A Literature Review on Leadership in the Early Years

April 2008
Aline-Wendy Dunlop
This Literature Review updates the review undertaken in 2005 by Aline-Wendy Dunlop supported by
Colleen Clinton. It is based on key documents, conference presentations, research studies and other
relevant data published since 2000. A few key references prior to that date are included. An overall
summary of findings is offered, supported by a prcis of some key first-hand sources referred to in the
summary.
0
Contents
Contents
Introduction
Overview
Definitions of Leadership in the Early Years
Leadership and Gender in the Early Years
Leadership and Professionalism
Effective Educational Leadership in Early Years Models and
Key Aspects
The Need for Training in Leadership in the Early Years
Relating Early Childhood Leadership to the Early Years of
Primary School
The Wider Leadership Literature
Conclusions
Key Points Emerging from the Literature on Leadership in the
Early Years
Sources Reviewed
References
Further Bibliography
Page 1
Page 2
Page 2
Page 4
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 18
Page 19
Page 21
Page 25
Page 27
Page 29
Page 40
Page 51
1
Introduction
This literature review aimed to locate the national and international research and documentary evidence
relating to leadership in the early years sector. A wide-ranging search was undertaken, including electronic
databases and search engines such as ERIC, Google Scholar, a range of websites including research
associations and government sites, as well as a trawl of printed and electronic journals on leadership and
early years. The choice of material to include was based on clear management, leadership and early years
criteria. As we found the literature to be limited, we approached particular authors known to have published
in this area to enquire after further sources this has allowed us to tap into a number of theses and
unpublished papers: where we have done so we have relied on the research records of the authors as
validation of the sources: their research methodology and a clear evidence base for any claims made was
important. While articles in peer-reviewed journals form a major part of reviewed materials, there was much
of interest to be found in conference papers, books, professional journals and research reports, and we have
therefore included materials from these sources as well. We present an overview of findings, followed by
key points to be drawn out of the review. We finish with a section which provides a summary of each of our
sources.
Overview
Good leadership is critical to a successful school. Success comes from aiming high with the clear vision,
ethos and communication that good leadership brings. We will act to support high quality school leadership
and inspired, ambitious school communities.
(Ambitious, Excellent Schools Our Agenda for Action, Scottish Executive, 2004, p5)
The Scottish Executive states that it sees the role of leadership in schools and the wider educational
community growing in importance (Scottish Executive, 2005, p2). The importance the Executive attaches
to leadership and development of leadership capacity is reflected in the leadership agenda set out in
Ambitious, Excellent Schools (Scottish Executive, 2004a; Scottish Executive, 2005). These documents make
the link between effective leadership, leadership development and pupils school success. The stated
intention is that by assisting schools in their leadership work, not adding to their workload (Scottish
Executive, 2005), schools will be more able to develop pupils capacities as successful learners, confident
individuals, responsible citizens and effective contributors to society (A Curriculum for Excellence, Scottish
Executive, 2004).
This literature review reveals that before our new Scottish initiative to address the curriculum 318,
leadership in the early years sector has been virtually ignored at governmental level this is an international
rather than a purely Scottish phenomenon, and is reflected most strongly in the growing literature on
leadership in early childhood emerging from New Zealand (McLeod, 2003; Meade, 2003; Scrivens, 2003,
2004; Thornton, 2005). It should be acknowledged that the New Zealand context for early childhood
services is different from our own. In Scotland since 2000 early childhood education has become a duty of
provision on local authorities, and the connection with the statutory school sector is a long established one,
whereas in New Zealand state provision of early childhood services is relatively new and not yet universal.
Where experience converges is in the complex and different nature of leadership in early childhood by
comparison with the statutory school sector, and the importance of early childhood services being managed
in informed collaborative, co-operative and community-oriented ways.
Leadership in the early years assumes great importance in this context and earlier assumptions that a focus
on early years leadership was unnecessary because of the existing team approaches which mark early
childhood services can be seen through evidence reported in this review to be no longer tenable. Indeed, the
academic sector in Scotland continues to respond to this need through provision of undergraduate and
postgraduate early childhood (08) degrees (eg University of Strathclyde, BA in Childhood Practice, BA in
Education and Social Services, and Postgraduate Certificate, Diploma and MSc in Early Childhood Studies).
Such courses promote reflection, enquiry and self-evaluation, all qualities of effective leadership (Harris and
2
Lambert, 2003), and provide important opportunities for leadership development. In England these have
become more specific through the advent of the Early Excellence Centres, and opportunities such as the MA
in Leadership and Management in Early Childhood (Whalley, 2003) and the National College for School
Leadership (2005) courses. A few main texts also support practitioners, particularly Jillian Rodds book,
now in its third edition (2005), and Sadek and Sadek (2004), whose book is specifically written for
Vocational Qualifications Level 3 (practitioner) and 4 (lead practitioner) students and those working in
management within a childcare setting.
The relationship between effective leadership and pupils achievement is strongly evidenced through school
inspection. Effective leadership has a perceptible impact on pupils learning (HMIE, 2000). While
leadership has been found to be central to successful schools, equally there is scope for improving the
quality of that leadership (HMIE, 2000): managers often focused overly on the day-to-day without being
strategic in the longer term. The complementary nature of leadership and management is often assumed;
however, in the educational literature a distinction is clearly drawn: leadership is perceived to include vision,
based on shared values. Leaders are better placed to provide both motivation and direction to colleagues
(HMIE, 2000).
Key aims of SEEDs broad leadership programme include increased collaboration among the key groups
who contribute to the development of leadership capacity in Scottish education and developing excellence
and capacity building across the educational system. Leadership development priorities should be identified,
innovation generated, expertise and new approaches developed in order to contribute to a general
strengthening of leadership capacity (Scottish Executive, 2005).
This link between leadership and effective provision is also true for early childhood settings, where research
indicates that leaders play an important part in the provision of quality services. Effective leadership has
been found to be a key element of effective early childhood provision (Muijs et al, 2004; Harris et al, 2002;
Rodd, 2005). Other factors that have contributed to the focus on leadership include pressure for increasing
professionalisation and accountability from within and outside the profession (Rodd, 2005).

Definitions of Leadership in the Early Years
Traditionally leadership in the early years has been associated with individual skills characteristics and
personal qualities in the leader (Nivala and Hujala, 2002). A more recent view of leadership is that it is not
an isolated activity invested in a single person, but rather that a variety of people contribute to effective
leadership, and that leadership is therefore distributed. If this is the case, then preparation for leadership has
to go beyond individual management training since leadership capacities will need to be more widely
developed in the team: how then can leadership qualities be developed? Currently in England the National
College for School Leadership is actively promoting development opportunities. As part of its Community
Leadership Strategy it has introduced the first national programme to address the needs of leaders within
multi-agency early years settings. The new qualification is called the National Professional Qualification in
Integrated Centre Leadership (National College for School Leadership, 2005): it recognises that leadership
in the early years has a distinctive focus, particularly as integrated services develop and mixed staffing
models continue to be a feature of early childhood work.
A view that leadership is about personal attributes and therefore about a single person playing a leadership
role into which is built notions of competition and power (Thornton, 2005) does not sit easily with the
collaborative approaches upon which early childhood practice is predicated. Early years prior-to-school
services are often non-hierarchical and most employees are women (Ebbeck and Waniganayake, 2003;
Rodd, 2005). This fairly flat structure means that distributive leadership models tend to be preferred in early
childhood settings, though the Pen Green website (Pen Green, 2005) asserts that if we are to transform
childrens life chances this can only be done through visionary leadership.
3
The early childhood sector is growing and a vast majority of our families now take advantage of pre-school
education (Scottish Executive, 2004a). Childcare and early education settings are diverse, including nursery
classes, primary schools, private and voluntary settings (Dunlop, 2003; Muijs et al, 2004; Solly, 2003).
These different settings often have contrasting philosophies, structures and a range of quality assurance
models: Muijs et al (2004) report that they are inspected by different bodies. In Scotland there has been an
integration of Care Commission and HMIE inspection through the joint inspection process.
A study conducted by Solly (2003) found that there was a difference in who was seen as a leader in various
types of early childhood settings. In nursery classes, primary schools, private and voluntary settings,
respondents saw the official leader (owner, headteacher) as the only leader, but responses from nursery
schools and excellence centres gave broader interpretations. Early years educators interpret their leadership
differently according to the setting in which they are based. For example, Osgood reports that private-sector
providers were more likely to apply business principles to the management of their settings, while those
managing voluntary-sector settings were much less comfortable with an entrepreneurial agenda (Osgood,
2004). Private nursery managers tend to have a less collaborative and community-centred approach to
leadership because of fears of competition (Osgood, 2004) endangering making profits.
In a study of nursery teachers concepts of leadership conducted in the West of Scotland, nursery teachers
working predominantly in nursery schools and nursery classes see themselves with a strong leadership
obligation that is not always recognised by their managers: they draw a distinction between leadership and
management (Dunlop, 2002; Dunlop, 2005). These teachers recognise distinctive areas of work on which
they lead including teaching, planning, observing children, undertaking assessments, evaluation,
identification of team development needs, record keeping, working with and reporting to parents, organising
time, space and resources, and organisation of people. They also identify a responsibility to report to the
head of establishment to keep that person informed of current work in the nursery class: this last activity is
confined to teachers in nursery classes, as opposed to a nursery teacher in a free-standing nursery where the
sole focus of effort is on early years provision. Nursery teachers reported a role ambiguity, as they were
expected to perform a day-to-day role as both team members and team leaders whilst not being accorded a
specific leadership or management role.
The early years workforce comprises a wide range of personnel, each with different experience, training and
qualifications. Solly (2003) highlights the number of young and inexperienced staff working in the sector
and emphasises that the specific leadership context is multi-professional, primarily female, and socially and
culturally varied. In June 2004 a news release on the Review of the Early Years Workforce in Scotland
showed that the number employed in the early years nursery sector had risen to over 30,000 people in
Scotland (Scottish Executive, 2004). Focusing on five key areas, this review aimed to:
examine and define the role and responsibilities of staff in all areas of the early years and childcare
workforce
improve workforce planning, to ensure that there are adequate staff numbers in each area
simplify and modernise the early years and childcare qualifications system
provide greater opportunities for staff in one area of the workforce to move to another
consider the potential implications of this work for pay and conditions.
Role definition is reported in the literature to be problematic in terms of leadership in the early years. The
Effective Provision of Pre-school Education Project found a strong relationship between the qualifications
of the centre manager and quality of service provision in early childhood settings (Muijs et al, 2004, p7).
The diversity of this workforce makes a particularly complex arena for leadership (Osgood, 2004; Rodd,
2005). Additionally there is a serious lack of leadership training for early childhood managers: it is likely
that many are significantly under-prepared for this role. Research based on and drawing from the work of
early childhood practitioners suggests that too often positions of leadership in early childhood settings tend
4
to be held by accidental leaders with minimal training to carry out their responsibilities (Ebbeck and
Waniganayake, 2003; Rodd, 2005). Ebbeck and Waniganayake call for clear definitions of roles and lines of
responsibility, and in turn explore ways in which obstacles to effective leadership and management can be
identified and overcome.
Characteristics traditionally associated with effective early childhood leaders include kindness and warmth.
The study conducted by Solly (2003) showed that parents who entrust their young children to staff must see
them as warm and gentle, thereby adding to the perception that the early years phase is the phase before real
education. Solly found that the early years phase appeared to educators and others outside as lacking
academic rigour, based on the perception that society perceives the education of older children to be more
difficult and more academically demanding. The huge range of qualifications, multi-professional career
structure and conditions of service, together with the stigma of early years only being about play, may
have created a divide between early years and later school education. In Scotland, where primary teachers
have traditionally been trained to work with children aged 312 years, the current volume of teachers in
initial teacher education (ITE) has led to difficulties in placing ITE students in pre-school settings staffed by
qualified teachers: a situation exacerbated by government initiatives that have opened the door to a notion of
teacher presence that may not be full-time.
Leadership and Gender in the Early Years
Leadership in early years services very often (though not exclusively) resides in female heads of centre. The
gender of leadership may be a way in which leadership in early childhood is set apart from other sectors of
education. According to Rodd (2005), women have problems identifying the concept and need for
leadership: they may lack understanding of what leadership may mean in an early childhood service. In this
sector the concept of leadership can involve sets of reciprocal relationships (Dunlop, 2005) and these have
more in common with the early childhood pedagogical approaches than with traditional business concepts of
leadership. There is a view that suggests that leadership styles differ between male and female leaders:
recent studies do not provide the evidence to support this (Muijs, 2004).
However, Solly (2003) found that the vast majority of early childhood leaders in her study thought there was
a difference in leadership styles between their sector and others. A social constructivist model of learning is
often advocated in early years, and Solly finds that early childhood leaders own positive learning
dispositions enable others. Participants saw their strengths as advocacy, inspiration, passion and enthusiasm
along with being a lifelong learner and having a team ethos (Solly, 2003).
In Osgoods study the sample was almost exclusively female. They voiced concerns based on perceptions
that governments push towards commercial models of childcare management favoured masculinised
entrepreneurialism over an ethic of care. The emphasis on caring amongst managers in early childhood
settings was paramount. However, Osgood (2004) found that managers in early childhood settings believe
that their commitment to care and to the local community and parents could embrace more commercial
approaches provided these were feminised and took account of their emotional investment and commitment
to work. They wish to enhance their professionalism, whilst maintaining an ethic of care and resisting a form
of entrepreneurship that in their view might be detrimental to provision (Osgood, 2004) and overly
masculinised. Past models and traditional leadership theories may not have been appropriate to the early
childhood field in that they reflected a hierarchical, top-down, male-oriented orientation (Kagan and
Bowman, 1997) mostly adopted from those used in the business world.
The majority of practitioners in Osgoods studies thought that businesslike approaches to management were
inappropriate in childcare. The importance of collaboration and mutual support was stressed and this is more
in concert with new theories on leadership: in the voluntary sector this extended to managers of voluntary
sector provision working within their own settings and with other provision to develop collaborative
practices (Osgood, 2004). In these studies women saw the importance of emotional management skills
5
essential in the nurturing environments which are childrens right. Many women in early childhood
education thus feel that most masculinised leadership models are inappropriate to early childhood
education as they do not recognise and respect the collaborative aspect crucial to this phase (Scrivens in
Nivala and Hujala, 2002).
Leadership and Professionalism
Dalli (2005) in reflecting on professionalism in the early years highlights the importance of relationships and
responsiveness in effective early childhood practice. She asserts that the discourse of early childhood
professionals has changed from childcare workers to educators and that this is part of constructing a
scholarly base for the early childhood profession. She voices love as a legitimate part of early childhood
practice. In arguing for a new definition of professionalism to fit early childhood work, by extension the
implication is for new concepts of leadership as well. She conducted a survey of ethics and professionalism
(2003) which aimed to establish a grounds-up definition of professionalism, and found three key themes in
childcare teachers statements about what matters in professionalism in the early childhood field in New
Zealand: these were pedagogy, professional knowledge and skills, and collaborative relationships including
management. In this last theme teachers felt it was important to be able to demonstrate leadership by
exhibiting management knowledge and skills, being able to articulate concerns in a confident manner,
demonstrating a knowledge of current educational research, and being aware of the educational political
environment.
Additionally, Scrivens, also working in New Zealand, highlights that women prefer a model of leadership
which, citing Hall (1996), embraces power for rather than power over someone. Nevertheless, women in
leadership roles appear both to be able to share leadership and to take the lead when required (Scrivens,
2002).
Effective Educational Leadership in Early Years models and key aspects
Beyond early childhood there is a growing consensus about the methods and approaches which contribute to
effective educational leadership development (Scottish Executive, 2005). There is a wide range of theories
on leadership (Nivala in Nivala and Hujala, ed, 2002). Many of the authors writing in Nivala and Hujala
argue that leadership, change, collaboration and improvement will happen only if there is interaction
between leaders and followers. Leadership is realised in relationships between the leader and the followers
and is not just a personal quality but happens in a social context. Leaders set the standards and the
expectations for others to follow. The more recent statements around educational leadership sit well with
perceptions held within early childhood that effective early childhood leaders need characteristics and skills
which are related to team work, motivation, support, role definition and goal setting (Rodd, 2005). Building
relationships, shared decision-making and empowerment of others are seen as important characteristics of
good leadership in early years (Scrivens in Nivala and Hujala, 2002).
According to Bloom (2000) early childhood leaders need to be competent in three key areas:
knowledge, including group dynamics, organisational theory, child development, and teaching
strategies
skills, including technical, human and conceptual skills (eg budgeting)
attitudes, including moral purpose,
and should demonstrate the following characteristics:
being goal-oriented, using planning, assertiveness, vision, and confidence (this was a change from
earlier research, where these factors had not been identified)
having good working relationships with staff, who participate in leadership
6
being responsive to parents needs and able to communicate with them.
Blooms three areas and key characteristics overlap significantly with the ways in which Dalli highlights
that leadership in early childhood can be demonstrated. Although the importance of leadership across most
educational levels is widely recognised and well researched, the research on leadership in early childhood
settings is still limited. Furthermore, Muijs et al find that most of the leadership research in this area is more
narrowly informed by theorising about early childhood contexts and qualities and avoiding the broader field
of research studies (Muijs et al, 2004).
A clear definition of an early education leader does not exist although leadership conventionally has been
equated with management. A need for a broader definition has arisen as responsibilities of early leaders have
expanded. Professionals in the early years have viewed themselves first and foremost as educators and child
developers. They have held a narrow view of their role, mainly as practitioners, and do not fully recognise
that their roles have expanded to include financial and leadership responsibilities (Muijs et al, 2004; Rodd,
1998; Rodd, 2001; Scrivens in Nivala and Hujala, 2002; Morgan in Kagan and Bowman, 1997). By
interpreting the meaning of activities, one can categorise them into five different frames: educational, caring,
managing, practical and personal. (Rosemary and Puroila in Nivala and Hujala, 2002).
According to Solly (2003), we need to develop high-calibre leaders in the early years who can both
maintain and enhance, but studies (Rodd, 2005; Bloom, 1997, in Muijs et al, 2004) show that most
leaders in early childhood settings in the UK found that roles most common to their work could be described
as focusing more on maintenance than development; there was more emphasis on management than on
leadership (Muijs et al, 2004). Scottish nursery teachers saw leadership as an essential element of their role
while acknowledging that they did not themselves hold management positions (Dunlop, 2002). The concept
of lead-practitioner as someone who promotes shared values and ethos in early years is increasingly
articulated in Scotland (Adams, 2005).
An important part of early childhood leadership is co-ordination between different players or interest groups
(Nivala in Nivala and Hujala, 2002), including family, school and community (Muijs et al, 2004; Osgood,
2004). These interest groups have their own view on early childhood education (Nivala in Nivala and
Hujala, 2002). Practitioners see themselves as contributing to the cohesion and strength of local
communities (Osgood, 2004) and adopt collaborative approaches to management. There is a strong
emphasis on working with parents in early childhood leadership (Muijs et al, 2004). However, leadership
studies in New Zealand report a downplaying of the importance of this kind of work a perspective that the
EPPE project outcomes can be understood to refute.
As part of the International Leadership Project (ILP), a research project on leadership in early childhood
context established between 1998 and 2000 by five countries including England, Nivala proposes a
contextual leadership model in early childhood education, in which four contextual elements seem to be
important for a successful leadership in the early years. These elements are: paradigms, actions, education in
the substance meaning of early childhood education, and environment- it is asserted that the more the
interest groups in early childhood education share the meaning of these elements, the better the everyday
reality of leadership will function (Nivala in Nivala and Hujala, 2002).
The importance of community-orientated provision does not match with an entrepreneurial managerial
approach (Osgood, 2004) nor with masculinist constructs of leadership associated with aggressiveness,
forcefulness, competitiveness and independence (Scrivens in Nivala and Hujala, 2002). Kagan speaks of
collaborative leadership, which fits with a systems theory and integrated services that conceptualises work
across agencies and disciplines (Kagan, 1993).
7
Multi-agency working in early childhood requires co-ordination and the ability to deal with conflict (Muijs
et al, 2004). Muijs et al cite an audit undertaken by Atkinson et al (2001, 2002), in which it was found that
the key to success of early childhood programmes like Sure Start involved effective leadership and multi-
agency work. The early childhood field is complex because of its diversity and scale but also because of the
aspect of community leadership (Muijs et al, 2004; Waniganayake in Nivala and Hujala, 2002). Kagan and
Hallmark (2001) make a focus on community aspects of early childhood leadership; their model embraces
five styles of leadership, shows the need for different types of leaders, and emphasises the need for training
and development in these aspects:
Community leadership
Pedagogical leadership
Administrative leadership
Advocacy leadership
Conceptual leadership.
More detail of these styles is given in the synopses of research that follow. Like Dalli (2003), they see a
need for early years leaders to be educationally and politically aware. Additionally they see community
leadership as a core capacity for development.
Shared leadership models, promoted in several studies of leadership within the sector, provide a contrast
with the assumption in much of the literature that leadership is linked to a role, and open up the possibility
that several people within a centre/service may be involved in leadership. Louise Hard (2004) has proposed
the concept of formal and informal leaders. She suggests that the formal leader is recognised because of their
position whereas the informal leader is one who shows leadership qualities even though they may not hold a
recognised leadership position. This accords well with Scottish teachers concepts of leadership as reported
by Dunlop (2002).
Janet Moyless publication Effective Leadership and Management in the Early Years is a research-based text
which draws from the project The Effective Leadership and Management Scheme for the Early Years. The
project produced ELMS a tool for those who are in leadership and management roles in early years
settings so that they may evaluate their effectiveness. It is claimed that the purpose of evaluation of
leadership and management is to ensure the best possible experiences for children and early educators; in
other words, effective leadership and management are central to the quality agenda. Moyles highlights
leadership qualities, management skills, professional skills and attributes, and personal characteristics and
attitudes. She endorses Ebbeck and Waninganayakes (2002) view that there are few publicly
acknowledged leaders and no set of common expectations for leaders in early childhood. Moyles juxtaposes
leadership and management, whereas Rodd (2005) distinguishes between them: her typology of what
managers and leaders do includes the following aspects:
Managers plan, organise, co-ordinate and control, whereas leaders are typified as people who give direction,
offer inspiration, build teamwork, set an example and gain acceptance. Often the literature reinforces the
view that leadership and management are separate but related concepts.
In their Effective Leadership in the Early Years Study (ELEYS), Siraj-Blatchford and Manni (2006)
highlight the effective leadership practices identified in the settings that took part in the study:
Identifying and articulating a collective vision
Ensuring shared understandings, meanings and goals
Effective communication
Encouraging reflection
Commitment to ongoing, professional development
Monitoring and assessing practice
Distributed leadership
8
Building a learning community and team culture
Encouraging and facilitating parent and community partnerships
Leading and managing: striking the balance
Here the idea of striking a balance between leadership and management is highlighted. The work drew from
the REPEY study also part of the wider EPPE project.
Nupponen (2006a, 2006b) also considers that effective leadership is vital to quality services for young
children. Effective leadership frameworks are needed as a starting point towards ensuring quality. Nupponen
emphasises the complex external social environment in which early childhood settings operate (Bergin-Seers
and Breen, 2002) and the consequent need for self- reflection. As elsewhere she finds that there has been
little Australian research that focuses on the leadership and management role of heads (directors) of centre-
based child care. National figures of children entering childcare is unavailable in Australia (OECD Country
Note, 2001), but in Queensland where she was researching, more children attend private provision rather
than community-managed centres. Her study included case studies of directors of child care centres, based
on interviews with them. She concludes that training and experience in business management and leadership
is needed in order to enhance the competence of centre managers.
Solly (2003) highlights enthusiasm, passion, inspiration and advocacy as leadership qualities. Whalley
(2005) emphasises influence rather than authority as an important element of leadership. What comes
through most sources is that there is a high potential for leadership activity in the field of early childhood.
What is less clear in the literature is who provides quality leadership, and agreement about who might do so
in early childhood services in the future is still more elusive and under-researched. The paucity of research
into early childhood leadership in the UK is beginning to be addressed through studies led by Janet Moyles
(2004) and Carol Aubrey (2007). The new Scottish workforce categories include Lead Practitioner and
herald a need for research into the roles played by the various professionals responsible for early childhood
services, integrated services and schooling in Scotland.
There is however ample research cited to support the claim that the higher the quality of early childcare and
education, the greater the contribution to positive learning outcomes for children (Vandell and Wolfe, 2000).
Such evidence supports education and training initiatives that aim to raise the level of education of
practitioners, and to include a leadership level in that training. Bronfenbrenners ecological systems theory
offers the idea that childrens development takes place through the interrelationships between the various
levels of environment they occupy and interactions with others who form part of their environment. It is
possible to reflect that unless those out-of-home environments are led by practitioners with formal
leadership training or credentials, quality is less likely to be sustained. Since most early childhood settings
are presently led by practitioners who have lacked until now the opportunity to engage in leadership training
a crucial variable in ensuring quality (Nupponen, 2003b), a political commitment or culture is required, so
creating the opportunity for improvement in the quality of early childhood services as newly trained leaders
become agents for change.
Bella and Bloom (2003)s study Zoom: The Impact of Early Childhood Leadership Training on Role
Perceptions, Job Performance, and Career Decisions was conducted with a sample of 182 participants who
took part in two different models of leadership training up until 2003. The study set out to look at the impact
of the forms of training on role perceptions, job performance and career decisions in the sample group. Self-
report questionnaires were used as well as follow-up interviews. The research questions guiding this study
were clustered into four areas:
1. current job status and motivations for staying or in leaving the field
2. perceived short- and long-term outcomes from having participated in leadership training
3. subsequent professional development experiences and knowledge of professional development
resources
4. feedback on the design and delivery of training.
9
Participants reported the link between their sense of empowerment following training, their consequent
raised sense of self-esteem and the impact of both on their leadership role. This new confidence had been
sustained and continued to allow participants to take on new challenges. Ratings of novice, capable and
master were used in this study to provide data for change in feelings of competence. The percentage
viewing themselves as master changed from 10% to 50% as a result of the Taking Charge of Change
model of leadership training.
In this study further statistical analyses were undertaken to establish which background variables correlate
strongly with participants perceptions of competence in a leadership role. It was found that perceptions of
competence are linked most strongly to the level of education of the participant and less to years of
experience either in the field or in an administrative role. New perspectives on their leadership role allowed
individuals to move beyond nitty-gritty, day-to-day matters, and to adopt a more strategic role in which
they developed a vision of what they wanted their service to become and a strong sense of what this meant
in their community.
In terms of job performance, the results of the Zoom study (Bella and Bloom, 2003) found that respondents
agreed they had improved their management skills, were more reflective about their leadership behaviour,
and felt they had practical resources to help. In terms of career decisions, 86% remained working in early
childhood, which seems to endorse the renewed focus leadership training brings, as well as the potential for
change The rich empirical and anecdotal evidence from respondents provides compelling evidence of
how leadership training can change the early childhood profession from the inside out and from the bottom
up, through changes in early childhood educators themselves. The results of this study underscore the need
for systematic, intensive, and relevant training focused on the unique needs of early childhood directors.
(p2)
They noted four clusters of skills that helped them in their leadership role:
1. interpersonal communication skills
2. group facilitation skills (mostly conducting effective meetings)
3. decision-making skills (particularly participative management)
4. staff development skills.
Their findings match the findings from Sylva et als EPPE study in which it was found that the higher the
qualifications of managers, the higher the quality of the curriculum experiences, the better the programme
structure and the relationships with and between staff and parents (Sylva et al, 2004).
The need for training in leadership in the early years
The Standard for Headship in Scotland has set out the key aspects of professionalism and expertise which
the Scottish education system requires of those who are appointed to headship (The Standard for Headship
in Scotland The Scottish Qualification for Headship, 2001). Take-up from the early childhood pre-sector
in this scheme is reportedly low, with little active recruitment and some reporting of doubts about the
relevance of the scheme to early years practice, by sponsoring authorities rather than by individual
participants (Dunlop, 2004).
A lack of training for leaders in early childhood settings is highlighted by Muijs et al (2004) as leadership
training and development has historically not been deemed necessary in the early childhood context.
However, there is a demand for it; for example, about two thirds of the respondents in a study undertaken by
Rodd (1997 in 2005) wanted specific training related to leadership and management issues. Many early
childhood leaders do not feel prepared for the responsibilities of their role (Jorde-Bloom and Sheerer, 1992).
Rodd (2001) sees early childhood leadership made up of three elements: technical knowledge and skills,
including pedagogical and curriculum leadership; conceptual ability, which involves critical thinking and
advocacy; and interpersonal skills. Rodd suggests that these elements can be developed through training.
10
Paula Jorde Bloom (2003, p5) uses a similar framework to Rodd when she describes the technical, human
and conceptual skills that define effective leadership. She further categorises these skills into four areas:
communication skills; decision-making and problem-solving skills; interpersonal skills; and organisational
skills. Bloom comments that defining leadership in terms of skills broadens the view of leadership to include
those outside specific leadership positions.
Training is essential to provide relevant knowledge and skills for leadership roles in early years services
(Dunlop, 2002; Sylva et al, 2002). Data from the 12 case study settings in the Effective Provision of
Preschool Education (EPPE) research project found a strong relationship between the qualifications and
training of the centre manager and quality of service provision in early childhood settings (Sylva et al,
2004). These centres revealed strong leadership and long serving staff (p35). All managers were reported
as taking a strong lead, particularly in the areas of curriculum, planning, educational focus, adult-child
interaction and the engagement of children in learning. Additionally In most of the settings the strong
leadership was characterised by a strong philosophy that was shared by everyone working in the centre
(p35). The strong relationship between the childcare/education qualifications of the leader/manager and the
effectiveness of the EPPE settings revealed in Sylva et als work supports a view that those who manage and
lead early years services should have high level qualifications: in view of these research findings a case is
being argued in England for having trained teachers in leadership positions (Muijs et al, 2004).
Early childhood managers make an enormous commitment to the profession and are willing to make
personal sacrifices, ie low pay, long hours and absence of benefits (Osgood, 2004). However, despite the
lack of reward and limited training opportunities available for the leadership role, many early childhood
professionals want to heighten their levels of professionalism and aspire to becoming a leader in their field
(Osgood, 2004; Rodd, 2005).
Specific training programmes are now being developed; however, they are small-scale (Muijs et al, 2004).
Where training is provided, effects appear positive (Muijs et al, 2004; Jorde-Bloom and Sheerer, 1992).
Whalleys team at Pen Green leads the National Professional Qualification in Integrated Centre Leadership.
Relating Early Childhood Leadership to the Early Years of Primary School
Hard and OGormans work is included in this Leadership Review as it resonates with current developments
in the Early Level of Curriculum for Excellence 318 to introduce active learning into Primary 1. Writing
about developments in Queensland, Australia, where a full-time Preparatory Year has been introduced to
replace the former part-time pre-school provision, Hard and OGormans discussions have centred around
how their Early Years Curriculum, which is play-based, might influence the nature of schooling in early
primary. Tied into such discussions is the role the early childhood world might play in leadership of change
in early primary schooling. The two research studies that inform Hard and OGormans article are reported
in the Sources Reviewed section that follows.
These studies find that the creation of full-time preparatory classes within primary schools is allowing
greater interaction between early educators, the possibility of greater movement of staff between sectors, and
promotion of a greater interrelationship between different pedagogies. The balance of child-responsive
practices and teacher-directed whole group approaches (p52) is interrogated. Early childhood approaches
are defined by the researchers as active learning, child initiation, the use of concrete materials and real life
learning opportunities underpinned by the scope for children to exercise choice (p52). These terms link to
the Scottish Early Level definition of active learning as:
Spontaneous play
Planned, purposeful play
11
Investigating and exploring
Events and life experiences
Focused learning and teaching
and to the view that in the early primary school active learning might be:
A true building on experiences in nursery. Hands-on independent play with
appropriate skilled intervention/teaching.
Children learn by doing, thinking, exploring, through quality interaction,
intervention and relationships, founded on childrens interests and abilities across a variety of
contexts. All combining to building the four capacities for each child.
Environments that offer differential play and challenge, staff who are well
informed and able to challenge learning, child-centred and building on
previous experiences, fun absolutely essential, children planning and evaluating their learning.
(Building the Curriculum 2, 2007, p6)
A broad agreement about what constitutes active learning seems to emerge. In the Queensland study the
importance of leadership of early years pre-primary (preparatory) and early primary education being
undertaken by professionals with early childhood qualifications emerges strongly, as does the need for those
professionals who would promote an early childhood philosophy to grasp the opportunity to influence
primary school developments through their leadership: Hard and OGorman write of the interplay of school
reform and leadership, and its particular relationship to the ECEC field (p54). They see early childhood
leadership as both challenging and contentious.
Hard and OGorman cite a number of authors as they consider the leadership challenge, including MacBeath
(2004), Lingard et al (2003) and Stamopolous (2003) to emphasise the ambiguities of leadership, leadership
and learning links, and the association of good leadership and change, respectively (p55). The importance of
those providing leadership of early childhood settings attached to primary schools having a strong
knowledge and understanding of the early levels of the curriculum is emphasised by Stamopolous, who
writes of specialised staff and resolution of philosophical differences; she states: Inadequate leadership may
have serious implications for program quality, accountability, student learning and staff training (p200). In
the Scottish case this could translate firstly to encouraging early childhood educators to consider the co-
operation they might offer in terms of distributed leadership to their colleagues in early primary education as
purposeful well planned play becomes a reality; secondly it points to the need for primary school heads
having a strong knowledge of the Early Level 36 if they are going to provide effective and appropriate
leadership for that stage of education at a time of curriculum reform.
Hard (2005) writes of two concepts that may be helpful as we consider leadership for the Early Level in
Scotland: interpreted professional identity, and interpreted leadership capacity. The first is how early
childhood professionals perceive themselves in the light of how others perceive them. For some early
childhood practitioners the message that working with the youngest children is not as highly regarded as
working with older children, and that the status afforded to early childhood workers is low, influences their
professional identity negatively. The second concept interpreted leadership capacity refers to the ways
in which these same professionals view their own capacity to lead. Hard claims these two concepts are
interwoven, and that study participants conceived of leadership in early childhood as a shared and team-
based process. Hard refers to participants understandings of leadership as a discourse of niceness and
suggests that this discourse militates against leaders standing out. She and OGorman (p58) recommend four
areas of knowledge that are essential if early childhood leaders are going to be able to relate to the early
12
years of primary and share approaches:
Know yourself what skills and knowledge do I have and what is my leadership capacity?
Know your field what do I know about leadership in an ECEC setting and can I use it in a school
setting?
Know your context what is the school setting like and how is leadership enacted?
Know your challenge what do I want to articulate and what do I value?
The Wider Leadership Literature
If we look beyond early childhood literature much has been written about school leadership and wider
educational leadership. In a comprehensive review of successful school leadership, the authors claim that a
great deal is known about leadership behaviours and practices: there is an abundant literature on what
constitutes good leadership in education (Leithwood et al, 2006). Leithwood et al write about core
leadership practices which are: setting directions; developing people; redesigning the organisation; and
managing the teaching programme (p2223). They offer a warning that We have instructional leadership,
transformational leadership, moral leadership, constructivist leadership, servant leadership, cultural
leadership, and primal leadership (Goleman, Boyatzis and McKee, 2002). A few of these qualify as
leadership theories and several are actually tested leadership theories. But most are actually just slogans
(p7), rather than conceptually coherent ideas supported by evidence that shows the effects of such
approaches on pupils and schools.
Different types of research evidence exist on educational leadership case studies, large-scale quantitative
studies of leadership effects, similarly large-scale studies of specific leadership practices, a literature on
pupil engagement in relation to leadership, and leadership effects at the school and district level. The
literature on leadership focuses more on the values, beliefs, skills and knowledge held by or perceived to be
important for good leadership, rather than on actual leadership practices. Leithwood et al warn in particular
against unwarranted assumptions made about leadership that they find are evident in leadership standards
which list skills, dispositions and knowledge that are assumed to be necessary for effective leadership the
authors claim that the literature on leadership says much less about what is needed for successful leadership
and a great deal more about effective leadership practices. They highlight the lack of published empirical
studies on teacher leadership and distributed leadership and suggest that both teacher leadership and
distributed leadership qualify as movements driven much more by philosophy and democratic values than by
evidence that pupils actually learn more if a larger proportion of school leadership comes from non-
traditional sources (p9). Leithwood et al also question the concept of leaderfulness (Sergiovanni, 1999)
and are critical of the idea of the more leadership the better and that everyone is a leader.
In his book The Motivated School (2003), the Scottish educational psychologist Alan McLean writes about
leadership, and its importance in developing a motivating school. In writing of the ways in which leaders
download their mindsets to staff, he asserts that the principles can be applied equally to motivating
colleagues and to working with parents. In referring to four drivers, McLean argues that managers may
move from a control culture to a focus on self-motivation in colleagues that encourages an optimistic view
about learning. Heads of lower performing schools have a more rigid dissonant style by comparison with
heads of high performance schools, who are more likely to take on a flexible and resonant style (p115).
Engagement, stimulation, structure and feedback form the basis of change. He asserts that where leadership
engages staff successfully it is transformational in nature, and asks the following questions:
What kinds of engagement might characterise transformational leadership?
What kinds of stimulation might characterise transformational leadership?
What kinds of structures might characterise transformational leadership?
13
What kinds of dialogue and feedback might characterise transformational leadership?
According to the Yukl and Chavez (2002) evidence, the most influential tactics are rational persuasion,
consultation, collaboration and inspirational appeal; these are tactics embedded in most conceptions of
transformational leadership, and rely too on trust as a basis.
Links can be made between distributed leadership and democratic leadership (Woods, 2004). The one is
characterised by action at all levels on a basis of direction-setting strategies, the other, democratic
leadership, implies consultation and participation.
The existing literature reveals overlaps between several forms of leadership identified, for example: shared
leadership (Pearce and Conger, 2003), collaborative leadership (Wallace, 2002), democratic leadership
(Woods, 2004) and participative leadership (Vroom and Yago, 1998) all leadership concepts cited in
Leithwood et al (p4748). This accumulation of allied concepts means that distributed leadership has
sometimes been used as a shorthand way to describe any form of devolved, shared or dispersed leadership
practice in schools. It is this catch all use of the term that has resulted in both the misrepresentation of the
idea and the common misunderstanding that distributed leadership means that everyone leads (Bennett et al,
2003), rather than it meaning that the form of leadership practice is distributed beyond the single
hierarchical leader or manager. Leithwood et al find that the evidence as a whole points to leadership having
a very significant effect on two elements the quality of pupil learning and the quality of school
organisation. They write about the strengths of transformational leadership.
Many definitions of leadership exist. However, none is clearly defined for early childhood practice. If
'Future leaders need to be proactive rather than reactive' (Bass, 2000, p22), then not only is training
necessary but also a theoretical understanding of concepts of leadership. Theories of leadership such as
Transformational Leadership (Bass, 1985), Contextual Leadership (Kagan and Hallmark, 2001), Shared
Leadership (Fletcher and Kaufer, 2003), and Distributive Leadership (Harris et al, 2002) that can be
considered when looking at leadership within early childhood services. Nupponen (2006) finds that
transformational leadership and distributed leadership are concepts suited to early childhood contexts;
transformational leaders recognise that people are motivated less by cognitive factors and more by affective
factors (Crawford, 2003). Their approach is empowering as it motivates people to make their own decisions
and take responsibility. By contrast, shared leadership embeds leadership within the social system of the
setting; here teamwork and the group predominates rather than the individual (Locke, 2003). Both seem to
be valid concepts for leadership in the early years.
Conclusions
Early childhood education and care has received unparalleled political attention in the last decade and
remains in the vanguard of current government policy. This is accompanied by a need to evaluate the
effectiveness of such attention and expenditure. This review of the literature makes a clear case for a
relationship between appropriate leadership in early years services and the effectiveness of those services:
this means that two initiatives should be to the fore the investigation of early years leadership practice in
Scotland, and the development of sound leadership training, which could be more widely embedded in
undergraduate and postgraduate early childhood courses.
Relating early childhood leadership to current developments in Scotland means thinking about leadership in
the context of A Curriculum for Excellence (Scottish Executive, 2004c, 2006a, 2006b), the National Review
of the Early Years and Childcare Workforce (Scottish Executive, 2006c), Guidance on Involvement of
Teachers in Pre-school Education (Scottish Executive Education Department, 2002), reports such as A
Literature Review of Models of Curriculum Change (Dunlop et al, 2007) and A Literature Review of Models
of Curriculum Architecture (Dunlop et al, 2007), Improving Scottish Education (HM Inspectorate of
Education, 2006), and the Early Years Parliamentary Inquiry (Scottish Parliament, 2006).

14
Improving Scottish Education draws renewed attention to leadership in the pre-school sector and states that
the quality of leadership needs to be improved, particularly in a substantial proportion of centres in the
private and voluntary sectors. Across all pre-school settings, managers/headteachers should more
consistently focus their leadership on improving the quality of childrens learning and the skills of staff in
promoting it.
The Early Years Parliamentary Inquiry (August 2006) sets out a 10-year vision for universal care and
education for Scotlands children:
In ten years time, we want Scotland to have an early years sector that gives all children the best possible
start in life, that values and develops them and is aspired to by the rest of the world.
It also states:
We endorse the need for upskilling the early years workforce as part of the same agenda as our call for an
expansion of the number of teachers into disadvantaged areas. We want to see qualification and skill levels
driven upwards as research indicates that this is likely to result in better outcomes for children, especially in
disadvantaged areas.
The National Review of the Early Years Workforce promotes a central leadership role for the lead
practitioner/manager of a service, as shown in the Roles and Responsibilities Framework. The lead
practitioner/manager has a role in, for example: assisting their staff to appreciate how they, as an
individual and a service, are contributing to the Vision for children (see Annex A); facilitating
partnership working with other occupational groups; and encouraging, advising and mentoring staff to
develop their own skills and knowledge.
The early years research studies reported show leadership in early childhood to be very complex and the
need for role clarity towards effective leadership as an area for development as regardless of the form of
childcare and early education the parents choose, the needs of the child remain the same (Rodd, 2005). For
the range of early childhood services to be equally valued and effective, good leadership is essential.
Some key issues and key questions arise as a result of this review. Key questions are:
What do successful leaders do?
How are their practices distributed?
What is the source of successful leadership?
How do good leadership practices transform childrens experiences?
Key Points emerging from the literature on Leadership in the Early Years
Leadership in early years practice is not clearly defined.
Many studies have explored leadership as a micro concept investigating leaders themselves or the
immediate environments in which they work, rather than viewing leadership as a cultural system.
Leadership is a key element of quality early childhood provision.
Leadership views of workers in the early childhood sector nationally and internationally are consistently
reported to be unclear.
Leadership is seen to be complex.
Leadership is relatively unexplored in early childhood.
15
Leadership is an accidental rather than a thought-through idea.
There is a lack of research activity and a lack of leadership development in early childhood.
The transition to a leadership role is isolating and challenging to early years practitioners.
The early childhood sector needs a contextual model of leadership, since it differs in nature, ideals,
philosophies and curriculum from other forms of education.
Leadership models such as transformational leadership and shared leadership link well to a contextual model
for early childhood.
The significance of leadership in the context of early childhood services should not be underestimated given
the documented importance of early childhood experience to later school success.
In the context of the Early Level of Curriculum for Excellence, early childhood leaders could espouse a
potential leadership role in relation to active learning in the early years.
Traditionally the guidance, supervision and mentoring of staff are not linked well to the leadership role in
early childhood.
Leadership approaches are more strongly developed in stand-alone services than in, for example, nursery
classes, where role ambiguity dominates.
Leadership in early childhood embraces advocacy, community, collaborative and political dimensions.
Leadership models that are effective for early years are reciprocal, empowering for staff, parents and
children, shared and distributed.
16
Sources reviewed
Of the many studies cited 20 or so are presented here in a little more detail as they develop some of the key
points drawn out of the literature in this review.
Aubrey, C (2007), Leading and Managing in the Early Years, London: Sage Publications
In this book Carol Aubrey proposes that the early childhood context demands skilled and effective
leadership. Her book is underpinned by research mainly undertaken in 2005, and draws on two principal
sources a British Educational Research Association (BERA) symposium paper presented in 2006 (Aubrey
et al), and a research report (Dahl and Aubrey, 2005). The book offers early childhood practitioners a rich
insight into the theory and practices of leadership.
Australian Journal of Early Childhood Management and Leadership, 25 (1), March 2000
This themed edition of the Australian Journal of Early Childhood presents the theories and research behind
practical leadership in early childhood settings.
It includes articles ranging from women's styles of leadership in the childcare sector to health promotion,
postmodernist approaches to training and ethical leadership.
Contents:
Editorial, Jacqueline Hayden and Helen Gibson
Children's services: A vision for the future, Denise Fraser
Women's models of leadership in the child care sector, Libby Henderson-Kelly and Barbara
Pamphilon
Leadership in child care centres: Is it just another job? Manjula Waniganayake, Romana Morda
and Anthoula Kapsalakis
A postmodernist approach to culturally grounded training in early childhood care and
development, Jessica Ball and Alan Pence
Leadership and change: A dialogue of theory and practice, Elspeth Humphries and Beres Senden
Health promotion: A new leadership role for early childhood professionals, Jacqueline Hayden
and John J Macdonald
Ethical leadership or leadership in ethics? Linda Newman
Boardman, M (2003), Changing times: Changing challenges for early childhood leaders, Australian
Journal of Early Childhood, 28 (2), pp 2025
The last 10 years have brought changing roles for school leaders, teachers and their communities. The
diversity and complexity of change within school management practices is recognised. Early childhood
leaders in school settings have not been exempt from the impact of these changes as they have striven to
accommodate rapid social and educational challenges within their leadership role. This article reports on a
survey undertaken with Tasmanian early childhood teachers and leaders to investigate the nature and
diversity of challenges faced by leaders with responsibilities in kindergarten to Grade 2 leadership. Analysis
of the data, concerning the most challenging aspects of early childhood leadership, revealed that both
teachers and leaders perceived there were significant, diverse and complex educational changes being faced
by leaders. Also, there were pressing organisational dilemmas associated with time available for teaching
and leading. Further, teachers perceived there were key challenges inherent in the area of leaders
knowledge and relationships which were impacting negatively on the leadership provision in schools.
17
David, T (2003), What do we know about teaching young children? A professional user review of UK
research based on the BERA Academic Review Early Years Research: Pedagogy, Curriculum and
Adult roles, Training and Professionalism
This review set out to engage with the research undertaken in the UK in relation to pedagogy, curriculum,
and adult roles, professional development, training and the workforce. The review focused on research about
practice rather than policy. It highlighted the role that qualified teachers play and their influence on the
pedagogy of differently qualified colleagues. They conclude that more research is needed on the different
outcomes for children associated with different staff training. While they do not use the word leadership,
they report that studies of the perceptions of staff about role and role difference suggest that staff often
perceive themselves as doing the same job, whilst observational studies provide opposing data, revealing
that qualified teachers engage with children in ways that focus on their cognitive development.
Duncan, J (20012002) Aiming away: New Zealand childcare supervisors' responses. Paper presented
to the Eighth Early Childhood Convention, Palmerston North, 2225 September, 2003
Researchers in New Zealand made a significant contribution to an International Leadership Project: Cross-
cultural reflections of leadership in early childhood education An ILP (International Leadership Project)
reflective survey, which was based at Oulu University, Finland, and overseen by Professor Eeva Hujala, Dr
Veijo Nivala and Anna-Maija Puroila. The survey was conducted in 18 countries over the years 20012002.
These countries were: Europe: Norway, Estonia, Germany, France (4); North and Middle America: Canada,
Mexico (2); South America: Brazil, Uruguay (2); Oceana: New Zealand, Philippines (2); Asia: China,
Taiwan, India, Japan, Malaysia (5); Africa: Tanzania, Namibia, South Africa (3).
The first part of this international project had been carried out examining childcare settings in Russia,
Finland, USA, Australia, and the United Kingdom. This earlier phase of the research questioned supervisors
as to what thought they did in these settings and the problems and issues for them. They also included focus
group interviews to investigate what supervisors, parents, government officials and teacher educators
actually thought leadership in childcare centres was. There have been several publications from this earlier
phase (Hujala, and Puroila, 1998; Nivala and Hujala, 2002; Waniganayake, Morda, and Kapsalakis, 2000).
In this paper Duncan discusses preliminary findings drawn from data generated during the second phase of
this international study, by asking 79 childcare practitioners to identify the main aims of their service and
then early childhood services in general (p1). The phase 2 aims were therefore to:
1. investigate the leadership issues of early childhood centre supervisors in Aotearoa/New Zealand
2. deepen the cultural understanding of leadership in early childhood education in different cultural
contexts (by being part of an 18-country international reflective survey on leadership in early childhood).
The research questions which frame the international study and this research project centred around:
1. Has leadership in early childhood education a unique character and how is it defined?
2. How do leaders in early childhood settings define the work of their centres and themselves as a
leader within that centre?
3. What support or supervision do early childhood leaders receive in their work?
Early childhood provision in New Zealand is separate from the statutory school sector, and respondents were
therefore early childhood leaders in their own right, rather than, as is often the case in UK studies, staff
deployed in early childhood services attached to the rest of school education and managed by primary school
headteachers. All respondents were however qualified to degree level as early childhood teachers. Duncan
reports in her discussion that the notions of competent and confident learners seems to fit very well with
18
the early childhood supervisors responses. Whilst some leaders did not mention children and families in
their aims, others placed importance on children and families together through clear community aims:
according to Duncan these differences in response may suggest a continuing ambivalence on the part of
early childhood leaders about early childhood settings being a place for families as well as for children.
Further she highlights Moss and Petries work on childrens spaces rather than childrens services (Moss
and Petrie, 2002) as significant.
Dunlop, A-W (2002), Scottish Nursery Teachers Concepts of Leadership, Paper presented at the
Third Warwick International Early Years Conference, University of Warwick, March 1820, 2002
A cohort of 176 nursery teachers studying on a specialist nursery education postgraduate certificate
programme and in the DIPEE evening programme between 1998 and 2002 were sampled on their concepts
of leadership in nursery education settings. Leadership in nursery education is a much debated concept
which is firmly related to role definition. The nursery school teacher often finds clearer role definition than
does the teacher in the nursery class attached to primary schools. It is likely that the work of the nursery
teacher is better conceptualised and understood in settings where the raison dtre of the whole
establishment is directed towards work with young children and their families, and the wellbeing, learning
and development of those children is the main priority. Within nursery classes, which are often viewed as an
add-on to existing primary school provision, the purposes of nursery education are not always fully
understood and the work can be seen as less important; there can be a sense of not being valued, and of
being isolated. The advent of increased funding for pre-school education in Scotland from 1996 onwards
brought renewed requests for specialist training for people working in pre-school settings.
During their Professional Development module students voiced many queries about the role of the nursery
teacher, the differences and overlaps between a management and a leadership role, review of practice,
undertaken with tutor support, and management of change. Discussions were particularly lively when the
status, role and challenges of nursery teaching were the focus. Students had reported practice concerns about
their widening role and the challenges of working with others. Numbers of them had expressed concern
about not knowing what others expected of them, about juggling administrative and reporting roles, and
about the amount and quality of time spent in being a teacher for children. As a result of such discussions
during the Professional Development module delivery, it was decided to sample recent graduates of the
Postgraduate Certificate in Early Education (nursery) offered at Strathclyde University on their concepts of
nursery teacher role and of leadership issues. This paper reports the results of the survey and considers the
implications for teaching on the Professional Development module of this postgraduate programme.
The language of teacher educators now revolves around such terms as reflective teaching, reflection in
action, and teacher as researcher. There has been a shift from the general expectation that teachers should
act as technical thinkers to an expectation that teachers need to operate as higher order or better thinkers.
In this context teachers were sampled on their views. Key findings included the role variety and complexity
of nursery teaching, a lack of clarity of role definition, and a gap between management expectations of
nursery teachers in terms of the job they were expected to do and the status accorded. Respondents
frequently stated Youre told youre just one of the team, which they linked to a consequent playing
down of teachers education and training. The majority of respondents reported a view that the position
they occupied was one of simultaneously being team member and team leader: in free-standing nursery
schools and centres this was less ambiguous than in nursery classes, where being perceived of as simply one
of the team led to leadership without authority or leadership without status whilst their primary school
headteacher-managers were often perceived to occupy a position of authority without knowledge vis vis
nursery education.
19
Dunlop, A-W, A (2005), Scottish Early Childhood Teachers Concepts of Leadership, Interim Report
of Research in Progress, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde
The research reported in Dunlop (2002) is ongoing. An additional 60 teachers (n= 236) were added to the
survey questionnaire sample at the end of their period of study. A 53% return rate allows insight into the
images held by Scottish early childhood teachers of the ways in which they see themselves as leaders or
managers in early childhood settings. During this time the rescinding of the Schools (Scotland) Code 1956
(2003) Item 2a has begun to have an impact, and not all local authorities remain committed to employing
graduate teachers in nursery education on a full-time single-setting basis. It is increasingly common to have
teachers employed on a teacher presence or peripatetic basis, and returns suggest that teachers feel they are
seen by others to have a leadership role in terms of childrens education, but not necessarily a team
leadership role nor a managerial role in the wider context of early childhood provision. The HMIE Report
Improving Scottish Education (HMIE, 2006) highlights the need for strong and effective leadership in
childrens learning perhaps teacher contribution remains important to ensure appropriate planning for
childrens learning. As new qualifications are developed for early childhood practitioners, attention to the
complementarity of different professional roles will be important.
Ebbeck, M, and Waniganayake, M (2003), Early childhood professionals: Leading today and tomorrow.
Sydney: MacLennan and Petty
Ebbeck and Waniganayake (2003) provide a number of possible definitions of leadership and provide a
number of theoretical models they propose new ways of understanding leadership in early years provision.
In their view leadership in early childhood has many faces: it is connected with administration and
management: they therefore emphasise that effective leadership is informed by and dependent on defining
and through definition, understanding the key concepts of administration, management and leadership. An
integration of these elements would allow for improved leadership approaches.
Through addressing obstacles to effective leadership, the authors show why traditional leadership theories
do not work in early childhood. They make the point that discussions about leadership have been too
restricted by the traditional tendency to align leadership to the position of the manager of a setting.
Waniganayake proposes a new model for distributive leadership in her model she proposes that several
people can simultaneously fulfil a leadership role in the same early childhood pre-school setting. In
proposing a distributed leadership model for early childhood these researchers are exploring new ways of
defining leadership in early childhood: their work reflects changing views of such leadership.
Hard, L, and OGorman, L (2007) Push-Me or Pull-You? An Opportunity for Early Childhood
Leadership in the Implementation of Queenslands Early Years Curriculum, Contemporary Issues in
Early Childhood, 8(1), 5060
Two research projects inform this discussion: the first is a study of parental views of the newly introduced
preparatory year which was accompanied by an upward adjustment of six months to the start of statutory
schooling; the second looks at ideas of leadership held by 26 early childhood professionals including pre-
school heads, early childhood students, academics, day care heads, family based day care providers and
providers of support services to early childhood education and care. Subjects were drawn from four of the
Australian territories. Interviews, focus groups and artefacts were used in the study and methods used a
symbolic interactionism, with data analysis being informed by feminist theory. By considering both studies
the authors create a space to think about the influence of early childhood philosophy upon early primary
school practice: they consider the role played by early childhood leadership in promoting such a philosophy
and find a link between personal-professional identity and enactment of a leadership role.
20
Hujala, E (2004), Dimensions of Leadership in the Childcare Context, Scandinavian Journal of
Educational Research, 48(1), February 2004
This article presents contextual leadership as a way to interrogate leadership issues in early childhood
contexts. This theory provides a frame in which leadership is perceived of as socially constructed, situational
and interpretive in nature. The purpose of the study reported was to establish how leadership is seen in
context by those who work in childcare, so teasing out the roles, responsibilities and significance attached to
leadership through sampling the views of those people who are involved with it. The focus group method
was used to gather data for the study. The results showed that the context of the leadership role defines the
role through the language used and the culture of the setting. In most focus group discussions leadership was
described as the position of a leader. Centre directors were seen to have multiple role positions. Overall the
study concluded that the tasks and duties connected to leadership on all contextual levels were unclear.
Kagan, S L, and Hallmark, L G (2001), Cultivating leadership in early care and education, Child
Care Information Exchange, 140: 710
Community aspects of leadership are emphasised by Kagan and Hallmark, who suggest that leadership in
the early years can take the following forms:
Community leadership, which connects early childhood education to the community through
informing and constructing links among families, services, resources and the public and private sectors
Pedagogical leadership, forming a bridge between research and practice through disseminating
new information and shaping agendas
Administrative leadership, which includes financial and personnel management
Advocacy leadership, creating a long-term vision of the future of early childhood education.
This involves developing a good understanding of the field, legislative processes and the media, as
well as being a skilled communicator
Conceptual leadership, which conceptualises early childhood leadership within the broader
framework of social movements and change.
The authors stress that these different elements may require contrasting styles of leadership, and different
types of leaders. They show that more training in these areas is needed. They see a strong political role for
leaders in the early childhood sector, and envisage community leadership as a core competency.
Larkin E (1999), The Transition from Direct Caregiver to Administrator in Early Childhood
Education, Child and Youth Care Forum, 28(1), February 1999, pp 21-32(12)
A summary of this paper is included though it precedes the date of review set at 2000, as it raises an issue
not much touched upon elsewhere. The author addresses the fact that many managers and leaders in early
childhood settings enter such roles with little formal preparation in educational leadership, and do not find
the transition easy. The paper is based on a research study of 16 pre-school directors who moved into
promoted positions after working as early childhood teachers. Their leadership role is recognised to be
complex. Learning the role was at its most difficult in terms of their own lack of preparation, although
respondents were not advocates of formal educational administration courses. The most challenging aspects
of leadership were to do with professional isolation from a peer group. The separateness of their role caused
them tension, especially as they were working to be responsive and nurturing at the same time as having to
be an authority figure. The author concludes by recommending ways to improve the preparation of child
care administrators. Someone to act as a sounding board and someone to act as a mentor would have been
valuable assets as they learned their new roles. A combination of theoretical knowledge and practical
experience was perceived to be helpful.
21
Moyles, J (2004), Effective Leadership and Management in the Early Years, Maidenhead: Open
University Press: McGraw-Hill Education
This book is based on a study of effective leadership and management in the early years. It conceptualises
effective leadership and provides a typology for self-evaluation. The study focused on private and voluntary,
maintained and non-maintained settings in three different authorities in the eastern region of England. Two
consultants worked with 16 practising heads of settings. They worked on leadership qualities, management
skills, professional attributes, and personal characteristics and attitudes. The focus on leadership and
management drew from discussions, diaries, activities and the literature. Participants were able to consider
their strengths and challenges and to identify their training needs.
Muijs, D, Aubrey, C, Harris, A, and Briggs, M (2004), How do they manage? A review of the
research on leadership in early childhood, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(2), 157160
This article reviews the research on leadership in early childhood, highlighting the paucity of research in a
context where there is a heightened potential for leadership development. Reporting that effective leadership
is widely held to influence outcomes for children, the authors find that research on leadership in the early
childhood sector is limited. The authors attribute this lack of research in part to the context of early
childhood itself, where role definitions even for those in leadership positions reinforce the need to be good
practitioners, educators and child developers first.
Muijs et al find that theorising about leadership in early childhood is limited and does not naturally connect
to leadership theory from other educational sectors, nor to a market or business model. A distinctive early
childhood approach to leadership is called for by the literature they have reviewed. Further they find that the
complexity of the early childhood sector and recent developments in this field call strongly for effective
leadership strategies, not least because of the evidence that children attending early childhood settings show
better long-term outcomes. They report that a number of studies show that organisational climate is strongly
related to leadership.
Nivala, V, and Hujala, E (2002) (eds), Leadership in Early Childhood Education, Cross Cultural
Perspectives, Oulu, Finland: Department of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education, University
of Oulu
This book consists of presentations given at the Open Forum at the University of Oulu in March 2001. The
book focuses on the contextual approach taken to leadership in early childhood. The articles presented are
organised into three sections. The first section, Introduction to leadership in early childhood education,
looks at leadership issues in general. The theoretical and the gender perspectives of leadership in early
childhood are introduced. The second section, Comparative perspectives to leadership, introduces
culturally based differences between the work of Finnish and Russian directors. It addresses the importance
of the director's work in a childcare centre as well as the meaning of government regulations and
administration. In the third section, Leadership in the national context points out the significance, roles and
responsibilities of day care directors in Finland. It also takes us into the middle of the dilemmas, tensions
and constraints with which female early childhood leaders struggle in New Zealand. This section introduces
good communication as the basis of leadership and asks whether anyone can become a leader with training.
Finally, it challenges the managers and other practitioners of early years settings to promote a change to the
present discourse of parental involvement.
Osgood J (2004), Time to get down to business? The Responses of Early Years Practitioners to
Entrepreneurial Approaches to Professionalism, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), 524
This article looks at implications of policies introduced in the early childcare and education sector by the
22
New Labour Government after its election in 1997. Included in the Governments agenda are guidelines to
embrace more commercial approaches to childcare management to ensure childcare services remain
financially viable and sustainable. It is shown that the (almost entirely female) sample of childcare
professionals in Osgoods two studies are opposed to these masculinized, new managerialized policies
and that this commercial approach is deemed to be inappropriate in the early childhood sector. It is argued
that the quality of childcare provision would suffer if business principles of profit making and
competitiveness were applied. It is suggested that the top-down application of business approaches to the
management of early childhood care and education settings does not do justice to the community-oriented,
collaborative and caring nature of this sector.
The author articulates that recent government policies promote individualism and
competitiveness and that these are in conflict with the non-competitive, collaborative community-orientated
approach adopted by early childhood practitioners. The study shows that private nursery managers tend to
have a less collaborative and community-centred approach to leadership because of fears of competition
endangering making profits. It was found that early childhood practitioners are highly dedicated to their
profession and are willing to make sacrifices when it comes to pay and benefits. They are devoted to
enhancing their professional skills and knowledge and are keen to attend training. An emphasis on care,
enhancing child development and supporting local communities as opposed to developing business skills
and making profit is paramount. Practitioners feel they play a significant role in the local community and
adopting business approaches in the field would be detrimental to encouraging community-orientated
practice. Although they contest the entrepreneurial policies favoured by the Government, practitioners feel
powerless and think they are unable to resist adoption of commercial approaches in the long run.
Rogoff, B, Turkanis, C D, Bartlett, L (2001), Community of learners; Adults provide leadership and
encourage leadership in children as well, in Learning Together: Children and Adults in a School
Community, New York: Oxford University Press
Rogoff et al highlight the importance of adults in a school community:
Sharing a philosophy of practice: to establish what a leader and his or her team believe is important
Considering the trade-offs between efficiency and the time and energy needed for collaborative
learning and decision making
Finding ways to use conflicting views and change as learning opportunities.
Scrivens, C (2001), Leadership in early childhood: National reflections. Paper
presented at the New Zealand Association for Research in Education Annual
Conference, Christchurch, NZ, 58 December, 2001
Scrivens reports on a research study undertaken in New Zealand as part of the International Leadership
Project which is being administered in 18 countries worldwide.
The author states that views documented in this report can be linked to other studies in early childhood
leadership research; the early childhood leader is found to be supportive, collaborative and professional. In
addition, early childhood professionals work in concert with an ethics of care; for children, staff, families
and the community. This paper specifically documents on the responses of New Zealand early childcare
leaders in relation to the following questions:
What do you see as the most important tasks and responsibilities of the leader?
How would you describe leadership in the context of an early childhood education service?
Replies to these questions could be divided into two overall clusters: support and teamwork and
professionalism. The support and teamwork cluster covered both support for staff and support for parents
and children. Many supervisors emphasise the importance of supporting staff, teamwork and working with
23
parents. In connection with professionalism, the author cites James Raths, who speaks of three facets of
professionalism: knowledge, colleagueship and advocacy. These aspects were manifest in the responses of
supervisors in this study as value enhancing and developing their knowledge and skills. They deem their
own and their staffs personal and professional development to be of crucial importance to improving the
quality of the service they provide. Working collaboratively is also referred to as being essential. Finally,
advocacy for the centres children, families and staff is seen as imperative.
Scrivens, C, and Duncan, J (2003) What decisions? Whose decisions? Issues for team leaders in
decision-making in New Zealand childcare centres. Paper presented at Our Child, The Future,
Adelaide, Australia, 58 May 2003
Scrivens and Duncan report on their project which looks at the process and issues of decision-making by
team leaders in New Zealand childcare centres. Early childhood leaders were asked two main questions:
Describe the decision-making that you are responsible for in your own centre.
Do you feel that you should have more responsibility or opportunity to make independent decisions
concerning your service?
It was found that responses from leaders could be divided into three overarching categories: decisions
concerning people (to be split up further into decisions about staff and about families/community);
programmes, policies and practices, and plant.
Issues in the decision-making process that came to the fore were lack of time, limited understanding and
difficult relationships with staff and parents.
It is suggested that knowledge about and involvement in the outcomes of the decisions is crucial for staff to
be engaged in the decision-making process.
The report illustrates the wide range of decisions supervisors are involved in. As a result of the different
parties involved (supervisors, staff, parents and community) it is suggested that leadership and decision-
making in early childhood settings should have a more consultative nature rather than making decisions by
using a consensus model and wanting to reach a compromise.
Siraj-Blatchford, I, Sylva, K, Muttock, S, Gilden, R, and Bell, D (2002), Researching Effective
Pedagogy in the Early Years, London: DfES
This report looks at the features which make for effective pedagogy in the early years, as found in the
effective Provision of Pre-school Education Project (EPPE) (Sylva et al). All of the case study settings in
this study were found to have sound leadership, good communications, and shared and consistent ways of
working amongst the staff. Where parents became involved in educational leadership and worked with
childrens learning at home, child outcomes were strong. The EPPE Project found a strong relationship
between the qualifications of the centre manager and quality of service provision in early childhood settings.
Whalley, M (2002), Early years leaders involving parents in their childrens learning, Creative Waves.
Discussion Paper on Future Schools, National College for School Leadership, presented at BERA,
2002
This paper explores the idea of parents and early years educators working together to benefit childrens
development and learning. Parents are their childs primary educator and are involved in and dedicated to
their childs development. When parents and early childhood professionals create an equal partnership in
which their knowledge and experiences are shared, a stimulating and encouraging situation is created, which
is advantageous for the childs progress. Research evidence shows that knowledge and experiences of both
parties are essential and should be seen as complementary. The author articulates that early care and
24
education settings ought to support parental involvement; however, it is not always recognised by early
childhood leaders in what way parents competencies can contribute to childrens learning.
The recent early years curriculum has encouraged both children and professionals to be more reflective on
their own experiences. Subsequently, this National College for School Leadership research aimed at creating
an understanding between parents and professionals and to develop an effective dialogue and partnership
between them to make them reflect on one anothers competencies to enhance childrens learning.
The leaders involved in the project agreed that engaging parents in the early years was crucial to childrens
achievements and in spite of some practical constraints in attending training and implementing interventions
aimed at parental involvement, all had taken notice of significant improvements after doing so.
The report states that it is crucial for leaders and staff to be reflective and to be willing to cultivate their own
practice. Improved co-operation of early childhood professionals with parents as part of that will mean a big
step forward for childrens learning and development.
Whalley, M, Whitaker, P, Wyles, G, and Harris, P (2005), An Enquiry into the Impact of a Leadership
Development Programme on Leaders of Integrated Early Years Centres, Derby: Pen Green
Innovators in the field of early childhood, Pen Green Research Centre, under the leadership of Margy
Whalley, developed a Leadership Programme. This study investigates the effects that the programme had on
those integrated centre leaders who took part. Further, the study sought to establish the impact of their
learning on the centres they lead.
25
References
Adams, K (2005), Personal conversation
Aubrey, C (2007), Leading and Managing in the Early Years, London: Sage Publications
Australian Journal of Early Childhood (2000), Management and Leadership, Australian Journal of Early
Childhood, 25 (1), March
Bass, B M (1985), Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York: Free Press
Bass, M (2000), The future of leadership in learning organisations, Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), pp
1840
Bella, J, and Bloom, P J (2003), Zoom. The Impact of Early Childhood Leadership Training on Role
Perceptions, Job Performance, and Career Decisions, The McCormick Tribune Foundation, The Illinois
Department of Human Services, Wheeling, ILL: The Center for Early Childhood Leadership
Bennett, N, Harvey, J A, Wise, C, and Woods, P A (2003), Distributed leadership: A desk study. Retrieved
from www.ncsl.org.uk/literaturereviews
Bergin-Seers, S, and Breen, J (2002), The performance of long day care centres in rural and remote areas,
Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27(1), pp 2432
Boardman, M (2003), Changing times: Changing challenges for early childhood leaders, Australian
Journal of Early Childhood, 28(2), pp 2025
Bloom, P J (2000), How do we define director competence?, Child Care Information Exchange, 138, pp
1318
Bloom, P J (2003), Leadership in action: How effective directors get things done, Lake Forest: New
Horizons
Boyd, B, Dunlop, A-W, Mitchell, J, Seagraves, L, Clinton, C, and Deuchar, R (2008 forthcoming),
Curriculum Architecture a Literature Review. Report for The Scottish Executive Education Department to
inform the implementation of A Curriculum for Excellence
Crawford, M (2003), Inventive management and wise leadership, in Bennett, N, Crawford, M, and
Cartwright, M (eds), Effective educational leadership, London: Paul Chapman, pp 6273
Dalli, C (2003), Professionalism in early childhood practice: thinking through the debates, Paper presented
at the 13
th
Annual Conference of the European Early Childhood Education Research Association, University
of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 36 September 2003
Dalli, C (2005), Reflecting on Professionalism in Early Years Teaching: Relationships, Responsiveness and
Curriculum, Early Years Lecture Series, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 6

September 2005
David, T (2003), What do we know about teaching young children? A professional user review of UK
research based on the BERA Academic Review, Early Years Research: Pedagogy, Curriculum and Adult
Roles, Training and Professionalism
26
Duncan, J (2003), Aiming away: New Zealand childcare supervisors' responses, Paper presented to the
Eighth Early Childhood Convention, Palmerston North, 2225 September, 2003
Dunlop, A-W (2002), Scottish Nursery Teachers Concepts of Leadership, Paper presented at the Third
Warwick International Early Years Conference, University of Warwick, 1820 March, 2002
Dunlop, A-W (2005), Scottish Early Childhood Teachers Concepts of Leadership, Interim Report of
Research in Progress, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde
Dunlop, A-W, Boyd, B, Skinner, D, Deuchar, R, Mitchell, J, and Smith, I (2008 forthcoming), A Literature
Review of Models of Curriculum Change, Report for the Scottish Executive Education Department to inform
the implementation of A Curriculum for Excellence
Ebbeck, M, and Waniganayake, M (2003), Early childhood professionals: Leading today and tomorrow,
Sydney: MacLennan and Petty
Fletcher, J, and Kaufer, K (2003), Shared leadership, in Pearce, C, and Conger, J (eds), Shared leadership:
Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, London: Sage, pp 2147
Hard, L (2004), How is leadership understood in early childhood education and care?, Journal of
Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 11(1), pp 123131
Hard, L (2005), Would the leaders in early childhood education and care please step forward?, Journal of
Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 12, pp 5161
Hard, L, and OGorman, L (2007), Push-Me or Pull-You? An Opportunity for Early Childhood
Leadership in the Implementation of Queenslands Early Years Curriculum, Contemporary Issues in Early
Childhood, 8(1), pp 5060
Harris, A, Day, C, Hadfield, M, Hopkins, D, Hargreaves, A, and Chapman, C (2002), Effective Leadership
for School Improvement, London: Routledge
HM Inspectorate of Education (2000), Improving Leadership in Scottish Schools, Edinburgh: Scottish
Executive Education Department. Retrieved on 3.11.05 from
http://www.hmie.gov.uk/documents/publication/ilss.pdf
HM Inspectorate of Education (2006), Improving Scottish Education, A report by HMIE on inspection and
review 20022005, Livingston: HMIE
Hujala, E (2004), Dimensions of Leadership in the Childcare Context, Scandinavian Journal of
Educational Research, 48(1), February
Jorde-Bloom, P, and Sheerer, M (1992), The effect of leadership training on child care program quality,
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, pp 579594
Kagan, S L, and Hallmark, L G (2001), Cultivating leadership in early care and education, Child Care
Information Exchange, 140, pp 710
Larkin E (1999), The Transition from Direct Caregiver to Administrator in Early Childhood Education,
Child and Youth Care Forum, 28(1), February, pp 2132(12)
27
Leithwood, K, Day, C, Sammons, P, Harris, A, and Hopkins, D (2006), Successful School Leadership
What it is and How it Influences Pupil Learning, Nottingham: DfES publications RR800
Lingard, B, Hayes, D, Mills, M, and Christie, P (2003), Leading Learning, Maidenhead: Open University
Press
Locke, E (2003), Leadership: Starting at the top, in Pearce, C, and Conger, J (eds), Shared leadership:
Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, London: Sage, pp 271284
MacBeath, J (2004), The Leadership File: twenty-five definitions of leadership with activities to help you
recognize their relevance to school practice, Melbourne: Hawker Brownlow Education
McLean, A (2003), The Motivated School, London: Paul Chapman Publishing
McLeod, L (2003), Organisational culture: A closer look at its effect on children, Early Education, (32),
pp 1723
Meade, A (2003), ECE Centres of innovation in New Zealand, Paper presented at the Leadership and
Management in the Early Years Conference, Pen Green Leadership Centre, Corby, Northamptonshire,
October 2003
Moyles, J (2004), Effective Leadership and Management in the Early Years, Maidenhead: Open University
Press/McGraw-Hill Education
Muijs, D, Aubrey, C, Harris, A, and Briggs, M (2004), How do they manage? A review of the research on
leadership in early childhood, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(2), pp 157160
National College for School Leadership (2005), retrieved on 20.10.05 from
http://www.ncsl.org.uk/community_leadership/communityleadership-index.cfm
Nivala, V, and Hujala, E (eds) (2002), Leadership in early childhood education, Cross-cultural perspectives,
Oulu, Finland: Department of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education, Early Childhood Education,
University of Oulu, retrieved on 20.08.05 from http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514268539/isbn9514268539.pdf
Nupponen, H (2006a), Framework for Developing Leadership Skills in Child Care Centres in Queensland,
Australia, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(2), pp 146161
Nupponen, H (2006b), Leadership concepts and theories: Reflections for practice for early childhood
directors, Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 31(1), March 2006, pp 4350
OECD (2001) Australia (OECD Country Note, 2001)
Osgood, J (2004), Time to get down to business? The Responses of Early Years Practitioners to
Entrepreneurial Approaches to Professionalism, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(1), pp 524
Pearce, C L, and Conger, J A (eds) (2003), Shared Leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Pen Green (2005). Retrieved on 30.10.05 from Publications http://www.pengreen.org
Rodd, J (2001), Building leadership expertise of future early childhood professionals, Journal of Early
Childhood Teacher Education, 22, 912
28
Rodd, J (2005), Leadership in Early Childhood (3
rd
edition), Maidenhead: Open University Press
Rogoff, B, Turkanis, C D, Bartlett, L (2001), Community of learners; Adults provide leadership and
encourage leadership in children as well, in Learning Together: Children and Adults in a School
Community, New York: Oxford University Press
Sadek, E, and Sadek, J (2004), Good Practice in Nursery Management (2
nd
edition), Cheltenham: Nelson
Thornes
Scottish Executive Education Department (2002), Guidance on Involvement of Teachers in Pre-school
Education, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department
Scottish Executive (2004a), Ambitious, Excellent Schools Our Agenda for Action, Edinburgh: Scottish
Executive Education Department
Scottish Executive (2004b), Review of the early years workforce. Retrieved on 31.10.05 from
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2004/06/5622
Scottish Executive (2004c), A Curriculum for Excellence: Ministerial Response, Edinburgh: Scottish
Executive
Scottish Executive (2005), Ambitious, Excellent Schools Leadership, A Discussion Paper, Edinburgh:
Scottish Executive Education Department
Scottish Executive (2006a), A Curriculum for Excellence, Progress and Proposals, A Paper from the
Curriculum Review Programme Board, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive
Scottish Executive (2006b), A Curriculum for Excellence, Building the Curriculum 1: The contribution of
curriculum areas, Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland
Scottish Executive (2006c), National Review of the Early Years and Childcare Workforce. Edinburgh:
Scottish Executive
Scottish Executive (2007), A Curriculum for Excellence, Building the Curriculum 318 (2), Active learning
in the early years, Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland
Scottish Parliament (2006), Early Years Parliamentary Inquiry, Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament Education
Committee
Scrivens, C (2001), Leadership in early childhood: National reflections, Paper presented at the New Zealand
Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Christchurch, NZ, 58 December, 2001
Scrivens, C (2002a), Redefining leadership for early childhood services, Delta, 54 (1&2), pp 4356
Scrivens, C (2002b), Constructions of leadership: Does gender make a difference? Perspectives from an
English speaking country, in Nivala, V, and Hujala, E, Leadership in Early Childhood Education, Cross
Cultural Perspectives, Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu
Scrivens, C (2003), Educational leadership: What might we learn from research in schools? Early
Education, 31, 2935
29
Scrivens, C (2004), Leadership in early childhood services: How can we discover what matters for
children? Paper presented at the New Zealand Early Childhood Research Symposium, Wellington, 23
November, 2004
Scrivens, C, and Duncan, J (2003), What decisions? Whose decisions? Issues for professional leaders in
decision-making in New Zealand childcare centres, 2003, Early Education, 33, pp 2937
Sergiovanni, T (1999), Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles, Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight
Professional Development
Siraj-Blatchford, I, and Manni (2006), Effective Leadership in the Early Years Sector (ELEYS) Study
Research Report, London: Institute of Education, Uniersit! of London"#eneral $eachin% &ouncil for
En%land' (aila)le at:
***'%tce'or%'u+
Siraj-Blatchford, I, Sylva, K, Muttock, S, Gilden, R, and Bell, D (2002), Researching Effective Pedagogy in
the Early Years. London: DfES
Solly, K (2003), What do early years leaders do to maintain and enhance the significance of the early
years? A paper on a conversation with Kathryn Solly held at the Institute of Education on 22 May 2003
Stamopolous, E (2003), Elucidating the Dilemma of P1 in Western Australian Schools: towards a solution,
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(2), pp 188217
Sylva, K, Melhuish, E, Sammons, P, Siraj-Blatchford, I, and Taggart, B (2004), The Effective Provision of
Pre-School Education (EPPE) Project: Final Report. A Longitudinal Study Funded by the DfES 19972004
Thornton, K R (2005), Courage, Commitment and Collaboration: Notions of Leadership in the New
Zealand ECE Centres of Innovation, Victoria: University of Wellington (unpublished M.Ed thesis)
Vandell, D L, and Wolfe, B (2000), Child Care Quality: Does it Matter and Does it Need to Be Improved?
Institute for Research on Poverty Special Report no. 78, Institute for Research on Poverty, Department of
Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved on 14.03.07 from
www.wcer.wisc.edu/childcare/statements.html
Vroom, V, and Yago, A (1998), Situation effects and levels of analysis in the study of leadership
participation, in Dansereau F, and Yammarino, F (eds), Leadership: the multiple-level approaches,
Stamford, CT: JAI Press, pp 145160
Wallace, M (2002), Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior
management teams in England and Wales, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), pp 163
186
Whalley, M (2002), Early years leaders involving parents in their childrens learning, Creative Waves,
Discussion Paper on Future Schools, National College for School Leadership, Paper presented at British
Educational Research Association Annual Conference
Whalley, M (2003), The Pen Green leadership centre: Developing leadership learning and growing
learning communities, Paper presented at the Eighth Early Childhood Convention, Palmerston North,
2225 September, 2003
30
Whalley, M, Whitaker, P, Wyles, G, and Harris, P (2005), An Enquiry into the Impact of a Leadership
Development Programme on Leaders of Integrated Early Years Centres, Derby: Pen Green
Woods, P A (2004), Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership,
International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), pp 326
,u+l, #, and &hae-, & (2002), .Influence tactics and leader effectieness/, in 0eider, L L, and Schrieshei1,
& (eds), Leadership, #reen*ich, &$: Infor1ation (%e 2u)lishin%
31
Further Bibliography
Ashman, C, and Green, S (2004), Managing People and Teams, London: David Fulton Publishers
Ashman, C, and Green, S (2004), Planning, Doing and Reviewing, London: David Fulton Publishers
Bass, M (2000), The future of leadership in learning organisations, Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), pp
1840
Bennis, W G (2004), The seven ages of the leader, Harvard Business Review, 82(1), pp 4653, 112
Bishop, A, and Lunn, P (2002), Nursery teachers as leaders and managers: A pedagogical and subsidiary
model of leadership, Research in Education, 67, pp 1322
Bloom, P J, and Bella, J (2005), Investment in leadership training: The payoff for early childhood
education, Young Children, 60(1), pp 3240
Carter, M (2000), What do teachers need from their directors?, Child Care Information Exchange, 136, pp
98101
Cohen-Vogel, L, and Herrington, C D (2005), Introduction: Teacher and Leadership Preparation and
Development: No Strangers to Politics, Educational Policy, 19(5), pp 517
Daly, M, Byers, E, and Taylor, W (2004), Early Years Management in Practice: a Handbook for Early
Years Managers, London: Heinemann
Dubois Davey, L (2000), Teaching for leadership and advocacy in early childhood: Exploring messages in
a college classroom, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 21, pp 179184
Dunlop A-W (2006), A focus on leadership in the pre-school sector, Presentation based on A Literature
Review of Leadership in the Early Years, Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland, HMIE Pre-school
Conference, Lauder College, 22 August 2006
Freeman, N K, and Brown, M H (2000), Evaluating the child care director: The collaborative professional
assessment process, Young Children, 55(5), pp 206
Gaffney, J S, Hesbol, K, and Corso, L (2005), Is your School fit for Literacy? 10 areas of action for
Principals, Naperville, ILL: Learning Point Associates
Geijsel F, Sleegers P, Leithwood K and Jantzi D (2003), Transformational leadership effects on teachers
commitment and effort toward school reform, Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), pp 228256
Harris, A (2004), Distributed leadership: Leading or misleading?, Educational Management and
Administration, 32(1), pp 1124
Harris, A (2002), Distributed leadership in schools: Leading or misleading?. Retrieved on 22.11.04 from
www.icponline.org/feature_articles/f14-0.2htm
Harris, A (2003), Teacher leadership: A new orthodoxy, in B Davies and J West-Burnham (eds),
Handbook of educational leadership and management, London: Pearson Education, pp 4450
Harris, A, and Lambert, L (2003), Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Retrieved on
22.11.04 from
32
www.ncsl.org.uk/index.cfm?pageid=nlg-nlc-resources-leadership
Hatherley, A, and Lee, W (2003), Voices of early childhood leadership, New Zealand Journal of
Educational Leadership, 18, pp 91100
Isles-Buck, E, and Newstead, S (2003), Essential Skills for Managers of Child-centred Settings, London:
David Fulton
Kagan, S L (1993), Leadership training for collaboration, Paper presented at the North Central Regional
Educational Laboratory Regional Early Childhood Forum, October 3, 1993
Knapp, M S, Copland, M A, Plecki, M L, and Portin, B S (2006), Leading, Learning, and Leadership
Support, A Research Report in collaboration with the Wallace Foundation, Washington, DC: University of
Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved on 3.05.07 from
http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/Publications.html
Knapp, M S, Swinnerton, J A, Copland, M A, and Monpas-Huber, J (2006), Data-informed Leadership in
Education, A Research Report in collaboration with the Wallace Foundation, 2006. Retrieved on 3.05.07
from
http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/Publications.html
Ministry of Education (2003), A logic model for the evaluation of Pathways to the Future Ng Huarahi
Arataki, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education (unpublished paper)
Ministry of Education (2002), Pathways to the Future Ng Huarahi Arataki: A 10-year strategic plan for
early childhood education, Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education
Mitchell, L (2002), Differences between community owned and privately owned early childhood education
and care centres: A review of evidence, Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational
Research (unpublished paper)
Moss, P (2002), Time to say farewell to early childhood?, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3
(3), pp 435438
Moss, P, and Petrie, P (2002), From children's services to children's spaces: Public policy, children and
childhood, London: RoutledgeFalmer
Muijs, D, and Harris, A (2006), Teacher Led School Improvement: Teacher Leadership in the UK,
Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 22, 8, pp 961972
Osgood, J, and Sharp, C (2000), Developing Early Education and Childcare Services for the 21st Century,
Slough: NFER
Osgood, J, and Stone, V (2002), Assessing the Business Skills of Early Years, Childcare and Playwork
Providers, London: Department for Education and Skills
Payne, M (2000), Teamwork in Multi-Professional Care, London: Palgrave
Portin, B S, Alejano, C R, and Knapp, M S (2006), Redefining Roles, Responsibility, and Authority of
School Leaders, A Research Report in collaboration with The Wallace Foundation, Washington, DC:
University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved on 3.05.07 from
http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/Publications.html
33
Portin, B S, Feldman, S, and Knapp, M S (2006), Purposes, Uses, and Practices of Leadership Assessment
in Education, A Research Report in collaboration with The Wallace Foundation, Washington, DC:
University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved on 3.05.07 from
http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/Publications.html
Shin, M S, Recchia, S L, Lee, S Y, Lee, Y J, and Mullarkey, L S (2004), Understanding early childhood
leadership: Emerging competencies in the context of relationships, Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2
(3), pp 30116
Smith, M (2005), Strategies for successful fellowships: Nurturing early childhood leaders, Young Children,
60 (1), pp 1218
Sotolongo, J (2004), Intensive Technical Assistance Assessment Tool, Community Systems Edition, Raleigh,
NC: Smart Starts National Technical Assistance Center, 2004
Spillane, J, Halverson, R, and Diamond, J (2004), Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed
perspective, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2004, 36 (1), pp 334
Teddlie, C, and Reynolds, D (2000), The processes of school effectiveness, in Teddlie, C, and Reynolds, D
(eds), The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research, pp 134159, London: Falmer Press
Van Tassel Baska, J, and Stambaugh, T (eds) (2007), Overlooked Gems: A National Perspective on Low-
Income Promising Learners, Conference Proceedings, Washington: National Association for Gifted
Children
Waniganayake, M, Morda, R, and Kapsalakis, A (2000), Leadership in child care centres: Is it just another
job?, Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25 (1) pp 1319
34