cu Y
FILED IN OFFICE
Noy 19.201 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF GEORGIA roe =
CLERK, COURT OF es a*
APPEALS Pf OVD COUNTY SCHOOL ) B28
DISTRICT ) Se = <
) 2.8 8
) Sow =
= 2s
) eon
Cross-Appellant, } 8B :
v. ) CIVIL ACTION .
) FILENO: A15A0402
)
GILDA DAY, )
)
)
Cross-Appellee. )
)
GILDA DAY/CROSS-APPELLEE’S RESPONSE BRIEF
JULIE OINONEN
Ga. State Bar No. 722018
MARIO B. WILLIAMS
Ga. State Bar No. 235254
WILLIAMS OINONEN LLC
44 Broad Street Ste 200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 PH) 404-654-0288I. PART O!
INACCURACIES AND INCOMPLETENESS.
c Y
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RESPONSE CONCERNING MATERIAL
Ms. Day Responds to the Material Inaccuracy Concerning the
District’s Failure to Name the Proper
Party:
Ms. Day Responds To The District’s Materially Inaccurate
Statements That Ms. Day Lost Her Tenure Even Though The
District And Their Attorney Has Admitted Multiple Occasions
It Had Tenured Teachers And That Ms. Day Was Tenured:
Ms. Day Objects to the Material Inaccuracy Regarding the
District's Allegations Concerning the RIF and Existence of
Supposed Financial Deficit
1. No Objective Evidence Was Ever Presented To Prove a
Financial Deficit Existed as Required by La
2. The District Unlawfully, Arbitrarily, and Capriciously
Excluded Local School Governance In Their Decision,
As Such Georgia Law Demands Reversal of the Local
Board’s Decision: ....
Ms. Day Objects to the District’s Mischaracterization of the
Fair Dismissal Act:
1, Providing Fair Dismissal and Due Process To Teachers
Has Been A Bedrock Principle In Georgia For Over 100
Years:..
2. Every School District Throughout Georgia For The Past
Thirty-Nine Years (1975 to Date) Including Charter
Systems For The Past Seven Years (2007 to Date) Has Been
Required by Law to Adhere to the Fair Dismissal Acv ~
IL. PART TWO: ARGUMENT WITH CITATION OF
AUTHORITIES IN RESPONSE TO DISTRICT’S
ENUMERATIONS OF ERROR:
A.
2. The Fair
Responding to District’s First Enumeration of Error:
Ms. Day Asserts That the Superior Court and State Board
Did Not Err In Exercising Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over
This Case as Ms. Day Was Entitled To Appellate Procedure
as Afforded By the Fair Dismissal Act:.
1. The District’s Explicitly Written Official Policies
Guaranteed Strict Adherence to the Fair Dismissal
Act: .
n
. The District Afforded Teachers the Right to
Appeal To The State Board In All Its Policies and
Practices:
3. These District Policies and Procedures Created a Property
Interest, a Civil Right to Due Process, and a Right to
Appeals Procedure:........ 21S
Responding to Second Enumeration of Error: Georgia Law
Also Created This Property Interest, The Legislature
Insuring that Charter Systems Would Still Be Subject To
All Laws Relating To Civil Rights, Which Includes the
Right Of Due Process Afforded Teachers Through the Fair
Dismissal Act:.
1. Since 2007 Charter Systems Have Had Policies Which
Afford Due Process Pursuant to Georgia Law:
ismissal Act Guarantees Due Process:
i The Fair Dismissal Act Affords Due Process
for Teachers, Administrators, Principals---