Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effect of Molecular Weight On The Rate of Diffusion of Substances
The Effect of Molecular Weight On The Rate of Diffusion of Substances
where d
i
= diameter of colored area at a given time
d
i-t
= diameter of colored area immediately before d
i
t
i
= time when d
i
was measured
t
i-t
= time immediately before t
i
All computed values were tabulated and the mean of the computed partial rates
of each substance was calculated. The average rate of diffusion of each substance
against molecular weight was plotted. Partial rates of each substance at a specific time
were plotted for analysis and interpretation.
8
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1 shows the distances of the smoke ring from the hydrochloric acid (HCl)
and the ammonium hydroxide (NH
4
OH) introduced to each sides of the glass tube. This
smoke is ammonium chloride (NH
4
Cl), the product formed between the reaction of
NH
4
OH and HCl. It was observed that the distance of the smoke ring was significantly
closer to the HCl side of the glass tube than the ammonium side, ranging from 9 to 11.3
centimeters as opposed to the distance measured from the NH
4
OH side which ranges
from 21 to 28.5 centimeters.
Computing for the average distances of the HCl-to-ring and NH
4
OH-to-ring
values, the HCl side has a lesser value (10.8 cm) than the NH
4
OH side (25.8 cm). This
means that the site of the initial reaction occurred nearer the HCl.
Hydrochloric acid has a molecular weight of 36.4611 grams per mole (g/mol)
while ammonium hydroxide has a molecular weight of 35.0459 g/mol. HCl has a heavier
molecular weight which means it should diffuse at a slower rate compared to NH
4
OH, as
observed in the experiment. Since NH
4
OH diffused at a faster rate, it reached the HCl
side faster than HCl reaching the NH
4
OH side of the glass tube. This resulted in the
formation of the smoke ring as the first indication that the NH
4
OH molecules have met
and reacted with the HCl molecules coming from the opposite side of the tube at a point
on the glass tube nearer the side of the HCl.
9
Table 1. Distance of the smoke ring from the hydrochloric acid and ammonium
hydroxide to the sides of each glass tube.
Trial
Distance (cm)
(d)
Total
distance
(D)
Ratio
d
HCl
d
NH3
d
HCl
D
d
NH3
D
NH
3
HCl
1 9 31 40 cm 0.225 0.775 3.44
2 12 28 40 cm 0.300 0.700 2.33
3 11.3 28.5 39.8 cm 0.284 0.716 2.52
Average 10.8 25.8 39.9 cm 0.270 0.730 2.39
Based on the above stated data, we could deduce that the measured rates of
diffusion of a series of molecules are proportional to the molecular weights of diffusing
substances. The hypothesis If the molecular weight affects the rate of diffusion of
substances, then the higher the molecular weight, the slower the diffusion was tested
on the next experiment.
Fig 3. Potassium permanganate (KMnO
4
), potassium dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
)
and methylene blue drops at 0 minutes.
K
2
Cr
2
O
7
KMNO
4
methylene blue
10
Fig 4. Potassium permanganate (KMnO
4
), potassium dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
)
and methylene blue drops after 30 minutes.
Concerning the water-agar gel experiment (Figs 3 and 4) using the substances
Potassium permanganate (KMnO
4
), potassium dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
) and methylene
blue, a clearer relationship seemed to emerge when the average rate of diffusion of
each substance was computed and then graphed.
In Table 2, results showed that after 30 minutes, potassium permanganate
(KMnO
4
), with a molecular weight of 158 g/mole, obtained the smallest diameter (6.273
mm) than the other two substances, potassium dichromate (12.545 mm), which had the
largest diameter, and methylene blue (8.205 mm). The observation showed
disagreement with the aforementioned hypothesis since we found no substance
supporting the theory increase in molecular weight means a decrease in diameter of
area of coloration.
K
2
Cr
2
O
7
KMNO
4
methylene blue
11
Table 2. Diameter of potassium permanganate, potassium dichromate, and
Methylene blue drops on water-agar gel at three minute intervals for 30
minutes.
Time
(minute)
Diameter (mm)
Potassium
permanganate
(MW 158 g/mole)
Potassium
dichromate
(MW 294 g/mole)
Methylene
Blue
(MW 374 g/mole)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
6
6
6
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6
6
7
8
9
12
14
15
17
21
23
6
6
6
6
6.25
7
8
9
11
12
13
Average 6.273 12.545 8.205
In Table 3, as time increases, the partial rate of diffusion of each substance
generally decreases. The relationship of the partial rate of diffusion of substances was
plotted against the time elapsed as shown in Fig 5. Within the 30-minute observation,
potassium dichromate had the highest average rate of diffusion at the rate of 0.533
mm/min., followed by methylene blue (0.233 mm/min.) and potassium permanganate
(0.017 mm/min.). This was presented through a bar graph in Fig 6, showing the
average rate of diffusion against the molecular weight of substances.
12
Table 3. Partial rate of diffusion of potassium permanganate, potassium dichromate,
and methylene blue at three minute intervals for 30 minutes.
Time elapsed
(minute)
Partial rates of diffusion (mm/min.)
Potassium
permanganate
(MW 158 g/mole)
Potassium
dichromate
(MW 294 g/mole)
Methylene
Blue
(MW 374 g/mole)
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
30
0
0
0.083
0
0
0
0.083
0
0
0
0
0.333
0.333
0.333
1
0.667
0.333
0.667
1
0.667
0
0
0
0.083
0.25
0.333
0.333
0.667
0.333
0.333
Average rate
of diffusion
(mm/min.)
0.017 0.533 0.233
Fig 5. A line graph showing the partial rates of diffusion of potassium permanganate
(KMnO
4
), potassium dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
) and methylene blue against. the time
elapsed.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
P
a
r
t
i
a
l
R
a
t
e
o
f
D
i
f
f
u
s
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
m
i
n
)
Time Ellapsed (min)
Potassium permanganate
Potasium dichromate
Methylene Blue
13
Fig 6. A graph showing the average rate of diffusion of potassium permanganate
(KMnO
4
), potassium dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
) and methylene blue vs. their
molecular weight.
Going against the formulated hypothesis, our experiment showed some sort of
inconsistency with our above mentioned hypothesis on the first experiment. According
to Chang, the rate of diffusion of a substance is affected by its molecular weight. As the
molecular weight increases, the rate of diffusion is generally low. This is because the
larger the size of a particle, a greater amount of force, in this case, thermal energy is
required to move the particle (Chang, 1998). Conversely, our experiment showed no
substance (neither of the three substance introduced in the water agar-gel) to support
the aforementioned hypothesis on the first experiment.
It may be hard to admit but this inconsistency maybe due to some human errors
that the group made upon the conduct of the experiment: (a) unequal amount of
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Potassium
permanganate
(158 g/mole)
Potassium dichromate
(294 g/mole)
Methylene Blue
(374 g/mole)
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
R
t
a
e
o
f
D
i
f
f
u
s
i
o
n
(
m
m
/
m
i
n
)
Molecular Weight (g/mole)
14
substances dropped on the water-agar gel, and (b) accidentally the water-agar gel was
moved and transferred from one place-to-another.
Some factors may have affected the rate of diffusion of the substances in the
experiment which may have led to inaccurate results. Such factors may include but are
not limited to inconsistent temperatures and concentrations, the type of medium used,
or handling and execution of the experiment.
15
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
The effect of molecular weight and the rate of diffusion were determined using
the water-agar gel set-up. One drop of potassium permanganate (KMnO
4
), potassium
dichromate (K
2
Cr
2
O
7
) and methylene blue were simultaneously placed on individual
wells on the agar. The diameter of the colored areas were measured and recorded at
regular three minute intervals for 30 minutes.
Results showed that potassium permanganate produced the smallest diameter at
6.2mm, as compared to potassium dichromate which produced the largest diameter at
12.545mm, followed by methylene with a diameter of 8.205mm. Potassium
permanganate diffused the slowest with the lowest average rate of diffusion at 0.017
mm/min. as compared to potassium dichromate (0.533mm/min.) and methylene blue
(0.233 mm/min.).
Conversely, our experiment showed no substance to support our aforementioned
hypothesis. This may be due to human error or to a number of possible reasons.
However, these speculations need to be validated by further experiments. There are
other factors which may affect the rate of diffusion. Such factors may include varied
temperatures, different amounts of substance, the type of medium used, or handling
and execution of the experiment. It is recommended that the same test should be
performed in a well isolated system, free of other factors which may affect the rate of
diffusion other than the controlled variable.
16
LITERATURE CITED
Chang, R. 1998. Chemistry. 6
th
ed. Boston: James M. Smith.
Everett, G.W and G.W. Everett, Jr. (n.d.). Diffusion of Gases and Grahams Law.
Retrieved Aug. 14, 2011 from http://www.cerlabs.com/experiments/
1087540412X.pdf
Meyertholen, E. (n.d.) Diffusion. Retrieved Aug. 14, 2011 from http://www.austincc.edu/
~emeyerth/diffuse2.htm
Nave, R. 2008. Diffusion. Retrieved Aug. 14, 2011 from http://hyperphysics.phy-
astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/diffus.html
Weiss, G. 1994. Aspects and Applications of the Random Walk. Amsterdam,
Netherlands: North-Holla
Duka, IMA and Diaz, MGQ (n.d.) Biology I Laboratory Manual: An Investigative
Approach 9
th
Edition. UP Los Baos, College, Laguna, Philippines. 2009