Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Washington v. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment Et Al. (10 Civ. 9647) - Notarized Application To Appeal in Forma Pauperis (September 30, 2014)
Washington v. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment Et Al. (10 Civ. 9647) - Notarized Application To Appeal in Forma Pauperis (September 30, 2014)
Washington v. William Morris Endeavor Entertainment Et Al. (10 Civ. 9647) - Notarized Application To Appeal in Forma Pauperis (September 30, 2014)
Marcus Isaiah W a s h i n g t o n
al.
Appeal NO.
District Court or Agency No.
10 Civ. 9647
Instructions
Date:
Signed:
Income source
Average monthly
amount during the past
12 months
You
Spouse
You
Spouse
Employment
$0
$ N/A
$0
$ N/A
Self-employment
$ 40().(X)
$N/A
$400.00
$N/A
$ 0
$ N/A
$0
$N/A
violation o f 10 of the FAA and whether his 'Tir d Award" was made in violation of the same statute. Deciding whether I . ^ b & Lc b L L P attorney Christian Carbone
should have disclosed to the SDN^' or myself that he was married to an executive for the AAA - Sasha Angelique Carlxmi - who worked
as a member of the AAA'.s
AAA's "Diversity
"'Diversity C(
Committee." Deciding
whether the
the AAA
AAA allowe
allowed
I'orked closely with Lewis a.s
g whether
I,ewis and Schnader L L P to engage
in fraud, by aJlowmg
allowing Lewis to provide Schnader LLP's bank routing number and havmg WUHan
gage m
im Morris make direct payment to the firm Lmore than $1 ij'i.OOO ii 1 le; tha
iths], in violation of AAA
Employment Rule 44.
1 2/0 1 /201 j ' S C C
Deciding whether Castel's decision to issue a filing injunction against me and strip me of my in forma pauperis status winle being aware of my dire economic circumstances is further denjonstraiion of his racial bias, prejudice, partiality and
impropriety in favor of William Morris, Ij^eb & I^eb L L P , Timothy K. I_^wis, the AAA and others, warranting his disqualification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2 1 0 6 and impeachment for intentionally engaging in fraud, conspiring against rights,
conspiring to interfere with the human rights of people of African descent and depriving me ofnsy constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law, in violation of iS U.S.C. , 241, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 187 1, as codified as 4 2 U.S.C
1985(3), 4 2 U.S.C. 19S3 and IS U.S.C. 242 to name a few. [ I f the font is too small, I've included the same summary at the end of this document.]
$0
$ N/.-V
So
$N,,A
Gifts
So
$ N/A
$0
$N/A
$N/A
$0
$N/A
Alimony
Child support
$n
$N/A
$n
$N/A
$0
$ N/A
$0
$N/A
$0
$N/A
$0
$N/A
Unemployment payments
$0
$N/A
$0
$N/A
$ 174.00
$N/A
$ 174.00
$N/A
Other (specify):
$ 0
$N/A
$0
$N/A
$ 4 -574.(J<l
$0
$ i
2.
0 74.00
$0
List your employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross
monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)
Employer
Address
Dates of
employment
Gross
monthly pay
N/A
N/A
N/A
$ N/A
$
$
3.
List your spouse's employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deduciions.)
Employer
Address
N/A
N/A
Dates of
employment
N/A
Gross
monthly pay
$ N/A
$
$
-2-
4.
Financial Institution
Type o f Account
Amount your
spouse has
Bank nf America
Cliculving
$ 2-02
$ N/A
If you are a prisoner seeking to appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding, you must
attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer showing all receipts,
expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you
have multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one
certified statement of each account.
5.
List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.
Home
Motor vehicle #1
(Value) $ N / A
(Value) $ N / A
(Value) $ N A
Make and year:
Model:
Registration #:
Motor vehicle #2
Other assets
Other assets
(Value) $ N A
(Value) $ N A
(Value) S N A
6.
State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
7.
$ N/A
State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Relationship
Age
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.
Estimate the average monthly expenses ofyou and your family. Show separately the
amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly,
quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate.
You
Y o u r Spouse
$ 75.00
$ N/A
$ so.oo
$ N/A
$ N/A
$N/A
Food
$ 200.00
$N/A
Clothing
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ 15.00
$N/A
$ N/A
$N/A
-4 -
1.
Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the docket fees
for your appeal
As deninnstrated iibove, I am poor ;md am currently l ^ i n g beiow tiie j>o\-ertv level. T h e tee alnnc t n hlc a Notice n f .'Xppcal is $50.5.00
and tur m u r t than two years, I have been surviving utTof Sl-00.00 a munih in cash due to contributions from my parents. A s a result of pursuing
this "undesirable case" and challenging the discriminatory employment practices, polices and procedures of my former employer, the
William Morris Agency (now known as VVillia?n Morris Endeavor Entertainment), I have been blacklisted from this industry and it has made it
extreniel3' difMcuit for me to gain employment, e \ c n in Jobs outside of the entertainment industry. Although I have actixely looked for employment
over the last iour year.s, 1 have been un&uccessii.d due to the damage thi-s case has had on my profejisional and personal reputation. A s demonstrated
by the Dctcndjcr \ ^013 Award issued b}"^ Arbitrator D a \ i d 1 G r e g o r y of the Auicrican Arbitration .Asiiociation. T ytTi entitled to substantial
moii(.-tar3' damages including punitive damages and pr^^-se aixornev-s fees, and 1 must he gh'en the tipportunitv to ha\'e this ma.nifest injustice cun-et:red.
2.
State
Brooklyn
New Y o r k
64.B-504-6407
Y o u r years o f schooling: j j
2^
6.
State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.
7.
^'RX) Jlt'ifk
irani pay, com}"cn>;jlotT
4)ixJH?mV'JjHia5es_ [jriu-cnun auorrey tVes. ttr J
State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Relationship
Age
N/A
"N/A
S/A
8.
Estimate the average monthly expenses ofyou and your family. Show separately the
amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly,
quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate.
You
Y o u r Spouse
$ 7S.00
$ SO.Od
$N/A
$ N/A
$N/A
Food
$ 200.00
$ N/A
Clothing
$ N/A
$ N/A
$ I.xiXl
$N A
$ N/A
$ N/A
-4 -
N/A
The two key issues on appeal are: (1.) determining whether Republican appointed federal judge P. Kevin Caste!
has intentionally violated the Constitution, the law, numerous Canons under the Judicial Code of Conduct, as
well as his Oath of Office m order to deprive me of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law
due to my race, color, national origin and pro se litigant status by issumg three, one-sided Orders that are
erroneous as a matter of law and/or public policy and the Second Circuit must also determine (2.) i f attorney
Michael P. Zweig and the elite law firm Loeb & Loeb LLP have engaged in a "pattern" of "fraud upon the Court"
on William Moms"' behalf since Castel refused to acknowledge my argument, while granting the Defendants'
request to impose a filing injunction agamst m.e and prejudiced my appeal by stating it would not be made in
"good faith."
Other issues include: Determimng whether both arbitrators' decisions to enforce William Moms
arbitration agreement were made in "manifest disregard of tiie law" due to violations of 10 of die FAA and
whether Castel's decision to uphold their decisions was also made m "mamfest disregard of the law," given that
neither arbitrator cited any case law and Castel saw no problem widi that. After receiving a "Partial Final Award"
on Decem.ber 17, 2013 from .\rbitrator David L. Gregory which determ.med that William Moms "discrim.m.ated
agamst [me] m violation of pertinent federal, state, and local law prohibiting discrimination on tiie basis of race"
and mdicated that I would be awarded substantial monetary damages, die AAA disqualified Arbitrator Gregory
without reason and a new arbitrator Schnader LLP attorney Timothy K. Lewis was appointed in violation
of the AAA's rules pertainmg to disqualification. On March 17, 2013, I submitted a Fraud Upon the Court
Motion, addressing the overall fraud Loeb & Loeb LLP were engaged in before, during and after I filed my
Complaint and I used Arbitrator Gregory's Award to support that Castel's July 20,2011 Stay Order was erroneous
as both a matter of law and public policy, and to further support that arbitration was an inappropriate forum for
this particular case to achieve the public policy goals of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 given that William Moms
and its counsel never refuted the pyramid of evidence demonstrating the company's intentional pattern and
continuing practice of discriminatmg against African Americans m employment spannmg 116 years. Castel
refused to disqualify himself or stay the arbitration, and instead told me to continue in arbitrating in "good faith."
The Sec-ond Circuit must also determine whether Arbitrator Gregory's Partial Final Award was "fmal,
for the sake of judicial review" and whether the AAA had authority to disqualify the lawfully appomted arbitrator
after determining liability and mdicating what monetary relief I was entitled to in this biftircated proceedmg.
Deciding whether my due process was further violated when Castel waited to fully address the arguments
contamed in my March 17, 2014 Fraud Upon the Court Motion and April 11, 2014 Motion for Reconsideration
which also sought significant disciplinary and monetary sanctions, including default judgment and $250
million, against Michael P. Zweig, Christian Carbone, and Loeb & Loeb LLP for intentionally violating
numerous Rules under the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, violatmg the New York Judiciary Law
487 and engaging in a "pattern" of "fraud upon the Court" on William Mortis' behalf - imtil after die fraudulently
appointed arbitrator dismissed my case widi "prejudice and on the merits" on June 25, 2014 and WiUiam Moms
sought to confirm that Award.
Deciding whether Lewis unlawfully vacated the Award of Arbitrator Gregory in violation of 10 of the
FAA and whether his "Final Award" was made in violation of the same statute. Deciding whether Loeb & Loeb
LLP attorney Christian Carbone should have disclosed to the SDNY or myself that he was married to an
executive for the .A'^A Sasha Angelique Carbone - who worked closely with Lewis as a member of the .A^AA's
"Diversity Committee." Deciding whether the AAA allowed Lewis and Schnader LLP to engage in fraud, by
allowmg Lewis to provide Schnader LLP's bank routing number and having William Moms make direct
payment to the firm [more than Si 1 5,000 in less than six months], in violation of AAA Employment Rule 44.
Deciding whether Castel's decision to issue a filing injunction against me and strip me of my in forma
pauperis status while being aware of my dire economic circumstances is further demonstration of his racial bias,
prejudice, partiality and impropriety in favor of William Morris, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Timothy K. Lewis, the A,A.A
and others, warranting his disqualification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2106 and impeachment for mtentionallv
engagmg m fraud, conspirmg agamst rights, conspinng to mterfere with the human rights of people of African
descent and deprivmg me of my constitutional and statutory rights under the color of law, m violation of 18
U.S.C. , 241, the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, as codified as 42 U.S.C. 1985(3), 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 18
u s e . 242 to name a few.