Plaintiffs filed a notice of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for judicial notice in the case of Rosenbrahn, et al. vs. Daugaard, et al. The notice states that Plaintiffs do not object or oppose the Defendants' motion for judicial notice that was filed on November 25, 2014 pursuant to Rule of Evidence 201. The notice was signed by attorneys representing the Plaintiffs from Madia Law LLC, National Center for Lesbian Rights, and Burd and Voigt Law Office.
Original Description:
Doc 48 - Plaintiffs' Notice of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for judicial notice
Plaintiffs filed a notice of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for judicial notice in the case of Rosenbrahn, et al. vs. Daugaard, et al. The notice states that Plaintiffs do not object or oppose the Defendants' motion for judicial notice that was filed on November 25, 2014 pursuant to Rule of Evidence 201. The notice was signed by attorneys representing the Plaintiffs from Madia Law LLC, National Center for Lesbian Rights, and Burd and Voigt Law Office.
Plaintiffs filed a notice of non-opposition to Defendants' motion for judicial notice in the case of Rosenbrahn, et al. vs. Daugaard, et al. The notice states that Plaintiffs do not object or oppose the Defendants' motion for judicial notice that was filed on November 25, 2014 pursuant to Rule of Evidence 201. The notice was signed by attorneys representing the Plaintiffs from Madia Law LLC, National Center for Lesbian Rights, and Burd and Voigt Law Office.
Case 4:14-cv-04081-KES Document 48 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 738
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Court File No. 14CV4081KES
Case Type: Civil Rights / 1983 Rosenbrahn, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Daugaard, et al., Defendants.
Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 201, on November 25, 2014, Defendants filed a
Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. 46) in the above-captioned matter. By way of this filing, Plaintiffs notify the Court and Defendants that Plaintiffs have no objection or opposition to the motion. Dated this 2nd day of December, 2014. MADIA LAW LLC /s/Joshua A. Newville . Joshua A. Newville Admitted pro hac vice 345 Union Plaza 333 Washington Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Phone: (612) 349-2743 Fax: (612) 235-3357 joshuanewville@madialaw.com
Case 4:14-cv-04081-KES Document 48 Filed 12/02/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 739
NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS
/s/Shannon P. Minter . Shannon P. Minter Christopher F. Stoll Admitted pro hac vice 870 Market Street, Suite 370 San Francisco, California 94102 Phone: (415) 392-6257 Fax: (415) 392-8442 sminter@nclrights.org BURD AND VOIGT LAW OFFICE /s/Debra Voigt . Debra Voigt SD Bar No. 2473 601 S. Cliff Ave, Suite A Sioux Falls, SD 57103 Phone: (605) 332-4351 Fax: (605) 334-6844 debra@burdandvoigt.com
USDC TXSD 14-Cv-254 Doc 212 Opposed MOTION For Leave To File Supplemental Amicus Curiae Brief Filing Transcript From Related Case Arpaio v. Obama by Joe Arpaio