34

- (, - );
- - .
,
,
.
, - , ..
.
-
. ,
-

- . , ,
,
.
, ..
,
.
, -
, , , ..

,
.

:
1. .. . 1955, 1, - . 12.
2. .. . ., 1964, - . 5.
3. .., .., .. . .: , 1995. . 118 150.
4. .., .., .. . . 2004. . 44-46, 57-64, 91-93.
5.Manfred Oehmichen. Hypothermia. Clinical, Pathomorfological and Forensic Features. Research in legal Medicine, volume 31//2004 274 s.
.. , .. , .. , 2006
340.624

.. , .. , ..


- (. . .. )

( 116, 116). -

, .
67,7-70,7%, 76,3%.
75-80% .
: , , , ,
.
USAGE OF DERMATOGLYPHIC AND DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS
FOR DEFINITION OF HUMAN SEX BELONGING
V.N.Zvyagin, O.I.Galitskaya, A.G.Cidorenko
Finger-marks of left and right palms of Russians and Ukrainian (male - 116 and female - 116) have been studied. Statistical treatment discovered sexual dimorphism. There was estimated diagnostic model for examination of left, right and both
palms at one time. Accuracy of diagnostic by one palm was 67,7-70,7%, by both palms 76,3%. Complex usage of diagnostic
models allows estimating human sex belonging in 75-80%.
Key words: palm dermatoglyphic, sexual dimorphism, canonical discriminant analysis.

[5 - 8, 15, 16].
..
[9], .. [2], .. [12], ..
[14] .. [11].
. ,
,
[13].
,
( ), (

). ,
1 , .
, , , . ,
, .
: 1- , 2-
3- [3, 4].
,
, (
) .
, , -

35

. 1.
: H - ; Th ; distalis, proksimalis, ulnaris, radialis
.
,
[1].

?

-

.

( 116, 116).

D1 D5*,
(. 1), .. .
1. D1 :
) D1 ;
b) D1 D2;
) D1
() .
2. D2 :
) D2 ;
b) D2 D3.
3. (D3) :
a) D3 ;
b) D3 D4;
c) D3 (
);
* a, b, c, d, t Cammins a. Midlo, 1962

. 2.
(H) ( H. Cummins, C. Midlo, 1961*)
: W, Ws ; Lr, Lu, Lc ,
; Tu, Tr, Tc t- () ()
, .
d) () .
4. (D4) :
a) D4
;
b) D4 .
5. (D5) :
a) D5 ;
b) D5
( ,
t- . (. 2).

13
- SPSS.

1.
, D1a, D2c, D3b D4b,
D1a D5b.
.
D1b ( ) D1 ( ).
()

( 1), ( 2), ( 3):
*Cummins H., Midlo C. Finger Prints, Palms and Soles. An Introduction to
Detmatoglyphics. New York: Dover Publications, 1961, . 101.

36

D1a

20,460,23

18,740,26

0,005

20,340,23

18,780,32

0,005

D1b

42,640,43

43,440,51

> 0,05

42,560,54

44,210,51

0,05

D1c

25,150,30

23,510,28

0,005

23,700,37

23,310,42

0,5

D2a

10,750,42

8,540,25

0,005

9,700,12

9,520,30

0,05

D2b

27,650,46

28,110,53

0,05

25,930,50

26,360,43

0,05

D3a

9,400,25

9,240,26

0,50

10,100,46

9,560,21

0,50

D3b

40,420,48

38,950,51

0,005

39,570,54

38,740,53

0,05

D3c

13,130,99

13,250,88

0,50

14,690,75

13,830,51

0,50

D3d

25,540,54

24,100,56

0,05

23,580,52

23,850,60

0,50

D4a

14,830,12

14,050,37

0,05

14,740,32

14,090,24

0,50

D4b

27,230,37

25,370,45

0,005

27,420,38

26,170,45

0,05

D5a

27,502,45

31,003,56

0,05

30,502,46

28,503,77

0,05

D5b

12,190,60

11,510,89

0,05

9,970,66

12,410,91

0,005

, 1 2
0,490 4,620. ,
.
, .
Pl 2, l = 1 .
1 l = 0,490 0,447 = 0,043
2 l = 4,620 0,447 = 4,173.
Pl<0,500, Pl=0,985.
2
Pl = 1 / (1 + e - l ) l, . . [10]

1 = 0,086 (D1) + 0,076 (D1) + 0,052(D3b) +

0,055(D5) 5,951
: 0,447, -0,447.
0,409.
:
73,3%, 68,1%, 70,7%.
2 = 0,151 (D2a) 0,136 (D3a) + 0,035 (D3b) + 0,049
(D5b) 1,706
: 0,464, 0,464.
: 0,424
:
60,3%, 75%, 67,7%.

Pl

0,500

0,525

0,550

0,574

0,599

0,622

0,646

0,668

0,690

0,711

0,731

0,750

0,768

0,786

0,802

0,818

0,832

0,846

0,858

0,870

0,881

0,891

0,900

0,909

0,917

0,924

0,931

0,937

0,943

0,948

0,953

0,957

0,961

0,934

0,968

0,971

0,973

0,976

0,978

0,980

0,982

0,984

0,985

0,987

0,988

0,989

0,990

0,991

0,992

0,993

0,9933

0,9939

0,9945

0,9950

0,9955

0,9959

0,9963

0,9967

0,9970

0,9990

0,9975

0,9978

0,9980

0,9982

0,9984

0,9986

0,9987

0,9988

0,9989

0,9990

: l - 0,0 6,9.
3 = 0,129 (D2a) 0,142 (D3a) + 0,032 (D5b) + 0,068
(D1a) + 0,053 (D3b) + 0,054 (D4b) 4,845
: 0,607, 0,612
: 0,522
:
76,5%, 75%, 76,3%.
3 , .
, . .
, 1 3, .

:
Pl 0,75 ,
0,75 < Pl 0,95 ,
Pl 0,95 .
, 1 = 0,490
, 2 = 4,620
,
.
-
- ( 17, 17). :
20 , 7, 3.

37

1.
,

.
2.
. 75-80%
.

:
1. .., .., .., .. // : ( ) ., 2002. . 113 -137.
2. .. : . . . . ., 2000. . 24.
3. .. // .-. . 1961. - 1. . 48-53.
4. .. . , 1986. . 160.
5. .. // : ( ). ., 2002, . 81 112.
6. .. ( ) // - . II - , ., 1926, . 82-99.
7. .. // - . II
- , , 1926, . 103-106.
8. .. // II -
, , 1926, . 99-102.
9. .. - .
. . . ... . 1992. 19 .
10. .. . .: , 1975, . 252, 282 284.
11. .. . . . . . , 2005. . 16.
12. ..
- . . . . . , 2002. . 19.
13. .., .. // , . 1. ., 1997.
14. .. ( - ). . . . . ... .: . . - . .. , 2003. 25 .

.. , .. , 2006
340.61

.. , ..
-

- (. ... .. )
, .
.
: , , .
TOPICALITY OF LEGAL - BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF SPERM DEPENDING
ON PRESCRIPTION OF FORMATION OF THE SAMPLE
Y.A. Averyanova, O.A. Dmitrieva
Urgency of forensic and biological research depending on antiquity of production of the sample of the sperm, the article contents data of increasing numbers of biological researches together with low percent of its detection. Shorr method suggested
by the authors will broaden morphological method of coloring of spermatozoa of great term of antiquity.
Key words: biological researches, spermatozoa, Shorr method.

,
.
, , ( ,
, ,

.).
,
-
- [9]. ,

, ,
.
,
, [8]. , : ,
, ,
, , - ,
, ,

, . [1, 3, 5, 6, 10]. -