Steam condensate recovery is often lower than ideal, between 30-40% rather than 70-80%, due to problems with steam condensate drainage from heat exchangers like process heaters and reboilers. These problems can cause more malfunctions than any other single issue. Two common problems are blowing the condensate seal, which reduces reboiler capacity, or condensate backup, which also reduces capacity regardless of the steam placement in shell-side or tube-side reboilers. The author provides an example from early in their career designing a stripper reboiler where the condensate drainage was sized based on flow rate and boiling point calculations.
Steam condensate recovery is often lower than ideal, between 30-40% rather than 70-80%, due to problems with steam condensate drainage from heat exchangers like process heaters and reboilers. These problems can cause more malfunctions than any other single issue. Two common problems are blowing the condensate seal, which reduces reboiler capacity, or condensate backup, which also reduces capacity regardless of the steam placement in shell-side or tube-side reboilers. The author provides an example from early in their career designing a stripper reboiler where the condensate drainage was sized based on flow rate and boiling point calculations.
Steam condensate recovery is often lower than ideal, between 30-40% rather than 70-80%, due to problems with steam condensate drainage from heat exchangers like process heaters and reboilers. These problems can cause more malfunctions than any other single issue. Two common problems are blowing the condensate seal, which reduces reboiler capacity, or condensate backup, which also reduces capacity regardless of the steam placement in shell-side or tube-side reboilers. The author provides an example from early in their career designing a stripper reboiler where the condensate drainage was sized based on flow rate and boiling point calculations.
You can imagine how I've become so smart on this subject. Author explaining preference for total trap-out chimney trays in crude distillation towers Probably more process heaters and reboilers malfunction because of steam condensate drainage problems than any other single cause. In most of the plants in which I have worked, steam condensate recovery is 30% to 40%, rather than 70% to 80%, because of this complex malfunction. The problem is that we operate between two extremes: Blowing the condensate seal Condensate backup Both conditions result in a loss of reboiler capacity, regardless of whether the steam is on the shell side (vertical reboilers) or on the tube side (horizontal reboilers). I began my career as a process design engineer in 1965 for the long-vanished American Oil Company. I recall the design of a stripper reboiler using 100 psig steam on the tube side. On my process owsheet diagram (PFD), I showed 10,000 lb/hr of steam entering the top of the channel head of the reboiler. Draining out from the bottom of the channel head, I indicated a ow of 20 GPM of water at 340F. The 340F was the boiling point, or saturation temperature, of 100 psig water. My pipe sizing chart indicated that a 20 GPM ow of water required a line size of 1 inches for a line velocity of 4 ft/sec. Steam Condensate Collection Systems
The Steam Engine Explained and Illustrated (Seventh Edition)
With an Account of its Invention and Progressive Improvement, and its Application to Navigation and Railways; Including also a Memoir of Watt