Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness: Date: Name: Product: Process

    Uploaded by

    shuklahouse
    19 views1 page
    This document summarizes the results of a study evaluating the reliability of three operators conducting visual inspections of wiring harnesses. Each operator inspected 30 samples and indicated whether they passed or failed. Their responses were compared to the known condition of the samples and to each other. The percentage of matches between each operator and the known condition was over 90% for all operators. When comparing the operators to each other, they agreed on their assessments for most but not all samples. The overall effectiveness of the inspection process, as measured by the percentage of matches to the known condition across all operators, was 93.33%.

    Original Description:

    MSA_ATTRIBUTE_EXCEL_FORMAT

    Original Title

    Attribute MSA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes the results of a study evaluating the reliability of three operators conducting visual inspections of wiring harnesses. Each operator inspected 30 samples and indicated whether they passed or failed. Their responses were compared to the known condition of the samples and to each other. The percentage of matches between each operator and the known condition was over 90% for all operators. When comparing the operators to each other, they agreed on their assessments for most but not all samples. The overall effectiveness of the inspection process, as measured by the percentage of matches to the known condition across all operators, was 93.33%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    19 views1 page

    Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness: Date: Name: Product: Process

    Uploaded by

    shuklahouse
    This document summarizes the results of a study evaluating the reliability of three operators conducting visual inspections of wiring harnesses. Each operator inspected 30 samples and indicated whether they passed or failed. Their responses were compared to the known condition of the samples and to each other. The percentage of matches between each operator and the known condition was over 90% for all operators. When comparing the operators to each other, they agreed on their assessments for most but not all samples. The overall effectiveness of the inspection process, as measured by the percentage of matches to the known condition across all operators, was 93.33%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Data Entry

    Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


    SCORING REPORT
    DATE: 18.03.2008
    Attribute Legend NAME: Rajeev Kumar
    1 pass PRODUCT: Wiring Harness
    2 fail PROCESS: Visual Inspection
    Known Population Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3 Y/N Y/N
    Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Agree Agree
    1 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    2 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    3 fail fail fail fail pass fail fail N N
    4 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    5 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    6 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    7 pass fail fail fail fail fail fail Y N
    8 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    9 fail pass pass pass pass pass pass Y N
    10 fail pass pass fail fail fail fail N N
    11 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    12 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    13 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    14 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    15 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    16 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    17 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    18 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    19 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    20 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    21 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    22 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    23 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    24 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    25 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    26 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    27 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    28 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    29 pass pass pass pass pass pass pass Y Y
    30 fail fail fail fail fail fail fail Y Y
    % APPRAISER SCORE
    (1)
    -> 100.00% 96.67% 100.00%
    % SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE
    (2)
    -> 90.00% 90.00% 93.33%
    SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE
    (3)
    -> 93.33%
    SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE
    (4)
    -> 86.67%
    Note:
    (1) If % Appraiser Score is less than 100% training needs to occur, focus on specific areas
    (2) % Score vs. Attribute is an error against known population as deemed by experts
    (3) 100% is the target for Screen % Effectiveness Score
    (4) Sceen % Effective vs. Attribute is an error against a known population as deemed by the experts
    (5) Attribute legend can be what defect codes are needing a score
    Page 1

    You might also like