This document summarizes the results of 5 hypothesis tests. The first test found that fuel consumption had not improved based on a p-value greater than 5%. The second test rejected the null hypothesis that fuel consumption met the manufacturer's claim of 39mpg, finding strong evidence it was worse. The third test rejected the null hypothesis that employees worked at least 40 hours based on a p-value slightly below 5%. The fourth test could not reject the null hypothesis that a machine was working properly. The fifth test could not reject the management consultant's hypothesis based on a p-value between 5-10%.
This document summarizes the results of 5 hypothesis tests. The first test found that fuel consumption had not improved based on a p-value greater than 5%. The second test rejected the null hypothesis that fuel consumption met the manufacturer's claim of 39mpg, finding strong evidence it was worse. The third test rejected the null hypothesis that employees worked at least 40 hours based on a p-value slightly below 5%. The fourth test could not reject the null hypothesis that a machine was working properly. The fifth test could not reject the management consultant's hypothesis based on a p-value between 5-10%.
This document summarizes the results of 5 hypothesis tests. The first test found that fuel consumption had not improved based on a p-value greater than 5%. The second test rejected the null hypothesis that fuel consumption met the manufacturer's claim of 39mpg, finding strong evidence it was worse. The third test rejected the null hypothesis that employees worked at least 40 hours based on a p-value slightly below 5%. The fourth test could not reject the null hypothesis that a machine was working properly. The fifth test could not reject the management consultant's hypothesis based on a p-value between 5-10%.
1. p-value = 0.05938 >5% so we cant reject H0 and conclude that fuel consumption has not improved. 2. p-value = 0.00307 < 5% so we reject H0 there is very strong evidence that fuel consumption is worse than the manufacturers claim of 39mpg. 3. p-value is just less than 5% so we reject H0 and accept that they are working less than 40 hours at the moment. 4. p-value = 2 x 0.04272= 0.08544 >5% so we cant reject H0 and conclude that the machine is working properly. 5. p-value is between 5% and 10% so we cant reject H0 and conclude that the management consultant is correct.