Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

B2 Advanced Robotics

Nick Cammarata and Dillon Thompson Robotics Final


Differences

Old New

Micr Me
MIT Legos Tufts oproc
essor tal
Robotic Transport Apparatus
More complex Typical

o t o r s
s e r v o s

b u i l d

b e
D i ff e r e L e s s
M o r e

w i t h
d o n e

l e s s
n t
a c c u r a
t o

f r o m

a n
c l a s s c y

m
C
Robot T h ro w i n g
Arm
p

Device

c
r

w i t h i n
c ti
r

W o u l d

o n s t r i
e q u i r e

b u i l d

ti
e
m o r e
m u c h

F i t s
m i n g
o g r a m

a c c u r a t t o

m e
m o r e

o n s
M u c h E a s i e r
Major Influences
H-Bridge Arm
Building the device
Allows robot to be able to went more smoothly
move backwards up ramp than expected, with
no building problems

Adds extra complexity to


project, and requires
motors to now Not strong enough
communicate with the
microprocessor
Looking Back

What I learned


What I learned by doing this project is that you have to work consistently, if you take breaks from
your robot working on separate parts without finishing other parts, it will not work correctly

What I would do differently


If I were to do this project again, I would have used a more efficient system
to manage the back engines both programmatically and structurally

What would I tell new people doing this


This project is more than you think it is at first, so be prepared for many
parts of a project that you did not expect
Further Ideas

Race Robots


Would add more of a speed issue to the project

Would create performance stature among successful robots

Lift and throw heavier objects


Robots that would throw larger objects with the same motors would have to use
the same potential energy more efficiently, adding another part to the project
The End, Thank You

エンド、ありがとう

Fin, Merci

You might also like