Running head: FINDERS KEEPERS

Add a comma after Tima's last name.

Finders Keepers: An Examination of a Persons Willingness to Return Lost Goods

Ian Sherrill, Timothy Goncharov and Cole Wagner
University of North Carolina at Charlotte

FINDER KEEPERS

One of your citations is not correct. This looks like a good start. Be sure to synthesize your
information, not just list it. It needs to flow.

Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers: this saying implies that people are entitled to keep any
belongings they may find laying around. Our goal in this study was to examine the idea that
people are generally good natured and, if presented with the opportunity, will return belongings
to their owner (specifically a $20 bill in this case).
According to Korte, People are often placed in situations where behavior that can assist other
people is restrained by certain variables. (Goldstein, Minkin, Minkin, Baer, 1978, p.465). An
individual may be distracted or influenced by a number of different variables that may impact
their decision or ability to return belongings. Some states have laws that limit an individuals
rights to keep something they find. The law does not sanction the childish rhymefinders
keepers, losers weepersbecause property remains with the owner until he voluntarily disposes
of his title to the property (Simeone, 2009, p. 170). In Missouri the laws concerning this matter
are clearly defined: Property may be separated from the owner by being abandoned, or lost, or
mislaid. In the first instance, it goes back into a state of nature; or as is most commonly
expressed, it returns to the common mass and belongs to the first finder, occupier, or taker. In the
second instance, to be lost, it must have been unintentionally or involuntarily parted with, in
which case it is also an object which may be found, and the finder is entitled to the possession
against everyone but the true owner. But, if it is intentionally put down, it is not lost in a legal
sense, though the owner may not remember where he left it, and cannot find it; for the loss of
goods in legal and common intendment, depends upon something more than the knowledge or
ignorance, the memory or want of memory, of the owner at any given moment (Simeone, 2009,
p. 171).

FINDER KEEPERS

Even though race, gender, and past offenses may influence if the person returns lost valuables,
we posit that people are generally good natured and will return valuables if given the
opportunity.

The sentence that beings, "Participants success in this study.." is worded awkwardly and not
punctuated correctly.
Convert the procedures to simple past tense.
Very through participants section!

Methods
Participants
Participants in this research were chosen at random based on their proximity to the
researchers. Both women and men, and all age groups were included in this research. The
youngest individual included in the research was an 18 year old female and the oldest was a 58
year old male. The majority of the participants were UNCC students due to the fact that the
research was done on campus at UNCC. No ethnicity was excluded from the research;
participants were chosen at random regardless of ethnicity.
Measurements
The data that was recorded from each participant included age, sex, place of residency,
and ethnicity. Participants success in this study was evaluated based on them returning or not
returning a $20 bill to the researchers. Some participants were too engaged in other activities to
notice the money on the ground and were not included in the data.
Procedure
The researchers walked around the University of North Carolina of Charlotte college
campus. All three of the researchers walked together and observed varying groups of people

FINDER KEEPERS

throughout campus. One of the researchers picked out a random target group in the immediate
area. The other two researchers strategically placed themselves in the vicinity of the target group.
One researcher walked past the target and drop a twenty dollar bill. The other researchers would
watch to see if the target would pick up the money and return it, or if the target would grab the
money and keep it. If the target picked up the money and didnt return it, the other researchers
walked up a politely informed the target that there was an experiment in progress. After the
participant returned the money to the researchers the data groups that were explained previously
were recorded.

Please indent the first line of each paragraph.

Avoid wordiness
Limit your table to one page.
In the results, you need to discuss the tables.
Label the tables as figure or table 1, etc.
Be sure to discuss the limits of your experiment in the discussion section.

Results
The results of the research turned out fairly close to as originally anticipated. The vast
majority of participants were more than willing to return the money. There were some outlying
factors that affected the participants responses to the money being dropped. A large number of
participants were too distracted in their current engagement to even notice the money, but those
people were not included in the data. The only participants that were included in the data were
those that had one of four responses: they saw the money drop and returned it, they saw the
money drop and attempted to take it, they did not see the money drop but attempted to find an
owner anyway, or they saw the money drop and continued about their business with no response.
A response of Yes in the returned money category indicates that the participant saw the money
drop and returned it. A response of No in the returned money category indicates that the
participant saw the money drop and picked the money up and did not return it. The two other

FINDER KEEPERS

responses are explained in the table. The table below shows all of the participants that had one of
the four responses previously mentioned.
Age Sex

Place of
Residency

Ethnicity

Returned money

19

Female Off

Caucasian

Yes

22

Female Off

Caucasian

Yes

45

Male

Off

Caucasian

Yes

22

Female Off

African
American

Yes

22

Female Off

African
American

Yes

18

Female On

Indian

Yes

22

Male

On

African
American

Yes

28

Male

Off

African
American

Yes

26

Male

Off

African
American

Yes

58

Male

Off

African
American

No

26

Female Off

African
American

Unresponsive

18

Female On

Caucasian

Yes - Did not see drop but attempted to

return anyways

21

Female Off

Caucasian

Yes

???

Male

???

African
American

Saw drop but did not attempt to return

???

Male

???

African
American

Saw drop but did not attempt to return

21

Male

Off

Caucasian

Yes

FINDER KEEPERS

22

Male

On

Caucasian

Yes

29

Female Off

Caucasian

Yes

19

Male

On

African
American

Yes

34

Male

Off - Works at
UNCC

Caucasian

Yes

23

Male

Off

African
American

No

19

Male

Off

Caucasian

Yes

Aside from whether or not the participant returned the money, there were four main data groups
that were recorded: Age, sex, place of residency, and ethnicity. Of these four data groups there
were two that seemed to be non-significant to the ultimate action of either returning or not
returning the money; the two data groups deemed non-significant were age and place of
residency. The categories that held the greatest impact for participants decision to return or not
return the money were sex and ethnicity. The only participants that picked up the money and did
not return it were black males. The following graph shows exactly how many participants by
response type.

FINDER KEEPERS

The next graph shows the percentage of participants

Discussion
According to the results of the experiment there were many factors that contributed to
whether or not the participant returned the money that was dropped. Some people did not attempt
to even pick up the money that was dropped because they simply didnt want to, meaning either
they were too lazy, they were too busy to return it or they were waiting for the owner to
disappear and take it.
There is a slight correlation between on-campus living students and returning the money.
Although there were only two participants who tried to take the money, they both lived offcampus. Campus living seems to have an impact on how people will respond to these situations.
When people live off campus they are typically living a life that isnt monitored much allowing
them to do whatever they want. When a person is unmonitored, typically, bad decisions will be
made. The bad decisions made off campus will affect how people act on campus.

FINDER KEEPERS

MINIMUM of 3 peer reviewed sources

References
Goldstein, R., Minkin, B., Minkin, N., & Baer, D. (1978). Finders, keepers?: An analysis and validation of a freefound-ad policy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(4), 465.
Simone, J. (2009). Finders keepers, losers weepers: the law of finding lost property in Missouri. Saint
Louis University Law Journal, 54(167), 170.