALUATION POLICY: GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF EVALUATION
The principles of sound evaluation underpin quality evaluation in schools and TAFE as well as major strategic evaluations by state and regional offices. The way that these principles are applied will depend on the context of the evaluation. The principles include: a. Validity: Comprehensively and accurately identifies: the needs that are to be met by an activity (e.g. program, project, strategy, policy or operational function) the evidence that would indicate whether those needs are being met, the extent to which they are being met and how the perspectives of relevant stakeholder groups, including clients/students.
b. Rigour: Soundly and systematically applies appropriate, well designed data collection methods and interpretive strategies to provide clear and accurate information that can be relied on.
c. Utility: The evaluation design is able to provide timely, accurate and practical information that meets the needs of the range of stakeholder groups.
d. Feasibility: The proposed evaluation can be completed within practical constraints and available resources and is cost effective.
e. Transparency: Comprehensive, systematic and well justified recording and reporting of all aspects of the evaluation including choice of methods and analyses and the conclusions drawn.
f. Integrity: evaluation is conducted in an ethical manner using appropriate, well designed, data collection methods and interpretive strategies reporting of results is clear, candid, comprehensive, accurate, fair and balanced.
g. Efforts are made to promote appropriate and effective use of the findings.
Evaluation policy: general principles (December 2010) General manager, planning and innovation, (02) 9561 8099.
For major strategic evaluations the principle of independence also applies i.e. individuals involved in, or responsible for the design or delivery of a program, project, strategy, or operational function will not be responsible for designing, undertaking or reporting on its evaluation.