qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx
cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl
zxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
Research methods
klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg
Dr. Guy Assaker
Assignment 1
hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd
Students: Allan Shaheen Abdou
Rody El-Khalil
fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa
Paul Mouawad
sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio
pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyu
iopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert
yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe
rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx

1.
Statistics
prescqa2
N

Valid

prescqa1

120

120

Mean

8.7667

7.5833

Std. Error of Mean

.87653

.82618

Median

6.0000

5.5000

.00

.00

9.60194

9.05036

92.197

81.909

1.477

1.521

.221

.221

2.684

2.460

.438

.438

49.00

41.00

Minimum

.00

.00

Maximum

49.00

41.00

1052.00

910.00

25

.0000

.0000

50

6.0000

5.5000

75

14.7500

12.0000

Missing

Mode
Std. Deviation
Variance
Skewness
Std. Error of Skewness
Kurtosis
Std. Error of Kurtosis
Range

Sum
Percentiles

All measures of central tendency (mean, median, range

and mode), are higher in month two than month one. In
addition, std deviation and variance are also higher in
month two.

2.
One-Sample Statistics
N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

prescqa2

120

8.7667

9.60194

.87653

prescqa1

120

7.5833

9.05036

.82618

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Lower

Upper

prescqa2

10.002

119

.000

8.76667

7.0310

10.5023

prescqa1

9.179

119

.000

7.58333

5.9474

9.2193

The mean for prescriptions in month 2 is higher than the

mean of prescriptions in month one, this indicates that
yes month 2 has higher prescriptions than month one.
From data in number 1, we also saw that sum of
prescriptions for month 2(1052)>sum of prescriptions for
month 1 (910).
We notice that prescriptions are increasing from month
one to month two (9101052). Thus sales are increasing
over the month.

3.

We notice that the points in the test are rising upward

and close to each other. We suggest a positive
correlation.

Correlations
prescqa2
prescqa2

Pearson Correlation

prescqa1
1

Sig. (2-tailed)
N
prescqa1

Pearson Correlation

.942**
.000

120

120

.942**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

120

120

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Ho=there is no significant relationship between the two variables at the

population level r=0.
P-value=0<0.05.
We reject Ho; hence there is a relationship between the
two variables.
r=+0.942. We deduce that 94.2 % of the time the sales in
the next month are related to the sales in the month
before.