Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Late Neogene Fluvial Stratigraphy of Texas Coastal PLain
Late Neogene Fluvial Stratigraphy of Texas Coastal PLain
LATE PREHISTORIC
I ,
f,-~'. LATEPALEOINDIAN
/-,
,..
'
. - - EAR!.V "Rl'IIAIC '::::J'-'I~ 6,450±,lJO B.P.
'.
.~8 780:,2108 P:
~VEl.M·C1I.EEJ(PALBJ5Ot.i i f j"ur'"!""('.,.'rTh u\ I
6.930.±,65 B.P.
.• 9,200.±,lJO 8.P•
................ ~ 9, 780.:t,IlO B.. .. I
I 1'10 ..
.•
\
i :870:t,120 B.P:~
I ··I··-... -.. _~r··T !
PEJlEZ'AlEOSOl
10,781):140 B.P.
SOMERSETPAI..BlSlX..
SUI,ifled Gruel, Ind S,n<b
•
PEJl.EZPAlfOS(H..
.' I \ I I
.•••
~
MOOERNA...OODPLAIN
9 800±,140 B.P.
0 70
1,41 ±.
n.r.
n
I 14~ .. -----------'L:.:.::,-'SOiL'1'-'.
SOILI
,- ..-
13,640:,210 B.P.
~", lJ,96~1S0 B.P. 15,270%,170 B.P.
" -',
SlIalifitd Grhtb Illd SllIdo
---~~------~=-------~~--------~'o~--------~lUo~m~------~"
i
,w. - ,~no..
I 400.. JOO.. . 0
Richard Beene Site (41BX83l)
!
\
I
I
I I CONTENTS
CONTENTS .................................................•................................
\
ROAD LOG
Rolfe D. Mandel and S. Christopher Caran ........................................... .
r
STOP DESCRIPTIONS
Rolfe D. Mandel and S. Christopher Caran,
\ with contributions by Alston Thoms,
John Jacob, Curt Sorensen, and Wulf Gose ........................................ .
I
\
PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO TIlE QUATERNARY OF
SlXTEEN COUNTIES IN THE CENTRAL TEXASI
BALCONES FAULT ZONE REGION: A BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dennis Tl'ombatore ...................................................................... .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............•......................................................
I
J
I
)
\
.)
I.
J
i I
I
; \
Road Log
The field trip originates from San Antonio, Texas, each day (March 27- 29, 1992).
See Figure 1.
Miles
0.0 Depart from the Howard Johnson Motel, Conference Headquarters, San Antonio, Texas.
Proceed out of parking lot and turn right (south) onto access road. Move into the far left
lane.
\ 0.5 Turn left (north) onto Crestway. Crestway parallels 1H-35 as an access road.
l.4 Bear left and enter 1H-35 North, continuing north to San Marcos, Texas. The interstate
highway parallels the Balcones Escarpment, the line of hills to the west of the highway.
The surface of the Edwards Plateau is about 600 m above the Inner Coastal Plain along the
escarpment in this area. Between San Antonio and New Braunfels, Texas, note the many
large quarries recovering Lower Cretaceous Edwards limestone for concrete manufacture
\ and crushed aggregate.
39.2 Exit 1H-35 North and get into the right lane of the access road.
! 39.4 Turn right (east) onto combined Texas Highway 21180.
40.5 Turn left (north) onto Texas Highway 21 (Old Bastrop Highway).
\
75.5 Turn right (east) onto Texas Highway 71 toward Bastrop,Texas.
79.4 Turn right (south) onto Farm Road 304. We are on the low, broad T-l terrace (Holocene)
of the Colorado River at the intersection of Farm Road 304 and Highway 71. Farm Road
304 crosses three terrace scarps as we continue to Stop 1.
,I. 88.1 Turn left (east) onto gravel road leading into gravel pit.
Tum around and travel back along the gravel road to Farm Road 304.
.I
I
The gravel pit at this locality occupies a terrace remnant only slightly higher than the
surface we drove across when approaching the site. Iron-stained sands and gravels are
exposed in the northern wall of the pit.
96.0 Tum left and come to an immediate stop. Then tum left (north) onto Farm Road 304.
101.9 Take the right (south) fork of Bastrop State Park Road (Loop) lA at the Dining Hall.
Continue on the park road as it loops counterclockwise toward Stop 3 (Lunch).
\'
103.1 Tum left (west) into camping area and continue west to covered pavilion at the end of the
road.
I 103.3 Stop 3 - Lunch.
[ Food will be served under the pavilion, but feel free to climb the hills and walk through the
I camp grounds. Please dispose of trash properly.
Tum around and head east to Bastrop State Park Road (Loop) 1A.
103.5 Tum right (south) onto Bastrop State Park Road (Loop) lAo
104.7 Tum left (west) onto entrance segment of Bastrop State Park Road 1A.
105.3 Tum left (south) onto Bastrop State Park entrance loop.
105.4 Tum left (east) onto Loop 150. The loop will tum to the south and merge with Texas
Highway 71, but instead bear right as you approach the highway.
108.5 We are on the modern floodplain (lowest surface) of the Colorado River at the intersection
3
I
I
of Tahitian and Riverside Drives. Turn left (east) onto Riverside Drive and continue east
as the road climbs Red Bluffs. The road curves left at the top of the bluff.
108.8 Turn left (west) into parking area for Stop 4.
Red Bluffs rise dramatically from the Colorado River to a high but deeply dissected
terrace. Thick Pleistocene fluvial deposits with well developed paleosols overlie the
Eocene Carrizo Formation.
Turn around in the parking area. Turn right (south) onto Riverside Drive.
117.4 A thick section of the Pliocene sandstone (Reklaw Formation?) is exposed on the north
side of Texas Highway 71. There is an ironstone "caprock" at the top of the section.
122.2 Loop 230 forks to the left. Continue south on Texas Highway 95 through Smithville, )
Texas.
4
126.9 Turn left (north) on Bastrop County Road 31S. The road jogs at several points. Stay on
the paved surface.
Miles
I 0.0 Depart from the Howard Johnson, Conference Headquarters, San Antonio, Texas.
Proceed out of parking lot and turn right (south) on access road. Move into the
center lane.
\
0.2 Cross intersection and proceed south onto the access ramp for IH-35 South.
O.S Bear left onto the main ramp for 1H-3S South.
S.9 Bear right onto long ramp for 1-37 South (Corpus Christi exit).
I
. I
. 9.5 Merge onto 1-37 South.
23.S Turn left (south) on Moursund Blvd. Moursund B1vd.becomes Pleasanton Road.
31.4 Turn right (north) and stop at gate leading into the Applewhite Lake project area. Proceed
north on private road.
33.0 Stop at the south end of the large trench for footing of the dam.
I
I
33.0 Stop la • The Richard Beene Site (41BX831).
Stop Ib • Backhoe trench excavated into the Miller Terrace.
Stop lc • Backhoe trench excavated into the Leona Terrace.
Stop Id • Backhoe trench excavated into the Walsh Thrrace.
34.5 SlOP at gate. Exit the Applewhite Lake project area and proceed west on Neal Road.
,
35.8 Tum left (south) on Applewhite Road.
I
37.0 Tum right on Loop 1604.
37.2 Tum left (south) on Oak Island Drive. I
37.3 . Tum left (east) onto dirt road leading into Oak Island Sand Pit (Stop 2).
38.1 Stop 2 • Oak Island· Sand Pit.
I
Tum around and follow dirt road out of the sand pit
38.8 Tum right (north) on Oak Island drive.
38.9 Tum left (west) on Loop 1604.
41.1 Tum right (north) at exit to Texas Highway 16.
41.2 Tum left (west) on access road for Texas Highway 16.
41.4 Tum right (north) on Texas Highway 16.
43.3 Cross the Medina River.
44.2 . Tum left (west) on Watson Road. Pass the Alamo Dragway.
47.2 Stop at intersection with Somerset Road. Cross the intersection and proceed west
47.7 Tum left (south) into Hidden Valley Recreational Park. Proceed south on gravel road.
I
49.0 Stop 3 • Lunch in Hidden Valley Park.
Tum around and proceed north on park road. I
49.3 Tum left (west) on dirt road adjacent to Hidden Valley Office and stop.
,1
49.3 Stop 4 • Hidden Valley Section.
Tum around and proceed north on park road.
49.8 Tum left (west) into gravel pit and stop.
49.9 Stop 5 • Jlidden Valley Sand and Gravel Pit.
6
Turn around and proceed north on park road.
51.0 Turn right (south) on Somerset Road, then bear left onto Quesenberry Road (gravel road).
I 52.2 Turn left (east) on unnamed gravel road.
52.4 Tum right (south) at gate. Proceed south on private gravel road.
\
53.0 Stop 6
/, 53.0 This concludes day 2 of the field trip. Exit the gate at the Stop 6 and tum left on gravel
road. Turn right on Quesenberry Road and proceed to Somerset road. Tum right (north)
on Somerset Road and proceed to Loop 410. Tum right (east) on Loop 410 and retrace the
( route back to Howard Johnson Motel. Take the 1lI-37 North exit, then exit at IH-35 North
(Austin exit). Proceed north on 1lI-35. Exit at Starlight Terrace. Turn left at Turnaround
and proceed under 1lI-35 North. Turn left on access road and proceed south to Howard
Johnson Motel.
\
DAY THREE (Sunday, March 29, 1992)
\ Miles
0.0 Depart from the Howard Johnson, Conference 'Headquarters, San Antonio, Texas.
\ Proceed out of parking lot and tum right (south) on access road. Stay in the right lane.
0.2' Cross intersection and bear right onto the access road for Loop 410 West.
36.5 Turn left (south) onto Farm Road 1343. Immediately turn left (east) onto dirt road. The dirt
road becomes a paved road. Proceed east.
36.8 Turn right (south) and stop at gate. Proceed south on private dirt road.
!
\
\
Stop Descriptions
Portions of the stop descriptions were prepared by Chris Caran, Rolfe Mandel, Alston Thoms,
John Jacob, Curt Sorenson, and Wulf Gose
Stop 1. Pleistocene Alluvial Deposits Exposed in the Tiner Sand and Gravel Pit.
At this stop we will examine heavily iron-cemented Pleistocene fluvial deposits underlying a
high terrace of the Colorado River. The surface of this terrace is -46 m (150 ft) above the low-
flow stage of the Colorado, and corresponds to the Capitol Terrace in Austin and to the Red Bluffs
Terrace in this reach of the valley (Figures 2 and 3; Table I; see also Caran, this volume). It is
one of the highest surfaces in this reach, but lower than the highest surfaces immediately across the
river (Stops 3 and 5). Gullies and small streams have dissected this terrace deeply, especially , I
along the scarp separating it from the next lower fill surface. The Tiner Sand and Gravel Pit was
excavated into this scarp (Figure 2), exposing a 6-m-thick section of alluvium along the west
headwall. Our discussion will focus on this section. .
The lower 5 m of the Tiner section is largely composed of coarse to very coarse sand and
gravel. These were the basal sediments of the Colorado River paleochannel lying just above the
unconformity on Eocene Carrizo sandstone (Unit I), which is exposed in the floor of the pit -30 m
(100 ft) east of the headwall. Terrace fIll directly overlying the Carrizo (Unit II) have a mixed
mineralogy dominated by quartz, quartzite, chert, and feldspar clasts. The sands are leached of
carbonates and exhibit strong, oxidized colors (2.5YR hue); yet primary sedimentary structures,
including tabular bedding and trough cross-bedding, are well preserved throughout the unit.
Unit II is capped by dense ironstone (ferricrete) near the top of the section (Figure 4). The
ironstone is -1 to 1.5 m thick and is continuous across much of the exposure, but fractured and
disrupted in places. Colluvium and/or slope-wash, including Iithoclastsof ironstone, accumulated
in these local depressions. A soil (3Bt4) developed in the colluvium and underlying fluvial
deposits where the ferricrete had been breached. The ferricrete is now "within" the upper part of
this soil, but necessarily pre-dates pedogenesis, since Iithoclasts of ferricrete form part of the soil's
parent material. This soil was subsequently burled by Unit III and became a paleosol. The
paleosol matrix is red (lOR 4/6, dry), strongly acid, moderately low in bases, and has Btsm-Btsg-
BCts horizonation (Table 2). Micromorphological analyses detected prominent clay ftIms and iron
coatings in the paleo-solum (Figure 5). These features are also evident in non-cemented portions
of the Btsb horizon. .
The paleosol is mantled by 65 to 85 cm of coarse-grained fluvial deposits (Unit III). Chemical
and grain-size data (Tables 3 and4) reveal dramatic differences between the soils developed in
Units II and III. For example, soil pH increases from 4.4 in the paleosol in Unit II to 7.1 in
overlying Unit III. The clay-free sand/silt ratio decreases from 7.2 to 2.5, base saturation
increases from 59 to 98 percent, and organic carbon increases from 0.26 to 0.62 percent. A well-
expressed surface soil with A-E-Bts horiwnation is developed at the top of Unit III. The soil
incorporates cobble- and boulder-size Iithoclasts of locally derived ironstone. The Bts horizon, in
aggregate, is 55 cm thick, dark red (2.5YR 3/6, dry) to red (lOR 4/6, dry) in color, and clay in
texture. Soil structure in the Bts horizon is subangular blocky with distinct ferriargillans on clasts
and ped faces. .
At first glance the Tiner section has soil characteristics that are oxic-like, notably a ferricrete
(pedogenic laterite) or iron-cemented B horizon. Soils with similar characteristics have been
reported from localities throughout the world (e.g., Thorp and Reed 1949; Dury and Knox 1971;
Goudie 1973; Nahon et aI. 1980). They are but one category in a class of cemented soil-
geomorphic features known as duricrusts (1\vidale 1976; Retallack 1990). Although opinions vary
widely regarding the origin of these features, there is general agreement that most are pedogenically
derived and further, that crust hardening is enhanced at the edges of escarpments where drainage
8
\
I
\
I )
\
I
I
I
StI NE
E1w. (A) (A') Terrace
m It TIn... gravel pit
140 ttReJlef m
(Stop ,. Colorado River valley 155...--.47
450
D
aurfac.
eroded ) 90
=~!...tr _._._.
%1
tr """nant
:!!-
- '< road of HIli.
-t-' rnl
(") unnamed
0 a~ tributary
of Colorado
._._
~a.
0 350
______ ~
gen..... elevation
of Hili. Pralrl. Crofto
Pralrl. .
&on
65 211
lie
Ii:
1
iil
::s
;..
, David Bottom 121.
~ 100
road I'"
11
..,.c
Topographic ba••: 8a.trop. Texaa "u
7.5-mln topographic quadran~l. 1.land cXj
map (Geological Survey. 1982) (.ubaerfol
lIIfI
bar) 0' o
o 1 ml
I
o ~
Vertical exaggeration: 68.8X
~
Table 1. Relief of the Colorado River terraces in the
l~~~r_fg~~~~l_El~l~ __________________________________________ _
Terracel Relief above Colorado River (low-flow stage): as
terrace reported previously (1-6); as described here (7-9)
q~~~~ii~ ___ l _____ s_____ _____ _____ _____ _____
~ ~ ~ ~ Z_____ § _____ ~ __
Uvalde* 230- 250 ~200- 213- 200+ 230+ NR NR NR
330 279 280
Asylum 195- 160- 195- 197- 180- 197- 180- 190- 195-
215 190 210 213 197 213 210 230 240
Capitol 105- 100 130- 131- 100- 131- 100- 100- 105-
130 160 158 130 157 130 155 160
Montop- NR NR 75- 75- NR 75- NR NR NR
olis 90 92 82
'I Sixth 80 75 60 59- 65- 59- 60- 65- 65-
Street 66 80 66 80 90 90
First 60? 24- 30- 33- 33- 33- 30- 40- 40-
Street 45 40 50 50 50 50 60 65
River- NR? 16- NR 20- 20- 20- 18- ~25- ~30-
view 28 33 33 33 30 40 40
Sand ~10? NR NR 7- 7- 7- 8- i25
Beach 16 16 16 18
River 422 NR ~420 NR NR NR 422** 290- 270-
__ ~l~Y~ ______________________________________________ ~sQ ___ s§~
1: Hill and Vaughan (1897, p. 244, 248>; ~~~ o!!.!.§'~ Hill (1901,
p. 352) and Hill and Vaughan (1902).
2: Deussen (1924, p. 115-116)
3: Weber (1968)
4: Baker and Penteado-Orellana (1977, Table 1)
I 5: Looney and Baker (1977, Table 3)
,I
6: Blum (1991, Table 6.5)
7-9: Relief as shown on the following topographic maps:
7--Austin East (Geological Survey, 1973a) and Montopolis
(Geological Survey, 1973b); 8--Bastrop (Geological Survey,
1982) and Lake Bastrop (Geological Survey, 1982);
9--Smithville (Geological Survey, 1982) and Togo
( Geo log i cal Sur vey, 1981).
Figure 4. View of Tiner Section showing massive ironstone at top of exposure.
12
--
o..scription of the Tiner Section.
A (}'15 7.5YR3/3 7.5YR5/3 IfGR LCoS vfr c,s Common very fine and few fme and medium roots; common
rounded and subangular chert, quartz, and quartzite pebbles;
few ironstone cobbles and boulders.
E 15-30 2.5YR3/6 5YR5/4 IfSBK-ImGR LCoS vf a,s Common very fine and few fine and medium roots; common
rounded and subangular chert, quartz, and quartzite pebbles;
few ironstone cobbles and boulders.
Btsl 3(}'40 2.5YR3/6 2.5YR3/6 2mSBK-2fSBK GSCL fr c,s Few fine and very fine roots; slightly sticky when moist;
few ferriargillans on clasts and vertical ped faces.
Bts2 4(}'56 IOR4/6 IOR4/6 3mSBK-ImSBK C fr g.i Few fme and very fme roots; few rounded and subrouoded
quartz, chert, and feldspar pebbles; slightly sticky when moist;
common ferriargillans on clasts and vertical ped faces.
Bts3 56-85 IOR4/6 IOR4/6 3mSBK-ImSBK C fr a.i Discontinuous massive ironstone; few fme roots; few (10%)
IOYR5/8 stains on ped surfaces; common ferriargillans on
clasts and vertical ped surfaces; 3(}' 50% of matrix consists of
feldspar clasts.
2Btsb 85-116 IOR4/6 IOR4/6 3mSBK-ImSBK GSCL fr -, a,w Discontinuous massive ironstone; few fine roots; few (10%)
IOYR5/8 stains on ped surfaces; common ferriargillans on
clasts and vertical ped surfaces; 60% of matrix is coarse
(2: pebbles); common ironstone lithoclasts.
3Btsgb 116-137 50% IOYR4/6 2m+fABK-vfABK CL h a,w Reduction zones (2.5Y612) on ped faces and along root channels.
50% 2.5Y612
4BCtsb 137-190 2.5YR4/8 2.5YR4/8 ImSBK GSCL vh g,s Most of matrix consists of stratified gravel; indurated; common
ferriargillans on clasts; common ferromanganese stains.
5C 190-560 2.5YR4/8 2.5YR4/8 M CoSL vh Stratified sand and gravel; indurated.
Abbreviations: Structure: I=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fme, m=medium, c=coarse, P=prismatic, SBK=subangular blocky, ABK=anguiar blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=sil~ C=clay, L=loam,V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly
Consistence: fi=frm, fr=friable, h=hard, v=very
Boundaries: c=clear, g=gradual, a=abrup~ s=smoodl, w=wavy, i=irregular
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
I,
I
' .
•
./
,.
b .~"';"_.....o.---J.I M 4i'·_A
Figure 5. Photomicrographs of thin sections, Tyner section. a). Bt2 horizon, PPL. Clay tilm )
overlying dense Fe-crystic fabric. b). Tyner section, 3Bt4 horizon, XPL. Iron and clay coats in
sandy matrix. Note weathered fedlspar particle in lower right corner. All bar lengths 100
micrometers. )
14
-~
A 0-15 13.2 0.7 0.2 0.3 13.1 1(H) 2.60 1.63 7.6
E 15-30 6.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 5.7 1(H) 1.20 0.38 8.1
Btsl 30-40 11.0 1.4 0.3 0.5 15.2 87 0.60 0.62 7.6
Bts2 40-56 18.2 4.5 0.2 1.2 24.6 98 0.41 0.85 7.4
Bts3 56-85 17.5 6.3 0.2 1.3 25.8 98 0.49 0.82 7.1
2Btsb 85-116 4.8 4.6 0.3 0.7 17.7 ·59 0.56 0.62 4.4
3Btsgb 116-137 8.6 4.6 0.3 0.7 17.7 59 0.56 0.26 4.3
4BCtsb 137-190 4.5 4.6 0.5 0.3 22.1 45 0.81 0.21 4.4
5C 190-240 5.2 4.5 0.7 0.3 15.7 68 0.63 0.14 4.8
6C 320-330 2.2 2.4 0.8 0.1 6.5 84 0.47 0.16 4.4
7C 450-460 5.9 4.2 0.5 0.5 16.1 69 5.1
8C 550-560 2.7 1.7 0.4 0.2 10.6 47 0.53 0.20 5.2
Tabl~ 4. Particl~-size distributions: Tiner Sand and Gravel Pit.
~ilD!!* :!il! ~Ii)~ V. F. Sandi Clay-me
HQ[g;QO IXptb V!:; !:; M F YE Total Finc IQta\ Fine Total I~lnn:~A EiD~ :lIm! SmdlSill
- -c:m-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - wI. %- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A 0-15 14.7 10.8 16.4 18.2 14.8 74.9 12.8 20.2 1.6 4.9 LCoS 0.8 3.7
E 15-30 13.5 12.8 16.4 20.0 15.8 78.5 9.3 27.0 1.5 4.5 LCoS 0.8 2.9
Btsl 30-40 9.2 10.6 12.0 13.9 12.3 58.0 12.7 16.6 15.8 25.4 SCL 0.9 3.5
Bts2 40-56 4.0 4.7 5.8 6.1 6.8 27.4 7.6 12.9 47.3 59.7 C l.l 2.1
Bts3 56-85 11.2 6.7 4.8 5.1 6.3 34.1 4.8 13.7 39.2 52.2 C 1.2 2.5
2Btsb 85-.116 28.4 10.7 7.6 8.4 5.1 60.2 4.4 8.4 22.4 31.4 SCL 0.6 7.2
3Btsgb 116-137 5.5 4.8 6.9 7.8 18.3 43.3 6.6 17.5 32.5 39.2 CL 2.3 2.5
4BCtsb 137-190 11.3 21.8 25.5 6.7 3.4 68.7 2.7 4.2 19.8 27.1 SCL 1.5 16.4
5C 190-240 22.1 20.9 12.8 6.5 3.8 66.1 4.7 9.2 16.4 24.7 SCL 0.6 7.2
6C 320-330 23.2 36.6 16.0 5.1 1.7 82.6 1.3 3.5 8.9 13.9 CoSL 0.3 23.6
7C 550-560 32.9 23.3 14.0 3.7 1.6 75.5 2.6 4.7 13.6 19.8 CoSL 0.4 16.1
Stop 2. Pleistocene Alluvial Deposits Exposed in the Townsend Sand and Gravel
Pit.
At this stop we will briefly examine the lithology of alluvium composing valley fill beneath a
low Pleistocene terrace of the Colorado River. A 5 m-thick section of fill (mostly coarse-grained)
is exposed in an abandoned sand and gravel pit about 4 km southwest of Bastrop, Texas (Figure
6). The surface of the terrace is more than 20 m (66 ft) above the modem low-flow channel of the
Colorado, and 25 m (82 ft.) below the highest surface on the cross-valley profile through this site
(Figure 7). The terrace at Stop 2 is correlative with the Sixth Street Terrace in Austin and to the
Antioch Terrace of the Bastrop area (Table I). Unlike the high terrace observed at Stop I, this low
terrace is fairly flat and undissected, although only an isolated remnant is preserved at this site.
An Alfisol, nominally representing the Demona senes, caps this remnant. The bulk of the terrace
fill at Stop 2 consists of stratified sand and gravel. Note the wide variety of clast types, many of
which are reworked exotics, including quartzite, vein quartz, dark (Pennsylvanian?) chert and
other cherts (mostly Lower Cretaceous), Tertiary silicified wood, granite, and rare indurated Lower
Cretaceous limestone particles and reworked fossils. The source of much of the alluvium is older
Colorado terrace deposits plus some newer material derived from bedrock exposed in the Central
Mineral Region (Llano Uplift), Edwards Plateau, and Inner Gulf Coastal Plain. The older terrace
fills that contributed alluvium to this terrace were composed of material derived from primary
sources and former fluvial systems for which there is a sedimentological record, but no remaining
geomorphic record.
I
I
t:
"", , \
: I
: I
.. ------;--1
I
I
\
I
)
18
'--
NW Sf
E1cv. (B) (B') Torrace
m It fl R..lef m
1411 155~47
4IiO
Colorado River volley
!l Elevation 01 hlghut
reported 1l00d 01
i
""iil'" Colorado Rlvv at
8o.tn>p. July 7 or !I.
;--I 1869 (Buckner and 100 JII
400 oth.,... 1987. p. 1SS):
e: 1211 317.7 It (112.1 m).
9OD'D~l
1 chutr
is" orodod margin
'< u pt a_-d 01 lioupt Bend
~ (") nOU ..,.,. aurface Iii.,
co (3 Colorado RlYllr· aurface
'"
'"'"
(lioupt Bend) - •- • t .- .- . .- obandonod 65
6Or-r 1l
20
- - I fIood-ploln
rldgo and Colorodo
~ ~j
l Bend~
~ ..oJe RIval'
o·
:>
J50 Quaternary tcm:u:. fliia Quotomory terrace "". (liou t 1i:U;
ovenylng Eocene WIlcox Group oyortying Eoceno Wilcox Croup 411
12 L •
,
Cll
Cll 100 ( a.H
I>:
..,.c
<:0
00
Topographic base: Baatrop. TO:03 "dl
]OQ
7.S-mln topographic quadran91e "I water leval (low floW) \ ! o o
map (Geological Survey. 1982). II
? •?
o 1 ml
o km
Vertical exaggeration: SS.6X
I
I
Figure 8. Location map, Stops 3-6, showing lines of section C-C' and D-D'.
20
~
S
Elcw.(Cl~
Nisw
L-- lin. 01 ••ctlon chong•• direction _ _ _ _J
N~SE NWt N~W
lin. of aectlon chang.. direction
E
(C')
m ft overlap with
201)' ___ an. of ..etlan
0-0'
k Baotrop State Pari< (part) >
Pork Rd. lC
2
~ Eocene Canrtzo Fm. ReII.1
Qu.t NE 01 Slop 5) ft ~
~
J
1110 HIghway 71 gravel Appraxlmcte E
1>
'<
pIt (Stop 3): contact: Eocene ~
PleIstocene fluvial Reklaw FI.t. ~
I\)
~ ...
(")
100
o
I
d ;2f5
~ii
o km J!,i
JCG-l\ I water level Vertical exaggeration: -40X o
? (low Ilow)
morphologically similar to the Rek and Tremona series, two Aquic Haplustults (U1tisols) formed
on gravel<apped ridge tops (Willis Fonnation?) in adjacent Fayette County to the east. Both series
have thick sola and strong red hues (2.5YR), but the Tremona is more depleted of bases. These
soils are rich in kaolinite, and there is usually ironstone within the Bt horizon. We are in the
process of analyzing the soils on the highest surfaces in Bastrop State Park to detennine if they are,
in fact, ancient U1tisols.
Among the principal attractions of Bastrop State Park are the "lost" pine trees. Loblolly Pine
(~ ~ is common here, but the species reaches its western limit in Bastrop County and
Fayette County immediately to the east (Correll and Johnston, 1970: 72). Loblolly Pine is a
dominant component of the forests of East Texas and the southeastern U.S. Wood from these
pines was used to construct many of the buildings in the park. During the 1920's and '30' s, the
Citizens Conservation Corps (Ccq made numerous improvements in the park grounds using pine
and other native materials, including ironstone which was quarried here and used as a facing stone
for buildings and walls.
S
(D)
NlSE Baotrop state
Pork (ontrance)
+:::v-+
/toy. 21
NW
(0') Terrace
Eloy. overtop ~'-lln. of Metlan N Rd. Pork \ ft Roll., m
m ft nne of section chang.. direction Tahitian WI"lIe
C-C' aubdMoion 150 '- Rei. '" 2JO...--. 70
180 .treet
E
Colorado River valley
Approximate
contaI:C
1
5110
PlaJltocene
fluvial dopo.1to 11O~5I
overlying EGaln.
Carrizo Formation otreot
"Il
QQ'
c: Eocene carrizo Formation
@ with local ven..,. of P1.18tocene
140 unnomed trfbutary fluvial depo.1to and/or lag
01 Cappo... Crt<. 15:1 47
gravel.
9 ~
~ '0
N "
'< Approximate :a o
~
Co) Contact: tJ
Pleistocene
fluvial
'"
a
o· 120
400
..apo.1ta
overlying
Eocene
Rod
Bluff.
l00~30
IOD u
::I Carrizo 27
(stop 4)
o N.
q
Hili.
Prairie _ . - .-f--.... 65 20
(margin) 60 18
pvt. rd.
~ Colorado ~]
1i:.,
Rlvor Elevotlon of highest
TopographIc baa.: Bastrop. Texas 40
Quaternary
reported flood of
7.S-mln topographic quadrangle 12 L •
Colorado RIver at Go!!
terrace Bo.trap. July 7 or 8. map (Goologlcal Survey. 1982) ~>
1110 flll::s over- a'"
lying
Eocene
Carrizo
1869 (Buckner and
othors. 1987. p. 155):
367.7 It (112.1 m).
o
I
o
~
krn
2S
.. '"
e
00
.,~
U
Fonnatlon
3110 water level
Vertical exaggeration: S8.eX o o
1 (low flow)
)
Figure II. View of iron-cemented gravel ledge at the base of Unit 11, Red Bluffs Section.
24
Table 5. Description of the upper 3 m of the easl-facing roadcul al the Red Bluffs Locality (SlOp 4).
Ap 0-20 IOYR313 IOYR413 ImSBK GLFS Ii" c.s Common fme and medium rools.
C 20-60 7.5YR414 7.5YR514 M GLCoS Ii" a.i Gravelly colluvium; many chert clasts; few fine rools.
2BIs Ibl 60-94 2.5YR316 2.5YR416 2mSBK vGSCL Ii" a,w Common rounded. subrounded. and angular cobbles and pebbles;
common distincl ferriargillans on clasls and perl faces.
2Bs12bl 94-118 2.5YR316 2.5YR416 2cSBK GSCL Ii" a,w Irregular zones of Iex!Ure.
3Bls3bl 118-157 60% IOR316 2m+cABK GSCL Ii" a,w Gravel beds through the horizon and bounding if; red zones are
20% 5YR416 slightly brittle (plinthitic); reduced zones are clayey and less
20% 2.5Y416 brillie.
4BCsbi 157-178 2.5YR516 IfSBK 10 M GCoSL Ii" a,w Common horizon!al beds of cherly graveL
5Bllb2 178-193 80% 2.5Y6f1 IfSBK CL Ii" g •• Very sticky when moisl; distinct reticulale 2.5Y612 mottling;
20%IOR316 common medium roots.
5BI2b2 193-248 7.5YR416 7.5YR516 2mP-3mABK FSL vh g.s Common patchy 7.5YR3f1 clay films on vertical perl faces;
common (25-30%) 2.5Y6f1 reduction zones along perl faces;
very hard when dry.
5 BI3b2 248-300 7.5YR416 7.5YR516 IcP-lmABK SCL vh Few patchy 7.5YR3f1 clay films on vertical perl faces;
common (15-20%) 25Y6f1 reduction zones along perl faces;
Abbreviations: Slructure: I=weak, 2=moderale. 3=strong. f=fme. m=medium, c=coarse. P=prismatic. SBK=subangular hlocky. ABK=angular blocky.
GR=granular. M=massive
Texl!!re: S=sand. Si=sil~ C=clay. L=loam, V=very. F=fine. Co=coarse. G=gravelly
Consislencdi=tirm. fr=friable. h=hard, v=very
Boundaries: c=cl..... g=gradual. a=abrup~ s=smooth. w=wavy. i=irregular
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting 10
Table 6. Particle-size distributions: Red Bluffs Locality
5i!1ld* V. F. Sandi Clay free
H2dZQJJ DeI1!1i V~ ~ M E !it: Total Sill Clav >2mm TextJm: Ein, Si!Il!1 SlIIldlSill
- -cm- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - owl % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------wl%-----
Ap 0-20 2.9 7.9 18.4 34.0 15.7 78.9 15.4 5.7 21.0 GLFS 0.4 4.3
C 20-60 19.7 IS.2 18.6 24.7 8.S 86.7 8.9 4.4 69.0 exGLCoS 0.3 0.9
2Btslbl 60-94 IS.7 19.4 19.8 IS.9 2.3 73.1 2.4 24.5 40.0 vGSCL 0.1 3.1
2Bts2bl 94-118 16.9 28.7 23.0 10.9 1.4 80.9 0.8 18.3 32.0 GSCL 0.1 11.0
3Bts3bl 1I8-IS7 9.8 22.S 24.7 13.8 1.7 72.5 1.1 26.4 30.0 GSCL 0.1 6.5
4BCsbl IS7-178 13.7 20.3 23.8 21.2 1.8 80.8 0.5 18.7 39.0 vGCoSL 0.1 16.5
SBtlb2 \78-193 0.8 I.S 7.9 2S.7 9.8 45.7 18.9 3S.4 1.0 CL 0.3 2.4
SBt2b2 193-248 7.7 8.7 12.2 2S.3 12.1 66.0 IS.9 18.1 0.0 FSL 0.4 4.2
SBt3b2 248-300 4.3 6.9 IS.O 23.3 10.3 S9.8 17.2 23.0 11.0 SCL 0.4 3.S
"Texture classes: S=sand, Si=sil~ C=clay, L=loam,V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly, ex=extremely, v=very
Figure 12. View of irregular surface of paleosol developed on Unit II, Red Bluffs Section.
27
zones, where they extend radially.
The 5Bt2b2 and 5Bt3b2 horizons have a combined thickness of about 1.4 m, and are strong
brown (7.5YR 516, dry) in color and fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam in texture. Soil structure
is dominantly prismatic parting to angular blocky with patchy, dark brown (7.5YR 312, dry) clay
films on vertical ped faces. The paleosol matrix is leached, and there are common (15-30%) light
brownish gray (2.5Y 612, dry) reduction zones along root channels and ped faces.
As noted above, the lowest paleosol is buried beneath Unit III, a 1.0-1.5 m thick package of
stratified sands and gravels. Unit III alluvium has a mixed mineralogy similar to that of Unit II,
and is completely leached of carbonates. A well expressed paleosol is developed at the top and
down through Unit III. This paleosol also has been truncated, with only the Bts horizon remaining
(Table 5). The fine-grained soil matrix is red (2.5YR 4/6, dry) to dark red (lOR 3/6, moist) in color
and sandy clay loam in texture. Soil structure in the 2Btslbl and 2Bts2bl horizons is medium
subangular blocky with distinct ferriargillans on clasts and vertical ped faces. Red portions of the
2Bts3b 1 horizon are slightly brittle (plinthite?), and there are common (20%) light brownish gray
(2.5Y 612, dry) clay-rich reduction zones along root channels.
The eroded surface of the upper paleosol is mantled by a 50-70 cm thick unit (Unit IV) of
gravelly colluvium. A weakly expressed surface soil with A-C horizonation is developed at the top
of Unit IV. The colluvium is dominated by chert cobbles (75-80%), and the < 2mm-fraction (5-
10%) is loamy sand. Nearly all of the silt and clay have been winnowed out by sheetwash, leaving
behind a very loose matrix of gravel that armors the underlying paleosol. This "lag gravel" is
ubiquitous on the terrace at Red Bluffs, and will be observed at other localities high in the valley
landscape.
The soil-stratigraphic record at Red Bluffs indicates that accumulation of alluvium on a former
Pleistocene flood plain (now a high terrace) was interrupted by at least two major episodes of
stability and soil formation. The lowermost buried paleosol was eroded down to and perhaps
within its B horizon before being covered by alluvium. The uppermost buried soil also was
severely eroded, but is mantled with colluvium. We suspect that repeated cycles of erosion and
deposition may be the rule, rather than the exception, on most terrace surfaces.
All of the soils that developed in primary alluvium at Red Bluffs are moderately to highly
oxidized with thick sola The uppermost buried soil is a PaleustaIf with strong red hues and a Bts
horizon. The 2.5YR colors of the paleo-solum may be partially attributed to the later stages of the
soil's development, after entrenchment inverted this landscape and promoted better drainage.
However, a stronger weathering environment in combination with landscape inversion provide a
better explanation for the magnitude of rubification and Bts-horizon development observed in
alluvium at Red Bluffs.
,I
/
~.~~~~.-~~~-T:~
" .
. J',
l,/
ol~ .J
Figure 13, Location map, Stops 7 and 8, showing lines of section E-E' and 0-0',
31
Terroco
ft RoDof m
160.---.41
Elev.
S
(E)
< Togo. TX mop
...... of Lava Cr1<. B
I Smithville. TX map ~ N
(E') 2
m It Hellcat ~. ""Iconic aah. Intetbeddod "ii
o
!! 120.,
400
1 ___ " J ,Rehmet
with fluvial sand (southern
extent undetennlnod) Elevation of hlghoot
<>
-
!"
Colorado River valley Smltlwlll.. Oeo. 5(1)
1913 (Dalrympl. and
105
oth.... 1939. p. 280-281):
l2
(,.)
I\)
"a
'<
0
lSI
C~:-:~. of contact Broad "010 on flood
(abandon.d chonnoJ
terTac:.
Smlthvlll. IIKT
1II0 U
betwe.n PI.lotocon. fluvial 65 20
'"'" depo.~ and Eocene Cook
rof CoIOf'Qdo Rlver)"""\ (numerous _to) RR
.... 60 '1
~
0
100 IItn. Fm. at Smith gravel pit Hwy. 95
g. 0.7 ml (1.1 km) NW af
uMamod trtbuto'l(
( of Willow Creok j J IIKT RR "-) ~il
Rohm.t locality .1....---'"- Ii: ill
:>
r;n Quaternary terTace fIJI. 4OD'2~j
t'!1 30D Topographic bas.: Togo. TX and overlying Eocene b.draclc lO .i>
Smlth"IJI•• TX 7.S-mln topographic (severol fonnotlons)
quadrangle mapa (GeoJoglcaJ Survey. ".0:
CO
1981; 1982). supplem.nted with 00
data from an olldad. survey at the "'.I:
R.hmet locality.
o 1 ml OL-.JO
ao I 1
o km
Vertical exaggeration: B6.6X
I
I
J
)
"""r>;"., ':,\,iii0\f;:;t:;))~_Yr
Figure 15. Location map, Stop 7, showing line of section F-F'.
33
j
W E
E1ev. (F) (P)
m It
180 -, l . . . . otrip
land'ng Terrace
pvt. rd.
H5 '5 Range
It 2:~~
r
In ....otfon at drainage
1'-1 cIvIde Hparatfng the Colorado
::!l
500 RIver and Guadalupe RIver baalna
-8.5 ml (13.6 km) SN of the
Rehmet locollty (SN comer of
Togo topogrophlc mop).
I I~ .:c
E
"
0<1 -4115 It
'" unnamed
-@
9' 140
tributary of
WIllow CrHk '" 59
~
Hwy.
m 535
Co)
..". "a
'<
(")
Rehmet Ferri.
180~48
'"
'" locality 9rovel pIt
~ (Stop 71.) (Stop 78)
WlUOW~ i
(")
g. WIllow pvt. HwyEoay
Creek rd. Creek 95 st. 8
'"'I1, 120
400
'I1
Topographic base: Togo. Texoa ~
7.S-mln topographic quadranvle 105 J2
mop (Geologlcol Survey. 1981).
aupplemented with data from an
aodad. survey at the Rehmet local~
and the Ferris grovel pll Apprax . •Iev. of contact between
PleIstocene fluvial deposita and
o 1 ml Eocene Cook Mtn. Fm. at Smith
350 I gravel pit, 0.7 mi. (1.1 km) IfN
o km of Rehmet locality.
Vertical exaggeration: 6a.aX
100
Figure 17. View of volcanic ash exposed in trench at the Rehmet Locality.
35
:I
o 21
20
19
1B
2 17
16
15
14
tuw 4 13 (J)
»
u. 12 s:
11 "mr
Z
10 C
9
s:
6 OJ
m
)J
B
7
6
B 5
4
3
2
10 1
INCLINATION DECLINATION
N
9 0
o ,,"7
o
,0
o1 " •
20
oS
Figure 18. Magnetostratigraphy of the Rehmet Locality and stereographic projection of the
directions of magnetization. Solid circles are in the lower hemisphere, open circles in
the upper.
36
is 620,000 yr. Bison sp. is the diagnostic element of the Rancholabrean land-mammal fauna in
North America, which is less than 300,000 yr old (Lundelius et al., 1987). No faunal material has
yet been reCovered from either the Rehmet locality or the Ferris pit.
Samples of ash were submitted to Barbara Winsborough for identification of diatoms,and in
contrast to the lack of preserved vertebrate remains, the ash contains a moderately diverse
assemblage of fresh-water diatoms. Stratigraphic and sedimentological evidence indicates that the
ash was transported to the Rehmet locality by the ancestral Colorado River after settling on the
landscape from a huge ash cloud The thick ash bed probably accumulated in an oxbow lake or
comparable environment with permanent water, where the diatoms flourished. A limited variety of
palynomorphs were also recovered from the ash, including pine, sedge, and grass pollen. Other
available analytical data are summarized below or completion of the analyses is pending.
The terrace fill underlying the ash consists of stacked upward fining thin beds of silty sand.
These deposits represent periodic influxes of fluvial sediment settling in a relatively quiet-water
environment, probably an oxbow lake. Several lines of evidence support this interpretation. The
volcanic ash bed consists almost entirely of glass shards (largely undevitrified bubble-wall and
bubble-junction shards) with very few detrital sand grains. The paucity of "contaminants" --typical
fluvial sediments--from this bed can be explained by the likelihood that the air fall of volcanic dust
blanketed the landscape, and was the first sediment then entrained by runoff and flushed into
streams. A small lake would have been the ideal environment in which to accumulate a relatively
pure ash bed under such conditions. In addition, the diatom micro flora includes several centric
diatoms that are exclusively planktonic and are confined today to lakes, ponds, and large rivers
(Barbara Winsborough, personal communication, 1992). Some of the diatoms are extremely
delicate forms that could not have withstood aerial transport (from a proto Yellowstone Lake. for
example). Finally, there are two modem examples of oxbow lakes--Shipp and Stagners Lakes--of
the type inferred in an abandoned channel segment of the Colorado River less than 3.2 km (2 mil
east of the Rehmet locality today. There seems little doubt that the ash bed is part of the terrace fill,
and that it accumulated in a small lake or pond
The Ferris pit affords exposures of both fine- and coarse-grained sedi ment typical of Colorado
River terrace fills. Section 1 in the Ferris pit is characterized by a 1.87 m thick upper unit of
stratified, dark yellowish brown (lOYR 4/4, moist) to yellowish brown (lOYR 5/4, moist) fine-
grained alluvium above a lower unit of stratified alluvial gravels. The surface soil was disturbed by
the sand and gravel operation, but the subsoil is fairly intact (Table 7). The soil exposed in Section
2 is a red (2.5YR and 5YR hues) Paleustalf (Alfisol) developed in stratified sands and gravel
(Table 8).
Spoil 0-60
Bt 60-85 IOYR4/4 2cP-I+2ABK CL fr c,s Faint bedding; many fine pores coated with iron and manganese.
BCkl 85-152 IOYR514 If+mSBK SCL fr c,S Common fme faint 5YRS/4 mottles; 5% soft carbonate masses;
few fine encrusted carbonate threads; faint bedding.
BCk2 152-247 IOYRS/4 If+mSBK SCL fr a,s Common medium and coarse distinctIOYR4I4, 10YRSI3,
IOYR6/6, and 5YRS/4 mottles; complex redox accumulation
and depletion patterns; 1-2% 2.5Y612 depletion zones; 10-15%
soft carbonate masses; few very fine encrusted carbonate
threads.
2C2 247-255+ 50% 7.5YR4/6 M GSCL fr Common large, round cobbles; stratified.
50% SYR4/6
Abbreviations: Sbuclure: l=weak, 2=moderalc, 3=slrong, f=fine, m=medium, c=coarse, P=prismatic, SBK=subangular blocky, ABK=angu1ar blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=sil~ C=clay, L=loom, V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=graveUy
Consistence: fi=f1Illl, fr=frlable, h=bard, v=very
Boundaries: c=c1ear, g=gradual, a=ahrup~ s=smooth. w=wavy, i=irregular
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
Table 8. o.scription of Section 2 at the Ferris sand and gravel pit
Abbreviations: Sb"Ucrure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fwe, m=medium, c=coarse, P=prismatic, SBK=subanguiar blocky, ABK=anguiar blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texrure: S=sand, Si=silt C=clay, L=loom, V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=graveUy
Consistence:fi=frrm, fr=friable, h=bard, v=very
Boundaries: c=clear, g=graduaI, a=abrup~ s=smootb, w=wavy, i=irregular
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
S
.... Togo. 1)( map I Smithville. 1)( map )
N
E1ev. (G) (G')
m It Clark
gravel Colorado Colorado River valley Terrace
:!l pit community
It Rolief m
OQ Elwatlon of high••
... 9OD27~1
c: (S~op reported flood of
-
'"'Ci J50
I ;
Broad IIwal. on flood
\elTQce (abandoned
.,...-chann.1 of Colorado RIver)......
Colorado RIver at
Smithville. Dec. 5(7)
1913 (Dalrymple and
' l o t h.... 1939. p. 280-281):
mm
~
65 20
317.5 II (96.8 m). 611 II
~
0
'"
'<
0
a
100 Hwy.
71 -._0_.-._. L0_.
mad
'1
ILm
o
1981: 1982).
1 ml
....
.".c
c"
md:
0,
I water level
(low flOW) ~
\. I
t
I I
0
BO
o Icm • 0
Vertical exaggeration: SS.8X
transported from west to east through this area, just as it is today.
A thick, red Paleustalf (Alfisol) is developed at the top of Unit II (Figure 20). This paleosol is
mantled with dark, silty colluvium and/or alluvium (Unit III) at most places along the pit walls.
The Paleustalf has an Eb-BtIEb-Btsb-BCtsb profile (Table 9) that is completely leached of
carbonates. The Eb2 horizon is 15 cm thick, pale brown (IOYR 6/3, dry) in color, and loamy sand
in texture (Table 10). Bodies of E horizon material are common (15-25 %) in the upper part of the
argillic (Btsb) horizon; hence, there is a 17 cm thick BtIEb transitional horizon. The Btsb2 horizon
(Btslb2+Bts2b2) is 71 cm thick, yellowish red (5YR 4/6, moist) to red (2.5YR 4/6, moist) in
color, and sandy clay loam in texture. There is distinct reticulate mottling in the Btslb2 horizon due
to common light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) depletion zones along root paths. Patchy clay films
occur on clasts and ped faces the BCtsb horizon, and red (2.5 YR 516), clayey lamellae are present
in the BCtsb2 and 2C2 horizons. Thick strata of rounded chert cobbles are common below a depth
of about 2.8 m.
Unit III is 50-75 cm thick across most of the section, and more than 2 m thick in some places
where it occurs as gully fill. This unit consists of dark brown (IOYR 3/3 - 4/3, dry) loamy sand
that forms a cumulic A horizon. There is a very high density of fire-cracked rock and chert flakes
within the Alb and A2b horizons, and more than a dozen intact burnt-rock features (some
stratified) have been documented in this unit. The recovery of a late-Paleoindian projectile point
along with several Archaic points suggests that Unit III is a product of gradual sedimentation on a
terrace surface that was frequently occupied by prehistoric ~ple through the Holocene.
Unit III is mantled by a thin veneer of slope wash (Umt IV). Unit IV is less than 25 cm thick,
dark brown (IOYR 4/3, dry) in color, and loamy sand in texture. No cultural features or artifacts
were found in this unit.
j
I
Figure 20. View of section exposed in west wall at the Clark Site.
42
Table 9. Description of Ibe west wall of Ibe Clark Site.
Abbreviations: Slructure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fme, m=medium, c=coarse, P=prismatic, SBK=subangular blocky, ABK=angular blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=si\~ C=clay, L=loarn,V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly
Consistence: fi=finn, fr=friable, b=hard, v=very
Boundaries: c=clear, g=gradual, a=abrup~ s=smoolb, w=wavy, i=irregular
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
Table 10. Particle-size distribution: Clark Sire.
limd* V. F. Sandi Clay free
HQ[lzQD Deillb VC C M E VF Total Sill CII): >2mm Ie&nG Eio!: SiIIld SilD!.!lS UI
- -cm- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -wI. % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------wt.%-----
Ap 0-23 9.0 16.9 20.9 26.1 14.4 87.3 9.5 3.2 13.0 LS 055 0.9
Albl 23-62 5.7 11.6 22.0 29.2 ·16.3 84.8 ILl 4.1 11.0 LS 056 8.0
A2b1 62-88 8.1 16.0 20.6 26.3 13.9 84.9 11.4 3.7 13.0 LS 052 8.0
Eb2 88-103 8.1 12.9 19.7 26.3 16.5 83.5 12.3 4.2 17.0 GLS 0.63 7.2
BtlEb2 103-120 5.2 12.0 16.3 25.5 16.7 75.7 129 11.4 12.0 FSL 0.65 6.1
Brslb2 120-143 4.7 8.0 11.8 2Ll 16.1 61.7 12.9 25.4 3.0 SCL 0.76 4.8
Brs2b2 143-191 \.6 4.8 11.2 25.2 17.4 60.2 15.2 24.6 1.0 SCL 0.69 3.9
BCrsb2 191-286 5.2 7.9 10.0 19.9 23.2 66.2 16.2 17.6 12.0 FSL 1.16 4.2
2C2 286-336 13.8 15.9 16.9 18.1 12.1 76.8 10.1 13.1 26.0 GSL 0.67 8.0
"fexlUre ciasses: S=sand, Si=sill, C=clay, L=loam, V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly. ex=exrremely, v=very
intact lens of fire-cracked rock.
There are numerous lenses of fire-cracked rock (ca. 10-20 cm thick and 0.40-2.0 m long)
exposed in the walls of the gravel pit. Most of these occur within the upper I m of sections, but in
one place where the dark sediments extend to about 2.5 m b~low surface (gully fill), there were
two superimposed lenses between about I and 2 m below surface. None of the features appear to
be associated with buried soils, but the carbon-staining and bioturbation of the sandy sediments
may well have masked soil boundaries. Most of the rock lenses seemed to be composed of
quartzite and some chert cobbles ranging from about 7 to 15 cm in maximum dimension, but a few
of the cobbles were somewhat larger. The rocks tend to be fire-cracked, heat-spalled, and
reddened. In several cases, a charcoal-rich deposit appeared to underlie the rock lenses. How
these features functioned is not clear, but they may represent some kind of earth oven or hearth
facilities.
2. With the exception of numerous lenses of FCR, clast supported FCR is not common anywhere
in the gravel pit profile.
4. Much of the chipped stone is fire-cracked, glazed, or discolored, suggesting that it may have
been used as some type of hearth stone, or perhaps that it was one of the components of a
burned "kitchen midden," or perhaps that it had been intentionally heat-treated.
5. A higher than expected proportion of the chipped stone appears to represent the initial stages
of lithic reduction, suggesting that tool manufacturing was a major activity at the site.
6. We did not find much in the way of lithic artifacts characteristic of camp debris, e.g., broken
points, scrapers, grinding tools, or expediency tools.
Collectively, these characteristics suggested that the site might not be a burned rock midden
deposit. Neither the artifacts or features seem to be consistent with my ideas about what a typical
base camp or hunting site should look like.
) The extensiveness of the site's carbon-stained and FCR-rich sandy sediments is reminiscent of
sites in parts of the Pacific Northwest where, for thousands of years, root foods (e.g. camas,
Camassia auamash) were bulk-processed in large earth ovens with rock heating elements (Thoms,
) 1989). Similar plant processing sites, but without much FCR, are reported from southern Africa
as well (Deacon, 1976). In fact, there are FCR-rich sites throughout the world with carbon-stained
sediments and large earth over-like features that may have been places where plants foods were
bulk-processed (Thoms, 1989).
For the Clark site, what is important is that carbon-stained soils and sediments seem to be
characteristic of places where many earth ovens were built and used through the decades,
45
centuries, or millennia. Loose, sandy sediments are especially prone to being "coated" by carbon
(Le., soot) when the fire for an earth oven is burning in the open air, as well as when the charcoal
continues to burn after the earth oven is loaded and closed (Le., capped with an earth cover).
Unlike the Clark site, plant food bulk-processing sites tend to be chipped stone-poor (Thoms,
1989). Nonetheless, while most Texas burned rock midden sites probably were plant food
processing places, it is clear that in many cases other subsistence and camp maintenance activities
were carried out there as well. To the extend that hunting-related, plant processing, and camp
maintenance tools, as well as food remains, turn out to be uncommon at the Clark site, as they
appeared to be upon initial inspection, this site appears to be atypical in comparison to the more
"typical" site types in the region.
1. There is an apparent high density of chipped stone artifacts characteristic of the early stages of
bifacial lithic reduction.
2. Many of the chipped stone artifacts appear to be "cooked" or over-cooked.
3. The lenses of FCR are structurally similar to heating elements in earth ovens ranging in
diameter from about 0.5 to 2 m or more.
4. The extensiveness of the carbon-stained soils and sediments may be a byproduct of the
intensive use of earth ovens.
What this tentative evidence suggests is that the Clark site may be a place where hundreds, if
not thousands, of earth ovens were built and used to heat-treat locally available chert cobbles and
other lithic materials. Heat-treating lithic material in earth ovens to render it more knapable is well-
documented in the ethnographic record, and to a lesser extend in the archaeological record (e.g.,
Hester, 1972,1977; Johnson 1978). In my quick literature review, I did not find a discussion of
rock lenses (i.e., heating elements) in the earth ovens used to heat-treat lithic raw material.
Additional research, however, is likely to improve the working data base
Concludins Comments
Exploratory excavations should yield the kinds of data needed to assess the working model for
bulk-processing lithic raw materials, as well as other models for different kinds of site function.
Assemblage comparisons of artifacts and features should also be made among the Clark site,
burned rock midden sites, and other site types in the region. Given the carbon-stained soils and
sediments at the Clark site, it should be possible to obtain reliable age estimates on a sample of the
features. Stratified cultural deposits in the more deeply buried parts of the site promise an added
measure of chronological control. The temporally diagnostic artifacts characteristic of the Late
Paleoindian and Archaic periods already suggest long-term use of the site, although site function
may have varied considerably through time. Judging from the presence of numerous intact
features in the active bioturbation zone, the site may have been used during the Late Prehistoric
period as well.
46
SUNDAY, MARCH 29, STOP 1
ABSTRACT
The Quihi soil fonned in stratified bedload channel alluvium of the Uvalde
Gravel. The limestone sands, gravels, and cobbles were probably the primary source
of carbonate that fonned the petrocalcic horizon. Evapo-transpiration is thought to
cause the upward movel11ent of soil solutions. Aqueous carbonates precipitate and
accumulate near the site of water withdrawal. Chert clasts constitute most of the layers
above the petrocalcic horizon, whereas solution-facetted limestone pebbles occur
within and below it. The red, clayey argillic horizon suggests intense weathering, with
residual and illuvial concentration of non-carbonate residue.
INTRODUCTION
The Quihi (pronounced kwee-hee) soil at Stop I near Castroville, Texas, is
developed in the Uvalde Gravel Formation. The soil (Figure I), which occurs on
stable, chert-armored surfaces with less than 8 percent slope, formed during an
extended period of landscape stability (Gustavson, 1988:66). The Quihi soil series,
established in 1972 during field work for the soil survey of Medina County (Dittmar et
al., 1977), has also been mapped in Guadalupe County (Ramsey and Bade, 1977).
Total area of the map units of Quihi soils is 8825 hectares in Medina County and 440
hectares in Guadalupe County.
Mean annual precipitation at Hondo, Texas, 21 km west, is 72 cm, and the mean
annual air temperature is 20.4 degrees C. Eastern Medina County has an annual
Precipitation-Effectiveness index of 40 (Thornthwaite, 1931). The seasonal
distribution of precipitation and temperature, as well as potential evapo-transpiration
and a soil water balance as computed by the Newhall Simulation Model (Van Wambeke
et al., 1986) are illustrated in Figure 2. The classification of the soil moisture regime is
Ustic, the soil temperature regime is Hyperthermic. Currently, the taxonomic
placement of the Quihi series is clayey-skeletal, mixed, hyperthermic Petrocalcic
Paleustolls (Table 1).
A morphological description of the Quihi pedon (Figure 1) sampled on a caliche
pit face is given in Table 2. Results of physical, chemical, and mineralogical analyses
performed by the National Soil Survey Laboratory of the Soil Conservation Service are
in Table 3. Table 4 presents particle size distribution in the Quihi soil on a clay-free
weight basis. Erosion or excavation partially truncated the A horizon (Sample 7928),
so an intact A horizon (Sample 7934) was sampled about 16 m northwest of the
sampled pedon location.
UVALDE GRAVEL
Early studies (Hill, 1891, Plummer, 1933) did not distinguish the Uvalde Gravel
from the Goliad Formation in South Texas. The Goliad Formation, originally
described and discussed under the name Reynosa Formation (Price, 1933:488;
Deussen, 1924; Trowbridge, 1932), crops out in a broad belt along the South Texas
Gulf Coastal Plain from Starr County to Lavaca County. Earlier maps of the Reynosa
Fonnation (Price, 1933:490) included areas of so-called "Up-dip Reynosa". These
areas are now recognized as the Uvalde Gravel (Brown et al., 1983).
.~
,.
-,
.
'.
-!," ~. ~.:.1- ~;' 1t ....... ,
, ,i~.,
,I 1:.' .~,
25 30
20
... -- -,, , 20
15 ,, 10
\
u D \
\
10 \ o
.\
5 -10
o I
--- '" '"
........
.... R
I -20
J D
s91TX-325-001
••• P R I H A R Y C H A R ACT E R I Z A T ION
(MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS
DA T A
J
...
PRINT DATE 02/06/92
SAMPLED AS : QUIHI ; CLAYEY-SKELETAL, MIXED, HYPERTHERMIC PETROCALCIC PALEUSTOLL
NSSL - PROJECT 91P 191, SOUTHERN F.O.P.
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - PEDON 91P1188, SAMPLES 91p7928-7936
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE - GENERAL METHODS IBIA, 2AI, 2B
NATIONAL SOIL SURVEY LABORATORY
LINCOLN, NEBRASKA 68508-3866
-1-- -2-- -3-- -4-- -5-- -6-- -7-- -8-- -9-- -10- -11- -12- -13- -14- -15- -16- -17- -18- -19- -20-
I
I I
An argillic horizon is recognized from 8 to 74 cm (Soil Survey Staff, 1990: 11).
The increase in clay content from the truncated eluvial A horizon to the Bt is 8.6%
(absolute), just adequate to meet the argillic horizon requirement in clayey soils (Soil
Survey Staff, 1990:12). However, the clay increase of32.5% (absolute) between the
intact eluvial satellite A horizon and the Bt of the argillic horizon suggests great age for
this soil and meets the taxonomic requirements for the Pale subgroup. Chert fragments
in the A, Bt, and Btss horizons are coated with iIluvial clay but ped surfaces are not.
Clay coats on ped surfaces in high shrink-swell clayey horizons either do not form or
are destroyed by cyclic volume changes (Nettleton et al., 1969).
Leaching of calcium carbonate from the upper solum probably preceded clay
eluviation from the A horizon and reddening of the B horizon (Gile et aI., 1981:72).
Atmospheric and organic acids dissolved calcium carbonate to leave a residual
concentration of chert, clay, and iron. The rock fragments in horizons above the Btk
horizon are composed solely of chert, though a few limestone lithoclasts and exfoliated
slabs of caliche are found immediately above the petrocalcic horizon (Table 2). The
I
absence of limestone clasts above "the Btk horizon and the presence of a red clayey
argillic horizon indicate a high degree of weathering. The chert pebbles and to a large
extent the red clayey argillic horizon above the petrocalcic horizon are thought to be
residual weathering products.
The Btk horizon (54 to 74 cm) with 32% calcium carbonate equivalent qualifies
as a calcic horizon (Soil Survey Staff, 1990:13). Strongly cemented pendants of
secondary carbonates are attached to the lower surfaces of solution-facetted limestone
pebbles in this horizon. The caliche of the Bkm horizons (74 to 153 cm) meet the
requirements for a petrocalcic horizon (Soil Survey Staff, 1990: 19). These horizons
are continuously cemented and completely plugged by secondary carbonates.
Although the top 1 cm of the petrocalcic horizon is indurated, a laminar cap does not
occur in this particular pedon. A laminar cap does occur, however, in pedons
observed in nearby pit walls. The upper surfaces of limestone fragments embedded in
the petrocalcic horizon are solution-facetted while the lower surfaces have secondary
lime pendants.
Slickensides, a feature of Vertisols and Vertic intergrades (Soil Survey Staff,
1990:28), in the Btss horizon (41 to 54 cm) do not affect the classification of this
pedon because cracks during dry periods do not extend to the surface. The grooved
and polished surfaces (slickensides) on parallelepipeds (wedge shaped peds) are
produced by one mass of soil sliding against another (or a rock fragment) during
volume changes associated with wetting and drying. The overlying Bt horizon does
not have slickensides because its very high (75%) content of chert pebbles and cobbles
form a rigid matrix that constrain soil movement. The lO-fold decrease in rock
fragment content of 75 to 7% from the Bt to the Btss is notable. The underlying Btk
horizon has a rock fragment content of 65%, but nearly one-half the fragments are
limestone. The Btss horizon could have formed from a stratum composed mainly of
limestone clasts. An alternative explanation of the low rock fragment content invokes
the high shrink-swell potential of the Btss horizon. Shrinking and swelling processes
may physically ratchet chert pebbles into the overlying Bt horizon as the soil wets and
dries.
CALCIUM CARBONATE IN TIlE QUllII SOIL
The morphology of the Quihi soil reflects a long and complex history. We
propose the following sources and processes as a general guide to origin of CaC03 in
the Quihi soils. Dissolution, translocation, and reprecipitation of calcium carbonate
were the major weathering processes in the Quihi soil. Some of the processes occurred
simultaneously, and because the parent material was an aggrading fluvial deposit, the
results of these processes were welded one on top of another.
Potential sources of non-pedogenic carbonate in the Quihi soil are the parent
material, atmospheric wetfall and dryfall, floodwater, and groundwater. Atmospheric
sources likely contributed some carbonate to the Quihi soil, but in the Edwards Plateau
dustfall as a source of carbonate is probably not important today (Rabenhorst and
Wilding, 1986). Certainly, dustfall is not required to explain the accumulation of
secondary carbonates in the Quihi soil, given the abundant carbonates in the parent
material sediments, groundwater, streamflow, and floodwater. While calcareous dust
is not necessary to form a petrocalcic horizon, it may plug a layer in a short time
because it is so reactive.
Floodwater is a source of carbonate in aggrading fluvial systems such as alluvial
fans and floodplains. Water-borne carbonates provide a mechanism for recalcification
of argillic horizons on floodplains and alluvial fans (Mandel, personal communication,
1990). Calcium bicarbonate-saturated floodwater percolating through the soil may
react with acids derived from organic matter and soil atmosphere and thereby become
unsaturated with respect to calcite.
Carbonate chemistry in soils is complex. Calcite solubility in pure water varies
directly with temperature. However, calcite solubility in C02-charged water varies
inversely with temperature because C02 solubility, which largely regulates calcite
solubility, also varies inversely with temperature. Rainfall, unsaturated with respect to
calcite, usually has a lower temperature than the surface soil. As rainwater warms
upon entering the soil, both C~ concentration and calcite saturation point decrease.
But, warm temperature and moist soil favor microbial respiration, resulting in higher
soil atmosphere C~ concentration and carbonate solubility. The C02 content of the
soil air is about 6 to 10 times higher than that of the atmosphere (Baver, 1965:205).
Organic acids, also originating from microbial respiration, further increase carbonate
solubility in soil water.
Dissolution and reprecipitation of limestone clasts have totally or partially
cemented the Uvalde Gravel to depths up to 6 m. Fragmental layers near the surface
were plugged with ilIuvial carbonates. The degree of cementation and plugging
decreases with depth, but some pedogenesis is evident throughout the section. This
\ suggests that weathering occurred simultaneous with aggradation during the Miocene
and Pliocene, and during the Pleistocene after aggradation ceased.
Solution facets on limestone pebbles are attributed to the dissolution of the upper
surface of initially subrounded clasts by soil water, with subsequent deposition of
carbonate pendants on the lower surface (Bryan, 1929; Bretz and Horberg, 1949).
Downward moving soil water preferentially dissolves the upper surface of a limestone
fragment because the upper surface is wet more frequently. In addition, soil water that
contacts the upper surface has less dissolved calcite than water contacting the lateral
and lower surfaces. In fact, the lower surtace is exposed to soil water saturated with
calcite dissolved from the upper surface. The lower surfaces of limestone clasts in
fragmental layers sometimes have abundant calcite crystals which suggest that water
clings to, slowly evaporates from, and carbonates precipitate there. The net result is a
loss of carbonate from the upper surface and a gain on the lower surface (Figure 3).
Solution-facetted limestone fragments appear to be characteristic of calcretes
developed in gravelly limestone parent materials. We have observed them in
petrocalcic horizons at several locations in the Rio Grande Plains, Edwards Plateau,
and Trans-Pecos of Texas. McFadden et al., (1991:26) and Sowers et al., (1988)
reported they occur well below the soil surface in fans and terraces of Kyle Canyon in
southern Nevada.
\
I.
I II III
Figure 3. Schematic Oiagr •• 01 Solution Facettlng and Pend.nt Formation on a Limestone Fragment.
CALCIC AND PETROCALCIC HORIZONS
Several hypotheses exist about the mechanisms involved in the accumulation of
\ calcium carbonate in soils. Woolnough (1928) and Price (1933) described a process of
carbonate accumulation relative to soil horizons or "zones", as they called them. The
following is quoted from Price (1933:510-511).
I • ... the circulation of ground waters in areas of seasonal precipitation
effects the downward movement of saturated solutions... Evapo-transpiration
would seem to be the controlling factor in the precipitation of caliche, since it
produces the upward rise of the soil solutions during the dry seasons... The
chief place of precipitation of caliche is the B zone of the soil, the A horizon in
some places being wanting or inconspicuous. The B zone constantl y invades
the C zone to the depth of ground-water activity. Some mineral deposition
occurs in the C zone as long as the base is above the water table. The
direction of movement of the precipitating solutions is circulatory, both up and
down. The main body of the material may be originally deposited during the
local rise of solutions, but aided by gradual erosion of the overlying soil, the
deposits are forced deeper and deeper into it by downward leaching (re-
I solution) and re-deposition .•
.
\
J
We believe that evapo-transpiration is necessary to form and maintain petrocalcic
horizons in South Texas. Figure 4 is a schematic model that illustrates the carbonate
compartments and movements involved in the formation of petrocalcic horizon. The
balance between deep drainage (E) and evapo-transpiration (F, I, I) probably
determines whether petrocalcic horizons (1) develop proanisotropically, (2) remain
stable, or (3) degrade. We propose this model to explain the formation of petrocalcic
horizons in unconsolidated, carbonatic parent materials in the Edwards Plateau, Rio
Grande Plains, and Trans-Pecos areas of Texas. Examples of these materials are marl
beds in the Boquillas, Buda, Fort Lancaster, Fort Terrett, and Glen Rose Formations in
ATMOSPHERE
1
SOIL A BI
~-
HORIZON 1
I tG
,
1
- -~
t -- ----.-
A, Bt C
.. ---
1
- "' [, 1
J ......'.· :0
I - .. /
· I' "- __
,1
-- ~.- ....
Bkm
.. -~
:+
~.".
· : !F
-- / '~-- 1 1
' I _. 1----.-
Bk
-- -~ 1
,
1
EI
,
Figure 4. D.agram of a Compartment and Transfer Model for Petroeale.e Honzon Formation in South Texas, Sea
Text for Explanat.on.
the Edwards Plateau, and alluvium (including the Uvalde Gravel and Goliad
Formation) derived from the Edwards Plateau.
Infiltrating rainwater (B) dissolves solid carbonates (C) in the A and Bt horizons
and trans locates aqueous carbonates (D) into the Bkm and Bk horizon through
fractures in the laminar cap. Dustfall (A) probably is not an important source of
carbonates in the Edwards Plateau today (Rabenhorst and Wilding 1986). Rainfall
events that exceed the water holding capacity of the profile fill it, and the gravitational
water that drains (E) from the Bk horizon removes some of aqueous carbonates from
the soil. Aqueous carbonates in the capillary water held by the Bkm and Bk horizons
equilibrate (C) with temperature and C~ regime. Aqueous carbonates precipitate (C)
to the solid phase when evaporation (G) or transpiration (H) withdraw water from the
horizon or when C02 content or pH drop. Capillary water in the Bk and Bkm
horizons moves upward (F) in response to a water potential gradient created by
evaporation and plant root suction. Woody plants can transpire large amounts of water
from the soil in warm climates. Roots commonly mat on the upper surface (laminar
cap) and in fractures of the petrocalcic horiwn. Water enters the roots (1) to be
I transpired (H) through the leaves, concentrating CaC03 around roots on the laminar
cap and in fractures to leave a precipitate (I) of CaCOJ.
I The formation of a laminar cap may require warm season precipitation. In South
Texas most of the annual rainfall, plant growth, and evapo-transpiration occur during
the warmer months. Small storms wet the uppermost part of the petrocalcic horizon
(indurated laminar cap) most frequently. Wetting front penetration associated with
l larger storms into the strongly and weakly cemented horizons is less frequent. The
strength of cementation may be directly related to the frequency of dissolution and
precipitation.
} Figure 5 illustrates the stages in the development of the Quihi soil in the Uvalde
Gravel. Stage 1 shows the removal of carbonates from the upper column and the
accumulation of secondary carbonates as pendants on the lower surface of rock
I fragments. Stage II portrays truncation of the surface layer and subsidence resulting
from the dissolution of limestone fragments and the loss to deep drainage and the
plugging of fragmental layers with secondary carbonates. Further subsidence and
truncation, residual concentration of chert and clay in the upper solum, clay illuviation
) and development of an argillic horizon, and plugging of skeletal layers occur in Stage
III. Stage IV illustrates complete stripping of the non-gravelly surface, subsidence,
and residual concentration of clay and chert in the upper solum, complete plugging of
skeletal strata, and cementation of the petrocalcic horizon and formation of a laminar
cap. Stage V is the present Quihi soil, depicting the loss of carbonates above the
petrocalcic horizon and degradation of the laminar cap. The mantle of chert fragments
protects the Quihi soil against more extensive erosion.
DEGRADATION OF TIlE QUIHI PETROCALCIC HORIZON
The Uvalde Gravel and Goliad Formation were partially plugged and cemented
\ with secondary carbonates during aggradation. Weathering during the Pleistocene
- I
finished plugging the material. As Early Holocene climates became more arid,
carbonates precipitating from the soil solution withdrawn by roots matted on the upper
surface of the Bkm horiwn. The solution-facetted limestone pebbles near the top of
-the petrocalcic horizon suggest that degradation processes balance or exceed formation
in the present climate. The laminar cap of the petrocalcic horizon would engul f and
encase the limestone fragments if proanisotropic processes were dominant. The
,I continuous petrocalcic horiwns in Olmos soils on nearby Holocene age erosional
A
awl
Bk2
Bk3
BkS
I II ill IV v
!
I
figure 5. Sequence of Quihl Soil for.atlOn In the Uvalde Gravel. Carbonate accumulations are indicated bV
black forms, li.estone fragments are white, chert fragments are grav, and strata of fine earth and vOids in
fragmental strata are white. I
!
surfaces suggest that formation and degradation processes can occur simultaneously.
Petrocalcic horizons are best preserved on stable geomorphic surfaces in arid
climates where proanisotropic processes (formation) are more effective than
\ proisolropic processes (degradation). The absence ofpetrocalcic horizons In soils with
wet ustic moisture regimes (Price, 1933:513-514) suggests that degradation exceeds
formation in moist sub-humid climates. Exfoliation is probably a major degradation
I process in petrocalcic horizons lacking clastic fragments. Competent rock fragments
strengthen the calcrete and retard exfoliation. Price (1933:514) observed that gravelly
caliches persist longer in subhumid climates than clayey caliches.
Figure 6 illustrates a degrading petrocalcic horizon in an Olmos soil described
near George West. Roots of woody plants pry masses of cemented caliche away from
the main body of the petrocalcic horizon. Many soils with petrocalcic horizons in the
Edwards Plateau and Rio Grande Plains are skeletal (contain <35% rock fragments)
because of detached caliche fragments. InfIltrating rainwater dissolves these exfoliated
caliche fragments and translocates aqueous carbonates into the Bkm horizon through
fractures in the laminar cap. After plants have exploited the readily available moisture
in the A horizon, roots matted on the laminar cap and fractures within the Bkm horizon
begin to extract stored water. Aqueous carbonates precipitate near the site of water
extraction. The laminar accumulations on upper and lower fracture surfaces suggest
that detached fragments are a source of water for plants, and a source of aqueous
carbonate for precipitation.
. ,\
SOIL
HORIZON
Bkm
Figure 6. [Ilustration of a Degrading Petroealele Horizon In an Olmos 5011 near George West, Texas. The
petroealele horizon and detaehed eal iehe fragments are white, and fine earth IS black. I
I
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge Mr. Glenford Boehme for permission to study this soil
on his farm. The staff of the National Soil Survey Laboratory provided timely results
of determinations. Thanks go to Mr. Ervin Willard, Area Conservationist, for
supporting our effort on this project. Dr. C.T. Hallmark, Dr. Dennis Nettleton, Dr.
I Doug Wysocki, Dick Base, Bob Ahrens, Gaylon Lane, Charles Batte, Micki Yoder,
and C.L. Girdner reviewed the manuscript and provided constructive criticism. Any
errors in interpretation remain the responsibility of the authors.
\
REFERENCES CITED
Baver, L.D.
1965 Soil Physics. 3rd. Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
Bennett, R.R., and A.N. Sayre
1962 Geology and ground-water resources 0/ Kinney County, Texas. Texas Water
Commission Bulletin 6216.
Bernard, H.A., and R.I. leBlanc
1965 Resume of the Quaternary geology of the northwest Gulf of Mexico province.
In: H.E. Wright and D.B. Frey (eds.), The Quaternary o/the United States.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Brewton, Joseph L., Frith Owens, Saul Aronow, and VlTgii E. Barnes
1976 Geologic Atlas o/Texas, Laredo sheet. Map (scale 1:250,(00) and legend.
University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin.
Brown, T.E., Noel B. Waechter, Frith Owens, Ike Howeth, and Virgil E. Barnes
1976 Geologic Atlas 0/ Texas, Crystal City-Eagle Pass sheet. Map (scale
1:250,0(0) and legend. University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology,
Austin.
Bryan, Kirk C.
1929 Solution facetted limestone pebbles. American Journal a/Science 18:193-208.
Byrd, C.L.
1971 Origin and history of the Uvalde Gravel of Central Texas. Baylor Geological
Studies Bulletin 20.
Deussen, Alexander
1924 Geology o/the Coastal Plain o/Texas West 0/ Brazos River. U.S. Geological
\ Survey Professional Paper 126.
,I
Dittmar, Glenn W., Michael J. Deike, and Davie L. Richmond
1977 Soil survey of Medina Q]unty. Texas. USDA Soil Conservation Service and
Texas Agriculture Experiment Station. 82 pp. + 58 pI.
Hibbard, C. W.
1960 An interpretation of Pliocene and Pleistocene climates in North America, the
President's Address: Michigan Academy of Science, Am, and Letters, RePOI1
for 1959-1960, p. 5-30.
Hill, Robert T.
1891 Notes on the Geology of the Southwest. American Geologist, 7:254-255,
366-370.
Hoel, Holly A.
1982 Goliad Formation of the South Texas Gulf Coastal Plain: Regional Genetic
Stratigraphy and Uranium Mineralization. Unpublished Master's thesis,
University of Texas at Austin.
Ragsdale, I.A.
1960 Petrology of Miocene Oakville Formation, Texas Coastal Plain. Unpublished
Master's thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
Schoch, E.P.
1931 The kaolin deposits of section 71, block 3, TVVNGRR Survey, 5 miles
I northwest of Leakey, Real County, Texas. University of Texas Bulletin.
3120:140-161.
I Schultz, Gerald E.
1990 Clarendon ian and Hemphillian vertebrate faunas from the Ogallala Formation
(Late Miocene-Early Pliocene) of the Texas Panhandle and adjacent Oklahoma.
In T.C. Gustavson (ed.), Geologic Framework and Regional Hydrology:
Upper Cenowic Blackwater Draw and Ogallala Fonnations. Great Plains. pp.
56-97. University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology Special Publication.
Sowers, Ianet M., Marith C. Reheis, E.M. Taylor, and Jennifer VV. Harden
1988 Geomorphology and pedology on the Kyle Canyon Fan, Southern Nevada: II.
Soil development as a function of time. In D.L. VVeide and M.L.Faber (eds.),
Field trip guidebook, pp. 142-146. University of Nevada-Las Vegas Special
Publication 2.
Stevens, lack VV. and Dan Arriaga. 1985. Soil Survey of Dimmit and Zavala Counties.
USDA Soil Conservation Service and Texas Agriculture Experiment Station.
161 pp + 136 pI.
\
Thornthwaite, C.w.
1931 The climates of North America; according to a new classification.
Geographical Review 21 :633-655.
Trowbridge, A.C.
1932 Teniary arul Quaternary Geology o/the Lower Rio Grarule Region. Texas.
U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 837.
Van Wambeke, A., P. Hastings, and M. Tolomeo
1986. Newhall Simulation Model: A BASIC program for the IBM PC. Department
of Agronomy, Cornell University, Ithica, New York.
l
\
George W. Bomar
Weather & Dimate Specialist
Texas Water Commission
INTRODUCTION
The climate of the Inner Gulf Coastal Plain (IGCP) of South Central Texas is humid
subtropical, characterized by mild winters and very warm, muggy summers. The area experiences
frequent intrusions of polar air in the 6-month period beginning in October and ending in March;
however, cold spells are almost always short-lived. With the approach of the summer solstice, the
upper-atmospheric westerlies migrate northward out of the central U. S., leaving the Texas coastal
plain to be dominated by the vast subtropical ridge of high pressure that drifts northward out of the
tropics and holds forth for nearly all of the late spring, summer, and early autumn. Fronts seldom
penetrate the region, and an almost incessant stream of southerly winds from the Gulf of Mexico
ensures a climate of mild to warm nights and very warm to hot days.
26
Recurrence of Drought
Even in a rain-rich region like the IGCP, Nature can-and occasionally does--shut down its
rainmaking apparatus just as readily as it may activate it. Yet, unlike uncommon wetness, drought
is a phenomenon that IS comparatively slow to materialize. It obviously begins once the rains end,
but its progression upon the landscape is gradual and hardly recognized until crops begin to wither
and water levels in reservoirs and wells dip to precipitous levels. By the time the reality of
drought is fully appreciated, its repercussions on agriculture, hydrology, and other sectors of the
IGCP economy have already become pronounced. At that point, humanity'S utter helplessness in
the face of such a scourge becomes all too evident.
Because the western portion of the IGCP is promimate to the Rio Grande and the
Chihuahuan Desert that lies beyond, the region--and particularly the area west of San Antonio--
will undergo periods of prolonged, diminished rainfall. That great desert continually expands and
contracts in response to the migration and behavior of the vast, subtropical ridge of high pressure
that girds the subtropics for much of the year. The size and strength of that prominent feature of
the northern hemispheric atmospheric circulation pattern is, in tum, dependent upon both terrestrial
(sea surface fluctuations and volcanic eruptions) and extraterrestrial (solar phenomena) influences.
Though it does not experience drought as often as parts of Texas farther west, the rGCP
does sustain prolonged periods of subnormal rainfall that are erratic and stressful. Rainfall
deficiencies may occur in the colder half of the year, when intrusions of bone-dry polar air are
frequent and the return flow of moist Gulf air above the shallow polar airmass is barely
appreciable. Usually, however, the spring quashes the incipient drought ushered in by winter with
frequent heavy rains. Summer drought invariably work a greater hardship on the region, because
they erupt more rapidly, last longer, and coupled with the intense heat around and after the summer
solstice, are more intense. Whether the IGCP will endure drought in the warmer half of the year
depends largely on the positioning of the vast subtropical ridge over the southern U. S.
and whether the tropics furnish rain-making disturbances.
Every decade of the twentieth century has been spared a drought of some significant
magnitude in South Central Texas. Unequivocally, the most calamitous drought of the modem era
was the extreme drought that tortured the whole state for nearly all of the decade of the 1950s.
That drought is commonly regarded as the benchmark against which all other, past and future,
droughts are compared. The Dust Bowl drought, While more severe in areas of the Great Plains to
the north of Texas, was only a "moderate" one in the IGCP and other for the latter few months of
1933. Other notable droughts, though of shorter duration, besieged the region in the 191Os, the
1960s, and the 1980s. The worst droughts, in both intensity and duration, have occurred
spasmodically, at irregular intervals, and hence are not apparently tied directly to the somewhat
predictable sunspot phenonemon.
I
I
) THE DIVERSITY OF TEMPERATURE
The Inner Gulf Coastal Plain's subtropical latitude ensures that a relatively substantial
amount of solar radiation impinges upon the atmosphere and land surface at steep angles, thereby
producing mild to warm temperatures in all but portions of the winter season. Yet, its position on
the equatorward side of the mid-latitudes is but one of the controlling factors of the diurnal and
seasonal temperature distribution that makes the region's climate highly diverse. The Gulf of
Mexico is highly influential as well, serving as the source region for prevailing winds that blow
from sea to land with varying amounts of heat and humidity.
l some areas in the western sector of the IGCP, temperatures can plunge 50F or more in little more
than twelve hours, or from mid-afternoon until dawn of the following day. Severe outbreaks of
cold air, popularly called "northers," can bring a freeze to more inland locales the morning after
temperatures the previous day soared into the 70s and 80s.
\
With warm fronts, however, skies are slower to cloud over (and ultimately to clear up), and fog is
a frequent signature of the nearness of a warm frontal boundary.
Many of the heavy-rain episodes that come to Texas are triggered by stationary fronts. An
incoming cold front may stall, and moist air converging in the vicinity of this frontal boundary can
feed budding thunderstorms that may persist for several hours. Fronts are most prone to stagnate
in the heart of Texas in the late spring and again in early autumn. A primary reason for May being )
the wettest--or next-to-wettest--month in the region is because of the proliferation of clusters of I
slow-moving and rain-rich thunderstorms in the neighborhood of cold fronts that did not have the
push to completely penetrate the state.
In winter, long spells of inclement weather in the region recur because a cold front
penetrated the state but then stalled in the western Gulf. Copious amounts of Gulf moisture pours
over the very shallow, leading edge of the cold airmass, creating widespread thick fog and rain that
may persist for up to a week in duration.
Significant weather occasionally develops in the absence of any well-defined frontal
systems. Thunderstorms outbreaks or long spells of light rain and thick cloud cover may be due
to the influence of "upper atmospheric" weather disturbances that appear to have no relation to any
identifiable surface system such as a front or windshift line. Meteorologists commonly refer to
these systems high in the atmosphere as "upper-air low pressure areas." Every few weeks in
spring, summer, or autumn, one of these "cut-off" lows (so-called because they have been severed
from the main mid-latitude flow of air in the upper atmosphere) will migrate eastward (or
westward in summer) to trigger showers and thunderstorms. These upper-air lows most often
consist of pockets of quite cold air at the 15,000 to 20,000-foot level that drift out of the Rocky
Mountain region and destabilize the atmosphere over South Central Texas just enough to promote a
rain event.
Virtually all of the severe-weather outbreaks (including snowstorms) that afflict the region
in all but the summer stem from the influence of the "jet stream." This broad and potent stream of
winds at altitudes where jet aircraft routinely fly (25,000 to 35,000 feet) is the driving force behind
much of the weather experienced in Texas each year. The jet stream shoves frigid polar and Arctic
air into the region in winter, while concurrently pulling in torrents of moisture from the Pacific and
Gulf of Mexico to cause a persistent--but most often Iight--cold rain. It is the root cause of the
springtime eruptions of tornado-bearing and hail-producing severe thunderstorms.
Extremes: Heat Waves and Arctic Outbreaks
The jet stream manages to seize and deliver to the IGCP one or more batches of Arctic air
each winter, thereby producing the notorious "cold snap." The vast pile of unusually cold air
gushes southward, enveloping the whole region for a few days, most often in December or
January. Temperatures plunge well below freezing in the mornings, and may remain in the 30s or
40s during the daytime. On the average, one cold snap each winter will manage to hold the
temperature below freezing for an entire day.
By contrast, in summer the jet stream retreats to the vicinity of the U. S.-Canadian border,
and cool air ceases to flow into the region from the north. Instead, a vast subtropical ridge of high
pressure takes up position over Texas. At times the core of this mountain of dry, hot desert air will
center over the Rio Grande Plain, forcing daytime temperatures to intolerable levels. Readi ngs
above lOOF will occur in all of the region, but especially in western portions of the region where
humidities are lower. The heat will intensify for several days, ultimately causing temperatures to
peak out at or even above 104F.
I
QUATERNARY FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGES FROM CENTRAL TEXAS
Vertebrate fossils of Quaternary age from the Texas Coastal Plain are
known from many localities but faunal assemblages and sequences are poorly
known. The ages of many localities are also poorly known, but all contain
Bison (bison) which indicates a Rancholabrean age for them. The
Pleistocene fauna of the Coastal Plain differs from that of the Edwards
Plateau in the presence of Glyptotherium (a glyptodont), Glossotherium (a
ground sloth), Mylohyus (long-nosed peccary) and Holmesina (a giant
armadillo). The Holocene faunas are essentially modern. They differ in
the presence of Microtus sp. (a vole), a holdover from the Pleistocene
faunas. The early Holocene faunas lack Tayassu tayassu (collared peccary)
and Dasypus novemcinctus (nine-banded armadillo) which are members of the
modern fauna. The collared peccary appears to have arrived from Mexico in
the late Holocene. Dasypus novemcinctus arrived in the middle of the last
century.
INTRODUCTION
Quaternary faunas and faunal sequences of the Gulf Coastal Plain are
poorly known. During the last century, late Pleistocene vertebrates have
I
been found in numerous localities along streams and from gravel pits on the
larger stream' terraces.
deposits (Hay, 1924).
However, little is known of the ages of these
The best record of Quaternary faunas of Central
Texas, in terms of both geographic and age coverage, comes from the Edwards
I
Plateau. It is possible to use data from that area, in conjunction with
occurrences in the Gulf Coastal Plain, to obtain some information on the
faunal sequence and past ecological conditions on the Coastal Plain.
PLEISTOCENE FAUNAS
Few older Pleistocene faunas of Central Texas are known and are at
present confined to the eastern edge of the Edwards Plateau. The oldest is
the Fyllan local fauna from a cave fill in the city of Austin (Patton,
1965; Taylor, 1982; Holman and Winkler, 1987). This is a Mid-Irvingtonian
assemblage containing Pitymys guildayi and Atopomys texensis (two extinct
voles), Ondatra annectens or O. hiatidens (an extinct muskrat), Neotoma
fyllanensis (an extinct packrat) and Sigmodon cf. ~. curtisi (an extinct
cotton rat). The remnant magnetism of the sediments has reversed polarity
indicating an age greater than 700,000 years (Mankinen and Dalrymple,
1979) •
The terrace deposits of streams crossing the Coastal Plain have
produced numerous vertebrate fossils over a long period of time. Some of
the earlier occurrences were reported by Hay (1924,1927). It is clear
that these deposits are not all of the same age but there is very little
reliable data on the ages of these deposits. There are also no generally
agreed upon correlations of the terraces of the different ri ver valleys.
Although attempts have been made to trace terraces of the Colorado Ri ver
downstream (Weeks, 1941; Doering, 1956), the results have not been useful
for relating the vertebrate faunas.
Vertebrate fossils come from at least two different terrace levels on
the Brazos and Colorado Rivers. In all cases where adequate faunas are
known, Bison is present which indicates a Rancholabrean age. Since at
least two different terrace levels are represented, they must contain
faunas of different ages. At Austin, the lowest major terrace of the
Colorado River, the First Street terrace (Weeks, 1941), has been
radiocarbon dated at about 15,000 yr B. P. (Lundelius, 1992). The second
major terrace, the Capitol terrace (Weeks, 1941), has produced Mammuthus
sp. which indicates an age younger than 1.5 my B.P. (Lundelius, 1987).
The first major terrace of the Brazos River in Brazos and Burleson
Counties has produced a fairly diverse fauna including Bison latifrons (a
longhorn bison), Mammut americanum (American mastodon), Mammuthus columbi
(Columbian mammoth), Equus (a horse) sp., Eremotherium mirabile (a giant
sloth), Glossotherium sp. (ground sloth), Holmesina septentrionale (a large
armadillo), Cuvieronius sp. (Cuvier's mastodon), Came lops huerfanensis (a
camel) and Bootherium sargenti (an ovibovine). The small animals of this
fauna are poorly known. The small animals of this fauna are poorly known.
A deposit in Laubach Cave in Williamson County has a Rancholabrean
fauna with a radiocarbon date of 23,230+490 yr B.P. This diverse
assemblage contains Glyptotherium floridanus (a glyptodont), Tremarctos
floridanus (an extinct spectacled bear) and Tetrameryx shuleri (a four-
horned antelope) (Lundelius, 1985). These species are not present in the
latest Pleistocene faunas of Central Texas.
Deposits underlying the First Street terrace of the Colorado River at
Austin, Texas have produced a typical late Pleistocene vertebrate fauna.
This fauna which has been dated at about 15,000 yr. B.P. includes Bison
bison antiquus (an older form of the modern bison), Equus, Mammut
americanum, Mammuthus columbi, Glossotherium, Blarina carolinensis (short
tailed shrew), SynaptomY3 cooperi (bog lemming), Microtus pennsyl vanicus
(meadow vole) and another vole (either the pine vole or the prairie vole).
The Pleistocene vertebrate faunas of the Coastal Plain show a number
of differences from those of the Edwards Plateau. Mammut americanum,
Holmesina sp., Paleolama sp. (an extinct llama), Glyptotherium floridanus
and Mylohyus sp. are common in Coastal Plain sites and are rare or absent
from the Edwards Plateau. Castoroides sp. (a giant beaver) is not only
confined to the Coastal Plain, but seems to occur only in the northern part
of it. Hydrochoerus sp. (a capybara) is another form that is confined to
the Coastal Plain only along the coastal section.
Fossil finds in the southern part of the Coastal Plain, particularly
the inner part, mostly consist of single specimens from widely scattered
localities. Farther south and southeast, closer to the coast, there are
several faunal assemblages from a series of localities along Blanco Greek
in Bee and Goliad Counties which have produced a diverse vertebrate fauna
(Sellards, 1940; Slaughter, 1963). Taxa include Smilodon fatalis (a saber
toothed cat), Mammuthus sp., Mammut americanum, two or three species of
horse, Bison sp., Camelops sp., Platygonus sp. (a flat-headed peccary),
Odocoileus sp. (a deer), Holmesina septentrionale, Dasypus bellus,
glyptodont, ground sloth, Ondatra zibethicus (muskrat), Sigmodon hispidus,
(cotton rat), Lepus sp. (a jack rabbit), Scalopus aquaticus (eastern mole),
as well as unidentified bird, lizard, alligator, turtle and snake. This
fauna is associated with Paleoindian artifacts (Campbell, 1940) which
places its age as latest Pleistocene.
The Kincaid shelter, located just off the Coastal Plain in Uvalde
County, shares the following taxa with the Bee County fauna: Came lops ,
Neotoma sp. (a packrat), Bison, Sigmodon hispidus, horses, deer, alligator,
sloth and Lepus. However, it lacks the glyptodont which is present in the
Bee County fauna. The two faunas are so alike that if faunas were known
from the intervening area of the Coastal Plain they would be similar to
these two faunas.
The Pleistocene faunas of central Texas are made up of three
components: one consists of the extinct species; the second contains
extant species that no longer inhabit that region; and the third consists
of the modern fauna. The third group gives no informnation about the
paleoenvironment except that it was within the tolerance limits of the
living species. The extinct species give only general information about
the paleoenvironment. Some information can be obtained from an examination
of the environmental requirements of their nearest living relatives. This
must be used with caution as closely related animals may have quite
different habitat requirements. The distributions of some extinct species
indicate limi tat ions in their tolerances but the details are not commonly
clear. A number of extinct species are restricted to certain parts of the
country which may give some indication about their requirements.
Extralimital extant species are much more useful as they are still
living and their habitat requirements can be better determined. A number
of species such as the Synaptomys cooperi (bog lemming), Microtus
pennsylvanicus (meadow vole) and Sore x cinereous (masked shrew) are found
today in areas of more mesic climate to the north and east of central
Texas. The presence of these animals in late Pleistocene deposits in
central Texas indicates that this region had more effective moisture at
that time.
Another characteristic of the Pleistocene faunas of this region is the
presence of associations of extant species that are now allopatric and
which seem to have contradictory environmental implications. These
associations have been termed "disharmonious" by Semken (1974) and
"intermingled" by Graham (1985). They were first recognized in North
America by Hibbard (1960) who interpreted them as indicating Pleistocene
climates that were less seasonal than the present ones. These assemblages
have no modern analogues and indicate a climatic regime that no longer
exists.
HOLOCENE FAUIIAS
Holocene vertebrates are known from a number of localities in central
Texas but, like the Pleistocene faunas, the best assemblages with the best
time control come from caves on the Edwards Plateau. Most of the material
comes from archaeological sites. Holocene, especially early Holocene,
faunas are very poorly known from the Coastal Plain. The Berger Bluff site
in Goliad County (Brown, 1987) has produced vertebrate remains of both
early and late Holocene age. The early Holocene fauna includes a variety
of small vertebrates still found in the area as well as Microtus sp.
(either Microtus pinetorum or ~. ochrogaster). Neither species of Microtus
sp. is known in that area today. Brown (personal communication, 1992)
states that the age is likely 8,000-10,000 yr B.P.
Microtus sp. is known from Holocene sites from San PatriCio, Nueces,
Uvalde, Jim Wells, Live Oak, Fort Bend, Goliad, Willacy and Bexar counties
as late as Late Prehistoric (Steele, 1986a; Brown, unpublished). The
detailed pattern of disappearance of voles from the Coastal Plain is not
yet known. A relict population of Microtus pinetorum (pine vole) is known
from Kerr County (Bryant, 1941) and a recently extinct population of
Microtus ochrogaster (prairie vole) is known from southeast Texas and
southwest Louisiana (Stalling, 1990). It is clear that one or both of
these species persisted on the Coastal Plain until very late in the
Holocene.
Extralimital records of these two species, whos'1 major distributions
lie in areas of more mesic climates, have been interpreted as indicating
more moist conditions during the past. In view of their late disappearance
from many parts of central Texas they may indicate the persistence of
locally moist localities maintained by local factors such as springs.
Further information on the details of both the changes in the distributions
of each of these two species and the environmental significance of these
changes must await more reliable methods of distinguishing the two species
on the basis of the material that is available from the fossil record.
The vertebrate faunas of central Texas have changed through the
Holocene in ways other than the loss of species. A number of species that
are present in the modern fauna are not found in the Pleistocene faunas.
These recent immigrants from Central America are Tayassu tayassu
(javelina), Tadarida brasiliensis (Mexican free-tailed bat) and Dasypus
novemcinctus. The exact times of arrival of these species are not well
known.
Late Holocene faunas of the Coastal Plain have a sparse record of the
arrival of Tayassu tayassu in Texas. This animal has been recorded from
several Late Prehistoric (circa 1300 AD) sites in Live Oak County (Steele,
1986b), Nueces County (Steele and Mokry, 1985), Kleberg County (Smith,
1984) and McMullen County (Steele and Hunter, 1986).
Another late addition to the modern fauna is Dasypus novemcinctus. A
large extinct close relative, Dasypus bellus (beautiful armadillo), is
known from numerous late Pleistocene faunas in Texas. It, along with
II Holmesina septentrionale (a giant armadillo) became extinct about 11,000
years ago. Armadillos were absent from Texas until the appearance of
Dasypus novemcinctus in about 1858 (Taber, 1939; Buchanan and Talmadge,
1954) •
I t
SUHHARY
REFERENCES CITED
Brown, Kenneth O.
1987 Early Occupations at Berger Bluff, Goliad County, Texas. Current
Research in the Pleistocene, 4:3-5.
Brown, Kenneth O. -----
ms. Berger Bluff: An Early Holocene Site on Coleto Creek.
Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.
Bryant, M.D.
1941 A Far Southwestern Occurrence of Pitymys in Texas.
Journal of Mammalogy, 22:202.
Buchanan, G.D. and R.V. Talmadge
1954 The Geographical Distribution of the Armadillo in the United
States. Texas Journal of Science, 6: 142-150.
Campbell, T.N.
1940 Notes on Artifacts. In: E.H. Sellards, Pleistocene Artifacts and
Associated Fossils from Bee County, Texas. Geological Society of
America Bulletin, 51:1640-1644.
Doering, J. A.
1956 Review of Quaternary Surface Formations of Gulf Coastal Region.
Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
40(8):1816-1862.
Graham, Russell W.
1985 The Response of Mammalian Communities to Environmental Changes
During the Late Quaternary. In: J. Diamond and T.J. Case (eds.),
Community Ecology, pp. 300-313. Harper and Row, New York.
Hay, O.P.
1924 The Pleistocene of the Middle Region of North America -- and --
its
Vertebrated Animals. Carnegie Institution of Was hington,
Publication No. 322A, Washington, D.C.
Hay, O.P.
1927 The Pleistocene of the Western Region of North America and its
Vertebrated Animals. Carnegie Insti tution of Washi ngton,
Publication No. 322 B, Washington, D.C.
Hibbard, Claude W.
1960 An Interpretation of Pliocene and Pleistocene Climates in North
America. Annual Report, Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and
Letters, 62:5-30.
Holman, J. Alan and Allsa J. Winkler
1987 A Mid-Pleistocene (Irvingtonian) Herpetofauna from a Cave in
South-Central Texas. Pearce-Sellards Series, 44:1-17.
Lundelius, Ernest L. Jr.
1985 Pleistocene Vertebrates from Laubach Cave. In: C.M. Woodruff,
F. Snyder, L. De La Garza, and R. Slade (eds.), Edwards Aquifer..,
Northern Segment, Travis, Williamson, and Bell Counties, Texas,
Guidebook 8:41-45. Austin Geological Society, Austin.
Lundelius, Ernest L. Jr.
1987 The North American Quaternary Sequence. In: Michael O.
Woodburne (ed.), Cenozoic Mammals of North America, pp. 211-235.
University of California Press, Berkeley.
Lundelius, Ernest L. Jr.
1992 The Avenue Local Fauna, Late Pleistocene Vertebrates from Terrace
Deposits at Austin, Texas. Acta Zoologica Fennica, in press.
Mankinen, E.A. and G.B. Dalrymple
1979 Revised Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale for the 0-5 my B.P.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 84:615-626.
Patton, Thomas H.
1965 A New Genus of Fossil Microtine from Texas. Journal of
Mammalogy, 46(3):466-471.
Sellards, E.H.
1940 Pleistocene Artifacts and Associated Fossils from Bee County,
Texas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 51:1627-1658.
Semken, H.A.
1974 Micromammal Distribution and Migration During the Holocene.
American Quaternary Association Abstracts, 3rd Biennial Meeting,
p. 25. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Slaughter, Bob H.
1963 Some Observations Concerning the Genus Smllodon, with Special
Reference to Smllodon fatalis. Texas Journal of Science,
15( 1) :68-11.
Smith, Herman Alphonso
1984 Prehistoric Settlement and Subsistence Pattern of the Baffin Bay
Area of the Lower Texas Coast. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
Stalling, Dick T.
1990 Microtus ochrogaster. Mammalian Species, 355:1-9.
Steele, D.G.
1986a Analysis of Vertebrate Faunal Remains. In: S.L. Black, The
Clemente and Herminia Hinojosa Site, 41 JW 8: A Toyah Horizon
Campsite in Southern Texas. The University of Texas at San
Antonio, Special Report, 18: 108-136. Center for Archaeological
Research, San Antonio.
1986b Analysis of Vertebrate Faunal Remains from 41 LK 201, Live Oak
County, Texas. Appendix V. In: C.L. Highly, Archaeological
Investigations at 41 LK 201, Choke Canyon Reservoir, Southern
Texas. The University of Texas at San Antonio, Choke Canyon
Series, 11 :200-249. Center for Archaeological Research, San
Antonio.
Steele, D.G. and C.A. Hunter
1986 Analysis of Vertebrate Faunal Remains from 41 MC 222 and 41 MC
296, McMullen County, Texas. Appendix III. In: G.D. Hall, T.R.
Hester, and S.L. Black: The Prehistoric Sites at Choke Canyon
Reservoir, Southern Texas: Results of Phase II Archaeological
Investigations. The University of Texas at San Antonio, Choke
Canyon Series, 10: 452-502. Center for Archaeological Research,
San Anton io.
Steele, D.G. and E.R. Mokry Jr.
1985 Archaeological Investigations of Seven Prehistoric Sites Along
Oso Creek, Nueces County, Texas. Bulletin of the Texas
Archaeological Society, 54:281-308.
Taber, F. W.
1939 Extension of the Range of the Armad illo. Journal of
Mammalogy, 20:489-493.
-----
Taylor, Alisa Johanna
1982 The Mammalian Fauna fr6m the Mid-Irvingtonian Fyllan Cave Local
Fauna, Travis County, Texas. Unpublished Master's thesis, The
University of Texas, Austin.
Weeks, A.W.
1941 Late Cenozoic deposits of the Texas coastal plain between the
Brazos River and the Rio Grande. University of Texas Doctoral
dissertation, 261 p.
ACKHOWLEDGEKENTS
The author wishes to thank the following people for their help in
preparing this paper. Dr. Thomas Hester, Director of the Texas
Archaeological Laboratory at The University of Texas at Austin, provided
important references and advice concerning the dating of some of the sites
in South Texas; Mr. Kenneth Brown generously made available his data on the
Berger Bluff site; Dr. Michael Collins of the Texas Archaeological
Laboratory gave advice on the Kincaid Shelter; Dr. Gentry Steele provided
information based on his work at the Richard Beene site; Ms. Cathleen
Babuska helped with the manuscript; and my wife Judith Lundelius helped
with the editing.
A LATE PLEISTOCENE THROUGH LATE HOLOCENE
FAUNAL ASSEMBLAGE FROM THE RICHARD BEENE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE (4lBX83l),
BEXAR COUNTY, SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Barry W. Baker
and
D. Gentry Steele
I I
I I
Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
77843 U.S.A.
ABSTRACT
The faunal assemblage from the Richard Beene site represents one
bone, tooth, and otolith fragments were recovered from 157 cubic m of
Provinces which compose the site area today. The presence of ringtail
second Pleistocene record for this species in the region. The recovery
of fauna from or near hearths, and one piece of worked rabbit bone
bone at the site. Assuming that the majority of the bone from the Late
INTRODUCTION
Richard Beene site (4lBX83l) from November 1990, through August 1991, by
Late Holocene rleposits (McGraw and Hindes, 1987; Thoms, 1991:4; see also
recovered from 1/4 and 1/8 inch mesh screens. Continuing analysis of
Mandel and Jacob; Neck and Fredlund; and Thoms in this volume for
Project).
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Province, which centers on the Edwards Plateau. To the south lies the
4
oak and brushy species, tall and short grasses, and bottomland flora
between the two provinces would have provided a rich environment for
METHODS
screening soil matrix at the site through 1/4 and 1/8 inch hardware
fine screens, and flotation samples have yet to be analyzed. For this
analysis, taxa counts were hand tabulated and recorded by time period
(Table 1). Counts reflect identifications made thus far. Many of the
refined with further analysis, though data on broad taxonomic class and
5
presented here.
teeth and otoliths. Broken elements which could be fitted together were
teeth were also counted as one specimen. In the final analysis, each
THE ASSEMBLAGE
discrete Late Pleistocene (ca. 12,500 yr B.P.), Late Paleo indian (ca.
B,BOO yr B.P.), Early Archaic (ca. 6,900 yr B.P.), Middle Archaic (ca.
4,500-5,000 yr B.P.), Late Archaic (ca. 3,000 yr B.P.), and Late
Prehistoric (ca. 1,000 yr B.P.) components (Table 2). While the faunal
particularly noteworthy for the large Late Pleistocene and Early Archaic
spiral fractures indicating the breakage occurred while the bone was
(Fig. l and Table 2). For the most part, elements from the Archaic are
more fragmented, with some specimens showing fine line cracking and
that created these conditions awaits further analysis. Many of the bone
fragments from the site are burned. The Late Paleoindian and Late
showing the lowest densities of specimen weight and count (Fig. 1 and
Table 2).
squirrel, cotton rat, ringtail, deer, and bison sized mammal (See TAXA
QESCRIPTIONS and Table 1). The bison-sized fragments from the Late
Pleistocene represent the only very large taxa recovered from the site.
specimen of this taxon has been reported from Pleistocene deposits north
nearby Edwards County, and implied the species may have colonized the
region only within the Late Holocene. The recovery of ringtail from
the species has been endemic to the region since the Pleistocene.
The sample size for the Late Paleo indian component is currently
faunal remains were recovered from strata that yielded a wide variety of
of the bone is burned. Taxa include fish, snake, small mammal, rabbit,
ungulates).
the combined Archaic assemblage (Figure 2). Early Archaic taxa include
8
unidentified small, medium and large sized mammals. The most abundant-
taxa (in terms of NISP) are medium/large mammals, rabbits, and small
remains is also seen in Late Archaic and Late Prehistoric sites from
The only culturally modified bone from the site, a single worked rabbit
Both charred (burned black) and calcined bones (burned white) were
comparatively less area was excavated than for the Early Archaic
Only mammals have been noted thus far, including small, medium and large
weathered.
(Table 2). Taxa from the Late Prehistoric deposits include frog/toad,
snake, and large mammal. Charred and calcined bone, and specimens with
There are some general statements that can be made from the faunal
data set concerning the local environment of the Richard Beene site.
deer, elements all of which were recovered from the site, are species
Provinces. The fauna from the Early Archaic component suggests that the
biotic community has been relatively stable within the region during the
10
species typical of the region today, existed during the Late Pleistocene
as well.
resemble assemblages from other human habitation sites from southern and
deer, and turtles are common, suggesting the sites' occupants followed a
Texas.
TAXA DESCRIPTIONS
southern Texas sites that have yielded similar taxa. This regional
(Early Archaic).
Discussion: A left sagitta otolith was recovered from Late Paleo indian
deposits at the site. From the Early Archaic deposits, two right and
one left sagitta otolith were identified. At least three fish, one from
Late Paleoindian and two from Early Archaic deposits, are represented in
11
thus far from Late Pleistocene, Early Archaic, and Late Archaic
deposits.
are represented from the Late Pleistocene, one being a softshell turtle.
with two other turtles of different size also present. Turtle shell
Figure 1.
Site records: This family has been reported from 4lLK28 (Hellier et al.,
Hunter, 1986:480).
12
Site records: This genus has been reported from 41LK28 (Hellier et al.,
Discussion: The use here of the taxon Chrysemys (sensu lato) follows
placement of the painted turtles within their own genus, with cooters
Site records: This genus has been recovered from 41LK28 (Hellier et al. ,
Hunter, 1986:480).
spiniferus often basks along banks and logs exposed in the water (Ernst
frequency lists.
Referred material: 213 complete and fragmented vertebrae from all time
analysis of the snake vertebrae from the site has yet to be undertaken.
14
with additional analysis. The majority are the size of large perching
Site records: Rabbits have been reported from 41LK28 (Hellier et al.,
small size.
Referred material: From all time periods excluding the Late Prehistoric.
of these specimens are incisors and long bone elements. Much of the
order Rodentia.
Referred material: 3 teeth from the Late Pleistocene and Early Archaic.
Site records: The family sciuridae has been identified from 4lLK28
squirrel), and S. niger (fox squirrel)], with S. niger being the most
Site records: Gophers have been reported from 41LK28 (Hellier et al.,
Despite the fact that gophers spend much of their time underground,
references therein).
Family CRICETIDAE (New World Rats and Mice); Genus Sigmodon (Cotton Rat)
Archaic).
17
Site records: This genus has been reported from 41LK28 (Hellier et al.,
Discussion: Of the three extant Texas Sigmodon species (Jones and Jones
today.
Site records: The genus Neotoma has been reported from 41LK28 (Hellier
Discussion: Three woodrat species occur today in, or near, Bexar County.
erupting right third molar. Jones and Jones (1992:67) noted that the
18
County, though no specimens are known from Bexar County, located just to
Site records: Ringtai1 remains have been reported from Late Pleistocene
Site records: Canis has been reported from 41JW8 (Steele, 1986:133),
1986:484-485).
Discussion: Species of Canis whose ranges have included the project area
1983:234-245).
the region.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research at the Richard Beene site was funded by the San Antonio Water
Research Laboratory under contract to Freese & Nichols, Inc. The U.S.
REFERENCES CITED
Auffenberg, Walter
10:131-216.
Black, Stephen L.
Blair, W. Frank
Science, 2(1):93-117.
Davis, William B.
1974 The Mammals of Texas. Bulletin No. 41, Texas Parks and
Dixon, James R.
Lexington.
Hester, Thomas R.
Hester, Thomas R., T. C. Hill Jr., Diane Gifford, and Sally Holbrook
Lawrence, Barbara
McClure, W. L.
Antonio.
Schmidly, David J.
1983 Texas Mammals East of the Balcones Fault Zone. Texas A&M
Shaffer, Brian S.
Station.
Steele, D. Gentry
.
I
\ 41LK20l, Live Oak County, Texas. In: Cheryl Lynn Highley
Antonio.
Thoms, Alston V.
,I
Figure 1. Selected densities (per cubic m) illustrating total lithic
,r
count, total vertebrate count, total vertebrate weight (g), NISP (number
'II
j
I,
,
! \
i,'
,I
[
,I
I
; )
\,
Table 1. Taxa by Preliminary NISP' Counts (Number of Identified Specimens) from 41BX831.
Castor canadensis
(Beaver) 1 1
Sigmodon
(Cotton rats) 8 8 16
Neotorna
(Woodrats) 3 5 2 10
cf. Neotoma
(Woodrats) 1 1
Erethizon dorsatum
(Porcupines) 1 1
Carnivora
(Carnivores) 8 1 9
Bassariscus astutus
(Ringtails) 9 9
Canis (Canids) 1 1
Artiodactyla
(Artiodactyls) 5 2 3 1 32 43
._
...
Table 1, Taxa by Preliminary NISI'" Counts (Number of Identified Specimens) from 4lBX83l,
Odocoileus
(Deer) 1 14 5 20
AntilocaBraL
Odocoileus
(Pronghorn/deer) 6 1 1 8
Antiloca:era americana
(Pronghorn) 1 1
Period Total 743 25 559 15 113 3 1,449
aNISP counts include taxa identified minimally to Class (Fish, Amphibian, Reptile, Bird, Mammal),
Note: Taxa counts are not inclusive (ex, Testudinata counts do not include identified turtles
such as Kinosternidae , Chrysemys, Trionyx, etc.).
·cf,-compares favorably with,
<For taxa size descriptions: S-small; SjM-small to medium; M-medium; M/L-medium to large; L-large;
VL-Very large, See Methods section for definitions of animal size ranges,
Table 2. Comparative sample Data for Selected South-Central, Southern, and
South-East Texas Archaeological Vertebrate Assemblages a •
Site & Period Mesh N Wt (g) m3 Wt/N N/m3 wt/m3
41BX831
Late Pleistocene 3,039 929.75 5.6271 0.3 540.1 165.2
Late Paleo indian 726 84.83 60.1679 0.1 12.1 1.4
Early Archaic 1/4" 4,850 1,134.98 37.2205 0.2 130.3 30.5
Middle Archaic + 229 34.40 12.7627 0.2 17.9 2.7
Late Archaic 1/811 1,798 275.41 36.1211 0.2 49.8 7.6
Late Prehistoric 40 3.30 4.6100 0.1 8.7 0.7
Total Sample 10,682 2,462.67 156.5093 0.2 68.3 15.7
41LK201 1/4 11 13,671 3.4 4,021
(Steele 1986) +
Late Archaic and 1/8"
Late Prehistoric
41HR273 1/4" 59,094 34,789 6.4 0.6 9,233 5,436
(Baker et al. 1991) +
Early-Late Ceramic 1/16"
INTRODUCTION
Excavation of the Richard Beene Site (41BX831) on the Applewhite Terrace of the Medina
River revealed a sequence of deeply stratified cultural and biological remains. A series of
radiocarbon ages indicated that the terrace deposit ranged in age from about 3,100 to 32,000 yr
B.P. (Thoms, 1991). Twenty-five soil samples from the potentially culturally significant levels
(3,100 B.P. to c.a. 15,000 B.P.) were collected and processed for pollen analysis. In addition, 21
samples containing carbonized wood were examined for identification.
CURRENT VEGETATION
The Applewhite Terrace of the Medina River is located 25 km south of San Antonio on the
Texas coastal plain. Blair (1950) has characterized the region south of San Antonio as arid sub-
humid or moist sub-arid, and has placed it in the Tamaulipan biotic province. The sub-arid
environment is created by megathermal temperatures with an evaporation rate that exceeds the
area's precipitation. The study area is situated in the north central part of the South Texas Plains
vegetational zone, a few kilometers south of its junction with the Edwards Plateau to the north,
and the Blackland Prairie to the northeast (Hatch, et al., 1990). the
The Applewhite formation consists of an active flOOdplain and three terraces that rise above
it, each with a characteristic vegetation community. The terrace (T-2) immediately overlooking the
main Applwehite formation consists of a Holocene mantle draped over a red alfisol of Plio-
Pleistocene age and is dominated by blackbrush acacia (Acacia rigidula), huisache (Acacia
I
y
farnesiana), mesquite (ProSQpis elandulosa), and various buckthorns (Rbamnaceae) and cacti. '
The main surface of the Applewhite formation (T-!), which stretches between the low-lying
Pliocene-age hills of T-2, is consists of abandoned cotton fields characterized by a weedy
mesquitelhuisache scrub. The Applewhite escarpment overlooks the active floodplain, and is
dominated by the more xeric mesquite, acacias, retama (Parkinsonia aculeata,), and prickly pear
mixed with live oak. The active floodplain is characterized by Texas riparian vegetation including
I
dense stands of huge pecan trees (~ illinoiensis), cypress (Taxodium distichum) soapberry
I (Sapindus saoonarial, hackberry (~sp.), sycamore (Platanus sp.) and elm (Ulmus sp.). , and
,I mesquite (Prosopis), oak (Ouercus), and thorny scrub brush land, including members of the
buckthorn (Rhamnaceae) and cactus (Cactac~e) families.
)
I
PALEOVEGETATION OF SOUTH TEXAS: PREVIOUS STUDIES
The ute Pleistocene and Holocene vegetation record for the region of the South Texas
Plains is very incomplete. The south Texas region lacks peat bogs, suitable lakes containing
lengthy deposits, and dry caves where botanists might be able to obtain sufficient plant remains or
fossil pollen to reconstruct vegetational chronologies. In addition, where deeply strati tied
archeological deposits have been studied, the high soil pH, low soil organic content, and poorly
drained soils of the south Texas region have yielded only meager traces of badly degraded fossil
pollen in quantities too small for analytical purposes from a large number of test samples collected
at archaeological sites and processed by us. I.
The nearest well-studied archeological sites within the South Texas Plains are located in the
I
Choke Canyon Reservoir area, 120 km to the south. Pollen preservation, however, around Choke
Canyon was very poor. The alkaline soils and the high oxidation rate in the sediments do not allow 1
for the preservation of the normally durable pollen grains (Havinga, 1964; Hall, 1981). As a
result, paleovegetational research in the south Texas region has yielded only meager traces of
pollen in quantities too small for analytical purposes.
Pollen and plant macrofossil studies from areas adjacent to the South Texas Plains help to
establish the paleovegetational context Peat bogs located just beyond the eastern periphery of the
South Texas Plains, in Gonzales County, have yielded a rich Late Pleistocene and Holocene
vegetation record. In addition, studies of the dry caves of the Lower Pecos and Devil's Rivers
region have established a long vegetational sequence for that area. When combined with the
meager data from the South Texas Plains, we can begin to get a picture of the paleovegetation of
the region during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene.
I deposits radiocarbon dated as being near the end of the late-glacial period in Hershop Bog note an
overall reduction in arboreal pollen and a total loss of birch (Betula nigra) pollen. Currently, birch
grows in regions of east Texas where the annual rainfall is in excess of 1.016-1,270 mm. In
addition, the closest known present stands of birch are 415 km northeast of Hershop Bog. Those
I, data suggest that during the late-glacial period, south-central Texas climates probably were wetter
and perhaps cooler than the climate in that region today.
In southwest Texas, fossil pollen records recovered from Bonfire Shelter are not well-
I dated below the Holocene. Nevertheless,suspected late-glacial deposits at that site reflect regional
trends similar to those found in other areas (Bryant, 1969). decreasing percentages of pine pollen
accompanied by rises in grass, composite and mormon tea (Ephedra) pollen just prior to the onset
of the post-glacial period at Bonfire Shelter suggest nearby areas of pinyon and juniper woodlands
were being reduced in size while the amount of grasslands and scrublands was steadil y increasing.
This proposed shift in the vegetational composition of the lower Pecos River area during the late-
glacial period may have resulted from a variety of factors including a suspected reduction in river
discharge and reduced availability of ground water moisture caused by higher evaporation rates
resulting from warmer summer temperatures.
By examining the data which geographically brackets the South Texas Plains, we can infer
,
I )
that the region experienced a gradual warming and drying trend during the late-glacial to Holocene
transistion. The lack of direct fossil evidence, however, prevents us from making a more detailed
statemenl
I Choke Canyon region (Fig. 1) south of the Applewhite Terrace. In that study Holloway found
, that the primary fuel sources used by local aboriginal groups consisted of Acacia spp. and
mesquite (Prosopis). To a lesser degree these same aboriginal groups also used tire wood from
, )
I riparian sources which included willow (~, pecan(~), and perhaps persimmon
(Diospyros). Based upon those findings Holloway (1986) suggested that during the last 6,000
years of the post-glacial period the Choke Canyon region of south Texas contained a vegetation
very similar to that area's current vegetation and that no apparent major vegetational changes
! I occurred in that time span.
I Steele's (in press) analysis of faunal remains recovered from some of the same Choke
Canyon archaeological sites studied by Holloway (in press) revealed a mixture of animal usage by
aboriginal groups during the past 6,000 years. Recovered faunal remains from those sites
included taxa such as the raccoon (Proyon locto), opposum (Didelphis virgineanus), and muskrat
(Ondatra zibethicus) which represent types generally associated with wooded areas similar to some
I,
I
Pollen
,I
During the last 50 years palynologists have learned that there are many complex factors that
determine the original composition of the pollen rain in a region. These include factors such as:
type of pollination; differences in pollen production; differential dispersion patterns; and the size, i
weight, and aerodynamic ability of pollen types to remain airborne. Once deposited, other factors
influence eventual loss or recovery of specific pollen types. These factors include: pollen
recycling, the chemical composition of a pollen grain's exine, its morphological shape and surface
ornamentation type, and its susceptibility to various types of degradation processes including those
from mechanical, chemical, or biological agents (Bryant 1978, 1988; Bryant and Jones 1989;
Bryant and Holloway 1983; Holloway 1989). It is this last category, the post depositional
degradation process, that is the focus of this report.
One of the first agents that can affect pollen grains is mechanical degradation. After pollen
is released from its source, it can become abraded or broken during the transportation phase.
These alterations can result from impact or from changes in the natural environment. Studies by
Duhoux (1982), for example, have shown that changes in atmospheric moisture levels can result
in high numbers of exine ruptures in closely related, thin walled pollen taxa such as Taxodium, i
Juniperus, and I!!J!ja. Later, after being deposited, these thin walled pollen types as well as other
types of grains can become further abraded by the cultural activities of humans such as burning,
land surface modifications; construction activities, and agricultural practices. Abrasion of pollen
,I
can also occur from various causes in the natural environment such as impact against objects,
water and wind erosion, changes in temperature, changes in atmospheric or soil moisture contents,
volcanic eruptions, and soil movement.
The morphological structure and ornamentation of pollen walls seem to be important
factors in determining their potential susceptibility to mechanical degradation. For example, pollen
grains having protruding structures, like the bladders of many conifer species or the spines of
some Malvaceae grains, have a tendency for their projections to break off or erode through a
variety of mechanical processes. In some cases, the actual appearance of a pollen grain may
become so altered after the loss of an appended structure, or structures, 'that accurate identification
is no longer possible. In addition, structural alteration by mechanical processes can also cause
severe exine weakening, thereby hastening the eventual destruction of the entire grain through
other processes.
Soil chemistry, acting on the natural chemical composition of a pollen grain's exine, or
outer wall, is another factor that seems to play an important role in pollen preservation. Although
the exine is mostly composed of a highly durable material called sporopollenin, certain
environmental factors can adversely affect it. Brooks and Shaw (1968), Shaw (1971), Rowley
and Prijanto (1977), and Rowley (1990) found that differences in sporopollenin composition and
molecular structure can make pollen grains either more, or less, resistant to chemical deterioration.
Using the effects of pH as an example, Dimbleby (1957) was one of the first to chart
differences in pollen preservation caused by soil chemistry. His research revealed that soils with a
low, acidic pH are ideal deposits for pollen preservation while sediments with a pH above 6.0
often result in the destruction of fossil pollen. Since Dimbleby's original study in the late 1950s,
other studies conducted in the arid regions of the American Southwest by Martin (1963), Bryant
(1969), and Hall (1981) have demonstrated that fossil pollen can be recovered from alkaline soils
with a pH as high as 8.9. Even when this is possible, however, the recovered pollen has often
deteriorated; a fact that makes accurate pollen analyses difficult, and in some cases nearly
impossible.
Related to Dimbleby's (1957) original work on pH is Tschudy'S (1969) research on the Eh
(oxidation potential) of sediments. Tschudy (1969) asserts that Eh actually may be a more
important guide to the eventual preservation or destruction of palynomorphs than is pH. Low Eh
reflects a reducing, anaerobic, environment where carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are the by-
products of microbe respiration and combine to decrease the pH values. Thus, in some sediments
remains is so complete that the residue consists of millions of tiny microscopic fragments about the
size of coffee grounds. Once this stage of reduction is reached, identification of plants is very
difficult (Bryant, 1989).
The second of these modification processes is decomposition, which is defined as the
decay and digestion of plant materials by chemical or biological sources. A number of inorganic
and organic acids and bases will dissolve cellulose or weaken it to such a degree that mechanical
reduction is rapid. Many of these substances are carried through the soil by ground water (Bryant,
I,
1989).
Chemical decomposition of plant materials plays an important role in preservation,
especially at the Applewhite Terrace. Of the three main compounds found in the walls of plant
cells cellulose is the easiest to oxidize, lignin is next, and sporopollenin is the hardest to oxidize.
Havinga (1964) reported that the ratio of sporopollenin to cellulose in the walls of pollen grains
directly affects their susceptibility to oxidation. The higher the amount of sporopollenin a grain
has, the less likely it is to oxidize. Because pollen is generally one of the plant remains most
resistant to decomposition, the amount, kind, and condition of fossil pollen is often a good guide
to the overall level and potential for organic preservation (Bryant, 1989).
Holloway (1981) showed that a number of specific chemical compounds can be classified
as important plant decomposition agents. Interestingly, eight of the nine compounds tested were
bases, and 3 of these contained carbonate. The Applewhite Terrace sediments are very basic and
are very rich in carbonates.
During the processing and examination of charcoal samples the condition of the specimens
varied from exhibiting good structure to completely lacking any internal structure whatsoever. The
most poorly preserved samples were little more than a black powder imbedded in a sediment
matrix. The most likely explanation for such degradation would be a combination of reduction and
l chemical processes involving the following: 1) basic pH levels, 2) percolation of carbonate rich
ground water, and 3) expansion and contraction of brought on by continual wetting and drying of
the site's sedimen ts.
\
SUMMARY
Pollen and plant macrofossil analyses were conducted on sediments from the Richard
Beene site (4lBX831), a deeply stratified archeological site located in the Applewhite Terrace of
the Medina River. Results of the analysis indicated that very poor conditions of preservation
prevailed at the site. Despite the poor preservation, the recovery from 10,000 year-old deposits of
bois d'arc charcoal, which currently grows to the north and east of the study area, indicate the
possibility of more mesic conditions at that time.
Other plant remains indicate little c~ange in the riparian vegetation of the Medina River
valley as reflected in the deposits of the Applewhite Terrace. The pollen record from the last
3,000 years indicated that modern vegetation patterns were probably in place by that time. The
\ presence of oak and mesquite in deposits in the 4,000-5,000 B.P. range, fail to demonstrate any
p change in the Holocene riparian vegetation.
Conditions of poor preservation probably are attributable to 1) very high pH levels. 2)
percolation through of carbonate rich ground water, and 3) expansion and contraction brought on
by continual wetting and drying of the sediments.
I The size of the fossil pollen and plant macrofossil assemblage must be considered when
I
weighing the validity of any conclusions regarding Holocene vegetation change in the study area.
These preliminary results from the botanical investigations at the Richard Beene site on the
Applewhite Terrace do not contradict the general trends indicate by other studies within the region
or adjacent to the region. Further analyses will serve to refine this description of Holocene
vegetation change at the Applewhite Terrace.
,
I
I I
iI'
REFERENCES CITED
Bicchieri, M.G.
1972 Hunters and Gatherers Today. Holt, Rhinehart, and
Winston, New York.
,\
Blair, will iam. F.
1950 The Biotic Provinces of Texas. The Texas Journal of
Science, 2(1):93-113.
Brooks, J. and Shaw, G.
1968 Chemical structure of the exine of pollen walls and a new
function for carotenoids in nature. Nature 219:523-524.
Bryant, Vaughn M., Jr.
1969 Late full-glacial and post-glacial pollen analysis of
Texas sediments. Ph.D. dissertation (Dept. of Botany),
i The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 168 p.
1989 Preservation of biological remains from archaeological
sites. In: Interdisciplinary Workshop on the Physical-
\ Chemical-Biological Processes Affecting Archaeological
Sites (edited by C. Mathewson). pp. 85-115. U.S. Army
Corp of Engineers Waterways Experiment station,
Vicksburg.
Bryant, Vaughn M., Jr., and Riskind, David H.
1980 The paleoenvironmental record for northeastern Mexico:
A review of the pollen evidence. In: Epstein J. F. ,
Hester T. R., and Graves C. (eds. ), Papers on the
Prehistory of Northeastern Mexico and Adjacent Texas.
Center for Archaeological Research Special Report, 9
(San Antonio, Texas): 7-31.
Bryant, Vaughn M., Jr., and Richard G. Holloway
1985 A Late-Quaternary Paleoenvironmental Record of Texas:
An Overview of the Pollen Evidence. In: V.M. Bryant,
Jr. and R.G. Holloway (eds.) ,Pollen Records of Late-
Ouaternary North American Sediments, pp. 39-70.
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. and John G. Jones
\
22
1989 Pollen analysis of samples collected from archaeological
sites along the route of the all American pipeline. In:
cultural Resources Report for the All American pipeline
Project. (edited by All American Pipeline Company). pp
316-365. New Mexico state University, Las Cruces.
1987 Pollen records from Lubbock Lake. In: Lubbock Lake Late
Quaternary Studies on the Southern High Plains (edited by
E. Johnson) pp 36-40. Texas A&M University Press, college
station.
Dering, J. Philip
1979 Pollen and plant macrofossil vegetation record
recovered from Hinds Cave, Val Verde county, Texas.
M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M University, college Station,
Texas, 79 p.
Dimbleby, G.W.
1957 Pollen analysis of terrestrial soils. New Phytologist
56:12-28.
Duhoux. E.
1982 Mechanism of exine rupture in hydrated taxoid type of
Pollen. Grana 21:1-7.
Elsik, William K.
1966 Biologic degradation of fossil pollen grains and spores.
Micropaleontology 12:515-518.
Goldstein, S.
1960 Destruction of pollen by Phycomycetes. Ecology
41:543-545.
Gunn, Joel, Hester, Thomas R., Jones, R., Robinson, Ralph L., and
Mahula, R.A.
1982 Climate change in southern Texas. In: Hall,G., Black,
S. ,and Graves C. (eds.), Archaeological investigations at
Choke Canyon Reservoir, South Texas: The Phase I
findings. Center for Archaeological Research, San
Antonio, Texas, Choke Canyon Series, 5 : 578-597.
Hall, Steven A.
23
1981 Deteriorated Pollen Grains and the Interpretation of
Quaternary Pollen Diagrams. Review of Paleobotany and
Palynology, 32:193-206.
Harper, Kay T, and G.M. Adler
1970 The Macroscopic Plant Remains of Hogup Cave, utah, and
Their Paleoclimatic Implications. In: G.M. Adler
(ed.), Hogup Cave. Anthropological Papers 93:215-240.
University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Hatch, Stephan L., K.N. Gandhi, and Larry E. Brown
1990 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas
Agricultural Experiment station, college station,
Texas.
Havinga, A.J.
1964 Investigations into the differential corrosion
susceptibility of pollen and spores. Pollen et Spores
6:621-635.
1984 A 20-Year experimental investigation into the
differential corrosion susceptibility of pollen and
spores in various soil types. Pollen et Spores 26:541-
558.
Holloway, Richard G.
1981 Preservation and experimental diagenesis of the pollen
exine. Ph. D. dissertation, Texas A&M University
(Botany), College Station, Texas, 317 p.
\ Holloway, Richard G.
1986 Macrobotanical analyses of charcoal materials from the
I Choke Canyon Reservoir area, Texas. In: Hall, G. D. ,
Hester, T.R., and Black, S.L. (eds.), The Prehistoric
sites at Choke Canyon Reservoir, Southern Texas:
Results of the Phase II Archaeological Investigations.
Center for Archaeological Research, San Antonio, Texas,
Choke Canyon Series No. 10.
24
1969 What Hunters Do for a Living. In: R.B. Lee (ed.), Man
the Hunter, pp. 30-48, Aldine, Chicago.
Robinson, Ralph L.
1979 Biosilica and climatic change at 41GD21 and 41GD21A.
In: Fox, D. E. (ed.), Archaeological investigations
of two prehistoric sites on the Coleto Creek Drainage,
Goliad County, Texas. Center for Archeological
Research, San Antonio, Texas, Archaeological Survey
Report 69:126-138.
1982 Biosilica analysis of three prehistoric
archaeological si tes in the Choke Canyon Reservoir,
Live Oak County, Texas: Preliminary summary of climatic
implications. In: Hall,G., Black, S., and Graves, C.
(eds) , Archaeological Investigations at Choke Canyon
Reservoir, south Texas: the Phase I findings. Center
for Archaeological Research, San Antonio, Texas, Choke
Canyon Series, No.5,: 597-610.
Rowley, John R., J.S. Rowley and J. Skvarla
1990 Corroded exines from Havinga I s leaf mold experiment.
palynology 14:53-80.
Shafer, Harry J.
1975 Clay Figurines from the Lower Pecos Region, Texas.
American Antiguity,40(2):148-158.
STEELE, D. G.
1986 Analysis of vertebrate faunal remains from
41MK201. In: Hall, G.D., Hester, T.R., and Black, S.L.
(eds.), 1985 The Prehistoric sites at Choke Canyon
Reservoir, Southern Texas: Results of the Phase II
Archaeological Investigations. Center for Archaeological
Research, San Antonio, Texas, Choke canyon Series, No.
11.
Thoms, Alston V.
1991 Floodplain Environments and Archaeological Assemblages
in the Lower Medina River Valley, south Texas. Paper
presented at the 49th Annual Plains Conference,
Lawrence, Kansas.
Tschudy, R.H.
25
\.
i
26
Table 1. Pollen Types (Percentages) From the Leon Creek Paleosol
sample
Taxon 1 2 3 4 5
Pinus 1.4 0.9 0.4 2.4 5.0
Ephedra 0.9 0.9
Taxodium 5.0
Quercus 1.4 2.7 1.2 3.8 14.3
Carya 0.9 2.7 0.5
Fraxinus 1.4 1.8 0.8 0.5 2.5 ,
Ilex 0.5 I
Myrica 0.5 1.4 0.4
Cornus 0.4 I
Platanus 0.5 0.4
Ulmus 0.5 0.8 I
Celtis 0.5 5.4 3.2 2.4 4.2
Salix 0.4 0.4 0.8
Cylindropuntia 0.5
Liquidambar 1.3 0.4 0.4
Poaceae 3.5 9.4 25.4 8.9 8.8
L.S. Compositae 66.1 35.9 38.6 41.0 25.8
H.S. Compositae 6.2 5.4 6.0 3.7 3.3
Liguliflorae 4.0 5.9 1.2 1.2 4.2
Cheno-Am 0.9 4.5 6.6 16.7
Convolvulaceae 0.5 0.5
Cyperaceae 0.9
Euphorbiaceae 0.4
Fabaceae 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.5
Alnus 0.9 I.
I
Apiaceae 0.5
Lamiaceae 0.4
Malvaceae 0.4 0.8
Mimosaceae 0.4 0.4
Nyctaginaceae 0.4
Liliaceae 0.8 0.5
Polygonaceae 0.4 0.4 1.5
Rosaceae 0.5 0.4
Scrophulariaceae 0.5
onagraceae 2.8
Eriogonum 4.9 2.8
Artemisia 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.5
Eleaginaceae 0.5
Unknown 0.4
Indeterminate 4.0 11.2 8.8 13.2 4.6
\ Total 100 100 100 100 100
Lycopodium
I Tracers
79 22 38 44 35
,\
·. Table 2. Carbonized Plant Remains From the Richard Beene Site.
INTRODUCTION
Late Quaternary sediments associated with 41BX831 in alluvial deposits of the Medina
River in Central Texas have been examined for molluscan remains. Nineteen species,
representing freshwater bivalves and gastropods as well as terrestrial gastropods were
recovered from these sediments. Reconstructed plant communities include marsh, wet
meadow, savannah, and short- to mid-grass prairie. Surface waters were present for part
of the time represented in this column and flood debris input was a source of a significant
number of shells. Relative stability in the molluscan paleofauna is probably the result of
distance from glacial fronts, nearness of moderating maritime influences, and partial
control of vegetational communities by edaphic factors. The limited species diversity
exhibited by the lowermost levels may be partially the result of taphonomic factors as well
as limited diversity of the source fauna.
The existence of deep. stratified alluvial sediments in the Medina Valley of southern
Bexar County, Texas, has presented an opportunity to investigate the environmental history
of this region from the Late Pleistocene through the Holocene to the present. This
opportunity is significant for several reasons. The sediments present at 41 BX831 present
the opportunity to analyze the Late PleistoceneIHolocene time period for changes in the
microhabitats available to nonmarine molluscs. The results of any analysis of
paleoassemblages from this area are likely to be significant for several avenues of research:
Late Quaternary history of the transition zone between the piedmont of central Texas and
the Coastal Plain, environmental changes in a geographical locality that is far removed
from any glacial front of the Pleistocene, and taphonomic factors that affect the relationship
between the paleofauna and the paleoassemblage that is extracted from the sediments.
The lower Medina Valley is located in the transition zone between the Balconian and
Tamaulipan biotic provinces as delineated by Blair (1950). Although all such boundary
lines are conceptual models, the delineation between these two biotic provinces is rather
sharp. However, there are noted edaphic islands or lineal dispersal routes that can be
observed from modern dispersal patterns or inferred from relictual populations.
Investigations that analyze the prehistory of this area have the opportunity to reveal
variations in geographical aranges of various species that are classified as either Balconian
or Tamaulipan. Sufficient variation from the modern distributional patterns may also
indicate the need to postulate temporal shifts in the boundary zone between these two
biotas.
Very little discussion on the history of the boundaries between biotic provinces in
central Texas has been published, although Durden (1974) discussed the history of the
biotic provinces of North and Central America over time periods much longer than the
Pleistocene. Gehlbach (1991) recently published his thoughts concerning the
environmental barriers on the eastern margin of the Balconican Biotic Province and the I
alleged early Holocene origin of this boundary. I
The paleoenvironmental history of the South Texas Plains, a term that applies to most
of the Tamaulipan Biotic Province in southern Texas, is largely unknown. However, a
few molluscan paleoassemblages from southern Texas have been reported with variable
attempts at analysis. Hubricht (1962) reported seven species of terrestrial gastropods from
"loess, near San Antonio River, 5 miles south of San Antonio." Five of the species
reported in this paleoassemblage are moderate to large-shelled species that occur in this
region today. However, two small-shelled species present in the assemblage are not found
living in the area today. Hubricht (1962) provided only limited comments on the
paleoenvironmental significance of this "loess" sample, except to note that the occurrence
of one of extralimital species indicated "that the climate was colder and wetter when these
deposits were laid down than at present." No estimate of age, other than Pleistocene, was
given for this assemblage.
Other paleoassemblages from southern Texas have been reported. Hubricht (1962)
also reported the occurrence of a very species-diverse assemblage in "loess" near Palo
Blanco Creek west of Falfurrias. This assemblage contained a number of aquatic
gastropods that are characteristic of northern and southern modem faunas. The terrestrial
gastropod species recorded from this assemblage include only species that can be found in
central and southern Texas today, although not necessarily in the immediate vicinity of his
I collection locality. Neck (1987) reported a stratified paleoassemblage from near Uvalde,
Texas, just south of the Balcones Escarpment Zone. These sequential assemblages
represent diffferent vegetational and edaphic environments that are best interpreted as a
I series of natural successional stages and do not require any change in macroclimate. All
species present in the various layers in this site are living in the immediate area of the site
today. Other analyses of nonmarine molluscan paleoassemblages from southern Texas
have involved sites that were closer to the coast. Neck (1983) reported on a low-diversity
\ assemblage extracted from Late Pleistocene sediments associated with a tributary of Los
Olmos Creek in Kleberg County. The recovered assemblage indicated a slight increase in
effective moisture but no major changes in molluscan microhabitats. Another
paleoassemblage from the extreme southern part of Texas in Cameron County involved a
mixed brackish and freshwater species assemblage that has more relevance to postulated
Holocene sea level changes (Neck, 1985) than inland nonmarine environmental changes.
METHODS
A series of three-liter samples were removed from 32 proveniences at 41 BX83 I.
These samples ranged from the modem soil surface to buried strats identified as Late
Pleistocene. The modem soil has been designated as Venus clay loam by the U. S. Soil
Conservation Service (Taylor et al., 1966); other stratigraphic names are from unpublished
work of Mandel, Thoms, and others. A stratigraphic ,summary of these samples is
presented in Table I. The 32 samples taken were identified as follows:
Im- 0-25 cm, mesquite covered area near the PresnallWatson barn,
If- 0-25 cm, plowed field near the slurry trench,
2- above the Leon Creek paleosol,
3- Leon Creek paleosol,
4- 18 cm below Leon Creek paleosol,
5- lower portion of the Leon Creek paleosol,
6- sandy zone above Medina paleosol,
7- top of Medina paleosol,
8- Bk of Medina paleosol,
9- Bk of Medina paleosol,
10- Bk of Medina paleosol,
11- Bk of Medina paleosol,
12- lower Medina paleosol,
13- CB horizon of Medina paleosol,
14-laminated zone above the Elm Creek paleosol,
\ 15- Bk of Elm Creek paleosol,
! 16- Bk2 of Elm Creek paleosol,
17- CB horizon of Elm Creek paleosof,
18- C horizon of Elm Creek paleosol,
19- top of Perez paleosol,
20- Perez paleosol,
21- Perez paleosol,
22- Perez paleosol,
23- CBk horizon of Perez paleosol,
24- bottom of Perez "C" just below (25 cm) gravel lens.
25- top of soil # 6, Bkl,
26- soil # 6, Bk2,
27- top of soil # 7,
28- "C" horizon of soil # 7('1),
29- top of soil # 8, "A" horizon,
30- bottom A soil # 8, above "C,", and
31- just below (10 cm) top of "C" soil # 8.
Samples were wet-screened through nested soil sieves (# 4, # 8, # 16, and # 30).
Retained shell material was hand-picked from the resultant residue. Shells were identified
to species and classified as adult or immature. [n the case of one species, Rabdotus
mooreanus, four size classifications were identified: adult, adolescent, juvenile, and
hatchling.
RESULTS
A total of 19 species was identified from the shell material extracted from the 32
samples. This molluscan assemblage consists of one pea clam, two freshwater mussels,
one freshwater operculate gastropod, three freshwater pulmonate gastropods, one
operculate terrestrial gastropod, and 11 terrestrial pulmonate gastropods. The species
identified from the shell remains are listed and discussed in the next section.
PALEOENvmONMENTAL RECONSTRUCTION
The molluscan shell remains extracted from the sediments of 4lBX831, as documented
in Table 3 and 4, demonstrate an overall homogeneity that belies the enviromental
information that is present in the distribution of the species present. Below is a first
attempt to reconstruct the paleoenvironment of 41 BX831 as demonstrated in the molluscan
remains present in these sediments. These reconstructions are described in terms of the
vegetational community type and structure. The resultant reconstructions are presented in
temporal sequence from the oldest available time period to the modern soil. The breaks
between vegetational types are somewhat arbitrary as any temporal variation in the
environment will be gradual with very few punctuated environmental changes. Some of
the inferred temporal boundaries are likely the result of the temporal distance between
samples. Also, keep in mind that these reconstructions and the chosen boundaries are
based solely on the molluscan remains. Although I believe that molluscan shell remains
can provide very powerful information on the paleoenvironment of this region, these
remains are--in the end result--<mly valid from the ecological perspective of the constituent
molluscan species.
Zone I-Marsh or Wet Grassland/Meadow-Samples 31 to 25
These lower levels are most remarkable in the limited number of species represented.
Indeed, except for a few, scattered fragments,of snail shell(some of which can be
identified), the only molluscan remains present in these samples are slug plates of at least
one, and likely two, species of gray slugs. The near absence of non-slug remains may be
partially taphonomic as discussed in the next section of this report, but the analysis will be
made assuming that the dominant molluscan life during the time period represented in these
sediments was one or two species of slugs. Living populations of Deroceras laeve in this
area are found concentrated under cover objects in seasonally moist microhabitats. This
species may enter the margins of aquatic habitats. Deroceras aenigma is assumed to have
lived in cooler and wetter climates than the present, but the details of the habitat have not
been, and probably cannnot be, described for an extinct species. The restriction of slug
plates referred to D. aenigma to the lower portions of this section may be an indication of
cooler and moister microhabitats than in the upper portion of this section. The dominance
of the assemblage by slugs indicates that a wet prairie or meadow could have been the
likely vegetational community type. The absence of aquatic forms would indicate that this
community was a "terrestrial" marsh, i. e., dominated by wetland grasses and sedges
rather than a deeper wetland with emergent and submergent aquatic vegetation. However,
if we assume that substantial amounts of terrestrial gastropod shell was dissolved, the
same fate could have been met by freshwater gastropod and bivalve shells; any record of
these aquatic habitats would have been lost. Seasonal loss of surface water is possible,
even likely, but the substrate did not desiccate to the extent that is observed in temporary
ponds of today. This zone includes all sediments assigned to soils 6, 7, and 8.
DISCUSSION TOPICS
The overall impression of the molluscan paleoassemblages recovered from the various
wnes of 41 BX83 1 is an indication of relative homogeneity on the species level. Although
there exists enough variation in relative amounts of species to reconstruct different plant
communities, the paleoassemblage in toto is one of a relatively few species with very little
representation of extra1imital species. This species homogeneity is probably due to the lack
of major change in the physiognomy of the site through the Late Pleistocene and Holocene.
Postulated plant communities--be they marsh, meadow, grassland, or savannah--are all
dominated by graminoid species with minimal to only moderate occurrence of woody
species. This relative stability throughout a period with presumed significant variations in
the ambient climate is a result of the relative importance of edaphic factors in relation to
climatic factors in determining the basic structure of the plant community at this site with
fine-grained, tightly packed soil.
Some variation in effective moisture that can be related to climate is indicated by the
occurrence of two extralimital species. The aquatic gastropod, Cincinnatia cinci1l1UJliensis,
was widespread during the Quaternary of Texas, although most localities are located to the
north or east of Central Texas (Fullington, 1978). The slug, Deroceras aenigma, is
pesumably an extinct species that lived in habitats similar to that of the modem Deroceras
laeve, but habitat details are unavailable. Some native slug populations in the montane
areas of western Texas have been assigned to this species in field and museum notes, but
this specific designation has never been applied to any living population in a published
report to date.
No shells of the terrestrial gastropod species that are present in the upper reaches of the
Medina River and that are characteristic of the Balconian Biotic Province were recovered
from these sediments. Not only were these species not living at this site during the Late
Pleistocene and Holcene, shells of these species were not a recognizable component of the
flood debris that was transported by high waters duing this time period. The lack of shift
of the boundary of the Balconian terrestrial gastropods may not be typical of all faunal
groups, however. Comprehensive investigations of several of the dominant faunal groups
would be required to produced a definitive study of the spatial dynamics of this boundary
through the Late Quaternary.
A significant proportion of the shells recovered from these sediments are not
autochthonous to this site. Many of these shells were deposited as flood debris by ebbing
flood waters. Most, if not all, of the Cincinnatia dncinnatiensis probably lived in a smaller
spring-run stream upstream of this site. The single shell of Euconulus folvus is a mature
shell that was secondarily deposited at this site. The biological origin of this shell was
undoubtedly a protected woodland in a canyon in the upper reaches of the Medina River in
the Texas Hill Country. This species has since been extirpated from Central Texas.
Charred shell remains were rare in the samples from 41 BX831. All remains were very
fragmentary gastropod shells. Levels 2 and 19 contained charred fragments of Rabdotus
mooreanus. Charred fragments of Polygyra texasiana and Oligyra orbiculata were
recovered from samples 6 and 8, respectively. An unidentifiable fragment was recovered
from sample 7. These few fragments may indicate the relative rarity of groundfires in this
area, possibly due to lack of sufficient fuel load to carry a significant fire that would leave
evidence in the form of charred shell.
The near lack of non-slug remains in the lowermost levels combined with the
fragmentary, etched condition of the few gastropod shell remains in these levels raises the
possibility of the occurrence of significant taphonomic changes of the original
paleoassemblages that were merely a. sample of the original paleo fauna of this area.
Molluscan shells are largely crystalline calcium carbonate with variable amounts of organic
compounds present in the various layers. The most common crystalline form of calcium
carbonate in terrestrial gastropods is aragonite, but the calcium carbonate in the slug plates
is calcite (Evans, 1972:23). As calcite is more stable than aragonite (Chave, et al., 1962),
in certain chemical environments, shells--even slug plates--that are composed of calcite
could be expected to be differentially preserved, especially in older sediments where longer
time periods have occcurred for dissolution.
The paleoreconstruction of prairie habitats as discussed above is somewhat
problematical in my mind. I feel that there is a valid doubt that one can accurately postulate
the occurrence of a prairie environment from terrestrial gastropods alone. In essence, my
assumption of the existence of prairies at various zones of the column examined at
41BX831 is based on the lack of gastropods indicating the presence of woody plants.
This "negative postulation" may not be inaccurate in its conclusions, but is not as sure or
"clean" as the postulation of a woodland. A survey of living gastropods of several prairie
remnants in Texas has revealed the occurrence of a very low species-diversity fauna that is
characteristic of prairie sites (Neck, unpublished data). However, all of these species can
be found in savannahs and open woodlands. Some species may also be found in the more
exposed or well-drained portions of closed woodlands. The lack of terrestrial gastropod
species that are endemic to prairie habitats is paralleled by most plant groups, including
grasses, and many faunal groups, including vertebrates, and may relfect the relatively
recent occurrence of broad expanses of prairie habitat.
SUMMARY STATEMENTS
The molluscan paleoassemblage extracted from the sediments of 4lBX83l indicate
only small vegetational changes from those conditions that are observed today. However,
the molluscan species recovered from an undated locality in alluvium of the San Antonio
River near the current study site indicate some major changes in the general environment at
some point upstream of this other locality. Seven species of terrestrial gastropods have
been reported from San Antonio alluvium, two of which do not live in this region today.
Whereas Gastrocopta annifera is found in protected areas of north central and Panhandle
Texas (Fullington, pers. comm.; Neck, 1990), the other--Discus crokhitei--is not found
living in eastern North America south of a line drawn from Kentucky to South Dakota
(Hubricht, 1985: 107). However, western montane populations of D. cronkhitei are
known as far south as the Guadalupe Mountains of Texas (Fullington, 1979).
The difference in the apparent environmental changes as demonstrated in these two
paleoassemblages illustrates the complexity of analysis of the environmental changes in the
past. Molluscan shells, indeed any biotic remains in sediments, are habitat proxies, not
climate proxies. Certainly, climate is a major factor in the enviroment of any particular
species, but many other factors impinge upon, and limit, the direct effect of the ambient
climate on the occurrence and abundance of any particular species. To properly interpret
the significance of the biotic remains in any site, one must understand the environmental
limitations of each species and be able to recreate, mentally, the habitat and
microenvironment in which the constituent species of the paleoassemblage live.
Reconstruction involves vegetational community structure, soil texture and drainage,
amount and nature of soil cover, and any other salient environmental factors that affect the
dispersal and survival of any particular species in the paleoassemblage.
LITERATURE CITED
Blair, W. Frank
1950 The Biotic Provinces of Texas. Texas Journal o/Science, 2(1):93-11
Chave, K. E., K. S. Defeyes, P. K. Weyl, R. M. Garrels, and M. E. Thompson.
1962 Observations on the Solubility of Skeletal Carbonates in Aqueous
Solutions. Science ,137(3523): 33-34.
Durden, Christopher 1.
1974 Biomerization: An Ecologic Theory of Provincial Differentiation. In:
Charles A. Ross (ed.), Paleogeographic Provinces ami Provinciality., pp.
18-53. Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralologists Special
Publication 21.
Evans,John G.
1972 Land Snails in Archaeology. Seminar Press, London, 436 pp.
Fullington, Richard W.
1978 The Recent and Fossil Freshwater Gastropod Fauna of Texas. Unpublished
Ph. D. dissertation, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas, 279 pp.
Fullington, Richard W.
1979 The Land and Freshwater Mollusca of the Guadalupe National Park, Texas.
In:H. H. Genoways and R. J. Baker (eds.), Biological Investigations in
the Guadalupe Mountains National Park. Texas, pp. 91-111. National Park
Service Proceedings & Transactions Series, 4: 1-442, Wahington, D. C.
Gehlbach, Frederick R.
1991 The East-West Transition Zone of Terrestrial Vertebrates in Central Texas: A
Biogeographical Analysis. Texas Journal o/Science, 43(4):415-427.
Hubricht, Leslie
1962 Land Snails from the Pleistocene of Southern Texas. Sterkiana, 7: 1-4.
Hubricht, Leslie
1985.The Distributions of the Native Land Mollusks of the Eastern United States.
FieldianaZoology (new series), 24:1-191.
Neck, Raymond W.
1983 Paleoenvironmental Significance of a Nonmarine Pleistocene Molluscan
Fauna from Southern Texas. Texas Journal 0/ Science. 35( I): 147-154.
Neck, Raymond W.
1985 Paleoecological Implications of a Holocene Fossil Assemblage, Lower Rio
Grande, Cameron County, Texas. Pearce-Sellards Series (Texas Memorial
Museum),41:1-20.
Neck, Raymond W.
1987 Terrestrial Gastropod Succession in a Late Holocene Stream Deposit in
South Texas. Quaternary Research, 27(2):202-209.
Neck, Raymond W.
1990 Ecological Analysis of the Living Molluscs of the Texas
Panhandle.American Malacological Bulletin, 8(1):9-18.
Thylor, F. B., R. B. Hailey, and D. L. Diamond.
1966 Soil Survey of Bexar County, Texas. Soil Conservation Service and Texas
Agricultural Experiment Station. United States Government Printing Office.
Washington, D. C., 126 pp. + 94 maps.
Table I. List of Samples with Molluscs and Their Relationship to Stratigraphy at
41BX83 I.
laminated zone 14
V Elm Bk 15
Creek Bk2 16
paleosol CB 17
C 18
N Perez top 19
paleosol 20-22
CBk 23
C (bottom) 24
III soil 6 Bkl 25
Bk2 26
II soil 7 top 27
C 28
I soil 8 A (top) 29
A (bottom) 30
C (top) 31
Table 2. Molluscan Species Codes Used in Tables 3 and 4.
Freshwater Mussels
A p- Amblema plicaJa
L t- Lampsilis teres
Pc Ap Lt Cc Pv Gp Ha
1m 1
If
2 1 I
3 1 2
4 2 3+5
5 1 5 4+6
6 2+6 4+ 11
7 1 3+1
8 1 3 5+1
9 1
\0
\1
12
13 *unidentifiable unionid fragments
14 0+ 1 I
15
16
17
18 2 1
19 2+0 2
20
21 0+1
22
23
24
25
I 26
27
28
I 29
30
31
l
Table 4. Distribution of Terrestrial Gastropods Recovered From Column at 41BX831 (see
Table 2 for Species Codes).
Alston V. Thoms
ABSTRACT
The Richard Beene archaeological site (4IBX831) is located about 25 Ian south of
San Antonio on the edge of the first terrace above the Medina River. Its most salient
ecological characteristics are its riverine location and its ecotone setting near the
Tamulipan, Balconian and Texan Biotic Provinces. Previous archaeological studies in this
broad ecotone demonstrate that hunter-gatherers continuously occupied the region
throughout the last 11,200 years, and perhaps during pre-Clovis times as well.
Excavations at the Richard Beene site yielded well-stratified artifacts, features, faunal and
floral remains from the Late Paleoindian through Late Prehistoric periods in the upper 12
m of terrace alluvium at the proposed dam site for Applewhite Reservoir. About 20
stratigraphically distinct archaeological deposits were recognized. Depositional processes
seem to account for much of the intrasite variation in preservation conditions.
Two Late Paleoindian occupation zones (ca. 8,800 B.P.) yielded what is probably
one of the largest Angostura assemblages in North America. The extensively excavated
Early Archaic occupation surface (ca. 7,000 B.P.) has many well-preserved features,
associated projectile points, other artifacts, and faunal remains. Middle Archaic surfaces
(ca. 4,100-4,500 B.P.) were comparatively feature-rich and artifact-poor. One of the Late
Archaic occupation zones (ca. 3,000 B.P.) has a large, earth oven-like feature, as well as a
relatively high density of broad blade projectile points and thin bifaces. The Late
Prehistoric (ca. 1,000-400 B.P.) component did not have intact features, but arrow points
and ceramic fragments were recovered.
Use of local river gravels as raw material for stone tools and the basic approaches
to tool manufacturing appear to have changed little during the 9,000 years of intennittent
occupation. Only the Late Paleoindian component has a high diversity of tools types, but
it also has the largest artifact sample. Overall, there is considerable inter-component
variation in the density of chipped stone artifacts, fire-cracked rock, and mussel shells,
suggesting variation in the nature and intensity of occupation. The site's archaeological
record provides a uniquely long-term perspective on the use of a riverine locality along
the ecotone between the central Texas plateau prairie and the south Texas plains.
3
INTRODUCTION
Upon discovery by a team of Texas A&M archaeologists in 1989, the site was
designated 4IBX831, but we subsequently named it in recognition of Richard Beene, the
chief inspector for Freese and Nichols, Inc., the engineering company that designed the
Applewhite Reservoir construction project. Mr. Beene discovered an extensive Early
Archaic component that had been exposed by heavy machinery 6.5 m below surface in the
deep trench being dug for the darn (Figure 2b). He reported his discovery to us as we
were fInishing our work at the site's previously identifIed Middle Archaic component and
preparing to· begin excavations at a nearby site where we anticipated finding Early Archaic
deposits. Had Mr. Beene waited half an hour to make his report, the pan scrapers would
have obliterated the Early Archaic component, and we would not have leamed nearly as
much about that time period. We might not have discovered the site's Late Paleoindian
components at all.
Discovery and excavation of the Richard Beene site afforded the opportunity to
address research topics pertinent to human adaptations and site fonnation processes in the
sub-humid savannas of North America during the Late Pleistocene and Holocene periods.
These topics include soil fonnation processes, geomorphology, chronostratigraphy, and
paleoenvironments (see Mandel and Jacob, this volume), palynology, paleobotany, and
paleoenvironments (see Dering and Bryant, this volume), gastropod assemblages and
41BXB31
Richard Bun.
Figure 1. Physiographic map of Texas and vicinity showing the location of Bexar County, the Richard Beene site (41BX831),
and the surrounding physiographic regions (redrawn from Arbingast et al., 1976:8).
Figure 2. a: Photograph of the Richard Beene site prior to excavation; site area extends
along the treeline and adjacent terrace surface; view to the north; b:
photograph of the Richard Beene site at the time Mr. Beene discovered the
extensive Early Archaic surface in the dam trench; view to the north.
)
4
paleoenvironments (see Neck, this volume), as well as faunal assemblages, taphonomy,
and paleoenvironments (see Baker and Steele, this volume).
This chapter presents some of the preliminary results of the archaeological studies
at the Richard Beene site. The first part of the chapter begins with a discussion about the
site's ecotonal setting to provide an environmental framework for the regional
archaeological records. Next comes a review of the archaeology of the northern part of
south Texas and the adjacent southern portion of central Texas. Included is a preliminary
land use model for the lower Medina River valley. The second part of the chapter focuses
on a preliminary description of the archaeological assemblages at the site, especially those
from the more extensively excavated components. Also included is a discussion of site
formation processes and an intersite comparison of components. It must be emphasized,
however, that this information comes from the very preliminary results of our initial
analyses. Further analyses will undoubtedly lead to changes in·the descriptive results and
preliminary interpretations presented herein.
AN ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT
Three major physiographic regions that roughly coincide with "soil areas" converge
in Bexar County (Figure 1): (1) the Edwards Plateau (and Balcones Escarpment), to the
north and northwest of 4IBX831; (2) the Blackland Prairie, to the north and northeast of
the site; and (3) the Texas Gulf Coast Plain (i.e., the Rio Grande Plain soil zone) that
encompasses the site and areas to the south, west and east (Arbingast et al.,1976:8,12;
Black and McGraw 1985:42). Modem vegetation regions in the site's macroenvironment
are as follows: (1) juniper-oak-mesquite savanna on the Edwards Plateau; (2) bunch and
short grasses on the Blackland Prairie; and (3) a combination of mesquite-chaparral
savanna and oak-hickory forest on adjacent parts of the Gulf Coastal Plain (Arbingast et
al., 1976: 13). This suggests that people who occupied the Richard Beene site would have
had reasonable access to a wide variety of resources.
)
5
The distribution of biotic provinces in the site's mesoenvironmental zone, an area
within 30 km or so of 41BX831 that could be exploited regularly by site's inhabitants,
also exemplifies the ecotonal setting. The boundaries of three biotic provinces intersect in
or very near Bexar County, Texas (Blair 1950:Figure I). The Richard Beene site is
within the Tamulipan Biotic Province, albeit at or near its northernmost limits. This
province extends far to the south of the lower Medina River valley, and it coincides
roughly with Texas' Rio Grande Plain soil zone (Arbingast et al., 1976:12). It has a
semiarid, megathermal climate, enabling plant growth throughout the year that supports a
wide range of vertebrate fauna including Neotropical, grassland, and basin desert species
(Blair, 1950:103).
The Balconian Biotic Province, to the. west and northwest of the site area, falls
largely within the Edwards Plateau physiographic region (Blair 1950:112-114). It has a
dry, subhumid, mesothermal climate that supports savanna vegetation. A variety of
animals characteristic of desert basin habitats and hardwood and pine forests occupy this
province, as do some grassland and Neotropical species.
To the northeast of the site is the Texan Biotic Province that encompasses the
Blackland Prairie physiographic region and others to the east The moist subhumid
climate supports both grasslands and hardwood forests, and occasional stands of pines that
in turn support a variety of vertebrate grassland and forest species (Blair 1950: 100-101).
Baker and Steele (this volume), Black and McGraw (1985), and McGraw and Hindes
(1987) provide more detailed information on the available fauna in the site area and
vicinity.
Given the site's ecotonal setting, it would have afforded ready access to
ethnographically important food resources, including white-tailed deer, pronghorn, bison,
bear, turkey, fish, shellfish, nuts, berries, prickly pear, mesquite beans, and wild root foods
(Campbell, 1975). Historical accounts clearly indicate that game--deer, bison, pronghorn,
bear, and turkey--and nut foods, notably pecans and acorns, were usually plentiful along
the stretch of the Medina River where the Richard Beene site is located (Neck, 1991;
Robbins, 1991a, 199Ib).
6
For much of south Texas, however, previously available paleoenvironmental data
have been interpreted as indicating that a "mosaic vegetational pattern probably was well
established throughout the post-glacial period and perhaps even longer" (Bryant and
Holloway, 39:39; also see Dering and Bryant, this volume). While climatic changes may
have affected the nature and distribution of food resources in the uplands around the
Richard Beene site, the riverine and near-river resources may not have been affected
appreciably during the last 10,000 years or so.
Little is known about the effects of local and regional edaphic conditions (or other
factors) on "advances and retreats" of biotic provinces in the vicinity of the site (cf.
Bryant and Holloway, 1985). It seems plausible, however, that even in the surrounding
uplands the general structure of food resources available within a few kilometers of the
Richard Beene site may have been similar throughout the Holocene and Late Pleistocene.
In any case, preliminary results of paleoenvironmental studies for the Applewhite
Reservoir archaeological project fail to provide evidence for dramatic changes during the
last 10,000 years in the depositional environment. It is important to emphasize, however,
that the data are preliminary. More complete analyses may yet demonstrate that
significant environmental changes occurred during the terminal Pleistocene and Holocene
periods that would have altered the structure of available food resources.
Archaeology in the eastern section of the Edwards Plateau, the southern part of the
Blackland Prairie, and the adjacent areas of the Gulf Coast Plains is now fairly well
known. The existing data base comes mainly from federally mandated cultural resources
studies conducted during the last 10-15 years. Results of these and earlier studies
demonstrate that hunter-gatherers continuously occupied the regions encompassing and
surrounding the Richard Beene site throughout the last 11,500 years, and there is some
evidence for pre-Clovis period utilization of the landscape (Black, 1989a, 1989b; Hester
1989).
Survey and excavation work carried out in the lower Nueces River valley in
conjunction with the construction of Choke Canyon Reservoir (ca. 85 krn south-southeast
of 4lBX831, on the Frio River near its confluence with the Nueces River, Figure 1)
revealed a long history of hunter-gatherer land use on the south Texas Plains (Hall,
Hester, and Black, 1986: 394-406). A variety of Paleoindian projectile point types,
including Plainview. Golondrina. Angostura, and Scottsbluff. were surface-collected from
sites located on high terrace remnants, and local residents reported finding Folsom and
Clovis points on similar landforms. Buried Early Archaic components were identified at
7
two sites (41LK31/32 and 41LK(1) where charcoal from fire-cracked rock features
yielded radiocarbon ages ranging from 6,360 ± 90 yr B.P. (TX-4690) to 4,690 ± 80 yr
B.P. (TX-2921). A stemmed, Bandy point, considered to be representative of the Early
Archaic period, was recovered from 41LKSI (Hall, Hester, and Black, 1986:96, 397, 585).
Other sites yielded projectile points characteristic of the Early Archaic period, but in
general, the Middle and Late Archaic periods and the Late Prehistoric period were better
represented than the earlier period sites (Hall, Hester, and Black, 1986).
Recent excavations and ongoing analysis of materials from the deeply buried,
stratified, multi-component Wilson-Leonard site (41WM235), located in the prairie zone
some 180 km northeast of the Richard Beene site, also indicate extensive use of the
regional landscape prior to 8,000 years ago (Weir 1985; Michael Collins, personnel
communication, 1992). Kincaid Rockshelter in the western part of south Texas (ca. 150
km west of 4lBX831) produced Paleoindian cultural materials, including several varieties
of Angostura points (Collins, Evans, and Campbell, 1988; Collins, personnel
communication, 1992). Collectively, the widespread occurrence of fluted and lancelot
projectile points in Bexar County and surrounding regions provides ample evidence for
substantial human occupation of the region during the Late Pleistocene and Early
Holocene (Hester, 1977; Largent, Waters, and Carlson, 1991; Meltzer, 1986).
8
There is some evidence for pre-Clovis occupation in South Texas, as there is for
other parts of the Americas (Fagan, 1992: 240-244; Hester, 1989). Two zones with
cultural materials at Cueva Quebrada on the Rio Grande produced radiocarbon ages
ranging from about 14,300 to 12,300 B.P.; both zones yielded chipped stone artifacts, and
the lower one contained the remains of extinct fauna (Collins, 1976, personnel
communication, 1992). Hester (1989:121) also discusses two other places in the Gulf
Coast Plains as potential pre-Clovis candidates:. (I) Berger Bluff site (41GD30), located
more than 150 kin southeast of the Richard Beene site, yielded chipped stone artifacts
associated with an "unprepared, fired surface," termed a "small hearth," and an adjacent
deposit of "microfauna," radiocarbon ages from charcoal in these deposits ranged from
about 11,550 to 7,700 B.P. (Brown. 1987); and (2) a fossil locality on Petronila Creek
(located more than 150 kin south-southeast of the Richard Beene site, near the mouth of
the Nueces) where C.R. Lewis, a geologist, has been excavating mammoth bones, some of
which he believes may have been modified by people. My objective in mentioning these
sites is not to debate their authenticity; rather, it is to recognize the potential for pre-
Clovis human occupations in south-central Texas in general, and the lower Medina River
valley in particular.
Archaeological survey and testing work conducted in 1981 and 1984 for the
proposed Applewhite Reservoir identified dozens of prehistoric sites, most of which were
. I
assigned to the Early, Middle, or Late Archaic periods (McGraw and Hindes, 1987).
Late Prehistoric sites were recorded, but their frequency was comparatively low. Early
Archaic features and tools were unusually common, and included large fire-cracked rock
features. Guadalupe tools and Martindale points. Several lancelot projectile points
reminiscent of Paleoindian types were surface-collected, but it was postulated that "the
diverse riparian resource zones within the drainage basin areas may have been less
significant than the broad savanna adjacent to or south of the study area, which contained
the forage necessary large groups of herd animals" (McGraw and Hindes, 1987:364). It
was also recognized that sites dating to this period might have been removed by scouring
or buried deeply in the older terraces.
Site 41BX831--later named the Richard Beene site--was one of those discovered
during the new survey work. Backhoe and test pit excavations led to the identification of
three components at the site. The Middle Archaic component (2.6 m below surface)
yielded a radiocarbon age of 4,570 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta 38700) and an oven-like feature in
the Late Archaic component (1.25 m below surface) dated to 3,090 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta-
36702; these and all subsequent dates with lab numbers are C-13 adjusted). In the
absence of radiocarbon ages or temporally diagnostic artifacts, the cultural materials in the
upper 30 cm of the site were presumed to be Late Prehistoric in age (Archeological
Research Laboratory, 1991:111-117; Carlson et al., 1990).
In reviewing the prehistory of the south Texas Plains, Black (1989b:61) recognized
that the portion of the south Texas Gulf Coastal Plain north and east of the Frio River
seems "to be more closely linked to central Texas than we previously realized." Hester
(1989:121) has also recognized broad similarities in the archaeological records for south
and central Texas, as well as for the adjacent parts of the lower Pecos River canyonlands.
Table 1 summarizes information compiled by Black (1989a, 1989b) for the major
prehistoric cultural periods in south and central Texas. For a description of the various
projectile point and tool types noted in Table 1 and elsewhere in the text, the reader is
referred to Turner and Hester's (1985) A Field Guide to Stone Artifacts of Texas Indians.
In his synthesis of south and central Texas, and the adjacent lower Pecos River
canyonlands, Hester (1989:121) identified several "adaptation types ... as abstractions
designed to suggest broad cultural-ecological patterns." Four of those potentially pertain
to the archaeology of the Richard Beene site and surrounding environs: (1) Pleistocene
foragers and hunters; (2) specialized hunters; (3) Holocene foragers and hunters; and (4)
specialized plant collectors.
Hester's (1989) "Pleistocene foragers and hunters" adaptation type dates to before
11,200 B.P. It is a hypothetical pre-Clovis construct wherein generalized hunting and
gathering activities predominate and specialized big game hunting is of lesser importance.
As noted earlier in this discussion, two south Texas sites, Berger Bluff (Brown, 1987) and
Cueva Quebrada (Collins 1976), as well as the Petronila Creek fossil locality are
"potential candidates" for this adaptation type.
"Specialized hunters" of big game animals, including mammoth, now extinct and
modem bison, operated in the northern part of the south Texas plains and adjacent regions
at various times in the past. This pattern was especially evident when bison densities
Table 1. Selected Characteristics of Archaeological Cultures in southern Central and northern South Texas; Data Summarized from
Black's (1989a, 1989b) Review of the Central Texas Plateau Prairie and the South Texas Plains.
were comparatively high during parts of the late Holocene period (Hester, 1989). Groups
representative of this adaptation type are believed to have relied heavily on broad
spectrum hunting and gathering, while taking advantage of increased numbers of big
game. This type of adaptation is represented by several archaeological cultures: (1) Early
Paleoindian period, 11,200-10,00 B.P.; (2) part of the Late Archaic period, ca. 2,800 B.P.;
and (3) during the last part of the Late Prehistoric period, 600 and 400 B.P.
In the northern part of the south Texas plains, the "Holocene foragers and hunters"
adaptation type occurred during the Late Paleoindian period, during most of the Early,
Middle, and Late Archaic periods, and for all but 200 years of the Late Prehistoric period.
Hester argues that the modem environment developed during the middle and late
Holocene, and it was then that "high density resource zones" such as riparian forests
began to play important roles in regional land use systems. Holocene foragers and hunters
utilized "practically all available plant and animal species," including deer, but snakes and
other reptiles, rabbits, other small game, fish, river mussels, berries, and other plant foods
are believed to have been especially important (Hester, 1989: 122-123).
Features resembling the central Texas burned rock middens have been reported
from sites in the Choke Canyon Reservoir area as well. There too, the consensus opinion,
albeit "stretching the inference very thin" was that the features may have been related to
processing acorns (Hall, Hester, and Black, 1986:401). An alternative speculation was
that the large "heat-fracture sandstone hearth features" at one of the sites (41MC209) may
have been used to process other plant foods, perhaps mesquite beans, prickly pears, or
yucca (Thoms, Montgomery, Portnoy, 1981: 187-196). In any case, there continues to be
considerable discussion on the function of burned rock middens (Hester, 1991 b).
The function of the fIre-cracked rock features in the Applewhite Reservoir remains
to be detennined, as does the relationship between these features and the better known
burned rock middens of central Texas. It seems likely, however, that procurement and
processing of plant foods, including nuts and roots, must have been an important
component of some past land use systems in the lower Medina River Valley. If the large
fIre-cracked rock features are indicative of plant food processing activities, and to the
extent they become a component of the regional archaeological record by 5,000-4,000
B.P., their presence in the regional archaeological record would be consistent with a
broader pattern.
In North America and elsewhere in the world, archaeological evidence for the
intensive use of plant food resources becomes apparent during the latter part of the early
Holocene and the mid-Holocene (Cohen, 1977; Fagan, 1992). In parts of west Texas, the
PacifIc Northwest, and as far away as southern Africa, bulk procurement and processing
of root foods is an indication of intensifIed land use that can be detected archaeologically
by the presence of large rock-filled or rockless earth ovens (Thoms, 1989).
In this part of the chapter, I present a preliminary land use model for lower
Medina River valley and surrounding environs. The model draws selectively from the
information summarized in the preceding pages and from broad patterns in prehistory. It
is a speculative synthesis of the regional archaeology that is developed from the
perspective of long-term land use intensification. It also serves as a general working
model for the Applewhite Reservoir archaeological project that will be refIned into a more
testable version as our analyses continue.
The project area and vicinity (Le., the San Antonio River basin) serves as a case
study, but available data from the adjacent Nueces River basin to the south and the
Colorado and Brazos River basins to the north will be used to develop a regional context.
Subhumid, subtropical climatic ecosystems and floodplain settings constitute the broader
spatial context into which the data we generate will be placed for comparative pwposes.
By land use, I mean the patterned exploitation of resources by human groups, the
manner in which they used places on the landscape, the technologies they employed in the
process, and the effect of that exploitation on the ecosystem (cf. Kirch, 1982). By
intensification, I mean a general (i.e. nomothetic) trend through the millennia toward the
expenditure of more energy per unit area to recover more food from the same landscape
to feed more people (cf. Cohen, 1977; Johnson and Earle, 1987). The working model
presented here holds that a negative imbalance, typically too many people for the
available commonly-used food resources, places stress on an existing land use system, and
thus, forces intensification.
The model is intended to specify general trends that are detectable in the local and
regional archeological records, but not necessarily at one site or in a single environmental
setting. Moreover, some areas may not have plant resources that could support increasing
populations, and in those cases, intensification would be limited to increasing the
exploitation of small terrestrial animals, or aquatic species. Additionally, fluctuations are
expected to occur in the directional trends of increasing population densities and land use
intensity. For example, some areas may be virtually abandoned due to environmental
factors. Or, as Hester (1989) noted, when bison become available in greater numbers, the
people would be expected to hunt more bison and do less deer hunting or reduce the level
of effort devoted to small game or plant food procurement. Other things being equal,
bison hunting probably has a better cost:benefit ratio compared to deer hunting or plant
gathering (cf. Thoms, 1989).
3. Late Early to Middle Holocene: Early Archaic (ca. 8,000-5,000 B.P.); increasing
population densities, with population circumscription well established; reduced
group mobility; a notable reduction in the use of short term occupation of sites by
family groups and the movement of people to the food resources, coupled with an
increase in logistically oriented, "collector-like" strategies (Binford, 1980); in the
absence of bison, reliance on deer in all settings, and increasingly on smaller
animals, fish, shellfish, and especially plants foods (roots, prickly pear, pecans,
mesquite, and acorns), focusing on the more abundant species with the best
cost:benefit ratios. Expectations of the archaeological record: notable increase in
site types, including sites with high artifact densities and diversities (Le., base
camps) that can be distinguished from sites with low or high artifact densities and
low artifact diversities (Le., task-specific, logistical sites); overall increase in the
diversity and frequency of tool and feature types; initial evidence for increased
procurement and bulk processing foods other than big game (Le., deer size and
larger), including small game, fish, and plant foods.
4. Middle to early Late Holocene: Middle Archaic (ca. 5,000-3000 B.P.); continued
increases in population densities and population circumscription; increase in
collector-like strategies; continued reliance on deer, but with an increasing focus on
riparian zones, and increasing use of smaller animals, fish, shellfish, and especially
plants foods; species with the lower cost:benefit ratios than those intensively used
in preceding time periods will be used more regularly. Expectations of the
archaeological record: notable increase in site types, including sites with high
artifact densities and diversities (Le., base camps) that can be distinguished readily
from sites with high artifact densities and low artifact diversities (i.e., intensively
used task-specific sites); initial appearance of sites with more permanent residential
14
structures, and evidence for trade, as well as cemeteries; overall increase in the
diversity and frequency of tool and feature types; more evidence for increased
procurement and bulk processing resources other than big game, especially plant
foods.
5. Early Late Holocene: Late and Tenninal Archaic (ca. 3,000-1,200 B.P.); continued
increases in population densities and population circumscription; increasing
collector-like strategies; reliance on deer in all settings, but with an even greater
focus on riverine environments and an ever increasing reliance smaller animals,
and plant foods with lower cost:benefit ratios than those used intensively during
preceding periods. Expectations of the archaeological record: village or quasi-
village sites (Le., longer term occupations with more substantial residential
structures, middens, and cemeteries) become more common, as do task-specific
sites; the pattern of an increase in the diversity and frequency of tool and feature
types should continue; bulk processing features (e.g., large earth ovens and burned
rock middens) should become more common, as should evidence for the use of
fish and shellfish; evidence for trade should become more abundant as well.
6. Late Holocene: Late Prehistoric (ca. 1,200-400 or 5(0); this is essentially the pre-
prothistoric land use pattern; it is the period when land use was at its maximum
intensity, semisedentism was at a maximum level, and native populations were at
their highest level prior to the population apocalypse brought about by the
I "discovery" of the New World by Europeans and the introduction Old World
diseases. Expectations of the archaeological record: the equivalent of the Austin
I Focus or some other limited or non-bison hunting phase of the well known Late
Prehistoric periods; tool and feature assemblages, including storage facilities,
should be more complex than in earlier periods, midden deposits at base
camp/village sites and special purpose sites should be at their densest, cemeteries
should be more common than during any other period, and evidence for violent
deaths should be at an all-time high, as should evidence for trade.
Elements of this model are subject to testing and refinement with data from the
Richard Beene site and from the Applewhite Reservoir archaeological project in general,
as well as from existing and new data generated by other projects in the south and central
Texas areas.
In several cases, there is overlap between the C-14 ages on wood charcoal and on I
soil humates from the same stratigraphic unit, but in each case, the soil humates contained
some wood charcoal as well. The broader pattern, however, is that the C-14 ages derived
from soil humates tend to be about 1,000 years older than those on wood charcoal from
the same stratigraphic or soil unit. While the estimated C-14 ages derived from wood
charcoal are used to date particular occupation zones and surfaces, the C-14 ages derived
from soil humates, minus 1,000 years, are used to bracket some of the archaeological
periods.
I begin the discussion of the archaeological record at the Richard Beene site by
summarizing the excavation strategies we employed during the course of fieldwork. This
is followed by descriptions of the general nature and distribution of artifacts and features
within each component. The next section discusses some of the intrasite patterns in the
archaeological record. A discussion of natural site formation processes follows. I
conclude the paper with a few comments about the site's potential to contribute
information about long-term land use in the region.
LATE PREHISTORIC (Arrow points and c.ramlca)
APPLEWHITE TERRACE
•
'OOm
~_~_~_~_~~~:;!;~~~~;J;:~:;~~~f=~~~~~=r~:;~~~tj~:-----------~--~~TEARC~Ca~~70~a~ 2
~ _ _ _ _ M'DDL£ ARCHA,C I'ppo<) 4.135.70,. B.P••
LEON CREEK PALEOSOl.
_______ MIDDLE ARCHAIC (!owN) ....570 ~ 70 'P B.P.
/', ,I \
I J
ELM CREEK PAlEOSO:.: --'----:f--r --\--7 - -
...:::L__
I ._ ________
T
r-ARE-CRACKED ROCK FEATURE B,080.t 130 'P7 B.P.
r- -C - '/
.5Om " ~' a....!.... rUTE PLEISTOCENE FAUNA 12.745 ;t.l90yr B.P.
1' I t--1_______~
PEREZ PALEOSOL.
FLOODPLAIN
,
- - - ... - - - - --sOiL:; - - - -
'45m
Sta8fiecl Gravell and Sandi ,,
L-________
"SOIL" , '_
, _________________________ ~
,,
,
.4Om
SOOm <OOm 300m 200m 'OOm Om
•
,e.c. 31702 (ciIIIcolll. _ ..... ""'I .Beta 4~El'Ha538 (chllCOoll, heanh) * 7
Bata 475271ETH8540 (charcoal. mW.n·.k. cIepoait) ....._ .....1: Excavaled Al.a
5
•
,8Ita43330(~lII.h'tun)
•
Bat. "7529JE'T"HaS42 (oIwcoaI, hNJ1h)
•
B.1I47526/ETH8539 (charcoal, organicbcn.rk:h, amaphoul , ..bJr." (7) • Approldm.ll. IocaJIon 01 charcoal umpJ.
8ata3l700 la-:o •. hI'tun) Be... 44386 (charcoal, Are-aDad nxk feature) Bata 4 7528fEl'H8S4 1 (charoc.al, burned lurtaoe) * ETHI: AMS Tachnlqu.
Figure 3. Schematic cross-section of the dam trench wall at the Richard Beene site (41BX831); view to the west showing the
relative positions of the excavated areas and dated deposits.
16
Excavation Strategies
The excavation goals for all archaeological deposits at the site were: (1) identify
and isolate intact features and well-preserved occupation surfaces representative of each
major archaeological component; (2) in the absence of intact features or occupation
surfaces, identify and isolate artifact-rich zones; (3) recover as large a spatial (or numeric)
sample of artifacts and features as possible; and (4) insofar as possible, recover some kind
of sample from each stratigraphically distinctive archaeological deposit exposed by heavy
machinery during dam construction.
A backhoe was used to search for and isolate buried features, occupation surfaces,
and high density artifact zones for excavation. As necessary, the overlying sediments
were mechanically removed to within about 40 cm of the target surface or zone. Next,
we hand dug a cross trench in the selected area(s), maintaining 1 m provenience.
Excavation was in arbitrary 10 cm levels, unless natural stratigraphy was evident. If the
latter was the case, the stratum was subdivided into levels of 10 cm or less. The purpose
of the cross trench was to sample from above and below the surfaces or zones selected for
excavation, and to obtain extensive profiles of area(s) selected for horizontal excavation.
In addition, several 1 X 1 m excavation units were placed within each quadrant delimited
by the cross trench to further document the distribution of features or occupation surfaces,
as well as to discover additional features.
Both shovel-skim and toweling techniques were employed. All sediments were I
water-screened through 1/8th inch hardware cloth, and constant volume samples (10 X 10
X 10 cm) for fine screening (water-screening through 1 mm mesh) were taken from each
level in each 1 X 1. In the horizontally excavated areas, non-feature sediments were
water-screened through 1/4th inch hardware cloth and constant volume samples were take
from each 1 X 1 m unit. Features were cross-sectioned to obtain a profile. Feature fill
was screened through 1/8th hardware cloth, and constant volume and bulk samples were
taken from the fill.
We spent ten months in the field with a field and lab crew ranging in size from
about 10 to 40 individuals. More than 600 m2 of artifact bearing sediments were
excavated in discrete occupation zones and surfaces. This included about 25 m2 in the
Late Prehistoric deposit, 150 m2 in three Late Archaic zones, 55 m2 on two Middle
Archaic surfaces, 180 m2 on one Early Archaic surface (Figure 4a), and about 170 m2 in
two Late Paleoindian zones (Figure 4b). Smaller areas were excavated in about 10 other
places, including the work done in the Late Pleistocene sediments that yielded the
paleontological remains. Preliminary counts of recovered cultural materials include,
30,326 pieces of chipped stone debitage, 131 cores, 483 chipped stone tools, 8,530 mussel
shell umbos (i.e., hinges), 11,246 bone fragments, and 25,864 pieces of flre-cracked rock,
mostly sandstone from local bedrock outcrops.
I
Figure 4. a: Photograph of the "gearing up" stage for large-scale excavation of the
extensive Early Archaic surface at 41BX831, 6.5 m below the terrace surface;
view to the west; b: photograph of the "digging out" after heavy rains during
the large-scale excavations of the upper Late Paleoindian zone at 41BX831;
view to the southwest.
17
When the site was recorded, chipped stone debitage, a few tools, mussel shell
fragments, and pieces of fire cracked sandstone were found in a roughly rectangular-
shaped area 350 X 50-100 m that extended in an east-west direction along the terrace
edge and south onto the terrace surface (Archeological Research Laboratory, 1991: 111).
Upon more detailed examination, however, it became apparent that the surface scatter
designated as 4IBX831 merged with similar scatters to the east (4IBX830) and west
(41BX833). In short, there is a continuous scatter of archaeological material on the
terrace edge along this stretch of the Medina River, such that horizontal site boundaries
often are set arbitrarily by large, headward-eroding gullies.
Backhoe trenches excavated during the testing phase revealed two archaeological
deposits buried in silt loam to silty clay loam, a Late Archaic component (ca. 1.25 m
below surface) and a Middle Archaic component (ca. 2.6 m below surface) (Archeological
Research Laboratory, 1991:111). Subsequent inspections of the cutbanks along the terrace
edge and in the headward-eroding gullies showed that the subsurface components merged
with the subsurface components of sites to the east and west. We also had the
opportunity to observe the pan scrapers as they began cutting the huge trench for the
dam's footing, and there too, we found scattered pieces of mussel shell and fire-cracked
I
sandstone.
I
In the backhoe trench we dug two meters below the surface of the site's previously
identified Middle Archaic component, and there we discovered· a fire-cracked rock feature
(ca. 4.5 m below the terrace surface). A C-14 age was obtained on the encompassing soil
humates: 6,450 ± 135 yr B.P. (Beta 43333; C-13 adjusted). One pattern was becoming
clear: this part of the lower Medina River valley was used extensively and perhaps
intensively throughout the last several thousand years.
Conformation came when Richard Beene discovered the extensive Early Archaic
component 6.5 m below surface in the footprint of the dam. Fire-cracked rock, mussel
shell, and chipped stone extended over the entire bottom of the huge trench, an area about
300 X 100 m in size, and into the trench walls. As the pan-scrapers continued to
excavate, we observed Late Paleoindian cultural materials in varying densities down to
about 12 m below the surface. Several of the deeper features underwent emergency
salvage excavations (Figure 3). By then, the picture was clear: the Applewhite terrace
preserved evidence of cultural and natural history that has an extraordinary potential to
contribute significantly to our understanding of long-term human adaptations, site
formation processes, and paleoenvironments.
18
Late Prehistoric Component (ca. 1200-400 B.P.)
The relative discreetness of the cultural stratigraphy and the presence of numerous
intact features, suggest that deposition was fairly rapid during Late Archaic times. It was
not so rapid, however, as to prevent soil development and significant bioturbation that
masked occupation "surfaces." As a result, we were only able to identify occupation
Ilzones. 11
We excavated about 65 m2 in the upper zone that yielded mainly small, expanding
stem Ensor points (Figure 5x). Our excavations focused (ca. 95 m2) on the middle Late
Archaic rone that had the highest density of fire-cracked rock and most of the large, broad
blade dart points, including Marcos and Lange types (Figure 5v, w). This rone also
encompassed the previously identified, pit feature dated to 3,090 ± 70 (Beta 36702, C-13
adjusted) (Figures 3 and 6a). Further excavation of this rodent-impacted feature showed it
.t D
• ,
E
G H I
A
C F
B
, ,
e 11 ) L
~
M
N
~ '*
P
.
Q R
K 0
J
" ,
. + t: *
:
AA
"
,
I ' •
X
Z
U
S
r
V
w
Y 0 , , , .
I
, "'
Figure 5. Selected artifacts from the Richard Beene site (4IBx831): A-I, artifacts from the upper Late Paleoindian zone; J-R,
artifacts from the extensive Early Archaic surface; S, Middle Archaic projectile point fragment from the top of the
Medina paleosol; T-Y, artifacts from the Late Archaic zones; Z-AA, artifacts from the Late Prehistoric zone.
I
Figure 6. a: View to the north of the middle Late Archaic zone at 4IBX831; the upper
I part of the oven-like feature is shown by the concentration of fire-cracked
rocks in the center of the photograph; b: view to the southwest of the upper
Middle Archaic surface showing the mussel shell concentration in the center
of the photograph.
19
to be basin-shaped, about 2.0 m in diameter, and 25 cm deep. Its base was oxidized and
further delineated by a thin scatter of fire-cracked rocks. Given its structure, and
considering the paucity of chipped stone artifacts and faunal remains in and around the
fearure, I suspect it represents a large earth oven that probably was used to cook plant
foods. I
Only about 20 m 2 were excavated in the lower part of the Late Archaic deposit; all
of the units were dug in the cross trench. We have not yet completed the initial sorting of I
artifacts by zone, but the one Langtry-like point (Figure 5u) from the Late Archaic
component was recovered from the deepest part of the deposit.
The types of comer-notched and stemmed dart points from the Late Archaic
components are consistent with the date on the oven-like feature and with other dates
from the Leon Creek paleosol ranging from 2,800 to 3,500 B.P. (see Mandel and Jacob,
this volume), considering that ages on soil humates tend to be about 1,000 years older
than those on wood charcoal. This, in combination with the presence of the lower zone
about 50 cm below the 3,000 year old earth oven-like feature, suggests that the Late
Arachic (/late Middle Archaic 7) zones at this site date between about 3,500 and 1,800
B.P. Most of the fearures were charcoal-poor, but several contained small pieces of wood
charcoal. We plan to submit a few of the samples for C-14 dating by the AMS technique
to obtain more reliable age estimates for the various Late Archaic zones.
Dart points and preforms or unnotched bifaces were the only formal artifact types
in the assemblage (Figure 5u-y). Preservation of recovered bone was comparatively good.
Deer, beaver, canid, rabbit, several kinds of small rodents, frog, turtle, and snake remains
were identified in the various Late Archaic zones (Baker and Steele, this volume).
preserved. This occupation also had several welI-preserved, basin-shaped, rockless hearths
about 40 cm in diameter and 15 cm deep. Wood charcoal from a tree burn on/near the
occupation surface yielded a C-14 age of 4,135 + 70 yr B.P. (Beta 43330, C-13 adjusted).
The lower Middle Archaic surface (ca. 2.6 m below surface) is in the upper part of
the Medina Paleosol (Figure 3; see Mandel and Jacob, this volume, for a discussion of
this paleosol). The C-14 age on wood charcoal from a tree burn at the surface of the
paleosol was 4,570 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta 38700, C-13 adjusted). A dense scatter of lithic
debris, with almost all of the flakes in horizontal angles of repose, and small, basin-
shaped, rockless and rock-filled features demarcated this well-preserved surface.
Most of the faunal remains were from deer and rabbit-sized animals. The closest
item to a time-diagnostic tool was a small biface fragment that appears to be a barb from
a dart-size projectile point Nearby, however, we collected a fragment of a deeply comer-
notched, BelVAndice type dart point (Figure 5s) from a setting stratigraphically identical
to the lower Middle Archaic surface (ca. 4,600 B.P.) at the top of the Medina Paleosol.
We also colIected several large wood charcoal samples from in situ tree burns in the top
I of the Medina paleosol where it was exposed in the dam trench. Some of these will be
submitted for C-14 dating.
To the extent that C-14 ages on soil humates in the site area are 1,000 years older
than ages on wood charcoal, this feature is expected to have a C-14 age of about 5,500
RP., or perhaps somewhat older, considering that the small amount of wood charcoal in
the bulk sediment sample probably affected the 6,450 B.P. age estimate. In any case, the
feature and associated artifacts represent the youngest of the Early Archaic materials at the
Richard Beene site.
21
Before discussing the extensively excavated Early Archaic surface, (ca. 7,000
B.P.), two other feature areas merit mention because they provide useful information about
the intermittent use of the site during the Early Archaic period. The ftrst of these is a
basin-shaped (ca. 0.9 X 0.4) hearth-like feature ftlled with carbon-stained sediments and a
few pieces of mussel shell and fire-cracked sandstone. It was exposed in the wall of dam
trench in the B horizon of the Elm Creek paleosol that underlies the Medina paleosol
(Figure 3). A small piece of wood charcoal from the feature yielded an AMS C-14 age of
7,645 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta 47529/ETH-8542, C-13 adjusted).
When Richard Beene, the site's namesake, reported his discovery of the extensive
J
Early Archaic component buried 6.5 m below the surface nearby in the dam ttench, we
quickly geared up for large-scale excavations in the footprint of the dam (Figures 3 and
2b). Our water screening system was upgraded, the crew size tripled, and we excavated
I
more than 180 m 2 of an unusually well-preserved, Early Archaic living surface in the
silty clay loam sediments at the base of the Medina paleosol (Figure 4a).
The elevation of the three features and the ttee burn varied only by about 30 cm
over an area 100 X 10 m in size. C-13 adjusted age estimates were as follows: (1) 6,985
± 65 yr B.P. (Beta 47523/ETH-8536) from the O'ee burn; (2) 6,900 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta
47524/ETH-8537) from a hearth; (3) 6,930 + 65 yr B.P.(Beta 47525/ETH-8538) from a ·1
hearth; and 7,000 ± 70 yr B.P. (Beta 47530/ETH-8543). The "pooled average" is 6,954 ±
34 yr B.P., calibrated to 5,805 B.C. (5,951-5,740 B.C.).
22
Almost all the mussel shells, lithic tools, and other artifacts were found in
horizontal angles of repose, indicating that this component had not been adversely
impacted by high energy floods or subjected to significant bioturbation. Moreover, rodent
burrows, root casts, and other forms of bioturbation were limited. All of the cultural
material appeared to within a single depositional unit. We estimated that, in any give
place within the area we excavated, about 90 percent of the cultural material was confined
to lens no more than 10 cm thick.
The pan scrapers, especially those with teeth, damaged the site to some extent, but
most of the approximately 35 recorded features were in good condition. Two types of
hearth features were especially common at the site: (1) those with a fire-cracked rock
lens in shallow (ca. 10-15 cm deep), circular to oval, basin-shaped pits (ca. 40-60 cm)
with oxidized bottoms and sides (Figure 7a); and (2) those in a rockiess, basin-shaped pit
of similar size with oxidized bottoms and sides, and typically ftIled with carbon-stained
sediments (Figure 7b). Other feature types included, mussel shell concentrations up to
several meters in diameter, fire-cracked rock concentrations about 1 m in diameter
(hearths or ovens ?), oxidized areas, and sparse "sheet middens" with bone, mussel shell,
chipped stone debitage and tools, fue-cracked sandstone, and carbon-stained sediments.
I Projectile points dominated the formal tool assemblage. All but one were
stemmed/indented-base types, similar to Bandy, Gower, Martindale, and Uvalde points
(Figure 5p-r). The exception was a lancelot point morphologically similar to the
Angostura type, but technologically similar to the stemmed/indented base types. To me,
this suggests that the lance lot-shaped point may be a refurbished stemmed/indented-base
form, possibly reworked after a barb(s) or shoulder(s) was broken. Most of
stemmedlindented-base forms are complete or nearly complete, but many have been
reworked. Other tools included preforms/thin bifaces, a single drill fragment, and burin
blades and cores (Figure 5k-n).
Faunal remains were more numerous, varied, and better preserved than in the other
components. The recovered skeletal elements included those from deer, pronghorn, canid,
porcupine, rabbit/hare, rat, gopher, squirrel, other small rodents, fish, turtles, and snakes.
By volume, deer-size animals dominate the Early Archaic faunal assemblage, although the
effects of taphonomic factors remain to be determined (see Baker and Steele, this
volume).
i
I
I
Figure 7. a: Photograph of an intact, basin-shaped hearth feature with a fire-cracked
rock lens, Early Archaic surface, 4lBX831; b: photograph of an intact, basin-
shaped, rockless hearth feature, Early Archaic, 4lBX831.
I
23
Some of the features overlap horizontally, and in a few cases, "sheet middens" cap
hearth features. This suggests there were multiple occupations of the same surface.
Several lines of evidence, however, convince me that the surface was available for
occupation for only a brief span of time, perhaps no more than a generation or so, before
it was buried by alluvium: (I) the AMS C-14 ages on features from across the site are
virtually identical; (2) the effects of bioturbation are minimal, as evidenced by the
presence of so many remarkably well preserved features, and the fact that almost all of
the cultural materials are confined to 10 cm thick lens; and (3) the sediments encasing the
cultural remains are at the bottom of the Medina paleosol, where deposition should have
been comparatively rapid (see discussion below).
Bulk sediment samples encasing the archaeological remains at the bottom of the
Elm Creek paleosol were submitted for rapid turn-around C-14 age determinations. The
results came back as 9,780 + 120 yr B.P. (Beta 43877, C-13 adjusted) and 9,750 ± 130 yr
B.P. (Beta 43878, C-13 adjusted). We also have a series of C-14 ages, in correct
chronological order, on soil humates from the upper part of Perez paleosol. The ages
range from 9,660 ± 100 yr B.P. (Beta 47564, C-13 adjusted) for the truncated surface, to
10,780 ± 140 yr B.P. (Beta 44543, C-13 adjusted) on B horizon sediments about 1.3 m
below the truncated surface (see Mandel and Jacob, this volume).
Almost all of the cultural materials believed to be Late Paleoindian in age were
recovered from sediments bracketed by these age estimates. The lowermost defmite
cultural deposit we excavated ("salvaged") at the site, a fire-cracked rock feature (ca. 1 m
in diameter), was at the bottom of the Perez paleosol, immediately overlying the Somerset
paleosol, but it is not necessarily any older than the other Late Paleoindian cultural
materials (Figure 3). Carbon-sediments and a few very small pieces of charcoal were
recovered from immediately beneath the lens of fire-cracked rock and will be submitted
for dating by the AMS technique.
24
So far, we have only one C-14 age on wood charcoal from a cultural feature in the
upper part of the Perez paleosol. The very small charcoal sample came from a sparse,
midden-like deposit of fIre-cracked rock, mussel shells, chipped stone, bone fragments,
and charcoal flecks in the lower Late Paleoindian zone about 40-50 cm below the
truncated surface of the Perez paleosol. It yielded an AMS C-14 age of 8,805 ± 75 yr
B.P. (Beta 47527/ETIl-8540, C-13 adjusted). I believe that this age estimate is the most
reliable one for Late Paleoindian occupation zones where we did most of our work.
The charcoal for the AMS age estimate came from precisely the same part of the
B horizon and within 4 m of the bulk sediment sample that yielded an age of 9,870 ± 120 ,
yr B.P. (Beta 47565, C-13 adjusted). By applying the 1,000 year discrepancy to the C-14 I
ages on soil humates that bracket almost all of the cultural remains, we come up with an
estimated age for the site's Late Paleoindian component of approximately 8,700 to 9,700
B.P., a range compatible with the 8,800 B.P. age estimate from wood charcoal. I
About 150 or were excavated in what we called the upper Late Paleoindian zone,
or the materials recovered from the lowermost part of the Elm Creek paleosol and on the
eroded surface of the Perez paleosol (Figure 3). Most of the artifacts were distributed
through 10 to 30 cm of stratifIed sandy silt alluvium overlying the eroded Perez Paleosol.
Unfortunately, this zone was not nearly as well-preserved as the younger parts of the site.
In fact, we did not fInd any in situ features.
It is important to point out, however, that the cultural materials included pieces of
fIre-cracked rock and chipped stone artifacts that were up to 15 cm in maximum
dimension, and thus several times larger than any of the stream worn cobbles. Moreover,
the edges of the fIre-cracked rock did not seem to be signifIcantly rounded, and even the
small flakes were razor sharp. This suggests that the cultural material was not transported
very far as part of the bed load of the flood(s).
All but one of the relatively complete projectile points were Angostura types
represented by proximal ends (Figure 5h-i). Interestingly, the only complete point was a
stemmed, indented-base specimen similar to the ones from the Early Archaic component
(Figure 5g). Two of the lancelot points were reworked to form drills. Gouge-like tools--
bifacial Clear Fork tools (Figure 5f)--were as common as points, and gravers (Figure 5e)
were almost as common .. Other artifacts in this diverse assemblage, included cobble
cores (Figure 5a), blade-like flakes (Figure 5c), and burin blades (Figure 5b), and burin
cores (Figure 5d). Artifact types present in this assemblage, but either absent or virtually
absent in the younger assemblages, include the gouge-like tools, the large burin blades and
blade-like flakes, the beaked, graver-like tools, and several well-made scrapers. Although
we have not yet controlled for sample size, the diversity of tool types suggests that a
wider range of tasks were carried out here than other places and during other times at the
site.
Faunal remains other than mussel shells were scant The few recovered bone
fragments were small and rounded. Here too, deer and rabbit-sized animals were
comparatively well-represented.
We also sampled (ca. 20 m2 ) a lens of artifacts exposed in the wall of the dam
trench about 1.0-0.45 m below the eroded surface of the Perez paleosol (Figure 3).
Compared to the upper Late Paleoindian zone on the eroded surface, most of the artifacts
from the lower zone were in horizontal angles of repose, and stream-worn pebbles were
smaller and fewer in number. We excavated a well-preserved, hearth-like feature that
consisted of a ring of fire-cracked rocks lining the edge of a small pit (Figure 8b).
Compared to the overlying zone, faunal remains, including deer and rabbit-size mammals,
were more numemus, larger in size, and not as well-rounded.
Preliminary counts on recovered materials from the lower Late Paleoindian zone
included, 720 pieces of chipped stone debitage, 1 hammers tone, 1 core, 3 heavy duty
tools, 1 light duty tool, 1 thick biface (a Clear Fork-like tool), 1 thin biface (a well made
drill, possibly from a reworked lancelot point), 2 projectile points (Angostura and
Plainview-like), 123 mussel shell umbos, 189 bone fragments, and 452 pieces of ftre-
cracked rock, including 124 from a caliche-like material. A few pieces of this material
were recovered from the upper zone as well. The caliche-like material is identical to the
BK horizon of the Somerset paleosol (Figure 3), suggesting that the eroded Somerset
surface was exposed somewhere in the vicinity during the Late Paleoindian period.
With the discovery of a Plainview-like point base, we thought this might be a pre-
Angostura component However, the lower assemblage compared well to the overlying
one, in that it too contained the base of an Angostura point, a Clear Fork-like tool, and a
26
well-made drill. This suggested functional, if not temporal similarities, between the two
zones. Temporal similarities are suggested more directly by overlapping C-14 ages on
soil humates from the upper and lower Late Paleoindian zones. The AMS C-14 age of
8,805 + 75 yr B.P. on wood charcoal was from the sparse midden-like deposit in the
lower Late Paleoindian zone. Compared to the upper zone, the importance of the lower
one is that it has significantly better preservation of faunal remains, intact features, and it
does not seem to have been subjected to the kinds of erosion that occurred when the Perez
paleosol was truncated.
I, The last part of the field work at the Richard Beene site was in what we came to
call the "turtle trench" that exposed a series of weakly developed "paleosols" ("soils" 6, 7,
and 8) between 12 and 16 m below the terrace surface (Figures 3, 9a, and 9b). The
trench was so named because of the density and variety of turtle remains that it contained
(Baker and Steele, this volume). All of the sediments we sampled in this trench were
below the Perez paleosol. Faunal remains were recovered from a lens of well sorted
sandy sediments between two thin gravel lenses and from each of the three weakly
developed paleosols.
"Soil" 7 produced some burned bone and a possible marine shell fragment,
although no defmite cultural materials were recovered. Several very small pieces of
charcoal from an amorphous, organic-rich, and fauna-rich area in that strata yielded an
AMS radiocarbon age of 12,745 + 190 yr B.P. (Beta-47526IETH-8539, C-13 adjusted).
The C-14 age on soil humates from the same area was 13,640 + 210 (Beta 47559, C-13
adjusted), again showing the 1,000 year discrepancy between ages on wood charcoal and
I soil humates. C-14 age estimates from the turtle trench ranged from about 13,500 RP.
for the "B horizon" of "Soil" 6 to about 15,300 for the "C horizon" of "Soil" 8 (see
Mandel and Jacob, this volume).
I
I
I
,I
Figure 9. a: View of the "turtle trench" in Late Pleistocene deposits, 12-16 m below the
terrace surface at 41BX831; b: photograph of the "turtle trench" wall showing
the weakly developed "paleosols:" "Soils" 6 (uppermost), 7 and 8
(lowermost).
27
Comments on Natural Site Fonnation Processes at the Site
This section of the paper focuses on site fonnation processes and resulting
preservation conditions in two different floodplain settings: the comparatively high-energy
environment of the Late Pleistocene, and the lower-energy system characteristic of the
Early Holocene. For most of the last 15,000 years, the lower Medina River has been a
low-gradient, flood-prone system, with floodplain alluvium consisting mainly of fine
sandy and silty clay loams. The approximately 50 C-14 ages from the site lend credence
to Mandel's (1991) suggestion that the ostensibly well-developed paleosols fonned in
, I, rapidly-deposited, preconditioned sediments.
Most of the paleosols are silty clay loams, but there is considerable variation in the
quantity of stream worn gravels. The amount of gravel in the sediments affords a relative
measure of energy levels. Gravel-rich sediments were limited to the Late Paleoindian
components on and in the Perez Paleosol, and the lower component has significantly less
gravel than the upper one (Figure 10). As noted earlier, the presence of an intact fire-
cracked rock feature in the lower Late Paleoindian component indicated that it was better-
preserved than the upper component, where many of the artifacts were in potholes and
rills on the eroded surface of the paleosol. During the early HolocenelLate Pleistocene,
local uplands, as well as the Edwards Plateau, were source areas for stream-worn gravels.
Preliminary analyses suggest that the fine-grained sediments comprising the terrace
fill derived from soils developed in the Glenrose Limestone on the Edwards Plateau
(Mandel 1991; Mandel and Jacob, this volume). These "soil sediments" seem especially
prone to forming high viscosity flows. High viscosity flows tend to result in rapid rates
of deposition, and they can also entrap and transport gravels. If velocity was sufficiently
high, these flows might altogether remove the lighter fraction of archaeological clasts,
such as bones, charcoal, and smaller flakes. The heaviest fraction, including larger fire-
cracked rocks and pieces of chipped stone, might be transported for very short distances.
This kind of scenario could account for the lag-like character of the upper Late
Paleoindian component. A somewhat lower velocity flow might remove the lighter
fraction, but leave the heavier fraction, and result in a situation similar to the better-
preserved, lower Late Paleoindian component.
The volume of gravel recovered from the archaeological screens shows that the
well-preserved Early Archaic component is gravel-poor, as is true for all the younger
components (Figure 10). The paucity of gravels is consistent with the idea that lower-
velocity, high viscosity flows covered the occupation surfaces without significantly
affecting the archaeological deposits. A probable result would be a well-preserved
archaeological deposit, much like our Early Archaic component. Here, almost all the
artifacts were in horizontal angles of repose, pit feature boundaries were abrupt, fire-
cracked rocks were typically in situ, and the faunal material was better preserved than it
Stream Worn Pebbles
1200
I .. ···.... ·.. ·· .. ·........·......·..·........ .................... ............................................................................................ ................ ................... ........... ..... .................... ..... ..................................................... ..................... .............. 1
1000 I·································..................................................................................................................................................................................
-E 800
T'"""
E
OJ
c 600
1:
OJ
Q) 400
s:
200 ......
o
Late Prehistoric Middle Archaic Upper/Late Paleo.
Late Archaic Early Archaic Lower/Late Paleo.
Figure 10. Graph showing the weight/density of stream worn cobbles (recovered from archaeological screens) by component
at 41BX831.
28
was in any other component at the site, although many taphonomic issues remain to be
addressed.
One of the more striking patterns is evident in the nature of raw materials for
chipped stone tools and in the basic approaches to tool manufacturing that appear to have
changed little during the 9,000 years of intermittent occupation. The initial results of the
lithic analysis show that almost all of the cores are from stream worn chert cobbles
readily obtained from gravel bars in the river or from gravel lenses exposed in cutbanks
near the water's edge. As noted previously, the river probably has been confIned to the
I present day floodplain area for 10,000 or more years. This suggests that the site's
occupants always had ready access to fIst-size, good quality, stream worn, chert cobbles
that originated somewhere upstream on the Edwards Plateau.
1. Projectile points are the only tool type common to all components, and they occur
I, in similar densities (Figure 12). Thin bifaces (also indicative of hunting-related
. " activities) are present in all but the Late Prehistoric assemblages, the one with the
---
100: !! i: ii i: ! ! ! i: ii
'"E
..
'i:
Q.
... "!!:! ! ! !
"'
'Ij'~'~:l~~~~~
.'l!
., . I.t i '::!.: i i
.. . . . .......
L :. :
E
IUI'I H~cre Ca. Olll:tage Ttick Braces
'"E
.
-"
."
..E ,
Q.
-'"...
E
."
Q.
.... =.
E
Figure 11. Log-scale graph of the densities of hammerstones, cores, debitage, and thick bifaces (possibly cores) from the
various components at 41BX831.
Late Prehistoric Component Late Archaic Component Middle Archaic Component
•.. ,--------------, •• r--------------------------------. ,.r-------------------------------~
"
'"E .. '"
~
E"
~
"i:: "i::
CD CD
0.'.111·············· Q"
<J) In
E E
~1.O1························.························· ............. . CD ,.
==
.. I························ .. I······················· •••
,. r--------------------------------. ",-----------------,
"I······································································································1 "I·· .. ·.. ·...... · .. ·.. ·......·.. ·....
..,
Eul·· ..................................................................................... . '"E ..
~ ~
"i:: "i::
CD CD
Qui .. ·.................................................. ·...... ·...... · .... ··· .. ·.. ·............ ·..1 Q" I ..·....................·· I
<J)
Figure 12. Graph of the densities of classes of stone tools and artifacts from the various components at 41BX831.
29
2. Although the total faunal sample size is small compared to some sites in the region
and issues concerning intra-component taphonomoy remain to be resolved (Baker
and Steele, this volume), deer and deer-size faunal remains were the only
taxa/class common to all components. This too is consistent with the proposition 'I
that hunting large game animals was always an important activity at the site. I
McGraw has discussed the importance of deer as a food source through the
millennia in the northern part of Bexar County (1985b). I
3. Expediency tools on thin flakes (less than 1 cm thick, and presumably used for
comparatively light duty tasks), as well as those made on thick flakes (for
comparatively heavy duty tasks), tend to be the most common tool types (Figure
12). The exceptions are the component assemblages with small sample sizes (Late
Prehistoric and Middle Archaic), but as the lithic analysis continues, we are finding
more edge modified flakes in the "debitage" category. There is considerable inter-
and intra-component variation in the densities heavy duty versus light duty tools
that remains to be explained.
4. The comparatively high density of cores as well as heavy and light duty tools in
the Late Paleoindian is also readily apparent (Figure 12). Some of the increase in
density might be explained if the lagged artifacts represent several occupation
surfaces. It is also possible that the overall distinctiveness of the Late Paleoindian
assemblage, including the presence of gouge-like and graver-like tools, in higher
frequencies than the other components may be explained mainly by the
significantly larger sample size. Alternatively, these tools may provide an
indication that woodworking, or some other activity, was comparatively more
important.
5. Fire-cracked sandstone and mussel shells are elements common to all components
(Figure 13). The sandstone probably was procured from nearby outcrops of
sandstone bedrock and the river was probably the source for all of mussel shells.
In this setting, fire-cracked rock and mussel shells can be assumed to represent
food processing activities. Inter-component variation in their densities, however,
suggests variation in intensity of use of the particular places on the landscape. It
is interesting to note that there is a better correlation between the density of mussel
shell umbos (Figure 13) and chipped stone tools (Figure 12), than there is between
fire-cracked rock and chipped stone. This suggests that the density of mussel shell
umbos (a measure of one kind of food procurement) may be a more reliable
Fire-Cracked Rock
5
ioS.
C")
E
0
T"""
~
Q)
a.
+-'
.c:
OJ
i i, ~
A
I,
i
Mussel Umbos
l00r------------------------------------------------,
f
!>
oS. 80 I····· ..·...... ·· ...... ·...... ·...... ·...... ··.... ·
C")
E
0
\ T"""
80 I .... ·...... ·...... ·.. ·.......... ··.. ·......
~
Q)
a.
m 40 I............ ·· .. ·.......... ·.... ·
E
Q)
.:t:!
20
o
Late Prehistoric Late Archaic Middle Archaic Early Archaic Paleoindian
B
Figure 13. Graph showing the weight/density of fire-cracked rock and mussel shell umbos
by component at 4IBX831.
30
measure of occupation intensity than fire-cracked rock (a measure of various kinds
of food processing). Stated differently, fIre-cracked rock may not be integral to all
forms of food processing.
6. Small (ca. 30-50 cm diameter), basin-shaped features with varying amounts of fIre-
cracked sandstone that probably represent hearths or earth ovens are common to all
components, except the Late Prehistoric which lacks intact features altogether.
Similar size, rockless, basin-shaped features with oxidized bottoms, as well as
mussel shell lenses are common to all the Archaic components. These data
suggest some similarities in food preparation and utilization through the millennia.
CONCLUDING COMMENTS
One of the more important conclusions that stems from archaeological and
paleoenvironmental investigations carried out as part of the Applewhite Reservoir
archaeological project is that the Applewhite terrace has preserved important evidence
about cultural and natural history. This evidence has an extraordinary potential to
contribute signifIcantly to our understanding of long-term human adaptations, site
formation processes, and paleoenvironments in general, not just for the lower Medina
River valley and adjacent regions.
These preliminary results also demonstrate something that many archaeologists,
geoarchaeologists, and geomorphologists have long maintained: the river valleys in the
upper part of the Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas, from the Sabine River to the Rio Grande,
are likely to contain deeply buried and well-preserved archaeological, paleontological, and
paleoenvironmental records of the Late Pleistocene and Holocene times. What we need to
do is to learn how to effectively and efficiently learn more about the nature and
distribution of these records.
It is worth repeating that the archaeological record at the Richard Beene site is
unusually well-stratifIed, well-preserved, and well-dated. And it provides a uniquely long-
term perspective of the utilization of a riverine locality along the ecotone between the
central Texas plateau prairie and the south Texas plains, as well as of generalized riverine
landscapes in subtropical, subhumid environments. The site can serve as a kind of "type
record" against which less well-preserved or less complete archaeological records can be
compared. Its well-stratifIed and well-dated components offer an opportunity to fIne-tune
some of our ideas about temporally diagnostic artifacts.
I. 31
the last 10,000 years or longer. We are fortunate indeed to be able to study such a
complete record of the local cultural and natural history. The opportunity to do this is a
testament to the cooperation among the City Water Board, federal and state regulatory
agencies, and the engineering and construction fInns involved in the Applewhite Reservoir
Project.
, (
1
!
I
32
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Investigations at the Richard Beene site and for other parts of the Applewhite
Reservoir archaeological project (ARAP) are funded by the San Antonio City Water
Board. The studies are carried out under the auspices of the Archaeological Research
Laboratory (ARL), Departtnent of Anthropology, Texas A&M University through Freeze
& Nichols, Inc., the engineering finn responsible for the design and management of the
Applewhite Reservoir construction project. The U.S. Anny Corps of Engineer, Fort
I,
Worth District oversees the project (including its archaeological component) for the
federal government, and the Texas Historical Commission is responsible for cultural
resource management concerns at the state level.
David Carlson(Co-PI for ARAP, and ARL's head), Patricia Clabaugh (ARL's Lab
Supervisor), and Gentry Steele read and commented on earlier versions of the text. Their
comments, as well as further discussions with them and Role Mandel, led to substantial
improvements in the manuscript. Ben Olive (ARL's data manager), spent many hours
generating the numeric data used in the paper and preparing the graphs, including the \ 1
schematic cross-section diagram of the Richard Beene site. John Dockall (ARAP's lithic
analyst) did the artifact illustrations, and Henry Lares drew the physiographic map. While
I
the assistance provide by these and other individuals who had much to do with "getting
things right" is greatly appreciated, I bear the responsibility for the paper's content,
including any errors of fact or omission.
I
I
I 33
REFERENCES CITED
Arbingast, Stanley A., Lorrin G. Kennamer, Robert H. Ryan, James R. Buchanan, William
L. Hezlep, L. Tuffly Ellis, Terry G. Jordan, Charles T. Granger, and Charles P. Zlatkovich
1976 Atlas of Texas. The University of Texas at Austin. Bureau of Business Research,
Austin.
Binford, Lewis R.
1980 Willow Smoke and Dog's Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and
Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4-20.
Black, Stephen L.
1989a Central Texas Plains. In: Thomas R. Hester, Stephen L. Black. D. Gentry Steele,
Ben W. Olive, Anne A. Fox, Karl J. Reinhard, and Leland C. Bement (volume
\ authors), From the Gulf to the Rio Grande: Human Adaptation in Central. South.
and Lower Pecos Texas, pp. 17-38. Arkansas Archeological Survey Research
Series No. 33.
Black, Stephen L.
1989b South Texas Plains. In: Thomas R. Hester, Stephen L. Black, D. Gentry Steele.
Ben W. Olive, Anne A. Fox, Karl 1. Reinhard, and Leland C. Bement (volume
authors), From the Gulf to the Rio Grande: Human Adaptation in Central, South.
and Lower Pecos Texas, pp. 39-62. Arkansas Archeological Survey Research
Series No. 33.
Butzer, Karl W.
1982 Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Campbell, T.N.
1975 The Payaya Indians of Southern Texas. Southern Texas Archaeological
Association, Special Publication No.1., San Antonio.
Carlson, David L, Joe W. Saunders, Grant D. Hall, C.S. Mueller-Wille, Blaine Ensor, Sam
McCulloch, Randy Korgel, Anita McCulloch, Randall Moir, David Journey, and Kay
Hindes
1990 A Research Design for Archaeological Investigations at Applewhite Reservoir,
Bexar County, Texas. On file, Department of Anthropology, Archeological
Research Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station.
Cohen, Mark N.
1977 Food Crisis in Prehistory. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Collins, Michael B.
1976 Terminal Pleistocene Cultural Adaptations in Southern Texas. Paper presented at
the 9th International Union of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Nice, France.
Fagan, Brian M.
1992 People of the Earth: An Introduction to World Prehistory, Seventh edition.
Harper-Collins Publishers, New York.
35
Hall, Grant D., Thomas R. Hester, and Stephen L. Black
1986 The Prehistoric Sites at Choke Canyon Reservoir. Southern Texas: Results of
Phase II Archaeological Investigations. Center for Archaeological Research,
Choke Canyon Series, Volume 10. The University of Texas at San Antonio.
!
Hester, Thomas R.
1977 The Current Status of Paleoindian Studies in Southern Texas and Northeastern
Mexico. In: Eileen Johnson (ed.), Paleoindian Lifeways, 169-186. The Museum
Journal, XVII, West Texas Museum Association, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
Hester, Thomas R.
1989 An Archeological Synthesis. In: Thomas R. Hester, Stephen L. Black, D. Gentry
Steele, Ben W. Olive, Anne A. Fox, Karl J. Reinhard, and Leland C. Bement
(volume authors), From the Gulf to the Rio Grande: Human Adaptation in
Central. South. and Lower Pecos Texas, pp. 115-128. Arkansas Archeological
Survey Research Series No. 33.
Hester, Thomas R.
',/ 1991a Notes on South Texas Archaeology: 1991-3. Further Notes on the Lithics form
the Plainview Occupation at the St. Mary's Hall Site, South Central Texas. La
Tierra 18(2):1-6.
Kirch, Patrick V.
1982 The Archaeological Study of Adaptation: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.
In: Michael B. Schiffer, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory:
Selections for Students from Volumes 1 through 4, pp.101-156. Academic Press,
New York.
I
. ,\
36
Largent, Floyd B., Jr., Michael R. Waters, and David L. Carlson
1991 The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Characteristics of Folsom Projectile Points in
Texas. Plains Anthropologist, 36-137:323-341.
Mandel, Role D.
1991 Geoarchaeology of a Deeply-Stratified Paleoindian Through Late Prehistoric Site
(41BX831) in the Lower Medina River Valley, South Texas. Paper presented at
the 49th Plains Anthropological Conference, Lawrence, Kansas.
McGraw, A. Joachim I,
1985a An Overview of the Prehistoric of the Upper Salado Creek Watershed. In: Stephen
L. Black and A. Joachim McGraw (authors), The Panther Springs Creek Site:
Cultural Change and Continuity within the Upper Salado Creek Watershed, South-
Central Texas, pp. 303-326. Center for Archaeological Research, Archaeological
Survey Report, No, 100, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
McGraw, A. Joachim
1985b The Importance of White-Tail Deer at 41 BX 228. In: Stephen L. Black and A.
Joachim McGraw (authors), The Panther Springs Creek Site: Cultural Change and
Continuity within the Upper Salado Creek Watershed, South-Central Texas, pp.
288-289. Center for Archaeological Research, Archaeological Survey Report, No.
100, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
Meltzer, David J.
1986 The Clovis Paleoindian Occupation of Texas: Results of the Texas Clovis Fluted
Point Survey. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society, 57:27-68.
Neck, Raymond W.
1991 The Diary of Jean Louis Beriandier: An Environmental View of South Texas and
Adjacent Mexico, 1828-1834. In: A. Joachim McGraw, John W. Clark, Jr., and
Elizabeth A, Robbins (eds.), A Texas Legacy, The Old San Antonio Road and the
Caminos Reales: A Tricentennial History, 1691-1991. pp. 269-281. Texas State
Department of Highways and Public Transportation, Austin,
Odum, E.P, I
1971 Fundamentals of Ecology. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
, )
\
37
Robbins, Elizabeth A.
1991a The First Routes into Texas: A Review of Early Diaries. In: A. Joachim
McGraw, John W. Clark, Jr., and Elizabeth A. Robbins (eds.), A Texas Legacy.
The Old San Antonio Road and the Caminos Reales: A Tricentennial History,
I
) 1691-1991, pp. 61-113. Texas State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation, Austin.
Robbins, Elizabeth A.
1991b The Natural Setting Encountered: The Scenic Landscape. In: A. Joachim
McGraw, John W. Clark, Jr., and Elizabeth A. Robbins (eds.), A Texas Legacy,
The Old San Antonio Road and the Caminos Reales: A Tricentennial History.
1691-1991, pp. 245-268. Texas State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation, Austin.
Thoms, Alston V.
1989 The Roots of Northern Hunter-Gatherer Intensification: Camas and the Pacific
Northwest. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman.
\ Weir, Frank A.
1985 An Early Holocene Burial at the Wilson-Leonard Site in Central Texas. Mammoth
Trumpe!, 2(1): 1,3.
I
I \
THE BALCONES ESCARJ>MENT--
BORDERLAND OF TIlE AMERICAN WEST
C.M. Woodruff, Jr.
Consulting Geologist
GENERAL OVERVIEW
The Balcones Escarpment marks a major break in the land. It is a line of hills that extends
through Central Texas and separates the coastal prairies and intervening low, wooded hills from
the limestone uplands to the west. The escarpment extends along an arcuate trend from Del Rio
on the Mexican border, north through San Antonio, Austin, and Waco. It is the dividing line
between two of the grand physiographic divisions of North America: the Great Plains extend
west of the escarpment; the Coastal Plains lie to the east (Fenneman, 1931). In Central Texas,
this boundary is seen in the change from Hill Country/Edwards Plateau on the west to
Blackland Prairie on the east Relief within typical topographic quadrangles range from 50 ft to
300 ft along the inner Gulf Coastal Plain. West of the escarpment, relief generally ranges from
400 ft to as much as 1,200 ft within a typical quadrangle.
The Balcones Escarpment delineates the southeastern dissected edge of plateau uplands that
eventually merge with the contiguous High Plains, which extend east of the Rocky Mountains
from Texas and New Mexico into Alberta, Canada. The Blackland belt extends beyond Central
Texas, skirting the entire Gulf Coastal Plain and Mississippi Embayment through Arkansas,
Mississippi, and western Alabama. TIle Blacklands are prime cotton country, and in Texas
these deep, fertile, black soils encouraged a cultural transplant of the Old South. West of the
Balcones Escarpment, in contrast, traditional land use has been ranching; farming is limited
largely to arable stream bottoms. In brief, the cultural outlook from the Blackland Prairies is
southern; from the edge of the Great Plains west of the Balcones Escarpment, the cultural sense
is western.
The Balcones Escarpment was so named because of its functioning as a physical barrier: an
overlook wi thout ready access from below--the balconies. This physical barrier was used to
good advantage during the cattle drives up the Chisholm Trail. Fertile grasslands and perennial,
spring-fed streams lay adjacent to the hilly terrain that hemmed in the herds on one side. But
even before the time of the cattle drives, the Balcones Escarpment was already a prime area for
human habitation. Archaeological surveys have documented sites along the escarpment that
were occupied by Paleo-Indians as early as [[ ,000 years ago (Hester, [986). Subsequent
archaeological sites cluster along the escarpment, suggesting that the dependable water supplied
by springs was a major resource for early man. The springs also proved to be an
understandable attraction to European settlers; in the early eighteenth century, the Spanish
located their missions and presidio at Bexar (San Antonio) because of the springs that fed the
headwaters of the San Antonio River. Later, in the m,id-nineteenth century, German colonists
settled in the New Braunsfels area because of the rich soils to the east and the high yield
springs flowing from the base of the hills. Still later, M. B. Lamar, President of the Texas
Republic, and a westward looking exponent of Manifest Destiny, chose Waterloo (later to be
renamed Austin) as the new Capital of the Republic. This choice was made expressly because \,
the site lay on the threshold of the West and because the key natural resource for a successful "
settlement did exist--namely water. The water was there in abundance for exactly the same
reasons as the dramatic landscape changes: a geologic fault zone controlled the topographic and
hydrologic setting.
Notwithstanding such western visions, the area west of the Balcones Escarpment remained
virtually unsettled until well into the Nineteenth Century. That region remained the undisputed
realm of the Comanches and Apaches until the 1840's (Palmer, 1986). Only after the
American Civil War did civilization come to the Hill Country and Edwards Plateau, and then
the conversion occurred only haltingly. Rose (1991) has pointed out how the dissected
margins of the Edwards Plateau promoted the continuation of frontier lawlessness: The Plateau
uplands provided open land for long-distance surveillance and for rapid movement by mounted
raiders--both outlaws and Indians--whereas the incised headwater canyons provided refuges
for hideouts and defense. Ultimate settlement and civilization of the Edwards Plateau (as well
as the rest of the Great Plains) depended on widespread employment of three technological
advances: the windmill, barbed wire, and the six shooter (Webb, 1931).
GEOLOGIC SETTING
The Balcones Escarpment marks the line of main dislocation across the Balcones Fault
Zone, which comprises an en-echelon system of mainly down-to-the-coast normal faults. Total
displacement across the fault zone is at least several thousand feet, and individual faults have
displacements of about 1,000 ft, although many faults composing the system have
displacements ranging from a few feet to tens of feet. The Balcones Fault Zone is aligned
along an overall northeast-southwest orientation; in detail, however, local small-displacement
faults trend in various directions. In sum, Lower Cretaceous limestones are juxtaposed against
Upper Cretaceous claystones, chalks, and shales. The relatively soft claystones and shales east
of the main fault line have been eroded more rapidly than the limestones to the west; hence, the
areas of limestone bedrock have been sculpted into a rugged hilly terrain, whereas the softer
claystones form low rolling prairies. In this way, the geologic break has resulted in the abrupt
change in landscape. In detail, faulting has created a mosaic of different rock types that results
in varying local ground conditions.
The Balcones Fault Zone is a near-surface manifestation of a more profound, deep-seated
geologic break: Beneath the fault zone, the buried roots of the Ouachita Mountain Belt mark
the boundary between the continental interior of North America and the still-subsiding Gulf
Coast Basin. The Ouachita Mountains once stood tall through Central Texas, but the complex
now extends underground from their present southwestern edge in Oklahoma, south along a
trend beneath DallasfFort Worth, Waco, Austin, San Antonio, to the Rio Grande near Del Rio.
From there, the complex extends westward into Trans Pecos Texas and into Mexico in the Big
Bend region. This complex belt originated owing to a collision (or close encounter) between
the North American continent and parts of South America or Central America during the late
Paleozoic Era (some 300 million years ago). Subsequently, about 250 million years ago, the
Gulf of Mexico began to form when the continental blocks broke up and drifted apart. In
\ Central Texas, the mountains were eroded and subsided below sea level and were covered by
younger sediments that compose the Mesozoic strata across the hinge zone. The arcuate shape
of the fault zone and the coastward-protruding escarpment reflect the underlying structural
salient where the Ouachita belt bends around the Llano Precambrian massif. The areal location
and depth of the Ouachita complex is documented owing to numerous deep wells and by
various geophysical data. Balcones faulting was probably a result of periodic adjustments
across this buried hinge.
A major episode of faulting along the Balcones trend occurred during the late Early
Miocene (Young, 1972) as evidenced by reworked Cretaceous fossils in the t1uvial sandstones
of the Oakville Formation (Wilson, 1956; Ely, 1957). This period of Balcones faulting is
generally contemporaneous with the pervasive uplift and crustal extension associated with
Basin and Range mountain-building episodes in Western North America. The Balcones Fault
Zone thus marks a possible eastern boundary for this realm of major Cenozoic extensional
tectonics. Hence, in yet another way, the fault zone and escarpment marks a dividing line
between east and west.
The Oakville Formation contains so many Cretaceous fossils that early geologists thought it
I was the site of upfaulted Cretaceous strata. It is an anomaly within the Coastal Plain, which
\
I otherwise consists largely of quartz sandstones and muddy sediments. The Oakville
Formation, in contrast, is a sandstone consisting of locally abundant limestone clasts. It is
exposed today along the middle Gulf Coastal Plain and extends along an outcrop belt that
parallels the present coast line from the vicinity of the Brazos River near Navasota, through
LaGrange, and ending near the Karnes/Bee County Line in South Texas. The presence of
reworked limy materials in this area has resulted in exceptionally fertile soils on rolling terrain
similar to the Blackland Prairie. In brief, eroded, transported, and redeposited limestone
fragments provide a means for establishing the age of the structural upheavals along the
Balcones Fault Zone. Likewise, these reworked sediments result in a recurrence of the prairie
terrain found at the foot of the Balcones Escarpment (Godfrey and others, 1973).
REFERENCES
Baker, Y.R.
1975 Flood hazards along the Balcones Escarpment in Central Texas; alternative approaches
to their recognition, mapping, and management: The University of Texas at Austin,
Bureau of Economic Geology Circular 75-5, 22 p.
Bybee, H.P.
1952 The Balcones Fault Zone--an influence on human economy: Texas Journal of Science.
v. 4, p. 387-392.
Caran, S. C., and Baker, Y. R.
1986 Flooding along the Balcones Escarpment, Central Texas, in Abbott, P. L, and
Woodruff, C. M., Jr., eds., The Balcones Escarpment--geology, hydrology, ecology,
and social development in Central Texas, published for Geological Society of America
Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, November, 1986, p. 1-14.
Ely, L.M.
1957 Microfauna of the Oakville Formation, LaGrange area, Fayette County, Texas: The
University of Texas (Austin), M.A. thesis (unpublished), 118 p.
Ewing, T. C., and Caran, S. C.
1982 Late Cretaceous volcanism in South and Central Texas--stratigraphic, structural, and
seismic models: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions, v. 32.
p. 137-145.
Fenneman, N.M.
1931 Physiography of Western United States: New Your, McGraw-Hill, 534 p.
Flawn, P.T.
1964 The everlasting land, in Maguire, Jack, ed., A President's Country, Austin, Shoal
Creek Pub1ishers,84 p.
Godfrey, C.L., McKee, G.S., and Oakes, H.
1973 General soil map of Texas: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M
University; approximate scale, 1:500,000.
Hester, T. R.
1986 Early human populations along the Balcones Escarpment, in Abbott, P.L., and
Woodruff, C.M., Jr., eds., The Balcones Escarpment, Geology, Hydrology, Ecology
and Social Development in Central Texas, published for Geological Society of
America Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, November 1986, p. 55-62.
Hoyt W.G., and Langbein, W. B.
1955 Floods: Princeton, Princeton University Press, 469 p.
Longley, G.
1986 The biota of the Edwards aquifer and the implications for paleozoogeography, in
Abbott, P.L., and Woodruff, C.M., Jr., eds., The Balcones Escarpment, Geology,
Hydrology, Ecology and Social Development in Central Texas, published for
Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, November
1986, p. 51-54.
Palmer, E.C.
1986 Land use and cultural change along the Balcones Escarpment: 1718-1986, in Abbott,
P.L., and Woodruff, C.M., Jr., eds., The Balcones Escarpment, Geology,
i Hydrology, Ecology and Social Development in Central Texas, published for
I
I Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas. November
1986, p. 153-161.
,
i
!
Rose, P.R.
1972 Edwards Group, surface and subsurface, Central Texas: The University of Texas at
Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations no. 74, 198 p.
1990 Role of Edwards Plateau geology in prolonging era of frontier lawlessness, West-
eentral Texas, I 860-1 880:Austin Geological Society Newsletter.
Webb, W. P., 1931, The Great Plains, Boston, Ginn (reprinted by University of Nebraska
Press, 1985), 525 p.
Wilson, J.A.
1956 Miocene formations and vertebrate biostratigraphic units, Texas Coastal Plain:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 40, no 9, p. 2233-224
Woodmff, C.M., Jr.
1977 Stream piracy along the Balcones Escarpment, Central Texas: Journal of Geology, v.
85, no. 4, p. 483-490. I
1984 Stream piracy--possible controls on recharge/discharge geometry, Edwards aquifer. !
Barton Springs Segment, in
Woodmff, C.M., Jr., and Abbott, P.L.
1979 Drainage-basin evolution and aquifer development in a karstic limestone terrain, south-
eentral Texas, USA: Earth-Surface Processes, v. 4, no. 4, p. 319-334.
Young, K.
1972 Mesozoic history, Llano region, in Barnes, V.E., Bell, W.C., Clabaugh, S.E., Cloud,
P.E., Jr., McGehee, R.Y., Rodda, P.U., and Young, K., eds., Geology of the Llano
region and Austin, area, Field Excursion: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau
of Economic Geology Guidebook 13,77 p.
NEOGENE AND QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHY OF THE
INNER GULF COASTAL PLAINS, SOUTH-CENTRAL TEXAS
S. Christopher Caran
Department of Geological Sciences
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78713
INTRODUCTION
Nonmarine Neogene (Late Miocene-Pliocene) and Quaternary
deposits compose an undeformed veneer manteling the thick
down-faulted and downwarped Upper Cretaceous (Gulfian),
Paleogene, and Lower Miocene stratigraphic sequence of the
Inner Gulf Coastal Plains of South-Central Texas. Fluvial
sands and gravels, reflecting both ancient and modern
drainage systems, constitute a majority of Neogene and
Quaternary sections throughout the region. Other sediment
types are represented locally, however, including alluvial-
fan deposits, peat, and a variety of pedogenic and diagenetic
sediments. The Balcones Escarpment, which forms the western
and northern boundaries of the Inner Gulf Coastal Plains,
provides a complementary record of this period, including
subaerial and subterranean travertines, clastic cave fills
(some of which contain important paleofaunas), collapse
breccias, and mass-movement deposits, as well as fluvial-
terrace fills.
In the past, chronologic control in Neogene and
Quaternary sections of the Inner Gulf Coastal Plains was
primarily based on qualitative evidence such as paleofaunal
and geomorphic indicators (landscape position, integrity and
continuity of deposits, degree of soil development, etc.).
No faunas older than Rancholabrean (~8,OOO-300,OOO yr) are
known from the Coastal Plains west of peninsular Florida,
however, and there were few calibrated geomorphic records.
The available data helped provide a relative-age sequence,
yet lacked the precision and resolution required for detailed
assessments. Radiocarbon assays were used sparingly, but
were limited to dating deposits of Holocene and latest
Pleistocene age. The absence of a quantitative chronometry
for strata that pre-date the effective limit of radiocarbon
extinction (~50,OOO yr) and/or lack materials suitable for
other numerical dating methods was a major hinderance to
investigation of Neogene and Quaternary deposits throughout
the entire Gulf Coastal Plains.
Recent studies at a site in southern 8astrop County,
Texas, provided the first quantitative age determinations for
deposits falling within the previously undatable "window"
from Late Miocene to Late Pleistocene in this region.
Tephrochronology, supported by paleomagnetic analyses and
earlier paleofaunal evidence from correlative deposits,
demonstrates an Early to Middle Pleistocene age for the fill
of the Capitol Terrace, one of the upper terraces of the
I
I Colorado River. This evidence affords a means of
I
interpolating ages of younger terraces fills, helps to
Page 1
constrain the age of older fills, and provides a temporal
benchmark for gauging rates of landscape evolution across the
region.
Page 2
·. 1
)
dipping monocline (Fig. 1). During the Late Miocene, these
same strata were faulted, down dropped, and further rotated
across the high-angle normal faults of the 8alcones Fault
System. The style and timing of 8alcones faulting and the
general orientation of the faults closely corresponds to that
of the 8asin and Range extensional regime (Ewing, 1991: 28-
29). Gable and Hatton (1983: Map 1) indicate that the net
epeirogenic uplift of the Edwards Plateau area during and
following the Late Miocene was as much as 1600 ft (500 m),
which would account for the total offset across the fault
zone. Upper Cretaceous strata in this region are relatively
unconsolidated, chiefly consisting of marls. 8alcones
faulting brought these marls into contact with indurated
Lower Cretaceous limestones and dolostones. The 8alcones
Escarpment was created by preferential erosion of the marls
and related strata long after tectonic displacement ended.
Formations cropping out across the Inner Gulf Coastal
Plains primarily consist of: Upper Cretaceous open marine and
lagoonal marls, limestones, and shales, with mafic to
ultramafic intrusions, tephra, and flows; Paleocene shallow
marine shales; Eocene marine, paralic, and nonmarine
sandstones and shales with seams of lignite; Oligocene shales
and sandstones, locally incorporating volcanic tephra; and
Miocene sandstones and conglomerates, in part composed of
lithoclasts of Cretaceous limestone. Upper Cretaceous rocks
are confined to the proximal margin of the Coastal Plains,
mostly within the 8alcones Fault Zone. Eocene deposits are
particularly thick, lithologically variable, and laterally
extensive in outcrop. All of these strata are unconformably
overlain by a complex suite of Neogene and Quaternary
deposits, described below. Most of the bedrock units were
sediment sources far younger deposits and some formed
permeability barriers along which diagenetic sediments
accumulated.
Page 3
extend down-valley continuously, yet be everywhere
diachronous.
Such variations should, in fact, be the rule, rather
than the exception, because lateral accretion implies that
both cross-valley and down-valley aggradation are progressive
and therefore diachronous. Only extreme high-magnitude
floods are likely to produce widespread contemporaneous
vertical accretion of overbank deposits, but these too will
vary as flood stage is enhanced or attenuated in response to
channel geometry, gradient, and obstruction, or the width and
slope of flood plains and flood terraces in different
reaches. Adjacent basins or nearby reaches in a single basin
are unlikely to feel comparable effects even during the
highest flood of record; for example, it is uncommon for
different gaging stations to have attained their respective
highest stages or discharge rates during the same storm
event, even when the stations are nearby in the same drainage
basin.
8aker (1975), Caran and 8aker (1986), and 80mar (this
volume) discussed the localized nature of flood-producing
storms in this region. Under a less erratic flow regime,
which might have existed during previous climatic episodes,
there may have been somewhat greater consistency in the
discharge patterns and in the resulting sedimentary sequences
of different reaches or basins. It. is probable, however,
that such episodes of consistency, if they existed at all,
were so short lived that their sediment records were
volumetrically insignificant. This does not mean that the
range in age of a given deposit or series of deposits cannot
be determined; instead, discretion is needed to assess the
applicability of data from different locations. The same
arguements may apply to other types of Neogene and Quaternary
deposits in the region, as well.
Miocene Deposits
Q~~~~ll~_~~c~~t~~~
The oldest Neogene deposits recognized in the Inner Gulf
Coastal Plains are, from oldest to youngest, the Oakville,
Fleming, and Goliad Formations, of Miocene age. The Oakville
Formation is a gravelly sandstone and shale overlying
Oligocene Catahoula sandstones. Locally, the Oakville
contains mineable concentrations of uranium. Much of the
Oakville is heavilly cemented with calcium carbonate, making
these deposits highly resistant to erosion. As a result,
they stand in relief as a west-facing cuesta, the largest of
which is the 80rdas Escarpment of South Texas. The Oakville
is the oldest formation that is composed in part of
lithoclasts of Lower Cretaceous limestone, including
diagnostic marine fossils. The presence of these lithoclasts
is significant because it proves that by the time of Oakville
deposition, Lower Cretaceous strata of the Edwards Plateau
had been exposed to erosion following the 8alcones faulting.
It is, therefore one the lines of evidence establishing the
approximate time of faulting. Oakville strata have yielded
Page 4
vertebrate remains that establish the age of this formation
as Early Miocene (Wilson, 1956).
El~m~ug_EQcm~t~QU
The Middle Miocene Fleming Formation is the thickest and
most areally extensive of the Miocene deposits in the Inner
Coastal Plains. The Fleming consists of shales and
sandstones and, like the underlying Oakville Formation,
contains lithoclasts of Lower Cretaceous limestone, as well
as Miocene vertebrate fossils. The contact between the
Oakville and Fleming is an erosional unconformity. Oakville
and older strata dip downward into the Gulf of Mexico basin
as a result of sediment loading on the Outer Coastal Plains
and the Continental Shelf. Fleming deposits are more than
1200 ft (370 m) thick and no doubt contributed to the
downwarp of subjacent strata. In contrast, deposits
overlying the Fleming are so thin that they have caused
little downwarp in Fleming and younger strata. Except along
some faults, all of the Coastal Plains deposits have gentle
dips (~5 degrees), but the dips of Fleming and younger strata
typically are even lower.
Goliad Formation
- - - - - - ---------
The Late Miocene Goliad Formation is the youngest of the
three Miocene units in the region. Lithologies
characteristic of the Goliad include shales, sandstones, and
conglomerates. In places, this formation is highly
calcareous, as a result of pedogenic and/or near-surface
diagenetic enrichment. Cementation makes the formation
resistant to erosion, such that it crops out as a series of
low ridges and cuestas. The age of this formation has long
been in question because few vertebrate remains and other
temporal indicators had been found. Recent studies reported
by Tedford and others (19B7, Pl. 6.2) have shown convincingly
that the Goliad is Late Miocene.
Pliocene Deposits
~illi§_EQIm~!iQ~
Two nonmarine Pliocene deposits are generally recognized
in the Inner Gulf Coastal Plains, but there are several
possible Pliocene deposits, as well. Virtually no vertebrate
remains or other direst chronologic indicators have been
found in any of these deposits. The Willis and the Uvalde
Formations are usually considered Pliocene (see also Loomis
~t ~l., this volume) and are the most extensive--they are the
only lithologic units in this part of the section that are
accorded formation status (Table 1). The Willis Formation
forms a nearly continuous outcrop along the coastward edge of
the Inner Gulf Coastal Plains as here defined. Dominant
lithology is gravel and sand, and the formation thickens to
~30 m (100 ft) to the southeast down the Coastal Plain paleo-
dip surface. Dip of the Willis beds is low (~2 degrees), but
steeper than that of Pleistocene I'coastwise " deposits such as
the Lissie and Beaumont (Winkler, 1991, Pl. B).
Page 5
~Y~!Q~ EQ~~~~iQD
The Uvalde Formation is perhaps the most often
misinterpreted stratigraphic unit in the region. Hill (1891,
p. 368) defined the Uvalde Formation as an upland relict
gravel capping drainage divides, and consisting of
lithoclasts of chert and limestone derived from Lower
Cretaceous formations of the Edwards Plateau, along with a
small percentage of exotic clasts including quartzite and
vein quartz. In the area where this formation was originally
recognized, in the Nueces and San Antonio/Medina drainages,
particularly in Uvalde and Medina Counties, the Uvalde is a
valid stratigraphic unit and use of the name Uvalde is
entirely appropriate (Table 1). [Participants in the 1992
South-Central Friends of the Pleistocene Field Trip will see
an excellent exposure of the Uvalde Formation in Medina
County.] I,
Some investigators, however, have misapplied the term I
elsewhere. This practice actually began with Hill himself
(Hill and Vaughan, 1897) when he mapped upland gravels in the
Austin area as Uvalde. The deposits mapped as Uvalde
included: fill terraces along paleochannels of major
tributaries of the Colorado River (Urbanes, 1963; Weber,
1968); and gravel lags lacking discrete stratigraphic
correlatives. Later workers have incorrectly applied the
name Uvalde to virtually every upland gravel, and even to
high terrace fills, throughout the Texas Coastal Plains
(e.g., Byrd, 1971). Part of the problem has to do with using
a formation name for an unstratified lag deposit consisting
of clasts assumed to have been derived from that unit, which
is completely inappropriate. Such lags occur on surfaces
across the region in unrelated geomorphic contexts, where
there is no basis for correlation. In addition, the
occurrence of exotic clasts, particularly quartzites, in
gravel deposits seems to have encouraged use of the name
Uvalde in some cases (e.g., Mathis, 1942). These clasts are
extremely durable and are reworked through multiple
generations of fills. [Field trip participants will find
examples of these clast types at most of the stops in the
Bastrop and Smithville areas.] Even the quartzite and other
exotic clasts in the Uvalde Formation itself were reworked
from older fluvial deposits, because there are no known
primary (bedrock) sources of quartzite in any of the drainage
basins of South-Central Texas. Although it is not possible
here to present a complete review of the evidence contra-
indicating correlation of these kinds of deposits with the
Uvalde Formation. Yet there appear to be no clear examples
of stratified fluvial gravels sufficiently high in the
landscape to qualify as the Uvalde Formation north of the San
Antonio River basin.
~ll~~l~l=f~Q Q~~~~lt~
Alluvial-fan deposits of varying age are found
throughout the region (Table 1). Those capping drainage
divides of high-order streams may be as old as Pliocene, but
are perhaps Early Pleistocene. Edwards (1974) described an
Page 6
extensive alluvial-fan system in the Brazos River basin just
north of the Colorado-Brazos divide in Williamson County.
Similar, but less extensive systems are represented in
elevated sites across the Colorado and Guadalupe basins. Few
of these deposits have been investigated; most are not even
shown on published geologic maps. Small alluvial-fans are
found in many places in the region and are demonstrably
Pleistocene to modern.
SUMMARY
Neogene and Quaternary deposits of the Inner Gulf
Coastal Plains are thick, laterally extensive, and
lithologically variable, and may, in aggregate, be nearly
Page 7
continuous chronologically. Previous workers have shown that
topographically separate deposits of a given area are often
chronologically distinct, as well. The oldest deposits are
generally those highest in the landscape. Erosion and
structural downwarp have modified the landscape
differentially, such that many of the deposits are relicts
with limited continuity. Stratigraphic correlation depends
on comparability of a range of characters. There has been
significant recent improvement in understanding the
chronology of these deposits, which will aid future efforts
to develop a coherent regional stratigraphy.
Page 8
Table 1. Neogene (post-Willis Pliocene) and Quaternary
stratigraphy of the Inner Gulf Coastal Plains, South-Central
Texas.
River basins
"Walsh Terrace
filII!
? ? Asylum
Leona Formation
?
HOLOCENE
flood- HMi Iler flood- Riverview
plain Terrace plain Sand Beach
fi 11s fill" fills
view 28 33 33 33 30 40 40
Sand ~10? NR NR 7- 7- 7- 8- S25 S30
Beach 16 16 16 18
River 422 NR ~420 NR NR NR 422** 290- 270-
__ ~l~~~ ______________________________________________ ~gQ ___ g§~
1: Hill and Vaughan (1897, p. 244, 248); ~~~ ~l~~ Hill (1901,
p. 352) and Hill and Vaughan (1902).
2: Deussen (1924, p. 115-116)
3: Weber (1968)
4: Baker and Penteado-Orellana (1977, Table 1)
5: Looney and Baker (1977, Table 3)
6: Blum (1991, Table 6.5)
7-9: Relief as shown on the following topographic maps:
7--Austin East (Geological Survey, 1973a) and Montopolis
(Geological Survey, 1973b); 8--Bastrop (Geological Survey,
1982) and Lake Bastrop (Geological Survey, 1982);
9--Smithville (Geological Survey, 1982) and Togo
(Geological Survey, 1981).
Table 3. Suggested nomenclature for correlative local
terrace sequences, and numbers of stops at which respective
terrace fills are exposed.
4: Red Bluffs
5: Tahitian Drive
8: Clark site
PUBLICATIONS RELATING TO THE QUATERNARY OF SIXTEEN
COUNTIES IN THE CENTRAL TEXAS / BALCONES FAULT ZONE REGION:
A BmLIOGRAPHY
Dennis Trombatore
I
l
Arnow. Ted. 1957. Records of wells in Travis county. Texas. Bulletin 5708.
Texas Board of Water Engineers. Austin. TX.
Baker. E.T. Jr .• 1986. Geohydrology of the Edwards Aquifer in the Austin area.
~. Report no.293. Texas Water Development Board. Austin. TX.
Baker. F.E. 1979. Soil Survey of Bastrop County. Texas. Soil Conservation
Service. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington. D.C.
Baker. Victor R 1983. Late Pleistocene fluvial systems in: Wright. H.E. and
Porter. S.C.• eds. Late Ouaternary Environments of the United States: V.l The
Late Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis. p. 26-41.
2
1
,
,
Baker. Victor R. et al. 1973. Urban flooding and slope stability in Austin.
Itl.a.s.. Fieldtrip Guidebook no.l. Austin Geological Society. Austin. TX.
Barnes. V.E. Geologic Atlas of Texas (scale 1:250.000): Austin sheet (1981.
rev). Llano sheet (1981). San Antonio sheet (1983. rev.) and Seguin sheet
(1974). Bureau of Economic Geology. Austin. TX.
Batte. Charles D .• 1984. SoU Survey of Comal and Hays Counties. Texas. Soil
Conservation Service. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington. D.C.
Beck. Miles Walter. 1934. Soil Survey of Frio county. Texas. Soil Conservation
Service. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington. D.C.
Bernard. H.A. and LeBlanc. R.J. 1965. Resume of the Quaternary geology of
the northwestern Gulf of Mexico province. in: Wright. H.E .• Jr. and Frey. D.G.
(eds.) The Ouaternary of the United States. Princeton Univ. Press. NJ. (reprinted
in Bur. Eeon. Geol. guidebook 11).
Bernard. H.A .• LeBlanc. RJ .• and Major. C.F .• 1962. Recent and Pleistocene
geology of the Gulf Coast and central Texas and guidebook of excursions.
Geological Society of America. 1962 annual meeting. Houston Geological Society.
Houston. TX.
Blair. W. Frank. 1950. The biotic provinces of Texas. Texas Journal of Science
v.2. no.l. p.93-116.
3
I
Blum, Michael D. 1992. MQdern depositional envimnments and recent
alluvial history of the Lower Colorado River. Gulf Coastal Plain of Texas.
unpublished PhD dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Blum, Michael D., and Valastm, S. Jr., 1989. Response of the Pedernales River
of Central Texas to late Holocene climatic change. Annals Qf the Association of
American Geographers. v.79, pp.435-456.
Breeding, S.D., 1948. Texas floods of 1940. Water Supply Paper no.1046, U.S.
Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Breeding, S.D., 1948. Flood of September 1946 at San Antonio. Texas. Circular
no.32, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Breeding, S.D. and Dalrymple, T. 1944. Texas floods Qf 1938 and 1939. Water
Supply Paper no.914, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Breeding, S.D. and Montgomery, J.H., 1954. Floods of September 1952 in the
CQIQrado and Guadalupe River Basins, central Texas. Water Supply Paper 1260-A,
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Brune, Gunnar, 1981. Springs of Texas. v,l. Branch-Smith, Inc., Ft. Worth, TX.
Bryant, V.M. Jr., 1977. A 16,000 year pollen record of vegetational change in
central Texas. Palynology v.l. p.143-156.
Bryant, V.M. Jr., 1969. Late full-glacial and post-glacial pollen analysis of
Texas sediments. unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Bryant, V.M. Jr. and Holloway, R.W., 1985. The Late Quaternary
paleoenvironmental record of Texas. ill: Bryant, Vaughn M. and Holloway,
Richard G., eds. Pollen Records of Late Quaternary North American Sediments.
American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists, Dallas, TX. p.39-70.
Bryant, Vaughn M. Jr. and Shafer, Harry J., 1977. The late Quaternary
paleoenvironment of Texas: a model for the archaeologist. Bulletin Qf the Texas
Archeological SQciety v.4S, p.I-25.
Caine, Thomas A. and Lyman, W.S .. 1904. Soil survev of the San Antonio area.
Texas. Bureau of Soils, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
4
I
Carr, J.T. 1967. Climate and physiography of Texas. Report 53, Texas Water
Development Board. Austin, TX.
Carter, W.T., 1911. Reconnoissance soil survey of the central Gulf Coast area
of Texas. Bureau of Soils, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Carter, W.T., 1931. The Soils of Texas. Bulletin 431, Texas Agricultural
Experiment Station, College Station, TX.
Choate, J.R. and Hall, E.R., 1967. Two new species of bats, genus Myotis, from
a Pleistocene deposit in Texas. American Midland Naturalist v.78, no.2, p.531-
534.
Collins, M.B., et al. 1990. Quaternary geology and prehistory of the Vera
Daniels Site, Travis County, Texas. Current Research in the Pleistocene v.7, p.8-
10.
Dalrymple, Tate, et ai, 1939. Major Texas floods of 1935. Water Supply Paper
796-G, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Davis, W.B., 1974. The Mammals of Texas. Bulletin 41, Texas Parks and Wildlife
Dept. Austin, TX.
DeCook, D. and Doyel, W.W., 1955. Records of Wells in Hays county, Texas.
Bulletin 5501, Texas Board of Water Engineers, Austin, TX.
Deussan, A., 1924. Geology of the Coastal Plain of Texas west of Brazos Riyer.
Professional Paper no.126, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Dittmar, Glenn W., Deike, M.L. and Richmond, D.L. 1977. Soil Survey of
Medina County, Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.
Dittmarr, Glenn W., and Stevens, J.W., 1980. SoU Survey of Atascosa County,
Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
5
Dorsey, Sara L., 1977. A reevaluation of two new species of fossil bats from
Inner Space Caverns. Texas Journal of Science. v.28, no.I-4, p.103-108.
Ellsworth, C.E., 1923. The floods in Central Texas in September. 1921. Water
Supply Paper no.488, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Evans, G.L., 1961, The Friesenhahn cave. Bulletin no.2. Texas Memorial
Museum, Austin, TX. p.I-22.
Ferring, C.R., 1990. Archaeological Geology of the Southern Plains. in: Lasca,
N.P. and Donahue, J. eds, Archaeological Geology of North America (Centennial
Special Volume 4) Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO. p.253-266.
Fieseler, R. G., Jasek, J. and Jasek, M. (eds.) 1978. An introduction to the caves
of Texas. Annual Convention Guidebook no.19, National Speleological Society.
Texas Speleological Survey, Austin, TX.
6
Follett, C.R., 1966. Ground-water resources of Caldwell County, Texas. Report
no.12, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
Garner, L.E. and Young, K.P., 1976. Environmental geology of the Austin
area: an aid to urban planning. Report of Investigations no.86, Bureau of
Economic Geology, Austin, TX.
Garza, Sergio, 1966. Ground-water resources of the San Antonio area, Texas.
Report no.34, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
Godfrey, C.L., McKee, G.S. and Oakes, H. 1973 General Soil map of Texas.
(MP1034) Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agricultural
Communications, College Station, Texas.
7
Grubb. H.F. and Carillo. R.. 1988. Region 23. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain in:
Back. W. Rosenshein. J.S. and Seaber. eds. Hydrogeology (Geology of North
America v.O-2) Geological Society of America. pp.219-228.
Gustavson. T.C .• 1978. Bed forms and stratification types of modern gravel
meander lobes. Nueces River. Texas. Sedimentology v.25. pp.401-426.
Gustavson. T.C. and Wermund. E.G .. 1985. The Guadalupe. Layaca. San Antonio
Nuece. river basins regional study. San Antonjo East I Llano East sheets: Seguin
West I Austin West sheets. (scale 1:250.000) Bureau of Economic Geology. Austin.
1X
Hall. Stephen A.. 1992. Late Quaternary vegetation and climate of the
northwest Gulf Coastal Plain. Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of
America v.24 no.l. p.13.
Heidemann. C. W .• 1979. Natural Bridge Caverns. The NSS Bulletin vol. 41.
no. 4. p.118-119.
Hill. R.T. and Vaughn. T.W .• 1898. Geology of the Edwards Plateau and Rio
Grande Plain adjacent to Austin and San Antonio. Texas. with reference to the
occurrence of underground waters. Annual Report v.18 pt.2. U.S. Geological
Survey. Washington. D.C. pp.193-321.
Hill. R.T. and Vaughn. T.W .• 1902. Descriptjon of the Austin Ouadrangle. Folio
Atlas no.76. U.S. Geological Survey. Washington. D.C.
Holland. P.H .• 1965. Base-flow studies. Guadalupe River. Comal County. Texas.
quantity March. 1962. Bulletin 6503. Texas Board of Water Engineers. Austin. TX.
Holloway. R.G .• Raab. L.M .• and Stuckenrath. R .• 1987. Pollen analysis of late
Holocene sediments from a central Texas bog. Texas Journal of Science v.39.
pp.71-80.
8
l
I
Holt, Charles Lee Roy, Jr., 1956. Geology and ground-water resources of
Medina County. Texas. Bulletin 5601, Texas Board of Water Engineers, Austin, TX.
(note: revised as USGS Water Supply Paper 1422, 1959)
Howard, James W., 1968. Water-Ieyel data from observation wells in the
northwestern gulf coastal plain of Texas. Report nO.70, Texas Water
Development Board, Austin, TX.
Jorgenson, D.G., et aI., 1988. Region 16, Central nonglaciated plains, in: Back,
W, Rosenshein, J.S. and Seaber, eds, Hydrogeology (Geology of North America
v.O-2) Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO. p. 141-156.
Kier, R.S., Garner, L.E., and Brown, L.F., 1977. Land Resources of Texas.
Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, TX.
Klemt, William B., Duffin, Gail L., and Elder, Glenward R., 1976. Ground-water
resources of the Carrizo Aquifer in the Winter Garden area of Texas, volume 1.
Report no.21O, v.l, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
Klemt, William B., Perkins, Robert D, and Alvarez, Henry J., 1975. Ground-
water resources of central Texas with emphasis on the Antlers and Travis Peak
formations. Report no.195, v.I-2, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
Klemt, William B., et ai, 1979. Ground-water resources and model applications
for the Edwards fBalcones Fault Zone) Aquifer in the San Antonio Region,
~. Report no.239, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, TX.
Lang, Joe W., 1954. Ground-water resources of the San Antonio area. Texas: a
progress report on current studies. Bulletin 5412, Texas Board of Water
Engineers, Austin, TX.
Larkin, T.J. and Bomar, G.W., 1983. Climatic atlas of Texas. Texas Dept. of
Water Resources, Austin, TX.
9
Liddle, R.A., 1918. Geology and mineral resources of Medina county. Bulletin
1860, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Livingston, Penn, 1942. A few interesting facts regarding the natural flow
from artesian well 4 owned by the San Antonio Public Service Company. San
Antonio. Texas. Miscellaneous Publication M240, Texas Water Commission,
Austin, TX.
Lowther, A.C. and Werchan, L.E., 1978. SoU Survey of Caldwell County. Texas.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
LundeIius, Ernest L., Jr., and Davidson, B. 1975. Late Pleistocene vertebrates
from Laubach Cave, Texas. Abstracts with Programs. Geological Society of
America v.7 no.2 p.211-212.
Lundelius, Ernest 1. Jr. and Slaughter, Bob H., 1971. Natural history of Texas
k.ilVll. Gulf Natural History, Dallas, TX.
Lundelius, Ernest L., Jr., et ai, 1983. Terrestrial vertebrate faunas in: Wright,
H.E. Jr., ed, Late Quaternary environments of the Unjted States. v, 1, The late
Pleistocene. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
10
Mandel. D.R .• 1980. Climatic and yegetatiye changes inferred from alluvial
paleosols in central and southcentral Texas. unpublished master's thesis.
University of Kansas.
Mangum. A.W. and Belden. H.L .• 1905. Soil Survey of the Austin area. Texas.
Bureau of Soils. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington D.C.
Mangum. A.W. and Lyman. W.S .• 1906. Soil survey of the San Marcos Area.
Texas. Bureau of Soils. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington D.C.
Marquardt. Glenn and Elder. Glenward R.. 1979. Records of wells. chemical
analyses. and water leyels of selected Edwards wells. Bexar county. Texas. Report
no.237. Texas Water Development Board. Austin. TX.
Massey. B.C. et al. 1982. Flood of May 24-25. 1981. in the Austin. TX.
metropolitan area. Hydrologic Atlas no.656. U.S. Geological Survey.
Washington. D.C.
McGannon. D. E.. Jr.. 1976. Carbon and oxygen isotope analyses of Pleistocene
fluvial (algal?) pisolites and pisolitic caliche in Texas American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Bulletin v.60. no.4. p.696-697.
McMahan. C.A .• Frye. R.G .• and Brown. K.L. 1984. The yegetation types of
Texas. including cropland (map and text). Bulletin 7000-120. Texas Parks and
Wildlife Dept.. Austin. TX.
11
Mear, Charles Eugene, 1953. Ouaternary geology of upper Sabinal River
valley, Uvalde and Bandera counties. Texas. unpublished master's thesis, Univ.
of Texas at Austin.
Milstead, W.W., 1956. Fossil turtles of Friesenhahn cave, Texas, with the
description of a new species of Testudo. Copeia 1956, p.162-171.
Moore, Walter L. et ai, 1982. The Austin, Texas, flood of May 24-25, 1981.
National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Outlaw, Donald E., et ai, 1952. Winter Garden District Dimmit and Zavala
counties and eastern Maverick county, Texas' records of wells, drjIlers logs,
water analyses and map showing locations of wells. Bulletin 5203, Texas Board
of Water Engineers, Austin, TX.
Parrish, John George, 1970. Ouaternary terraces of the lower Colorado River,
Texas. unpublished master's thesis, University of Houston.
Patton, Peter C., 1977. Geomorohic criteria for estimating the magnitude and
frequency of flooding in central Texas. unpublished PhD dissertation, Univ. of
Texas at Austin.
Patton, Peter C. and Baker, V.R., 1977. Geomorphic response of central Texas
stream channels to catastrophic rainfall and runoff. in: Doehring, Donald O.
(ed.) Geomorphology in arid regions: proceedings of the 8th Binghamton
Geomorphology Symposium. Publications in Geomorphology, Ft. Collins, CO.
p.189-217.
Patton, Peter C., Baker, V.R. and Kochel, R.C., 1979. Slack-water deposits: a
geomorphic technique for the interpretation of fluvial paleohydrology. in:
Rhodes, D.D. and Williams, G.P. (eds.) Adjustments of the fluyial system. Kendall
Hunt, Dubuque, IA. p. 225-253.
Petitt, G. Jr. and George, W.O., 1956. Ground-water resources of the San
Antonio area. Texas: v 1. progress report of current studies: v,2, 111.1. records of
12
wells and springs: v.2. pt.2. records of drillers logs: v.2. pt.3. water levels in
wells. Bulletin 5608. Texas Board of Water Engineers. Austin. TX.
Poage. Janet. 1989. Wild Basin of Bee Creek. Earth Science v. 42. no.l. p.14-17.
Potter. A.D. and McKnight. David Jr.• 1931. The clays and ceramic industries
of Texas. Bulletin 3120. The University of Texas at Austin. Austin. TX.
Ricklis. R.A .• Blum. M.D .• and Collins. M.B .• 1991 Archaeological testing at the
vera Daniel Site (4ITV1364). ZUker Park. Austin. Texas. Studies in Archeology
12. Texas Archeological Research Laboratory. University of Texas at Austin.
Austin. TX.
Rodda. P.U .• 1970. Austin West. Travis County. Texas. Geologic Quadrangle map
GQ 38. (scale: 1:24.000). Bureau of Economic Geology. Austin. TX.
Sellards. Elias Howard. 1920. The geology and mineral resources of Bexar
county. University of Texas Bulletin. no. 1932. University of Texas at Austin.
Austin. TX.
Slaughter. B.H.. 1966. Platygonus compressus and associated fauna from the
Laubach Cave of Texas. American Midland Naturalist v.75. no.2. p.475-494.
13
Sneed, Edmund David .. 1955. Roundness and sphericity of Colorado River
pebbles. unpublished master's thesis, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Sneed, Edmund D., and Folk, R.L., 1958. Pebbles in the lower Colorado River,
Texas: a study in particle morphogenesis. Journal of Geology v.66, p.114-150.
Stearman, Jack, 1960. Water levels in observation wells in Atascosa and Frio
counties, Texas 1955-1960. Bulletin 6015, Texas Board of Water Engineers, Austin,
TX
Stevens, Jack W. and Arriaga, D., 1985. Soil Suryey of Dimmit and Zavala
counties, Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.
Stevens, Jack W. and Richmond, D.L., 1976. Soil Survey of Uvalde county,
Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Suhm, Dee Ann, 1957. Excavations at the Smith Rockshelter, Travis county,
Texas. Texas Journal of Science v.9, no.l, p.26-58.
Swartz, B.W., 1957. Records of wells in Bastrop and Caldwell counties, Texas
1937 through December 1956. Bulletin 5702, Texas Board of Water Engineers,
Austin, TX.
Tamsitt, J.R., 1957. Peromvcus from the late Pleistocene of Texas. Texas
Journal of Science v.9, no.3, p.355-363.
Taylor, Alisa J., 1982. The mammalian fauna from the mid-Irvingtonian
Fyllan cave local fauna, Travis county, Texas. unpublished master's thesis,
Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Taylor, Frank B., 1977. Soil survey of Wilson county. Texas. Soil Conservation
Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
14
Taylor. Frank B .• Hailey. R.B. and Richmond. D.L .• 1962/66. Soil Suryey of
Bexar county. Texas. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.
Washington. D.C. .
Taylor. T.U .• 1900. The Austin dam. Water Supply Paper no.40. U.S. Geological
Survey. Washington. D.C.
Templin. E.H .• et al.. 1938. Soil survey of Williamson county. Texas. Soil
Conservation Service. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Washington. D.C.
Thorkildsen. David and Price. Robert D.. 1991. Ground-water resources of the
Carrizo Wilcox Aquifer in the central Texas region. Report no.332. Texas Water
Development Board. Austin. TX.
Tinkler. K.J .• 1971. Active valley meanders in southcentral Texas and their
wider implications. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America v.82. p.1783-
1800.
Toomey. Rickard S. III. 1990. Faunal evidence for a middle Holocene dry
period in central Texas -- Hall's Cave. Abstracts with Programs. Geological
Society of America v.22. no.7. p.311.
Toomey. Rickard S. III. 1992. Central Texas climates and environments 25.000
years B.P. to present: the vertebrate evidence. Abstracts with Programs.
Geological Society of America v.24. no.1. p.49.
Urbanec. Don Alan. 1963. Stream terraces and related deposits in the Austin
area. Texas. unpublished master's thesis. Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Veni. George. 1988. The caves of Bexar County. second edition. Speleological
Monographs. 2. Texas Memorial Museum. Austin. TX.
Walker. H.J. and Coleman. J.M .• 1987. Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Province. in.:
Graf. W.L.. ed .• Geomornhic Systems of North America (Centennial Special
Volume 2). Geological Society of America. Boulder. CO. p.51-110.
Weber. G.E. 1968. Geology of the fluyial deposits of the Colorado Riyer yalley.
central Texas. unpublished master's Thesis. Univ. of Texas at Austin.
15
Weeks, Albert W. 1941. Late Cenozoic deposits of the Texas coastal plain
between the Brazos River and the Rio Grande. unpublished PhD Dissertation,
Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Welder, F.A. and Reeves, R.D., 1962. Geology and ground-water resources of
Uvalde county. Texas. Bulletin 6212, Texas Board of Water Engineers, Austin, TX.
Werchan, Leroy E., and Coker, J.L., 1983. Soil survey of Williamson county.
Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Werchan, Leroy E., Lowther, A.C., and Ramsey, R.N., 1974. Soil survey of
Travis county, Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture,
Washington, D.C.
Wilson, William Feathergail, 1982. Meteor impact site asphalt deposits and
volcanic plugs: south Texas field trip 1981. in: Geology of the Llano Uplift
central Texas and geological features in the Uvalde area. annual spring field
conference. May 7-9, 1982. Corpus Christi Geological Society, Corpus Christi, TX.
(separately paged).
Winkler, Alisa J., 1990. Small mammals from a Holocene sequence in central
Texas and their paleoenvironmental implications. The Southwestern Naturalist
v. 35, no.2, p.199-205.
Winston, R.A., 1907. Soil survey of Bastrop county, Texas. Soil Conservation
Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Young, Keith, 1967. Early Holocene earth movements, Travis county, Texas.
Texas Journal of Science v.19, no.4, p.420-421.
16
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The 1992 South-Central Friends of the Pleistocene field trip would not be a
reality had it not been for the support and cooperation of a number of individuals,
institutions, and businesses. Contributing authors and "communicators" are cited on
the title page and throughout the text, but the editors wish to thank them collectively for
the high quality of the papers and the timely submission of draft and revised text and
figures. Other individuals whose assistance proved invaluable include the private
landowners who opened their property for what must have appeared a bewildering
blizzard of activity "just to look at some old dirt": Dr. D. L. Clark, Tuscon, AZ.; Mr. and
Mrs. Johnnie Harrell, Smithville; Mrs. Jean Mcintyre, Falfurrias, TX, and her daughter
Mrs. Sandra Stone, San Antonio; Mr. Joe Tiner, Smithville: and Mr. and Mrs. Tom
Townsend, Bastrop. San Antonio Water Board allowed access to Applewhite Reservoir
and actively supported investigations there, even providing a backhoe and operator
for preparing trenches for the "Friends" field trip. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
allowed access to Bastrop State Park for preliminary research on the soils of high
strath surfaces and provided "The Refectory" for our catered lunch on Friday; thanks to
David Riskind for assisting to these ends. Other institutions deserving appreciation
include: the Archeological Research Laboratory of Texas A&M University, College
Station, for providing a van for the field trip and for supporting Alston Thoms's work to
date at the Clark site; the Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, for providing a van for I
the field trip (special thanks to Tom Gustavson); the Department of Geological
Sciences of The University of Texas at Austin for providing financial and logistical
support and student ·volunteers"; the Geology Foundation of The University of Texas at
Austin for providing financial support for backhoe excavations at the Rehmet locality;
the Geology-Geography Department of The University of Nebraska, Omaha, for
. I
financial support and endless help in preparing the guidebook; the Soil
Characterization Laboratory at Texas A&M University for providing soil analyses and
supporting John Jacobs's research efforts at several of the field trip stops; the Soil
Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, for supporting research by
Wayne Gabriel and Lynn Loomis, and for providing soil analyses through the National
Soil Laboratory at Lincoln, NE; the Texas Archeological Research Laboratory of The
University of Texas at Austin for serving as institutional sponsor and providing
equipment for the alidade survey at thr Rehmet locality and the Ferris gravel pit; and
the Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory of The University of Texas at Austin for
supporting research by Ernest Lundelius and for providing two vans for the field trip.
The following individuals assited in many ways during the initial excavation at the
Rehmet locality: John Arthur; David Brown; Dan and Martin Julien; Martin Lagoe; and
Rick Toomey. Nan Olsen, Bastrop County Historic Commissioner and owner of the
Bastrop Pit Barbecue Restaurant, served as coordinator for many of our efforts in the
Bastrop area, for which we extend our gratitude. Finally, but in no way least, we wish
to thank our corporate sponsors. Several companies have agreed to make
contributions, but special thanks goes to Hicks and Company (Sandra Hicks,
President), Austin, for much needed financial support in preparing the guidebook.
The editors would also like to thank their respective spouses and children,
Sharon and new born Daniel Mandel and Kay, Abby, and Libby Caran, for patience
and much needed support of all kinds. R. Mandel and C. Caran, eds.
1
· 1
.1
. 1
I
I
·I
~I
·I
·I
·I
·I
·I
I
\
. I
I
·I
·I
·I
, -j ~
c 1 '-
"l,
Walsh Eolian
Terrace Sands
SOtlth
1 Millcr
1 North
Terrace
Bedrock 1
"
"
V... rtieal
Seule Covered
1m)
"
[ , "' . . ? ?,,,,,,
[, '?
""'?
Bedrock Bedrock
~
~
~
I
~
~
LATE PREHISTORIC
APPLEWHTIE TERRACE
3CBb 203-250 75YR5/8 (60%) If+mSBK FSL sl h, fr c,s Connnon ironstone pebbles.
IOYR712 (30%)
IOYR2I2 (10%)
3Ck 250-280 7.5YR4/6 M SL so, fr Few (1 %) light gray (lOYR712) soft carbonate bodies; matrix is
non-caIcareous.
Abbreviations: Structure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fine, m=medinm, c=coarse, P=prismatic, SBK=subangular blocky, ABK=anguIar blocky,
GR=granuJar, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=sil~ C=clay, L=loam,v=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly
Consistence: fi=firm, fr=friable, h=hard, so=so~ v=very, sl=slightIy
Boundaries: c=clear, g=gradua!, a=abrup~ s=smooth, w=wavy, i=irreguJar
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
Description of the west wall of the Richard Beene Site (41 BX831).
Ap 0-14 IOYR312 IOYR313 Compacted CL c,s Drastically disturbed by heavy earth-moving equipment.
Bkl 14-37 IOYR4/3 IOYR 513 Compacted CL g,s Common pedotubules with very dark grayish brown (IOYR 312)
ftllings; fine flnffy threads of calcium carbonate cover 1-5 % of
each ped surface.
Bk2 37-51 IOYR4/3 IOYRS/3 ImP-2f+mSBK CL h,fr g,s Many worm casts; few land snails; tme somewhat coalesced
fluffy threads of calcium carbonate cover 10-20% of each ped
surface.
CBkb4 1,227-1,257 75YR5/4 75YR5/4 If+mABK CL vh, fi g.s Few rolWd siliceous pebbles; common fine and medium pores;
few fine faint yellowish brown (75YR 5/6) mottles; 1 % coarse
carbonate-lined pedotubules that are 5-8 mm wide and 10- 20 em
long; thin faint aureole of oxidized iron arolWd the edges of
pedotnbules, but interiors of pedotnbules are light gray (IOYR
712) iron depletion zones.
Ck4 1,257-1,357 10YR 6/6 (50%) M FSL h,fr a,s Few lobular depletion zones as above; 1 % fine and very fine
10YR 7/4 (50%) encrusted carbonates; 2 em thick lens of fine gravel 63 em below
top of horizon.
Soil 6
Bklb5 1,357-1,375 IOYRS/6 IOYR6/6 lmABK SiCL h,fr g,s Few lobular depletion zones as above; 1% fine encrusted
carbonates; few fine faint yellowish brown (IOYR 5/8) mottles;
many fine and medium pores.
Bk2b5 1,357-1,459 IOYRS/6 IOYRS/6 ImSBK SiCL h,fr a,S Few lobular depletion zones as above; 1-2% fine encrusted
carbonates; few fine faint yellowish brown (IOYR 5/8) mottles;
common fine and medium pores.
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1,505 IOYRS/6 ImSBK SiCL h,fi a.s Few distinct strong brown (7.5YR 4/6) mottles; common pale
brown (JOYR 613) and brown (IOYR 513) pedotnbules;
Soil 8
Alb7 1,505-1,540 IOYR44 IfSBK SiC h,fi g,s Few fine faint yellowish brown (J OYR 5/8) mottles; 1-2%
depletion pedotnbules as above; < 1 % encrusted carbonates; few
brown (JOYR 5/3) clay balls.
A2b7 1,540-1,575 10YRS/6 IfSBK SiC h,fi g,s Few fine faint yellowish brown (JOYR 5/8) mottles; 1-2%
depletion pedotnbules as above; < 1 % encrusted carbonates; few
pink (7.5YR 7/4) sand bodies; few brown (IOYR 513) clay balls.
C7 1,575-1,600 IOYR7/4 (75%) M SiCL hJi a,i Few fine depletion pedotubules as above; few carbonates in
IOYRS/8 (25%) pedotubules.
Somerset Paleosol
Bkmb81,6QO..l,638 IOYR 812 Laminar L vh c,s Eroded petrocalcic; dissolution cavities filled with dark sediment
from above.
Abbreviations: Structure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, £=fme, m=medium, c=coarse, !'=prismatic, SBK=subangnlar blocky, ABK=angn1ar blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=silt, C=clay, L=loam,V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly
Consistence: fi=frrm, fr=friable. h=hard, so=soft, v=very. sl=slightly
Boundaries: c=clear. g=gradual, a=abrupt, s=smooth. w=wavy. i=irregnlar
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
Particle-size distributions: Richard Beene Site.
Sand* Sill V. F. Sandi Clay free
HQrizon I!!m!!J VQ Q M E VF IQta! Q F IQ!l!! Q!ax I~ture Ei!l~ Sl!m! Sl!!ldlSi!!
- -cm-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -WI. % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- WI. %-------
Ap ()()'14 0.1 0.2 1.5 14.5 15.2 30.7 13.3 27.5 40.8 28.5 CL 1.0 0.8
Bk1 14-37 0.0 0.2 1.4 13.8 13.4 28.4 11.5 31.9 43.4 28.2 CL 1.0 0.7
Bk2 37-44 0.1 0.1 1.0 11.7 10.6 23.1 11.0 34.1 45.1 31.8 CL 0.9 0.5
Bk2 44-51 0.0 0.1 1.1 9.4 9.7 19.9 9.8 36.4 46.1 34.0 CL 1.0 0.4
Medina Paleosol
Akb2 223-264 0.1 0.1 2.1 11.8 10.1 23.8 10.1 35.4 45.4 30.8 CL 0.9 0.5
Akb2 264-289 0.1 0.1 0.9 6.7 8.1 15.7 9.6 39.6 49.2 35.1 SiCL 1.2 0.3
ABkb2 289-317 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.3 4.5 8.1 9.9 41.1 51.1 40.8 SiC 1.4 0.2
Bk1b2 317-360 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.4 3.6 9.5 44.8 54.3 42.1 SiC 2.4 0.1
Bk1b2 360-404 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 3.2 4.1 14.2 42.0 56.2 39.7 SiCL 3.9 0.1
Bk2b2 404-456 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 3.2 3.8 10.2 47.5 57.7 38.5 SiCL 5.2 0.1
Bk2b2 456-508 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.9 5.1 7.4 13.9 43.1 57.0 35.6 SiCL 2.6 0.1
Bk2b2 508-560 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 3.8 4.5 9.9 46.1 56.0 39.5 SiCL 5.3 0.1
Bk3b2 560-597 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.6 4.9 7.5 10.2 43.1 53.3 39.2 SiCL 1.9 0.1
Bk4b2 597-693 0.1 0.3 0.7 4.8 6.8 12.4 8.7 41.2 49.9 37.7 SiCL 1.4 0.2
C2 693-706 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 7.5 9.1 14.5 41.1 55.6 35.3 SiCL 4.6 0.2
C2 706-720 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.7 12.5 13.6 39.6 53.2 34.3 SiCL 3.3 0.2
Soil 6
Bklb5 1,357-1,375 0.0 0.2 1.8 33.8 16.5 51.7 5.3 17.6 23.0 25.3 SCL 0.5 2.3
Bk2b5 1,375-1,425 0.0 0.1 1.4 32.6 20.9 54.3 3.0 19.9 22.8 22.9 SCL 0.6 2.4
Bk2b5 1,425-1,459 0.0 0.0 0.4 14.5 16.7 31.2 11.3 27.9 39.1 29.7 CL 1.2 0.8
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1.485 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.7 4.4 6.4 8.7 44.6 53.3 40.3 SiC 2.5 0.1
Bkb6 1,485-1,505 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 4.8 6.0 14.0 45.3 59.3 34.7 SiCL 5.2 0.1
Soil 8
Alb7 1,505-1,540 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.3 2.9 4.5 16.1 35.5 51.6 43.9 SiC 2.2 0.1
A2b7 1,540-1,575 0.0 0.1 5.5 1.2 2.8 9.4 5.6 45.2 50.8 39.8 SiCL 2.3 0.2
C7 1,575-1,600 0.1 0.0 1.2 2.1 3.6 6.6 10.8 49.1 59.9 33.5 SCL 1.7 0.1
Somerset Paleosol
BkmbS 1,600-1,638 1.0 2.5 4.9 18.6 14.3 40.4 8.9 25.5 34.4 25.2 L 0.8 1.2
Bkl 1,638-1,676 0.2 1.1 3.2 21.7 16.0 41.4 8.7 27.3 35.9 22.7 L 0.7 1.2
Bk2 1,676-1,698 0.1 0.4 2.0 20.0 13.9 36.0 9.4 27.2 36.6 27.4 L 0.7 1.0
Bk2 1,698-1,720 0.0 0.2 1.2 14.4 13.8 29.2 15.7 25.7 41.5 29.3 CL 1.0 0.7
Bk3 1,720-1,745 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.4 3.6 9.5 44.8 54.3 42.1 SiC 2.4 0.1
Medina Paleosol
Charcoal 4570±70 -26.3 Beta-38700
Humate 4670±120 -24.0 Beta-43332
Humate 4730±110 -18.8 TX-6568
Humate 4900±100 -18.4 TX-6571
Humate 5340±11O -18.9 TX-6464
Humate 5370±100 -18.6 TX-6468
Humate 5770±11O -17.4 TX-6463
Humate 641O±75 -23.7 Beta-43335
Humate 6450±135 -24.2 Beta-4333
Humate 7030±100 -23.5 Beta-44547
Humate 7900±100 -22.6 Beta-44548
Charcoal 801O±70 -25.5 Beta-44387
Humate 8080±130 -26.0 Beta-44386
Charcoal 8380±21O -23.0 Beta-44544
Elm Cr.Paleosol
Humate 9170±11 0 -20.2 Beta-44541
Humate 9200±130 -22.4 Beta-44545
Humate 9670±120 -20.3 Beta-43542
Humate 9750±130 -21.0 Beta-43878
Humate 9780±120 -21.0 Beta-43877
Perez Paleosol
Humate 9800±140 -20.1 Beta-44546
Humate 9870±120 -20.6 Beta-47565
Humate 10,040±120 -20.5 Beta-47566
Humate 10,130±120 -20.7 Beta-47567
Humate 10,780±140 -20.8 Beta-44543
Humate 11,070±220 -19.9 TX-6465
Humate 11,240±210 -20.9 TX-6570
Cont. Table 1
Kf~enar---------Radiocarbon-----lDeffa-------LiboraIory-------------
Dated Age (B,P,) C-l3 Number
Soil 6
Humate 13,480±360 -24.3 Beta-47558
Soil 7
Humate 13,640±210 -26.6 Beta-47559
Soil 8
Humate 13,960±150 -19.7 Beta-47560
Humate 15,270±170 -20.9 Beta-47561
Organic Silts 4 m below the Somerset Paleosol
Humate 20,080±560 -22.6 Beta-47563
Bum wne about 4 m below the Somerset Paleosol. Alluviual deposit is inset against organic silts
(see above).
Charcoal 32,850±530 Beta
APPLEWHITE TERRACE: Site 4IBX831
Horizon CaC03 Equiv. Organic Carbon
--cm-- ----------------------vvt. ~ ------------------------
Ap 00-14 49.6 1.26
Bk1 14-37 52.5 1.07
Bk2 37-44 52.8 0.90
Bk2 44-51 53.2 0.79
Leon Creek Paleosol welded into modern surface soil
Bk3 (Abl) 51-69 52.6 0.84
Bk3 (Abl) 69-87 53.7 0.60
Bk4 87-120 51.7 0.52
Bk4 120-154 55.5 0.12
BC 154-206 60.4 0.29
CB 206-223 55.3 0.06
Medina Paleosol
Akb2 223-264 52.4 0.33
Akb2 264-289 50.8 0.27
ABkb2 289-317 48.9 0.24
Bk1b2 317-360 46.7 0.29
Bk1b2 360-404 48.7 0.20
Bk2b2 404-456 48.6 0.23
Bk2b2 456-508 48.0 0.17
Bk2b2 508-560 49.2 0.15
Bk3b2 560-597 45.2 0.45
Bk4b2 597-693 47.2 0.46
C2 693-706 47.9 0.31
C2 706-720 47.8 0.44
Elm Creek Paleosol
Bklb3 720-744 41.0 0.54
Bklb3 744-768 43.5 0.46
Bk2b3 768-794 43.3 0.24
Bk2b3 794-820 45.7 0.23
CBb3 820-980 47.6 0.53
C3 980-1,000 48.5 0.06
C3 1,000-1,020 47.4 0.11
Perez Paleosol
Bkb4 1,020-1,044 42.9 0.29
Bkb4 1,044-1,068 40.6 0.27
Bkssb4 1,068-1,102 38.2 0.29
Bkssb4 1,102-1,136 37.9 0.16
Bk'b4 1,136-1,169 38.0 0.12
BCkb4 1,169-1,198 41.1 0.27
BCkb4 1,198-1,227 42.1 0.13
CBkb4 1,227-1,257 44.9 0.13
C4 1,257-1,307 20.9 0.14
C4 1,307-1,357 21.8 0.05
Horiwn Depth CaC03 Equiv. Organic Carbon
~m- -------------------vvt. ~ ------------------
Soil 6
Bk1b5 1,357-1,375 22.3 0.73
Bk2b5 1,375-1,425 38.3 0.11
Bk2b5 1,425-1,459 40.5 0.23
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1,485 44.0 0.59
Bkb6 1,485-1,505 53.6 0.50
Soil 8
A1b7 1,505-1,540 40.7 0.93
A1b7 1,540-1,575 45.8 0.46
C7 1,575-1,600 65.3 0.10
Somerset Paleosol
Bkmb8 1,600-1,638 69.3 0.02
Bk1b8 1,638-1,676 61.8 0.33
Bk2b8 1,676-1,698 55.9 0.34
Bk2b8 1,698-1,720 55.6 0.30
Bk3b8 1,720-1,745 55.3 0.34
Walsh Eolian
Sands
South
1 Leona Applewhite
Terrace
Applewhite
Terrace
1 Miller
1 North
Terrace
Bedrock 1
",
"
V~rtical
SClll~ , Covered
Iml
"
-' . . ?
t:, ~'?
Bedrock
~" ? ? .. ". . .
Bedrock
LATE PREHISTORIC
APPLEWHITE TERRACE
140 m
500m 400m 300m 200 100m
":J
0
Ap 0-27 IOYR312 IOYRS/3 M LS h,fr e,s Common very tme roots; crossbedding.
A 27-63 IOYR313 M LS sl h, fr e,s Common very fine roots; common krotovinas; few ironstone
pebbles.
2Btslb 63-112 5YR313 ImP-2mSBK SC h, fr g,s Few tme roots; common ironstone pebbles; common
pedotnbuJes; about 50% of the pedotnbuJes are tilled with worm
casts; many thick distinct continuons dark brown (7.5YR 3/3)
clay films on vertical aud horizontal ped faces.
2Bts2b 112-164 7.5YR4/4 (60%) ImP-2mSBK SC h, fr g,s Discontinuons ironstone gravel lens at bottom of horizon;
2.5YR4/6 (15%) common thin continuous clay fi1ms on vertical ped faces;
IOYR7/4 (15%)
IOYR312 (10%)
3BCb 164-203 7.5YR4/6 If+mSBK SCL h, fr g,s Mauy very dark grayish brown (IOYR 312) worm casts.
3CBb 203-250 7.5YRS/8 (60%) if+mSBK FSL sl h, fr e,s Common ironstone pebbles.
IOYR712 (30%)
IOYR2I2 (10%)
3Ck 250-280 7.5YR4I6 M SL 8O,fr Few (I %) light gray (IOYR712) soft carbonate bodies; matrix is
non-<Oalcareous.
Abbreviations: Structure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fme. m=medium, c=coarse, P=prismatie, SBK=subaugular blocky, ABK=augular blocky,
GR=granuJar, M=massive
Texture: S=saud, Si=silt, C=clay, L=loam,V=very, F=fme, Co=coarse, G=graveUy
Consistence: fi=firm, fr=friable. h=hard, so=soft, v=very, sl=slightly
Boundaries: c=clear, g=gradual, .=abrupt, s=smooth. w=wavy. i=irreguJar
Symbols: (+) aud; (-) parting to
Description of the west wall of the Richard Beene Site (4IBX831).
Ap ()"14 IOYR312 IOYR3/3 Compacted CL c.s Drastically disturbed by heavy earth-moving equipment.
Bkl 14-37 IOYR4/3 IOYR 5/3 Compacted CL g,s Common pedotubules with very dark grayish brown (IOYR 312)
fillings; fine fluffy threads of calcium carbonate cover 1-5 % of
each ped surface.
Bk2 37-51 IOYR4/3 IOYR5/3 ImP-2f+mSBK CL h,fr g,s Many worm casts; few land snails; tme somewhat coalesced
fluffy threads of calcium carbonate cover I ()..20% of each ped
surtace.
CBkb4 1,227-1,257 7.5YR5/4 7.5YR5/4 If+mABK CL vh, fi g,s Few roood siliceons pebbles; common fine and medium pores;
few fme faint yellowish brown (7.5YR 516) mottles; 1 % coan;e
carbonate-lined pedotubules that are 5-8 mm wide and 10- 20 cm
long; thin faint aureole of oxidized iron aroood the edges of
pedotobules, but interiors of pedotobnles are light gray (10YR
712) iron depletion zones.
Ck4 1,257-1,357 10YR 6/6 (50%) M FSL h,fr a,s Few tobular depletion zones as above; 1 % fine and very fine
10YR 7/4 (50%) encrusted carbonates; 2 em thick lens of fine gravel 63 em below
top of horizon.
Soil 6
Bklb5 1,357-1,375 IOYR5/6 IOYR6/6 lmABK SiCL h,fr g,s Few tobular depletion zones as above; 1 % fine encrusted
carbonates; few fine faint yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/8) mottles;
many fine and medium pores.
Bk2b5 1,357-1,459 IOYR5/6 IOYR5/6 ImSBK SiCL h,fr a.s Few tobular depletion zones as above; 1-2% fine encrusted
carbonates; few fine faint yellowish brown (I OYR 5/8) mottles;
common fine and medium pores.
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1,505 10YR5/6 ImSBK SiCL h,fi a,s Few distinct slrong brown (7.5YR 4/6) mottles; common pale
brown (10YR 613) and brown (lOYR 513) pedotobules;
Soil 8
Alb7 1,505-1,540 IOYR44 IfSBK SiC h,fi g,s Few fine faint yellowish brown (lOYR 5/8) mottles; 1-2%
depletion pedotobules as above; < 1% encrusted carbonates; few
brown (IOYR 513) clay balls.
A2b7 1,540-1,575 10YR5/6 IfSBK SiC h,fi g,s Few fine faint yellowish brown (lOYR 5/8) mottles; 1-2%
depletion pedotobules as above; < 1 % encrusted carbonates; few
pink (7.5YR 7/4) sand bodies; few brown (IOYR 513) clay balls.
C7 1,575-1,600 IOYR7/4 (75%) M SiCL bJi a,i Few fine depletion pedotubules as above; few carbonates in
IOYRS/8 (25%) pedotubules.
Somerset Paleosol
Bkmb81,600-I,638 IOYR 8fl. Laminar L vb c,s Eroded petrocalcic; dissolution cavities filled with dark sediment
from above.
Abbreviations: Structure: l=weak, 2=moderate, 3=strong, f=fme, m=mediwn, =coarse, !'=prismatic, SBK=subangular blocky, ABK=anguJar blocky,
GR=granular, M=massive
Texture: S=sand, Si=sill, C=clay, L=loam,V=very, F=fine, Co=coarse, G=gravelly
Consistence: fi=f"mn. fr=friable, h=hard, so=soft, v=very, sl=slightly
Boundaries: =clear, g=gradual, a=abrupt, s=smooth, w=wavy, i=irreguJar
Symbols: (+) and; (-) parting to
Particle-size distributions: Richard Beene Site.
San\!* Silt V. F. Sandi Clay free
Horizon Il~1!!b vC C M E VF Total C F Total Clav I~ture Fin~ S;m\! S;mdlSilt
- -cm-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -WI. % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- WI. %-------
Ap ()()"14 0.1 0.2 1.5 14.5 15.2 30.7 13.3 27.5 40.8 28.5 CL 1.0 0.8
Bkl 14-37 0.0 0.2 1.4 13.8 13.4 28.4 11.5 31.9 43.4 28.2 CL 1.0 0.7
Bk2 37-44 0.1 0.1 1.0 11.7 10.6 23.1 11.0 34.1 45.1 31.8 CL 0.9 0.5
Bk2 44-51 0.0 0.1 1.1 9.4 9.7 19.9 9.8 36.4 46.1 34.0 CL 1.0 0.4
Medina Paleosol
Akb2 223-264 0.1 0.1 2.1 11.8 10.1 23.8 10.1 35.4 45.4 30.8 CL 0.9 0.5
Akb2 264-289 0.1 0.1 0.9 6.7 8.1 15.7 9.6 39.6 49.2 35.1 SiCL 1.2 0.3
ABkb2 289-317 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.3 4.5 8.1 9.9 41.1 51.1 40.8 SiC 1.4 0.2
Bklb2 317-360 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.4 3.6 9.5 44.8 54.3 42.1 SiC 2.4 0.1
Bklb2 360-404 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 3.2 4.1 14.2 42.0 56.2 39.7 SiCL 3.9 0.1
Bk2b2 404-456 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 3.2 3.8 10.2 47.5 57.7 38.5 SiCL 5.2 0.1
Bk2b2 456-508 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.9 5.1 7.4 13.9 43.1 57.0 35.6 SiCL 2.6 0.1
Bk2b2 508-560 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.7 3.8 4.5 9.9 46.1 56.0 39.5 SiCL 5.3 0.1
Bk3b2 560-597 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.6 4.9 7.5 10.2 43.1 53.3 39.2 SiCL 1.9 0.1
Bk4b2 597-693 0.1 0.3 0.7 4.8 6.8 12.4 8.7 41.2 49.9 37.7 SiCL 1.4 0.2
C2 693-706 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.6 7.5 9.1 14.5 41.1 55.6 35.3 SiCL 4.6 0.2
C2 706-720 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.7 12.5 13.6 39.6 53.2 34.3 SiCL 3.3 0.2
Soil 6
Bklb5 1,357-1,375 0.0 0.2 1.8 33.8 16.5 51.7 5.3 17.6 23.0 25.3 SCL 0.5 2.3
Bk2b5 1,375-1,425 0.0 0.1 1.4 32.6 20.9 54.3 3.0 19.9 22.8 22.9 SCL 0.6 2.4
Bk2b5 1.425-1,459 0.0 0.0 0.4 14.5 16.7 31.2 11.3 27.9 39.1 29.7 CL 1.2 0.8
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1,485 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.7 4.4 6.4 8.7 44.6 53.3 40.3 SiC 2.5 0.1
Bkb6 1,485-1,505 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.9 4.8 6.0 14.0 45.3 59.3 34.7 SiCL 5.2 0.1
Soil 8
Alb7 1,505-1,540 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.3 2.9 4.5 16.1 35.5 51.6 43.9 SiC 2.2 0.1
A2b7 1,540-1,575 0.0 0.1 5.5 1.2 2.8 9.4 5.6 45.2 50.8 39.8 SiCL 2.3 0.2
C7 1,575-1,600 0.1 0.0 1.2 2.1 3.6 6.6 10.8 49.1 59.9 33.5 SCL 1.7 0.1
Somerset Paleosol
BkmbS 1,600-1,638 1.0 2.5 4.9 18.6 14.3 40.4 8.9 25.5 34.4 25.2 L 0.8 1.2
Bkl 1,638-1,676 0.2 1.1 3.2 21.7 16.0 41.4 8.7 27.3 35.9 22.7 L 0.7 1.2
Bk2 1,676-1,698 0.1 0.4 2.0 20.0 13.9 36.0 9.4 27.2 36.6 27.4 L 0.7 1.0
Bk2 1.698-1,720 0.0 0.2 1.2 14.4 13.8 29.2 15.7 25.7 41.5 29.3 CL 1.0 0.7
Bk3 1.720-1,745 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.4 3.6 9.5 44.8 54.3 42.1 SiC 2.4 0.1
Medina Paleosol
Charcoal 4570±70 -26.3 Beta-38700
Humate 4670±120 -24.0 Beta-43332
Humate 4730±110 -18.8 TX-6568
Humate 4900±100 -18.4 TX-6571
Humate 5340±110 -18.9 TX-6464
Humate 5370±100 -18.6 TX-6468
Humate 5770±11 0 -17.4 TX-6463
Humate 641O±75 -23.7 Beta-43335
Humate 6450±135 -24.2 Beta-4333
Humate 7030±100 -23.5 Beta-44547
Humate 7900±100 -22.6 Beta-44548
Charcoal 801O±70 -25.5 Beta-44387
Humate 8080±130 -26.0 Beta-44386
Charcoal 8380±210 -23.0 Beta-44544
Elm Cr.Paleosol
Humate 9170±110 -20.2 Beta-44541
Humate 9200±130 -22.4 Beta-44545
Humate 9670±120 -20.3 Beta-43542
Humate 9750±130 -21.0 Beta-43878
Humate 9780±120 -21.0 Beta-43877
Perez Paleosol
Humate 9800±140 -20.1 Beta-44546
Humate 9870±120 -20.6 Beta-47565
Humate 10,040±120 -20.5 Beta-47566
Humate IO,130±120 -20.7 Beta-47567
Humate IO,780±140 -20.8 Beta-44543
Humate ll,070±220 -19.9 TX-6465
Humate ll,240±210 -20.9 TX-6570
Cont. Table I
~a~riaf---------Radiocar6on------Deffa-------Caboratori------------
Dated Age (B,P,) C-B Number
Soil 6
Humate 13,480±360 -24,3 Beta-47558
Soil 7
Humate 13,640±2JO -26,6 Beta-47559
Soil 8
Humate 13,960±150 -19,7 Beta-47560
Humate 15,270±170 ·20,9 Beta-47561
Organic Silts 4 m below the Somerset Paleosol
Humate 20,080±560 -22,6 Beta-47563
Burn zone about 4 m below the Somerset Paleosol. Alluviual deposit is inset against organic silts
(see above),
Charcoal 32,850±530 Beta
APPLEWHITE TERRACE: Site 41BX831
Horizon Depth CaC03 EQuiv. Organic Carbon
--cm-- ----------------------vvt. 91a ------------------------
Ap 00-14 49.6 1.26
Bkl 14-37 52.5 1.07
Bk2 37-44 52.8 0.90
Bk2 44-51 53.2 0.79
Leon Creek Paleosol welded into modern surface soil
Bk3 (Abl) 51-69 52.6 0.84
Bk3 (Abl) 69-87 53.7 0.60
Bk4 87-120 51. 7 0.52
Bk4 120-154 55.5 0.12
BC 154-206 60.4 0.29
CB 206-223 55.3 0.06
Medina Paleosol
Akb2 223-264 52.4 0.33
Akb2 264-289 50.8 0.27
ABkb2 289-317 48.9 0.24
Bklb2 317-360 46.7 0.29
Bklb2 360-404 48.7 0.20
Bk2b2 404-456 48.6 0.23
Bk2b2 456-508 48.0 0.l7
Bk2b2 508-560 49.2 0.15
Bk3b2 560-597 45.2 0.45
Bk4b2 597-693 47.2 0.46
C2 693-706 47.9 0.31
C2 706-720 47.8 0.44
Elm Creek Paleosol
Bklb3 720-744 41.0 0.54
Bklb3 744-768 43.5 0.46
Bk2b3 768-794 43.3 0.24
Bk2b3 794-820 45.7 0.23
CBb3 820-980 47.6 0.53
C3 980-1,000 48.5 0.06
C3 1,000-1,020 47.4 0.11
Perez Paleosol
Bkb4 1,020-1,044 42.9 0.29
Bkb4 1,044-1,068 40.6 0.27
Bkssb4 1,068-1,102 38.2 0.29
Bkssb4 1,102-1,136 37.9 0.16
Bk'b4 1,136-1,169 38.0 0.12
BCkb4 1,169-1,198 41.1 0.27
BCkb4 1,198-1,227 42.1 0.13
CBkb4 1,227-1,257 44.9 0.13
C4 1,257-1,307 20.9 0.14
C4 1,307-1,357 21.8 0.05
Horizon Dtmth CaC03 EQuiv. Organic Carbon
-cm- --------------------vvt. ~ ------------------
Soil 6
Bk1b5 1,357-1,375 22.3 0.73
Bk2b5 1,375-1,425 38.3 0.11
Bk2b5 1,425-1,459 40.5 0.23
Soil 7
Bkb6 1,459-1,485 44.0 0.59
Bkb6 1,485-1,505 53.6 0.50
Soil 8
A1b7 1,505-1,540 40.7 0.93
A1b7 1,540-1,575 45.8 0.46
C7 1,575-1,600 65.3 0.10
Somerset Paleosol
Bkmb8 1,600-1,638 69.3 0.02
Bk1b8 1,638-1,676 61.8 0.33
Bk2b8 1,676-1,698 55.9 0.34
Bk2b8 1,698-1,720 55.6 0.30
Bk3b8 1,720-1,745 55.3 0.34
LIST OF FIELD TRIP PARTICIPANTS
1992 SOUTH - CENTRAL FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS