Whole Class Analysis

Students

Pre Assessment

a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
q)
r)
s)
t)
u)
v)
w)
x)
y)
z)
aa)

0%
10%
0%
25%
30%
50%
30%
40%
60%
20%
21%
30%
60%
20%
40%
0%
17%
30%
40%
20%
0%
0%
15%
20%
35%
0%
15%

During Assessment
10%
15%
10%
35%
50%
70%
45%
60%
70%
25%
30%
81%
63%
60%
46%
10%
20%
34%
46%
25%
05%
08%
18%
25%
45%
05%
35%

Post Assessment
85%
72%
60%
74%
83%
90%
68%
85%
71%
90%
87%
99%
83%
95%
83%
70%
83%
80%
89%
81%
28%
71%
73%
55%
83%
38%
80%

Judging from the data above, I can conclude that all but five of my twenty-seven students passed the final
assessment. Ten of my students received a B and two received an A. Overall, the student improved dramatically;
for example, student u went from 0% to 85%. The pre assessment was a written draft of a paper for their writing
prompt on Things Fall Apart, the during assessment was a peer edited draft that they typed in the lab, and the
post assessment is the final draft of the paper. Each student improved over the course of the activities that I had
them complete. The lesson was successful, but I feel that the five students who received failing grades will need
to conference with me individually on their writing. The grades administered were calculated according to the
following: promptness, grammatical correctness, ideas, organization, transition words, formatting, works cited,
direct textual evidence from the book, and verb tense consistency. The majority of the points that students
missed were due to simple grammatical errors. Therefore, I can conclude that I need to spend more time with
them on grammar.