Labour councillors question if the city's budget focuses on the correct priorities, as there appears to be slightly more money than expected. While they support fully funding council tax reduction for the poorest residents, they are unsure if other vital services protected by previous Labour amendments, such as children's centers, parks, and pest control, will receive funding. The Labour leader argues that if spare cash exists, it should go to these essential local services rather than the mayor's personal projects.
Labour councillors question if the city's budget focuses on the correct priorities, as there appears to be slightly more money than expected. While they support fully funding council tax reduction for the poorest residents, they are unsure if other vital services protected by previous Labour amendments, such as children's centers, parks, and pest control, will receive funding. The Labour leader argues that if spare cash exists, it should go to these essential local services rather than the mayor's personal projects.
Original Description:
Mayor looks already committed to 6 item shopping list. Is this a real consultationm
Labour councillors question if the city's budget focuses on the correct priorities, as there appears to be slightly more money than expected. While they support fully funding council tax reduction for the poorest residents, they are unsure if other vital services protected by previous Labour amendments, such as children's centers, parks, and pest control, will receive funding. The Labour leader argues that if spare cash exists, it should go to these essential local services rather than the mayor's personal projects.
Labour councillors question if the city's budget focuses on the correct priorities, as there appears to be slightly more money than expected. While they support fully funding council tax reduction for the poorest residents, they are unsure if other vital services protected by previous Labour amendments, such as children's centers, parks, and pest control, will receive funding. The Labour leader argues that if spare cash exists, it should go to these essential local services rather than the mayor's personal projects.
Labour Councillors welcome any genuine consultation on the Budget, and that there is apparently a little more money than the Councils finance people thought - but a consultation with a shopping list attached makes it sound as if the Mayor has already made his mind up. Labour Leader, Cllr Helen Holland said, We are glad to see that the argument we made last year that the Mayor should fully fund the Council Tax Reduction scheme, has been taken on board, and that particular help to the poorest has not been threatened again, but what has happened to other areas given protection by Labours amendments to this years Budget in February? We keep being told these have been supported, but anecdotal evidence suggests otherwise. If there is some spare cash, then the Mayor must look again at vital services like Childrens Centres, Parks, Pest Control, the Hardship Fund, before committing funds to his pet projects. Local Authorities have borne the brunt of the Coalition Governments cuts, and some services are close to collapse, with budget reductions and staff redundancies. These are the areas that residents want to see protected first.