This document discusses the differences between theology and religious studies. Theology emerges from a confessional perspective where religious traditions are presented as true, while religious studies takes a more objective approach to understand how humanity perceives the sacred. Religious studies views religion from an outsider perspective, seeking to make sense of it without questioning its beliefs. The document also notes that religious authority controls sacred traditions, and that popular faith among practitioners sometimes differs from official doctrine. It aims to categorize and analyze religion, not to liberate people from their beliefs.
This document discusses the differences between theology and religious studies. Theology emerges from a confessional perspective where religious traditions are presented as true, while religious studies takes a more objective approach to understand how humanity perceives the sacred. Religious studies views religion from an outsider perspective, seeking to make sense of it without questioning its beliefs. The document also notes that religious authority controls sacred traditions, and that popular faith among practitioners sometimes differs from official doctrine. It aims to categorize and analyze religion, not to liberate people from their beliefs.
This document discusses the differences between theology and religious studies. Theology emerges from a confessional perspective where religious traditions are presented as true, while religious studies takes a more objective approach to understand how humanity perceives the sacred. Religious studies views religion from an outsider perspective, seeking to make sense of it without questioning its beliefs. The document also notes that religious authority controls sacred traditions, and that popular faith among practitioners sometimes differs from official doctrine. It aims to categorize and analyze religion, not to liberate people from their beliefs.
REL 101 Theology in Confessional settings Theologians talking about their religion as true and persuading (not religious studies) No questioning what they are writing about Religious Studies emerges in the 1960s Makes sense of how humanity perceives the sacred Objective approach
Insider vs. outsider perspective Theology is from a insiders perspective God-talk Word theology literally means this Faith seeking understanding
Belief is not irrational
Religion and humanity vs. the sacred Religion is always the human response
Religious authority controls the sacred Religions have religious leaders Believers are often uninformed about their religion Faith as critical People have very intentional reasons for what they believe Communal We dont live in a world of spiritualties of I
Popular vs. institutional faith Many practitioners do things that do not go with or even go against their religion This is popular faith
Storyteller Academics create frameworks for religions to make sense of the big picture and to look for trends. Most practitioners do not do this
Categorizes religion in ways practitioners do not
Half in and half out of belief
The point is not to liberate folks from their delusions Emerges during European colonialism of Asia and Latin America Abrahamic religions are Christianity, Judaism, and Study of religion is political
Scientific study Very hard to be objective about something they cant see Initially focuses on Christianity Constitution deems religion as significant aspect of U.S. life Hard to say separation of church and state has been successful Viewed as subjective belief and individual preference In the US religion is viewed as a choice, very rarely in other parts of the world Subject not a method Better understanding of self and others Part of being an educated person Over 90% of humanity is religious Globally religion is growing History and current events Lifes big questions Is this it? Religions teach that your actions in this life affect you in another