Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Effects of Al On Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Casuarina
The Effects of Al On Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Casuarina
The Effects of Al On Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation in Casuarina
Key words: actinorhizal plants, aluminium toxicity, Casuarina cunninghamiana, Frankia, nitrogen fixation, nodulation
Abstract
In order to investigate the effects of Al on nodule formation and function in the Casuarina-Frankia symbiosis,
inoculated plants were grown in sand culture at five nominal Al concentrations (0-880 M Al) at pH 4.0. There
was an Al-free control at pH 6.0 to assess the effects of pH 4.0 treatments. Mean N concentration of nodules was
significantly less at pH 4.0 (1.83%) than at pH 6.0 (2.01%). There were nodulated plants at all Al levels, though
there were fewer nodulated plants at 440 and 880 M Al. Dry weights of nodules, shoots and roots were not
reduced by Al concentrations at or below 220 M Al, but were decreased by Al concentrations at or above 440 M
Al. Nodule weight expressed as a percentage of total weight did not differ significantly with respect to an Al-free
control at pH 4. N concentrations of shoots and whole plants were significantly reduced at 440 M Al. Nodular
specific acetylene reduction activity (ARA) did not differ significantly among Al treatments. However, N2 -fixation
efficiency was decreased from 0.20 to 0.10 mg N fixed mg nodule dry weight 1 at 880 M Al.
Introduction
Acid soils occupy approximately 30% of the worlds
ice free land area and occur mainly in two global belts:
one in the humid northern temperate zone that is covered predominantly by coniferous forests; another in
the humid tropics occupied by savanna and tropical
rainforest (Von Uexkull and Mutert, 1995). Furthermore, human activity is increasing soil acidification
throughout the world, especially in the developing
countries. The poor fertility of acid soils is due in part
to high H+ concentrations and, especially below pH 5,
to Al, Mn and Fe toxicity, and limited availability of
Ca, Mg, K and P (Von Uexkull and Mutert, 1995).
Aluminium is the third most abundant element in
the earths crust after oxygen and silicon. It is found
in soils predominantly as insoluble alumino-silicates
or oxides (Martin, 1988). In acid soils, Al (primarily
in the form of Al3+ ) is mobilized into soil solution
*134280*
42
Al cation is tolerated within the symplasm (Kochian,
1995).
With respect to the symbioses between RhizobiumBradyrhizobium and legumes, Al has been shown to
adversely affect the process of nodulation through inhibition of root hair formation and nodule initiation (Flis
et al., 1993). The susceptibility of the symbiotic relationships of actinorhizal plants to damage by Al has not
been studied, though some research has been focused
on the role of pH in nodulation (Dixon and Wheeler,
1983).
Among the N2 -fixing trees, members of the Casuarinaceae family are recognized as versatile species capable of tolerating extreme environmental conditions
such as waterlogging, variation in soil pH, salinity
and drought. Some Casuarina species, such as C.
deplancheana, thrive in soils so rich in Al and Fe that
they are toxic to most plants (NRC, 1984). They possess root nodules caused by the nitrogen-fixing actinomycete Frankia and hence are self-sufficient with
regard to N nutrition. For these reasons, they are successfully used in the afforestation of unproductive soils
(Subbarao and Rodrguez-Barrueco, 1995). Casuarina
cunninghamiana is one of the largest of the casuarinas.
Native to eastern and northern Australia, this species is
adapted to climates varying from temperate to tropical,
and it is able to tolerate up to 50 light frosts per year
(NRC, 1984). Casuarina cunninghamiana is extensively planted in Argentina and neighboring countries
for windbreaks and to protect stream bands. In Hawaii,
it grows well on histosols (pH 5.0) developed over
acidic lava (NRC, 1984).
The present study was designed to determine the
effects of Al on the symbiosis between Frankia and C.
cunninghamiana, and thereby to test its potential for
the afforestation of acid soils.
43
using an Orion Research Ioanalyzer 901 equipped with
an ammonia electrode.
Nitrogenase activity
Nitrogenase activity was estimated by the acetylene
reduction assay. Excised roots were incubated for 20
min at 25 C in hermetically sealed flasks (310 mL)
containing 10% v/v acetylene. A flask without acetylene was also incubated for the assay of endogenous
ethylene. Ethylene was quantified using a Varian Gas
Chromatograph 2700 equipped with a hydrogen flame
ionization detector and one alumina column. High
purity N2 served as the carrier gas. The column temperature was 150 C. The endogenous production of
ethylene was negligible.
Statistical analysis
There were eight replicates per treatment and the
experiment was arranged in a completely randomized
design. The results of each treatment were compared
to the control (pH = 4,0 M Al, inoculated) using
a Students t-test according to Snedecor and Cochran
(1989).
Results
Although all plant mass and N concentration values
tended to be higher at pH 6 than at pH 4, only the
N concentration of the nodules differed significantly
(p 0:5) between these two pH levels.
44
Table 1. Effect of Al concentration on shoot, root, nodule and total dry weight of Casuarina cunninghamiana 32 weeks after the
commencement of Al treatment (values are means of 8 replicates S.E.)
pH
Treatment
M Al Inoculationa
4
6
4
4
4
4
4
0
0
0
110
220
440
880
Nodulated/
nonnodulated
Ratio
+
+
+
+
+
+
Shoot
0 /8
8/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
7/8
4/8
0.05
3.68
2.39
3.10
2.71
0.44
0.13
0.01**
0.72
0.57
0.44
0.47
0.13*
0.05**
0.04
1.34
1.15
1.25
1.31
0.21
0.07
1)
0.01**
0.35
0.28
0.16
0.25
0.07*
0.01**
Nodule weight as
% of total weightb
Total
0.09
5.36
3.83
4.72
4.28
0.71
0.21
0.02**
1.03
0.90
0.60
0.73
0.22*
0.07**
6.26
7.67
8.07
6.46
7.18
8.54
0.80
0.58
0.89
0.64
0.53
2.19
a +inoculated, -uninoculated.
b Nodulated plants only.
*Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH 4; 0 M Al) at p 0:05 according to Students t-test.
**Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH 4; 0 M Al) at p 0:01 according to Students t-test.
Table 2. Effect of Al concentration on N concentration in shoot, root, nodules and total N content of Casuarina cunninghamiana
32 weeks after the commencement of Al treatment (mean S.E.)
Treatment
M Al Inoculationa
pH
4
6
4
4
4
4
4
0
0
0
110
220
440
880
Nodulated/
Nonnodulated
Ratio
0/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
7/8
4/8
8
8
8
8
8
7
4
+
+
+
+
+
+
N concentration (%)
Root
Nodules
Shoot
0.81
1.63
1.69
1.74
1.60
1.31
1.16
0.06**
0.11
0.07
0.10
0.12
0.06**
0.25
0.82
1.01
0.94
0.87
0.97
0.85
1.04
0.07
0.09
0.07
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.17
2.01
1.83
1.98
1.88
2.05
1.66
Total
0.81
1.49
1.47
1.53
1.43
1.23
1.15
0.05*
0.06
0.09
0.16
0.09
0.15
0.03**
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.08
0.05**
0.22
a +inoculated; -uninoculated.
*Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH 4; 0 M Al) at p 0:05 according to Students t-test.
**Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH 4; 0 M Al) at p 0:01 according to Students t-test.
Table 3. Effect of Al concentration on N2 fixation of Casuarina cunninghamiana as estimated by three different methods (mean
S.E.)
Nodulated/
Treatment
nonnodulated
pH M Al Inoculationa
Ratio
4
6
4
4
4
4
4
8
8
8
8
7
4
0
0
0
110
220
440
880
+
+
+
+
+
+
0/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
8/8
7/8
4/8
Estimated N fixedb
(mg N mg nodule d.wt
0.26
0.20
0.21
0.23
0.16
0.10
1)
ARA nodules
(mol C2 H4 g d.wt 1 h
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02**
40.38
39.20
37.11
60.41
38.23
22.48
5.22
4.15
3.63
9.16
6.31
11.71
1)
ARA plant
(mol C2 H4 plant
1)
3.40
2.72
1.71
4.84
0.83*
0.46**
14.32
11.23
13.05
17.99
2.23
0.72
a +inoculated; -uninoculated
b Estimated mg N fixed per mg nodule dry weight calculated as :
total N content of inoculated plant - N content of uninoculated plant
total nodule dry weight per plant
*Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH4; 0M Al) at p 0:05 according to Students t-test.
**Significantly different from the inoculated control (pH4; 0M Al) at p 0:01 according to Students t-test.
45
There was a significant difference (p 0:05) in N
concentration of nodules between Al-free treatments at
pH 6 and pH 4 (Table 2). The rate of N2 -fixation (Table
3) was higher and the nodule weight/total weight ratio
(Table 1) was lower at pH 6 than pH 4. Although these
differences were not statistically significant, they suggest that the nodule efficiency was higher at pH 6. No
further significant differences (p 0:05) were found
between Al-free treatments at pH 6 and pH 4; thus,
solutions as acid as pH 4 did not significantly impair
growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation in C. cunninghamiana. In the rhizosphere, it is known that the
pH of the soil solution can be greatly altered to values more suitable for plant growth (Marschner, 1995).
The utilization of unbuffered solutions and sand as
substrate could reflect more accurately what happens
in the plant-soil system, and it can explain why there
were not more appreciable differences due to pH.
There were nodulated plants at all Al levels. This
indicates that the growth of Frankia in the rhizosphere,
infection and nodule development occurred at low pH
with Al concentrations up to 880 M Al. The presence
of nodulated actinorhizal plants on acid soils (Dixon
and Wheeler, 1983) indicates that Frankia can grow
saprophytically on these soils; therefore, they may tolerate some Al in the soil solution. When assayed in
vitro, the optimum growth of Frankia is achieved at
pH values near to neutrality (Burggraaf and Shipton,
1982; Murry et al., 1984). However, some Frankia
strains can grow at pH 4.6, and a correlation apparently exists between tolerance to acid pH and tolerance
to free Al3+ in the culture medium (Faure-Raynaud et
al., 1986).
Nodulation was noticeably reduced at 880 M Al,
where only 50% of the plants were nodulated (Table
3). In legumes nodulation has often been shown to be
affected by Al. In addition to its effects on molecular
interactions between rhizobia and plants (Richardson
et al., 1988a, 1988b) it has been suggested that the
reduction caused by Al in root hair formation might
lessen nodulation (Brady et al., 1993, 1994; HechtBuchholz et al., 1990). As do most actinorhizal plants,
Frankia gains entry into Casuarina via root hairs (Subbarao and Rodrguez-Barrueco, 1995). Therefore, a
possible detrimental effect of Al on root hair development might explain how Al impairs nodulation in
Casuarina.
Two estimates of nodular nitrogenase activity
(Table 3) were done in order to avoid the uncertainty associated with the closed acetylene reduction assay
(Minchin et al., 1994; Vessey, 1994; Winship and Tjep-
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank M V Sevillano Gonzalez for
technical assistance in pot experimentation and sample
analyses, and Professor J O Dawson, University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, for manuscript reading
and valuable discussions. We thank Dr D R Parker,
University of California, Riverside for supplying the
GEOCHEM-PC program. This research was supported
by European Union (Program STD-II)
References
Brady D J, Edwards D G, Asher C J and Blamey F P C 1993
Calcium amelioration of aluminium toxicity effects on root hair
development in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). New Phytol.
123, 531538.
Brady D J, Edwards D G and Asher C J 1994 Effects of aluminium on
the peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)/Bradyrhizobium symbiosis.
Plant Soil 159, 265276.
Burggraaf A J P and Shipton W A 1982 Estimates of Frankia growth
under various pH and temperature regimes. Plant Soil 61, 135
147.
46
Delhaize E, Ryan P R and Randall P J 1993 Aluminium tolerance in
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). II. Aluminum-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices. Plant Physiol. 103, 695702.
Delhaize E and Ryan P R 1995 Update: Aluminum toxicity and
tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. 107, 315321.
Dixon R O D and Wheeler C T 1983 Biochemical, physiological
and environmental aspects of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. In
Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Forest Ecosystems: Foundations
and Applications. Eds. J C Gordon and C T Wheeler. pp 107
171. Nijhoff/Dr W Junk, The Hague.
Faure-Raynaud M, Bonnefoy-Poirier M.A and Moiroud A 1986
Influence de pH acides sur la viabilite disolats de Frankia.
Plant Soil 96, 347358.
Flis S E, Glenn A R and Dilworth M J 1993 The interaction between
aluminum and root nodule bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25,
403417.
Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978 The physiology of metal
toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511566.
Grabski S and Schindler M 1995 Aluminium induces rigor within
the actin network of soybean cells. Plant Physiol. 108, 897901.
Hecht-Buchholz Ch, Brady D J, Asher C J and Edwards D G 1990
Effects of low activities of aluminium on soybean (Glycine
max). II. Root cell structure and root hair development. In
Plant Nutrition-Physiology and Applications. Ed. M L Van Beusichem. pp 335343. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Kochian L V 1995 Cellular mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and
resistance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
46, 237260.
Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic
Press, San Diego. 889 p.
Martin R B 1988 Bioinorganic chemistry of aluminum. In Metal
Ions in Biological Systems: Aluminium and its Role in Biology.
Eds. H Sigel and A Sigel. pp 157. Marcel Dekker, New York.
Matsumoto G, Morimura S and Takahashi E 1977 Localization of
absorbed aluminium in pea root and its binding to nucleic acid.
Plant Cell Physiol. 18, 987993.
Minchin F R, Witty J F and Mytton L R 1994 Reply to Measurement
of nitrogenase activity in legume root nodules: In defense of the
acetylene reduction assay by J K Vessey. Plant Soil 158, 163
167.
Morimura S, Takahashi E and Matsumoto H 1978 Association of
aluminium with nuclei and inhibition of cell division in onion
(Allium cepa) roots. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 88, 395401.
Murry M A, Fontaine M S and Torrey J G 1984 Growth kinetics and
nitrogenase induction in Frankia sp. HFPArI3 grown in batch
culture. Plant Soil 78, 6178.