Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Review1
Peer Review1
Absent or Below
Criteria
Basic
Sections
organization is
absent, illogical,
or inconsistent;
Headings may be
absent or do not
describe content
Form & Organization
effectively
Content &
Persuasiveness
Appearance
Language
Developing
Proficient
Advanced
Comments
Sections
organization isn't
always clear or
consistent;
Headings may not
describe content
effectively
Sections are
organized logically
and consistently;
Headings describe
content concisely,
specifically, and
accurately
It is very well
organized. The format
is very easy to read and
it is broken down into
many sections.
Descriptions of
the group's
completed tasks,
current work, and
future work may
be vague;
evidence of the
group's ability to
complete the
project on time
isn't quite
convincing.
Specific details
describe the group's
completed tasks,
current work, and
future work directly
and aptly; evidence
of group's ability to
complete the project
on time is convincing.
White space,
fonts, and design
are not used to
increase the
readerfriendliness of the
report.
Spelling, syntax,
diction, or
punctuation errors
impede
readability.
White space,
White space, fonts,
fonts, and design and design are
may be
effective.
distracting or
ineffective.
Spelling, syntax,
diction, or
punctuation
errors impede
readability or
otherwise
distract from
meaning.
Spelling, syntax,
diction, or
punctuation errors
are few and do not
distract from
meaning.