Average Post-Assessment Score: 74.29% (without outlier, 76.92%)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Number of Students Score Pre-Assessment Data 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Number of Students Score Post-Assessment Data Summative Assessment Data: Analysis and Reflection When I gave my pre-assessment, I was surprised to see that most students understood the content well enough to score in the 60-80% range. Most questions missed were questions that used new vocabulary (communication, recreation) or concerned similarities and differences between items. As a result, I focused more heavily on higher-level thinking questions throughout the unit and did not spend much time on being able to identify each item. Students scores increased slightly on the post- assessment, indicating that they made gains in being able to use new vocabulary and compare and contrast past and present items. I intended for the pre-assessment and post-assessment to be identical to truly show gains in understanding, but I did not teach all ten lessons of my unit, so I modified the post-assessment accordingly. I believe this assessment was an adequate indicator of student knowledge, though I believe some students were confused by the format of the multiple-choice questions (questions 9 and 10). Since the test was given orally, it was difficult for several students to attend to the question and answer choices. I wanted to assess students ability to compare and contrast items covered in the unit, but since not all students are able to write independently, I was somewhat limited in my ability to do so. Oral assessment may have been possible in a small group setting, and this would be an option to explore if I taught this unit again. Overall, I feel this assessment was effective and my data show gains in student learning.